Military Review

Nikolai Starikov: "There will be no blow"

130
The situation around Syria has strained to the limit. Will the aggression of the States and their allies follow? Let's look at the causes of the exacerbation of the situation, and then we will have information for analytics.


Nikolai Starikov: "There will be no blow"


The goal of all this is to create a new “collective Hitler”, a new force, which is then planned to lead through Afghanistan to Central Asia. Next, causing upheavals there, throw the fire heads inside Russia and China.

2. The "change" is the Islamic factor. For each time the Anglo-Saxons pick up their banner. At the beginning of the twentieth century it was a social factor (workers against the bourgeoisie), in the middle of the twentieth century - national (Aryans against non-Aryans), today - religious (Islamists against all others).

3. The plan began to act. The United States destroyed Libya and Yemen, shook Morocco and Tunisia. Then Syria was supposed to collapse, but with the support of Russia and China it resisted.

4. Unable to cope with Assad, the United States began to experience problems with its reputation. Militants and terrorists do not “pull” the task, and you cannot interfere in full growth yourself. After all, chaos must be “in itself”, separately from the American army, and not be the result of its coming somewhere. By intervening once, and then it is hidden (special forces), in the events in Libya, the United States created a precedent.

The brutal murder of Gaddafi was to discourage the resistance of all the leaders of the region. But Assad did not flinch, and Syria does not completely plunge into chaos. The power of the country holds, and the farther, the more it supports the population. It is impossible to invade, but it is necessary to destroy the country. Then the States decided to withdraw from the Syrian situation. Leave to return later, not immediately.

5. Leaving Syria, the United States began to change the information background. The world media talked about "terrorists", although previously there were only rebels. The shooting of 450 Kurds (women and children) no one even thought to blame the Syrian army, they immediately said that the militants did it.

6. The first result of the withdrawal of the States from Syria was the surrender of the Muslim Brotherhood regime to the Egyptian military. Having received a blank check from the United States, the army firmly put things in order. Do not hesitate, as if forgetting about the "Hague court", shed blood. Egyptian army "suddenly" decided to shoot demonstrations in defense of the legitimate president of Mursi, who was removed by the military themselves? And two years ago, the same army was afraid to defend the legitimate President Mubarak? Not. Two years ago, the Americans said to surrender Mubarak, and now allowed to remove Mursi - that's the whole difference.

7. The reason for the elimination of the Egyptian regime is purely informational - the Islamists must become bad. So that the United States could stop their assistance without losing their reputation. But the new Egypt was assigned the role of "shop window". See, here Islamic radicals came to power - and the country lives normally. Hard, yes. But in Libya and Syria, where the leaders did not give power, the situation is much worse. Therefore, give it away. In Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, etc.

8. Even before the events in Egypt, against the background of the Snowden case, the US president refused to meet with the Russian president during the meetings of the heads of the leading 20 countries in St. Petersburg on September 5 – 6. This decision was not due to the fact that Russia gave asylum to an American citizen. Snowden was just a pretext - US diplomacy simply had no trump cards for talking with Putin.

9. Instead of communicating with Obama, Russia and China planned at the summit to announce the creation of a new “monetary union” in the form of a sovereign fund, the main “chip” of which should be the possibility of issuing debt securities and the possibility of lending at a low percentage of business projects in Russia and China as for their and for foreign businessmen. In the case of this step, the blow is applied to the Anglo-Saxons, as they say, under the gut. At the same time, the place of the statement attracts the attention of all world media - it is impossible to conceal.

10. Information about the intentions of Russia and China is becoming known in Washington and London. They urgently need a trump card, they urgently need a serious problem to create a serious problem for Russians and Chinese in order to exchange it for refusing to declare the creation of a “monetary union”.

11. And "suddenly" the situation around Syria became aggravated. Having no evidence of chemical use weapons in principle, having no evidence of the use of these weapons by the Syrian army, the United States and its closest allies “suddenly” are ready to start a war against Bashar al-Assad WITHOUT the UN SANCTION. The meaning of their actions is to slam the door so loud that everyone will turn away from the window.

12. They cannot fight "land" in Syria - there will be losses and serious losses. Bombing Syria with impunity will not work either - our air defense systems are there. In addition, there will be no sense in bombing. This is not Kosovo - there is no one to be separated. But there is no way out, they are obliged to respond to the Russian-Chinese financial threat, which undermines the basis of their power. And now the West “beats its wings” and makes statements one more threatening than the other. This is August 26.

13. On Tuesday, August 27, the tone of US statements magically changes. Now we are talking simply about “punishing” missiles, we are not talking about disembarking and overthrowing Assad. On Wednesday, 28 August, the tonality softens even more, the UK speaks about introducing a resolution to the UN, although two days ago it declared that it would start a war just as it wished, without any permission from the international community.

14. Only one fact leads to a change in rhetoric and a decline in the passions of Western leaders: in St. Petersburg, Obama will still meet with Putin. There will be negotiations, which means that the US will try to exchange the problem of the war in the Middle East created by them for the non-declaration of a “monetary union” between Russia and China.

15. Making predictions is always a thankless task. Especially in a situation where the US is cornered and experiencing hard time pressure. But judging by the entire amount of information, most likely, there will be no impact on Syria. Before Obama’s meeting with Putin and, most likely, in principle.

16. Instead, the "partners" in the negotiations will agree on the exchange. After that, the United States will begin to return to Syria, that is, will begin to strengthen the supply of weapons and money to the "rebels", and Russia and China will prepare a new opportunity for the announcement of "monetary union." Everything will be as usual. Hardly having agreed, each party will try to deceive its “partner” in the negotiations. This is politics ...

In this situation, two things can not but rejoice: the inability of the United States to solve all the accumulated problems with its resources and the need to negotiate with other centers of power. That does not fit with the status of the sole superpower. And another, which cannot but rejoice, - the chaos that the Anglo-Saxons are sowing in the Middle East, already leads to the fact that they themselves are stuck in it. And this makes it possible for Russia and China to strike them in the most sensitive place for the United States and Great Britain: in the financial sphere. Which is the basis of their power.

Source: Nikolay Starikov Blog
Author:
Originator:
http://nstarikov.livejournal.com/1126895.html
130 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avant-garde
    avant-garde 30 August 2013 06: 33 New
    17
    To whom is war, and to whom is mother dear, but to see this war for America and Co. was not loving forever punishing stepmother!
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 30 August 2013 07: 38 New
      11
      Quote: avant-garde
      but to see this war for America and Co. was not loving forever punishing stepmother!

      Despite the further development of events, it is already clearly seen that America is not a hegemon, everything, they are exhausted, they have problems. Russia, China are breathing in their backs and there is no strength left to tear themselves away from them, but there is still the opportunity to throw sticks in the wheels of their competitors. Yes, they have a strong army, but to use it openly means to go against international law, to lose the last crumbs of a positive image and authority before the world. They are really in time trouble, any of their next move threatens them with loss. So they will have to move away from the board and sit on the back desk.
      By the way, their aircraft will become for them the anchor that will intensively pull them to the bottom. There is an ax of war, but to use it means to become a savage.
      Z.Y. It seems that they include the back one not only because of the creation of a financial union between China and Russia, Western protests, there are probably some other factors here: the combat readiness of the strategic nuclear forces, the disappearance of submarines from bases, Iran which can make any territory of the military base and Syria uninhabited for 1000 years with their skads ...
      1. INTER
        INTER 30 August 2013 09: 46 New
        +9
        Quote: SPACE
        Despite the further development of events, it is already clearly seen that America is not a hegemon, everything, they are exhausted, they have problems. Russia, China are breathing in their backs and there is no strength left to tear themselves away from them, but there is still the opportunity to throw sticks in the wheels of their competitors.

        The main thing after the fall of the Anglo-Saxons is not to create a new enemy of China, I logically assume that perhaps China will take the place of the USA. As the saying goes: "Man suggests, God disposes"
        1. SPACE
          SPACE 30 August 2013 11: 30 New
          12
          Quote: INTER
          The main thing after the fall of the Anglo-Saxons is not to create a new enemy of China, I logically assume that perhaps China will take the place of the United States.

          Despite the political system, creed, faith and events in the world, Russia, the government and each of its inhabitants, it is necessary to clearly cut yourself on the nose and understand: "We are peaceful people, but our armored train is on a siding." No need to fall into Sakharov pacifism and Solzhenitsynov’s lyrics, without rushing, without straining, without distortions, constantly, systematically developing, updating, advanced weapons and keeping gunpowder dry, but at the same time, remember to live normally. Then there will be nothing unexpected, surprising and terrible.
          God saves man, who save himself.
        2. washi
          washi 30 August 2013 13: 09 New
          +3
          China has not won a single war. He always devoured his conquerors. And Russia-adapted the annexed peoples for their needs. I wonder which policy will win?
        3. ksan
          ksan 30 August 2013 16: 45 New
          +2
          INTER RU Today, 09:46 ↑


          The main thing after the fall of the Anglo-Saxons is not to create a new enemy of China, I logically assume that perhaps China will take the place of the United States.
          With all the “mistakes” in the international arena and the difficulties in the economy, it’s too early to “bury” the States, they are still a superpower and printing money on which the global financial system rests
          Z.Y. It seems that they include the back not only because of the creation of a financial union between China and Russia
          Who has any info about it? "monetary union" Russia and China? Post links please.
      2. mamba
        mamba 30 August 2013 09: 47 New
        +7
        Quote: SPACE
        They are really in time trouble, any of their next move threatens them with loss. So they will have to move away from the board and sit on the back desk.

        Using chess terminology, we can say that time pressure is evident, zugzwang looms, and there is a checkmate in several moves. Our task is to make zugzwang inevitable, mat - forced, with the least number of moves.
        And then they will move away from the chessboard forever.
        1. cdrt
          cdrt 30 August 2013 10: 20 New
          +6
          Our task is to make zugzwang inevitable, mat - forced, with the least number of moves.
          And then they will move away from the chessboard forever.


          Hmm ... why?
          Thank God, not the USSR, there is no global ideological rivalry.
          The goals of the Russian authorities are to provide an excellent degree of control over the territory of the former USSR (with some exceptions).
          Actually, the United States opposed this.
          Those. to achieve their full goals - control over the CIS countries, a common market, an effective defense alliance, the Russian Federation does not need the United States at all, they only need to be weakened in such a way that it will deprive them of the opportunity to interfere with the plans of the Russian Federation.

          Well ... this is just another move in the Big Game. The game has been going on for 180 years and will continue after the Syrian war.
          1. SPACE
            SPACE 30 August 2013 11: 44 New
            +3
            Quote: mamba
            Our task is to make zugzwang inevitable, mat - forced, with the least number of moves, and then they will leave the chessboard forever.

            Quote: cdrt
            Hmm ... why?

            I suppose it is not necessary to drive rats into a corner, the key task is to knock off the hegemony from them and make them normal and contractual, equal. In the end, not ordinary American people are a problem, but their labored State Department with their financial elite.
            Steam needs to be let off slowly, so they still need to leave a loophole ... who knows, maybe they will come in handy for us ...
          2. washi
            washi 30 August 2013 13: 15 New
            +2
             cdrt  Today, 10:20 ↑ New
            Our task is to make zugzwang inevitable, mat - forced, with the least number of moves.
            And then they will move away from the chessboard forever.
            Hmm ... why?
            Thank God, not the USSR, there is no global ideological rivalry.
            The goals of the Russian authorities are to provide an excellent degree of control over the territory of the former USSR (with some exceptions).
            Unfortunately, the ideological confrontation was, is and will be. Or do you already agree with the propaganda of individualism (in contrast to our public consciousness), homosexuality, pedophilia?
          3. Zhylaw
            Zhylaw 30 August 2013 16: 50 New
            +2
            Quote: cdrt
            Hmm ... why?


            Carthage must be destroyed.
            As long as there is this new Carthage, this empire of evil beyond the seas, the new Rome can never be calm. The Carthaginians will not stop trying to destroy an opponent. And who is the new Rome? We all know who is the third Rome, and the fourth will be.
            My words may seem too pompous, but I think that the geopolitical struggle of our time will determine the future of the Earth for many centuries to come. Therefore, I leave modesty for another time.
            Of course, I do not want a new Carthage was wiped off the face of the earth and its lands were sprinkled with salt. But I think that all of us would like to have good and peaceful relations with the newly independent states on the territory between Mexico and Canada.
      3. Sandov
        Sandov 30 August 2013 11: 58 New
        +6
        If the states give up, then Russia needs to deal with them. After all, the amers have enough achievements. And be more careful with China. Multipolarity comes.
        1. Basarev
          Basarev 14 February 2014 23: 34 New
          0
          Multipolarity is a myth for diverting our eyes. Our main task is to make the world unipolar again. But this time Russia should become the absolute hegemon. Without options. But at the same time we must strengthen our position so that we won’t be blown away in the most ridiculous way due to a piece of paper.
      4. KazaK Bo
        KazaK Bo 30 August 2013 12: 21 New
        +3
        Quote: SPACE
        Despite the further development of events, it is already clearly seen that America is not a hegemon, everything, they are exhausted, they have problems. Russia, China are breathing in their backs and there is no strength left to tear themselves away from them, but there is still the opportunity to throw sticks in the wheels of their competitors.

        The logic in your conclusions, as well as in the arguments of the author of the article IS !! About a week ago, this state of affairs and threats from the United States I called the same blackmail ... I just did not know then the subject of bargaining - the NEW MONETARY UNION !. If so, then we can only rejoice that rationality has prevailed.
        At the same time, many other ... opposite arguments can be given that ameri can strike ... one of the most important and the most recent - the launch of a heavy satellite photo ... video reconnaissance ... the so-called "wartime" reconnaissance satellite or as they are also called - the satellite of the "battlefield". For fear, such special satellites do not launch! In addition, SUMMIT is ahead ... the USA has a shortage of time. They either need to strike before the Summit ... after that, organize a powerful media campaign to prove to the world community that they only punished ... but did not attack ... that they are not aggressors, but "orderlies" of the world who destroyed " infection "... Or do not go into Syria before the summit. But the fact that America remains almost alone in striving to strike a blow is encouraging that issues can be resolved through diplomatic means.
    2. Turik
      Turik 30 August 2013 07: 39 New
      18
      The fact that there will be no blow, I and many others want to hear from Obama and his faithful dog Camiron.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 07: 42 New
        15
        Quote: Turik
        and his faithful dog Camiron.

        Camiron blown away yesterday, his idle talk did not ride
        1. 755962
          755962 30 August 2013 07: 55 New
          15
          "I'm ashamed of the USA": Americans demand an end to escalation in Syria
          On Thursday, August 29, anti-war demonstrations were held in several US cities at once, Russia 24 reports.
          In Washington, a protest rally was staged right at the walls of the White House. Activists made it clear that the arguments of US President Barack Obama in favor of military intervention did not convince them. And the so-called "irrefutable evidence" of Bashar al-Assad's guilt is considered to be fabricated at all.
          Hundreds of pacifists took to the streets of New York. With flags of the Arab Republic and posters: "Hands off Syria" they marched to Times Square.
          "I am here because I am ashamed of the United States. I am ashamed of the fact that we are going to bomb another country. The United States should not interfere in the affairs of the Middle East. The American regime brings only death and destruction. The United States is the bloodiest regime, that ever existed on our planet ", - one of the opponents of the military escalation in Syria is sure.


          http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=1123610&cid=9
          1. Revolver
            Revolver 30 August 2013 09: 09 New
            10
            And I just recently had to travel on business through a nearby white city, in which many, in particular, Arabs live. And in particular, I drove past the mosque there. A crowd stood there on the sidewalk, NOT a man of about a dozen 3, mostly bearded, and waved the flag of “fighters for freedom and crap in Syria,” the size of a sheet. They shouted something, well, I still have all the windows raised from the heat and the music, so I didn’t hear it, and I don’t care, I’m not interested in what they can say so smart, I guess, “Alla, I'm in a bar”.
            And on both sides of the block, a police car is parked with 2 cops in each, and they turn on with flashing lights. Protect this scum.
            And so it would be nice to plant an automatic thread on them, and with a store more than a standard AK store. But alas, I can only do this in my dreams, because "I read the criminal code"© Ostap Bender
        2. Turik
          Turik 30 August 2013 08: 37 New
          +3
          Camiron blown away yesterday

          Last night I didn’t watch the news, it was late. Bandits usually just come out of the gateway at night.

          But still glad to know.
        3. Guun
          Guun 30 August 2013 09: 32 New
          +7
          I already wrote in recent articles that there will be no blow, so it happened. I don’t know what happened - but something very good. A blue sky above your head and a calm border - this is what Syria, the long-awaited peace, desire.
          1. Turik
            Turik 30 August 2013 10: 19 New
            +3
            If Cameron is blown away, the main thing now is to somehow Obama troll.
          2. ksan
            ksan 30 August 2013 16: 58 New
            +1
            Guun (1) KZ Today, 09: 32 ↑

            I already wrote in recent articles that there will be no blow, so it happened. I don’t know what happened - but something very good. A blue sky above your head and a calm border - this is what Syria, the long-awaited peace, desire.
            The blue sky and the world will not yet come to Syria. America with such a "slap in the face" does not agree. So the "nasty" from"the most democratic democracy" still be full.
        4. alex13-61
          alex13-61 30 August 2013 09: 49 New
          +5
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Camiron blown away yesterday, his idle talk did not ride

          So Obama issued: they say that he can cope alone ... But, it seems to me that he will be lonely "Alone" ...
          1. Dober
            Dober 30 August 2013 11: 55 New
            +4
            Well, somewhere "alone" ... There are Israel, Turkey, Qatar, the Saudis. Some "new arrivals" NATA members catch up. Even if not weapons, manpower or money. Then in Brussels, amers will sing for sure. And those to get out - be sure.
            But we must admit the practicality of Europe - "we don’t have any nishtys from this." NATA bursting at the seams?
            Now Washington is scratching turnips - how much will it cost if "alone" and what the Jews will command them. And so, too, under Asadovsky “dust” I don’t feel like getting into it ...
            1. SlavaP
              SlavaP 30 August 2013 23: 47 New
              0
              And they forgot such great warriors as the French ...
              1. Dober
                Dober 31 August 2013 04: 37 New
                0
                They sucked and fell away ...
                More precisely, they figured a long nose to the Asadov * opera. and there’s nobody there ... Well, the frogmen “changed their minds” ...

                See the national composition in the combat units of the same Napoleosi.
                Do not be surprised.
                Just stop using the word warriors. Replace with "sex-conscious quartermasters"
        5. Corsair
          Corsair 30 August 2013 10: 03 New
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Camiron blown away yesterday, his idle talk did not ride

          Do you mean his speech in parliament?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 10: 25 New
            +2
            Quote: Corsair
            Do you mean his speech in parliament?

            Yes, the translator could hardly keep up with this shiver.
            1. Corsair
              Corsair 30 August 2013 11: 26 New
              -1
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Yes, the translator could hardly keep up with this shiver.


              Apparently VERY in a hurry. And the amers burned in empty "fuel" in the Middle-earth and hoped until the very end ... well, AT LEAST WHO ANYTHING request
              1. ksan
                ksan 30 August 2013 17: 10 New
                +2
                [quote] Corsair (1) RU Today,

                [quote] Apparently VERY in a hurry. And amers burned the empty "fuel" in the Middle East and hoped until the very end ... well, AT LEAST WHO ANYTHING request [/ quote] Come on, but Latvia fellow She is not a decree, she will throw all the tanks (3pcs T-55) and all aviation (1pcs L-410 and 2pcs AN-2) to the aid of an ally soldier
          2. alex13-61
            alex13-61 30 August 2013 11: 08 New
            +1
            Quote: Corsair
            Do you mean his speech in parliament?

            Voting in Parliament ....
      2. Crocodile
        Crocodile 30 August 2013 08: 09 New
        +6
        If there is no blow, then the truth WHY there was no ordinary people know in 100 years (if they survive)! laughing
      3. svp67
        svp67 30 August 2013 08: 18 New
        +4
        Quote: Turik
        The fact that there will be no blow, I and many others want to hear from Obama and his faithful dog Camiron.
        Conversations are one, actions are different - that’s when the grouping of US troops in that area will come to a qualitative and quantitative state of peacetime, then we can say
        “There will be no blow”
        , and so it’s still very shaky ... Although of course, every day of the US Army’s procrastination is a victory, our victory.
        1. Turik
          Turik 30 August 2013 08: 41 New
          +4
          when the group of US troops in that area will come in a qualitative and quantitative state of peacetime


          As long as there is oil in the Middle East, the US group will never be PEACEFUL there.
          1. Just Vasilich
            Just Vasilich 30 August 2013 09: 36 New
            12
            The British parliament refused to participate in hostilities against Syria. Gentlemen washed their aristocratic hands and offer Obama to drink a basin of dirty water himself. Obama is facing a Shakespearean question - drink or not drink?

            Russian folk tales warn: Don’t drink, Obama, you’ll become a kid! That is the scapegoat for the Anglo-Saxon establishment.
            1. Just Vasilich
              Just Vasilich 30 August 2013 11: 03 New
              +4
              The blow will be delivered, and Obama will personally decide. He has already passed the point of no return. A wave of protests will rise in the world and the African American Nobel Peace Prize laureate will merge. Apparently, this doll has already done its job and may leave the political scene.
        2. a52333
          a52333 30 August 2013 09: 47 New
          +7
          The main thing is not to relax. Deliveries on c-300, Bastions, shells, what else is needed? This is not a victory, this is a respite. are preparing a new setup NOW.
          1. ksan
            ksan 30 August 2013 17: 17 New
            +1
            a52333 RU Today, 09: 47 ↑

            The main thing is not to relax. Deliveries on s-300 to fulfill, Bastions, shells, what else is needed there? This is not a victory, this is a respite. are preparing a new setup ALREADY NOW
            I agree. This victory is not even in battle, but in a separate battle. America so just not blown away some kind muck already cooked
    3. Nickanor
      Nickanor 30 August 2013 09: 21 New
      +3
      To whom is war, and to whom is mother dear, but to see this war for America and Co. was not loving forever punishing stepmother!


      A stepmother is not a stepmother, but her mother can also be brought in with bad behavior and a good belt can be robbed from her wink
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 30 August 2013 09: 47 New
        +6
        Now, when the American and Jordanian troops depart from the borders of Syria, the aircraft carriers and escorts with tomahawks go their separate ways, and Obama will publicly declare that there will be no bombing of Syria, then it will be possible to think about canceling the operation and it’s not a fact - they will find more reasons will arrange another provocation.
        1. Aryan
          Aryan 30 August 2013 10: 19 New
          +2
          reminded
          -Our regional committee said that there would be no pogroms ...
          -And our pogrom said that there would be no regional committees ...
        2. washi
          washi 30 August 2013 13: 26 New
          +3
          Do not depart. If the UN commission recognizes that the Islamists used WMDs, then an investigation should be carried out: who gave, sponsored, etc. This is necessary to punish the perpetrators. And who will give this investigation? After all, this means that the authorities of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and other allies of the Anglo-Saxons must be punished. The same guilty of all Israel participated in the treatment of militants and the bombing of government facilities
          In an extreme case, they will transfer the blow from Syria to Iraq. Why launch extra centrifuges?
    4. denson06
      denson06 30 August 2013 13: 57 New
      +3
      Great article .. just recently read an article about the prospects of a “monetary union” and thought about the same thing .. in the current world order, the Anglo-Saxons mired in debt, there is no place .. everything will go to hell .. They need to change the world!
      I hope it doesn’t work out .. at least by such "democratic" methods ..
      Respectfully.. hi
  2. domokl
    domokl 30 August 2013 06: 34 New
    +9
    I agree with something, but the main thing is not. The blow will be for anyone. Not as powerful as planned, but it will be. Abama put too much on Syria. This is both the country's image and its own political status.
    1. avant-garde
      avant-garde 30 August 2013 06: 40 New
      +6
      Quote: domokl
      This is the image of the country, and its own political status.

      But you can get into such a train ... and when the "wooden jackets" with American soldiers in America begin to go, it will begin that the coal’s political status will not only drop to zero, but will go to minus !!!!
      1. domokl
        domokl 30 August 2013 06: 47 New
        +6
        Quote: avant-garde
        . and when the "wooden jackets" with the American soldiers begin to go

        I agree. Only you forget how the Americans act in such conflicts. Bombings and missile attacks in the initial period spread the enemy’s defense and air defense. Then tanks and armored vehicles operate already on the destroyed defense. And only then brave American soldiers occupy strongholds and do not protrude from there.
        Abama has not just stated that the United States does not plan military operations. limited to bombing and rocket attacks, and militants will be sent under bullets.
        Then the sheep are safe and the wolves are full. The militants will win, the USA contributed to the establishment of democracy, the militants will lose, the militants will be to blame. A small victorious war for any outcome ...
        1. avant-garde
          avant-garde 30 August 2013 07: 04 New
          +4
          Bombings, bombings, but even this can cause discontent among simple hamburger devourers because they will bomb them with their money and they will ask Obama how reptile the benefits of these bombings have brought to these simple belltackers. And what can Obama answer them, to this question ???
          1. domokl
            domokl 30 August 2013 07: 08 New
            +5
            Quote: avant-garde
            , but even this can cause discontent among simple hamburger-eaters, since they will bomb it with their money and they will ask Obama

            At the moment, the Americans are supplying weapons for millions of bucks to the militants ... Do they ask a lot? Winners are not judged ... Nobody has canceled this principle, colors ...
            1. avant-garde
              avant-garde 30 August 2013 07: 12 New
              +2
              Quote: domokl
              At the moment, the Americans are delivering weapons for millions of bucks to militants ... Do they ask a lot?

              Do you think they are aware of this? I even doubt what
            2. Prorox
              Prorox 30 August 2013 11: 09 New
              +3
              Obama was black ("complete" democracy for the outside world, to reassure blacks inside the country) a dummy (what promises and zero result) initially, and who conceived a new American fascism, the option to bring it to power is only the first part, now we need to run (in full ) and blame it on him and the crisis.
          2. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 07: 44 New
            +4
            Quote: avant-garde
            Bombings, bombings, but even this can cause displeasure in simple hamburger-eaters

            They are not satisfied anymore, 70% of amers are against warriors. Democratic videos of the opposition in YouTube are shouting, shouting allahu akbar wassat
          3. ale-x
            ale-x 30 August 2013 08: 15 New
            +4
            Obama will just leave, a new moron will be slipped into his place, that's all. "Moor has done his job - Moor can be disposed of"
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 10: 31 New
              +4
              Quote: ale-x
              Obama will just leave, a new moron will be slipped into his place, that's all.

              This is what a new moron ??? belay Vanga said 44 would be the last, all of that!
              1. ale-x
                ale-x 30 August 2013 12: 02 New
                0
                Gee. Yes, I do not mind .. Only for.
              2. ksan
                ksan 30 August 2013 17: 48 New
                0
                Alexander Romanov (1) RU Today, 10: 31 ↑

                Quote: ale-x
                Obama will just leave, a new moron will be slipped into his place, that's all.

                This is what a new moron ??? belay wang said 44 will be the last one, all is great!
                Yeah, sure, Obama is "offhand" and will be removed, and the presidency will be replaced by the "Committee of 300" or the Bilderberg Club fellow
        2. cdrt
          cdrt 30 August 2013 10: 32 New
          +2
          .Those. limited to bombing and missile strikes, and militants will be sent under bullets.

          So.
          Actually, they fought and won in Libya, and in Afghanistan, the main burden of the fighting was carried by the fighters of the former Northern Alliance. From the United States, so - marines, special forces, rangers, targeted.
          Actually combining this with the weapons of the militants - almost any regime is enough for the fall.
          Only here in Afghanistan, the Americans went to the occupation - either wanted to gain a foothold, or by inertia of the thinking of the generals.
          But in Libya there is already no occupation - just chaos. It will also be evident in Syria in case of war.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 07: 42 New
        +1
        Quote: avant-garde
        But you can get into such a ..

        Now where is Obama?
        1. avant-garde
          avant-garde 30 August 2013 07: 47 New
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Now where is Obama?

          Well, while he’s only there wassat
          1. alone
            alone 30 August 2013 09: 41 New
            +1
            wink maybe he was there only with his head? wassat
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 10: 31 New
              0
              Quote: lonely
              maybe he was there only with his head?

              Or only the head sticks out laughing
    2. Tersky
      Tersky 30 August 2013 07: 11 New
      +7
      Quote: domokl
      The blow will be on anyone. Not as powerful as planned, but it will

      Sasha hi ! However, the USA will probably have to apply it practically in splendid isolation;BRUSSELS, August 30. / Corr. ITAR-TASS Denis Dubrovin. The US media campaign to prepare world public opinion for air strikes in Syria, based on the organization of numerous leaks of information about the inevitability of military intervention against this country, began to yield the opposite result. US allies in NATO, one after another, began to refuse to participate in the war against a sovereign state without a relevant UN Security Council resolution.
      As an informed source in Brussels told ITAR-TASS, at least 12 NATO countries have already excluded their participation in the operation against Syria, if it is not authorized by the Security Council. A diplomat from one of the European countries announced this on condition of anonymity, while the British parliament refused to approve the government’s plans to carry out the so-called "humanitarian intervention" in Syria. In other words, one of the leading NATO countries refused to directly participate in possible hostilities.
      Read the full story http://www.itar-tass.com/c1/858052.html
    3. LaGlobal
      LaGlobal 30 August 2013 07: 16 New
      +4
      Quote: domokl
      This is the image of the country, and its own political status.


      - I would have stuck his image of the country somewhere very deeply into this one, how is it there? Well black, which he has!

      Beat on any


      - I would really like to carry, all the same! And Syria, as a country, would remain so!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 07: 45 New
        +3
        Quote: LaGlobal
        ! And Syria, as a country, would remain so!

        No, it won’t remain. Nothing will be the same as before.
        1. LaGlobal
          LaGlobal 30 August 2013 09: 16 New
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          No, it won’t remain. Nothing will be the same as before.


          - Can't the country recover after the devastation? Of course - yes, and of course, not a big scar will remain on the body of the country, which will heal for a long time. I think we will need to help, no matter how, we have a lot of experience in recovery =)
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 10: 33 New
            +3
            Quote: LaGlobal
            - Can't the country recover after the devastation?

            I think that if it recovers, it will not be very soon. There is now a hotbed of banditry and how it will end is not known request
            1. LaGlobal
              LaGlobal 30 August 2013 14: 28 New
              0
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              There is now a hotbed of banditry and how it all ends is not known


              Sasha! In your opinion, will the Russian Assad help in rebuilding his country?
          2. cdrt
            cdrt 30 August 2013 10: 37 New
            +1
            Of course - yes, and of course, not a big scar will remain on the body of the country, which will heal for a long time

            Well, most likely one of the results of the civil war will be the appearance of Kurdistan. Those. such as Syria was no longer. And living together with Sunnis with Shiites and other groups will be much more difficult, you can look at the neighboring Lebanon as an example.
          3. alone
            alone 30 August 2013 11: 08 New
            -3
            Syria needs tens of years and trillions of dollars to rebuild. What do you think, where does Syria get such money from? I'm not talking about rebuilding the army. The losses are huge. Unfortunately, Syria will no longer play the role in the region that played before the conflict. How do you imagine Russia's help? Are you ready to give trillions of dollars to Syria? I personally doubt it.
    4. S-200
      S-200 30 August 2013 08: 02 New
      +3
      hi while Israel will not give the go-ahead-no one will strike no blows!
      the condition for Israel to give the green light is the guaranteed destruction of the Syrian-Iranian missile and chemical (radiological) potential (and is it all located in Syria?)
      otherwise, the fault in the next Holocaust will fall on the United States, which is equivalent in Zionist circles to fratricide.
      It is necessary to separate the "flies from cutlets" ...
      currency union between Russia and China - BE in any way!

      and all the linkages with trade in Syria, as an alternative to the "currency union" of two superpowers - economically, politically and logically - are NOT CONSTANT!
      The price of the Syrian-Iranian issue is Middle East energy resources and their transport logistics to Europe and the USA on the one hand and to China on the other ...
    5. Very old
      Very old 30 August 2013 08: 51 New
      +5
      The blow will be. And here's what - we'll see. He will not want to give his leadership in the US world for so, multipolarity is unacceptable to them. They will bend the stick to the end. They have already laid out Syria with hostile states: Israel, Turkey, Jordan (an obedient Egyptian army looms on the horizon) "The strong is always guilty of the weak" And again: "You are guilty of the fact that I want to eat." The appetites of Wall Street are famous. There is no oil in Swaziland!
  3. serge-68-68
    serge-68-68 30 August 2013 06: 35 New
    19
    The material, in principle, is not bad. There are, of course, attractiveness, but they are discussed.
    1. The United States does not control the processes in the Middle East so much, as Starikov writes. The killing of Gaddafi, the atrocities of terrorists in Syria and a number of other facts speak of this.
    2. Revaluation of Syrian air defense is characteristic not only for Starikov. Meanwhile, the Syrians have weak and old radars, around air defense posts there are a lot of terrorists (and special forces?) Who can block their work before being destroyed, etc. etc.
    3. The United States did not leave Syria. Intervened is limited. They lost time and pace, received the atrocities of terrorists and poor public opinion. Now they decide what to do next.
    4. There will be a blow or not - we'll see. If there is a meeting and blows continue, it means that I was mistaken in Obama. If there are no blows, Obama can be compared with Gorbachev. It is unlikely that any of the American presidents caused more damage to their country.
    To summarize: Obama’s position will be the key moment of US policy in Syria and in the future in the Middle East. I think we will see what sad consequences for the country can lead to the indecision of its leader in international affairs.
    PS the old truth and the foundation of any upbringing - waved (promised) - hit (fulfill)!
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 30 August 2013 07: 46 New
      +7
      I absolutely agree with you -
      1. Syrians' air defenses are worthless, struck by the speech of Ankhor Kochneva, who said the following: "... NATO aircraft will not go down, you remember that as soon as a Turkish aircraft invaded airspace, it was immediately shot down ..." recall that the aircraft was over the oldest F4, as well as the attacks of Jewish aviation on Syrian territory, which turned out to be completely unpunished. So, there can be no talk about the strength of Syrian air defense.
      2. The special forces of Israel and someone else there in Syria are climbing with might and main, and almost everywhere.
      3. Whether there will be a blow, that's it, we'll see. Rather yes, than no. I am 99% sure that the situations with Iraqi and Libyan are too similar. Then it was also said that there would be no. And Qatar money The British economy is not just, and not a little invested.
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 30 August 2013 11: 07 New
        +1
        Quote: mirag2
        2. The special forces of Israel and someone else there in Syria are climbing with might and main, and almost everywhere.

        You also climb the site, but you can be seen without identifying marks who you are, and that you, both in Syria and your special forces, are visible in the palm of your hand and show him not what he wants to see. wink
        1. mirag2
          mirag2 30 August 2013 12: 52 New
          0
          And how is he "shown" not what he came for? The Syrians have not developed the army to track other people's small groups, and even slip them into disinformation.
    2. cdrt
      cdrt 30 August 2013 10: 44 New
      +1
      4. There will be a blow or not - we'll see. If there is a meeting and blows continue, it means that I was mistaken in Obama. If there are no blows, Obama can be compared with Gorbachev. It is unlikely that any of the American presidents caused more damage to their country.

      In fact, I agree on everything except this.
      Yes, Obama is like Gorbachev, except that leadership qualities are more pronounced.

      Yes - indecisive, but hmm ... perhaps for the USA the best way out now is precisely some kind of isolationism. Those. some return to the doctrine of Monroe.
      Markets for US products are secured by superior international trade control by international organizations.
      World trade is again controlled by a fleet that surpasses all other fleets of the world in terms of strike potential.
      In this situation - concentrating on the Western Hemisphere, but retaining control of the oceans, the United States ceases to be responsible for the problems of Eurasia, continuing to receive everything necessary from there and remaining an arbitrator.
      1. serge-68-68
        serge-68-68 30 August 2013 19: 55 New
        0
        In any case, it was necessary to decide earlier - smart or beautiful. Isolationism or openness. And in the “a little pregnant” position, Obama was first cornered with Snowden (any decision is a losing one, so he still managed to choose the worst one), and then with Syria (any solution is a losing one, but will he choose? (If the blow is bad , if not a blow - it's even worse ...)).
        Something must be decided. And he wrinkles different organs ...
  4. NOMADE
    NOMADE 30 August 2013 06: 36 New
    +7
    Interesting article. It seems to me that indeed, there will be no attack (fucking, fucking ...), ironing Russia will have time to replay. That is, until the time of the G20, pull the fleet (cruisers, apl) to Syria, the BDK (supposedly for the evacuation, and then suddenly the S-300 and our calculations, to cover the base and the city ..))), and when he there will be ... then it will untie Russia's hands to sign a project on a new international currency with China. Then, we will be in the "dams", and Anglo Amer, in the "fools."
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 30 August 2013 07: 51 New
      +1
      Sorry, but such speculation looks like a child’s reasoning. The fact that you describe the path to the Third World War is only a little longer than just turning the key and pressing the “start” button to launch a missile with nuclear weapons on board.
  5. Crocodile
    Crocodile 30 August 2013 06: 36 New
    +1
    It seems that our diplomats still outplayed the amers!
    Somehow they very quickly declared that we won’t be at war and didn’t deliver the S-300 missiles - here they became thoughtful ...
    It would be interesting if Syria would ever respond with something extraordinary!
    And we modestly declared - they didn’t ask us about the S-400 request
    We don’t know what they brought in half a year; Ukraine or Georgia sent gifts to friendly Syria ... Our weapons are full everywhere, where we got them off course wassat
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Dimy4
    Dimy4 30 August 2013 06: 41 New
    +3
    Management psychology in the states got stuck somewhere at the level of the late nineties and early XNUMXs, and if before that it was smart and arrogant, then as a result of Bush’s rule the “smart” part disappeared, only arrogance remained.
  8. plotnikov561956
    plotnikov561956 30 August 2013 06: 48 New
    +2
    The logic algorithm is just fine ... don't turn it down, don't turn it up.
  9. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 30 August 2013 06: 52 New
    +3
    Quote: domokl
    .Not as powerful as planned, but will be. Abama put too much on Syria

    After Obama lost his main ally (in the UK, most parliamentarians opposed participating in the campaign), he is unlikely to decide to attack Syria. hi
  10. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 06: 54 New
    10
    It is strange that with respect to paragraph 5. Something I did not hear big words from Obama and other European politicians condemning the declarations and demands to punish the perpetrators of the murder of 450 women and children. Their press has long assumed the role of a delimiter. Terrorists do all the bad things, and the opposition is fighting for freedom, despite the fact that these are the same people.

    Item 6. It’s also controversial that the USA surrendered to Mursi is understandable, but given that 20 million took to the streets and it showed the whole world belay Obama did not expect this, and no one expected. And to say that the United States is now controlling the situation in Egypt is also not entirely correct. Putin's portraits are beginning to be posted, but they are definitely not printed in US printing houses.

    Point 10. Well, what trump card does the USA and England have now ??? Syria, but this is not a trump card, and even direct intervention will not give the United States anything, except for another haemo swarm on its dumb heads.

    Point 11. examined the beginning of the chatter of the leader of England in his house before the vote — We have irrefutable evidence of Assad’s guilt and this ... dozens of articles in the media and dozens of YouTube videos wassat

    Point 14. Putin is not a sucker, as it turned out again. Some shouted, urgently needed to do something, the military in Syria. But Putin was stupidly silent and, as a result, the West again gives the rear. Of course, the West began to include the rear, not Putin's merit, but the result is the West in full ass.

    Item 16. I do not agree in principle. Do not go to Russia and China to exchange, Obama is not in the position to set conditions.
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 30 August 2013 07: 22 New
      +5
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      watched the beginning of the talk of the leader of England in his house before the vote

      Hi Sasha! I will continue the topic, from the latest news in Moscow. August 30th. INTERFAX.RU - The House of Commons of the British Parliament late Thursday voted against the country's participation in the international military operation against Syria. According to the BBC, several votes were not enough to approve the initiative of the head of the British government, David Cameron - 285 parliamentarians voted against military intervention, 272 voted for it.

      original material at http://www.interfax.ru/world/txt.asp?id=326073
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 07: 47 New
        +3
        Quote: Tersky
        I will continue the topic, from the latest news in Moscow.

        Hi Vitya! I know I read it already. It's not sickly laughing
    2. lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus 30 August 2013 08: 09 New
      +4
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      And Putin was stupidly silent

      And he did it right. In such situations, do not shout. He clearly worked hard, lifting the entire diplomatic corps, along with advisers and the rest. Surely there were talks with leaders of many countries, including NATO. And apparently, successfully. And the Yankees alone will not climb into Syria. This is not kosher. They need support not so much military as political.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 10: 35 New
        +2
        Quote: lewerlin53rus
        And the Yankees alone will not climb to Syria

        Maybe Obama also has no where to retreat, and he doesn’t make decisions.
    3. olviko
      olviko 30 August 2013 08: 18 New
      +9
      "Putin wasn’t a sucker, as it turned out again. Some people shouted, urgently needed to do something, the military to Syria. But Putin was stupidly silent and, as a result, the West again gives back. Of course, the West began to include the back not to Putin’s merit, but the result is West in full ass. "

      I think Putin is not stupid, but prudently silent, having studied all these Obama, Kemeronov, and Olandes well. While the West is chasing a wave, its destroyers are prancing in the Mediterranean Sea, and aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, Putin is engaged in a more serious business - flooding in the Far East. Thus, he says - you guys are still going to show off, when the show-offs are over, then we will talk in detail, and all sorts of pats wrestling do not work here. Judo must be practiced gentlemen, judo!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 30 August 2013 10: 36 New
        +3
        Quote: olviko
        I think Putin is not stupid, but prudently silent

        Well this is an expression
      2. Lone gunman
        Lone gunman 30 August 2013 13: 32 New
        +1
        well done ... you can see right away our friend + ... Judo is power!
    4. Corsair
      Corsair 30 August 2013 10: 21 New
      +2
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Item 16. I do not agree in principle. Do not go to Russia and China to exchange, Obama is not in the position to set conditions.


      I would like to hope for your conclusions from this point
  11. LOCKS
    LOCKS 30 August 2013 06: 55 New
    +4
    It turns out that they are not as helpless as in the 1990s. Yes, we have not yet reached the capabilities of the former union, but are already considered dreams. And a unipolar world is slowly coming kirdyk.
  12. bomg.77
    bomg.77 30 August 2013 07: 11 New
    +8
    Already 12country Nato refused to participate in the attack on Syria, and Del Ponte said that the militants used the XO.
  13. Dyukha Siberian
    Dyukha Siberian 30 August 2013 07: 12 New
    +7
    but this is already pleasing !!! http://www.rg.ru/2013/08/30/nato-anons.html
    At least 12 states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) have already refused to participate in a military operation against Syria, unless the UN Security Council authorizes it. This was reported by ITAR-TASS with reference to an informed source in Brussels.

    "The countries that have already definitely refused any forms of participation in hostilities in Syria without the sanction of the UN Security Council are actually much more, at least a dozen states are involved," the source said.

    He added that the consequences of the operation in the SAR are “absolutely unpredictable,” and the victory of the rebels in its current composition “is unlikely to return long-term peace to Syrian land.”

    Earlier, the British Parliament rejected a resolution on the need to "toughly respond to the humanitarian crisis" in Syria, which "could require the start of a military operation." "Against" the initiative of Prime Minister David Cameron were 285 deputies, "for" - 272.
    but good thoughts they still attend)))
  14. Dyukha Siberian
    Dyukha Siberian 30 August 2013 07: 29 New
    +2
    finally the states got their hands on it)) now they either climb on their own and take out coffins on tankers, or yap and sail home! I hope all the same for the 2nd option!
  15. George
    George 30 August 2013 07: 29 New
    +3
    Hello all.
    In this situation, two things can not but rejoice: the inability of the United States to solve all the accumulated problems using its resources

    Maybe I didn’t understand why, but is it not for the sake of those very resources that the Yankees are starting a war?
    1. ksan
      ksan 30 August 2013 18: 17 New
      +1
      GEORGIAN SU Today, 07:29

      Maybe I didn’t understand why, but is it not for the sake of those very resources that the Yankees are starting a war?
      Yuri, not just for the sake of resources,INFLUENCE- also a resource. And Syria and Iran are the only ones in the region who do not "listen" to the opinion of the State Department. Here is another example: RTin the United States blocked a site with links to "alternative" material about Syria. smile I do not like ALL THE TRUTH fellow
  16. regdan
    regdan 30 August 2013 07: 32 New
    +7
    It’s not 12 NATO countries that refused to attack Syria, the Germans said no to their war. Germany is the locomotive of the EU, from them comes the filling of the budget, those who pay money order music. In Germany, elections are coming soon and German politicians are not particularly eager to answer the question, "Why didn’t the burghers give money for beer with grilled sausages, but they allocated for the war in a distant country?"
    1. avant-garde
      avant-garde 30 August 2013 07: 45 New
      +6
      Quote: regdan
      for beer with grilled sausages burgers

      Well, you have a conscience, I almost choked on my saliva, on Friday, and in the morning about this bully
      1. JIaIIoTb
        JIaIIoTb 30 August 2013 09: 07 New
        +3
        Quote: avant-garde
        Quote: regdan
        for beer with grilled sausages burgers

        Well, you have a conscience, I almost choked on my saliva, on Friday, and in the morning about this bully

        In a word: Sadist!))))
      2. cdrt
        cdrt 30 August 2013 10: 53 New
        +1
        Well, you have a conscience, I almost choked on my saliva, on Friday, and in the morning about this

        Mndaa ... I'm tastier than beer and sausages than I have never seen in German laughing
    2. Dyukha Siberian
      Dyukha Siberian 30 August 2013 07: 52 New
      +5
      Quote: regdan
      It’s not 12 NATO countries that refused to attack Syria, the Germans said no to their war. Germany is the locomotive of the EU, from them comes the filling of the budget, those who pay money order music. In Germany, elections are coming soon and German politicians are not particularly eager to answer the question, "Why didn’t the burghers give money for beer with grilled sausages, but they allocated for the war in a distant country?"


      or maybe everything is much simpler, the West began to understand that these wars in the east did not bring them any benefit, only financial problems, what would they get from Syria? headache and more! who wants her for a few billion? none! maybe they’re tired of supporting the state machine already! and Germany could just be offended after requesting its gold in the states, and the staff started to go crazy!) there is no gold there along the way)))
      1. cdrt
        cdrt 30 August 2013 10: 56 New
        +2
        or maybe everything is much simpler, the West began to understand that these wars in the east did not bring them any benefit, only financial problems, what would they get from Syria? headache and more! who wants her for a few billion? none! maybe they’re tired of supporting the state machine already! and Germany could just be offended after requesting its gold in the states, and the staff started to go crazy!) there is no gold there along the way)))


        The pipeline project from Qatar through Syria is rather an American one.
        Germany, with the advent of supplies of liquefied natural gas at low prices, had good leverage over the Russian Federation, i.e. the issue of control over suppliers of critical resources, they decided for a certain time. And they simply do not need to spend their resources on projects controlled by the USA.
  17. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 30 August 2013 07: 42 New
    +8
    Russia and China strike them in the most sensitive place for the USA and Great Britain: in the financial sphere. Which is the basis of their power.
    This is the point said !!! And the possibility of Russia and China has such (if combined) the Anglo-Saxons know this .. The main thing is not to rush but to push slowly and solemnly.))))
    1. Novosib980
      Novosib980 30 August 2013 08: 53 New
      +2
      The main thing against the backdrop of unification against the West is not to begin to actively share territory with an eastern "friend".
    2. alex13-61
      alex13-61 30 August 2013 09: 57 New
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Russia and China strike them in the most sensitive place for the USA and Great Britain: in the financial sphere. Which is the basis of their power.

      You need to do it slowly, but hurrying ...
  18. gud123
    gud123 30 August 2013 07: 44 New
    +3
    But judging by the entire amount of information, most likely, there will be no blow to Syria. Until Obama meets Putin and, most likely, in principle.

    Your words, Nikolai, but to God’s ears !!!! good
  19. shinobi
    shinobi 30 August 2013 07: 44 New
    +4
    Howling in the media is the processing of the mass consciousness to give “justice” to the impending blow to the scenario that has already been worked out more than once. And it would have worked, but the Yankees did not take into account their arrogance that the world has changed since then. on NATO, they are more interested in their financial problems than the political image and the influence of the suzerain. Moreover, they don’t expect any exhaustion for money at all. One waste. Obama from political troupes, it seems that he still didn’t understand this. He made too many rash statements, rather in the State Department forced him to do so, thereby depriving himself of freedom of maneuver. There was no single world support, promises were made, without UN sanction he would simply stand on a par with those against whom America itself had fought. In short, do not throw a wedge everywhere. . The blow will most likely be, but such, purely symbolic and without the participation of aviation.
  20. olviko
    olviko 30 August 2013 07: 46 New
    +2
    "The purpose of all this is to create a new" collective Hitler ", a new force, which is then planned to be brought through Afghanistan to Central Asia. Then, after causing upheaval there, throw fire at the head of Russia and China."

    The Anglo-Saxon-Jewish gang can not part with the dream of world domination, now under the star - bearded flag. The leading financial groups of the Rockefellers and Rothschilds are fighting a fierce fight in history, "for the seizure of dominant heights in the upcoming post-industrial information society of the knowledge economy." Of course, the sovereign fund of Russia and China is a powerful blow to the North American white Protestants - the Rockefellers who created the debt economy, and stagnant American globalism, controlling the world oil and the US military-industrial complex. And most importantly, controlling the unlimited issue of paper dollar. In this meat grinder, where huge money and power are at stake, war is not excluded and Russia, in order to survive, will have to work hard, thoroughly, without fools.
    1. cdrt
      cdrt 30 August 2013 11: 01 New
      +1
      for the seizure of dominant heights in the upcoming post-industrial information society of the knowledge economy

      What does the Russian Federation have to do with the knowledge economy today?
      There are no special positions left, neither the growth potential in its current form, nor the understanding of how to change and the will to carry out these changes.
      Although it is foolish to deny the presence of a certain post-industrial project of the Russian Federation.

      And what does China - the workshop of the world (i.e. the manufacturer of all low-tech goods) have in the post-industrial economy?
  21. skychnii
    skychnii 30 August 2013 07: 48 New
    +4
    Putin on the G20 should not meet with Obama, why talk with the dog when you can talk with his master.
  22. taseka
    taseka 30 August 2013 07: 50 New
    +7
    The United States is completely entangled in lies and its double standards. Perhaps for the first time in 20 years they got on their feet - dumbfounded and are in political perplexity!
  23. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 30 August 2013 08: 06 New
    +2
    from the Don.
    To the author - +. The article suggests something to think about. To draw some conclusions. In my opinion, both Cameron and Sshayka in the face of Bardak. He directs and directs British money bags, in a compartment with Jewish ones. The US pawn is in the hands of the Britons !!!
  24. mirag2
    mirag2 30 August 2013 08: 14 New
    +2
    No-no-no. The article is so-so.
    1. The whole "Arab spring" -who was carried out? Who, roughly speaking, ruled the events, who were these same rebels? ISLAMIS. Salafi trend in religion. Where does it prevail? -Katar, Saudi Arabia.
    Since ancient times, these people have been allies of the United States, and therefore NATO, I don’t know why they decided to spread their influence on the Islamic world. The north of Africa came under their influence. In Egypt, it did not fail. (Egypt is a separate bazaar).
    2. Shiites and Salafi opponents, almost antagonists (even, probably, it is) by faith.
    3. The Iran-Shiite country was gaining not a sour pace of development, for it went along the path of China, began to educate people, strives for advanced, modern technologies, etc. In short, Iran in conjunction with China began to pull up. China's development, so the United States does not like it.
    So we get the start of coalition formation.
    Further, in Europe, the crisis began — everything is bad, except for Germany — because it has a lot of productions of what is in constant demand (albeit a little lower). Qatar-Hop drove grandmothers to Britain too — Britain felt better, but the British should to work out grandmas (conditions were certain) -to ensure hegemony of Salafists in the East.
    In short, I can’t describe everything in a nutshell — it doesn’t work out in a simple and short language — you must first say “how it will be” or “as it is”, then say why, and not in another way, to cite the facts — too long.
    Maybe I could try to write an article here. What do I need to hang it, to make out myself?
    Need to see ....
    1. creak
      creak 30 August 2013 09: 46 New
      +1
      I would like to note that the division in Islam passes between its two main branches - Shiites and Sunnis, which have many branches, approximately the same as Christianity between Catholicism and Orthodoxy (the comparison is of course approximate). Iran supports Syria since the ruling elite of the country are traditionally Alawites, close to the current to Shiism. More than 70% of Syrians profess Sunni Islam, so the conflict there is also religious in nature. many Alawites are regarded as apostates from the true teachings of the Prophet. And the Salafis are the common names of the supporters of a return to the vulnerable, not distorted sources of the teachings of Muhammad and have no clearly defined boundaries, but his followers often profess radical views.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 30 August 2013 12: 54 New
        0
        Sorry, sorry !!! I made a reservation !!! Yes, I mean Sunnis !!!! I understand correctly that the Salafis are closer to the Sunnis?
        1. alone
          alone 30 August 2013 13: 57 New
          0
          if the Salafis are correctly expressed, this is the party of Satan in Islam. you almost need these reptiles wherever they are.
        2. creak
          creak 30 August 2013 14: 27 New
          0
          The fact is that even experts in Oriental studies find it difficult to give a clear definition of Salafism, calling it fundamentalism. The Salafis themselves define themselves as true Muslims who have returned to the origins of Islam. Wahhabis are also one of the varieties of Salafism that rejects the secular structure of the state and is dominant in Saudi Arabia .. Wahhabis in the North Caucasus profess radical Islam, in other countries they get along with other currents of Islam. The concept is vague and diverse, and because of this it is difficult to give it a clear definition.
          1. alone
            alone 30 August 2013 16: 30 New
            0
            The Salafis were created by the British as the current. The British knew about large oil deposits in Saudi Arabia and in order to tear the region away from the Ottoman empire went on this move. It worked for some time. The Salafis took power in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Oman for a while. years have passed and now British intelligence again remembered them. getting accustomed to other currents is something in reality. In my country, too, certain people are Salafists. to the question of one of them, "how do you feel about the fact that your parents are against those ideas that you profess?" You know what he answered, they are not my parents, they are infidels. That's why I remain in my opinion that they should be wetted. and not only in the toilet. everywhere and everywhere.
  25. Hitrovan07
    Hitrovan07 30 August 2013 08: 28 New
    +2
    I interenzo and what will happen in the world if the US strike on Syria takes place? Will there be millions of demonstrations? Will Russia (and who knows ... suddenly the UN) decide to declare that the leadership of the countries of aggressors be handed over to the Hague Tribunal?
  26. 787nkx
    787nkx 30 August 2013 08: 42 New
    +3
    The goal of the United States is not to do disgust for the sake of disgust. One of the steps towards a specific goal that is beneficial for the state. And if the goal is important, it justifies the means. On the moral aspects, Western American politics has not been obsessed with for a long time, but it must be restrained within the legal framework. Despite the fact that our interests do not coincide, and for often directly opposite, there are common ground, one of them is the observance of international law and the increasing role of UN structures.
    So we need to work in this direction, involving other states in the process.
    The result is a morally questionable US foreign policy, but within the framework of the law and under UN control.
    1. cdrt
      cdrt 30 August 2013 11: 06 New
      +2
      Western American politics has not been obsessed with moral aspects for a long time

      On the moral aspects, not a single good politician bothers.
      Your principles should not stop you from making the right decisions (c) A. Azimov

      The main thing is to organize everything so that the enemy looks like an immoral side.
      And for now ... they do it. Most of the inhabitants of the most powerful countries in the world consider Assad a murderer, and the Russian Federation a defender of the killer.
      In other words, the information war of the Russian Federation is again losing.
      Another thing is that no one wants to fit into the elimination of Assad.
  27. hollger
    hollger 30 August 2013 08: 46 New
    +1
    Nikolay, thanks for the article!) There is one BUT, I heard here about the Norwegian geologists that they found oil and very large volumes in Syria. Knowing about the almost "sexual" arousal of the Anglo-Saxons from the smell of "black gold". Blow possible!
  28. Marconi41
    Marconi41 30 August 2013 08: 51 New
    +5
    Britain’s refusal of hostilities would hardly stop the United States from striking Syria. In addition, there is also France. Yes, even alone the US Armed Forces would have coped with this task without thinking. Most likely we don’t know something. Everyone says that Putin is silent - but is he silent? Maybe he’s talking slowly. With China, for example, with the same Israel. After all, the Israelis in all refusal of such an undertaking of the United States. Read their sites, Obama is cursed at what the light is on, gas masks are bought heavily, etc. So there must be a lot of work behind Putin’s outward calm. I hope this work will bring positive results.
    1. olviko
      olviko 30 August 2013 10: 10 New
      +4
      Israel does not like this half of the alleged operation against Assad, the Jews want a full-scale invasion with decisive goals. Obama wants to shoot a couple of days from a safe distance and get down, and Israel will be given the bills. Syria and Iran, in the event of a US attack, have already promised to arrange a happy life for their chosen ones, no dome will help. In general, the actions of the United States are really not clear: well, everything is clear with Syria, but why so substitute Israel, an ally who has served faithfully for so many years? Really just to create this notorious chaos in the BV!
  29. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 30 August 2013 09: 13 New
    +3
    Kind! If all the cards are right on the table they’ll lay down (read: lay out) then there will be no blow, and this, friends, is a stunning victory of our foreign policy! Yes, they will still shoot in Syria for some time, MB and a fairly long BUT! it will stand and on this stone the Americans no longer stumble but break their leg! and the beginning of the end of their empire will begin as once the USSR. evil is such a thing that always has the property of returning!
  30. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 30 August 2013 09: 25 New
    +3
    Quote: serge-68-68
    Whether there will be a blow or not - we'll see. If there is a meeting and blows continue, it means that I was mistaken in Obama. If there are no blows, Obama can be compared with Gorbachev. It is unlikely that any of the American presidents caused more damage to their country.

    It seems to me that it will still be. To save face, the United States must go all the way in this scenario, or bite Russia elsewhere. Of course, the old men are a serious analyst, I want to believe him, of course, but I doubt that the pendes will simply wipe themselves off.
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 30 August 2013 11: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      It seems to me that it will still be. To save face, the United States must go all the way in this scenario, or bite Russia elsewhere. Of course, the old men are a serious analyst, I want to believe him, of course, but I doubt that the pendes will simply wipe themselves off.


      The stupid sequence of the policies of 90x-beginning2000x will lead the United States only to deepen contradictions in relations with the rest of the world. First of all, with Russia and China.
      As you can see, the “cowboy” version did not work, the world is no longer the first one to rattle with weapons, and only then start trying to bring some kind of political base under it ...
  31. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 30 August 2013 09: 28 New
    +2
    Quote: Hitrovan07
    Will Russia (and who knows ... suddenly the UN) decide to declare that the leadership of the countries of aggressors be handed over to the Hague Tribunal?

    How is Griboedov-A judge who?
  32. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 30 August 2013 09: 41 New
    +4
    The article is good, the analysis is given competently and with an understanding of the essence of what is happening. We will not rush with joyful cries about victory, etc., etc., is still ahead ...
  33. Ulysses
    Ulysses 30 August 2013 09: 41 New
    +3
    I would like to believe that Starikov did not miss the forecast.
    His own parliament had already given a shit to Cameron yesterday.
    Today, the main paddling pool Oland walks with a gloomy face.

    One “WORLD Award winner” states “we are looking for new partners to bomb Syria.”
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 30 August 2013 09: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: Ulysses
      Today, the main paddling pool Oland walks with a gloomy face.

      He is a TENDER, for the rest, agrees completely.
  34. EtickayaSila
    EtickayaSila 30 August 2013 10: 13 New
    +2
    Quote: Tersky
    The blow will be on anyone. Not as powerful as planned, but it will

    I completely agree. They will not give up the blow. Moloch is already untwisted and will not stop bloodless.
  35. Ross
    Ross 30 August 2013 10: 27 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: Turik
    and his faithful dog Camiron.

    Camiron blown away yesterday, his idle talk did not ride


    Now he will not be able to return home in any way, the spouse who has eaten him baldness about poor "rebels" will not let him go to bed. The English press has long written that it was Cameron’s wife who pressured him with a request to punish Assad for the “poor” rebels.
    1. olviko
      olviko 30 August 2013 10: 57 New
      -1
      As for his wife, let him turn to Putin, he will tell him what to do.
  36. SvetoRus
    SvetoRus 30 August 2013 10: 33 New
    +2
    I really wish there wasn’t a blow. Very! However, there are a lot of interested people who spent a lot of time and money on it. These villains need a new world carnage, they need it like air. And now, when to it everything is ready, they cannot allow Assad to win. It will not work now, a little later they concoct a more convincing provocation, especially since provocations are their hobby.
    1. Very old
      Very old 30 August 2013 10: 47 New
      +2
      We all need this very, very much. But the Anglo-Saxons of faith have not one iota of faith. The British Parliament is against the invasion, against the war. So what? Hawks will begin to "twist hands" to pigeons
  37. individual
    individual 30 August 2013 10: 37 New
    +2
    Nikolai Starikov is right in one thing, that politics is such a dirty business that the agreements have no strategic significance. Each side takes a tactical step backwards, in order to take three steps forward in order to take advantage of verbal husk.
    Interest is always one $ or its equivalent.
  38. dimon-media
    dimon-media 30 August 2013 10: 52 New
    0
    As they say, "we will see" how events unfold. To say that all this is interesting is to say nothing at all. If only in fact there was no war ..
  39. Andrew 447
    Andrew 447 30 August 2013 11: 03 New
    +3
    I think that Europe is not enthusiastic about the likely gas pipeline from CA and Qatar, and this is one of the reasons for the disagreement in NATO. The reasons for 1. Gazprom, with all the nuances, is an old trusted partner. 2. CA and Qatar countries supporting Wahhabism will very seriously strengthen their influence in the EU given the high level of its Islamization today. 3. CA and Qatar have huge assets in the EU (including media) that they will protect and through which influence the position of Islam in the EU. 4. Russia does not have such assets in the EU as sheikhs, therefore its main interest is oil and gas revenues.
  40. pensioner
    pensioner 30 August 2013 11: 12 New
    +3
    Today it is known that 12 NATO countries have already refused to participate in the strike on Syria without UN sanction. Including England !! (Wonderful things are your Sovereigns!) France also played back and began to wrinkle her boobs. The states said they would continue to search for "partners." I think that they have four iron ones: Psheks + Balts with their combat air mattresses. And what? They will hook their entire inflatable flotilla for an aircraft carrier, make their faces worse and go ahead - to overthrow Assad ...
    1. Horde
      Horde 30 August 2013 12: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: retired
      I think that they have four iron ones: Psheks + Balts with their combat air mattresses. And what? They will hook their entire inflatable flotilla for an aircraft carrier, make their faces worse and go ahead - to overthrow Assad ...


      do not forget about NEVER-RESPONSE very eager for NATO, or such brave, invincible troops from the state of GEORGIA. In Iraq, the Pindo-sams helped and in Syria they want again. The partners are bad.
      1. pensioner
        pensioner 30 August 2013 12: 38 New
        0
        Quote: Horde
        do not forget about non-fallowing very torn in NATO

        But really! Especially since they have Bathers hanging out somewhere nearby. Launch, head for Syria and go!
      2. pensioner
        pensioner 30 August 2013 12: 40 New
        0
        Quote: Horde
        The partners are bad.

        Not bad! Horseradish is our everything !! Adzhikovs and Tkemalevs!
  41. Lone gunman
    Lone gunman 30 August 2013 13: 16 New
    -1
    How did the great analyzer Starikov find out that there would be no blow, Putin said? unlike Europe, Obama still listens to his electorate, and he has a kind of peace prize, it would have somehow turned out to be strange if he had started the war, but he’s not in a simple situation, he can’t transplant his entire administration. it seems to me that he is now on his way with Russia ... especially since in the West now all sane people are very "obedient" to Putin, something like that ...
    1. alone
      alone 30 August 2013 14: 01 New
      0
      last week, how much has been said. starting from the fall of Syria ending to a nuclear strike on Washington.

      Quote: Lone gunman
      How did the great analyzer Starikov find out that there would be no blow, Putin said?


      probably the Commander in Chief whispered in his ear))))
  42. Black
    Black 30 August 2013 14: 30 New
    +1
    Quote: Old very
    The blow will be. And here's what - we'll see.

    It's right.
    The old people don’t take into account that to bring a fist and not to strike is always much more expensive than a strike.
    Axes will fly. It’s a pity that the Kremlin has had less time supplying missile defense and air defense systems. Thought- will resolve itself. Not resolved.
    1. slaventi
      slaventi 30 August 2013 16: 52 New
      0
      But judging by the entire amount of information, most likely, there will be no blow to Syria. Until Obama meets Putin and, most likely, in principle.

      It’s quite bold on the part of Starikov. Let’s see. If the amers stop, their authority in terms of world hegemon will be undermined, and that’s good.
    2. fero
      fero 30 August 2013 17: 30 New
      0
      I support ... they’ll hit, grandmas are already invested, ships are sent, gears rotate
  43. Laaperanta
    Laaperanta 30 August 2013 18: 00 New
    0
    It would be nice if after some time we would read Starikov's article "Well, I told you !!!"
  44. greenpeace
    greenpeace 30 August 2013 18: 46 New
    0
    The grandmother is now able to play war with her friend Dzhorzhik. Babama Tomahawk - Dzhorzhik in response to a dry cake :). He has a lot of them on the ranch :). I wish that this all ended. And then the “singed” dove of the world will have to be tight. I hope so.
  45. Russ69
    Russ69 30 August 2013 20: 26 New
    0
    The news said that the head of NATO said that the organization will not participate in the bombing. The Yankees were left alone along the way, except perhaps France. The Saudis themselves will not climb, as well as the Turks.
  46. sird64
    sird64 30 August 2013 20: 28 New
    0
    an alliance with China is certainly good, but as the story of Russia has two friends, this is the army and navy. There is one such moment. China is a time bomb, for example, they teach at our school that our Far East is theirs. It turns out that China is raising a new generation that can aggressively affect Russia
  47. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 30 August 2013 20: 50 New
    0
    <<< In this situation, two things can not but rejoice: the inability of the United States to solve all the accumulated problems with its resources and the need to negotiate with other centers of power (Russia and China). Which does not fit with the status of the only superpower. >>>
    And where are these frogs endlessly trending - Russia is a US colony! Can there really be a colony a country with which the "colonizer" has to agree before the eyes of the whole world, losing his face? Unable to find opportunities to put pressure on the "subordinate" West, according to liberals, Russia, the United States and NATO did not find anything better than to threaten to bomb the Russian ally with the Tomahawks as pressure on Russia, thereby completely discrediting themselves in the eyes of the world community as the only one in the world a global superpower that no one could resist, and thereby raised Russia's authority on the world stage!