US Air Force Strategic Bomber crashed in Montana

107
US Air Force Strategic Bomber crashed in Montana

The US Air Force strategic bomber B-1B crashed in the US state of Montana. Two pilots and two crew members managed to eject.

According to preliminary information, they received minor injuries, ITAR-TASS reports with reference to Kevin Kennedy, a representative of the US Air Force.

A bomber assigned to an airbase in South Dakota collapsed in remote areas, 270 km southeast of the city of Billings.

Rescue services are sent to the crash site.

It is not reported whether any weapons were on board the bomber. The cause of the accident is not yet known.

The B-1B Lancer strategic bomber, with variable wing geometry, was created at the end of 1970's as a carrier of nuclear weaponshowever, it has now been re-equipped to deliver high-precision non-nuclear ammunition to targets.
107 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Luger
    +29
    20 August 2013 11: 07
    Something that American planes often fell, and for the most part army ones, maybe, like we haven't updated the park for a long time? what
    1. Constantine
      +48
      20 August 2013 11: 17
      Quote: Luger
      Something that American planes often fell, and for the most part army ones, maybe, like we haven't updated the park for a long time?


      They have no new bombers. Well, except for the B-2, but it’s hard to call him a mass bomb. It stands like a bridge made of platinum, and the practical benefits of it are not commensurate with its value.

      In general, the news, of course, is positive. smile
      1. 0
        20 August 2013 11: 25
        ABOUT! -1

        PS looks like our swan!
        1. +13
          20 August 2013 11: 27
          No, the photo is just B-1. And about licked a moot point. Swan more than one and a half times ...
          And here is Tu - 160
          Py Sy in the light of the correction of your comment, mine is not relevant already but I will not delete it.
      2. -9
        20 August 2013 17: 22
        Quote: Constantine
        They have no new bombers


        These Americans are just eating burgers and chewing gum. They don’t know anything. A backward nation, a country is heading into the abyss, only claims.

        I think if a bomber would fall with us, all Americans would write something similar about Russia. Only change the text of the Americans to Russian, and hamburgers to vodka.
        1. me
          me
          +10
          20 August 2013 17: 42
          Well, then why are you better than amers if you gloat like them?
          1. +3
            20 August 2013 23: 03
            Quote: i
            Well, then why are you better than amers,


            Firstly, I never said that it is better than amers.
            Secondly, I respect the opponent, but this is not a reason to feel sorry for him.
            Thirdly, I don't like the way they treat the whole world. And I'm not going to cry "sorry for the pilots." They knew what they were doing when they endured half the world for the sake of "democracy."
            And the nefik is here to represent the apostle.
            1. +1
              21 August 2013 04: 25
              really ... the news is good! good
      3. +3
        20 August 2013 17: 37
        Quote: Constantine
        In general, the news, of course, is positive.

        If memory serves, Herrr Professor last week laid out in his amputation-photographic review a vokurat flying entih wafers.
        If everything starts to crumble and fall for the "sworn friends" after "demo-reviews" then let him fast at VO at least several times a day. drinks
        http://topwar.ru/31517-10-fotografiy-s-strategypagecom-ot-1-avgusta-2013-goda.ht
        ml
    2. strange and pretty meaningless
      +21
      20 August 2013 11: 54
      Can the B-1B be tested as a "precision non-nuclear weapon"?
      1. +12
        20 August 2013 12: 06
        B-1B cruise missile wassat
        1. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      20 August 2013 15: 15
      Have you seen the movie "Broken Arrow"?))
    4. +3
      20 August 2013 19: 42
      In New Jersey, a U.S. Navy-based explosion occurred. According to ITAR-TASS, citing CNN, eight people were injured. The explosion occurred in one of the buildings located along the coast. The house started a fire. Rescuers work at the place of emergency.

      The destination of the Navy base in the city of Middletown is the storage of ammunition. About 1,5 thousand military personnel and civilians work at the facility.
    5. +1
      20 August 2013 20: 35
      Quote: Luger
      Something often fell American planes, and for the most part army

      On the plane, the dignity unit refused ...........?
    6. -1
      21 August 2013 02: 07
      the main thing is that it is not contagious - this disease did not go over to us
  2. +2
    20 August 2013 11: 08
    It would be better to fall in Washington, loaded with nuclear bombs))))
    1. Constantine
      +25
      20 August 2013 11: 19
      Quote: T-100
      It would be better to fall in Washington, loaded with nuclear bombs))))


      And then civilians who put on politics would perish. Ordinary people, like you and me. You have strange desires. sad
      1. +40
        20 August 2013 12: 44
        And they give a damn about us, I give a damn about them, I like Hannibal, who swore that he would be the eternal enemy of Rome. I: I swear that until I lose my breath I will be the eternal enemy of the United States and its satellites, they should be punished for the under-genocide of the Russian people !!!!!!! 1111
        1. +4
          20 August 2013 13: 14
          Quote: T-100
          I: I swear that until I lose my breath I will be the eternal enemy of the United States and its satellites


          He wrote while sitting on the Internet, invented by the Americans.
          1. +8
            20 August 2013 13: 23
            Quote: Karavan
            He wrote while sitting on the Internet, invented by the Americans.

            lies. The Internet was invented at CERN (European Center for Nuclear Research). All the merit of the United States is that they have the most powerful servers
            1. Constantine
              +6
              20 August 2013 17: 37
              Quote: Eugene46
              lies. The Internet was invented at CERN (European Center for Nuclear Research). All the merit of the United States is that they have the most powerful servers


              The Internet is a further development of the ARPANET. The Europeans had an alternative technology, but it died in competition. Before making statements like "lies", etc., it would not be bad to check yourself for the same hi
              1. +6
                20 August 2013 20: 12
                Please
                http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/science/2013/04/130430_internet_first_web_page_rest
                ored.shtml
                and let's not mix military ARPANET and the development of its civilian sector with the Internet itself. It was the launch of the world's first website (see link) that marked the beginning of the Internet. Good evening hi
          2. +3
            20 August 2013 14: 00
            however, the question is why it was supposedly coined by American students. It has long been no secret that these students fulfilled the order of the CIA))))))) total surveillance, the ability to control - this is the original goal of creating a tyrnet))))))) the ability to massively influence minds, a means of communication, control of millions of people, control ... So nothing is inherently positive. And "invent" to connect a bunch of computers to the network is not such a big merit.
          3. +1
            20 August 2013 20: 42
            lol definitely +
        2. SPBOBL
          +1
          20 August 2013 14: 47
          I agree with you!
        3. Constantine
          +9
          20 August 2013 17: 35
          Quote: T-100
          And they give a damn about us, I give a damn about them, I like Hannibal, who swore that he would be the eternal enemy of Rome. I: I swear that until I lose my breath I will be the eternal enemy of the United States and its satellites, they should be punished for the under-genocide of the Russian people !!!!!!! 1111


          It means that you simply have not yet matured to understand some things. There is only one greatest value on earth - life. Do not confuse the government and the oligarchy with the people. Americans are an unhappy people who are zombified and twisted as they want. There is no freedom as such at all, but only its illusion. We, Russians, are a peacemaker and the qualities that you describe are not peculiar to us. The overthrow of the tyrant / the destruction of the enemy - yes, but not the destruction of the people. Look at our story.

          So I suggest that you put your populism aside and think about the meaning of life hi
          1. 0
            20 August 2013 20: 03
            It is important to educate the spirit and not the life of the beast (body). As the very purpose of being on earth, if you want the meaning of life. Go through many worlds, knowing them, and perfecting your spirit.
            God Ramhat.
          2. mamba
            -1
            21 August 2013 09: 16
            Quote: Constantine
            There is no freedom as such at all, but only its illusion.

            On the conflict of slogans and reality in American society through Jewish humor:
        4. 0
          20 August 2013 18: 07
          Well, name at least one in our government or the State Duma? Or really a foreigner! You have to deal with your own.
        5. Fedych
          +1
          20 August 2013 19: 44
          SHO, but at the same time did the ento do and does the rushka people? consumes beer with a wobble, sits in front of tattered TV shows, or is it like that ?. Millions have passed already in Afghanistan and Chechnya, how much can you hang up on your dickiness, dullness of mind, thought and reflection abroad? - wake up, brother. Enough to wait for a miracle from the Kremlin! - your streets, lady, apartments and cities must be maintained in order and cleanliness without looking back and order from the Kremlin, and even- despite everything from it that interferes with you as an individual, city dweller, father, brother and son, of your specific deeds on the spot, not for a salary, but simply because it is neither human nor possible to live in a paid place. In the meantime, this is invisible and even more so !. In a small, poor, without anything Estonia, on the streets, cities and towns, cleanliness, and not because the cleaners get a lot. I come to the historical Motherland and three steps to the left, right, dirt, stink and garbage. So let's figure it out in ourselves and among ourselves in this matter, and then we will litter the USA. The feeling that the fifth column of the former ideological ones filled with abstract manure in the forewords all the books about the leading and the component migrated to some topics and their interpretations .. If this is so? - sorry for those who are listening to this old fellow. from nothing and into nothing that he was, is, and will abide
      2. +6
        20 August 2013 13: 35
        Quote: Constantine
        And then civilians would die

        Only if the relying code blocks are removed and an electronic signal (key) is received for the use of the product. The maximum that would happen in our case is P / A contamination of the terrain by isotope fragments. (fuse on YO BP). Plus panic, congressional hearings, mass demonstrations by the greens and pacifists, removal of the NAC commander.
        1. Constantine
          +3
          20 August 2013 17: 39
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          Only if the relying code blocks are removed and an electronic signal (key) is received for the use of the product. The maximum that would happen in our case is P / A contamination of the terrain by isotope fragments. (fuse on YO BP). Plus panic, congressional hearings, mass demonstrations by the greens and pacifists, removal of the NAC commander.


          The fact that there are subtleties is understandable, but the author of the comment, to which I answered, judging by the rhetoric, meant precisely cocked weapons smile
        2. s1н7т
          +3
          20 August 2013 20: 18
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          Plus panic, congressional hearings, mass demonstrations by the greens and pacifists, removal of the NAC commander.

          Plus the dissolution of the United States into separate states - then I am in favor!)))
      3. SPBOBL
        0
        20 August 2013 14: 45
        high precision on the pentagon ...
      4. +2
        20 August 2013 16: 21
        Why did you decide that "Suitcase I with nuclear bombs" would explode, detonation of a nuclear weapon is not a detonation of explosives, everything will be more complicated.
    2. psv910
      +7
      20 August 2013 11: 19
      Quote: T-100
      It would be better to fall in Washington, loaded with nuclear bombs))))

      There would be a 2nd farce series on September 11th. I wonder who would be bombed, Syria? Or the DPRK?
      1. eplewke
        0
        20 August 2013 14: 11
        It would have fallen better on the Air Force base with raptors in the hangars. Naturally ... laughing
        1. eplewke
          +1
          21 August 2013 16: 34
          Like NSA spies minus ... laughing
      2. d_trader
        -2
        20 August 2013 14: 33
        If you arrange such a farce with nuclear weapons as September 11 in Washington, it will mean that you have acknowledged your financial and political collapse, the failure of Pax America and, through this provocation, the start of the Third World War of the Anglo-Saxons with Russia and the rest of the world. China may stand aside to smoke.
    3. +1
      20 August 2013 18: 43
      And it would be better if all their bombers fell on their cities. And the sympathizers apparently do not know that when the Kursk submarine died, these same peaceful citizens hung out national flags from the windows and balconies, as on a public holiday. And their adoptive parents? Have you seen their faces? These are real sadugi. And pity these? No, guys, war is like war.
  3. Ruslan_F38
    +13
    20 August 2013 11: 08
    The good news is that the less they have in the United States, the better.
  4. Airman
    +11
    20 August 2013 11: 08
    Another strategist among the Americans was less, it’s good that without human casualties.
    1. +1
      20 August 2013 12: 06
      They still have nearly 60 of these bombers
  5. +9
    20 August 2013 11: 10
    Minus one more combat unit. Urgently stop all flights and think longer why it crashed.
    1. avt
      +32
      20 August 2013 11: 14
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Urgently stop all flights and think longer why it crashed.

      Continue flights with intensified kerosene extermination and without scheduled repairs, and do not think at all why it fell. laughing
      1. Constantine
        +5
        20 August 2013 11: 25
        Quote: avt
        Continue flights with intensified kerosene extermination and without scheduled repairs, and do not think at all why it fell


        It’s better to immediately write off as not reliable wassat
  6. +4
    20 August 2013 11: 18
    Minus one, keep up the good work
  7. +6
    20 August 2013 11: 22
    that's good, that's nice. And with one bomb carrier less and without human casualties (so as not to accuse me of inappropriate gloating :))
  8. +1
    20 August 2013 11: 29
    Yes, something for a long time they did not fall something big and expensive. Not B-2 of course, but not bad either. One minus - this is probably the most favorite phrase today.
    However, they also think the same ... though we have more pluses.
  9. +2
    20 August 2013 11: 47
    great news, can not but rejoice! Still, regarding their navy, the same news would go
    1. +2
      20 August 2013 13: 31
      Did you forget the fires last year on the nuclear submarine and then on the aircraft carrier?
      1. 0
        20 August 2013 15: 04
        so I want more am
        1. 0
          20 August 2013 19: 42
          In New Jersey, a U.S. Navy-based explosion occurred. According to ITAR-TASS, citing CNN, eight people were injured. The explosion occurred in one of the buildings located along the coast. The house started a fire. Rescuers work at the place of emergency.

          The destination of the Navy base in the city of Middletown is the storage of ammunition. About 1,5 thousand military personnel and civilians work at the facility.

          PS At your request
  10. USNik
    +5
    20 August 2013 11: 49
    The cause of the accident is not yet known.
    Well, residents of several states threatened to shoot down UAVs, they saw a little mistake feel Well, or in continuation of all the hesitant LGBT topics, I can assume that the accident occurred due to gender inequality in the crew, the US pilots must be gay!
  11. +16
    20 August 2013 11: 58
    That's ... The bomber turned out to be fundamental. Preferred to break better than pid..ov to be in the service.
  12. sens99.ru
    +3
    20 August 2013 12: 16
    I wonder which fighter star on board) laughing
  13. +5
    20 August 2013 12: 29
    Small but good news.
    Still, ours would not burn their planes ....
    Maybe he met in the air with such a dove?
  14. shower
    +3
    20 August 2013 12: 30
    The comments are pretty funny, but it seems to me that they again experienced some kind of muck like a harp on it! Note the strategic bomber.
    1. +9
      20 August 2013 13: 26
      Quote: schauer
      The comments are pretty funny, but it seems to me that we again experienced some sort of muck

      Dear "observer", I welcome you to our forum. Try to put your "not funny" posts on public display: judging by your nickname, you are an aviator.
      I am not an expert, but it seems to me a banal failure of avionics has occurred, or the engines are bent (electronics, damn it!). Our guys would manually try to land the car, they would surely die themselves, but they did not leave the car. Amers have a different mentality. This is what makes us different from them. And it is not yet known what is better in battle.
    2. Constantine
      -3
      20 August 2013 17: 41
      Quote: schauer
      The comments are pretty funny, but it seems to me that they again experienced some kind of muck like a harp on it! Note the strategic bomber.


      B-1B is not a strategist wink
      1. +2
        20 August 2013 17: 45
        B-1B is not a strategist

        12 thousand km range, why is he not a strategist?
        1. Constantine
          +1
          20 August 2013 18: 48
          Quote: Wedmak
          12 thousand km range, why is he not a strategist?


          With the fact that it is converted to simple weapons and it makes little difference how far it flies. Front-line bombers fly in the air as much fly, but what's the point? It is strategic from the fact that it carries strategic nuclear weapons, and without it, it is an ordinary bomber.

          The strategic bomber B-1B Lancer, with variable wing geometry, was created at the end of the 1970's as a carrier of nuclear weapons, but now it is converted to deliver high-precision non-nuclear munitions to targets.


          It is customary to call a bomber strategic only when it has an intercontinental range (over 5000 km) and is capable of using nuclear weapons. For example, aircraft such as Tu-22M, Tu-16 and B-47 are capable of using strategic nuclear weapons, but do not have an intercontinental flight range, and therefore are often called long-range bombers. (Actually, this use of the term “long-range bombers” is incorrect, since such bombers, without having an intercontinental flight range, are technically strategic bombers as well. That is, intercontinental and so-called “long-range” bombers are nothing more than two subclasses of strategic bombers.)
  15. sens99.ru
    +2
    20 August 2013 12: 31
    Quote: lelikas
    Small but good news.
    Still, ours would not burn their planes ....
    Maybe he met in the air with such a dove?

    Pigeon shahid this is a turn laughing
  16. +3
    20 August 2013 12: 37
    US Air Force Strategic Bomber crashed in Montana

    what Is Putin again to blame?
    1. +1
      20 August 2013 12: 58
      No, it’s not without LGBT.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          20 August 2013 23: 11
          quite possible:

          http://klimoff-den.livejournal.com/245653.html
          The pilots of the strategic bomber that crashed in the United States were gay and were "high"
  17. +3
    20 August 2013 12: 59
    HIKING The United States begins to have problems with the aircraft ...... then the planes fall, then some parts of the check do not pass .... then they should leave them whole from Afghanistan ........ balm for the soul is direct
  18. +2
    20 August 2013 13: 04
    Early cancellation, others there too .... Could fall to the airfield, capturing a couple more brothers.smile
  19. +1
    20 August 2013 13: 05
    like a balm for the soul, nothing pleases like the failure of the enemy ... I would like to finally wish every American aircraft a Russian missile (or two)
  20. ed65b
    +9
    20 August 2013 13: 09
    soon they will all start to fall.
    1. 0
      20 August 2013 18: 37
      Can I link to a tablet? And then I see you have not everything fit.
      1. +1
        20 August 2013 20: 44
        those that didn’t hit have already fallen wassat
    2. +1
      21 August 2013 10: 24
      Indeed, a reference to the data. And then I did not understand how the percentage of exploited devices was considered there. Either my mathematics is very bad, or the author of the table, in addition to the primer, also smoked all the math textbooks at one time. recourse
  21. +3
    20 August 2013 13: 49
    What to say: people are alive, iron is not a pity
  22. 0
    20 August 2013 13: 58
    Better fall to the pentagon
  23. +4
    20 August 2013 14: 00
    There are no losses from our side.
  24. shower
    +3
    20 August 2013 14: 01
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: schauer
    The comments are pretty funny, but it seems to me that we again experienced some sort of muck

    Dear "observer", I welcome you to our forum. Try to put your "not funny" posts on public display: judging by your nickname, you are an aviator.
    I am not an expert, but it seems to me a banal failure of avionics has occurred, or the engines are bent (electronics, damn it!). Our guys would manually try to land the car, they would surely die themselves, but they did not leave the car. Amers have a different mentality. This is what makes us different from them. And it is not yet known what is better in battle.

    Dear "regular" I welcome you to this forum! Let's go in order: I already wrote my comment (you even managed to discuss it, for which thanks), you shouldn't judge by nickname, so for example, by your nickname, we can conclude that you like to choke defenseless monkeys (I apologize right away, this is just an example )))))), I also express the opinion of a non-specialist like you))). I agree with you about the failure of avionics, but this fits into my version, why not ??? Rescuing the plane after the test of the secret weapon is a dubious question, perhaps it was not possible. And along the way they rolled out new modifications of the catapults, this is a plus, they are not to be occupied in practicality. I agree 100% about our guys
    1. +2
      20 August 2013 17: 03
      Quote: schauer

      Dear "regular" I welcome you to this forum!

      Yuri! In no way did I want to offend you. Simply "schauer" in German means "observer".
      Quote: schauer
      judge by nickname is not worth it

      In vain! Nick says a lot. If you choke, then only "Banderlog", and go hunting with those to whom you can say: "You and I are of the same blood!" and wish your friend "a successful hunt".
      Quote: schauer
      and skated along the way new catapult modifications this is a plus

      Where does this infa come from? What did not use them before? Enlighten! And another question: what about ours, the catapults sold by him are no longer in use?
  25. shower
    0
    20 August 2013 14: 03
    I called the previous posts ridiculous not in content, but really laughed plenty. ))))
  26. +1
    20 August 2013 14: 18
    But I wonder if the United States is able to reproduce such bombers again.
    1. +4
      20 August 2013 14: 38
      Well, the F-22 did the same. A promising bomber is such a cut of dough that all of their printing presses will overheat.
  27. shower
    +2
    20 August 2013 14: 20
    Yes, I would also like to add that someone may doubt that it is inexpedient to run weapons in a full aviation complex + pilots, you can use models, UAVs. Here I can assume that the weapon is in the final phase of testing and by the way were there pilots, and if there were then at what point the catapults worked?
    1. +4
      20 August 2013 14: 43
      that weapons are in the final phase of testing

      What weapon? Over the past two decades, the United States has created so much ... so much ... new ... you can count on your fingers! Moreover, half of this is still being completed. And the second half is unlikely to go beyond laboratories and test benches.
      By the way, were there pilots, and if there were then at what point the catapults worked?

      The "Crash" light came on, and they flew away ... there they don't worry about the equipment, as we do. Each plane is a living organism, a friend and partner of the pilot.
      1. Oskar
        +2
        20 August 2013 15: 11
        It has always been like this with us. Pilots cherish every penny, especially now, when many losses are irreparable. It is a pity that no one cherishes a job for those who are supposed to be ex officio.
  28. shower
    0
    20 August 2013 14: 56
    What weapon?
    For example HAARP, heats the atmosphere to a plasma state.
    If interesting
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K84AnHn7bk
    1. +1
      20 August 2013 15: 08
      For example HAARP

      All results are classified, but there is reason to believe that the cat wept for these results.
      Heats the atmosphere to a plasma state.

      Not the atmosphere, but the stratosphere, where there is no particular air anyway, some electrons with protons go around. That is, in fact, rarefied plasma. And it does not warm, but ionizes. They, in addition to breaking long-distance radio communications, did not achieve anything in my opinion. The project was recently closed.
      More options?
  29. shower
    -1
    20 August 2013 15: 15
    Testers have options, I have assumptions.
  30. Vtel
    0
    20 August 2013 15: 17
    It seems that our youngsters have blinded them with a laser pointer. They said not to indulge. Well, okay, our lead 1-0.
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. shower
    -1
    20 August 2013 15: 20
    [quote = Wedmak] [quote] For example HAARP [/ quote]
    All results are classified
    It's clear
    , but there is reason to believe that the cat wept for these results.
    Where is the reason if not a secret
    1. +3
      20 August 2013 15: 26
      Where is the reason if not a secret

      Well, if something was significant, there would be a continuation of the project. Or its modernization. But everything quietly closed peacefully. But Americans are famous lovers of praising their own achievements.
      1. shower
        0
        20 August 2013 15: 37
        Quote: Wedmak
        But Americans are famous lovers to praise their own achievements

        I agree, but as a rule, deliberately failed projects are praised, they are pushing disu while no one has yet understood, but how they get silent they are silent in a rag.
        1. 0
          20 August 2013 15: 46
          but how come what is silent in a rag.

          Well, not really either. An example of this is F-22. Oh, like a booster plane. But no .. little is known about him. Those. he is, flies, here! He is cool! But the characteristics are hushed up, in hostilities it does not accept (by the way, but against whom, in fact?). HAARP is more difficult of course, but using all the achievements in high technology as an example - hypersound, railgun, combat lasers, wave weapons, etc. we can conclude: Americans want to bite off a piece that they can not swallow. Too expensive technology at the moment.
  33. 0
    20 August 2013 15: 41
    Fewer people will be killed on the planet. I'll post an article plus.
  34. 0
    20 August 2013 16: 10
    fell? ... well then ... amen! ... feel
  35. Bashkaus
    +4
    20 August 2013 16: 32
    I make a strong proposal to invite the pilots of the fallen bomber to rest and improve the health that has been shaken by this unpleasant incident in our sanatoriums of mineral waters. In addition, I propose to issue Russian citizenship to all pilots, the ship's commander a three-room apartment in Lyubertsy and the Black Volga, the rest of the crew members a two-room apartment and the prior's car. In addition, I consider to present the entire crew for the awards "Air Defense Veteran"
  36. 0
    20 August 2013 16: 43
    The plane crashed from the strategists. In the short term, it seems like not bad. One less carrier. But if you still get one, then, of course, this model will be replaced with new products. It’s better if they fly longer and calmly become obsolete mentally and physically, than new developments will soon come in their place. Ahead of ours. And that the pilots are alive, plus.
    1. +1
      20 August 2013 17: 09
      than new developments will soon come in their place.

      And they don’t even hear about the development of a new strategist. We even started ... However, their 60 B-1 and hundreds of B-52 will be enough for a long time. And how they will protect the B-2, blow off dust particles!
    2. +4
      20 August 2013 17: 21
      Quote: AIR-ZNAK
      this model will be replaced with new items.

      B-52 when released, and everyone will upgrade it. Already a CD carrier have been made. The platform is good, so they drive until the metal fatigue does its job. The B-1B has more dynamic loads, which means the platform will soon fail. Ours are already designing PAK YES, I think the amers on the quiet also sculpt something. Wait and see.
  37. 0
    20 August 2013 17: 32
    amen amen amen drinks wassat
  38. -1
    20 August 2013 17: 32
    Lobbied, lobbied but not lobbied the bomb truck! Bad luck! am laughing
  39. Kowalsky
    +3
    20 August 2013 17: 56
    Crashed? For luck :)
  40. vmsnick
    +1
    20 August 2013 17: 57
    It would be better to fall on Washington, loaded with nuclear bombs)))

    We don’t need blood, even enemy, and even more so pathetic American civilians!)))
  41. 0
    20 August 2013 18: 04
    if the pilots catapulted, then I’m very happy about the -1 bomber, the guys do not work well in RUSSIA, it would be necessary at least -5 a year more ...
  42. 0
    20 August 2013 18: 08
    Quote: vmsnick
    Crashed? For luck :)


    Yeah and others for good luck)))
  43. +1
    20 August 2013 18: 10
    Quote: avt
    Continue flights with intensified kerosene extermination and without scheduled repairs, and do not think at all why it fell.

    Counteroffer:
    - Continue flights, but without kerosene
  44. -1
    20 August 2013 18: 36
    The answer, why fell, is already known: amerovsky a locksmith with a sledge hammer drove the sensors of angular speed out of place stop
  45. +1
    20 August 2013 18: 44
    Quote: avia12005
    The answer, why fell, is already known: amerovsky a locksmith with a sledge hammer drove the sensors of angular speed out of place stop


    "Well done, anti-aircraft gunners !!!"
  46. 0
    20 August 2013 18: 57
    Quote: Constantine
    In general, the news, of course, is positive.

    Undoubtedly! good
    Quote: Constantine
    According to preliminary information, they received minor injuries,

    Yeah. A bruise all over. about. py.
  47. -1
    20 August 2013 19: 04
    Well crashed and crashed.
    thank god everyone is alive.
    They’ll still print money and send it a newer one.
  48. +5
    20 August 2013 19: 41
    Most likely it was like this
  49. +2
    20 August 2013 20: 07
    People are alive. Technique - crashed. And this means that decent damage has been done to their economy.
  50. +6
    20 August 2013 20: 33
    it's probably bad, but I'm gloating ... drinks
  51. Fedych
    +2
    20 August 2013 20: 42
    Yes, sir! They say that a person has convolutions, and the more of them, where they are supposed to be, the better. How is it with us with this producing product? - do we sit on it and think from it, or do we have something higher that produces...... I look with longing at our generation wink
  52. +1
    20 August 2013 22: 02
    Crashed and okay! If only we didn't fall. Pah-pah-pah.
  53. The Indian Joe
    +2
    20 August 2013 22: 56
    More!!!
    More!!!
    More!!!
  54. +1
    21 August 2013 05: 29
    A neighbor's cow died... three button accordions have already been torn???
    Fedych - I agree with you that this is a clinic and her legs are from the 90s drinks
  55. -1
    21 August 2013 07: 48
    A US Air Force B-1B strategic bomber crashed in the US state of Montana. Two pilots and two crew members managed to eject.

    And who are the 2 crew members, besides the two pilots, flight attendants? wassat
  56. kkenkkk
    0
    21 August 2013 09: 19
    people yesterday found a service for checking fines in the traffic police by the state number of the car, otherwise I had a bit more fines than I thought. By the way, there they can be appealed, I was canceled two fines :). You can check your fines yourself, here is the site - http://redir.ec/mvdbaz
  57. 0
    21 August 2013 09: 23
    it was necessary to fall on an aircraft carrier. they will be cut down in every possible way. and at least the Americans showed the video. wassat
  58. -1
    21 August 2013 09: 25
    They should have jumped on an aircraft carrier, they seem to want to lay them off.
  59. USNik
    0
    21 August 2013 12: 38
    Bgg, the version about pedras is confirmed laughing

    The pilots of the strategic bomber that crashed in the United States were gay and were "high"

    The US Air Force B-1B bomber that crashed on Monday, August 19 in Montana was driven by drunken pilots, the Associated Press reports, citing witnesses to the incident/
    The B-1B crew members were injured, but their lives were not in danger, US Air Force officials said. The circumstances surrounding the B-1B crash are under investigation. Immediately after the incident, the pilots “giggled” and asked for food. This is a sign of marijuana use, experts say.
    In addition, according to eyewitnesses, the pilot-in-command and co-pilot acted as if there was “something” between them.

    http://klimoff-den.livejournal.com/245653.html
  60. USNik
    0
    21 August 2013 12: 52
    To follow up with a photo of the crash site. Judging by the round trail, these stoned gays tried to make a vertical landing on the bomber belay laughing