Military Review

CombatBoat 90 in Russian. Patrol boat "Raptor"

67
On August 15, Leningrad Shipyard Pella OJSC (Otradnoye, Leningrad Region) launched the lead boat of Project 03160 Raptor. The boat was built by order of the naval fleet Russia and is currently being tested. Checking all systems will take a matter of weeks - the transfer of the boat to the customer is scheduled for September this year.


High-speed patrol boat project 03160 "Raptor" is designed to perform several tasks. Depending on the need, it can carry more than 20 people, including with weapons and equipment; on duty in a given area; intercept and delay light watercraft; as well as carry out search and rescue. The boats of the Raptor project are able to work in the coastal zone of the seas, straits and estuaries. The equipment allows them to perform assigned tasks at any time of the day at a distance of 100 miles from the base.

CombatBoat 90 in Russian. Patrol boat "Raptor"
Launched at the JSC "Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant" Pella ", the speed boat built for the Russian Navy of the 03160 project (" Raptor ") was built for the Russian Navy. Otradnoe, 15.08.2013 (c) JSC "Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant" Pella "


The head boat of the project has the greatest length of about 17 meters, width - about 4 meters. The power plant with a total horsepower 2000 allows Raptor to accelerate to 50 nodes. Own crew of the boat - two people. In addition, there is a room with places for 22 people - troops, doctors, etc., depending on the current task.

Externally, the boat, built at the Pella factory, very much resembles the Swedish multi-purpose boats of the Strb 90H project (also known as CombatBoat 90 or CB90), which we wrote about not so long ago. The reason for this is very simple - according to available data, the 03160 project was developed on the basis of the Swedish Strb 90H / CB90 with the participation of Dockstavarvet, which created and built the original boats. Thus, the Russian “Raptor” is actually a licensed version of the Swedish boat, which supplements the list of numerous options, modifications and versions of the original Strb 90H.

Based on the "origin" of the project 03160, we can draw the appropriate conclusions about its capabilities. Boats of the Strb 90H / CB90 family are actively operated by the naval forces and security forces of Sweden, Norway, the United States, Greece and other countries. In all of these states, Swedish boats are used to patrol waters, disembark landing and search and rescue operations. Judging by the appearance of the leading Russian "Raptor", he will also perform these tasks. This is supported by the preservation of the nasal amphibious assault landing and the almost complete absence of any major changes in the design of the boat.

As can be seen from the available materials, boats of the 03160 project, like their Swedish “predecessors”, have a ramp and a passage for landing on the coast in the bow. Immediately behind the aisle is the cabin with the workplaces of two crew members. Behind the cabin there is a troop compartment with places for the group being transported. When disembarking through the nasal ramp paratroopers pass through the wheelhouse. It is also possible to land through the upper and rear hatches of the landing compartment.

[Center]
Built for the Russian Navy at the JSC "Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant" Pella "the head speed boat of the 03160 project (" Raptor ") before launching into the water. Otradnoe, 15.08.2013 (c) JSC "Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant" Pella "[/ Center]

The photographs of the head "Raptor" is missing any weapons. Nevertheless, the foreign experience and mission of the boat suggests that it will be installed in the future. Its exact composition is still unknown, but it can be assumed that the boats of the 03160 project will be installed machine guns of various models, including large-caliber. As international practice shows, almost any necessary armament can be installed on such boats, even guided missiles (Norway conducted an experiment with the installation of Hellfire missiles, but these works remained at the stage of test firing).

The specific purpose of the new boat and the unit in which it will serve have not been announced at this time. However, from the camouflage applied to it, appropriate conclusions were drawn. A similar color with the characteristic "chopped" colored spots get high-speed project 12150A "Mongoose", designed for special forces of the navy. Thus, the Raptor boats in the near future may go to serve precisely in such units.

The fact that the Russian enterprise Pella has created a new boat for the domestic fleet based on the Swedish development looks quite interesting. Earlier, Russia and Sweden were not engaged in joint development or construction of military equipment, including for the fleet. At the same time, the head boat of the 03160 project is not the first light multi-purpose vessel of the Strb 90H / CB90 family to be commissioned in our country. From 2004 to 2012, the Federal Guard Service bought 11 boats like IC16MII, built by the Swedish company Dockstavarvet. The IC16MII boats are a revised version of the Strb 90H / CB90 martial designed for use by security forces and civilian organizations.

Thus, the Russian Navy in the very near future will take advantage of the best practices of foreign shipbuilders in building light multipurpose boats. Workers of the Russian shipbuilding industry, in turn, gained access to the technological part of a foreign project. Over the coming years, a new multi-purpose boat can be created on the basis of the 03160 project, which has higher performance and better capabilities than the Raptor. In the meantime, the Navy will receive a number of boats built in the framework of international cooperation.


On the materials of the sites:
http://arms-expo.ru/
http://pellaship.ru/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
http://navyrecognition.com/
Author:
Photos used:
http://www.pellaship.ru
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. awg75
    awg75 22 August 2013 08: 13 New
    +7
    tell smart people - why paint it in such an amazingly mysterious camouflage ?? !!
    1. Zhenya
      Zhenya 22 August 2013 08: 19 New
      +2
      A new fashion trend, airplanes also paint, the Chinese and armored vehicles.
    2. Bigriver
      Bigriver 22 August 2013 08: 38 New
      10
      Quote: awg75
      tell smart people - why paint it in such an amazingly mysterious camouflage ?? !!

      Based on the objectives and nature of the water area:
      "Raptor" is capable of operating in the coastal zone of seas, straits and river mouths "
      Deforming silhouette coloring on the background of the coastline.
      And here is Bora.
    3. avt
      avt 22 August 2013 09: 48 New
      +9
      Quote: awg75
      tell smart people - why paint it in such an amazingly mysterious camouflage ?? !!

      So there was an article about this "broken" camouflage, during the Second World War they began to use it at sea. good If they adapted production normally, good luck!
      Quote: kartalovkolya
      What is not enough of their developments? Or is the reason again in kickbacks?

      Quote: donavi49
      This is the best boat in the world, which is produced under license for the US Navy.

      Well, even with the sailing fleet, the Swedish skerry vessels took the Russian fleet as the basis, from good, they are not looking for good, the boat is not even IVECE, now let them break in and make it better.
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 22 August 2013 23: 03 New
        0
        Quote: avt
        So there was an article about such a "broken" camouflage, it was used during the Second World War at sea.


        Such and similar camouflage was used to "conceal" the outlines of the ship, and in addition, the "rippling in the eyes" silhouette was supposed to make it difficult for the rangefinder posts to determine the range to the target, its speed and heading. That in turn made it difficult for the enemy to aim ...
    4. Mairos
      Mairos 22 August 2013 10: 16 New
      +3
      This is called deforming color.
    5. Reasonable, 2,3
      Reasonable, 2,3 22 August 2013 11: 04 New
      -15
      Fuck without weapons, is he even needed ?.
      1. edge
        edge 22 August 2013 15: 39 New
        +3
        Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
        Fuck without weapons, is he even needed?

        there are points of strengthening, you put machine guns and buzz yourself
        1. Reasonable, 2,3
          Reasonable, 2,3 22 August 2013 16: 13 New
          -4
          that’s how it was! b .... It’s not provided for by the armament program. It is guarded to the Caspian. Not to the Pacific Fleet for sure. What the hell is goat bayan ?.
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 22 August 2013 17: 23 New
            +2
            All pograny go to the FSB FS, with the appropriate colors. The Russian Navy does not deal with these functions.

            Examples of use, offhand:
            MTR - quite.
            Mistral - quite like the Americans on the USPs.
            The patrol service is the Caspian, Cupid, quite.
            High-speed MDK - any fleet, as well as the Mistral.
    6. ed65b
      ed65b 22 August 2013 11: 07 New
      +2
      that it would be harder to make out what these things are racing for a miracle.
    7. Gladiatir-zlo
      Gladiatir-zlo 22 August 2013 21: 34 New
      0
      they were especially keen on issues of external camouflage during the First World War; if you are interested, look for some very fantastic examples of coloring warships. But then the progress of technical, rather than visual, means of detection returned the familiar format to our place. For such small vessels operating in the coastal zone, the very thing is, try to correctly take into the sight a moving vessel, if it is not clear where it has what?
    8. vjhbc
      vjhbc 22 August 2013 22: 55 New
      +1
      and another question is that already the Russian names are over
    9. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 23 August 2013 05: 13 New
      +3
      much more surprising is the name-raptor)))) why not pershing, or tomket, needles, abrams .... and many more "beautiful" names ... laughing fool
    10. Civil
      Civil 23 August 2013 06: 15 New
      0
      I wonder whose engine?
    11. kosmos44
      kosmos44 23 August 2013 06: 50 New
      +1
      Soon the descent of each kayak, we will celebrate so pompously.
  2. Zhenya
    Zhenya 22 August 2013 08: 21 New
    +4
    And on the topic, such boats should do a maximum of a month.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 09: 12 New
      +9
      Even in Sweden they are made in 4-6 months, depending on the type of equipment.
  3. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 22 August 2013 08: 31 New
    -15
    What is not enough of their developments? Or is the reason again in kickbacks?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 09: 10 New
      23
      This is the best boat in the world, which is produced under license for the US Navy (they have a lot of similar developments, but no, they bought a license in non-aligned and neutral Sweden), England, Australia, Greece and even a bunch of countries. The total circulation of more than 300 boats is only under direct licenses, but there are still variations on the topic and not licensed combat boats.

      This is the case when it is more profitable to take the proven and the best than to develop your own. Plus, the capacity is quite low, that is, our 20 boats will not corny pay for development and not the fact that they will be so cool and multifunctional.
      1. valerei
        valerei 22 August 2013 18: 53 New
        0
        donavi49, The best or not the best is still a question. You never know what and who wrote it. But the contours of the bottom of this "miracle" are one-to-one as the contours of the boat "Progress", which was produced for the population of the USSR and which everyone could buy. We had a lot of these boats on the Volga, and even now they still run in sufficient numbers. The fact is that this and other boats were produced at aircraft factories. Serious people worked there, and accordingly these products were of good quality. Maybe the Swedes have put the filling super serious, so, in appearance, nothing special.
    2. sub307
      sub307 22 August 2013 11: 52 New
      +5
      "Thus, the Russian navy in the very near future will use the best practices of foreign shipbuilders in the construction of light multipurpose boats. The workers of the Russian shipbuilding, in turn, got access to the technological part of the foreign project."
      This is the essence of the "maneuver". In general, this is a very common practice. To develop everything ourselves - and more expensive and longer. On China, "admire", what have they not "stole" yet?
    3. dustycat
      dustycat 22 August 2013 15: 32 New
      +1
      Quote: kartalovkolya
      What is not enough of their developments? Or is the reason again in kickbacks?

      Typical statement of design specifications ...
      A high rank in stripes comes, reaches into the picture and says:
      - WANT IT SUCH! IS THE PROBLEM CLEAR? ANY QUESTIONS?
      - NO NO!
      - Work ...
      1. ildar335
        ildar335 22 August 2013 18: 40 New
        0
        directly reminded the battalion commander)))))
    4. Reasonable, 2,3
      Reasonable, 2,3 22 August 2013 18: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
      Fuck without weapons, is he even needed ?.

      He is without a barrel (large, not needed) With Kalash go? .- no!. Large caliber, at least. Support the landing.
  4. Paul
    Paul 22 August 2013 08: 51 New
    +8
    the principle is right, why reinvent the wheel, nobody will just give technology, but through joint ventures, please, it’s stupid not to use
  5. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 22 August 2013 09: 07 New
    +8
    Handsome boat !! In the Far East, there would be more of such poachers to drive well and guard the border by itself !!
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 09: 16 New
      +7
      No, the FSB FS is engaged in poachers, they have their own Fireflies, Mongooses, Sables, they sent the second Purga to the Far East, and next year there will be the head PSKR 22460.

      These are light boats. By the way, the niche in our fleet is not completely clear. In the world they use:
      - The Swedes are like a patrol ship, a small landing ship, a snorkel-and-mine-layer, there are even variants with anti-ship missiles, but this is mobilization.
      - The United States uses both a coastal and river patrol ship, as well as a support boat for coastal operations, for this it is loaded into USPs. Separately, it was precisely on these Bots that they developed the tactics of controlling river water areas in the conditions of counter-guerrilla warfare.

      In other words, it is a fast patrol-landing (about 20 people) boat, with not very good seaworthiness.
      1. avt
        avt 22 August 2013 09: 52 New
        +1
        Quote: donavi49
        These are light boats. By the way, the niche in our fleet is not completely clear.

        request But how many rivers and lakes do we have? You will not drive a corvette there. What a pity the swamp will not work laughing here is a field for improving the basic design, they will decide - then it can also be put into orbit. laughing
      2. Kapitänleutnant
        Kapitänleutnant 24 August 2013 21: 58 New
        +1
        hell knows when on the Far East there will be ships of project 22460
    2. Val_y
      Val_y 22 August 2013 14: 51 New
      +1
      Yes, and on the Azov and the Caspian, otherwise the poachers all exterminated the bastards. In Azov, out of 21 varieties of commercial fish for 20-25 years, 4 remained, of which bulls, pelengas, sprats and still forgot.
  6. mirag2
    mirag2 22 August 2013 09: 31 New
    +2
    It’s a good boat. It’s very good that it’s at the world level. No worse! Let it be a license.
    And then they would have released a galosh, and then wrote that in 88, these boats tore all the Americans.
    Let there be licenses — but modern with management and navigation at the level, instead of articles and videos about the glorious past — and management by stars.
  7. Iraclius
    Iraclius 22 August 2013 09: 46 New
    +2
    Survived. Is the country unable to build its own boats? I won’t believe it for anything. Armored boats and gunboats in the USSR, too, jointly built? The same legendary small river armored boats of the 1125 project. Or more modern art.cat. pr.1204.

    Creatively rethink, rearm, change the displacement, and the same Sweden will strangle itself with envy. Russia has a wealth of shipbuilding experience, and now we cannot even assemble such vessels ourselves - the help of the Swedes is needed. negative Again, someone's pocket is stuffing, bljad.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 10: 33 New
      10
      Well, this is a completely different steppe! You have an armored river monitor. Moreover, it is rather unsuccessful (the tower from the PT-76 does not provide the necessary accuracy even at an average distance, because the excitement is not countered). We do not have a modern analogue, but there is Buyan with stabilized A-190 and Grad, for the Caspian and the Volga.

      This is a fundamentally different boat, oriented to speed, delivery of airborne cargo. In the combat boat variants, these are machine guns-20mm guns - in this embodiment, the boat is intended for patrolling inland water areas in the context of counteracting irregularities (roughly the 4-5 group is partisan with AK). Your armored vehicle is again not suitable for these tasks. For large guns are not particularly needed here, speed and landing loses. The essence of this armored boat is to act on the water arteries in conditions of war with the army. The essence of the Raptor and the Swedes is the patrol in areas with irregulars and rebels with light weapons and the transportation of landing / inspection groups.

      Boats are fundamentally different, to create from one, the other will not work. Develop your own from scratch, in principle, you can. But, the total number is unlikely to pass through 20 pieces. In other words, it will not be the intended use of money, because development will cost more than the entire series.

      And yes, I repeat, the USA, Britain and Australia, Greece and other countries are also stuffing their pockets when ordering boats in NEUTRAL AND NON-BLOCK Sweden and buying licenses?
      1. Iraclius
        Iraclius 22 August 2013 11: 19 New
        0
        In principle, I do not care where weapons are purchased in Western countries. My opinion is that Russia itself must master and produce, and not buy. I gave examples of old ships only to show experience in the construction of small displacement ships.
    2. Grifan
      Grifan 22 August 2013 10: 39 New
      +8
      On August 15, OJSC Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant Pella (Otradnoye, Leningrad Region) launched


      Chukchi is not a reader? smile
    3. IT
      IT 29 August 2013 10: 32 New
      0
      Why not? so they built it! In Otradnoe!
      And there were no analogues in the USSR of such a boat. And you imagine how much time and money it would be from scratch to develop something like that? The point is, if made on the basis of the finished and easier, and cheaper and faster?
  8. denson06
    denson06 22 August 2013 09: 49 New
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Handsome boat !! In the Far East, there would be more of such poachers to drive well and guard the border by itself !!

    It’s also true, MIKHAN .. poachers from what countries do not catch our fish because of caviar .. and our guys all catch them on old motor boats ..
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Terrible ensign
    Terrible ensign 22 August 2013 09: 58 New
    +4
    Nice boat. Since they plan to use it in a rather specific area of ​​special operations and the party is planned to be small, then, indeed, why spend money on R&D - it's easier to buy a license and rivet. (Together with the license, we get advanced technologies, we tighten up our production, jobs again, ... and then, after the license expires, we clone in the quantities necessary for the country's law enforcement agencies - "China's example is science to us" - after all, everything that serves to strengthen the defense capability of the Motherland is good for definition.)
  11. Paul
    Paul 22 August 2013 10: 16 New
    +2
    camouflage is right: a blurry silhouette merges with the background of the coast - a simple and cheap way from optical reconnaissance

    read Pikul (Cruiser), he has a good marine theme, a comparison of the colors of the Russian and English fleets
  12. Ivan_Ivanov
    Ivan_Ivanov 22 August 2013 10: 26 New
    +1
    The music in the video just killed.

    What kind of clowning ???
  13. ed65b
    ed65b 22 August 2013 11: 08 New
    +1
    We need to adopt all the best over the hill and apply with us. I think that this is a normal state of affairs.
  14. krot00f
    krot00f 22 August 2013 11: 50 New
    0
    It is good that such boats have appeared, they will save on fuel, and the resource of larger ships, By design, Doubt causes landing through the wheelhouse, I do not believe that they shared the technology with us somewhere trick, the slag was drained, And it is written that the "revised version".
  15. NOBODY EXCEPT US
    NOBODY EXCEPT US 22 August 2013 11: 58 New
    +5
    The only question ..... why is the Raptor ??? Why not Bold, Fast or something else in Russian .... why the Raptor ??? Or do the Swedes put this as the terms of the license?
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 22 August 2013 13: 22 New
      +3
      Quote: NOBODY BUT US
      The only question ..... why is the Raptor ??? Why not Bold, Fast or something else in Russian .... why the Raptor ??? Or do the Swedes put this as the terms of the license?

      Well, at least not the Penitrator - and thanks, then. This is all from a lack of imagination and not outdated complexes — imported — means the best.
    2. Was mammoth
      Was mammoth 22 August 2013 21: 16 New
      0
      Interesting too. Who comes up with the names? Constructors who? belay
      1. IT
        IT 29 August 2013 10: 39 New
        0
        Designers are usually the last people to come up with a name. For designers, the boat is called "project 03160"
    3. IT
      IT 29 August 2013 10: 37 New
      0
      And bold and quick were already there. What is a bad word? It causes the corresponding associations - a fast predator.
  16. slaventi
    slaventi 22 August 2013 11: 58 New
    +2
    An excellent boat, although a Swedish project, the main thing is that we have built.
  17. High speed
    High speed 22 August 2013 12: 00 New
    +3
    I recall that a man comes up to me at the Marine Salon and says: you and I are partners in misfortune!
    - And what is it?
    - Yes, we are also building a tug on Pella!

    Sorry boat ...
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 22 August 2013 13: 19 New
      +1
      And what is wrong with your tugboat?
    2. Val_y
      Val_y 22 August 2013 14: 55 New
      +1
      But why, what the fuck are they building or for a long time ??
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 22 August 2013 15: 24 New
        +3
        Pella? No, on the contrary, they break off any contractors that pull eggs in tow on the 3-4 of the year. The pace is shocking, the prices are optimal (lower than others) - these are the others that spit saliva.

        Ah, Pella is a private company that does not go into corporations and the state has no influence on the company. It is believed that it is better not to give orders to such companies on especially closed topics. However, the GUGI ordered them a new vessel based on a tugboat.
  18. Evgeniy667b
    Evgeniy667b 22 August 2013 12: 33 New
    +1
    Hydrodynamics of the boat at a high level. The composition of weapons is also not a question, it can be different. There is not enough submarine to build, even if there are more such boats. And the color? Yes, let it be at least whatever, if only to carry out its tasks.
  19. USNik
    USNik 22 August 2013 12: 50 New
    +3
    A normal boat, under Serdyukov they would have bought some fiberglass walking crap at all. Only the article does not indicate who the manufacturer of the power plant? Swedish or ours, or Swedish but assembled with us?
    1. Val_y
      Val_y 22 August 2013 15: 06 New
      +1
      In the course of Swedish, we don’t have such compact ones, there are very reliable ones (for example 7D12 or 71N12 silt B2, dry weight without foundation and gearbox is 1,6-2,2 tons), but there are no compact ones. Penta, with the same power to carry 500 kg. But on reliability, and most importantly on maintainability, to our peers. Therefore, for the fleet, B2 may still be
    2. IT
      IT 29 August 2013 10: 42 New
      0
      Yes, our unfortunately do not do competitive power plants. Judging by the power, it could be Caterpillar or MTU. We don’t have water cannons at all.
  20. Massik
    Massik 22 August 2013 13: 20 New
    0
    Well, if only the whole army was not transferred to the struggle with 4-5 guerrillas, the tendency however, I would like to know about the reservation, if it holds at least 12,7 then this is not a bad vessel ...
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 15: 28 New
      +2
      This is not an armored boat, it does not hold 5,45. There is a different concept - they quickly came in the war, landed SpN-saboteurs, left. In the patrol, partisans noticed, crushed by fire, landed a group for mopping up and pursuing.
  21. coserg 2012
    coserg 2012 22 August 2013 13: 37 New
    0
    That's how we will slip until very small shipyards begin to produce such products. A large ship, like a large shipyard, a large voyage. Maybe shipbuilding enterprises like ships, should it be divided by rank?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 15: 31 New
      +3
      Pella is a small Shipyard, which builds ships up to 1,5 tons and those only in the form of port support tankers (Pecha and Umba for the Russian Navy, both will surrender to the Northern Fleet this year). Otherwise, tugboats, boats like the Cormorant for the FSB and Navy, various small rescue supplies. Mostly products up to 800 tons.
  22. rugor
    rugor 22 August 2013 16: 07 New
    +1
    Why Raptor? No Russian name found? "Predator" for example.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 22 August 2013 16: 08 New
      +4
      Quote: rugor
      Why Raptor? No Russian name found?

      Yes, we are mocking the USA laughing
  23. Hitrovan07
    Hitrovan07 22 August 2013 16: 08 New
    +1
    OJSC “Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant“ Pella ”” is building a lot, there was recently a list of ships for the Navy on the site - so this plant flickers very often in the descriptions - it seems that they are building quickly - well done.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 22 August 2013 17: 30 New
      +7
      Only this year 11 tugboats are being handed over, plus a ship for the GUGI is being built, plus a full-fledged sea tug with unlimited seaworthiness. PS-45 has been laid, plus 2 port supplies of Pech and Umba (2 in and out with full tanks), plus pilot and crew boats for commercial customer, the FSB and the Navy. Over the past few years, more than 40 ship ships have been delivered wink . At the same time, capacities are very limited.

      Here is a story about Pella, mainly for development, they are building a new shipyard.
  24. Nayhas
    Nayhas 22 August 2013 16: 45 New
    +3
    "Thus, the Russian navy will soon take advantage of the best practices of foreign shipbuilders in the construction of light multipurpose boats."
    Let’s take a breath, everything seems to be wonderful. But. What is so superexclusive in such a boat? Contours? It is doubtful that all variants of contours were cross-checked many years ago. Ship set? It is also doubtful, you can’t think of anything new and there’s no point. Internal organization? C'mon, this can also be copied from photographs. It remains:
    1. Case material, use instead of aluminum composite materials. To adopt this for yourself, you need to know how and what to do, you need the same machines and raw materials. I am 100% sure that the Swedes did not transfer production technology and equipment, but supply finished products.
    2. The engine. Ours could not in a short time develop a new marine engine under 2 thousand hp. it’s suitable in size for this boat, so the engine and gearbox are probably supplied by the Swedes, I don’t believe in the possibility of building the Swedes plant in our engine.
    So what will domestic shipbuilding draw for itself by releasing this boat? Nothing, this is a typical screwdriver assembly. Just nothing gave our car industry screwdriver production of foreign cars.
  25. syntanjey
    syntanjey 22 August 2013 21: 20 New
    0
    I wonder what are the water cannons on our version?
    English? Or maybe ours are fussing?
    Rolls-Royce Kamewa FF. Used water cannons have an interesting feature: they are able to work even when the channel is not filled with water. This allows the boat to perform complex maneuvers with a large roll.
  26. mujahideen
    mujahideen 22 August 2013 23: 48 New
    +1
    Please tell me what kind of a Russian boat should have been called the obscene name "Raptor" (and even in the Russian transcription of this exclusively English word). What, names like "Swift", "Perfect", "Smashing", etc. have already come out of those that were called our ships of similar construction before?
  27. romaskadarv
    romaskadarv 23 August 2013 02: 16 New
    0
    It is high time to adopt the experience of China ... The best examples of technology "to the masses"!
  28. Letnab
    Letnab 23 August 2013 04: 19 New
    0
    It’s time to adopt the experience of other countries in some issues.
    And for discussion, such a feeling of many people cares only about one question, about the name ...
  29. xomaNN
    xomaNN 23 August 2013 13: 23 New
    0
    Taking into account the fact that all design bureaus of the ship industry are loaded with "serious" ships, the Swedish license option is very good. Moreover, in the course of construction, local personnel will learn something.
  30. jjj
    jjj 24 August 2013 22: 08 New
    0
    Look at the hull lines. This is a typical river, with planing, but without redan. Of course he can give 50 knots. But only by being unloaded. At full load, going on planing is problematic. Body material - light alloys. When hit by an incendiary projectile, it will burn out in 20 minutes. Completely. The crew will be able to jump out. But "it will be difficult for passengers. It is problematic to use on the seas - seaworthiness is about 3-4 points. But the hull, 17 meters long and a flat bottom, with any slight waves will force you to go at a speed of about 10-15 knots, otherwise there will be significant loads on the set hulls made of light alloys. Low speed is already a "displacement" mode with all its charms with flat-bottomed contours. Use on rivers? Do we have river flotillas? Even on the Amur, the former Amur flotilla became part of the 12th brigade of the FSB.
    Yes, and some kind of ugly this "columbine".
    Thank God marines of the border troops order other boats
  31. Karius
    Karius 28 August 2013 16: 15 New
    0
    here. Well, maybe they, like themselves, took advantage of the experience of others.
    the beginning is good, then I hope it will only get better.
  32. IT
    IT 29 August 2013 10: 53 New
    0
    Already experienced
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_9iDZ9b0AU&feature=em-uploademail
  33. Dendinavi
    Dendinavi 12 September 2013 17: 51 New
    0
    Another video with this boat.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bF-dPc8F8Q