Military Review

USA - a banal nationalist state

141
The situation around Syria began to develop not according to the “democratic” American scenario. Not only is it unable to create a large-scale coalition against Syria, but the proven "democracies" refuse to fully support the United States. The English Parliament suddenly “failed” its Premier D. Cameron, and demanded evidence of the use of chemical weapons B. Assad, which he could not provide. And the House of Commons of England imposed a veto on the Syrian war, before the presentation of indisputable evidence. And this is England, which is also called America's "unsinkable aircraft carrier"! No better attitude to the Syrian adventure of the United States and many other seemingly proven American satellites.


What's happening? Riot on the "American ship"? A revolt is not a revolt, but, apparently, political scientist M.Hazin is right when he speaks of a split in the Western elites on fundamental, financial issues in the first place. This split manifests itself, for example, in the reaction of the Western media to E. Snowden’s revelations of the world CIA-NSA espionage. It was not by chance that the English “Guardian” published Snowden’s expose, behind it, apparently, by influential forces, which this time set the bandwagon to the States in the House of Commons.

It is known that in times of crisis there are “moments of truth” when the secret becomes apparent. And now Washington, represented by US National Security Council spokesman Caitlin Hayden, makes a remarkable statement on Syria: The United States will act "unilaterally in its national interests." Like this…

This time, the United States fails, it seems, to pass off its policy as “democratic and universal”, and it turns out that mercenary national interests are hiding behind it, so sometimes sheep’s mouth is hidden behind sheep's skin. And it becomes clear that the United States is a banal nationalist state.

In the old days, such powers conducted a “divide and conquer” policy in the “third world”; today it is somewhat modernized into “controlled chaos”, when “controlled” civil strife is provoked. But if “chaos” fails, as in Syria, when there is not enough “soft power” to maintain it, we have to go back to the good old “politics of the gunboats”. And democratic myths ... can wait.

In a recent interview with CNN, Barack Obama stated that the United States remains an “indispensable nation” in the unstable Middle East and in other regions of the world. “We need to think strategically and understand what actions will meet our long-term national interests.”

He said quite seriously about his “irreplaceable nation” in the world, and the most striking thing is that in America they see nothing special in it. This is a banality for Americans, this wonderful idea has become a common place there. They seriously think so. There is even a corresponding ideological concept - “American exclusiveness”, according to which Americans occupy a special place among other nations.

And here one American military man, a colonel, under the camera, in a documentary film explained the torture of those arrested by his subordinates in Abu Great prison in Iraq: after all, we Americans know how to distinguish bad from good ...

And woe to those whom they appointed to be "bad", "they are to blame for everything." All of us are not sinless - there are no sinless people in the world, but who do Americans think they are?

We remember who, in the past century, declared the Aryan nation to be remarkably exceptional — albeit in a more superior “higher” degree, but this is not fundamental - having the right to execute and pardon other nations. It was Adolf Hitler.
Author:
141 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. serge-68-68
    serge-68-68 31 August 2013 08: 03 New
    30
    Does it make sense to criticize the obvious? "Promotion of democratic values" has long been an element of US policy to safeguard its interests in the world. Perhaps there was once a long "romantic period", but a very long time ago.
    1. Civil
      Civil 31 August 2013 08: 13 New
      +4
      Any sane state first of all pursues its national interests. And he extols the interests of his nation over the values ​​of other nations, it is for this created.
      1. TS3sta3
        TS3sta3 31 August 2013 08: 44 New
        60
        any normal state in its national interests solves its problems either alone or in cooperation with others. but the fascist regimes solve their national problems at the expense of others. this is the difference between normal states and these fascists from the west and because of the oken.
        1. SASCHAmIXEEW
          SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 11: 43 New
          +3
          1000 +++++++++++++++++++
        2. VKabanov
          VKabanov 31 August 2013 14: 36 New
          +3
          Truly plus
        3. _Forgiven_
          _Forgiven_ 1 September 2013 23: 53 New
          0
          Here I agree with you entirely. The Nazis always did dirty tricks on people but not on their own. Such, the puppeteers tattered ... The hour is not far off when all this pimple on the planet’s ass will simply decay so much that it will not be possible to cure it.
          And the phrases of course their politicians cast serious: We are an irreplaceable nation ... AHAHAH They probably threw something before talking such a heresy on camera. If you dig deeper, the American nation was destroyed by "fiery water" by the British and French for a very long time. And the mass of people who live in the territory of the present United States is simply the occupiers. And the invaders have never been an indispensable nation. They usually did not live long ...
      2. Papakiko
        Papakiko 31 August 2013 10: 59 New
        14
        Quote: Civil
        And he extols the interests of his nation over the values ​​of other nations, it is for this created.

        It can and can be created, but on the blood and genocide of hundreds of millions (today) of people who once lived in the vastness of North America and other parts of the world. And this is not counting the fact that the United States is a bunch of clan-financial-national trust-corporations (Jewish, Italian, French, English, Dutch and so on)

        The article is not correctly named.
        View "Ordinary Fascism" (Dok.film 1965) and one is enough to confirm that
        US Fascist State.

        Fascism (Italian: fascismo from fascio “union, bundle, bundle, unification”) is a generalized name for extreme right-wing political movements, ideologies and the corresponding form of government of a dictatorial type (electors prescribe the presidency), which are characterized by nationalism, a personality cult (Cult of dough and the rich), militarism, totalitarianism.
      3. smile
        smile 31 August 2013 11: 29 New
        +6
        Civil
        But not every state, through the mouth of its leaders, declares its nation God's chosen to bring about a new ordnung on the planet. For this, the state has not been created; for this, aggressive regimes are created that are dreaming of world domination.
        1. novobranets
          novobranets 31 August 2013 14: 05 New
          +1
          He also considered himself God's chosen. Http: //topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/788/rbmw746.jpg He finished poorly.
      4. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 11: 42 New
        +4
        The United States was created by Jews + Anglo-Saxons, now this country is ruled by the Jewish-Jewish upper elite in the person of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers And their value is their wallet! Jews always have that, in the first place seven, and then mani mani ... !!!
      5. starshina78
        starshina78 31 August 2013 23: 05 New
        +5
        Talk to any American and see how narrow his horizons are. He wholeheartedly loves the country, the President, blindly believes in the correctness of everything that the president and congress do, each house has a flagpole with a flag, or the flag hangs at home, they all know the anthem and put their hands to their chest while the anthem is playing, but still they limited people, their stubbornness and tyranny are endless, arrogant and rude, terrible informers, in a word - the Americans. Hence, such a state is moronic!
        1. papas-57
          papas-57 1 September 2013 15: 43 New
          0
          If from childhood you drive a child into the head that he is the best, the child will believe in this sacredly. The Americans have been driven into the head for more than a dozen years and they believe. After all, we were the same, but we have all this in the past.
          1. Cyber7
            Cyber7 1 September 2013 16: 23 New
            +5
            Do not distort. We were driven into the head for a long time that "communism is good." And there was some truth in this. Since socialism, or to the limit - communism - is the best form of government for our people. Democracy is the best form of government for the United States, but not for everyone else. And we ourselves built factories and factories, ourselves flew into space, ourselves invented lasers.
            We are proud that we are not aggressors, that we can live peacefully in a world of aggressors and in the absence of allies. What we dream about space exploration, but able to protect ourselves. Sami, without Europe and other countries.
            Nobody ever hammered this into our heads.
            I'm sorry.
        2. ksv1973
          ksv1973 1 September 2013 17: 12 New
          +2
          Good morning, Comrade Sergeant!
          You are right - their limitations are indescribable !!!
          The silly and rude nature of their state, as well as of individuals, is unlimited. But one cannot be indignant at the behavior of patients in a psychiatric boarding school, especially since the management of this boarding school is drawn from among its patients.
      6. IT
        IT 1 September 2013 04: 07 New
        +1
        Yes, the fact of the matter is that behind these interests is not a nation, but American oil companies, local oligarchs. The average statistical American benefits from this war 0. Taxes will not lower, social standards will not raise.
      7. ksv1973
        ksv1973 1 September 2013 17: 01 New
        +1
        I completely agree with you. The struggle of any state for its interests, as well as any person for its own, is just a manifestation of natural selection. Here only one individual walks on the corpses for his own purpose, and the other, moving forward himself, helps others to stay on my feet, sometimes disinterestedly. And somehow I don’t recall a single case of disinterestedness in the whole history of the USA. And this is due to the fact that North American statehood was initially "sharpened" to profit in any way, because it was originally formed and It continues to emerge from the losers, who have come and are coming to this earth in pursuit of "the light of the American dream."
        A person who has nothing to lose is no longer too scrupulous in choosing the means to achieve his goals. And, given that these were originally that made up 99 percent and continues to make up North American society (already at the genetic-psychological level), one should not be surprised that this society back in the second half of the 19 century, having eaten itself from the inside, it began to eat outside its range.
        1. Cyber7
          Cyber7 1 September 2013 17: 25 New
          0
          Natural selection is when the strong devours the weak or sick. There is no concept of compassion in natural selection. That is, when someone helps the weak against the strong predator.
          This is a human right to go against the "natural" laws.
          Is not it?
          1. ksv1973
            ksv1973 1 September 2013 17: 49 New
            +2
            Hi Cyber7!
            The fact of the matter is that in the process of global natural selection, America showed itself to be the 100% predator that has NOTHING human. And Russia ... Somewhere in Europe or Asia there are monuments to the fallen Americans, about which you can read though would be on wikipedia?
            1. Cyber7
              Cyber7 1 September 2013 18: 09 New
              +1
              Hello, private as-you-there. :)
              My name is Alexey.
              Quote: ksv1973
              America has shown itself to be a 100% predator

              A predator eats only when it is hungry. America is not a predator, it is an aggressor who grabs everything that is bad.
              Quote: ksv1973
              Anywhere in Europe or Asia there are monuments to fallen Americans, about which you can read at least Wikipedia?

              Beautifully noticed. I will remember.
              1. ksv1973
                ksv1973 1 September 2013 18: 51 New
                0
                HELLO again, Alexey! I’m Sergey.
                Thanks for good words!
                And about the USA, in nature there are such predators that make a supply of food (wolves, for example)
                and play with the victim for fun (the whole family of cats). And in the stomachs of sharks they just couldn’t find! And the USA is a constantly hungry old shark. It eats everything in a row! The teeth have already faded. Here you have to hook a new big meat grinder to swallow it’s ready soft stuffing. And there, you look, and new teeth climb.
      8. alex13-61
        alex13-61 1 September 2013 18: 37 New
        0
        Quote: Civil
        Any sane state first of all pursues its national interests.

        I agree with that
        Quote: Civil
        And extol the interests of his nation over the values ​​of other nations

        but not with that.
      9. 225chay
        225chay 1 September 2013 21: 31 New
        0
        Quote: Civil
        Any sane state first of all pursues its national interests. And he extols the interests of his nation over the values ​​of other nations, it is for this created.

        I don’t know what about the nationalist, but rather, the United States looks like a fascist state
    2. Igor39
      Igor39 31 August 2013 08: 15 New
      12
      The romantic period was when they fought with the British, and then it began, the destruction of the indigenous population, the slave trade, the deception of their own people, the segregation of the population, the use of chemical weapons in Vietnam, etc., etc., in short, complete democracy.
    3. svp67
      svp67 31 August 2013 08: 15 New
      23
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Does it make sense to criticize the obvious?

      Yes, yes. Since in our country and in neighboring countries there are a number of people who "sacredly" and "for money" believe in this "American fairy tale ..." and are actively trying to promote it, for often to the detriment of the interests of their homeland, and " common sense "in general ...
      1. Sergh
        Sergh 31 August 2013 11: 10 New
        13
        Yes, to hell with these amers, as they were dumb, they remained, but you can look at these Syrian guys with pride and even envy!



        The latest roundups for August 30th:

        1. Radoslav
          Radoslav 1 September 2013 07: 27 New
          +3
          Thank you guys, protecting your country. YOU defend our Motherland Russia with your lives. THANKS YOU!
    4. Che
      Che 31 August 2013 12: 14 New
      +1
      There is even a corresponding ideological concept - “American exceptionalism”, according to which Americans occupy a special place among other nations.

      wassat Well amers made laugh I can’t. The exceptional is that countless others like them have killed.
    5. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 31 August 2013 12: 18 New
      +2
      "We remember who in the last century declared the Aryan nation remarkably exceptional, - although to a more excellent" higher "degree, but this is not of principle - having the right to execute and pardon other nations. It was Adolf Hitler." - Well, of course the story repeats itself. The new “adolf” with the “new fascist regime”, with the only difference being that Hitler was independent and Obama was a pawn. Just now there are many more followers of this regime than Adolf had.
      1. pavlo
        pavlo 1 September 2013 00: 26 New
        +1
        which means non-dependent, the Americans gave him money on credit and others, the goal is one, and even with the wrong hands, to crush the USSR !!!
      2. 123123123
        123123123 1 September 2013 02: 40 New
        +2
        Hitler was exactly the same pawn !!
    6. novobranets
      novobranets 31 August 2013 14: 50 New
      +8
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Perhaps there was once a long "romantic period", but a very long time ago.

      the United States as they were, they have remained so. But the world around them is changing. About twenty years ago, could it be supposed that such a small country like Syria would dare to disobey the "ruler of the world." Vietnam seems to have been forgotten a long time ago, the time has come for a new lesson. This time the Middle East has shown that it does not need democracy. So: Indochina, the Middle East, Afghanistan, who else should pay for the "education" of the United States with their blood? Who hasn’t tasted the delights of democracy? Gradually, the thing is to show the states that the training is finished, it’s time to answer ... Sloppy, damn it, it turned out, well, as I could. repeat
      1. ksv1973
        ksv1973 1 September 2013 17: 28 New
        +1
        Novobranets is right. And not at all "clumsy, damn it happened."
        Here is just one thing, my friend, understand, before they fought to gain a foothold. And now, so as not to sway, because the sphincter is already weak, the contents do not hold.
    7. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 1 September 2013 02: 54 New
      +4
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Perhaps there was once a long "romantic period", but a very long time ago.


      He was never. A nation born of runaway gallows, by definition, has nothing romantic.
      1. ksv1973
        ksv1973 3 September 2013 18: 48 New
        0
        A nation born of runaway gallows, by definition, has nothing romantic.
    8. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 1 September 2013 15: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Does it make sense to criticize the obvious? "Promotion of democratic values" has long been an element of US policy to safeguard its interests in the world. Perhaps there was once a long "romantic period", but a very long time ago.

      There is a point, because the obvious is not obvious to everyone.
      It is symbolic that the American flag resembles a terrible work-holding past, looks like a slave’s body in bloody scourges, and in the coat of arms is a cowardly corpse-eagle.
    9. Quiet
      Quiet 5 September 2013 19: 41 New
      0
      Perhaps there was once a long "romantic period", but a very long time ago.

      Maybe there are historians on the site who will try to recall this exceptional case ???
  2. a52333
    a52333 31 August 2013 08: 10 New
    +6
    In a recent interview with CNN, Barack Obama said the US remains an “indispensable nation” in the unstable Middle East and other regions of the world.
    I wonder how is it there? Can it sit after thrashing? tongue
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 11: 58 New
      +2
      Indispensable in the "toilet" where they are wet by the Syrians !!! In Vietnam, they got it to the fullest, and everything to the Jewish Zionists is lacking, guys play out, wake up .....
  3. Denis
    Denis 31 August 2013 08: 15 New
    +6
    And this is England, which is also called the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of America!
    This is usually called Japan
    However, what is the difference? If we take naval terms, then both are latrine
    And their masters love to compare themselves with the homeland of shit-democracy, the Roman Empire. Also a parasitic country, have they produced anything besides blah blah blah and Roman?
  4. edge
    edge 31 August 2013 08: 20 New
    +7
    What's happening? The riot on the "American ship"? As usual, the amers ... they all fled to us and are now waiting for support from them (they took the gold stock from the FRG for storage and refused to return it: they replaced the sold gold with tungsten from China and the like)
    1. mole
      mole 31 August 2013 18: 14 New
      +1
      We will replace it with titanium! drinks
  5. avant-garde
    avant-garde 31 August 2013 08: 34 New
    10
    I'm wondering, but what kind of nation is the Americans ???
    1. TS3sta3
      TS3sta3 31 August 2013 08: 52 New
      19
      really. the nation "Americans" does not exist, it is just a self-name for a gathering of migrants from other countries. a nation has a culture, tradition, a history to be proud of, the principles of life, after all. "Americans" do not have a single sign of a nation. How can you be proud of a hamburger and genocide? "you can," the Americans answer.
      1. Maverick78
        Maverick78 31 August 2013 09: 54 New
        11
        Here is a very interesting point. They CREATE their pseudo-culture, which they successfully export by any means around the world. The American way of life is considered by many to be an ideal, McDonald's is the greatest invention, moronic cartoons are the standard of culture. The whole world is watching THEIR films. listens to their music, their news. In fact, everything is very serious. At the state level, so far it has not been possible to resist such dominance. This must be done at the individual family level. Many in this world condemn the United States, but want to live like Americans. And this is a big problem.
        1. Proud.
          Proud. 31 August 2013 11: 22 New
          +5
          Quote: Maverick78
          The whole world is watching THEIR films. listens to their music, their news.

          That's for sure. Some characters are everywhere:
        2. SASCHAmIXEEW
          SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 17: 03 New
          +3
          And who will say how to live in American? From their films, which are mainly staged by emigrants, one can see the Western way of life, nothing more, that is, worship of money, profit, greed, a complete set of sins!
          1. Stalinets
            Stalinets 31 August 2013 21: 18 New
            +2
            Films set by the Jews. Like everywhere today. Read "Jewish Catachesis in the USSR."
          2. pavlo
            pavlo 1 September 2013 00: 30 New
            0
            Speak honestly — not immigrants — but Jews — if I'm not right — let me be banned — or whatever it is called.
        3. puskarinkis
          puskarinkis 31 August 2013 17: 20 New
          +8
          Perhaps for this reason, the West is so actively destroying the institution of the family. All kinds of sexual deviations are cultivated, like polygamous families, gender mixing, restriction of the rights of parents, etc. ... The family is the place where Other values ​​can be instilled! And the West does not need this! We need slaves who faithfully believe that it should be so.
        4. Stalinets
          Stalinets 31 August 2013 21: 20 New
          +2
          This is in Kiev, McDonald's is something cool, and in America mostly black people go there. yes
      2. fedorovith
        fedorovith 31 August 2013 14: 26 New
        +3
        This is a nation that has no homeland. They have a homeland where the ass is warm.
      3. ksv1973
        ksv1973 1 September 2013 18: 25 New
        +3
        Hello, dear TS3sta3! You are wrong, the US nation has distinct signs:
        1 idiocy (as a diagnosis)
        2. Dullness and limitation (as a fact)
        3: Faith in God (as an excuse for items 1 and 2)
        and traditions:
        1. Money is God.
        2.In God We Trust.
        3.Oh, my God !!! (Everywhere and for every reason)
    2. mole
      mole 31 August 2013 18: 17 New
      +2
      Quote: avant-garde
      I'm wondering, but what kind of nation is the Americans ???

      New, without history. Cosmopolitans repeat There is no history, no moral foundations
      and values! Only a bloody trace in history!
    3. Denis
      Denis 31 August 2013 18: 54 New
      13
      Quote: avant-garde
      I'm wondering, but what kind of nation is the Americans ???
      Such. See photo
  6. OTTO
    OTTO 31 August 2013 08: 35 New
    15
    "In a recent interview with CNN, Barack Obama said the US remains an“ indispensable nation. ""
    He is absolutely right if, if the American nation does not become, it will not be necessary to replace anyone. Why do we need another parasite nation whose merits are all that it has convinced the whole world that cut green paper is of great value?
  7. an_ursus
    an_ursus 31 August 2013 08: 36 New
    12
    The United States of America is a typical fascist state structure, surrounded by a fence of an electronic concentration camp. Fascist ideology covered by “SMOKE”, plus hedonism ..... Another explosive device .... In an interview with Voice of Russia, Paul Craig Roberts, deputy secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, said that the United States was controlled by a “government,” who came to power as a result of a military coup. "
    Another quote: "... Congress relinquishes its authority because it is simply intimidated. It is afraid. The so-called war on terror gave the executive branch the opportunity to simply push the other two branches of government as unnecessary." ...

    Read in full: http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_07_24/SSHA-i-RF-pomenjalis-roljami-posle-holodnoj-vojni-
    Mnenie-insajdera-9460 /
    1. a52333
      a52333 31 August 2013 09: 01 New
      +4
      There now asses are smoking !!! Fun!
      Because of the Syrian chemical weapons story, Barack Obama has become much more critical. If Obama gives the green light to the intervention in Syria, then in the eyes of the liberal-minded part of society he will act just like Bush and Iraq: he has neither evidence of chemical weapons, nor UN sanction

      Conservatives, on the contrary, accuse Obama of indecision. The Washington Post columnist is outraged that the report on chemical weapons was presented by the Secretary of State, and not by the president - supposedly that did not have the courage, Russia 24 television channel reports.

      And the British press is discussing the decision of the parliament to postpone the military operation against Syria. The Independent newspaper reports that Prime Minister David Cameron is very dissatisfied with his ministers, who lacked coordination to convince deputies, and is about to shuffle the cabinet.
    2. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 17: 06 New
      +4
      The Jews are working tirelessly, how would they shorten those hands on the shoulders, which are already too much raking ....
  8. Victor Kamenev
    31 August 2013 08: 37 New
    16
    The USA gives out its national interests for "general democratic" - this is a blatant lie, today it has manifested itself, and this is a good reason to give the States, for example, the meme "Empire of Lie".
    The USSR, as is well known, is the “evil empire”, indeed it really fought for some “communist” ideals in the world, but not for purely nationalistic ones. States surpassed the USSR by lying. It is time for us to return debts to the States ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. pavlo
        pavlo 1 September 2013 00: 35 New
        +1
        notice what surnames-Kamenev-Zinoviev-Rykov -...
    2. poquello
      poquello 1 September 2013 00: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: Victor Kamenev

      The USSR, as is well known, is the “evil empire”, indeed it really fought for some “communist” ideals in the world, but not for purely nationalistic ones. States surpassed the USSR by lying. It is time for us to return debts to the States ...

      Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of the Russia Today TV channel, announced problems that arose with the broadcasting of the channel’s programs in the USA.
      "I was waiting for when our channel began to be blocked in the States. We started. Bravo freedom of speech," Simonyan wrote on her microblog on Twitter. "
  9. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 31 August 2013 08: 52 New
    25
    Oh it's time to say, or have already said:
    1. shinobi
      shinobi 31 August 2013 09: 30 New
      +3
      The picture is cool!
      1. Sharingan
        Sharingan 31 August 2013 16: 05 New
        +2
        Quote: shinobi
        The picture is cool!

        The picture will become cool if the amers do not tuck into Syria precisely because of Russia. And if they turn up, then all the political ... uh ... Putin’s victories are just a soap bubble. Obama will say so: "Come in, Volodya, with Snowden, and I will take Syria."
        1. Basil123
          Basil123 31 August 2013 20: 55 New
          +3
          they will strike Syria; there is no choice; but if Volodya hadn’t erased it for a long time already, the experience of the army and especially the United Nations and democracy would have helped it and the Obama’s head wouldn’t have been breaking on a wall of latrine where no one sees
  10. shurup
    shurup 31 August 2013 09: 08 New
    +1
    On a site that positions itself as Russian-patriotic, it’s a little strange to read about the American site in the context of a nationalist one.
    At least such a nation is unknown to me.
    But a long dollar takes place to walk the globe. If the euro does not want to shorten and the yuan lose weight, then they have no place to want to support the American national patriots, obsessed with the mania of democratization.
    The Russian ruble in this situation, it is advisable to grow by five centimeters, as suggested on some other sites.
  11. shinobi
    shinobi 31 August 2013 09: 15 New
    +8
    As I said earlier, and I am becoming more convinced of this, the United States is using the situation to remove the last obstacle in the form of the UN from its path, thereby gaining, thinking that they will gain complete world domination. Having failed to achieve this economically, they decided to go along ways of military force. The situation to an extreme resembles the situation before the First World War, with the then League of Nations. And since the history of the Third World War is not far off. The United States will face the same fate as Germany. America will have to fight on land where its powerful fleets are useless, but she never learned that.

    PS: For the United States, the moment of truth has come. Wise people remained in their political system or "well, dumb !!!", at least among the military.
    1. smile
      smile 31 August 2013 11: 43 New
      +4
      shinobi
      And I think that the UN-convenient screen for the United States, which more or less successfully use it to legitimize their actions. When it doesn’t work out, they just spit on the UN and the whole business. Unfortunately, I believe that they will not face a fight on land - who will land troops in Mexico or Canada? And where will the American Navy be at this time? When their policy of planetary expansion crashes, they will simply clean up the continent to restore order, because there in this case there will certainly be a mess-mix of the collapse of the Union and riots in the spirit of New Orleans - they are inclined to this, apparently.
    2. Stalinets
      Stalinets 31 August 2013 18: 05 New
      +8
      YOU RAVE !!!! UN, this is the brainchild of America !!! The UN is the lawyer for any crimes of the Zionists, and the United States, its main sponsor. Wake up and take off your hat, here they laughed at the truth .....
      1. drewlanin
        drewlanin 31 August 2013 22: 23 New
        +1
        absolutely right, it is a puppet in the hands of the usa who controls the usa itself for a long time it is clear to everyone and I want to add from myself no matter how the states bombed Syria there will be little people and the army proved their unity and this is a very significant factor and the Assad army learned to fight well the beast gets there over the head.
  12. Boris55
    Boris55 31 August 2013 09: 15 New
    10
    Amer seriously believe that they benefit the nations of the world. They do not understand that life determines consciousness and vice versa - consciousness determines being. These are two snakes crawling along the history of evolution reflected in the "caduceus wand." The heads of snakes are always opposite each other.

    They try to impose life without thinking about the consciousness of the natives. Clinton was very surprised when their diplomat was killed in Libya. She even exclaimed something like that - we brought them the benefit.

    You cannot trust a grenade to a monkey until it has become a human being.
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 17: 42 New
      0
      Unfortunately, a “wiser monkey” buys pomegranates from poor scientists, whom he lures with a piece of “fat” in the form of green paper and poor, ambitious ones are sold .... What would be empty to them and their descendants .....
    2. Stalinets
      Stalinets 31 August 2013 18: 07 New
      +2
      "The caduceus’s wand" is a Jewish symbol. And you hang it on the Anglo-Saxons .... Zionists at the head of America, do not represent the Americans at all. As well as everywhere. How Medvedev represented the Russians ...
      1. old man54
        old man54 31 August 2013 21: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: Stalinist
        How Medvedev represented the Russians ...

        I’m reading your comments, it’s kind of nice to write, the consent is provoking, but here is the flag under which you speak ... it is very embarrassing! Sorry. negative
        1. Stalinets
          Stalinets 1 September 2013 17: 57 New
          +1
          Understand! Excuse me, it just so happened ... The main thing is not the flag. Soul . My nickname, he talks about everything .... yes
  13. Slevinst
    Slevinst 31 August 2013 09: 25 New
    +9
    everything is clear with them in principle
  14. aszzz888
    aszzz888 31 August 2013 09: 35 New
    +3
    Enters Barack specifically. Yes, and is it any wonder, the mericatos always and everywhere drove according to their scenario, previously attracting their sloths from NATO as well. But times seem to change. How will it turn out for America after the bombing of selective targets in Syria?
  15. Ussuriets
    Ussuriets 31 August 2013 09: 42 New
    +3
    Soon there will be a G20 summit in St. Petersburg, so Obama must choose the side of evil or good. If he chooses the side of evil, he will point his finger at Holland and say FAS ...., and other mongrels. But I think that no one will attack in Syria, Americans and other shniki will look for other provocative ideas. In the USA they are studying from the movies, nobody knows where any state is located. The American fairy tale is to shake your ass in front of the camera and become an idol.
  16. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 31 August 2013 09: 47 New
    +4
    I always admired how the Americans built their foreign policy, if you need something, then we look for it from others, then we declare it "a communist, fascist regime, terrorist, insufficiently democratic regime, etc." And then you are quietly robbing to the cheers of the whole world, Russia should have adopted this principle for a long time and not listen to idiots broadcasting that they say "Russia has a special spirituality, its own way ..." and other nonsense, it’s time to adopt the tactics of the Anglo-Saxons and not have permanent ones ” friends "because" special spirituality "does not affect them and at the first opportunity they throw Russia, and having only constant interests, it’s enough to hang on the neck of parasites ready at the first opportunity to strike a blow in the back. Americans for example, no remorse for many wars waged by them they don’t feel it, they can even do this:
    1. smile
      smile 31 August 2013 11: 48 New
      +8
      Standard Oil
      If we lose spirituality and start acting like them, then what will we become? Remember the cartoon about the liberator who destroyed the dragon, and then turned into it? You can not degrade to their level, we are not fascists.
    2. Cyber7
      Cyber7 31 August 2013 12: 07 New
      12
      Quote: Standard Oil
      And then you calmly rob

      Quote: Standard Oil
      Russia should have adopted this principle for a long time

      If we adopt such principles, then how will we differ from them? The fact that we live in the other hemisphere?
    3. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 17: 50 New
      -2
      standard-like people like you, are now sitting in our government and the Duma! To drive you out of RUSSIA, the Hebrew Jews through the court and the zone .... Whatever your rotten spirit was in Russia !!!
      1. Stalinets
        Stalinets 31 August 2013 18: 09 New
        +1
        Approve !!!! Only in the zone and in the cemetery. You should not forgive them for what they did and do with the Slavs !!!! yes
        1. old man54
          old man54 31 August 2013 21: 17 New
          +1
          I support you both, who wrote above, but ... I don’t think it’s worth morale of their hands with filthy blood! To expel everyone outside, without the right to return, and to those who have arms in their hands to blame, like in Syria all sorts of scumbags, chopping off of hands, providing assistance to the same place as the first ones. We are not murderers, but we also “scattered” these, so that we wouldn’t take up arms anymore.
    4. ksv1973
      ksv1973 3 September 2013 18: 34 New
      0
      I'm sure Standard Oil is a pseudonym. And the real name is UNCLE SAM!
  17. Sadikoff
    Sadikoff 31 August 2013 09: 52 New
    +7
    The United States will go to perestroika when its post and tasks can be fulfilled by another sufficiently strong state. There is a challenger, but the position of Russia is preferable, is the experience of the USSR. As soon as Russia can demonstrate, replay strong opponents of the West in military-political chess, the whole world will be defeated economic and other excesses, (I don’t know how to describe).
  18. GUSAR
    GUSAR 31 August 2013 10: 16 New
    +1
    They already said that Russia will not supply weapons to Syria like they don’t pay ...
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 31 August 2013 22: 58 New
      0
      Quote: GUSAR
      They already said that Russia will not supply weapons to Syria like they don’t pay ...

      The conversation was about the MiG-29 and Yak-130, for them this is not a priority. A few days ago, the Western press said that Assad, on the contrary, began making payments. Allegedly, that would not turn away the GDP ...
  19. observer
    observer 31 August 2013 10: 20 New
    +2
    It’s possible not to read the article by the title, it has long been clear that they are rowing for themselves.
  20. SlavaS
    SlavaS 31 August 2013 10: 22 New
    +4
    The United States is far away, and Europe is near, they will brew porridge in Syria, America will obviously be less affected by this, England, France and other Europeans will have to disentangle.
  21. Ustas
    Ustas 31 August 2013 10: 30 New
    +8
    that the USA is a banal nationalist state.

    The USA is a banal fascist state.
  22. 128mgb
    128mgb 31 August 2013 10: 53 New
    +2
    He spoke very seriously about his “indispensable nation”
    Well, in a democratic pack of peers, one turned out to be more equal. Eternal Rome, the Millennium Reich was already, I wonder how the next "world lord" will be called?
    1. smile
      smile 31 August 2013 11: 51 New
      +3
      128mgb
      The “beaten dog” is what it will be called ... remember the red dogs from the “Mowgli”? :))) This is a logical result of all who crave world domination.
  23. Backfire
    Backfire 31 August 2013 10: 57 New
    0
    Quote: avant-garde
    I'm wondering, but what kind of nation is the Americans ???


    This is a misunderstanding from lack of knowledge of the language and incorrect translation.
    English word: nation - corresponds (I do not like the word "translated") to the word "people", meaning - all the inhabitants of this country.
  24. andreyurugvay
    andreyurugvay 31 August 2013 10: 58 New
    +1
    I can’t understand anything. But is it, from the very beginning of 2011, it was not clear that this was a setup !?
  25. saveall
    saveall 31 August 2013 11: 03 New
    +7
    Obama at the time, "Mine Kampf" write ...
    1. wax
      wax 31 August 2013 11: 35 New
      +2
      Late that author was nominated for Nobel, otherwise he would have received. With Obama, they decided to give the Nobel Prize right away, it was obviously taken into account that it would be problematic to give it following the presidency. If you look at the latest awards, then this is Martti Ahtisaari, EU, Obama (achievements: Kosovo, the Mediterranean coast of Africa, Syria).
  26. stroporez
    stroporez 31 August 2013 11: 07 New
    +7
    the basis of the "American nation" was originally constituted by deported bandits, religious fanatics, and other scum from Europe ........ there was nothing to be surprised at that "grew" today. selection, it is such a selection ...... ...
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 18: 02 New
      +2
      We don’t know what grew up, we haven’t tried it, but whoever does it, it’s known is the Hebrew money bag of the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and there are different people on earth, almost like us. Only we are the Russian nation, and who they are is a question for entographers ...
  27. Zhylaw
    Zhylaw 31 August 2013 11: 20 New
    +4
    The bite of a poisonous snake is the most dangerous just before death.
    But don’t worry, children, Carthage will be destroyed. It just does not have Carthage its own Hannibal.
    1. smile
      smile 31 August 2013 11: 53 New
      +1
      Zhylaw
      Hannibal, remember, also finished badly ... :)))) He will not save them.
    2. Stalinets
      Stalinets 31 August 2013 21: 37 New
      0
      Before whose death ????? Biting ??? laughing
  28. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 31 August 2013 11: 27 New
    +2
    The USA is a banal gangster state, an evil empire.
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 31 August 2013 18: 02 New
      +1
      1000 +++++++++++
    2. Stalinets
      Stalinets 31 August 2013 18: 11 New
      +1
      And France, England, Germany, Italy, are they better?
  29. Ulysses
    Ulysses 31 August 2013 11: 34 New
    +1
    Quote: chunga-changa
    в

    But like any freak addict. never admit it.
  30. solomon
    solomon 31 August 2013 12: 03 New
    +3
    In a recent interview with CNN, Barack Obama said the US remains an “indispensable nation” in the unstable Middle East and other regions of the world.

    An “indispensable nation” for destabilization?
  31. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 31 August 2013 12: 09 New
    +5
    Quote: smile
    Unfortunately, I believe that they will not face a fight on land - who will land troops in Mexico or Canada? And where will the American Navy be at this time? When their policy of planetary expansion crashes, they will simply go to the continent to restore order, because in this case there will certainly be a mess

    Not-not-not, not a mess; at this time, on the territory of us-A will happen ... hi
    1. smile
      smile 31 August 2013 14: 30 New
      +3
      Valery Neonov
      :))) But it’s not contagious ... there, what green ... and what if they like it .... no-no-no-in the ass, only with a boot ... :)))
    2. pavlo
      pavlo 1 September 2013 00: 38 New
      0
      cool picture !!!
  32. left-wing
    left-wing 31 August 2013 12: 31 New
    +2
    It has long been clear that the United States is now like Germany in the 1930s
    1. old man54
      old man54 31 August 2013 21: 21 New
      0
      Quote: links
      It has long been clear that the United States is now like Germany in the 1930s

      no, 1000 times worse and meaner!
  33. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 31 August 2013 12: 32 New
    +4
    We bend the Anglo-Saxons slowly .. The main thing is not to rush slowly and solemnly (with a delay ..))) So that it is delayed at the genetic level ... in the subconscious. !! This is of course in the future. Now time has won and this is a small victory!
  34. Donvel
    Donvel 31 August 2013 14: 49 New
    0
    Well, roughly speaking, there is no such nationality as "American." And besides, in a rare country, people do not consider themselves exceptional - propaganda does not sleep.
    1. Victor Kamenev
      31 August 2013 17: 16 New
      +1
      I don’t know — I don’t know, Russia is an exception in this case, Russia is talking about a distinctive development, that's all.
    2. Stalinets
      Stalinets 31 August 2013 18: 17 New
      +1
      That's right !!! Although the Americans do not consider themselves to be exceptions, they are UNLAWFUL and very brainwashed. But the technologies run on the Americans, today they are used against Russians, Ukrainians, this is the problem. Whoever exposes America as the main culprit, intentionally or not, diverts attention from the main culprit. In this case, it is Zionism. All poison flows from old and not good Britain. By the way, a bastard, the last one, CUT A RABBIN .. yes hi
      1. Donvel
        Donvel 31 August 2013 18: 39 New
        +2
        To expose someone guilty of all mortal sins is profitable, very distracting from other problems. It seems to me that each player in the political arena has his own goals and he achieves them, that's all. And propaganda serves to hide their dishonest game and reveal someone else's. I think, it is impossible to call Americans or Jews conditionally bad, and us conditionally good.
        1. Luga
          Luga 1 September 2013 02: 38 New
          +1
          In politics, IMHO, it is generally impossible to divide the parties into "conditionally bad" and "conditionally good." If we take the methods of achieving goals as the division criterion, then absolutely everything is bad. If the goals themselves, then they change all the time. Yesterday's “good” allies become enemies and vice versa. Each for itself, the choice of methods is unlimited. Power is at stake. It is possible and necessary to navigate what is good and what is bad according to only one criterion - the Homeland. She is beyond categories. She is always right. Our Homeland is Russia, with all its Russians, Tatars, Buryats, Jews, finally. The staff have their own homeland, which they also probably love. For 70 years we are enemies. Therefore, they are for me (in the mass, and not each personally) not “conditionally bad”, but “definitely bad”. Enemies It was they who threatened my country with a nuclear bomb, forcing it to spend forces on an arms race, they supplied weapons from which they shot my relatives in Afghanistan and Chechnya, they destroyed it and trampled my Homeland in 1991, providing it with 10 years of chaos and ruin, this they still send bulk, yavlinsky and similar creatures to us so that we don’t raise our heads from the swamp into which they managed to drive us, it’s because of them that in our Caucasus (an amazing, heavenly place) the war has been going on for a year, because of them, in Ossetia, Orthodox Russians and Georgians shot and into each other.
          Therefore, "conditionally bad" and "conditionally good" really do not exist. But there are “definitely bad” ones.
          I'm sorry, carried away.
          1. Donvel
            Donvel 1 September 2013 12: 21 New
            -1
            At the same time I agree with you I do not agree. I believe that our Motherland as such is no longer a player. The power that rules Russia is perceived by me as a separate organism that has nothing to do with the Motherland. And in many ways, this power uses these most bulk and Yavlinsky, covering them with their mistakes. What, in essence, are they to blame? Has anyone convicted them of any anti-government activities other than organizing rallies? I believe this screen only works while the regime needs it. This screen does not have real power, which is why I do not respect the opposition. America sends spies, but certainly will not do it so clumsy. IMHO
            1. Cyber7
              Cyber7 1 September 2013 16: 06 New
              +1
              I would venture to disagree with you. If Russia had not been a player, then we would not have had a Caucasus, the Ossetians would have been cut by the Negroes and the Georgian army, England and other Europe would not have been blown into the pants when our strategists appeared in their airspace.
              GDP does not touch bulk and Yavlinsky for two reasons. The first one is contrary to democracy, for which many are ready to gnaw their throats to each other. The second - in any country, even the smallest, there is always something dissatisfied with comrades (the number of sausages on the shelves, the ability to speak filth with impunity, and propagate sins and tyds). If you crush everyone - you will be called a tyrant and bombed from the most "bright and democratic" motives.
              America now operates in completely different ways. In "democratic" countries, you can sponsor with impunity all those who are dissatisfied, who themselves will undermine the most stable state from within. There is no need for military aggression, just changing the government to a loyal US. And they will plunder everything that is possible.
              Russia's problem is that it has a large territory, a lot of resources, but there are no real allies. And that we do not want to rob, bomb and cut to the root. We always defend ourselves. We do not need North America to fuck, we and our Siberia and the Far East suffice. And they lack them.
              Something like that.
              1. Donvel
                Donvel 1 September 2013 17: 05 New
                0
                Oppositionists cannot even organize normal unrest. Our opposition is a fiction of pure water. And GDP does not look like a person who will defend himself. I honestly don’t understand his logic. He is trying to conduct foreign policy without understanding the domestic one. Even if the gloomy crushers are destroying our country, it is not visible that he was somehow struggling with this. When we cease to be a raw materials appendage, then the allies will stretch. This is if you look at the GDP as a normal "leader." It seems to me that he himself is more dangerous for us than anything sent.
                1. Cyber7
                  Cyber7 1 September 2013 17: 58 New
                  +2
                  On the first point. I do not argue that the opposition is weak. Since she cannot organize something serious, it means that there is simply no serious confrontation between the authorities in the state. Why is the GDP not struggling with them, I, it seems, have already expressed my opinion above.
                  On the second point. I have already said that they unite only by necessity. The United States also has no allies. The United States simply imposes its will on those who look in its back. If we become strong and tie Europe to our economy, it will not become our ally. It will simply cease to obediently obey the United States, as it will be economically connected with us. But he can betray you at any moment, since there is no one to love us in Europe.
                  As for the GDP. It is easy to find fault now, stroking the current situation. But if you just look a little into the past and everything will fall into place.
                  Since 1991, 10 years has been a devastation. This is worse than war, because during the war everyone is trying to preserve at least something of what can be lost - factories, factories, people.
                  In the wreck, all sectors simultaneously plummet due to poor financing and plunder. Stalin 15 years after the war brought the Union to the level when we launched the first satellite. GDP 10 years after devastation has achieved that we can protect our territory.
                  Is this not enough? The rest will be shown by the future.
                  1. Donvel
                    Donvel 1 September 2013 21: 10 New
                    -1
                    For 15 years, GDP has not achieved anything outstanding. There is no need to protect our territory - we drive our natural resources abroad and without annexation. The future will really show which of us is right.
                    1. Cyber7
                      Cyber7 1 September 2013 21: 50 New
                      +2
                      The power in power is less than 15 years. Didn’t achieve anything? Oh well.
                      Quote: DonVel
                      There is no need to protect our territory

                      Oh really? If there hadn’t been nuclear weapons in Russia, the Yankees would have gone everywhere, drank whiskey and discharged their sexual energy on our women, and maybe not only.
                      Quote: DonVel
                      we drive our natural resources abroad and without annexation

                      Really? Do you know what happened under Yeltsin? How much then did we sell oil and gas?
                      The future is built with one’s hands one who remembers the past and changes the present through this experience.
                      You have disappointed me. We started like not bad, but the last post is just for children. You didn’t even really hear what I told you.
                      It is a pity.
                      1. Donvel
                        Donvel 1 September 2013 22: 15 New
                        -3
                        Sophistry, pastor, sophistry. Our main exports are oil, gas, timber and so on (and not the products of their processing). For 15 years, our friend of the GDP did not bother to restore industry and force the rest to work normally (recall the rearmament of our army, which is going on, but no matter how). And Serdyukov as Minister of Defense, who, apparently, was saving us from the Yankees hordes (and for some reason they can’t put them in prison). And in general, in terms of logic, what should we do with the Americans? If we are afraid of anyone, then the Chinese, who really have little room.
                      2. Cyber7
                        Cyber7 1 September 2013 22: 51 New
                        +1
                        Quote: DonVel
                        pastor

                        I am not a pastor and generally have nothing to do with clergy. I have a different kind of activity.
                        Quote: DonVel
                        sophistry

                        Either you do not know the meaning of the word, or you use it incorrectly. It is out of place here.
                        Quote: DonVel
                        GDP did not bother to restore industry and make the rest work normally

                        You would in his place, without a doubt, make Russia an incredibly powerful state, make everything work normally and restore industry, and not only it. All would be restored. And not for some 10-15 years there. 5 years, which is already there.
                        Then why weren’t you on the voting lists for the presidency of Russia? Or were you there? Then why aren't you president?
                        Quote: DonVel
                        in terms of logic, what do the Americans do?

                        Once again I am convinced that only one who hears the interlocutor and knows how to think can change his mind. Surely you will answer this post. And not because they are confident that they are right, but because the extreme one feels like a winner. But not everyone can ask the cited question above. Proud of you.
                        Quote: DonVel
                        If anyone is afraid, then the Chinese

                        We were never afraid of anyone beforehand. Therefore, they won. To be afraid and prepare for war are two different things.
                        It’s a pity the conversation didn’t happen.
                        Farewell.
                      3. Donvel
                        Donvel 1 September 2013 23: 08 New
                        0
                        Firstly, you do not know the classics of Soviet cinema. Secondly, nitpicking to the opponent’s words is the last argument of the demagogue. Third, we judge Putin’s actions as president, not mine (don’t forgetThe future is built with one’s hands one who remembers the past and changes the present from this experience) Fourth, you did not give a single argument in favor of the "former KGB officer nicknamed" Moth "leading us to prosperity, write high-spoken expressions and consider me unworthy of your conclusions, which are built without relying on facts.
                      4. Cyber7
                        Cyber7 2 September 2013 01: 09 New
                        +1
                        Damn, could not resist. :)
                        Quote: DonVel
                        You do not know the classics of Soviet cinema

                        Yes, I know, I know.
                        Quote: DonVel
                        Sophistry, pastor, sophistry.

                        This is from "17 Moments of Spring." So said that woof new that Stirlitz from PM shot.
                        I would even give you a "plus sign" for this. :)
                        So substitute - it must be able to. Taking off my hat. hi
                      5. Donvel
                        Donvel 2 September 2013 15: 31 New
                        0
                        Why don't I take off hi

                        And, by the way, Stirlitz himself spoke about sophistry, during the interrogation of Schlag lol
                      6. ksv1973
                        ksv1973 2 September 2013 22: 44 New
                        0
                        DonVel and Cyber7! Argue, argue and argue. I hope that she will still be born!
  • Goldkonstantin
    Goldkonstantin 31 August 2013 16: 21 New
    +1
    In the USA - the Reich, and will end its existence in the same way as all empires!
  • Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 31 August 2013 19: 22 New
    +3
    The more I analyze the actions of American politicians and the military in Syria (and not only), the more I begin to understand that the Americans act like Hitler Germany against Europe. Those came up with the "reasons" for the attack on Poland (remember the radio station in Gleivitz). The Pentagon does not shine with a variety of methods and techniques of provocation. He goes along the Nazi path. True with the spice of "democracy." But the end will be the same. The inglorious end ...
    1. Stalinets
      Stalinets 31 August 2013 21: 22 New
      0
      Hello !! And who sponsored Hitler ????
      1. ksv1973
        ksv1973 2 September 2013 22: 47 New
        -1
        The facts claim that Stalin.
        1. Docent1984
          Docent1984 5 September 2013 15: 56 New
          +1
          Give at least one fact
          1. ksv1973
            ksv1973 7 September 2013 16: 00 New
            0
            Dear Docent1984, I welcome you!
            But don’t you know how much the USSR supplied Germany with various strategic raw materials?
            And the Stalinist ban to the German Communists to create a coalition with the Social Democrats in the elections? This is the same direct political sponsorship of Frenzied!
    2. Stalinets
      Stalinets 1 September 2013 19: 05 New
      0
      Hitler decided to outwit the Zionists. And the United States, this is the Zionists. yes
  • Kolyan 2
    Kolyan 2 31 August 2013 20: 36 New
    0
    Beautiful rooster in the photo.
  • nelson
    nelson 31 August 2013 21: 38 New
    +1
    but the proven "democracies" refuse to fully support the United States. The English parliament suddenly “failed” its Prime Minister D. Cameron, and demanded evidence of the use of chemical weapons by B. Assad, which he could not provide. And the House of Commons of England vetoed the Syrian war, before presenting conclusive evidence. And this is England, which is also called the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of America! For that fought for it and ran. What in our time are "sincere friends." Nothing good, just business!
  • konvalval
    konvalval 31 August 2013 21: 40 New
    0
    The USA was and is the world gendarme, the empire of evil. They have nothing sacred. And they pursue only selfish goals. And their "democracy", which they allegedly carry around the world a fig leaf to cover up their atrocities.
  • Centaurus
    Centaurus 31 August 2013 22: 01 New
    +1
    Does Britain finally come to its senses? Of course, it’s unlikely that the Foggy Albion suddenly flamed up with noble feelings towards Syria, but apparently they really needed to be obedient to the US satellites. And not just them. Today is England, and tomorrow the whole EU will send Washington to hell.
    The only question is when. On the 4th, the United States will answer, and in the 4th, the Pentagon, and who will become the new dictator of Europe?
    Hmmm ... it seems a world war is inevitable. But it seems that NATO has finally seen a tangible split.
    We are waiting, sir :)
  • rolik
    rolik 1 September 2013 00: 57 New
    0
    Quote: novobranets
    the United States as they were, they have remained so. But the world around them is changing.

    It seems that while his father was seriously ill, after a viral infection. The little ones climbed into his car and tried to steer the mask, remembering how the older one did it. He broke all the buttons and levers, knocked down the seat settings. And offended that his car does not obey. Fortunately, the oldest in reason and age, he was on the mend and soon his unfortunate fate awaits for his son to stand in a corner picking a wall with his finger.
  • pinecone
    pinecone 1 September 2013 01: 08 New
    0
    The United States is not only a multinational, but also a multiracial state, which can be called "nationalistic" only if you agree with the term used by the patriots of White America to designate the country's leader - "Israeli Vice President for American Affairs."
  • Vintorez333
    Vintorez333 1 September 2013 01: 12 New
    +1
    Americans? There is no such nation (with the exception of the indigenous ones, which were driven into the reservation), hiding criminals fled there all the time, and now their descendants are trying to dictate terms to the rest of the world.
    1. Patchito
      Patchito 1 September 2013 19: 44 New
      -1
      Quote: Vintorez333
      Americans? There is no such nation (with the exception of the indigenous ones, which were driven into the reservation), hiding criminals fled there all the time, and now their descendants are trying to dictate terms to the rest of the world.


      A nation is a generally accepted scientific term. According to his definition, Americans (US residents) are also a full-fledged nation. True, they are not a nation in the sense that you have apparently developed about this term.
  • yurii p
    yurii p 1 September 2013 11: 49 New
    +1
    usa fourth reich? it’s very similar to just another sign
  • Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 1 September 2013 14: 50 New
    +3
    The funniest thing is that most of all about freedom and democracy they are screaming in the United States, in a country in which there has never been freedom or democracy, where the dollar and the gun have always ruled.
    1. ksv1973
      ksv1973 1 September 2013 17: 57 New
      +2
      Man, you are right to all 100!
  • lucidlook
    lucidlook 1 September 2013 15: 08 New
    +1
    The danger of Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz is so real, and the potential damage is so great that without a pipe from Kuwait and Qatar through Syria, it is impossible to attack Iran. Well, and Tartus, of course, for the United States, like a thorn in the eye.
  • adehduard
    adehduard 1 September 2013 16: 13 New
    0
    Strange as it may seem, only one state is guilty of changing the US foreign policy from restrained to frankly aggressive over the past 20 years. This is the deceased in the Bose of the USSR. A powerful counterweight has disappeared - respect for international law has disappeared. One flowed from the other and, whatever we say now, the rule of power rules the world. Russia will become strong - lawlessness will disappear.
    1. Cyber7
      Cyber7 1 September 2013 16: 32 New
      +2
      You're not right. The Korean crisis erupted in 1950, 5 years after the end of WWII. After 15 years was Vietnam. Further down the list.
      The United States has never been restrained in its plans to subjugate the whole world. And they always interpreted the norms of world law in their own way - what is beneficial for us is right. And lawlessness will not disappear even if Russia rises to the level of the USSR. Just US foreign policy will change a little.
      That's all.
  • Technologist
    Technologist 1 September 2013 16: 41 New
    0
    But who exactly are the Americans? A bunch of impudent Anglo-Saxons, Jews, Chinese, blacks, etc. etc.
  • Dyukha Siberian
    Dyukha Siberian 1 September 2013 18: 00 New
    +2
    one hitler was beaten, we can handle the 2nd one too! external enemies have always tormented us, but the bureaucrats inside do it even harder! so apparently our fate is taking shape! but Russia is standing and breaking sticks in wheels! let them shout that we are weak and no one notices us! whoopers and screamers have always shouted about our doom and beat them with stones before! we were always strong and never asked for outside help, but we always helped friends and neighbors! whoever calls Russia weak is itself weak, or has disowned it! Glory to Russia and its sons and daughters! it's time to get up, it's time to make yourself known to the whole world again! WE ARE RUSSIA! WE ARE POWER! in the ass of the Americans, cover Syria with your “hand” and say: “hands off! there are thousands of our citizens and their families,” it’s time for us to say our word!
    something like that!
  • vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 1 September 2013 19: 29 New
    +1
    << This time, the United States does not seem to be able to pass off its policy as “democratic and universal,” and it turns out that it conceals selfish national interests, so sometimes the wolf’s mouth is hidden behind sheep’s skin>>
    Well said in the article, it’s better not to add !!!
    US leaders in all the media insist that in Syria they defend their national interests - what impudence and in what way are these interests expressed?
    Shed the blood of thousands of innocent people, establishing their "bloody democracy"