Syria will be able to shoot down American missiles by Russian complexes Pantsir-С1

70
In the course of military supplies between Russia and Syria, the latter were delivered several dozen complexes Carapace-S1, which is able to destroy the American cruise missiles "Tomahawk".



The Pantsir-S1 complex (sample of 1995) is equipped with 12 9М335 missiles, externally and in layout similar to 9М311 ZRPK Tungusk missiles (the launch range increased for new missiles increased to 12 km, the height of the targets hit - up to X ZNXX, the launching range increased from new missiles to 8 km, the height of the targeted targets was up to X ZNXX, the launching range increased for new missiles to 90 km, the height of the targets hit - up to X ZNXX, the launching range increased from new missiles to 12 km, the height of the targeted targets was up to X ZNXX, , the new rocket used a more powerful engine, increased the mass of the warhead, while its caliber “grew” to 8 mm). The rocket has a short flight time at the launch site and high speed. The range of damage in range is 20 km, in height - 3 km. The mass of the warhead consisting of core attack elements is XNUMX kg. The rocket uses an air-dynamic steering gear that maneuvers the rocket during flight. The complex can direct simultaneously to XNUMX missiles on the radio command guidance system. In such systems, the rocket is controlled by radio commands transmitted from the carrier.

The artillery “stuffing” of the “Shell” consists of two 30-mm single-barrel automatic guns 2А72, which are powered by two cartridge belts with high-explosive fragmentation and armor-piercing projectiles. The combat module mounted on the roof of the body of the combat vehicle includes an 2 6 anti-aircraft missile unit, two cannons placed on the inside of the missile launch cannons, a radar target detection station, and a target tracking station and missiles. There is also an optical channel fire control system.

ZRPK “Carapace” was just (and so far, apparently) designed mainly to combat flying Tomogawk type cruise missiles and low-flying (maneuvering) enemy targets, which for some reason broke through the air defense barrier. Tests of the “Carapace” showed that the complex is capable of shooting down low-flying missiles, including at a record low altitude of 15 meters.

It should be noted that the armament of the American squadron of ships, which moved to the shores of Syria, includes the Tomoghawk cruise missiles. And it was a two-day bombardment of “Tomogawks” that Barack Obama threatened Syria.

Was delivered from Russia to Syria 36 96K6 complexes between 2008 2011 for years. Supply made within 2006 contract, which provides for the supply to 50 96K6 complexes and to 700 missiles for them.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    29 August 2013 06: 58
    Now, in general, much will be a revelation for everyone. The Americans are not in vain afraid for their ships .. and missiles ... Some part will certainly hit the target, but most will be destroyed. As we say, for every .... there is ... with screw.
    1. +7
      29 August 2013 07: 06
      Quote: domokl
      The Americans are not in vain afraid for their ships

      They are afraid of the Syrian response, and they are threatening to spray Russia with chips with cruise missiles alone, even to the point that Russia cannot even answer ... And moreover, according to them, this should be a complete surprise for Russia!
      And someone in fact believes in it! laughing
      1. +19
        29 August 2013 07: 15
        Hi guys! They threaten quite reasonably. If we do not cover the Ukrainian direction, then the losses will really be huge from one launch. Only in one country is there a city that is populated by more than 10% of the population. And air defense guarantees 95% of missile destruction. Total-100 missiles and five hits ...
        Another thing is that Russians, unlike the Americans, can go hand to hand, and not only drop bombs and missiles.
        I recalled an episode from the 17 moments of spring when Stirlitz on a train talking to a general on a train ... Americans will be destroyed by a love of technology. Each mechanism will always be created by a different, more powerful one.
      2. duke
        +2
        29 August 2013 08: 57
        Well, why did the amers rivet 10 thousand tomahawks, beat the sparrows? Just for a serious adversary, Russia or China .... a sudden massive strike, it might work ...
        1. +1
          29 August 2013 11: 00
          And to come up they’ll put on all the invisibility caps ... well, well ...
      3. +1
        29 August 2013 10: 32
        Quote: We refund_SSSR
        They threaten to spray Russia with chips with cruise missiles alone,

        Good day to all!
        Let them say it is their fate. They are talkative too. Although yes, in Russia, only Moscow is provided with a high-quality air defense shield. I doubt that in other areas this shield is so powerful and powerful. And if I somewhere, I didn’t notice something, but it is, then everything is fine. Not all my eyes should see!
    2. +18
      29 August 2013 07: 07
      Quote: domokl
      . Some part will certainly hit the target, but most will be destroyed

      Hi Sanya! Everything will depend on those who sit at the complexes of skill and courage.
      1. +8
        29 August 2013 07: 36
        Quote: domokl
        ... Americans will be ruined by a love of technology. For each mechanism, a different, more powerful one will always be created.

        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Everything will depend on those who sit at the complexes of skill and courage.

        Alexandra hi ! Do not forget about Iran, it also has what and with whom to rule humpbacked ..
      2. 0
        29 August 2013 10: 19
        And I forgot to mention the quantity.
    3. +2
      29 August 2013 08: 06
      I heard that someone still managed to put Syria C-300 and Iskander? Who it?
      1. duke
        0
        29 August 2013 08: 59
        if so, then deliveries were only from Belarus.
      2. +1
        29 August 2013 10: 16
        Quote: Karavan
        I heard that someone still managed to put Syria C-300 and Iskander? Who it?

        Iskanders are unlikely ...
      3. +1
        29 August 2013 10: 45
        Quote: Karavan
        I heard that someone still managed

        Oh, I doubt it. First, it seems necessary to train those who will control the weapon, and only after that will deliver that weapon. And just bring and give, not seriously. Even a grenade must be prepared before throwing. A knife without preliminary training cannot be thrown at the target. And then a whole complex of air defense. No, I can’t believe it. And the Israelis are silent. And their spies in that Syria are a dime a dozen. Wherever you spit in the Jewish spy, you get.
      4. Ruslan_F38
        0
        29 August 2013 11: 04
        Quote: Karavan
        I heard that someone still managed to put Syria C-300 and Iskander? Who it?


        I hope that they did. At least the S-300. Iskander is unlikely, but it was necessary.
    4. +3
      29 August 2013 08: 24
      If Syria manages to organize competent control of the air defense system, restore its unity, provide air defense systems with qualified crews and prevent the destruction of air defense systems by special forces on the ground, then an option to effectively repel US bombing is possible. I hope Syria succeeds.
    5. 0
      29 August 2013 10: 44
      here and see the capabilities of the Shell!
      1. +2
        29 August 2013 18: 07
        Quote: Civil
        here and see the capabilities of the Shell!

        It would be better if such an opportunity was completely absent!
        1. +1
          29 August 2013 21: 31
          I remember that at the end of the Iraqi operation, their Tomahawks flew anywhere, even flew into Iran. I think that Russia will "try" this time too. hi
  2. +3
    29 August 2013 06: 59
    Volfych yesterday in Syria said: scouts and specialists are needed there. see and practice. soldier angry Maybe the aircraft carrier is empty. There, not only the shells broke through?
    1. +6
      29 August 2013 07: 33
      Volfych spoke a lot of things, especially on a drunken head. The funniest political jester
      1. +16
        29 August 2013 07: 40
        Only a royal jester was always allowed to say what others paid for with their own heads ... wink
      2. +1
        29 August 2013 10: 48
        Quote: Dangerous
        Volfych said a lot

        Strange as it may seem, sensible thoughts often slip through his mind.
        1. Ruslan_F38
          +2
          29 August 2013 11: 06
          Quote: Hedgehog
          Quote: Dangerous
          Volfych said a lot

          Strange as it may seem, sensible thoughts often slip through his mind.


          Nothing strange, Zhirinovsky is not so stupid as many people think of him.
    2. duke
      +5
      29 August 2013 09: 02
      Carapace alone cannot solve the problem, it needs layered air defense, with a large, medium and small radius of action, as well as in height ... for example, we have shells covering the S-300 and 400, as well as airfields, as it is unknown
  3. +19
    29 August 2013 06: 59
    It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!
    Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.
    1. +12
      29 August 2013 07: 07
      Quote: VadimSt
      It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!

      Your koment from the heart. But ... How to stop a ram who attacks a new gate? Let her head break if she spits on all international organizations.
      1. +9
        29 August 2013 07: 18
        Let's hope that the skin of these rams will remain hanging on those gates.
      2. duke
        +7
        29 August 2013 09: 03
        if there was a ram, there was half the trouble, unfortunately prudent and cunning hamadryl with sharp fangs.
    2. Che
      Che
      +8
      29 August 2013 07: 20
      Quote: VadimSt
      It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!
      Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.

      And on the other hand, a large cupboard falls louder, that's the whole difference.
    3. +10
      29 August 2013 07: 25
      Quote: VadimSt
      Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.

      That's for sure, the chief "arbiter" is already making it clear that he is not in business;UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday that he was not aware of the upcoming Western military operation in Syria, the press service of the world organization said, “I’m not going to make assumptions about what I’m not aware of,” he said in response to the question of the appropriateness of the use of military force against the ATS. Oh how! The whole world is aware and Moon is probably in deep isolation on a desert island ....
      1. +9
        29 August 2013 07: 34
        Russia, looking at all this chaos, it is time to dot all the mockery of the principles of international law and to intensify work in the SCO as an alternative.

        And in the future, I can only wish London, Paris and Istanbul one thing - my own 11 of September from my beloved opposition. Vile, probably, because there are people! And then who in Syria, nonhumans or what?
      2. +7
        29 August 2013 08: 43
        Quote: Tersky
        ; UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Thursday he’s not aware of the upcoming Western military operation in Syria, the press service of the world organization said. “I’m not going to make assumptions about what I’m not aware of,” he said in response to the question of the appropriateness of the use of military force against ATS

        Three famous monkeys united in the person of Ban Ki-moon
        1. Hudo
          +2
          29 August 2013 09: 12
          Quote: lewerlin53rus

          Three famous monkeys united in the person of Ban Ki-moon


          In the face of the crooked-faced and bald-haired Anthem, these primates never got disconnected.
      3. 0
        29 August 2013 10: 56
        Quote: Tersky
        said on Thursday that it was not aware of the upcoming military operation by Western countries

        That's right. If oh horseradish for meat is no longer considered, then of course they will not say anything to anyone. For amers and their mongrel, the UN is the same as OOМ and OOЖ
  4. +8
    29 August 2013 07: 12
    Siri should put such complexes ..............
    1. Che
      Che
      +3
      29 August 2013 07: 23
      Apasus. There is no more time for training. Bastards have already left the gateway.
      1. 0
        29 August 2013 18: 10
        Quote: Che
        Apasus. There is no more time for training. Bastards have already left the gateway.

        And who said that there was no time?
  5. +8
    29 August 2013 07: 13
    It seems to me that the fact that the cost of a tomahawk is several times higher than the cost of a shell rocket seems to me very interesting. The economic effect, as they say, "on the face".
    1. +3
      29 August 2013 08: 28
      Quote: Predator-74
      The economic effect, as they say "on the face".

      Rather, "in the face", but it was too tactful ... for a gulp, somewhere so that would not offend members of the forum obscene language.
      I'm only afraid that the economic component in deciding to strike is in last place, if at all. All! Eyes bloodshot, arguments aside ... who's going to count the money? Ministry of Finance guys in jackets and ties - this is their lot ... and then "we carry the wind of freedom" !!! disperse! Only with a crowbar "in the face" and you can stop
      1. 0
        29 August 2013 10: 05
        Quote: Akhtuba73
        I’m only afraid that the economic component, when deciding on a strike, is in last place, if at all.

        Modern warfare is precisely, first of all, an economic factor. How many weapons each side can use and determines success. After all, there is no infinite amount of weapons and resources for their production or acquisition by a country.
        And in fact, it is very interesting what the cost of the trident and the shell (and the complex and missiles) is, that is, the efficiency coefficient.
        It may be that the destruction of one trident will more than pay for the whole shell with its missiles. For Syria, a coefficient close to the ratio of the economies of the United States and Syria itself is important.
        After the war in Iraq, it was expensive for the Americans to restore their missile resource.
        1. 0
          29 August 2013 10: 54
          Quote: Genry
          After the war in Iraq, it was expensive for the Americans to restore their missile resource.

          The stump is clear, the jacket has been shaken off, but the country is in ruins ... What and to whom to restore is what needs to be compared. One hundred missiles to America and the state for Syria. Two big differences.
    2. 1712
      -3
      29 August 2013 11: 26
      Yes am, that - they will print pieces of paper and rivet sticks of democracy. Fuckers ..
  6. +5
    29 August 2013 07: 14
    And there are also Bastions there ... If they fire a full salvo, can the US destroyers be able to fight off this flock? I think it’s unlikely ... A couple of missiles will find their target.
    1. Alex-z84
      +7
      29 August 2013 07: 22
      Quote: Wedmak
      And there are also Bastions there ... If they fire a full salvo, can the US destroyers be able to fight off this flock? I think it’s unlikely ... A couple of missiles will find their target.

      The only `` BUT '' Bastion in the export version shoots 300 km, the destroyers will hit from a safe distance of 1000-1200 km.This is the effective launch range of the TOMAGAVK KR now from the coast, they are at a distance of 800 km, BASTION is unlikely to reach them at this distance No.
      1. 0
        29 August 2013 19: 54
        Will aircraft carriers also stand at 1000 km? It’s easier then to take off from Turkey. Where is the chocolate?
    2. Che
      Che
      +7
      29 August 2013 07: 25
      Everything will depend on the skills and resilience of the Syrians. Amer is a coward, but a coward with a club against a kid. Without our help, they will have a hard time. Assad of luck and fortitude. And our sobriety and fidelity to duty.
  7. +9
    29 August 2013 07: 15
    from the Don.
    Sometimes our desires do not coincide with our capabilities. It seems that with Syria, this is the case! Geyts are not stupid, intelligence works for them! Syria needs to have a deeply echeloned, varied air defense. This is not! Syrians will drink blood from the US, but no more. And these warriors, will strike at night, spreading fear and horror! And they will go unpunished, scum! It’s hard to imagine the feelings of soldiers and civilians under the sword of Damocles! It’s only necessary to survive, God forbid! It’s a very difficult time for Syria, and, unfortunately, Russia cannot do anything about it. otsya prepare to meet the enemy !!!
  8. +7
    29 August 2013 07: 32
    "Russia supplied 36 96K6 complexes to Syria in the period from 2008 to 2011. The supply is carried out under a 2006 contract, which provides for the supply of up to 50 96K6 complexes and up to 700 missiles to them."
    Why did they stop deliveries after 2011? Where are 14 more missing complexes ??
    1. +4
      29 August 2013 08: 09
      Quote: Dangerous
      Where are 14 more missing complexes ??

      DAM helpfully squeezed to please amers
    2. Guun
      0
      29 August 2013 09: 36
      And who said they stopped deliveries? It is written because from 2008 to 2011 they delivered 36 complexes. Not for nothing that our BDKs went to Syria very often.
    3. 0
      29 August 2013 10: 20
      Quote: Dangerous
      "From Russia, 36 96K6 complexes were supplied to Syria in the period from 2008 to 2011. The supply is carried out under a 2006 contract, which provides for the supply of up to 50 96K6 complexes and up to 700 missiles to them." Why did they stop deliveries after 2011? Where are the other 14 missing complexes ??

      There were deliveries, more recently we wrote about the deliveries of "Pechera". It's just that the quantity is not clear now, maybe it's for the better ...
    4. 0
      29 August 2013 11: 16
      Quote: Dangerous
      Why did they stop deliveries after 2011?

      Who and where said delivery completed? Everything has its time.
  9. +4
    29 August 2013 07: 35
    Shoot down and knock down everything again and as much as possible .. The devil (NATO) is not so terrible as it is painted. Hold on to Syria!
  10. vietnam7
    +8
    29 August 2013 08: 04
    Even 50 complexes is ridiculous if there is no echeloned air defense system. Syria has been weakened by the civil war, and the "orderlies of the forest" always choose the weak victim.
  11. +7
    29 August 2013 08: 12
    Let Assad let the aircraft carrier sink to the bottom, all ears buzzing with their democracy
    1. 1712
      0
      29 August 2013 11: 39
      So they left aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, they are afraid to push them to the shores of Syria ...
  12. soldier's grandson
    +3
    29 August 2013 08: 34
    everything will depend on who has more missiles, more terrorists on land in Syria, so Syria has a worse situation than in Iraq
  13. Horde
    0
    29 August 2013 08: 42
    In the course of military supplies between Russia and Syria, the latter were delivered several dozen complexes Carapace-S1, which is able to destroy the American cruise missiles "Tomahawk".


    "tomahawk" tomahawk - your m ... illiteracy
    interesting at the consoles who will be the Syrians or again ours? would look with -300 more in action
    1. 0
      29 August 2013 10: 52
      S-300 in action, a very impressive picture.
      One complex can release the entire ammunition, almost in one gulp, destroying over 20 targets and immediately go to the emergency position. Three or four regiments can theoretically provide protection against an air opponent in a circle and from a massive strike in two or three possible directions. But show this the effect can only be very well-prepared calculations. Plus coherence, interaction with a higher command post, with neighbors, with reconnaissance, communications, maneuvers, supply of reserves, reserves and other dr.
      Even on a regiment scale, it is very difficult to achieve maximum combat effectiveness, and in Syria the entire air defense system must do this.
      In a country that has the necessary weapons and the ability to effectively use it, such scenarios do not work.
      Honestly, I have great doubts that the Syrians will be able, if necessary, to realize all the combat capabilities of their weapons.
  14. -1
    29 August 2013 09: 09
    There will be few Shell-C1 complexes, and the S-300 will already be in Syria, or, as usual, with our speed of deliveries, everything is pros .... God help the Syrian army in the fight against aggressors and bandits.
  15. 0
    29 August 2013 09: 19
    it is almost impossible to create a layered defense of air defense in Syria - Israeli intelligence knows this well; well, the competent use of mobile systems can also cause considerable damage to the states; here the main cost of missiles both on that and on the other hand; as much damage as possible should be done so that the cost of robbing (in the future) Iranian oil and gas would not be beneficial to Israel and the states
  16. Vtel
    +3
    29 August 2013 09: 21
    One thing is pleasant, that the point is playing with all this crafty rag-tag - Russian weapons unpredictably hit hard and on the spot, comrades - "Yakhonty" kosher could not destroy and it pleases. Turks and Tel Aviv, too, do not interfere with navflyat, Shoba did not nag more. May the Lord God help the Syrian people!
  17. +1
    29 August 2013 09: 42
    Syria has nothing to lose when it becomes clear that war is absolutely inevitable. Do not wait for the aircraft to be destroyed on the ground. Deliver a massive strike against Israel and the American base and Patriot batteries in Jordan using aircraft and ballistic missiles, or other targets. break through the enemy's air defense.
  18. Nitup
    +2
    29 August 2013 10: 04
    I think that until the end of the summit in St. Petersburg there will be no blow to Syria. Apparently, this muscle game is needed in order to have a weighty argument in negotiations with Putin. You see, and Obama was about to meet him on the G-20. Probably, purely by chance after this rattling of weapons he wanted to do it.
    1. 0
      29 August 2013 10: 22
      Quote: Nitup
      I think that until the end of the summit in St. Petersburg there will be no blow to Syria. Apparently, this muscle game is needed in order to have a weighty argument in negotiations with Putin. You see, and Obama was about to meet him on the G-20. Probably, purely by chance after this rattling of weapons he wanted to do it.

      Much will depend on UN inspectors. What will they say and how much is reasoned.
      1. Nitup
        0
        29 August 2013 11: 34
        What inspectors say will depend on negotiations between Putin and Obama
    2. vaddag1
      0
      29 August 2013 15: 28
      "and Obama is already going to meet with him" - forgot Yugoslavia? But then Perm also flew to the meeting.
      these guys have no principles, they cannot fight beautifully, the "code of honor" is not their topic - everything is somehow rotten with them, it turns out disgustingly.
      I honestly, so offhand, and I can’t remember their victory, which I can be proud of. if you recall, I will be grateful
      1. vaddag1
        0
        29 August 2013 16: 15
        excuse me. primakov
        1. Nitup
          0
          29 August 2013 19: 09
          Quote: vaddag1
          excuse me. primakov

          Yes, it’s not a meeting for the sake of the meeting that is important, but what they want from us during this meeting is important for them.
  19. USNik
    +3
    29 August 2013 10: 28
    36 shells against a thousand axes and other missiles will not be enough, plus the habit of assassin Americans shoot at peaceful targets ... You can’t hide everything, and there’s not much sense from hundreds of shot down missiles. Now, if we could put a couple of Orly Berkov to the bottom, that would be a sensitive slap in the face for the star-striped fascists.
  20. +1
    29 August 2013 10: 44
    Quote: VadimSt
    It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!
    Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.

    Everything is absolutely true - the forces are not at all equal .. and the missiles made a bunch of cartridges for a machine gun - you can't shoot everything .. show their strength and that they spat on all this public opinion and the UN Security Council resolution .. they don't want to let Syria go in any way .. it will not seem enough to anyone .. but is there a technical possibility of the Syrian army (and its closest allies) to eliminate at least one aircraft carrier, as someone wrote here, no one knows .. I personally don’t .. maybe this is what they really fear from ignorance .. because they understand that if the anti-ship supersonic cruise missile 3M-80 "Mosquito" or the complex "Mosquito-MVE" with the anti-ship missile 3M-80MBE with a significantly increased firing range flies into an aircraft carrier, it is unlikely that something will stop it. before they have time to blink, the wings from the aircraft from the deck will fly in different directions .. In the west, the 3M80 received the designation SS-N-22 "Sunburn" (ASM-MSS) .. they have something to be afraid of in order to go from shuddering muscles to business ..
    But these are just my fantasies, friends!)
    Respectfully.. hi
  21. 0
    29 August 2013 10: 58
    It is not sad, but the shell alone will not do anything there. Overwhelmed by the number of missiles or when reloading. And everything else there is too outdated and modern electronic warfare will not even allow them to capture the target. Without retaliatory strikes at the airfields of the enemy air defense of Syria will last 2 - 3 days
  22. 0
    29 August 2013 11: 40
    When already these star-striped eagles will be lowered to the ground ...! To do everything possible for defense .. Would drown the AUG, after that the conversation will not be so arrogant. Good luck
  23. ilia3075
    0
    29 August 2013 13: 12
    I would like to clarify about the s-300. I have a friend, a former employee of the NAK, who nevertheless regularly runs to Syria. So he blabbed to me in a drunken shop that he had met in Syria with our specialist, who helped to deploy the 2nd division s-300. And the 1st division there he was deployed a long time ago. We had a conversation with him somewhere in June of this year. Yes, and Assad in his interview "Izvestia2 said that Russia is all He fulfills the contract, indirectly confirming the words of my friend. So, there is a S-300 in Syria. The question is only how much, I know about 2 divisions, but this information was relevant for June. And now, maybe, they have even more deployed.
    1. +2
      29 August 2013 13: 55
      A talker find for a spy!
  24. Stavr
    0
    29 August 2013 14: 16
    The average cost of a "tomogavka" according to various sources is around 940 thousand dollars. If you believe the article, then taking into account the delivered "armor" 36 * 12 = 432 anti-missiles, taking into account the good percentage of hitting the "armor" (theoretically stated at least 95%), then a salvo across Syria will cost 410 tomohawks (this is 95% of those killed) multiply by 940 thousand bucks = 385 million dollars. Not so little money down the drain)) and if the anti-missile missile in Syria is not 432 and more ??? Now it is clear why the US economy is bent over.
  25. TAGIR
    0
    29 August 2013 18: 34
    Our answer to the aggressors
  26. Alex-z84
    0
    30 August 2013 07: 33
    Quote: a52333
    Will aircraft carriers also stand at 1000 km? It’s easier then to take off from Turkey. Where is the chocolate?

    The chicolad is that with the radius of flight of modern carrier-based aircraft, aircraft carriers can attack from the Persian Gulf without approaching directly to Syria.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"