Military Review

Echoes of provocation

105
Echoes of provocationWhen information noise is too loud - it’s impossible to hear the truth behind it. When the media hostile to Syria shouts about hundreds or even thousands of victims of chemical weapons, and behind all this hysteria familiar alarming notes sound about a possible invasion of another sovereign country - all this is intended for an immediate effect. Within one day, to convene the UN Security Council, hastily, at night, to adopt a resolution on punishing the next demonized country - and hastily send the planes to explode the bombed "democracy."


It was such a hysteria in March 2011 of the events in the Libyan Benghazi - they say, what is there to think when the “dictator” is about to arrange a “mass slaughter” in the country's second largest city! And only later it turns out that the “peaceful demonstrators” who were allegedly bombed from airplanes are not at all peaceful, that no “struggle for democracy” even smells, but smells of big blood, oil and dirty money ...

Now, when it is necessary to punish another country - they let in so much noise that it is difficult to understand the truth behind it. At the initiative of Britain, Western countries urgently convened a UN meeting, apparently hoping to stun Russia and China and congratulate themselves on another brilliant blitzkrieg.
But - with the advancement of the Syrian army - not only the buildings and streets are cleared, but the truth is clarified.

24 August in the course of the counter-terrorist special operation in the suburb of Damascus Jobar, several servicemen became ill - they had asthma attacks. It turned out that the militants used hand-made shells with chemistry against them. Several soldiers died, others were hospitalized in serious condition.

But the bandits failed to stop the advance of the army. And the servicemen found a warehouse in which barrels with toxic substances were stored. Most of them were labeled "Made in Saudi Arabia." In the same warehouse, a large number of gas masks and medical preparations were stored to help victims of poisoning with toxic substances.

The correspondent of the Al-Ikhbariya Syrian TV channel, Yara Saleh, who visited the place where the substances were found, said that the warehouse found in the tunnel dug by the militants was also a laboratory in which they stuffed shells with toxic substances. Two of these projectiles, according to the correspondent, were fired at soldiers in Jobar.

This is not the first time that soldiers detect toxic substances. So, in early July, during one of the special operations against terrorists in the vicinity of the coastal city of Baniyas, a large arsenal of chemicals was discovered - 281 barrel with polyethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol, monoethanol, diethanolamine, triethanolamine.

Speaking to the UN after this, the Permanent Representative of Syria to this international organization, Bashar Al-Jafari, noted that this quantity of hazardous substances is enough to destroy an entire city, if not an entire country. He then called on an international commission, in particular, the representative of the UN Secretary General for Disarmament Affairs, Angela Kane, as well as Professor Oke Selstrem, to come to Syria.
And when the commission arrived, the forces hostile to the UAR put sticks in its wheels, arranging a wild sensation, one in which the truth must inevitably drown.

Meanwhile, the Arab press confirms the findings, which were voiced by Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich, who, commenting on the incident, said that most likely the warheads with chemical substances were used by the militants. Just like they did in Khan Al-Asal.

When all the media trumpeted about the “next atrocity of the regime,” there was hope that the provocation prepared for the commission’s arrival was purely informational. Unfortunately, according to the latest data, it can be concluded that it was not only informational. Just like in Al-Hula last May, there were real casualties on the Western and Pseudo-Arabian TV channels with loud noises.

But, in the first place, their number is not at all the same as what the gangsters and the forces supporting them said. Therefore, they had to “take into circulation” videos from the Al Fateh mosque in Egypt.

Secondly, the alleged attack, most likely, did not occur where the "oppositionists" and their masters declared - but much further from Damascus. Therefore, residents of the areas adjacent to Jobar did not see any signs of himataka. The tragedy occurred closer to the city of Duma - that is, in the far deeper rear of the rebels. And this means that the army, which was preparing for the attack on Jobar that day, could not use chemical weapons - it would not have reached those positions.

The Arab publicist Muhammad Balut in the newspaper Al-Safir, as well as the Lebanese television channel Al-Mayadin, report the following.

At a meeting of the UN Security Council, which was hastily convened on the night of 22 in August, representatives of the United States and Western countries squealed that the chemical weapon was used and demanded a tough resolution. But Russia presented data from satellites, according to which the missiles were launched from the Duma area in 1-35 on the night of August 21. They were released from the territory, which is under the control of the militants, and came to areas that are also under the control of the "opposition". These were artisanal rockets similar to the one used in the Khan Al-Asal area of ​​Aleppo Province.

This territory is controlled by Islamist militants from the Dzhebhat An-Nusra organization associated with the sinister Al-Qaeda.

The dampress.net website provides additional details: the missiles may have been launched by an Islamist extremist organization called the Islamist Brigade, led by the gangster Zahran Allush. According to the site, this operation was sponsored by Saudi Arabia, which donated 4 a million US dollars to Allyshu. At the same time, the Saudis were not interested in the number of victims - they were only interested in the very fact of the use of chemical weapons.

Who were the victims of this monstrous game? Shortly before, as a result of the atrocities of the militants, many people went missing in the north of Latakia province. They were abducted by terrorists. In addition, part of the captives was from the province of Damascus and other areas of Syria. They were placed in one of the schools, according to which they fired missiles with warheads ...

After Russia's presentation of satellite data, the United States, despite the hysterical cries of France, began to make, although extremely contradictory, but still more restrained statements. Perhaps all the threats of the invasion sounding today are nothing more than a bluff, aimed solely at the psychological pressure on the Syrians.

But it was very strange these days to read the headlines of some Russian newspapers and news agencies that picked up Western tracing paper. Speaking about the position of Russia and China at the most urgent meeting of the UN Security Council, many Russian (!) Media were filled with the following words: “Russia and China do not allow to investigate the use of chemical weapons in Syria” - and the like. I would like the media to chase less sensations, and more to protect the country's foreign policy and its state interests. And also - so that the massacre committed by the rebels in the Kurdish regions of Syria would receive at least as much attention as the cries of the West about the "atrocity of the government" - which, as it turns out, the militants committed.
In addition, as stated by Tehran, Iranian intelligence also has information that the missiles were fired by the "opposition." Iranian officials strongly condemned the crime and called for the punishment of the terrorists.

Against this background, the statements of Western leaders seem all the more false and hypocritical. Already knowing what data Russia and Iran have, the most rabid of them - the French, the Turks and the British - continue to insist on the use of force against Syria. But Obama’s official statements have become more cautious. But they are contradictory - on the one hand, he states that he does not want a military operation without the sanction of the UN Security Council, on the other, he says that no options are excluded.

His following statement looks particularly ridiculous: they say that the USA is doing everything to overthrow Bashar Assad, but within the framework of international law.
The fact is that international law does not provide for outside interference in the affairs of a sovereign state. And this principle, repeatedly trampled by the United States, has not been canceled yet. So, even making oral statements about the need for the president of a sovereign state to leave, Obama and his ilk already violate international law.

And - according to the latest reports - the UN Commission states that it does not intend to go to the province of Aleppo, ostensibly for security reasons. But she was called into the country for precisely this purpose - to investigate the incident in Khan Al-Asal ...
Author:
105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vadivak
    Vadivak 26 August 2013 08: 29 New
    19
    despite the hysterical screams of France,


    I can’t even believe that once these tantrums conquered all of Europe.
    1. OPTR
      OPTR 26 August 2013 09: 03 New
      +4
      Now a new war.
      While informational.
      And in it they quite successfully conquer Europe.
      1. 225chay
        225chay 26 August 2013 10: 07 New
        +7
        Quote: OPTR
        Now a new war.
        While informational.
        And in it they quite successfully conquer Europe.

        Naglosak residents are preparing another slaughter. It is not clear why Russia does not supply as many S-300s and other related weapons to Syria as possible. The next attack may be on us
        1. Arabist
          Arabist 26 August 2013 10: 48 New
          +1
          On us? Is there enough strength? I doubt it very much.
          1. EtickayaSila
            EtickayaSila 26 August 2013 11: 50 New
            +4
            Yeah ... we will beat the enemy on its territory ... the red army is stronger than all ... we don’t want an inch from a foreign land, but we won’t give up our tip ...
            Somehow, the beginning of 1941 ...
            1. Arabist
              Arabist 26 August 2013 11: 52 New
              +4
              Remind me how it all ended?
            2. Geisenberg
              Geisenberg 26 August 2013 18: 16 New
              +4
              Quote: EtickayaSila
              Yeah ... we will beat the enemy on its territory ... the red army is stronger than all ... we don’t want an inch from a foreign land, but we won’t give up our tip ...
              Somehow, the beginning of 1941 ...


              Nuclear weapons are quite enough so that, as Khrushchev said, there is not even an island on which the British state is located ...

              Your sarcasm is inappropriate. We had to conquer us under Yeltsin, now it’s already a rush to rush around.
          2. stroporez
            stroporez 26 August 2013 16: 29 New
            +2
            the strength may not be enough, but, it seems, the attempt will be ..........
        2. rauffg
          rauffg 26 August 2013 10: 57 New
          0
          And why is Russia so calm about possible air strikes on Syria? Because the S-300 is already there. And they are already at the post.
          1. EtickayaSila
            EtickayaSila 26 August 2013 11: 47 New
            +7
            do not tell ... do you seriously believe that the presence (even if it is not a bluff) in Syria of several C 300s will stop Americans and French from bombing?
            I would really like to make a mistake, but I think the complexes will be destroyed without even having time to make a salvo. There are many ways (sabotage groups, cruise missiles, etc.)
            1. a52333
              a52333 26 August 2013 13: 35 New
              +3
              You can’t wait. Enough of Yugoslavia and Libya. That way we will be left alone. Fleet set in the Mediterranean!
              1. skeptic
                skeptic 26 August 2013 16: 09 New
                +4
                But it was very strange these days to read the headlines of some Russian newspapers and news agencies that picked up Western tracing paper. Speaking about the position of Russia and China at that very emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, many Russian (!) Media were full of the following words: “Russia and China do not allow investigating the use of chemical weapons in Syria” - and the like.

                To begin with, as for NPOs, in the headings of such info-sticks, enter a mandatory notification that this Media serving the interests of the West.
              2. Val_y
                Val_y 26 August 2013 18: 24 New
                0
                So he is there, if there was no BDK with marines in Tarusa and a BOD with SKRs, they would have long bombed the Anglo-Saxons Syria.
              3. Imigrantt
                Imigrantt 26 August 2013 20: 32 New
                +2
                I completely agree! In my opinion, diplomacy is strong when it is effective and heard by the community! But now diplomacy is not effective! It’s time to step forward and not jump as if imposed in his pants! These, the Yankees and the British, the UN do not put in anything! But Russia in general is not considered a state vote! Isn't it time to declare yourself loudly! And so they all pissed! We also profane Syria! The next will be WE! It’s time for Putin to turn off the delicate tone, and start to wet, even in toilets !!!!! I think Russian people will support him in this! hi
            2. Cynic
              Cynic 26 August 2013 18: 46 New
              +1
              Quote: EtickayaSila
              There are many ways (sabotage groups, cruise missiles, etc.)

              And there are many ways to protect, in general, mind games.
              Here, I repeat, the main behavior of Iran. We are far away.
              If yusovtsy will be sure that Iran will intervene, then ...
              1. alone
                alone 26 August 2013 19: 59 New
                0
                Iran has no land borders. The maximum that they do will launch a couple of scads on Israel
        3. Val_y
          Val_y 26 August 2013 18: 13 New
          +3
          I think that everything that is needed has been supplied there for a long time, as necessary. May God grant the GDP to pass this test and not allow Syrians to gobble up vampires.
        4. alone
          alone 26 August 2013 19: 58 New
          +1
          Laurels already said that no one is going to fight over Syria.
          1. ultra
            ultra 26 August 2013 21: 58 New
            0
            And this is not necessary! It is enough at the level of the president to declare our intentions in case of intervention in Syria. It will be thought of by many.
    2. Sandov
      Sandov 26 August 2013 12: 18 New
      +3
      It is clear that the amers want to destroy Syria as a sovereign state. How it happened and is still happening. I wish Assad courage and strength. This is our last and decisive battle.
    3. nnz226
      nnz226 26 August 2013 12: 41 New
      +2
      The "nation of the brave," as they self-named, was blown away after the 1 of the World War! It’s good to march in beautiful uniforms even under fire, but to rot in the trenches and wash your face with blood, as Russia fought for centuries, defending its independence, this is not for gay people. They immediately raped the "lost generation" and in 1940 already squealed: "Better surrender than blood!" So here ...
    4. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 26 August 2013 13: 26 New
      +7
      Quote: Vadivak
      despite the hysterical screams of France,


      I can’t even believe that once these tantrums conquered all of Europe.


      Now this is not a country, but the territory of the victorious piderasty and tolerasty, and at the same time the faithful flea-lapdog of the Phasington Regional Committee.
      1. old man54
        old man54 26 August 2013 15: 41 New
        +1
        Quote: Sakhalininets
        Now this is not a country, but the territory of the winning piderastia and tolerance

        I watched a video from the party of public safety, rather fresh, so it was directly stated that today 70% of mayors of cities in France are frank and legal PIDORASI! What else to expect is a country and a people with such a level of the fall and spread of society ?! After all, they have these mayors vibrate! hi
    5. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 26 August 2013 14: 15 New
      10
      Any beast that climbs into Syria will get the same on their heads.
      1. old man54
        old man54 26 August 2013 15: 45 New
        +3
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Every beastthat will climb into Syria will receive just like the heads.

        at the end of the video, after the explosion of an ammunition, the words of this insignificance with a camera: “Allahu Akbar” (God is great), sound right now and there !!! good laughing That's about how it will be, over time!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. vasiliysxx
          vasiliysxx 26 August 2013 21: 43 New
          +1
          judging by the voice he piled full pants, already somewhere on the way to his village he was rushing with terrible force good
      2. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 26 August 2013 18: 19 New
        +3
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Any beast that climbs into Syria will get the same on their heads.


        Classics of the genre. The whole video sat before the denouement and waited for when it arrives to them :) ... arrived :)
    6. old man54
      old man54 26 August 2013 15: 26 New
      +1
      Quote: Vadivak
      despite hysterical screams of france,

      I can’t even believe that once these tantrums conquered all of Europe.

      apparently they forgot how the Russian Cossacks washed their horses on the Seine embankment, quite embarrassed by the lascivious beauty of the lascivious Parisians, and when they beat the tables of Paris taverns with fists, rebuying, like winners, “FAST” to give them food, without unnecessary European ceremonies !!!
      Maybe it’s time to remind them, huh?
      1. nelson
        nelson 26 August 2013 21: 32 New
        +2
        "FAST" give them food,
        When the troops of Ataman Platov took Paris, the Cossacks, approaching a Parisian cafe, beat with a kalukom in the windows, not getting off their horses with shouts: VODKA FAST. Since then, a “western” fashion for bistro street cafes has appeared. And here is the expression known for centuries in Russia: the sharomyga appeared as a result of the fact that the Napoleonic troops who had retreated from Moscow burned down sent along the Smolensk road they had already cut, where the hungry and frozen Frenchmen no longer robbed, but asked for something to chew. We went into the villages and turned to the previously robbed population DEAR FRIEND (cher ami), our ancestors and are used to - again, the French came to sheramizhn6ichat. Here is the interpenetration of languages. In my opinion, deservedly!
        1. old man54
          old man54 27 August 2013 00: 01 New
          +1
          deservedly so! laughing But ...
          Quote: nelson
          driving up to a Parisian cafe, they beat with a kaluka through the windows, not getting off the horse with shouts: VODKI FAST. Since then, a “western” fashion for bistro street cafes has appeared.

          otherwise I know this! In fact, the Cossacks were forbidden to "rob" and stupidly rob Parisians and other residents of this country! They were paid a salary and were required to buy both drink and food. About vodka this is probably now invented, in the west. negative But actually they went into their eateries and demanded food FAST, because they didn’t want to wait for her to get ready, but that would be right there, i.e. quickly! fellow But they paid money, which was very profitable for taverners, because Parisians themselves, for obvious reasons, then with the money it was very bad, the war no matter how, lost it, the army is the winner in the capital and all that. And so, quickly having a glimpse, innkeepers began to run out into the streets and shout in broken Russian: FAST, BISTRO! laughing Thus, they invited customers, telling them that they could quickly give them something to eat, that they did not have to wait long. Over time, with the help of "gentlemen-officers" who knew French very well, they learned to write this word in large Russian over a tavern, as an advertisement already. And so this name, already as a form of service, has been fixed in their subcortex of the brain so far! Here is such a true story. hi
    7. Setrac
      Setrac 26 August 2013 15: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: Vadivak
      I can’t even believe that once these tantrums conquered all of Europe.

      Not all, but only western.
    8. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 26 August 2013 18: 14 New
      +2
      Quote: Vadivak
      despite the hysterical screams of France,

      I can’t even believe that once these tantrums conquered all of Europe.


      And then they got a jug from the men in bast shoes and forever stopped threatening Europe. Now here they’re again climbing into Syria, oh they’ll get it again on the jug ...
  2. artemiy
    artemiy 26 August 2013 08: 36 New
    +9
    It is time for Russia and China to arrive in Tartus, and to cover the whole shelupon there!
    1. LaGlobal
      LaGlobal 26 August 2013 09: 12 New
      +3
      Quote: artemiy
      It is time for Russia and China to arrive in Tartus, and to cover the whole shelupon there!


      - It's too early. It is too early. This is not a clap and it's over. In this situation, you need to be very, very careful!
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 26 August 2013 09: 18 New
        +4
        Quote: LaGlobal
        It's too early. Still early. This is not a clap and it's over. In this situation, you need to be very, very careful!


        The US Secretary of Defense said the US Army was ready for decisive action against Syria: “I would definitely go the path of air strikes. This can be done without ground military intervention, without exposing our soldiers to new dangers. ”

        Wait for the US to launch an attack? There are no C-300 in Syria, they didn’t. And after the raid attacks of militants, and possibly Turkey, will begin, what to expect?
        1. LaGlobal
          LaGlobal 26 August 2013 10: 48 New
          +2
          Quote: Vadivak
          Wait for the US to launch an attack? There are no C-300 in Syria, they didn’t. And after the raid attacks of militants, and possibly Turkey, will begin, what to expect?


          - I agree! But in this matter, you need to be extremely careful and accurate. I understand that in no case should you lose Syria !!! Here, in this matter, our strategists must think through everything to the smallest detail. For the consequences will not be favorable for us.

          PS usa - she herself will stumble on what she herself is doing in the world. They want war - I am ready to join the ranks of our army!
        2. Fin
          Fin 26 August 2013 12: 48 New
          +3
          Wait for the US to launch an attack? There are no C-300 in Syria, they didn’t. And after the raid attacks of militants, and possibly Turkey, will begin, what to expect?

          In my opinion, too, nowhere to wait. The Commission will unequivocally conclude that Assad’s use of weapons. And this is what they need. In order to get out of the crisis, the Anglo-Saxons need war, there are no other ways.
          Need to get ahead. At the request of the Syrian government, in order to protect the base of the Russian Federation and democracy, a full regiment of airborne troops or marines in Tartus with an air defense system will be planted. One thing I don’t understand is why Moscow and Kulakov were sent to the Atlantic, which they could not have foreseen?
          1. Onotollah
            Onotollah 26 August 2013 14: 31 New
            +2
            Quote: Fin
            to land a regiment of airborne forces or marines

            Honestly, it’s debatable, but for example, it’s very possible to organize some PMCs to protect Russian specialists or equipment supplied under the complete unspoken control of the General Staff, and it’s not necessary in Russia, there are few offshore companies all over the world, and moreover, the money is stored in American banks.
            In which case there is an excuse: this is all the temptation of money, we have nothing to do with it, these are mercenaries, they themselves have come. We are not to blame.
            1. stroporez
              stroporez 26 August 2013 16: 33 New
              +1
              Quote: Onotolle
              but for example, to organize some PMCs for the protection of Russian specialists or equipment supplied under the complete unspoken control of the General Staff
              --------correctly!!!!!!!! by their methods .......... I think that there will be no shortage of those wishing to participate .....
          2. stalkerwalker
            stalkerwalker 26 August 2013 15: 27 New
            +4
            Quote: Fin
            The Commission will unequivocally conclude that Assad’s use of weapons. And this is what they need.

            Yeah...
            And after the fact, the next “Carla del Ponte” admits in his memoirs that they say they pressured from above, they forced me, so I signed the verdict for the whole nation ...
          3. 31231
            31231 26 August 2013 15: 43 New
            +3
            Which regiment ?! Are you sick with Grachev’s ideas ?!
            Nothing needs to be planted anywhere. There is Iran for this. All preparations can be made there.
            Have you forgotten what Afghanistan has become for us ?! Isn’t it easier to make a second Vietnam for the USA from Syria ?!
        3. Onotollah
          Onotollah 26 August 2013 14: 25 New
          +5
          Quote: Vadivak
          Turkey, what to expect?

          I wildly apologize, there is an opinion that the competition here is the other way around: who the first of the countries openly gets into conflict - he lost.
          As in the case of Georgia - they waited until they rush, and then they blew on most do not indulge.
          1. Fin
            Fin 26 August 2013 15: 26 New
            0
            I wildly apologize, there is an opinion that the competition here is the other way around: who the first of the countries openly gets into conflict - he lost.
            As in the case of Georgia - they waited until they rush, and then they blew on most do not indulge.

            But won't it be too late? When the airfields, air defense system, warehouses, arsenals are smashed ... God forbid Assad. The army betrayed us, screaming, we’ll run, what then?
            Who first got up and slippers.
            1. Onotollah
              Onotollah 26 August 2013 18: 12 New
              +2
              Quote: Fin
              Who first got up and slippers.

              Maybe so.
              But what prevented the amers from giving Syria at the beginning of the conflict?
              If then they did not venture to a local war, can they really decide on a world war?
      2. Grigorich 1962
        Grigorich 1962 26 August 2013 10: 13 New
        0
        then be careful ..... yes .... I agree .... but better a little earlier than later ....
    2. Mr.M
      Mr.M 26 August 2013 13: 41 New
      0
      Yes, where already there. It would be better if the Russian Foreign Ministry once again "expresses concern and calls on the parties to prudence."

      In no case do I urge to directly engage in a military conflict in Syria, but the silent position of the Russian Federation and inaction in this situation raise questions for the ruling elite. I do not believe that we completely lack diplomatic and any economic levers to prevent intervention in Syria.
      1. 31231
        31231 26 August 2013 15: 53 New
        +2
        Where did you see silence ?! If the UN filmed from Russian satellites provided and dealt with England and France. Such points of view smile at me: "the enemies are to blame, but ours are even more to blame." Thanks to the three states, Syria is not yet bombed by NATO, and only people like you do not see it.
        1. Mr.M
          Mr.M 26 August 2013 23: 02 New
          +1
          Do you seriously think that the evidence base provided by us will be taken into account and will affect the decision of the western jackals?)

          But, I admit, with a tacit position, I got excited. Yes, and I suppose it wasn’t worth waiting for a meaningful reaction so quickly. Most likely, by the end of the week it will become clear how this situation will unfold.
    3. eplewke
      eplewke 26 August 2013 14: 34 New
      +2
      Raise the entire Black Sea Fleet to high alert, and the Caucasian Military District, bring the Strategic Missile Forces and Space Forces into combat mode, and conduct exercises to relocate the SV to Novorossiysk. And Putin will make an urgent visit to Beijing. This will cool the hot heads of pseudo-democrats.
      1. old man54
        old man54 26 August 2013 15: 51 New
        +2
        Quote: eplewke
        Raise the entire Black Sea Fleet on high alert

        write well, but ... only from KChF one flotilla then remained in fact! Like this ...
  3. Luger
    Luger 26 August 2013 08: 40 New
    +6
    Judging by the newspapers, the question “to be a war or not?” Is no longer standing, the question is “when do we start?”. The chemical weapons theme was far-fetched for rocket attacks. They’ll type bombing warehouses with chemical weapons and, under the guise, they will strike at places (and intelligence already exists) of the storage of weapons and ammunition of government troops, as well as equipment of various uses, thereby depriving the government of technical superiority and lowering them to the level of armed detachments of terrorists. And considering that Assad’s human resources do not have such a reserve as that of terrorists, the outcome is already understandable in principle. Unless some third country responds to Assad’s call for help in the fight against terrorism (but who wants their soldiers in packs to be taken out of Syria in zinc?).
    Apparently, ours apparently didn’t have time to bring funds that would provide protection against cruise missiles, the Anglo-Saxons, along with Israel, probably assured that they would not attack. What started So about a missile strike on Syria, it started About a new bunch of problems with us.
    1. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 26 August 2013 12: 34 New
      0
      thereby depriving the superiority in technical terms of government forces, and lowering them to the level of armed terrorist units

      The only thing stronger is aviation ... unfortunately in the first year of the war a lot of ground equipment fell into the hands of the militants, now they have tanks and infantry fighting vehicles and artillery ... I won’t be surprised if there is aviation, for some reason they are unused airfields climb to capture ...
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 26 August 2013 15: 28 New
        +5
        Quote: KG_patriot_last
        I won’t be surprised if there is aviation, for some reason they climb unused airfields ...

        And where to take transports with the landing and weapons of benefactors?
  4. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 26 August 2013 09: 05 New
    +1
    The more monstrous the lie, the sooner they will believe in it! I don’t remember where I read and whoever said some kind of analyst, back in early summer, like, "The denouement in Syria will be in September after a monstrous and arrogant provocation ..) They will obviously bomb .. g ..... dy !!!!
    1. UzRus
      UzRus 26 August 2013 11: 13 New
      +2
      "The grander the lie, the easier it is for them to believe." Adolf Gitler
  5. Zhenya
    Zhenya 26 August 2013 09: 07 New
    +9
    Well, the beginning of the century, the next major mess comes into its stage ( 1914-1918 World War I 1812-1813 Patriotic won, 1700-1721 North War,1605-1618 Russian-Polish war). History takes place to make a circle and a new round has already begun. The question remains when Russia will fit into another meat grinder, and the meat grinder on the face.
    ps
    And this is not a joke, every century there is a “good” meat grinder in the world - this century is no exception.
    1. Scoun
      Scoun 26 August 2013 10: 27 New
      +3
      Quote: Marrying
      And this is not a joke, every century there is a “good” meat grinder in the world - this century is no exception.

      And I would really like Russia to stand aside at least once and only at the end separate the warring parties in its corners, after giving each a kick in the ass and the backside.
      1. LaGlobal
        LaGlobal 26 August 2013 10: 57 New
        +2
        Quote: Scoun
        previously giving everyone a kick in the ass and the backside.


        - giving only one kick in the ass (I think, guess who)! What does it have to make another 300 look, if not more. Or destroy before the complete disappearance of the country as such! angry soldier Under the pretext? "ELIMINATE THE MODE NOT PLEASANT TO THE WORLD SUCH."

        1. Scoun
          Scoun 26 August 2013 11: 20 New
          +4
          Quote: LaGlobal
          Or destroy before the complete disappearance of the country as such!

          Well, the country as such will most likely fail .. these are several countries. Several countries that speak English, the United States, England, Canada, Australia, although in general the rest of the Western countries need to recapture colonial manners ...
          arrogant Saxons must rake, got moral lessons
          PS.
          New Zealand can not be touched.
          1. stroporez
            stroporez 26 August 2013 16: 39 New
            +2
            Quote: Scoun
            New Zealand can not be touched.
            wassat continuation of the "Lord of the Rings" hotts see ??
    2. stroporez
      stroporez 26 August 2013 16: 38 New
      0
      unfortunately you are right .........
  6. falcon
    falcon 26 August 2013 09: 11 New
    +2
    One can only hope for the objectivity of the UN Commission, which will begin work on the spot today.
    chemical applications weapons. And for the Americans and the British, in my opinion, the militants are not a priori guilty.
    1. LaGlobal
      LaGlobal 26 August 2013 11: 00 New
      +4
      Quote: falcon
      It remains to hope for the objectivity of the UN Commission


      this organization is no longer objective! You yourself know that.
    2. Asgard
      Asgard 26 August 2013 12: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: falcon
      And for the Americans and the British, in my opinion, the militants are not a priori guilty.

      You yourself answered .....
      UN, Ban Ki-Mundak "modestly" did not say anything when the Serbs were killed ...
      When Libya was bombed "by law" by a Security Council decree, this organization demonstrated that the fundamental principle of non-interference in the affairs of a sovereign state has sunk into oblivion .....
      The posing of the question for the UN is a crime .....
      Well, geographically, they are located on the territory of "terrorist number 1"

      it is naive to think that they are somehow opposed ....
      Then look at the flags of (independent)) states, almost all BLUE_WHITE_Red-colors of the Masons)))
      .................................................. .......................
      1. Ka-52
        Ka-52 26 August 2013 15: 22 New
        +3
        UN, Ban Ki-Mundak "modestly" did not say anything when the Serbs were killed ...

        Amendment, then was Kofi Annan - 7th Secretary-General of the United Nations (1997-2006). And so, the UN worked when there were 2 poles of power. When there is 1 pole it is no longer needed.
  7. Zhenya
    Zhenya 26 August 2013 09: 12 New
    +5
    Quote: falcon
    One can only hope for the objectivity of the UN Commission, which will begin work on the spot today.
    chemical applications weapons. And for the Americans and the British, in my opinion, the militants are not a priori guilty.

    1. The UN will say what the United States tells it.
    2. Militants are the money of Americans and British, their brainchild.
    So the conclusion is obvious - there should be operations against Syria, the question is what the Kremlin will say and how Beijing behaves.
    1. alone
      alone 26 August 2013 20: 04 New
      +2
      After the words of Lavrov, China is already preparing investment projects for post-war Syria. China has its own game.
  8. optimist
    optimist 26 August 2013 09: 16 New
    +5
    All these prudent arguments are simply broken into the immortal phrase of Grandfather Krylov: "You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat!" 100 years ago Serbia, now Syria. Who cares?
  9. 31231
    31231 26 August 2013 09: 23 New
    +1
    Now the professor will come and say that the Israeli satellites have taken the exact opposite.
    In general, I agree with Elena in many ways, but it’s stupid to bring the victims of the terrorist attack from the north of Latakia.
  10. i'm from texas
    i'm from texas 26 August 2013 09: 43 New
    +1
    the Zionist fascists will not calm down in any way. They have one chance, to overwhelm Assad, and they will try to use it. It’s a pity to Syria, it will be even more difficult further.
  11. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 26 August 2013 10: 12 New
    +3
    <<< But Russia presented (at the UN Security Council) data obtained from satellites, according to which rockets were launched from the Duma region at 1-35 on the night of August 21. They were released from the territory, which is under the control of militants, and fell into areas that are also under the control of the "opposition". These were handicraft missiles similar to the one used in the Khan Al-Asal area of ​​Aleppo province. >>>
    Fine! So with the use of high technology, it would be more common in public from a high rostrum to put the Muzzle ABOUT the TABLE of these unbridled Franco-Turkish-Naglosaxon shit-democrats who can’t manage to find an excuse, even a fig leaf to cover their longed-for plans, to finally get NATO boots into Syria!
  12. Kolya
    Kolya 26 August 2013 10: 29 New
    +2
    Both world wars began with provocations. For example, World War II began with a supposedly simulated attack by the Poles on a German frontier outpost. Today, some countries really want war, but you can always come up with a reason.
  13. aszzz888
    aszzz888 26 August 2013 10: 43 New
    +1
    The fact that the mericatos are determined "in final form" to carry out attacks on Syria (see the war) is an obvious and unfortunately indisputable fact. Question on time. But he is not far off. And no one decree to them. Neither Russia nor China ...
  14. andrei332809
    andrei332809 26 August 2013 10: 56 New
    0
    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov urged the United States to refrain from forceful pressure on Damascus, not to succumb to provocations and to facilitate the work of UN experts in investigating reports of the use of chemical weapons in Syria, it follows from the official press service of the department.

    Lavrov expressed his opinion on the situation in Syria during a telephone conversation with US Secretary of State John Kerry, which was initiated by the Russian side. The Russian Foreign Minister emphasized that Washington’s official statements about its readiness to intervene in the Syrian conflict were received with "deep concern", and also expressed bewilderment at the fact that a number of representatives of the US presidential administration Barack Obama openly declare the guilt of the Bashar al-Assad government. According to Lavrov, such statements are aimed at undermining all joint Russian-American efforts to convene the Geneva-2 international conference. The Russian Foreign Minister noted that there is growing evidence that reports of the use of chemical weapons in the suburbs of Damascus were a staging of the Syrian opposition. He also noted that the consequences of a new armed intervention in Syria could be dangerous for the entire region of the Middle East and North Africa.

    Kerry promised the Russian minister to study all of Russia's arguments and continue contacts on this issue with Moscow in the near future.


    Thus, in his telephone conversation, Lavrov personally conveyed all the arguments of Russia regarding the conflict in Syria, with which his department had already officially made 25 on August. Recall that the politicians of several Western countries, including the United States, Britain and France, declared their readiness for a “forceful action” after the alleged chemical attack by the Syrian government. Even the consent of the Syrian authorities to an independent investigation of what happened by UN experts did not inspire confidence on the part of these countries, in contrast to the rebel reports.
    1. Retx
      Retx 26 August 2013 11: 28 New
      +4
      As always, the Russian Foreign Ministry expressed concern about the most unbearable and sent the next paper to the UN. Nothing changes.
  15. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 26 August 2013 11: 03 New
    +7
    The huge (shameless) propaganda machine of the West treats the population of its countries in the spirit: the "democratic" Western world must destroy the "bloody regime" of Assad. At the same time, the NATO Goebbels do not disdain frank manipulations of facts. Syrian army soldiers are unproven, a priori, declared guilty of far-fetched crimes. Mercenaries, bandits of all stripes, including Alkaida, are called by the Western media "freedom fighters." The impudence, shamelessness, and deceit of Western politicians have no limits!
  16. Professor
    Professor 26 August 2013 11: 42 New
    -13
    And - according to the latest reports - the UN Commission states that it does not intend to go to the province of Aleppo, ostensibly for security reasons. But she was called into the country for precisely this purpose - to investigate the incident in Khan Al-Asal ...

    Well yes. It took Assad 5 (five) days to print a permit (the printers for them must have the wrong system) from the UN commission to get to work. What did he expect 5 days? What did you hide or clean?
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 26 August 2013 11: 49 New
      +9
      Quote: Professor
      Well yes. It took Assad 5 (five) days to print a permit (the printers for them must have the wrong system) from the UN commission to get to work.

      Ensure security, not print permissions. And it was the safety of the commission that was the main requirement for the Syrian authorities, right?

      Something you began to juggle powerfully. Do you hate Assad so much that any lie is acceptable to you?
      Or just, like a good fighter, follow the general line announced yesterday by the Americans? You in your post almost repeated what the US Secretary of Defense said yesterday.
      1. Professor
        Professor 26 August 2013 12: 07 New
        -7
        Quote: Spade
        Something you began to juggle powerfully. Do you hate Assad so much that any lie is acceptable to you?

        And where is the lie? Exactly 5 days, the commission was waiting for the permission of the Syrian authorities. Today, even the UN Secretary General “raised his voice” and said that they are no longer ready to wait an hour.
        Fact finding mission in Syria to start immediately-Ban Ki-moon
        1. KG_patriot_last
          KG_patriot_last 26 August 2013 12: 30 New
          0
          Something you began to juggle powerfully. Do you hate Assad so much that any lie is acceptable to you?

          Assad has nothing to do with them, and anyway, if all the Shiites, Christians and the rest are slaughtered ...
          For them, Syria is the foothold of Iran - that's what they want to get rid of at all costs - even as terrible as genocide. After all, the revelations of the militants have already been heard - their next goal: Russia and China. And not Israel which is in 2 steps. Do you understand where the roots grow from?

          I would really laugh if, instead of a faithful ally, Israel receives another hostile, uncontrolled country and all efforts are in vain ...
          1. Professor
            Professor 26 August 2013 12: 35 New
            +2
            Quote: KG_patriot_last
            I would really laugh if, instead of a faithful ally, Israel receives another hostile, uncontrolled country and all efforts are in vain ...

            What do you smoke? When did Syria become a faithful ally of Israel?
          2. alone
            alone 26 August 2013 20: 08 New
            +1
            belay Syria is an ally of Israel? fool
        2. Lopatov
          Lopatov 26 August 2013 12: 55 New
          +2
          Quote: Professor
          And where is the lie?

          Here:
          Quote: Professor
          Exactly 5 days, the commission was waiting for the permission of the Syrian authorities.

          Because they demanded not pieces of paper, but ensuring the safe work of the commission in this area.

          By the way, you still didn’t explain the strange coincidence between the position of Hagel and yours.
          1. Professor
            Professor 26 August 2013 13: 54 New
            -3
            Quote: Spade
            Because they demanded not pieces of paper, but ensuring the safe work of the commission in this area.

            They demanded permission, not any security guarantees. Even now, no one can guarantee them security. No gag. Here is the official UN press release where they report that the Syrians agreed to cooperate with the commission only after two days of negotiations on August 24th and 25th. There is no question of any security guarantees for the commission, but only about Syria’s reluctance to cooperate.
            Fact-finding mission to conduct on-site activities starting 26 August

            On 24 and 25 August, the High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, Ms. Angela Kane, met with senior officials of the Syrian Government to seek its cooperation in facilitating an expeditious investigation of the incident.


            Quote: Spade
            By the way, you still didn’t explain the strange coincidence between the position of Hagel and yours.

            My position is different from Hagel’s. I am against any external military intervention in the civil war in Syria, be it the United States, NATO, Hezbollah, Iran or anyone else.

            PS
            Here's another.
            Yesterday, Mr Assad agreed to allow the inspectors to visit the site.
            I translate for you:
            Mr Assad agreed to allow inspectors to visit the area yesterday.

            UN to start on-site fact finding mission in Syria over chemical weapon use claims
            1. Tourist Breakfast
              Tourist Breakfast 26 August 2013 15: 40 New
              +2
              By the way, it is not a fact that UN inspectors will be able to find any traces of OM on the ground. The best option is to go to the hospital and take blood tests from the victims.
            2. 31231
              31231 26 August 2013 16: 03 New
              +1
              Professor, do not explain why then the poisonings occurred after, and not before, the arrival of the commission ?! Just do not need fairy tales that Assad has an army on her own mind.
      2. old man54
        old man54 26 August 2013 15: 58 New
        0
        Quote: Spade
        Something you began to juggle powerfully

        Quote: Spade
        You in your post almost repeated what the US Secretary of Defense said yesterday

        Yes, this "professor". sour cabbage soup, the famous ... (as it were not very unprincipled to put it that way) that still sv ... b, dug in here! Do you, Lopatov, still not understand this? It’s all right with analytics. hi
    2. eplewke
      eplewke 26 August 2013 14: 44 New
      +3
      professional troll ...
      1. 31231
        31231 26 August 2013 16: 04 New
        +4
        professional Jew.
        1. Professor
          Professor 26 August 2013 16: 18 New
          -3
          Quote: 31231
          professional Jew.

          Are you talking to me? Please explain what a professional Jew, professional Russian and others are.
          1. 31231
            31231 26 August 2013 21: 10 New
            +1
            Professor, one thing is when a Jew is a nationality, and when it is already a citizenship, it is already professional.
        2. old man54
          old man54 26 August 2013 16: 37 New
          +1
          Quote: 31231
          professional Jew.

          Unfortunately you are right! There are Jews by blood, but there are Zionists, i.e. ideological Jews, who believe that their nation is clearly superior to all any nations (of which they call goyim) and should definitely reign (in their opinion) over the whole world. Here to these, I think, and yours is applicable:
          Quote: 31231
          professional Jew.

          And undoubtedly this famous “professor” with VO belongs to this category! hi
    3. stroporez
      stroporez 26 August 2013 16: 45 New
      0
      Quote: Professor
      What did you hide or clean?
      judge by yourself ............
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 26 August 2013 17: 15 New
      +1
      Quote: Professor
      What did he expect 5 days? What did you hide or clean?

      So to the topic wink the culprit is naiden. Welcome to the side of the terrorists
      France and Israel accuse Syrian authorities of a chemical attack near Damascus
      French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the Syrian authorities of using chemical weapons. “The mass killings in Syria with the use of chemical weapons are the clear responsibility of the regime. It cannot remain unanswered. This is the position of France, as well as other democratic countries. I hope that the incident will receive a decisive answer, "- quotes the politicians of the Air Force. The Israeli leader called what is happening in Syria "a crime committed by the Syrian regime against its own people."
  17. satellite
    satellite 26 August 2013 12: 06 New
    +5
    Professor, there’s a war going on there and not an airsoft game, first of all, secondly, who will give security guarantees to the bandit inspectors or the regular army? And do you really think that a military machine that crushes bandits successfully, and in packs, will take such measures that it signs a mortal verdict? You do not pretend to be an idiot, it does not suit you.
  18. wax
    wax 26 August 2013 12: 08 New
    -1
    They say the United States, it means - Israel, it says about Syria, it means - Iran. And Syria as an appendage with Assad’s head. Will it go so smoothly?
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 26 August 2013 12: 17 New
      +3
      Mujahideen destroyed in one shot

      The video got the story of the confrontation of a small gang of rebels, entrenched in the suburbs of Damascus. A machine gun point and a jeep with anti-aircraft weapons tried to shoot the gunner of the government troops. The long shooting ended with the gunner indicating the gang’s coordinates and being “covered” with one guided missile, which was supposedly fired from the tank.
      The video is commented on by hundreds of citizens from all over the world with a wide range of opinions.
      1. Sandov
        Sandov 26 August 2013 12: 46 New
        +2
        Did the jeep leave? Sorry.
      2. Onotollah
        Onotollah 26 August 2013 14: 59 New
        +2
        Quote: Apollon
        The story hit the video

        Colleagues, explain to me how such videos get on the net. It’s obvious that they were die-hard freedom fighters.
        Option 1: trophies.
        Option 2: They themselves spread something like "Like how cool Abdullah killed with a stream from a shaitan-pipe"
        Option 3 :?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Neksel
          Neksel 26 August 2013 15: 54 New
          +5
          Quote: Onotolle
          Option 2: They themselves lay out something like "Like how cool Abdullah killed with a stream of shaitan-pipe" Option 3 :?


          IMHO - your option 2 with changes.
          most likely lay out themselves.
          For example, those that are exhibited on "youtube" e - pops up in almost all videos
          advertising, so here are the number of views + your careless
          pressing when trying to hide it brings all these terrorugs extra
          denyuzhku on "humanitarian" help.

          Personally, I basically do not watch their videos for this reason, so as not to sponsor.
          1. Neksel
            Neksel 26 August 2013 16: 37 New
            +3
            It’s interesting, if only someone would explain, here is that why minusanuli? fellow
            More confirmation that some only need one flag
            and you don’t need to read the content anymore. Well, very revealing ....
            soldier
            For those who are not banned in the tank and google - we search and read about "Google Adsense".
            You yourself watching all these videos sponsor all terrorists fighting against your beloved ophthalmologist.
            Well, well, minus, the reality will not change from this hi
            1. 31231
              31231 26 August 2013 21: 16 New
              0
              Do not tell me the amount of this help as a percentage of the help of Saudi ?!
              1. Neksel
                Neksel 27 August 2013 00: 09 New
                +4
                Unfortunately, I do not have such information.
                But in the course of the YouTube mechanism. Personally, I do not consider it important
                How small or large the percentage of assistance. It is important that he is!
                And I think that is absolutely superfluous. And even if al-Qaeda and Co. It will get at least a cent less due to the fact that I did not watch their video, I think that I completed my part. What I wish for the rest.
      3. Do not care
        Do not care 27 August 2013 01: 19 New
        0
        KVO - 0,5m. Not bad. I wonder what?
  19. ivshubarin
    ivshubarin 26 August 2013 12: 21 New
    +2
    “Russia and China do not allow investigating the fact of the use of chemical weapons in Syria” - and the like. I would like the media to chase after the sensations less, and more protect the country's foreign policy and its state interests. So US foreign policy, they protect, corrupt
  20. PureGUN
    PureGUN 26 August 2013 12: 24 New
    +1
    Start yourself operation to force SUSH to World Peace!
  21. gena7777777
    gena7777777 26 August 2013 12: 31 New
    +2
    This is a clear provocation and this chemical attack is beneficial to all opponents of Syria, but Syria itself is not
  22. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 26 August 2013 12: 40 New
    +2
    All this hype around chemical weapons in Syria is directed primarily against Russia and personally against V.V. Putin, but if you take into account the cost of the destruction of Gaddafi, Syria will cost an order of magnitude more, and the US Congress will never give such money. Yes, and the arsenals of France and England are exhausted by the Libyan adventure! Scare the hedgehog with bare ass gentlemen "peacekeepers"! But these neo-Bolsheviks are not enough to calculate future brain losses: we get involved, and there we will see!
  23. RBLip
    RBLip 26 August 2013 13: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Marrying
    Well, at the beginning of the century, another major mess enters its stage (1914-1918 World War I, 1812-1813 Patriotic War, 1700-1721 Northern War, 1605-1618 Russian-Polish War). History takes place to make a circle and a new round has already begun. The question remains when Russia will fit into another meat grinder, and the meat grinder on the face.

    I don’t know ... as for me it’s so important for Russia that it’s NOT FOR ALL to climb. nobody will return our children to our mothers. arms supplies, uniforms, food - yes. but the main thing is not to climb our army and navy.
  24. Sasha
    Sasha 26 August 2013 13: 31 New
    +2
    Related Videos
    1. Sandov
      Sandov 26 August 2013 15: 52 New
      0
      Sasha.
      These fascists will stop at nothing, commit any crime for the sake of their selfish goals. Amer is evil in its purest form. If the terrorists come to the amers, let the Western crusaders not be surprised.
  25. baku1999
    baku1999 26 August 2013 13: 32 New
    -3
    TO COLLECT ALL OF THESE “LADIES” IN ONE HEAD, TOGETHER WITH THEIR W-IDOMASSONIAN PROTECTORS AND ALSO WITH THEM IN THE MOST SCHOOL WHICH HAVE BEEN CHEMICATED WITH THESE !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! KEEP SYRIA, WE WILL WITH YOU NEED TO BE, WE HAVE MUCH VOLUNTEERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  26. Colonelic
    Colonelic 26 August 2013 14: 02 New
    0
    Quote: Apollon
    Mujahideen destroyed in one shot
    Thank! Great video...
  27. Cynic
    Cynic 26 August 2013 14: 15 New
    0
    Why are everyone considered fools?
  28. Vasia kruger
    Vasia kruger 26 August 2013 14: 44 New
    0
    One involuntarily wants to ask, but are there other Arab countries where they are not fighting?
    1. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 26 August 2013 16: 02 New
      +1
      Saudi, Qatar ... Do you think it's time? laughing
      1. Vasia kruger
        Vasia kruger 26 August 2013 17: 11 New
        +1
        No, I don't think it's time. This is not the case, the tendency is that the whole east is fighting. And countries that are able to prevent war, on the contrary, are engaged only in fanning the fire, while making money on it. I understand the reasons for what is happening ... but how then to disentangle it all? No democracy in these countries is even theoretically possible; dictators holding terrorists in check are being pissed off by the whole world under the howls of weapons of mass destruction. And then for decades we will rejoice in the rise of terrorism around the world.
      2. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 26 August 2013 20: 53 New
        +4
        Quote: KG_patriot_last
        Saudi, Qatar ... Do you think it's time?

        It's time, brother, it's time ...
        It's time for a couple of BRDS "get lost" after the launch ... laughing
  29. denson06
    denson06 26 August 2013 15: 20 New
    0
    Quote: Marrying
    Quote: falcon
    One can only hope for the objectivity of the UN Commission, which will begin work on the spot today.
    chemical applications weapons. And for the Americans and the British, in my opinion, the militants are not a priori guilty.

    1. The UN will say what the United States tells it.
    2. Militants are the money of Americans and British, their brainchild.
    So the conclusion is obvious - there should be operations against Syria, the question is what the Kremlin will say and how Beijing behaves.

    Unfortunately, I have to adhere to the opinion of Eugene and his conclusions .. Westerners can only provocatively achieve a UN Security Council resolution .. although they are ready to get involved without it and arrange their favorite bombing ..
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 26 August 2013 18: 50 New
      0
      Quote: denson06
      only provocatively achieve a UN Security Council resolution

      And what veto right has already been canceled?
      1. alone
        alone 26 August 2013 20: 12 New
        0
        they don’t even need a resolution. The West is acting on the program and purposefully fulfills it.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. GEO
    GEO 26 August 2013 20: 02 New
    0
    Quote: Vadivak
    despite the hysterical screams of France,


    I can’t even believe that once these tantrums conquered all of Europe.

    and then proudly marched back along the Old Smolensk Road ...
  32. Anphy
    Anphy 26 August 2013 22: 21 New
    0
    But it was very strange these days to read the headlines of some Russian newspapers and news agencies that picked up Western tracing paper.


    What are Russian newspapers? What are you speaking about? Are there still such people in Russia?