Military Review

What I see Russia, ready for war

176



Part of 1. Do not yet hopelessly broken trough

Thanks again to all for the reviews of the previous articles. Believe me, I tried to get acquainted with all opinions. But I am only a man, and in a day I have only 24 hours, of which 8 has to spend on earning my daily bread. By the way, I am especially grateful to the person who wrote that I "put my soul" - this is so.

I am calm and understanding with all kinds of condemnations (even reproaches), but I do not accept insults. I will not stoop to stupid swearing at those who are not doing it themselves (in our case, do not write, but only read), throw mud at others.

Well, we will consider the introduction of a short such a heart-to-heart talk. Get down to business. Many have condemned me that I’m writing how to dismantle NATO, while I’d better understand how to strengthen our country. Honestly, I didn’t want to raise this question, because this topic is very long and complicated, but so that they don’t doubt that I’m imbued with it and will raise it for a long time. I apologize in advance for the "superficiality", but with this topic otherwise it will definitely not work. Or you need to write a book. Would you like to read later? - A moot point. Therefore, I will simply describe my vision in which direction our country should move.

Immediately make a reservation that in the case of Russia, first - to strengthen, and then - to put enemies in place, DO NOT GET !!! AT history take a dip, our country ALWAYS lived in a ring, if not enemies, then enemies. And our ancestors (and we are not an exception) had to plow and fight off raids at the same time.

Forget the rules!

First of all, let's talk about how to behave yourself so that our country in general can become happy rich and strong. Here it is necessary to understand, and what if "play by the rules." Let us remember the great Russian naval commander Admiral Ushakov, who, without hesitation, "violated" the order of the sea battle and, thanks to this, smashed the superior forces of the Turks.

We, the Russian people, are in the pen. Do not hesitate, long before the evil old woman Margaret Thatcher (and she wanted to leave only 15 million souls in the entire Soviet space), the plans for the destruction of our country were determined by the order from which we, while alive, would be allowed to go under the knife. Hoping that the gate will open in the pen or at least the pen will be expanded - utter nonsense. The fence will have to break, break headlong! Discarding such things as “decency”, “civilization”, modesty and, I warn you, sometimes even conscience (it should be left for its own, to deal with the enemy with conscience - a lot of honor). The world has become different. Everything is constant, like in a war, or - it is you, or - you are his. In such an environment is useful to become a barbarian. But, here it is again important to understand that the barbarian is for the enemy (it does not matter whether the external is the enemy or the internal). Remember, the bourgeoisie (I also include bureaucrats in this notion) will not spare us, which means no mercy for them either.

Consider these lines ma-a-a-scarlet preparation for what you have to read further.

Pulling the country out of the pit, we have to abandon such a thing as “international law”, and at times from the law in general. Get ready for the fact that you will often have to shoot scoundrels and traitors without a trial, and before that - to beat their teeth, smash their ribs, etc. (I'm not kidding).
Undoubtedly, all this will involve “angry” attacks from the West, “preoccupied” with the protection of the rights of a “person” (in quotes, because it’s impossible to call those whom they protect to be people).

And the leadership of our country (if there is a guide looking for it) comes up on the words and articles of all Bankers from Wall Street, lawyers and just homosexuals to stupidly disregard or snap (sometimes with a good mat!). Spit on "diplomacy", "political correctness" and "etiquette"!

In the coming years, 20 will not be able to add anything to their poisonous words for at least three reasons:
1) Russia still has atomic weapon;
2) our country is the largest supplier of gas to Europe (and in the coming years, 20 without them will be the end of our gas);
3) we are one of the largest markets, will not sell goods (and services, the same tourist) to us - they will not find another such buyer, and this is a ruin.

There are other reasons, but these lie on the surface. Therefore, fears of external threats - to the side! Not that the invasion, but the embargo does not threaten us. It is more useful to instill in oneself another panic fear - the fear of extinction of our GREATEST nation.

Yes, and most importantly, not only our homegrown, but also Western economists already recognize that capitalism, as a way of organizing production and public relations, has exhausted itself FINALLY. And it is better to believe now, by making a dogma for ourselves, such an assertion: only SOCIALIST Russia is capable of becoming strong, happy and rich. If you recall the old talker Plekhanov (who was so afraid to blot his “intellectuals” hands), then now not only “the flour was crushed”, but also the “dough has been mixed up for a long time”, it is time to give it shape and immediately put it in the oven! Otherwise, the “lush pie” will never be baked.

Initial funds

To restore and renew the industry, to breathe oxygen into our already, honor, destroyed agriculture, to return to normal education, to cultivate morality in our long-suffering people, some initial savings will be required, as the bourgeois say, “starting capital” (we will not use their ape language we are RUSSIAN).

At first, trade in raw materials abroad will do. With a tiny amendment so that the money gained from our oil and gas in the hands of the bourgeoisie and bureaucrats would not settle. To achieve this should be the most severe, sometimes - hellish measures (see above about the scuffle and shootings).

The second source of income for the first time was the two most important transport arteries that our country possesses: the Northern Sea Route (I wrote about it in more or less detail in the article “Between a Chinese Lion and a NATO Crocodile”) and the Trans-Siberian Railway. And, if the first one still requires huge investments for the restoration of ports, the icebreaker fleet and polar aviationthen the second is ready now. Sign contracts (only wisely) and drive freight trains. With all the hatred for us, the West will NEVER refuse such a direct (and therefore relatively cheap) way from the Pole to the Chinese.

Remember, bourgeois (in particular - the western subspecies of this mammal) - a creature, by definition, stupid, no matter how clever and educated it is. Why? - Yes, everything is simple, because with an appraisal mind, education, and sometimes inventiveness, its purpose throughout life remains the same - HELLER and everything ...

Several trial multimodal (for those who do not know, the composition, which includes different types of cars: tanks, refrigerators, platforms with containers, etc.) trains from the West through Russia to China and vice versa already allowed. The result (in terms of economy) exceeded all expectations. Do you really think that they will refuse this if we offer to put on stream? - Yes, never! Having seen such a mad decrease in expenses, the bourgeois will completely spit, even if we have his own brethren (in class and mind) in the middle of Red Square they will chop them. And the path from China to Europe and vice versa through Russia, whatever you might say, is SHORT. Everything is also safe, because It passes through the territory of ONE state that is not covered by war or widespread unrest. Not to mention the fact that rail transport - the cheapest of all possible.

Now we will not describe all the details of how to organize the work of our transport arteries (for this, we would have to write a couple of similar articles, at least). To whom it is interesting, first read about China and the Northern Sea Route. As for the railway, everything is much simpler, it is enough to demand that two conditions be met: the crew serving the squadron (at least while traveling across Russia) is Russian, and the guards of the squad are too. Of course, Russia should be ready to take responsibility for the cargo along the whole route, say, from Leningrad (I don’t accept the word “St. Petersburg”) to, say, the Kamyshovaya station (on the Russian-Chinese border). In general, you can not be afraid of responsibility, starting great things. A little running ahead, I dare to suggest that if the case with Transsib goes well, then you can not skimp on even parts of the route (especially for freight trains, so as not to interfere with passenger trains), but this is a matter of the future.

The beauty of these sources of income for our country is their inexhaustible. The Northern Sea Route and Transsib are not oil, gas, iron or coal. These things have been given to us by Mother Nature by virtue of geography, and ALWAYS will be with us!

So, the continuing supply of raw materials (without which the West can not yet, far before its notorious "green" energy), the work of transport arteries (sea and land), and what is the third component necessary for our country torn "market" economy?

And the third is the return of all loot that can be returned. I am sure you can, if you try! First, to return the enterprises of the mining, fuel and energy, military and near-war, automobile and alcoholic industries (in other words, of all strategic industries), transferred to private hands, into the hands of the state - the hands of the people. If someone now starts saying: “What should I return, then? “Everything has long been ruined!” - this is utter nonsense! Plants, oil rigs, mines abroad are not so easy to take out. Everything remained where it was. Yes, much is not in that condition, it is necessary to repair, it is necessary to restore. And who said it would be easy? In this sense, I was just struck by the statement by Putin, they say, "there will be no revision of the results of privatization (read, plunder)." It is clear that he is a bourgeois president, it is clear that he does not serve the people, but he even had no right to say so !!! How is it, "will not be"? And if a pensioner has a bag of potatoes stolen, then now, also not to try to return her potatoes or knock out money from a thief so that her grandmother would not die of hunger ?!

Therefore, no Sberbank OJSC is a State Savings Bank, no Russian Railways OJSC is a ministry (although, in my opinion, this is the People's Commissariat), and, of course, no Gazprom OJSC is the State Production Association of Gas Industry Enterprises Gazprom. "

Second, try to return and stolen money. Everything will definitely not work out, but partially, oh, how it doesn’t hurt us. And no "Khodorkovsky processes", no "legal methods". Everything is in the style of the surplus (with the only difference that it is strictly selective, I would say personally-selective) and “dashing 90's”. Because we don’t have time to roll up perennial processes, is it really not clear that a person, say, who bought a plant in 90 for 10 000 rubles (even Soviet ones) is, by definition, GUILTY? Of course, the person who sold the plant for such a price is also GUILTY! And our task is not to collect evidence of his guilt, but to knock out what he has stolen from children, old people, our wives. If someone has the words “But this is inhuman!” - ask yourself, and “humanely”, what did people throw out on the street, closing factories and selling “on a cog ?! But humanly, when the remaining "in business", for years their hard-earned money was not paid ?! And the fact that nightclubs “sculpted” from schools and kindergartens, where our children were poisoned (and today they are also poisoned) with “fake” vodka and drugs — are also humane ?! So, the perpetrators of all the above-described "activities" today and do not need to look (what is the beauty and simplicity). It is they who are the inhabitants of the "ruble", that they sit in the Association of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs of Russia, that they occupy the seats in the State Duma. Chubais, Abramovich, Prokhorov, Izmailov (director of Cherkizon) are all the same ... Do you feel sorry for them? - I - no !!!

The money collected by the second and third methods will be enough for our country for 10 years, in addition to the first 20 from the sale of raw materials (maybe more, but I consider, as always, the most lousy course of events). But 30 years behind the eyes is enough for all the measures that I will describe next.
How to free the national economy from the influence of "traders" from Wall Street.

Already, even the child knows that thanks to the "wave of the hand" of the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Morgans, Goldmans and other Saxons, any, the most prosperous power of the world today, can be launched in the blink of an eye around the world.

This is done simply, rather old-looking goat-goat Soros, or “great analyst” Ben Bernanke, can “blurt out” something like the price of shares of the PROSTHETIE ENTERPRISE company and, as a result, on its product, falls on the New York Stock Exchange (which “taxis” all others) to zero. This happened more than once with our oil, for example.

I do not like these unusual words to the Russian ear, with your permission, I will call the exchange “a market for trading empty papers” or “a workshop for making money out of thin air”.

What is the result? - Because sometimes, as if by chance of the words spoken, the next economic collapse occurs, enterprises go bankrupt, people lose a good job and go so far as having a HIGHER education, they agree to take revenge on the street. And all because some "financial luminaries" did not like the development and strengthening of the "non-democratic" country. How come? - Only “correct”, “parliamentary”, “tolerant” states have the right to this (and this is strictly slower than the States), he resents. And then, let's say, dictatorial, and even Muslim Iran (or Libya) began to rise. Aw, not good! You can, of course, destroy other people's well-being with bombs, but you don’t always have confidence in complete victory, and they already have many fronts. Therefore, there are different ways to apply: Libya - bombs, and Iran (immediately anticipating cavils, just for example took) - safer with the help of "paper (although it is more correct - already electronic) market".

How can we avoid this? - Well, no bombs are foreseen, but what to do with “financial terrorism”? - Yes, everything is simple - the will is broken by a stronger and inflexible will! “Let down”, let's say, our oil, and we reply: “We will not sell at your“ exchange ”price! “Pay well!” They will try to buy from someone else. Oil will find, perhaps. And gas? And the Northern Sea Route, and Transsib ?! - No to this replacement. We are destiny - the sole owners. So it is necessary to use! And our Vneshtorg and Foreign Ministry (Nakromindel) should talk like this: “Oh, you have difficulties, collapse, you have no money? - We do not care! Prices are! It will be either way or not at all! ”

The second point on which I would like to dwell here is the complete control of our country over the Central Bank. I have already written a few words about Sberbank, that it should be state owned, and the Central Bank of Russia, even more so. That's when we are definitely out of reach for "financial terrorists." I apologize, but I confess honestly, in banks it is not at all strong. I know that it should be so, but how to achieve it - let, having read my lines, someone who understands this question better will tell you step by step. I will be grateful.

Of course, I describe everything here very simply, so that it is understandable and accessible. The bottom line is that you need an isolated economy. Not “fenced off” (like a feudal subsistence economy), not an “iron curtain”, but ISOLATED, i.e. having all the necessary relations with the outside world, leading a brisk trade, but very tough, dictating the prices of its products. And the prices should not be determined by the “paper-electronic bazaar”, but by the cost price and the profit that we, Russia, want to make. To do this, you need to be either the sole producer of the goods (the sole owner of the transport route in our case), or the producer of the highest-quality goods, which obviously beats the market with all their own kind, but costs not much more (better when cheaper, of course). Here we are approaching the most important component in the reconstruction of the country, which I will discuss in the next part of my article.
Author:
Articles from this series:
What I see Russia, ready for war
What I see Russia, ready for war (continued)
What I see Russia, ready for war (continued)
176 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Igor39
    Igor39 23 August 2013 08: 16
    29
    First, we must take all the people's good from the bourgeoisie, and then build an isolated economy.
    1. master_rem
      master_rem 23 August 2013 09: 29
      18
      Yesterday, the residents of our house cleaned up (the imputed part of it) the crap playground for the other residents of our house (alcoholic omission) I write without rhyme, but about the war - it’s just a mirror image of our state.
      1. Apologet.Ru
        Apologet.Ru 23 August 2013 13: 28
        +2
        hi
        Quote Igor39
        First, we must take all the people's good from the bourgeoisie, and then build an isolated economy.

        The Russian Empire has already passed in the 1917 year. Are you a colleague? Didn’t you read the history of Russia?
        Or do you think Russia and its peoples d.biloidami-to step on the same rake?
        Do not pick up and isolate, but multiply ...

        1. little man
          little man 23 August 2013 15: 46
          +6
          And there is not a word about the revolution. But to judge, to plant (namely to plant) and necessarily confiscation are necessary. Although how to reach their foreign accounts is a question.
          1. goldfinger
            goldfinger 23 August 2013 22: 32
            -11 qualifying.
            Can i ask you? Is this often printed on the site? Much like an article from a wall newspaper in a madhouse. Especially after the words about the "evil old woman" Thatcher, who told the author, in great secrecy, about the desired number of the population of Russia. Even Hitler did not mention these numbers! The rest is on the level! It's a shame even to read! What a feverish delirium, diluted with Lenin's quote - "Rob - loot!" "The same egg - side view! After all, they have already passed!
            The Russian people have always been prevented from dancing First, they say, we will take the factories, and the land to the peasants, then they killed millions of bourgeois, Cossacks, priests, ruined and killed the Russian peasant, then they went to interfere with all kinds of enemies of the people, spies, pests, killer doctors, about decaying imperialists and aggressive Zionists, I do not speak. The Volga Germans, Meskhetian Turks, Chechens, Ingush, Koreans were repressed ... Then came dudes, speculators, currency dealers. But, in the end, they agreed on the Jews. Like, the world government, the Masons, drink the blood of babies ... Today, the fascism of public consciousness in Russia is irreversible. As confirmation - this opus. Be sure to find your own Adolf Alloizovich and away we go. Jews then left, but Muslims and Caucasians, in particular, have nowhere to go, no one is waiting for them. And the whole thing will surely end, with a long and bloody massacre for resources and borders. Long, long. And then there will be a new Nuremberg. The sad thing is that all this is inevitable ... While maintaining the current political and, most importantly, social state of Russia. However, in several new Russian states, perhaps, there will be a chance to become an ordinary European state, without the greatness of the people and God-bearing. What to do now? Taking into account our Slavic-Soviet mentality - to plant and plant in a square-nesting way, regardless of ranks. Start with the Lake Cooperative. An example is nearby - to the west of you. You know him well. Helps a lot. Take my word for it. Maybe a little harsh, but I think so. This is my vision of the problem.
            1. avdkrd
              avdkrd 24 August 2013 01: 56
              11
              Quote: goldfinger
              Especially after the words about "evil old lady" Thatcher,


              In principle, it doesn’t matter whether the evil old woman said it or not, but Thatcher’s authorship of this phrase is widely discussed on the network and the secret is only from you. In fact, the evil old woman did a lot for the collapse of the USSR, while realizing that the socialist system was more competitive than she spoke inspirationally in 1991. http://pikabu.ru/view/margaret_tyetcher_pro_razval_sssr_437526
              Examples from the WEST from us - leave for yourself. To the west of us, there is not a single country that can be equal, except for lovers of homosexual and pedophiles. The Western system, in principle, is not self-sufficient, capitalism simply needs to rob someone, that's why Libya, Syria, etc. are happening. Who are you to judge the social state in Russia? I have many friends in Hungary and Slovenia. They sincerely envy when they come to visit (not me, but Russians in general), and somehow I don't feel any trepidation before their social structure. There is no need to speak for the Russian people and how they were prevented from dancing. In our history, there were many Lenin and Trotsky, who threw the country on the "fire of the world revolution", while they were not Russians by definition and hated the Russians and Russia and there were enemies of the people, moreover, there were real ones - sabotages, explosions at industrial facilities in the 30s were more common than now in the Middle East and the Chechens were with the Ingush, who, by virtue of their traditions, preferred to live by robberies (have not changed much), and not to work. The Volga Germans, you generally did not mention the suit. The Americans kept all Japanese in concentration camps until the end of the war. This is normal during the war. Even in our history, there was Alexander Nevsky, who slapped those who were from the WEST OF US, Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great did the same, there was the First World War, when allies from the WEST OF US simultaneously sponsored the revolution and threw it after the victory, there was the Second World War, when from the WEST FROM US they came to civilize the barbarians, but the same left with the Lyuli. We have enough examples from the West, but I don’t want to follow them, and I don’t want such "happiness" in Belarus.
              1. goldfinger
                goldfinger 24 August 2013 10: 36
                -3
                Dear Avdkrd! They teach the classics - don't speak nicely, so I got burned. After all, when I said the word "west" I meant geography, i.e. my Belarus (according to the rules of the Russian language), and the AHL, which is quite decisively and publicly fighting corruption! I know about your "social program" from the media and from relatives living in Moscow, the Moscow region and Ryazan. Different planets! Parallel Worlds! This bundle can detonate! That Thatcher, about whom your Valya Matvienko said that they are almost twins in politics, (a story on RTV), could blurt out about 15 million. I don’t believe. There are many things walking on the Internet. I believe, not always, the writing media, and even then not all.
              2. goldfinger
                goldfinger 25 August 2013 00: 05
                -1
                There should be about 15 million Russians left, the minimum number sufficient to extract raw materials and maintain gas and oil pipelines. - For the first time such a phrase was mentioned in the book by Andrey Parshev “Why Russia is not America”: “... once I came across in a sound recording some public speech of M. Thatcher on foreign policy. <...> So speaking about the prospects of the USSR, she said something like the following, without explaining it in any way: “On the territory of the USSR, the residence of 15 million people is economically justified.” [24] No documentary evidence was provided. Parshev later clarified that it was about an economically efficient population: “It was her speech on foreign policy. I heard it on sound recording. It did not directly say that 15 million people should be left in the USSR, but it was said more cunningly: they say, the Soviet economy is completely ineffective, there is only a small effective part, which, in fact, has the right to exist. And this effective part employs only 15 million people of our population. ”[25] However, again no source of quotation was provided.
            2. postman
              postman 26 August 2013 16: 34
              0
              +.
              Everything is written correctly (by you)
              Not "fascia"
              It is unlikely that "supporters" and manipulators (such as the author) read Mussolini, and the others do not distinguish the NSDAP from the Nazi party, among other things, from Franco's phalangists ...

              For that you have so many minuses ... It is clear, but logically inexplicable
            3. Don
              Don 27 August 2013 11: 01
              0
              Quote: goldfinger
              It's a shame even to read! Some kind of feverish delirium, diluted with a quote from Lenin - "Rob - loot!" ".

              I agree with you, but I was more reminded of the delirium of a youngster, with such crazy thoughts at the level of 1917 agitation for illiterate peasants.
      2. Apologet.Ru
        Apologet.Ru 23 August 2013 18: 32
        -10 qualifying.
        hi
        3-th article with which my comment was deleted for some reason ...
        Restoring -
        Quote Igor39
        First, we must take all the people's good from the bourgeoisie, and then build an isolated economy.

        The Russian Empire has already passed in the 1917 year. Are you a colleague that at least you have not read the history of Russia?
        Or do you think Russia and its peoples d.biloidami-to step on the same rake?
        Do not pick up and isolate, but multiply ...

        Although I agree, the audience, with my remark on the discussion, you hit, colleague Igor 39, well. For this respect!

        1. revnagan
          revnagan 23 August 2013 19: 40
          15
          Quote: Apologet.Ru
          Do not pick up and isolate, but multiply ...

          How?! How can you multiply what you personally do not have? That which you have barely received and without even bringing it to your pocket, you need to give back. To give the oligarchs for the apartment received from the Soviet regime, for the heat that they sell to us from heating stations, built by the whole people for everyone, and now "grabbed" by the oligarchs, for the electricity generated at the power plants built during the USSR and stolen by the same oligarchs ... You can continue this list indefinitely or become like a donkey pulling an overwhelming load, which is controlled by those sitting on this load people by means of a carrot on a fishing rod in front of a donkey's muzzle. I am not a donkey. Therefore, the author is right, everything stolen, fooled from the people-state, return to the treasury, the thieves are severely punished. Only then will we be able to multiply and build an independent, strong economy. And the bourgeois-alien players are in our team, and they will play against their people for those who promise them more (at our expense, of course).
        2. Igor39
          Igor39 23 August 2013 22: 10
          +2
          Dear Apologet colleague, if my memory serves me, then in 1917 a revolution took place in Russia, sponsored from outside. I said that it would be nice to nationalize the wealth created by the collective labor of the peoples of Russia for more than 70 years and privatized by a bunch of close oligarchs for several years of financially illiterate working people. I do not need anything, everything is there, I only want justice. hi
        3. avdkrd
          avdkrd 24 August 2013 00: 59
          +5
          the article is not about a repetition of 1917, but a repetition of 1937, when Stalin cleared the country's economy of compradors and the most rabid part of the Jewish international. At the same time, in reality, his actions and the legislative framework were far more humane than they are now in ASPnet, and not as liberals have been drumming into us over the past 30 years. Of course, Igor's slogan - "take away all the people's good from the bourgeoisie" from Igor39 hurts the ear, but if we are talking about the PEOPLE GOOD, what objections can there be? How were enterprises acquired in the 90s and entire economies grew by the current oligarchs? Enterprises that were built by the whole country and which should give this country not taxes, but ALL profits, for the above reason. All corporatization within the framework of privatization is illegal and all the Abramovichs, Prokhorovs, etc. live on OUR MONEY. People came to big business in different ways, one managed to take out a loan and build a plant (on the site of the destroyed one), and the other, being in the "right team", bankrupted the company and bought something worth billions for next to nothing. Medvedev's privatization policy is also criminal and, in principle, clearly shows whose team he plays. The policy of re-privatization would be reasonable, all the nonsense about the fact that the state cannot effectively manage big business is untenable. Our sworn friends of the ASP, the most significant for the economy and security, have grown and enterprises prefer not to give it to a private individual, and the banking sector is nationalized little by little. In the end, there is a solution "both yours and ours", which has long been used by large developers. The bottom line is to attract a management company that receives 10-20% of the profit, but at the same time is tightly controlled and can be replaced by a competitive one if it fails.
          Many thanks to the author for the article. This topic needs to be raised in wide layers of society. It should be discussed, our political elite and elite shushara should be informed of the aspirations of the people.
      3. Dimy4
        Dimy4 23 August 2013 19: 07
        +5
        He suggested that the neighbor not walk his huge oversized walk in the forest, since he was not far (m. 300), and not on the playground. They quarreled in the mat.
    2. strange and pretty meaningless
      strange and pretty meaningless 23 August 2013 09: 29
      38
      N.N. Nosov's wonderful children's story "Dreamers". Two boys sit and compose fables. Naive and childish tales. A third comes up, listens to them - and laughs. Like, you are talking nonsense here - and I came up with this. He stole the jam from his parents, ate it - and smeared his sleeping sister with this jam. And he ate too much jam - and he translated the arrows to his sister, and she flew in from her parents. Well, the boys called him a scoundrel - and they bought ice cream for his sister.

      I need it. The author is just such a naive dreamer. We will expand, deepen, wean and divide. Just like Radiant about the Great Rearmament. Meanwhile, someone cunning, laughing, eats our jam - the general. And we are smearing our lips. Rather, brains.

      I look forward to continuing - the most interesting is how to translate this into reality. At what price this time.

      And also ... The author is by chance ... not a lawyer?
      1. smart ass
        smart ass 23 August 2013 10: 41
        10
        I agree with you ... fantasy article, I read it to half, there is no time for delirium
        1. mnn_13
          mnn_13 23 August 2013 13: 39
          +4
          Young people like to fantasize. The good thing is that while they are young est, they will learn many chances and manage ...
        2. Constantine
          Constantine 23 August 2013 15: 22
          0
          Quote: Clever man
          I agree with you ... fantasy article, I read it to half, there is no time for delirium


          Similarly. Almost complete separation from reality))
          1. 755962
            755962 23 August 2013 20: 02
            +4
            Quote: Constantine
            Almost complete separation from reality))

            The cry of the soul .. if you want.
            IMPAIRED!
        3. Hug
          Hug 24 August 2013 02: 19
          0
          Quote: Clever man
          I agree with you ... fantasy article, I read it to half, there is no time for delirium

          What kind of fantasy is there - "porridge, honey, shit and bees", as my battalion commander used to say. At first I even thought that the custom - about everything a little bit: about the Jews, and just about the Jews, and about the Jewish financial oligarchy, and about the Western Jewish "liberals". In short, the terminology is pleasant in all respects for the bulk of forum visitors, who find it easier to find the image of the enemy in .... - well, you yourself know who is to blame for the fact that there is no water in the tap. However, everything is simpler - the author of the article has another aggravation. It's time to "Kashchenko" Article - no.
      2. Gato
        Gato 23 August 2013 10: 44
        +7
        Quote: abyrvalg
        The author is just such a naive dreamer. We will expand, deepen, wean and divide.

        This is exactly laughing
        And who will take, share, shoot and plant? The author for some reason does not specify ...
        Probably some kind of "hit" from the past or the future. Like this:
        1. strange and pretty meaningless
          strange and pretty meaningless 23 August 2013 13: 09
          +3
          Quote: Gato
          А who will take, share, shoot and plant?


          And - the second half of the apple - in whom to take away that share and ... whom shoot and plant. Somehow they are now heating up the issue of suspending the moratorium on the death penalty. So what is this done for, if Kvachkov is sitting - and the rusty lard with a stool is fluttering?

          Quote: Gato
          The author for some reason does not specify ...


          And not the time to clarify. Bye probe.

          Quote: Gato
          Probably, some "hit" from the past or the future.


          Well, here I am afraid that with a global mindset, the gavitel can be invited to this role by partners from the "foreign". What is symbolic - through Ulyanovsk. Something like PMCs. It seems to me that after the job, he sheds a woman’s dress from the Kremlin ... In short, we are teaching history.
      3. Per se.
        Per se. 23 August 2013 12: 09
        15
        Quote: abyrvalg
        N.N. Nosov's wonderful children's story "Dreamers".

        Nosov also has "Dunno in the Solar City" (socialism) and "Dunno on the Moon" (capitalism), though the stories are for children, but very graphic. As long as we live "on the moon", little good will come of it.
        1. strange and pretty meaningless
          strange and pretty meaningless 23 August 2013 12: 40
          +8
          Quote: Per se.
          Nosov also has "Dunno in the Solar City" (socialism) and "Dunno on the Moon" (capitalism)


          recourse oh don't poison the soul. We all lived in the Flower City - the USSR, went to the Solar ...

          Quote: Per se.
          As long as we live "on the moon"


          Y-yes. And we are ruled by a luntik lawyer and a scoperfield uncle. What are we going to do? By the way - on the topic. If you haven't, check out the cartoon "Alice's Birthday" in 2009. And be sure to show the children - with comments.
      4. Skiff-2
        Skiff-2 23 August 2013 12: 31
        +4
        Quote: abyrvalg
        the most interesting how to translate this into reality. At what price this time.

        The author inattentively followed Putin's actions, after all, he had already raised the issue of unfair privatization of the 90s, offered the bourgeoisie to voluntarily and forcibly make one-time contributions to the "development fund" in the amount of the difference between the prices of the real cost and the price of privatization, but they are not bastard either - most of the enterprises have been resold many times and the current owners bought them at full price, you cannot drive up to these with confiscation, and how to manage a confiscated enterprise? Where to get managers when they are all in business? State property must be returned carefully so as not to break the wood again.
        1. strange and pretty meaningless
          strange and pretty meaningless 23 August 2013 14: 02
          +6
          Quote: Skif-2
          The author inattentively followed Putin’s actions, because he had already raised the issue of unfair privatization of the 90s


          Poo, like a true liberal stabilizer, which is called "translated and voiced" tracing paper from the Obama project. Let me explain.

          The Obama group, as a condom around the dollar bubble, proposed a very unpopular measure - reducing the state's social obligations. The choice of a descendant of a Kenyan shepherd as president was not accidental; he had to tighten the belts of black "consumers". Khuseinovich coped with this task - let's be objective - the negroes are "transplanted" to ration cards. Moreover, the black lord even exceeded (!) The plan. Return of production to the States under Obama! How? The method is ancient and, of course, effective. Labor of prison slaves - http://warfiles.ru/36668-tyuremnoe-rabstvo-v-ssha.html. Almost seven million labor force. For a bowl of gruel. China is resting. I will only note that the use of prison labor is put on a broad commercial footing - this is a whole sector of the "economy", with stocks and quotes.

          Now about the "second part of the Marlezon ballet". The lightning rod for such a strengthening of democracy was ... yes, those very slogans about dispossession of kulaks. Here, as usual, the plan was not fulfilled a little less than completely. The "dispossession" was limited to public appeals of Gates, Buffett and So to accomplices - they say, as much as possible ... And that's all. The wave parted without hitting anyone.

          So the Father of Russian Stability is here, as usual, unoriginal. Appeals have been made - but who will hear them ... True, unlike Obama, Our Tsar still did not milk the blacks. Moreover, how could he mitigate their plight by "pouring" the money-box of the Stabilization Fund into "supporting the banking sector." The Stabilization Fund, in principle, did not move anywhere, it simply dissipated at the place of lying - the fat body of P-Hindustan. Apparently, they didn't even have time to ask Radiant. But he managed to say wassat
          1. nevopros
            nevopros 23 August 2013 19: 52
            +3
            Those. 7 million unmotivated slaves will rectify the situation? Are you seriously???

            The next "world crisis" will give many times more of the cheaper labor force. "The Great Depressyak" is a good example.

            And we do not have a king with the appropriate powers, but Пabandoned resident which in the last decades is represented in the media_for_western_obtainer as an autocrat. Where is the logic?

            If copy-paste - give a link please. The source is interested. hi
            1. strange and pretty meaningless
              strange and pretty meaningless 24 August 2013 05: 08
              +1
              Quote: nevopros
              Those. 7 million unmotivated slaves to rectify the situation? Are you seriously???


              They will not fix it, but they will give an outlet. There is enough for the production of army ammunition in the USA. And now this is an o-very priority direction.

              Quote: nevopros
              give me a link please.


              I gave the link, dear - http://warfiles.ru/36668-tyuremnoe-rabstvo-v-ssha.html.
      5. Papakiko
        Papakiko 23 August 2013 20: 35
        +3
        Quote: abyrvalg
        And also ... The author is by chance ... not a lawyer?

        Definitely not!
        Quote: abyrvalg
        I look forward to continuing - the most interesting is how to translate this into reality. At what price this time.

        The price will be, as in 1917-1924, about 20 million people and multiplied by 000.
        But they will not implement it and all undertakings will be cut down at the root.
        The police were not just renamed the police.
        Initially, it was customary to denote the word militia, and in this sense it is used in most countries of the world, irregular armed formations used both for military purposes and to maintain public order, created from the local population, often, on a voluntary basis (militia), and not included in the official system of state military and law enforcement agencies. The main functions of the police are to maintain signs of the state; protection of the rights of citizens and society.
        Police - a system of public services and public order policing bodies. It performs a wide range of functions, the set of which varies from country to country. The most characteristic function is the prevention (prevention), suppression, detection and disclosure of crimes and other offenses. The Nine Saws Principles are often cited. In particular, the seventh principle reads: “Always maintain relations with the population, implementing historical traditions, according to which the police are society, and society is the police; the police are made up of members of the public who receive a salary in order to fully devote their attention to duties, assigned to every citizen, in the interests of the welfare and survival of society". Other countries followed this example. In the colonies, the police were organized by the colonial authorities and often served only their interests to the detriment of the locals.
        Now let’s analyze one topic from the article; Trans-Siberian Railway.
        Transsiberian technical capabilities allow it to transport up to 100 million tons of cargo per year.
        For example, approximately 18000 vessels pass through the Suez Canal annually, and most of them are far from even 10000 tons. displacement a is much larger.
        The difference in the most conservative estimates is far from even double (maybe four times) in favor of the Suez Canal.
        We consider this without taking into account the fact that Russian Railways cannot allow us to carry containers in two tiers (in aggregate, the platform height and the height of the contact line), which made it possible to double the container turnover by two times. But the whole economy of Russian Railways throughout the country needs to be reconstructed, and this is rude to 40000 km paths alone, not counting bridges and tunnels (Vladik (Zabaykalsk) -SpB, Vladik (Zabaykalsk) -Rostov-on-Don-Novorossiysk, Vladik (Zabaykalsk) -Brest)
        We do not believe that Geyropa is announcing and promoting the "Silk Road" with the real construction of roads and infrastructure through Kazakhstan-Caspian Sea-Azerbaijan-Georgia-Russian Sea (Black) (Well, the people of Geyrope like to put it down, nothing will be done here).
        The Chinese are intensively building infrastructure in the direction of Kazakhstan (Khami-Urumqi-Zaysan (Kazakhstan) - and then the project is read St. Petersburg-Brest-Rostov-on-Don.
        The main difference between railway and sea vessels is a fourfold advantage in speed of 1200 km / day versus 300 km / day.
        The cost of railway infrastructure and maintaining it flows into a pretty heavy bag.
        Therefore, everything is relative.
        We are waiting for the beginning of the era of transport on other physical principles.
        A-A-U-U! Kulibiny-Tsiolkovsky-Mendeleev-Korolev !!!!!!!!
    3. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 23 August 2013 09: 30
      +5
      Quote: Igor39
      and then build an isolated economy.

      There is no completely isolated economy; to one degree or another, any economy is in contact with the economies of other countries and is integrated into the world system. Another thing is that we must try to minimize dependence on other countries.
      1. Revolver
        Revolver 23 August 2013 09: 49
        +4
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Igor39
        and then build an isolated economy.

        There is no completely isolated economy; to one degree or another, any economy is in contact with the economies of other countries and is integrated into the world system. Another thing is that we must try to minimize dependence on other countries.

        There is a living example of an "isolated economy" - Korea, and by no means South Korea. Even the term there for the concept of "isolated economy" was invented - juche. Only something the Koreans do not look rich and happy.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. aktanir
        aktanir 23 August 2013 10: 24
        +5
        Well, what do you think the author is writing about? "Not closed, but isolated"
      3. 311ove
        311ove 23 August 2013 10: 47
        +8
        In this case, I would say that the economy is self-sufficient, in terms of meaning it is better suited. Then, no external openness is a hindrance, but vice versa.
      4. bairat
        bairat 23 August 2013 13: 59
        +2
        The question is in the proportions, it is worthless for us to import cucumbers from China, we ourselves can grow it. For me in this regard, Thailand serves as an example, during the holidays I did not find a single Madeinchain product there, all of my own.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 23 August 2013 16: 06
          +2
          Quote: bairat
          The question is in the proportions, it is worthless for us to import cucumbers from China, we ourselves can grow it.

          Of course we can, only in Magadan, judging by the price tags, Krasnodar tomatoes are 500 rubles per kilogram, where is it cheaper to carry?
    4. 225chay
      225chay 23 August 2013 09: 31
      13
      Quote: Igor39
      First, we must take all the people's good from the bourgeoisie, and then build an isolated economy.

      Absolutely correctly painted by the author. and his surname is like that)) Slab! Our country is once again ... ali. They robbed and robbed almost everything of the common people.
      An insignificant number of parasites owning most of the wealth, sits on the neck and sucks blood. No reforms from above will help - this is all foolishness. This is Moses driving Jews in the wilderness for 40 years
      1. ale-x
        ale-x 23 August 2013 10: 16
        +3
        About Moses .... There is some similarity))))))
    5. 6216390
      6216390 23 August 2013 10: 05
      +3
      Quote: Igor39
      First, we must take all the people's good from the bourgeoisie, and then build an isolated economy.

      Passed, not everyone liked it.
    6. domokl
      domokl 23 August 2013 10: 32
      +4
      Quote: Igor39
      First, we must take all the people's good from the bourgeoisie, and then build an isolated economy.

      Complete nonsense. You still build the great Russian wall. It is foolish to resist the whole world. You need to take modern, high-quality from others and on this basis create your own, even more high-tech.
      Isolation will necessitate reinventing the wheel.
    7. KGDU10
      KGDU10 23 August 2013 10: 43
      0
      There are a lot of these "at first", including "young children must first be taught to speak Russian, so that they know Pushkin by heart, etc." ...
    8. Zhylaw
      Zhylaw 23 August 2013 12: 00
      +2
      Quote: Igor39
      then build an economy isolated


      It's right. To stabilize and protect the process of its restoration, at least initially, Russia should strive to organize a kind of "autocratic". Or, in other words, the border has become one-way passable for financial gain. If someone wants to export money offshore, they must be willing to pay with their lives.
      I almost missed, the KGB should be restored in all its former glory. The West is still peeing when they hear about the KGB.
      The new old KGB should include a department similar to the US National Security Agency in order to monitor what is happening in the near and more distant Internet.
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. ildar335
      ildar335 23 August 2013 21: 36
      0
      Volodya, I checked all your articles at once, BUT Stalin was not at the helm (although I would very much like to). All of them are written wonderfully and correctly, for this there is a huge plus!
      and again, BUT this is fantasy !!! recourse
      I am for the sole power of the tsar, the king, the tyrant-president (in this sequence), do not give a shit what it will be called. OUR country needs ONE wheel !!! and to rule with an iron hand! we have no number "@ .. LEY, as without gingerbread! Only this OUR people will love and respect!
      1. ildar335
        ildar335 24 August 2013 01: 03
        +1
        voros zaminusili, piss that fucking will be under the new Stalin!)
    11. Seraph
      Seraph 24 August 2013 03: 08
      -1
      "To take people's goods from the bourgeoisie." The thesis is correct and has been in the air since the early 90s. There is no discovery. The article suggests a well-known path: a cavalry raid, an armored car with a street speaker, expropriations and even the People's Commissariats. My friends and I, when we were younger, we imagined everything, youth is passionate and harsh on rash actions. And then someone has to rake them. After the 17th to Stalin, after the 91st to Putin. And many disliked Stalin, and collectivization, and canals with construction sites of the century, and Putin. And they did and are doing their job without the help of kitchen projectors and they succeed.
      Who was in the shoes of the boss will not let lie: subordinates always see everything in a simplified form. And in politics, too: a hundred executions, the Northern Sea Route, the second branch of the BAM and all things. Enemies are fools. We’ll catch the span. All citizens are for us, the victory will be ours! Oops, it doesn’t come out: the enemy’s resolve wasn’t taken into account, the punks are inadvertently (and even among his comrades-in-arms), the shootings are thousands and millions, the BAM capitalists do not want to use it, the Arabs filled the entire market with cheap oil, NATO mobilized, the oligarchs took refuge with the loot, etc.
      The article blew steam from the author. And a "talk for the poor" began. All this has nothing to do with reality and the future of Russia.
      ps And the tails are screwed onto Khodorkovsky, Urlashov, Serdyukov, Berezovsky and their accomplices without cavalry raids
  2. Crang
    Crang 23 August 2013 08: 25
    +4
    Great article! Well done Vladimir.
  3. Luger
    Luger 23 August 2013 08: 29
    15
    In general, everything is correct, both about "transport arteries" and about taking away and not giving and reviving, as well as living self-sufficient and taking everything "inside", but there is one big "BUT" all this is possible provided a strong, patriotic leader of the country, who could gather people like him in a circle, who knows how and could consistently go towards the intended goal and have a clear idea of ​​the current situation, as well as know what the final goal looks like. GDP, no matter how scolded it, has done a lot of useful things for the country, only the strengthening of the country in the foreign policy arena is worth what, now it needs a worthy replacement, a successor of good and only good deeds, a person who must organize and do a lot of things inside the country and for the country ... Unfortunately, there are no such people yet. hi
    1. master_rem
      master_rem 23 August 2013 11: 09
      +5
      Well, yes, I looked at Rogozin - but something is still too small, or something ..
      1. Luger
        Luger 23 August 2013 11: 15
        +6
        I also looked at him since 1998 and look, it’s too small for the bill, of course, I don’t agree, he will be a kilogram 120 (just kidding), nevertheless, if he doesn’t disagree with words, then in principle the most probable, and gain political weight possible, and the smallness in this matter can be eliminated.
        1. Max otto
          Max otto 23 August 2013 13: 42
          +8
          Yes, fullness! Rogozin is an activist! Rogozin is a typical modern politician, PiAra is a lot, there are a lot of words, he says everything correctly and in fact with slogans. Only now it does nothing. A typical representative of modern youth. If it’s not difficult, can you dig up something from his last affairs? And then I except for poplars in front of NATO headquarters did not hear anything else.
          1. ildar335
            ildar335 24 August 2013 01: 06
            -2
            drags the defense up and this is enough for now.
            and poplar in front of NATO headquarters, is this not enough?
  4. svskor80
    svskor80 23 August 2013 08: 32
    +6
    I agree with the general trend of the article, one can argue with the details. If desired, an article can be hung up to incite social discord, which would not be desirable since the author in his indictments of rights, no one ever regretted and will not regret until the person himself realizes that he is a citizen and demands to observe his rights .
    1. My address
      My address 23 August 2013 08: 56
      +5
      The existing distribution of the national product can also be regarded as stirring up social discord.
      1. My address
        My address 23 August 2013 10: 42
        +3
        I like the minus without a general dispersion of opinions. When the article is controversial, the pros and cons without authorization are normal.

        So, for a living touched people.

        Or are they old "friends" with intelligence below the stool?
    2. klimpopov
      klimpopov 23 August 2013 09: 15
      +7
      Now everything can be regarded as kindling something ...
      I agree with the article. But where can I get a leader "from the people" who will not be affiliated with the oligarchy and about Western forces?
      1. Garrin
        Garrin 23 August 2013 10: 17
        -3
        Quote: klimpopov
        But where can I get a leader "from the people" who will not be affiliated with the oligarchy and about Western forces?

        And there, where at one time the Chileans, and now the Egyptians have found.
        Article "plus".
        1. domokl
          domokl 23 August 2013 10: 39
          +6
          Quote: Garrin
          And there, where at one time the Chileans, and now the Egyptians have found.

          Do you propose to start street riots and then a leader will appear? He will not appear. But the graves in Russia will definitely increase. It is not clear that even present-day Russia is dangerous for the West. And the option of pushing us into a civil war has already been tried a hundred years in the ass.
          A bear never attacks 4 paws ... Only two.
          1. Garrin
            Garrin 23 August 2013 11: 06
            -2
            Quote: domokl

            Do you propose to start street riots and then a leader will appear?

            I suggest that the army take control of everything until spontaneous street riots begin.
            1. Garrin
              Garrin 23 August 2013 22: 35
              +2
              Gentlemen minusers, do you have any doubts that in the Russian army there are more adequate people in the person of literate and patriotic officers than in the current government and in the "thieves' army of officials"? Please justify.
  5. domokl
    domokl 23 August 2013 08: 33
    11
    Robbing the loot is of course a wonderful slogan. Only he will plunge the country into a civil war. Swamp and others like them have shown that if there are sufficient funds (where they come from, it’s clear that in Russia) it’s quite possible to create a powerful anti-movement of any kind.
    I think that it’s more important now to return the money to Russia, to make it work for us. To establish the absolute legitimacy of everything and everything. To investigate the crimes of not only poor boys, but also of oligarchs, ministers and other powerful people.
    We really must by all means, by hook or by crook, not only preserve the country, but also restore its former greatness.
    1. My address
      My address 23 August 2013 08: 54
      15
      In China and Norway, the movement of capital abroad is tightly controlled.
      With regard to China, everything is clear - the machinations of the Communists against the free market.
      But how then in Norway? Why does the Norwegian bourgeois government think of Norway and not of the Canaries? Maybe because it is Norwegian, not liberalistic?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Corsair
      Corsair 23 August 2013 10: 20
      +3
      Quote: domokl
      I think that it’s more important now to return the money to Russia, to make it work for us. To establish the absolute legitimacy of everything and everything. To investigate the crimes of not only poor boys, but also of oligarchs, ministers and other powerful people.
      We really must by all means, by hook or by crook, not only preserve the country, but also restore its former greatness.


      And imagine that EVEN now, in the presence of those factors that you have listed - Russia GOES FORWARD !!!
      And if we eliminate them (factors), then after a short period of stabilization a WRONG is possible, a phenomenon quite predictable taking into account the absence of facts of deterrence within the country ...
      1. domokl
        domokl 23 August 2013 10: 30
        +8
        Quote: Corsair
        EVEN now, in the presence of those factors which you listed - Russia GOES FORWARD !!!
        And if you eliminate them (factors

        That's the thing. We are going, but rather slowly. And we have no time for such a walk, as always in our history. We must run. Otherwise, they will devour and not choke.
        The sooner our sovereigns and money rowers realize that there are no jurisdictions, the better for everyone.
    4. optimist
      optimist 23 August 2013 11: 07
      13
      Quote: domokl
      Rob the loot of course a beautiful slogan. Only he will plunge the country into a civil war

      Do you have any other suggestions? The trouble is that all the options are between "very, very bad" and "just pi ... ts". I somehow hardly believe that the Abramovichs, Chubais, Deripaska and other GDP-shnaya shelupon will sprinkle ashes on their heads and give the people "factories, newspapers, steamers" ... Our ancestors 100 years ago, not from sadistic inclinations, tore each other's throats : there were, apparently, good reasons. And all these "songs" about the fact that "there is no need for revolutions" remind a naive cancer patient: "Doctor, maybe you shouldn't cut it? Maybe we will smear it with green stuff and dissolve it?" May it not dissolve! And don't accuse me of bloodthirstiness !!! And I want to live no less than others. It's just better to die in the struggle for the real freedom of the country than to see how all sorts of Judas sell it and its citizens wholesale and retail ...
      1. krpmlws
        krpmlws 23 August 2013 12: 50
        +4
        I support optimist!
      2. KVB-76
        KVB-76 23 August 2013 21: 13
        +2
        Absolutely agree!
      3. michajlo
        michajlo 24 August 2013 03: 21
        +1
        Good evening, dear Alexey!
        You are absolutely RIGHT!
        It is only necessary for all of us here on the VO website, who cares about what will happen in 5-10-20 years or more in the territory of the ex-USSR, to unite, and reflect together to move on to business. The conversations here are very interesting and NEEDED.
        But all the same, we must begin to do something for all of us, albeit in small steps!

        After all, time is running out, and around ALL-THIS devastation and not GRACE!
        Business centers, banks and supermarkets DO NOT RESCUE Russia.
        Souls warm us with messages about new equipment, planes, tanks, missiles and other weapons, but they are EVERYTHING VERY LITTLE.
        It will be possible to rejoice for the military-industrial complex when such messages from the "IMPORTANT EVENT" row go over the "WEEKLY HABITABLE FACT" row.

        In my opinion, here many of us called the author of the article a dreamer. If you want and willingness to live more modestly and self-sacrifice, any fantasy is EXECUTIVE!

        Since in 1985-1991 we stole our homeland - the USSR, and we have all been like two decades each other we swear on trifles, instead of to COMBINE, THINK and ACT.
        After all, our enemies only rejoice looking at us, forgetful, naive, honest and still not reconciled "kids in the sandbox"! fool

        What are your dear forum users, there will be concrete proposals for translating this fantasy into reality ?

        Sincerely, Mikhailo.
        1. optimist
          optimist 24 August 2013 09: 50
          +1
          You see, dear, it's not that simple. If, as you suggest, you start doing something concrete, then you can easily find yourself next to Kvachkov and Khabarov, having a corresponding criminal article. Now the main thing is not this, but the realization that all this "elite", including the "guarantor", deserves (at least) a good rope or a queue from the PC. Time itself will put everything in its place and our task is to determine its place in the impending terrible events. This and (similar) sites gather people who, at least, are not indifferent to the future of their country. The problem is that the overwhelming majority of the population has become a stupid b. Idol, who lives in the present and does not want to think about the future at all. They remind me of a worm crawling along a rail, and not even thinking that a train is approaching. Therefore, until this majority specifically bites a famous bird into the loin, nothing will change.
    5. krpmlws
      krpmlws 23 August 2013 12: 35
      +6
      The article is excellent. It is pleasant to read the work of a sane person, it’s like opening a window in a stuffy room. Patience and only patience, I wish the author if he decides to read reviews on this forum. laughing domoki. There will be no civil war - these are horror stories invented by our oligarchs, thereby trying to preserve the current situation in the country (they themselves will dump the country abroad if the ass gets tanned). Even if it does, let’s say patriotic power against the current lawlessness, I’m only for it. The oligarchs are watching and scaring people about it. You are talking about establishing the rule of law, but is the author saying something else, isn’t it lawful to take property stolen from the state and return it back? About the investigation ??? You can, of course, investigate,


      delay the process for years, but only the Russian economy, why should it suffer all this time? Is it a law higher than national interests? No, national interests are above all!
      1. Pinochet000
        Pinochet000 23 August 2013 15: 02
        +4
        Quote: krpmlws
        The article is excellent. It is nice to read the work of a sane person is like opening a window in a stuffy room.

        The author voiced what many in our country thought about one way or another. IMHO of course. The article plus is huge.
    6. dmb
      dmb 23 August 2013 14: 30
      +2
      Maybe you can also tell me the methods with which you are going to "return the money to Russia, make it work for us. Establish the absolute legality of everything and everyone. Investigate the crimes not only of poor boys, but also of oligarchs, ministers and other powers that be." The author is accused of utopianism, but no one makes specific proposals other than: "Maybe it will all resolve itself". The author has specifics. Yes, in some places it overlaps, but we already really have experience, including a sad one. And building socialism (and under capitalism we will remain in the same ...) we can avoid these mistakes. In particular. I do not quite understand the author's thesis about the "crash of ribs" without trial and investigation. In order to confiscate what was stolen, it is absolutely not necessary to do this. The law on nationalization is enough. Therefore, it will be necessary to "crush the ribs" only in case of armed resistance to non-compliance with the LAW. In all other cases, there will be a trial. And, believe me, fairer than the current one.
  6. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 23 August 2013 08: 39
    10
    from the Don.
    It’s famously! To make a fairy tale come true, we have to object to the Cheka. I don’t see such people who can do it. I don’t offer this to the heirs, and there’s an eternal question: What to do? Or rather, who will do it?
    1. Gato
      Gato 23 August 2013 10: 50
      +3
      Quote: borisjdin1957
      Dashingly! To make a fairy tale come true, one must object to the Cheka. I do not see such people capable of doing this on the horizon.

      Similarly. And nowhere to take them.
      After all, officers of the ChK-NKVD-KGB were not raised in special nurseries, they came to the bodies by already well-formed people from the society in which they grew up.
      1. JonnyT
        JonnyT 23 August 2013 20: 22
        0
        Patriots are ... you need a clear command from above
  7. Fin
    Fin 23 August 2013 08: 41
    +5
    The article is interesting. In some moments, it smacks of revolution, which means chaos.
    I did not like this:
    from Leningrad (I do not accept the word “St. Petersburg”)

    And what about the people we have fulfilled for the money the order of the Germans and Anglo-Saxons worthy of the name of the city founded by Peter?
  8. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 23 August 2013 08: 42
    +2
    HAPPY WALKING HOLIDAY! In Russia and the rules laughing ... there are no rules for us ... looking at the results, the West draws (!) conclusions and is not in its favor!
    This is done simply, rather aging sibling goat Soros or "great analyst" Ben Bernanke-They do not work for Russia ... THEIR CHOICE IS NOT RIGHT!
  9. Xroft
    Xroft 23 August 2013 08: 44
    +3
    If we discard the emotionality of the article and look sensibly at the actions that they want to propose, then the return to true sociolism as a path to success is already a recognized fact even in * civilized * Europe (the socialists won all past elections) the question is that we simply do not have them ... Communists? in their form, they now do not represent anything. But real changes in the country's course will only happen after Putin leaves (no sooner than 14 years later), but for now we are waiting for (my personal opinion) Brezhnev’s stability with attempts to solve specific problems and growing stagnation (corruption, creation of a national idea, development of alternative ways of income ) Unfortunately, the results are so-so Serdyukov justified, missiles fall due to the misfortune of workers, etc. ..... But the country's prestige is growing and we are again becoming a powerful political power, military exercises, etc. are resumed. This is much better than what Western * friends * prepared for us
  10. ramsi
    ramsi 23 August 2013 08: 46
    +2
    right, of course, but only who will lead this process?
    1. Yura
      Yura 23 August 2013 08: 54
      +4
      ramsi- "that's right, of course, but only who will lead this process?", the one we will choose, we just need to think about whom we will choose.
      1. ramsi
        ramsi 23 August 2013 09: 14
        +3
        I wanted to say that intuitively, everyone understands everything so well; the dispute may go not about what and how to do, but about how to start doing
        1. CaptainBlack
          CaptainBlack 23 August 2013 10: 30
          +7
          Yes, damn it, I haven’t read such articles for a long time! Although, in my thoughts for a long time I had something like that!
          The author is well done, he was not afraid to express his opinion. My respect and respect for him!
          But, unfortunately, the revolution will not work. And little will change in society. Putin nuts all unhappy immediately. Personally, for a similar article on my blog, only regarding the laws of migration, the prosecutor has already warned me! And the police beat the rapids for more than one week ... for talking. So far, why haven’t they sent, not far behind! Extremism was accused. Although, in none of the publications there was even a hint of this. But, officials from the FMS and the police did not like something VERY! Especially the facts of corruption and bribery ...
          And the fact that Russia is preparing for war is understandable to a fool! It's just that everyone doesn’t care what’s going on around, or they don’t even want to think about it, or there’s simply nothing to think about ...
          When something serious starts, then there will be an opportunity, on the "sly", to cleanse the country of outcasts.
          And before the start of the war, any mastaba, the most "clever patriots" will start, like rats from a ship, to bring down from the country! This will be the first and sure sign of impending change! The main thing is not to miss it, and to be on the alert !!!
          1. optimist
            optimist 23 August 2013 11: 12
            +6
            Quote: CaptainBlack
            When something serious begins, then there will be an opportunity, on the "sly", to cleanse the country of outcasts. And before the start of the war, any mastab, the most "clever patriots" will start, like rats from a ship, to bring down from the country! This will be the first and sure sign of impending change! The main thing is not to miss it, and to be on the alert !!!

            I absolutely agree with you! And all this whining like "the leader is not visible" - not from a big mind. Until October 1917, very few people had heard about Lenin's grandfather, and the Bolsheviks in Russia were fig and nefig. The war is just around the corner: "the process will go on" immediately after Putler's "limpiyada". Here each of us will show what he stands and on whose side he is.
          2. chemerisov
            chemerisov 23 August 2013 12: 07
            0
            The main thing is to finish
      2. Dimych
        Dimych 23 August 2013 10: 47
        0
        Are you sure that you choose this?
  11. Yura
    Yura 23 August 2013 08: 49
    +3
    I don’t think that there will be a discord in the comments to the article, everything is correctly said, everything is painful, and most of what has been said will be done, there seem to be no other options. Article plus.
    1. d1m1drol
      d1m1drol 23 August 2013 09: 28
      +3
      Even from the beginning of the path we are approaching its end. And only by how the path is traversed, one can judge the correctness of the direction. I'm afraid with such a seemingly good undertaking, we will come to the conclusion that people will be taken away by anonymous calls, and dispossession of EVERYONE in a row, equalize everyone and iron ... nothing like? I don't need to remind you of how collectivization took place in the USSR. Even if you very selectively begin to dekulak the bourgeoisie, you will eventually reach the middle class, and then those who have more "cows" than their neighbors.
      1. Mr. Gambu4aS
        Mr. Gambu4aS 23 August 2013 10: 10
        +4
        All the mistakes of the past can be taken into account, we have already gone through this, as they say "the first pancake is lumpy"!
        1. Gato
          Gato 23 August 2013 10: 56
          +5
          Quote: Mr. Gambu4aS
          All the mistakes of the past can be taken into account, we have already gone through this, as they say "the first pancake is lumpy"!

          Is it the first?
          And we also have a lot of rakes on which the human foot has not set foot!
          1. krpmlws
            krpmlws 23 August 2013 13: 02
            +2
            What do you suggest, to sit and do nothing, to reconcile and put up with all this shit? Of course, no one wants a repetition of the excesses of the past, everyone is afraid of the old Russian habit of stepping on their rake, you need to be smarter and act.
      2. Yura
        Yura 23 August 2013 10: 33
        +2
        Quote: d1m1drol
        Even from the beginning of the path we are approaching its end. And only by how the path is traveled, can we judge the correct direction.

        It's right. A man is born to die, the first step is to reach, sitting in place you will not see the end of the path. It depends on us what this road will be and it does not have to be what you are afraid of.
  12. bulvas
    bulvas 23 August 2013 08: 49
    +1
    The author's ideas are just right for the remnants of specialists and people able to work to flee away from the country. Further it is clear - the rest of the camps, those who do not want to work will climb into the People's Commissariats, which are so dear to the author's heart, and so on: "More Gasstgels, tovagischi, more Gasstgels!"

    Article - pure provocation
    As for transport, the idea was well described by A. Afanasyev: to build two highways, East - West and North - South, with a wide gauge and to launch special heavy-duty trains
    1. anip
      anip 23 August 2013 09: 52
      +7
      Quote: bulvas
      The author’s ideas are just right for the remnants of specialists and able-bodied people to escape away from the country.

      People who can really work will just stay. Or do you mean by "able to work" such as Chubais, Deripaska, Abramovich, Medvedev, Putin (the list goes on for a long time)? Then yes, let them run, but they foresaw this, withdrawing money abroad and buying real estate abroad.
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 August 2013 08: 49
    0
    The article is correct in its essence! Now they are trying to do something similar but all with a creak and howl from the side of liberals (ours and westerns) But I agree to all 100 to tighten the policy both inside the country and foreign !!
  14. sigizmund472
    sigizmund472 23 August 2013 08: 57
    0
    Article plus!
  15. Alex-z84
    Alex-z84 23 August 2013 09: 08
    +5
    But how the `` Russians '' mass media cried with anguish when this witch Thatcher died, I almost licked myself crying
  16. bulvas
    bulvas 23 August 2013 09: 11
    +1
    Author, whose spy are you, English or German?
    Whose money do you work out?

    If it is dangerous or impossible to destroy a country from outside, the best way is to arrange a revolution and plunge the country into chaos. Forgot whose methods are these?
  17. Natalia
    Natalia 23 August 2013 09: 13
    0
    Author plus for the article per se (+)
    And minus for this (-)
    say, from Leningrad (the word "St. Petersburg" I do not accept)

    Perhaps the author decided that Peter I in Russian history, the figure is more than unacceptable ... well, the flag in his hands ....
  18. Metlik
    Metlik 23 August 2013 09: 14
    +8
    The author calls for shedding a sea of ​​blood. Destroy to the ground, and then ... Select and divide.
    We have already gone through this.
    1. Mr. Gambu4aS
      Mr. Gambu4aS 23 August 2013 10: 16
      +6
      Right! Do not rock the boat, gentlemen, homeless people, since half a century we have been pumping out everything that is left of your country, our children are no longer living in Russia, soon we will move to Monaco with them, and you, and that you, you will not be left in this half a century later land, it will be occupied by the southern neighbors-slaves and rampant managers! DO NOT DOWNLOAD THE BOAT!
      1. Mr. Gambu4aS
        Mr. Gambu4aS 23 August 2013 10: 47
        +4
        Well, are you minus me? it’s IRONIA, although what sort of business are Seliger vegetables, they’re not literate, and all for Putin!
        1. Metlik
          Metlik 23 August 2013 12: 00
          +2
          Quote: Mr. Gambu4aS
          they are not literate and all for Putin!

          Tell me, you are our competent, do you really believe that rail transportation is the cheapest? The article has a lot of nonsense, but for trolls it is.
          1. Mr. Gambu4aS
            Mr. Gambu4aS 23 August 2013 12: 19
            +2
            No, I think that the cheapest water, although I will not argue! Yes, there is no accuracy in the article, well, this is not a doctoral dissertation, the most important thing is that it provides food for thought! Yes, and troll and ironize different things.
  19. saag
    saag 23 August 2013 09: 16
    +2
    in the most interesting place, the article ends :-)
  20. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 23 August 2013 09: 16
    -1
    As for nationalization, one must think
    First, to return the enterprises of the mining, fuel and energy, military and paramilitary, automotive and alcohol industries (in other words, all strategic sectors) transferred to private hands, into the hands of the state - the hands of the people.

    can simply put under strict control of state bodies, especially with regard to banking operations - no left-wing withdrawals of finance "abroad."
    And isn’t it time to trade in raw materials and resources for rubles, and not for exaggerated green candy wrappers, which at any moment can depreciate to their cost?
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. erased
    erased 23 August 2013 09: 22
    +6
    Is this a dream retelling? Or a revelation of secret desires? Then yes - it is originally written. But this dream has little in common with harsh reality. Rather, almost not at all.
    One thing is not clear, why should such dreams be placed on the pages of the site, seemingly with a military theme?
    1. creak
      creak 23 August 2013 10: 21
      +2
      Moreover, this is not the first time to post the creations of this author ...
    2. Gato
      Gato 23 August 2013 11: 00
      0
      Quote: erased
      Is this a dream retelling?

      laughing
      It looks like another dream of Vera Pavlovna.
  23. roma-belij
    roma-belij 23 August 2013 09: 22
    +7
    You need to start by lifting the moratorium on the death penalty (with mandatory confiscation of property), after which you can initiate a LOT of criminal cases and restore order in the country.
    1. Gato
      Gato 23 August 2013 11: 01
      -2
      Quote: roma-belij
      We must start by lifting the moratorium on the death penalty

      Yeah. Only beauty will save the world. Beauty and mass executions. lol
  24. PROXOR
    PROXOR 23 August 2013 09: 25
    0
    I do not quite agree with the article. As soon as we start doing business with the outside world, in the first we will have the Iron Curtain again, and this will again roll back to the 60s-80s. Secondly, we will again deal with the whole world. And here even China will turn from a good neighbor into the first butcher for our country. China will promise support and tutu. The provocation on the Ganitsa and the PLA will gallop to the Urals, bombarding the western part of Russia. I do not agree. It is necessary to introduce order in the economy and the distribution of incomes, agriculture must be raised, but it will not work to fence itself off from the whole world.
    The more the Russian economy is tied to the world, the greater the risk, but also the greater our peace of mind. Collapses with us - pulls the rest like dominoes.
    1. Mr. Gambu4aS
      Mr. Gambu4aS 23 August 2013 10: 19
      -1
      What provocations?))) We have YAO after all, with such a neighbor, a neighbor who thinks with his head for no reason will provoke provocations!
  25. a52333
    a52333 23 August 2013 09: 25
    +1
    Well, about nationalization, this is some kind of Sharikovism. How much can you experiment? I agree to withdraw large enterprises from offshore - I agree, to force a subsoil use tax - I agree, privatization of industry for 3 billion was extortionate - I agree, but stop shaking us.

    It is more useful to instill another panic fear in oneself - the fear of the extinction of our GREAT nation.
    I agree here - a big serious topic. Here I think three solutions
    1) Payments for the birth of a child - gave a result, you can still promote the topic.
    2) Take on the experience of Germany. There is a lot of public housing there - pay and live, it will not become yours. but use it. Slowly pays off, but demography is largely constrained by square meters.
    3) Make an effort (spend money) on the accession of Ukraine. There will be 50 millions more of us.
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 23 August 2013 16: 43
      0
      Quote: a52333
      Well, about nationalization, this is some kind of Sharikovism
      belay ??
  26. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 23 August 2013 09: 29
    +8
    Controversial, very controversial. The world is ruled by children with thousands of years of experience in political games, and it's silly to rely on the fact that they will allow someone to swing their scales of power. Under the slightest preconditions for a change in the system in Russia, they will instantly find an external enemy, there are no options. And under this thread they will clean up all potential candidates for the post of I.V. Stalin. His methods. But the article is still interesting, because it’s better to jerk for the last time, taking off the shirts (the original Russia) than to live, aware of its powerlessness.
  27. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 23 August 2013 09: 29
    +1
    the article seemed a little chaotic, all the author wants to see is that they don't want to see the authorities, so I will class it as a "fantasy"
  28. Witch
    Witch 23 August 2013 09: 35
    +5
    The idea, of course, is cool ...
    It is a pity that utopia .... ((((
  29. Mercenary
    Mercenary 23 August 2013 09: 39
    +3
    in my opinion everything is simpler. From January 1, 3014, all oligarch money should go to the Bank of Russia; foreign accounts also to our banks. otherwise, the source of income (oil market, etc.) is nationalized. Nahapali fellows fellows. It's time and honor to know. and all cash transactions through the bank.
  30. reality
    reality 23 August 2013 09: 43
    +3
    All is correct. Only besides war, it is also necessary to build up - above all, education. Only through it can corruption be defeated, because it sits firmly in us. I would not want half the country to be shot again.
  31. Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 23 August 2013 09: 47
    +5
    In principle, everything goes to that, at some point the Russian people will click on the instinct of self-preservation and unity. Woe then awakens our adversaries, among whom are our officials!
    There is truth and one more misfortune, on the crest of the Russian cleansing war, as always, there will be scum again who, armed with the slogans "free Russia from parasites", will lead the liberation movement. For them, all this awakens the essence of the reason to overthrow others from power and take their place for the sake of power itself. This has already happened in our long-suffering history.
  32. RBLip
    RBLip 23 August 2013 09: 49
    +2
    strange article. good one. hi but at the same time, some ... beautiful-hearted or something. in the spirit of the kitchen intellectuals of the eighties. heaven on earth or communism ... you need to understand that by legal means people who want to change the country in such a way will not come to power. all these dreams are from the evil one. and with the help of the revolution ... our external "friends" in the event of a weakening of the center will instantly pull the country apart. and they won't give us back. drown in blood. and Pu companions are ready for riots. the number of explosives confirms this. and zp policemen. and in the army they began to pay money and give apartments. therefore, unfortunately, all dreams of people's power will remain dreams. it's like a wonderful dream, damn it.
  33. 416sd
    416sd 23 August 2013 09: 49
    +7
    The author wrote everything correctly, but I did not quite understand who would do all this.
    All this requires Soviet power, revolution, and revolutionary terror.
    Who will carry it out?
    Do you understand what I'm talking about.

    +

    The degree of their presence in Russia is such that it is real from the realm of fiction.
  34. sever123
    sever123 23 August 2013 09: 58
    +1
    For the article, my RESPECT!
  35. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 23 August 2013 10: 05
    +5
    To do this, you need a leader with iron will, fortitude. Putin does not have this, he is dominated by his authority among his circle, he is dominated by his past. In order to break this, and begin to distribute lyuley to everyone who had a little bit of a hand in the good of the state, courage and will are required. A prime example is a serdyuk, secretary, golikova, fursenko, and almost all the ministers.
    1. CaptainBlack
      CaptainBlack 23 August 2013 10: 49
      +2
      First you need to disperse the Duma, to the Siberian camps, with complete confiscation! And, at any cost to take power in one hand, like Stalin! Then there will be order. Now they have lost all fear, they remembered their rights. And no one has responsibilities ?! Before the Motherland, family, ancestors ...
      Only misfortune and sorrow always unite and unite our people in all difficult times! That's what everyone is missing right now ...
      1. alone
        alone 23 August 2013 12: 29
        +3
        Yes Yes!! Do not forget to create triples. And do not need ships. Immediately shoot and that's it. and a family in Siberia. recourse is it really necessary to return 80 years ago to raise the country !! No.
    2. CaptainBlack
      CaptainBlack 23 August 2013 10: 52
      +2
      Quote: Mareman Vasilich
      To do this, you need a leader with iron will, fortitude. Putin does not have this, he is dominated by his authority among his circle, he is dominated by his past. In order to break this, and begin to distribute lyuley to everyone who had a little bit of a hand in the good of the state, courage and will are required. A prime example is a serdyuk, secretary, golikova, fursenko, and almost all the ministers.

      Yes, this is just the tip of the iceberg! With Stalin, everyone would go under the gunshot ...
  36. lotar
    lotar 23 August 2013 10: 05
    -3
    In my opinion, all these steps in modern Russia can be attributed to utopia. We have no other leader who could adequately replace the GDP, well, at least I don’t see that. All these parties, which we supposedly are a counterweight to the current government, are not otherwise, as "cheap fakes", otherwise I can’t call them anything. I’m also almost 100% sure if the government even changes, and together with the leader, then first of all another redistribution of property will begin, and as usual everyone will calmly forget about the people. About their needs, desires, interests and many other things. Before breaking anything, something needs to be prepared for replacement, and this something should be a reinforced concrete argument in favor of a new project.
    1. CaptainBlack
      CaptainBlack 23 August 2013 11: 11
      -4
      Replacement will come soon! Although Jewish roots, but rooting for Russia! Some Jews also made a revolution in the 17th. Stalin was a bandit. SO WHAT??? The country and people need a leader. For Stalin, they went under the bullets without weapons in the war. Cult? Bolt to you! Loved, feared, respected, believed !!! The leader would have lived since at least 10 years old - and there would have been neither the States, nor the shaving, nor the other on the world map ...
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 23 August 2013 11: 18
        +4
        some kind of rage ...
      2. alone
        alone 23 August 2013 15: 12
        +5
        first you ask him what he lost in a gay club? such a rescuer breaks firewood worse than liberalists)) and yet, imagine Stalin and Zhirinovsky !! wow comparison. eh, they survived (someone compared with whom
      3. Yarosvet
        Yarosvet 23 August 2013 16: 49
        0
        Quote: CaptainBlack
        Stalin was a bandit.

        A link to the documentary evidence of this nonsense, please.
  37. reader1964
    reader1964 23 August 2013 10: 06
    -2
    The idea of ​​"select and divide" is not new, we have already gone through this in the last century. There are so few people in Russia and there should be no red-and-white terror again. But there is no doubt that in all large open joint-stock companies (etc.) the state should have its own levers of control, a maximum block of shares, a decisive vote, some kind of party committee of its kind. Our state must have its own ideology of statehood and a structure that must brainwash the townsfolk and the head of all ranks and stripes. What we have now: "enrich yourself by any means" - it somehow doesn't work.
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 23 August 2013 16: 50
      0
      Quote: reader1964
      Take and Divide Is Not New

      Where does the article say about screening and sharing?
      1. reader1964
        reader1964 26 August 2013 13: 00
        0
        And the third is the return of all the loot that can still be returned.
  38. Navy7981
    Navy7981 23 August 2013 10: 07
    +2
    You need to start with the reconstruction of the state foundation, the cornerstones of which are education (consistent, deep, thoughtful and patriotic.) And free, for all, medical prevention (heart surgery is wonderful, but it’s better not to allow it), but on a good foundation, t .e. with educated, healthy, and self-respecting people and their country, you can build anything you want and much easier, better and faster.
  39. Andrew 447
    Andrew 447 23 August 2013 10: 08
    0
    The correct title of the article is "UTOPIA".
  40. Paul
    Paul 23 August 2013 10: 10
    -2
    RUSSIA NEVER WAS READY
    TO WAR
    Why?
    Because of the vast expanses. These
    open spaces laden in mind the thoughts of
    that what needs to be done
    today, you can do tomorrow;
    don't rush; what all
    equal to the horizon today not
    to get there.
    And a big army is needed here.
    A large army should
    manage BIG people but they
    always been dangerous
    unpredictable, wayward,
    ambitious. Therefore led
    a large army of people
    SMALL but manageable. In peace
    they can still arrange time
    continuous combat training on
    entrusted territory but in
    wartime - alas!
    In wartime, big people
    got out of the shadows and put on
    its rightful place. That's just on
    it all takes time, so Russia
    always backs off at first.
    Mostly to the Urals.
    And if they attack her from the side
    tail to Siberian,
    impassable swamps. They are before
    still impassable so in
    on this side of the issue
    - from the obstruction - to
    we are always ready for war.
    The enemy comes to us, but we don’t
    roads.

    SOMETHING LIKE THIS :(
    1. Trapperxnumx
      Trapperxnumx 23 August 2013 10: 58
      +1
      Quote: Pavel
      Russia
      always backs off at first.
      Mostly to the Urals.

      Even I don’t remember such a global retreat from our history. Volga, Moscow - it was, the Ural - was not. And who is it interesting from the "Eastern interventionists" stuck in the Siberian swamps?
    2. Proud.
      Proud. 23 August 2013 14: 25
      +1
      Quote: Pavel
      RUSSIA NEVER WAS READY FOR WAR
      Russia is never historically ready for war, but ALWAYS triumphs in wars, especially on its territory - this is the real, and not virtual history of Russia. Another thing is a secret war, internal, with a fifth column mimicking (though not very carefully), with obvious enemies (I will not list), with occupation (with the permission of a certain circle of people), with substitution (uncontrolled migration). You Pavel, as a whole, distorted the reasoning of the writer Alexander Pokrovsky, pulled out the quotes you need from the context. You-MINUS.
  41. Pensioner
    Pensioner 23 August 2013 10: 12
    0
    The author of the article is a tremendous plus! The more we have thinking people in this direction of development of the country, the faster it will be fulfilled. The main thing is in the like-mindedness of the people and their own self-awareness of their power. In the Russians, this national power "woke up" in the years when the country was in danger. , so people "who are in the woods, some for wood." It's time to realize that there is a secret war against the Russians. Both within the country and from abroad. Therefore, such articles with plans for the future are important. The main thing is a clear goal, and opportunities and means to implement it, along the way, there will be. The Russian people are savvy. "It takes a long time to harness, but it goes fast." It was just three decades that it was not clear where we were going, and as a result, the feeling: "Well, here we are ..." . And with a clear goal, and the path is shorter. Dare, dream, make plans, believe, act, and everything will come true. At least for your own children and grandchildren.
  42. Ivan_Ivanov
    Ivan_Ivanov 23 August 2013 10: 15
    10
    now there is a war without a front line.
  43. pahom54
    pahom54 23 August 2013 10: 35
    +2
    In general, I agree with the idea of ​​the article (except for inciting a revolution and civil war), especially with the idea of ​​an ISOLATED ECONOMY. Yes, the iron curtain will not be pulled now, it is not needed, but can an isolated economy be created without it? It is disgusting to realize that it is precisely the different Soros and others like him who are trying all the time to exert pressure on Russia, and joining the WTO has also brought nothing good to Russia. The essence of the article is how to increase the economic power and defense capability of the country. I think that one of the main ways is the privatization and nationalization of the main sectors of the economy. Well, what about the Central Bank, you are a little wrong - 50% + 1 share is in the hands of the Government of the Russian Federation, and in the rest, the share of foreign shareholders decreases every year. The only question is how the Government controls financial policy (yes, like that, according to different Dow Jones indices, etc.).
    In matters of defense - thank God, new missile systems of the Strategic Missile Forces are developed and put on duty, new Tu-160s fly and are built (manufactured), our ships are being built and return to where they left 20-25 years ago ... All this needs money , and here I agree: without giving a damn about the international legal norms, you won’t refund the money. But was it weak for the President and the Government to return the money stolen by Serdyuk and to Ryzhiy in Skolkovo ??? And for starters, from the whole of privatization, without starting a civil war, do not select enterprises, but simply announce a state monopoly on tobacco and vodka ??? Now there is real money for the development of the same Northern Sea Route and so on.
    Here in the responses to the article it was said that after such calls businessmen from Russia would run ... What kind of businessmen? Who do buy-sell without producing anything ??? Which rushed into the alcohol-tobacco and pharmaceutical business, bringing fabulous incomes ??? Let them run, and let the state receive these incomes.
    A strong Russian army and navy - BE! And for this it is necessary to raise the economy from its knees, perhaps, by draconian measures ...
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 23 August 2013 16: 58
      0
      Quote: pahom54
      Well, what about the Central Bank, you are a little wrong - 50% + 1 share is in the hands of the Government of the Russian Federation, and in the rest the share of foreign shareholders decreases every year

      The Central Bank has no shareholders at all - you confuse it with Sberbank, 50% + 1 share of which belongs to the Central Bank.
  44. Amur
    Amur 23 August 2013 10: 49
    -1
    “Let’s lower”, let’s say, our oil, and we will answer them: “We will not sell at your“ exchange ”price! “Pay with dignity!” They will try to buy from someone else.
    You just need to sell for rubles ...
    1. Ivan_Ivanov
      Ivan_Ivanov 23 August 2013 11: 21
      +3
      “Let’s lower”, let’s say, our oil, and we will answer them: “We will not sell at your“ exchange ”price! “Pay with dignity!” They will try to buy from someone else.

      This is utter nonsense.
  45. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 23 August 2013 10: 50
    +1
    Kind! We will start recovering when we leave payment in dollars, when we will impose mutual settlements in rubles on most partners, then we’ll finally get stronger!
  46. SPIRITofFREEDOM
    SPIRITofFREEDOM 23 August 2013 10: 51
    +2
    Rogozin or Churkin to the presidency - worthy people
    And there is experience in the struggle with other "countries" for our country!
  47. Prapor Afonya
    Prapor Afonya 23 August 2013 10: 53
    +1
    Yes, you have my friend, Hitler’s plans are direct, but this is not an insult, but rather support! Do not think that I respect Hitler, it is impossible to respect a person who wants to enslave your people, but he had the right methods, and although your article is utopian, I am for it!
  48. Svarog
    Svarog 23 August 2013 10: 56
    -1
    In many ways, I do not agree with the author, namely in the methods. Many enterprises, even dishonestly received, are now in the hands of the owner. But each cook still can not control the state. Immerse the state for another 20-30 years in the internal division, which will be, because most of us do not even want to manage our share in the house, we do not need this. Therefore, we systematically begin to take only strategic objects and spheres. The rest of the private trader will do just fine.
    Well, mother nature didn’t give us territories, etc. according to the text - our ancestors themselves took it all and kept it. And we, at least not need to lose.
  49. Alex66
    Alex66 23 August 2013 11: 04
    +1
    "only SOCIALIST Russia is capable of becoming strong, happy and rich."
    It is difficult to disagree; on the capitalist path of development, we are not competitors to the West because it is hundreds of years ahead of us on this path.
    "Throwing away such things as" decency "," civilization ", modesty and, I warn you, sometimes even conscience (it must be left for your own people, to do conscientiously with the enemy is a lot of honor)."
    Probably I do not agree, in conscience we must deal not only with our own, but also with our enemies, because we have one conscience. The idea uniting the Russians is just a life of conscience, so that it would not be a shame for a life lived. And the principle of conscience with our own, without conscience with the rest is purely Jewish - this is not for us. We need the truth. Here come Putin (maybe there are others) repent to the people, only sincerely from the heart, so then we will turn mountains for him, with his name we will go into battle for our future.
  50. saag
    saag 23 August 2013 11: 14
    0
    Quote: Pavel
    RUSSIA NEVER WAS READY
    TO WAR
    Why?
    Because of the vast expanses. These
    open spaces laden in mind the thoughts of
    that what needs to be done
    today, you can do tomorrow;
    don't rush; what all
    equal to the horizon today not
    to get there.
    And a big army is needed here.
    A large army should
    manage BIG people but they
    always been dangerous
    unpredictable, wayward,
    ambitious. Therefore led
    a large army of people
    SMALL but manageable. In peace
    they can still arrange time
    continuous combat training on
    entrusted territory but in
    wartime - alas!
    In wartime, big people
    got out of the shadows and put on
    its rightful place. That's just on
    it all takes time, so Russia
    always backs off at first.
    Mostly to the Urals.
    And if they attack her from the side
    tail to Siberian,
    impassable swamps. They are before
    still impassable so in
    on this side of the issue
    - from the obstruction - to
    we are always ready for war.
    The enemy comes to us, but we don’t
    roads.

    SOMETHING LIKE THIS :(

    Yes, judging by the history of Russia, it was always not ready for war, in the beginning it always suffered losses, then it learned to fight, and then it ended the war
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 23 August 2013 12: 11
      +6
      I do not agree! Russia (USSR) was often ready for war, only idiots attack in, this time, was not!
      smile