The term "agent of influence" has ancient historical the roots. Initially, these were deeply classified people who were deported to neighboring tribes, cities, and communities in order to penetrate the highest echelons of power and undermine the power of rivals. Since then, little has changed. And this term has not lost its relevance in our days.
The Dulles Plan
In the Soviet Union, there were quite a lot of agents of influence, unfortunately, as well as the socialist countries of the Warsaw bloc. Thus, in Poland, Lech Walesa became a conductor for the interests of the CIA. But undermining the USSR has always been given the greatest influence.
This is how the future director of the CIA, A. Dulles, saw himself at the beginning of 1945: “The war will end, somehow everything will be settled, settled. And we will throw all that we have, all gold, all material aid or resources to fooling and fooling people. The human brain, the consciousness of people are capable of change. Having sowed chaos there, we quietly replace their values with false ones and make them believe in these false values. How? We will find our like-minded people, our assistants and allies in Russia itself. Episode by episode, the tragedy of the death of the most recalcitrant people on Earth, the final, irreversible extinction of their self-consciousness will be played out, grandiose in scale. From literature and art, for example, we will gradually eradicate their social essence, wean the artists, discourage them from being engaged in depicting, exploring, perhaps, those processes that occur in the depths of the masses. Literature, theater, cinema - everyone will depict and glorify the most base human feelings. We will in every way support and raise the so-called artists who will implant and grind into the human consciousness the cult of sex, violence, sadism, dissidence, in a word, of all immorality. In government we will create chaos and confusion ...
Honesty and decency will be ridiculed and no one needs, they will become a relic of the past. Rudeness and arrogance, lies and deceit, drunkenness, drug addiction, animal fear of each other and shamelessness, dissidence, nationalism and opposition of peoples - we will defuse and imperceptibly all this ...
We will shatter, thus, generation after generation ... We will take on people from childhood, youth, we will always rely on young people, we will decompose, corrupt, corrupt it. We will make of them the agents of our influence, the cosmopolitan of the free world. This is how we will do it. ”
Gorbachev and company
Unfortunately, these plans were fully implemented by the United States and its ideological allies. But still, the USSR had the opportunity to survive, if agents of influence had not penetrated to the highest echelons of power, and the most vivid example is the unforgettable M. Gorbachev, who exchanged our country for a condescending pat on the back of his "democratic" friends. There is no doubt that Mikhail Sergeevich was recruited as an agent of the influence of M. Thatcher, after one of the confidential conversations, when the “iron lady” pronounced that “you can deal with this person”. The West did not regret the praises for Gorbachev - so, he won the Nobel Prize, became the "best German". And his recent 80 anniversary, pompously marked in the UK and not very noticeable in the post-Soviet space, only proves once again that he has become his stranger, and what other assessment can there be of the political life of a strong Western influence agent. By the way, the same agents were Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev and Eduard Amvrosiyevich Shevardnadze, whom Gorbachev introduced into the top leadership of the country.
Yakovlev, being the USSR ambassador to Canada, spent his intoxicating days and nights in communication with Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau, forgetting to appoint a charge d'affaires, as required by the protocol. There is no doubt that the conditions for the recruitment of Yakovlev were ideal.
Shevardnadze inflicted tangible damage on the USSR, it was a super agent of influence. Having no experience in diplomatic work, he became Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR. He almost independently worked on disarmament of our country in favor of the United States. He did not inform other ministers about negotiations with representatives of foreign countries, as was customary earlier. He often spoke with US Secretary of State D. Baker, resorting only to the help of an American translator, without the presence of Soviet officials.
In December, 1989, during the Soviet-American summit in Malta, D. Baker shoved E. Shevardnadze into the pocket! The note wrote: "Opportunities lost as a result of military and economic assistance to foreign countries." There it was said about the expediency for the USSR to stop providing assistance to seven countries — Afghanistan, Angola, Cambodia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, and Vietnam. And it was proposed instead to build a plant for the production of toothpaste, soap and other perfumes. This is the most real instruction agent influence. He even managed to make territorial concessions in favor of the United States when he signed an agreement on the transfer of more than 50 thousand square kilometers of the disputed shelf in the Bering Sea to them!
The West exulted: the work of its agents and multibillion-dollar investments aimed at undermining the USSR were not in vain. Then there was an unsuccessful attempt of the State Emergency Committee to restore the status quo, which caused a stir in the West, then rampant "democracy" and those "values" that Dulles wrote about in 1945, then a parade of sovereignties.
L. Kravchuk from the "hundred brave"
Our independence is rooted in the past, in the work of US intelligence and in their own funding. This independence is worthless on the market day, since we cannot afford to pursue a truly independent foreign policy. The country is sitting on a multi-vector twine, like an aged acrobat with numb muscles. We constantly need foreign investment. Geographically, we are divided into different territories, with different views, ideology and worldview. There is no unity of the nation, in western regions neo-fascism and nationalism flourish. A whole club of Bandera lovers entered the parliament. Where did these agents influence financial support? After all, on some theses you will not get far, we live in the material world.
Who signed the Bialowieza Agreement? Kravchuk, Shushkevich, Yeltsin. This trio, of course, finally dealt the final blow to the USSR. At that time, Yeltsin was also the favorite of the West and the ideal of the “democratic” forces of Russia. And our first president, Kravchuk, who was he?
He wasn't even to be recruited. After all, he had a wonderful childhood, he passed the forge of personnel in the OUN-UPA, was a member of the "hundreds of brave young men" who were at the department of special purpose. Young people were divided into three age groups: 10-12 years, 13-15 years and 16-18 years. All these age and gender groups had their own tasks, actions and demands. The youngest were used as observers, reconnaissance and liaison officers, the older ones were used as saboteurs. And just in the “hundred brave young men”, the future President of Ukraine Leonid Kravchuk began his “career” as a scout. This "brave young man", like many aspiring Bandera, throwing weaponHe became involved in party and Komsomol work, so that later, when the time came, strike inside. They conducted secretive subversive work aimed at discrediting the Soviet government and the Communist Party, creating a negative image of them at any opportunity. This person also belongs to the category of agents of influence, only in the USSR he was in the second echelon, and after Belovezhya he moved to the highest echelon.
With this man, Ukraine has lost everything that is possible. A rich, prosperous, industrially developed republic, with a powerful agricultural sector, a good network of highways and railways, river and sea ports, fleet, shipbuilding factories and a population of 52 million people were completely consciously immersed in the economic abyss. And nuclear weapons were also disposed of under US supervision. Just like the army and navy.
At the same time, he did not hesitate, constantly trying to convince everyone that Ukraine did not need a fleet. Plants are also not needed. In general, we do not need anything. Only independence - apparently, independence from common sense. It is not surprising that in the photographs of those years L. Kravchuk had a frozen, blissful smile to death: the dreams of Bander and Shukhevychs came true: the USSR collapsed, and Ukraine’s best friend is America. The best symbol of the Kravchuk epoch is a “Kravchuchka” car, and unfortunately, this agent of influence, unfortunately, did not abandon his task of finishing off what was left of Soviet Ukraine.
Dioxin Yushchenko and his wife
After him, L. Kuchma, who, fortunately, was not tied up by ideological and other ties with the “civilized” West, became president. When it came a certain illusion of balance, he did not knock at the western gates for a long time, and partnership with the Russian Federation was a priority in foreign policy. This, of course, did not fit into the American model of the existence of Ukraine. And the exit was found. Leonid Danilovich repeatedly then complained that "America imposed the prime minister on him." This is, of course, about the torch of the national democracy V. Yushchenko.
But if America imposed the prime minister on Yushchenko to Kuchma, then it imposed on us the future president, whose rating at the end of his inglorious reign was 1%, like kefir. We all remember the orange events of 2004 of the year, when all the agents of US influence manifested themselves in full force, proving that it was not for nothing that they had eaten their own bread all these years. The case of Yushchenko’s poisoning was completely falsified, his blood samples were secretly exported to the USA, where they were enriched with dioxin, and the flight for treatment in Austria was covered with a dark mystery.
And Yushchenko’s wife, Katherine Chumachenko (from the diaspora), according to some sources, is a US intelligence agent named Martha. The BP commission had an audio recording that testified to Martha’s contact with a representative of the US intelligence service, dated October 2004. Odessa Research Institute of Forensic Expertise at the Ministry of Justice concluded that the voice of "Martha" is identical to the voice of Katerina Chumachenko. What a little swing: a married couple of agents of US influence at the head of a whole country, an independent country ...
Yushchenko appointed V. Nalyvaichenko as head of the Security Service of Ukraine, and in 2008, the most terrible scandal broke out in Ukraine in connection with the fact that US intelligence officers were given full access to the secret and top secret materials of the Security Service of Ukraine. It came to the point that they were allocated office offices in the main office of the SBU on the street. Vladimirskaya, 33. The CIA ruled there like at home. This is the security service, this is the class! This is independence!
However, one should not think that America was nursed only by Kravchuk and Yushchenko with his wife “Martha”. She always looked at those on whom it would be possible to bet in the future.
So in 2009, US Vice President Joe Biden publicly called our "front-line soldier" A. Yatsenyuk a "promising politician," clearly letting everyone know that Washington supports this person. Just as in 2004, Washington supported Yushchenko.
Yatsenyuk has a lot in common with America. In addition to frequent visits to America, both personal and business, he has time to see his sister Alina Petrovna Steele, who lives in Santa Barbara, California, there. The relationship between Yatsenyuk and the famous American homosexualist Andrew Sullivan, the author of such books as “Essentially normal: the debate about homosexuality”, “Same-sex marriage: pro and contra”, “Lost love: notes about friendship, sex and survival” also raises many questions. Yes, with Arseny Petrovich, a lot is not clear, much causes questions, but one thing is certain: he is a man committed to the interests of the United States and the cause of "democracy."
But even more causes our new political star - Vitali Klitschko. It's no secret that Ukraine is in the zone of close attention of the CIA. And no party has any real political independence, except for the Communist Party of Ukraine. There is a question of financing this new political entity. Klitschko himself answered this question extremely vague and vague. They used their money, they helped the medium business, but I could not advertise them by name, it was very dangerous, the consequences could be, etc., etc. The thesis about using your money in the political struggle is naive and designed for people with very rich in imagination.
There is no doubt that the passage of "BLOW" to parliament was a rehearsal of the presidential election-2015, whose ultimate goal is Klitschko-president.
How was yesterday's boxer able to achieve a successful passage to BP in a short time, who was behind him? How did yesterday's boxer want to be president tomorrow? This is the plot for Andersen, although even for the great storyteller such a plot is too fantastic. From the ring to the presidential chair ... an incredible leap and unthinkable, if someone is not worth it, someone who knows how to jump right, where to get money for the needs of the party, who know PR technology, who is connected with international financial elites - for example, with the Rothschilds. With whom Pinchuk has a close relationship. And that with Klitschko also maintains a close relationship.
In the election race at the Kyiv City Council, Klitschko Sr. was advised by the former mayor of New York, Rudolf Giuliani and the mayor of Berlin, Klaus Wowereit. For a long time, the media discussed the topic of Klitschko’s links with one of the leaders of Kiev organized crime, Viktor Ivanovich Rybalko (Rybka). There were even published his pictures with the Klitschko brothers, made in New York. In May 2005 of the Year, “Rybka” was shot by unknown persons in the center of Kiev. Apparently, it was then that the brothers who provide our vaunted independence took up their business. The choice of our guardians fell on the eldest of the boxer brothers - Vitali Klitschko.
Klitschko's office and Interpipe's office are located in the same business center, and the ways of Pinchuk and Klitschko at social events and boxing fights intersect. Most likely, Pinchuk relies on Klitschko, and Klitschko received funding for the maintenance and organization of an election campaign throughout the country. Separate attention deserve the connection of Victor Pinchuk with George Soros. Soros himself is often accused of being the “wallet” of oppositions around the world. So, with a boxer who wants to become president, everything is also not clear and transparent.
In recent years, the years of independence, this is the period of control of the agents of influence of Ukraine. The country is shaking like a Foucault pendulum, no stops are foreseen. Because those who work out their content and high patronage are not at all interested in stability and order. In the muddy water, the fish is easier to catch, and if you put things in order, then there is no time to steal. And they, like puppets, obediently pull hands and feet, when puppeteers drive their chopsticks over their heads. It goes without saying that without sacrifices - for example, Yushchenko’s puppet turned from a US pet into a political corpse without a single chance for revival. But he does not cause pity - when one doll breaks, the puppeteers find new toys for themselves. It is a pity that we, ordinary citizens of independent Ukraine, become hostages and victims of these manipulations. The victims of someone else’s influence that is hostile to us.