Military Review

Why has the situation in Syria or the everyday life of world geopolitics escalated?

47
Why has the situation in Syria or the everyday life of world geopolitics escalated?

The situation around Syria has strained to the limit. Will the aggression of the States and their allies follow? Let's look at the causes of the exacerbation of the situation and then we will have information for analytics.


1. The US strategy in the Middle East is to sow Chaos, destroy statehood and in every way reset the economy and living standards of the states of the region. The goal of all this is to create a new “collective Hitler”, a new force, which is then planned to lead through Afghanistan to Central Asia. Next, causing upheavals there, throw the fire heads inside Russia and China.

2. The "change" is the Islamic factor. For each time the Anglo-Saxons pick up their banner. At the beginning of the twentieth century it was a social factor (workers against the bourgeoisie), in the middle of the twentieth century - national (Aryans against non-Aryans), today - religious (Islamists against all others).

3. The plan began to act. The United States destroyed Libya and Yemen, shook Morocco and Tunisia. Then Syria was supposed to collapse, but with the support of Russia and China it resisted.

4. Unable to cope with Assad, the United States began to experience problems with its reputation. Militants and terrorists do not “pull” the task, and you cannot interfere in full growth yourself. After all, Chaos must be "in itself", separately from the American army, and not be the result of her coming somewhere. By intervening once and then hidden (special forces) in the events in Libya, the United States created a precedent. The brutal murder of Gaddafi was to discourage the resistance of all the leaders of the region. But Assad did not flinch, and Syria doesn’t completely dive into Chaos. The power of the country holds and the further, the more it supports the population. It is impossible to invade, but it is necessary to destroy the country. Then the States decided to withdraw from the Syrian situation. Leave to return later, not immediately.

5. Leaving Syria, the United States began to change the information background. The world media talked about "terrorists", although previously there were only rebels. The shooting of 450 Kurds (women and children) no one even thought to blame the Syrian army, they immediately said that the militants did it.

6. The first result of the withdrawal of the States from Syria was the surrender of the regime of Muslim brothers by the Egyptian military. Having received a blank check from the United States, the army firmly put things in order. Do not hesitate, as if forgetting about the "Hague court", shed blood. Egyptian army "suddenly" decided to shoot demonstrations in defense of the legitimate president of Mursi, who was removed by the military themselves? And two years ago, the same army was afraid to defend the legitimate President Mubarak? Not. Two years ago, the Americans said to surrender Mubarak, and now allowed to remove Mursi - that's the whole difference.

7. The reason for the elimination of the Egyptian regime is purely informational - the Islamists must become bad. So that the United States could stop their assistance without losing their reputation. But the new Egypt was assigned the role of "shop window". Look, Islamic radicals came to power and the country lives normally. Hard, yes. But in Libya and Syria, where the leaders did not give power, the situation is much worse. Therefore, give it away. In Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, etc.

8. Even before the events in Egypt, against the backdrop of the “Snowden case,” the US president refused to meet with the Russian president during the meetings of the heads of the leading 20 countries in St. Petersburg on September 5-6. This decision was not due to the fact that Russia gave asylum to an American citizen. Snowden was just a pretext - US diplomacy simply had no trump cards to talk with Putin.

9. Instead of communicating with Obama, Russia and China planned at the summit to announce the creation of a new “monetary union” in the form of a sovereign fund, the main “chip” of which should be the possibility of issuing debt securities and the possibility of lending at low% of business projects in Russia and China as for their and for foreign businessmen. In the case of this step, the blow is inflicted on the Anglo-Saxons, which is called podhy. At the same time, the place of the statement attracts the attention of all world media - it is impossible to conceal.

10. Information about the intentions of Russia and China is becoming known in Washington and London. They urgently need a trump card, they are urgently, in a terrible time trouble, you need to create a serious problem for the Russians and the Chinese in order to exchange it for the refusal of the statement about the creation of a “monetary union”.

11. And "suddenly" the situation around Syria became aggravated. Having no evidence of chemical use weapons in principle, having no evidence of the use of these weapons by the Syrian army, the United States and its closest allies “suddenly” are ready to start a war against Bashar al-Assad WITHOUT the UN SANCTION. The meaning of their actions is to slam the door so loud that everyone will turn away from the window.

12. They cannot fight "land" in Syria - there will be serious losses and losses. Bombing Syria with impunity will not work either - our air defense systems are there. In addition, there will be no sense in bombing. This is not Kosovo - there is no one to be separated. But there is no way out, they are obliged to respond to the Russian-Chinese financial threat, which undermines the basis of their power. And now the West “beats its wings” and makes statements one more threatening than the other. This is August 26.

13. On Tuesday, 27 August, the tonality of US statements magically changes. Now we are talking simply about “punishing” missiles, we are not talking about disembarking and overthrowing Assad. On Wednesday, 28 August, the tonality softens even more, the UK speaks about introducing a resolution to the UN, although two days ago it stated that it would start a war simply at will without any permission from the international community.

14. Only one fact leads to a change in rhetoric and a decline in the passions of Western leaders: in St. Petersburg, Obama will still meet with Putin. There will be negotiations, which means that the US will try to exchange the problem of the war in the Middle East created by them for the non-declaration of a “monetary union” between Russia and China.

15. Forecasting is always a thankless task. Especially in a situation where the US is cornered and experiencing hard time pressure. But judging by the entire amount of information, most likely, there will be no impact on Syria. Before Obama’s meeting with Putin and, most likely, in principle.

16. Instead, the "partners" in the negotiations will agree on the exchange. After that, the United States will begin to return to Syria, that is, will begin to strengthen the supply of weapons and money to the "rebels", and Russia and China will prepare a new opportunity for the announcement of "monetary union." Everything will be as usual. Hardly having agreed, each party will try to deceive its “partner” in the negotiations. This is politics ...

In this situation, two things can not but rejoice: the inability of the United States to solve all the accumulated problems with its resources and its need to negotiate with other centers of power. That does not fit with the status of the sole superpower. And another, which cannot but please - the chaos that the Anglo-Saxons sow in the Middle East, already leads to the fact that they themselves are stuck in it. And this makes it possible for Russia and China to strike them in the most sensitive place for the United States and Great Britain - in the financial sphere. Which is the basis of their power.
Author:
Originator:
http://nstarikov.ru/
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. experienced
    experienced 30 August 2013 18: 33 New
    +9
    Neither add nor decrease, a stitch in a stitch. This is a good example of analytics, everything is clearly “on the shelves” laid out and expressed in a clear and accessible form.
    They cannot fight “on the ground” in Syria - there will be serious losses and losses. It will also fail to bomb Syria with impunity - our air defense systems are there. Moreover, there will be no sense in the bombing.

    Yesterday, there was an article on Vzglyad with an analysis of the Tomahawks attack on Syria by the American military, they also said that it was effective only against stationary targets, but Syria relocated the headquarters and units and it would not be possible to achieve noticeable success, and each KR cost money.
    1. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 30 August 2013 19: 00 New
      +4
      Comrades, I have such feelings that this is in full swing in order to harm Russia and China in the first place. The more noise, the higher oil prices, the worse China and good for the United States. Perhaps the Americans before that knew that it wouldn’t work out with Syria, so at least China (the enemy number 1) is to spoil completely. And then Russia decided to create a common bank with all allies to develop its economies. This refers to the issuance of loans at low interest rates. This horrified the democrats, but it became more terrible that loans can be issued to any country with preferential interest rates. And we all perfectly understand that democracies have power at the expense of their money and dragon credits. Such a picture is much worse for Americans than a nuclear defeat! These are the thoughts! smile
      1. vadson
        vadson 30 August 2013 20: 14 New
        +2
        Quote: tronin.maxim
        Comrades, I have such feelings that this is in full swing in order to harm Russia and China in the first place. The more noise, the higher oil prices, the worse China and good for the United States. Perhaps the Americans before that knew that it wouldn’t work out with Syria, so at least China (the enemy number 1) is to spoil completely. And then Russia decided to create a common bank with all allies to develop its economies. This refers to the issuance of loans at low interest rates. This horrified the democrats, but it became more terrible that loans can be issued to any country with preferential interest rates. And we all perfectly understand that democracies have power at the expense of their money and dragon credits. Such a picture is much worse for Americans than a nuclear defeat! These are the thoughts! smile

        if the country is full of money, that even international funds for lending are going to create, what pink stumps do not give loans in their country for real production at a low percentage of the same VTB or Sberbank? nowhere else to go?
        but these are not questions for you, but mostly rhetorical
      2. rus9875
        rus9875 30 August 2013 21: 06 New
        +3
        Do you seriously believe that high oil prices are unprofitable for Russia? And probably just as seriously do you think that Russia and China have common interests?
        1. I am a Russian
          I am a Russian 30 August 2013 21: 39 New
          +2
          There are common interests.
    2. vadson
      vadson 30 August 2013 20: 10 New
      +2
      Well, at the expense of the partition of Syria, I would not be so clear
      firstly the Kurds
      secondly Shiites vs Sunites
      those. there is much to divide Syria
      1. Sergh
        Sergh 31 August 2013 03: 10 New
        +7
        Healthy men!
        May there be no America in Syria.
        But such gifts bearded, I like.



        or here, everyone quickly went wild.



        Well, this shooter was generally "reassured" beautifully. It seems like the leader of the Abu Sliman squad. But anyway, he will not return to Turkey anymore.

  2. Rus2012
    Rus2012 30 August 2013 18: 36 New
    +8
    already was - http://topwar.ru/32627-nikolay-starikov-udara-ne-budet.html
    Nikolay Stakrikov - “There Will Be No Impact”
  3. alone
    alone 30 August 2013 18: 40 New
    -2
    They cannot fight “on the ground” in Syria - there will be serious losses and losses. It will also fail to bomb Syria with impunity - our air defense systems are there.


    Yesterday it was already discussed here. The air defense system, with the exception of beech and shell, consists of old junk. When using electronic warfare, all this junk will uselessly look at the sky. but what about the effect of bombing or not, it can be argued after the bombing. Yes, and there already seems to be nothing to bomb there. The country is almost in ruins
    1. a52333
      a52333 30 August 2013 20: 11 New
      +1
      Well, a land invasion entails losses. The Syrian army is experienced and serious. I agree that Syria is not ideal for guerrilla warfare (there are no mountains like in Afghanistan, Chechnya or the Vietnamese jungle), but the aggressor can be patched there too.
      1. alone
        alone 30 August 2013 22: 03 New
        +3
        Alexey, tell me why the amers land phase of operations is necessary? Data about the objects is received from the command of the militants, they make a missile or air strike, after the attack the object is immediately attacked by a bearded riffraff. All the black work will be drunk by the bearded men. coordination of actions. You think the American divisions will be convoying on Syrian soil. They will shoot their missiles and that’s all. So the land phase is ruled out. By the very amers.
        1. Suhov
          Suhov 30 August 2013 23: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: lonely
          shoot their rockets and that's it

          Who knows if Assad has the means by which the Americans can break their slingshot shooters?
          1. scientist cat
            scientist cat 31 August 2013 01: 50 New
            +3
            Suhov [/ Quote]
            Who knows, does Assad have the means by which the Americans can break off their slingshot shooters? [/ Quote]
            In an open confrontation with the coalition of the West, Turkey and the Arab monarchies, victory in the Syrian war cannot be won.

            Assad’s chance is to disperse his forces, evacuate strategic targets, and wait out an attack that will be time-limited. Save your strength in this way to continue the fight against the rebels. In addition, Assad needs to expose the civilian population of Syria, a small sacrifice throughout the country, several thousand, including women and children, to place the civilian population in the places of the alleged attack, to show in all media the footage of dead civilians injured during shelling of the coalition. To wage an information war, to raise a wave of civil protest in Western countries, behind enemy lines.
        2. a52333
          a52333 31 August 2013 06: 04 New
          +2
          Omar, the bottom does not have a lot of chances to remain “white and fluffy” even with the SLCM raid. Missiles will leave the course. Civilians will suffer. The troops are dispersed, and the target, like a single tank, is not economically justified. Of course, much can be done. 2 / 3 air defense radar. But without landing 100% success will not be. You can break the situation. After all, bearded partisans, by and large. Positions can’t hold, no heavy equipment. Their tactics (successful I do not argue) shot = redeployed. They occupied the village, cut it out, ran away. Therefore, the blood of the army and the economy can be launched, weakened. And then either add bearded ones, or go down to the shore ourselves.
          To go down to the shore ourselves, it’s not yet clear for such a purpose. where the bearded will shoot.
  4. shinobi
    shinobi 30 August 2013 18: 44 New
    +3
    A. Elmurid: Analytics

    Long trade in anticipation of war fails
    The international situation around Syria is well defined. The group of categorical opponents of the force scenario includes Iran, Egypt, Russia and China. Moreover, it is this sequence that is built according to the degree of severity of statements by officials. A much larger number of countries distanced themselves from the idea of ​​attacking Syria, but at the same time trying to do it gently and without much tear. These are all US allies in NATO, and even England and France took an openly expectant position. Finally, a significant part of the Arab states generally does not show their attitude to what is happening. Even direct opponents of Syria.

    Turkey and Israel occupy a special position, however, they are not ready to go in the forefront.

    Against this background, a statement by the US Secretary of Defense follows, in which he excludes US military actions outside the coalition and announces ongoing consultations on its creation. How exactly the coalition will come together when the United States itself has not made a final decision is unclear. At the same time, Obama continues to "work with documents."

    Western media are no longer at risk of giving any dates and dates. The most decisive point to the weekend as the probable beginning of limited air strikes, but what their confidence is based on is not known.

    Uncertain situation continues to persist. It does not work for a long time to trade in anticipation of a war; the topic inevitably leaves the front pages, which is completely uncharacteristic for preparing for a war. In any case, the current situation is completely knocked out of all its previous analogues. The expansion of the group around Syria has virtually ceased. This, of course, does not mean anything, since for a limited strike of forces and means it is quite enough - but again, in the current situation, the absence of a visible strengthening of the military component of the future conflict looks strange.

    At the same time, Russian ships are heading towards Syria. It is not yet fully understood which particular group is heading to the Mediterranean Sea, but it seems that there is a chance to see the flagships of three Russian fleets near the Syrian coast. If Obama finally decides to attack Syria, doing it with the Russians between Syria and his ships will look completely “not halal.”

    Public opinion, to which politicians of modern bottling are quite reverent, is very categorically opposed to war. Moreover, in the United States it is the most pacific - no more than 10% support the idea of ​​punishing the dictator. If you wish, you can certainly not pay attention to this opinion, but it can also become a pretty good excuse for changing your position.
  5. andrei332809
    andrei332809 30 August 2013 18: 50 New
    +5
    why, why ... yes pressed the assad of bandits, and if they are not supported, they will flee (to die then they are not hunting) to countries allied to the amers. Well, there are the same Cathars, UAE, well, how can it be without Europe. and since you won’t get them to work, banditry will come to houses that support just the banditry, but not on its territory. so the reason is one - cowardice. It's my personal opinion. maybe I'm wrong
  6. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 30 August 2013 18: 52 New
    +6
    The situation has escalated to the limit of Syria (a small country) in the center of global disassembly on a global scale .. Russia has rested because it’s our turn to go nowhere after Syria and nowhere to go back ... Obama I think will give the order .. clicked on him (and the amers will analyze them. centers on the nose) .. But Putin is silent .. (now you need to behave yourself ..) in the west, weathercocks change every day .. Nervous about the behavior of Russia .. (optimal tactics are significantly silent)))
    1. Suhov
      Suhov 30 August 2013 23: 42 New
      0
      Quote: MIKHAN
      optimal tactics meaningfully silent

      and puff out cheeks to impress the “partners”.
      yes
    2. alex13-61
      alex13-61 31 August 2013 00: 04 New
      0
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Obama think the order will give .. clicked him

      Obama is already broadcasting about a certain "limited" blow ... Hollande - they say on September 4, he is lying, if they hit, then earlier.
      so we'll see.
  7. varov14
    varov14 30 August 2013 18: 57 New
    +1
    If these are not regular wishes but facts, then it would be wonderful to play on this field.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 30 August 2013 18: 57 New
    0
    They cannot fight “on the ground” in Syria - there will be serious losses and losses.

    They could fight on the ground and can if they want, they just don’t want to tarnish their reputation, that's why the militants will do it for them.
    It will also fail to bomb Syria with impunity - our air defense systems are there.
    What are our air defense systems, even if they shoot down missiles and planes, then this is not 100%. Because the missiles will all arrive, the maximum that they can do is reflect the first two waves of missile attacks, they will run out of charges and there will be no time to reload, all the more, there will still be misses, so losses are inevitable, the Amers have 360 ​​missiles, the Syrians simply can’t physically destroy all the missiles, and as soon as the rest of the wave of missile attacks destroys their air defense system, nothing can stop them, the remaining (more precisely, survivors ) parts of the troops will be brutally finished off by militants, I already said that then the only thing that Syrian soldiers can do is die like heroes i.e. to die with honor. They would have a chance if they had our modern air defense systems, but they don’t have it, basically they still have equipment from the time of the war with Israel. Alas, this is the reality. crying
    1. alone
      alone 30 August 2013 22: 07 New
      +2
      Do not forget about the satellites. These satellites have long been transmitting all the information to where they should be. The first to hit it is at air bases and air defense.
      1. GREAT RUSSIA
        GREAT RUSSIA 30 August 2013 22: 43 New
        0
        Yes, it’s about them that I forgot, though in vain I apologize in advance. hi
    2. poquello
      poquello 30 August 2013 23: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
      They would have a chance if they had our modern air defense systems, but they don’t have it, basically they still have equipment from the time of the war with Israel. Alas, this is the reality. crying

      What are you talking about? There are over thirty shells at the beginning of the conflict, read the characteristics
      1. alone
        alone 30 August 2013 23: 17 New
        +2
        Do you think 30 shells will be enough to curb all aviation and cruise missiles?
        Shell-C1 is a short-range anti-aircraft missile-gun complex.
        1. poquello
          poquello 30 August 2013 23: 29 New
          +4
          Quote: lonely
          Do you think 30 shells will be enough to curb all aviation and cruise missiles?
          Shell-C1 is a short-range anti-aircraft missile-gun complex.


          Over thirty at the beginning. It is imprisoned for tomahawks, for small-sized military and administrative-industrial facilities and areas.
      2. GREAT RUSSIA
        GREAT RUSSIA 30 August 2013 23: 19 New
        +2
        Hmmmm, I read the specifications for this, thank you and plus, but still agree that thirty shells will not be able to withstand all this power. Alas, the Syrians do not have all the air defense systems of such excellent military inventions, the Syrians mainly use air defense technology. more than 360 missiles and three aircraft carriers in the region, they can easily deal with the remaining air defense and then deal with these (shells). Because, as Confucius said, attack weak points and avoid strong ones.
        1. poquello
          poquello 30 August 2013 23: 31 New
          +1
          Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
          After all, as Confucius said, attack weaknesses avoid strong ones.

          I agree with that who will outplay whom.
        2. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 30 August 2013 23: 46 New
          +3
          Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
          Alas, not all air defense systems of the Syrians consist of such excellent military inventions, the main part of the air defense of the Syrians is outdated

          No country in the world will repel a missile and bomb strike by all 100 percent.
          There are two questions:
          - how effective will be the remaining, after striking, infrastructure, both military and administrative;
          - What will be the retaliatory strike against the aggressor?
        3. Suhov
          Suhov 30 August 2013 23: 51 New
          +1
          Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
          After all, as Confucius said, attack weaknesses avoid strong ones.

          All right.
          The weak they have already paid.
          But will they be able to cope with a strong opponent?
          This is a question.
        4. Sandov
          Sandov 31 August 2013 05: 37 New
          +2
          I hope our squadron from the sea will cover Syria. It will help them in the destruction of these international criminals.
          1. poquello
            poquello 31 August 2013 11: 31 New
            +2
            Quote: Sandov
            I hope our squadron from the sea will cover Syria. It will help them in the destruction of these international criminals.

            Ours said that they were not participating, therefore the squadron would insure or immediately provide part of the radar. And further along the play.
      3. Sandov
        Sandov 31 August 2013 05: 34 New
        +2
        Goofy.
        If the calculations are prepared, and the fighters do not scare, many gringo flyers are not counted. It all depends on the Syrians.
  10. varov14
    varov14 30 August 2013 18: 58 New
    +1
    If these are not regular wishes but facts, then it would be wonderful to play on this field.
  11. awg75
    awg75 30 August 2013 18: 59 New
    +5
    5 points to the author !!!! I really want to believe that the USA will finally find its deserved place in the history cemetery
    1. GREAT RUSSIA
      GREAT RUSSIA 30 August 2013 19: 09 New
      +3
      Quote: awg75
      5 points to the author !!!! I really want to believe that the USA will finally find its deserved place in the history cemetery

      They already found it, they just try to postpone this terrible end. But they forgot the main thing, the more they try to do it (postpone the end), the worse their fate will be. And to the author + without a doubt.
  12. AlexP47
    AlexP47 30 August 2013 19: 22 New
    +3
    There is a persistent feeling that the tail has been wagging the dog for a long time. The Saudis and other oil monarchies of the Persian Gulf pursue a policy of their own interests, using the corrupt ruling circles of Western countries. Well, the French president F. Hollande recently gotten up to his head: we’ll hit Syria without any UN sanctions, and that’s it! Why did Assad do something bad to him?
    So there is a suspicion that the leading politicians of Geyropa and SESHA have long been fed from the chubby hands of Arab kings, who were soaked up from free oil tanks ...
  13. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 30 August 2013 19: 27 New
    -5
    Quote: AlexP47
    Why did Assad do something bad to him?

    I could list what he did wrong as his hands are in blood, but I have no data and information, but I’ll write the main idea: he’s stopping the west, that’s all, that’s enough for them.
    1. igor06161
      igor06161 30 August 2013 21: 02 New
      +1
      If there is no data and information and there is no need to talk!, And so they are raking hands from each king-ruler in a batch!
    2. poquello
      poquello 30 August 2013 23: 19 New
      +5
      Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
      Quote: AlexP47
      Why did Assad do something bad to him?

      I could list what he did wrong as his hands are in blood, but I have no data and information, but I’ll write the main idea: he’s stopping the west, that’s all, that’s enough for them.


      You are about the bloody hands of Assad tell a raped six-year-old girl and a child cut out from the womb of a mother who scumbags-friends of a woman and Clinton played football.
    3. Sandov
      Sandov 31 August 2013 05: 40 New
      +1
      Assad physically simply did not have time to do anything. And the fact that the rats are wet, for this he thanks a lot.
  14. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 30 August 2013 19: 30 New
    +1
    Still ahead .. men .. Anglo-Saxons just won't give up ... Politically they are clearly omitted .. heh heh .. (I mean the top ..) In this situation, they are the most dangerous for the whole world .. You need to wait and get ready. .to the next provocations .. I think so.
    1. vadson
      vadson 30 August 2013 20: 21 New
      +3
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Politically, they are clearly omitted .. heh heh .. (I mean the top ..)

      you do not know? it’s not dumb for them
  15. ruslan7608
    ruslan7608 30 August 2013 19: 48 New
    0
    A magnificent article, everything has been analyzed, not invented, not taken from somewhere from heaven. The best answer is still not exchanged with the Anglo-Saxons. And squeeze them out from the Middle East to the fullest. Let them sit on their islands and on their own continent.
  16. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 30 August 2013 19: 56 New
    +4
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Nervous about the behavior of Russia .. (optimal tactics are pointedly silent)))


    Russia will strengthen the grouping of the Navy in the Mediterranean Sea in connection with the aggravation of the situation around Syria.
    The group will be replenished with a large anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet, and a little later it will be joined by the Moscow Black Sea Fleet missile cruiser, located in the North Atlantic and preparing to move towards the Strait of Gibraltar. In autumn, the Varyag missile cruiser of the Pacific Fleet, which will replace the large anti-submarine ship Vice Admiral Panteleev, should join the group.
    The connection, although it did not get an introduction to fight with anyone, is ready for any action to protect Russian national interests in the region.

    The Russian group of the Navy near the coast of Syria monitors airspace in any scenario and regardless of the environment.

    At the same time, the Russian military can also transmit information received during monitoring to the Syrian air defense crews. This will ensure the most timely reaction of the Syrian air defense to any attempts at military aggression by the United States and its allies both in airspace and at sea.

    Washington understands this very well, therefore, a number of military experts have already expressed the view that sending Russian ships has just become the trump card that will most likely put an end to NATO’s air strike.
    1. scientist cat
      scientist cat 31 August 2013 01: 58 New
      -4
      AleksUkr
      Assad must enter into a military alliance with the Russian Empire, wait for the transfer of the Russian expeditionary force from the place of its permanent deployment on the rings of Saturn. The battleships of the Corps, led by Vice Admiral Urgant on the flagship Perun, will burn Washington as soon as possible from Earth’s orbit with streams of antimatter, and aircraft carriers and frogs will sink to the bottom with plasma charges :-)))
      1. scientist cat
        scientist cat 31 August 2013 02: 07 New
        -3
        I apologize, one word did not go through the moderators, let me fix it.

        , and plasma charges will bring aircraft carriers to the bottom Yankees and frogmen :-)))
  17. k1964
    k1964 30 August 2013 19: 57 New
    +2
    In general, the situation is somehow strange and incomprehensible. The UN Commission cannot determine the substance that was used. but then, logically, could Syria create such a substance, and if not (yes, most likely not) then the question arises: where did it come from. and that’s why Russia hasn’t sent its specialists to Syria.
  18. APASUS
    APASUS 30 August 2013 19: 58 New
    +1
    15. Forecasting is always a thankless task. Especially in a situation where the US is cornered and experiencing hard time pressure. But judging by the entire amount of information, most likely, there will be no impact on Syria. Before Obama’s meeting with Putin and, most likely, in principle.

    Here I agree to all 100!
    Obama will either have to cancel the trip to St. Petersburg, or wait with the start of the bombing!
    Otherwise, journalists will have to answer unpleasant questions, in a obviously losing position for themselves and an alien country, it will be very difficult for him not to get in touch!
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 1 September 2013 12: 55 New
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      Obama will either have to cancel the trip to St. Petersburg, or wait with the start of the bombing!

      I turned out to be right. Obama decided to ask Congress for permission to operate and is waiting for permission, and Congress is now on vacation until the 9th. The summit will be held on 5-6, everything came together!
      It’s a smart move, considering that it wasn’t supported by the NATO allies and the people didn’t use this decision. You see Congress will refuse and then everything will turn out as it should.
      And Obama didn’t seem to manage it and made a noise, but in general terms, this will be Russia's gain
  19. -Max-
    -Max- 30 August 2013 19: 59 New
    +1
    And where does such information about the "monetary union" come from?
    The first time in this article I found out.
    And silence in the foreign press.
    Yes, and there are no attacks on China in this regard in the Western press.
    But if it is SO, then Uncle Sam will retire soon!
  20. andruha70
    andruha70 30 August 2013 20: 13 New
    +3
    creeping line on the rbc channel (rhyme straight ... laughing ) marked urgently: Rasmussen-Nata will not participate in the military conflict in Syria ... good Vladimir Vladimirovich VERY SIGNIFICANTLY silent ... laughing
  21. rus9875
    rus9875 30 August 2013 21: 18 New
    +5
    How has the tonality of media reports changed in just a day? Guys who hysteria on the site yesterday about the fact that GDP sold to Syria, where are you? As expected - everything was done very competently - our president, so unloved by many, the president demonstratively travels to the Far East - such as watching flood damage and Angela Merkel, Kemeron and others call him to clarify his position on Syria and then the anti-Syrian bubble suddenly blows off and Obama remains practically alone with a great headache - what to do next when even Jordan and Israel said that they would not support the attack on Syria
  22. Maks-80
    Maks-80 30 August 2013 21: 53 New
    +1
    Song of American Democracy Carriers

    1. Sandov
      Sandov 31 August 2013 05: 48 New
      +2
      Yes, the punishers of these amers, rightly noticed. Therefore, they support terrorists around the world.
  23. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 30 August 2013 22: 11 New
    0
    In my opinion, if the United States attacks, it will be in the interval between the departure of experts from Syria and the receipt of research results. Because if the results show that the army did not use chemical weapons (it is likely, according to some statements, that the experts will be honest), then the attack will reveal the true face of the United States (although most probably know their faces) to world public opinion, this will mean its loss. And they will say so, spreading their hands: well, they didn’t find (as in Iraq) well, they made a mistake, with whom it does not happen. Otherwise, if the experts tremble, they will say: what did we say. Everything points to this gap, or there will be no attack.
  24. Boricello
    Boricello 31 August 2013 07: 20 New
    +2
    Quote: cat scientist
    Assad must enter into a military alliance with the Russian Empire, wait for the transfer of the Russian expeditionary force from the place of its permanent deployment on the rings of Saturn. The battleships of the Corps, led by Vice Admiral Urgant on the flagship Perun, will burn Washington as soon as possible from Earth’s orbit with streams of antimatter, and aircraft carriers and frogs will sink to the bottom with plasma charges :-)))

    Old Jewish song. I wonder how long you will laugh if Allahakbar comes to power in Syria? Or do you hope that the Colorado beetles can help you. You are like that mongrel that barks and bites from under the silence from behind the owner. Imagine for a moment what will happen to Israel if the Anglo-Saxons stop supporting you? Your entire territory is shot from a machine gun. And your dagger (which is really highly professional) and all your equipment will not help. And you should not laugh at Russia at all. You will never compare in authority or power with this country. I think that in about a dozen years, the first Jews will run to the Russians screaming uncles save-help.
  25. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 31 August 2013 08: 41 New
    0
    The article passed on the idea of ​​a new monetary union that China and Russia want to create. Something like that has already flickered in the media of the West, supposedly a "global government", seeing the unenviable fate of green wrappers, re-aimed at China and wanted to make the golden reserve yuan a new reserve currency . Maybe it's just their attempt to maintain their financial sovereignty? Something is wrong here! Then why did the Western press flashed reports of a huge increase in Beijing's "gold reserve"?
  26. Andrey Peter
    Andrey Peter 31 August 2013 11: 53 New
    0
    It would be great to substitute the United States not only politically, but also economically, otherwise they only increase the turnover of their candy wrappers which are not confirmed by the production of the product. My opinion is, if you collect all the printed dollars, you can buy the United States several times with giblets.
  27. Gerasim
    Gerasim 31 August 2013 13: 48 New
    0
    Gentlemen "from politics" if before meeting in Leningrad, i.e. Until September 5th, Obama will not “answer” Russia with a blow to Syria, at least with one salvo, then there will be no reason for Obama to fly to Leningrad! It’s the same as wiping snot after insults from Guinea
    Bissau!
    For some reason it seems to me ... you really excuse me !!!
  28. individual
    individual 31 August 2013 21: 36 New
    +1
    In the Middle Ages, wars of conquest ended relatively successfully.
    The twentieth century shows that the outbreak of war becomes more expensive for itself, as a significant loss of material and human resources.
    The United States adapted to fight with foreign armies in foreign territories, but in its own interests.
    So far, their strategy has worked.
    But there comes a moment of truth, and their faithful ally, NATO, with even more faithful Britain, said: “Stop, stop it.”
    If someone had suggested this a week ago, that would have been accepted with a grin.
    But it happened - 12 NATO countries are refusing military intervention in Syria without the approval of the UN Security Council, realizing that Russia will block the anti-Syrian resolution.
    What happened? Inexplicably.
  29. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. 31 August 2013 21: 58 New
    0
    Quote: individ

    What happened? Inexplicably. [/ B]

    Explained ...
    Dreaming ... They lied, They played too much ... Overshot ... They fucked ...
  30. Konstantm
    Konstantm 31 August 2013 22: 58 New
    +2
    Well, here is our President said: "In the context of the offensive of the Syrian army, to say that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons is utter nonsense”, He said during a visit to Vladivostok.
    1. poquello
      poquello 1 September 2013 04: 01 New
      +1
      Quote: KonstantM
      Well, here is our President said: "In the context of the offensive of the Syrian army, to say that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons is utter nonsense”, He said during a visit to Vladivostok.

      Yes, I gave it well, I also read it.