Military Review

Ardzhil Turner: Chemical attack in Syria - the shameful failure of the special services of the United States and Britain

The United States and Great Britain regard the world community as idiots who do not remember history. The governments of these countries are screaming "Hold the thief!", Accusing Syrian President Bashar Assad of using chemical weaponswhich they themselves transported and applied in Damascus.

Ardzhil Turner: Chemical attack in Syria - the shameful failure of the special services of the United States and Britain

Honest Americans, who represent the majority of the population of the United States, are well aware that the history of the wars that their country has waged is inextricably linked with provocations.

The ongoing occupation of Texas and California was organized by the then US government through provocations in these, then Mexican territories.

In March, 1846, the US Army commanded by General Taylor, crossing the Texas border, erected Fort Brown in the Mexican territory of Texas and accused Mexico of aggression. A message to Congress from 11 in May 1846 of the year said that Mexico "invaded our territory and shed American blood on American soil." Thus, this provocation was the first, but not the last, “casus belli” to start a war in US history.

The reason for the Spanish-American war 1898 of the year, as a result of which Spain lost the status of one of the world powers, was the explosion of the American cruiser "Maine", who was on a visit to the Spanish island of Cuba. The tragedy happened 15 February 1898, 266 crew members died. Although the cause of the explosion was never established (the Spanish and American commissions that conducted parallel investigations differed in determining why the explosion occurred, but neither of them could identify the perpetrators), the US accused the Spanish side of deliberate sabotage.

Some stories link the killing of the Austrian-Hungarian throne, Archduke Franz-Ferdinand in June 1914, by the Serbian student Gavrilo Princip, which served as a pretext for the outbreak of the First World War, to the activities of the United States secret services, who were so keen to promote the outbreak of hostilities.

The United States and Great Britain helped Adolf Hitler in every possible way in his coming to power and the revival of the German military industry and the army. The 1 September 1939 attack on Poland began with a provocation in true American style, crudely designed and also crudely executed, by the Germans attacking their own radio station in the city of Gleivets. Hitler was a good student of the Americans.

The war in Korea, the war in Vietnam, numerous local wars of the second half of the 20 century always began with American provocations followed by the accusation of a country undergoing aggression, "non-observance of human rights", "lack of democracy", "massacre of civilians", etc. d. So it was in Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya, Afghanistan. Now in line is Syria.

Moreover, the terrorist attacks of 11 of September of 2011, the overwhelming majority of Americans consider the operation of their own special services. The people of the United States, where are your ideals of freedom and democracy? The Statue of Liberty has long become a symbol of aggression and the blood of innocent victims.

In Syria, the Americans did not bother to invent something new: they simply transferred chemical weapons from Turkey to Damascus, and with the help of international terrorists prepared their use. However, this is another shameful action for the United States, was broken by the Syrian troops of Bashar al-Assad.

Apparently, someone in the United States decided that in the case of Syria, simply shaking a UN test tube with some white powder, as Colin Powell did, accusing Iraq of producing non-existent chemical weapons, would be little ... And for complete credibility organized the crime.

It is indicative that sources in intelligence agencies of countries with modern space reconnaissance systems refuse to comment on this fact, which serves as indirect evidence that the operation to transfer chemical weapons from Turkey to Syria did take place. Just the Americans, intoxicated by the mania of their world domination, did not even care how to ensure the secrecy of this operation.

And on the Turkish sites (; and others have information that could shift the government in any country that can still call itself democratic ...

On August 23 20 trucks passed through the territory of the southern region of Turkey, Kathin, each accompanied by the Turkish military, including security officers of Turkey. After crossing the border in the city of Idlib, militants of the Jabat-en-Nusra group met a convoy in Syria. According to one of the Turkish border guards, chemical weapons were transported in three trucks. What was in the rest of the car, the border guard does not know. Cargo did not pass border control.

Of course, the world community would very much like to hear comments on this issue from US President Obama, British Prime Minister Cameron, and Turkish Prime Minister Herodogan. But it can be said with complete confidence that they will completely deny their participation in this disgraceful incident. First, not wanting to lose your face. Secondly, because they never recognize the lowest competence and complete lack of professionalism of their special services.

While Syrian troops everywhere win victories and destroy international terrorists throughout the country, Bashar Asad gives the command to use chemical weapons in the capital Damascus (?!)
The use of a prohibited type of weapon would be advisable when the Syrian government forces almost suffered a complete defeat ... And so you have to assume that Bashar Asad, having almost won, suddenly decided ... to organize his own defeat!

Whose dull head could have come up with an idea of ​​such a crude provocation? From what madhouse did the ideological inspirer and organizer of this idiocy squared run away? And why does he (or they) consider the whole world to be such idiots?

And why, after the terrorists declared the alleged "use of chemical weapons by the Syrian troops," did the United States, Great Britain, France, and some other countries immediately "believe" them? Their leaders immediately accused Assad, even without evidence on their hands?

And they began to demand armed intervention in the Syrian conflict, which they provoked and still lead by the so-called “Syrian rebels”, who are in fact international Islamic terrorists, Western mercenaries and instructors of special forces of the same states ...
Is it because they were confident of the success of this stupid provocation, they themselves authorized its conduct and knew about it in advance?

All this is so sewn with white threads that it would simply be ridiculous if such actions of countries claiming the high title of “democratic powers” ​​were not caused by the death, injury, tears of millions of Syrians.

The peoples of the United States, Great Britain and other Western countries should strive to conduct a full and objective investigation of this provocation, and the role of their governments in its organization.

The UN should not investigate the mythical guilt of Assad, but the fact of the transfer of chemical weapons from Turkey to Syria. Where was the sarin produced, who and how was it transported to Damascus, equipped storage spaces?

If this is not done, the UN threatens to repeat the sad history of the League of Nations, and the world expects a fate to survive the horrors of World War III.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. an_ursus
    an_ursus 31 August 2013 06: 49
    Whose dull head could have come up with an idea of ​​such a crude provocation? From what madhouse did the ideological inspirer and organizer of this idiocy squared run away? And why does he (or they) consider the whole world to be such idiots?

    Ie State Department mental hospital with a syringe on a naked ...
  3. Strashila
    Strashila 31 August 2013 06: 56
    Such money was pumped into the war ... that as one character used to say ... or we go to the registry office or it leads to the prosecutor ... and how the characters go to the prosecutor in the film. Will the UN court be the fairest, just as the Soviet was fair court in the film.
  4. Very old
    Very old 31 August 2013 07: 00
    Masters, big docks in their field. All wars began with provocations, if nothing to complain about.
    The main thing is no democracy and no human rights. Therefore, one should LEARN the unreasonable. But in a good way they don’t understand. Therefore, they should be bombed. Western politics can offer nothing new to the world
    1. a52333
      a52333 31 August 2013 07: 28
      I read the book I. DAMASKIN 100 GREAT OPERATIONS OF SPECIAL SERVICES. Recommend. Admittedly, British intelligence has always been on top. The United States did not do such operations, and the British are strong. But this time, how someone crookedly turned out. Even within their countries, from 50 to 70% opposed the war. I must say that they worked clumsily (and the Turks on their territory got pierced), but you can’t deceive the people several times equally. One thing is certain. They will not back down. Already working on the next setup.
      1. novobranets
        novobranets 31 August 2013 10: 04
        Quote: a52333
        Already working on the next setup.

        I think you are right. A "second edition, edited" is to be expected. The United States invested a lot in this adventure, did not receive dividends, and knowing their vile nature, it would be naive to assume that they will retire to shed tears about the spoiled "holiday of democracy" hi .
      2. Very old
        Very old 31 August 2013 12: 15
        = They will not back down = No, of course. Wounded pride is still bearable for the US, but a blow to the pocket is Oh-Oh-Oh. For oil, Uncle Sam will be teeth and claws. There will still be substitutes
  5. bairat
    bairat 31 August 2013 07: 03
    While Syrian forces are everywhere gaining victory and destroying international terrorists across the country
    Of course, I would like to believe in it, but ... there is no map of military operations, then it would become clear that military operations are going on 1/3 of the country's territory, the remaining 2/3 are not controlled by Assad at all, i.e. the situation is more than critical.
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 31 August 2013 08: 12
      Quote: bairat
      Of course, I would like to believe in it, but ... there is no map of military operations, then it would become clear that military operations are going on 1/3 of the country's territory, the remaining 2/3 are not controlled by Assad at all, i.e. the situation is more than critical.

      The analysis of the course of the confrontation in April of this year is given in very detail with maps and diagrams. here

      Currently, militants hold about 30% of the country's territory. This is a significant part of the provinces of Idlib, Aleppo and Deir al-Zor, as well as a significant part of Aleppo and its environs, areas of the Turkish and Jordanian borders. However, after the liberation of the city of Al Quseir, the Lebanese transit of militants has already been blocked. The successes of Assad’s army in recent months are irreversible, when all attempts by the Americans to overthrow the Syrian leadership without external aggression will fail inevitably.
      Why did the scales lean in Assad's favor?
      Firstly, self-defense units and irregular militia from among
      volunteers, Iraqi Shiites and Hezbollah of Lebanon. It was these formations that made it possible to replace the most combat-ready army units in the rear and strengthen the offensive.
      Secondly, due to the complete frostbite of the bearded, creating lawlessness and lawlessness, the support of the opposition among the Sunni majority of the Syrian population has decreased and now Assad is considered by many people as the only guarantee of protection against radicals
      Thirdly, the Syrians were able to organize the repair of armored and aircraft equipment in place (without sending it to repair plants), which qualitatively affected the efficiency of putting it into operation.
      Fourth, the main sponsors of the militants began to experience internal difficulties and disagreements, which also facilitated the foreign policy situation.
      Fifthly, Iran, unlike the Saudis, Qatar and Turkey, on the contrary does not reduce the volume of political, military and economic assistance.
      Sixth, the Kurds began an armed struggle against the Syrian radicals.
      And most importantly, the Syrian army, cumbersome and imprisoned for a full-scale war against the Israeli army, gained invaluable experience in waging war against partisan units using infiltration tactics (an analogue of military operations during two Chechen wars).
      Therefore, even a missile strike by the Tomahawks involving UAVs at military facilities and control posts is unlikely to lead to a turning point in the situation, and even more so the removal of President Assad from power. For this need ground operation why do we need to create a no-fly zone and deploy an invasion force of at least 100 thousand in Turkey and Jordan. people
      All this says that a small victorious war to raise Obama’s prestige does not shine, therefore, based on all this, he is now in a position characterized by the words from the song
      1. 31231
        31231 31 August 2013 08: 33
        Well and briefly described.
      2. bairat
        bairat 31 August 2013 18: 21
        Quote: Ascetic
        Currently, militants hold about 30% of the country's territory.

        another 30% of the Kurds.
      3. Che
        Che 31 August 2013 19: 15
        Ascetic read an analysis of Syria. There are opportunities to get out of this massacre by and large provoked by amers. As well, and Chechnya is with us. There is no time to lose.
  6. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 31 August 2013 07: 03
    hi The fact that the government troops of Syria did not need to use chemical weapons is understood by any sane and their (sane) is becoming more and more, except for France against 12 state-TV NATO members. And let John Kerry be hysterical, his work is such ... he is " worthy successor "successor to Clinton:
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Very old
      Very old 31 August 2013 12: 19
      I really liked the halo. Valery, didn’t guess the wings to spank?
  7. vadson
    vadson 31 August 2013 07: 07
    the article is certainly good, but it has no future in the Western media space. In the United States, Russia has already blocked the Todays. they want to push people into the brain further
  8. Ascetic
    Ascetic 31 August 2013 07: 18
    In Syria, the Americans did not bother to invent something new: they simply transferred chemical weapons from Turkey to Damascus, and with the help of international terrorists prepared their use. However, this is another shameful action for the United States, was broken by the Syrian troops of Bashar al-Assad.

    Very similar to Americans, if true. If you recall the Iran-Iraq war of the mid-80s of the last century, then as it turns out today The United States helped Saddam Hussein’s regime conduct chemical attacks against Iran.
    Declassified CIA documents can be viewed here

    By the way, according to the US Constitution
    “In a situation where no one attacks the United States, only Congress has the power to decide whether to join the United States in war».

    Thus, the US administration and Obama personally violate not only the norms of international law but also their own Constitution!
    Now in Congress, vacation and congressmen gather only on September 9th. Will Obama dare not give a damn about his own congress and run into impeachment? Perhaps, but only if he manages to crank out a small and quick victorious war in Syria. And on whose account, as they say in the famous comedy

    As of August 30, 140 American congressmen - both Republicans and Democrats - put their signatures on a letter that says in black and white that President Obama will violate the Constitution if he orders to strike Syria without receiving Congressional permission.
    1. bask
      bask 31 August 2013 10: 09
      Quote: Ascetic
      I The United States helped Saddam Hussein’s regime conduct chemical attacks against Iran.

      Greetings Ascetic. hi
      But also on the territory of Iraqi Kurdistan.
      Because, then, in 2006, he was hanged himself, Saddam Hussein. (Commandment: Do not be friends with the devil, first deceive, and then kill.)
      The faces of the presidents are changing, and the devilish essence of the United States remains ...
  9. krpmlws
    krpmlws 31 August 2013 07: 29
    And why do they think the whole world is such idiots?
    Who can stop them, get in their way? From here they have a feeling of their own impunity. At the heart of the Western mentality is the value of material gain, moral values ​​are of secondary importance. This leads to war, violation of international standards, neglect of the position of the international community and public opinion. I won’t be surprised if the amers nevertheless strike a blow to Syria. The use of chemical weapons is a serious matter and they, having made a good face in a dirty game, ignoring all reasonable arguments and evidence, will be forced to bring their aggressive policy towards Syria to a logical conclusion. of them, it means to admit that they are implicated in the use of chemical weapons, so they won’t do it. Although it is necessary to take into account the Obama factor, as the president in the USA is not quite standard, more subject to the influence of moral and legal values.
  10. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 31 August 2013 07: 36
    Whoever lied, lies and twice.
    There is no faith in those who live solely on personal gain contrary to the interests of all who surround them.
  11. olviko
    olviko 31 August 2013 07: 37
    The website provides additional details: this operation was sponsored by Saudi Arabia, which donated $ 4 million to Alush. At the same time, the Saudis were not interested in the number of victims - they were only interested in the fact of using chemical weapons. Zahran Alush is a bandit who leads an Islamic extremist organization called the Islamic Brigades.
  12. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 31 August 2013 09: 00
    <<Now, few people remember, but in the summer of 1952, the United States conducted Operation Strangulation against the people of North Korea, during which they used chemical and bacteriological weapons against the 78 cities of North Korea. Toxic and irritant poisonous substances were used, including hydrocyanic acid. Even Adolf Hitler did not reach this point ...>> (November 5, 2012 - Ardzhil Turner. View from Canada: "Russia has two troubles - the pseudo-elite and the pseudo-intelligentsia")
    From a quote from another article by A. Turner, it is clear who and on whose order used the chemical attack. You can also remember who used nuclear weapons in Japan when there was no need for it. US authorities are true to their "traditions"
  13. ZU-23
    ZU-23 31 August 2013 09: 43
    A surprisingly attentive and competent author, although not ours, if the Americans and the Anglo-Saxons capture the world, then everyone will forget who the Russian Tatars are Germans, etc., and there will be very few of them, and all the tops of their countries will live in the states managing these colonies within their means communication. Now he will hammer everyone one at a time and everything will turn out, and then at the end they will put out Europe, he doesn’t need a big mind, although Europe sucks them excellently anyway))). I think maybe at least we have the strength to preserve at least a bipolar world.
  14. dima-fesko
    dima-fesko 31 August 2013 09: 53
    If the war is on, then it is beneficial to someone. And who benefits from this? And it is beneficial to the American oligarchs who supply weapons to the conflict zone, and to those who feed the army (or feed at the expense of the army). Well, Obama has something to do with them, because forced to lobby for their interests ...
  15. The Indian Joe
    The Indian Joe 31 August 2013 10: 17
    It is obvious to any thinking person that no one will use chemical weapons immediately after the arrival of the UN inspectors invited by him to use these weapons.
    Another provocation from the West.
    1. ZU-23
      ZU-23 31 August 2013 10: 36
      it’s still interesting what conclusion this UN commission will give, which is very doubtful as a result in favor of Bashar al-Assad, although there is a belief that, in principle, the senior commission of inquiry is the same as it was in Iraq, which said that there were no chemical weapons there, but no one began to listen to this, but Russia and China then quietly smoked aside.
  16. individual
    individual 31 August 2013 10: 41
    The USA brought a lot of grief and suffering, both in Latin America, and in Vietnam, Japan, Korea, Yugoslavia, and this continues in northern Africa: Libya, Tunisia, Syria.
    The peoples understand the aggressive nature of the United States and can call their policy not a handshake, but the policy of gunboats and sophisticated diplomacy makes all governments of the world, with a few exceptions, curry favor with the big uncle with the big club.
    The UN is an organization capable of uniting everyone and extinguishing the ardor of the American hegemon, but the US-funded one has lost its any noticeable role in the world and it will face the fate of the "League of Nations" on the eve of World War II.
    We know the continuation from history.
  17. serpimolot
    serpimolot 31 August 2013 11: 03
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    and here everything is white and clean, as if there were no warriors and not everything was destroyed

    But where is it clean? Cracks, something lying around, dirty, and in the distance there is no harshness, probably ruins.
  18. not good
    not good 31 August 2013 11: 05
    From the very beginning of the story of the chemical attack in Syria, it was clear who was behind it. The USA needed a war in Syria and they were coming up with where to start. But this time it seems that their special services screwed up. or later they will find a reason.
  19. PiP
    PiP 31 August 2013 11: 31
    There is only one conclusion. When an economic crisis is coming (or happening) in the West. The government is not inventing anything new. Unleash a war in which as many countries as possible will be involved. Due to its geographical position, the United States always wins wherever the war is fought (except for North America, since there is no real enemy). There is a small-big "BUT" - in the wars of the past there were no NUCLEAR WEAPONS and their DELIVERY SYSTEMS anywhere in the world. I do not mean that our country or some other country will immediately apply it, but that a small, insignificant event can lead to such consequences that it becomes scary. No missile defense system is capable of intercepting 100% of warheads; it will be enough for each side to miss 10% and the Earth will be practically unusable. THIS IS SCARY FOR ME. So let the dear gentlemen of the United States and the British think hard about their actions.
    Polish Foreign Minister Radoslav Sikorski called Russia responsible for the presence of chemical arsenals in Syria ...
    THESE WHERE LIKE (climb)?
  20. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 31 August 2013 12: 05
    Quote: PiP
    Polish Foreign Minister Radoslav Sikorski calls Russia responsible for the presence of chemical arsenals in Syria

    Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski decided to lay the blame for the use of chemical weapons in Damascus on Russia. In his opinion, since Syria borrowed the technology of chemical weapons from the USSR, it means that Russia is responsible for its use.

    The head of the Polish Foreign Ministry said that the Russian side had to "say that it would ensure control over the Syrian arsenal of chemical weapons, this could affect the further development of the situation," Rosbalt quotes Sikorski with reference to Agence France Presse.

    At the same time, Poland itself is not going to participate in the military operation that the United States proposes to conduct because of the possible use of chemical weapons near Damascus.
    1. avia12005
      31 August 2013 16: 40
      How did Churchill speak about Poland? Purely Pshek method - to incite, unleash a war, and themselves aside
  21. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 31 August 2013 12: 35
    What is there to breed "turuses on wheels", the provocateurs from the CIA did not even take care of at least a minimal camouflage of the supply of chemical weapons to the rebels. Remember a snapshot of a militant in full gear and has a chemical grenade on his belt, and in other pictures it is the same but used. Yes, they have thousands of such blunders, they expose themselves hourly! And then there's the Turkish border guard's confession about 3 trucks with chemical weapons for the militants. Only the last fool won't add 2 + 2! They spit in our faces from the UN rostrum, and our diplomats Politeses are bred! Enough, it's time to give them g .. to eat!
  22. shinobi
    shinobi 31 August 2013 14: 46
    There are, there are adequate people in the West! But who listens to them, if the rest have eyes blocked with a dollar and ears covered with propaganda?
  23. Bekzat
    Bekzat 31 August 2013 22: 19
    Greetings to all, recently often leads articles from abroad, increasingly began to write what we are discussing with you. Has the eyes really begun to open in the west?
    1. avia12005
      1 September 2013 10: 09
      Do not hope, these are lonely honest people. Western media space is subject to the enemy
  24. albanech
    albanech 2 September 2013 15: 31
    This is not a failure, but the work of the US and British special services! They did everything to untie their hands! So it was and will be - the special services worked as they should - made it so that everyone believed that they didn’t do it — it was the same on September 11.09.2001, XNUMX in the United States to rally people and increase the role of the president and his authority!