Something happened to the carburetor!

93
Something happened to the carburetor!Greetings to all categorically! Something like this was said by one of the literary heroes, and I like this wording.

For some time I did not have the opportunity to spend so much time on the “computer” as to be able to write at least one comment, not to mention an article or publication. And tonight, such an opportunity appeared and - could not resist the wave News around the situation around Syria, I decided to express some of my thoughts.

The words in the title of this publication are the words of one of the heroes of the American play of the end of the 70-s of the last century. In the course of the play, a poor American, whose daughter began to arrogantly arrogant, cynical and young millionaire, who does not conceal his passions from the father that he needs a girl only for bodily pleasures and who considers that a fat wallet excludes the concept of spiritual purity, decency and the agony of the ruined girl heart, plans to kill the scoundrel with the help of his equally old and harmless in life, like the hero himself, comrade. To this end, they lured a rich scum into the boat for “talks” about the fate of a girl who had gone too far in his omnipotence and during the conversation, by reciting the conditional phrase “Something happened to the carburetor!”, A friend of our elderly hero had to stun the millionaire on the skull by mounting . But since neither the father of the offended girl himself, nor his comrade had ever dealt with such matters, the rehearsed script began to fail and after the wary and tense phrase “Something happened to the carburetor!”, The comrade froze behind the back of a young and rich scoundrel raised mount, not daring to lower it on the head of a millionaire. The girl's father, as if hypnotized, repeated the agreed words, and the mount did not cut off the head of the intended victim, and this lasted until the millionaire, turning around, seeing and understanding the plan, both old men did not drop them from the boat into the water, where they were safely and "Sunk."

In all this tragicomic situation, I would like to single out only that, in a seemingly pre-rehearsed situation, reality made its own corrections, and the “program” began to fail.

This is a preface. And now how this situation has become stratified (in my opinion) on the situation around the long-suffering Syria.

The states and their European, as well as those who have recently joined the “friendly choir” of the monarchies of the bay. It would seem that the passing situation to eliminate the unwanted Assad regime should not have encountered any special obstacles - according to such schemes, intervention was carried out in the affairs of all the countries of the Middle East, starting from Tunisia, and everything was OK. And there were worried reports about the violence of authorities over citizens of the countries, and governments were created in exile or simply opposition (of course, progressive!) Forces, concerned about the struggle for a brighter future, and full support was given to all these forces by the most compassionate and progressive countries of Europe, led by a guarantor World Peace - USA. Everything worked, everything went as it should and brought the expected results. Until they tripped over Syria. This is where the system began to fail. The fact that the world’s grandees for Syria have embarked on the grandees of world politics - Russia and China, is already common news. But the fact that their position got somewhere silent, somewhere restrained, and somewhere explicit and cautious support of some other countries, these were the first sobs of the coalition "engine of progress" led by the United States.

Further more. Over time, the voices of Russia and China were already more and more loudly and boldly joined by the voices of some other countries - not members of the Councils of the UN without the UN but something meaningful and forcing them to listen to their opinions. Disagreements began in the camp of the most seemingly loyal staff vassals — either Germany would come up with “non-constructive” initiatives, or Italy would begin to slip.

But, remarkably, the information war has ceased to be a one-gate game! During all this pre-today's, before the military situation near the borders of Syria, all the so-called hawks were forced not only to attack, but also to defend. And today's news releases of foreign TV channels, in general, showed a complete discrepancy in public opinion between Europeans and Americans. And the fact that people with placards in support of Syria took to the streets of European cities means that with the slightest mistake during the outbreak of hostilities, with the appearance of the first coffins with the bodies of European and state warriors, this opinion will receive powerful replenishment from the passive yet passive inhabitant . That's when the situation will pull on some deja vu. Thousands and desperate manifestations of the times of the Vietnam War will be immediately remembered.

And such a situation is quite likely. Syria’s air defenses, although not able to contend with the NATO colossus in full measure, may well present unpleasant surprises. And the morale and acquired hardening of two difficult war years cannot be discounted. And the morale of the civilian population is admirable. As one of the residents of Damascus said in an interview - “We have been fighting for two years. What new things will the Americans and NATO present? We will defend ... "

So - "Something happened to the carburetor" and the debugged engine of global American politics begins to sneeze. And with unfavorable developments for NATO countries and their podgavkivayuschih, it may even stall.

I would like to touch upon the situation with very often quoted words of Lavrov, interpreted as the reluctance of Russia to fight for Syria. It is surprising that the injected interpretation has found wide support, despite the fact that many have not even tried to think about the construction of Lavrov's phrases. The words: “We are not going to fight with anyone” can also be regarded as words that - “We are not going to fight with anyone without due reason”. That is - "We are peaceful people, but ..." - then you know. I emphasize, there were no words - “We are not going to fight for Syria”!

And I would like to cite the words of Bashar Assad himself addressed to Russian politicians:
Syrian President Bashar Assad spoke very precisely about Russian politics - although not about this, it’s about general principles: “You don’t need to protect me, you don’t need to support Syria. Protect yourself, pursue a policy in your own interests. "

If you think about it, with these words, Asad makes it clear to our leadership that, by helping Syria, Russia is upholding its long-range borders. And we should not rush to interpret these words as a reason for our President to wash his hands and sit in the corner while the ally is under pressure. Our President understands this very well and does exactly as much in this situation as necessary. And those crying cries about the merging of Syria by Russia, about the treachery of Syria and appeals to make war, as a rule, these are the words of those who either do not know what war is or those who know perfectly well that he will not go there.

As it was repeatedly said before and, as sounded in one of today's article.

Jews put pressure on Obama, Putin loses half a trillion dollars

On the Internet, where Prince Bandar’s visit to Putin was touched with generous gifts for Putin changing his position on Syria and which Putin refused.
/ Why Putin refused such a good bargain to us. Putin really does not sell friends, he is not Kozyrev /

All the best and peaceful sky over your head.

Sincerely, ESAUL
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    93 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. serge-68-68
      +2
      30 August 2013 08: 26
      The carburetor is fine ... Like the whole car. The steering got bad. So the team got a little bit fussy.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +30
          30 August 2013 08: 48
          Our president probably understood one wisdom for himself: "Be cool with your enemies and do not give up under any circumstances, and you will see how others (enemies) surrender!" good
          1. +21
            30 August 2013 09: 48
            This man, always surprised me with his cold-bloodedness, perseverance, his charisma, and especially not with a bendable line. Such a president, I wish everyone like ours!
            1. +1
              30 August 2013 10: 53
              Urgent: to organize V. Putin a creative business trip to Washington - to teach this master class
              1. +3
                30 August 2013 11: 18
                Yeah, on the list include Chub and the like with a one-way ticket.
              2. Basil123
                +5
                30 August 2013 15: 11
                in St. Petersburg the master class will be)))
              3. +3
                30 August 2013 16: 48
                Quote: Old very
                Urgent: to organize V. Putin a creative business trip to Washington - to teach this master class

                According to the rules of the genre, Putin needs to sit at home for some time and calmly contemplate the results of the work done ... his own and the team.
                Valera, thanks for the article! Short and weighty ...
                I feel progress ... Quietly I envy the syllable.

                Good luck!
                1. +2
                  30 August 2013 18: 52
                  Quote: Tartary
                  Valera, thanks for the article! Short and weighty ...

                  I'm joining !! hi
                  1. +3
                    30 August 2013 19: 52

                    Tartary (2)

                    senior citizen (5

                    Guys salute hi Thanks for the kind words. Thanks to all forum users for their feedback! drinks
                    Godinovich, do not be shy. You have the very syllable - hoo! I always read your posts with pleasure - not verbose, but beating in the stomach.
                    Glad to see you" drinks
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      30 August 2013 20: 00
                      Quote: esaul
                      Glad to see you"
                      fellow drinks Mutually Valera! Do not get lost for a long time!
                      1. +1
                        30 August 2013 20: 18
                        Quote: retired
                        Do not get lost for a long time!

                        Winter will put everything in its place laughing Someone will drive to the couch. I do not want this and I am afraid, but because there will always be (I hope) not enough time. drinks I shake my hand, Yura.
      2. +8
        30 August 2013 11: 33
        Quote: serge-68-68
        The carburetor is fine ...

        Clickable Image:
        1. +2
          30 August 2013 16: 04
          Quote: Corsair
          Clickable Image:
          Rarity, however!
          There are already fewer and fewer
        2. -1
          30 August 2013 19: 56
          Quote: Corsair
          Clickable Image:

          PIRATE, salute hi It is a pity that few people have added your post! I laughed heartily. Maybe it's just that some were too lazy to "click" or I just haven't seen this joke until now. Class! good
          1. +1
            30 August 2013 20: 03
            Quote: esaul
            Maybe some were just too lazy to "click"
            In-in! Too lazy.fool Cool!! "The whole canoe is assembled" - must be taken into service.
      3. +2
        30 August 2013 12: 09
        Yes no carb is out of order. Time has changed - 21st century in the yard. It's time to change humanity. Other problems are pending.
      4. Quiet
        +4
        30 August 2013 14: 27
        Carburetor is okay

        That's right. The whole problem is that between the steering wheel and the seat .... laughing
      5. Lukich
        +2
        30 August 2013 19: 22
        ... Regards, to ESAUL ...

        ... "We are peaceful people, but Our armored train is on a side track" ... the young do not know - they have not been taught this for twenty years ...
        1. +1
          30 August 2013 19: 58
          Quote: Lukich
          Sincerely, to ESAUL

          Mutually, Luke hi It is a pity that there is no emoticon - "Shake hands" drinks
          1. Arabist
            +2
            30 August 2013 20: 04
            Dear Esaul, do not abandon the horse (write optimistic and good articles)! I always read with pleasure. Good luck to you!
            1. 0
              30 August 2013 20: 15
              Quote: Arabist
              I always read with pleasure. Good luck to you!

              Greetings buddy hi Thank. As far as possible - I try wink And to you - good luck in everything! drinks
    2. +9
      30 August 2013 08: 26
      Yes, that's right, an article plus! And for those who have something with a carburetor, a little advice: you should first think carefully, and only then talk. So as not to torment yourself with the heavy torment of choice.
      1. Basil123
        +2
        30 August 2013 15: 16
        I put booooolshoy + and it seems to me that these torment will lead to an attack on Syria request otherwise it will be cowardice and the president will be branded for centuries lol
        1. Basil123
          +2
          30 August 2013 17: 27
          especially since this is not a simple president .......... he is a Negro belay 1 the negro president and oh ...... smiling belay
          1. +1
            30 August 2013 20: 03
            Ivan79
            Basil123
            Guys, welcome hi and thank you. Regarding the phrase
            Quote: Vasily123
            1 the negro president and oh ...... smiling
            I remembered the words from one article on the Internet - "... But what a productivity! They don't have time to wash themselves, as they immediately obsi ..."
    3. +7
      30 August 2013 08: 34
      Kind! Friends, whoever says anything about the Russian Federation and its inaction / action, but look at this information http://news.mail.ru/politics/14542597/?frommail=1

      I don’t think we have anything to do with it! Mb is the hype around Syria and there is a clearly thought-out plan, or rather a response plan, to merge the Americans! Look, they really remain alone! The art of politics, I think! Good day.
      1. +3
        30 August 2013 10: 01
        if the offended boy did the obamka, then this would be his death sentence and the mothers of American soldiers who did not return on their feet would tear him to pieces. The deaths of their children will be in vain and only for the benefit of a few gentlemen
      2. +8
        30 August 2013 11: 06
        Quote: Dwarfik
        I don’t think we have anything to do with it! Mb is the hype around Syria and there is a clearly thought-out plan, or rather a response plan, to merge the Americans! Look, they really remain alone! The art of politics, I think! Good day.


        Any war, including information war, is first of all demolition of enemy country sovereignty... This scrapping is taking place under the slogans of globalization and common human values. In fact, why any obsolete independence, if there is a single "friendly" market and everyone is for democracy?
        This is clearly evidenced by the wars in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria. You can still remember the collapse of the USSR, it all started with information attacks. Especially now, in the era of the Internet, there is even a new kind of wars against regimes unwanted by globalizers - "twitter revolutions".

        In the case of Syria, for the first time we are witnessing a slipping of the worked-out scenario, it has even come to the point that the closest US vassals for NATO refuse to get involved in the war and Obama can be left alone. And now he will have to listen to the opinion of Russia
        The American leader announced his readiness to cooperate with Russia in finding a political way out of the situation.

        link
        “We hope that a political settlement is possible in Syria. We are ready to work with everyone, Russians and others, to bring the parties together and resolve the conflict. ”

        Thus Obama recently spoke out. This is such a turn ... If at first he flatly refused to meet with Putin, now his plans have changed dramatically ... We must maintain a good face in a bad game.

        1. +10
          30 August 2013 11: 21
          Putin’s response to the situation in Syria and the supply of weapons to Western media.

      3. +12
        30 August 2013 12: 01
        Quote: Dwarfik
        the hype around Syria is a well-thought-out plan, or rather a response plan, to merge the Americans!

        In my opinion, everything is somewhat more complicated. Obama really does not want to fight in Syria. But they push him to this. The story with chemical weapons is a pure setup and it looks like it is a setup for Obama. It seems that there are two forces in the western establishment, and there is a struggle between them.
        Look: In Syria, a booze begins with the unequivocal support of the Americans for the "revolutionaries". Also starring Qatar, Turkey and Egypt under Morsi. All of them are for the overthrow of Assad, all are ready to fight with him if the West supports them. What they loudly declare. Then the following happens: Mursi is removed from office. The Americans are filming by American methods-orange coup. The military who came to power, who are clearly pro-American, support Assad.

        Erdogan slipped the same thing, but he managed to fight back. Until.

        The emir of Qatar is removed, and his son is placed, and Qatar essentially leaves the game. His place is occupied by the Saudis.

        And the Americans who supply and support the militants do all this. Cognitive dissonance arises.
        There is only one explanation - there are two forces in the US and the Western elite, and these forces have different plans. Moreover, the anti-Assad side is mainly based in Europe. Obama is against the war in Syria, and Putin knows it. That is why there are no harsh statements and threats from Russia. Putin is suspiciously calm. Obama has still "not made a decision," and probably will not. The game goes much deeper than we think. To know what was at stake.
        1. 0
          30 August 2013 16: 08
          Quote: tungus
          The game goes much deeper than we think. To know what is at stake.


          Absolutely true analysis. At stake is the fate of the world order.
        2. 0
          30 August 2013 16: 42
          It is quite logical. Perhaps we are really on the example of Syria, we observe the distribution of power within the United States. The question remains open how this divide will end, and whether the situation in the world will worsen as a result.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    4. +2
      30 August 2013 08: 34
      Yes, there is condensation, and in the heads of the bastards in the White House
      1. +2
        30 August 2013 10: 02
        and condensate ... gas laughing
    5. +11
      30 August 2013 08: 35
      Assad said beautifully. You can’t say more precisely. In general, having started this entire campaign, the Western leaders did themselves a disservice. They attack Syria or abandon the war, in any case, they lose points. It was much more profitable for them to simply support the murderers of bandits and looters they had sent, while supporting their actions in every possible way. The world is changing. Hard for a long time, but changing. And as always, a bad world is better than a good war.
      I wish you all good health.
    6. +2
      30 August 2013 08: 35
      +. In general, I read the version that this is an exchange. The Russian Federation and China at this summit were to announce a new reserve currency. Obama did not attack in exchange for deferment. If this is garbage, then the second option is also more like the joint statements of the Russian Federation and China + the fleet scared away the jackals.
    7. +5
      30 August 2013 08: 39
      Yes, and morale and the acquired training of two difficult war years cannot be discounted.

      When units with combat experience threw from Berlin to the Far East, how long did the Kwantung army last? In the event of a ground invasion, NATO will both from the army and from the population and even from militants. The United States has no experience in combat (front-line) operations. Iraq and Afghanistan are not considered, for a long time it was. Today, NATO soldiers are not ready for blood and sweat and tears.
    8. +9
      30 August 2013 08: 45
      “No need to protect me, no need to support Syria. Protect yourself, pursue a policy in your own interests. ”
      Assad clearly spoke well done! The interest now in many countries is one to besiege the presumptuous Anglo-Saxons!
    9. +6
      30 August 2013 08: 49
      Everything about the case +!
      That's just
      As one of the residents of Damascus said in an interview, “We’ve been fighting for two years. What new things will the Americans and NATO bring to us? We will defend ourselves ... "
      Iraq fought no less
      All the fifth column, so that ...
    10. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 55
      and I want to ask a question to these clowns - amers:
      where are the tracks of your policy laid?
    11. +12
      30 August 2013 08: 55
      RT-people also contributed to the split of the NATO allies, and some say why this channel is needed. If the Amers do not retreat, they will receive enemies among their former allies.
      1. +3
        30 August 2013 13: 31
        M. Simonyan - Order of St. Andrew the First-Called for this, she really deserved it, unlike Gorbi!
        1. +1
          30 August 2013 15: 27
          Quote: Syrdon
          M. Simonyan - Order of St. Andrew the First-Called for this, she really deserved it, unlike Gorbi!
          She really deserved it, unlike the labeled one. We fully realized how important this channel was in the 2008 year (Georgia, South Ossetia). Putin understood this in 2004, and Margarita talentedly executed his instructions.
    12. Valery Neonov
      +3
      30 August 2013 08: 56
      Article +++. As for the further actions of the amers and their allies (read vassals), let me quote a short excerpt from Krylov's fable "Swan, Cancer and Pike":
      -When there is no agreement in the comrades,
      In the mood their business will not go,
      And it doesn’t come out of it, only flour
      Once a Swan, Cancer, yes Pike ... (France, England and the United States) ..
      It seems not true, is it .... hi
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 20: 10
        Valery Neonov
        Thanks, namesake hi I myself love to cite as an example the words of Russian classics! drinks
      2. 0
        30 August 2013 21: 01
        maybe it will be better if "... once a Swan with Cancer - a Pike ..." Russia + Syria = -USA?
        1. 0
          31 August 2013 06: 59
          Quote: sso-250659
          maybe it will be better if "... once a Swan with Cancer - a Pike ..." Russia + Syria = -USA?

          Yes, no-ee-ettt, it was originally like this: - once a swan with pike cancer ...

          But there is a double meaning ...
          Or, CANCER is a device that is used ...
          Or, "cancer" is a pose in which the user is ...

          And whoever turns out to be who, time will tell ...
    13. -7
      30 August 2013 08: 57
      The engine is not a carburetor, it has long been an injection one, where it is necessary to reduce the speed to minimum, where it is necessary to turn it on more.
    14. +6
      30 August 2013 09: 07
      “No need to protect me, no need to support Syria. Protect yourself, pursue a policy in your own interests. ” - GOOD ADVICE FOR OUR MILITARY-POLITICAL MANAGEMENT.
      PROTECTING IS ALWAYS EASIER ON FAR APP.
      When Syria falls, Iran will be next, and then the United States will take over the CIS, including Russia itself, so Russia's current actions in the context of the “Syrian issue” are also due to self-preservation issues. In this regard, Syria is one of the lines of defense on the far approaches to Moscow. Libya, which was surrendered, was the same line of defense, after which what is now happening around Syria became inevitable.
    15. +11
      30 August 2013 09: 11
      I want to draw the attention of members of the forum to the fact that after the G-8 summit at which Putin voiced Russia's position on Syria, he no longer made comments on this issue and spoke only to Lavrov and the Foreign Ministry. Putin did not call any of the Western leaders, everyone called him ... I believe that Putin and Lavrov have definitely outplayed the West in Syria. I will not try to assess this fact from a geopolitical point of view, but I think that for NATO, Qatar and the SA this is a bad signal. Cameron was "lowered" by his own parliament, Obamka Congress. Cock Hollande stayed in loneliness, as I understand it, he alone plans to fight in Syria, or will the parliament also "lower" him?
      1. wax
        +2
        30 August 2013 11: 48
        If I am not mistaken, then Stalin was not at all scattered with speeches and comments. And now everyone has been infected by blogs and twitter. It is time for senior executives to sit there less, and do more business. We will see the result without words.
      2. 0
        30 August 2013 20: 13
        Quote: Andrey 447
        that after the G-8 summit at which Putin announced Russia's position on Syria, he no longer made comments on this issue and spoke only to Lavrov and the Foreign Ministry. Putin did not call any of the Western leaders, everyone called him.


        Greetings, Andrew. hi It seems to me that the proverb fits perfectly here - "The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on." drinks
    16. Owl
      +5
      30 August 2013 09: 11
      If Russia and China enjoy dignified respect in the world, if the British, French and Americans are afraid of retaliatory actions by Russia, China and Iran, then open aggression (introduction of a "no-fly zone", cruise missile strikes, airstrikes on targets in Syria or "pinpoint strikes" units of the Special Forces) will not take place. The development of events will show, like a litmus test, the position in the world and the authority of Russia.
    17. olviko
      +1
      30 August 2013 09: 16
      “We are not going to fight with anyone”

      Well, right Lavrov said, did we fight with someone? let's say in Korea, in Vietnam, in Egypt and Syria, in Angola? They didn’t fight with anyone. Ask the USA, England, France, Israel, they will confirm. Let's say the West and Israel fought with Russia in August 2008. Of course not, this is not good Georgia ...
      1. wax
        +3
        30 August 2013 11: 51
        Naturally, we are not going to. We will fight if external circumstances force us. By the way, between going together and making a huge distance.
    18. +3
      30 August 2013 09: 19
      US Department of Defense refused to fight in Syria without allies

      The United States will begin a military operation in Syria only as part of an international coalition. This, according to Reuters on August 30, said US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel.

      “This is the goal of President Obama. Whatever the decision, it will be international cooperation, ”the agency quotes the minister. Hagel added that Washington will continue to seek allies. Including the United States intends to continue to negotiate with the UK.

      Earlier, a number of American media, citing a source in the US presidential administration, said that America was ready to independently strike at Syria. This statement came after the British parliament refused to participate in a military operation against the regime of Bashar al-Assad. In addition, according to ITAR-TASS, 12 NATO countries also refused to participate in the war without the approval of the UN Security Council.

      PS: Everything, blown away like the Yankees lol
    19. +8
      30 August 2013 09: 27
      What keeps Mr. Assad at the expense of? True, it is supported by the people, the army, allies !!! This is the set of codes and rules that the leader stood to the end! Let's not remember Libya, Iraq. It was yes, but, excuse me, this is history and we (the Russian Federation) have learned a lesson from it! We support Syria by whatever means there - bidding with NATO, an alliance with China - it does not matter, but our frontier is standing! and that car that could plunge Syria into chaos, as was noted in the next article, her carburetor began to rattle! A reserve currency to be! Now they will ask for a higher price in trades with NATO, which already in agony are already spraying saliva (it makes no sense to argue, but then this currency will be accepted anyway and this will be the last nail in the dollar's lid!
      PS. How many people have so many opinions, but great wisdom: to have an opinion and to know when to express it.
      PSS The Russian Federation expressed its opinion in my opinion successfully and on time.
    20. +4
      30 August 2013 09: 30
      The time is right and NATO as part of the international coalition will only go to gay parades. fellow
    21. +4
      30 August 2013 09: 36
      You can’t relax. Close C-300 supply contracts, expose bastions. Early to sleep on our laurels !!!
    22. +3
      30 August 2013 09: 46
      Amers need war in any case. In a country where more than half of the GDP is financial services, a high standard of living can only ensure the capture and ruin of more and more countries. If it doesn't work with Syria, it will be a different country. America has already invested heavily in destabilizing Syria and will now "protect its investments" as long as it is beneficial to "investors."
    23. +6
      30 August 2013 09: 48
      Obama will not be envied now. He won’t attack, he will end like Kennedy, he will attack, like Nixon. That is silent, wants to slip.
      1. +2
        30 August 2013 12: 03
        Quote: Yoon Klob
        Do not attack, - ends as Kennedy, attacks, - as Nixon

        There is a third option: Submit a request for Russian citizenship as Depardieu. Moreover, the informational occasion has already been worked out - our taxes are very high, and there are not enough bananas.
        Damn, rzhunimaga - photo of Kadyrov with Obama in an embrace.
        lol
        1. +2
          30 August 2013 16: 34
          Quote: Onotolle
          Quote: Yoon Klob
          Do not attack, - ends as Kennedy, attacks, - as Nixon

          There is a third option: Submit a request for Russian citizenship as Depardieu. Moreover, the informational occasion has already been worked out - our taxes are very high, and there are not enough bananas.
          Damn, rzhunimaga - photo of Kadyrov with Obama in an embrace.
          lol

          What more?!! He supports the minority. We don’t need these.
          1. +1
            30 August 2013 20: 25
            Quote: Onotolle
            There is a third option: Submit a request for Russian citizenship as Depardieu.

            Quote: Vasya
            What more?!! He supports the minority. We don’t need these

            Guys, salute hi Here is such not malicious, poisonous and clever humor you will not meet on every site. What is the beauty of VO. Good luck to you guys drinks laughing
    24. +1
      30 August 2013 10: 10
      Why envy him? he himself defined the "red line". Now either into a fight or a call to Putin))
      1. +3
        30 August 2013 10: 40
        And who pulled his tongue? laughing
      2. +4
        30 August 2013 10: 59
        Or I would say "call a friend" or the point goes into the audience.
        1. +4
          30 August 2013 12: 11
          Quote: sasha.28blaga
          ... or the point goes into the auditorium.


          To tear to pieces?
    25. Valery Neonov
      +3
      30 August 2013 10: 16
      [quote = sinobi] Earlier, a number of American media, citing a source in the US presidential administration, said that America was ready to strike at Syria on its own. This statement came after the British parliament refused to participate in a military operation against the regime of Bashar al-Assad. In addition, according to ITAR-TASS, 12 NATO countries also refused to participate in the war without the approval of the UN Security Council. [/ Quote
      To our satisfaction, this is so, not everyone in the world has lost their mind!
    26. Chumich
      +1
      30 August 2013 10: 23
      Quote: a52333
      You can’t relax. Close C-300 supply contracts, expose bastions. Early to sleep on our laurels !!!


      Air defense is not only the S-300 and the Bastions, it is also radars, control systems and also military specialists who will manage all of this .. Everything is put together in a complex multi-level system and huge funds are needed that Syria simply does not have.
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 10: 43
        Well, the day is clear, like in Vietnam or Ukrainians like Georgians, our military specialists will work at the facilities.
    27. 0
      30 August 2013 10: 31
      12 countries seem to have refused to participate in the show. But the States continue to prepare. You can bet - hit not hit. And little depends on Russia, in the game there are heavyweights of politics, which even the US president is no match for. Syria is a bargaining chip, the main goal is not the Middle East and not even Russia. At stake is planet ownership. It’s a pity, in this game we are only dust on the ombre table.
      1. +3
        30 August 2013 16: 14
        Quote: erased
        It’s a pity, in this game we are only dust on the ombre table.

        Some strange "dust" can only be erased together with the table. Russia is not just a factor in the world order, but a key one.
        I note Syria is alive and fighting, just because of the position of our country, compare with Libya.
      2. 0
        30 August 2013 16: 40
        Yes, there is Iran nearby. They do not want to Syria, hit rockets in Iran.
    28. +5
      30 August 2013 10: 33
      Now there will be no attack for sure. "The kid said - the kid did." They had to attack immediately, until they woke up, and not to breed snot. Now any bombing will look like an act of despair, which is even worse for them.
      The international commission will be forced to tell the truth that there was no gas attack.
      Now we can say that Russia is winning without saying a word, without firing a single shot.
      What can I say ... Bravo, Putin.
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 16: 44
        Yeah. They took and told the truth that Chemistry was provided to the militants by Turkey or Saudi Arabia. What is it - to bomb the US allies and demand the trial of their leaders?
    29. 0
      30 August 2013 10: 47
      Quote: erased
      12 countries seem to have refused to participate in the show. But the States continue to prepare. You can bet - hit not hit. And little depends on Russia, in the game there are heavyweights of politics, which even the US president is no match for. Syria is a bargaining chip, the main goal is not the Middle East and not even Russia. At stake is planet ownership. It’s a pity, in this game we are only dust on the ombre table.

      and Hitler, I wonder, was also ambitious in his thoughts?
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 11: 15
        But what is still Cameron Hitler nambitsiozil?
    30. Vtel
      +2
      30 August 2013 10: 51
      Obama is just a garrison among the Rothschilds and Rockefellers of the Zhidomassaans, while the enti crafted for their Tel Aviv are ready to put everyone on the altar of war and the USA and Geyvropu and the henchmen of the Arab world, so that they will not deviate from their plan - Iran with a vigorous bomb in their throats .
      1. +2
        30 August 2013 13: 36
        I think that Tel Aviv will side with them, they will exchange it, if Israel is to be merged, how to give it to drink.
    31. +1
      30 August 2013 11: 15
      And here is some very interesting information from the US Department of Defense
      http://warfiles.ru/show-37573-minoborony-ssha-otkazalos-voevat-v-sirii-bez-soyuz
      nikov.html
    32. +1
      30 August 2013 11: 22
      Well done Yesaul, right so their face is about in ... oh! PLUS for the article!
    33. +3
      30 August 2013 11: 24
      The United States of America and the United Kingdom will come to this .. And this will end ..
    34. +1
      30 August 2013 11: 29
      yes .. Time is not right now .. it's time to change the carburetor to the injector. Only here, how? Service to-by-bye! Late to drink Borjomi when the kidneys fell off. Bad of you grandfather Mazay, Barack Obamych !. hares (vassals) fled from your leaky boat!
    35. +2
      30 August 2013 11: 42
      ... But, what is remarkable, the information war has ceased to be a one-goal game! In the course of this whole pre-war situation near the borders of Syria, all the so-called hawks were forced not only to attack, but also to defend themselves. And today's news releases of foreign TV channels, in general, have shown complete disagreement in the public opinion of both Europeans and Americans. And the fact that people with placards in support of Syria took to the streets of European cities ...

      Excellent spotted.
      This gives us hope that even where we are not "Copenhagen" (information wars), there are also positive developments.

      How amers cannot understand what is dangerously shaking the Middle Eastern and Arab boat ...
      It’s for them to roll out in such a pretzel that the al-Qaeda fostered by them in Afghanistan will seem like a flower.
      Libya's experience is not enough for them?
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 20: 32
        Aleks tv
        Lesha, welcome hi Photo - otpad. And, surprisingly, Rebel (and this is probably their glorious representative, seasoned with Photoshop) - not a pity. Even though he is a man. And the inscription - with an error. It is necessary to photoshop so that it was - "Everything will return BACK" laughing drinks
    36. 0
      30 August 2013 11: 53
      So after all, they have a different system - injection, direct injection, and no discussions are needed in the UN Security Council; democracy is to be injected into the Middle East masses and they are splashing.
    37. wax
      0
      30 August 2013 11: 55
      In any case, Mr. Obama has already messed around (I do not want to ban) the Nobel Peace Prize, not only his own, but in principle.
    38. +1
      30 August 2013 13: 04
      I am incredibly interested, what did Putin say to this camarilla at the G-8 so that his silence so far influences the balance of power around Syria? And after all, for each of this flock he found a "good" word that warms their souls in such a difficult time. Respect. This is not a shoe on the podium.
    39. 0
      30 August 2013 13: 51
      Already half a trillion? The author, it seems, it was about 15 billion, and this is 0,15 trillion. Disinformation?
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 20: 38
        Quote: KG_patriot_last
        Already half a trillion? The author, it seems, it was about 15 billion, and this is 0,15 trillion. Disinformation

        Salute, partriot hi In addition to gingerbreads worth 15 billion, Bandar tried to appease Putin with the unhindered transit of Russian oil through pipelines built by Russia. He considered that the silver-legged man ruled Russia and the Eastern cunning was too tough for him. Go to KONTRPOST and you will see everything with your own eyes. hi
    40. +1
      30 August 2013 16: 15
      Like shaving, a little calmed down. But the main French fagot, everything will not calm down ...
      French President Francois Hollande believes that the United States and some of its allies will strike in Syria until September 4. At the same time, Paris is ready to proceed with decisive action without the appropriate permission of the UN Security Council.
      http://www.dni.ru/polit/2013/8/30/259094.html
      1. xan
        0
        30 August 2013 22: 59
        somewhere in my opinion I heard the slaughter characteristic of Hollande - Napoleon was followed by the guard, Hollande followed the homosexual
    41. +2
      30 August 2013 16: 49
      And where are the comments: Putin is silent, Putin has surrendered everyone?
      When I quoted one of the statements of GDP in Syria (does not surrender) I was actively minded.
      AU. Where do not believe in GDP? I demand moral compensation
      1. Laaperanta
        -2
        30 August 2013 17: 04
        Where are the comments? And why in vain do you wag your tongue? This is your capricious privilege. And we just wait until the hostilities begin. Then it will be clear who handed over whom - and for how much.
        1. olviko
          +2
          30 August 2013 17: 52
          That will be the answer!
    42. +1
      30 August 2013 16: 54
      Why did you pass it? You may be interested in this information on the procurement of Russian weapons http://rus.postimees.ee/1366760/istochniki-sirija-nachala-platit-po-oruzhejnym-s
      delkam-s-rf-dela-v-moskve-vedet-djadja-asada
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. wax
        +1
        30 August 2013 22: 12
        The Russian fleet, including RK Moskva, RK Varyag and Admiral Kuznetsov, is going to Syria
        http://warfiles.ru/show-37618-k-sirii-idet-rossiyskiy-flot-v-tom-chisle-rk-moskv
        ai-rk-varyag.html
    43. Ryzhikov
      +2
      30 August 2013 17: 37
      I know that I will be a bit angry Article is good good However, I will express my position on CLICKS saying that Russia is merging allies, I think people have the right to think so remembering the recent executions of Hussein and Gaddafi, then Russia, in the person of its authorities, acted in a similar way TALKED and STATED. No one talks about joining the hostilities on the side of Assad, but the amers must be stopped here and now while their carburetors are not standing on our borders and are not thirsty to drink Russian oil. Regards to the author hi PS I apologize for the confusion
      1. +1
        30 August 2013 20: 47
        Quote: Ryzhikov
        I know that I will be a bit

        Dima, welcome. hi What to expect, colleague? Unfortunately, in the heat of the moment people forget the real alignment of things in relations between Russia and Libya at the time of aggression against them. By that time, both Iraq and Syria had freed themselves from allied obligations and feelings in relation to the Pro-Russia. Russia was at that time weakened and they hurried to get rid of the "burden" of friendship with the "sick" country. Okay, Iraq is an outcast in the Western world. At least Saddam had the pride not to kiss all sorts of Sarkozy. And Gaddafi decided to simply score on Russia and the debts to her and cling to the powers that be. So I clung ...
      2. Arabist
        -1
        30 August 2013 21: 06
        Ryzhikov, please tell me how can a person who publicly approves terrorist acts (Gaddafi) be an ally of Russia? Saddam Hussein is certainly no better, if not much worse.
    44. Alexander borey
      -1
      30 August 2013 21: 07
      I think that we should not speak for Assad, Lavrov, Putin, etc.: what they want to say and what they don’t want and what they hint at. This is bad manners. They are not small, they can answer for themselves if they want. Here, and so everything is clearly understood. Lavrov openly calls Assad a dictator; in fact, he put an end to it. How many friends we have already sold how the Union collapsed? In order not to go far - Gaddafi. Torn to pieces the old man because of the spinelessness of our foreign policy. What is there to say? The very near future will show whether the author is right or not. In conclusion, I can say that the crowd in the streets never stopped the West before aggression. They wanted to spit at the UN Security Council, they say it almost in plain text. My opinion is that an attack on Syria is inevitable. In short, why the water in the mortar is crushed, wait and see.
      1. Arabist
        0
        30 August 2013 21: 12
        When did Lavrov call Assad a dictator? Give a quote.
    45. Alexander borey
      0
      30 August 2013 21: 19
      Quote: Arabist
      Give a quote.

      Lavrov's quote: "You cannot, for example, fight a regime just because you personally do not like the dictator who leads it, and not fight another regime because you like an authoritarian ruler in another country."
      1. Arabist
        0
        30 August 2013 21: 42
        Something I did not find this. Where did you get it?
      2. 0
        30 August 2013 21: 50
        Well, where is the name of Assad? This can easily be attributed to Gaddafi and Qatar.
      3. wax
        0
        30 August 2013 22: 20
        The quote is correct, but where did you find that Assad is called a dictator? You might as well "read" in such a quote the Qatari or Saudi monarch. Don't lower Lavrov's level to that of a kitchen one.
    46. Alexander borey
      0
      30 August 2013 21: 49
      Quote: Arabist
      Where did you get it?

      1. Arabist
        0
        30 August 2013 21: 51
        Well, that he said the word dictator convinced. So what? Are you sure that he meant Assad?
    47. Alexander borey
      0
      30 August 2013 21: 58
      Quote: Arabist
      Are you sure that he meant Assad?

      I'm sure. Everything is very clear.
      1. Arabist
        0
        30 August 2013 22: 01
        It is extremely clear only that you are customizing everything to your point of view. All your arguments about surrendering your friends are empty, but they are full of lies and leave only doubts about the correctness of your perception of reality.
      2. 0
        30 August 2013 22: 09
        Ah ... ahem ... I see.
      3. wax
        +1
        30 August 2013 22: 24
        Powell, showing the test tube, was also very clear, and he was sure, but Cameron was sure without the test tube and not even resorting to a thimble. So I’m sure that Lavrov poked into the eyes of the West precisely in connection with their support of Middle Eastern dictators loyal to the states.
    48. Alexander borey
      0
      30 August 2013 22: 11
      Quote: Arabist
      All your arguments about surrendering your friends are empty, but they are full of lies and leave only doubts about the correctness of your perception of reality.

      Yes, you personally can doubt anything. For God's sake. It makes me neither cold nor hot. And blaming the lies of a person who has only expressed his point of view, while not imposing it on anyone, to put it mildly - is indecent. Especially for men. This is very to say the least.
      Life has taught me how to proceed from the worst, rely on the most unfavorable scenario and draw conclusions from this. And throwing hats is not my style. And I clearly wrote that time will tell. All the best.
      1. Arabist
        0
        30 August 2013 22: 17
        Yes, please, what a man should do. I myself know. I did not urge anyone to throw their hats on. All the best.
    49. wax
      0
      30 August 2013 22: 54
      Here is the Man:
      http://warfiles.ru/show-37603-hafez-asad-zhdet-amerikanskoy-ataki.html
    50. wax
      0
      30 August 2013 22: 55
      Here is the Man:
      http://warfiles.ru/show-37603-hafez-asad-zhdet-amerikanskoy-ataki.html
    51. 0
      30 August 2013 22: 57
      -Great news, by God!!!
    52. mihasik
      0
      30 August 2013 23: 07
      That's how many times I read about a mysterious world government that plots intrigues around the world and incites wars in its own interests. One question constantly comes to my mind: How many of them are there in quantitative terms and why is not one (or joint) secret service of the world liquidating them (fortunately there are a lot of methods ) key figures? After all, if this is a person, then he can simply be physically eliminated, and everyone would live more calmly. But no one does this. Why?
    53. 0
      30 August 2013 23: 23
      -all because these same secret services receive their salaries from them!
    54. 0
      31 August 2013 04: 55
      “Something happened to the carburetor!”..
      There is condensation in the carburetor)))
      1. 0
        4 November 2015 02: 11
        What happened, what happened?! If it happens, it needs to be repaired!
    55. 0
      4 November 2015 02: 18
      if something happens to the carburetor, you shouldn’t ask for half a year what happened to it, but have it repaired!

      but what was the name of this American play and who the author was - that is the question! can anyone tell me?

      PS
      I watched this play for a long time and the conventional phrase - “Something happened to the carburetor” has stuck since the viral advertisement! ,)

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"