A. Wasserman: “The recipe for economic recovery is simple: to drive out all liberals from power”

82
A. Wasserman: “The recipe for economic recovery is simple: to drive out all liberals from power”It so happened all over the world that financiers are not that heartless and complete cynics, but, in general, people who are not prone to deep moral reflections when it comes to mixing debit with a credit. They are ready to put everything on the altar of this task, and, perhaps, within the framework of their logic, they are right in this. They are soldiers on guard for the budget, so they serve as best they can.

The Ministry of Finance of Russia is also trying to make ends meet. Again, how can, as taught. And his current head Anton Siluanov in this respect is not very different from his predecessor Alexei Kudrin: he also laments that regional authorities, they say, only know what to ask for money instead of effectively using domestic resources. Yes, and the Ministry of Economics "treacherously" encourages, convinces that money is needed for development. You can treat this shackling in different ways. The Western press, I remember the same Alexei Kudrin, called her “the best finance minister”, and Vladimir Vladimirovich himself did not lose loyalty to the ex-minister and seemed to urge him to work, which he personally confirmed during a recent straight line. Then the president even called Kudrin, who was deviating from the civil service, a “net.”

Is it surprising in this light that the current financial power in Russia has not at all denied the general line of a very “economical” prime minister? Perhaps, Anton Germanovich even cherishes the hope of surpassing his former boss, to become "better", saving even more money. And it doesn’t matter that at the same time, money is saved only from the people, from domestic enterprises, which, in the absence of a convenient alternative, are forced to borrow on enslaving conditions. From the point of view of the Ministry of Finance, this is all, of course, sad, but justified costs. Not all Shrovetide cats, there will be a reason - we are still eating, but for now it is better to tighten the belts.

The generous distribution of money to young mothers, pensioners and other “insignificant” economic actors in this light, of course, could not last forever. As befits any beautiful fairy tale, she came to an end. According to the new concept developed by the President of the Ministry of Finance together with professors of the Higher School of Economics, maternity capital will not be paid for the second and subsequent children born after December 31 2016 of the year.

At the same time, it is planned to raise the retirement age, although so far with reservations: they say, this is only one of the options for optimizing the pension budget. But where is the guarantee that in the end it will not remain the only one as the most simple? The question is, of course, primarily political, but it’s hard not to pay attention to how the authorities, in fact, conduct “explanatory work” with citizens, through the loyal media, gradually promoting the idea that raising the retirement age inevitably . Yes, in general, the Ministry of Finance does not hide its position: citizens should be encouraged to retire later. As they say, a collective farm is voluntary.

By the way, the mechanism of indexation of pensions is also expected to be revised - of course, in favor of the budget, and not the pensioners. It is supposed to introduce new coefficients for working pensioners (let's guess, whether raising or lowering?). It is also supposed to change the frequency of indexation of the base fixed part - once a year instead of two. The costing has already shown: this approach will allow to achieve a savings of 2020 billion rubles by the 781 year. Well, how can you resist such a figure?

But retired people are still mostly hardened, unlike young mothers, and even fathers, who, however cynically it may sound, still give birth today, including thanks to not-so-small payments. Has this policy not justified itself, since it is supposed to be curtailed? But, according to the Minister of Labor and Social Development, there is a direct link between the introduction of the practice of maternal pay and the birth rate, and quite impressive - its growth was 30%. Perhaps, the Ministry of Finance and scientists from the "tower" this growth alarmed, and even plunged into depression?

But are there among the proposals developed by the ministry and scientists that they do not touch the least protected social strata? After all, we are a social state, according to the Constitution. But, alas, the same scenario of introducing a progressive scale of taxation is not considered even from critical positions. About him, apparently, it is supposed not to remember at all. Probably, this is too simple a solution for such smart and complex people.

In a conversation with a KM.RU columnist, well-known publicist and political scientist Anatoly Wasserman was critical of the Ministry of Finance’s recipes for saving the budget:

- The solution to all the problems of the Russian budget is very simple and has long been known. This is a complete expulsion from all structures related, however, to the government, those who profess libertarianism — the belief in the beneficence of unlimited individual freedom without regard for society. In particular, this is exactly what should be done with all those who ever after 1991 have served as ministers of finance, economics, and chairmen of the Central Bank. Even though among these people there are relatively low-risk for society.

An additional diagnostic sign, on which the state apparatus should be cleaned from such people, may also be their recourse for advice on any matter to the staff of the Higher School of Economics, the New Economic School and the Academy of State Service and the National Economy, not counting those who teach in these schools exact sciences and foreign languages. That is, to those who, fortunately, have nothing to do with the economy there. They only can be consulted for the benefit of the case.

As for maternity capital specifically, its abolition in the conditions prevailing in our country will lead to a sharp reduction in the population, since even if it is present, Russia has only been able to barely slow down the demographic decline. Thus, it can be considered that those who propose the abolition of maternity capital directly and directly undermine the very basis of our country and contribute to the destruction of the people.

Which articles of the Criminal Code punish for the relevant acts, I can not remember without thinking, but we have the head of state and even the head of government studied at the law school, and I hope they have not completely forgotten the Criminal Code that was in effect during their studies.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +44
    23 August 2013 09: 53
    Onotolle speaks as always! "The concept was developed by the Ministry of Finance together with the professors of the Higher School of Economics!" Hmm, we know WHO sits at HSE and what views they hold!
    1. 225chay
      +22
      23 August 2013 21: 34
      Quote: makst83
      Onotolle speaks as always! "

      The honest Jew and decent man Wasserman correctly said - to fuck all the liberoid-der.m.o.crack shelupon, and it’s better to transfer it to mines.
      These creatures destroy both the country and indigenous peoples.
      1. Basil123
        +3
        24 August 2013 12: 55
        red as a specialist in higher flight (just do not sit down) put to steer some kind of backward region, for example, the Altai Territory, let it show the class is not .... under the ass angry and with all so if successful means to increase. and in any way we have about .. shit .. was on the rise am
        1. +8
          24 August 2013 16: 08
          Quote: Vasily123
          red as a specialist in higher flight (just do not sit down) put to steer some kind of backward region, for example, the Altai Territory, let it show the class is not .... under the ass angry and with all so if successful means to increase. and in any way we have about .. shit .. was on the rise am


          you do not mind the residents of Altai? enough for people to put experiments!

          everything is made much simpler, an initiative group of citizens is being created applying for a redhead in the Ministry of Internal Affairs regarding specific cases, the Ministry of Internal Affairs is investigating the case, but our responsibility is to fully cover and monitor it
          is it really impossible to find years for 20 for red materials ???
        2. +1
          27 August 2013 10: 31
          Comrade I.V. Stalin did something similar. Only he does not have "... under the ass", but a lead seal.
  2. +31
    23 August 2013 15: 20
    You don’t even have to comment. Anatol ...
    1. +14
      23 August 2013 15: 42
      Quote: domokl
      You don’t even have to comment.

      Alexander, hi ! There is still something to comment“I can't remember offhand which articles of the Criminal Code are punishable for the relevant acts, but our head of state and even the head of government studied at the Faculty of Law, and I hope they have not completely forgotten the Criminal Code that was in force during their studies. "They will recall all these articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation under one condition, but under what wink I think it’s not necessary to speak, our people are quick-witted Yes
    2. duke
      +12
      23 August 2013 18: 54
      I agree, if he was a Jew three times, but I agree !!!!
  3. Vtel
    -26
    23 August 2013 15: 27
    Anatoly Aleksandrovich Vasserman - Ukrainian journalist, political consultant.
    In Ukraine, everything is calm, but sho in Russia, oh yes liberals, if only yours! Otkel became aware of them, the might with the Independent wind blew, al from Israel or from Geyvropa glass, and we are not familiar. But all would be nice, but whoever steers, he crushes, and then they - the liberals, to crush themselves - a paradox or something. So the rake we have among the Slavs is the same and the cones are the same, the size is very different, we will do it.
    1. Tykta
      +8
      23 August 2013 19: 55
      Anatoly Aleksandrovich has long been living in Moscow, although not often, but is published in the press, some interesting questions can be asked to him privately, although he is a busy person, he occasionally answers to messagi, depending on the plane of the question posed. I personally answered all the questions on which I asked to consult in the range of opinions, his answers are objective, his opinion can be found in the links located in the posted links in his journal for the convenience of those interested.
      His opinion (as the author of this article did) can be interpreted in different ways, depending on the point of view, the author of the article did it his own way, taking words out of context, which I certainly do not agree with. The author’s task was to show the plane driven into parameters, although I understand for myself the thinking of Anatoly Alexandrovich I fix for myself only his observations, not conclusions. This is not futurology - these are vectors of possible projections. In general, Wasserman is more liberal and cautious in judgments than he wants to appear in dry analytical assessments, his goal is to say obvious things and objectively assess the situation, rather than engage in ranting.
  4. predator.3
    +19
    23 August 2013 15: 29
    - The solution to all the problems of the Russian budget is very simple and has long been known. This is a complete expulsion from all structures connected with the government, those who profess libertarianism - faith in the beneficence of unlimited personal freedom without regard to society. In particular, this is exactly what should be done with everyone who ever after 1991 held the posts of ministers of finance, economics, and chairmen of the Central Bank

    The right words, and you need to start with the red Tolyan!
    1. Gari
      +15
      23 August 2013 18: 25
      Quote: predator.3
      The right words, and you need to start with the red Tolyan!

      Is that what is on the left?
      A. Wasserman: “The recipe for economic recovery is simple: to drive out all liberals from power”
      To expel all liberals to Siberia
      1. p-159
        +9
        23 August 2013 18: 33
        I would recommend applying military communism methods to these citizens
      2. +5
        23 August 2013 19: 56
        Is that what is on the left?

        He will catch a cold at our funeral ...
      3. +7
        23 August 2013 20: 07
        And the fig immediately to Siberia? Harness to the plow Ryzhiy, Taburetkin with his harem, and the others who were especially distinguished when cutting folk money (after the complete confiscation of banknotes and property) and sent to plow the non-chernozem territory to obtain world-record yields.
      4. +6
        23 August 2013 23: 25
        What is Siberia to blame for? Immediately to Novaya Zemlya, to ensure the construction of the infrastructure of Arctic transport in the role of handymen ....
      5. albatross
        +3
        24 August 2013 03: 34
        Gari (1) AM Yesterday, 18:25 ↑ New
        Quote: predator.3
        The right words, and you need to start with the red Tolyan!
        Is that what is on the left?

        + Test photo. They have been preparing for the Kremlin for several years: I read about Chubais, while in ENGECON I was still planning privatization. Long before the arrival of Gorbachev.
        In 1984-1987, Anatoly Chubais was one of the leaders in the circle of young economists - graduates of LIEI. Over time, the circle brought together graduates of many universities, including Moscow. At different times, P.O. Aven, S. Yu. Glazyev, A.V. Ulyukaev took part in its activities. In 1987, A.B. Chubais took part in the founding of the Perestroika club in Leningrad. In 1990, he was appointed deputy, and then first deputy chairman of the executive committee of the Leningrad City Council. After the election of A. A. Sobchak as mayor of Leningrad, Anatoly Chubais became his economic adviser.
      6. +3
        24 August 2013 09: 23
        Cool! It’s rare where you find such a bunch of freaks!
  5. serge-68-68
    +4
    23 August 2013 15: 32
    Libertarianism and liberalism are two different things. Wasserman speaks of the expulsion of LIBERTARIANS, not liberals. And the author of the article incorrectly quotes it in the title.
    1. +3
      23 August 2013 16: 58
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Libertarianism and liberalism are two different things. Wasserman speaks of the expulsion of LIBERTARIANS, not liberals. And the author of the article incorrectly quotes it in the title.

      Add information:
      Libertarianism (English libertarianism; from English liberty - personal freedom; also from French libertaire - anarchist [1]), less often libertarianism (French libertarisme) - political philosophy based on the ban on "aggressive violence", that is a ban on the use of force or threat to another person or his property, against the will of [the source is not specified 206 days] of that person. The prohibition of violent violence is legal, not ethical. In other words, libertarianism implies that violations of this prohibition must be prosecuted. However, it does not provide guidance for specific actions of people. By virtue of this, libertarianism is not an ethical system. It is compatible with different views on morality: from conservatism, which supports numerous self-restrictions, to libertinism, which rejects any moral restrictions.
      Some libertarians (anarcho-capitalists) consider the ban on “aggressive violence” as absolute and not allowing exceptions even for public servants. In their opinion, such forms of state intervention as taxation and antitrust regulation are an example of theft and robbery, and therefore should be eliminated. Protection of citizens from violence should be carried out by private security agencies, and helping the poor should be the task of charity.
      Another part of the libertarians (minarchists) accepts the prohibition of “aggressive violence” as an important principle, but considers it necessary or inevitable to have a state forcing taxes, the sole task of which would be to protect the life, health and private property of citizens. The difference between this and the previous approach to libertarianism is that in the first case, the ban is absolute and applies to each specific action, and in the second, the task is to minimize violence in society, for which the state is seen as a lesser evil.
      Due to the fact that the listed specific forms of libertarianism (anarcho-capitalism and minarchism) contain ideas not only about the right to be (prohibition of aggressive violence), but about the state, these specific forms of libertarianism are not only legal, but also political philosophy.


      In other words, Anatoly Wasserman, calls for the expulsion from power and its entourage of co-neighbors, reinsurers and other cowards who hinder, for various reasons, but also because of their belief in libertarianism, the imposition of a tough order in the state of Russia.
  6. +12
    23 August 2013 15: 32
    If the government decides to still not pay maternity capital am , let some other family assistance projects come up with the birth of a child, a permanent supplement to their father’s wages, not a miserable one, but a half-salary!
    1. -15
      23 August 2013 15: 51
      Quote: polly
      If the government decides to still not pay maternity capital am , let some other family assistance projects come up with the birth of a child, a permanent supplement to their father’s wages, not a miserable one, but a half-salary!

      Bullshit!!! Maybe you pay extra for each session of "love" with your wife, otherwise you will refuse to "make love" (a vile liberal expression) !!!
      1. +14
        23 August 2013 16: 59
        Sorry, dear, first of all, I'm not a lesbian! laughing Secondly, effective assistance to a family with children is the direct responsibility of the state in current prices for baby food, baby products, kindergartens, education!
        1. +6
          23 August 2013 18: 13
          Quote: polly
          effective assistance to a family with children is a direct responsibility of the state

          You still did not understand that the new minister is pushing the idea of ​​reducing maternal capital and social payments. A direct continuation of the Kudrin line is ALL IN THE WEST!
    2. +6
      23 August 2013 18: 28
      Quote: polly
      let other family projects come up with the birth of a child

      Giving an apartment is unambiguous. And at the birth of subsequent ones, according to the room per child
      1. +9
        23 August 2013 19: 04
        Quote: Pilat2009
        Giving an apartment is unambiguous. And at the birth of subsequent ones, according to the room per child


        What is it like? Select from the capitalist the developer and give? Or buy from him (how many square meters of dollars are there in Moscow you don’t know?) And ruin American banks where the reserve fund is stored?
        1. 0
          23 August 2013 21: 17
          Quote: Vadivak
          Or buy from him

          The state can buy, because only Sberbank’s profit, for example, is about 200 billion. You can also put things in order with finances, for example, transfer deputies to self-financing and don’t pay them salaries. Do you want to be a deputy or a senator?
          1. +4
            23 August 2013 21: 45
            Quote: Pilat2009
            The state can buy, because only Sberbank’s profit, for example, is about 200 billion. The finances can also be adjusted,

            This is how you waved!
            And what will our rulers revel in their vanity? What to celebrate the victories of the Olympians?
            what to build olympiads, rallies, summits, the fastest roads?
            And then buy everyone an apartment here, and even allocate for children ............. Sberbank money was cut in 200 years before and you don’t have to be so naive!
            1. +3
              23 August 2013 23: 27
              Quote: APASUS
              . Sberbank money is cut in 200 years before and you don’t have to be so naive!


              A person simply does not know that in the near future Sberbank will be privatized, the Central Bank is slowly selling its shares, for example, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation sold 7,58% of Sberbank’s shares for $ 5,2 billion. The final sale in Russia is less than 5% - a 19/20 stake sold to non-residents abroad.
    3. +4
      23 August 2013 19: 23
      Quote: polly
      ust some other projects to help families come up with the birth of a child,


      According to economists, it will still have to be saved - grandiose investments adjusted for the scale of embezzlement will require large infrastructure projects such as the World Cup (the Sochi Olympics alone will cost at least $ 50 billion, and the world football championship in 12 cities of the country can be significantly more expensive).
      With the abolition of maternity capital in 2017, there will be "free" 300-330 billion rubles. Instead of maternity capital, it is planned to increase benefits for children from poor families, this will require "only" 100 billion rubles.
    4. +2
      23 August 2013 20: 42
      polly case says, fathers who are married should be encouraged so that families do not break up. In Belarus, there was such a thing - the childcare allowance for single mothers was greater than that for married mothers, so the youth did not knowingly enter into marriage. Well, he didn’t get married - all the same, there are no obligations, at least a part, let him go free. Since this year, the allowance has been leveled, the situation is changing. And by the way, many acquaintances went in the third round, the allowance is already higher than the salaries of small employees (where mostly women work), it’s advantageous to sit on maternity leave.
      1. +1
        23 August 2013 23: 30
        Quote: Max Otto
        polly case says, fathers who are married should be encouraged so that families do not break up.


        Of course she’s right, in developed countries governments do just that, the question is how we will
  7. +10
    23 August 2013 15: 36
    Recently I am starting to "fall in love" with Wasserman
    1. +8
      23 August 2013 17: 21
      Good man how not to respect
  8. +6
    23 August 2013 15: 37
    These laws will not pass. Here is our Stalingrad !!!
    1. +4
      23 August 2013 16: 29
      Stalingrad was made by Stalin: he simply banned it categorically ... And these laws will pass (as soon as they pass). And what, excuse me, will manifest your "Stalingrad"?
      1. +3
        23 August 2013 17: 24
        Andrey Ivanovich. This is our fault. We voted for them, we elected them (maybe not WE?)
        1. +8
          23 August 2013 19: 07
          Quote: Very old
          We voted for them, we elected them (maybe not WE?)


          As the TDF said, “No matter how they vote.” It is important how they count.
    2. +2
      23 August 2013 22: 23
      yeah, for power they will fight to the end ...
  9. +3
    23 August 2013 15: 38
    - The solution to all the problems of the Russian budget is very simple and has long been known. This is a complete expulsion from all structures related, however, to the government, those who profess libertarianism — the belief in the beneficence of unlimited individual freedom without regard for society. In particular, this is exactly what should be done with all those who ever after 1991 have served as ministers of finance, economics, and chairmen of the Central Bank. Even though among these people there are relatively low-risk for society.
    Bravo, Onotole. good And a list, please attach.
    1. +2
      23 August 2013 17: 26
      You know that little list. And we know. They are waiting for "spring", it seems
  10. +19
    23 August 2013 15: 42
    I wrote earlier that sometimes the Wassermans are more russians than other Sidorov-Petrovs. smile
    1. +3
      23 August 2013 17: 27
      BRAVO, Sergey !!!
  11. stroporez
    +4
    23 August 2013 15: 49
    A. Wasserman seems to be an intelligent person, but to blurt out ------- "expel liberals" ........ PPC.et like Medvedev with Vovan and "bits" ------ will whip themselves. ...........
  12. +6
    23 August 2013 16: 00
    More and more, I respect Wasserman !!!
    Quote: stroporez
    A. Wasserman seems to be an intelligent person, but to blurt out ------- "expel liberals" ........ PPC.et like Medvedev with Vovan and "bits" ------ will whip themselves. ...........

    At the first stage, you need to get rid of the most ardent liberals, like Medvedev and Dvorkovich at least.
  13. -31
    23 August 2013 16: 03
    laughing
    What liberals does A. Wasserman speak of when he himself is a liberal of pure water. Covers constantly dirt Putin. All liberals are the Communist Party, the Liberal Democratic Party, Alyosha Anal. Well, they are not in power. Where this bearded man saw the liberals in power. Maybe he himself does not know that he is a liberal, or he is just a sick person.
    1. -13
      23 August 2013 17: 30
      Quote: WIN969
      Lesko Anal

      Yesterday was at a speech by Navalny, he says smart things by the way.
      1. +12
        23 August 2013 18: 17
        Quote: Manager
        Yesterday was at a speech by Navalny, he says smart things by the way.

        It's easier for you ... you won't have to go to the store for "noodles" ...
        Yes! At one time EBN spoke even more correct speeches! And we hung up our ears ... hoping for free "noodles" .... and all waited ... when he lay on the rails .... And he put us under the locomotive!
        And Navalny is the EBN of today!
        1. +2
          23 August 2013 23: 20
          Quote: KazaK Bo
          And Navalny is the EBN of today!

          So for sure, he also speaks on State Department spurs so that stupid hamsters like it.
      2. +2
        24 August 2013 09: 18
        say and do different things.
  14. shpuntik
    +4
    23 August 2013 16: 05
    An additional diagnostic sign, according to which it is necessary to clean the state apparatus from such people, may also be their appeal for consultations on any occasion to the employees Higher School of Economics, Russian economic school и Academy of Public Administration and National Economy, not counting appeals to those who teach in these schools the exact sciences and foreign languages.

    Finally, the essence of these institutions was voiced. + Wasserman and + author of the article.
  15. Andrey312
    +6
    23 August 2013 16: 07
    The solution to all the problems of the Russian budget is very simple and has long been known. This is a complete expulsion from all structures connected with the government, those who profess libertarianism - faith in the beneficence of unlimited personal freedom without regard to society

    How the exile of anyone from anywhere will bring the budget of the Russian Federation half a trillion rubles? If only to expel with confiscation? Then I agree ....))
  16. +2
    23 August 2013 16: 09
    I am all the same surprised that a citizen of Ukraine, Wasserman A.A. he "sings" a lot about the problems in Russia and is "silent in a rag" about the problems of his country.
    Maybe we have quiet, whim and universal satisfaction. Or talk about their own problems is fraught, or in the wrong hands hen thicker.
    1. +17
      23 August 2013 16: 21
      Are there any problems in Ukraine? A rich country with a strong science and industry, five minutes to a member of the European Union. Switzerland smokes in the line Yes . The experience of the development of Ukraine can be studied in any country, ingenious leadership, the standard of living exceeds the bounds of reality, its happy citizens are happy.

      PS And Wasserman is a political scientist, philosopher. He is our common, you forgive him ...
      1. +4
        23 August 2013 17: 32
        OTTO, they forgive me for misconduct ... And what criminal did Wasserman commit? Only told the truth
    2. +2
      24 August 2013 00: 55
      In Russia, there is someone to listen to. In Ukraine, no.
      In addition, he likes to say: "In Ukraine, like the rest of Russia ...".
      For him, Ukraine is a purely geographical concept. Like Siberia or the Far East.
  17. +10
    23 August 2013 16: 19
    I don’t understand why there is no article for wrecking? No kidding: entrepreneurs pay employees of their competitors (especially sales and technology managers) to do their dirty tricks to their owners (for example, they lost a couple of customers or released a batch of sausage of poor quality). Foreign powers pay officials of other states to destroy their own industry (a vivid example is the former Argentine president). Damn, everything is so obvious, but for some reason everyone pretends that they are all around white and fluffy, full of honor and dignity, rivals competing exclusively in conscience and according to written laws !!!
    I understand that such an article will not get rid of Judas at all, but at least somehow it will be possible to attract them. For example, in the most benign mode, prescribe "for intentional damage to the property / image of a company (or country) by conspiracy with a third party for mercenary, ideological or any other purposes." Indeed, in 90% of these liberals, they were obviously incited somewhere abroad. Well, I do not believe that they are so fluffy harmless! It's a no-brainer - you don't need to save, but earn. What prevents state refineries from building (otherwise they are already asking not to send gasoline for export) How much mind does it take to start producing your own baby diapers? After all, we buy in Poland! And only my family spends 3 thousand on them every month !!! Well, they will crash the capital - the mortgage will immediately collapse, followed by construction, which means that the GDP will fall exactly by this amount !!! That is, income will decline again. So will you continue to cut off the tail of the cat?
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 14: 44
      They will ... they will cut the tail piece by piece, and the further, the larger the pieces will be, until only the ears remain. The budget is not enough, but we provide Georgia with energy resources, we write off debts for some former "friends", help future enemies, and so on, etc. And also in every locality it sits in a Duma; and they think about what: "where you can not walk the dogs (where you can not say), how to cut the lawns (and whether it is necessary at all), who has more stash abroad - they argue; but the laws on their own benefits and benefits are adopted quickly and clearly. And from time to time they fight - for the joy of the people, which they supposedly represent, with the people's money. They can still be reduced completely, and the budget can be saved, and how many able-bodied people can join production, it would be good to go to agriculture, yes and there will be fewer harmful laws, since there is no one to invent them.
      I'm exaggerating, of course, but there are a lot of people trying to think for us and tell us, only there is no one to work. There is a saying like this: "don't move pebbles." It's about them.
  18. FATEMOGAN
    +8
    23 August 2013 16: 23
    Only the grave will be corrected by the liberal, or labor migration to the logging site, the time over this disease is powerless, that now they hate Russia, that they wanted death before ...

  19. And raid
    +6
    23 August 2013 16: 32
    I am not a nationalist, I am defending my nation! Nobody defends or defends the rights of Russians, funding is primarily for small peoples, for some reason they are somehow not Russians, but immediately in need. Almost only Indians give birth, worthy Russians have few children, and indeed Russians, 1 maximum 2, and if 3, then in any social service they will tell you: "Who did you give birth to?" Cancel all subsidies, let everyone be in the same conditions!
  20. +5
    23 August 2013 16: 42
    Lord! Are you reading the first two syllables, and then you think up.

    "those who profess libertarianism - the belief in the beneficialness of unlimited freedom of the individual without regard to society. "

    Wasserman specifically and absolutely correctly says that it is necessary to expel and from where.

    And first of all, it is necessary to expel from our consciousness our own inferiority, the stance of the one who asks. The Russian person has enough common sense that, without climbing into the barricades, to force those who must answer, he answered.

    Not the last place here is occupied by the Internet and the task set for ministries and regions is to create electronic representations of official bodies. Try to ask a normal, without kooky, question of your administration on its website, make a screen for memory and it on the city forum. Enough for 10 days.

    Further, at the autumn session, deputies should consider an amendment to the law on the applicant, which introduces the concept of a collective statement. Opponents of this amendment are these very libertarians who understand that collectives come into the game, not single citizens.

    "Faith in a good tsar" is a purely Russian invention. But we chose the "king", and what he does - we approve (mostly). So help him and yourself.

    PS About the power of the Internet. Mosque - A Symbol of RUSSIA ?!
  21. +3
    23 August 2013 16: 44
    Article +. Apparently there is no other way.
  22. +2
    23 August 2013 16: 46
    Anatoly Wasserian said simply and clearly what can be explained for a long time: "Drive liberals out of the government"!
    Their time is gone.
    1. +2
      23 August 2013 17: 34
      The question remains: HOW?
      1. +4
        23 August 2013 18: 26
        How to drive? A very simple, nasty broom! What does Russia have from their "activity"? The fact that our money invested for a meager percentage in American debt obligations is returned to us for astronomical interest. That our stabilization fund is again placed with American bankers and does not stabilize anything with us, but works for the Americans. And I think no one is going to return it to us, And all this is the merit of our liberals. And Wasserman has repeatedly notified us about this at the top of his voice!
  23. +3
    23 August 2013 17: 07
    Wasserman is right! Dostoevsky is right!
    1. +1
      23 August 2013 20: 54
      I can not master the "Demons" I read it for the 5th time. Amazed at the depth of foresight
  24. +4
    23 August 2013 17: 25
    Wasserman said everything correctly (about the need to expel liberals from power structures), but this
    it’s obvious to us. But who, and how will it do it? However, the question is rhetorical! how
    They say the task is understandable, but the ways to solve it are not very!
  25. +4
    23 August 2013 18: 15
    Quote: makst83
    "The concept was developed by the Ministry of Finance together with the professors of the Higher School of Economics!" Hmm, we know WHO sits at HSE and what views they hold!

    When already this hornet’s nest will be burned out! Yasin s. the decree almost every day teaches us how to live on TV, radio or in newspapers.
    1. +2
      23 August 2013 20: 31
      Usually taught by those who do not know how HRENA
  26. +4
    23 August 2013 18: 32
    I think we all need to take the elections at all levels very seriously. So that under the smokescreen of white-banded marsh bands, liberal traitors would not seep into power with quiet glanders! And Wasserman says it’s necessary to listen to him.
    1. 0
      23 August 2013 20: 57
      Our colleague noted that it’s important how they count, he quoted their IVS
  27. +5
    23 August 2013 18: 47
    According to the new concept, developed on behalf of the president by the Ministry of Finance together with professors of the Higher School of Economics, maternity capital will not be paid for second and subsequent children born after December 31 2016.

    How can you! After all, Kissinger and ALBRIGHT have determined the task for our liberals - in Russia there should be 30-40 million people ... as slaves of the first category ... the rest are superfluous! Here are the HSE professors. Washington’s instructions must be followed ... otherwise they’ll be scattered ...
    The idea of ​​a later retirement is added to this - work until you fall lifeless!
    After all, we are a social state, according to the Constitution

    It’s interesting, but do the Prime Minister and his liberal associates from the Ministry of Finance and the Higher School of Economics know about this article of the main law of the state? Or are they completely illiterate?
    And it doesn’t matter that money is saved exclusively from the people, from domestic enterprises,

    Of course, you need to save money ... if you spend on the people, then who will and where will they pay the salary of 2 million re / month to SKOLKOVO CEO? Or 300 thousand re to each of ten customs officers, in the same place in SKOLKOVO, for one operation per year for everyone ... I will simply keep silent about salaries and fees and bonuses at RUSNANO ... And by purchasing US state lists for hundreds of billions who will support decrepit dollar and the same economy amers?
    You will listen to the top officials of the state ... and then you will look at the practice of "real budget execution" and it would be desirable that a decision aimed at
    the complete expulsion from all structures connected with the government, those professing libertarianism ... In particular, this is the way it should be done to everyone who ever held the posts of ministers of finance, economics, and chairmen of the Central Bank .

    And as soon as possible to start their "employment" on KOLYMA! There are so few working hands ...
    1. +2
      23 August 2013 21: 01
      Boris, are YOU sure that everyone sitting in GD familiar with the constitution?
  28. SvetoRus
    +3
    23 August 2013 18: 55
    I agree with Wasserman!Those, who offers us to save on our old people and children, apparently so that the former live less, and the latter born less,drive from the government and all HSE, on foot by stage to the construction sites of the new Industrialization!
  29. Vtel
    +3
    23 August 2013 19: 03
    One small snag - well, they disagree, well, these liberals, they are up there and it’s so good that the sea (of the people) is seething under them. To see our people, as well as the Lord God until long-suffering these bugs on his tormented body - there will come a time, already at the door. Nekhai Chubzaytsy begin to pack the Chumadans.
    1. +4
      23 August 2013 20: 09
      Quote: Vtel
      To see our people, as well as the Lord God is long-suffering


      The people will not endure for the first time, the Lord would not be angry
  30. +4
    23 August 2013 19: 11
    Wasserman is some kind of phenomenon in our life .... the exact opposite of his tribe. Respect.
    1. +1
      23 August 2013 21: 03
      No wonder you are Che. Man is always human
  31. atomic
    +5
    23 August 2013 19: 25
    The recipe for economic recovery is simple; to expel all the Jews from power (not to be confused with the Jews).
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. +2
    23 August 2013 19: 51
    The recipe for economic recovery is simple - to expel everyone from power! Half measures will not give anything.
  34. +4
    23 August 2013 19: 56
    Guys do not get caught on writing sweet for the soul (I kind of read myself ..)) They know how to poke around in the soul .. Don’t believe them for God's sake. ..I was Wasserman plyusovat and agreed .. He is not the one he wants to give himself .. !! They want blood again Slavic .. (maybe I'm too emotional .. From the soul it just goes .. it just flows in the soul .. unconsciously ..) Think analyze .. yourself .. My opinion is this !!!
    1. +2
      23 August 2013 21: 08
      You have been taught to read and write. To think, you need to learn yourself. So ...
    2. shpuntik
      +3
      24 August 2013 04: 43
      MIKHAN SU Yesterday, 19:56
      Guys do not get caught on writing sweet for the soul (I kind of read myself ..)) They know how to poke around in the soul .. Do not believe them for God's sake ..

      Then yes, MIKHAN is right good Caution will not hurt. Something a couple of years ago, Wasserman did not say anything like that, and he did not go into politics. And then I broke up, look. We'll see... what
    3. +1
      27 August 2013 11: 41
      Quote: MIKHAN
      He is not the one he wants to betray himself .. !!
      He is not particularly disguised, but personally I did not catch him for manipulation. He speaks honestly, but about sharp things - carefully, he approaches from afar, but hints intelligibly. For example, when he advised me to vote for Putin. Speaking abstractly, it is characterized by the following specific qualities: "reasonable behavior in a dangerous situation" (the principle when taking hostages by terrorists), "of two evils we choose the least." What is this, pragmatism or specific national wisdom, I do not know. It seems that this is simply a desire to avoid chaos in conditions of a high probability of losing control over the process. The people have not yet decided what they want. But Wasserman has already clearly formulated that capitalism, as it turned out, as a means of ensuring the well-being of the people, is the worst in comparison with socialism. I apologize for not verbatim, but I did not distort the meaning. And in many ways, what he is accused of here is unfair - analyze his videos on YouTube, there are a lot of them in various aspects. In short, he may not be in the socio-political position in which we would like, but it is necessary to listen to such people, and of course we draw conclusions ourselves. The criticality of the perception of any information is assumed.
  35. Russian
    -1
    23 August 2013 20: 06
    yeah the Jew says)
  36. 0
    23 August 2013 20: 06
    Wasserman is the smartest man. And the liberals are beaten clearly, on the case and specifically. Therefore, the shit and squeals ...
  37. 0
    23 August 2013 20: 19
    Bravo Anatole !!!! So their liberals. To reserve them.
  38. +4
    23 August 2013 20: 23
    Quote: arnulla
    Wasserman is the smartest man. And the liberals are beaten clearly, on the case and specifically. Therefore, the shit and squeals ...

    Why is it not (spread rot) in the Western media ??? Is he like a star here ?? Slowly getting into our souls ... I'm not an anti-Semite. Just what kind of reaction to the former Russophobe and anti-Stalinist .. It's funny and sad all of this .. Remember the shifters .. (some are already spinning like squirrels ...))) .. I just broke through Guys .. Again we are stepping on the old rake, and I, including alas, too .. (((
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 12: 01
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Just what kind of reaction to the former Russophobe and anti-Stalinist ..
      A serious argument, I admit, is itself so vindictive. As for anti-Stalinism, he explained this as a lack of mastery of the initial information and, now, after a detailed study of this issue, "gives a worthy rebuff to anti-Stalinism." I don’t think it’s a move on his part. It doesn't seem like he could live with it, he has a different value system, I suppose. But caution in these matters will not hurt, here I agree.
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Why is it not (spread rot) in the Western media ???
      I think there’s nothing to catch on, they didn’t find a weak spot. Contacting a smart person, like a fool, is more expensive.
  39. Uhe
    Uhe
    +3
    23 August 2013 20: 24
    Somewhat more accurately would be worth expressing. It’s not just to expel the liberals, led by Allah Giving Money, who is the main liberal of Russia, but to come to the dictatorship of the proletariat, democracy and a socialist planned economy. Reliance solely on the triune Russian people and brotherly nationalities. Then the country will rise, and the expulsion of the liberals alone will do little. Who's going to come? Another sort of bourgeois? Fascists, for example. Pinochet was far from being a liberal either, so what? Only Russian socialism in Stalinist style.
  40. +3
    23 August 2013 20: 36
    Russian liberalism really took on perverse forms. Our liberals seem to be paying ideological reparations towards the West for losing the Cold War.
    As for Wasserman, he is just a clown.
  41. +2
    23 August 2013 20: 44
    we can assume that those who propose the abolition of maternal capital directly and directly undermine the very foundation of our country and contribute to the destruction of the people.
    What article will suit them: treason or genocide?
    1. +2
      23 August 2013 21: 11
      Short answer: BOTH
  42. +2
    23 August 2013 20: 45
    A photo before an article takes a soul ??? At the beginning, analysis is also underway and takes the soul .... and then, as always, the installation algorithm ... (then there is a heated discussion ..))) Everything is standard .. Just think what hooked you .. (calmly) .. I’m sure the following the article will be in a slightly different topic and with a different photo ...)) This is an example of an information war .. That's how revolutions are made (controlled houses)) .. Don’t be fooled by this .. !!!
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 12: 11
      Quote: MIKHAN
      This is how revolutions are made (controlled houses)) ..

      Where is Wasserman and where is the revolution? Yes, he is like fire ...
      Quote: MIKHAN
      I am sure the next article will be in a slightly different topic and with a different photo ..
      I admit, but here the author of the article is not Wasserman.
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Everything is standard .. Just think what hooked you .. (calmly).
      Personally, nothing hooked me. How can the obvious catch on? "Everything is standard ...", everything is trite, everything is as always - from empty to empty ...
  43. 0
    23 August 2013 20: 47
    Not only to drive, the total physical destruction of liberals and tolerasts will save Russia
  44. +2
    23 August 2013 21: 12
    Quote: Viacheslav
    Russian liberalism really took on perverse forms. Our liberals seem to be paying ideological reparations towards the West for losing the Cold War.
    As for Wasserman, he is just a clown.

    And not just a clown, they want to be on the wave again .. (they have a flair for that .. (Sings like a nightingale .. they know how to turn around 360 ..)) .. and notice I start to suck again ..))) Everything as usually .. heh heh ..
  45. +3
    23 August 2013 21: 26
    There are many words, but the essence is the same - there is little money in the treasury.
    2 questions are relevant - who is to blame and what to do?
    Okay, let's say they found the villains - the liberals, who were executed, some were exiled, some were put on bunks ...
    Noted noisy this thing. Something has changed? No.
    We pass to the second part.
    But the second question is a hundred times more complicated than the first (he disagrees with Wasserman).
    I would like to see and live in a state where the course is taken for the development of industry, agriculture (in such open spaces), science, high technology.
    Who will do this? Are there really responsible people?
    I think no. And now...
    Now all efforts are devoted to collecting taxes. It seems like a long time. Simple and stupid.
    What minds, such and politics ...
  46. 0
    23 August 2013 21: 44
    +1 article
    I completely agree with the author!
    1. sashka
      0
      24 August 2013 00: 43
      First, find the difference .. liberal and liberal .. The president thinks on Facebook that he is "president" .. The rest does not matter
  47. Rapira111
    0
    23 August 2013 21: 50
    Well done Tolyan !!!
  48. dmb
    +2
    23 August 2013 21: 52
    Life sometimes twists such squiggles. Tell me that I would at least partially agree with the fascist element, I would spat in the face. Of course, in the assessment of Meehan Wasserman, I am least interested in the nationality of the latter, but Meehan is partly right. And his rightness is that the popularity of Wasserman (with his natural consent) is quite successfully used by the current government. Let's try to figure it out without emotions and screams about Bolotnaya and Navalny. Most who welcome Wassermann's theses on the expulsion of liberals long for power and a firm hand. I thirst for her no less. Here is just one question, whose interests will this strong power protect? And it will primarily protect the interests of the banker Gref, the industrialist Tishchenko, the oligarch Yakunin, and the humble worker Chubais, but where would he be without him. It goes without saying that the interests of the metalworker from Kharkov Petrenko, the teacher from Voronezh Ivanov, the doctor from Armavir Petrosyan and the farmer from Stavropol Golopupenko will be protected only when their interests do not contradict the interests of the first group. I don’t need such power, but you?
    1. DPN
      +3
      23 August 2013 22: 55
      Unfortunately, we pissed off Soviet power, and for the newly arrived capitalists the interests of the people were ***. And now the population growth has ceased to worry them. So the interests of the groups named by YOU will never coincide!
    2. 0
      27 August 2013 12: 34
      Quote: dmb
      I don’t need such power, but you?
      This is from the series "I thought it up myself - I got offended myself." Sorry for the analogy, but it fits too well. Wasserman and calls for a change of power ?! This is off topic, definitely, you misunderstood something here.
      Quote: dmb
      And his rightness is that the popularity of Wasserman (with his natural consent) is quite successfully used by the current government

      The authorities are, of course, free to take advantage of anything, even bribery. But there can be a number of points of view about the success of this use. Lenin was also accused of being used by the Germans, but it turned out to be a lie. On the other hand, if we talk about "parliamentary" methods of struggle, then categorical refusals are not useful - you can even lose the "tribune". In short, it is advisable to formulate suspicions more specifically and reasonably, otherwise a pointless conversation turns out.
  49. +2
    23 August 2013 22: 03
    An interesting article but there is one catch - there are no liberals in Russia - there are chaos in Russia ... Liberalism can be in countries with developed social policies and in the same ideal country of US liberalism - liberals will NEVER and GIVE GOD in any of their reforms harm America’s old interests ... And in Russia there is no Liberalism and there has never been - there is a free will and there is impunity and as they say - after us at least a flood and also as they say - everything around is collective farm everything around me !!!
  50. DPN
    +2
    23 August 2013 22: 43
    Quote: Gari
    Quote: predator.3
    The right words, and you need to start with the red Tolyan!

    Is that what is on the left?
    A. Wasserman: “The recipe for economic recovery is simple: to drive out all liberals from power”
    To expel all liberals to Siberia

    The correct photo, just all the heroes were selected, the entire first row without exception to Novaya Zemlya. With the exception of the deceased, they were late.
  51. aleksandr.k
    +1
    23 August 2013 23: 17
    Sooner or later, the time of Putin's nouveau riche will end.
  52. Yurez
    +1
    23 August 2013 23: 41
    357 Article. Genocide
    [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation] [Chapter 34] [Article 357]

    Actions aimed at the complete or partial destruction of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such by killing members of this group, causing serious harm to their health, forcible obstruction of childbearing, forced transfer of children, forced displacement or other creation of living conditions designed for physical destruction members of this group -

    the applicable sentence is deprivation of liberty for a term of from twelve to twenty years, with restriction of liberty for a term of up to two years, or life imprisonment, or the death penalty. am Probably something like this...
  53. minimum
    +2
    24 August 2013 00: 24
    Wasserman showed himself to be good at “his game,” but he has problems with political analysis and advice. Expel all liberals? And who actually installs these liberals, appoints the government, patronizes Chubais, etc.?
    This fairy tale about the “good king and bad boyars” is pretty boring. Putin, in fact, comes from the liberal crowd, if anything, Sobchak made him, Yeltsin made him president, Putin consistently, throughout his entire power, surrounds himself with liberals. Who does Wasserman want to expel?
  54. +2
    24 August 2013 00: 29
    “Thus, it can be considered that those who propose the abolition of maternity capital are directly and directly undermining the very foundation of our country and contributing to the destruction of the people.”

    It is worth adding that these economists are also indirectly ruining the economy - you cannot rush around, accept today and tomorrow cancel what is approved by the majority; the people and the market do not forgive instability.
  55. +1
    24 August 2013 00: 30
    Today, the majority of Western markets (I know about real estate) preach analysis and five-year planning, something that they once ridiculed and considered fundamentally wrong... eh... where are the specialists who were involved in this planning...
    1. +1
      24 August 2013 11: 35
      Quote: Makarov
      Today, the majority of Western markets (I know about real estate) preach analysis and five-year planning, something that they once ridiculed and considered fundamentally wrong... eh... where are the specialists who were involved in this planning...

      Planning is a normal practice for serious companies. I read that IBM is planning for 100 years ahead.
      1. +1
        24 August 2013 18: 44
        Well, yes))) try to plan when not only does the Tax Code change every six months, but the Constitution changes no less often))
  56. sashka
    0
    24 August 2013 00: 36
    First you need to define your concepts. WHO is this liberal? Poo and the bear say that they are liberals.. Then it is not clear what this Word means.
  57. 0
    24 August 2013 01: 35
    Each liberal - a rope and a separate branch on a birch tree laughing .
  58. 0
    24 August 2013 02: 35
    To reduce controversy, I will give an excerpt from the dictionary:
    Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language by D.N. Ushakov:
    LIBERAL, liberal, m. (from Latin ltberalis - related to freedom). 1. Supporter of liberalism. This liberal begins by asking his superiors for reforms “if possible”; continues by begging “well, at least something” and ends with the eternal and unshakable position “in relation to meanness.” Lenin. The Russian liberal is a representative of reformism that is cowardly and treacherous towards democracy. 2. Member of the Liberal Party; opposite conservative. English liberals. 3. In the language of the noble and bourgeois environment - a free-thinking person. I sincerely confess to you that I am just like you, a terrible liberal. Griboyedov.
    1. sashka
      0
      25 August 2013 03: 01
      Quote: indifferent
      LIBERAL, liberal, m. (from Latin ltberalis - related to freedom)

      This is all clear.. I didn’t see or hear the answer.. Who are Poo and the bear?
      1. +1
        27 August 2013 12: 41
        Quote: Sasha
        Who are Poo and the Bear?

        It’s hard to say who this bear is, in my opinion no one. But Pu is a liberal.
  59. 0
    24 August 2013 02: 47
    According to the new concept, developed on behalf of the president by the Ministry of Finance together with professors of the Higher School of Economics, maternity capital will not be paid for second and subsequent children born after December 31 2016.

    As I remember, maternity capital was supposed to stimulate the birth of two or more children in our families. Abandoning it from 01.01.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX means that our women will produce offspring in the required quantities and without any financial incentives? Or maybe without husbands... laughing laughing laughing
  60. +3
    24 August 2013 04: 56
    No, no, no... Stop sending waste to us in Siberia. To the Moon or beyond the Lagrange point, swing them there!..... And in Siberia we need working brains.
  61. 0
    24 August 2013 09: 57
    Where a liberal has stepped, the grass no longer grows, only a hoof mark remains.
  62. +2
    24 August 2013 10: 13
    Finally, the initiative was published on the Russian Public Initiatives website
    “On Amendments to the Federal Law “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”
    Everyone vote! Repost everyone! Show maximum initiative in this battle for the Russian Central Bank!
  63. +1
    24 August 2013 10: 22
    Maternity capital was essentially a guarantee or hope to give at least something to the children.
    Given our overwhelmingly poverty-stricken salaries, this was an incentive to have children.
    It’s not hard to guess what will happen if it is cancelled, because:
    - with the birth of the first child, the family becomes twice as poor;
    - second, at four, etc.

    Are there many people who want to give birth?
  64. Government1981
    -1
    24 August 2013 10: 28
    Somehow I can’t believe that a Jew would give birth to Russia.
  65. +3
    24 August 2013 11: 16
    On board the Il-96-300PU there are three bars, a lounge with two beds for the presidential couple, and a study area of ​​10 m². The salon is decorated with tapestries inlaid with gold and precious stones.
    On May 26, 2010, a government contract was concluded for the supply of two more aircraft with Il-96-300PU (M1) control points, registration numbers RA-96020 and RA-96021. According to the Federal Treasury website, the contract value is 10,39 billion rubles.
    p.s. Let them start saving from the top... and not touch the already gnawed bottom... The people don’t deserve this!!!
  66. sashka
    -1
    25 August 2013 03: 10
    Which articles of the Criminal Code punish for the relevant acts, I can not remember without thinking, but we have the head of state and even the head of government studied at the law school, and I hope they have not completely forgotten the Criminal Code that was in effect during their studies.
    Author Victor Martynyuk
    After everything that has been written, draw such stupid conclusions... So WHAT. What did you study... Next What? Just good people will not be enough.
  67. 0
    25 August 2013 13: 23
    Quote: 225chay
    Quote: makst83
    Onotolle speaks as always! "

    The honest Jew and decent man Wasserman correctly said - to fuck all the liberoid-der.m.o.crack shelupon, and it’s better to transfer it to mines.
    These creatures destroy both the country and indigenous peoples.


    An analyst of rare wisdom among his colleagues who flood the media space.
  68. -1
    26 August 2013 11: 57
    Moderators are stagnant.
    Wasserman wrote out a prescription for recovery on 23.08.13/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    Forum members mastered it and accepted it.
    The dosage for use is determined independently. tongue
  69. yuri p
    0
    26 August 2013 12: 40
    how to accomplish this? Wasserman did not voice, in order to accomplish this, it is necessary to carry out another revolution, there are too many of these monsters in power, the only question is whether Russia will survive another civil strife and what will happen to the people? No wonder the Eastern proverb says “God forbid we live” in an era of change."
  70. labendik
    -1
    26 August 2013 12: 56
    Your website is gloomy, the main guests are from the Stone Age, and the employees are illiterate (or rather, prone to forgery; hardly any of the guests understand the difference between these two concepts).
  71. +1
    26 August 2013 19: 19
    RIA News
    16:15
    Baumgertner was in Minsk at the invitation of the government of Belarus
    As noted in the Investigative Committee, the basis for initiating criminal cases was materials on the commission of abuse of official powers for personal gain, which entailed causing significant harm to the state and public interests of Belarus, as well as causing damage on a particularly large scale to the Belaruskali enterprise and CJSC Belarusian Potash Company. (BKK).
    Here is the improvement of the economy, but we have forgotten the words “state and public interests”
  72. Victor 4
    0
    26 August 2013 21: 53
    Every fan knows EXACTLY WHAT needs to be done for the team to win. Much better coach. But only the COACH knows HOW to bring the team to the lead and in what time frame this can actually be done. And if we look among the coaches, we will find that there is no replacement for the current one. The foreigners will screw up the case. The newly minted ones will pile up so much that it will take a long time and pain to dump them out.
  73. pahom54
    0
    27 August 2013 12: 40
    Quote: atomic
    The recipe for economic recovery is simple; to expel all the Jews from power (not to be confused with the Jews).

    Now, the person, most likely not fully knowing the meaning of the word “Jew,” said the very essence. The essence of the word "Jew" is "h... (member) of a dog." And if these members of the dogs, who occupy high and profitable positions, are expelled to the vast expanses of our Motherland that require development, and they are forced to support themselves and their families with THEIR LABOR (ideally, also to bring benefit and profit to society and the state) - this is it would be great! The only question is: who will come to take their place?
  74. pahom54
    0
    27 August 2013 15: 21
    [quote=pahom54][quote=atomic]The recipe for improving the economy is simple; expel all Jews from power (not to be confused with Jews).[/quote]
    Now, the person, most likely not fully knowing the meaning of the word “Jew,” said the very essence. The essence of the word "Jew" is "h... (member) of a dog." And if these members of the dogs, who occupy high and profitable positions, are expelled to the vast expanses of our Motherland that require development, and they are forced to support themselves and their families with THEIR LABOR (ideally, also to bring benefit and profit to society and the state) - this is it would be great! The only question is: who will come to take their place?[/quote
    I wrote: the meaning of the word “Jew” and the essence of the word “Jew”, not Jew. Where did that change come from? A setup...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"