Russia strengthens the grouping of the Navy off the coast of Syria

267
Russia strengthens the grouping of the Navy off the coast of Syria

Naval command fleet In connection with the situation around Syria, Russia decided to renew the naval staff of the permanent operational formation in the Mediterranean Sea, a source in the Russian General Staff said on Thursday.

According to him, the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean has demanded from Russia separate adjustments in the composition of the navy group. In the coming days, it will be replenished by a large anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet, reports the Mayak radio station.

Later, according to the source, “the Moscow Black Sea Fleet’s missile cruiser“ Moscow ”will join it, which is now completing tasks in the North Atlantic and will soon begin a transatlantic transition towards the Strait of Gibraltar”.

In addition, according to him, in the fall the Mediterranean grouping of the Navy should be replenished by the Pacific Fleet missile cruiser Varyag, which will replace the large anti-submarine ship Vice-Admiral Panteleev, currently performing combat missions as part of the operational force, Interfax reports.

Earlier it was reported that the frigate Chevalier Paul (“Chevalier Paul”), one of the most modern in the French fleet, departed from the port of Toulon to the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. Prior to this, it became known that Washington sent two aircraft carriers to the Gulf region: Harry Truman and Nimitz.

The situation around Syria escalated after August 21 media, citing opposition to the statements reported the alleged use of chemical weapons in the suburbs of Damascus. Thereafter, in the West, where the application formerly known as sarin Syrian authorities under direct intervention in the conflict, openly talking about a possible military intervention in the Arab republic.

On Wednesday, NATO ambassadors stated that the information about the involvement of the government of Bashar Assad in Damascus under himatake confirmed from multiple sources, and British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the possibility of foreign intervention even without the unanimous support of all members of the UN Security Council.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday gave Syria's leading himataki UN inspectors investigating evidence that the republic's authorities did not use toxic substances. On Thursday, the media wrote that while the White House also can not provide indisputable evidence that it is involved in himatake Assad.
267 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    29 August 2013 15: 38
    Well, it really will not be very fast.

    Moscow is now in Venezuela (yesterday the commander of the Navy of this country examined her). Kulakov on the way to the strait (Gibraltar which), the Varangian generally gathered in Australia, and from there it will already be visible where he will go.

    By the way, do not forget about Panteleev, who if something, then immediately run, but so far peacefully stands on Novorossiysk naval base.

    It is not worth dumping the RCA yet - R-60 went to provide the 2 BDK to Tartus. This can be quite effective in tracking launches and transmitting information directly to the ATS. BOD and SRZK may not keep track of everything on a large theater, but the RCA can be attached to almost everyone, but there is still a tanker to display.

    Also for the same purpose, you can use the running oldies - Inquisitive, Okay and Savvy.
    1. +82
      29 August 2013 15: 44
      Quote: donavi49
      Well, it really will not be very fast.

      Yes, and it seems to me that we will still not be able to resist ... So if only give target designation and help with electronic warfare as much as possible, but they will not be superfluous there. The main thing is to carefully avoid provocations, such as the KR or the anti-ship missile system lost its course and ended up in the Russian ... It is better to "blow into the water" and shoot down everything that flies in the affected area, having warned enemies in advance, like we are afraid and we will shoot down, so shoot, but away from Russian ships and fly away from us hi
      1. yan
        +22
        29 August 2013 15: 47
        Good suggestion, it’s time to already adequately respond to the metastases of liberalism.
        1. teleset
          +29
          29 August 2013 16: 47
          It looks like Egypt began to turn to face RUSSIA. Putin’s posters were hung in Egypt next to General Abdel Fattah al-Sissi’s and the Arabic inscription “Bai Bai, America!” HERE LINK http://smart-lab.ru/blog/137642.php
          1. +19
            29 August 2013 19: 40
            The Egyptians now have a competent leadership. It is well understood that in the event of Assad's loss, a flock of Wahs will rush to Egypt to rescue Murzik and the Muslim brothers ..
            1. +4
              29 August 2013 19: 44
              Well, the posters are hanging, with inscriptions in the style "It is vital to squeeze the bangers in the country." However, it is still unclear who hanged them, Nasser, the current leader of Egypt (de facto) and Putin.

              However, yes, although not completely. Islamists from Nusra and ISIL - will bring peace and Islam to Iraq. Here, without options, it is already everywhere declared that it is necessary to create a caliphate from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea and save the Sunnis oppressed by unfaithful Shiites in Iraq.

              The other part will go to Egypt, here, too, without special options.
              1. +5
                29 August 2013 21: 15
                Maybe they will still give the back bullshit, few children were killed, the Nazis !!! I imagine the mood of the common people in Syria, not the military who fought, are fighting and will fight, but ordinary people ... and how will Iran do, will it introduce infantry units to help to Syria after the bombing!? people need to be saved from this scum!
                1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +8
          29 August 2013 18: 03
          Quote: yan
          it is time to adequately respond to the metastases of liberalism.

          It’s too late to drink Borzh when the liver has collapsed. liberals, not metastases, we have been holding gentlemen in power in Russia since the beginning of the nineties. What an adequate answer is there.
          1. +3
            29 August 2013 22: 03
            It seems to me that at the top, at the moment, there is a struggle between the librarians and the patriotically inclined. And to speak unequivocally about the authorities as a liberal or pro-Russian one, probably all the same bust.
            1. +7
              29 August 2013 23: 29
              Quote: arnulla
              there is a struggle between the librarians and the patriotic.

              Kubyshka-Tsenrobank-WTO-Serdyukov-Offshores-Education reform-housing and communal services-reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Something after that is hard to believe in a patriotic mood. Now they will merge Syria, within a year or two Privatization 2.0. This is the "fight of the Nanai boys".
              1. 0
                29 August 2013 23: 38
                in life, not everything is so straightforward
              2. +3
                30 August 2013 09: 15
                Quote: Karabin
                Now they will merge Syria, within a year or two Privatization 2.0. This is the "fight of the Nanai boys".
          2. rodevaan
            +3
            30 August 2013 02: 30
            Quote: Karabin
            Quote: yan
            it is time to adequately respond to the metastases of liberalism.

            It’s too late to drink Borzh when the liver has collapsed. liberals, not metastases, we have been holding gentlemen in power in Russia since the beginning of the nineties. What an adequate answer is there.


            - Well, what do you suggest? Sit, lament and groan like old grandmas, and endlessly mumble like "EVERYTHING IS BAD"? Need to do something. Let them do little, but at least they do not stand still. Even if now they are picking out liberoids-subzapadoids, but the process is going on, slowly but surely. Further I think there will be more.
            1. +1
              30 August 2013 16: 17
              Quote: rodevaan
              “Well, what do you suggest?”

              1. Turn on the brains, add 2 and 2, and finally understand that people who are tightly integrated into the political, financial and property components of Western civilization cannot do more for Russia than they do now. Namely, to maintain its raw material status, dependent on external price management.
              2. Stop hoping that those who determine the life of the country will change.
              3. Stop living one day and be content with what is now better than in the 90s, because it will be much worse.
              Quote: rodevaan
              Let now subtly pick out liberoids-sub-Western, but the process is going on, slowly but surely.

              The names of those "wiped out" from the authorities, please. Transfers from government seats to other non-dusty seats are not considered.
      2. +31
        29 August 2013 16: 20
        Quote: seasoned
        but to the other side from Russian ships and fly away from us

        Lesha, hello lost! And then the AMBASSADORS of NATO countries to the UN will declare that Russia used XO and BO against their TAMA-GAVK. In this case, provocation cannot be avoided, we only hope that Obama at the last moment will try to shoot a bullet in Syria, and that this is a show-off for the sake of in order to regain positions after the runway on the last summit had the whole Caudle of "shit" fans of homosexuals, and in pursuit he inserted Snowden for them in a very famous place instead of a whistle ...
        1. +5
          29 August 2013 16: 26
          Quote: Tersky
          Lesha, hello missing

          Hello Vit hi The "problem" was very serious, yesterday it seemed like we managed to "figure it out" drinks
          Quote: Tersky
          And then the AMBASSADORS of NATO countries to the UN will declare that Russia used CW and BW against their "TAMA-GAVK"

          It will be worse if some torpedo floats into the side, everyone will refer to "I am not me and the torpedo is not mine." There are a lot of participants in the conflict and the weapons are unified, something from the Soviet "zapulnit" and the Americans can transfer "arrows" to Iran. This is what I fear most. The history of the Kursk is enough for the eyes ... I don't want VVP to answer questions again with a standard phrase about drowning. recourse
          1. +7
            29 August 2013 16: 30
            Quote: seasoned
            something from the Soviet "zapulnut" and the Americans can transfer "arrows" to Iran.

            This is quite expected, and predictable. That’s why they start swara so that, by the way, they would go around Iran.
          2. +20
            29 August 2013 18: 18
            Quote: seasoned
            The history of the Kursk is enough for the eyes ...

            neither you nor I who knows the truth with Kursk, so there’s no need to draw analogies here, but about the torpedo on board, there are two options
            1. Piss and shut up.
            2.How did the Russian heroes say? - "to stand up for the Russian land" ... so let the ships stand on the roadstead and continue with a ban for all aircraft, flights nearby and not very close ..
            1. -10
              29 August 2013 18: 24
              Quote: gispanec
              then there are two options1. Piss off and shut up. 2. as the Russian heroes said? - "to stand up for the Russian land" ... so let the ships stand on the roadstead and continue with a ban for all aircraft, flights nearby and not very close ..

              And what will you provide a no-fly zone with? It’s ridiculous to read such comments ... They listen to those who have the power and this is a stubborn reality in the modern world. We have a weak Fleet and we cannot expose it as targets for provocations. request
              Estimate the number of ships and planes in the region and stop drooling over the monitor in "heroic" anger. hi
              1. alex21411
                +2
                29 August 2013 18: 43
                I put a minus, don't be angry with "gispanec" ... For boorish remarks about him ...
                1. -1
                  29 August 2013 18: 52
                  Quote: alex21411
                  I put a minus, don't be angry with "gispanec" ... For boorish remarks about him ...

                  If this is for me, then I somehow don't care who put a minus ... I'm not going to get angry at anyone, but what he is trying to "tear hair on his chest" and put our ships under attack ... but he is here (on the site ) is not the only one winked Now, if he himself, as a "Russian hero", bought a ticket and flew to Syria to defend the "Russian land", then he would be honored and praise, and throwing slogans on the website and attacking opponents "in a rage" does not paint him.
                  1. alex21411
                    0
                    29 August 2013 18: 57
                    Putting ships under attack, it's funny, is he the commander-in-chief? "tearing chest hair"? "Now, if he himself, as a" Russian hero ", bought a ticket and flew to Syria to defend the" Russian land ", then he would be honored, and to rush with slogans on the site and attack opponents" in a rage "does not paint him."
                    - By God, a kindergarten was bred here on the site)))
                  2. +5
                    29 August 2013 21: 14
                    Quote: seasoned
                    here "tearing the hair on his chest" and putting our ships under attack ... however, he is not the only one here (on the site). If only he, as a "Russian hero", bought a ticket and flew to Syria to defend the "Russian land" Praise him, but throwing slogans on the site and attacking opponents "in a rage" does not paint him.

                    That is, you call Russia rages ... this time ... piss and shut up - this is your policy, - these are two ... not three ... I would go, but I’m old ... I’m better to teach young people that what I knew at the time ... and I served on the S-75 ... and for the experimental at that time, the S-300 went on guard and co-protection .. right now my knowledge is generally a laugh for s ..... you want what would I make fun of nato ??
                    1. 0
                      29 August 2013 21: 54
                      Razh - courage.
                    2. -7
                      29 August 2013 21: 56
                      Quote: gispanec
                      That is, you call Russia rages ... this time

                      That's what it's called "what do ... k doesn't know, then thinks out" ... If you do not know the Russian language and the meaning of the word "rage", then I can not help you with anything other than referring to dictionaries, however, considering your level, I will facilitate your work
                      RAGE
                      rage, many no, m. (FR. rage) (open.). Rage, fury, frenzy, intense excitement. Come in a rage. Enter the rage. Do smth. in a strong rage.


                      Quote: gispanec
                      piss and shut up is your poly tick

                      Your policy is to smear everyone around and to ascribe some kind of "stamps" to everyone. It's funny to read, but at the same time it feels like you are touching excrement ...
                      Quote: gispanec
                      I would go, but I’m old already ... I’m better to teach young people what I knew at the time ... and I served on the S-75 ... and I went to the guard and co-pilot for the experimental S-300 at that time .. right now my knowledge is generally laughter for ov ..... do you want me to laugh at NATO ??

                      Well here hi
                      1. +7
                        29 August 2013 22: 22
                        for me, Russia doesn’t seem like a rage .... and stick your excuses away, my policy is not to scoop (this is your reality) -A ACT ... and to whom I attribute stamps here ???? ... but about sartier here you are they’re right ... your place seems to be there, and finally about the hat ... I'm really old ..... but if the Motherland calls, I will certainly get up ... unlike you and your help 7B .... me 47 and I do push-ups for 30 seconds 27 times .... I’m ready to defend my homeland at all borders ... but you’ve hiked the epaulettes on the Internet and whined and watered with shit
                      2. -9
                        29 August 2013 22: 27
                        Quote: gispanec
                        for me, Russia doesn’t seem like a rage .... and stick your excuses away, my policy is not to scoop (this is your reality) -A ACT ... and to whom I attribute stamps here ???? ... but about sartier here you are they’re right ... your place seems to be there, and finally about the hat ... I'm really old ..... but if the Motherland calls, I will certainly get up ... unlike you and your help 7B .... me 47 and I do push-ups for 30 seconds 27 times .... I’m ready to defend my homeland at all borders ... but you’ve hiked the epaulettes on the Internet and whined and watered with shit

                        I thought I’m talking with a person, but here is some kind of a bunch of trolls with URYAKalka, which hears only itself and communicates exclusively on shit-urinary turns wassat
                        In general, I made conclusions for myself, good luck with a sketch on the fan and scoring against the wind wassat (I tried to answer you in your language)
                      3. Anti
                        -4
                        29 August 2013 22: 40
                        Quote: seasoned
                        on the fan

                        this + lol
                      4. +1
                        30 August 2013 05: 10
                        Experienced, yes you are in shock today! good hi
                  3. locman60
                    +6
                    29 August 2013 22: 24
                    I apologize ... but in my opinion none of the distinguished guests had ever thought of buying a ticket to Syria ... why put pressure on a person, this is just his opinion ...
              2. +7
                29 August 2013 21: 08
                Quote: seasoned
                And what will you provide a no-fly zone with? It's funny to read such comments ...

                it’s ridiculous to read you, neither I nor the fleet are going to 100% provide the b / zone, you are directly in real contact with Nata, I tell you that you need to get up and ANNOUNCED, and NATO will crap one's pants, and you consider anti-submarine missiles in general launch. .. anti-aircraft missiles in the total answer ... yes, you are a bit sick with numbers ... I'm talking about PETA ... you are talking about Smith ... if you are not catching up about my post, then just ask to clarify ... and that’s it. .for otvetka SAShe any one at this time any submarine with ballistic missiles on board ... and she can spit in Sasha from the pier ... and you think anti-aircraft, anti-ship and other weapons .. ridiculously by God ... you are our swamp Troll! Oh
              3. +3
                30 August 2013 01: 28
                Quote: seasoned
                Quote: gispanec
                then there are two options1. Piss off and shut up. 2. as the Russian heroes said? - "to stand up for the Russian land" ... so let the ships stand on the roadstead and continue with a ban for all aircraft, flights nearby and not very close ..

                And what will you provide a no-fly zone with? It’s ridiculous to read such comments ... They listen to those who have the power and this is a stubborn reality in the modern world. We have a weak Fleet and we cannot expose it as targets for provocations. request
                Estimate the number of ships and planes in the region and stop drooling over the monitor in "heroic" anger. hi

                Our fleet is weak, no doubt. And what do you think, what could turn out for the great and terrible attack (read the provocation) of our ships? They are not there for direct confrontation. This is a demonstration of the will and invariability of the position, Assad’s moral support .. If the amers mess with S. Korea to contact, just in case, I’ll remind you that we are the only ones who can guarantee to erase the states from the globe. do they need? As, however, to us too ... Therefore, there will be no provocations. Torpedoes are they flying in different directions (or swimming? hi )
              4. yuri p
                +1
                30 August 2013 16: 24
                "Estimate the number of ships and aircraft in the region and stop drooling on the monitor in" heroic "anger." -and that the legs are up, but you can remember the Varyag and the Pskov paratroopers in Chechnya. Frightened now, you can wake up tomorrow in an occupied country
            2. +6
              29 August 2013 23: 15
              Quote: gispanec
              .that let the ships stand on the roadstead and further with a ban on all aircraft, flights near and not very close ..

              The passage of aircraft of the Russian Federation and the USA over ships is prohibited by the agreement on the prevention of incidents at sea between our countries (then the USSR and the USA).
              The no-fly zone is an invention of the new time. In fact, the liberals called the establishment of an air blockade of the victim state that way. And you won't complain to the UN, and it sounds "euphonious".
        2. +5
          29 August 2013 18: 10
          Quote: Tersky
          after the runway on the last summit raped the entire Caudle of "shitcrats"

          Apparently, the "capture" took place only for domestic use, because the Caudla, judging by the latest actions, did not notice this. And the "one who had" himself took such a deep grandmaster pause on the Syrian issue that it seems as if he was stupidly stuck.
          1. -1
            30 August 2013 01: 40
            Quote: Karabin
            Quote: Tersky
            after the runway on the last summit raped the entire Caudle of "shitcrats"

            Apparently, the "capture" took place only for domestic use, because the Caudla, judging by the latest actions, did not notice this. And the "one who had" himself took such a deep grandmaster pause on the Syrian issue that it seems as if he was stupidly stuck.

            In what, and even in the absence of calculating the situation, you will not refuse Putin. The key word is the grand master. Now the move of shit ...
        3. Garik
          0
          30 August 2013 08: 10
          Something tells me that our group is also covered by submarines, so it’s not so simple, these Syrian friends can grab on the very tomatoes. All the same, the amers were going to reduce the aircraft carrier fleet, but with a trout and a nimitz they can be helped. lol
      3. +2
        29 August 2013 16: 41
        The fact is that we can clearly indicate the boundaries of the database area. With the same warnings.
        1. -1
          30 August 2013 01: 51
          Quote: clidon
          The fact is that we can clearly indicate the boundaries of the database area. With the same warnings.

          They will indicate houses to their wife if they can ... And do not care on which side they have a skullcap ...
          1. +1
            30 August 2013 17: 41
            Then a "skullcap" may just fly in with the words "Well, we warned you." And there will be nothing to say in response, there is a war going on, and we climbed under the bullets.
      4. vaddag1
        +38
        29 August 2013 17: 03
        "It seems to me that we will not be able to resist anyway ..." - the point is not that we can or cannot, the point is that they will see (potential opponents) determination and disregard for numerical and qualitative superiority. the honors that the Japanese gave to the "Varangians" and "Koreans" confirm my words, and the incident in the Black Sea is our ramming by a patrol boat of a US destroyer. and if a handful of ships (reconnaissance and security), ignoring all the warnings and maneuvers of the amers, take the most advantageous (and impudent) position off the Syrian coast, while clearly and loudly (so that later they would not say that they did not hear) define the zone around them "flightless" - this should cause frustration and an understanding that several ships have not poured, and what will happen when the situation escalates to the limit and more serious forces are brought up (albeit, again, inferior to the world hegemon).
        and there will be no direct confrontation over Syria (and there wouldn’t be under the USSR). we have neither the legal nor the moral right to start a war. our war has not come yet.
        ps it’s a confrontation of characters, someone alone will collapse.
        1. 0
          30 August 2013 01: 55
          The world hegemon is a colossus with feet of clay. The West will never climb to Russia, knowing what consequences it might expect. Of course, you don't need to go into trouble yourself, so as not to put the "hegemons" in an awkward position (like a low start)
        2. Garyk701
          +4
          30 August 2013 08: 55
          Let's be realistic. Russia is not defending Syria, not Assad and not the Syrian people; Russia is defending its interests in this region. We must make life as difficult as possible for NATO "peacekeepers", but at the same time, we should not endanger our citizens, and so on. combat ships.
          It is better to spend money and donate air defense and electronic warfare equipment to Asadka, you can even hire "specialists" volunteers to help the Syrians, but not throw your military on deeds.
          1. Garyk701
            +1
            30 August 2013 08: 59
            By the way, following the example of France, it is possible to form a foreign legion (a native or wild division) from guest workers from the Caucasus and Central Asia and throw them at similar hot spots.
            1. +1
              30 August 2013 11: 14
              The Caucasus is like a part of Russia.
              1. +1
                1 September 2013 16: 17
                Not the entire Caucasus is part of Russia. At least for now)
            2. 0
              30 August 2013 17: 14
              Quote: Garyk701
              form a foreign legion (native or wild division) from guest workers from the Caucasus

              You have obvious gaps in geography!
              1. Garyk701
                +1
                31 August 2013 23: 43
                Oh, read Wikipedia at http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/People of the Caucasus ... and don’t make me funny.

                Countries and regions of the Caucasus

                Azerbaijan
                Georgia
                Armenia

                Russia, including regions:
                Adygea
                Dagestan
                Ingushetia
                Kabardino-Balkaria
                Karachay-Cherkessia
                North Ossetia
                Chechnya
                Krasnodar
                Stavropol region

                Abkhazia (frequent recognition)
                South Ossetia (frequent recognition)
                Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (unrecognized)

                But if you still insist on Russia, then the local Caucasians can also be taken into the native wild division ...
          2. -1
            1 September 2013 16: 22
            You can not give, you can sell, Syria still has money, Iran threw a loan, and to buy Syria is real only from Russia or China. The benefit of Russia is obvious. We will not sell - sell China. In this case, Syria will have worse equipment and the money will pass by the Russian treasury. Definitely sell everything that works out. Well, except for WMD of course.
      5. +4
        29 August 2013 17: 17
        Of course, I apologize, but it will not be easier to disable or drown out the signals of GPS satellites, without positioning, they will not be able to launch rockets. In general, arrange an electronic blockade. ???
        1. vaddag1
          +9
          29 August 2013 17: 24
          so this is already fighting - EW.
          ps But can it be done right from the Kremlin? in the sense of without the presence of funds in the confrontation zone
        2. +1
          29 August 2013 19: 52
          This is easier said than done.
      6. shpuntik
        +26
        29 August 2013 17: 28
        experienced (1) RU Today, 15:44 ↑
        Yes, and it seems to me that we still can’t resist ...

        Alexey hi It is difficult and expensive to resist, here you are right. But you can. For example, to give the Syrians an "old woman", a reactive pop-up mine, with new "brains". And not one, but 100 pieces. Let them install them from planes wherever they want. And take your ships aside and watch. Cheap and cheerful.
        http://russianarms.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=830
        1. +4
          29 August 2013 19: 06
          And what a good thing. recourse
          1. +5
            29 August 2013 21: 40
            Quote: Simon
            And what a good thing.

            KRM "Kambala" was placed from ships (!). And what ships will put it? This is the first thing.
            And secondly, the installation of the MLM in the waters of the open sea is an act of aggression, in the territories of a foreign state - an act of declaration of war. This is if under the law of the sea.
            1. +11
              29 August 2013 22: 03
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              secondly, setting the MLM in the waters of the open sea is an act of aggression, in the territories of a foreign state - an act of declaring war. This is if under the law of the sea.

              and if you spat on the UN charter? ... is it considered an act of aggression ?? .. if it is under international law ..
              1. albatross
                +2
                30 August 2013 22: 35
                gispanec (2) Yesterday, 22:03 PM ↑
                and if you spat on the UN charter? ... is it considered an act of aggression ?? .. if it is under international law ..

                That's right: if an aircraft carrier is beyond the 12 mile zone, then he can march on Yugoslavia fool These are the lawyers of the "Shevardnadze line" and are carrying out.
            2. +3
              30 August 2013 00: 49
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              aggression in the waters of a foreign state - an act of declaration of war. This is if under the law of the sea.

              Alexander! hi And who, right, both maritime and international, is strongly observing it, on the part of the "crap-mongers"? They do what they want and do? You will get tired of listing how many and how they have violated international norms and laws recently, starting with the fundamental norms of the UN Charter on non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states !!! angry
              KRM "Flounder" was placed from ships (!)

              strange, but in its form the suggestion is quite obvious that it could be put from a submarine. request But I do not argue with you, the weight categories are very different with us. bully
              1. +1
                30 August 2013 02: 07
                Quote: old man54
                And who is it, right, both maritime and international, that strongly observes, on the part of "crap-mongers"?

                There is such a thing as Mr. State reputation.
                GDP holds this word - and how its authority has grown! They take his word for it! So it is with states. The weight and authority of a country is its golden foundation in international relations.
                States and their double morality is a temporary phenomenon: you cannot go far in a lie. Sooner or later, they will have to pay the bills, and they are moral bankrupt.
            3. shpuntik
              +2
              30 August 2013 02: 00
              Boa KAA RU Yesterday, 21:40 ↑
              KRM "Kambala" was placed from ships (!). And what ships will put it?

              It might have been put by someone, it’s more convenient from the ship. Personally, I didn’t pose it, but I don’t see problems when setting up from an airplane. I find confirmation of my words in the description: http://vadimvswar.narod.ru/ALL_OUT/TiVOut9801/AvSeM/AvSeM006.htm

              And secondly, the installation of the MLM in the waters of the open sea is an act of aggression, in the territories of a foreign state - an act of declaration of war. This is if under the law of the sea.

              And when, two aircraft carriers come to you - is this not a violation of the law? Or only when planes fly off of it? In principle, it is possible to make activation after the onset of aggression, a hydroacoustic signal. The bottom line is that one sunken aircraft carrier can make the ShA government refuse to continue aggression. Too many coffins at a time, the population of Sha will be against it.
              1. +4
                30 August 2013 04: 02
                Quote: shpuntik
                It might have been put by someone, it’s more convenient from the ship. Personally, I didn’t pose it, but I don’t see problems when setting up from an airplane.

                Colleague Simon gave a link to the KRM "Flounder", produced in 1957-60. It was installed exclusively with NKs with mine paths. But its further development RM-1 (1960) could already be placed from an airplane. Further - more: 1963 - RM-2; 65g -RM-2G; 70g - PMR-1; 73g - PMR-2; 72g - PMT-1 (Captor appeared only in 76g); 1983 - MTPK-1 and so on.
                Quote: shpuntik
                And when, two aircraft carriers come to you - is this not a violation of the law? Or only when planes fly off of it?

                Until they violate the territorial waters and airspace of the country, they do not violate the law of the sea, using the right of freedom of navigation (even in straits - the right of free passage).
                Another thing, any state, on the shores of which the AUG appears, will take measures to protect against uninvited guests.
                Quote: shpuntik
                The bottom line is that one sunken aircraft carrier can make the ShA government refuse to continue aggression.

                Here you are deeply mistaken! If this happens you will get the war in full. At the same time, American society at 95% will support the actions of its government. Such is reality, as if it were not unpleasant for our pride ...
                1. shpuntik
                  0
                  30 August 2013 12: 32
                  Boa KAA RU Today, 04:02 ↑
                  Colleague Simon gave a link to the KRM "Flounder", produced in 1957-60.

                  I do not see his links, I see this comment:
                  Simon RU Yesterday, 19:06 ↑
                  And what a good thing. recourse
                  Yes, you yourself brought the prototypes, what is the argument ??

                  Here you are in the deepest way are mistaken! If this happens you will get the war in full. At the same time, American society will support the actions of its government by 95%. Such is reality, as if it were not unpleasant for our pride ...

                  I do not agree here hi . There is an example of Vietnam: the SA did not win this war, lost more than 50 thousand people and ended it because of internal protests.
                  One aircraft carrier: 2500 people. immediately + 5 billion dollars. + A couple more submarines of protection - this is another couple of billions. This will make any aggressor think. Yes, and then, what do you suggest not to fight at all, not to defend yourself? Something did not understand your position: for some reason, bring international maritime law when UN resolutions are violated? The bombing of Yugoslavia for example. Is this not a violation of the law of the sea? wassat

                  1. +1
                    30 August 2013 15: 45
                    Quote: shpuntik
                    I do not see his links, I see this comment:

                    I apologize: This is yours, dear koment from 17: 28 with reference to the info on CRM. In 4 hours, and after work, thinking is somewhat inhibited. Once again I apologize for the false accusation of colleague Simon.
                    Quote: shpuntik
                    There is an example of Vietnam: Sha did not win this war

                    Comparison regarding the losses of the fleet is incorrect: the States did not lose a single ship, with the exception of the Tonkin incident. The loss of the AVU is a tragedy worse than the loss of the Kursk. The ship is the sovereign territory of the FLAG state, which the ship carries. Remember what was written on the AB case, which the amers dropped on the Japanese.
                    Quote: shpuntik
                    Do you suggest that you do not fight at all, do not defend yourself? Something did not understand your position: for some reason, bring international maritime law when UN resolutions are violated? The bombing of Yugoslavia for example. Is this not a violation of the law of the sea?

                    I unequivocally expressed my position in my comments. See above.
                    A couple of remarks about your post. They defend themselves when you are attacked.
                    It's about the fleet, therefore, relations are regulated between combatants by this branch of law. I think this is logical.
                    The bombing of Yugoslavia has nothing to do with Mr. Law of the Sea. This is a crime against humanity. It belongs to the category of violation of the customs and rules of warfare. This section of law is also there. As colleagues say: Learn materiel and do not be clever where weak.
                    1. shpuntik
                      +1
                      30 August 2013 17: 45
                      General Major Avatar
                      Boa KAA RU Today, 15:45 ↑
                      I apologize: This is yours, dear koment from 17:28 with a reference to the info on CRM. At 4 o’clock, after work, thinking is somewhat inhibited.

                      If you can not read the comment, then do not bother to refute. Here is a quote from the link I gave: http://vadimvswar.narod.ru/ALL_OUT/TiVOut9801/AvSeM/AvSeM006.htm
                      The RM-1 mine was made in the dimensions of the FAB-1500 bomb ... At this altitude, a braking rotating parachute with an area of ​​1,8 m2 opens, reducing the descent rate to 50-65 m / s.
                      Where did I say that Flounder was installed from an airplane? They invented it themselves, they themselves refuted it, they started an empty argument. Follow the link and read what I wrote: "reactive-pop-up mine" and what modification it is, this is a minor role.
                      They defend themselves when you are attacked.
                      It's about the fleet, therefore, relations are regulated between combatants by this branch of law. I think this is logical.

                      Listen to "combatant" fellow , maritime law during the war is canceled, do not disgrace.
                      Here's what I wrote: "In principle, you can activate activation after the start of aggression by a hydroacoustic signal." Refute?
                      Further, in general, a "masterpiece":
                      The bombing of Yugoslavia has nothing to do with Mr. Law of the Sea. This is a crime against humanity. It belongs to the category of violation of the customs and rules of warfare.

                      That is, in your opinion, there is a war and the parties must comply with the law of the sea? Well, then I don’t know how to communicate with you. I have not seen such stupidity for a long time. It seems that you flutter on the comments and teach the law of the sea.
                      Remember what was written on the AB case, which the amers dropped on the Japanese.

                      Yes, it doesn’t matter to me what is written there, I’m for Syria, okay?
                      Here from such you and hemorrhoids in Russia.
                2. IGS
                  0
                  3 September 2013 21: 04
                  Quote: BoA KAA

                  Here you are deeply mistaken! If this happens you will get the war in full. At the same time, American society at 95% will support the actions of its government. Such is reality, as if it were not unpleasant for our pride ...

                  I completely agree with you. Example of Louisitania, Pearl Harbor, 11 September. American discontent is caused by constant, protracted human losses, even if they are not great, and they should not bear a pronounced challenge to the "American nation", or it should be "washed out" by the routine of events (Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan).
            4. albatross
              +1
              30 August 2013 22: 26
              KAA boa RU Yesterday, 21:40 ↑ New

              Quote: Simon
              And what a good thing.

              KRM "Kambala" was placed from ships (!).

              Alexander, don't be stupid. What is Simon's "Flounder"? And the shpuntik talks about the RM-1, it is installed from the planes, read the link. And "old man 54" is right, it is 533 mm in diameter of the torpedo tube.
              Anti-submarine mine-missile PMR-1 with an inclined warhead at launch on 4 sides (development of RM-1). 1970 was staged with submarines. Depth of the sea is up to 600m. Depth up to 150 m. Radius of damage 150 m.
            5. albatross
              0
              30 August 2013 22: 45
              Boa constrictor KAA RU Yesterday, 21:40 KRM "Flounder" was placed from ships (!). And what ships will put it?

              Where did the "Flounder" come from? We are talking about RM-1, it is installed with a parachute, from an airplane, made in the dimensions of KAB-1500. wassat
              They didn’t enter the topic and delivered srach out of the blue.
              What is the law of the sea in war? fool Carriers did not violate the law of the sea in the waters of Yugoslavia? Are you a submarine lawyer?
        2. +2
          29 August 2013 20: 37
          It would be so simple, the war at sea would have ended long ago.
      7. +13
        29 August 2013 17: 29
        Quote: seasoned
        while the White House also cannot provide indisputable evidence that Assad was involved in the chemical attack.


        Most likely, Obama or McCain could give the chemical attack order, this is a more plausible version.
      8. +9
        29 August 2013 18: 12
        Quote: seasoned
        Yes, and it seems to me that we still can’t resist ...

        what is this conclusion based on? ..... after all, it doesn’t matter the iron that goes ... what matters is how it defends and attacks .... an example of a war between Britons and Argentines .. and not a single sane officer will NEVER shoot at our ships ... even if it’s a missile boat or a BDK ... after all, it’s the 3rd World War ... just declare that we can close it from the sea as a no-fly zone ... well, the exercises we have and .... and that’s not even + , plus for Syria air defense
        1. d_trader
          +5
          29 August 2013 19: 27
          I remembered the Chinese embassy in Belgrade "accidentally" bombed by NATO ...
          1. -1
            29 August 2013 21: 19
            Quote: d_trader
            I remembered the Chinese embassy in Belgrade "accidentally" bombed by NATO.

            So it was covered SPECIALLY ... enlighten .... didn’t you point the ax ??, but since there’s no, then you don’t need to troll
        2. +7
          29 August 2013 23: 36
          Quote: gispanec
          what is this conclusion based on?

          Dear gispanec, this "experienced" conclusion was made based on the analysis of the quantitative composition and qualitative state of the ships of the fleet. It is bitter to admit it, but today it is so.
          Quote: gispanec
          not one sane officer will NEVER shoot at our ships.

          And if you get an order?
          And if the nerves can’t stand it?
          And if just - a provocation !?
          And if a system error (malfunction), or an attack by hackers?
          Many things happen in the sea. Then Obama will write off 10-20 billion greens, apologize, condolences. But the guys, like on the "Kursk", will no longer be returned.
          Will 3 MB start because of this? Personally, I'm not sure: this is suicide, not only for us, but for the entire human civilization.
          1. +5
            30 August 2013 01: 03
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            Will 3 MB start because of this? Personally, I'm not sure: this is suicide, not only for us, but for the entire human civilization.

            Alexander, in the world, always, but especially today, it is impossible to retreat forever, backing away and justifying this by the fact that there are more of them and that they are stronger. In our situation, I mean Russia, and even more so. Otherwise, in a year or two we will discuss the situation here - "When amers with their mongrel (NATO) hit us", and moreover, in all seriousness we will do it already. But then we will be left alone and there will be no one around to rely on! Yes, we are much weaker today, but there is nuclear weapons and we must very clearly make it clear that this is a line that we won't cross! War? As for me, it would be better if my family and I burned in the fire of a nuclear war than live as the Syrians live in their own country now or drown the whole country in LGBT people and fagot!
            There is nowhere to retreat further, further our borders are already! hi
            1. +2
              30 August 2013 02: 42
              Quote: old man54
              As for me, it would be better if my family and I burned in the fire of a nuclear war than live as the Syrians live in their own country now or drown the whole country in LGBT people and fagot!

              Strongly said! But!!! You and I are close to 60, my children 30-35, grandchildren 5-9 ... I don’t know how your family is, but mine still want to live. Ask them if they agree to burn for Syria in an atomic fire, then you need to contact a psychiatrist (no offense!), Since this contradicts the main instinct of a living creature and does not particularly fit in with the high ideals of protecting their homeland.
              In general, I am firmly convinced that we should die only for soybean Rodina, her vital interests, or saving the lives of our compatriots. Internationalism is good, but Trotskyism decided that only Russians would sacrifice themselves for the cause of the world revolution. I. Stalin in practice showed the fallacy of these views. This is the first.
              Secondly. S. Lavrov said: Russia is not going to fight. It can be brainwashed and, having analyzed the state of the economy, the Armed Forces, the level of BP of the troops, the presence of allies, the interests of the country and its citizens, you will understand that we can’t afford the war, morally the people don’t ready, the level of power supply and the state of the aircraft leave much to be desired. Our umbrella, until combat-ready, modern aircraft, nuclear weapons are recreated. Therefore, you need to be very careful and, as experienced colleague correctly noted, you can not let yourself be drawn into a provocation ... IMHO.
              1. +1
                30 August 2013 12: 01
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                Therefore, you need to be very careful and, as experienced colleague correctly noted, you can not let yourself be drawn into a provocation ... IMHO.

                So yes, I don’t want to die for the Syrians. But the choice is what - to merge Syria and dutifully stand in line for Iran or ... Or what?
              2. 0
                30 August 2013 18: 46
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                Strongly said! But!!! You and I are close to 60, my children 30-35, grandchildren 5-9 ... I don’t know how your family is, but mine still want to live.

                Both my family and I myself are by no means looking for death, like a "storm petrel", but ... if a war breaks out all around, then it is unlikely to sit out, well, only in the deep taiga. negative And I’m not under 60, you were mistaken, Alexander (I will clarify in PM). bully
                It is strange that you did not understand me, Sasha. I offered to fight not only for Syria, although this people is by no means fallen and is worthy of respect so that we, as a state, fulfill our allied obligations to them and do not abandon them in trouble! But fighting for them, we will fight for ourselves, do we really disagree? The bottom line is that if tomorrow we silently surrender Syria, as yesterday we surrendered Serbia and Libya, then in a few years a similar situation will develop in our home (in the Caucasus, for example) and we will again be faced with the same choice as now in Syria, but in a tougher version and we will be many times worse than now. I not only offered to help Syria, but first of all "stand up to full height" and stop the global aggressor. We no longer have a choice, why don't many people understand this ??? Rising to defend Syria, we defend ourselves, but on distant approaches, and thereby rallying around ourselves those countries that still want to resist this aggression by the Anglo-Jewish-Saxons! It's the same as in everyday life - if you constantly sit at home, not sticking out, when they kill your neighbors in the village, like "your own shirt is closer to your body", then soon, when they come to kill you at night, even if you are the last, then for help then there will be nowhere to turn! And so I would really not want our country to find itself in such a situation, although then many will see the light, but it will be very late. And if the hands in Russia continue to sell their geopolitical confederates with the same ease, as the Ural drunks and the iPhone did 3 years ago, then no one else will believe us in the future and everyone will turn away from us. And it's so clear who wants to create alliances with the state, which does not keep its word and betrays friends! Strange, but for me it is so obvious, Alexander! request
              3. 0
                30 August 2013 19: 24
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                if they agree to burn for Syria in an atomic fire, then you need to turn to a psychiatrist (no offense!), since this contradicts the main instinct of a living creature and does not particularly fit in with the high ideals of protecting their homeland.

                Strange, but here we disagree! Those. the fact that our fathers helped the Vietnamese in their war for independence against the amers was this their mental insanity? And the participation of our troops in the civil war in Spain before the 2nd MV, is also suicidal paranoia? (Do not be offended only!) And do a few Middle East wars with the same Israel be done from him in order to show your valiant boldness? Africa? And the direct (to the DB did not reach fortunately) participation of our Navy in the wars of India against Pakistan, aimed at suppressing the interference of the Nuggosaxis in these conflicts, is also madness?
                I am sure that the leadership of the country had good reasons! And the main one: to repulse the imperialists there, at the distant approaches to our borders, they fled for the quiet sleep of USSR citizens. For some reason, today, this understanding has disappeared from the minds of Russians, apparently dermocratization, the decomposition of society by philistine values ​​makes itself felt !!!
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                In general, I am firmly convinced that we should die only for soy Rodin,

                Well, I am first of all for her and suggest I do it, apparently I have poorly stated my thought, I'm sorry.
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                Secondly. S. Lavrov said: Russia is not going to fight.

                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                Secondly. S. Lavrov said: Russia is not going to fight.

                Well, this Lavrov! They us, the West, once again take on the show, check, and we are already blown away. In one video, one of the observers said that US politicians before the start of the escalation in Syria said bluntly: "This will be our test, can we openly look the Russians in the eyes ?!" And Putin is not even close to the Great Stalin, not a fighter! negative To say that you will not fight is the same as saying that you can bomb them! When you, Alexander, were surrounded by 5 healthy men in a dark alleyway and are clearly going to attack, then announcing to them that you are not going to fight means that with 95% probability they will rush at you! But if it is extremely tough and serious to tell them what they say, let's. swoop in, I'm not afraid and I'll literally gnaw your throat, then most likely very much become thoughtful and maybe they will leave! (Remember Shukshin's "Kalina red"!)
                Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                you will understand that war is too expensive for us, morally, people are not ready for it, the level of BP and the state of the armed forces leave much to be desired. Our umbrella, until combat-ready, modern aircraft, nuclear weapons are recreated.

                And when the state-va and the people are ready for war then? And you think they will let us seriously prepare for it? They will sit and wait until we get ready ?? The fact is that if you seriously say no, then they will retreat, but they must believe it, otherwise it will not work. And in order to be believed, the determination of hands must be 100%!
          2. 0
            30 August 2013 02: 31
            Quote: BoA KAA
            Quote: gispanec
            what is this conclusion based on?

            Dear gispanec, this "experienced" conclusion was made based on the analysis of the quantitative composition and qualitative state of the ships of the fleet. It is bitter to admit it, but today it is so.
            Quote: gispanec
            not one sane officer will NEVER shoot at our ships.

            And if you get an order?
            And if the nerves can’t stand it?
            And if just - a provocation !?
            And if a system error (malfunction), or an attack by hackers?
            Many things happen in the sea. Then Obama will write off 10-20 billion greens, apologize, condolences. But the guys, like on the "Kursk", will no longer be returned.
            Will 3 MB start because of this? Personally, I'm not sure: this is suicide, not only for us, but for the entire human civilization.

            Following your logic, then you shouldn't interfere, like China, right? And the sheep are fed and the wolves are safe. Why the hell, then, all these show-offs? To the bushes at the last moment? And what if they are being bullied at us? The fact that our ships are present there just speaks of our intentions to go to the end. Or to show it. And then, what kind of group is this, if it cannot destroy an "accidental" torpedo or missile? This is not a salvo of tomahawks ...
            ZY: Even Abromovich's yacht is protected from "accidental" launches.
            1. +2
              30 August 2013 04: 29
              Quote: Semyon Semyonich
              Following your logic, then you should not interfere, like China, right?

              Now the struggle is on a political and diplomatic level. The Union could, with the power of the socialist camp, put an ultimatum in 1956: either stop the aggression against Egypt, or we will use nuclear weapons.
              Today, officials open-textured to the whole world from the TV screen declare that Russia will not fight, and you reproach me with disloyalty to the Syrians. Our ships in Middle-earth will carry out the tasks that they will be assigned with the Navy CKP. And this is Moscow’s decision. In modern conditions, the war does not meet the national interests of the Russian Federation. We do not have an agreement with Syria on friendship and mutual assistance. So from the legal point of view of mn ... Sympathy - yes, BUT this is from the realm of emotions.
              Quote: Semyon Semyonich
              : Even Abromovich's yacht is protected from "accidental" launches.

              Oh how! And the modern project 949A plark caught the MK-48 on board ... The Belknap climbed under the Forrestal and burned down for a good life, so no one is safe from accident. Even Abramovich, judging by its end ...
              1. 0
                31 August 2013 04: 49
                You probably confused Abramovich with Berezovsky? And I did not suggest getting involved in the war directly. I affirm that such provocations as the shelling of our ships with "random" torpedoes, in principle, cannot be. Play with matches on a powder keg ... hi
          3. +2
            30 August 2013 08: 40
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            And if you get an order? And if your nerves can’t stand it? And if it's simple - a provocation !?

            Dear KAA, the time of doubts and assumptions, as the Germans say, plus a kwam perfect .... that is, a long time past .... by our doubts about our readiness we make it clear that we are not ready to defend our own, precisely our Motherland ... and we there isn’t enough courage (in the name of mankind) to press the start button of ballistic missiles during the aggression against us !! ... and everything will start simply ..... or the Japs will smoke (and next to the scary whale of whales) ..... or Norwegians with Danes will begin to seize the Arctic ... the citizens of Germany will come to Kaliningrad with the slogans OTHER ..... yes, until the figs of micro-conflicts that can be carried out knowing that Russia will not answer ... guys will die .....
            1. +1
              30 August 2013 17: 02
              Quote: gispanec
              With our doubts about our readiness, we make it clear that we are not ready to defend our own, precisely our Motherland ... and we don’t have the courage (in the name of mankind) to press the start button of ballistic missiles during the aggression against us !! ..

              No, dear, we will defend our homeland to the last possible opportunity and even clutch the amers in the throat of the dead. But I don’t advise anyone, including VGK, to scatter the nation by the gene pool of the guys 18-25 years for a foreign country!
              Well, you damn it, give! The doctrine says in black and white that in case of a threat to the national security and integrity of our state, we reserve the right to be the first (!) To use nuclear weapons. But when it comes to OUR country! The states know this, they have something to lose, so they want to disarm us first, and only then fuck us. This is what Putin does not allow them to do.
              Quote: gispanec
              .a everything will start simply.

              Nah, it won’t start as you wrote ... They will try to decompose it from the inside, or tie it into endless conflict, grinding the male half of the country, or getting an ABSOLUTE weapon in the form of a space annihilator (for example).
              Quote: gispanec
              Yes, to the fig microconflicts that can be held knowing that Russia will not answer ... because the guys will die .....

              And then by! Example 08.08.2008. But there they attacked our peacekeepers, violating the norms of Mr. Law! Therefore, there was every reason to teach the Georgians "military affairs in a real way". Yes, and we defended (formally) people who have passports of Russian citizens. So you have no cots, my dear, on this point.
          4. gunnerminer
            0
            31 August 2013 15: 37
            And if you get an order?
            And if the nerves can’t stand it?
            And if just - a provocation !?
            And if a system error (malfunction), or an attack by hackers?


            Right!
      9. +3
        29 August 2013 18: 42
        Quote: seasoned
        It is better to "blow into the water" and shoot down everything that flies in the affected area, having warned enemies in advance, like we are afraid and we will shoot down, so shoot, but in the other direction from the Russian ships and fly away from us

        Russia sent a large anti-submarine ship and missile cruiser to the coast of Syria


        Command of the Navy of Russia in connection with the situation around Syria has decided to update the ship's structure permanent task force in the Mediterranean Sea, said a source in the Russian General Staff.
        According to him, the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean has demanded from Russia separate adjustments in the composition of the navy group. In the coming days, it will be replenished by a large anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet, reports the Mayak radio station.
        Later, according to the source, “the Moscow Black Sea Fleet’s missile cruiser“ Moscow ”will join it, which is now completing tasks in the North Atlantic and will soon begin a transatlantic transition towards the Strait of Gibraltar”.
        In addition, according to him, in the fall the Mediterranean grouping of the Navy should be replenished by the Pacific Fleet missile cruiser Varyag, which will replace the large anti-submarine ship Vice-Admiral Panteleev, currently performing combat missions as part of the operational force, Interfax reports.

        Earlier it was reported that the frigate Chevalier Paul (“Chevalier Paul”), one of the most modern in the French fleet, departed from the port of Toulon to the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. Prior to this, it became known that Washington sent two aircraft carriers to the Gulf region: Harry Truman and Nimitz.

        The situation around Syria escalated after August 21 media, citing opposition to the statements reported the alleged use of chemical weapons in the suburbs of Damascus. Thereafter, in the West, where the application formerly known as sarin Syrian authorities under direct intervention in the conflict, openly talking about a possible military intervention in the Arab republic.

        On Wednesday, NATO ambassadors stated that the information about the involvement of the government of Bashar Assad in Damascus under himatake confirmed from multiple sources, and British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the possibility of foreign intervention even without the unanimous support of all members of the UN Security Council.

        Meanwhile, on Wednesday gave Syria's leading himataki UN inspectors investigating evidence that the republic's authorities did not use toxic substances. On Thursday, the media wrote that while the White House also can not provide indisputable evidence that it is involved in himatake Assad.
      10. +1
        29 August 2013 19: 30
        Use homing icebergs.
        And the charges in our favor will be avoided.
      11. +2
        29 August 2013 21: 34
        Quote: seasoned
        Yes, and it seems to me that we still can’t resist ...

        Resist some sort of aborigines, maybe there’s not enough strength ...
        But Russia will be able to answer Usa and Eureka once and for all .., only the next war will happen with stone axes ...
      12. xmel2003
        +2
        29 August 2013 21: 36
        There is nothing to confront: send the prime minister with a delegation there to restore the national economy, develop nuclear energy, the chemical industry, promote nanoprojects and democracy with the appropriate composition of the delegation.
        1. largus886
          +1
          30 August 2013 09: 03
          Cool thought! To send Medvedev to Syria with WELL VERY BIG DELEGATION of officials, let Syria be covered with their carcasses for a place of C 300!
      13. TIGER
        -2
        29 August 2013 22: 31
        Certainly we can’t! THE ARMY IS DECLINED, AND THE STATE IS IN DECLINE !!!
        1. +2
          30 August 2013 02: 44
          Quote: TIGER
          Certainly we can’t! THE ARMY IS DECLINED, AND THE STATE IS IN DECLINE !!!

          Said it suddenly and bluntly!!! And so the silence in the library am
      14. +5
        29 August 2013 22: 44
        Quote: seasoned
        So if you only give target designation and help electronic warfare to the best of your ability,

        plus the supply of good weapons in a set with good Russian military experts - this will be enough.
        But under two important and essential conditions:
        1. Syrians need to show courage, courage and a willingness to die for their homeland no less than what the Vietnamese showed in their dashing years
        2. The Syrians need to throw their national Arab pride away during the war! Military experts are not graduates of a school of good manners at all, but graduates of institutions where they teach how to competently kill the enemy, therefore they do not know how to politely explain, and they will not have time to thoroughly explain in order to master a complex technique. Checked - the person remembers well some very important information, if the presentation of this information is combined with some kind of harsh, preferably negative emotional shock. That is, in order to quickly and effectively instill that you should not stick your fingers into the socket or run abruptly out onto the road, while explaining "This cannot be" it is good to give a slap on the head from the heart. Association of "what is not" with pain in the back of the head - the information is remembered. Tested on children who are human too. Conclusion - military experts will teach Syrians about the same. The S-300 is a complex complex, it can be quickly mastered only on such methods. I served on the S-200, these were the methods we were taught. I especially remember this - on the S-200, in front of the launcher, a special very powerful hydraulic paw connected the launcher connector to the rocket. The zone of action of this paw was called the "sweeping zone", and the soldier should not be there at a certain time - you can guess the consequences. How they drummed it into us is a separate story. But I am not offended by sergeants and officers for this! But I was not banged by this hydrolap. I will round off - in short, the Syrians should not behave like these fools Egyptians in the 70s, who resented the Soviet military experts who tried to help them in the war against the Jews. You read Mubarak's memoirs - they celebrated the local victory of the Israeli pilots over the Soviet ones as their own victory! The mind does not fit. And I really hope that Russia will have nothing in common with Egypt. The betrayer once BETRAYED again. Let this Egypt all die in its Tahrir square - absolutely no emotions. That's where they go. And if Israel is still aggressive, then let all its aggression be directed at Egypt - no one here WILL have nothing against it. Even wipe this Cairo off the face of the earth. But the Syrians - DO NOT TOUCH!
        1. 0
          29 August 2013 23: 42
          You are Muslim?
          1. +6
            30 August 2013 01: 20
            Quote: Den 11
            You are Muslim?

            Only by virtue of traditions and respect for decency, since this is the confession of my parents. But I don't read namaz, I don't fast. I am a typical scoop, I was taught atheism at school and Marxist-Leninist philosophy at the institute. And what about religion? And about religion brilliantly in Ilf and Petrov - "how much will we pay for the people?" And once again - "how much is opium for the people"? This is me about political religion in general and about political Islam in particular - I categorically do not accept this kind of mixing of the immiscible. This is in the first, and secondly, purely humanly, I appreciated the action of the Egyptians, not from the point of view of a Muslim, but from a human, FROM THE PATSAN (no need to laugh here, many life attitudes are laid during this period of life), if you like, points of view ! They themselves begged the USSR to help them, then they themselves beat them in the back, vigorously celebrated each murder of a Soviet military expert by an Israeli, and in the end geopolitically betrayed the USSR for a pinch of tobacco am For that matter, this is NOT a MUSLIM act, it is an act of a corrupt girl who only calls herself a Muslim on the grounds that she reads namaz and does some kind of external ostentatious Muslim rituals. But such a corrupt girl does not have a god in her soul! That’s the whole story. So I don’t have to take me to a Muslim.
            1. +1
              30 August 2013 01: 38
              I can’t say that I’m satisfied with your answer, because now the time is right to get closer to YOUR religion, the time of atheism (it seems to me) has already passed. Another question is what kind of current you will come to. Well, this is already personal! I, for example , I’m very good with Tatars (Tatar wife). And I’m very glad that everything is fine with Muslims! Children are the fruits of the love of the Orthodox and Muslim women. It happens in Russia as well. And THANKS TO GOD !!!
              1. +1
                30 August 2013 02: 55
                Quote: Den 11
                I can’t say that I’m satisfied with your answer, because now the time is right to get closer to YOUR religion, the time of atheism (it seems to me) has already passed. Another question is what kind of current you will come to. Well, this is already personal! I, for example , I’m very good with Tatars (Tatar wife). And I’m very glad that everything is fine with Muslims! Children are the fruits of the love of the Orthodox and Muslim women. It happens in Russia as well. And THANKS TO GOD !!!

                But what does religion have to do with it, it’s not entirely clear ... And so, I’m very happy for you hi
            2. 0
              30 August 2013 02: 51
              aksakalu (1) KZ Today, 01:20 ↑
              Simple and easy to understand good
        2. 0
          30 August 2013 02: 48
          Straight on Pavlov)))
      15. 0
        29 August 2013 22: 50
        Quote: seasoned
        , such as the Kyrgyz Republic or RCC lost its course and ended up in Russian.


        then you have to throw up "surprised" hands and say: well, there were no aircraft carriers here, we came and they are not. can we go on a spree?
        1. 0
          30 August 2013 02: 58
          Quote: KrSk
          Quote: seasoned
          , such as the Kyrgyz Republic or RCC lost its course and ended up in Russian.


          then you have to throw up "surprised" hands and say: well, there were no aircraft carriers here, we came and they are not. can we go on a spree?

          A new kind of aircraft carrier-submarine laughing
      16. AVV
        -1
        29 August 2013 22: 56
        Peter the Great needs to be there, by the way he would protect Tartus there, they would not dare to drown him, and they would stay away from him. Moscow to the Strait of Hormuz, and Peter the Great to the Mediterranean Sea !!! And not a single aircraft carrier will remain close !! !
      17. +8
        29 August 2013 23: 02
        Quote: seasoned
        The main thing is to carefully avoid provocations

        Wisely. Yes
        About the situation. NATO's naval group will strike at identified targets (KP, PU, ​​airfields and air defense system). After the violation of command and control, mercenaries from Jordan, Turkey, etc. will move forward. Assad’s ground resistance will be broken by air strikes.
        Possible our actions. The naval grouping should occupy the sector and conduct electronic reconnaissance in order to determine the moment of impact of the Kyrgyz Republic, and the mass rise of aviation. Timely warn the Syrians about this.

        Quote: seasoned
        It is better to "blow into the water" and shoot down everything that flies in the affected area in advance

        You can shoot down only those missiles that go to the ship, or have a parameter less than 2,0 km. Then the "Dagger" can fire at these VCs in a machine gun. If the parameter is more than 2 km, such a target is considered not dangerous and the self-defense complex is not fired upon. (The rest of the air defense systems are for complacency). But such a decision can only be made by the "top" command, and then with good luck the Supreme Command, or the Ministry of Defense, as this is fraught with very serious consequences.
        Quote: seasoned
        Yes, and it seems to me that we still can’t resist ...

        Quote: seasoned
        so bullet, but to the other side from Russian ships and fly away from us

        It is bitter to admit, but it is true. The best thing you can do in this situation is to dig holes, or to sink some kind of hook.
        Actually, our ships are tracking the NATO grouping, fulfilling the BS mission. This is absolutely in the interests of our country, including relations with Syria.
      18. waisson
        +1
        30 August 2013 00: 51
        Now, if the Chinese fleet could still draw something, it turned out
      19. -1
        30 August 2013 02: 53
        Quote: seasoned
        Quote: donavi49
        Well, it really will not be very fast.


        The main thing is to carefully avoid provocations, such as the KR or the anti-ship missile system lost its course and ended up in the Russian ... It is better to "blow into the water" and shoot down everything that flies in the affected area in advance


        And here I disagree. It would be better if they actually accidentally hit ours, and meanwhile pull up a dozen multipurpose submarines there, so, just in case, all of a sudden, the Americans want to use chemical weapons. Although I agree to preventively shoot down everything that gets into the air defense zone.
      20. 0
        30 August 2013 11: 01
        Today there was information that the Europeans thought better of it and refused to participate in the Amer aggression against Syria. Something is changing in the world in a positive way.
      21. 0
        30 August 2013 15: 49
        "Russia is strengthening the naval grouping off the coast of Syria" and will "observe" that the missiles would not go off course, but flew straight into the anus of the terrorists and sip them ...
      22. +1
        2 September 2013 12: 37
        The military significance of the point of logistics of the Russian Navy ships in Tartus is also greatly exaggerated. First of all, it is not a military base, as Tartus is mistakenly called. There is no fleet operational connection. Airplanes are not based there, and in general there are no conditions for receiving aviation. There are no military personnel - only civilian personnel. There is no hotel for sailors where they could rest - the crews remain on ships during the call at the port.

        The “Russian” Tartus is two non-stationary 110-meter floating piers (some sources claim that one: the second is dismantled and decommissioned), several onshore warehouses and a fence.
        -This is recourse a real reflection of our "presence" ...
    2. teleset
      +6
      29 August 2013 15: 45
      In the event of an attack on Syria, Russia threatened the United States, Britain, France and Israel to launch a retaliatory strike against Saudi Arabia. Information leaked from the Kremlin. HERE LINK http://www.gegenfrage.com/russland-droht-mit-militaerschlag-gegen-saudi-arabien/
      1. Natalia
        +22
        29 August 2013 15: 57
        This is very correct. You can not give Syria.
        No one will dispute the fact that the first army after the United States is still Russian, respectively ... no one but us.
        But to be honest, the news is encouraging. After all, you can’t sit back ... oh, you can.
      2. +17
        29 August 2013 16: 01
        Quote: teleset
        In the event of an attack on Syria, Russia threatened to launch a retaliatory strike against Saudi Arabia

        This is the German press, and there are enough dreamers there.
        1. +1
          29 August 2013 19: 30
          all this is unreal. another duck stoned German
      3. +1
        29 August 2013 17: 06
        Dreamers. Everyone is trying to add fuel to the fire.
      4. captri
        +3
        29 August 2013 17: 53
        It’s time to disturb this hotbed of terrorism
        1. +10
          29 August 2013 18: 43
          Saudi Arabia and Kaрtar .. not only to disturb but in the tail and mane to raskhrenachit all that on which they once climbed ....
          It is enough to recall the threats of these mongrels and incidents with our ambassadors.
          1. shpuntik
            +8
            29 August 2013 19: 13
            Scoun SU Today, 18:43 PM ↑ New
            Saudi Arabia and Kartar .. not only to disturb but in the tail and mane to raskhrenachat all that on which they once climbed ....
            It is enough to recall the threats of these mongrels and incidents with our ambassadors.

            And AbuAmar of Chechen recall them, the war is still ongoing in the Caucasus, the soldiers are dying. We are already used to it, as it were, the norm. The Saudis are financing.
            It's the same with Afgan: we sowed everything with poppy seeds, we get "gerych", on a drum. "We do not inject, they say, and who injections is their problem." And the fact that young people are drawn in, put in clubs, at discos is not taken into account. For a long time they must be sprinkled with dust.
      5. +1
        29 August 2013 18: 44
        Quote: teleset
        In the event of an attack on Syria, Russia threatened the United States, Britain, France and Israel to launch a retaliatory strike against Saudi Arabia. Information leaked from the Kremlin. HERE LINK http://www.gegenfrage.com/russland-droht-mit-militaerschlag-gegen-saudi-arabien/

        Crap. Sketch
      6. +1
        29 August 2013 19: 32
        Quote: teleset
        In the event of an attack on Syria, Russia threatened to launch a retaliatory strike against Saudi Arabia. Information leaked out of the Kremlin’s circle.

        Then oil will cost like gold!
        And there is no need to talk about the recovery of the Western economy after the crisis. The third crisis, not all countries will be able to survive!
        1. 0
          29 August 2013 21: 29
          That's right! need to eliminate a competitor for the sale of oil! They themselves are still the Gavriks, who made a considerable contribution at the time for the collapse of the USSR
        2. +5
          29 August 2013 22: 59
          Quote: APASUS
          Then oil will cost like gold!
          And there is no need to talk about the recovery of the Western economy after the crisis. The third crisis, not all countries will be able to survive!

          - I agree. The attack on Saudi Arabia has its own common sense, and in the first place - what you brought. And the second reason is to reckon with Saudi Arabia for its past in relation to Russia - Afghanistan, and Chechnya ... The third reason - for imperial ambitions, after all, in addition to immeasurable dough, you need to have science (including fundamental) and a completely fighting population with good military traditions. If the Saudis think that one dough is enough, that insolently throwing a geopolitical challenge to Russia, for example, the punishment should follow IMMEDIATELY. Otherwise, tomorrow any country in the Middle Ages, which suddenly had grandmothers, will "stir up the movement" - and what is it for? Ambitions must be confirmed NOT ONLY by BABKS!
          1. 0
            30 August 2013 09: 42
            And it would be great if chemical weapons "unexpectedly" worked in Saudi Arabia, and, in general, any distracting "accidents" in some not very democratic countries close to USAM would not hurt.
      7. Bonce
        +2
        29 August 2013 20: 10
        Quote: teleset
        In the event of an attack on Syria, Russia threatened the United States, Britain, France and Israel to launch a retaliatory strike against Saudi Arabia. Information leaked from the Kremlin. HERE LINK http://www.gegenfrage.com/russland-droht-mit-militaerschlag-gegen-saudi-arabien/


        Ducklings! Although it would be fun, it’s just not for oil wells (gas prices are scary anyway), but for the golden palaces of obscurantists.
        1. +2
          29 August 2013 21: 11
          Just the same in oil fields. Then the embargo will be lifted from Iran.
        2. +4
          29 August 2013 23: 08
          Quote: Kumpol
          and so gas prices are terrible

          - Well, excuse me, dear. To war, that is
          Quote: Kumpol
          and so gas prices are terrible
          , and to whom - the mother is dear. There will be no Saudi oil - Russia and Kazakhstan will be on horseback for some time. Well, at least some time people will live. I just hope that at this very moment that Putin, that Nazarbayev, will stop sending money in the form of a "public welfare fund" laughing laughing laughing laughing (fund name what mocking laughing)
    3. +3
      29 August 2013 15: 58
      Quote: donavi49
      Moscow is now in Venezuela

      And in any case, he will go to Middle-earth returning to the base.
      1. +1
        29 August 2013 16: 00
        Of course, the only question is when. Yesterday was Maduro and excursions. Today, obviously, no one is leaving yet. Plus, the transition itself is not fast, it’s far to go. By 10-numbers or even by mid-September will be, not earlier.
    4. 0
      29 August 2013 16: 19
      And which ships are there at the moment?
    5. +5
      29 August 2013 16: 19
      I wonder how many of our submarines are in the region, then there is 100%.
      1. captri
        0
        29 August 2013 17: 38
        Only diesel submarines can produce the desired effect. For nuclear there it is small and cramped, especially with such a cluster of ships.
        1. 0
          29 August 2013 20: 01
          Not a fact, civilian ships flicker on a peacetime schedule and our submarines can be attached behind them.
          1. teleset
            0
            29 August 2013 23: 17
            here the battle order of the American aircraft carrier approaching it unnoticed will be very difficult for the otaki.
        2. +3
          29 August 2013 22: 08
          Quote: kaptri
          For nuclear there is small and cramped, Especially with such a congestion ships.

          One can thin out...
          laughing
        3. +3
          30 August 2013 00: 18
          Quote: kaptri
          Only diesel submarines can produce the desired effect.

          Yeah ... when it pops up to charge AB. And then 3 days will run from anti-submarine ships until it comes time to pop up for a new charge.
          Quote: kaptri
          For nuclear there it is small and cramped, especially with such a cluster of ships.

          Yes, not really. East - Levantine basin of the Mediterranean Sea, depth to 4 380 m, offshore from 200 to 800m. So it’s quite possible to try PLRK. But when the leadership of the 6 fleet receives a report on the PLA, then it will not be a joke. Especially if it will be an 971 project.
      2. -2
        29 August 2013 18: 47
        Quote: Army1
        I wonder how many of our submarines are in the region, then there is 100%.

        Why are they there, and how will they crawl there?
    6. Ruslan_F38
      +2
      29 August 2013 17: 23
      Few and long, do not have time to start. And if they succeed, they should shoot down all cruise missiles whenever possible, having publicly announced this in advance and warned the Yankees.
      1. 0
        29 August 2013 20: 09
        Than?! Did you learn geometry ?! How can one ship intercept axes from several destroyers ?!
        1. 0
          29 August 2013 22: 11
          Quote: 31231
          Than?! Did you learn geometry ?! How can one ship intercept axes from several destroyers ?!

          Why are axes when there are destroyers ...
          wassat
    7. Volkhov
      0
      29 August 2013 18: 11
      If you look without sound, you can see the BOD "Kulakov" with cap.-2 at the head, if you listen ... then a cruiser with an admiral.
    8. Prishtina
      0
      29 August 2013 18: 51
      And who is chasing our pirates now?
    9. Zen
      Zen
      +5
      29 August 2013 22: 17
      I don’t understand one thing ... What do the Americans want ???
      Do they want a big war against Russia ???
      And who, by and large, is now able to confront Russia in an open war in the world ???
      Fat amers? Geyropa? Disunited Arabs? The Chinese ??? WHO ???
      Who can resist us people of the GREAT EMPIRE !!!
      Yes, I hate these dermocratizers with all my Heart, with all my Soul !!!
      And if necessary, the Russians in 2 weeks will reach the very west of Europe!
      And the matter is not in weapons, not in equipping the army ..... BUSINESS IN JUSTICE !!!!
      I believe that I will live to see the moment when their power collapses, the power of money and injustice !!!!
    10. Reasonable, 2,3
      0
      30 August 2013 02: 01
      We can. At least one of our warships is a conflict! One thing is Syria, we are another. They won’t go to a super-conflict. Here, as Putin and the military-industrial complex decide. If yes, then they won’t climb the Middle Seas. And here is the proof ... ..... get, if not, I made a mistake in Putin.
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 04: 30
        We don’t have the power for Russia to take concrete decisive actions. And the problem is not that we are weak, we still have gunpowder and, if we have the will, we can say our word that can stop Western aggression. If I find myself wrong .. ., but somehow I can’t believe it, it’s a pity ...
  2. +2
    29 August 2013 15: 38
    Let's hope it's true ...
  3. +15
    29 August 2013 15: 39
    faster! quickly form a support group for Syria. We cannot let it go. Syria is our frontier, Next is Iran, Russia ....
  4. +2
    29 August 2013 15: 39
    A couple of nuclear submarines and diesel-electric submarines there ... What would the adversary lose sleep.
    1. +6
      29 August 2013 16: 02
      Quote: dmitreach
      A couple of nuclear submarines and diesel-electric submarines there.

      Better to the shores of the United States and exponentially emerge in the Hudson. So it will be more intelligible
      1. +3
        29 August 2013 16: 11
        Aha! Accidentally "losing a training torpedo" in the waters of New York and remembering it after a couple of days .... It would be fun. Better yet, so that the American journalist would find her on some coast, within Manhattan. Like: the current carried it out .... :)
        1. +24
          29 August 2013 16: 57
          There is another option: LIMAN medium reconnaissance ship of the 861M project
          In the spring of 1999, "Liman" was in the Adriatic Sea in the immediate vicinity of the NATO operation zone against Yugoslavia and warned the Serbs of a new wave of raids. Thanks to him, the Yugoslavs saved many lives and technology. And in the case of Syria, it will be able to carry out target designation for the Yakhonts.
          1. +1
            29 August 2013 17: 15
            It goes without saying! I was not so much waiting for statements about the future plans of the RK "Moscow", but about the fact that there, in the Syrian neutral waters, there is already something similar! But there will be no information about this, as well as about our nuclear submarines ... We will only be shown BDK775 ...
          2. +4
            29 August 2013 18: 13
            Quote: Kibalchish
            Thanks to him, the Yugoslavs saved many lives and equipment.

            And then they surrendered their heroes with giblets.
          3. +5
            29 August 2013 18: 44
            Quote: Kibalchish
            And in the case of Syria, it will be able to carry out target designation for the Yakhonts.

            Yes mattresses will not go into the coverage area of ​​coastal complexes .... but to help Syria give data on the mass launch of axes and the departure of carrier-based and ground aviation this is the thing ... and this is REAL help !!!!
            1. -2
              29 August 2013 18: 51
              Quote: gispanec
              Quote: Kibalchish
              And in the case of Syria, it will be able to carry out target designation for the Yakhonts.

              Yes mattresses will not go into the coverage area of ​​coastal complexes .... but to help Syria give data on the mass launch of axes and the departure of carrier-based and ground aviation this is the thing ... and this is REAL help !!!!

              To do this, it was necessary to conduct joint exercises and combat coordination, as well as organize a joint headquarters. And this is the entry into the war.
              You need to think before you dream.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +2
                29 August 2013 21: 58
                Quote: Polar
                You need to think before you dream.

                I advise you to turn on the brain and not verbiage ... who do you think gave data during the raids on Yugoslavia ??? ... or were there previously planned exercises ?? ... funny ...
              3. +1
                30 August 2013 00: 32
                Quote: Polar
                To do this, it was necessary to conduct joint exercises and combat coordination, as well as organize a joint headquarters. And this is the entry into the war.

                What for? Just send (seconded) the task force (6-8 people) to the headquarters with the task of warning about the attack of the air defense center (number, direction, flight time, estimated target of attack, etc.). They will be called volunteers and no entry into the war.
          4. 0
            29 August 2013 22: 01
            A friend served then on him. I didn’t tell about the service, but the guy was terribly ballistic and smart.
          5. gunnerminer
            0
            31 August 2013 13: 59
            He will not be able to. Such interaction is practiced in joint training and exercises. Such kind of joint training activities were not planned, plans were not drawn up, were not agreed upon, and were not approved by anyone.
      2. 0
        29 August 2013 22: 16
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Better to the shores of the United States and exponentially emerge in the Hudson.
        So it will be more intelligible

        And a company of airborne troops to land on the lawn in front of the White House.
        Well, to make it easier to understand ...
        laughing
  5. series
    +1
    29 August 2013 15: 39
    And this is "something", if they have time ...
    At least from the Mediterranean, organize radar reconnaissance, detect sea-launched launches of the Kyrgyz Republic, try to bring down ...
    1. +6
      29 August 2013 16: 13
      So there "Azov" is rummaging around, just for this. soldier
    2. gunnerminer
      0
      31 August 2013 14: 02
      The Russian Air Force has only two A-50 aircraft that have undergone modernization. It is impossible to base it at the airports of Maytig, Benghazi in Libya or in Ras Baniyas in Syria. The necessary air cover for these sides at the Mediterranean Naval Theater is impossible.
  6. +7
    29 August 2013 15: 40
    Eh, with "Ukraine" would still be dealt with and brought to mind. How would she fit in now!
    1. series
      +8
      29 August 2013 15: 52
      Quote: man
      Eh, with "Ukraine" would still be dealt with and brought to mind. How would she fit in now!

      Yes, we do not need ALL "Ukraine"! Only Crimea is enough! wassat
      We do not feed ALL ... crying
      1. +14
        29 August 2013 16: 06
        The issue with Crimea ... there was no need to create "hemorrhoids". "Thanks" to Nikita Sergeevich.
      2. 0
        29 August 2013 16: 15
        Come on, maybe now Odessa, Nikolaev, Kherson, etc. somehow they depend on Kiev (they all earn money themselves, but Kiev only drinks ... t afford it)
      3. +6
        29 August 2013 16: 20
        - How do you feel about money?
        - I do not belong to them! - answered proudly hryvnia.
    2. +4
      29 August 2013 16: 03
      Quote: man
      Eh, with "Ukraine" would still be dealt with and brought to mind

      Uh, the child has been waving for 22 years, however. It’s sinking, then we’ll talk.
      1. +8
        29 August 2013 16: 24
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        the child has been waving for 22 years, however. Bread

        All this time, the child sucked on his paw. Soon he will have to try another part of the body. wassat
        1. +3
          29 August 2013 16: 31
          Quote: Ruslan67
          this time, the child sucked on his paw. Soon he will have to try another part of the body.

          Ruslan, hi ! And then if it reaches ....
          1. +2
            29 August 2013 17: 50
            Hi hi hi They will want to eat out laughing
            1. +4
              29 August 2013 19: 48
              Quote: Ruslan67
              They will want to eat out

              I'm sorry, but I live in cheat I want to eat earlier than they ..... and this is a FACT ..... do not judge by the nearby supermarket
              1. +1
                29 August 2013 20: 37
                Quote: gispanec
                but I live in cheat I want to eat earlier than they.

                If you hold back from the EU, it’s possible what And that’s not a fact - all the same, the gap between us is growing and it’s not from Russia that they go there to earn money
                Quote: gispanec
                ..Do not judge by a nearby supermarket

                I even do not judge trips to office plankton on credit machines and with VIP tours to third world countries wassat
                1. +1
                  29 August 2013 21: 43
                  Quote: Ruslan67
                  If you hold back from the EU, it’s possible. And it’s not a fact.

                  I wanted to eat in the year 75 ... although from a family of officers .... and in 97, having visited my homeland, I wanted to eat no less .... your post is inappropriate .... you just watched my post, my friends every year go to Chita to raft on I don’t remember what the river is called ..... the bugger is taken from the center of Russia ... of course it is there ... but all of China .... and what is there in the cannabis incomprehensible ... well, about fruit and so everything is clear
                2. +1
                  29 August 2013 21: 48
                  Quote: Ruslan67
                  I'm even on office plankton on credit cars

                  you are just an embittered Troll .... if you drive everyone under credit cars ...... I’m like an aunt in years, but looks quite 35-45, she said the same ... literally “bought cars on credit ... you can't go through ... office "so I answered her .... that I took the car on credit ... I stole it and now I just trudge ..... so you reminded me of it right now ..... you complex ... it's a fact to them
                  1. +2
                    29 August 2013 22: 12
                    Quote: gispanec
                    you are just embittered troll ..

                    And you are a beginner wassat
                    Quote: gispanec
                    I also wanted to eat in 75 ... although from a family of officers .... and in 97, having been in my homeland, I wanted to eat no less ...

                    Maybe it's time to eat something? And do not be rude, it is fraught angry
            2. +1
              29 August 2013 22: 05
              Quote: Ruslan67
              They will want to eat out

              Well, maybe something like this laughing :
    3. +3
      29 August 2013 16: 03
      Smerdyukov blabbed the cruiser "Ukraine".
      1. +7
        29 August 2013 16: 24
        funny conversation, some about the cruiser, others about the misunderstanding W, like a blind man with a deaf.
        1. +1
          29 August 2013 16: 42
          yeah. I meant the cruiser, but still in the subject smile
          1. -1
            29 August 2013 17: 49
            "Ukraine" is already in such a state that it can only be scrapped. Alas.
            1. Donetskiy
              +11
              29 August 2013 18: 31
              If the ship’s metal is corroded from above, this does not mean that it is in poor condition. The cruiser is mothballed and connected by an umbilical cord to the plant, and the necessary microclimate is maintained on board all the years, which, incidentally, costs a lot of money. There were reports and from them it was possible to judge that he was at least in good condition.
              1. 1712
                +1
                29 August 2013 19: 51
                And that there are no prospects for a cruiser? Didn't hear anything?
              2. +1
                29 August 2013 22: 30
                Quote: Donetskiy
                if the ship’s metal is corroded from above, this does not mean that it is in poor condition. The cruiser is mothballed and connected by an umbilical cord to the plant, and the necessary microclimate is maintained on board all the years, which, incidentally, costs a lot of money. There were reports and from them it was possible to judge that he was at least in good condition

                I wrote the same thing below, but I got -5 from the marshals, and then +7 ... hurray smelling Russia ... trolls and goblins are not only in power but here !!!
            2. -3
              29 August 2013 19: 53
              Quote: Kibalchish
              "Ukraine" is already in such a state that it can only be scrapped. Alas.

              yes you seem to be a goblin ...... sorry, but I’ll only apologize when you give the example of metal fatigue and corrosion using chemical compounds used in alloys as an example when creating the hull of this vessel, and since I have an idea .. .... then you goblin !!
        2. +2
          29 August 2013 19: 50
          Quote: seller trucks
          funny conversation, some about the cruiser, others about the misunderstanding W, like a blind man with a deaf.

          +100% ... nothing to add .... and my post is just + you
    4. +1
      29 August 2013 19: 46
      Quote: man
      Eh, with "Ukraine" would still be dealt with

      so for this we need a POLITICAL decision ..... and we have a pure economy in our heads ... like a rusty trough which is not necessary for nothing .... only nubasy write and think so ... the hulls of these cruisers are made of what steel and alloys ?? ... who knows? I know ... and .... it’s pointless to explain and paint it .... they’ll be covered up with answers that do not correspond to reality ...
  7. +31
    29 August 2013 15: 43
    The United States only succeeds in saving the world in its dirty films, but in reality, Russia does it.
  8. Pit
    Pit
    +16
    29 August 2013 15: 43
    In the whole story with chemical weapons, I like this:
    NATO ambassadors state that information on the involvement of the Bashar al-Assad government in the chemical attack near Damascus is confirmed from several sources

    So they call these militants and ask:
    - Do you shoot chemistry?
    And those to them:
    - No, not us.
    - Right?
    - Exactly, but I’ll also ask Ahmed from Ali ...
    No, they didn’t shoot either.
    Well, the ambassador is told about several sources.
    1. +12
      29 August 2013 17: 59
      On Wednesday, NATO ambassadors stated that the information about the involvement of the government of Bashar Assad in Damascus under himatake confirmed from multiple sources, and British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the possibility of foreign intervention even without the unanimous support of all members of the UN Security Council.

      MOSCOW, Aug 28 - RIA News. Russia cannot prevent the military intervention of the United States and several other Western countries in the Syrian conflict, Moscow will not take any military action, but it will try to organize a group of countries opposed to military actions in Syria, experts interviewed by RIA Novosti say.

      РИА Новости http://ria.ru/arab_sy/20130828/959124727.html#ixzz2dMl6fwc7

      In the event of US military intervention in Syria, Russia will lead the unification of countries opposing American actions. "The reaction will be political, sharply negative. Probably, Russia will use the forthcoming informal BRICS meeting" on the sidelines "of the G13 in early September and then the SCO summit in Bishkek on September XNUMX. Russia will try to organize an impressive group of countries that will sharply reject this practice ( forceful intervention of Western countries in the affairs of Syria) ", - the expert concluded.

      RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/arab_sy/20130828/959124727.html#ixzz2dMlXhvda

      WITH THEM YOU NEED ONLY SO:
  9. +8
    29 August 2013 15: 45
    The good news, no matter how late it would be, would be in time.
  10. artemiy
    +3
    29 August 2013 15: 46
    Fair wind guys! If only we had time!
  11. demon ada
    +5
    29 August 2013 15: 47
    assumption:
    maybe Moscow is carrying a military specialist from Cuba and from Venezuela.
  12. +5
    29 August 2013 15: 48
    the operational formation of the Russian Navy in the Mediterranean Sea "although it did not receive an introduction to fight with anyone, is ready for any action to protect Russian national interests in the region."
    Read the full story: http://rus.ruvr.ru/news/2013_08_29/Istochnik-Rossijskij-Genshtab-obnovljaet-grup

    pirovku-VMF-v-Sredizemnom-more-9973 /
    The Russian Navy is configured for combat and this is not unimportant !!
  13. artemiy
    +7
    29 August 2013 15: 50
    And where is the Chinese interesting ???
    1. +9
      29 August 2013 15: 55
      Nearest Chinese in Aden:
      destroyer Harbin, frigate 054A. They are conducting exercises there with the Americans on the effective fight against piracy.
    2. +27
      29 August 2013 16: 20
      Quote: artemiy
      And where is the Chinese interesting ???

      The Chinese in jo ... ne. They sleep and see how Russia would have plunged into it and they turned out to be the ones who forgive me ....! Both ours and yours. They are not reliable.
      1. +3
        29 August 2013 17: 09
        China "must clearly state its position on the situation in Syria." They also emphasize that the Syrian crisis "could strengthen China's trusting relationship with some other states."
        A similar position is held by the China Daily. One of her publications says that "without a solid legal basis, military intervention in Syria will be a gross violation of international law." The publication notes that accusing the Syrian government of using chemical weapons before the UN investigation, "the United States and its allies act like executioners."
  14. -29
    29 August 2013 15: 50
    Too late to drink Borjomi my friend. Tsushima reminds.
    1. +18
      29 August 2013 16: 02
      Not a single ship was sent - they surrendered to Syria! Putin is an agent of the West !!! 111
      Ships sent - Tsushima, why!?! 11
      1. Arabist
        +14
        29 August 2013 16: 04
        And these are such specially trained individuals, they do not like everything.
      2. +9
        29 August 2013 16: 17
        Trolls and hamsters, friendly, not paying attention, they are at work.
      3. 0
        29 August 2013 23: 48
        This is called the information war ...
    2. +4
      29 August 2013 19: 55
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Tsushima reminds.

      for more details ... what personally reminds you of TsUSIMU? and what do you personally know about this battle ... you’re a real goblin with a tail for self-reproduction
      1. -1
        30 August 2013 09: 47
        When a person has nothing to answer on the topic, he goes on to the individual. And according to Tsushima, then Rozhestvensky’s campaign was doomed already at the time of the 2nd squadron’s release. Read the story, dear ELF
  15. -1
    29 August 2013 16: 05
    In the coming days, it will be replenished by a large anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet,


    Lord They will bare the whole north!
    1. +7
      29 August 2013 16: 36
      Quote: crambol
      Lord They will bare the whole north!


      Who are you so afraid of? Thank God, the Bulava can fly well now.
    2. 1712
      0
      29 August 2013 19: 55
      Peter stayed there!
    3. -2
      29 August 2013 21: 28
      Quote: crambol
      In the coming days, it will be replenished by a large anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet,


      Lord They will bare the whole north!

      so you are the one who dreams of Russia with a small letter ...... but to hell with you
  16. +2
    29 August 2013 16: 08
    "On Wednesday, NATO ambassadors said that information about the involvement of Bashar al-Assad's government in the chemical attack near Damascus was confirmed from several sources, and British Foreign Minister William Hague announced the possibility of foreign intervention even without the unanimous support of all UN Security Council members."
    And who had doubts about "being confirmed"?
  17. +3
    29 August 2013 16: 13
    Quote: donavi49
    Not a single ship was sent - they surrendered to Syria! Putin is an agent of the West !!! 111
    Ships sent - Tsushima, why!?! 11

    It was necessary to send earlier, when the meaning was. And in the fall, what will they do there? Now it’s not ships, planes need to be sent.
    1. +1
      29 August 2013 19: 01
      Unfortunately, I completely agree with you. I treat all these attempts with pessimism. It seems to me that getting ready is just an excuse. Libya was handed over directly by Medvedev. Now they will spread their hands, "they did not have time." If there was a real desire to help Syria, ships should have been sent there on August 21!
  18. jon111
    -1
    29 August 2013 16: 14
    Where is Petya? maybe him there? well, or that would be nearby.
  19. +5
    29 August 2013 16: 19
    Quote: Ingvar 72
    In the fall, the Varyag missile cruiser of the Pacific Fleet, which will replace the Pacific Fleet Vice Admiral Panteleev’s large anti-submarine ship, which is currently performing combat missions as part of the operational unit, will replenish the Mediterranean naval group, the Interfax reports.


    Interfax drives. It is written: "The Varyag will join the group in the fall," and not "replace Panteleev." Simply put, "And you, Panteleev, I will ask you to stay."
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 09: 39
      I really want to believe.
  20. +2
    29 August 2013 16: 24
    American sources are somewhat reminiscent of a city sewer after a breakthrough: it flows and it stinks, and whose shit sort it out yourself! They themselves have been shitting (their special forces, which they covered) themselves and let them gobble up!
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    29 August 2013 16: 29
    Quote: jon111
    Where is Petya? maybe him there? well, or that would be nearby.

    Is it true where Petya is? Tell me who is in the know ???
    1. +4
      29 August 2013 16: 34
      Quote: Vitaliy-46
      But where is Petya?

      Well, if you recall the bearded anecdote, then Petya at the rally, and Mitya at the petition laughing
    2. +3
      29 August 2013 16: 53
      Petya in the north, he has the Arctic 2013 program.

      Initially, Kuznetsov and several ships (Wise / Undaunted and BOD with SF) were planned for the second half of autumn and winter. But how it will be unclear now. Kuzya is being cooked, but it will not really come soon (months through 2). They also wanted to take the first MiG-29K / UB, but this will not grow together because they will be handed over closer to the end of the year, and not in the summer, as MiG promised.
    3. +1
      29 August 2013 19: 57
      Quote: Vitaliy-46
      Is it true where Petya is? Tell me who is in the know ???

      Petka in the North ... Dorlozhen stand up for a scheduled repair .... let it become ... and without it there is someone to scan and report on the customs ...
      1. +2
        30 August 2013 00: 58
        Quote: gispanec
        .and without it there is someone to scan and report on the customs ...

        Respected! At least on wikis, look at the range of tasks that AVU solves. (our Kuzya is a really light aircraft carrier).
        1. -1
          30 August 2013 01: 23
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          (our Kuzya is a really light aircraft carrier).

          strange, I thought he was "average", ie. not a shock, but not an easy AB! And in general, it seems to me that they are judged by the displacement, and if you look at it, then "Admiral Kuznetsov" does not get tired of the same "Midway" (65000 gross tons) and significantly surpasses the "Essex". All these AV amers were never considered easy! And to compare our Kuznetsov with the same really light AV type "Invisible" or the Spaniard "Prince of Asturias" well, that right is not worth it at all! laughing
          hi
          1. +3
            30 August 2013 04: 35
            Quote: old man54
            strange, I thought he was "average", ie. not a shock, but not an easy AB!

            Trendsetters in this matter are amers. According to their classification, AV carriers 20-50 LA - belong to the lungs; 70-100 aircraft are heavy. (http://forum.worldofwarships.ru)
  23. +15
    29 August 2013 16: 39
    Something is wrong here. From the beginning, our ships were parted in a ball, and now we are hurrying into the bath, closer to Syria. It seems that the Americans will bomb a day or two, by this time ours will come up and everything will calm down. The Americans save face and we kind of did not give up.
  24. +1
    29 August 2013 16: 58
    Maybe I'm off topic ... I recalled the Fiume incident. Weakly ours or not to do the same? Or are the days when the honor of the flag was not an empty word gone?
  25. 0
    29 August 2013 17: 33
    In short, everyone to take their places, anchor removed !!!
  26. Grigorich 1962
    0
    29 August 2013 17: 41
    Yes ... the situation is heating up .... tell me, my friends, comrades, does Assad have a submarine ?? .... I just don’t know ... litter
    1. +1
      29 August 2013 18: 23
      It was 3x633 but they were of no use, they were making noise all over the sea, and the old ones were rusty, back in 2008, they were put in reserve.
  27. rumatam
    +5
    29 August 2013 17: 55
    eh, the Syrians would have shuffled one American "enterprise" and the world would have become 100% quieter. Well, ours certainly need to merge intelligence in full, if there is any.
    1. +5
      29 August 2013 18: 40
      Quote: rumatam
      eh, the Syrians would have shuffled one American "enterprise"

      You are a little late with advice. USS Enterprise is already in the process of disassembling "on pins and needles". Learn materiel.
  28. soldier's grandson
    0
    29 August 2013 18: 01
    THAT SENT, THEN DON'T SEND, damn THAT, I THINK OUR ALREADY AT THE GULF OF MEXICO
  29. Antokha
    +3
    29 August 2013 18: 09
    Now we need to do everything possible (Physically, diplomatically, informationally) to prevent an attack on Syria. I hope that the right decisions are made in political and military circles!
  30. 0
    29 August 2013 18: 13
    Well, APLRK is exactly at the Gulf of Mexico
  31. 0
    29 August 2013 18: 26
    Later, according to the source, “the Black Sea Fleet missile cruiser Moscow will join it,

    Later, when is this? And most importantly, why? Watch how the Syrians are being healed? Or are we going to provide practical assistance to Assad? Or just scare ** ndos threatening view of the five ships? You must admit that a miserable picture emerges - NATO members bulging with Tomahawks against the background of Russian ships smoking on the sidelines.
    1. 1712
      +2
      29 August 2013 20: 05
      It seems to me that Moscow was not alone on the shores of America. Somewhere below, she pulled up a submarine in the noise of her propellers
  32. +7
    29 August 2013 18: 30
    I was always amazed at the expense of the "world community" of liberals "Fighters for human rights" Today and tomorrow they will start bombing another state "where there is no democracy!" and bombard from afar with the main and powerful weapon of all defenders of "democracy" WINGED ROCKETS ($ 1.5 million) each and they will fly in hundreds on the heads of the common people .. Note how the LGBT defended what howl was in the world ... AND NOW SILENCE ...
  33. +3
    29 August 2013 18: 42
    Stop showing eyebrows, show teeth am
  34. alex5zahar211
    +2
    29 August 2013 18: 43
    Yes, ours would have gathered in the Mediterranean Sea. Yes, how would they have made a rustle there and nothing more in the way.
  35. alex5zahar211
    0
    29 August 2013 18: 53
    After Syria, our Caucasus, and these fanatics do not need to be tuned at all, they were already tuned. There was a Vostok squad, but Putin was losing everything to him. I put him down below the baseboard. They are only afraid of losing their pipe; they don’t care about Syria. already passed here I am waiting for the NKI until the dogs of the United Nations come out of there and then begin.
  36. Prishtina
    0
    29 August 2013 18: 53
    In general, the Chinese are touching ... where are their tricky new items of the Navy ?? or are they paravozim yapping behind our broad back ???
    1. +5
      29 August 2013 19: 29
      Novelties run in the Yellow Sea. Here is the latest news - 052D.

      China will not participate in the defense of Syria directly. It is not his responsibility to squeeze the shelf from the Philippines using practice - but you did it in Syria / Libya / Iraq and we will do it - it can be, squeezing the islands from Japan is also a priority of 1. Going to the other end of the world, in isolation from supply bases, air cover (Philippine disputed area and islands under the umbrella of Su-30, J-10, J-11) for Syria, which is not really needed - this will not be.

      And yet, the main thesis of the PRC's policy "Let the tigers fight, and we will observe, when the tigers run out of breath, we will destroy them at once."
  37. +1
    29 August 2013 18: 56
    Today I suddenly thought. And if ours quietly find (steal) "Mr." Clinton and "Mr." Sarkozy and hand them over (accidentally lose) the guys from the Jamahiriya and they will do with them the same as with the respected Muammar Gaddafi. Then when I see this video I will say "WOW WOW WOW they are DIED"
    PS I apologize for the emotions. (tired of keeping to himself)
  38. alex5zahar211
    0
    29 August 2013 19: 08
    The Bilderberg club threw themselves off and decided to play fun in bombing Syria. It’s just how tired these scum Jewish with their Hasidism are. It’s a pity that their Hitler did not burn to the end in ansvensen.
  39. +1
    29 August 2013 19: 11
    There are a lot of Russian citizens here to explain the situation to the incomprehensible overseas residents, but we won’t give our offense. And with all the power of Russian weapons. Can you change your mind? Or is the Kremlin sobbing? So after Iran, and then we ourselves ....
  40. 0
    29 August 2013 19: 24
    Of course, a spoon for lunch is good, in such a difficult international situation, we must have a clenched fist to protect our interests and allies, it’s good if they manage to strengthen the grouping of our ships off the coast of Syria, and if the amers strike soon, then “what the hell they were carried to these galleys by the "shortsightedness of our commanders?" or maybe we thought that NATO was pulling the fleet to the shores of Syria for rest?
  41. alex5zahar211
    -11
    29 August 2013 19: 25
    The same Jews are sitting in the Kremlin. Putin is one of them. The family of such Rhodschilds is all familiar. Until recently, they bought up our aluminum plants, etc., etc. All regions ate breathing, all coming to work in Moscow from the regions.? why yes because the whole industry is at the stages of bankruptcy. I also admired Putin earlier, but after a series of terrorist attacks on the territory of Russia. Which were not committed by terrorists at all, but by our special services under Putin, I generally lost faith in all this government. Our economy is sitting on a pipe everyone knows. Our science is governed by Chubais. Scientists half had a good night's sleep and half went abroad. How else to convince our people that we are meat, sheep. Under the cap of this Jewish administration. Serdyukov planted x .. and put a secretary to his scapegoat. So piz .. Syria will not wait for help.
  42. 0
    29 August 2013 19: 32
    Strengthening the group - this is not ensuring superiority! As a rule, this means ensuring self-preservation and no more. This is a factor in the manifestation of political aspirations, which in reality does not ensure the prevention of real threats to partners and is purely political in nature.
    Bringing the Russian Armed Forces to alert, and even more so coordinated actions with the Armed Forces of China, Syria and Iran, really represent a real readiness to ensure non-interference in Syrian affairs. But this will not happen - our personal, even if consolidated, public aspirations to repulse possible aggression, relations are breaking between political and economic interstate relations. Thank God (although "Thomas" is not a believer, but baptized), the current leadership of Russia does not focus on purely political dividends, but also measures the possible risks in the long term.
  43. slvevg
    +1
    29 August 2013 19: 40
    santor
    milkman !!! drinks Naryl good Old. Thank you. Some puzzles were in place ...
  44. sad33
    -6
    29 August 2013 19: 45
    I don’t understand something ... explain, gentlemen ... why do we need Syria? how long have you become our friends? or is it money interest? then this is another topic ... when in Vietnam there was a mess with missile complexes in three shifts loaded ... they were not afraid of anyone and did not conduct negotiations ... and now they are consulting ... they call back ... the loot is being divided in Syria ? "" "can I call you, find out whether to hit you in the face or not? okay? .... thanks ..." ""
    1. sashka
      +2
      29 August 2013 20: 10
      Quote: sad33
      ... explain gentlemen ... why do we need Syria? How long have you become our friends? or is it a matter of monetary interest?

      If we leave, we will have to deal with the Caspian Sea in the foreseeable future .. Now it’s not about money, but about principle .. Who will sit out whom playing on nerves and demonstrating determination. I personally have my own selfish interest, (very bad, but it is) to see how the S-300 "work". Is it as they say ..
    2. 0
      29 August 2013 22: 08
      And besides the Soviet newspapers of that period, do you know all diplomacy in Vietnam?
  45. -5
    29 August 2013 19: 47
    Where and what maneuvers makes our surface fleet more or less clear. And what is busy, and most importantly, in what waters are our nuclear submarines? This is a state secret as I understand it.
    1. -1
      29 August 2013 19: 59
      Yes there are already traffic jams from atomic submarines. It's time to set traffic lights !!!
    2. sashka
      +2
      29 August 2013 20: 22
      Quote: Renat
      This is a state secret as I understand it.

      What are you, what are you .. Every kiosk has a route and a timetable for the nuclear submarines .. What kind of heresy are you talking about ??
      1. -2
        29 August 2013 20: 29
        Do you work at a kiosk?
  46. -1
    29 August 2013 19: 49
    The trolls activated, which is not surprising ... heh heh .. They are waiting for the start of the volume launchhawks Oh well..
  47. 0
    29 August 2013 19: 57
    Quote: Renat
    Where and what maneuvers makes our surface fleet more or less clear. And what is busy, and most importantly, in what waters are our nuclear submarines? This is a state secret as I understand it.

    aha now coordinates will be specified and laid out in interest .. gee
  48. The comment was deleted.
  49. +5
    29 August 2013 20: 07
    And after with a heroic victory
    Back to the rocky shores.
    Though the waves moan and cry
    And splashing on the side of the ship
    But joyfully will meet the heroes Rybachy -
    Our dear land.

    Fleet - keep it up !!!!
    Have a good sea guys!
  50. d_t_p
    +3
    29 August 2013 20: 13
    Yes guys ...
    It would be good now to stir up all our potential allies.
    Egypt, Pakistan, who are now turning America back and AZ to her AZ!
    Iran, which must be fully aware of the danger of crappy democratization of its only ally.
    And even China, which would seem to be far away and out of business, but which will be in trouble if NATO approaches its western borders!
  51. +4
    29 August 2013 20: 16
    Sad and toothless.
    So tomahawks, standards and harpoons will reach our homes.
    The essence of America is continuous war. Against whom is not so important. Sure. When today's supposed American enemies are defeated, the Americans will immediately announce the birth of new evil empires.
    This is an axiom of imperialism. During war, the fastest money is made and the most crazy mistakes and crimes are justified.
    As for Syria, the first battles were lost... in Serbia, Iraq, Libya,.....
    Then Assad began to correct the mistakes of others, and now he needs support.
    The evil empire can only be crushed by the whole world, and, above all, together with the Chinese.
    And what the Chinese have in mind is correct - and we should be the same.

    But the USSR could have dealt with the situation alone, and easily!
  52. +2
    29 August 2013 20: 17
    The main thing is not to give in to provocations!!!
    As many have already written, knock down tamahawks, while warning.
    And China can be persuaded to do the same.
    Deliver S300 to Iran (it’s too late for the campaign in Syria)
    Iskander also to Iran and Iraq.
    And most importantly, close Turkey to our tourists (Turkey will have less money, Erdogan will be overthrown faster)
    1. sashka
      +3
      29 August 2013 20: 26
      Quote: -Max-
      Iskander also to Iran and Iraq.

      Why should Iraq?? They are already independent..
  53. Southerner
    0
    29 August 2013 20: 20
    http://warfiles.ru/37525-rossiya-utilizirovala-iranskie-kompleksy-s-300.html
  54. +1
    29 August 2013 20: 29
    Seems like shitty things. Gas masks have been issued in Israel, people are finding out if there are free seats on planes from Ben-Gurion to Moscow. TV channels in Israel are all talking about an imminent war. So.....(In both Israel and Syria there are many citizens with Russian passports)
    1. +11
      29 August 2013 20: 44
      Quote: AIR-ZNAK
      people will find out the availability of seats on planes from Ben-Gurion to Moscow.

      As soon as we smelled something fried, we immediately remembered that they were like compatriots am
  55. Stavr
    +2
    29 August 2013 20: 34
    There is a proverb “hope dies last”, for the Syrian people it is more relevant than ever. As long as there are countries in the world that support Syria, it will stand to the death to the end, hoping for victory.
    Our fleet is going to the shores of Syria not to fight with someone for this country, but in order to:
    1. Provide moral support (possibly technical support) and strengthen hope for victory.
    2.Cool down the ardor of some US satellites. There are many who want to attack Syria, but it’s one thing to attack a small country en masse, and it’s a completely different thing to have even a small chance of colliding with the Russian fleet. Do you think France, England, Türkiye are so stupid?? They understand perfectly well how this will come back to haunt them.
    Therefore, as soon as ours officially confirm that the group has arrived in Syria, the French corvette will immediately be forced to retreat. I bet you))
  56. Cuba86
    -5
    29 August 2013 20: 39
    This is good news, I would also send the Peter the Great missile cruiser there.
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. -3
    29 August 2013 20: 48
    Quote: Cuba86
    This is good news, I would also send the Peter the Great missile cruiser there.

    Typical troll
    1. Cuba86
      +3
      29 August 2013 20: 50
      Sorry, you are mistaken, I just registered recently. Before that I was a reader. What am I doing wrong? This ship would really, it seems to me, strengthen our naval group in the Mediterranean.
      1. 0
        29 August 2013 22: 01
        This ship would really, it seems to me, strengthen our naval group in the Mediterranean.
        I’m not a strategist either, BUT, there’s no point in “rattling” weapons, and in general, our simple minesweeper would be standing in a Syrian port, let some mongrel touch it!.................. ............. am
      2. sashka
        +1
        30 August 2013 06: 58
        Quote: Cuba86
        What am I doing wrong? This ship would really, it seems to me, strengthen our naval group in the Mediterranean.

        Do you really think that Russia will get involved in “this” war? Nothing and never...Show presence and determination, yes. But there is no such goal in fighting.
  59. +2
    29 August 2013 20: 52
    Quote: Stavr
    Do you think France, England, Türkiye are so stupid??
    ... I bet you))

    1. It’s better to take care of your teeth
    2. Those listed above are stupid, and also corrupt and have inferiority complexes.
    especially the French. The houses have become a mess, they revere gays, they have turned into multiculturalism....
    They burn their cars, terrorize them with hedgehogs, but they just wipe themselves and sing along with the Yankees more than the English.
  60. -1
    29 August 2013 20: 52
    Quote: Stavr
    There is a proverb “hope dies last”, for the Syrian people it is more relevant than ever. As long as there are countries in the world that support Syria, it will stand to the death to the end, hoping for victory.
    Our fleet is going to the shores of Syria not to fight with someone for this country, but in order to:
    1. Provide moral support (possibly technical support) and strengthen hope for victory.
    2.Cool down the ardor of some US satellites. There are many who want to attack Syria, but it’s one thing to attack a small country en masse, and it’s a completely different thing to have even a small chance of colliding with the Russian fleet. Do you think France, England, Türkiye are so stupid?? They understand perfectly well how this will come back to haunt them.
    Therefore, as soon as ours officially confirm that the group has arrived in Syria, the French corvette will immediately be forced to retreat. I bet you))

    Also a provocateur..obviously..
  61. 0
    29 August 2013 20: 57
    Quote: AIR-ZNAK
    Seems like shitty things. Gas masks have been issued in Israel, people are finding out if there are free seats on planes from Ben-Gurion to Moscow. TV channels in Israel are all talking about an imminent war. So.....(In both Israel and Syria there are many citizens with Russian passports)


    why do we need these people here? many of them probably voted for the policies pursued by Netanyahu, and now, as soon as they smell something fried, they’re heading straight to Mother Russia?! Ugly...
  62. +1
    29 August 2013 21: 00
    Quote: Cuba86
    Sorry, you are mistaken, I just registered recently. Before that I was a reader. What am I doing wrong? This ship would really, it seems to me, strengthen our naval group in the Mediterranean.

    Maybe he’s wrong..It’s just that the website has gone off the rails abruptly..they’re provoking sudden, thoughtless actions..Info, there’s a war going on..you’ll understand..who’s for what..I’M PERSONALLY FOR RUSSIA!!
  63. Niecke
    +3
    29 August 2013 21: 03
    I read the phrase - operational group, and it became funny! The 5th Soviet operational group consisted of 130 ships... and this parody of the heels of ships, well, it’s not even funny!!! although the hope of the Syrians, who believe in us in the old fashioned way, is understandable, only us - far from the USSR!
    1. 0
      29 August 2013 22: 19
      The defenders of the Brest fortress also had no hope. And what?! How can the Iraqi generals surrender their country?! Forecasters, ml.
      1. Niecke
        +2
        29 August 2013 22: 24
        Brest stronghold... complete encirclement, zero hope, only ours fought on our HOMELAND, for the HOMELAND and PEOPLE (our own) and not for who, where and how!!!
  64. -1
    29 August 2013 21: 14
    A Russian missile cruiser is heading to the Mediterranean Sea. By sending a cruiser to the shores of Syria, Putin makes it clear that we are ready to strike back, but for now this is just a gesture towards the West. It now depends on the West how this message to the West will turn out to be peaceful or not entirely.
    1. +4
      29 August 2013 21: 30
      komel: "we are ready to strike back"
      Think about what you're saying... Missile cruiser, retaliatory strike... From the Star Wars series. In Sevastopol, let's raise a "bad weather division" and, with the support of a couple of 30-year-old guards, let's give it a blast...?
      The times of Ushakov, Nakhimov and the Empire are long gone. There is nothing to give “retaliatory strikes” with. Do you want World War III, son? So there's one there Delete everyone will. Everyone, do you understand? And Putin, and Obama, and you.
      1. -1
        29 August 2013 21: 53
        those. According to your text, there used to be wooden ships, and the people on them were made of iron, but now it’s the other way around? Only they came from the other side with eggs?! Do we smell like that under the Christmas tree? At any time there are men, and there are... well, whatever their name is, they also seem to have balls. For some reason, Khrushchov, with his 300 warheads (which there was nothing to deliver), took off his shoe and pounded on the podium with it, and those with 6000 thousand (from the bottom 3000 could have brought it to us) paid $$.
        1. Niecke
          0
          29 August 2013 22: 07
          so he banged his butt after the explosion of a five-hundred-megaton tank - the argument was... mom, don’t spoil me!!!
          1. +2
            30 August 2013 02: 46
            Quote: niecke
            after the explosion of a five hundred megaton

            fool
  65. +3
    29 August 2013 21: 19
    only we are far from the USSR!

    Alas
  66. 0
    29 August 2013 21: 19
    Quote: Cuba86
    Sorry, you are mistaken, I just registered recently. Before that I was a reader. What am I doing wrong? This ship would really, it seems to me, strengthen our naval group in the Mediterranean.

    Plus you.. probably wrong.. Just catching up with a bunch of ships (of which we have few) is good, of course, only they will look very modest.. Our feature is usually Nuclear submarines and missiles with nuclear weapons.. in such crises.. Their task is to appear (secretly) in the right place and at the right time... and that's it!!
    1. Cuba86
      0
      29 August 2013 21: 23
      I agree with you, maybe it’s not evening yet, they’ll send, who knows. This is of course unlikely, but what the hell is it when God sleeps.
    2. -2
      29 August 2013 22: 39
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Our trick is usually Nuclear submarines and missiles with nuclear weapons..in such crises..Their task is to appear (secretly) in the right place and at the right time..and that’s all!!

      .. neighing... our submarine with blue on board secretly approached (for example) California and the Americans didn’t know about it (secretly).. so why should they crap themselves???... since they don’t know what’s nearby them?!!...Lord...how many not very smart ur patriots...okay, they would be ready to put their heads down without hesitation...but no...they will troll the Internet and be happy....believe me...we will sift through you ...wait...we are the Americans and you...one and the same
  67. +1
    29 August 2013 21: 43
    US sends fifth destroyer to Mediterranean

    publication time: 18: 52
    last update: 19: 25



    A US Defense Department source told AFP that the US Navy is sending the destroyer Stout to the Mediterranean. It will become the fifth American ship off the coast of Syria.

    The Pentagon announced the redeployment hours after Russian media reported that two Russian navy ships had been sent to the Mediterranean. According to Interfax, an anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet and a missile cruiser of the Black Sea Fleet have been sent to the shores of Syria.

    RIA Novosti published a report that the renewal of the Navy in the Mediterranean is not related to the situation in Syria and is a planned rotation, but Interfax, citing a source in the Russian General Staff, claims the opposite.

    A Pentagon source told the French news agency that Stout was supposed to relieve the destroyer Mahan in the Mediterranean, which in turn was supposed to return to Virginia, but plans changed last week and Mahan remained in the region.

    A report from the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence on the use of chemical weapons near Damascus on August 21 of this year is expected to be published today.

    According to The New York Times, the DNI report will not provide unequivocal evidence that the decision to use chemical weapons was made solely by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad or directly by the political leadership of this country.

    Although, as the US State Department emphasizes, even if this decision was made at the level of the commander of one of the units of the Syrian army that has chemical weapons, responsibility rests with the commander-in-chief, that is, President Assad.
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 11: 14
      Quote: igor67
      Although, as the US State Department emphasizes, even if this decision was made at the level of the commander of one of the units of the Syrian army that has chemical weapons, responsibility rests with the commander-in-chief, that is, President Assad.

      Well, isn't it nonsense? Rats gas their own people, and the Americans accuse Assad of these crimes. Well, nonsense.
  68. -2
    29 August 2013 21: 44
    Quote: Cuba86
    I agree with you, maybe it’s not evening yet, they’ll send, who knows. This is of course unlikely, but what the hell is it when God sleeps.

    It’s too late to send)))...They are already at the calculated positions...(some of them have been spotted..) and yet, maybe one of them is hidden under the belly of the aircraft carrier, or maybe it will surface on the shore of the beach in Turkey (women look..hehe) )Nobody knows anything (autonomy)
  69. +2
    29 August 2013 21: 54
    I am the KDD SSBN of the 13th division (whoever understands the topic), took the oath in 1982, served my HOMELAND on the BDRM project, these “steamers” are still in service, 16 ballistic missiles, you can shoot without leaving the pier, IT’S TIME TO TEACH OV ,we need political will. HOW MUCH CAN YOU TOLERATE....!!!
    Hello everyone from Dobryak.
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 22
      Finished Holland, Obryak?
      1. gunnerminer
        0
        31 August 2013 19: 19
        Most likely Dzerzhinka. They are so determined there.
    2. gunnerminer
      0
      31 August 2013 19: 19
      And how will something similar arrive in response?
  70. Strong
    0
    29 August 2013 21: 57
    Quote: esaul
    Before this, it became known that Washington had sent two aircraft carriers to the Persian Gulf region: Harry Truman and Nimitz.


    Aircraft carriers in the Arabian Sea/Persian Gulf are constantly on duty, replacing each other. I wonder why their next departure to replace the previous duty aircraft carriers attracts so much attention? Flying to Syria from the Gulf when Iraq closed its airspace is nonsense.
  71. sergei..79
    0
    29 August 2013 22: 11
    They will show who has more... and blur. The DPRK has clearly shown what NATO is.
  72. TIGER
    0
    29 August 2013 22: 28
    RUSSIA SHOULD NOT INTERVENE IN THE MILITARY CONFLICT IN SYRIA AT THIS TIME! AT THIS TIME, IT IS NECESSARY TO REMARM THE ARMY AND NAVY AT AN ACCELERATED PACE! STRENGTHEN THE TROOPS IN THE SOUTH AS WELL AS THE BLACK SEA FLEET AND THE CASPIAN FLOTILLIA!
  73. 0
    29 August 2013 22: 46
    I don’t know if this has already been written or not, but FINALLY!!!
    I was already thinking, why the hell are our people in no hurry with the “sea response”? And here he is, hurray! Now let's see how the foreigners will try to maintain their mine in such game conditions!
    (they might save it, but it’s sour...)
    They will not agree to an open forceful confrontation with us - the risk of suffering huge losses will increase by an order of magnitude. Not to mention the world split into two or three camps and such an arctic cooling in politics that their own citizens will hang their foreign “godfathers”-sixes by their personal belongings!
  74. 0
    29 August 2013 23: 42
    Well, they will arrive and what next, it wouldn’t be bad if at the same time the Americans started bombing the rebels, they would go crazy.
  75. Kavosh
    0
    30 August 2013 00: 04
    Russia fights once every 10 years, who's next?
    1. rodevaan
      0
      30 August 2013 02: 38
      Quote: KAVOSH
      Russia fights once every 10 years, who's next?


      - Yes, we have been fighting all our history with all sorts of Westernized rabble... We came from the East, but rarely - mostly Westernized trash was a pearl...
      If they climb this time, everything will end the same as centuries before. I don’t know who’s next - but God forbid. Enough of Russian people dying already.
  76. Deadman
    0
    30 August 2013 00: 22
    Not everyone has to sail the seas alone!
  77. 0
    30 August 2013 02: 16
    The Egyptians have hung posters of Putin all over Egypt and are promoting him. This is tough. A huge poster depicting Putin in a Navy uniform and the inscription in Arabic “Bye-Bye, America!” appeared in the northern capital of Alexandria alongside images of General Abdel Fattah al-Sissi and Egypt's beloved President Gamal Abdel Nasser. An identical banner was posted in the Egyptian resort city of Hurghada. There, the portraits of the three leaders are crowned with an inscription written in Russian: “Against terrorism - it is necessary that the people empower the military to fight violence and terrorism.” Oh, these Arab tricks...
  78. rodevaan
    +1
    30 August 2013 02: 40
    And this is for those who are still holed up in a remote tank dugout of the 90s, with cola and burgers...
    I am sure that the time will come and the Russian fleet will become a worthy successor to the USSR Navy.

  79. -1
    30 August 2013 02: 40
    In order to shoot down everything that flies, a large BC is needed. Whether they will be able to ensure reloading of air defense systems in combat conditions is a question.
  80. Kavtorang
    +3
    30 August 2013 04: 58
    Lord God, what nonsense has been written.
    However, the commentators - leavened - keyboard - hurray - are generally burning.
    I'm out. I had already taken off my shoulder straps and hung them in the far corner of the closet for funeral purposes, but this did not stop me from constantly communicating with colleagues who are closely occupied with ships.
    Well, here's the latest from the respected:
    Quote: voliador
    In order to shoot down everything that flies, a large BC is needed. Whether they will be able to ensure reloading of air defense systems in combat conditions is a question.

    I answer, in combat conditions, reloading (except from the cellar supply drums themselves) is not necessary, in principle. Either the ship will sink or the attacking side will consider the losses unacceptable.
    Further, for those who finish only at the sight of a picture of the TARKR "Peter the Great", this ship, in the force presence version, is standing in the roadstead and trying to cover one direction. And they will hit everyone.
    Opportunities: what they greedily masturbate over, the Fort air defense system is a naval version of the first modifications of the S-300, the rest is self-defense at close range.
    Should you calculate an ASP outfit to suppress the air defense capabilities of this particular ship?
    Further, “Moscow” and “Varyag” - the source disgustingly screwed up. In the first lines of the letter: the RKR data is outdated, in fact, they have already approached the standard “bar” for withdrawal from the Navy. Accordingly, nothing serious is being done on them. Neither the main complex nor the onboard S-300F can operate. The complexes are inoperative - is this clear?
    Now these two RKRs perform the functions inherent in the concept - “gunboat diplomacy”
    1. +1
      30 August 2013 07: 54
      Some knowledge is better kept to yourself. Why do the Americans need intelligence when there are such people.
    2. Chumich
      0
      30 August 2013 09: 42
      It turns out that it is better to remove ships from the Mediterranean Sea area altogether? Otherwise, God forbid, they will drown while plowing the vast expanses of the Mediterranean Sea...
  81. +2
    30 August 2013 07: 38
    I'm reading the news feed: "NATO countries refuse military intervention in Syria."
    These are the prerequisites that common sense will prevail and the bloody “meat grinder” in Syria will stop.
  82. Apsui
    0
    30 August 2013 07: 40
    Empty puffing out of cheeks by the Ozero cooperative.
  83. +1
    30 August 2013 09: 29
    Quote: artemiy
    And where is the Chinese interesting ???

    As usual, they sit on a high hill and watch what is happening with interest.
  84. +1
    30 August 2013 09: 36
    Quote: gispanec
    Quote: Ingvar 72
    Tsushima reminds.

    for more details ... what personally reminds you of TsUSIMU? and what do you personally know about this battle ... you’re a real goblin with a tail for self-reproduction

    When a person has nothing to answer on the topic, he goes on to the individual. And according to Tsushima, then Rozhestvensky’s campaign was doomed already at the time of the 2nd squadron’s release. Read the story, dear ELF
  85. largus886
    +1
    30 August 2013 09: 38
    It’s really a pity that Kuzi is not there! Imagine the Amers attacking Assad, without UN sanction, and we are attacking the opposition. The Amers: “We are destroying chemical weapons,” ours: “And we too”!
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 10: 24
      An adequate answer would be.
  86. Vtel
    0
    30 August 2013 10: 37
    Good news against the backdrop of the rattling and squealing of the evil West. They will answer us for the Kursk. Either the shavers have already backed down, or the cunning ones are being cunning again.
  87. Armenia
    0
    30 August 2013 10: 44
    You can argue in any way, but the fact remains that World War 3 is just around the corner. THE WORLD (West) IS GOING CRAZY
  88. poccinin
    -1
    30 August 2013 10: 44
    Quote: arnulla
    It seems to me that at the top, at the moment, there is a struggle between the librarians and the patriotically inclined. And to speak unequivocally about the authorities as a liberal or pro-Russian one, probably all the same bust.

    at the top they are simply thinking about the right thing to do. If we get involved in this war. In RUSSIA, the howling of mothers will rise and begin. According to polls of Russians, 80% are not interested in politics.
  89. 0
    30 August 2013 12: 20
    In fact, there were earlier precedents when the presence of a warship decided the issue: “In April 1986, during the Libyan conflict, when US aircraft bombed Libyan cities, he received an order from the main headquarters to enter the capital of Libya, the port of Tripoli. Alexander Sergeevich prepared the RKR “Vice Admiral Drozd” "and along a complex river channel, in full combat readiness to repel air strikes, he entered the main base of the city of Tripoli. The situation was tense. The presence of a powerful missile ship forced the Americans to stop bombing and shelling the capital of Libya." The truth and power of the USSR Navy was significantly different than what we have at the moment.
  90. DIMAS
    0
    30 August 2013 12: 35
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    http://www.gegenfrage.com/russland-droht-mit-militaerschlag-gegen-saudi-arabien/

    but I really wanted it...
  91. 0
    30 August 2013 14: 21
    Quote: sub307
    In fact, there were earlier precedents when the presence of a warship decided the issue: “In April 1986, during the Libyan conflict, when US aircraft bombed Libyan cities, he received an order from the main headquarters to enter the capital of Libya, the port of Tripoli. Alexander Sergeevich prepared the RKR “Vice Admiral Drozd” "and along a complex river channel, in full combat readiness to repel air strikes, he entered the main base of the city of Tripoli. The situation was tense. The presence of a powerful missile ship forced the Americans to stop bombing and shelling the capital of Libya." The truth and power of the USSR Navy was significantly different than what we have at the moment.

    Yes. Cool example. TaG and in Haiphong were angry with AM. But this is not an example of readiness to respond. Example - Cuba. The fleet should not cruise and collect filibuster tribute. The volleys are vigorous, and then - whoever didn’t hide, it’s not my fault. Everything else is a war with pirates on pies))) by uprooting grass with a walking excavator.
    PS And fiK you will find out whose fleet is stronger...
  92. Kovrovsky
    0
    30 August 2013 14: 34
    Quote: donavi49
    Well, it really will not be very fast.

    Moscow is now in Venezuela (yesterday the commander of the Navy of this country examined her). Kulakov on the way to the strait (Gibraltar which), the Varangian generally gathered in Australia, and from there it will already be visible where he will go.

    By the way, do not forget about Panteleev, who if something, then immediately run, but so far peacefully stands on Novorossiysk naval base.

    It is not worth dumping the RCA yet - R-60 went to provide the 2 BDK to Tartus. This can be quite effective in tracking launches and transmitting information directly to the ATS. BOD and SRZK may not keep track of everything on a large theater, but the RCA can be attached to almost everyone, but there is still a tanker to display.

    Also for the same purpose, you can use the running oldies - Inquisitive, Okay and Savvy.

    Well done Maduro! I put the beska on right away, albeit crookedly. We wish we had more such friends of Russia!
  93. 0
    30 August 2013 14: 52
    Quote: Kavtorang
    Lord God, what nonsense has been written.
    However, the commentators - leavened - keyboard - hurray - are generally burning.
    I'm out. I had already taken off my shoulder straps and hung them in the far corner of the closet for funeral purposes, but this did not stop me from constantly communicating with colleagues who are closely occupied with ships.
    Well, here's the latest from the respected:
    Quote: voliador
    In order to shoot down everything that flies, a large BC is needed. Whether they will be able to ensure reloading of air defense systems in combat conditions is a question.

    I answer, in combat conditions, reloading (except from the cellar supply drums themselves) is not necessary, in principle. Either the ship will sink or the attacking side will consider the losses unacceptable.
    Further, for those who finish only at the sight of a picture of the TARKR "Peter the Great", this ship, in the force presence version, is standing in the roadstead and trying to cover one direction. And they will hit everyone.
    Opportunities: what they greedily masturbate over, the Fort air defense system is a naval version of the first modifications of the S-300, the rest is self-defense at close range.
    Should you calculate an ASP outfit to suppress the air defense capabilities of this particular ship?
    Further, “Moscow” and “Varyag” - the source disgustingly screwed up. In the first lines of the letter: the RKR data is outdated, in fact, they have already approached the standard “bar” for withdrawal from the Navy. Accordingly, nothing serious is being done on them. Neither the main complex nor the onboard S-300F can operate. The complexes are inoperative - is this clear?
    Now these two RKRs perform the functions inherent in the concept - “gunboat diplomacy”

    Just a minute. Their task is to release the main caliber. And then try to defend. And not vice versa. What a strange naval lieutenant colonel you are)))
    PS Neushto, all the polymers have failed again and the Mace doesn’t fly?
    1. Kavtorang
      +3
      30 August 2013 16: 28
      You just may not be aware.
      I'll try to make a "squeeze":
      Yes, indeed, their task is to break through to salvo range, and then at least the grass won’t grow. But there are a number of nuances.
      The very concept of using these RKRs implied working in pairs (this is such a tattered blue book with a “neck”). To put it very briefly: while one comes within range of a main battery salvo, the other’s entire attention is on air defense. After two broadside salvos of the first, the roles change. True, I do not know of cases of even one full broadside of this project.
      I’ll immediately make a reservation about the equipment in the SBC - in an onboard salvo of 8 missiles, one can carry one. The specifics of the design of the launch containers.
      So, you can further assume that I am strange. In practice, I just don’t like empty boasting, especially without knowing the essence of the issue - which is what a significant part of our forum members are sinning with. For example, I don’t even get involved in issues of the Strategic Missile Forces, tanks or planes/helicopters, I don’t know anything about it at all, it’s a different school.
      But on the forum we have a lot of “specialists” in RPG-7, BTR-80, T-72/90, S-300/400/500, Topol, Severodvinsk and Dolgoruky tanks.
      They all can’t say anything, but putting up a beautiful picture is a must. laughing
      And for you, personally: I personally had and still have ordinary naval shoulder straps for captain 2nd rank, which are no longer needed for everyday wear; I have never been a lieutenant colonel.
      1. gunnerminer
        0
        31 August 2013 13: 41
        How would you comment on the absence of an anti-tank missile tank (at least one) in the group? Where to store tactical anti-tank missiles and other ammunition? The absence of a hospital ship? Where to evacuate and how, who, and how to provide assistance to the wounded. In case of further developments? Should we just display the flag?
        1. Kavtorang
          0
          1 September 2013 08: 34
          Actually, PRTB, in your understanding, is not needed there. In the Baltic and Black Sea, such units of the 12th Main Directorate of the Moscow Region are not needed due to a number of geopolitical features; in the North and Pacific Fleet they already exist.
          With the imbalance of the group - yes, there is such a thing. But here is the question of forming a composition so that there is always an ocean-going rescue tug, a squadron tanker and a hospital ship.
    2. gunnerminer
      0
      31 August 2013 13: 43
      What is the main cadre without exposed targets? Without aerial reconnaissance? Shipborne radars will be suppressed by electronic warfare. The satellite system for reconnaissance and target designation has not been adopted for service. Who will provide anti-submarine defense?
    3. gunnerminer
      +1
      31 August 2013 19: 25
      The Bulava flies in the wrong way and in the wrong direction. Fleet Admiral V. Chirkov promised to load the Bulava of the Navy Civil Code onto the submarine in January 2014. It will only be tested again in the fall. The Bulava is not ready for combat use according to the project. The carrier submarine has been sitting without the main one for almost a year weapons, without a Mace. Such a boat has no combat value.
  94. -1
    30 August 2013 15: 27
    Quote: Kavtorang
    "gunboat diplomacy"

    If you are not aware, this diplomacy was carried out in China and other Latin Americas. And if you don’t understand the meaning (and you don’t understand, a priori, since you compare the presence of a missile cruiser with a cannon boat), then turn to the history of the Korean War. Do you remember how the small-shaven men and the guards pooped around the Suez Canal?
  95. 0
    30 August 2013 17: 06
    Due to the situation, we will add the cancellation of regular airline flights for an indefinite period of time to some airports in the region. In particular, using the example of Cyprus Airlines (currently to Beirut. Otherwise, Hezbollah may remember the kingdom’s Air Force planes, which can fly from Cyprus to Damascus.
  96. 0
    30 August 2013 17: 07
    Quote: Kavtorang
    You just may not be aware.
    I'll try to make a "squeeze":
    Yes, indeed, their task is to break through to salvo range, and then at least the grass won’t grow. But there are a number of nuances.
    The very concept of using these RKRs implied working in pairs (this is such a tattered blue book with a “neck”). To put it very briefly: while one comes within range of a main battery salvo, the other’s entire attention is on air defense. After two broadside salvos of the first, the roles change. True, I do not know of cases of even one full broadside of this project.
    I’ll immediately make a reservation about the equipment in the SBC - in an onboard salvo of 8 missiles, one can carry one. The specifics of the design of the launch containers.
    So, you can further assume that I am strange. In practice, I just don’t like empty boasting, especially without knowing the essence of the issue - which is what a significant part of our forum members are sinning with. For example, I don’t even get involved in issues of the Strategic Missile Forces, tanks or planes/helicopters, I don’t know anything about it at all, it’s a different school.
    But on the forum we have a lot of “specialists” in RPG-7, BTR-80, T-72/90, S-300/400/500, Topol, Severodvinsk and Dolgoruky tanks.
    They all can’t say anything, but putting up a beautiful picture is a must. laughing
    And for you, personally: I personally had and still have ordinary naval shoulder straps for captain 2nd rank, which are no longer needed for everyday wear; I have never been a lieutenant colonel.

    Don't be offended. When I was building fucking factories for the Navy six days a week with a vacation in January, I hoped that I was doing something useful... It turned out that I was in vain. I take my leave.
  97. +1
    30 August 2013 19: 27
    Maybe here it’s worth thinking about the fact that if we are unable to defend Syria, then we may also declare an obvious undemocratic aggravation of the situation in some Baltic country, for example, Lithuania. And there is a reason for the campaign - recently our citizen was extradited to the United States without Russia’s permission. This is a clear reason to intervene in the situation, incl. by military means. It’s better to take Constantinople back into the Orthodox framework - our reinforced squadron will be in this region, and the Turks will send their fleet to Syria.
  98. 0
    30 August 2013 19: 39
    Quote: AnpeL
    Maybe here it’s worth thinking about the fact that if we are unable to defend Syria, then we may also declare an obvious undemocratic aggravation of the situation in some Baltic country, for example, Lithuania. And there is a reason for the campaign - recently our citizen was extradited to the United States without Russia’s permission. This is a clear reason to intervene in the situation, incl. by military means. It’s better to take Constantinople back into the Orthodox framework - our reinforced squadron will be in this region, and the Turks will send their fleet to Syria.

    No, it’s enough that I can’t open the windows at night - the TU-95 and 160 are roaring. Especially the first ones.
    Constantinople was also missing... “Crocodiles” are already shaving bream over the Volga.
  99. waisson
    0
    30 August 2013 20: 02
    The Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov will head to Syria in the winter, ITAR-TASS reports.

    “At the end of the year, most likely in early December, the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov of Project 11435 will set off on a long sea voyage, during which it will call at the Russian Navy’s logistics center stationed in the Syrian city of Tartus,” the defense ministry said. department. According to an employee of the Ministry of Defense, the schedule of the campaign has already been agreed upon, so the aggravated situation in the region is unlikely to become an obstacle to sending the aircraft-carrying cruiser to the Mediterranean Sea. He also clarified that the visit of the Russian aircraft carrier is in no way connected with the confrontation in Syria.

    Let us recall that the aircraft-carrying cruiser was laid down in 1982 in Nikolaev. At first it should have been called "Riga". It was then renamed twice until the cruiser received its current name in 1990.

    The Project 11435 aircraft-carrying cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" is the fifth Soviet-built heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser and today the only one in service in the Russian Navy. The aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" includes more than 50 aircraft and helicopters, anti-ship missiles "Granit", anti-aircraft missiles "Kortik" and "Kinzhal", anti-submarine systems "Udav". The deck area is 14 thousand square meters (three football fields, the largest American aircraft carrier has only twice as much), the crew is 1586 people plus 656 flight technical personnel.

    Why, unlike its Western counterparts, is Admiral Kuznetsov classified not as an aircraft carrier, but as an aircraft-carrying cruiser? The fact is that, according to international treaties, aircraft carriers are prohibited from passing through the Bosporus and Dardanelles. Having the status of such a ship, the future "Admiral Kuznetsov" would not have access to the World Ocean. But this ban does not apply to aircraft-carrying cruisers.
    when will the war end
    1. gunnerminer
      0
      31 August 2013 14: 33
      What combat value is the Kuznetsov TAVKR, whose condition has long required at least average repairs? What threat can his squadron pose and to whom, without electronic warfare aircraft, without an AWACS aircraft (the eyes and ears of aviation and not only). Will there be enough tankers to ensure this? ship and naval aviation with all types of fuel and lubricants?
  100. Ryzhikov
    +1
    30 August 2013 21: 23
    old man54 if I'm not mistaken, Russia does not have aircraft carriers, we have aircraft-carrying cruisers (the difference is huge) hi