Last year, the White House in the person of Obama and H. Clinton applauded the standing of the democratic election of M. Mursi to the kingdom in Egypt. Mursi, as every schoolboy now knows, although he formally retired from the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood, but remained in his heart a “brother”. It was he who called for jihad in Syria, it was his office that composed a new Sharia constitution for Egypt, it was he who ruined his home economy and eventually caused unrest, which some of the inhabitants of Washington so like to watch from a long distance.
For the third year, the White House talks, if not about intervention in Syria, then that “Assad must leave.” Obama’s appointee, Secretary of State John Kerry, is no different from Hillary Clinton in this sense, and he transfers the money to the cannibal “opposition”, perhaps, more often than his brisk language did to his predecessor. Bearded fighters are fighting shoulder to shoulder against Assad, both al-Qaeda itself and its "affiliated branches" (like "Dzhebhat al-Nusra" or "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant"). They are joined by bloodthirsty warriors from various countries, including ardent supporters of the world caliphate from Western Europe. This gathering of thugs who have recently cultivated holy lice do not like the secular rule of Bashar al-Assad, and they generally prefer slaughter and looting to work.
Why is Barak (by the way, the second name - Hussein) Obama supports those who are called Islamists, and with the addition of the adjective “radical”? Is the situation around Syria getting worse every day? The press writes about the American ships, the Russians, the F-22, the unsuccessful “testing” of Syria’s defense with Tomahawks, the overlapping of the Suez Canal by the Egyptians, and the prevention of the terrorist act there. The native Congress is scolding the US president for the vagueness in the motivations of the coming invasion of Syria, and the president, although they are shaking, they are still going to “pay back” Assad for using weapons of mass destruction — to fire missiles at ATS “two days”, which means not war, but “educational measures "(as stated by the representative of the presidential administration). The plan of the American leader came up with a cunning one: let the responsibility fall to Congress.
And now Secretary of State Kerry shook the "test tube", that is, the "evidence" of the use of chemical in Syria weapons. He spoke on TV and said that the results of the analysis of hair and blood samples from the scene indicate the use of sarin in Syria. And once sarin was used, then it is time to start a military operation against the Syrian authorities. It is naive to think that Kerry spoke about this without the knowledge of his boss from the Oval Office. Neither Obama, nor Kerry, nor their friends in France have any doubt that only Assad forces can use sarin - and especially waiting for UN inspectors to arrive in Damascus.
Julia Zamanskaya ("Voice of Russia") cites the opinions of experts who believe that Obama is facing a trial at the Hague Tribunal for war crimes and Al-Qaida support.
Mikah Zenko, an employee of the Center for Preventive Measures of the Consulate for Foreign Affairs, believes that any military operation in Syria will be considered illegal at the moment, because the United States is one of the countries participating in international agreements that the start of hostilities at the initiative of one state in against another state is considered a crime if the direct threat of an attack on the initiating state is not proven. Violation of this law in accordance with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the provisions of the UN Charter is called a crime against peace.
Bill Ayers says that if the US president decides to intervene militarily, he must be brought to justice. Comrade Ayers proposes to betray Obama to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, just as they did with politicians who committed similar war crimes.
By the way, Ayers argues that B.H. Obama should be tried for war crimes not only because the US invasion will be “absolutely illegal”, but also because the president is involved in “entirely and completely” terrorist activities in Syria.
So who are you, Mr. Obama? Who are you for? Or against whom?
The stubbornness of the American president, whispering even in a dream, “Assad Must Go Away” and supporting everywhere notorious Islamist thugs who advocate a world caliphate, needs not so much a geopolitical understanding as religious interpretation. And in the interpretation of the most direct, without any tricky symbolism there.
In September 2010, Obama told the world about his faith. Interfax, referring to the Christian Post, wrote that Obama had made a two-day trip around the country on the eve of congressional elections and the election of governors and answered voters' questions.
Speaking with one voter from Albuquerque (New Mexico), B.H. Obama admitted that he had come to faith on his own. The “commandments of Jesus Christ” helped him in this. It was from them that he derived the way of life that he wanted to lead: "To be responsible for our brothers and sisters, to do with others as we want them to do with us." Obama said: “The understanding that Jesus Christ died for our sins tells us that we all must have humility ... that we humans are sinful and imperfect, we make mistakes and achieve salvation only by the grace of God” .
Obama added that he tries to live according to Christian principles, to pray every day and serve the people.
What god he prays for and what kind of people Obama serves, it turned out two years later.
In September 2012 years "Inopressa" Made abbreviated translations of a series of articles by the President of the Middle East Forum Daniel Pipes (The Washington Times).
Pipes established "numerous ties between the president and Islam," the American newspaper notes.
"Perhaps the most remarkable and outrageous lie of Obama is his words about his own religion," says D. Pipes. The American president answered the unequivocally posed question in different ways: either "my mother is a Christian from Kansas, I was always a Christian," or "I came to the Christian faith as an adult." What is B.H. Obama hiding?
In the title of the next article by Pipes, the words of Obama’s acquaintances are pronounced: “Barry was Muslim”. Obama, writes Pipes, "was born a Muslim and received a Muslim upbringing." In Islam, the children of a Muslim father are already considered Muslims. The second name of Obama (Hussein) - purely Muslim. As a child in Indonesia, he attended the Koran lessons in a secondary school, memorized the Koran and went to the mosque and wore a sarong - the clothes of Indonesian Muslims.
The third article is entitled: “Obama:“ My Muslim Faith. ” In a conversation with George Stephanopoulos in September 2008, Obama pronounced the words "my Muslim faith." He recovered by saying “my Christian faith”, only after Stephanopoulos interrupted him and corrected him, Pipes notes.
Obama exaggerates the number and role of Muslims in the United States, the author believes that "smacks of the Islamist mentality." In the United States, 2,5 million Muslims, but Obama said in 2009 that almost 7 million
The next article is called: "His middle name is Hussein." The author quotes the words of his brother Obama’s father, George Hussein Onyango Obama: “Perhaps because of his position he behaves differently, but in his heart Barack Obama is a Muslim.”
Finally, the fifth article is the story of a former Obama teacher from Indonesia. At school, Barak Hussein was the only student who voluntarily combined the study of Christianity and Islam. “This indicates all the intricacies of the formation of Obama’s personality,” the author writes, suggesting that from childhood Obama tried to unite the religions of his parents, introducing himself as a Christian and as a Muslim. “He still does just that, in an obscure way,” says Pipes.
Pipes does not call Obama an Islamist, but indicates: “The problem is different - Obama specifically and repeatedly lied about his Muslim identity. The way Obama has dealt with his religious past exposes his moral flaws more than any other deception. ”
In October 2012 of the year on the resource Digital Journal an article was published by John Thomas Didymus, who cited a publication in the World Net Daily, stating that Obama's wedding ring has an inscription that partially corresponds to the declaration of Islamic faith: “There is no God but Allah.”
According to WND, the president wore a ring long before marriage. But now this ring also performs the function of a wedding.
However, David Emery, the author of Urbanlegends.com, referring to the high-resolution picture of the ring, does not believe that there is any inscription at all. The characters depicted there, according to the journalist, are “abstract design”.
However, according to Blaze, an expert in Arabic studies, a professor at Duke University, agrees that there may be the first part of the shahada on the ring. In addition, the professor explained to the publication that the purpose of such a ring could be “personal protection” - for example, from “evil”, from car accidents. Men, in some countries in the Middle East, he noted, cannot wear gold. Such a ring could be an obstacle for Obama to enter the mosque and participate in worship in some localities.
But Dr. Ali Asani from Harvard University, a professor of Indo-Muslim and Islamic religion and culture, told the same publication that not all Muslim men believe that Islam does not allow wearing gold. The scholar said that it depends on the interpretation of Islam. Some ultraconservatives limit the wearing of gold, but many Muslim men still wear gold rings.
That same October Digital Journal Greta McClain material appeared in which the journalist writes about the rumors around Obama's ring. In the publication “WND” it was noted that, according to Islamic experts, the ring, which Obama wore for more than 30 years, is decorated with the inscription: “There is no god but Allah”.
One of the experts is an Islamic scholar, Mark A. Gabriel, Ph.D., who graduated from Al-Azhar University in Cairo.
Greta McClain, referring to photos of the Obama ring with different resolutions and different sources, questions the allegations of journalists. In her opinion, there is nothing on the ring that even remotely resembles Arabic ligature.
These critics of the material in WND deliberately missed several important details from the article reviewed by Jerome R. Korsi "Obama's Ring:" There is no god but Allah ".
Jerome R. Corsi is a Harvard Ph.D., a senior WND reporter, author of many books, including such a bestseller on the New York Times list, like Obama Nation. In a rather extensive material, the publicist notes that Obama began to wear a ring with the inscription “There is no god but Allah” on the ring finger before he met Michelle (future wife), being a law student at the Harvard School, rather than puzzling his classmates. It is also interesting that Michelle Robinson’s finger on the wedding ceremony of the couple in 1992 had a “traditional” ring, but Obama did not change his ring.
Obama himself did not explain why he wore a ring on his ring finger before the wedding.
As the author mentioned Mark Gabriel (by the way, a great expert on the Koran who learned him by heart at 12 years of age) told the author, on the Obama ring the inscription “There is no god but Allah” is laid out in two sections, one above the other. Usually, in Islamic art and Arabic calligraphy, especially when engraving Koranic quotations on jewelry, experts skillfully place the letters so that they fit into the available space.
The article also notes other facts, bypassed by critics.
In an interview during the 2008 presidential campaign, New York Times columnist Nicholas Christoph expressed doubt about Obama's Islamic education in Indonesia, where he lived from 1967 to 1971.
Obama, in response, read out to Christophe an Arab call to prayer - azan.
“Allah is above all! Allah above all!
I testify that there is no god but Allah.
I testify that Muhammad is his prophet. ”
I testify that there is no god but Allah.
I testify that Muhammad is his prophet. ”
Christophe noted that Barack Obama was reading a prayer in Arabic "with a first-class accent." Further columnist reported that
“Delightfully unthinkable (after all, Alabama’s voters will have heart attacks), Mr. Obama called the call to prayer“ one of the most beautiful sunset sounds on earth. ”
As for Gabriel, he also confirmed that Muslim men wear golden rings, despite the ban on Islamic law. “Wearing gold rings is even more acceptable if the rings contain religious messages like“ There is no god but Allah. ” And just men in non-Arab Islamic societies of Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Pakistan wear gold jewelry. Moreover, the wearing of such rings is approved for businessmen: after all, they “deal with the infidels,” and a person with a ring will be considered to be those who have an influence.
Finally, the journalist recalls the words of director Joel Gilbert, a specialist in stories Islam, who noted that Obama wore a ring during his speech in Cairo 4 on June 2009, that is, in the first months of his presidency. In Cairo, Obama said that he, being the president of the United States, considers it part of his responsibility to fight negative stereotypes of Islam where they just appear.
And now some other information directly related to the White House.
At the beginning of 2013 year news broker MIGnews.comreferring to the Egyptian magazine "Rose El-Youssef", published an article about the Muslim Brotherhood, introduced into the administration of the President of the United States. These people, the portal notes, "are influencing US foreign policy in a direction favorable to world Islamism."
The presidential administration employs six "brothers in mind." For a couple of years of work, they managed to change American policy and turn the States into the largest and most important sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood.
According to the Egyptian magazine, the following representatives of the Brothers work for Obama: Arif Alikhan (Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security); Mohammed Elibiari (member of the Advisory Council on National Security); Rashid Hussein (US Special Envoy for the Islamic Conference); Salam al-Marayati (founder of the Muslim Council on Public Relations); Imam Mohammed Majid (head of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), from 2011 onwards - adviser to the Ministry of National Security, as well as the FBI and State Department adviser); Ebu Patel (member of the Presidential Council for Religious Cooperation).
And the last. In the spring of Mississippi and Alabama, 2012 was surveyed on the subject of presidential faith. 45% of respondents from Alabama enrolled Obama in Muslims, and 41% found it difficult to answer. In the state of Mississippi, 52% already found Obama a Muslim, and 36% found it difficult to answer. The poll, it should be noted for the sake of objectivity, was conducted by the Republicans during election time.
Aaron Blake (Washington Post) in the July blog of the same year cited data from the “Pugh” poll, according to which the Americans were much more worried about the religion of Obama than the faith of his rival Mormon Mitt Romney.
A noticeably larger number of Americans (19 percent) expressed concern about the Obama religion. About faith, Romney experienced only 13 percent. The reason is probably that there are 17 percent of Americans who find their president a Muslim.
Finally, Matt Donnelly (Los Angeles Times) in an article from 25 of September 2012, the words of Madonna’s singer: “We have a black Muslim in the White House”. By the way, at that concert Madonna urged to vote for Obama.
In short, whatever religion Obama adheres to - Muslim or Christian - there is no faith to him. Speaking of democracy and freedoms, he infringes both the first and second - both in his own country and abroad, where the long arm of the NSA also reaches out. Protecting homosexuals and condemning Russia in this sense, B. Kh. Maintains warm relations with Saudi Arabia, where LGBT people caught in the curve with a saber truncate their heads. By the way, there is no democracy among the Saudis either, but this sin is redeemed by oil sold for petrodollars. Speaking about human rights and democracy in Syria, Obama is in favor of intervening and selling weapons to local “oppositionists” - read: Al-Qaida cells. Claiming his Christianity, he pronounced: "My Muslim faith."
Today, congressmen believe that the resolution on Syria from Mr. Obama is “not concrete”: in the same document (request for approval of a military operation) it is written that it is necessary to deliver a military strike, because the Syrian authorities violated the Chemical Weapons Convention, but that the settlement of the conflict in Syria can be exclusively political. The instability of double standards penetrated even into the document on the basis of which military orders are supposed to be issued. Isn't it right that Pipes wrote: “The way Obama managed with his religious past exposes his moral flaws more than any other deception”?
Well, let's repeat Obama's words about his own way of life: “To be responsible for our brothers and sisters, to do with others the way we want them to do to us.” So, Mr. Barak Hussein, do you want to be treated the same as you did to the Libyans? Just as you intend to do with the Syrians?
Observed and translated by Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
- especially for topwar.ru