Military Review

Announcement of the C-350E anti-aircraft missile system announced

41



The Almaz-Antey air defense concern at the MAKS-2013 aerospace show is going to present the C-350E anti-aircraft missile system to the general public for the first time.

“The concern will demonstrate almost the entire spectrum of its military-made products, including a wide range of new developments in the form of full-scale samples for the first time,” ITAR-TASS reports with reference to the concern’s press service.
They clarified that the main novelty of the exposition of the enterprise will be promising air defense systems of medium-range C-350. “In terms of its tactical and technical characteristics, it is superior to foreign analogues and should replace the C-300 series of weapons in service with weapons”, the company added.

C-350E is designed to protect objects from massive strikes of modern and prospective means of air attack, including those made using stealth technology, including tactical and operational-tactical ballistic missiles.

“The key factor determining the effectiveness of the new system is its ability to simultaneously repel the blows of various types of air attack weapons from any direction over the entire range of their flight altitudes, in all weather conditions, day and night, in difficult interference conditions,” noted Almaz Antea ". “This is achieved through the use of a fundamentally new information tool, a multi-function radar, for the first time developed in our country.”

In addition, the C-350E has a high mobility and survivability. Thus, the time to bring the means of aids to combat readiness from the march is no more than 5 minutes.

Recall that in late July, the Defense News publication ranked the most successful defense enterprises in the world. And, as it turned out, only Russian companies showed impressive growth over the past year. So, the Almaz-Antey concern rose to 11 places in the world ranking (from 25-th to 14-e) and entered the top five of the rating in Europe with revenue growth of 62%.
Originator:
http://vz.ru/news/2013/8/22/646715.html
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. kafa
    kafa 23 August 2013 07: 33
    +3
    eh, it would be like in a fairy tale, from an exhibition and into the troops fellow
    but it will be as always so far and not to the troops but to the museum crying
    1. Hauptmann emil
      Hauptmann emil 23 August 2013 07: 35
      +2
      The main thing is not to decide to sell abroad. Otherwise, the Chinese and others will quickly copy or find opposition.
      1. denson06
        denson06 23 August 2013 09: 17
        +2
        The Chinese will copy - on this part they are pros .. but on the issues of counteraction, which is much worse - there are specialists from Israel, the USA and Great Britain.
        Keep it up Almaz-Antey! If I see on MAX-2013 - I will post more pictures of this miracle of Russian military equipment ..
        1. Apologet.Ru
          Apologet.Ru 23 August 2013 10: 23
          +7
          hi
          A worthy answer for whiners who claim that everything is bad in Russia, and the equipment and weapons in the army are only those that remain of the Union.
          But no!
          In my opinion, at least, focused work is being monitored on the development and rearmament of troops with new generation equipment and weapons.
          С-350Е, С-400, С-500 - diversity in Distances, Altitudes and Tasks - just “what the doctor ordered”.
          It is enough to compare this sample, which is going to replace the average "BUK" with the average modifications of the 300-ki and the European SAMP-T SAM.
          And what kind of Chinese - so, if they need it, they will buy it anyway, with their money then, NOT from Russia, SO from the Indians, so it’s better to LET Russian buy ...
      2. Airman
        Airman 23 August 2013 13: 23
        0
        Quote: Hauptmann Emil
        The main thing is not to decide to sell abroad. Otherwise, the Chinese and others will quickly copy or find opposition.

        If a new multifunctional locator, then this is already a Soviet secret technique, but you can expect everything from our "managers". If only greed does not cover your eyes.
      3. AVV
        AVV 23 August 2013 16: 05
        0
        All the best to the troops, and what has been run in for a long time is for sale !!! Fucked Yankees do just that !!!
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 23 August 2013 08: 54
      +3
      Quote: kafa
      but it will be as always so far and not to the troops but to the museum

      But what about 400 already put in a museum? Or do you just bluck? Why I ask, but I’m worried about you, what to write if you put him in the military what
      1. Skiff
        Skiff 23 August 2013 09: 18
        +3
        A promising medium-range anti-aircraft missile system S-350E, also known as "Vityaz". This system should replace the outdated Soviet-made modifications of the S-300, as well as, in part, the Buk anti-aircraft missile systems.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Scandinavian
    Scandinavian 23 August 2013 07: 36
    11
    her immediately to Syria on the state. trials ... against the next Zionist raids ...
  4. Dangerous
    Dangerous 23 August 2013 07: 42
    0
    What is the difference from C-400, which seemed to replace C-300 as well?
    1. 11 black
      11 black 23 August 2013 08: 39
      17
      Quote: Dangerous
      What is the difference from C-400, which seemed to replace C-300 as well?

      In the firing range and the number of missiles on one launcher (hence, during the operation of the complex before reloading, which takes a very long time), the C350 aka "Vityaz" has 12 missiles per 1 PU instead of 4 missiles for the C400, the missiles are presumably 9m96E, e1 is unknown or e2, but if it is said about the possibility of replacing the S300, then most likely e2 (range 150 km), the S400 will become, as it were, the farthest hand in the air defense system, it will not allow the enemy to use AWACS and electronic warfare aircraft, and also will not allow attacking the positions of our air defense systems with controlled JDAM bombs with a range exceeding the C350, he will also be responsible for the destruction of especially important targets (strategic bombers, for example), and the C350 will become the main means of destruction of enemy aircraft, which is correct if you shoot at each one with precious and labor-intensive c400 missiles ( I'm talking about 40N6e, range 400 km), then they will end in the first days of the war, and this cannot be allowed IMHO hi
      1. Mairos
        Mairos 23 August 2013 11: 51
        -1
        "..and also will not allow attacking the positions of our air defense missile systems with guided bombs of the JDAM type from a range exceeding the action of the C350"
        I am under the table! Guided bombs can drop from a range of over 150 km ??
        1. 11 black
          11 black 23 August 2013 13: 29
          +2
          Quote: Mairos
          "..and also will not allow attacking the positions of our air defense missile systems with guided bombs of the JDAM type from a range exceeding the action of the C350"
          I am under the table! Guided bombs can drop from a range of over 150 km ??

          Do you really think that the rocket can be launched at the plane at the maximum range, you need a margin of time for it to reach the plane and it did not have time to go beyond its flight range, so the attack line of 100-120 km looms, and this is the flight range of gliding bombs (for example, Israeli bombs of the Spice series fly 100 km from a height of 20 km and hit the bull's-eye), so think a little about how to get out from under the table laughing
          if C350 can even fight off planes with such ammunition, I repeat IF it is the limit of its capabilities, and it’s better not to bring it up and have a bigger club for this case ...
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 23 August 2013 09: 39
      +4
      C-350 is a general replacement for C-300PS. C-400 is a more serious complex with long-range missiles.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 23 August 2013 12: 53
        -2
        Quote: donavi49
        C-350 is a general replacement for C-300PS. C-400 is a more serious complex with long-range missiles.

        No, the S-400 was supposed to replace the S-300 because manned missiles long-range 40N6E, medium 9M96E2 and near 9M96M. But by the time of adoption of the S-400 in 2007. not one of the missiles was ready and the complex was received with SAM 48N6E from S-300PMU-2. As stated in 2012. The 40N6E missile launcher seems to have finally gone through the GSI and was put into service, while it is not clear whether its guidance to the maximum distance from external sources (AWACS and Su-35S radar systems) was realized, now there is no news on this missile. It was in 2007. it was decided to remove 9M96 missiles from the S-400 air defense system and make a new air defense system for it. The hardware most likely is a stripped-down one from the S-400 and most likely there were no special problems, but the 9M96 missiles seem to have endured the brain.
        1. PLO
          PLO 23 August 2013 13: 28
          +2
          the fact that you mixed in a bunch of export and domestic indexes (and at the same time mixed everything up) will not add credibility to your murzilka.

          but about the lack of news .. it is worth reading annual reports
          1. Nayhas
            Nayhas 23 August 2013 16: 01
            0
            It's you again lol Something with witticisms is now fresh, plus you little ...
            1. PLO
              PLO 23 August 2013 16: 47
              0
              It is again you lol Something with witticisms is now fresh, plus you little ...

              well, that’s enough for you today)

              besides, you, too, have ceased to issue pearls, just write nonsense.
              bored with you.
              1. Nayhas
                Nayhas 23 August 2013 18: 29
                0
                so ignore, as I for example you ...
                1. PLO
                  PLO 23 August 2013 18: 54
                  +1
                  so ignore, as I for example you ...

                  that's exactly how I ignore you)
                  1. Nayhas
                    Nayhas 23 August 2013 19: 53
                    0
                    Quote: olp
                    that's exactly how I ignore you)

                    Yes Yes exactly...
  5. Tatarus
    Tatarus 23 August 2013 07: 51
    0
    Prefix S-350Е What means? Is it export? Then they will sell to China or India. Or over again, to Azerbaijan
    1. Trapperxnumx
      Trapperxnumx 23 August 2013 08: 12
      +8
      Еsport? wink
      Hardly. Rather, something like "the louse is edren to you and not our sky" soldier
    2. 11 black
      11 black 23 August 2013 08: 46
      +2
      Quote: Tatarus
      The prefix C-350Е what does it mean? Is it export? Then they will sell to China or India. Or over again, to Azerbaijan

      No, the export ones are designated E, the prefix E is most likely a modification of the rocket (9М96Е) although this is just a hunch.
      1. PLO
        PLO 23 August 2013 13: 11
        +3
        in Almaz-Antey, all export modifications are designated with the letter 'E', because there is no letter E in English)
        why are they representing an export modification, because the domestic one is classified, and the fact that no one really cares about the external difference.
        the main thing is formally secrecy
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 23 August 2013 16: 04
          0
          Quote: olp
          in Almaz-Antey all export modifications are designated with the letter 'E', because there is no letter E in English

          Or maybe because in English EXPORT is written as EXPORT?
    3. Skiff
      Skiff 23 August 2013 09: 15
      +6
      The prefix "E" is export, "E" is most likely the same, but in essence there is one whining on the forum, but simply humanly HAPPY !!!
  6. individual
    individual 23 August 2013 07: 52
    0
    For some reason, the S-350.
    Probably a deep modernization of the S-300, as previously written about the Iranian counterpart
    C-300.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 23 August 2013 09: 40
      +7
      No, this is the general audit of C-300PS; in fact, nothing remains of the old complex, but the same poverty is being closed. The new one has more missiles, a better control system and radar, full compatibility with C-400 and other goodies.
    2. makst83
      makst83 23 August 2013 09: 48
      0
      no, this is the name of the S-350 owl system "Vityaz", a new system designed to replace the S-300 and Buk-M1-2!
  7. Basileus
    Basileus 23 August 2013 07: 57
    0
    And will there be indicative launches on the aircraft of a likely enemy?)
    1. Trapperxnumx
      Trapperxnumx 23 August 2013 08: 12
      0
      Quote: Basileus
      And will there be indicative launches on the aircraft of a likely enemy?)

      In the sky of Syria)))
      1. Basileus
        Basileus 23 August 2013 08: 56
        0
        So in Zhukovsky!
  8. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 23 August 2013 08: 03
    +1
    Impressive information, but when will the supply begin? Judging by the promised parameters, the thing is necessary for our army.
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 23 August 2013 10: 26
      0
      Quote: kartalovkolya
      Impressive information, but when will the supply begin? Judging by the promised parameters, the thing is necessary for our army.

      2015-2016 is tentative, unlikely before.
    2. Nayhas
      Nayhas 23 August 2013 12: 55
      0
      Quote: kartalovkolya
      Impressive information, but when will the delivery begin?

      After passing the ICG, without this in any way ...
  9. NOMADE
    NOMADE 23 August 2013 08: 10
    +2
    Quote: Dangerous
    What is the difference from C-400, which seemed to replace C-300 as well?


    Greetings. Judging by the photograph, if this is a launcher (and not a missile transporter), then missiles are much more compact and there are more! Remember the dimensions of the S-300 wink
    Also, it is a medium-range missile system (although this concept has recently been also relatively relative).
    Indeed, it is necessary, as in the days of the USSR (the conflict in Korea, Vietnam), to put in a quiet place with your staff in Syria .., to check the performance characteristics and the conformity of the TOR, then make amendments (if necessary) to the design.
    For us it will be a triple benefit: 1) a check by battle, 2) assistance to Syria, 3) Real advertising for the whole world.
    1. Proud.
      Proud. 23 August 2013 09: 09
      +2
      Quote: NOMADE
      if it’s a launcher (and not a rocket transporter),

      It looks like a launcher:
      1. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 23 August 2013 10: 01
        +2
        So I look - TZMka (transport-loading machine) is a launcher. Well, judging by your photo, this is a launcher. The number of rockets is impressive: as many as 12! +++ good
        1. Mairos
          Mairos 23 August 2013 11: 54
          +1
          This is PU. Definitely. The vertical start and for TZMki do not need the opra, which can be seen in the picture
    2. alone
      alone 23 August 2013 09: 44
      +4
      against whom in Syria will you use this system?
      there are planes? how do you imagine installing this system in Syria, where there is no continuous front, everything mixed up like a layer cake? where there are guarantees that the system will not fall into the hands of the militants. well, they’ll be unable to use the installation. but sell or exchange interested parties will be able to. get it on their own hands passed the secret to competitors and enemies
  10. Boot under the carpet
    Boot under the carpet 23 August 2013 08: 20
    +2
    Rather, see the performance characteristics of the system!
  11. Tuzik
    Tuzik 23 August 2013 08: 30
    0
    the letter E suggests the idea of ​​Export Orientation, 12 missiles in pu, an excellent addition to the c400-500 and shells, for layered defense. Still missiles with a range of up to 2 km as SM700.
  12. NOMADE
    NOMADE 23 August 2013 08: 33
    +1
    Quote: Tuzik
    the letter E suggests the idea of ​​Export Orientation, 12 missiles in pu, an excellent addition to the c400-500 and shells, for layered defense. Still missiles with a range of up to 2 km as SM700.

    They would also be adapted to sea-based, for our new corvettes and frigates. )
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 23 August 2013 09: 53
      +5
      You overslept my friend. Redoubt - this is actually the same Knight laughing . They have the same long-short missiles and a common ideology.

      Only the naval complex is more complex, there are only 3 radars of the Furke piece (which is now), Polement (on frigates) and the Optron mast on new corvettes.
  13. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 23 August 2013 08: 40
    +1
    Good The infa about replacing the S-300 with the above complex was somewhat confusing, since the missile is clearly smaller in size! Exactly everything is true in the article?
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 23 August 2013 13: 00
      +1
      Quote: Dwarfik
      The infa about replacing the S-300 with the above complex was somewhat confusing, since the missile is clearly smaller in size! Exactly everything is true in the article?

      Well, the replacement will be the S-300PS, which form the basis of air defense, at this complex of the V-55 missiles with a range of 75 km. Well, and that is smaller, so in the yard and century it’s already 21, the fuel is better, the equipment is lighter ..
  14. King
    King 23 August 2013 09: 25
    0
    I am more and more pleased with the Russian developers. Bite your elbows NATO generals from your vaunted F-22 and F-35 will remain horns and legs.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 23 August 2013 13: 01
      +2
      Quote: King
      Bite your elbows NATO generals from your vaunted F-22 and F-35 will remain horns and legs.

      Then you write in English, otherwise it will not be bitten by what you want ... I would like to hear where such confidence comes from that there will remain horns and legs?
  15. pensioner
    pensioner 23 August 2013 09: 33
    +3
    Where, where, and in the field of air defense, everything is very good with quality. The quantities would be even bigger ...
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 23 August 2013 10: 29
      +4
      Quote: retired
      Where, where, and in the field of air defense, everything is very good with quality. The quantities would be even bigger ...

      The new plant will be completed next year and the number will increase ...
  16. Petrucho
    Petrucho 23 August 2013 09: 51
    +4
    The system looks cool! good
    But most of all I am glad that she was not called again some "Terminator" or "Raptor".
  17. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 August 2013 10: 00
    +2
    Tremble !!! Eat the hazel grouse pineapples .. your last day comes bourgeois! .. good
  18. Sochi
    Sochi 23 August 2013 10: 46
    +3
    Our "pharmacological" industry produces excellent "pills" of medium and long range against the chronic aggression of under-treated sworn friends.
    1. Sochi
      Sochi 23 August 2013 14: 49
      +2
      Minusator, what is awful that the "sworn friends" will not come to your aid? don't worry, you have a chance to go to them yourself ... while there is.
  19. sergey158-29
    sergey158-29 24 August 2013 00: 42
    0
    Campaign in the world now is such a development trend of air defense systems - in a batch vertical scheme, it is very similar to European SAM SAM-T

    Read more on:
    http://topwar.ru/32286-evropeyskiy-zrk-samp-t.
  20. Batkamahno
    Batkamahno 26 August 2013 10: 08
    0
    According to the photo, I thought that they had mixed up the picture)))) It looks very similar to the MLRS. Interestingly, it can be fired in one gulp. I suppose tracking several goals at the same time