Military Review

Russian-US military clash becomes inevitable

225

After the fall of Syria, only one thing remains unclear: when will the US get to us?


Syria for Russia is more than just a foreign country and a strategic partner. This, if you will, is a test of our geopolitical opportunities, and such a bar was set not at all by the United States or other Western "partners", but by us. We will defend Syria - we will demonstrate to the world that after the collapse of the USSR, we did not just have some of our own opportunities in the foreign policy arena, but also that we know how to use them, defending our interests. Well, do not protect - then what really ...

A firm position on Syria, Russia, of course, is a great obligation. Those Syrians who just want to live peacefully in their own country look at Moscow with a hope that cannot be justified by the fact that it has no moral right. But the rest of the world, no doubt, is watching Russia now with interest: what can these mysterious Russians do against the inevitable development of the most unfavorable scenario for Syria?

We, in turn, are forced to state that, in fact, nothing. In a world where international law has ceased to be an unconditional and indisputable truth, try to admonish a potential aggressor with diplomatic notes - a venture, if not empty, then unpromising for sure. You can, of course, as in the case of Libya, transfer all the arrows to Dmitry Medvedev alone, but this will remain a weak consolation, because, as life has already shown, no blocking of resolutions can today become a serious obstacle to military expansion. Because “democracy” in the world is above all conventions - this is a clear credo of the American “hawks”.

It is hardly possible on the fingers of one hand to recount those observers of the latest events in Syria who seriously take the version of the West about the chemical attack near Damascus as real. Why she was Bashar Assad - it is not clear, but why it was needed by his enemies - the matter is very clear. Now the United States and its allies have a powerful argument for the most urgent and widespread invasion of Syria. This, it seems, is favored by all conditions and above all by the significantly weakened Syrian air defense system. There are similar reports from various sources in the highest US government circles and in the NATO leadership: a military strike on Damascus will be made, perhaps by the end of this week ...

Every day there are fewer doubts about the credibility of these rumors, but the Kremlin doesn’t seem to believe in them that much: in any case, all the opposition and all the protection of the Syrian people here boil down to long, diplomatically sustained, but, alas, fruitless telephone conversations or statements (albeit loud) at press conferences. The conference on Syria was canceled by the USA - we only expressed disappointment. But is this a disappointment?

The main disappointment is still to come.

Negative scenario of the development of events in Syria in an interview with the KM.RU columnist was predicted by Valery Korovin, political scientist, director of the Center for Geopolitical Expertise, deputy head of the Center for Conservative Research of the sociological faculty of Moscow State University:

- Diplomatic mechanisms for resolving international conflicts ceased to exist at the time of the bombing of Yugoslavia. In principle, those Yugoslav events became the starting point for the new world, where international law lost any meaning and force became the decisive factor. In fact, we returned to the situation of the Middle Ages, when power is the right and the right is the strongest. Today, the Americans are demonstrating to the world the actual sole power of their hyperpower and are warning everyone who is preparing to challenge her of the inevitability of the physical destruction of anyone who dares to attack US sole dominance.

So in Syria we are confronted with American lawlessness, and in the new world in which we find ourselves after the destruction of this state, the only thing that will matter is the force factor. And in this regard, we must prepare for the full and absolute mobilization of the state and society in order to repel the American aggression, which is now inevitable in relation to Russia, for Syria is only a little more distant front line, which inevitably moves in our direction.

So to speak about any legal, political or even diplomatic measures that could cancel the inevitability of American aggression against Syria today is not necessary. Now, only the USA, only “hardcore”, only a force scenario, and the only question is what the sequence of the destruction of states and peoples will be and what place Russia occupies in this queue. This is the question that should concern us first of all today. The inevitability of a military clash between Russia and the United States is obvious.

“However, both Lavrov and Putin himself, it seems, still do not lose hope of“ reasoning ”the West. They continue negotiations with him ...

“These are all attempts to blow on water and heal a severe cancer by shamanic dances and spells.” When there are no means of real influence, and the current political regime believes that it is not able to defend Syria by force, then other improvised means are used - sacks of herbs, decoctions, lotions, spitting, scratching ... Today’s Russian political leadership seeks to heal the Syrian wound with folk remedies, and in conditions of complete desacralization, when there is simply no such magical environment in which these funds could help.

- Putin himself has by now been declared almost the guarantor of the salvation of Syria. But how does the inevitable overthrow of Bashar al-Assad affect him?

- Unfortunately, the surrender and subsequent defeat of Syria will hit very hard on the legitimacy of Putin and the current Russian government. All these statements that Putin would not surrender Syria were rather wishes, conditioned by the desire of the people to somehow influence the authorities so that they would take a more attentive and weighty attitude to the Syrian situation.

All the “leaks” that Putin is determined not to surrender Syria, even if the Americans reach Moscow, are, unfortunately, only the quintessence of popular expectations that underlie Putin’s legitimation. The defeat of Syria will hit Putin as the only Russian political figure who has concentrated in his hands the entire power, but also thereby assumed responsibility for everything that happens in the country and in the world, including the situations for which Russia has or influence.

So this is a double blow to the American network empire in Russia. This is an external blow, which underestimates the status of the Russian state in the international community, but it is also an internal blow, striking Putin as the only political leader within the Russian state.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru/
225 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. domokl
    domokl 29 August 2013 07: 28
    19
    Nonsense. The author proceeds from the position that the West is not afraid of anything. But in fact, it is even very afraid. As soon as the American and British planes in Syria begin to crumble to the ground, in my opinion, Western countries will stop getting involved in the conflict. Well, they don’t like coffins and financial losses. It is impossible to speak seriously of Great Britain and France as the main military forces of Europe. In Europe there is one really strong and capable of spoiling the mood of any country Bundeswehr army.
    It is not in vain that the Americans declare a two-day shelling. It is terrible to encounter those who can, in response, face in the face with their fists ...
    1. Refund_SSSR
      Refund_SSSR 29 August 2013 07: 35
      36
      The problem is that after a two-day shelling, Syria's defense ability will be significantly undermined.
      After the shelling, the United States hopes to break Assad and transfer the initiative into the hands of terrorists.
      If this does not happen, then another chemical attack may occur "Suddenly" and again shelling ... and so on until victorious.
      An attack with cruise missiles is not fear, but a tactical device ... Unfortunately, there is nothing to put it directly against this technique, at least because Syria does not have an extensive launch detection network for the Kyrgyz Republic.
      But the fact that the US is being cautious is in itself a merit of Russia.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Luger
          Luger 29 August 2013 08: 05
          +6
          Putin is great, in foreign policy, under the circumstances, I think it’s difficult to play, and it is unlikely that anyone would be better off, just the fact that we have a lot of money in THEIR banks makes the game much harder. We have no allies, we are actually alone. As for the sobriety of our citizens, God forbid, I think that at the same time I will also clear all citizens with defeatist moods and not love for the country where they grew up, and they will quietly begin to leave (run away) outside the Russian Federation.
          1. domokl
            domokl 29 August 2013 08: 35
            30
            Quote: Luger
            As for the sobriety of our citizens, God forbid that it would be so, I think at the same time I’ll also cleanse any citizens with defeatist moods

            When the war begins, volunteers are just those for whom the Motherland is holy. And those whom you think to cleanse will go to polyclinics for a linden ulcer or a deadly disease. In order to stay out of bed like bugs in a bread warehouse.
            1. Fire
              Fire 29 August 2013 10: 21
              0
              domokl  Today, 08:35 ↑

              Quote: Luger
              As for the sobriety of our citizens, God forbid that it would be so, I think at the same time I’ll also cleanse any citizens with defeatist moods

              When the war begins, volunteers are just those for whom the Motherland is holy. And those whom you think to cleanse will go to polyclinics for a linden ulcer or a deadly disease. In order to stay out of bed like bugs in a bread warehouse.

              To overstay is all right, traitors can fully appear ...
          2. vezunchik
            vezunchik 29 August 2013 11: 49
            +9
            Where to run? Berezovsky’s example is vivid! WE DO NOT NEED ANYONE !!! Russia is our homeland - and we will share everything, share its fate. SUCH THE TRUTH! And do not hide your head in the sand. It will not save ...
            1. vostok68
              vostok68 29 August 2013 16: 17
              +1
              And we were not going to run anywhere!
      2. Wedmak
        Wedmak 29 August 2013 07: 53
        19
        after a two-day shelling, Syria's defense ability will be significantly undermined.

        By the way, this is also not a fact. Assad evacuates the General Staff, there is a relocation of heavy weapons and the relocation of important facilities. So shelling with tomahawks can give nothing. But the United States can easily get a couple of missiles in its destroyers.
        1. Luger
          Luger 29 August 2013 08: 07
          +9
          Do not forget about the fifth column, about those who want Assad to have a sweet time, they will sit and aim for new goals at new places of deployment of the armed forces, and the constant movement of even so many people and equipment is not possible.
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 29 August 2013 08: 36
            15
            Do not forget about the fifth column, about those who want Assad to have a sweet

            In the two years of the war, the army has already identified such individuals. I think so. It would hardly be such a major victory without the work of intelligence and counterintelligence. Including ours.
            1. Hudo
              Hudo 29 August 2013 08: 46
              +4
              Quote: Wedmak
              In the two years of the war, the army has already identified such individuals.


              Did she reveal all right? In a country where all the infrastructure has been beaten to the brim, where anyone can roam under the guise of refugees. Where a hungry or loved one requiring treatment can be involved in reconnaissance. Activities in favor of the bearded easily have a bottomless wallet.
              1. ale-x
                ale-x 29 August 2013 09: 14
                +3
                Exactly. Traitors are always and everywhere. Ways to win over a wagon and a cart, the CIA and their hirelings do not shun anything ..
            2. novobranets
              novobranets 29 August 2013 15: 13
              +2
              Crowds of refugees are moving around the country. Chaos, devastation. How to find an agent in this mess whose only task is to watch and report? On a leather cap and a parachute? He doesn’t even need a walkie-talkie, cellular communication works. There is no doubt that the enemy will be aware of all movements, equipment and personnel.
          2. alexng
            alexng 29 August 2013 11: 14
            +7
            Quote: Luger
            Do not forget about the fifth column, about those who want Assad to have a sweet time, they will sit and aim for new goals at new places of deployment of the armed forces, and the constant movement of even so many people and equipment is not possible.


            Only trained specialist can give target designation, all other info for axes is useless. So it is not yet known how everything can end. And the Syrian army is now the most efficient in the world in terms of soldierly prowess.
            But all the same, it is already visible that the amers have begun to strike. Something does not fit in with them and they began to pull a bagpipe, and this is in Syria’s hand.
            1. novobranets
              novobranets 29 August 2013 15: 18
              +2
              Quote: alexneg
              Only trained specialist can give target designation, all other info for axes is useless.

              -Allo, chief, it's me, Lelik, the column of tanks stopped, in the village of Mukhorshn ... nskaya ... I'm glad to try, Allahu Akbar. It’s easy, right? And the calculating officer will digitize the coordinates of the target and memorize the rockets.
              1. vostok68
                vostok68 29 August 2013 16: 51
                +2
                By the way, yes, let’s recall the story when US troops posted in the social. networks of photographs of helicopters at the aerodrome of Afghanistan, made by iphone, as a result of 5 helicopters were damaged by mortar shelling, which was targeted by meta-data containing exact geographical coordinates from graphic files stored by iphone devices.
        2. domokl
          domokl 29 August 2013 08: 41
          35
          Quote: Wedmak
          But the United States can easily get a couple of missiles in its destroyers.

          That is why aircraft carriers and the most important ships of the Amers keep in the Persian Gulf. In the strait of the boat of Syria, they calmly strike back and wash off with impunity. Shallow water ...
          Another question, and who said that Syria only plans to defend itself during the shelling? It is quite logical that retaliatory strikes will be carried out both against Israel, and Turkey, and against American bases in other countries.
          We are not at all talking about an adequate answer. Syria is now like a cat cornered ... It will turn into a tiger. There are no options .. Or death like a ram in a slaughterhouse, or the death of a warrior. Assad has repeatedly proved that he is a warrior.
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 29 August 2013 09: 06
            +8
            What is true is true. In the event of an attack on Syria, all means will be used.
            1. sasha.28blaga
              sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 10: 48
              16
              To be honest, I don't want to say anything about Syria. Until recently, almost everyone on this site, except for the "trolls", shouted we will not give up Syria, but we are for Syria ... laughed at the Ukrainian military who was going to organize a volunteer detachment for Syria, advised what should be done to make the amers worse, shouted when Putin closed their mouths at the 20-ki summit, and today no one says that we will not give up Syria, today, today, but the amers listened, looked and do their own thing, at first they wanted to do something good, but now they will probably do something bad ... Does anyone else doubt that the United States is a super superpower? And as much as it hurt me, it was rather so, the prophecy that the USA will soon be blown away is nothing more than an advertisement for a bad movie. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare for the worst, for a war with them, only they, from the ruling countries have not yet fought with us and the war in dreams, and even more so the victory will equate them with the Roman Empire. And tomorrow we will look for the guilty, who handed over Syria? Correctly, many say, do not fight at the clave,
              1. goldfinger
                goldfinger 29 August 2013 11: 15
                -1
                View from Belarus. To "children of Lieutenant Schmidt" are added "children of Baron Munchausen". What is this - a retelling of children's fantasies that I will shoot all the fascists with a stick? Y-yes. "Garachya boys" live close to calm Belarusians! And at home you have probably won all the adversaries? Dreamers .... And, what, suddenly Putin's "roof will go" - then "Forward to Damascus!" This is for you, and, probably, we just did not have enough!
                1. T80UM1
                  T80UM1 29 August 2013 13: 05
                  +2
                  and what to wait for while these Islamist ghouls will stand under our borders?
                2. Su24
                  Su24 29 August 2013 14: 11
                  0
                  Quote: goldfinger
                  View from Belarus. To "children of Lieutenant Schmidt" are added "children of Baron Munchausen". What is this - a retelling of children's fantasies that I will shoot all the fascists with a stick? Y-yes. "Garachya boys" live close to calm Belarusians! And at home you have probably won all the adversaries? Dreamers .... And, what, suddenly Putin's "roof will go" - then "Forward to Damascus!" This is for you, and, probably, we just did not have enough!


                  Some kind of look that is not clear what he sees, you would write more clearly. With feeling, really, with arrangement.
              2. Vlad 1965
                Vlad 1965 29 August 2013 12: 23
                +2
                sasha.28blaga
                What did the Great ROME end in? But did it end up having the Army, collapsed, had a society, but a society mired in all debauchery and perversions, do not catch the analogy?
                1. Su24
                  Su24 29 August 2013 14: 13
                  +1
                  Quote: Vlad 1965
                  sasha.28blaga
                  What did the Great ROME end in? But did it end up having the Army, collapsed, had a society, but a society mired in all debauchery and perversions, do not catch the analogy?


                  And the Great Rome has not finished yet, do not worry. Moscow is standing. That's when it falls, then we'll see what Rome has finished.
                  1. Vlad 1965
                    Vlad 1965 29 August 2013 15: 35
                    -1
                    Su24 RU
                    “And Great Rome has not finished yet, you don’t worry. Moscow is standing still. When it falls, then we’ll see how Rome ended.” - I don’t know what you’re thinking of there, the answer was about yu, imagining herself RIM.Ali doesn’t know that these monkeys copied all their administrative buildings in a pseudo-Roman style?
                    About Moscow, if you wish, there is a saying that you shouldn’t be in ROME, so read carefully what it is about.
              3. T80UM1
                T80UM1 29 August 2013 13: 04
                +7
                To be ready for a war with them, it is necessary to clean society from the fifth column and send all newly-minted bourgeois to Kolyma ... Then it will be necessary to create an ideology to counter intervention, unite the 4 main republics of the former USSR, and ultimately be ready for war.
                1. novobranets
                  novobranets 29 August 2013 15: 27
                  +1
                  That's right. First, you need to get rid of the threat from the inside. Thieves, embezzlers, provocateurs, in which case, can do much worse than the enemy’s division, or even worse. Backstabs are the most painful. am
          2. p-159
            p-159 29 August 2013 09: 23
            +2
            someone remembered professors yesterday
        3. Buran
          Buran 29 August 2013 10: 49
          +4
          Most likely, the US intelligence and sabotage units have already been deployed, and the special services of Syria yesterday had to intensify their efforts to search and destroy. For all the coolness of guidance systems, the massive use of cruise missiles and aircraft without target designation at the site of the attack is ineffective.
        4. Su24
          Su24 29 August 2013 13: 51
          +1
          Quote: Wedmak
          But the United States can easily get a couple of missiles in its destroyers.


          Yeah, what do you think, amers will keep their ships so close to shore?
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 29 August 2013 13: 59
            +2
            No ... Americans are not stupid. But for the sake of such a case, you can drive the Bastion onto barges (or bulk carriers) and put it into the sea. At night. How do you like the idea?
            PS I’ve just met it now - they’re offering to sell rockets in flight. Reset X-102 for an unknown target, start engines, sell a dropped missile Syria ... Formally, a Syrian missile will hit the target. wassat
            1. Su24
              Su24 29 August 2013 14: 26
              +2
              Quote: Wedmak
              No ... Americans are not stupid. But for the sake of such a case, you can drive the Bastion onto barges (or bulk carriers) and put it into the sea. At night. How do you like the idea?


              This is an extreme case)) An "idea" would be to make a harsh statement, saying, since, they say, there are our citizens in Syria, then we have every right to protect their life and safety in connection with a possible US attack. In the meantime, they are thinking, urgently parachute airborne and air defense units into Damascus, through the territory of Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan.
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 29 August 2013 14: 34
                0
                It would be an "idea" to make a harsh statement, saying, since, they say, there are our citizens in Syria, then we have every right to protect their life and safety in connection with a possible US attack.

                That would be very helpful, by the way. Would cool the hot heads a bit.
                In the meantime, they are thinking of urgently landing airborne and air defense units in Damascus through the territory of Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan.

                And for this it is necessary (as well as the development of the first) to coordinate everything with Assad. But by and large, our troops are not needed there. This will only aggravate the situation.
                Send a couple of three submarines with the KR on board and let them sit, guard. Like Assad will ask to nibble the rebels, we will help, we have a remedy. Here they think a lot.
            2. pensioner
              pensioner 29 August 2013 18: 40
              0
              Quote: Wedmak
              offer to sell rockets in flight. Reset X-102 for an unknown target, start engines, sell a dropped missile Syria ... Formally, a Syrian missile will hit the target.

              !!!!!!!!!!!!!! +++++++++++++ good hi
        5. vostok68
          vostok68 29 August 2013 16: 26
          0
          It is unlikely that the United States will bring its ships to the range of Syrian missiles! Unfortunately, not the scale! So, recently I found it on the Internet, it seems like a good analyst spoke out: "The Arctic fox doesn't just sneak up, he got up and playing the pipe is approaching in full growth!"
      3. GreatRussia
        GreatRussia 29 August 2013 07: 58
        -2
        Quote: We refund_SSSR
        The problem is that after a two-day shelling, Syria's defense ability will be significantly undermined.

        What prevents the Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation in response to strike at the positions cared for by the "Stars and Stripes" militants?

        "Stars and Stripes" are unlikely to land in Syria. Syria is not Libya.
        1. Refund_SSSR
          Refund_SSSR 29 August 2013 08: 10
          +2
          Quote: GreatRussia
          What prevents Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation from attacking positions

          That is just what remains.
          But I’m even afraid to imagine that the two largest powers will knead little Syria.
        2. Wedmak
          Wedmak 29 August 2013 08: 38
          +6
          What prevents the Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation in response to strike at the positions cared for by the "Stars and Stripes" militants?

          If Syria gives the green light to such an operation - nothing.
        3. domokl
          domokl 29 August 2013 08: 45
          +6
          Quote: GreatRussia
          What prevents the Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation in response to strike at the positions cared for by the "Stars and Stripes" militants?

          What, then, will Russia differ from amers? Thirst is nothing, image is everything. People are already starting up in the West. Protest demonstrations have begun. So, you need to very clearly argue your actions.
          1. sasha.28blaga
            sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 10
            +3
            Today, aggressive politics is the norm. And not only today, it has always been so. Russia has always lived by the fact that we have everything; we don’t need anything else. At the same time, forgetting that there are countries where either there is nothing, or there is, but more is needed. Many here say it is necessary to restore order at home, and then take on world orders. And my opinion is this, you must first put in the place of all the neighbors, and then solve internal problems. I doubt if anyone with a neighbor on the porch is violent or aggressive, then his family is fine. As long as you don’t drive into the neighbor’s cookie house, there will be no orderly way. What international law? Which UN? Missiles, planes, navy, this is international law and the UN and the economy and resources, gold, etc. Why amuse ourselves with the fact that we are not like that. And they are, therefore, 240 million amers and Europe believes that they live better than we do and they are largely right. They can afford what Russia cannot afford.
            1. SASCHAmIXEEW
              SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 15: 34
              0
              And what can Russia not afford? To bring in troops at the request of the legitimate government of Syria to help destroy the cannibals and I don’t understand at all, do we have an Army or one ghoul-taburetkin blisses out as a witness of how the Army was stolen!
              1. Setrac
                Setrac 29 August 2013 17: 53
                0
                Quote: SASCHAmIXEEW
                Enter troops at the request of the legitimate government of Syria

                And did such a request from Syria take place?
        4. Recon
          Recon 29 August 2013 08: 53
          +7
          who will give the airspace to fly?
          1. sasha.28blaga
            sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 12
            +2
            We do not need it, no one will fly anywhere, only if civilian vessels from Syria are released along with Assad.
        5. slas
          slas 29 August 2013 09: 59
          10
          Quote: GreatRussia
          "Stars and Stripes" are unlikely to land in Syria. Syria is not Libya.

          Well, yes, yes, such words have already been said somewhere. Didn’t Saddam Hussein say that Iraq is not for you muhra muhra? Didn't Muammar All Jamahiriya say that Libya is not Iraq for you? Yes, and you can recall Yugoslavia, the same speeches were pushed that you are not Iraq in 91
          So if Syria is a matter of principle for the sshans, then they will put it on the fact that Syria is not Libya. With whose hands the consequences are another topic
        6. stroporez
          stroporez 29 August 2013 10: 43
          +2
          when there were conversations, shaw Libya is not Iraq ......... deja vu ??
        7. Setrac
          Setrac 29 August 2013 17: 51
          0
          Quote: GreatRussia
          What prevents the Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Federation in response to strike at the positions cared for by the "Stars and Stripes" militants?

          Assad currently has a system advantage. He has heavy equipment, artillery, aviation, centralized supply. Americans by bombing can deprive Syria of this advantage, then the war will be reduced to a simple exchange of people for people, and since the resources of Syria (even with Russia) are incommensurably less than the resources of the West, this will lead to defeat.
      4. domokl
        domokl 29 August 2013 08: 32
        0
        Quote: We refund_SSSR
        After the shelling, the United States hopes to break Assad and transfer the initiative into the hands of terrorists.

        Why? The cards have been revealed. Fighters for which there will no longer be needed. The Libyan scenario is much preferable. Any elections there, transitional governments and the solution of American economic problems, Turkish territorial, Israeli military.
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 29 August 2013 09: 55
          +3
          Quote: domokl
          Why? The cards are opened. Fighters for what there will not be particularly needed.

          It is true that the "fighters" will get over to us. If the current government in Syria collapses, then we can definitely say that in this case the military-political situation in the North Caucasus will aggravate. The leaders of the militants do not even hide the fact that our North Caucasus is the next target for the terrorist international.
          1. vostok68
            vostok68 29 August 2013 18: 21
            0
            Damn it! Can they all be a little fucking? Together with the South? I like it with us, it can cover the whole South with one blow, such as an epidemic!
      5. MstislavHrabr
        MstislavHrabr 29 August 2013 08: 45
        +5
        We are not at war with the United States, but we have every opportunity to detect the launches of their cruise missiles using our Navy. In Vietnam, it worked ... It is necessary to bring our and Iranian ships and work out a target designation system for Syrian air defense.
        1. sasha.28blaga
          sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 16
          +3
          What are you talking about? When was Vietnam, in what year? then Russia was not Russia, but the USSR. Then the fleet was in all parts of the world's oceans. If I’m not mistaken, then within 30 minutes during an attack on the civilian fleet of the USSR a warship approached wherever this happened, and now two vessels have blown about the seas for three months, and we scream.
          1. teleset
            teleset 29 August 2013 13: 35
            0
            it’s just such situations that show that the United States and Russia will sooner or later face their foreheads, and for this we need air carriers and as much as possible for us. but that’s why our ministers didn’t put the leadership of the country before the fact that such a need for a ballot was a very big question ... as well as about drones, the faster we start to cost them the better it will be for us. veto plan evavuyuyu the Chinese if they are given kamanda then they will rivet on the aircraft carrier once a month ...
            1. Wedmak
              Wedmak 29 August 2013 13: 44
              +3
              A huge request. Learn to use punctuation and clearly.
            2. vostok68
              vostok68 29 August 2013 17: 37
              -1
              Carriers are an attack tool, do we need it? We will tear everyone apart! Do we need it? We are the kindest people on this earth! We are for world peace! Do we need this World? (Do we need it?) We need means of fighting aircraft carriers! This is what we need !!!
          2. vostok68
            vostok68 29 August 2013 17: 28
            +1
            I would not know about 30 minutes to return the fleet on which I served military service, but within a radius of 500 km, there would never be any more ships!
        2. vostok68
          vostok68 29 August 2013 17: 22
          0
          In Vietnam, they were often intercepted on short wave (shortwave), the B-52 had no other connection, now everything is much more complicated, a noise-like encrypted connection, with a narrowly targeted antenna to the satellite!
      6. nokki
        nokki 29 August 2013 10: 33
        +6
        Yes, no one in the West is careful! Do not reassure yourself! They have already crossed the line beyond which only one is WAR. Already the occupation zones of responsibility have been set, and Gauleiters have been appointed.

        In the event of the fall of Syria, we can roughly estimate the course of further events.


        1. I must say right away: China will, like us, sit out to the last. Following Syria, Iran will fall and wars will erupt in the South Caucasus and Central Asia.

        2. The rating of the authorities in Russia will fall to zero, which will be used by the "fifth column". Putin will have to introduce an emergency. So at that moment he will have no time for external threats.

        3. The West will begin with economic attacks on Russia. A reduction in oil and gas prices, the freezing of all our foreign exchange reserves abroad, the seizure and seizure of private Russian deposits, and the inflation of prices for supplied food will come into play. This will exacerbate the chaos in Russia.

        4. The general rehearsal will be the entry of NATO troops into Ukraine.

        5. Well, and then a proven scenario: a massive non-nuclear strike on key command and nuclear facilities.

        I am sure that our leadership will not dare to strike back at all stages.

        This, of course, is a negative scenario. But he is more real than ever. As a believer, I am convinced that God helps only those who actively resist evil, and does not wait for everything to "resolve" by itself! Laziness and "like a boorishness" lead to disaster. There have already been examples of this in history. For example, Byzantium, whose successor Russia is considered ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. T80UM1
            T80UM1 29 August 2013 13: 09
            +3
            Because ideology is now absent, we need an ideology based not on consumerism, but on socialism, and first of all we must start from the head.
        2. Su24
          Su24 29 August 2013 14: 38
          0
          Quote: nokki
          The West will begin with economic attacks on Russia. A reduction in oil and gas prices, the freezing of all our foreign exchange reserves abroad, the seizure and seizure of private Russian deposits, and the inflation of prices for supplied food will come into play. This will exacerbate the chaos in Russia.


          As the most extreme scenario, this is, in principle, possible, but only with this development, oil prices will only rise. So in the near future, most likely, there will be a further increase in oil prices.
      7. T80UM1
        T80UM1 29 August 2013 13: 00
        +1
        There is a chance, to strike first, with yachts at sea targets, and OTK at ground targets ... But will Assad do this?
        1. Hudo
          Hudo 29 August 2013 13: 02
          +1
          Not the first one. Then for sure.
          1. T80UM1
            T80UM1 29 August 2013 13: 58
            +2
            One fig, he is doomed against the invasion, and so at least let the aggressors bleed ...
            1. Hudo
              Hudo 29 August 2013 14: 14
              0
              Begins first, his Amer lackeys at once will be equated to Hitler.
    2. Turik
      Turik 29 August 2013 07: 46
      +7
      Why the hell are we scratching eggs? America will be ready to bomb Syria into democracy the other day!
      Here you need to yell at the top of your lungs!
      Return a couple of ships from Venezuela, throw a couple of planes there and no bandits will risk the war to start.
      1. Luger
        Luger 29 August 2013 08: 11
        +8
        Please tell me, how will the presence of our ships and aircraft affect NATO firing? What will they catch missiles, intercept planes? You have been clearly told that Russia will not fight (and in this situation this is true). Or will the Americans see our ships and planes and scatter in horror (which is naturally complete nonsense)? I think it will be a waste of motor equipment and taxpayer money. The only plus, let's see how it looks close .... NATO operation. And about Yelling loudly I agree with you 100%, so nothing else remains.
        1. domokl
          domokl 29 August 2013 08: 48
          +7
          Quote: Luger
          Please tell me, how will the presence of our ships and planes affect NATO firing? What will they catch missiles, intercept planes?

          lol Namely, the missile launched towards the ship is for any purpose of shipborne air defense. Just like the strategist who came closer to the ship closer to 600 km is already the target.
          And then, we also have to conduct exercises in that area ...
          1. KazaK Bo
            KazaK Bo 29 August 2013 10: 30
            +5
            Quote: domokl
            A missile launched towards the ship is for any purpose of the ship’s air defense system. Just like a strategist who came closer to the ship closer than 600 km is already the target.

            The main thing is that our political leadership would NOT FORGET to say this to the whole world - WE WILL NOT FIGHT FOR SYRIA, BUT EVERYTHING THAT WILL FLY IN OUR SHIPBOAT AREAS (within a radius of 150-250 km) WILL BE DONE AS A POTENTIAL THREAT TO RUSSIA SEAFARERS! And DAM, who must be immediately sent there.
            And yet, if aMers start bombing Syria, 10 minutes before OBAMA arrives at the G20, they will publicly declare their unwillingness to meet with him, and ... in general, he, as a violator of international laws and UN decisions, his status of a "peace prize winner", - became not a "handshake" political leader for us.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. little man
            little man 29 August 2013 11: 16
            +1
            About rockets right. And about the strategist got excited. Yes, there are agreements to avoid provocations, such as weapons not to direct a potential enemy on the plane and all that .. But who followed them and is observing them? Ours flew over the masts of amers, we were above them and no one knocked anyone. And if the plane is still shot down, then the cruiser will no longer be a tenant. All this, of course, is part of a local conflict.
          4. teleset
            teleset 29 August 2013 12: 00
            -2
            maybe someone in the know. if we assume that tamahawks fly from about 1200km to 3000-4000km, then we can assume that there will be an aircraft carrier at the far distance. but if you consider that there is an agreement on not using medium-range missiles, then why are you using tamahawks at the current distance. and whether Russia has missiles of such range to give an aircraft carrier at such a distance from the coast.
            1. Su24
              Su24 29 August 2013 14: 40
              0
              Russia does not have access to the Mediterranean coast if you are not in the know. And your writings are barely understandable.
            2. Tersky
              Tersky 29 August 2013 16: 54
              +1
              Quote: teleset
              . and whether Russia has missiles of such range to give an aircraft carrier at such a distance from the coast.

              and that Russia has already announced its participation in the database in Syria?
          5. a52333
            a52333 29 August 2013 12: 21
            -1
            Syria has at least 2 installations of Yakhont. Maybe Nimitz will become a submarine? winked
            This missile is a universal supersonic (speed at an altitude of 14 km - about 750 m / s) medium-range anti-ship missiles (up to 300 km), designed to combat surface naval groups and single ships in conditions of strong fire and electronic countermeasures. The advantages of a rocket include:

            over-range firing range;
            full autonomy of combat use ("shot-forgot");
            a set of flexible trajectories ("low", "high-low");
            high supersonic speeds in all phases of flight;
            full unification for a wide range of carriers (surface ships of all major classes, submarines and ground launchers); the aviation version has slight differences;
            stealth for radar;
            the possibility of the effective use of missiles in the conditions of electronic countermeasures.
            "Yakhont" can be used with warships of various classes, missile boats and submarines. Aviation version "Yakhont-A" is designed for arming aircraft of various classes. For ground missile launch, the Bastion coastal missile system is used. By agreement, such complexes should be delivered to Syria in a mobile version, which ensures its greater protection from a preventive strike.
            1. teleset
              teleset 29 August 2013 13: 14
              0
              yes the rocket is excellent no one doubts but! It seems that only rockets are capable of flying current at short distances. this is just a big minus, if this is the result of an agreement on the non-use of medium-range missiles, then we urgently need to get out of it. and to create kakraz rockets are capable of hitting an aircraft carrier from the coast at a distance of up to 5500 km, then the American fleet would simply not be able to crush its tomahawks, since an aircraft carrier would give a retaliatory strike from the coast. because the tamahawk is capable of flying up to 4000km.
        2. Vlad 1965
          Vlad 1965 29 August 2013 09: 55
          +6
          Hypothetically, on the flight path of the Kyrgyz Republic, our ships are standing.
          A target is spotted - who is stopping her from shooting down?
          The threat is obvious-KR in the direction of the ship, the actions of the commander?
          Right, destroy.
          Fantasy7
          How to say, firing range in combat conditions.
          Howl Amerov, they say we are not for you, but who will believe them by the same amers.kol they once shot down a Boeing, "confusing" it with the f15 of the Iranian Air Force.
          Air defense, experts will believe in such turbidity, the mark from Boeing and the mark from F15 are the same?
          But all this needs WILL, in the UNION of WILL was, now, that it is not believed, in the presence of WILL.
          1. Su24
            Su24 29 August 2013 14: 52
            0
            Quote: Vlad 1965
            Hypothetically, on the flight path of the Kyrgyz Republic, our ships are standing.
            A target is spotted - who is stopping her from shooting down?
            The threat is obvious-KR in the direction of the ship, the actions of the commander?
            Right, destroy.
            Fantasy7
            How to say, firing range in combat conditions.
            Howl Amerov, they say we are not for you, but who will believe them by the same amers.kol they once shot down a Boeing, "confusing" it with the f15 of the Iranian Air Force.
            Air defense, experts will believe in such turbidity, the mark from Boeing and the mark from F15 are the same?
            But all this needs WILL, in the UNION of WILL was, now, that it is not believed, in the presence of WILL.


            This may well be amateur performance, not a bad option. Yes, it’s entirely possible to shoot down everything within reach. Then say that they thought it was an attack on a ship. Amer shot down an Iranian passenger Boeing in 1986, they say, it seemed to them that this fighter was attacking them (!!!).
        3. novobranets
          novobranets 29 August 2013 15: 37
          0
          Newly-born bandits will not even get in touch with a couple of ships, they just pass by. What then? Open fire first? So they only need this.
      2. sasha.28blaga
        sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 21
        0
        There is no need to yell. If we talk about this seriously, we must pull up and deploy the troops in battle formation. And yelling from a yell can get sick.
      3. Stas
        Stas 29 August 2013 14: 47
        0
        Quote: Turik
        Why the hell are we scratching eggs? America will be ready to bomb Syria into democracy the other day!
        Here you need to yell at the top of your lungs!
        Return a couple of ships from Venezuela, throw a couple of planes there and no bandits will risk the war to start.


        Here is a note from "Look". I hope they haven't lost Syria yet.
        Russia sent a large anti-submarine ship and missile cruiser to the coast of Syria
        http://vz.ru/news/2013/8/29/647735.html
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. Luger
        Luger 29 August 2013 08: 13
        -2
        First, you need to get an invitation from Assad for bombing, but I think he will not invite, because he himself may not bomb sourly, but he does not, because he has the tactics of squeezing out militants, the maximum possible preservation of infrastructure and civilians, so our "bears" are not needed there.
      2. JonnyT
        JonnyT 29 August 2013 08: 14
        +9
        Why the long-range aviation of the Russian Federation in response does not strike at the position of the militants?

        The stench will rise in the media about the Russian aggressor ....... Yes, and do not need it. Now the West is "losing face" in Syria. Their image losses are very high. There is no need to give them a reason to "maneuver" in the information war. And bombing from any side will lead to an escalation of the conflict.
        Unfortunately, Russia is not the USSR, the USSR would have wailed on the bearded!
        Star-stripes in Syria are unlikely to land. Syria is not Libya.
        What kind of landing are we talking about if amers and others are even afraid to come close to the coast ... Bastions and yachons may well sink several coalition ships, and this is a huge economic loss that will now finish them off completely ... NATO will do a cowardly shelling of the type attacked-retreated, well, they will try to perform any tasks through their special forces ... But judging by the fact that the students of this special forces are successfully wiped out by the Assad, the prospects for NATO special forces are not optimistic ... how Israel will behave. In my opinion, it is he who can inflict maximum damage on Assad. Most likely there will be a provocation in order to take Israel out to a full-scale retaliatory strike. But after an Israeli strike, Iran will specifically intervene in the situation, Turkey can someone else, on the sly, want to solve their territorial problems ... then a full-scale regional war will begin ... in this case, NATO will immediately "zdrisnet" and will be limited only by mate ... support ..... Israel in this case will face very difficult times - even if not destruction. Netanyahu leads his people into hellish heat, the Jewish Fuhrer is straight
        1. Guun
          Guun 29 August 2013 09: 27
          +4
          The IDF knows how to fight, a well-thought-out plan for the invasion of Syria they have a dozen pieces already typed or even more. Without Israel and Turkey, Syria cannot be taken.
          1. Tersky
            Tersky 29 August 2013 10: 51
            +5
            Quote: Guun
            IDF knows how to fight

            Let the Tsakhal prepare for the fact that all the rabble fighting against Assad will unleash their "righteous" anger on Israel. In this case, Israel and his US patron will not help, "Tama-Gavkami" ( wink ) you will not be able to fight the desert warriors, you will not stop your ass with the "Zhezny kumPol". And if we take into account the number of "volunteers" who will join the ranks of Hezbollah and Al Qaeda with the fall of Syria, then, as they say, put out the light, and it’s so bright, since the entire BV will burn with the next transition to the South and North Caucasus.
          2. Su24
            Su24 29 August 2013 14: 59
            +1
            Quote: Guun
            The IDF knows how to fight, a well-thought-out plan for the invasion of Syria they have a dozen pieces already typed or even more. Without Israel and Turkey, Syria cannot be taken.


            Yes, only in Israel cannot directly participate in a coalition with Muslim countries, only separately.
        2. elmi
          elmi 29 August 2013 10: 00
          +4
          Quote: JonnyT
          Turkey, maybe someone else will want to quietly solve their terrotherial problems ..... then a full-scale regional war will begin

          I also think so, perhaps in the event of a serious deterioration in the situation in Syria, and if Turkey remembers the revival of the Ottoman Empire and begins a successful conquest, I think Russia will cool the ardor of Turkey with missile and bomb strikes.
    4. serge-68-68
      serge-68-68 29 August 2013 07: 57
      10
      No planes will sprinkle anywhere. Due to the weakness of the Syrian air defense system. No fist they will not go anywhere. For two reasons: the lack of a fist and the distance of the muzzle.
      France and England have demonstrated the capabilities of their Air Force and partly armies in Africa relatively recently. The Bundeswehr has not fought for a long time.
      A two-day shelling of Syria (if there is one) suggests that the Yankees are not yet sure that the overthrow of Assad is the right way out of the situation. Examples of Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan are doubtful.
      If Obama does not authorize the attack then the United States will receive a serious blow to the image.
    5. Luger
      Luger 29 August 2013 08: 00
      +5
      It’s good if their planes begin to crumble, then this fact will really bring them together, but if they don’t get a lesson and Syria’s air defense will not be able to bring down at least five heels of planes or missiles, then I think they will remember that they are really gods of war on earth , and all the weapons of Soviet and Russian production are simply frightening of the Papuans, and as a result they will begin to glance with great impudence towards Russia and China at the same time and just in case make plans to democratize the whole earth.
      1. sasha.28blaga
        sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 27
        +2
        They have planes, like a fool shag. Who told you that if several planes are shot down, they will calm down. In Vietnam, they were shot down in batches, they still flew.
        1. Wedmak
          Wedmak 29 August 2013 12: 59
          +1
          They have planes, like a fool shag. ..... In Vietnam, they were shot down in batches, they still flew.

          That was in Vietnam. Now every plane is at least a dozen million dollars. And if some growler or hokai is knocked down ... tens of millions. They themselves admit that an invasion will be very expensive.
          1. novobranets
            novobranets 29 August 2013 15: 53
            0
            Even to bring the group into combat readiness is not a small expense. Another argument in favor of the fact that the am-braids will attack all the same. Mother’s dogs.
    6. dominion
      dominion 29 August 2013 08: 09
      +4
      What makes you think that their planes will be falling, they can strike Syria with cruise missiles for a year or two from a distance inaccessible to the "Bastion" and Syrian air defense. Thus, they will simply level all military facilities to the ground, and then fly over Syria as much as you like.
      1. domokl
        domokl 29 August 2013 08: 54
        +8
        Quote: dominion
        What makes you think that their planes will be falling, they can strike Syria with cruise missiles for a year or two from a distance inaccessible to the "Bastion" and Syrian air defense.

        lol Under the contract, Russia supplied Syria with even more powerful air defense systems. And on the issue of missiles, I’ll repeat it ... And what do you think, if strikes are made on a country by another country, what should the president do? Will he sit and wait when it finally hit? Or respond with a blow to the aggressor countries?
        I think you will agree, Assad has already repeatedly proved that he is a warrior. Do not mumble. He will not chew his tie.
        1. serge-68-68
          serge-68-68 29 August 2013 09: 26
          +2
          Uh-huh. Immediately he presented a picture: the Syrian Air Force is attacking an aircraft carrier group of the US Navy ... Or even cooler: an air raid signal over New York ... Like "Akhtung! Assad in der play!"
          God does not give horns to a vigorous cow. But Assad is not awake.
          1. sasha.28blaga
            sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 29
            +2
            Quite rightly, it is not worth comparing the Syrian army even with the US aircraft carrier group, especially with the armies that may be there.
        2. elmi
          elmi 29 August 2013 10: 06
          +3
          . And what do you think, if strikes are being made on a country by another country, what should the president do? Will he sit and wait when they finally get into him? Or will he respond with a blow to the aggressor countries?
          I think you will agree, Assad has already repeatedly proved that he is a warrior. Do not mumble. He will not chew his tie.

          Perhaps B. Assad in the event of a conflict will engage in sabotage detachments, you cannot hide from them at a safe distance.
          1. sasha.28blaga
            sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 30
            +1
            Underwater swimmers on death row.
            1. elmi
              elmi 29 August 2013 13: 45
              +3
              Not only, under the guise of tourists, to sabotage the aggressor countries, if the missile range is not enough. When the aggressor feels his safety and impunity, it even more "unties his hands", and knowing that the attack will be followed by an inevitable response in their cities where theirs live close ones, that's when the point and bench press, will cool down instantly.
    7. starshina78
      starshina78 29 August 2013 09: 26
      +5
      I would not be so optimistic! I put a plus in the article, and I agree with the author that Russia may be next. Western politicians have a kind of euphoria from the lawlessness that they are doing. They bombarded Yugoslavia with impunity, led Iraq to chaos with impunity, destroyed the Libyan Jamahiriya, and now it is Syria's turn. What's next ? Iran, of course. This one will be stronger, and he will fight fiercely, but will be defeated. One country cannot fight against a coalition that is tens, if not hundreds of times stronger. And after Iran, won't it be Russia's turn? If everything goes according to this scenario, then we, Russia, have two scenarios: to fall on the legs of the United States and bleat with a thin voice: "Sorry!", Or, while there is time, to heavily arm ourselves so that by the time the intervention begins we can fight back ... The United States and its allies are well aware that they will not just conquer Russia, but they can try. Analysts from the Pentagon have perfectly counted everything more than once, tried on many combinations, for sure there are real plans for an attack, but they are well aware that this attack will lead to their destruction, or to partial loss of territory due to infection, loss of industrial and military potential, and countries such as Great Britain and France may generally disappear from the world map after a nuclear bombing. In its history, Russia suffered defeats (the Russian-Japanese war of 1904 -05), but then it rose and revived, in the twentieth century Russia, the USSR revived several times, and God forbid that the twenty-first century began like that for Russia!
      1. sasha.28blaga
        sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 34
        0
        Russia cannot be, and Russia will be next is a matter of time for preparation. The direction of impact is chosen the most reliable from the south. As far as I know, only from the south of Russia it is always poorly protected, which is why the Communists created an artificial buffer from the Union republics. Mostly they attacked us from the west, and from the south they came once and for 300 years.
    8. Fire
      Fire 29 August 2013 10: 17
      -2
      What Americans are afraid of is the 10th question, the main thing here is why Russia does not give a clear opinion against the American lawlessness!?!? Why do amers allow themselves to hide behind another bullshit delirium to climb into another state with weapons and kill innocent people ?? !! I think it's high time to put an end to such amerikosovsky tricks, and punish what you deserve!
      1. sasha.28blaga
        sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 35
        0
        In your words, apparently Russia does not have such an "end" to put it.
        1. alexng
          alexng 29 August 2013 12: 51
          +1
          It’s not yet evening, and it’s not in vain that our ships made charter flights from Russia to Syria and vice versa. They probably prepared something and more serious kinder-surprises and the specialists behind the screens of these gifts were by no means Syrians. So the US began to pull the rubber with striking. Syria is a red line for Russia, for which, if the West crosses, a global fire breaks out. Do you want this? All the jokes are over. Putin warned that if you go about getting surprises I don’t want it at all and the current silence only speaks about the iron nerves of the Russian leadership and it infuriates the West most of all. After a telephone conversation with the British prime minister on the telephone with Putin, England, after weighing everything, had already refused to participate in the attack on Syria. You can now at least make fun of Russia’s relishing toothlessness, but there will be no missile attack, just like an attack on Syria (WILL NOT!). There was a clumsy attempt to scare, but it failed, and then ... everything is in the hands of the Almighty.
      2. Setrac
        Setrac 29 August 2013 14: 07
        0
        Quote: feuer
        What Americans are afraid of is the 10th question, the main thing here is why Russia does not give a clear opinion against the American lawlessness!?!?

        Perhaps Syria is a distraction? Will Russia strike the main blow to the USA in Ukraine? Although it would be better to win both there and there.
    9. Jack122
      Jack122 29 August 2013 10: 30
      +4
      They wanted to make a second Stalingrad out of Baghdad, Gaddafi promised big problems. Already in Syria, they are talking about weapons that will "surprise" the West. And I already see how it will end. You are such an optimist, do you believe in what you write? I would be happy if American planes fell, but I am a realist. Syria will simply be rolled out, because Syria has nothing to oppose the coalition. No one is afraid of Syria, just two days of shelling would be enough for the coalition to demoralize the population and turn the tide of the war in favor of the terrorists. NATO members themselves will not even climb into Syria
    10. vezunchik
      vezunchik 29 August 2013 11: 45
      0
      disagree with an ostrich ... such is the reality, as the Bible says - judge not by ambassadors, but by his deeds ...
    11. matross
      matross 29 August 2013 11: 49
      0
      Quote: domokl
      In Europe there is one really strong and capable of spoiling the mood of any country, the Bundeswehr army

      Let me disagree with you! An army numbering about 200 thousand people, together with auxiliary services and, most importantly, having no nuclear weapons, will not be able to spoil the mood of "any country"! Russia will not spoil for sure.
    12. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 29 August 2013 12: 05
      0
      Quote: domokl
      Nonsense. The author proceeds from the position that the West is not afraid of anything. But in fact, it is even very afraid. As soon as the American and British planes in Syria begin to crumble to the ground, in my opinion, Western countries will stop getting involved in the conflict. Well, they don’t like coffins and financial losses. It is impossible to speak seriously of Great Britain and France as the main military forces of Europe. In Europe there is one really strong and capable of spoiling the mood of any country Bundeswehr army.
      It is not in vain that the Americans declare a two-day shelling. It is terrible to encounter those who can, in response, face in the face with their fists ...


      You are an optimist. Only the Pandora's box has long been open. The war wheel spun and I don’t think it can be stopped.
    13. T80UM1
      T80UM1 29 August 2013 12: 59
      +1
      The trouble is that there, militants dominate in the rear now, in order to provide decent resistance you need to have a reliable rear ...
    14. maksman
      maksman 29 August 2013 13: 25
      +1
      For Russia it is important to prevent a strike for one simple reason - this may conceal the real culprit of the gas attack - therefore the amers are in a hurry, a couple of days of investigations will be brought against the world and the real organizers.
    15. Su24
      Su24 29 August 2013 13: 44
      -1
      Quote: domokl
      Nonsense. The author proceeds from the position that the West is not afraid of anything. But in fact, it is even very afraid. As soon as the American and British planes in Syria begin to crumble to the ground, in my opinion, Western countries will stop getting involved in the conflict


      Are you afraid of something? Airplanes will not be strewed there, because Syria does not have normal air defense, this is clearly demonstrated by Israel. In addition, the Kyrgyz Republic will be used, so the West has nothing to fear from.
    16. StolzSS
      StolzSS 29 August 2013 20: 22
      -1
      Aircraft rash ha ha 1 torpedo with a nuclear warhead launched in the direction of the NATO squadron in an instant will make the West wail and beg for a truce ...
  2. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 29 August 2013 07: 28
    +3
    Well done, I wrote what is already clear. However, I forgot to add what needs to be done. If he did not say, then I suppose he himself does not know.
    1. Che
      Che 29 August 2013 07: 38
      12
      Alexander Romanov.
      Putin thinks as simple as it seems to Amer. Living in Russia and hoping that the amers will not touch it is at least naive. Syria is the Rubicon. Let's see what happens?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 29 August 2013 08: 22
        +4
        Quote: Che
        Living in Russia and hoping that the amers will not touch it is at least naive.

        These were all naive in the swamp, the rest are adequate. The only difference is what and how to do
        1. fisherman
          fisherman 29 August 2013 09: 00
          +1
          and terms

          the same applies to the title of the article (with which, unlike theses, it is impossible not to agree)

          ever necessary, it's just inevitable
        2. Corsair
          Corsair 29 August 2013 09: 36
          +5
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          These were all naive in the swamp, the rest are adequate. The only difference is what and how to do


          For now, we must use the information space "to the fullest" ...

          Can you tell me where they write in "hackers"?
          1. alexng
            alexng 29 August 2013 13: 41
            +1
            To sign up for hackers, you need to become one. A hacker is the highest step in the qualification of a programmer, not a cracker. This Hollywood in these terms mixed up everything and put everything upside down. You probably want to sign up for Crackers. If you want to be a Cracker, be it. hi
            1. Corsair
              Corsair 29 August 2013 14: 41
              -1
              Quote: alexneg
              To sign up for hackers, you need to become one. A hacker is the highest step in the qualification of a programmer, not a cracker.

              Without going into verbiage, I will note - the word hackers is taken in the commentary in "quotes".
              The same hackers that you are talking about, if necessary, will provide ordinary users with programs for blocking the US information space and satellites, and instructions for them.
              In this case, when the world is on the verge of great disaster, any available methods of struggle are appropriate.

              Your irony is inappropriate ...
  3. buzuke
    buzuke 29 August 2013 07: 31
    +3
    [quote] Unfortunately, the surrender and subsequent rout of Syria will greatly affect the legitimacy of Putin and the current Russian government [/ quote
    What side does Syria relate to the legitimacy of Putin? some nonsense. Syria is one of the facets of our foreign policy. important, but not the only one. you need to react without tantrums, and try to extract the pros from any situation, albeit sometimes cynically, but to live with wolves, as they say ...
    1. soldier's grandson
      soldier's grandson 29 August 2013 08: 46
      0
      in the same way they thought about Libya, then got used to it, nothing is fine
      1. buzuke
        buzuke 29 August 2013 09: 00
        +2
        so you don’t have to step in the same thing twice. no hysteria, politics is the art of the possible. this is what is possible and needs to be done. I do not exclude the possibility that certain measures are already being taken to develop various scenarios of actions in our general staff to help the whole of Syria, that our advisers are already there, and for sure, some other actions are being taken to complicate NATO's life. but it’s silly to miss the pros, and they are in any situations
  4. a52333
    a52333 29 August 2013 07: 33
    +5
    So in Syria we are faced with American lawlessness
    Yes it is UNLIKELY. You can’t find another word. Well, there is another hope, there are opponents in Congress.
  5. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 29 August 2013 07: 35
    +3
    And where is our fleet, at the appearance of which the Americans briskly escaped from the scene? Where are the invisible S-300s? Judging by the development of events, Syria has already been delivered.
    1. soldier's grandson
      soldier's grandson 29 August 2013 09: 03
      +2
      amers came to Mediterranean, and ours sailed away in their places
      1. Guun
        Guun 29 August 2013 09: 45
        +4
        Amer will not run away this time. Is it really unclear? Last night, Russia and China sent a resolution (which would give a green light to the attack) of the British and Amers for revision and they swallowed it and saddened, BUT they sent their resolution for revision! Time won a bit. I feel that today and tomorrow they will not bomb Syria.
        1. shpuntik
          shpuntik 29 August 2013 11: 51
          +1
          Guun (1) KZ Today, 09: 45 ↑
          I feel that today and tomorrow they will not bomb Syria.

          I agree with you. I think that they can start the operation during the congress of the "20" in St. Petersburg. The SHA will then show who is the boss, at the same time they will play for Snowden.
  6. Rus2012
    Rus2012 29 August 2013 07: 37
    +7
    So in Syria we are faced with American lawlessness, and in the new world in which we will find ourselves after the destruction of this state, the only thing that matters is the force factor. And in this regard, we must prepare for the complete and absolute mobilization of the state and society in order to repulse American aggression, which is now inevitable in relation to Russia


    and act in advance!
    Firstly, to beat the aggressor at distant approaches, urgently providing the Syrians with the most advanced air defense systems, along with calculations and crews. And immediately, as soon as the first winged axes take off.
    Secondly, to introduce on its territory a "special period" with all that it implies: to intern Libroids and Orangemen, to nationalize enterprises in critical industries
    Thirdly, to strengthen the union of non-Western civilizations: Russia + SCO + EURASES. The main thing is China!
  7. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 29 August 2013 07: 42
    +6
    The fall of Syria will hurt Russia both politically and economically, it is unequivocal .. All hope is for the Syrian people to restrain themselves and courage (to withstand the first blows ..)
    1. elmi
      elmi 29 August 2013 10: 14
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      The fall of Syria will hit Russia painfully both politically and economically.

      Another hit on the prestige of the country-Yugoslavia, Iraq, Lebanon, SYRIA-?
    2. sasha.28blaga
      sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 39
      0
      If there is no people, then there will be no one to hope for.
  8. vasiliysxx
    vasiliysxx 29 August 2013 07: 43
    20
    Putin is silent, it’s annoying the possessed, the Obama is turning on the back one slowly, the resolution from England is being finalized, because the mysterious Russians must be respected when the Amer destroyer will be the last to drown from the Syrian missile, what they heard from the EPT was (in Russian)
    1. afire
      afire 29 August 2013 09: 07
      0
      and pleased applause surrounding the fighter)
    2. ale-x
      ale-x 29 August 2013 09: 22
      +2
      Yeah, remember how in the movie "Peculiarities of National Fishing" - "with gas" and "without gas", then the replica - "the missiles are gone."
    3. Vasya Ivanov
      Vasya Ivanov 29 August 2013 09: 51
      +1
      Yes, Putin makes people nervous, he also went around the country to ride as if nothing had happened, the man had an iron extract. Let's hope that BB has hidden an ace of a trump in his sleeve.
      1. Makhno
        Makhno 30 August 2013 19: 52
        -1
        Quote: Vasya Ivanov
        Let's hope that BB has hidden an ace of a trump in his sleeve.

        Aha, Vasya, he holds a pair of trump aces in the form of "fighting storks" and "knights in armor on battle bicycles" in his sleeve with a specialist, and he himself is ahead
    4. sasha.28blaga
      sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 39
      +1
      It is rather a Syrian dream.
  9. Prometey
    Prometey 29 August 2013 07: 56
    +4
    As far as I understand, the first strikes are planned to be delivered with cruise missiles from American ships. But the question is, if our ships are not far away and try to start intercepting the "axes" - will this be regarded as aggression? And what, after all, no one was injured, "accidentally" intercepted by hostile flying targets?
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 29 August 2013 08: 40
      0
      Quote: Prometey
      But the question is, if our ships are not far away and try to start intercepting the "axes" - will this be regarded as aggression?



      Better without any IF, because it's too late. Previously, it was necessary to scratch, otherwise they exchanged Syria for a bespontovoy American torpedo of Snowden, as was sewn on soap. Maybe someone seriously thinks that Snowden is not an American setup?
      1. ale-x
        ale-x 29 August 2013 09: 24
        +1
        Speaks horror stories, desa merge pool? Do not ride, beat it with something, I think they do not hesitate ....
        1. Hudo
          Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 31
          0
          Quote: ale-x
          Speaks horror stories, desa merge pool? Do not ride, beat it with something, I think they do not hesitate ....


          What is the point of "stabbing" him, if the amers of this misbegotten 1000% played in the dark, and ours, by any means or crook, shoved this overseas tsatsu into some Venezuela.
          1. ale-x
            ale-x 29 August 2013 09: 46
            +2
            And FIG knows how it really is there, maybe you’re right that he played him in the dark. Who knows?
            1. Hudo
              Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 52
              +1
              Quote: ale-x
              And FIG knows how it really is there, maybe you’re right that he played him in the dark. Who knows?


              Alexei, the curtain in this strolling circus is sewn with white thread, and this is visible even without binoculars. The practical values ​​in this roving clown are the shish of the tenth shish.
      2. elmi
        elmi 29 August 2013 10: 21
        +4
        Quote: Hudo
        and then they exchanged Syria for a bespontovoy American torpedo of Snowden, as was sewn on soap.

        They did it right. It’s not always possible for amers to imprison Russian citizens in captivity with impunity around the world, to give refuge to Russian traitors, let them know that we can.
        1. Hudo
          Hudo 29 August 2013 11: 06
          +1
          Quote: elmi
          They did it right. It’s not always possible for amers to imprison Russian citizens in captivity with impunity around the world, to give refuge to Russian traitors, let them know that we can.



          No less your soul hurts for that, but this is not a reason, being like a brainless fish, to swallow any bait like crazy Snowdens. It would be better if they made some kind of "management list". But you never know amers have painful calluses to press on them periodically, smiling sweetly?
    2. Wedmak
      Wedmak 29 August 2013 08: 41
      +1
      I support the question. What do the military say about this?
    3. fisherman
      fisherman 29 August 2013 09: 06
      0
      will be regarded as aggression?


      of course it will be
      1. little man
        little man 29 August 2013 11: 36
        0
        The question is complex. The difference is substantial to bring down a plane or a rocket. In the Israeli-Lebanese conflict 82g. our fifth flotilla, the maximum that did it, detected the departure of Israeli aircraft and transmitted data to the Lebanese. Those. even then, with all our might, we didn’t climb on the rampage.
    4. ale-x
      ale-x 29 August 2013 09: 22
      +1
      Automation, what's there.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 29 August 2013 09: 44
        10
        Depends on the trajectory.
        If the ship is on the flight path of a rocket or considers the path as threatening, it has the right to shoot down.
        If the rocket goes far to the side, if the starter has announced the ultimate goal of the launch - it is impossible to shoot down.
        We shot at the territories in the Pacific Ocean. So there were so many rotozeys gathering around - nobody knocked anything. Because it was announced in advance.
        But if the United States declares - we are shooting at Syria, but we do not have UN Security Council sanction - then we must already look .....
        Although what to watch? For example, everything is clear to me. But I am not Putin.
        ....
        Two years of fuss, two years of great-power admiration, "support" for Syria - and everything is down the drain.
        Here you have a dying America, and here is a growing Russia.
        How hopelessly painful and bitter. For my Fatherland.
        1. Guun
          Guun 29 August 2013 09: 54
          +7
          Syria is standing but you have already buried it. Isn’t it strange? That's when Syria will fall then
          Quote: Igarr
          Two years of fuss, two years of great-power admiration, "support" of Syria - and everything is down the drain. Here's a dying America, here's a growing Russia. How hopelessly painful and bitter. For my Motherland.

          I am personally sure that Syria will survive - it cannot do otherwise. After all, Kazakhstan and Belarus during the fall of Syria will be uncertain that in the event that Russia will protect them.
          1. Igarr
            Igarr 29 August 2013 10: 19
            +9
            No, it's a little different.
            Syria is not going anywhere. As it was, it will be so. Iraq, after all, is still there. And will be.
            But such an existence ....
            .
            Another disturbs me. If the Russian government is not able to really protect Syria, then why then it was necessary to puff up.
            So they would say - guys, I'm sorry, we are dead. To put on us - at a loss.
            Well, they would be wiped out. Again.
            Otherwise .... the fleet is there, the fleet is here. "Kuznetsov" rode there, proudly churning Mediterranean.
            As it came to pass - liquid about ...
            All right, I would have understood - would have raised our "Avaks", but let them fly from Taganrog to Egypt - and then at least something.
            One Lavrov, poor fellow - erased the language.
            .
            We're not good ... to play poker ... with burnt adventurers.
            1. sasha.28blaga
              sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 45
              +3
              I fully support Igarra. Every word. Hurley had round dances.
              1. Setrac
                Setrac 29 August 2013 14: 25
                0
                Quote: sasha.28blaga
                I fully support Igarra. Every word. Hurley had round dances.

                So what? Raise your legs up and shout "we give up"?
            2. Wedmak
              Wedmak 29 August 2013 14: 36
              0
              If the Russian government is not able to really protect Syria, then why then it was necessary to puff up.

              Where did you get that is not capable?
              We're not good ... to play poker ... with burnt adventurers.

              Yes, we beat a couple of times. Yes, so the screech was (and still is) throughout Europe.
          2. Corsair
            Corsair 29 August 2013 10: 22
            +1
            Quote: Guun
            I am personally sure that Syria will survive - it cannot do otherwise. After all, Kazakhstan and Belarus during the fall of Syria will be uncertain that in the event that Russia will protect them.


            But it is precisely the actions of the United States with regard to Syria that should "push" the three republics towards closer integration (the Union?).
          3. sasha.28blaga
            sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 43
            +1
            Syria will survive only if the amers do not shoot missiles at it.
        2. fisherman
          fisherman 29 August 2013 10: 26
          +1
          Here you have a dying America, and here is a growing Russia.


          in two years?

          "only cats will be born quickly"
        3. denson06
          denson06 29 August 2013 13: 10
          0
          One can only hope that we simply do not see the trump cards that our politicians, the authorities and the military have in the arms of the Armed Forces of Russia and Syria .. after all, the lessons of Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya should have been taught something ... because the approach was absolutely straightforward in all cases .. one mechanism ..
        4. Setrac
          Setrac 29 August 2013 14: 17
          0
          Quote: Igarr
          Two years of fuss, two years of great-power admiration, "support" for Syria - and everything is down the drain.

          Chef, the mustache is gone, the plaster is removed, the client is leaving!
        5. Su24
          Su24 29 August 2013 15: 17
          0
          Quote: Igarr
          Depends on the trajectory.
          If the ship is on the flight path of a rocket or considers the path as threatening, it has the right to shoot down.
          If the rocket goes far to the side, if the starter has announced the ultimate goal of the launch - it is impossible to shoot down.


          You can shoot down all the missiles, let the commission of inquiry be appointed, if they say that we were wrong - we apologize for being slightly mistaken.
          1. Igarr
            Igarr 29 August 2013 19: 16
            0
            That's right, brothers ...
            I read and listened all day ... even wrote. In other branches. They called me once a graphomaniac - well ... you have to correspond.
            I don’t bury anything. I just prepare in advance for troubles - they usually come on their own.
            And in order to shoot down everything that flies .. and fuck everything that moves - you have to be in the right position for this.
            And where are our knockers, fuckers?
            Far away, damn it.
            ..
            about two years. During this period, there "Bastions" with Granites in four rows could be delivered by three echelons.
            Stuff the whole Mediterranean with guided minefields.
            From Crete to Libya, stick active torpedoes, reactive pop-up mines. On all slides to stick auto-jammers.
            In Syria itself inflate rubber tanks, planes, mountains, Everests. Close them with Shilkami.
            .
            How much could be done .... there would be a desire. And money.
            Made?
            I do not know. That is why .... "I am in pessimism, and almost in a cataclysm ..."
  10. GUSAR
    GUSAR 29 August 2013 08: 10
    +5
    And we? To put it mildly, we are not in a better situation in terms of the armed forces, ideology, industry, etc., etc., we are to blame for all our problems ourselves, and only then the USA, Jews, Masons, aliens ...
  11. Was mammoth
    Was mammoth 29 August 2013 08: 14
    +1
    "US President Barack Obama said that intervention in the civil war will not save the situation in Syria, ...
    In an interview with PBS, Obama also said that a possible strike on Syria should be small in scale, so as not to break the balance between Assad’s forces and the rebels."(They need a light there)
    This is from an Obama interview.
    But the Germans have elections. They have nothing to do with it (yet).
    The cranberries are too branchy about the use of Assad's chemical weapons. So far they will only intimidate.
    1. sasha.28blaga
      sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 48
      +1
      Appetite comes with eating. They (Saxons), always fought only with those who are weaker than they, whom they are not afraid of.
  12. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 29 August 2013 08: 15
    +4
    "... The defeat of Syria will hit Putin as the only political figure in Russia ..." - even my cat will stop respecting him! angry
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 August 2013 08: 45
      +4
      Quote: Dazdranagon
      - Yes, even my cat will cease to respect him!

      Is he on the profile picture?
      1. denson06
        denson06 29 August 2013 13: 19
        -1
        Alexander Romanov
        Dazdranagon
        - Yes, even my cat will cease to respect him!

        Is he on the profile picture?

        Apparently his cat ... only looks like he lives in an underground warehouse of the "opposition", where chemical weapons are made ..
        Are you with a cat not from Syria, Dazdranagon?
        1. Dazdranagon
          Dazdranagon 29 August 2013 13: 23
          +1
          No, we are not from Syria, but FOR Syria. hi
    2. KEKS44
      KEKS44 29 August 2013 08: 47
      +2
      What can Putin do? Send troops? Political support and arms deliveries to Syria are probably the only available support methods.
      1. Hudo
        Hudo 29 August 2013 08: 58
        0
        Quote: KEKS44
        What can Putin do?


        It’s too late to do something. It's time to think about how to resolve the situation in Iran, which, at the direction of the stripes, has disrupted the supply of air defense systems.
        1. fisherman
          fisherman 29 August 2013 09: 16
          0
          Iran is a map from the sleeve
          1. Hudo
            Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 38
            +2
            Quote: fisherman
            Iran is a map from the sleeve


            What sleeves are there for the damn grandmother, when they are about to begin to pull them together.
            1. fisherman
              fisherman 29 August 2013 10: 28
              0
              Can I be more specific? :)
              1. Hudo
                Hudo 29 August 2013 12: 39
                +1
                I do not buy tickets to win!
                - And for what?
                Newspapers must be read ...(c)
  13. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 29 August 2013 08: 15
    +2
    Quote: Prometey
    As far as I understand, the first strikes are planned to be delivered with cruise missiles from American ships. But the question is, if our ships are not far away and try to start intercepting the "axes" - will this be regarded as aggression? And what, after all, no one was injured, "accidentally" intercepted by hostile flying targets?

    And in your words it makes sense sorry that no one will.
  14. Revolver
    Revolver 29 August 2013 08: 18
    +3
    Today, the Russian political leadership seeks to heal the Syrian wound by folk remedies, and in conditions of complete desacralization, when there simply is no such magical environment in which these remedies could help.
    This quote alone casts doubt on the adequacy of author.
  15. Ustas
    Ustas 29 August 2013 08: 35
    0
    - Putin himself has by now been declared almost the guarantor of the salvation of Syria. But how does the inevitable overthrow of Bashar al-Assad affect him?

    - Unfortunately, the surrender and subsequent defeat of Syria will greatly affect the legitimacy of Putin and the current Russian government.

    If Putin surrenders to Syria, then in the person of the people of Russia, he will lose credibility and thereby hammer a nail in the coffin of his power.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 August 2013 08: 49
      +7
      Quote: Ustas
      and thereby hammer a nail into the coffin of his power.

      Actually, this is our government and there is no need to speak for all the people. Putin is now in a situation no less difficult than the same Assad, only politically.
    2. Revolver
      Revolver 29 August 2013 08: 50
      +2
      Quote: Ustas
      If Putin surrenders to Syria, then in the person of the people of Russia, he will lose credibility and thereby hammer a nail in the coffin of his power.
      Your dreams are not true. If something ever knocks Putin down, then it will certainly not be Syria, but something related to the economy.
    3. buzuke
      buzuke 29 August 2013 09: 30
      0
      If Putin surrenders to Syria, then in the person of the people of Russia, he will lose credibility and thereby hammer a nail in the lid of the tomb of his power

      and what does "hand over" mean in your concept?
      1. Hudo
        Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 35
        +3
        Quote: buzuke

        and what does "hand over" mean in your concept?


        The term "surrender" --- has only one interpretation, and it is extremely disgusting in meaning. sad
        1. buzuke
          buzuke 29 August 2013 09: 52
          +2
          which interpretation? will support the resolution, abstain from voting in the UN, will not declare war on NATO? What exactly?
          1. Hudo
            Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 57
            +1
            Quote: buzuke
            which interpretation? will support the resolution, abstain from voting in the UN, will not declare war on NATO? What exactly?


            DELETE, surrender, surrender, surrender, surrender, surrender, surrender; hand over; passed, passed, passed; delivered; -done, -a, -o; St.
            Stopping the resistance, not restraining, give to the enemy. C. city, train station, fortress. C. ships in the hands of the enemy. C. weapon
            (= give up). C. position (also:
            deviate from their opinions, decisions).


            Z.Y. Such things are very accessible to you any boy of about eight is able to explain.
            1. Hudo
              Hudo 29 August 2013 12: 12
              +2
              Ay "minusers", it's time for you to blow foam out of your mouth and, rolling in a fit of madness on the floor, tore to shreds all the books that came to hand with the inscription "INTERPRETING DICTIONARY" on the cover. laughing
            2. Setrac
              Setrac 29 August 2013 14: 32
              0
              Quote: Hudo
              Z.Y. Similar things are very accessible to you any boy of about eight is able to explain.

              Well, Russia is not backing down from its position, what's the change? Russia, of course, can, in response to aggression in Syria, pull poplar groves in the United States, but for this, Syria must join the Russian Federation.
    4. KEKS44
      KEKS44 29 August 2013 11: 20
      0
      Quote: Ustas
      Putin will hand over Syria

      A moronic phrase that does not correspond to reality or common sense!
      Or do you propose to enter the war with the United States and its allies? And if a couple of American missiles fall on the roof of your house, you won’t shout that Putin is bloody, plunging Russia into the war! If you can’t wait to shed blood for Syria, then go there as a volunteer or something.
  16. shitovmg
    shitovmg 29 August 2013 08: 35
    +3
    Yes, to practice "dropping" a couple of Tomahawks is not bad. There will be suppression of all kinds of communication. And it would be nice to notify the Syrians about launches and targeting, if they have something to destroy them ...
  17. fisherman
    fisherman 29 August 2013 08: 41
    +2
    these allegations that Putin would not surrender Syria were more likely wishes due to the aspirations of the people


    this is a blizzard

    this, unfortunately, is only the quintessence of popular expectations,


    and this is crap

    The defeat of Syria will hit Putin as Russia's only political figure,


    and this is the author’s dream :)

    first put the "-" sign, this is the author's achievement

    another attempt to impose on society their lies, their vision, their desires under the guise of the desire of the whole people :)
  18. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 29 August 2013 08: 44
    +1
    These two days of the blow can easily break the entire defense system and military infrastructure of Syria, thereby turning the already weakened and sustained heavy losses army into an unworkable and completely defeated organization, and the only thing they can do then is to die with honor.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 29 August 2013 08: 52
      +3
      Quote: GREAT RUSSIA
      These two days of strike can easily break the entire defense system and military infrastructure of Syria


      Ibrahim, a very significant part of the targets for strikes, is coordinated with the rebels. Surely the plans of interaction between the "democratizers" and the thugs have been worked out. So the consequences will be very sad.
      1. GREAT RUSSIA
        GREAT RUSSIA 29 August 2013 08: 59
        0
        I’m trying to say Gleb as soon as these strikes are delivered from the military infrastructure (chemical weapons storage facilities, ammunition depots, communications system, various command headquarters, etc.) nothing will remain. After that, the militants will simply finish them off, so I I say that they will have to die in battle as heroes, i.e. die with honor.
        1. ale-x
          ale-x 29 August 2013 09: 27
          0
          They won’t finish without special forces. And he, I think, is already there.
  19. Zheka Sibiryak
    Zheka Sibiryak 29 August 2013 08: 48
    +5


    Russians are already in Syria
    1. novobranets
      novobranets 29 August 2013 16: 12
      0
      Damn, really Russian flags. At heart, how it has become shitty. They believe and hope. God grant that it would not be in vain.
  20. korvin1976
    korvin1976 29 August 2013 08: 54
    14
    At the moment, Putin's "silence" scares the West more than Russia waving its fists and banging its boots.
    I express my opinion purely, you can agree with him or not, this is your right.
    Putin has already said everything about his attitude to the Syrian conflict, and now he can only wait.
    Figuratively speaking, he made it clear to the West that "guys, it would be better for you not to poke your nose into Syria." Further chatter on this topic is simply stupid. And at the moment, the West is still trying to carry out a provocation, a petty dirty trick, so that Russia and in her person Putin, whatever answer, and preferably, answered in such a way that it could be discredited for it. The West at the moment is still frozen at the stage: "What are you? What are you? I don't. What are you?" Whoever understood what I mean will understand why Putin is silent at the moment. It makes no sense to conduct a conversation in this manner with scumbags.
    Putin made it clear to the West, do not panic, otherwise ........
    What exactly is THAT, think yourself dear gentlemen from the West.
    And they think.
    Maybe there isn’t the one that Putin could answer, but as the saying goes, the West is not sure about this.
    Again, recently, too often our BDKs visit the Mediterranean Sea. Maybe of course they just swim there, swim there and other delights, or maybe not just like that, guess guess.
    In this situation, there are many more questions than answers. Does Syria have S-300 or not? No one will say or show. And then again: Surprise !!!!
    I do not look at the picture in a rainbow color, but I perceive it with a balanced opinion.
    At the moment, history shows that Putin doesn’t just throw words, and the West knows this, they are taught to say so. So they are trying to make a provocation, a petty dirty trick. I really hope that they still have enough brains to understand that it’s better to stop on small dirty tricks, and not THAT ......
    Well, about what we have already said ......
    1. elmi
      elmi 29 August 2013 10: 34
      +4
      Quote: korvin1976
      Putin made it clear to the West, do not panic, otherwise ........
      What exactly is THAT, think yourself dear gentlemen from the West.
      And they think.

      Think and bomb, think and bomb as they bombed Iraq and Libya
    2. Irtysh
      Irtysh 29 August 2013 10: 57
      +3
      I remember the screams and tantrums of Candolisa Rice at the UN and other stands. Tantrums worthy of street girls. Extremely not serious and not solid, especially for a representative of the "type of a great power." What about Monica's famous "Wow" stunt double? Fu ... disgusting somehow ...

      Restraint of GDP knocks out opponents at all. And it looks serious. That already tears deadlines include back. However, the point is not rubber, what else have these barbarians dragged into Syria?

      We are waiting for the development of events. Time will tell whose SPN instructors are cooler.
    3. sasha.28blaga
      sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 53
      +1
      If, after striking against Syria, our state or Assad manages to defend Syria, I will apologize for every word I say on this article.
    4. polly
      polly 29 August 2013 12: 27
      0
      ... but obviously he’s not going to turn into a kitten now!
      (clickable)
    5. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 16: 33
      0
      At 12.00 Syria declares war on RUSSIA and at 12.15 surrenders and all the questions are gone!
    6. Docent1984
      Docent1984 29 August 2013 17: 25
      0
      I support. To be honest, those who indiscriminately shout "Give a volley across Washington!" And those who whine about the fact that we have neither a strong state, nor an army, nor political will are equally tired. If it were not, then the war would have been with us for a long time. And since the sky is clear over our houses, it means that not everything is so bad. The position of the West is extremely clear - if they could, they had torn us to pieces with their teeth long ago. But, apparently, they cannot yet. But rushing now "with your chest to protect Damascus" is also not an option. Of course, we are no stranger to fighting against everyone and right away, but in the end we also have a hard time. And, of course, the situation is such that the silence of our leadership is worth its weight in gold. If someone here seriously thinks that we are afraid to fight, read the history books. Moreover, the Americans. Moreover, in someone else's territory. But the later the war in Syria begins, the longer your foreheads crackle and your fists itch, the better for us. No matter how we despise all these "bad countries", they are still people, armies, cities - and they are also prone to hesitation. And then, as in a yard fight, whoever lowered his eyes first showed his back first.
  21. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 29 August 2013 08: 56
    +9
    American presidents are becoming like hunters on an African safari. I bought a license (won the election), shot one elephant (spent one small, victorious war). A mentally unhealthy society gives birth to leaders in its own image. God will certainly punish them, but really with our hands (rockets).
  22. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 29 August 2013 09: 13
    +5
    Quote: Jurkovs
    God will certainly punish them, but really with our hands (rockets).

    It’s better that way, then before they die they will understand that they paid in full, and that the RUSSIA which they believed was not capable of anything, wiped them off the face of the earth, yes, and I’ll be so calm.
  23. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 29 August 2013 09: 15
    +2
    The British have already slowed down. Internal political contradictions do not allow the Britons to get so easily involved in the slaughter. Not all politicians in Western countries are so reckless. Although many will try to earn political points on this. In any case, Britain will slow down for now:Tyts
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 29 August 2013 09: 26
      +3
      Quote: lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus (1) SU Today, 09:15 AM New

      The British have already slowed down.



      There is no faith to these nits. 100% some kind of trick performed by these geeks of the human race.
  24. sigdoc
    sigdoc 29 August 2013 09: 30
    +1
    It was somehow not American style to warn Syria about the invasion, they do not want to fight on their own, but want to tell Europe and Turkey, "Come on, guys, start, and we will support you," they are looking for fools!
  25. dimon-media
    dimon-media 29 August 2013 09: 51
    +2
    It is in vain that the author underestimates our capabilities and raises the West in his own. We are a very serious "potential (?)" Enemy for the West, and the West is well aware of this. What prevented the west from carrying out a full-scale invasion yesterday, today, tomorrow in the end ?? He is biding his time ... he is looking at what actions Russia will take (or can it take?) In response. If Russia did not have a stuck bone in their throat, they carried out their villainous plan back in 2011. So far, only Russia remains a stumbling block. And that says a lot. As a political player, we are strong and no matter how much the West would like to agree with this, our military potential obliges them to do this. If it were not for him, NATO bases would have long stood on the Volga and beyond the Urals, and an American missile defense system would have been deployed in the Khabarovsk Territory aimed at China. But this will never happen.
    1. sasha.28blaga
      sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 11: 57
      +1
      They, like real capitalist realists, are still calculating how to get Syria cheaper. Russia has never scared them, you can simply pay more, but you can pay cheaper, more simply.
  26. Patush
    Patush 29 August 2013 10: 03
    +1
    The bar is not set by us. This is a historical predestination and even inevitability. It arises due to the fact that they want to remove us from the game - to deprive the status of the subject. This goal was achieved in the 90s. And suddenly it turns out that it is not yet evening. We are still breathing. And the right to life in this world is confirmed only by force. To do this, you must answer the blow, preferably two.
  27. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 29 August 2013 10: 08
    0
    Quote: This is an external blow that underestimates the status of the Russian state in the international community, but it is also an internal blow that hits Putin as the only, in fact, political leader within the Russian state.
    The aggression of the Americans will not produce any "blow" against Putin. The whole world understands that the United States, having superpower in the world, has corrected all the legal norms that have developed in the post-war world, after the defeat of fascist Germany, act in the most unscrupulous manner against sovereign countries! And here is Putin? Americans once again show the world their filthy essence
    1. sasha.28blaga
      sasha.28blaga 29 August 2013 12: 01
      0
      Amers and, as has already been seen recently, the world began to give a damn about shameless acts against sovereign states, they simply did not remain. One by one, they beat all those who could stop them on their way to Russia, and then along the carpet, to the Kremlin.
    2. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 16: 41
      0
      And they do not care what they think about them in the world !! For them, the main thing is money !!! And nothing more !!! Proceed from this ....
  28. rennim
    rennim 29 August 2013 10: 11
    +4
    Everyone needs to understand for a long time that for NATO (read the USA) no one and nothing is a threat. They are not afraid of anything and nothing. Well, except for terrorist attacks in the USA itself. In the world now there is not a single state capable of bending the United States. Only the USSR was an adequate contrast for them. But the USSR possessed the most powerful scientific and technical potential and the largest armed forces. Therefore, they will not reckon with anyone. Including with Russia, which does not have a tenth of the potential of the United States. It is only necessary to understand that the Russian Federation is still alive only because it still has nuclear weapons. But this too for them ceases to be a problem ... There is only one problem in RUSSIA. THIS IS A HUGE NUMBER OF TRAITORS INSIDE THE COUNTRY !!! And the authorities practically do not fight against them.
    1. elmi
      elmi 29 August 2013 18: 32
      +3
      Quote: rennim
      RUSSIA’s problem is only one. THIS IS A HUGE NUMBER OF TRADERS INSIDE THE COUNTRY !!! And the authorities practically do not fight against them.

      Half of the power is traitors. It is necessary to drive liberals into the neck. If you yourself are weak, you need to unite with Belarus and single President Lukashenko! he will quickly restore order.
  29. Vtel
    Vtel 29 August 2013 10: 18
    +1
    If Iran fully supported Syria during the attack, it would not have seemed to the Amers, given our weapons, both the Syrians and the Iranians.
  30. Max_Bauder
    Max_Bauder 29 August 2013 10: 22
    +1
    Quote: domokl
    Nonsense. The author proceeds from the position that the West is not afraid of anything. But in fact, it is even very afraid. As soon as the American and British planes in Syria begin to crumble to the ground, in my opinion, Western countries will stop getting involved in the conflict. Well, they don’t like coffins and financial losses. It is impossible to speak seriously of Great Britain and France as the main military forces of Europe. In Europe there is one really strong and capable of spoiling the mood of any country Bundeswehr army.
    It is not in vain that the Americans declare a two-day shelling. It is terrible to encounter those who can, in response, face in the face with their fists ...


    You shouldn’t underestimate the USA,

    the author is right! the surrender of Syria, will lower the reputation of Russians in front of the whole world, you will see (God forbid that this happens) immediately after the defeat, the Western press will sour with tables of contents like "Russians are not the same, or Russians are afraid and so on." Inside the country there will be a decadent mood, and the militants who have returned with triumph will gladly take on terrorist attacks, killing peaceful people, everything will come to an end.

    If at least one missile hits US ships, they won’t be surprised, they will definitely send troops into Syria, and they will certainly destroy Assad. All this is very sad.
    1. Irtysh
      Irtysh 29 August 2013 11: 12
      +1
      Politics is a dirty business. Regrettably. The goal of all the manipulations is to draw the United States directly into the conflict. What would all the troops go there. As a result, gain time for yourself to reorganize, arm, train your army, raise the military-industrial complex back. To hold the Olympics, which is extremely important for the image of the country. Strengthen the vehicle.

      Affairs - a wagon and a small cart. And Syria, very much contributes to this.

      And as for me personally, so you need to slaughter in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel.
  31. GREAT RUSSIA
    GREAT RUSSIA 29 August 2013 10: 23
    +1
    Quote: Ivanovich47
    And here is Putin? Americans once again show the world their filthy essence

    Let them show after that what will happen? They have shown more than once and that nothing has come of it. A couple of times in the news they will show that several discussions will go through political and scientific circles and will be forgotten. And they will remember when something like this happens again, and something like that happens , this time in Iran so that only Putin, our RUSSIA and China will be able to stop all this.
  32. deman73
    deman73 29 August 2013 10: 25
    0
    the fact that we need to support Syria is beyond doubt by the fear of the West in my opinion they are more afraid of us
  33. Max_Bauder
    Max_Bauder 29 August 2013 10: 30
    0
    I want to add, as the political scientist said in the next topic, you need:

    Urgently, demonstratively, by air to deliver the s-300 systems to Syria, with the help of Russian instructors, quickly deploy in the country, and prepare for defense as soon as possible. And then really, already fully equipped to see if they have enough spirit.
  34. crambol
    crambol 29 August 2013 10: 33
    +3
    Quote: domokl
    Nonsense. The author proceeds from the position that the West is not afraid of anything. But in fact, it is even very afraid. As soon as American and British planes in Syria begin to crumble to the ground, in my opinion, Western countries will cease to get involved in the conflict.

    Hooray-patriotic with a complete separation from reality

    Quote: rennim
    Therefore, they will not reckon with anyone. Including with Russia, which does not have a tenth of the potential of the United States. It is only necessary to understand that the Russian Federation is still alive only because it still has nuclear weapons.

    Here is the opinion of a real analyst!
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 16: 53
      0
      While we are in the occupation of the Amers (in the person of Chubais Mendel Gref Dvarkovich) they are not afraid of anything !!! We will have changes only when we expel all Jewishismist neglect from the country !!! I have this opinion, if anyone is interested ...
  35. slaventi
    slaventi 29 August 2013 11: 05
    +1
    Unfortunately, the surrender and subsequent defeat of Syria will greatly affect the legitimacy of Putin and the current Russian government.

    No one is going to surrender Syria the question is leash in how much Russia can help Syria. Since its capabilities in the current situation are limited {the fifth column inside the country, etc.} The situation in Syria will not affect Putin's legitimacy, this is absurd. But by attack on Syria and its ability to defend themselves will affect the geopolitical situation, and will rally around Russia the countries ready to free themselves from the American dictatorship and those who just want to survive. America crossed the "red line" by attacking Syria. Syria will cost America and its satellites dearly.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 29 August 2013 11: 09
      +1
      Quote: slaventi
      But an attack on Syria and its ability to get rid will affect the geopolitical situation, and unite the countries around Russia ready to free themselves from the American dictatorship and those who just want to survive.


      Surrender to Syria will not unite a damn !!! On the contrary, it will push away.
      1. slaventi
        slaventi 29 August 2013 12: 21
        0
        surrender is not meant, but Syria’s ability to inflict sensitive damage on the enemy, naturally with the participation of Russia {supply of weapons, intelligence, participation of military experts}.
  36. ed65b
    ed65b 29 August 2013 11: 10
    +3
    The author is right, all Putin's words are the dances of the Indians around the fire. If Obama decides to destroy and wipe Syria into powder. And Putin will not bother him. Nobody will hinder. America is not afraid of anyone and nothing in this world, and this must be admitted. Only the presence of nuclear weapons in Russia saves us, for now. In financial terms, we have long been under the heel of the United States and the WTO. From integration into the global economy, Russia lost in all positions except one. this is the creation of a new oligarchic, super-rich stratum of the population. everyone else is in the stall. So what are we waiting for. Hit Obama in Syria - the beginning of the end of the Putin era. His authority will fall at the speed of sound. And there is still a fig in Abama’s pocket and not one. before going into the hall .. have to climb open your eyes and look around. sold everything, transferred everything over a hill, you change everything for American money.
    1. Kushadasov
      Kushadasov 29 August 2013 11: 17
      -1
      I agree with the beginning of the opus, but the end is somehow embarrassing:
      Hit Obama in Syria - the beginning of the end of the Putin era. His authority will be lost. And there is still a fig in Abama’s pocket and not one. It seems Putin woke famously.


      It is not known yet as he will strike, and what will come of it. It is also not known who figs are cooler in your pocket. And who famously woke up also need to understand.
      1. ed65b
        ed65b 29 August 2013 11: 26
        +4
        Silently he will strike, and it will come out of this, which option to draw for you, choose Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia. And everywhere Russia has worn itself out. no figs in your pocket in Russia. some American pieces of paper.
    2. goldfinger
      goldfinger 29 August 2013 11: 21
      +2
      View from Belarus. I agree with you. And then as in the sandbox of reasoning. Lets rip off the damned pin ... Os heads! Troopers! Ships! And let's go .... To the "children of Lieutenant Schmidt" are added "children of Baron Munchausen". It's like a retelling of children's fantasies - what with a stick I will shoot all the fascists? Y-yes. "Garachya boys" live close to calm Belarusians! And at home you have probably won all the adversaries? Dreamers .... And, what, suddenly Putin's "roof will go" - then "Forward to Damascus!" Do not make me laugh.
    3. 12061973
      12061973 29 August 2013 11: 35
      +2
      [quote = ed65b] Obama will hit Syria - the beginning of the end of the Putin era. His authority will fall at the speed of sound.
      only not with the Kadyrovites, they will help him to close their disgruntled mouths, of course for the money.
      1. ed65b
        ed65b 29 August 2013 13: 55
        +2
        Well, yes, Allah gives money.
  37. adm656
    adm656 29 August 2013 11: 15
    0
    And yet I think that today's Syria is really not Iraq and not Libya .. Anyone who wanted to betray Assad from his entourage has already done this ... the army has been fighting for two years, and everyone understands that the war is going to extermination .. the losers will doom themselves to physical elimination, so there is nothing to lose. they will survive to the death .. The ground operation will turn out for NATO, if not defeat, then huge losses ... as it wouldn’t work to enter Paradise in Baghdad .. And in the West, oh, how they dislike it. .
    But what worries me is Putin’s silence .. if you follow the news, you probably noticed .. all world leaders have already spoken about this .. And Putin is silent, traveling around the Far East .. Either he decided to turn in Syria that it’s not acceptable for him .. he’s still an intelligent person, unlike Obama’s puppet, either he’s waiting ... and it’s time to say something concrete .. don’t chew on the snot about international law, which is now no more than a beautiful fairy tale .. but how in the 99th year .. soak in the toilet ..
    1. ed65b
      ed65b 29 August 2013 11: 28
      +2
      May they not go to Damascus. they’ll spoil the country with missiles and bombs and terrorists will enter Damascus.
  38. adm656
    adm656 29 August 2013 11: 46
    +1
    Yes, it’s understandable, as God's day .. And what will happen next? It’s just interesting, did the same Cameron or Hollande think that the next target might not be Iran, but unplanned London or Paris? And a barrel of sarin can explode not only in Damascus, but also under the Eiffel Tower ..
    1. ed65b
      ed65b 29 August 2013 13: 56
      0
      Quote: adm656
      Yes, it’s understandable, as God's day .. And what will happen next? It’s just interesting, did the same Cameron or Hollande think that the next target might not be Iran, but unplanned London or Paris? And a barrel of sarin can explode not only in Damascus, but also under the Eiffel Tower ..

      But this option is not counted west. Hope that Assad is embarrassed like Gaddafi.
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 17: 05
        0
        In Vanga's predictions there is about a poisoned, desert Europe !!! Let's see what happens next! Vanga has 80% of hits, and Syria will fall, but at the feet of another winner ...! I think it will be according to her predictions, she spoke about Kursk under water long before the tragedy with the Kursk nuclear submarine
    2. 12061973
      12061973 29 August 2013 16: 45
      0
      Quote: adm656
      but unplanned London or Paris? And a barrel of sarin can explode not only in Damascus, but also under the Eiffel Tower ..
      the question is not if, but when it explodes.
  39. 787nkx
    787nkx 29 August 2013 11: 55
    0
    It is important not to defeat the enemy in an open confrontation, it is enough to see that he understood that he had lost.
  40. Micex
    Micex 29 August 2013 12: 00
    +1
    I’m completely ready to agree with the interviewee’s point of view regarding Putin and his legitimacy - he’ll hit the image and even hit it. The rest is a subjective point of view of a person. He will surrender, not surrender - we will see that the denouement is close.
  41. shpuntik
    shpuntik 29 August 2013 12: 14
    +2
    So this is a double blow to the American network empire in Russia. This is an external blow, which underestimates the status of the Russian state in the international community, but it is also an internal blow, striking Putin as the only political leader within the Russian state.


    Article +.
    The next stage after the occupation of Syria, in my opinion, is destabilization in the Caucasus. First of all, Karabakh. Here he will move to Azerbaijan, as Turkey will actively help. At the same time, the Caucasian republics will separate, and it is not for nothing that the cadres are being trained at the Maimonides Institute. Further Tatarstan ...
    The watershed runs along the lines of Muslims-others (Christians in Russia). The goal of the Sha, not an open war, but the separatist movements in Russia.
  42. EtickayaSila
    EtickayaSila 29 August 2013 12: 21
    +1
    Quote: domokl
    .And actually afraid, and even very. As soon as American and British planes in Syria begin to crumble to the ground, in my opinion, Western countries will stop getting involved in conflict

    Let me ask, why is the NATO aircraft suddenly sprinkled on the ground? Could it be brought down by the nonexistent C 300? These presumptuous bloodthirsty butchers are not afraid, they spat on the UN, Russia and the rest. Syria will be destroyed and this is a fact. Everything they have thought out, do not hesitate. The arrogance with which they openly neglect all sorts of COUNCILS, veto, international law is the arrogance of self-confident predators who are not afraid of resistance.
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 17: 12
      +1
      In Pristen, when our airborne forces took an airfield, the little shavers wanted to crush our weapons, BUT ... they pissed off, do you really think that cowards are capable of something ... while our nuclear weapons are working, their point is working.
  43. Old warrant officer
    Old warrant officer 29 August 2013 12: 32
    +4
    When the amers and their allies bombed Yugoslavia - I dreamed that the Slavic brothers would give them the teeth. They didn’t give ... When they climbed into Iraq, I thought that the Arabs would certainly break them, alas ... Then Libya - the same result. Now I dream about the fact that once, someone must break them! Maybe this time it will work out? The most significant will be the destruction of one of the aircraft carriers, or at least its damage. But does Syria have such opportunities? I wonder if you can lease or rent a submarine and strategic bombers? For example, a friendly Iran, moreover, it is already necessary to go on combat duty.
    1. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 29 August 2013 17: 16
      0
      And who was in power in those days, although even now the Jewish Zionists rule, but they have already been moved by them, and we’ll see what will happen ....
  44. serge
    serge 29 August 2013 12: 34
    +2
    The appetite for the aggressor comes with eating. Like Hitler. Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, then we. What is the USA there? Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, then Syria, Iran, then a pause, Ukraine joining NATO, a massive attack by cruise missiles on our country and a land invasion of Central Russia from Ukraine. Everything is quite logical. There will be a war tomorrow. If the war will still be, it is necessary to prepare for it. Remove the dollar from circulation, introduce a state of emergency in the country, plant Chubais in the camps. If you can invade any country for any reason, it means that as soon as the United States gets into Iran, Ukraine needs to be returned right away, maybe Georgia and the Baltic states, and the risk of invasion will decrease. The reason for the introduction of troops is the chemical and bacteriological laboratories of the United States in Ukraine and Georgia.
  45. newmark1948
    newmark1948 29 August 2013 12: 45
    0
    Well, here most people think like children. Well, what can we oppose to amers? Nothing. What can the raw-material colony of the metropolis oppose? What Putin can say to the American masters of Russia. Will he try to return the money of his officials and oligarchs to the country? Will withdraw the foreign exchange reserve from the West, cancel all our accounts and demand that the kids of our officials and deputies return home? Our "elite" and the so-called opposition have long been thinking not in the interests of the country, the state, but exclusively in the interests of their wallet. They have us to Syria and together with it to the Motherland. Brzezinski said that Russia would not be able to oppose anything to the United States, because "our elite" had long ago become not pro-American, but a real American one. For them, the homeland is where they keep their money. Remember how our singer Alla said: "All decent people have children already abroad. Russia has no future."
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 29 August 2013 12: 50
      +1
      Quote: newmark1948
      "All decent people have children already abroad. Russia has no future."



      ORDERED ??? !!! Yah!!!

    2. Wedmak
      Wedmak 29 August 2013 13: 27
      +3
      Remember how our singer Alla said: "All decent people have children already abroad. Russia has no future."

      Singer alla goes in three letters. You, with such moods, can follow her.
      1. Asgard
        Asgard 29 August 2013 15: 34
        +2
        I will add ...
        This native songwriter is called Faina Borukhovna Pevzner ...
        On our stage, if you are not a Jew, they will not let you get through ....

        Barack is still waiting, but a matter of time will finish him off, in fact not he decides everything there ...
        35 the president (Ivan Kennadi)) began to think that he was independent and in November (it seems)) they killed him on the show .....
        Vova has voluntary cooperation (as a slave))) but He also began to understand that he would not die by his death (already for sure) ....

        Die a hero? lack of intelligence if "kind People" do not help))))
        Die Judas ???? I don’t feel like it either - if a person normally thinks)))
        although ..... no, he cannot be a hero, since he is a "patriot" drawn by the Jewish media ...
        signed the entry into the WTO ...,
        Appointed Nabiulina to the Central Bank ..,
        He’s Shoigu’s Minister of Defense, and a man has once betrayed the country!?!?!?

        The good news is, We won’t die))) They don’t tell about this according to Tel-a-Vision, but This is the War against the People ... Syria is the beginning. By and large, people have not yet entered the war ...
        The attack on Syria will force us to do this ...
        The order was given not to leave the wounded and prisoners alive))))
    3. Arabist
      Arabist 29 August 2013 13: 43
      -2
      That you have no future. For people like you it never was and never will be. Do not deserve it.
  46. yanus
    yanus 29 August 2013 12: 57
    0
    It is unlikely that they will especially bomb. They will launch a dozen rockets towards Syria. Actually now the situation in Syria suits everyone, except the Syrians themselves and neighboring Arabs.
    America and Europe have achieved some of the goals. Syria is weakened and will not be a serious ally for Iran in case of war.
    Using Syria as a staging ground for attacks on Iran or for "commercial" purposes is not feasible at the moment. There are too many rabble in the "opposition" there, too hot a place turns out. The situation is unmanageable.
    The "bourgeois" should have bombed in the first six months of the conflict, now everything is too "neglected". Now everyone will be watching from the sidelines the "atrocities of Assad" until a way out of the situation is outlined in some kind of controlled form.
    1. Wolf3d
      Wolf3d 29 August 2013 13: 47
      0
      Today it was on the news that the Syrian pilots are ready to become kamikaze in the event of an attack ... So in the event of an attack, the "callicia" will also suffer some damage.
  47. paul1969
    paul1969 29 August 2013 13: 16
    0
    all this fuss is a provocation for working off nuclear weapons strikes on a foreign continent, you have already gone so far with your debts, you cannot take out a stroller with debts to your girlfriend, and do not give a damn about your allies - you need to prepare for the worst ...
  48. StrateG
    StrateG 29 August 2013 13: 25
    +1
    or, as long as there is time, to arm heavily so that by the time the intervention begins, we can fight back.


    What have we done in recent years? Exercises, arms purchases, weapons development, and again exercises.

    Putin is silent, and rightly so. Do not rush with words, especially those that cannot be supported by actions.
  49. serge
    serge 29 August 2013 14: 00
    +2
    newmark1948
    Well, what can we oppose amers? ... Will he try to return the money of his officials and oligarchs to the country? ... as our singer Alla said: "All decent people already have children abroad. Russia has no future."
    --------
    What can we oppose to amers? Nationalize industry. Nationalize the media. Great Russian firewall on the Internet. Arrest all those who have accounts and assets abroad and gently, like under Stalin, ask for the return of the national property. Under Stalin, everything was returned, now it will be the same. All "our former" living over the hill, ask to do the same. They will, be sure, if it is good to ask. The so-called "elite" in the person of all Lebedevs, Milners, Rotenbergs, Makhmudovs, further down the FORBS list and below, is taken overnight. Another elite will be, serving the Russian. Are there a lot of foreign agents in the State Duma and the Central Bank? The guard is tired, guys. Is it wrong in the Constitution? On Wednesday, a referendum on a new constitution, the people will approve. Will relations with the West deteriorate? They are preparing a war against us, what a nafig relationship. Singer Alla - to her historical homeland in Israel riding a cruise missile. The people, the army and even the Ministry of Internal Affairs with the state security have been ready for a long time and are only waiting for the command. Lead, Comrade Putin, if you have the courage.
    1. rks5317
      rks5317 29 August 2013 17: 54
      +1
      Command, comrade Putin ... So he is the main embezzler and conductor of the w / m policy to destroy Russia and the Russians ...
  50. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 29 August 2013 14: 06
    -1
    "Unfortunately, the surrender and subsequent defeat of Syria will severely hit the legitimacy of Putin and the current Russian government."
    Regardless of the essence of the issue under discussion, if a person uses psychological master keys as an "argument" - he is a liar and a scoundrel, and in no case should you listen to what he says. The situation is serious, but discussing it with dastardly liars is counterproductive.
    1. rks5317
      rks5317 29 August 2013 17: 45
      0
      Mikhailu3- m ..k You.batenka ... But the correct comment and the Kremlin w / Freemasons did not have much time to scoff at Russia and the Russians !!!