Ready next Su-34

August 15, 2013 at the airport of the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant named after V.P. Chkalov (NAZ, a branch of JSC "Company" Sukhoi ") held a celebration in honor of Air Day fleet. The central moment of the holiday was the demonstration flights of two regular Su-34 front-line bombers built by the enterprise. One of them already carried the full color scheme of the Russian Air Force, standard for these vehicles of the last issue, and had tail number “31 red”, and the second was still unpainted and had no tail number.

The two 15 August planes demonstrated in Novosibirsk are next, built under the State Contract No. 319 / 3 / 1-ЕОЗ from 10 November 2008 worth 33,6 billion rubles for the supply of Su-32 bombers to the Russian Ministry of Defense. Under this contract, four Su-34 aircraft were built in Novosibirsk and transferred to the Russian Air Force in 34, six in 2010, ten in 2011, and four earlier in May and July 2012 (vehicles with red tail numbers) 2013 "," 28 "," 29 and "30"). Thus, the aircraft shown on 34 August became the 15 and 25 machines built under the 26 contract of the year, and the 2008 and 38 aircraft Su-39 in general, taking into account all flight prototypes. In total, in the 34, the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant must manufacture and hand over the final 2013 machines under contract to the Russian Air Force 12 of the Year.In addition, in 2008, the Sukhoi Company signed a contract with the Russian Ministry of Defense to supply Su-2010 92 aircraft.

Two new Su-34 front-line bomber built at the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant. In front of the plane in the coloring of the Russian Air Force (tail number "31 red"), followed by an unpainted plane. Novosibirsk, 15.08.2013 (c) Ilnar Salakhiev / www.mycity-military.com

A new not yet painted front-line bomber Su-34, built at the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant. Novosibirsk, 15.08.2013 (c) Ilnar Salakhiev / www.mycity-military.com

Comments

[silver_roman]

beautiful birds.
just do not quite understand how many of them will (should be) in total?

[klimpopov]

How many will build, all of ours!)
Cool plane! Still pictures of "painted".

[Ruslan_F38]

Super news, super pictures +++++.

[Lord of the Sith]

In early 2012, the Russian Ministry of Defense entered into a supply contract with Sukhoi 92 Su-34 until 2020, in addition to the already concluded contract for 32 machines. In 2013, the expectedabandonment 12 Su-34.

[Su24]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

In early 2012, the Russian Ministry of Defense entered into a supply contract with Sukhoi 92 Su-34 until 2020, in addition to the already concluded contract for 32 machines. In 2013, the expectedabandonment 12 Su-34.

12 pieces under a contract from 2008 for 32 cars, and 2 aircraft under last year’s contract.

[sergey72]

Catch, do not mind ...

[viruskvartirus]

Elegant device is very photogenic ...

[Apollo]

Quote: klimpopov

Still pictures of "painted".

Su-34 board number 23 red, 2013



Su-34 board number 10 red, 2013

[klimpopov]

Well, I like the new color.

[Apollo]

Quote: klimpopov

Well, I like the new color.

me, too, this is called the latest fashion
Good afternoon Klim

[malikszh]

why does the word separate red ?? So is there still blue or white?

[Search robot]

Quote: malikszh

why does the word separate red ?? So is there still blue or white?

Look at the number of the aircraft.
Color indicates belonging to a specific air base.
There are 5 of them: red, white, yellow, blue, black.

[Bronis]

124 pcs. ordered (about 10 squadrons). The numbers of bringing to 140 pcs were announced.

[silver_roman]

well, it seemed like 98 was said first. Then it was decided to increase it in order to replace all the su-24s. 24 at one time, they will probably be converted into scouts or something else, and part will be written off.

[patline]

What a beautiful airplane. As much as I watch, I admire so much. And the filling is cool.

[Bronis]

Quote: silver_roman

24 at one time will probably be converted into scouts or something else, and part will be written off.

Write off, soon, will have all the Su-24. No one has yet canceled the resource. And it’s very emergency (the most emergency in our Air Force). For 10 years about 15 boards lost.

[Su24]

Quote: silver_roman

beautiful birds.
just do not quite understand how many of them will (should be) in total?

124 under two existing contracts. And if you recall yesterday's news about the order of 184 state recognition complexes for them by 2020, then apparently even more. This year the contract for 32 cars from 2008 will be closed, by the way.

[Bronis]

Quote: Su24

124 under two existing contracts. And if you recall yesterday's news about the order of 184 state recognition systems for them by the 2020 year, then apparently even more.

Not a fact, unfortunately. You need to have a bit of stock.
However, now the order of fighters is more interesting.

[viruskvartirus]

Sukhoi bought 184 state recognition systems for Su-34
http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/19/su34/

[Grisha]

The bigger, the better!

[DRUG DRUG]

By the end of 2013, a total of 45 pieces will be manufactured. and under the new contract another 92 pcs. So there will be a total of 137 pcs. This is a force.

[Suhov]

If planes waved their wings, can you imagine how much faster they would fly?

[tilovaykrisa]

More planes, more.

[eplewke]

Beautiful bird, powerful attack aircraft! The load capacity is good, the aerodynamics are excellent for a tourmovik, 30mm. the gun generally complements the theater. Generally a big fat plus !!!!

[Wedmak]

This is not an attack aircraft. This is a front-line bomber. The Su-25 is working as an attack aircraft.

[Constantine]

Fine! Just great!

[Diviz]

peregrine falcon in a leather robe ...

[Apollo]

quote - August 15, 2013 at the airfield of the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant named after V.P. Chkalov (NAZ, a branch of JSC "Sukhoi Company"), a holiday in honor of the Air Fleet Day was held.

[eplewke]

oh handsome ... Assad would have such a squadron, the war would have ended in a month ...

[Wedmak]

It’s like a microscope cracking nuts. Assad would be a Su-25 with high-precision weapons (yes, I know that they themselves don’t even have it) - the very thing is to dig out a terragyug from a hole.

[Ezhaak]

Quote: Wedmak

hatch out of the terrorug

Good. when bandits are in the open. What to do when they, creatures, hide behind the backs of women and children, like real warriors?

[Wedmak]

Alas, the Air Force is powerless here. Here it is necessary to connect a company of snipers to work.

[ivansaxonov]

Quote: silver_roman

beautiful birds.
just do not quite understand how many of them will (should be) in total?

32 + 92 = 124 This is only under existing contracts ... I think there will be more :)

[Bronis]

Quote: ivansaxonov

32 + 92 = 124 This is only under existing contracts ... I think there will be more :)

If you consider how many Su-24 are there, then when replacing 1x1, a maximum of pcs. 140-150.

[Mercenary]

it will not be enough.

[USNik]

Quote: Mercenary

it will not be enough.

124 is not the final figure, plus do not forget more than 200 su-24 different modifications, they can do a lot of the same thing. Plus, sworn friends do not have this type of aircraft at all, you can forget about the decommissioned Fe-111s ...

[viktorR]

They have a strike of needles - not a bad unit, no worse than thirty-four

[Prishtina]

Quote: USNik

Quote: Mercenary

it will not be enough.

124 is not the final figure, plus do not forget more than 200 su-24 different modifications, they can do a lot of the same thing. Plus, sworn friends do not have this type of aircraft at all, you can forget about the decommissioned Fe-111s ...

this is not out of stupidity or naivety .. but because our "sworn friends", all (almost all) front-line fighters are station wagons equally capable of working on 3 environments. Electronic warfare is carried out by modifications of their aircraft or by elementary suspended containers. Armor (like that of the 34th) is a very controversial element for this type of aircraft. From my point of view, it would be much more interesting to replace the SU-24 with the SU-30SM in a 1 to 1 ratio.
"Work on the ground," - announced the project PAK SHA_ waiting. One of the main advantages of the attack aircraft will be a combat radius of ~ 1000 km .. Which brings it to approximately the same radius as the MiG-35. + armor, + new avionics, + possibly airborne radar for work by air at small, medium distances.
And SU-34 ... from the opera
1) support the pants Chkalovtsev
2) the development of the SU-24 resource leaves no choice .. it is necessary to change the faster the better.

[guran]

Su-34 is essentially a mini-strategist. Taking off from Kamchatka, it will cover the west coast of the USA like a rabbit bison.
I’m not talking about Europe. Fifty 34's will smash the European theater into trash and horror, from Budapest to the English Channel.

[guran]

retired negodue)))
and cho indignation, huh?

[Bashkaus]

Su-34 is essentially a mini-strategist. Taking off from Kamchatka, it will cover the west coast of the USA like a rabbit bison.
I’m not talking about Europe. Fifty 34's will smash the European theater into trash and horror, from Budapest to the English Channel.
There is some truth in your words, theoretically, the plane has everything you need to make an intercontinental flight (with an additional adjustment, of course), and indeed, if you really want, you can deal a serious blow to these birds on the west coast of the United States. But there is a small, or rather large BUT:
1-The aircraft has everything necessary for a long flight, but the main task of all these amenities is primarily mobility, and the ability to transfer an aviation regiment to a theater of operations in a matter of hours, but not intercontinental flights.
This function can be used only in the most critical case of hopelessness and the absence of other means of delivering a strategic strike.
In addition, I myself can hardly imagine how such an air ticket should look like.
Single planes in escorting the doser are nonsense (there will not be enough dough for kerasin), and a group flight of several dozen pieces, so forgive us so much, and even if there were, it is easier to find a "steel cloud" flying from the ocean side than a steamed turnip ... And we have forgotten about the pilots, they fly there about 5 hours, bombing and back, all the same, not the ergonomics conditions that strategists have. So let everyone do their own thing, the front-line soldiers at the front, and the strategists deep in the rear)))

[guran]

If the air regiment is based on Kamchatka, then what is the transfer? One last and decisive flight and all.
Europe. What are the intercontinental flights? Almost the entire territory is within 30 minutes of arrival.
And if he let go of the rocket, then you can forget about Europe.

[Wedmak]

And if he let go of the rocket, then you can forget about Europe.

You can’t take a lot of missiles either. This was shown on the model by 3 anti-ship missiles (or missile defense systems, now this is not essential), actually two. Moreover, the plane with them will be like a pregnant hippo. So Bashkaus is right, everyone should do his own thing. Another question is if there will be some kind of modification for a distant bomber.

[Prishtina]

refueling system and a similar assortment of ASPs, I make a mini-strategist of any MFI generation 4+

[Bronis]

Quote: guran

Su-34 is essentially a mini-strategist. Taking off from Kamchatka, it will cover the west coast of the USA like a rabbit bison.
I’m not talking about Europe. Fifty 34's will smash the European theater into trash and horror, from Budapest to the English Channel.

That's what, but he is not a "mini-strategist". The Tu-22M was once "a bit of a strategist" within Europe. But that's what the nomenclature of weapons is for, for a missile carrier. The Su-34 is a front-line bomber with a longer range than the Su-24, but not a strategist. The nomenclature of weapons is not the same, and the range, as you understand, is also different.
50 cars will be able to "smash", say, one city. Well, a lot more is needed in the European theater of operations ... And in the current situation, they will not survive in a hypothetical conflict (I repeat - the nomenclature of weapons will not allow operating outside the enemy's air defense zone). And they should not be the nightmare of Europe, because the role is not of theirs, but of the "classic" long-range vehicles with the Kh-55 / 101/102.
Although the French also proudly called their "Mirage" "strategic", but this is just to preserve national pride. And here PAK YES is foreseen - he and laurels ...

[Mikhail3]

Japan. And China, of course ... SGA needs completely different means, we also have them, of course.

[Wedmak]

"Work for the earth", - announced the project PAK SHA_ waiting.

Where, when, who voiced? More?

[Su24]

Quote: Prishtina

From my point of view, it would be much more interesting to replace the SU-24 with the SU-30SM in a 1 to 1 ratio.

Su-30s are already being purchased from us, and this is more likely an analogue of the MiG-27, IS. The Su-34 has its own niche.

[Prishtina]

what niche? decrypt?

[Wedmak]

what niche? decrypt?

Front-line bomber. Honed to work on the ground. With appropriate weapons. Imprisoned for striking in the depths of the enemy’s defense against important targets.

[Avenger711]

Universal aircraft do not exist, the F-15E is so-so strike and at the same time heavier than fighter options.

[Oskar]

A real flying cruiser of shaving attacks and the world's strongest front-line bomber, chained in titanium armor. Real Russian Knight. His prototype took off from the earth in April 1990, when in Russia everyone was already raving about Yeltsin. After the collapse of the Union, it was planned that they would begin to test it in 1996. But the EBN regime didn’t have you understand, of money. But there was money to keep in power in the same 1996, they easily threw billions into the election propaganda for pop monkeys and television dealers. Under the contracts valid until 2020, 124 aircraft of this type should be issued. The fate of the aircraft, as well as all the weapons created during that period, is difficult.

[Voskepar]

We ordered for the SU-34 184 friend or foe system.
With a margin coming out?

[Hort]

see they were making noise over the city that week :) The tests were held

[Prishtina]

Again, as for me, it’s better to remove the armor ... thus increasing the radius or load. And the aircraft itself will be more squat. Thrust in normal m ~ 0,71 leaves no chance for this sort of fighter-bomber in an air battle. No matter what the manufacturers say. Thrust SU-30SM ~ 1,0 at normal.

[Evgeniy46]

only this "like a fighter-bomber" carries a good set of explosive missiles - R-73, R-27, R-77. No wonder its old designation for export as Su-32FN (Fighter Navy - naval fighter)

[leon-iv]

If they will use something other than brides, the entire Air Force leadership must be under the tribunal.
And so IMHO Great front-line bomber.

[Prishtina]

look at his capabilities radar ... he is not a tenant. on 3 sq.m 100-120km
the same Europeans have 1-2 meters ..

[Wedmak]

the same Europeans have 1-2 meters ..

Which specifically, let me ask?

[tungus]

Quote: Prishtina

Thrust in normal m ~ 0,71 leaves no chance for this sort of fighter-bomber in an air battle.

True? You tell this to the Americans. Their F-35A has a thrust-weight ratio of 0,74. And F-35C -0,7.
However, the Americans are not shy about presenting this device with a fifth-generation fighter-bomber.
Su-34 is a replacement for Su-24, i.e. essentially a front-line bomber. Impact machine sharpened for work on the ground. The machine is able to fend for itself in aerial combat, but this is still not its profile. But you do not expect, for example, an attack aircraft victories in maneuvering aerial combat over fighters? so why are you waiting for these victories from the bomber?

[Prishtina]

Yes .. I wanted on their Fu-35 ... they have much more serious machines, albeit earlier ... and they are just much better than the Fu-35 in terms of flight characteristics and as pure "hawks". Where did you see that I put a fu-35 as an apponent?

[Prishtina]

Answer the simple question: what can the Su-34 and what cannot the Su-30SM? and vice versa?
I do not compare with us .. I compare Russian options and see that there is a more interesting and universal option.

[Wedmak]

Well, let's open the wiki we all love.
Sioux 30SM
Designed to control group combat actions of fighters in solving the problems of gaining air supremacy, ensuring combat operations of other branches of aviation, covering ground troops and objects, destroying airborne assault forces, as well as for conducting air reconnaissance and destruction of ground or surface targets.
Su-34
It was intended, first of all, to destroy ground and surface targets, including small and mobile ones, both in tactical and operational depths of the enemy, in any weather and climate conditions, day and night.

I hope you saw the difference?

[Su24]

Quote: Prishtina

Again, as for me, it’s better to remove the armor ... thus increasing the radius or load. And the aircraft itself will be more squat. Thrust in normal m ~ 0,71 leaves no chance for this sort of fighter-bomber in an air battle. No matter what the manufacturers say. Thrust SU-30SM ~ 1,0 at normal.

But his armor is not tank, there will be no fundamental change in mass if it is removed.

[Prishtina]

Well, 3 tons in aviation .. it does not spit 2 meters from the balcony. take an interest in specialized forums .. how to fight for each kilogram in weight LA

[evil hamster]

OH and with armor perfectly without straining takes off with full refueling while it can carry 10500 loads if it is necessary.

[Suhov]

Quote: Prishtina

as for me, it’s better to remove the armor ...

as well as weapons
and you get a dove of peace ...

[evil hamster]

1.

Quote: Prishtina

like a fighter-bomber

the pichalka is that the Su 34 is like a front-line bomber and this is like different things.
2.

Quote: Prishtina

Thrust in normal m ~ 0,71 leaves no chance

Quote: Prishtina

Thrust SU-30SM ~ 1,0 at normal

Everything is wonderful, only suddenly the normal take-off Su30SM / MKI - 24900, which, as it were, hints to us that there are 6 tons of weapons and fuel aboard - air load P73 steam air and 4 pieces P27 or P77 and that’s all !!! But the normal take-off Su-34 is 38200, which, as it hints at 16 tons of weapons and fuel on the brtu. If Che maxed Su 30CM / MKI - 34500, and Su34 - 45000

[Mikhail Topor]

Quote: Prishtina

Again, as for me, it’s better to remove the armor ...

from the song "Swifts Have Arrived" (about Su-25 pilots, I highly recommend who have not seen it yet. Easily searched on you-pipe)
"... I'm like a mouse in a tin can, according to which MO-LOT-COM !!!!"

I don’t think that the pilot with such ease will refuse the armor in favor of range, maneuverability or anything ... he is sitting there in the cockpit, they are shooting at him from all types of weapons, armor is not superfluous in his situation.

[awg75]

just a magnificent plane - both in terms of characteristics and beauty !!! GLORY TO RUSSIA!!!

[ivshubarin]

In the primer, the first for ab Shagol or again in Baltimore

[ivshubarin]

I asked a question, but instead of answering you are cons

[Su24]

In fact, I did not understand why you set the cons)))

[sir.jonn]

Quote: Su24

In fact, I did not understand why you set the cons))

Many forum users poke pluses and minuses as children.
We neutralize another's stupidity Ivan. + !!!

[HAM]

Guys, who knows, explain what the coloring of numbers "red", "blue", etc. means.

[Wedmak]

Belonging to the air base / part.

[HAM]

Thanks, got it.

[individual]

Yes, everything is simple.
To distinguish between teams in a tank biathlon.

[Wedmak]

To distinguish between teams in a tank biathlon.

Well, yes ... by the way, something about air darts is not heard. Do not take root?

[V. Tarasyan]

This is so that multi-digit side numbers do not enter.

[guran]

There is also the Su-25, "armored outlaws," also with good potential. No wonder the Ulan-Ude aircraft plant resumed their production. Inexpensive, effective attack aircraft.

[leon-iv]

he’s right

[Wedmak]

Call a bomber armed to the teeth with a little face ... I think it can only in our country.

[leon-iv]

But this video reminded me

[mirag2]

And does anyone know what the new project is with a triangular wing?

[Vtel]

It turned out to be a good fighting duckling - as they say, chickens are considered in the fall, and autumn is on the nose.

[engineer74]

The news is positive!
But our craving for window dressing is inextinguishable, well, why the heck it was to roll out the unpainted board! ??

[Corsair]

Quote: engineer74

But our craving for window dressing is inextinguishable, well, why the heck it was to roll out the unpainted board! ??

In "paint" or without, but they are already there and still will be !!!

[denson06]

You can order as many as you like, friends .. every year .. the question is when will they be built .. the question is still in production capacities .. Tolerant, everything will be fine!

[andru_007]

Quote: Apollon

Quote: klimpopov

Still pictures of "painted".

Su-34 board number 23 red, 2013



Su-34 board number 10 red, 2013

cool coloring !!!

[Prishtina]

Well then .. minuses poked .. and not one sane argument against, did not hear. If I'm wrong about something .. argue ?! If there are no arguments, but my opinion on the Su-34 is not in the trend, and in response only the minuses are flying_ so I was right

[Wedmak]

And you were asked what kind of PAK SHA is silent ...

The armor (as in the 34th) is a very controversial element for this type of aircraft.

And they answered you kind of ... and you did not give arguments in favor of the controversy of the armor.

From my point of view, it would be much more interesting to replace the SU-24 with the SU-30SM in a 1 to 1 ratio.

What is more interesting? Su-30SM is not a bomber, it is primarily a fighter. Why replace a car of one type with another?

[Prishtina]

PAK SHA ..- perspective aviation complex of attack aircraft We are more interested .. there will be no questions.
The second time I ask .. what can the Su-34 which cannot the Su-30SM ???! when you find the answer let me know

[PLO]

The second time I ask .. what can the Su-34 which cannot the Su-30SM ???! when you find the answer let me know

it can carry one and a half times more payload over a greater distance.

[Wedmak]

The second time I answer, since you do not see the difference. Su-30SM - work mainly by air, Su-34 - work mainly by land!

[Refund_SSSR]

Quote: Prishtina

The second time I ask .. what can the Su-34 which cannot the Su-30SM ???! when you find the answer let me know

Why do you think the Su-34 has such a strange "nose" shape ??? O_o
Hint: The answer is somewhere in this direction ...

[darksoul]

Two more ducklings, .... class

[1c-inform-city]

As far as I heard, the Su-30s are going to be used as a replacement for naval 24oks. It seems like it is better sharpened for anti-ship weapons. If anyone can confirm this, I will be grateful.

[Prishtina]

Su-30 are going to use as a replacement for naval 24ok.

to the point .. exactly. because the uniqueness of 34 matches lies in only one thing - the maintenance of the pants of the Chkalovites. Absolutely the same tasks as the 34th will be solved by 30 and 35, and even more so T-50.

[Wedmak]

Absolutely the same tasks as the 34th will be solved by 30 and 35, and even more so T-50.

Not true.

[NURLAT]

More is needed!

[novobranets]

Beauty plus power, impressive to a puppy's delight.

[armandos]

Yes, great bird. And remember there was still such a SU-47 Golden Eagle. The same handsome, but there seemed to be problems with the wings, but the pilots say that it was very maneuverable.

[sir.jonn]

Quote: pav-pon1972

Yes, great bird. And remember there was still such a SU-47 Golden Eagle. The same handsome, but there seemed to be problems with the wings, but the pilots say that it was very maneuverable.

How do you forget? Such a beauty. But the goal of the work so far cannot be unambiguously assessed, according to some experts and PR analysts. According to the rest, the development of structural elements of the 5th generation fighter.
In my opinion, both are combined. And also so that time and money, or not to spend, or vice versa? In short, everything is not clear.

[voliador]

More new equipment in the troops!

[pav-pon1972]

What, say ... Just Handsome !!!

[erased]

Not enough of them yet. And you need hundreds of five. To replace the Su-24.

[figwam]

Do not forget that one SU-34, maybe more than one su-24, so the replacement will not be one to one.

[Dyukha Siberian]

beautiful and powerful equipment in Russia! that we could always and hopefully will be proud in the future !!!!

[The Indian Joe]

The plane is handsome, but it is still few, very few. Although, in order to roll out some kind of Georgia, four dozen will be more than enough, but standing up against NATO will not be enough. But I’m sure that the troops will receive the entire amount that is planned to be purchased.

[Irokez]

Well, you guys can’t compare the difference between the Su-30, Su-34 and Su-35.
The Su-34 is a long-range bomber, as well as a short-range one for all occasions.
Distance flight:
Su-34 4500 km
Su-30 3500
Su 35-3600
Maximum takeoff weight:
Su-34 44000 kg.
Su-30 33000
Su-35 34000
It was not too sick to carry an extra 10 tons under the belly and in the belly itself. Therefore, both the ceiling and speed are lower and the performance characteristics of the fighter as a fighter are certainly not super-duper. But I think with the Wu-35 in the battle can compete in the near.
Plus minus in TTX on different sites is not very different.
And of course, first of all, the replacement of the Su-24, which the Geyropov-holopopov are very afraid of.
http://s018.radikal.ru/i525/1308/0c/d75c4940a9e1.jpg

[Wedmak]

Plus minus in TTX is not very different.

But how the insides vary ...

[waisson]

definitely happy at least something but the troops

[waisson]

Russia will supply 12 more multifunctional Su-30-MK2 fighters to Vietnam, a military-diplomatic source told Interfax-AVN on Tuesday.
"The contract for the supply of 12 Su-30MK2 fighters to Vietnam was signed last week. It provides for the supply of not only aircraft, but also technical property," the source said. He recalled that this is the third contract for Sukhoi fighters. The two previous ones for the delivery of eight and twelve aircraft have been successfully completed.
"The supply of aircraft under the new contract will be carried out in three batches of four aircraft in 2014-2015," the source said.
He declined to name the value of the contract, citing the fact that it was a trade secret. According to experts, the value of this contract is at least $ 600 million.
Rosoboronexport and Sukhoi did not comment on the signing of a new arms contract with Vietnam, but noted that this country is an important partner of Russia in the MTC area.
Su-30MK2 is a multi-functional fighter with wide combat capabilities. It is capable of hitting not only aerial, but also ground and sea targets with high efficiency. Its arsenal includes guided missiles and adjustable bombs.
The aircraft is equipped with a modern set of on-board equipment, new communication and navigation systems, equipment operation control and crew actions. The REP equipment provides automatic target designation of X-31P anti-radar missiles introduced into the armament of the aircraft.
Since then, over 130 Su-30MK2 fighters have been delivered to China, Indonesia, Vietnam and Venezuela.

[Irokez]

Quote: Wedmak

But how the insides vary ...

And from the back like a wasp, an electronic sting - is that so for visibility?
http://s019.radikal.ru/i605/1308/7b/3cc2b4b795a4.jpg

[Wedmak]

What kind of electronic sting?
The back is only a parachute and APU. And at the ends of the wings, individual electronic warfare equipment.

[waisson]

The troops of the Southern Military District (Southeast Military District) continue to receive new aircraft. From the aerodrome of the manufacturer in Ulan-Ude to the air base of the army aviation of the Southern Military District, deployed in the Stavropol Territory, 4 upgraded Mi-8AMTSh helicopters fly. Until the end of the year, it is planned to receive another 6 helicopters of this modification.
Since the beginning of the intensive re-equipment of parts of the army aviation of the Southern Military District, attack helicopters Ka-52 Alligator, Mi-28N Night Hunter, Mi-35M, special helicopters Mi-8MTPR-1, Mi-8AMTSh, Mi-8MTV5, Mi-8MTPR , military transport helicopter Mi-26.
Until the end of this year, more than 30 modernized and new Su-27SM3, Su-30M2, Su-25SM2, and Su-34 aircraft will go into service with front-line aviation. Last year, more than 50 units of modern aviation equipment were received and put into operation in the Southern Military District.

[Irokez]

This electronic warfare equipment should be very good. And for a parachute, it’s too big a tailbone. The child was infa that a very sickly electronic warhead with brains in 34-ke is.
http://i017.radikal.ru/1308/18/fb3e4abf8e45.jpg

[Alex 241]

...............................

[Alex 241]

A lot of space in the tail compartment is occupied by the gas turbine APU, which allows starting engines on the ground without the use of ground equipment. This increases autonomy and expands the number of airfields based. All Su-34s produced since 2011 are equipped with APU. Many holes in the lower part of the beam - places for setting false thermal targets

[Irokez]

I will not argue with the General Staff, but the infa was very long-standing and in those days the ideas were different from a special modification of the jammer and electronic intelligence to very specific ones.
By the way, how to insert pictures on my site does not work Nitsche although they are inserted on others.

[Paul]

the plane is handsome, and in principle, as in all the latest developments of Sukhoi and MIG
my opinion for multifunctionality is not much to chase! for get Swiss knife Victorinox or worse for me so corkscrew separately scissors separately knife separately
Yes, it takes up more space but also copes with its task an order of magnitude better

[harrymur]

on a military photo he was already given a name-hel duck, a devil’s duck or a devil’s duck)) for me so a devil’s duckling, that’s it)))

[Vincente]

A worthy replacement for the su-24

[kkenkkk]

people yesterday found a service for checking fines in the traffic police by the state number of the car, otherwise I had a bit more fines than I thought. By the way, there they can be appealed, I was canceled two fines :). You can check your fines yourself, here is the site - http://redir.ec/mvdbaz

[sivuch]

But his armor is not tank, there will be no fundamental change in mass if it is removed.
================================================== ==
Korbka is included in the power circuit of the aircraft. Therefore
1.It can not be removed
2. She adds extra weight no more than 400 kg.