Military Review

Defense Ministry will test the new Russian aircraft "Rysachok"

35



The Russian light multipurpose aircraft “Rysachok”, as planned, will pass a test at the State Flight Test Center (GLITS) in Akhtubinsk before the end of the year, where it will be tested by military pilots, said Deputy Designer General of the State Progress Rocket and Space Center Yevgeny Shtanko.

The Rysachok aircraft was designed in the 2007 year, and the first flight was made in the 2010 year. A pilot batch of five aircraft, of which three are flying.

“The Ministry of Defense wants to try this aircraft as a search and reconnaissance, patrol and, of course, training aircraft. In the near future, the aircraft will be tested by 929-th GLITs in Akhtubinsk, a technical task plan for the Russian Air Force will be written, and we will be able to do it for these requirements. I think that at the end of this year, the military will look at it and make their assessment, ”Shtanko said, RIA reports.News».

For the needs of the security forces, “Rysachok” can be equipped with a side-view locator, which will be installed in the container under the case, an optical-electronic system for detecting and specifying the coordinates of the target. If necessary, it can even install light weapons, said Shtanko.

In the "Rysachka" while there are Czech engines. However, Shtanko said that the Moscow Motor-Building Plant "Salyut" is making its own development on the technical specifications of the designer "Rysachka" Vyacheslav Kondratieff. “The 500 TV-630 engine is already in a good stage, they literally make their own money and do it with enthusiasm. If everything goes well, they will certify it by the end of 2014, ”Shtanko emphasized. He added that the Ramenskoye Instrument Engineering Design Bureau is developing avionics for Rysachka (while American avionics are being used). If these two enterprises fulfill all the tasks, then as a result, the designers of TsSKB Progress will have a fully domestic aircraft without the use of foreign components.
Originator:
http://www.vz.ru/news/2013/8/31/648060.html
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Cuba86
    Cuba86 2 September 2013 07: 09 New
    +8
    Maybe we will raise small aircraft too? Oh, I would like to!
    1. Recon
      Recon 2 September 2013 07: 42 New
      +4
      If only there was everything, domestic ..
    2. Sergh
      Sergh 2 September 2013 07: 43 New
      +8
      Yes, this is not "Rysachek", this is a real "Rasak"! Probably takes about ten passengers. I would have bought one for myself in cooperation for two or three. A wonderful device!

      1. Tersky
        Tersky 2 September 2013 08: 22 New
        +7
        Quote: Sergh
        I would have bought one for myself in cooperation for two or three. Wonderful machine!

        Sergey, take a share, laughing , we’ll open the non-stop line Moscow-Johannesburg. We will scrabble the beavers unnecessarily .., or we will scoop immensely laughing
        1. Very old
          Very old 2 September 2013 08: 47 New
          +1
          On a safari? Fully usable car
          1. Sergh
            Sergh 2 September 2013 09: 09 New
            +5
            Quote: Tersky
            non-stop line Moscow-Johannesburg. Bobla raking

            Vitya, then Uryupinsk-Johannesburg is better, otherwise they will definitely tear us into daisies in the capital with sacks of bruliks! In Uryupinsk, we will dig a hole deeper and plant the cashier, let him sell it in bulk or in glasses, you look and people will reach out, so later you can adjust a couple of Poplar and Yars for guards, let them shoot near the cashier occasionally, everything will be calmer in my soul!
    3. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 2 September 2013 09: 33 New
      +1
      Quote: Cuba86
      Maybe we will raise small aircraft too?

      Here is the finished foundation for it. Yes, An-2-100.
    4. AVV
      AVV 2 September 2013 10: 39 New
      0
      How necessary is it for the whole country !!! The territory is large, and local aviation is in decline !!!
  2. pinecone
    pinecone 2 September 2013 07: 50 New
    +5
    The Ministry of Defense wants to try this aircraft as a search and reconnaissance, patrol and, of course, training.

    It looks like a car for transporting top managers and other responsible comrades.
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 2 September 2013 08: 00 New
      +4
      Quote: pinecone
      for transportation of top managers and other responsible comrades.

      Yes, there is at least tobacco and sausage on it, just remember to throw chairs out onto the street.
      Right now I look TTX and wonder

      TECH SPECS
      Crew: 1-2
      Passenger Capacity: up to 10
      Capacity: 1500 kg
      Length: 12,44 m
      Wingspan: 18 m
      Height: 5,38 m
      Wing area: 32,3 m2
      Maximum takeoff weight: 6000 kg
      Fuel mass in internal tanks: kg 1520
      Powerplant: 2 × TVD General Electric H80
      Engine power: 2 × 760 hp
      Screw Diameter: 2,3 M


      Flight characteristics
      Cruising speed: 250-400 km / h
      Practical range: 2000 km
      Service ceiling: 6000 m
      Length of takeoff: 370 m
      Mileage length: 350 m (600 m without reverse)

      In the first post above, even the number of passengers was unaware!
      1. zzaharr
        zzaharr 2 September 2013 09: 57 New
        0
        Is this data from the wiki? Where is JE from when the Czech Walters are standing?
    2. denson06
      denson06 2 September 2013 10: 32 New
      0
      In a word - great .. looks .. AN-2-100 still flies of course with new engines, but this device is a completely different story ..
      I did not find the device on MAX-2013 ... maybe I was looking badly ..
      (http://topwar.ru/32721-maks-2013-fotootchet-za-31082013.html)
    3. Muadipus
      Muadipus 2 September 2013 11: 17 New
      0
      Exactly! I have the opinion that not for study and reconnaissance the airplane is purchased. and for charters of top managers in uniform.
      1. Muadipus
        Muadipus 2 September 2013 11: 26 New
        0
        and also .. he is ugly. The plane must be beautiful, so that the sky will fall in love with him.
        1. zzaharr
          zzaharr 2 September 2013 11: 56 New
          +1
          and also .. he is ugly.


          Very elegant with its utilitarianism
    4. JonnyT
      JonnyT 2 September 2013 13: 33 New
      +1
      But how do you like this look?
  3. kafa
    kafa 2 September 2013 08: 02 New
    +1
    For the needs of security forces, the "Rysachok" can be equipped with a side-view locator, which will be installed in a container under the body, an optoelectronic system for detecting and indicating target coordinates. If necessary, even light weapons can be installed on it, Shtanko noted. and also a dozer blade jack and tank turret laughing
  4. Marconi41
    Marconi41 2 September 2013 08: 24 New
    +5
    Yeah. Patrol plane, fly around the fires or what? Even the search and rescue option is very doubtful.
    But for small aircraft is an entirely acceptable topic.
    1. roial
      roial 2 September 2013 12: 09 New
      0
      Just the thing
      - low fuel consumption
      - great barathing time
      - inexpensive operation

      Light aircraft DA42 MPP NG is used by border guard service of Ukraine as a patrol
      - Designed for battery life for 13 hours when patrolling a given area at a range of up to 1200 nautical miles
      - fuel consumption 35 l / hour
      Each aircraft is equipped with a powerful on-board complex, including a multifunctional platform for installing a gyro-stabilized camera, operating both in the visible and infrared ranges, with live video transmission and recording in HD format. The aircraft are equipped with a microwave data exchange system between the side and the ground station, which provides high-quality video information transmission over a distance of more than 100 nautical miles, as well as a satellite data transmission system from board to ground outside the line of sight. Operators' workstations on board and on the ground are equipped with computers with LCD displays that allow the identification of ground objects, significantly increasing the effectiveness of monitoring.
  5. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 2 September 2013 08: 45 New
    +1
    And what will the generals fly to the dacha? And you have already rolled out your lips to buy yourself!
  6. Kolya
    Kolya 2 September 2013 08: 49 New
    +3
    This Rusachek could be a good substitute for small Canadian aircraft that Russia plans to purchase, as described in an article on the site.
  7. saag
    saag 2 September 2013 08: 53 New
    0
    Name must be changed
  8. Vtel
    Vtel 2 September 2013 08: 55 New
    0
    He added that the Ramenskoye instrument-making design bureau is developing avionics for the “Rysachka” (while American avionics is being used on it)

    That he looks like an American, but sho nezya Russian appearance to him, was to give - Boing 777.
  9. Ivan79
    Ivan79 2 September 2013 09: 05 New
    +1
    Beautiful airplane. Yes, and ours, Russian.
  10. King
    King 2 September 2013 09: 07 New
    0
    norms apparatus for small aircraft in the development of the north just right
  11. ramsi
    ramsi 2 September 2013 09: 10 New
    +1
    for take-off and landing on the primer, a high wing would be preferable, and so it is more passenger than special
    1. zzaharr
      zzaharr 2 September 2013 09: 55 New
      0
      What is preferable? Low wing is quite convenient for unpaved strips. The only minus is a large loading height, well, so it will not carry bags from cement on it.
      1. cosmos111
        cosmos111 2 September 2013 10: 20 New
        0

        Defense Ministry will test the new Russian aircraft "Rysachok"

        Great news. It’s a pity only MO, it is necessary to connect the Ministry of Emergencies, BB MVV. And the most important thing is to create a state ... airline, local and regional airlines. With 100% domestic fleet.
      2. ramsi
        ramsi 2 September 2013 11: 02 New
        0
        Quote: zzaharr
        What is preferable? Low wing is quite convenient for unpaved strips. The only minus is a large loading height, well, so it will not carry bags from cement on it.

        air intakes, of course, are made competently, but still, this is not jet thrust, but the screw diameter - 2.3m
        1. zzaharr
          zzaharr 2 September 2013 11: 47 New
          +1
          Quote: ramsi
          air intakes, of course, are made competently, but still, this is not jet thrust, but the screw diameter - 2.3m

          That's where the ass is with the air intakes. And nothing, 7000 of these AirKings have been riveted and still fly from Africa to Alaska.

          And with screws, the main thing is that the bottom point would be higher than 400 mm, the rest is garbage.
  12. Alexey M
    Alexey M 2 September 2013 09: 39 New
    +2
    I wonder who came up with the name? And why is he the Ministry of Defense? And by the way, such airplanes were invented and made in metal more than a dozen than this one is better? At least "Gzhel"
    1. zzaharr
      zzaharr 2 September 2013 09: 53 New
      +1
      Gzhel is smaller and heavier.
    2. cosmos111
      cosmos111 2 September 2013 10: 34 New
      +2
      Quote: Alexey M
      better? Here at least "Gzhel"

      Be-103 completed on July 15, 1997. Certification tests of the Be-103 amphibian were completed in 2001. Why mass production has not begun. The aircraft should be of interest to me first of all. The plane is an amphibian, there are places where there are no airfields, and there are enough rivers in Russia. the plane is coming.
  13. MilaPhone
    MilaPhone 2 September 2013 09: 43 New
    +2
    Nice plane. I hope he will have a more fortunate fate than that of the Myasischevsky M-101T Gzhel.
  14. zzaharr
    zzaharr 2 September 2013 10: 01 New
    0
    The military certainly has its own plans, but in the civilian world it will have to compete primarily with de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter-Twin Otter



    and our Czech Elka 410

    The latter, by the way, has long been in the Air Force and seems to suit everyone
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 2 September 2013 10: 42 New
      0
      Quote: zzaharr
      and our Czech Elka 410

      Quote: zzaharr
      first with de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter-Twin Otter

      Why do we need to create jobs for Canadians and Czechs?
      We still have 60's developed, domestic regional aircraft. Be-32 New avionics and engines and in flight.
      Only state support in financing and government orders are needed.
      1. zzaharr
        zzaharr 2 September 2013 11: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: cosmos111
        Why do we need to create jobs for Canadians and Czechs?
        We still have 60's developed, domestic regional aircraft. Be-32 New avionics and engines and in flight.

        Ural metallurgists negodue! Aircraft Industries is our company, 100% alloys for aircraft from Pervouralsk. I can’t say anything for Canadians.
        Be-32MK is a good plane, so who's stopping it? Take it and build.

        And you can also C-80GP to the heap. There will be real competition and profit for the operators.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 2 September 2013 13: 44 New
    +1
    Two things will instantly lift our small aircraft. Firstly, permission to fly anything up to an altitude of 500 meters, provided that you do not meddle in the areas of responsibility of airports. And the abolition of the wild "notification" order of flights. If in some industry someone is "putting things in order" - ie. accepts a package of restrictive documents - he wants to destroy this industry, which we have done with small aircraft. Given - to inflict the greatest possible damage on Russia in the tactics of mosquito injections - i.e. harm wherever possible. One way is to slow down operational communications by blocking rapid, unexpected long-distance movements. We buy a couple of "supporters of order" in the Moscow ministry, they are lobbying for the above restrictions - profit!
    Our country is huge. The blockade of small aircraft is causing tremendous damage ... and you will not get to the bottom of it! We are for order! What is it, whoever will fly on anything? But what if?! And under this meaningful "suddenly" damage is done to the State. What "suddenly" then? Some kind of burdock flew out on a cracked stool and was killed. Are we going to save him? I'll tell you a secret - he will be killed anyway, just by car or from the shore will jump ... He's a burdock! Climbed into the airport's area of ​​responsibility? Send a helicopter, land and penalize in such a way that he would work on a fine for the rest of his life, and bequeathed him to his grandchildren. It works great on the most reckless, in America it has been checked repeatedly. With them, no one bothers people to fly, if they need to. And, you will not believe, they do not collide with Boeings!
    But what am I talking about ... because we are inferior! We can’t do anything! These bright elf-like Americans can own weapons, fly, register cars under any numbers ... smelly silver-footed subhuman of all this cannot be solved in any way! Ugh ...