Military Review

The US is actively preparing for war in Europe

59
The US is actively preparing for war in EuropeTrying to put down the vigilance of the Russian leadership by talking about disarmament, the United States is actively engaged in modernizing its tactical and strategic weapons in Western Europe ...


Speaking in June of this year in the capital of Germany, US President Barack Obama announced the new initiatives of Washington in the reduction of nuclear weapons. To the delight of thousands of Berliners gathered at the Brandenburg Gate, Obama promised that America would promote the idea of ​​a world free of weapons of mass destruction in every way. In his speech, the head of the White House spoke not only about the need for transatlantic solidarity, but also about how the world is still threatened by nuclear arsenals left over from the days of the Cold War.

However, B. Obama's statements contradict the final resolutions of last year’s NATO summit in Chicago, where a new US-NATO concept on tactical nuclear weapons (TNW) was defined. In June, the 2013 of the year document was approved by Washington. This is the third modification of the nuclear strategy after the end of the Cold War and its first adaptation after 2002, when the United States unilaterally withdrew from the ABM Treaty and began a large-scale deployment of a global system for intercepting ballistic missiles. For the first time, guidance documents stated that existing nuclear forces will have strategic and tactical directions. In order to understand the essence of the “new” American nuclear concept, it is necessary to find out what its consequences may be for the process of ensuring security and stability both on the European continent and on a global scale.

It should be recalled that at present, the total nuclear arsenal of US tactical nuclear weapons is approximately 800 free-fall nuclear bombs (B61-3, B61-4, B-61-10). At the same time, the tactical nuclear forces of NATO are armed with 150-200 YAB type B-61 with a total power of 18 MT, which are located at six air bases in Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Turkey. For their delivery to targets, it is planned to use around the 400 aircraft carrier F-15, F-16 and Tornado-GR.MK.4 from the squadrons of the US and British air forces and aircraft of the above-mentioned countries. The presence of US tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of these states is regulated by bilateral agreements, under which they provide external protection and maintenance of the infrastructure of facilities where the JAB is stored, and also create conditions for the work of special US units in these warehouses.

In order to justify the presence of its nuclear weapons in Europe, despite the end of the “cold war”, the US leadership has constantly stated the increasing political significance of TNW as a tool for conducting regional deterrence policy. In addition, it is regularly claimed that this accommodation ensures the maintenance of political and military ties between the European and North American members of the Alliance. In reality, the focus of such statements is primarily aimed at strengthening the position of the United States as the dominant “leader” in NATO, and also to have a rather formidable argument in relations with Russia.

In this regard, it should be noted that the new concept on tactical nuclear weapons is based on one of the postulates, which was reflected in the US National Nuclear Policy Review, approved by the Congress in April 2010 of the year, in particular on the position that, although the threat of nuclear war has become distant, however, the risk of a nuclear attack has increased. On this basis, far-reaching conclusions are drawn on the need to preserve strategic and tactical nuclear weapons in a very distant future. Also, the nuclear strategy maintains unchanged and significant power potential, which involves nuclear strikes on military targets in order to minimize the possibility of a nuclear strike by a potential adversary.

According to the document in question, the American military-political leadership reserves the right to use nuclear weapons only in extraordinary circumstances. However, in practice it can exercise this right at any time and anywhere in the world to protect the so-called vital interests of the United States, its allies and partners, both in the first and in the response nuclear missile strike. And the armed forces of the country will pursue such a line, as recorded in the report of the American defense ministry, at least throughout the 21st century.

The new nuclear concept also determines the future directions of US tactical nuclear weapons development in Europe. In particular, the document notes the need to maintain tactical fighter carriers of nuclear charges and to extend the service life of the B61 bombs in NATO’s airborne forces, making it possible to use them from F-35 aircraft that will replace the outdated F-16. In this regard, this year it is planned to begin measures to extend the resource use of tactical nuclear weapons with the start of work on their modernization in 2018. Based on the components of the existing nuclear weapons, it is planned to assemble air bombs of type В61-12 with the service life extended to 30 years. In the future, they will be adapted for combat use with a promising multi-purpose aircraft F-35.

Of particular interest is the fact that the start of nuclear modernization was put by the Nobel laureate of the Peace Prize B. Obama, primarily in order to win over Republican senators. In particular, when ratifying the START treaty, the president promised to spend 10 billion in the coming 85 years for the modernization of the US nuclear weapons complex.

Nuclear modernization of the United States, according to its ideologists, involves the revival of old and the construction of new complexes that will modernize the existing and produce new nuclear weapons. The creation of new nuclear forges is expected in Kansas City (Missouri), Oak Rizhge (Tennessee) and Los Alamos (New Mexico) - the symbolic location of the first atomic bomb. All old equipment at these enterprises will be replaced by new ones, and the technology for creating charges will be modernized. Production facilities allow the production of up to 80 nuclear warheads per year. Experts in the field of nuclear weapons unambiguously characterize the goals of the “new modernization”. In particular, one of the prominent figures of the Federation of American Scientists, Hans Christensen, called it no less - the start of a new nuclear era.

It is well known that if a gun hangs on the wall at the beginning of the play, then at the end it should fire. So, it is precisely for such a development of events that Americans are preparing constantly. Special attention is paid to planning the use of tactical nuclear weapons at the European theater of operations, which is carried out by the joint US strategic command. In addition, it is assumed that the command will lead the use of a variety of nuclear strategic and tactical forces and means using an automated system that allows you to quickly perform target distribution and complex attacks, including general-purpose forces. This takes into account the fact that Russia is the only nuclear power capable of destroying the United States.

In addition, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is regularly submitted to the command and staff exercises of US military authorities in Europe. They are held 2-3 once a year and are part of the operational training of these structures. During the command-and-control exercise, questions are being developed on deploying command and control systems and combat systems and wartime communications, organizing the leadership of tactical nuclear forces using an air command center, transferring the US military and allied forces from peacetime to wartime, and preparing nuclear weapons for use.

As the results of the exercise show, in the case of the redeployment of NATO-armed air-borne nuclear-armed aircraft and the delivery of the YAB to advanced airfields in Poland, Slovakia and the Baltic countries, the entire territory of Belarus and almost the entire European part of Russia are within reach. At the same time, the flight time to the object at the western borders of Russia is reduced from 40-50 to 4-7 minutes. In addition, the accuracy of bombing is 40-60 meters, which, taking into account the power, allows bombs of type B-61 to hit almost any objects, including protected ones. Airplanes used can carry several charges, however, to increase combat effectiveness, the main option is considered to be a suspension of no more than two, since the successive execution of tasks by carriers reduces the likelihood of subsequent strikes at one sortie.

And there are plenty of such advanced airfields in Europe among the Americans. In particular, in Poland, according to NATO standards, seven aerodromes are equipped, capable of receiving all types of aircraft. The Lithuanian and Latvian airfields at Zokniai and Lielvarde air bases were modernized accordingly. In addition, the reconstruction of Emari airbase in Estonia was completed last year.

All these facts eloquently indicate that the United States not only stores tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, but is ready to use them and create all the conditions in order to increase combat effectiveness in use. This once again confirms that the statements of American politicians about the reduction of US nuclear reserves are nothing more than a bluff, in order to force Russia to begin reducing its most combat-ready type of armed forces.
Originator:
http://www.news-svoboda.com/
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. experienced
    experienced 4 September 2013 16: 15 New
    28
    "The US is actively preparing for war." In this wording, it will become an axim for any time before the collapse of these subhuman hi They do not care where and with whom to fight, the main thing is that there are resources, and they will always find a reason. The test tube is still working flawlessly. Labeled at one time bought into the non-proliferation of NATO to the East ... And now we look at how Russia is "encircled from all sides with bases, the inclusion of our neighbors in NATO and Euro missile defense.
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 4 September 2013 16: 44 New
      24
      Quote: seasoned
      Tagged at one time bought into the non-proliferation of NATO to the East ...

      Lesha, he bought into the grandmother, like a banal salesman, and the unfulfilled promise of NATO nonproliferation is a blinker ...
      1. experienced
        experienced 4 September 2013 16: 46 New
        19
        Quote: Tersky
        , he bought grandmas, and the promise of non-proliferation of NATO is a blink ...

        I got the Nobel Prize, I think it wasn’t weakly added to the accounts, again I gave lectures for which I paid well, but when he starred in a pizza advertisement negative Disgrace
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 4 September 2013 16: 49 New
          16
          Quote: seasoned
          but when he starred in a pizza advertisement

          So his life credo is money and greed above all ..
          1. experienced
            experienced 4 September 2013 16: 52 New
            +7
            Quote: Tersky
            So his life credo is money, greed above all ..

            There was already super greed ... And alright, I would be starving ... But I remembered Anek
            Two Georgians are sitting on a bench by the house and watching a rooster run after a chicken in the hope of taking it away. Suddenly, running past a bowl of grain, he stops and starts pecking the grain. Georgians look at each other and one says: “Wah! God forbid that you get so starving!” laughing
          2. Apologet.Ru
            Apologet.Ru 4 September 2013 16: 53 New
            13
            hi
            Neither are they the first, but they will be the last!
            If tomorrow is war ...

            And even slightly tightened, but within the meaning - right!
            1. v_1
              v_1 4 September 2013 20: 31 New
              +3
              Cranberries
              Can you imagine what rs-18 is? half of Poland can be rented as a pavilion for the film adaptation of "metro-2033".
              1. Onotollah
                Onotollah 5 September 2013 05: 30 New
                0
                Quote: v_1
                half of poland

                In the event of a nuclear conflict, the matter will not be limited to half of Poland.
                It will be bad for everyone, there will be no winners.
              2. ed65b
                ed65b 5 September 2013 11: 36 New
                +1
                Quote: v_1
                Cranberries
                Can you imagine what rs-18 is? half of Poland can be rented as a pavilion for the film adaptation of "metro-2033".

                But the movie will turn out, at the same time, and the new stalker will be destroyed by the Ukrains: laughing:
            2. Berserk
              Berserk 5 September 2013 05: 21 New
              0
              What game is this?
              1. ed65b
                ed65b 5 September 2013 14: 15 New
                0
                Quote: Berserker
                What game is this?

                Metro 2033 is a postacaleptic igruha, about the Moscow metro after a nuclear war. 1 person shooter.
        2. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 4 September 2013 19: 29 New
          +6
          Quote: seasoned
          but when he starred in a pizza advertisement

          Good evening, Alex! It was a shame when he in one of the supermarkets in Germany made a banal attempt to stole a bottle of expensive wine. The Germans quickly hushed up the scandal, but the journalists left the info.
          This is where it should be shameful: one cannot unlearn one's old habit!
          1. Alex 241
            Alex 241 4 September 2013 19: 35 New
            +6
            This time, the former fighter against alcoholism in our country and the great reformer fell in the same way as the other, albeit literary, insignificance - Shura Balaganov. As we recall, after gaining a large sum of money, he suddenly became attracted to petty theft. It happened somehow “mechanically”.

            Just as it happened “mechanically” with M, S. Gorbachev, who, “being the best German”, according to his friend, the German Chancellor, stole a bottle of wine worth 5000 euros from a supermarket in Germany, which is itself the leader of changes in Russia assesses it as a misunderstanding and trifle. On Thursday, July 5, the security service of the city supermarket handed over to the police department a surveillance video recording showing the former USSR president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, awarded by President Dmitry Medvedev the highest state award of Russia, the Order of the Holy Apostle Andrew the First-Called, being in the elite alcohol department, carefully cuts the magnetic key from the selected bottle, puts it in the basket and calmly leaves the department bypassing the cash register.

            A criminal case was opened on the fact of theft in a supermarket by the police. The maximum term that “shines” for Mikhail Gorbachev is 3 years. And not at all conditionally. And it is unlikely that this case will be hushed up - Germany, nevertheless, is not Russia. And here, in spite of former merits, a person who has committed a criminal offense carries a punishment corresponding to the degree of misconduct.
            1. 0255
              0255 5 September 2013 11: 37 New
              0
              A criminal case was opened on the fact of theft in a supermarket by the police. The maximum term that “shines” for Mikhail Gorbachev is 3 years. And not at all conditionally. And it is unlikely that this case will be hushed up - Germany, nevertheless, is not Russia. And here, in spite of former merits, a person who has committed a criminal offense carries a punishment corresponding to the degree of misconduct.

              Let him sit for at least some crime.
            2. 89501358976
              89501358976 5 September 2013 14: 22 New
              0
              Quote: Alex 241
              This time, the former fighter against alcoholism in our country and the great reformer fell in the same way as the other, albeit literary, insignificance - Shura Balaganov. As we recall, after gaining a large sum of money, he suddenly became attracted to petty theft. It happened somehow “mechanically”.
              So that he ..uka choked !!! Judas selling angry
              Just as it happened “mechanically” with M, S. Gorbachev, who, “being the best German”, according to his friend, the German Chancellor, stole a bottle of wine worth 5000 euros from a supermarket in Germany, which is itself the leader of changes in Russia assesses it as a misunderstanding and trifle. On Thursday, July 5, the security service of the city supermarket handed over to the police department a surveillance video recording showing the former USSR president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, awarded by President Dmitry Medvedev the highest state award of Russia, the Order of the Holy Apostle Andrew the First-Called, being in the elite alcohol department, carefully cuts the magnetic key from the selected bottle, puts it in the basket and calmly leaves the department bypassing the cash register.

              A criminal case was opened on the fact of theft in a supermarket by the police. The maximum term that “shines” for Mikhail Gorbachev is 3 years. And not at all conditionally. And it is unlikely that this case will be hushed up - Germany, nevertheless, is not Russia. And here, in spite of former merits, a person who has committed a criminal offense carries a punishment corresponding to the degree of misconduct.
            3. postman
              postman 5 September 2013 15: 07 New
              0
              Quote: Alex 241
              now stole a bottle of wine worth 5000 euros from a supermarket in Germany

              Quote: Alex 241
              The maximum term that “shines” for Mikhail Gorbachev is 3 years. And not at all conditionally.


              I will disappoint you ...
              1. Most likely this is crap (probability 99,999999%), because
              -in Germany, supermarkets (supermarkets) do not sell wine for 5000 EURO.
              Neither in Metro, RAtio, Marktkauf, etc.
              ultimately, that is about 200 euros (cognac, champagne). ALL that is more expensive than 50 Euros, usually locked up in a glass cabinet: call the seller, look, make decisions, take them to the cashier
              -if something is for sale then in vinekontor .... but here again, more expensive than 1000 euros (kalvaos, cognac) did not meet. By pre-order, please.
              But vine kontor is dwarf, it’s almost impossible to steal there
              -a restaurant (good) -yes.
              2.Up to 3 years = SAME LIE

              Federal Penal Code (Strafgesetzbuch-STGB)

              simple theft (para. 242),
              particularly serious theft case (para. 243),
              weapons theft; theft committed by a gang (para. 244);
              a particularly serious case of theft committed by a gang (para. 244A); appropriation of property (paragraph 246);
              family theft (para. 247);
              theft and misappropriation of things of little value (para. 248 a); illegal use of a vehicle (para. 248 c);
              theft of electricity (para. 248 s).

              ====
              the case is described ("5000Euro", non-recidivism, no weapons, the same gang) = paragr. 242

              Paragraph 242 reads:
              "Whoever takes possession of someone else's movable thing with the intention of illegally appropriating it, shall be punished by imprisonment on up to five years or a fine ”.



              but even if this fact took place (5000 Euro wine in the "five"), it is required:
              -According to § 248a of the German Penal Code: theft in small amounts is subject to investigation only (!) in the presence of the request of the victim to institute criminal proceedings.
              - taking into account the identity of the offender: the case is closed without trial under Article 153a of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Germany


              § 243 para.
              FROM THE HERMITAGE, COLOGNE HOUSE (CATHEDRAL) OR MSG THIS DOES NOT MAKE LIFE

              usually a fine .... if there is no "aggravating circumstances"
              Proposed
          2. experienced
            experienced 4 September 2013 19: 45 New
            +2
            Quote: BoA KAA


            Quote: Alex 241


            Guys, thanks for the info hi I did not know this case, just in shock belay
            It seems to me that GDP is a good reason given for the deprivation of awards after careful verification and benefits, as it discredited the post of President of the USSR. After that, the rating of the GDP would have "grown by leaps and bounds."
            Thanks again for the info. drinks
        3. Sadikoff
          Sadikoff 4 September 2013 19: 51 New
          +3
          Just a million to him and a million Shevarnadze, there was an article on this occasion. The transfers were to their funds. Cheap.
        4. Nikaviz
          Nikaviz 4 September 2013 21: 15 New
          +5
          Here it is!!!!
        5. bubla5
          bubla5 4 September 2013 21: 15 New
          +1
          \ It’s unlikely that Gorbachev bought himself, it’s been an implementation agent since the 70s, here’s where you need to dig where he came from and where he was trained in the systematic collapse of the USSR economy
        6. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 5 September 2013 11: 48 New
          +3
          Quote: seasoned
          I think, and they didn’t drip on his accounts,

          200 "lyamov" of Baku to him, and the magpie for "Dato Batono" - the price of surrendering East Germany.
    2. michajlo
      michajlo 4 September 2013 17: 36 New
      +3
      experienced (2) RU Today, 16:15
      "The US is actively preparing for war" ... The test tube is still working flawlessly. Tagged at one time bought into the non-proliferation of NATO to the East ...

      Good afternoon, dear Alexey!
      I allow myself to disagree with you regarding the mistake of "Tagged".
      By my conviction, the rotten top of the KGB in Gorbi & Co. simply methodically and systematically implemented the plans for the collapse of the USSR, the creation of national hostility, and the DESTRUCTION of Soviet weapons and the army, which were issued by the CIA.
      Moreover, everything was done subtly, naive and then young, served in a sweet wrapper "perestroika and other poison for rats. "
      After all, only a negligible amount in the 80-90s of our older, gray-haired people (60-80 years), were immediately unraveled by his diabolical essence.

      I personally and now doubt Are all declared nuclear weapons of Russia in working condition? is it even in the right quantity because American "advisers" under the presidents, prime ministers probably "not for nothing ate their bread" !?

      To myself I can not answer one simple question:
      - If the USA / NATO in the 80-90s playfully collapsed the Union and the ATS, why all of a sudden they left us, the defeated, working nuclear weapons?

      Would you do this when you completely defeated the enemy in a 70-year war?

      How would we answer this simple question - DO NOT SURPRISE or stunned by the hour "X" !? Ugh, ugh!
      1. dimon-media
        dimon-media 4 September 2013 18: 55 New
        +3
        Quote: michajlo
        I personally and now doubt whether all the declared nuclear weapons of Russia are in working condition, whether they are at all in the right quantity, because American "advisers" under the presidents, prime ministers probably "not for nothing ate their bread" !?

        You can ask another way: - Is all our nuclear weapons declared? What I deeply doubt is that it is ALL declared. With these "wolves" you should always have a stone in your bosom.
        Quote: michajlo
        Russian nuclear weapons in working condition?

        Want to check it out? I would not advise. We will not know until we use it for its intended purpose. This is not an AKS-74, in order to shoot a test dash.
        1. Andrey Energiya
          Andrey Energiya 5 September 2013 00: 03 New
          -3
          ))) Yes, no, just the same michajlo is right, you will remember the exercises last two years ago, when both launched balestic missiles did not reach the target, and after all, they were preparing for the exercises, they knew about them in half a year, they checked these same missiles 100 times, and as a result, the bolt, and if the war is so they are not prepared at all, then I will reveal a secret to you in our army, everything is like that, everyone who shouts here that yes we are a super army in the army, then he was not and did not serve and did not see what was really going on there , so I'll tell you from what the army has in real life in working order no more than 10%, and the last check Shoigu carried out suddenly showed this. I’ll tell you this while rotten KGBists rule us, it will only get worse, so with the current president there will be no army, and soon there will be no country, and all that he’s talking about new weapons, re-equipment and so on, is a complete mess, they write off the old but still quite weapons and for scrapping of its type they will replace it with a new one, and as a result, 10 for scrapping 1 gave a new type, and even then at best
          1. Onotollah
            Onotollah 5 September 2013 05: 39 New
            +1
            Quote: Andrey Energiya
            best case scenario

            At the last exercises, rubber inflatable women were driven back and forth, og.
            That's what I look from the side of the geyropa, he still inflicts odors, not all the panties were removed there.
      2. s1н7т
        s1н7т 4 September 2013 19: 16 New
        0
        I am also not sure that we still have the Strategic Missile Forces necessary to curb their appetites - for example, their movement to our borders - which means they are no longer afraid.
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 4 September 2013 19: 54 New
          +2
          Quote: c1n7
          I’m also not sure that we still have the Strategic Missile Forces necessary to restrain their appetites

          Valentine! You do not believe us - see their summaries. Maybe then it will become clearer that the Strategic Missile Forces, rkkSN and YES can seriously offend Uncle SAMA if he behaves incorrectly in relation to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Russian Federation. And also if it encroaches on our allies and steps on our vital interests. IMHO.
          1. Andrey Energiya
            Andrey Energiya 5 September 2013 00: 10 New
            +1
            for the naive you will never know their real intelligence, and reports that are publicly available only serve to knock out money for the army from Congress, like, look, they are arming the Russians, give the money to us and the khan, otherwise, if the army officials will tell you how things really are the Russian army, and whatever the hell we are rearming, the congress will simply cut back the funding of the US Army every five times, so they tell tales about us and periodically wars wage something to occupy their army and at least somehow justify the loot spent on the army
      3. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 4 September 2013 19: 48 New
        +4
        Quote: michajlo
        is everything declared nuclear weapons of Russia in working condition, is it at all in the right quantity,

        Everything is in accordance with those regulations: ready-made on media, ready to serve the first stage, tries. in storage, components for final assembly by the deadline D-3, etc.
        Quantity is determined by the doctrine of defense sufficiency. The General Staff and the 12 GU MO know their work. Therefore, they are afraid to touch us. I do not advise anyone to check - you can get burned!
        1. Andrey Energiya
          Andrey Energiya 5 September 2013 00: 13 New
          -2
          this is all nonsense; this doctrine is even close in real life, only on paper, I know exactly what I’m talking about, and the exercises showed the past few years ago when none of the ballistic racket was fulfilling the tasks, or maybe our rocket mace flies well , and you know how many space launches we have failed over the past year and a half? so doctrine is not fulfilled don't have to be so naive
      4. Sadikoff
        Sadikoff 4 September 2013 19: 56 New
        +1
        The state of nuclear weapons in Russia is the same as in other countries, not by 5. And it will naturally be that for everyone it can not take off 100% and not be activated 100%. There are facts about how the management of the complexes took the plates. So a nuclear war does not happen , well, maybe if a couple of bombings in the USA over Hiroshima, Nagasaki. The rest is only possible like dirty bombs, contamination with radioactive material.
    3. Army1
      Army1 4 September 2013 20: 25 New
      +2
      And let us not be scared by thousands of tomahawks and other high-precision x @ rnoy, this is for the Papuans. Nuclear weapons are the main thing in the world and the point at least for now! And the States are actively proposing to reduce it, not because the WTO is throwing us, but want to have an advantage in nuclear weapons, namely nuclear weapons.
    4. TUNISIA
      TUNISIA 4 September 2013 22: 52 New
      0
      If these people give in to Syria (and thank God that common sense has not yet been drunk on them), then with Russia they have a completely "zero" option in terms of a real war. Anglo-Saxon drizzlers - they are drizzling in Africa too!
      I propose that these fagots get rid of espumisan and loperamide, opening an appropriate charity account so that they do not do our western borders with their involuntary chemical attack)))
      1. Onotollah
        Onotollah 5 September 2013 05: 45 New
        0
        Quote: TUNISIA
        on espumisan and loperamide

        No buddy, exclusively on potassium cyanide.
        1. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 5 September 2013 11: 53 New
          +3
          Quote: Onotolle
          exclusively on potassium cyanide.

          How bloodthirsty you are however! laughing
          The best death of the enemy - from diarrhea !!!
  2. NAV-STAR
    NAV-STAR 4 September 2013 16: 17 New
    +7
    They are preparing for civilian life.
    1. shark
      shark 4 September 2013 16: 53 New
      +7
      It would be better prepared for global suicide. God sees, even a tear would wipe away ..... from happiness
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 4 September 2013 20: 07 New
        +2
        Quote: shark
        Better prepare for global suicide

        Volodya! GLOBAL - This is Earth-wide! Personally, I am the opposite! I still want to live. But against the national, all-American, etc., I would probably not mind. Therefore, advice: articulate a thought more clearly, do not allow mistakes.
  3. oleg bags
    oleg bags 4 September 2013 16: 22 New
    0
    I am Oleg Meshkov.
    1966 gr. Russian. Not married. Higher education.
    I live: 394006. Russia, Voronezh, st. 5th of December. D 17.
    T + 7 (920) 2197666; +7 473 2774154
    e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] The full text of the book "Hidden Reality" 300 pages is available at http://place.rusfolder.net/files/35071906
    The purpose of my appeal is to spread the truth about our reality among people around the world. You will not read this truth in the newspapers, you will not see it on television, and it is unlikely that you will find anything like that anywhere on the Internet.
    This truth is hidden in every possible way from us by those who divide and deceive us, gradually weaken us and quietly turn us into powerless slaves. Many of us do not feel this, and consider everything that is happening the norm. At the same time, they think that it has always been so. Until they themselves face a terrible manifestation of lies and slavery.
    "There is no hopeless slavery than the slavery of those slaves who consider themselves free from fetters"
    This statement by Goethe is very suitable for the worldview imposed on us. Please download the book. And if it doesn’t work, write to me and I will send it in a reply letter
  4. shark
    shark 4 September 2013 16: 30 New
    +5
    And when did the Yankers not prepare for war in Europe? Probably never guess, with whom?)))
    All of this disarmament is worthless, the promise of NATO is even lower. In these children's tales, if only the out-of-the-way hamsters of the bulk can believe.
    The only conclusion is to get out of all these passe, OSCE, SALT, ABM treaties and do what we need to ensure our own security. I do not care about public opinion. We can afford it.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Rus2012
    Rus2012 4 September 2013 16: 32 New
    +5
    We need to build up military cooperation with Venezuela, Bolivia. Including the "thin" issues of including them under our "nuclear umbrella" ...
    1. ramsi
      ramsi 4 September 2013 16: 41 New
      +2
      “subtle” questions are buzz: for example, indefinite, by the time spent in the ports of the named republics of submarines with nuclear weapons on board
      1. dimon-media
        dimon-media 4 September 2013 19: 08 New
        +1
        Yes, what is there ... You can also place the launchers there (in front of the west). Whether mine or ground (mobile) based. Pindostan does not hesitate to place its nuclear weapons in non-nuclear countries, violating the entgo nonproliferation treaty. Are we made with a finger? breaking any agreement for mattresses is like wiping. Personally, I would advise the entire top echelon of power in our country to help Iran create an ICBM as a "humanitarian" aid. To spite the whole west.
        Z.Y. To manifest aggression in the WEST and to democratize small and eastern Muslim countries that are not "nuclear" has become an axiom. Anyone probably noticed where there is nuclear weapons, there is the world.
        1. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 5 September 2013 11: 55 New
          +3
          Quote: dimon-media
          Personally, I would advise the entire highest echelon of power in our country to assist Iran in the creation of ICBMs as "humanitarian" assistance. Spite the whole west.

          In the event of aggression against Syria, Iran will receive everything, and even more, from Russia and China.
    2. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 4 September 2013 17: 26 New
      +6
      ... with the planting of our "trees" - "Topol" and "Ashen" in that tropical zone, to mitigate the "climate"!
  7. Brave
    Brave 4 September 2013 16: 38 New
    +3
    To the Iskander’s, to increase the range a little, and their number, that’s an adequate answer.
    1. avt
      avt 4 September 2013 16: 42 New
      +4
      Quote: Bold
      To the Iskander’s, to increase the range a little, and their number, that’s an adequate answer.

      No, not adequate. Due to the geography of Amer’s tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, the weapon is strategic for us, and Iskander in Kaliningrad was and will remain tactical for the Yankees. Where is the adequacy here.
    2. dimon-media
      dimon-media 4 September 2013 19: 14 New
      +1
      And equip the Iskanders with a nuclear warhead. The design allows this. By the way, it would be very democratic! good
    3. Onotollah
      Onotollah 5 September 2013 05: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: Bold
      increase the range a little

      "As part of the Iskander-M OTRK, R-500 cruise missiles can be used, the firing range of which, according to some statements, exceeds 2000 km."
      Pedivikia kag be hinted that there are goodies for the geyropa.
  8. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 4 September 2013 16: 42 New
    +3
    Quote: Rus2012
    We need to build up military cooperation with Venezuela, Bolivia. Including the "thin" issues of including them under our "nuclear umbrella" ...

    Cuba also needs to be connected. The United States forgot to see the Caribbean crisis (the Russians were howling all over the world) Now they have encircled Russia with bases and begin to impudently seriously .. Nuclear submarines with missiles are needed and the more the better ..
    1. Rus2012
      Rus2012 4 September 2013 17: 02 New
      +3
      Quote: MIKHAN
      You also need to connect Cuba

      ... first, restore the radar and put the SPRN
      And think about EW bases and non-nuclear missile defense :)
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 4 September 2013 17: 29 New
        +1
        Also, to restore the state wiretapping base - are they cracking at the seams. And missile defense in that part of the world is possible with nuclear warheads!
  9. svp67
    svp67 4 September 2013 16: 43 New
    0
    And what about the article? The author is not Khramchikhin?
    1. USNik
      USNik 4 September 2013 16: 52 New
      +4
      No, not Khramchikhin, he would have fought with might and main with China wassat
      And the article talks about the aggressive plans of the totalitarian anti-human NATO bloc.
  10. Uhe
    Uhe 4 September 2013 16: 44 New
    +7
    Since the beginning of the 20th century, they have been actively preparing for war. Many people for some reason forget that in 1918 the United States occupied part of the land of Russia, but then the Red Army managed to drive the Yankees out of our land, although they did things here. Since then, they have not calmed down and always had ready-made plans for intervention in Russia. Britain, the USA are our original enemies. We did not choose them as enemies, but we must take a sober view of life. We will never live in peace with them. We need to attract our allies, including from US puppets, bribe them, work with citizens, attracting to our side. And here they again quarrel with Belaya Rus, although this is our best and almost only ally ... The Russian Federation does not have such an idea that could rally other nations and states around it. Trade? It is important, of course, but this is not an idea, but a simple benefit, because of which today together, and tomorrow separately. The USSR gave such an idea, therefore it had many friends and allies; the current state is not capable of this yet.
  11. andrei332809
    andrei332809 4 September 2013 16: 46 New
    +1
    good to scare that. my cellar can’t stand the explosion of an ordinary grenade, and here you are ... okay, you need a man everywhere, and judging by the latest checks from amers, they need to be afraid of themselves. some soldier-computer technician will start playing in the tanks on the monitor of the tracking system and Washington will demolish the park
  12. R-2
    R-2 4 September 2013 16: 56 New
    +6
    And can we, without violating world norms, shoot down missiles fired across Syria, without attacking the Pindo-Stan’s ships?
    1. Rus2012
      Rus2012 4 September 2013 17: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: R-2
      And can we, without violating world norms, shoot down missiles fired across Syria, without attacking the Pindo-Stan’s ships?

      KVM is quite ...
      For example, if the Kyrgyz Republic flies at the heading (or near) with our sea vessels ... to say for self-defense. We do not know their ultimate goal ...;)
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 5 September 2013 11: 59 New
        +3
        Quote: Rus2012
        KVM is quite ...

        And who said that the ships of the Russian Navy, standing in Tartus and Latakia, will not "defend themselves"?
    2. 787nkx
      787nkx 4 September 2013 18: 31 New
      +1
      No, it will be an open confrontation and the initiator will respond in the same way.
      We encroached on their missiles. Another thing is to declare a part of the territory of Syria as a zone of our interests with motivation, for example, the presence there of our private property, our citizens or the destruction of objects in this territory may entail an immeasurable threat to other territories and countries or other very important and good reasons. And then it is possible to protect this territory from strikes, on the basis of the stated arguments, which should correspond to reality, we cannot cover the whole of Syria. Moreover, our expedition in the conflict zone is much smaller than the NATO and US forces located there.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 4 September 2013 19: 30 New
        -1
        Quote: 787nkx
        and the initiator will respond in the same way.

        ... well, let him try to intercept the Yachts and C300 rockets! Wellcome !!! And along with the shots of the Pantsyr ...
  13. Strong
    Strong 4 September 2013 16: 58 New
    +4
    Modernization of nuclear weapons is a necessary thing and none of its owners disdain this. Unless of course financial and technical capabilities are available.

    Regardless of the country of manufacture and the political course, old warheads are not good.

    And since of all types of weapons, nuclear weapons contribute best to maintaining peace throughout the world (and even more so in the possessing state), the modernization of nuclear weapons is a logical step for any peacekeeper. IMHO.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 4 September 2013 20: 43 New
      +2
      Quote: Fuerte
      Modernization of nuclear weapons is a necessary thing and none of its owners disdain this

      You are absolutely correct. We also do not stand with our mouths open and we don’t catch flies. Now work is underway to miniaturize the charges so that it is easier, more reliable, the power is switched, the ultra-small are almost "clean" ... This makes it possible to more flexibly place them on carriers, as well as applications.
      The article is weak. There are bloopers. Facts from the press and TASS press releases. There are probably men on the site who, on duty, had to deal with this side of the BG.
      There is something to recall, but it was not accepted to disseminate on these issues even among colleagues. Which is generally correct.
  14. Savva30
    Savva30 4 September 2013 18: 06 New
    +1
    It seems that the time has come to send diplomats and new weapons to Syria for testing, so to speak ...
  15. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 4 September 2013 18: 21 New
    +5
    In short, men, the time for talkers ends, it's time to remind the Anglo-Saxons and To the horror story of the last century, "RUSSIAN GO ..!" FINISHED AT THE END ..! The thunder has already struck .. it's time to be baptized .. (and unite in the face of the imminent threat of the destruction of Russia as a national and territorial entity. Our ancestors will not forgive us (we got all this with too much blood) I don’t feel like fighting .. (the boys are still snotty ) I have to see .. (((
  16. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 4 September 2013 18: 32 New
    +9
    Let these Americans get ready, Napoleonic France was also the strongest power in its time, it attacked RUSSIA with 500 army, while the army was 000, and we all know what came out of it. And Hitler Germany was also the same power, and what came of it. These Americans will not understand one thing, no one will accept them as liberators, they will be demolished here, so let them take this into account, we are not Iraq whose generals have thrown their country, we will fight to the last drop of blood for every meter of our land soldier .
  17. lilit.193
    lilit.193 4 September 2013 18: 38 New
    +6
    If so, then they have only one goal in Europe - Russia and its allies. And of the real allies, Russia has only Belarus. Everyone else is, for the time being.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 4 September 2013 21: 20 New
      +4
      Quote: lilit.193
      If so, then they have only one goal in Europe - Russia and its allies.

      The female snake reasoned wisely! Well, not against the same Custodians, they keep tactical nuclear weapons at our borders. Here, the matter is different: To what extent our missile defense and air defense systems are ready to take their SBP carriers into their tender embrace. If it is true that in Syria our C-400 took off the Raptor near the borders of Jordan, and the Armors landed the Axes, then we can wish bon appetit to our air defense regiments and brigades. The main thing is not to miss the first disarming strike.
    2. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 5 September 2013 12: 00 New
      +3
      Quote: lilit.193
      Everyone else is, for the time being.

      08.08.08 We didn’t see any allies ... fellow
  18. user
    user 4 September 2013 19: 10 New
    +6
    If the Soviet tactical nuclear weapons have not been optimized in a quiet place, then no one will fight with us. I remember at our airport (it was already optimized) there was a very small military unit near TEC, well, maybe 100 or even less people (I judge by the size of the ration that they were given, they received it in front of us), they all called deaf and dumb, them was with the checkpoint behind the fence. All this inside the garrison, their only activity was when China attacked Vietnam.
    So while we have such deaf-mute parts, the country can sleep peacefully.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 4 September 2013 21: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: user
      they were all called deaf and dumb; all of them had a checkpoint behind the fence.

      And in the North, in the adit. And they are not deaf and dumb, just THEIR WORDS ARE VERY WEIGHT (megaton class!), So they do not throw words into the wind!
      In Yalta, we met with a system friend. So he told the girls, in all seriousness, that he was a foodstuff, sitting in the warehouse of the National Assembly and was preparing to issue rations for wartime. And what, with humor, but in fact - right!
  19. Jogan-xnumx
    Jogan-xnumx 4 September 2013 19: 57 New
    +1
    As if from these pin.dos, you can expect something else ... They were preparing - and will be preparing. It’s bad that we are not preparing in any way, and bases with the same tactical nuclear weapons in Cuba, Venezuela, Vietnam would bring them to life.
  20. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 4 September 2013 20: 00 New
    +1
    There are many different surprises in our vast territory .. (not everyone passed in the 90s and not everyone sees their "vaunted companions" .. And most importantly, the Kulibins in Russia have not yet been transferred ..
  21. shinobi
    shinobi 4 September 2013 20: 00 New
    +3
    The anecdote is that for the production of modern compact nuclear weapons, plutonium of high concentration and purity is definitely needed. You can't go far with uranium. But at the moment, the amers simply do not have it. His only plant that had been built up has been closed since the end of the 90s. As their nuclear scientists say already without It got to the point that NASA bought plutonium from us for its rover in a thermal power plant. Their military simply did not have it. To install new products urgently, they first need to get some plutonium somewhere. And for this they need to or re-establish production or gut old nuclear warheads. And this is not Ice, to say the old advertising. We have order with production, and there is enough old tactical nuclear weapons for evisceration. All their plans are just another bluff and declarations of intentions. The truth should not be relaxed because the ancient world wants , Get ready for war - as relevant as ever!
    1. sleepy
      sleepy 4 September 2013 22: 09 New
      0
      A lot has been written about the shutdown of the world's last weapons-grade plutonium plant in Russia in 2010, which is a strategic production
      should not be closed.
      Since there is a great threat of loss of technology in a few decades.
      "This" news "has been haunting the minds of the Internet community for two years now and engenders a chain reaction among conversational hamsters about lost polymers among war hamsters."
      http://ipolk.ru/blog/7188.html
  22. vezunchik
    vezunchik 4 September 2013 20: 10 New
    +3
    back in the 19th century there was a sign- they started talking about disarmament - to be a war ...
  23. Consul-t
    Consul-t 4 September 2013 20: 48 New
    0
    It is necessary to record in our warheads all the coordinates of the ovsky henchmen. And if that, cover the Poles and who else is there to the fullest. So that they forever remember that it’s not worth joking with us.
    They seem to have forgotten Hitler. Nothing, recall ...
    1. m262
      m262 5 September 2013 01: 16 New
      0
      Do not need Poles by atom, I have a mother-in-law from under Brest, they need dust, like cockroaches, what for me mushrooms with plutonium !!! repeat
  24. flint1309
    flint1309 4 September 2013 20: 50 New
    0
    http://www.kontrtube.ru/videos/2002/yadernye-vzryvy-v-sirii/ Ребята! А кто-что об этом видео думает? Наводит на нехорошие мысли... (по поводу сша и их союзников)
  25. HF
    HF 4 September 2013 22: 23 New
    0
    Quote: Apologet.Ru
    hi
    Neither are they the first, but they will be the last!
    If tomorrow is war ...

    And even slightly tightened, but within the meaning - right!

    It will certainly be hard, but WE will defeat them! (We’ll finish it) "I think so!" (c)
    1. GREAT RUSSIA
      GREAT RUSSIA 4 September 2013 22: 57 New
      +1
      If there is a war with America and all of Europe, we will demolish them, show what our fathers, grandfathers, and our ancestors taught us, as they say, "show them Kuzkin’s mother." RUSSIA is a world power, everything has its time. From Warsaw to Washington and farther. soldier
  26. Peaceful military
    Peaceful military 5 September 2013 00: 17 New
    +1
    This is neither news nor analytics, but merely a statement of fact. We were at the school, more than 30 years ago, "fought" with NATO troops (including with the Americans) in the European theater of war, in the classroom on tactics.
    What got better? Nothing. Not at all, with the collapse of the USSR, etc. everything only got worse.
    Alas. sad
  27. bif
    bif 5 September 2013 12: 11 New
    0
    "..At the same time, the flight time to the object at the western borders of Russia is reduced from 40-50 to 4-7 minutes. In addition, the accuracy of the bombing is 40-60 meters, which, taking into account the power, allows bombs of the B-61 type to hit almost any objects, including protected ones ... "
    It is naive to suppose this, because with an ALREADY existing level of air defense (especially in the Western European direction), someone will give these f-15, -16 (or even f-35) not only to bomb successfully, but at least 1 to spend a minute in the airspace of the Russian Federation.
  28. Black
    Black 5 September 2013 16: 26 New
    0
    The Europeans in their asshole lost their instinct for self-preservation.