Military Review

Severodvinsk is back from testing

42
Oleg Kuleshov published photos of the return of the 21 of the nuclear submarine K-2013 "Severodvinsk" of the 560 project at the JSC "Northern Machine-Building Enterprise" after the next stage of State testing.


Severodvinsk is being tested since September 2011 of the year, but so far it has not been accepted into the Russian Navy. According to available information, the tests of the boat pass with great difficulties and revealed a significant number of defects and serious flaws.

Severodvinsk is back from testing


Nuclear submarine K-560 "Severodvinsk" project 885. Severodvinsk, 21.08.2013 (c) Oleg Kuleshov / kuleshovoleg.livejournal.com
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grigorich 1962
    Grigorich 1962 22 August 2013 10: 32
    +3
    Well, it's real sabotage .... if you call a spade a spade .......
    that's why sometimes I want to recall the methods of Comrade Stalin
    1. Retx
      Retx 22 August 2013 10: 34
      +3
      what sabotage?
      1. Grigorich 1962
        Grigorich 1962 22 August 2013 10: 36
        0
        think for yourself ......
        Severodvinsk "has been undergoing trials since September 2011, but has not yet been accepted into the Russian Navy. According to available information, the boats are being tested with great difficulties and have revealed a significant number of defects and serious deficiencies.

        you need to call everything by their proper names .......
        1. Retx
          Retx 22 August 2013 10: 42
          15
          This is a new, old submarine, the lead in the series. Naturally there will be problems and difficulties during state trials. There is no need to go far for an example - British Astyut.
        2. Botanologist
          Botanologist 22 August 2013 12: 33
          19
          Sabotage is when instead of freon, nitrogen is pumped into the fire extinguishing system. And on the new boat, in which they placed a great many new equipment, problems will constantly come out until everyone breaks in. Here a simple iPhone either doesn’t catch the connection, then it beats the current, but do you think the nuclear submarine - drew and swam?
        3. Volkhov
          Volkhov 22 August 2013 16: 46
          -7
          Now the boats and surface ships are entering combat service with the same hopelessness as the Leningrad submariners are blockaded through minefields - so it's good that it is faulty - it is more beautiful in the port than at the bottom.
          Too much has been failed in science and management, and no one at the top admits to being moronic. The presence of neutrino optics in the enemy makes the nuclear submarine visible over hundreds of kilometers, and then a technical matter.
          The fleet is too complicated for the modern Russian Federation - here we are strong in the riot police competition and terrorism - the world has not seen such scumbags.
    2. avt
      avt 22 August 2013 10: 42
      19
      Quote: Grigorich 1962
      Well, it's real sabotage .... if you call a spade a spade .......

      Practically this is an experimental ship, try like this, from a sheet, after all the dashing 90s to make a new generation boat. The project is going hard.
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 22 August 2013 11: 19
        +1
        "Severodvinsk" has been undergoing trials since September 2011, but has not yet been accepted into the Russian Navy. According to the available information, the boats are being tested with great difficulties and have revealed a significant number of defects and serious shortcomings. "- why is it always like this with us? How many more years does it take to get closer to the level of production and modernization of equipment, at least approximately corresponding to the level of the USSR?
        1. Constantine
          Constantine 22 August 2013 14: 07
          +3
          Quote: Ruslan_F38
          How many more years does it take to get closer to the level of production and modernization of technology, at least approximately corresponding to the level of the USSR?


          Breaking - not building. In the USSR, too, everything was not set at the level you are talking about in 2-3 years. hi
      2. little man
        little man 22 August 2013 11: 53
        +2
        Oh well. And how many years will it still be possible to do this?
        1. Constantine
          Constantine 22 August 2013 14: 09
          +4
          Quote: man
          Oh well. And how many years will it still be possible to do this?

          And here excuses? This is an objective reality. Echoes of the consequences of the destruction of the USSR and its heritage in turbulent and dashing years.
        2. igor.borov775
          igor.borov775 22 August 2013 17: 04
          0
          No one otmazyvatsya, you need to follow such things and the shipbuilders themselves said this is a completely different century this is a different generation, And there will be difficulties,
      3. Constantine
        Constantine 22 August 2013 14: 07
        +1
        Quote: avt
        Practically this is an experimental ship, try like this, from a sheet, after all the dashing 90s to make a new generation boat. The project is going hard.


        It would be more. This is not a bike to assemble. You have to go through difficulties. This is experience, and it decides a lot.
      4. Wolf
        Wolf 22 August 2013 16: 14
        0
        Enough time has already been set for the defense industry, and why didn’t it happen? There was enough money for the last 10 years! Someone in the administration and in the enterprises is trying to see that the bi rearmament of the army failed! If he builds 1 submarine in 10 years, then in 1000 years the fleet will have the intelligence! The same goes for the remaining weapons! networks, tanks, etc.!
    3. sub307
      sub307 22 August 2013 11: 16
      +2
      So let's see, they will hand over on time as promised, or "shifted" as it was already customary.
    4. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 22 August 2013 16: 58
      +2
      Hi, what he is talking about, A completely new series is starting up and there will always be some flaws some inconsistencies, This comment is not in the topic, They will still bring if the equipment is a completely new sense of novelty, It should be all the more so before the shipbuilders and designers spoke at 3 x the first will be debugging equipment the newest there will always be problems, And from 4 there will already be a series where it will concentrate something that has not yet been completed, Shipbuilders are much more difficult if they start something new, Everything seems to be normal in testing, but how it is assembled on a ship as they say to treat a childhood illness, in aviation it’s easier to test and test a few samples, and here it’s much harder to nobody will build a very expensive sample, and at the beginning of the series they’ll finish everything as it should function, experience is the most important thing, the beauty will be brought to the requirements that are laid down in the project, And this is just information that it is brought to the necessary parameters, After all, no one hid that it would be very difficult with these 3 first boats, You can’t so offend a team of many thousands that eliminates what came out of the test Well, good health and success in work to everyone who has a relationship with these beauties,
    5. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 22 August 2013 17: 51
      +1
      After so many years of downtime and brain leaks, no wonder the problems ... sorry ...
  2. Civil
    Civil 22 August 2013 10: 38
    +6
    Excellent foty long-awaited boat! Minute of adoration on the ax! good
    1. afire
      afire 22 August 2013 10: 41
      +7
      Such an elegant boat! What a line! credited! repeat
      1. strange and pretty meaningless
        strange and pretty meaningless 22 August 2013 11: 55
        +1
        Quote: afire
        What a line!


        Nasal contours look interesting. It's a pity there is no full surface photo request
  3. gispanec
    gispanec 22 August 2013 10: 42
    +7
    from what year was it being built ?? ... what time was it being built ?? ... and when was it lowered ??? .... it’s strange that it’s dear was completed .... the main thing is not to drive the race with the change this year and calmly in the next to take to the Russian Navy ... I think the head office always gives up with problems ... there is an extra rush ....
    1. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 22 August 2013 17: 48
      +1
      Quote: gispanec
      Navy of the Russian Federation ... I think the headache always gives up with problems ... there is an extra rush ....

      It is certainly right, the rush is superfluous, but after all, the boat went 21 years. Another couple of years and will have to be upgraded to the 5th generation, and modernization again 20 years?
  4. bulvas
    bulvas 22 August 2013 10: 54
    15
    Super complex product, very high requirements.
    A lot of work is needed to achieve a coherent and accurate operation of all systems.
    Military acceptance (customer representatives) has always been very meticulous, and it should be.

    In Soviet times, there were no less difficulties, the difference was that it was not customary to report this.
    1. FREGATENKAPITAN
      FREGATENKAPITAN 22 August 2013 11: 24
      11
      That's right ...... I confirm the fact ...... The crew of the NF (of the new formation) went to S.-Dvinsk to take a new ship (and not necessarily the first in the series) for a year and a half, and not the fact that for that time, the ship was taken from industry ... There was always a lot of what needed to be brought to mind ... and here is actually the latest cruiser. Given the past collapse of everything and everything, the current time of kickbacks and sunsets, this is normal, and sabotage has nothing to do with it .......... Another thing is the desire to soon see this handsome man in the fleet ........ .......
  5. denson06
    denson06 22 August 2013 11: 12
    +2
    Quote: gispanec
    from what year was it being built ?? ... what time was it being built ?? ... and when was it lowered ??? .... it’s strange that it’s dear was completed .... the main thing is not to drive the race with the change this year and calmly in the next to take to the Russian Navy ... I think the head office always gives up with problems ... there is an extra rush ....

    Apparently, the leadership of the Navy understands this very well .. there are really a lot of difficulties .. I read a lot about it (which I could find in free sources) - the device is conceived worthy of its "ancestors" .. only the quality is concerned ..
  6. dimon-media
    dimon-media 22 August 2013 11: 12
    0
    Not much time will pass before its adoption. While all the fleas are combed out of it .. The Hindus got something wrong, and sank in their bay. This is not good for us.
  7. dizelniy
    dizelniy 22 August 2013 11: 17
    -3
    Only effective managers can bring down difficulties and the 90s, Pros build and rent after not much refinement. Another way to declare the product as experimental, otherwise they will put pressure on the military and they will accept, and there will be another current emergency.
  8. ivshubarin
    ivshubarin 22 August 2013 11: 27
    +4
    It has a lot of new things that were not practiced in the USSR, one and a half hull design, torpedo tubes moved to the middle ... Therefore, it’s hard to fine-tune it.
  9. avt
    avt 22 August 2013 11: 37
    +5
    Quote: dizelniy
    Only effective managers can bring down difficulties and the 90s, Pros build and rent after not much refinement. Another way to declare the product as experimental, otherwise they will put pressure on the military and they will accept, and there will be another current emergency.

    Pros from an oak tree, like acorns do not fall, there is such a concept - a school, when the process of educating personnel in design bureaus and in production goes on continuously, everyone who at least once stood at a drawing board or at a machine tool knows this, and then in production with iron, he saw how drawings were implemented into a specific thing. And taking into account the huge cooperation, also in many, sometimes not related industries. Nobody appointed the boat as an experimental (not experienced), it happened in fact, they probably saved on mock-ups and stands, hoping that they could cope with limited funds, and we have just begun to launch experimental ships from the stocks, Sarov, for example, and one more surface ship. Well, about "a little tweak" - this is a song about an unkilled deer, in life in new projects it practically does not happen. Well, about the fact that God forbid pushing the boat out of the way - I agree.
    1. Gronsky
      Gronsky 22 August 2013 12: 10
      +7
      I completely agree with you. Now I have to watch the young shoots of designers and engineers standing on their feet, while there is an opportunity to learn from the experience of the old people who are leaving at an accelerated pace. This, I tell you, is not a sight for the faint of heart.
    2. dizelniy
      dizelniy 22 August 2013 16: 45
      +2
      Quote: avt
      Nobody appointed the boat as an experimental (not experienced), it happened in fact, they probably saved on mock-ups and stands, hoping that they could cope with limited funds, and we have just begun to launch experimental ships from the stocks, Sarov, for example, and one more surface ship. Well, about the "little tweak" - this is a song about an unkilled deer, in life in new projects this practically does not happen

      Who forced to save on this, or the devil pulled. The same factory and industry leaders with customer representatives are effective managers. The beauty of the product indicates the presence of an engineering school, and the lack of the ability to use all this for its intended purpose - the lack of responsibility from the leadership.
  10. smiths xnumx
    smiths xnumx 22 August 2013 11: 55
    +3
    "Severodvinsk" is the first boat of project 885 "Yasen" - "Severodvinsk" was built for 20 (TWENTY) years, since 1993, this year it is finally planned (for now!) To join the fleet. And here comes failure again
    According to the available information, boat trials are carried out with great difficulties and revealed a significant number of defects and serious shortcomings.

    "Kazan" and "Novosibirsk", laid down according to the improved project "Yasen-M" in 2009 and this year, respectively, it is planned to enter the fleet in 2015. Well, wait and see. I am afraid that the fate of her younger sisters diesel-electric submarines of project 677 "Lada" will await her. The first (and so far the only) boat of the St. Petersburg project was under construction for 13 years (from 1997 to 2010) and turned out to be so unsuccessful (problems with weapons and power plant) that the fleet even wanted to abandon the entire series. But still, they were armed, construction resumed and the next diesel-electric submarines "Kronstadt", laid down in 2005, are preparing to finish building in 2016 (11 years), and the third boat of the "Sevastopol" series laid down in 2006 in 2015 (9 years) that given the timing of the adoption of "Kronstadt" and the fact that its construction has not yet resumed, it is extremely doubtful. Failures with Project 677 prompted a return to the good old proven "Varshavyanka". In 2010 the boat of the improved project 636.3 "Novorossiysk" was laid down. which is planned to be handed over to the fleet in 2014, its launching was expected in the summer of this year, however, there are still 17 days left until the end of summer, so we'll wait and see. In the same 2014, it is planned to commission 2 more boats of the Rosto-on-Don and Stary Oskol series, which I personally doubt very much.
    Another submarine introduced into the fleet was the pilot diesel-electric submarine of project 20120 "Sarov", laid down in 1989 (again the Soviet reserve) and entered into the fleet in 2008. Its construction lasted 19 years.
    So, for all the "zero" the fleet received only one SSBN of project 955 "Borey" "Yuri Dolgoruky", which was under construction for 16 years (from 1996 to 2012), which is currently undergoing pilot operation (although this year should also introduce into the fleet "Alexander Nevsky" and "Vladimir Monomakh", but as they say after the problems with "Severodvinsk" wait and see); and 2 diesel-electric submarines: "St. Petersburg", about the problems with which I wrote above and the experimental "Sarov". All this, unfortunately, is regrettably small. Yours faithfully! hi
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 22 August 2013 12: 08
      +5
      quote-Oleg Kuleshov published photos of the return on August 21, 2013 of the nuclear submarine K-560 Severodvinsk of project 885 to OAO PO Severnoye Machine-Building Enterprise after the next stage of State tests.

      most recent video, dated 21.08.2013
  11. Evgeniy667b
    Evgeniy667b 22 August 2013 12: 14
    +1
    Severodvinsk is the only project in the class of multipurpose nuclear submarines, unfortunately for too long it "hung" in modifications and tests. There is no other project yet. There is nothing left but to bring it up and launch a modernized series in an amount sufficient to solve the problems of defending Russia. Why only cut, not quite old 671RTM and 971 ???, (not otherwise the insistent requests of the staff) until there is a replacement for them. This is how it was in the USSR and this is how it is done in the USA. They built a ship, disabled an obsolete one.
    1. Bronis
      Bronis 22 August 2013 12: 33
      0
      971 did not cut or cut. As for the RTM, they most likely considered the modernization inappropriate (for the rest) in favor of titanium. Well, those "Pikes" that were cut in the 90s ... it's too late. Moreover, they changed to "Pike-B" (by inertia, until 1995, they were lowered)
      1. Sokol peruna
        Sokol peruna 22 August 2013 16: 59
        +1
        Bronis
        971 did not cut and do not cut.


        K-480 and K-284 are already disposed of. K-263 also seems to be going to open-hearth pieces soon.
  12. coserg 2012
    coserg 2012 22 August 2013 12: 39
    +1
    I think this is a normal acceptance period. Considering that I never gave the best specialists to these crews in the fleets, we ourselves need them. The more factory faults they find upon acceptance, the better it will be to serve later.
  13. Evgeniy667b
    Evgeniy667b 22 August 2013 12: 42
    +1
    As far as I know, there have been cases of scrapping 971s, fortunately not many. And who considered the modernization potential of RTMok? It is much more profitable to weld from cutting into metal in someone's personal pocket than to keep a warship. In the USSR, even diesel engines of the 613 project were kept to the last. "Hiroshima" and she turned out to be a long-liver.
  14. dvvv
    dvvv 22 August 2013 13: 31
    +1
    it’s good that the boat returned and nothing burned out, did not drown and no one died ..
  15. 955535
    955535 22 August 2013 13: 44
    +3
    State tests of "Severodvinsk" have not yet begun, factory sea trials are underway. The author of the article is apparently not in the know.
  16. fedorovith
    fedorovith 22 August 2013 13: 46
    0
    I am glad that after our "glorious" 90 we can still do something .. everything will rub off and go.
  17. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 22 August 2013 14: 11
    11
    A nuclear submarine is more difficult to create than the Mir station. Men will have enough of the USSR to remember what was not returned, although I really want to. The realities are different. No country in the world is capable of surviving what we have experienced and at the same time producing such machines. The fact that "Severodvinsk" went to sea is already a miracle or a feat, I don't know. I work in the real (as it is now customary to call) sector of the economy and I can tell you that people who are now doing business are doing it not because of, but in spite of (this is another story). In general, our fleet would rather really need such a beauty and these "Los Angeles" and "Virginias" or that they have completely lost the keys to their ass, it's time to drive them.
  18. Vtel
    Vtel 22 August 2013 14: 35
    0
    Russians harness for a long time, but go fast (dive). (Otto von Schoenhausen Bismarck)
  19. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 22 August 2013 14: 56
    0
    Thus the iron chancellor spoke such words. And he also said that they should fight with everyone and win all except the Russians because he said if you even get back to the Urals you won’t bring a bag of your bones. Did not listen.
  20. kaptri
    kaptri 22 August 2013 16: 04
    0
    Eh, I went to the NF to her ... And how many years in retirement ...
  21. rugor
    rugor 22 August 2013 16: 17
    +1
    Problems on the new ship .... blah, blah, blah .... Everything is clear. But why identify these problems at sea? For example, they test a new car in the form of a matmodel, breaking it into finite elements and simulating all the loads in the computer. For a crash test, they send a tested car 100 times already, only to make sure of reliability. There are methods for checking the reliability of the design, manufacturing processes, etc.
    We simply save on this (at a loss), and the new leaders didn’t even hear about statistical methods of quality control and quality assurance.