Ham's a sin, or why Russians don't speak well of themselves

124
Russian - probably the only people in the world, a large part of which is firmly in the habit of not responding to yourself as a people well. It is customary to compare the characteristic national features with the peculiarities of the neighbors, and not always in their own favor.

If we turn our eyes to the East, then we note what chastity and honoring of old men reign there, and how far we are from this with our depravity and ingratitude. If - to the West, then we cite as an example the purity of the streets and the perfection of democracy, while not neglecting to reproach ourselves with backwardness and lack of organization.

Some even see this as an act of humility: look at the dirt from which I came, how can I! There was even a whole such genre in the Orthodox-patriotic media of the 90-ies, and in some places it is still being encountered - a self-flaunting penitent. Its essence can be described as follows: we, Russians, have fallen into grave sins and have completely dropped, we drink vodka and have abortions, and therefore we are right if tomorrow pious Muslims, hardworking Chinese, valiant NATO troops, stress it, will occupy our cities and weigh and establish a proper, decent life there. And we will no longer be - well, yes, and they are themselves to blame, because of their sins.

Repentance is a very personal matter. This is when only you and God, and also a priest, who is only a witness, and a lectern with a cross and the Gospel. And you confess your sins in confession, make your conscience unburdening, and you do not complain to your near and dear ones and do not retell gossip about them. But about yourself - it is very close to the body, it is hard and painful, and here you have such a wonderful opportunity: it seems like repenting, and not about what exactly you have sinned. And some kind of movement happens, and at the same time you can not change your life.

You know, there are many such families, by the example of which you can see how the fifth commandment of God works - “Honor your father and your mother so that your days on earth will last”. But, alas, more often these examples are negative. These are those families where the child grows up without a father - divorced or deceased - and the mother, executed on her former offense, allows you to talk about him either nothing or badly. That is, the closest person, the mother, constantly forces the child to commit a serious sin against his second closest person - the father. This gives rise to a serious conflict that the child cannot cope with.

It is those children from whom the offended mother “knocks out with her knee” agreeing with her opinion that “dad was bad”, often become drug addicts, alcoholics, or players in their teens. All human life is rolling down the slope, and for only one reason - he blasphemed his father, committed Ham to sin. For justice, I note that the same rule also applies to the mother or other family members, only such cases are not common.

To blaspheme your people is much worse and harder for fate than to condemn your father. Suppose the child had a drunkard and a rowdy father, the son remembers the fights and scandals of his childhood in detail, and it’s not so easy for him to forget and forgive all this. But in this case, you can "make life" with a hardworking and sober grandfather. Or a kind and cordial mother. Or with a reasonable and imperturbable uncle.

But in the case when you were forced to repeat the “Russian bad” several times, and you so happened that everyone is only Russian along all lines, then there is no support under your feet. Cursed all the ancestors to the seventh knee, no one to rely on, it remains only to fall into extreme longing and go hang himself. Well, or drink it in black, since you were recorded as descendants of drunks, and there is no other way out.

This terrible sin of hula against fathers is constantly laid on us, wrapped in bright wrappers, offered to be swallowed like a sweet candy. Say the magic words: “I want a hotel in a resort where Russians do not rest,” and you will be comfortable and happy. Tell others: “Russians don’t like and don’t know how to work, so you have to import hard-working, hardy and undemanding migrants,” and they will consider you an enlightened, tolerant person and accept them in a decent society. Say the pious: "All Russians should repent of the sin of the regicide day and night, blood on them and on their children," and you will become pleasant not only to the liberals and the left, but also to some right.

Ham's a sin, or why Russians don't speak well of themselves

No, you will not be happy, as well as Ham and his descendants. Because, accustomed to blaspheme your people and your blood, you are destroying yourself, shaking the foundations of your being, and not someone else's. Even if you are not Russian by blood, but speak Russian and brought up in Russian culture, the consequences will be the same - engaging in constant self-suggestion on the topic of “unsuitability of Russians”, you can convince yourself only of your own worthlessness and start a self-destruct program, which you can stop will be very, very difficult.

How can you stop destroying yourself? To do this, you need to learn to be grateful not only to the members of your small family - parents, spouse, children - but also as a big family to your whole people. And the Russian people even have something to be grateful for. At least for the fact that he managed to survive, and that is why you are now walking the earth. Survive wars, revolutions, the most difficult and tragic historical twists and turns and upheavals. Trust me, it was not an easy task in life.

Then the world around you will begin to slowly change. And, having arrived in the ancient city, you will begin to see a dirty alcoholic who has not fallen asleep on the bench and not painted female creatures in red jackboots, for example, a XVII century cathedral and a merchant's house with a front garden. The word “Russian” will stand in a completely different associative range - not “Russian drunkards”, “Russian cattle” and “Russians ... hmm ... women of easy virtue”, but “Russian heroes”, “Russian culture”, “beauty of Russian nature” and “ Russian church".

Why is it important? Because Russian is you. And the image of Russian, developing from the smallest details in your head, is an image of yourself. This is your life force and support for further growth. It can be a blessing if you take it with gratitude to your ancestors, or a curse if you focus on their sins. Yes, Noah was actually drunk, only his different descendants treated it differently.
124 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. yan
    +39
    26 August 2013 15: 47
    Olga, thank you very much! Under each word is ready to subscribe. Just how to convey it to everyone from the cradle and grind daily that until you start talking about your people in a positive way, nothing will change. The word is material. Let's be proud of ourselves.
    1. +10
      26 August 2013 16: 00
      Quote: ...
      “All Russians must repent day and night of the sin of regicide, blood on them and their children,”


      Well, the order to execute the tsar was not signed by the Orthodox or even by Catholics, and it wasn’t beautiful to turn the gospel, even in this context comparison is inappropriate

      When Pilate, who was executing the judgment, asked whether to crucify Christ or let him go, the crowd gathered shouted: "Let him be crucified." And all the people said: "His blood is on us and on our children" (Matt. 27:25).
      1. +12
        26 August 2013 16: 27
        And yet, Vadim - TAM.za Bugrom - the monarch's heads flew from the chopping block much more often. Was it not "ottedova" brought by the wind, where they do not think about repentance for any reason
      2. +12
        26 August 2013 17: 32
        not the Russians killed the king, the Jews.
        1. -7
          26 August 2013 17: 58
          I, RUSSIAN, on January 12 killed him ....
          1. +5
            26 August 2013 19: 22
            “Bloody Sunday” was January 9th. There is something symbolic and epic in this "Bloody resurrection" when the people were crucified by the tsar, only then the people executed not the tsar, but the Renegade, who, seeing what he had done, abandoned the throne and reign, tried to transfer power to the Grand Duke, but he did not be, showed everyone a fig, thereby showing that he is not going to disentangle other people's sins. So they shot the citizen of Russia Nikolai Romanov with his family, nicknamed by our great-grandfathers "Nikolai the Bloody". And they were shot for "services to the fatherland" and indifference to the people, here I agree with "My address".
            1. 0
              27 August 2013 15: 33
              Oh, you are naive, I’m sure that the tsar is not to blame for the bloody .. it was a setup, how much has already been said about it, that provocateurs shot from the crowd from the crowd to cause shooting at the crowd, and that after only a few hours, there was no way to get leaflets around the city from horrific number of victims. By the way, the person here wrote that the Jews were killed by the king, and they sought to destroy the Russian state, note that among the revolutionaries the vast majority are Jews.
          2. shpuntik
            +8
            26 August 2013 23: 20
            wirbeln RU Today, 17:58 ↑ New
            I, RUSSIAN, on January 12 killed him ....

            This is the version of the winning side. The same government that shot the officers in the Crimea. "Storming the Winter" the same Russian director shot - Eisenstein. But in fact there was no assault, there was a simple hospital, no one resisted, by the way: the Latvian arrows were loaded at Finland Station. Look at the problem more broadly. Remember who killed Stolypin? The hunt for the Romanovs was until January 12 (9) -
            "... On March 13, 1881, Alexander II was mortally wounded on the embankment of the Catherine Canal in St. Petersburg by a bomb thrown by the People's Will Grinevitsky."
            36 years before the October Revolution.
            Source: http://www.calend.ru/event/4776/
            © Calend.ru

            The tsar is blamed for spinelessness, but they forget that he was a fatalist, and was born on the day of memory of Job the Long-suffering. Well, the fact that the Bolsheviks tried to write the history of his reign is not surprising. In general, do not believe advertising.
        2. shpuntik
          +11
          26 August 2013 22: 30
          dmitrich (2) SU Today, 17:32 ↑ New
          not the Russians killed the king, the Jews.

          Likewise, in the defamation of Russia, Russians are seen not by Russians, but by the so-called "Russian intelligentsia". For example, I don’t hate my country, but those who are ready to leave for permanent residence in Israel and the Shan, those who do not care who to play in the movies:
          in the Soviet Union, they played the good grandfather of Lenin, and as soon as the country collapsed, they immediately began to parody Brezhnev, communism, etc. Remember the films: "Shirley Myrli", "Battle of Mudanzan", etc. Hee-hee, ha-ha ...
          1. Dober
            +3
            26 August 2013 23: 55
            Greetings, Roma! Hello to you, your family and relatives !!!
            Your first paragraph is an ideal misunderstanding of the feelings and aspirations of the "Russian intelligentsia in exile."
            Now at home, tomorrow the plane to Hanover. Home???
            DICK. there - precisely in exile ...
            Three of my Sovetsky higher education, are more necessary to Germany than a hundred Taji for Russia. Time has shown that Russia can easily exchange people like us for colored Asiopes ...
            And at Izrailovke we are needed, all the more in Germany, and many more where. And Russia is the least ...
            "Abysmal, huh? ..." (c)
            And how...
            Quote: shpuntik
            Shirleys, Battle of Mudanzan, etc. Hee-hee, ha-ha.

            Here, Roma, not so much "Hee-hee" as "Ugh and bueeee ..."
            "On / some there / good weather, It's raining again on Brighton Beach" - the apotheosis of fucking * bizm and the collapse of the "local" cinema.
            For the fun of a certain contingent ...
            1. shpuntik
              +7
              27 August 2013 02: 03
              Dober RU Yesterday, 23:55 ↑ New
              Greetings, Roma! Hello to you, your family and relatives !!!

              Great Vadim! Got your idea, you're in Germany. I didn’t want to offend, sorry.
              To scratch everyone under one comb, this is not true. And not everyone left, dual citizenship.
              Time has shown that Russia can easily exchange people like us for colored Asiopes ...

              The fact of the matter is that non-Russians are in the leadership. Or it turns out that the Russian Ramodanov guest workers gave green light? But who will wish evil for their country? Moscow and Peter are already choking. We felt that their authorities were protecting and already at home. They go: they wave their hands, spit on the asphalt, the women on the path do not give way.
              Here is a quote from the seer monk Abel:
              - Nicholas the Second Holy Tsar, Job the Long-suffering like.
              On the crown of thorns he will replace the royal crown, he will be betrayed by his people; as once the Son of God. There will be a war, a great war, a world ... Through the air, people, like birds, will fly, under water, like fish, swim, they will begin to destroy each other with fetid gray. Treason will grow and multiply. On the eve of victory, the Royal Throne will collapse. Blood and tears will water the damp earth. A man with an ax will take power in the madness, and the Egyptian execution will truly come ... The prophetic Abel wept bitterly and quietly continued through tears:
              - And then a Jew will scorpion scour the Russian Land, rob her Shrine, close the Church of God, execute the best Russian people. This is God's permission, the wrath of the Lord for the renunciation of Russia from the Holy Tsar. Scripture testifies of Him. Psalms of the nineteenth, twentieth and ninetieth revealed to me his whole fate

              http://www.bibliotekar.ru/ggAvel.htm
              http://www.pravda.ru/society/fashion/couture/16-03-2012/1111070-avel_life-1/

              PS Here they made an autocorrect on the site: the famous word "%%%" is changed to "Jew". lol But this is not entirely correct, or rather not at all correct. Jewish nationality. And without them, nothing and nowhere. (Once I opened a card index in the library on technical disciplines and mathematics. There are no Rosenfeldov and Baumanovs. And there are many namesakes.) That's right: "Jew" is a religion.
              1. Mature naturalist
                0
                27 August 2013 21: 46
                Quote: shpuntik
                Jewish nationality. ... That's right: "Jew" is a creed.

                You are mistaken, dear. That's right: a Jew and a Jew are a religion.
                Otherwise, how can Ashkenaz and Ethiopian Jew of the same nationality be? They are even from different races ...
      3. +3
        26 August 2013 17: 55
        And, on January 12, when Saint Nikoai the "Bloody" gave the command to shoot icons, children, women, old people, peacefully went to the king under the leadership of priest Gapon? Oh, holy martyrs?
        1. +3
          26 August 2013 18: 09
          Nicholas was called "bloody" after his indifference to those who died on the Khodynskoye field during his coronation. And they were named not revolutionaries, but part of the then nobility, the intelligentsia. And it seems to me that it would be more accurate to call him "Indifferent".
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 19: 01
            Quote: My address
            Nicholas was called "bloody" after his indifference to those who died on the Khodynskoye field during his coronation. And they were named not revolutionaries, but part of the then nobility, the intelligentsia. And it seems to me that it would be more accurate to call him "Indifferent".

            The people turned their backs on the Romanovs after the execution of a peaceful demonstration on Palace Square on January 9, 1905.
            The sovereign, who ordered to shoot at the people, can not be legitimate. The indignation of the people by this bloody and senseless reprisal was so great that the whole country and all classes and sections of society, including the army and navy, revolted.
            The revolution was suppressed only due to a lack of leaders and weapons.
            In Russia, there is hardly a city or village in which there is no square or street named in memory of January 9, 1905.
            1. +1
              26 August 2013 19: 38
              Forgive the "Corsair", but I do not agree, since the indicator of the rejection of the tsar by the people was a fact, when in 16 on Easter, 15 people from the battalion came to the army, while in 15 10 people from the battalion were absent from the celebration of Easter.
              When the army rejected God, then the revolution prevailed over the Provisional Government, but this was the last straw, after the Japanese War, the Potemkin Stairs in Odessa, Bloody January 9, and the pogrom of our army, which even from the offensive, in the form of the sloppiness of the command, created a defeat, than dragged Russia into a positional war, in the absence of weapons in the trenches. Indicative is the fact when in the 90s the police stopped a truck with 40 "Nagans" produced by the "Imperial Arms Factory" in factory lubrication. But with the weapons captured in the imperial arsenals, the revolutionary army of the RSFSR fought the entire civilian one.
              Your phrase about the shortcomings of the leaders, rather reminds Vysotsky: There are few real violent ones - there are no leaders!
              Previously, the day of Bloody Sunday was marked on the calendar, but now people even confuse the date, and young people probably do not know what it is about.
              1. +7
                26 August 2013 20: 41
                shasherin_pavel
                the revolution prevailed over the temporary. when they destroyed the army, introducing the election of command in the spring of 17 and abolishing sub-coordination. when the temporary destroyed the power in the country and the rule of law, in March 17 dismissing the police and all local authorities. when they, in the best traditions of Nikolashki, destroyed everything they touched ... then really. the revolution prevailed ... if it hadn’t taken, the country would have perished, the Allies would have fulfilled their plans to destroy Russia. I compared Nicolaška with Gorby above, and so the temporary ones played the role of the elbon ... only more effective .... If the mention of God is appropriate here only in the context of the saying, whom God wants to punish, then he deprives the mind .... and conscience and honor .... so that they were empty in the next world ....
                And about the weapon .... well, tell me. why we could not even meet our needs for rifles and bought them in all the allied countries and in general. anywhere, right up to Japan and Mexico. we actually did not have heavy artillery, and practically did not release it, we did not release either light or large-caliber machine guns, we lagged behind the rest, did not release mortars or normal fighters, we all, including myself, are proud of our "Ilya Muromets ", but compare it with the Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI, although very few of them were released ... but what kind of fighters they had ... you can continue until they drop ...
                and if you recall how Stalin out of nothing, and having practically nothing, was able to create an industrial base that allowed us to survive. and Nikolai, having everything, could miscalculate everything ..... then it becomes inconvenient to tryndet about Stalinist cruelties, although I don’t really like them ..... so that you don’t have to pretend. what you do not know. what is the emergency stocks. which even a broken-down Nazi Germany would have been enough for a long time ......
              2. +1
                27 August 2013 18: 54
                Quote: shasherin_pavel
                Forgive the "Corsair", but I do not agree, since the indicator of the rejection of the tsar by the people was a fact, when in 16 on Easter, 15 people from the battalion came to the army, while in 15 10 people from the battalion were absent from the celebration of Easter.

                I do not see the connection between Easter and the king.
                Outwardly in the empire, after the suppression of the uprisings of 1905-1907, everything became the same, but the sympathies of the people were on the side of the revolutionaries, and not the king.
                Therefore, they overthrew the Romanovs almost without blood and violence.
                They fought in Civil not for the tsar and not for Orthodoxy, but for who will own the land and all the wealth of the empire, the people, or the privileged classes.
            2. +1
              27 August 2013 09: 54
              And was the Soviet government that shot the demonstration in Novocherkassk legitimate? And not a single street was named after this execution. Let's not draw conclusions based on propaganda cliches.
              1. +4
                27 August 2013 12: 42
                Midshipman
                Read about Novocherkassk not only perestroika wailing. and documents. reports. materials of criminal cases, they have long been published ... understand. that no one shot any demonstrations ... in the city because of idiotic rule. there was a riot, looting reigned, robberies and robberies, the first blood was spilled when trying to capture a weapon in the destroyed police building .... why did the demonstrators have machine guns? By the way, many police officers were disarmed. What do you think. We need weapons to collect mushrooms? .. We know such demonstrators. on TV every day they show .... by the way. answer the question. how did the demonstrators manage to print leaflets distributed in the city? And most importantly, where?
                So, that attempt to break off failed ... you don't - you don’t know anything about the events you are writing about.
                1. 0
                  27 August 2013 14: 06
                  Quote: smile
                  Midshipman
                  Read about Novocherkassk not only perestroika wailing. and documents. reports. materials of criminal cases, they have long been published ... understand. that no one shot any demonstrations ... in the city because of idiotic rule. there was a riot, looting reigned, robberies and robberies, the first blood was spilled when trying to capture a weapon in the destroyed police building .... why did the demonstrators have machine guns? By the way, many police officers were disarmed. What do you think. We need weapons to collect mushrooms? .. We know such demonstrators. on TV every day they show .... by the way. answer the question. how did the demonstrators manage to print leaflets distributed in the city? And most importantly, where?
                  So, that attempt to break off failed ... you don't - you don’t know anything about the events you are writing about.

                  Smile, and then you answer the question, why and where did the "peaceful demonstrators" get rifles and revolvers in January 1905? What kind of bombs were exploded among civilians and who arranged provocations, firing at troops and soldiers from the side of residential barracks? The same technology , brought to perfection today. Why, while defending Soviet power in Novocherkassk, do not want to see that the same technologies were launched against the Empire? And what do you know about the assassination attempt on the Tsar a few days before "Bloody Sunday", and after all, it was, and was done with one purpose - so that there was no Tsar at that time in the capital to launch that very large-scale provocation. Where did the Swiss rifles from ordinary laborers from Putilovsky? You can count hundreds of such moments! Smile, be objective! ! They did not start waging war against Russia from 17. It began much earlier !!!
                  1. +1
                    27 August 2013 15: 40
                    Trapperxnumx
                    What do you want? It is not known that at that time small arms in the Republic of Ingushetia could simply be bought? Even without a certificate from a psychiatrist? :))) Although, of course, some of the weapons had a criminal source of origin ...
                    Further. Yes, the technology of any revolution is similar, and it arose even when the monkeys in the flock overthrew the legal leader in connection with his totalitarian style of government ... :))) and now it is truly perfected ...
                    And what have I ever supported anarchists, all kinds of bombers or those. who committed the revolution of 1905, February 17th? If you think so, please give me a quote. If you can’t, your reproach of bias can be addressed to you, not to me.
                    I have never and nowhere claimed that the war against us began in 17, on the contrary, I have repeatedly stated the opposite ... please do not accuse me unreasonably of idiotic statements that do not belong to me, for subsequent "exposure" .... it looks ugly , honestly....:))))
                    1. +1
                      27 August 2013 17: 06
                      Quote: smile
                      I have never and nowhere claimed that the war against us began in 17, on the contrary, I have repeatedly stated the opposite ... please do not accuse me unreasonably of idiotic statements that do not belong to me, for subsequent "exposure" .... it looks ugly , honestly....:))))

                      If you offended - I'm sorry. Did not want. And bias - it happens not only in words, but also in silence. You, accusing the Empire of executions of workers and other "crimes against the people", are defending the USSR with exactly the same excesses. And this is bias. Bias is to scold the Tsar and his reign, keeping silent about the merits, or separating the merits of the Empire from the personality of the Monarch. In the same way, many say that the people won the Great Patriotic War without Stalin's participation. Sorry, this is not correct.
                      I do not whitewash the Tsar for his mistakes, but I also do not want to blame him for all the dirt and false rumors.
                      1. +1
                        27 August 2013 20: 46
                        Trapperxnumx
                        You didn’t offend me in any way and you apologize in vain for nothing. In addition, I am absolutely not touchy, although quite malicious ... :))) Although, of course, apologies characterize you from the very best side ... although, I repeat, there is no fault at all ...

                        According to the text.
                        That is the point, if you carefully read exactly my comments that you criticize, you will find. that I never wrote a single comment about that. how the tsarist government shot workers and committed crimes against the people ... never ... not a single comment ... I wrote about something completely different, I have different claims to tsarism during the reign of Nicholas 2, and to nicholas personally ... :) )))
                        In addition, I see the falsity of your position precisely in the unjustified equalization of excesses committed against the people under Nikolauska and later, through his fault, to actions under the Soviet regime ... especially. when the state stabilized .....
                        He poured the most dirt on Nikolashka himself, carefully read his personal diaries ... they are published .... you will not like to write it with a capital letter, chesslovo ...
                    2. +1
                      27 August 2013 21: 15
                      Quote: smile
                      Yes, the technology of any revolution is similar, and it arose even when the monkeys in the pack overthrew the legal leader in connection with his totalitarian style of government ... :)))

                      This is a fallacy, the monkeys were afraid to raise their heads at the totalitarian leader, revolutions are possible only in a liberal society that protects criminals.
                      Well, or sent from outside, there is no difference in the form of government.
                      1. +1
                        27 August 2013 23: 26
                        Setrac
                        :))) Well, a non-totalitarian monkey king will be instantly recognized as fake by the community ...:))) ... in addition, even monkey satraps tend to grow old, get injured or be eaten by even more totalitarian jaguars ..... :) ))) and the monkey community also tends to give birth to new leaders from their bowels, hungering for power, bananas and monkey women .... some monkey gods, at the same time, give physical capabilities that allow them to compete with dictators .... :))) )
                        So, that, perhaps, I’m still right .... :))))) and the monkeys didn’t think of perversions like liberalism .... and who after that will say that they are worse than us? :))))
                  2. +2
                    27 August 2013 19: 03
                    Quote: Trapper7
                    Smile, and then you answer the question, why and where did the "peaceful demonstrators" get rifles and revolvers in January 1905? What kind of bombs were exploded among civilians and who arranged provocations, firing at troops and soldiers from the side of residential barracks?

                    This nonsense was composed by liberals in the 90s.
                    The demonstrators did not have any weapons on January 9, 1905 and could not be. The demonstrators would have torn to shreds anyone who tried to get into their ranks with weapons, a true believer in the tsar was going to ask, not demand.
                    There are no residential barracks on Palace Square and on Nevsky Prospekt, and never has been.
                    And in Novorossiysk there was an elementary pogrom and brutality of the crowd, and this is treated only with lead inside. The brutal crowd of words does not understand.
                    And there were no special reasons for rebellion and brutality in Novorossiysk, the whole country lived so, according to the means it had.
                    1. Mature naturalist
                      -1
                      27 August 2013 22: 07
                      Quote: Corsair5912
                      And in Novorossiysk there was an elementary pogrom and brutality of the crowd

                      In Novocherkassk, and not in Novorossiysk.
                      Or is it not important where, just to speak out?
                      1. +2
                        27 August 2013 23: 33
                        Mature naturalist
                        this is clearly an elementary mistake. Moreover, for example, all computers consider me obviously worse than they are, and try to add words for me, including geographical names ... sometimes, due to my carelessness, they succeed in it, and it turns out rubbish, not text. .. :)))
                        maybe at Corsair too the computer thinks too much of himself? :)))) ...
                      2. Mature naturalist
                        0
                        28 August 2013 01: 16
                        I do not like such statements "... it can only be treated with lead inside" in relation to the citizens of their own (our) country, even after half a century. And actions too.
                      3. +2
                        28 August 2013 02: 27
                        Mature naturalist
                        Sometimes you have to do things that no one likes. for example, going to the doctor is unpleasant and, often, painful ... but it is necessary, because otherwise the body may die ... And I especially do not like that people from that breed who raise a howl on such topics, thanks to which the Union was destroyed and now they are trying to destroy Russia according to the same scenario ... they are more terrible and more dangerous than any killer ... And this is accompanied by such a dose of deliberate lies that ... there is a desire to plant a machine gun barrel in a lying mouth on a grand scale .. That is why I am sympathetic to such words ... as well as to the fact that such actions, in theory, themselves suggest themselves in relation to some "citizens of our country" ... a scanty inflamed appendix is ​​able to kill the entire body. therefore it must be removed ... this is an intolerant statement ... but true ...
                    2. +1
                      28 August 2013 08: 55
                      Quote: Corsair5912
                      Quote: Trapper7
                      Smile, and then you answer the question, why and where did the "peaceful demonstrators" get rifles and revolvers in January 1905? What kind of bombs were exploded among civilians and who arranged provocations, firing at troops and soldiers from the side of residential barracks?

                      This nonsense was composed by liberals in the 90s.
                      The demonstrators did not have any weapons on January 9, 1905 and could not be. The demonstrators would have torn to shreds anyone who tried to get into their ranks with weapons, a true believer in the tsar was going to ask, not demand.
                      There are no residential barracks on Palace Square and on Nevsky Prospekt, and never has been.
                      And in Novorossiysk there was an elementary pogrom and brutality of the crowd, and this is treated only with lead inside. The brutal crowd of words does not understand.
                      And there were no special reasons for rebellion and brutality in Novorossiysk, the whole country lived so, according to the means it had.


                      Source: L.D. Trotsky. “Our First Revolution” (December).

                      “On the first day, about 100.000 people stopped working. At one of the stations, two drivers were killed who arbitrarily led trains. There are minor skirmishes in different parts of the city. A group of combatants dismantles a gun shop. Starting from this day, ordinary police posts disappear from Moscow streets. Urban appear almost only in groups ... ".

                      “On the 16th, a test artillery bombardment of Presnya began. The warriors responded with vigorous fire and forced the artillery to retreat. But on the same day it became known that Dubasov received great reinforcements from St. Petersburg and Warsaw, and the mood began to decline ... ”

                      cobblestones forced to retreat probably ...

                      http://nstarikov.ru/blog/19471
            3. +1
              27 August 2013 15: 38
              It was not the people who turned their backs on the Romanovs, but the confused generals and Duma members who spread rumors about the tsar. for example, that they say that Rasputin was a part of the royal family and influenced politics, while in reality, based on the records of the tsar's diary, Rasputin came to the maximum for the treatment of the heir 1-2 a year, and the rest of the time he "treated" by phone, and also spread rumors about spying Queen of German descent
          2. +3
            26 August 2013 20: 16
            My address
            And rather, to call it insignificant .... all responsibility for two lost wars, for a devastated country brought to three revolutions, is his direct and unconditional guilt. And I don't care. who shot him like, (especially since the country's leadership didn’t give an order to destroy him), what nationality did the torus ... in any case, he got what he deserved. on his conscience the blood of millions of people ...
            To those who consider. that his non-destruction would play some role in advance I answer, this insignificant humanity. specializing in shooting a raven, the victories over which he scrupulously entered into a diary, he collapsed. spoiled and spoiled everything that his little hands reached out to, a direct direct ancestor of Gorbachev, this time ... and he had so few supporters, among disparate forces and currents, who fought mainly for the interests of various countries of the Entente. funded them. that he simply would not have been noticed. a small propaganda effect cost you only a little more Russian blood ... that's all .... so please do not focus on those nationalities. who rewarded Nikolashka with what he deserved ..... none of you would have shed tears for Gorby. if a fair punishment by hand overtook him. even the Chukchi. even a Jew. at least Russian .... I, for one, would be indifferent to it .....
            1. +1
              26 August 2013 21: 10
              Hello, Vladimir.
              I adhere to communist views because of their groundedness in justice. I consider communist ideas to be Christian development.
              But I would be interested to know what would have happened if Russia had not got involved in the First World War. It could have been very bad, but it could have been the other way around, but with a normal autocrat. After all, the States twice with Germany acted like that monkey on a tree with tigers fighting downstairs. I think the coming of the Bolsheviks to power is not the worst option after that mess.
              And the Jews. Once I read that modern Jews have identified themselves as Jews in Europe, in the 16-17 century. It is evident that they are Semitic blood, like the Arabs, the ancient Jews and other Syrians. But the descendants of evangelical Jews or not - is unknown. They decided that the descendants, based on religion - Judaism. Although Jews are among the blacks, some even among the Arabs. And in ancient Asia Minor there were enough Semites, including enemies of biblical Jews.
              1. +2
                26 August 2013 21: 20
                My address
                Greetings, Alexander. Here I agree with you ... literally with every word ...
                And the Jews ... I perceive them as all other people, no better and no worse, although I do not like the state of Israel (why should I like the closest US ally) and strains their percentage among financial movers .... and we including ..... but I feel sorry for ours. when they get hung up on these unfortunate Jews .... well, I don’t believe this quantifiable people are able to control the planet and be completely the fiends of hell ....
              2. +4
                26 August 2013 23: 04
                My address
                He returned to put + and decided to add, I don’t see anything wrong with communist views ... you remember the Moral Code of the builder of communism - they practically do not differ from the ten commandments. And given the time of occurrence, given the constant and consistent humanization of our society (which no matter who says), these are quite relevant views ... especially now ....
                1. +1
                  27 August 2013 00: 09
                  Quote: smile
                  they practically do not differ from the ten commandments

                  We were deceived! And it was like that ... belay
                2. -4
                  27 August 2013 10: 00
                  Of course not different, tk. this is plagiarism. The communists did not come up with anything better than to distort the commandments, and replace the words God and heaven with communism and a bright future. The result was an aggressive pseudo-religion that destroyed the Orthodox Church as a "competing organization".
                  1. +2
                    27 August 2013 12: 32
                    Midshipman
                    Well yes. well yes .. aggressive ... try to be peaceful. if all your neighbors are eager to chop off your territory and have fun looking at you over the sights. and the neighbors have plans for the complete destruction of your statehood and are actively arming and rallying these neighbors. planning to use them as the vanguard of their troops ... here who is non-aggressive is dead ... especially as the Communists. until they cleared cannibals like Trotsky from their ranks, there were, so to speak, childhood illnesses ...

                    And yet, if the Communists only changed their words. as you said. what turns out before that Orthodoxy was aggressive? This is quite clearly traceable based on your words .... :)))
                    1. 0
                      29 August 2013 10: 03
                      Aggressive towards Orthodoxy. Orthodoxy did not drown communist leaders in the ice holes and did not arrange mass executions for their convictions. There is no reason to talk about the aggressiveness of Orthodoxy. And the aggression of the Communists was caused by the fact that they quite logically felt like ideological impostors.
              3. +4
                26 August 2013 23: 46
                Quote: My address
                Although Jews are among blacks,

                Anecdote
                Odessa. A Negro is sitting on Primorsky Boulevard reading a newspaper in Hebrew. Two residents of Odessa pass by:
                "Izya! Look at this idiot! He doesn’t need a black man!"
                1. +3
                  27 August 2013 00: 43
                  chehywed
                  I could not limit myself to a miserable plus sign ..... :)))) by the way, to the honor of the Jews. they invent most of the jokes for themselves .... that is, they are no different from us in this regard .... :)))))
                  1. +2
                    27 August 2013 01: 03
                    Quote: smile
                    by the way, to the honor of the Jews. they invent most of the jokes for themselves .... that is, they are no different from us in this regard

                    That's right. If people know how to laugh at themselves ... then the rest is no longer laughing! laughing
            2. 0
              27 August 2013 15: 43
              The 1st world king did not lose because it was not allowed to be brought to the end by the traitors, but the Japanese one, because when in your country the nits again made a revolution, then it’s hard to wage two wars at the same time, and if not for the revolution, the troops being riveted and prepared after the retreat near Mukden would have defeated the Japs who were already exhausted
            3. +1
              27 August 2013 19: 14
              Quote: smile
              And I don't care. who shot him like, (especially since the country's leadership didn’t give an order to destroy him), what nationality did the torus ... in any case, he got what he deserved. on his conscience the blood of millions of people

              The Romanovs in 1918 in E-burg graduated at the initiative of English agents.
              From 1914 to 1917, 500 tons of Russian gold were exported to Small Britain to secure military loans. Nobody could demand it, except for members of the royal family. Therefore, the British did not accept Nikolai with his family, and therefore they sent him to Tobolsk, away from the arrogant Saxons, and therefore they killed the whole family.
              In Britain there were many impostors posing as the surviving children of Nikolai Romanov in order to get to gold, but when did all sorts of Rothschilds and other bankers let such money out of their hands?
              Small Britain never gave back the gold of Russia.
          3. 0
            27 August 2013 15: 35
            just after shelter .. Sunday.
      4. SASCHAmIXEEW
        0
        27 August 2013 14: 04
        And the Jewish people cried out, and who killed the Russian Tsar? Not the Russian people! And who brought the revolution to us? And who is in power now in RUSSIA?
    2. +10
      26 August 2013 16: 06
      Quote: yan
      Let's be proud of ourselves

      ... You open a newspaper and there is a blasphemy against your country - boldly, without hesitation, you can say - ORDERED ARTICLE, WRITTEN FOR GRANTS OF OUR "DAMNED" partners in the fight against terrorism! And since there are a lot of such publications and they are more organized by the "CUSTOMER FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT" ... they are the most large-circulation (for "freebie" and the vinegar is sweeter!), Then we get a continuous "voice" of these pro-Western "agents of influence"! This is the liberal press and will not let itself be offended ... try to run into someone from this "fifth column" ... So for other people's money, an image of Samoyeds and self-criticism is created from us ...
      Until these "custom media" are taught to be not only free from conscience ... decency ... until they limit the position they arbitrarily assigned to themselves - the "fourth" power ... until they teach that one must be RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR WORDS. .. until then we will find fault at every corner.
      1. Airman
        +1
        26 August 2013 20: 06
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        Quote: yan
        Let's be proud of ourselves

        ... You open a newspaper and there is a blasphemy against your country - boldly, without hesitation, you can say - ORDERED ARTICLE, WRITTEN FOR GRANTS OF OUR "DAMNED" partners in the fight against terrorism! And since there are a lot of such publications and they are more organized by the "CUSTOMER FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT" ... they are the most large-circulation (for "freebie" and the vinegar is sweeter!), Then we get a continuous "voice" of these pro-Western "agents of influence"! This is the liberal press and will not let itself be offended ... try to run into someone from this "fifth column" ... So for other people's money, an image of Samoyeds and self-criticism is created from us ...
        Until these "custom media" are taught to be not only free from conscience ... decency ... until they limit the position they arbitrarily assigned to themselves - the "fourth" power ... until they teach that one must be RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR WORDS. .. until then we will find fault at every corner.

        We are not kicking ourselves, but of our rulers, who have been at the helm of the state for so many years, and in the country everyone can’t bring basic order. Americans, Germans, and French, etc., blamed their power. The article is clearly custom-made, someone in the West (American ears stick out from afar), I really want to instill in us an inferiority complex, guilt. But it is precisely the Americans who are to blame for all the TROUBLES of the WORLD, and they VERY WANTED TO LOOK WHITE AND FURNISHED, but everything is getting worse.
        1. +1
          27 August 2013 10: 04
          There is such a commandment - Do not slander the ruler among your people. Pouring mud over the country's leadership, you pour it on your own head, because including and it’s your fault that they are in power. Constructive criticism - please, but to find fault is somehow shameful.
      2. +9
        27 August 2013 01: 12
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        You open a newspaper and there is a blasphemy against your country - you can safely say without hesitation


        Scolding black racist
        Scolding anti-Semitic Jews
        Scolding Russians is an honest, brave, progressive journalist.
      3. Mature naturalist
        +1
        27 August 2013 22: 12
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        You open a newspaper and there is a blasphemy against your country

        "- Do not read Soviet newspapers until lunchtime.
        “So there are no others.”
        - Don't read any ... "
        As if it was written yesterday, corrected for "Russian newspapers".
    3. +1
      26 August 2013 21: 22
      Nothing to add! It's like that! That would be more history books to rewrite everything back to normal! And it would be the case !!!!
      1. Alex1959
        -1
        26 August 2013 22: 55
        Dear Emigrant. Could you tell me where the Russian website went in Kazakhstan. I think I already met you there. For a month now this site has not been opened (It’s not possible to open the page. Maybe the address has been changed, or maybe it was covered up.? I will be very grateful to YOU ​​for your reply.
    4. 0
      26 August 2013 21: 39
      and you ask my wife what they teach at school and then you will consider that everything is bad that we say flowers about ourselves and berries in front
  2. ramsi
    +2
    26 August 2013 15: 49
    as far as I understand, we are the descendants of Japheth; descendants of the hama - blacks
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 17: 16
      Quote: ramsi
      as far as I understand, we are the descendants of Japheth; descendants of the hama - blacks


      We are the descendants of the Boreal Aryans.
      1. ramsi
        +3
        26 August 2013 17: 31
        ek, where you brought something ...
        1. +4
          26 August 2013 18: 00
          Ah, you are marking everything in the Jews ...
          1. ramsi
            +2
            26 August 2013 18: 06
            Jews - from Eber - a descendant of Shem
      2. +3
        26 August 2013 20: 58
        Boreals, Arias, Slavs, Rus are our descendants ...
        That is, People created in the image and likeness ....
        All the rest are created from dust, Adam, Eve, (unsuccessful experiment-Lilith)),
        12 Israeli tribes, Japanese-Chinese, blacks - can also be considered an experiment, not viable, because they did not create anything (as a maximum - attributed to themselves)) and they destroy each other and People all the time ...

        And we, People, put up with this for some reason, we pity them all, raise them to our level, here the Chechens were taught the language, culture, and those teachers were a chainsaw ...
        Asians - built factories and factories, and they go here revenge streets and wear bricks ...
        Jews - we created a state and we all feel sorry for the "POOR", AND THOSE LOCATED IN GAZPROM AND THE KREMLIN AND STEAL, steal and rob according to the invented, in the Duma collected from Judas under "justifiable" laws ...

        Why? This is a maturity experiment. No matter what, we remained People ....
        The rest is NO.
        1. +1
          26 August 2013 23: 55
          Quote: Asgard
          The rest is NO.

          On this resource, Russophobes paid attention that for all nations the name is a noun, and only for Russians is an adjective. I explain Russian - an adjective, a man - a noun, that is, we are Russian people, if the name of a nation is a noun, then it is no longer a person, but a new kind of two-legged - a Pole, a Chechen, a Turk, not a general person.
          1. ramsi
            0
            27 August 2013 11: 28
            come on, just the features of the Russian language: something is leaning, something is not, because of the clearly audible dissonance
          2. +1
            27 August 2013 14: 14
            That's right: "Russian" is an adjective. That's just an adjective because it is a description, first of all, of mentality, soul, etc. etc. This is broader than nationality. In my life I met a lot of people who were outwardly non-Russian, but who grew up here, absorbed everything and became truly Russian people.
    2. +3
      26 August 2013 19: 51
      The tribe of Molokhov, which is called the Scythians in the Book of Maccabees. But by spiritual kinship from Andrew the First-Called or the first-called. When Jesus went home, two disciples of John (the Baptist) followed him. He stopped and asked them: What do you want? We want to see where you live. Go and see. One of these two was Andrew the First-Called. And the spiritual is higher than the carnal, because when the Pharisees asked John: How can you make these uncircumcised children of David? He answered them: the Lord, and of these stones can make the children of David.
  3. +9
    26 August 2013 15: 51
    It is those children from whom the offended mother “knocks” her consent with the opinion that “dad was bad”
    Yes, there are enough of such mothers. Then he is looking for a man to sit on his neck and shine his legs, and milk money for the next man. An example is shitty for a daughter, if any. family now more often disenfranchised and with a meager salary shabbat after work. At this time, the little wife slowly begins to twirl her tail. Having turned around turns into a mother one-on-one.
    1. +9
      26 August 2013 15: 57
      Hit the woman with a hammer, the woman will be gold, the "Domostroy" handbook in every house laughing

      I ALWAYS talk about Russians either Good or very good, for this is the harsh truth, the rest is all the slander and lies of those who are profitable to expose Russians as subhuman.
      1. +3
        26 August 2013 16: 05
        Quote: tilovaykrisa
        Hit the woman with a hammer, the woman will be gold, the "Domostroy" handbook in every house


        Domostroy gave instructions - how to beat, but not cripple: do not beat "under the heart with a fist, do not kick or use a staff to stab with any iron or wood."

        And this proverb is relatively modern
        When, after the war in 1949, the MGB instituted a case against Vyacheslav Molotov's wife, Polina Zhemchuzhina (later she was arrested and sent into exile), Stalin said at a Politburo meeting: "Kill the woman, MOLOTOV, the woman will be gold."
        1. +2
          26 August 2013 20: 47
          Vadivak
          And I like women who can fight back .... :)))
          By the way, and without whipping, no way? :))))
    2. +11
      26 August 2013 16: 08
      All right. From my own experience I know how single mothers distort their daughters because of the inability to forgive and forget their ex-husband. I was lucky, my case is simple and God helped. But the family must be complete and be able to forgive each other.
  4. +3
    26 August 2013 15: 57
    we are just very modest. this is not self-praise, in any case. and if that, we can give a tambourine feel angry
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 18: 02
      Not right. It is said, if you do not respect yourself, you will not be respected.
  5. Lech from ZATULINKI
    +7
    26 August 2013 15: 58
    Yes, all sorts of fighters for the rights of democracy and gays are trying to put into the heads of weak Russian minds that RASHA is bad, that it is necessary to bring down from this country a weak-willed person EASY TO BELIEVE THIS.
    But the one who loves his people, his land, his family, children will finally always fight for a better future for his people.
    People do not believe all the swindlers, scammers and haters of our people - our ancestors have done the impossible, defended our life and freedom, and we must BELIEVE IN FINALLY and our future.
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 14: 18
      These disgusting little people who allow themselves to say "Rashka" .. Let them knock down… Let them knock on all four sides. I have seen those abroad: you can go on a visit, but never live. Taking Germany as an example: a wonderful country, but there is one drawback - the Germans :)
  6. +13
    26 August 2013 16: 10
    Emotionally and blurry, but generally true. Until it is officially announced that the Russian people are the most important in Russia, that the very name of the country comes from the Russians, that this country is Russian - we won’t see anything sensible. Moreover, it must be emphasized that there is no damage to small nationalities. They are also Russian, but some of them are drilled, some are Kalmyks, some are Ingush, and so on. Even if you are a Chinese or a Martian, but if you live in Russia, then you are now Russian, you must know the cultures and customs of Russia and protect them.
    There should be no national republics within Russia, no autonomies. Only areas, regions within the country. And of course, the widespread enforcement of the law!
    But this already causes laughter - what a law, when on the streets of Moscow !!! collective prayers are held, and officers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs are killed in front of everyone! When the power is 100% corrupt and actually surrendered to the Russian people. As long as the Russians are so divided, they (they) will be destroyed. And not so much external enemies as internal ones. With the connivance of the authorities of the Russian Federation. So much for Mother Russia! ..
    1. Toporkoff
      +2
      26 August 2013 16: 25
      Most likely not with the connivance of the Russian authorities, but with the connivance of the people. You should not give up responsibility. We are no less to blame for what is happening.
    2. Tretyakov
      0
      26 August 2013 22: 10
      Perhaps more I like the saying - "Russian is not a nationality, this is a state of mind!" An acquaintance Fin told me so ..
    3. vladsolo56
      +2
      27 August 2013 07: 19
      Wow how wrong you are
      Quote: erased
      Until it is officially announced that the Russian people are the most important in Russia, that the name of the country comes from the Russians, that this country is Russian - we won’t see anything sensible

      How simple it is: announced through the media, Russians are the main people in Russia (the most important), and everything at once became simply wonderful. Only now it will not, and nothing will change at all. It will not change until the Russian understands that to be called Russian is one thing, and to correspond to this is completely different. What should be Russian? this is where to start. In my cultural, well-mannered, respecting their ancestors and those who are weaker. Helping the weak and soothing presumptuous. If all this is, then you can call yourself a Russian. And if you have a mate through the word, if you spit yourself and others under your feet, if you can insult the old or small. You are not Russian, no matter who you are born, and whoever you consider yourself to be.
  7. xan
    +6
    26 August 2013 16: 17
    pretty girls in the photo
    we were lucky with the female sex, it is indisputable, for the sake of them it is possible to suffer totalitarianism with all sorts of inconveniences and deprivations.
    and with Western horror no democracy nafik unnecessary
  8. +9
    26 August 2013 16: 19
    The Russian people are a great people. I am proud that I am Russian!
    However, we are judged not by origin, but by our actions. Russian tourists, according to all ratings, are the most noisy, arrogant and rude. In terms of my current activity, I can say that Russians are the most problematic guests. Especially those who think they have "some" money. You cannot judge an entire nation by the actions of its individual representatives. Only these very "representatives" who have the opportunity to travel around the world have formed such an opinion about us.
    Here, in Russia, it is enough to go to places of rest (outdoors) in order to assess the entire level of "development" of other representatives of the Russian people. Piles of rubbish, cars on the beach ...
    And so, practically, everywhere and in everything. Isn't there too many "representatives" who dishonor their people with all their deeds?
    And no matter how beautiful the temple was, everyone, first of all, sees not him, but the drunken peasant pissing under him and the company of young people thumping nearby. Not Russian birches, but mountains of garbage under them. Not a representative of the great Russian people, but a drunken boor, requiring a special attitude. Hu..li, not hu ... if the Russian people - so far no hu ... if it doesn’t work ...
    1. Dober
      0
      27 August 2013 00: 33
      Quote: IRBIS
      they judge us not by origin, but by our actions. Russian tourists, according to all ratings, are the most noisy, arrogant and rude. In terms of my current activity, I can say that Russians are the most problematic guests. Especially those who think they have "some" money.

      Complete nonsense !!! You need to shoot a couple of such provocateurs, so that others would not be accustomed!
      I have money and "not some", and the queue to visit my family is already lined up for a month. And I choose, not me. The local "aborigines" have long ago put me on the list of the "most fucking" friends (of the nation).
      Quote: IRBIS
      in Russia, it is enough to go to places of rest (outdoors) to assess the entire level of "development" of other representatives of the Russian people. Piles of rubbish, cars on the beach ...

      Alas, brother, but it is so ...
      And you (we) yourself are to blame first of all ...
      Are the muzzles in the blood of the habalniks or have they applied to the "commandant's office"?
      The answer is not required - "the right guys" are more piss cops than thugs ...
    2. +2
      27 August 2013 04: 45
      I completely agree with you, Irbis. A fly in the ointment spoils a barrel of honey. There are a lot of spoons. I really like the motto: "Start with yourself!"
  9. Vtel
    +11
    26 August 2013 16: 21
    “The Russian people have a place in prison, and not just anywhere, but in the prison bastard ...”
    “The Russian nation is a cancerous tumor of humanity!” Novodvorskaya ...

    “I realize that I do not belong to the Russian people. Yes, at times I dreamed of the day when I could proudly say:“ I am Russian! ” It was in America ... "Posner ...

    etc. - these are the "teachers" of the Russian people. Nothing will soon wake up the Russian bear and these pseudo-teachers will not seem little. Amen!
    1. +5
      26 August 2013 16: 39
      What nasty faces ....
    2. smiths xnumx
      +5
      26 August 2013 16: 44
      No, I see them a little different:

      and here is their reward

      Everyone except the liberals, with respect! hi
      1. +1
        26 August 2013 17: 36
        Quote: Kuznetsov 1977
        and here is their reward

        Sorry! and Judas and the rest of the team what citizenship?
        1. +1
          26 August 2013 18: 39
          Quote: kvirit
          Sorry! and Judas and the rest of the team what citizenship?

          Judah, as well as the rest of the team - all the apostles, and Jesus himself were Jews, and by birth, and by religion, and citizenship were the countries of Judea (at that time either a colony, or a protectorate of the Roman Empire).
        2. -1
          26 August 2013 20: 00
          Jesus and Judah from the city of Cariot (Iskareot) were the only thoroughbred Jews.
          1. Dober
            -2
            27 August 2013 00: 38
            Quote: shasherin_pavel
            Jesus and Judah from the city of Cariot

            Cho, bad cap or daunyonok?
            Jesus is a Galilean by birthplace and has absolutely nothing to do with the Jewish tribe by blood.
            You will find links yourself or want to attract the attention of forum users who are versed in this topic?
    3. Pit
      Pit
      0
      26 August 2013 17: 02
      Yes there is not a single Russian, at best, ROSIAN.
    4. +5
      26 August 2013 17: 30
      In the West, Russians call all immigrants from the Soviet Union. It is only we who listen to such moral freaks as Novodvorskaya.

      May 11, 2010 13:26

      To Mishchenko's question "to whom should we repent?", Novodvorskaya assured that it was necessary to repent in front of everyone.

      “We must repent of the Baltic countries occupied by us, of the occupied and genocidal countries of Eastern Europe, of the Chechens, whom, in gratitude for having given a huge number of heroes of the Soviet Union, we expelled, and some were burned in barns, because they did not Before the Crimean Tatars, before everyone ... (...) Yes, before everyone whose fate we have distorted, whom we dragged into hell with us. Before the Baltic countries, no one has yet repented and even the fact of occupation is not recognized " , - said Novodvorskaya, reports ru.DELFI.lt.

      I WOULD LIKE TO SPECIFY - DOES THIS APPLY TO NEWWORDS AND PERSONALLY WITH IT PERSONALLY!

      They constantly try to convince us that we are outcasts, always guilty before all. For 20 years, we almost silently perceive this as a punishment for the sins of historical Russia. When do we realize our significance in the historical development of the same Europe? Stop doubting yourself, the ability of your homeland-RUSSIA !!!
      1. +2
        26 August 2013 21: 02
        AleksUkr
        The most offensive is that the screams of our scum of our society, replicating opinions. such as those mentioned in the article or those that the aforementioned individuals admit, they listen with joyful attention and wrap around the mustache in our neighboring republics ... even here we especially often hear them from the lips of representatives of the two republics ... who claim that we are colonizers and stranglers of freedom and development ... etc .... and their local propaganda clearly builds the worldview of their subjects on a similar foundation, they say, the Russians there are talking about themselves .... eloquence, eloquent eloquence, similar rhetoric and vocabulary eloquently used by some of our colleagues in relation to Russia and Russian ..... damn, very disappointing ...
      2. Tretyakov
        +1
        26 August 2013 22: 16
        Well, Novodvorskaya is "SOMETHING"!
        Moreover, this is not something from our past (USSR), and not from our present life. There are parasites on the body of any living creature, if that creature is viable. So, Novodvorskaya is a real parasite, i.e. lives on the body of the creature, and eats its juices, but never, under any circumstances, does not leave this creature, because and lives at the expense of him!
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 23: 47
          Quote: Tretyakov
          Well, Novodvorskaya is "SOMETHING"!

    5. 0
      26 August 2013 17: 35
      Quote: Vtel
      - these are the "teachers" of the Russian people.

    6. +1
      26 August 2013 18: 04
      No need to wake up, need to BE.
    7. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 57
      It’s time to remove the cancerous tumor surgically, as chemotherapy will not help anymore, since this tumor is nourished by pus from abroad.
  10. 0
    26 August 2013 16: 28
    They themselves live without pants, but are ready to teach and help everyone around the world.
  11. +2
    26 August 2013 16: 32
    That's just not necessary to generalize, dear Author! And what specific Orthodox patriotic media are you talking about?
    are you leading, is it possible to find out? Self-flagellation is characteristic of some (liberal-oriented
    ) parts of the Russian intelligentsia, so it has long been (read the classics). The bulk
    Russian people, thank God, are mentally healthy! And about the cleanliness of the streets in the West, too, like where
    do you know! Look at the streets in Paris, for example, in our cities an order of magnitude cleaner! Excuse me,
    Of course, the problems of single women are very important! But the subject of the site is somewhat different.
  12. +1
    26 August 2013 16: 56
    Olya, that would be to convey such generally simple truths to the younger generation, and those who have already entered adult adult life. We are in awe of our ex / she, especially if we have not parted with dignity well .. He is so-and-so ... why ?? Sometimes they are cruel to their closest ones, and at the same time they are ready to help completely strangers. Angry at home and compatriots at home (negative darkness) and willing to help their, Russian people outside the homeland. Why is that? I can not understand.
    Article + 500!
  13. pinecone
    0
    26 August 2013 16: 56
    If we turn our eyes to the East, we note what chastity and veneration of the elderly reigns there, and how far we are from this debauchery and ingratitude.

    What chastity is there when seven-year-old girls are married to old men. For the money, of course.
  14. +1
    26 August 2013 16: 57
    What beautiful girls smile
    1. Dober
      0
      27 August 2013 00: 46
      Quote: KG_patriot_last
      What beautiful girls

      Rahmet for tact.
      Kyrgyz women are also very personal ... Narrow-chested, thin-boned, dark-skinned ...
      top-anthropos.com/rating/item/339-samye-krasivye-kirgizki
      1


      Against the background of his aul, and not in the vastness of the Great Russian Plain hi
  15. Oskar
    +13
    26 August 2013 17: 00
    Replacement national superiority complex on national inferiority complex is in full swing. It follows the orders of the West and the direct indulgence of the Kremlin, with the involvement of huge resources and "authoritative" people. We must stop considering ourselves poor and half-drunk sufferers! They make us like that, rubbing that:
    1) The history of Russia is the most long-suffering. Undoubtedly. But nothing more than the history of many other countries. There was no European plague in Russia, which wiped out from 1/3 to ¾ of the population in different places; there was no inquisition; there were no religious wars, as in Germany since the middle of the 16th century. in the middle of the 17th century; the Tatar-Mongol Yoke is in question, it most likely was not what they tried to impose on us for centuries for the truth; for centuries, the Turks slaughtered the Greeks and Serbs - with impalement, desecration of temples and mass deportation into slavery; we are generally silent about the indigenous peoples of both Americas; in the east, life is an illusion and grief does not matter - the whole story is a continuous "bloodbath"; in China, the victims of the population have never been counted (and why?); atomic bombs were not thrown at us; there was no fragmentation, as in Goethe's time in Germany; how Poland was not torn to pieces (with a complete loss of sovereignty); there were no events like the Bartholomew night or the Armenian massacre.
    2) Russians are prone to sloppiness, carelessness and drunkenness, capable of short-term exertion of strength, but not constant work. If the long-suffering history is a polemical question, then this statement is generally ridiculous. Drunken assholes ... tsy mastered the territory from the Volga to Alaska and fed half the world with grain (as in the early 20th century)? Created the Great USSR, before which the whole world trembled? The mind is incomprehensible ...
    3) Peacefulness of the Russian people. We have been attacked throughout history. Poor, we are unfortunate ... Just do not forget that we also attacked. Can a peaceful people build a gigantic empire? Empires are built at all times by force of arms. There is nothing to talk about here. Peace-loving Russians reached Japan - at her side, on the Pacific coast. Kicked out the Swedes from the Gulf of Finland. They crossed the Caucasus Range and piled on the Turks. Poland was captured more than once, and the liberation uprisings were drowned in blood. For centuries they got involved in European strife. You can list for a long time.Peaceful is the people to whom nothing shines in the war. This is not us.
    Stop feeling sorry for yourself! We are a great nation, a victorious nation for centuries solving any historical and territorial issues and problems in our favor! What a pity that our government, apparently, will never share these truths ...
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 17: 40
      Quote: Oskar
      . There was no European plague in Russia,

      She was, and if not mistaken in Moscow.
      1. Oskar
        +1
        26 August 2013 19: 52
        I mean the pandemic of the 14th century plague, and you, apparently, the outbreak in Moscow 1771-1773, which probably occurred as a result of another Russian-Turkish war.
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 21: 07
          Oskar
          Not. there was still a flash., I don’t remember right now, at the end of the 13th and beginning of the 14th centuries, entire princely families were killed, in Moscow too .... but it ended very quickly and did not repeat ...
    2. Fedych
      0
      28 August 2013 10: 57
      It, as a concrete person, is both complex and unique and not completely understood and unambiguously inexplicable, or this or that nation as a whole. In this perspective, view, section of reflection, you can understand and evaluate, and accept the uniqueness of the people who call themselves Russian. I note, not all. There is another - Rusak, Rusich, and M. b. and others. I, not about that, but about how I understand the very essence of this, the phenomenon of a new reality. And this is the knowledge that, even before the Baptism of Rus, the Russian army included squads from other peoples and their particular beliefs. And Russia of that period, respected, and found a common language with them. So it remained, and it was accepted after Baptism. It is clear that this was ideally, the reality was more complicated, it was a debate and battles and theologians and teachers from a particular faith, and skirmishes of empty-headed ideologists with their state component killing all living religious thought and the ability to live on it. For others, let them answer. But as a knowledgeable living Orthodoxy, I note that our generally accepted teachers, knowing and following the Covenant from Christ and the Savior of all, understanding and, the exceptional significance for the time and time and earthly people of Israel, and the knowledge and faith of him, who gave at the end of the time of the Savior of all, understood that at a new level it was inherited by those who accepted this New Testament, which was extended to everyone and everyone. And it so happened that Russia, as a state, was able to accept, understand, and reasonably (albeit with flaws to uphold these new values) - as only the Jewish people once defended them.
  16. +8
    26 August 2013 17: 00
    I believe that history itself has left its mark on the self-realization and self-awareness of the Russian people.
    We are unbending, we are self-sufficient, we are a spiritual people.
    I am convinced that Russian people, true Russians, are the best in the world.
    I invite you to drive along the Golden Ring of Russia to touch the History of the Russian Earth ...
    He just bowed before the holy lands of Vladimir, Suzdal, Murom.
    You can not do self-flagellation. We are not allowed...
    The best deserve the best ...
    We just need to understand and accept this.
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 18: 51
      Quote: Samsebenum
      I invite you to drive along the Golden Ring of Russia to touch the History of the Russian Earth ...
      He just bowed before the holy lands of Vladimir, Suzdal, Murom.
      You can not do self-flagellation. We are not allowed...


      Well said.
      Most whiners about a bad life in Russia and paradise abroad have never crawled out of the circle of a house, work, or a pub. Never traveled to historical places of Russia-Russia.
      And foreign countries are judged by foreign films.
  17. vladsolo56
    +5
    26 August 2013 17: 02
    As long as from childhood we will be poked that everything is better abroad, every new generation will be worse and worse in our country. I admire those who call themselves Rodnovers, they themselves lead a rational lifestyle, and children are taught from childhood to the traditions and culture of our ancestors. They don’t drink, don’t smoke, don’t swear (as they don’t even speak it) and not because they are afraid of punishment or God's judgment, but simply because parents teach this way, because our ancestors lived like that. In addition, it is among them that the community of Russian people is growing. It is there that the understanding of the people of Russian unity comes. Nowhere else do I see this.
  18. +4
    26 August 2013 17: 11
    I am wondering whose cons article ???
    1. +1
      27 August 2013 09: 53
      I promoted. I can criticize, ironize with myself, but not over my people. how did she famously dump all one heap. what does she know about the Russian people? we can laugh at ourselves, but as this ,, fat lion ”writes in a skirt , mocking, humiliating your people who know the people living around you is not permissible. So that is her HUGE MINUS, at least from me.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. +3
    26 August 2013 17: 17
    The ability to self-critically treats itself is a sign of high spirituality and wisdom of our people and the main thing is the ability to cleanse ourselves and solidarity in difficult times for us .. (this is most likely the mystery of the Russian soul) I was always proud that I was Russian and did not understand why so before they treat us badly .. Now I understand they envy !!! That's something like that ... And the article is excellent !!!
    1. +2
      26 August 2013 19: 22
      Quote: MIKHAN
      I was always proud that I am Russian

      And what to be proud of? So, due to the coincidence of many accidents, he was born at this time in this place with this mother? What is your merit here personally? Now, if you have done something that makes your country even a little better, then yes, there is every reason to be proud.
      Another thing is that there is no reason to be ashamed and to sprinkle ashes on your head, unless there is a specific guilt in something that should really be ashamed of. Well, that in the country not everything is "thank God", it is not a fault but a disaster. Or are there such people who know for themselves a sin or two?
      1. Tretyakov
        0
        26 August 2013 22: 22
        Well duck without sins in any way! And I am proud that here is my Motherland, here I was born! Accidents are not accidental!
      2. 0
        27 August 2013 14: 49
        Accidents are not accidental. This is what makes him proud that he was born here to this particular mother and this father. In the Belarusian language there is such a wonderful word - Batskaushchina - literally the land of the father.
  21. +7
    26 August 2013 17: 19
    The article is not bad, but not all Russians speak badly of themselves! Basically, the dirt in the Russians comes from behind a hill. Only in Russian names is there a super respectful attitude towards a woman - Vera Nadezhda Lyubov Lada.
  22. +2
    26 August 2013 18: 11
    I support the author, but you need to not only talk about yourself, but also really correspond to the words.
    So far, unfortunately, the roads abroad are really better, it’s cleaner there, but everyone knows how our people behave there.
    It was so cool to return home from vacation - the first thing I met was the broken-down road from the airport, the second was the lack of light in the entrance, the third was the same with hot water, the fourth was that all the ATMs in the district refused to work at the same time - then I realized this is my house, I came back.
    I’m writing not to poke, I just remembered reading it.
  23. +3
    26 August 2013 18: 24
    I heard all this from childhood. He listened for many years (the truth himself never said that, he didn’t let his throat go away) and suddenly in the fifth ten ... he almost got into a fight with a good man. How he started a familiar song about a friend in Germany, but how everything is well arranged there ... on my proposal to buy him a ticket there immediately, expressed (I admit) loudly and with great feeling laughing uncle began to move away frantically. Since I didn’t know how to fight as a child, I still don’t know how to do it, it doesn’t come out for me to just wave my fists and a couple of bruises. In general, I began to nip such conversations in the bud. And the air is cleaner and the hands do not itch ...
  24. +1
    26 August 2013 18: 29
    With us, somehow with repentance is not very.
    That is to criticize yourself, to laugh at yourself - easily and with pleasure.
    But God forbid, when another criticizes you, it will be an eternal enemy.
    We have this personal.
    1. Fedych
      0
      28 August 2013 11: 24
      And let’s remember the song of the Circle and Lesopoval -... I’ll take the cross, but not repentance! - repentance, the opportunity to be born into a new life. A zone, it makes sense to consolidate for themselves and their usual, and heated, albeit not quite convenient and practical. Therefore, in these articles every third word-pride. It is as if they did not know that the cause of the fall of the Dennitsa of the archangel was this very pride and all its component and not proceeding. Until we understand that God resists the proud, and C- (peaceful) gives Grace, we will not move anywhere. Another thing! - THE DEMANDED, does not mean toothless, unarmed and careless, but enlightened by a special world from Above, and having both the right and the obligation to live in a new and old sinful world, as the Jews used to do with respect to many peoples and their faiths, for the time being and time.
  25. +5
    26 August 2013 18: 45
    Russian - probably the only people in the world, a large part of which is firmly in the habit of not responding to yourself as a people well. It is customary to compare the characteristic national features with the peculiarities of the neighbors, and not always in their own favor.

    Lies, unreasonable.
    The Russians do not have such a habit, despite many years of obgazhivaniya our people and the Fatherland by the corrupt Mr. nation, starting with Khrushchev.
    In the privileged classes in Russia, during the Romanov rule, it was also fashionable to bombard the Russian people with Western examples.
    But this is not a people, but a dirty toilet foam.
    The Russian people have always treated foreigners without arrogance and without hypocritical reverence. This was especially pronounced during the time of Ivan the Terrible and then, during the time of enemy invasions.
    Sharomygs and trash have experienced the Russian "repentance" on their own skin.
  26. +3
    26 August 2013 19: 05
    Quote: Mikhail3
    I heard all this from childhood. He listened for many years (the truth himself never said that, he didn’t let his throat go away) and suddenly in the fifth ten ... he almost got into a fight with a good man. How he started a familiar song about a friend in Germany, but how everything is well arranged there ... on my proposal to buy him a ticket there immediately, expressed (I admit) loudly and with great feeling laughing uncle began to move away frantically. Since I didn’t know how to fight as a child, I still don’t know how to do it, it doesn’t come out for me to just wave my fists and a couple of bruises. In general, I began to nip such conversations in the bud. And the air is cleaner and the hands do not itch ...

    I just remembered ... also a friend (they lived in a hostel in the early 90s, German (Russian)) A good smart guy .. (went to Germany in those difficult years ..) corresponded for a while .. Well, he’s doing well at home the machine is working ... and between the lines (and remember how we sat with a piece of weathered fat and a bottle of alcohol Royal and talked about life ..)) Or we congratulated each other (for good ..) we on May 9 ..a he is from June 22 ...))) laughed at each other .. As I understand it, this is not .. I mean heart to heart talk .. Strict hierarchy and order .. I would not be able to live like that .. Russia is open souls and opportunities .. !! It’s hard for us to live, and yet spiritually we are cleaner and more honest .. (for this we constantly suffer) .. In the world there are many ordinary people who sincerely support Russia ... and believe in us ... I won’t write further and there are too many emotions .. Here are such things!
  27. +11
    26 August 2013 19: 57
    Strange note ...
    Not all Russians find fault with themselves. Not all Russians are choked with saliva from the happiness that they are Russians.
    For the first time, I managed to visit 20 years, in 1979 year. Well, interesting, well, great.
    He visited the last time just about, in August. In West Germany. Still interesting. And great.
    And much more crap than we say 30 years ago.
    There are places in Cologne, and even next to the cathedral - not every Zazhopinsk has such a srach.
    Berlin, especially the center, generally sucks. When the GDR was TWO order cleaner and more comfortable. And now - some sort of homeless tusyatina.
    ...
    He who wants to fool himself will find spots on the Sun. To that, everything in Russia will seem filthy.
    But when I first drove along the M-1 highway in Belarus, and then turned onto the Smolensk-Bryansk highway .. - here everything shows up live. And honestly, it's a shame for the homeland. There are beautiful highways and there are such rocky roads.
    ...
    Churchill’s words are constantly recalled when he mobilized England for the war - "I guarantee you labor, blood, sweat and tears. But if we want to be a NATION, we must endure it."
    This is a free arrangement of his words. But the point is this.
    England was among the winners.
    ...
    Russia also had such a person who once said - ".. Brothers and sisters. I am addressing you, my friends ..."
    ...
    And now all sorts of chuchundra are turning to us. All kinds of singers, politicians, hammocks ... the rest of the stars.
    Ahhhhhhhhh, shorter.
    ..
    "Russia is concentrating"
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 00: 17
      Quote: Igarr
      England was among the winners.

      Like France, but their merits are not here, licked on time.
  28. +1
    26 August 2013 20: 26
    And we have something without halftones - either really "we are the worst of all, inept drunks," or "godlike Arioslavians, whom everyone should be on the grave of life."
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 13: 34
      Here's the current at the expense of drunks, please do not ... We recently had a collective "binge" at work on the occasion of the commissioning of the object, so on the second day I noticed one characteristic trifle on the second day Latvians went and complained - "why drank ... "," why did I drink the drain ... "," why did I drink at all ", and our Russian guys basically grumbled something like" why mixed "and" had a bad bite "... And secondly, a drunk is a person who drinks for no reason , and we always drink on occasion, though we always have a reason ... and this speaks of our cheerfulness!
      1. +1
        27 August 2013 16: 26
        Well, that means my neighbor, who is again beating his wife about something, that he has jabbed himself or has a bad bite.
  29. Yarosvet
    +5
    26 August 2013 20: 56
    ____________________________________________
  30. +2
    26 August 2013 21: 03
    We won’t help in a fight, but if there is a war,
    God willing, victory, victory, God willing.
    And the earth has one name - Bright Russia,
    Bow to your feet, call her - mother ...
    Words: K. Kinchev

    The article is good !!! We must be proud of our history, our ancestors. You need to stick together and fight for your not only in war, but also in daily fights. Because it is a timely response that stops bad ideas ...
  31. +4
    26 August 2013 21: 13
    An article, apparently for the post-perestroika youth. I was born in 1974 in Ukraine, and to this day I am sure that we are Russians, the best people. Throughout our history, we have been prepared for difficult trials, and the people have always come out of them with honor .Often contrary to the narrow-minded rulers. Well, if the article is for the swamp-"orange", then you shouldn't throw pearls in front of the pigs. As for the negativity in our life ... as one of my acquaintances says, "have you decided that you've got into a fairy tale?" But our people have much more good things, and I am proud of this good, great history of our people and how much I can explain to my son, talk with colleagues and others. This is all I can do myself.
  32. +1
    26 August 2013 22: 26
    Good article. Correct. It is necessary to get rid of the false and harmful about yourself and your people.
  33. 0
    26 August 2013 22: 35
    I was also born in 1974 in a small village of the Bryansk region, only 18 km from Ukraine. It was difficult of course in perestroika times for both my parents and my brother, but they didn’t give up, as they say hands have a head, we don’t get lost. They worked a lot, but they did not survive, I didn’t stay home after the army, like many of my friends did. He worked on a shift in other areas, served on a contract, then came to Moscow, met his wife here, bought an apartment, a car, we have two children, we still want, in general, what’s all this to me: if there is a goal, then there’s no time to engage in self-flagellation, and any such nonsense, this is done from idleness. Whoever wants to live a normal life will not disappear anywhere, and no matter how much I have not spent my childhood friends pulling out of this drunkenness, they still did not want to come back. One youth is happy now another, there is no longer such drunkenness as in the 90s. Those who want to work in the suburbs near Moscow work on a rotational basis, others earn money in their homeland, maybe there is less work, it would be nice if they don’t allocate billions to anyone who knows where and where, but create points of sale for agricultural products, such as Soviet times were and the village itself would feed itself. After all, I remember as soon as our family handed over potatoes up to 10 tons, onions, beets, apples. The trains went to the north and abroad, and now we are buying products from Israel in Poland and FIG knows what. Ehhh ....
  34. +6
    27 August 2013 01: 01
    I am RUSSIAN and proud of it, I continue my family (my daughter Nastya was born on 23.08.13), I try not to sin and not give in to vices. I treat everyone normally, with the exception of those who hate my homeland! I honestly live and work in the name of my family (first of all), and the Russian state will follow this. And when I didn’t say anything obscene or untruthful about my ancestors to my children, I make them live by honor and dignity. He graduated from Kaz.SVU and NVOKU, finished the service of the deputy commander in Kantemirovka in 2011. And now I continue to teach our children Russian culture, Russian spirit ...
    http://sddu.ru/
    I think the irony of the Russian people is that we treat a lot with humor, and therefore we survive !!!!
  35. The comment was deleted.
  36. Valery Neonov
    +1
    27 August 2013 01: 40
    +++
    Quote: yan
    to convey to everyone from the cradle and to grind daily that until you start talking about your people in a positive way, nothing will change. The word is material. Let's be proud of ourselves.

    Just a thousand times over !!! Nm RUSSIAN has something to be proud of and more so than other nations! good
  37. Valery Neonov
    +2
    27 August 2013 01: 43
    On July 13, 1941, from the Pesets district, the Red Army soldier Ovcharenko was carrying ammunition for the 3rd pulpot, being 4-5 kilometers from his unit. In the same area, the Red Army was attacked and surrounded by two vehicles of 50 German soldiers and 3 officers. Getting out of the car, a German officer ordered the Red Army to raise his hands up, knocked out a rifle from his hands and began to teach his democracy to interrogate him.

    The Red Army soldier Ovcharenko had an ax in the wagon. Taking this ax, the Red Army soldier chopped off the head of the German officer, threw three grenades near the standing car. 21 German soldiers were killed, the rest fled in panic. Following another wounded officer, Ovcharenko with an ax in his hands pursued him and in the garden of metro Pesets, he caught him and chopped off his head. The 3rd officer managed to escape.

    The Red Armyman Ovcharenko received the Star of the Hero and reached Berlin with his ax. So once again, the Europeanization and democratization of Russia broke. Some people think that this is an ax. And some - that the matter is in Russian.
  38. Fedych
    -1
    27 August 2013 02: 44
    Once on the forum, And Kuraeva I raised the question of Russianness and Russian and their (our) attitude to the peoples and cultures with which we co-exist .. In the answers I was convinced how this issue is not clarified with us, even in relation to ourselves and between themselves. Dig deeper! - and you get it, your eyes will fly off to the ceiling. The self-abasement of us Russians among themselves and to ourselves is not humility at all, but something else. Throne whoever we are, will receive this, that our ears will burn, which I received. From the Jewish Christian message, we took the worst, their pride and our supposedly exclusive selectivity and preference for God in contrast to other peoples, faiths and cultures. Since then, this has gone both ours and hatred and neglect of the cultures and languages ​​of other peoples of the USSR (preserved to this day). And why is this all? - Yes, in almost complete disregard for the culture of thought, reflection and attempts at self-awareness and self-knowledge, it is completely suppressed by the state and its neighbors and bureaucracy. We ourselves are not needed and exist only bodily and for the body from birth to the grave. In the book. Ilyin - the tragedy of Russian philosophy is well shown.
  39. vladsolo56
    +3
    27 August 2013 03: 54
    Often I read that I’m Russian and proud of it, what are you talking about? How can you be proud only that you were born? We must not be proud of ourselves, we must at least educate our children, so that we know who they are, who their ancestors were, and what the Russian people should be like. Then we can be proud of something. In the meantime, it is necessary to raise, first of all, raise consciousness, culture, get rid of rudeness and greed, selfishness and show off for any reason.
  40. -1
    27 August 2013 05: 44
    This is when we blasphemed our fathers ... our history?, I was brought up in Soviet times and at that time we were taught to be proud of our ancestors and our past. But all this blasphemy began, if anyone remembers in the perestroika times, remember how even then the comrades deputies were racing to cut the "truth uterus" from the TV screens ... And on the subject of nationality ... yes I am proud that I am RUSSIAN, because I was people who defeated the Germans in WWII ... because this people gave the world such people as Pushkin, Gagarin, Suvorov ... and many more worthy people. Yes, we have such a property as a slightly exaggerated self-criticism ... but there is no need to make a complex out of this current.
    1. Tver
      0
      27 August 2013 14: 39
      “This is when we blasphemed our fathers ... our story?” When our officers were raised with bayonets ... In Soviet times, you were not taught that everything was very bad before Lenin's grandfather?
      1. +1
        27 August 2013 15: 25
        You read the new textbooks on the history of Soviet times ... where it says that everything was bad before Lenin’s grandfather ?, it has become fashionable to talk about bad for the last twenty years.
      2. 0
        27 August 2013 19: 27
        Quote: Tver
        “This is when we blasphemed our fathers ... our story?” When our officers were raised with bayonets ... In Soviet times, you were not taught that everything was very bad before Lenin's grandfather?

        We were not taught that everything was bad before Lenin’s grandfather, I went to the 1st grade in 1960.
        We were taught that in Russia there were great writers, artists, sculptors, doctors, scientists, statesmen, generals, etc.
        But they did not hide from us that serfdom was in Russia, there was social inequality, arbitrariness of priests and landlords and rebellion against arbitrariness, there was a division of people into privileged classes that did not pay taxes, and those that paid taxes.
        Those who had brains, they understood everything correctly, and in the idiots in the head only black and white, at all times, to teach them what to treat the dead.
  41. andruha70
    0
    27 August 2013 09: 20
    bold minus article negative the theme of balalaikas and bears is not disclosed ... attention is not focused on earflaps and felt boots ... the nuclear club is not mentioned laughing but seriously, already tired ... drunks ... savages ... they don’t want to work ... they’re just jealous, they’ll invent it ... tongue
  42. 0
    27 August 2013 14: 16
    Kind! I absolutely agree with the author! The state begins with people, its citizens! and not the people! do not use this word. People, society! Respect yourself, relatives and people who live with you in the state!
  43. +1
    27 August 2013 14: 33
    In the opinion of many foreigners with whom I had a chance to communicate, the Russians from the outside were very severe, so severe that they were not at ease even asking for help, but after 10 seconds of communication they were very similar to Italians :)

  44. 0
    27 August 2013 14: 59
    This is the problem of looking at the world - one sees a broken bench, the other sees the joy of children playing in the sandbox. In difficult times, the former are always more than the latter.
  45. 0
    27 August 2013 14: 59
    Everything is written correctly except one. It creates the image of a Russian subhuman by certain media representatives with a very specific appearance, although it is possible with a Russian surname, which later turns out to be either a pseudonym or not quite Russian. And this is done for very decent money of various funds. But the task is formulated correctly. To knock out the foundation on which the foundations of the nation are based.
    Everybody can bring down Russia, and our liberals still can’t see it! In fact, it is either bought people or near-by.
    But I think that the people survived the war, famine, socialist abundance, and this invasion of ideological dogs will survive.
  46. picnic
    0
    27 August 2013 15: 23
    "Russians are probably the only people in the world, a significant part of which has firmly established the habit of not speaking well of themselves as a people. It is customary to compare characteristic national features with those of neighbors, and always not in their favor."

    I disagree. As far as I know Russians, they all have a highly developed sense of arrogance in front of other peoples. And the feeling of "Great Power" is strongly developed, brought up, probably by centuries of their progressive development. After all, they, Russians, at the dawn of their history, who crawled out of the very last shit, were able to become the greatest nation of our time (which all their surrounding neighbors could not do).

    Say the pious: “All Russians must repent day and night of the sin of regicide, the blood on them and their children,” and you will become pleasant not only to the liberals and the left, but also to some right.

    Olga, you're wrong here. The king killer got what he was supposed to get. And then the will of God. Here I do not agree with the Russian Orthodox hierarchs, who ranked this Judas as a saint. The man who caused the greatest power to disappear from the face of the earth, through whose fault millions, tens, hundreds of millions of Russian people were plunged into the abyss of a fratricidal war unprecedented in the countryside, has no right not only to canonization, in general to commemorate him.
    God is not a fraer, he sees everything. And this German, called Nikolashka (the Russian people still still do not call him Nikolai, but according to the old, Nikolashka), together with all his unchaste, is currently burning (with blue flame) in hell (and where else is the merciless killer of millions innocent people).
    In short, the Russian church hierarchs overdid it a bit, ranking the enemy burning in hell as a saint. Amen.