Military Review

Perspective anti-aircraft missile system 50Р6 "Vityaz" of the C-350 system at the MAKS-2013 air show

28
From 27 August to 1 this September, the next International Aviation and Space Salon MAKS-2013 is held on the territory of OJSC Transport and Exhibition Complex Russia (Zhukovsky, Moscow Region). Now this exhibition event deservedly occupies one of the leading places among the world's largest airline forums.


Among the aircraft presented at the air show, armament, equipment and military equipment, the C-350 anti-aircraft missile system manufactured by the Almaz-Antey air defense concern was first demonstrated to the general public. According to the developers, this promising medium-range anti-aircraft missile system is superior in its capabilities to foreign counterparts and should replace the C-300 air defense systems currently in service.

The C-350 anti-aircraft missile system is designed to defend administrative, industrial and military facilities from massive strikes of modern and prospective air attack weapons. It is capable of simultaneously reflecting the impacts of various EHVs around the entire range of their flight altitudes, from extremely small to large. C-350 can operate autonomously, as well as in the composition of air defense groups in the management of the superior CP. The combat operation of the system is carried out fully automatically - the combat crew provides only preparation for work and controls the course of combat operations.

The main tactical and technical characteristics of C-350:
The maximum number of simultaneously fired targets:
- aerodynamic - 16
- ballistic - 12
The maximum number of simultaneously induced missiles - 32
Aerodynamic damage area:
- by distance - 1500 ... 60000 m
- in height - 10 ... 30000 m
Ballistic target area:
- by distance - 1500 ... 30000 m
- in height - 2000 ... 25000 m
Time to bring the means into combat readiness from the march - 5 min
System composition:
Combat Control Station 50K6 - 1
Multifunctional radar 50Н6 - up to 2
Self-propelled 50P6 launchers with 12 9М96Е2 anti-aircraft missiles - up to 8

Self-propelled launcher 50P6

Perspective anti-aircraft missile system 50Р6 "Vityaz" of the C-350 system at the MAKS-2013 air show





























Combat Control Station 50K6













Multifunctional radar 50Н6

















Originator:
http://otvaga2004.ru
28 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 5 September 2013 08: 06 New
    13
    Here she is beautiful in the photographs, we look forward to the military!
  2. awg75
    awg75 5 September 2013 08: 18 New
    +9
    Russia just needs an effective air defense system - the circle around Russia is narrowing and you can only rely on yourself. I want to recall the golden words --- who does not feed his own army he will feed someone else's
    1. ben gun
      ben gun 5 September 2013 08: 30 New
      +5
      A good should be a system of object-based air defense with an average arm length)))
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Cormorants
    Cormorants 5 September 2013 08: 44 New
    +5
    Keep it up!
  5. Ivan79
    Ivan79 5 September 2013 09: 11 New
    +7
    Don’t say, but we are the first in the development and manufacture of air defense systems!
  6. ded10041948
    ded10041948 5 September 2013 09: 24 New
    +3
    A beautiful "toy", and the performance characteristics are impressive. That would be to see the results of shooting (only real, not "parquet")! I understand that he is impudent, but I really want to. One question: batch reloading of GUNS?
  7. greka
    greka 5 September 2013 09: 43 New
    +5
    Hello! Yes, the complex is not bad, and in fact, the replacement of the c300 with their launchers of 4 rockets, etc., has long been overdue. But the indicated range, it seems to me, is not enough at 60km. Look at the Eureka SAMP-T at 100km, this is much better.
    1. mark1
      mark1 5 September 2013 10: 35 New
      +9
      Quote: greka
      the specified range, it seems to me, is not enough at 60km

      The characteristics are given for the air defense missile system with the 9M96E2 missile, for the 9M96E missile, the range of 120-150 km apparently has not yet been brought to the rocket, therefore it was not presented at MAKS. It was also planned to add a self-defense air defense system with a 350M9 missile to the S-100 kit, but now it has been allocated to a separate development - "Morpheus"
    2. Nitup
      Nitup 5 September 2013 23: 01 New
      -1
      Quote: greka
      Hello! Yes, the complex is not bad, and in fact, the replacement of the c300 with their launchers of 4 rockets, etc., has long been overdue. But the indicated range, it seems to me, is not enough at 60km. Look at the Eureka SAMP-T at 100km, this is much better.

      All the characteristics specified in the article apply to the version of S-350E, i.e. export.
      1. AVV
        AVV 2 January 2014 22: 04 New
        0
        Air defense of the country on top !!!
  8. KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 5 September 2013 10: 35 New
    +1
    Yes, the performance characteristics are very, very good in altitude, the number of guided missiles and guided missiles, mobility ... and most importantly, it has the ability to work on ballistic missiles ... though only in their final flight section ... but this is still fraught with bad consequences. ... against a high - precision weapon with a conventional charge - very good, but if the BRs are equipped with nuclear warheads, then ... M-A-L-O-B-A-T-O!
    But in terms of range for aviation ... it's something a little better With the 125 complex ... it’s definitely LITTLE LIKE .. SAME! Look at the performance characteristics of the modern equipment of the bomb and missile load of aviation of our probable enemy and you will agree with me ...
    1. Argon
      Argon 5 September 2013 12: 19 New
      0
      In general, it is not entirely clear, the place of this complex in the army air defense system, given the presence of Buks, the potential of which is far from being exhausted. As a purely export product, it is not entirely reasonable to consider the S-350. I have two options: 1 pissimistic, based on realities, the current leadership of the country abandoned plans to revive the state air defense system with a single radar field (similar to the one that the USSR had in the early-mid 80s) in favor of interconnected air defense zones of individual regions (the effectiveness of such a system is much lower than the first option, but cheaper and this complex fits into it is ideal) 2 optimistic - we are seeing the emergence of a kind of universal land / sea-based complex with optimized zones of destruction, an open architecture of construction, and most importantly, with the initial "sharpening" for integration into some kind of automated control system (something like "ijes" but more wide), But in this case we are only at the very beginning of the path. Personally, I would like to believe in the second oh option.
      1. egsp
        egsp 5 September 2013 21: 11 New
        +1
        the complex is not for army air defense, it will change the S-300PS of which we have a huge number, and the resource is almost exhausted. Will go to the Air Force and East Kazakhstan area.
  9. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 5 September 2013 11: 07 New
    +2
    Quote: KazaK Bo
    But in terms of range for aviation ... it's something a little better With the 125 complex ... it’s definitely LITTLE LIKE .. SAME! Look at the performance characteristics of modern equipment

    All the same, it is a medium-radius complex, the beech's successor. For its tasks it is very decent, especially if they bring the missile to 150 km to mind. Long-range s-400 and s-500
  10. rudolff
    rudolff 5 September 2013 11: 19 New
    +2
    If I am not mistaken, the "planning" range of old aerial bombs with new control systems is from 20 to 40 (roughly) km. The new UABs have up to 60 km. That is, the carrier does not even need to enter the affected area to bomb. Not to mention the use of missile weapons. By the way, a question for specialists: a guided aerial bomb, is it a ballistic or aerodynamic target?
    1. 1c-inform-city
      1c-inform-city 5 September 2013 13: 40 New
      +3
      1. Normal air defense is always layered. Small, medium, long range.
      2. The complex will use two missiles at 60 and 150 km.
      3. The planning UAB is more relevant to aerodynamics in its flight path, only slightly noticeable (dimensions and lack of engine radiation)
  11. Witold
    Witold 5 September 2013 11: 58 New
    -18
    How it can hit 32 targets at once, if there are only 12 missiles in the installation. The range does not exceed the flight ranges of Spice-100 and Spice-2000 http://topwar.ru/29831-izrailskaya-bomba-sposobnaya-spravitsya-s-300.html
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith 5 September 2013 12: 19 New
      +5
      Self-propelled 50P6 launchers with 12 9М96Е2 anti-aircraft missiles - up to 8

      Quote: Vitold
      how can it hit 32 targets at once if there are only 12 missiles in the installation

      Something like this winked
    2. berimor
      berimor 5 September 2013 14: 22 New
      +5
      Yes, you figure it out first! The division includes several launchers!
    3. PSih2097
      PSih2097 5 September 2013 15: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: Vitold
      How it can hit 32 targets at once, if there are only 12 missiles in the installation.

      In the air defense division, as a rule, four batteries of six PUs in each ...
    4. Airman
      Airman 5 September 2013 17: 09 New
      +3
      Quote: Vitold
      How it can hit 32 targets at once, if there are only 12 missiles in the installation. The range does not exceed the flight ranges of Spice-100 and Spice-2000 http://topwar.ru/29831-izrailskaya-bomba-sposobnaya-spravitsya-s-300.html

      At the same time, the complex can fire at 16 aerodynamic targets with 32 missiles, you carefully read.
    5. ded10041948
      ded10041948 5 September 2013 19: 21 New
      +2
      Well, did you learn to read in childhood? Carefully read the TTX again (you can aloud).
      Now remember the multiplication table and everything will fall into place.
    6. Vlad_Mir
      Vlad_Mir 5 September 2013 23: 28 New
      0
      It's dark how!
    7. nightingale
      nightingale 6 September 2013 17: 18 New
      0
      System composition:
      Combat Control Station 50K6 - 1
      Multifunctional radar 50Н6 - up to 2
      50P6 self-propelled launchers with
      12 9M96E2 anti-aircraft missiles - up to 8
  12. scientist
    scientist 5 September 2013 16: 08 New
    +4
    Well done. Finally, we restored the classic architecture of the defense of objects on a modern technological base, i.e. Long-range air defense missile systems S-300 (400), medium S-350 and small "Pantsir".
    It would be good if we remembered that in addition to layered air defense with an increase in the density of fire destruction, effective radio reconnaissance, air defense aviation, and electronic warfare systems and radio-electronic systems were also required. That's when all this will be collected under a single command and included in the integrated ACS, then there will really be nothing to be afraid of. But the most important thing is that new equipment must be tested in combat conditions. Syria is now the optimal training ground for testing new air defense systems and electronic warfare.
  13. kind
    kind 5 September 2013 17: 37 New
    +2
    Beautiful complex. I think that in practice it will show itself well!
  14. smiths xnumx
    smiths xnumx 5 September 2013 22: 54 New
    0
    Domestic response to SAMP-T / MEADS complexes. Confused only by the lack of medium and heavy missiles, so it is unlikely that this is a complete analogue of the S-300PM / PMU-1/2, most likely it is a replacement for the S-300PT and S-300PS, of which there are still many, or we were shown the complex not in full complement ... Perhaps there will also be launchers on a car chassis with a different type of missiles. Or a clear division of tasks - S-350 (E) military air defense complex, S-400 object air defense. The level of automation, apparently, is similar to that of the Tor-M2 air defense system. And this is serious. And the 12 guides say a lot. If it passes the tests, the result is a solid system. S-350E with 9M96E2 missiles for which the range was initially declared 40 km., And then 60 km. Essentially a replacement for "Buk".
    1. Nitup
      Nitup 5 September 2013 23: 15 New
      0
      TTX presented in the article refers to the export version of S-350E
      It does not apply to military air defense. This is an object system. Designed to replace the first versions of the S-300P, whose range is 75-90 km. S-300PMU 1-2 will be replaced by S-400 systems.
  15. Okuscher
    Okuscher 8 September 2013 07: 13 New
    0
    Quote: Vitold
    How it can hit 32 targets at once, if there are only 12 missiles in the installation. The range does not exceed the flight ranges of Spice-100 and Spice-2000 http://topwar.ru/29831-izrailskaya-bomba-sposobnaya-spravitsya-s-300.html

    As usual, the current adjusted for what our local Jew first wrote, and then thought laughing
  16. Ruslan
    Ruslan 8 September 2013 10: 15 New
    -1
    in my opinion, the only thing needed in this system: radars, rockets, electronics. S-300 say about 2100 units in service. What are they thrown now? it is not easier and cheaper to repair the Mazovian chassis, and install everything new on it. it will definitely be cheaper.
  17. Pate
    Pate 24 February 2015 21: 41 New
    0
    Developed developed, but not yet heard about the start of mass production and their entry into the army, in contrast to the S-400.