Military Review

Syria will be able to shoot down American missiles by Russian complexes Pantsir-С1

70
In the course of military supplies between Russia and Syria, the latter were delivered several dozen complexes Carapace-S1, which is able to destroy the American cruise missiles "Tomahawk".




The Pantsir-S1 complex (sample of 1995) is equipped with 12 9М335 missiles, externally and in layout similar to 9М311 ZRPK Tungusk missiles (the launch range increased for new missiles increased to 12 km, the height of the targets hit - up to X ZNXX, the launching range increased from new missiles to 8 km, the height of the targeted targets was up to X ZNXX, the launching range increased for new missiles to 90 km, the height of the targets hit - up to X ZNXX, the launching range increased from new missiles to 12 km, the height of the targeted targets was up to X ZNXX, , the new rocket used a more powerful engine, increased the mass of the warhead, while its caliber “grew” to 8 mm). The rocket has a short flight time at the launch site and high speed. The range of damage in range is 20 km, in height - 3 km. The mass of the warhead consisting of core attack elements is XNUMX kg. The rocket uses an air-dynamic steering gear that maneuvers the rocket during flight. The complex can direct simultaneously to XNUMX missiles on the radio command guidance system. In such systems, the rocket is controlled by radio commands transmitted from the carrier.

The artillery “stuffing” of the “Shell” consists of two 30-mm single-barrel automatic guns 2А72, which are powered by two cartridge belts with high-explosive fragmentation and armor-piercing projectiles. The combat module mounted on the roof of the body of the combat vehicle includes an 2 6 anti-aircraft missile unit, two cannons placed on the inside of the missile launch cannons, a radar target detection station, and a target tracking station and missiles. There is also an optical channel fire control system.

ZRPK “Carapace” was just (and so far, apparently) designed mainly to combat flying Tomogawk type cruise missiles and low-flying (maneuvering) enemy targets, which for some reason broke through the air defense barrier. Tests of the “Carapace” showed that the complex is capable of shooting down low-flying missiles, including at a record low altitude of 15 meters.

It should be noted that the armament of the American squadron of ships, which moved to the shores of Syria, includes the Tomoghawk cruise missiles. And it was a two-day bombardment of “Tomogawks” that Barack Obama threatened Syria.

Was delivered from Russia to Syria 36 96K6 complexes between 2008 2011 for years. Supply made within 2006 contract, which provides for the supply to 50 96K6 complexes and to 700 missiles for them.
Originator:
http://telegrafist.org/2013/08/28/81951/
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. domokl
    domokl 29 August 2013 06: 58 New
    17
    Now, in general, much will be a revelation for everyone. The Americans are not in vain afraid for their ships .. and missiles ... Some part will certainly hit the target, but most will be destroyed. As we say, for every .... there is ... with screw.
    1. Refund_SSSR
      Refund_SSSR 29 August 2013 07: 06 New
      +7
      Quote: domokl
      The Americans are not in vain afraid for their ships

      They are afraid of the Syrian response, and they are threatening to spray Russia with chips with cruise missiles alone, even to the point that Russia cannot even answer ... And moreover, according to them, this should be a complete surprise for Russia!
      And someone in fact believes in it! laughing
      1. domokl
        domokl 29 August 2013 07: 15 New
        19
        Hi guys! They threaten quite reasonably. If we do not cover the Ukrainian direction, then the losses will really be huge from one launch. Only in one country is there a city that is populated by more than 10% of the population. And air defense guarantees 95% of missile destruction. Total-100 missiles and five hits ...
        Another thing is that Russians, unlike the Americans, can go hand to hand, and not only drop bombs and missiles.
        I recalled an episode from the 17 moments of spring when Stirlitz on a train talking to a general on a train ... Americans will be destroyed by a love of technology. Each mechanism will always be created by a different, more powerful one.
      2. duke
        duke 29 August 2013 08: 57 New
        +2
        Well, why did the amers rivet 10 thousand tomahawks, beat the sparrows? Just for a serious adversary, Russia or China .... a sudden massive strike, it might work ...
        1. Refund_SSSR
          Refund_SSSR 29 August 2013 11: 00 New
          +1
          And to come up they’ll put on all the invisibility caps ... well, well ...
      3. Ezhaak
        Ezhaak 29 August 2013 10: 32 New
        +1
        Quote: We refund_SSSR
        They threaten to spray Russia with chips with cruise missiles alone,

        Good day to all!
        Let them say it is their fate. They are talkative too. Although yes, in Russia, only Moscow is provided with a high-quality air defense shield. I doubt that in other areas this shield is so powerful and powerful. And if I somewhere, I didn’t notice something, but it is, then everything is fine. Not all my eyes should see!
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 August 2013 07: 07 New
      18
      Quote: domokl
      . Some part will certainly hit the target, but most will be destroyed

      Hi Sanya! Everything will depend on those who sit at the complexes of skill and courage.
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 29 August 2013 07: 36 New
        +8
        Quote: domokl
        ... Americans will be ruined by a love of technology. For each mechanism, a different, more powerful one will always be created.

        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Everything will depend on those who sit at the complexes of skill and courage.

        Alexandra hi ! Do not forget about Iran, it also has what and with whom to rule humpbacked ..
      2. King
        King 29 August 2013 10: 19 New
        0
        And I forgot to mention the quantity.
    3. Trailer
      Trailer 29 August 2013 08: 06 New
      +2
      I heard that someone still managed to put Syria C-300 and Iskander? Who it?
      1. duke
        duke 29 August 2013 08: 59 New
        0
        if so, then deliveries were only from Belarus.
      2. Russ69
        Russ69 29 August 2013 10: 16 New
        +1
        Quote: Karavan
        I heard that someone still managed to put Syria C-300 and Iskander? Who it?

        Iskanders are unlikely ...
      3. Ezhaak
        Ezhaak 29 August 2013 10: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: Karavan
        I heard that someone still managed

        Oh, I doubt it. First, it seems necessary to train those who will control the weapon, and only after that will deliver that weapon. And just bring and give, not seriously. Even a grenade must be prepared before throwing. A knife without preliminary training cannot be thrown at the target. And then a whole complex of air defense. No, I can’t believe it. And the Israelis are silent. And their spies in that Syria are a dime a dozen. Wherever you spit in the Jewish spy, you get.
      4. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 29 August 2013 11: 04 New
        0
        Quote: Karavan
        I heard that someone still managed to put Syria C-300 and Iskander? Who it?


        I hope that they did. At least the S-300. Iskander is unlikely, but it was necessary.
    4. Orel
      Orel 29 August 2013 08: 24 New
      +3
      If Syria manages to organize competent control of the air defense system, restore its unity, provide air defense systems with qualified crews and prevent the destruction of air defense systems by special forces on the ground, then an option to effectively repel US bombing is possible. I hope Syria succeeds.
    5. Civil
      Civil 29 August 2013 10: 44 New
      0
      here and see the capabilities of the Shell!
      1. Oleg14774
        Oleg14774 29 August 2013 18: 07 New
        +2
        Quote: Civil
        here and see the capabilities of the Shell!

        It would be better if such an opportunity was completely absent!
        1. Kasym
          Kasym 29 August 2013 21: 31 New
          +1
          I remember that at the end of the Iraqi operation, their Tomahawks flew wherever they went, even flew to Iran. I think that this time Russia will "try." hi
  2. a52333
    a52333 29 August 2013 06: 59 New
    +3
    Volfych yesterday in Syria said: scouts and specialists are needed there. see and practice. soldier angry Maybe the aircraft carrier is empty. There, not only the shells broke through?
    1. Dangerous
      Dangerous 29 August 2013 07: 33 New
      +6
      Volfych spoke a lot of things, especially on a drunken head. The funniest political jester
      1. VasDA
        VasDA 29 August 2013 07: 40 New
        16
        Only a royal jester was always allowed to say what others paid for with their own heads ... wink
      2. Ezhaak
        Ezhaak 29 August 2013 10: 48 New
        +1
        Quote: Dangerous
        Volfych said a lot

        Strange as it may seem, sensible thoughts often slip through his mind.
        1. Ruslan_F38
          Ruslan_F38 29 August 2013 11: 06 New
          +2
          Quote: Hedgehog
          Quote: Dangerous
          Volfych said a lot

          Strange as it may seem, sensible thoughts often slip through his mind.


          Nothing strange, Zhirinovsky is not so stupid as many people think of him.
    2. duke
      duke 29 August 2013 09: 02 New
      +5
      Carapace alone cannot solve the problem, it needs layered air defense, with a large, medium and small radius of action, as well as in height ... for example, we have shells covering the S-300 and 400, as well as airfields, as it is unknown
  3. VadimSt
    VadimSt 29 August 2013 06: 59 New
    19
    It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!
    Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.
    1. domokl
      domokl 29 August 2013 07: 07 New
      12
      Quote: VadimSt
      It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!

      Your koment from the heart. But ... How to stop a ram who attacks a new gate? Let her head break if she spits on all international organizations.
      1. VadimSt
        VadimSt 29 August 2013 07: 18 New
        +9
        Let's hope that the skin of these rams will remain hanging on those gates.
      2. duke
        duke 29 August 2013 09: 03 New
        +7
        if there was a ram, there was half the trouble, unfortunately prudent and cunning hamadryl with sharp fangs.
    2. Che
      Che 29 August 2013 07: 20 New
      +8
      Quote: VadimSt
      It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!
      Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.

      And on the other hand, a large cupboard falls louder, that's the whole difference.
    3. Tersky
      Tersky 29 August 2013 07: 25 New
      10
      Quote: VadimSt
      Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.

      That’s for sure, the main “referee” already makes it clear that he’s not in business;UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday that he was not aware of the upcoming Western military operation in Syria, the press service of the world organization said, “I’m not going to make assumptions about what I’m not aware of,” he said in response to the question of the appropriateness of the use of military force against the ATS. Oh how! The whole world is aware and Moon is probably in deep isolation on a desert island ....
      1. VadimSt
        VadimSt 29 August 2013 07: 34 New
        +9
        Russia, looking at all this chaos, it is time to dot all the mockery of the principles of international law and to intensify work in the SCO as an alternative.

        And in the future, I can only wish London, Paris and Istanbul one thing - my own 11 of September from my beloved opposition. Vile, probably, because there are people! And then who in Syria, nonhumans or what?
      2. lewerlin53rus
        lewerlin53rus 29 August 2013 08: 43 New
        +7
        Quote: Tersky
        ; UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Thursday he’s not aware of the upcoming Western military operation in Syria, the press service of the world organization said. “I’m not going to make assumptions about what I’m not aware of,” he said in response to the question of the appropriateness of the use of military force against ATS

        Three famous monkeys united in the person of Ban Ki-moon
        1. Hudo
          Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 12 New
          +2
          Quote: lewerlin53rus

          Three famous monkeys united in the person of Ban Ki-moon


          In the face of the crooked-faced and bald-haired Anthem, these primates never got disconnected.
      3. Ezhaak
        Ezhaak 29 August 2013 10: 56 New
        0
        Quote: Tersky
        said on Thursday that it was not aware of the upcoming military operation by Western countries

        That's right. If oh horseradish for meat is no longer considered, then of course they will not say anything to anyone. For amers and their mongrel, the UN is the same as OOМ and OOЖ
  4. APASUS
    APASUS 29 August 2013 07: 12 New
    +8
    Siri should put such complexes ..............
    1. Che
      Che 29 August 2013 07: 23 New
      +3
      Apasus. There is no more time for training. Bastards have already left the gateway.
      1. Oleg14774
        Oleg14774 29 August 2013 18: 10 New
        0
        Quote: Che
        Apasus. There is no more time for training. Bastards have already left the gateway.

        And who said that there was no time?
  5. Predator-74
    Predator-74 29 August 2013 07: 13 New
    +8
    Here the fact that the cost of a tomahawk is several times greater than the cost of a shell rocket seems to me to be very interesting. The economic effect, as they say "on the face."
    1. Akhtuba73
      Akhtuba73 29 August 2013 08: 28 New
      +3
      Quote: Predator-74
      The economic effect, as they say "on the face."

      Rather, "in person", but it is painfully tactful ... on a piece of bread, somewhere so as not to offend the forum users with obscene language.
      I am only afraid that the economic component, when deciding on a strike, is in last place, if at all. All! His eyes are bloodshot, his arguments aside ... who will count the money there? Ministry of Finance guys in jackets and ties - this is their destiny ... and here "we carry the wind of freedom" !!! get out! Only crowbar "in the face" and you can stop
      1. Genry
        Genry 29 August 2013 10: 05 New
        0
        Quote: Akhtuba73
        I’m only afraid that the economic component, when deciding on a strike, is in last place, if at all.

        Modern warfare is precisely, first of all, an economic factor. How many weapons each side can use and determines success. After all, there is no infinite amount of weapons and resources for their production or acquisition by a country.
        And in fact, it is very interesting what the cost of the trident and the shell (and the complex and missiles) is, that is, the efficiency coefficient.
        It may be that the destruction of one trident will more than pay for the whole shell with its missiles. For Syria, a coefficient close to the ratio of the economies of the United States and Syria itself is important.
        After the war in Iraq, it was expensive for the Americans to restore their missile resource.
        1. Akhtuba73
          Akhtuba73 29 August 2013 10: 54 New
          0
          Quote: Genry
          After the war in Iraq, it was expensive for the Americans to restore their missile resource.

          The stump is clear, the jacket has been shaken off, but the country is in ruins ... What and to whom to restore is what needs to be compared. One hundred missiles to America and the state for Syria. Two big differences.
    2. egor 1712
      egor 1712 29 August 2013 11: 26 New
      -3
      Yes am, that - they will print pieces of paper and rivet sticks of democracy. Fuckers ..
  6. Wedmak
    Wedmak 29 August 2013 07: 14 New
    +5
    And there are also Bastions there ... If they fire a full salvo, can the US destroyers be able to fight off this flock? I think it’s unlikely ... A couple of missiles will find their target.
    1. Alex-z84
      Alex-z84 29 August 2013 07: 22 New
      +7
      Quote: Wedmak
      And there are also Bastions there ... If they fire a full salvo, can the US destroyers be able to fight off this flock? I think it’s unlikely ... A couple of missiles will find their target.

      The only `` BUT '' in the export version, the Bastion shoots 300 km, the destroyers will hit from a safe distance of 1000-1200 km, this is the effective launch range of the TOMAGAWK KR now they are 800 km from the coast, it is unlikely that the BASTION will reach them at this distance no
      1. a52333
        a52333 29 August 2013 19: 54 New
        0
        Will aircraft carriers also stand at 1000 km? It’s easier then to take off from Turkey. Where is the chocolate?
    2. Che
      Che 29 August 2013 07: 25 New
      +7
      Everything will depend on the skills and resilience of the Syrians. Amer is a coward, but a coward with a club against a kid. Without our help, they will have a hard time. Assad of luck and fortitude. And our sobriety and fidelity to duty.
  7. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 29 August 2013 07: 15 New
    +9
    from the Don.
    Sometimes our desires do not coincide with our capabilities. It seems that with Syria, this is the case! Geyts are not stupid, intelligence works for them! Syria needs to have a deeply echeloned, varied air defense. This is not! Syrians will drink blood from the US, but no more. And these warriors, will strike at night, spreading fear and horror! And they will go unpunished, scum! It’s hard to imagine the feelings of soldiers and civilians under the sword of Damocles! It’s only necessary to survive, God forbid! It’s a very difficult time for Syria, and, unfortunately, Russia cannot do anything about it. otsya prepare to meet the enemy !!!
  8. Dangerous
    Dangerous 29 August 2013 07: 32 New
    +7
    "36 96K6 complexes were delivered to Russia from Syria between 2008 and 2011. Supply is carried out under the contract of 2006, which provides for the delivery of up to 50 96K6 complexes and up to 700 missiles to them."
    Why did they stop deliveries after 2011? Where are 14 more missing complexes ??
    1. Veter
      Veter 29 August 2013 08: 09 New
      +4
      Quote: Dangerous
      Where are 14 more missing complexes ??

      DAM helpfully squeezed to please amers
    2. Guun
      Guun 29 August 2013 09: 36 New
      0
      And who said they stopped deliveries? It is written because from 2008 to 2011 they delivered 36 complexes. Not for nothing that our BDKs went to Syria very often.
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 29 August 2013 10: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Dangerous
      “36 complexes 96K6 were delivered to Syria from Russia between 2008 and 2011. Supply is carried out under a contract in 2006, which provides for the delivery of up to 50 complexes 96K6 and up to 700 missiles to them.” Why did they stop deliveries after 2011? Where are 14 more missing complexes ??

      There were deliveries, more recently, they wrote about the deliveries of Pechera. It’s just that by the number they don’t understand right now, maybe for the better ...
    4. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 29 August 2013 11: 16 New
      0
      Quote: Dangerous
      Why did they stop deliveries after 2011?

      Who and where said delivery completed? Everything has its time.
  9. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 29 August 2013 07: 35 New
    +4
    Shoot down and knock down everything again and as much as possible .. The devil (NATO) is not so terrible as it is painted. Hold on to Syria!
  10. vietnam7
    vietnam7 29 August 2013 08: 04 New
    +8
    Even 50 complexes are ridiculous if there is no layered air defense system. Syria is weakened by the civil war, and the "orderlies of the forest" always choose a weak victim.
  11. NKVD
    NKVD 29 August 2013 08: 12 New
    +7
    Let Assad let the aircraft carrier sink to the bottom, all ears buzzing with their democracy
    1. egor 1712
      egor 1712 29 August 2013 11: 39 New
      0
      So they left aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, they are afraid to push them to the shores of Syria ...
  12. soldier's grandson
    soldier's grandson 29 August 2013 08: 34 New
    +3
    everything will depend on who has more missiles, more terrorists on land in Syria, so Syria has a worse situation than in Iraq
  13. Horde
    Horde 29 August 2013 08: 42 New
    0
    In the course of military supplies between Russia and Syria, the latter were delivered several dozen complexes Carapace-S1, which is able to destroy the American cruise missiles "Tomahawk".


    tomahawk tomahawk -m ... illiteracy
    interesting at the consoles who will be the Syrians or again ours? would look with -300 more in action
    1. 787nkx
      787nkx 29 August 2013 10: 52 New
      0
      S-300 in action, a very impressive picture.
      One complex can release the entire ammunition, almost in one gulp, destroying over 20 targets and immediately go to the emergency position. Three or four regiments can theoretically provide protection against an air opponent in a circle and from a massive strike in two or three possible directions. But show this the effect can only be very well-prepared calculations. Plus coherence, interaction with a higher command post, with neighbors, with reconnaissance, communications, maneuvers, supply of reserves, reserves and other dr.
      Even on a regiment scale, it is very difficult to achieve maximum combat effectiveness, and in Syria the entire air defense system must do this.
      In a country that has the necessary weapons and the ability to effectively use it, such scenarios do not work.
      Honestly, I have great doubts that the Syrians will be able, if necessary, to realize all the combat capabilities of their weapons.
  14. Nikolski1973
    Nikolski1973 29 August 2013 09: 09 New
    -1
    There will be few Shell-C1 complexes, and the S-300 will already be in Syria, or, as usual, with our speed of deliveries, everything is pros .... God help the Syrian army in the fight against aggressors and bandits.
  15. dojjdik
    dojjdik 29 August 2013 09: 19 New
    0
    it is almost impossible to create a layered defense of air defense in Syria - Israeli intelligence knows this well; well, the competent use of mobile systems can also cause considerable damage to the states; here the main cost of missiles both on that and on the other hand; as much damage as possible should be done so that the cost of robbing (in the future) Iranian oil and gas would not be beneficial to Israel and the states
  16. Vtel
    Vtel 29 August 2013 09: 21 New
    +3
    One thing is nice that the point is played by all this crafty riffraff - Russian weapons unpredictably hit hard and on the spot, comrades - the Yakhonts could not be destroyed by the kosher and this pleases. Turks and Tel Aviv, too, do not interfere with shafts, the Shobes did not stir up anymore. May the Lord God help the Syrian people!
  17. slaventi
    slaventi 29 August 2013 09: 42 New
    +1
    Syria has nothing to lose when it becomes clear that war is absolutely inevitable. Do not wait until the aircraft is destroyed on the ground, deliver a massive blow to Israel and the American base and Patriot batteries in Jordan with the help of aircraft and ballistic missiles, or other targets. will break through enemy air defenses.
  18. Nitup
    Nitup 29 August 2013 10: 04 New
    +2
    I think that until the end of the summit in St. Petersburg there will be no blow to Syria. Apparently, this muscle game is needed in order to have a weighty argument in negotiations with Putin. You see, and Obama was about to meet him on the G-20. Probably, purely by chance after this rattling of weapons he wanted to do it.
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 29 August 2013 10: 22 New
      0
      Quote: Nitup
      I think that until the end of the summit in St. Petersburg there will be no blow to Syria. Apparently, this muscle game is needed in order to have a weighty argument in negotiations with Putin. You see, and Obama was about to meet him on the G-20. Probably, purely by chance after this rattling of weapons he wanted to do it.

      Much will depend on UN inspectors. What will they say and how much is reasoned.
      1. Nitup
        Nitup 29 August 2013 11: 34 New
        0
        What inspectors say will depend on negotiations between Putin and Obama
    2. vaddag1
      vaddag1 29 August 2013 15: 28 New
      0
      "and Obama was about to meet him" - did they forget Yugoslavia? But then Permyak also flew to the meeting.
      these guys do not have principles, they can’t fight beautifully, the “code of honor” is not their topic - everything is somehow rotten with them, it’s vile.
      I honestly, so offhand, and I can’t remember their victory, which I can be proud of. if you recall, I will be grateful
      1. vaddag1
        vaddag1 29 August 2013 16: 15 New
        0
        excuse me. primakov
        1. Nitup
          Nitup 29 August 2013 19: 09 New
          0
          Quote: vaddag1
          excuse me. primakov

          Yes, it’s not a meeting for the sake of the meeting that is important, but what they want from us during this meeting is important for them.
  19. USNik
    USNik 29 August 2013 10: 28 New
    +3
    36 shells against a thousand axes and other missiles will not be enough, plus the habit of assassin Americans shoot at peaceful targets ... You can’t hide everything, and there’s not much sense from hundreds of shot down missiles. Now, if we could put a couple of Orly Berkov to the bottom, that would be a sensitive slap in the face for the star-striped fascists.
  20. denson06
    denson06 29 August 2013 10: 44 New
    +1
    Quote: VadimSt
    It is better to avoid such bride, but wait and see!
    Too different weight categories of rivals and inadequate referees.

    Everything is absolutely true - the forces are not at all equal .. and the missiles have done a lot like cartridges for an assault rifle - you won’t lose everything .. show their strength and that they spat on all this public opinion and the UN Security Council resolution .. they don’t want to let Syria go .. little will not seem to anyone .. but is there a technical possibility for the Syrian army (and its closest allies) to liquidate at least one aircraft carrier, as someone wrote here, no one knows .. I personally do not .. maybe this is what they really fear from ignorance .. because they understand that if the anti-ship winged St. the sonic rocket 3M-80 Mosquito or the Moskit-MVE complex with the 3M-80MBE anti-ship missile with a significantly increased firing range will fly into an aircraft carrier, it is unlikely to stop it .. they won’t have time to blink like wings from aircraft from the deck scatter in different directions .. In the west 3М80 received the designation SS-N-22 "Sunburn" (ASM-MSS) .. they have something to fear in order to move from muscle shudder to work ..
    But these are just my fantasies, friends!)
    Respectfully.. hi
  21. loki565
    loki565 29 August 2013 10: 58 New
    0
    It is not sad, but the shell alone will not do anything there. Overwhelmed by the number of missiles or when reloading. And everything else there is too outdated and modern electronic warfare will not even allow them to capture the target. Without retaliatory strikes at the airfields of the enemy air defense of Syria will last 2 - 3 days
  22. sys-1985
    sys-1985 29 August 2013 11: 40 New
    0
    When already these star-striped eagles will be lowered to the ground ...! To do everything possible for defense .. Would drown the AUG, after that the conversation will not be so arrogant. Good luck
  23. ilia3075
    ilia3075 29 August 2013 13: 12 New
    0
    I would like to clarify about the s-300. I have a friend, a former NAC employee, who nevertheless regularly darts to Syria. So he blundered me on a drunken bench that he met in Syria with our specialist helped to deploy the 2nd S-300 division. And the 1st division there it was deployed a long time ago. We had a conversation with him somewhere in June of this year. Yes and Assad in his interview to Izvestia 2 said that Russia is all fulfills the contract, indirectly confirming the words of my friend. So, there are s-300 in Syria. The question is how much, I know about 2 divisions, but this information is an act cial was June mesyats.A now, maybe even deployed more.
    1. Day 11
      Day 11 29 August 2013 13: 55 New
      +2
      A talker find for a spy!
  24. Stavr
    Stavr 29 August 2013 14: 16 New
    0
    The average cost of "tomahawk" according to various sources in the region of 940 thousand. Bucks. If you believe the article, then taking into account the delivered "shell" 36 * 12 = 432 missile defense, taking into account the good percentage of hit "shell" (theoretically stated at least 95%), then a volley in Syria will cost 410 tomahawks (this is 95% shot down) we multiply by 940 thousand bucks = 385 million dollars Not so weak money so much)) and if Syria’s missile defense is not 432 but more ??? Now it’s clear why the US economy is bending.
  25. TAGIR
    TAGIR 29 August 2013 18: 34 New
    0
    Our answer to the aggressors
  26. Alex-z84
    Alex-z84 30 August 2013 07: 33 New
    0
    Quote: a52333
    Will aircraft carriers also stand at 1000 km? It’s easier then to take off from Turkey. Where is the chocolate?

    The chicolad is that with the radius of flight of modern carrier-based aircraft, aircraft carriers can attack from the Persian Gulf without approaching directly to Syria.