Solar drone can seriously press satellites

56
Solar drone can seriously press satellites

The American company Titan Aerospace has demonstrated a prototype of its solar-powered UAV, which, according to the manufacturer, can stay in the air for up to 5 years. This unit will cruise at an altitude of about 20 thousands of meters and take photographs of the surface or perform the role of an atmospheric satellite. Developers from Titan Aerospace are ready to fly their first aircraft in the 2014 year. It is worth noting that their concept may have a promising future.

Traditional space satellites today are doing quite well with their duties, but they have a number of drawbacks. For example, the satellites themselves are quite expensive, their launch into orbit also costs a considerable amount of money, moreover, they can not be returned back if they have already been commissioned. But the American company Titan Aerospace provides an alternative to space satellites, which will be spared from all these problems. The unmanned high-altitude aerial vehicle called “Solara” is designed to operate as an “atmospheric satellite” —that is, to perform autonomous flights in the upper layers of the Earth’s atmosphere for quite a long time.



The company is currently working on two models drone Solara. The first of them Solara 50 has a wingspan of 50 meters, its length is 15,5 meters, weight - 159 kg, payload - up to 32 kg. The more massive Solara 60 has a wingspan of 60 meters and can carry up to 100 kg. payload. The tail of the apparatus and the upper wings are covered with 3 solar cells, which allow generating up to 7 kWh of energy during the day. At its cruising altitude of 20 meters, the atmospheric satellite will be above cloud level, which means it will not be affected by weather factors. The collected energy will be stored in onboard lithium-ion batteries to power the engine, autopilot, telemetry systems and sensors at night. It is assumed that the atmospheric satellite will be able to operate completely autonomously, being in the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere for up to 000 years, and then return to the ground, so that its payload can be returned, and the device itself can be disassembled for spare parts.


It is reported that the cruising speed of the unmanned vehicle will be of the order of 100 km / h, and the operational radius - more than 4,5 million kilometers. According to experts, the drone for the most part will fly in circles over a certain part of the earth's surface. Such applications include tracking of objects, observation, mapping in real time, as well as monitoring of weather, agricultural crops, forests, places of incidents, and in general practically any tasks that an ordinary low-altitude satellite can handle.

On top of that, Titan Aerospace experts say that every UAV can provide 17 cellular coverage immediately thousands of thousands of square kilometers of the earth’s surface, communicating with more than 100 ground towers. Currently, Americans have already conducted tests of reduced models of atmospheric satellites and are hoping to release full-size versions of the Solara 50 and 60 devices later in the 2013 year.

According to preliminary estimates by experts, multispectral imaging of the earth's surface using Solara devices will cost only 5 dollars per square kilometer: this is just 7 times lower than the rates for satellite data of comparable quality. In addition, such drones will be able to provide telecommunications services for a locality in 30 km radius, which is quite comparable with a modern metropolis like London or Moscow with most of their suburbs. Under normal conditions on the territory of megacities in such a system, there is no need yet, but the company believes that their drones can be useful either in the case of emergency situations or in underdeveloped states. Titan Aerospace says that the well-known computer corporation Google, which can use them as part of its own Internet Africa project, has become interested in their Solara unmanned vehicles.


The use of mobile high-altitude vehicles (aerostats or airplanes) for radio broadcasting was proposed quite a long time ago, but the practical application of this idea was hampered by the lack of suitable power sources. The batteries were too heavy, and the solar cells lacked efficiency. The first experimental aircraft, equipped with solar batteries, were designed and built by NASA in 1990-s, it was then that these aircraft and received the unofficial designation - "atmospheric satellites".

To date, two things strengthen Solara as an atmospheric satellite. The first is the height of its flight. The device is designed to fly at an altitude of more than 20 000 meters, which allows it to be almost above all possible atmospheric phenomena. The device hangs over the clouds and a variety of weather conditions, where the environment and wind, as a rule, are fairly stable or at least very predictable. Being at this altitude, the order of 45 000 square kilometers of the earth’s surface immediately hits the field of view of the drone. Therefore, a cellular base station installed on Solara could replace the 100 of such stations on the surface of the Earth.

The second very important thing is that the device is powered by solar energy. All available surfaces on the wings and tail of the drone are covered with special solar panels, and lithium-ion batteries are mounted in the wings. During the day, Solara is able to generate an impressive amount of energy, which is enough to leave a charge in the batteries, which would be enough for the rest of the night. Since the solar-powered unmanned aircraft does not need refueling, it can be airborne for up to 5 years. At this time, he can either circle above one place, or (if you want the device to make long-distance flights) get the opportunity to fly a distance of the order of 4 500 000 kilometers with a cruising speed of slightly less than 60 nodes (about 111 km / h). In this case, the five-year period of flight of the device is due only to the life cycle of some of its components, so there are all the prerequisites to ensure that this drone could be in the sky much longer.

Equally important is the return of the device. If something goes wrong, you can always bring it back, saving the payload and the unit. Solara also promises to be much cheaper than classic satellites, although the manufacturer has not yet been in a hurry to disclose prices for its new product. The launch of such devices into mass production opens up new possibilities for humanity like the regional Internet or Google Maps with real-time maps. At the same time, the appearance of the Solara drone does not mark the end of the era of space satellites, although it gives us a choice of a larger number of alternatives.

Information sources:
-http: //gearmix.ru/archives/4918
-http: //aenergy.ru/4126
-http: //lenta.ru/news/2013/08/19/solar
-http: //nauka21vek.ru/archives/52274
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    3 September 2013 08: 43
    Admittedly, the idea is good. If it still will be all of the composites then this is a serious tool for solving the tasks.
    1. +1
      3 September 2013 10: 22
      I don’t care, but sorry for my descendants who will be afraid to look into the sky
      and see in the sky not the sun and stars, but a threat
      I do not want them such "heavenly punishment"
    2. +3
      3 September 2013 13: 59
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      Admittedly, the idea is good.

      Max agrees with you, but there is one thing, but this aircraft will not replace the real satellites in low Earth orbit. In all other respects, the thing is good, especially for reconnaissance, but, as always, this device will be used for military purposes. So, as always, with good intentions the road to Hell is bridging.
      The device is designed to fly at altitude more 20 meters, which allows him to be practically above all possible atmospheric phenomena.
      Can anyone answer the question of how high planes fly with thrust??
      1. No_more
        +1
        3 September 2013 17: 12
        There is a record of a similar project NASA Helios 29,5 km. I honestly doubt the necessity and effectiveness of the propeller at such heights. Most likely the device at such heights will be uncontrollable, but these are more engineering / technical problems than fundamental ones.

        The direction is extremely promising, like orbital planes, but alas, we do not hear about the development of this direction. I'm afraid we firmly believe in rockets.
        1. +3
          14 September 2013 13: 19
          I agree, a promising direction.
      2. Windbreak
        0
        3 September 2013 21: 24
        Quote: Sirocco
        Maybe someone will answer the question of how high aircraft fly with a thrust ??

        The Grob Strato 2C is the highest altitude manned propeller-driven aircraft, reaching an altitude of 18552 meters.
    3. aviator46
      0
      4 September 2013 00: 41
      And I had two questions.
      How to take 20 km to the echelon on "screws". and how to provide heating of batteries when
      temperature -60,70 degrees.
      1. 0
        4 September 2013 03: 48
        And where will the device take so much energy to power the repeaters? The article provides an example with a base station of a mobile operator. Has anyone seen equipment there, and in particular batteries for an uninterruptible power supply? Who will slaughter them? What is the area of ​​solar panels needed? And what will be the weight of the device then?
  2. +1
    3 September 2013 08: 50
    Well, as I understand it, this is not even a demonstrator. The idea of ​​atmospheric satellites is quite interesting, although their great vulnerability should be recognized.
  3. +1
    3 September 2013 08: 58
    "+"
    An interesting solution. I would like to see a working option in action.
    On the border of the Troposphere and Stratosphere (~ 20km), temperatures are minus (-50 / -40). It is quite suitable.
    We will observe smile
  4. ramsi
    +4
    3 September 2013 09: 32
    and an airship in this role would not be more practical?
    1. 0
      3 September 2013 09: 47
      in certain situations, they will pose a threat to passenger airlines.
  5. 0
    3 September 2013 09: 58
    Who cares, more detailed information about the solar-powered device, 14 hours in the air.
    http://fpv-community.ru/index.php?showtopic=198
  6. Veles25
    +5
    3 September 2013 10: 04
    .................
  7. 0
    3 September 2013 10: 17
    These things should be cheap. They are very cheap, because in terms of strength it is even inferior to an airplane from a notebook sheet, at least from any composites it is not molded. But 20 000 still need to climb! In addition, about the lack of atmospheric phenomena - this is another question. Satellites are good at being predictable. But in general, of course, a wonderful spy, it is not for nothing that Google is so interested. I think it’s worth building for us, especially since such work does not present the slightest problems.
    1. 0
      3 September 2013 10: 44
      Mikhail-3: ... in terms of strength, it is inferior even to an airplane from a notebook sheet, at least from any composites it is not sculpted.

      Exactly, is this design friendly with sopromat? What operational overload will it be designed for? 50-60 meters the wingspan, and up to 20000 meters you need to get through all sorts of turbulences, ascending and descending flows of dense layers of the atmosphere.
    2. +3
      3 September 2013 14: 35
      everything is normal with durability)
      pictured wing of a modern sports glider:
      1. +1
        3 September 2013 19: 43
        Yes, yes ... from the model. Weak jump on a full wing? Oh breaks? Well, yes, the length of the lever plays a role ... Huge wings, very long and very light. That is very weak. In addition, the solar battery cannot be bent, so ... In general, the contraption will collapse like a package, it is worth the serious wind to take up on it. If one such sail out of three reaches working height, it will be a success.
      2. 0
        3 September 2013 23: 55
        Quote: desertfox
        pictured wing of a modern sports glider:

        This glider has an electric motor under 5 kW and a speed under 300 km.h wink , therefore, such a strong one, and that one with a scale of 60 meters will fall in love with a sickly and delicate one, as soon as it is pulled over 20 km without breaking it, you will need to look, and the thrust of the screw for 20 km is completely different from 3-8 km , it is necessary to spin the motor very strongly, and this is superfluous energy and again weight and reliability, electric motors do not live for long at 30-40 thousand rpm, they do not hold pods, even ceramic ones.
    3. No_more
      +1
      3 September 2013 17: 14
      Here it is also necessary to take into account the protection from most meteorites and space debris and one hundred percent return to earth.
  8. +5
    3 September 2013 10: 23
    All the good days!
    An interesting economical development, if implemented, it will be very effective
    multifunctional tracking and communication satellite. hi
    1. +1
      3 September 2013 22: 38
      Quote: alex67
      An interesting economical development, if implemented, there will be a very effective multifunctional tracking and communication satellite. hi


      With a payload of 32 kg? No.
    2. Egor.nic
      0
      4 September 2013 16: 09
      The notion is interesting. But rather, a multifunctional seven-fingered-eight-membered one is obtained. lol
  9. 0
    3 September 2013 11: 18
    In the northern latitudes this winter is not really what you will exploit, and it is not known whether the winter sun will suffice in the temperate zones. And previously, the idea is good for sub-moderate zones and to the south (for the northern hemisphere, for the southern, respectively, vice versa).
    1. 0
      3 September 2013 15: 50
      And at 20 km what is the temperature? No less than the frosts of the winter Arctic. The unit is very promising.
  10. 0
    3 September 2013 11: 21
    Great plane! Something fabulous in it.
  11. Vorkot cat
    0
    3 September 2013 12: 18
    The very idea of ​​such an aircraft has existed for about 10 years already, but so far no one is in a hurry to start production of this device wink
    1. 0
      3 September 2013 19: 47
      And what are the problems with its production? Rather, many have already tried ... but no one has yet succeeded in bringing it to working heights, so there is hardly anything to announce.
  12. 0
    3 September 2013 12: 23
    An excellent technical tool for duplicating satellites. It is only necessary to modify the wing to unfold in flight, otherwise it is very large.
    1. 0
      3 September 2013 13: 35
      Also, the drone can use incident wind flows for flight.
  13. +1
    3 September 2013 12: 26
    Quote: atk44849
    and an airship in this role would not be more practical?

    if you fly in a circle above one point, then it’s probably more practical to use a tethered balloon (http://www.membrana.ru/particle/12522) equipped with solar panels, an on-board wind generator, an electrolysis unit for producing hydrogen from atmospheric water, condensing on the surfaces of the aerostat. The resulting hydrogen can be used to fill and make up for the loss of hydrogen from balloons instead of expensive helium. You can tie the balloon to the ground with ropes based on graphene nanotubes (http://plastcraft.ru/nanoprovod). The balloon can also be equipped with an air separation unit for nitrogen production. Nitrogen is used to replace flammable hydrogen in a balloon when it is planted on the ground for maintenance.
    1. ramsi
      +1
      3 September 2013 13: 04
      tethered is unlikely, a wind generator is doubtful, electrolysis is sensible; with helium, probably, you should not bother at all, as with nitrogen, and for planting you can simply bleed hydrogen; and finally, returning to the idea of ​​a vacuum shell, the main problem is not to bleed off the gas (hydrogen), but to reduce the closed volume of the shell, if the inside pressure is at least equal to or slightly lower than the outboard pressure (which for a rigid shell at high altitude, probably real), then the drop in lift will not happen
      1. +1
        3 September 2013 19: 13
        all hydrogen from the cylinder cannot be vented, because then the volume of the cylinder will become equal to zero.
        Hydrogen can be vented only with a soft balloon body - when the volume of the balloon may decrease.
        but then the cross-sectional area of ​​the balloon decreases, the ability to parachute when descending from a height
        decreases, the descent can turn into an uncontrollable fall, as happened with the stratospheric balloon “Osoaviahim-1” (http://class-fizika.narod.ru/vosd14.htm)
        It is tempting to use a rigid or semi-rigid cylinder body.
        1. ramsi
          0
          3 September 2013 22: 00
          you are right - there is a problem - in the release of hydrogen at practically "outboard" pressure in the shell. So, the idea is - cubic meter blocks, sequentially opened, like tanks for the main ballast of submarines. With a small volume and sufficiently large valves, the danger of the formation of "oxyhydrogen gas", I think, can be neglected, and a consistent decrease in lifting force will make possible a controlled descent
    2. +1
      3 September 2013 23: 40
      Quote: Svetlana
      if you fly in a circle above one point, then it’s probably more practical to use a tethered balloon (http://www.membrana.ru/particle/12522) equipped with solar panels, an on-board wind generator, an electrolysis unit for producing hydrogen from atmospheric water, condensing on the surfaces of the aerostat. The resulting hydrogen can be used to fill and make up for the loss of hydrogen from balloons instead of expensive helium. You can tie the balloon to the ground with ropes based on graphene nanotubes (http://plastcraft.ru/nanoprovod). The balloon can also be equipped with an air separation unit for nitrogen production. Nitrogen is used to replace flammable hydrogen in a balloon when it is planted on the ground for maintenance.


      And for what purpose is this whole garden? Or is it the irony of Svetlana? Then 5 s +.
      1. Alex 241
        +2
        3 September 2013 23: 53
        Cool San! I felt like a schoolboy laughing Something futuristic! You can still arm with blasters, and photon torpedoes laughing
        1. +1
          3 September 2013 23: 58
          Quote: Alex 241
          Cool Sanya! I felt like a schoolboy laughing Something futuristic! You can still arm with blasters, and photon torpedoes laughing


          And also enable the search function for "first aid kits", and connect at least three "lives", in case of inept use of 8D blasters.
          1. Alex 241
            +1
            4 September 2013 00: 06
            And be sure to save laughing
      2. 0
        4 September 2013 07: 58
        this garden is mainly for low-altitude small-sized purposes such as axes, as in a fairy tale (I sit high, I look far ..) But we were born to make the fairy tale come true.
  14. +2
    3 September 2013 13: 48
    For some reason, it seems to me that the airship will be more justified for the same functions. In general, the idea of ​​atmospheric satellites is justified, but according to this model there are a number of questions:
    1-in my opinion, this device will be comparable in price to satellites, with its dimensions and number of solar cells, the more I suspect that the design will have figs of composites and are light and strong, and at the same time not cheap alloys
    2-payload 32, 100 kg - given the range of tasks that they want to assign to him, will it be enough to accommodate such a number of rather different equipment in it, his tasks are more modest than those of satellites, but still, this article indicated that he was "and the Shvets, and the reaper and the player on the pipe."
    3-third after practicing for 5 years, which materials need to be changed, how many and, accordingly, which attendants will get into it. If the situation with metal over many years of use in the aircraft industry is, in principle, more or less clear, then the composites will not fully understand how they will behave during such a long, continuous operation at low temperatures and high ultraviolet and radiation exposure.
    4-strong dependence on solar panels, the device will not be able to stick out in one place for too long if it wants to perform its tasks, we can say that it must fly behind the sun, otherwise you need to either put a set of batteries on it or a generator
    The project is interesting, not new (I already saw something similar at the beginning of 2000), but flat unmanned airships with a "hard" body would be better suited for this functionality
  15. 0
    3 September 2013 14: 49
    Something I doubt that the batteries will remain operational at -40C and the 5-year life is alarming.
    1. ramsi
      0
      3 September 2013 15: 20
      Well, they work in space ...
      1. 0
        3 September 2013 15: 42
        There the insulation is good, but here there are strict weight restrictions.
        1. +1
          3 September 2013 17: 26
          If I'm not mistaken, it all depends on the type of battery, for example, lithium-ion batteries on Russian satellites, on the contrary, require "hellish" cooling, since during their operation the electrolyte heats up a lot and without proper cooling it will simply explode, and put it into the shade in space and already -100C, so the batteries can still be picked up, there are other problems, as it seems to me, well, for example, how many of these batteries can you put in there and how long will it last on them at full power of the equipment used?
          1. 0
            4 September 2013 08: 46
            Ooh, I didn’t know these properties of lithium-ion batteries. I really read it. Then there was one question that remained for 5 years with constant work.
      2. +2
        3 September 2013 19: 50
        There ... no oxygen! Oxygen is a universal destroyer. And on 20 000 there is oxygen, and some water, either in the form of ice, sometimes in the form of vapor, or even droplets will appear, just on the joints of the structure, very suitable conditions. And the flakes of batteries rained down ...
  16. +1
    3 September 2013 15: 29
    in peacetime, as a reconnaissance officer, it’s unlikely that you can’t take down satellites, but in the U-2 atmosphere only in an unmanned aircraft
  17. -2
    3 September 2013 17: 10
    A very stupid idea, inside and out, absolutely everything is not consistent. There can be no question of any replacement of the satellite precisely for technical reasons and the laws of physics. As a short-term PROBE, as a repeater, well, there are many different "BUT".
  18. Captain cook
    0
    3 September 2013 19: 33
    Quote: habalog
    "+"
    An interesting solution. I would like to see a working option in action.
    On the border of the Troposphere and Stratosphere (~ 20km), temperatures are minus (-50 / -40). It is quite suitable.
    We will observe smile

    I will disappoint you, the border of the troposphere and stratosphere is much lower - 8-15 km, depending on the time of year and latitude.
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Atmosfeer.png?uselang=ru
  19. +2
    3 September 2013 20: 27
    The idea is very good. An interesting illustration of the development of history in a spiral. The days of Powers and the "black birds" of genius Kelly Johnson with his Lockheed U-2 are back.

    The heights are just those.
    With great pleasure I would read material on the effectiveness of the propeller drive in the upper layers of the stratosphere. As well as the issue of structural stability in conditions of high ozone content.
    Geostationary satellites, of course, will not replace such devices, but the application promises many attractive prospects.
  20. 0
    3 September 2013 20: 29
    It’s time for us to design anti-drones.
  21. 0
    3 September 2013 22: 24
    This unit will cruise at an altitude of about 20 thousand meters and take photos of the surface or act as an atmospheric satellite.

    For civilian use, the product is great !!! good

    And if there is a desire to use for military and reconnaissance purposes - that is, the M-55. drinks
    1. Alex 241
      +1
      4 September 2013 01: 06
      Solar Impulse - a plane powered by the sun's rays during a flight with grief in half in a month overcame 5000 km over continental America.
      1. +1
        4 September 2013 22: 37
        Master class of an advanced aircraft modeling club with good funding!
  22. Egor.nic
    0
    4 September 2013 16: 03
    Doubtful project. Rather, another fraud to knock out funds from the state budget. The optimum ceiling for jet aircraft is 20km. At a cruising speed of 100 km / h - you need a turboprop engine, taking into account the solid payload (chemical batteries, cameras, radio systems and navigation systems, solar batteries) several engines, add here 5 years of continuous operation in difficult environmental conditions. To ensure the effect of a glider flight at a given height, thoughtful aerodynamics are required. The effect of solar radiation, plus cosmic radiation and reflected earth radiation. The other side - the reliability of the 5-year continuous operation of turbine engines and blades should be confirmed. The costs are substantial, and the effect is minimal. Not an alternative to satellites.
    1. 0
      4 September 2013 19: 20
      Egor.nic , but what have the turbines and blades? Electric airplane. The propeller is driven by DC motors. My old laptop at the end of the month will be knocked down exactly 8 years old - the motors also work silently and alright. I did not serve them even once - only once I cleaned it from dust. Hard drive drives that work for years ... But are there any examples of extremely long-term operation of mechanisms?
      This is a time. Secondly, the threat from the aggressive environment is, in my opinion, far-fetched. Current polymers do not burn in fire, and do not drown in water.
      Turbines are not needed here. The aircraft is made with a clear "glider" slope. What a wingspan! And powerful convection flows persist in the stratosphere.
      In addition, Solara is far from the first.
      Known prototype NASA Pathfinder. In 2001, this device climbed to an altitude of 29,5 km already, and this is the so-called. precosmos - on propellers!
      Here is a gravitap with 75 meter wing:
      1. 0
        5 September 2013 15: 15
        The problems with composite materials at low (below -30 ° C) and high temperatures (above 100 ° C) are not far-fetched; they are very real and for ultramodern materials and many, there is still sensitivity to ultraviolet, so the question of materials, in my opinion, cannot be removed, NASA Pathfinder did not carry a payload (something that it does not need to control and fly), in addition it was a project to test the fundamental possibilities of creating such machines, so it's only too early to talk about the whole direction, in addition, record flights are record flights , and the working height and lifetime with subsequent maintenance is another.
        All these solar devices are certainly interesting, but from a conceptual point of view (I’m not saying that this type of device itself will not work as it should), that is, the development prospects seem to me like a dead end
        1. 0
          5 September 2013 19: 53
          I apologize. It is not always possible to write the whole phrase at a time, so schizophasia comes out periodically.
  23. 0
    4 September 2013 21: 13
    Firstly, an AES body orbiting around the Earth and having a speed not lower than the 1st space one.
    Secondly, satellites above 100-110 km are located outside the territorial airspace and their destruction is an act of aggression. This aircraft operates in the area of ​​air borders, and can be shot down by air defense systems as soon as they cross them.
    But in principle, for peaceful purposes, the thing is not bad, scientists will appreciate.
  24. vasily2803
    0
    15 September 2013 01: 32
    Very interesting! Because it's cool!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"