Military Review

New Su-30CM

40
A photo of Russianplanes.net published on August 16, 2013 a photo of a new aircraft arriving at the airfield of OJSC MM Gromov Flight Research Institute in Zhukovsky near Moscow, board number “30 black”, built for the Russian Air Force by Irkutsk aviation plant of OJSC "Corporation" Irkut ".


This aircraft is the fourth Su-30CM built in Irkutsk under a contract of March 2012 of the year with the Russian Ministry of Defense for the supply of 30 fighters Su-30СМ before the 2015 of the year, and the second aircraft of this type built in 2013 of the year. The first two Su-30CM fighters built by the Irkutsk Aviation Plant under this contract (the airborne numbers "01" and "02") were handed over to the Russian Air Force 22 November 2012. In May, the third Su-2013CM under this contract was demonstrated in Akhtubinsk, the first built in the 30 year (the aircraft with the tail number "2013 is black"). In total, under two contracts with Irkut Corporation, the Ministry of Defense has so far ordered a total of 54 Su-60CM airplanes, of which 30 units are expected to be delivered in 2013 year.


Su-30SM Russian Air Force (tail number "55 black"). Zhukovsky, 16.08.2013 (c) Vitaly Yurtaev / russianplanes.net
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. igls
    igls 19 August 2013 12: 28
    -3
    At this pace of aircraft deliveries to the Air Force, we will not go far, shame and shame weave ate spruce.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Evgeniy46
      Evgeniy46 19 August 2013 14: 07
      14
      Are you sick of whining? If they didn’t deliver equipment - it’s bad, they deliver - it’s bad, at the end of the year four squadrons of Su-30СМ, Su-34, Su-35С, Yak-130 will be delivered in packs - again it will be bad. And then what is good ?!
      There is a suspicion that 54 and 55 blacks will be used in Lipetsk for retraining
      1. Ruslan_F38
        Ruslan_F38 19 August 2013 14: 24
        +7
        "The Russian Ministry of Defense, at the request of the Ministry of Finance, has postponed the signing of one of the largest defense contracts with the Russian Aircraft Corporation (RSK) MiG for the supply of 37 MiG-35 fighters for three years," said a senior source in the military department. - The supply of new Su is certainly good, but why did they do this to Migami? You can save on a lot, but not on the supply of new equipment to the troops.
        1. leon-iv
          leon-iv 19 August 2013 14: 48
          +6
          So do not want the Mig-35 Which, as a girl, the Mig-29KUB to take with the old radar. They want a new one that Fazatron recently presented. True it is necessary to bring it. BUT while Lukhovtsy have work and how they will bring the radar will conclude a contract.
          But they can sign it at the MAKS, but the delivery dates should be indicated 15-16 years.
      2. me
        me 19 August 2013 18: 07
        -2
        And you are not tired of reading about the single receipts of aviation? They write an article about every incoming airplane, create the appearance of well-being, it’s ridiculous already.
        1. Ruslan_F38
          Ruslan_F38 19 August 2013 20: 56
          +2
          Quote: i
          And you are not tired of reading about the single receipts of aviation? They write an article about every incoming airplane, create the appearance of well-being, it’s ridiculous already.


          Change the photo of the avatar - they’ll peck. Do not like this character here.
          1. me
            me 20 August 2013 16: 45
            0
            But they love him upstairs, and besides, I didn’t come here for the pluses.
        2. evgenii67
          evgenii67 19 August 2013 23: 08
          0
          Hello everyone!
          Quote: igls
          At this pace of aircraft deliveries to the Air Force, we will not go far, shame and shame weave ate spruce.

          Quote: i
          And you are not tired of reading about the single receipts of aviation? They write an article about every incoming airplane, create the appearance of well-being, it’s ridiculous already.

          I will say this: COULD BE WORSE. You guys thought that hundreds of Su-30s, Su-35s, Su-34s would be stamped per year (where does Zin's money come from (about corruption is a separate issue)), but production needs to be restored, new personnel should be trained, because you can't build collapses, but I repeat - COULD BE WORSE, the 90s and the beginning of the 2000s, purchases for the defense industry were generally zero, by the way, guys besides the Su-30 also receive other aircraft in the military, of course I want large volumes, but look at the purchases of aircraft with each year go with increasing and further increase is planned. The main thing is that the OLD MiG-29, Su-27, Su-24 and others survived until a decent change comes to them.
        3. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 20 August 2013 05: 29
          0
          Quote: i
          And you are not tired of reading about the single receipts of aviation?

          They will put a few dozen this year, what will you write?
      3. papas-57
        papas-57 19 August 2013 20: 57
        0
        Whining is not tired, a shame for the country. Surrender 1-3 aircraft to the troops, and at the same time proudly write about it. Recently they wrote about the transfer of the anti-sabotage boat to the fleet with such pride that it was embarrassing to read. It would be better if they did not write about such a trifle, they did not disgrace.
    3. Basil123
      Basil123 19 August 2013 22: 05
      -2
      ah handsome for evil and in spite of the liberals pr.Shushara
    4. Kostya pedestrian
      Kostya pedestrian 20 August 2013 10: 30
      0
      You have some kind of marine terminology, just as the sailors put it, those also on their minds - everyone says to swim, but they need to be told to go.

      By the way, military aviation exists for this purpose, so that motorized infantry does not drape far.
  2. Lissyara
    Lissyara 19 August 2013 12: 31
    12
    With an initiative! And I believe that until December 24 of this year, all 12 vehicles will be in the army!
    Well, I wish the T-50 to quickly "buy" my new "native" engine!
    1. ivshubarin
      ivshubarin 19 August 2013 12: 59
      +8
      The other day, the fifth T-50 should take off, LIS passes
      1. eplewke
        eplewke 19 August 2013 14: 31
        +2
        Great car! only I would like to receive them a little faster! And so the news is good ... Little by little we fill the army with equipment.
        1. 53-Sciborskiy
          53-Sciborskiy 19 August 2013 15: 45
          +2
          Su-30SM, Su-35S and T-50 are super-maneuverable fighter aircraft with a controlled thrust vector, which are currently not in the combat forces of the Russian Armed Forces. Obviously, the two-seat Su-30SM allows for a shorter time to prepare a sufficient number of pilots for the new look of the Air Force.
  3. fklj
    fklj 19 August 2013 12: 34
    +2
    The pace is low, and the need is high. Bear with the Su-27, in ten years you will be replaced. May be...
  4. Lissyara
    Lissyara 19 August 2013 12: 34
    12
    Quote: igls
    At this pace of aircraft deliveries to the Air Force, we will not go far, shame and shame weave ate spruce.

    And to some comrades I’ll say that the SU-30 is not a VAZ 2108, and it is built on slipways, and not on a conveyor for 10 minutes.
    And I’ll remind you that in the glorious 90 of the last century, the Air Force, like all the Russian Defense Ministry, sucked a paw on the supply of new military equipment.
    So the same 12 cars by the end of the year is already a holiday!
    1. fklj
      fklj 19 August 2013 12: 44
      +4
      I am happy about any new aircraft of the Russian Air Force. And some comrades should calculate (using a calculator) how many years (or decades) it will take to update our Air Force, at this rate. I think everyone here knows the difference between "Drying" and "Eight". As well as the difference between today's piece production and yesterday's batch production.
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 19 August 2013 16: 32
        +3
        Quote: fklj
        And some comrades should calculate (you can use a calculator) how many years (or decades) it will take to update our Air Force, at such a pace.

        If we take into account the number of really suitable summer Dryers and especially the Migs, then there are not so many.
        As for the power of the Air Force of the sample 70-80x, under the current conditions and production base, alas, you can forget about it.
  5. Denis
    Denis 19 August 2013 12: 35
    +6
    For the photo plus, for the number of minus.
  6. Russ69
    Russ69 19 August 2013 12: 39
    +2
    Today the news was that instead of the MiG-35, they will purchase the MiG-29SMT.
    However, as it became known to Kommersant, because of the lengthy work on the provision and justification of settlement and calculation materials, the government could not sign the order to determine MiG RSK as the sole executor of this task. At the same time, sources in the defense department told the publication, the Ministry of Finance suggested that the Ministry of Defense transfer part of the costs allocated under the state armament program for 2014-2016, beyond the line of 2016. As a result, the defense department decided to postpone for several years the purchase of 37 MiG-35 fighters.
    The source is true, so-so ... We’ll soon find out by anyone.
  7. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 19 August 2013 12: 41
    +1
    And it’s better to let out new and updated equipment slowly, the conveyor must be debugged and the staff will get used to it. If there is enough assembly equipment, subcontractors with a complete set will not fail and there will be enough competent technicians in the assembly, then things will go and new planes will periodically take off!
    1. fklj
      fklj 19 August 2013 12: 56
      +4
      Irkutsk is ready even now to put the Su-30SM on stream, there would be a state order.
      1. evil hamster
        evil hamster 19 August 2013 19: 24
        +2
        Mmm actually it is already in mass production, what other "stream" do you need? voice the number.
  8. Artillerist
    Artillerist 19 August 2013 12: 53
    +2
    Each wing has only one "point" of ammunition suspension. How can this be? Is the plane not for combat use? Experts, can you explain?
  9. Lissyara
    Lissyara 19 August 2013 12: 53
    12
    People! Let's really look at things. I'm talking about the number of cars.
    There are factories, qualified personnel are. But!
    Do not forget that Comrade Poghosyan is being "torn to the British flag" also for the reasons that India, Malaysia, Vietnam, Venezuela and a bunch of other "younger brothers" of the USSR are waiting for Sushki. Moreover, the orders have been prepaid in hard currency.
    And yet - in the days of the USSR, we churned aircraft at the speed of light. Just do not forget - then there were 15 republics that produced a bunch of various complexes for "products".
    Of course, I am not an economist, a simple soldier, but with our "oil filling hole", we could build a couple more factories like "Irkut".
    1. fklj
      fklj 19 August 2013 13: 00
      +5
      Even at existing facilities, Irkut alone is capable of producing much more and faster. This is according to the director of the plant.
      1. Lissyara
        Lissyara 19 August 2013 13: 10
        +2
        Alexey, then the question arises! The RF Ministry of Defense transferred all the money to the development of the Air Force. Or once again "drank"? It seems that "Serdyukovism" is over.
        Further, I am for the restoration of production of "Ruslan" Antonov 124. We will build a glider, no question. But the engines for the VTA were made by Ukraine (excluding the IL-76). Motor Sich, if my memory serves me right.
        Next, about the fighters. KnAAPO them. Yu.A. Gagarin should not be seriously considered. Not the power, but it builds the T 50 and Su-35. This is a court factory of Sukhoi Design Bureau.
        1. fklj
          fklj 20 August 2013 21: 28
          0
          Sergei, "Serdyukovschina" began long before his appointment as defense minister, and did not end with his resignation wink ... When the Russian Air Force is equipped with modern technology, in an amount sufficient for the country's defense, only then the word "Serdyukovshchina" will go down in history.
          Unfortunately, I can’t say anything about the An-124. Alarmed by the next political cat and mouse with the Ukrainian aircraft industry. Is it really impossible to create an analogue of the An-124 in Russian KB and completely from our components.
      2. Avenger711
        Avenger711 19 August 2013 15: 06
        0
        The aircraft is built for at least 9 months, the pace is agreed, do not forget about the tests in the LIS based on the results of which many changes can be made to the design.
      3. evil hamster
        evil hamster 19 August 2013 19: 28
        +1
        How much more is this? And how does this all correlate with the real zaza of 60 boards and the budget capabilities of the Russian Federation, as well as the fact that money is needed for a whole bunch of everything, ships, nuclear submarines, air defense systems, etc. etc. and they would also all have more ..
  10. Lissyara
    Lissyara 19 August 2013 12: 57
    +4
    Do not forget that Irkut is still Yak-130 doing.
    Photo attached.
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 19 August 2013 14: 29
      +2
      They don’t confuse spare parts there? laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Denis
      Denis 19 August 2013 15: 05
      +2
      Quote: LiSSyara
      Do not forget that Irkut is still Yak-130 doing.
      Photo attached.

      Do not forget, but not all for us.
  11. smiths xnumx
    smiths xnumx 19 August 2013 13: 14
    +9
    This year there will be 14 Su-34, 12 Su-30СМ, 12 Su-35С, 4 MiG-29К, 18 Yak-130. Total 60 pcs. Plus modernization of Mig-31BM, Su-25СМ. It’s not a little at all. It’s not bad at all, about 10 years ago one could only dream of such deliveries to the army. Given that long ago our aircraft industry assembled an order of magnitude more simple machines, what is the Su-27 compared to the Su-35? what is the Su-24, in comparison with the Su-34 or MiG-29K and MiG-29 - this is heaven and earth ...
    The situation is similar for helicopters, Mi-8 and Mi-24 / 24P versus modern and sophisticated Mi-28H, Ka-52, Mi-35M, Mi-8AMTS, the pace is comparable, and the complexity of the technique is simply epic. Respectfully! hi
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 19 August 2013 16: 22
      +2
      Quote: Kuznetsov 1977
      Given that, long ago, our aircraft industry assembled an order of magnitude more simple machines, what is the Su-27 compared to the Su-35? what is the Su-24, in comparison with the Su-34 or MiG-29K and MiG-29 - this is heaven and earth ...

      All of us, of course, rejoice in the supply of new aircraft (although so far there are more promises than deliveries), but you distort.
      According to the plans of the Soviet Air Force, serial production of the Su-27M (Su-35), Su-27IB (Su-34), MiG-29M was supposed to begin in the early to mid-90s in the number of hundreds.
      Now is the year 2013, respectively, now this obsolete equipment would already be transferred to secondary districts, and then to write-offs.
      1. leon-iv
        leon-iv 19 August 2013 17: 39
        0
        obsolete equipment

        And how to define it then? She doesn't have wifi
  12. Vtel
    Vtel 19 August 2013 13: 29
    +4
    Thank God the process is not worth it, everyone with the Prahdnik of the Transfiguration of the Lord! There is a huge sky over our Russia and a lot of aviation is needed to protect it from blue globalization.
  13. kori
    kori 19 August 2013 13: 41
    +3
    They do well, and if they do well, it’s even better. I agree with Comrade Kuznetsov, aviation rises slowly, albeit not by leaps and bounds, but still. Let slowly, but qualitatively, evil adversaries!
  14. denson06
    denson06 19 August 2013 14: 19
    +1
    Quote: smiths xnumx
    This year there will be 14 Su-34, 12 Su-30СМ, 12 Su-35С, 4 MiG-29К, 18 Yak-130. Total 60 pcs. Plus modernization of Mig-31BM, Su-25СМ. It’s not a little at all. It’s not bad at all, about 10 years ago one could only dream of such deliveries to the army. Given that long ago our aircraft industry assembled an order of magnitude more simple machines, what is the Su-27 compared to the Su-35? what is the Su-24, in comparison with the Su-34 or MiG-29K and MiG-29 - this is heaven and earth ...
    The situation is similar for helicopters, Mi-8 and Mi-24 / 24P versus modern and sophisticated Mi-28H, Ka-52, Mi-35M, Mi-8AMTS, the pace is comparable, and the complexity of the technique is simply epic. Respectfully! hi

    I completely agree with Mr. Kuznetsov ... you need to rejoice wildly, friends ... we must not forget that more ships and submarines are under construction ... the load on the RF Ministry of Defense is not comparable compared to previous years ... total, over the 1,5 of the year there are more changes in fleet than in the last 15 years ...
  15. Oskar
    Oskar 19 August 2013 14: 26
    +2
    Is it not better to refuse to supply the latest technology to foreign partners (after the execution of already concluded contracts naturally) in favor of their armed forces. And then everything is with our new equipment, and our deliveries are based on the residual principle. Is it really so important for the state several hundred million dollars at the current oil prices? After all, the 90s, when the sale of equipment abroad was necessary for the survival of factories, it seems to have passed?
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. byben
    byben 19 August 2013 14: 28
    0
    The machine with PGO is strange, because initially the project was without PGO like the Su-35S
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 19 August 2013 16: 28
      +2
      Quote: byben
      The machine with PGO is strange, because initially the project was without PGO like the Su-35S

      Without PGO, the "Chinese" line is the Su-30, and the Su-30SM is the "Indian" line. They are with the PGO.
  18. vm68dm
    vm68dm 19 August 2013 14: 35
    +1
    Cool fighter !!! Su-30!
  19. vm68dm
    vm68dm 19 August 2013 14: 37
    +1
    TECH SPECS
    Crew: 2 person
    Length: 21,9 m
    Wingspan: 14,7 m
    Height: 6,36 m
    Wing area: 62 m²
    Weight:
    empty: 18800 kg
    normal takeoff: 24900 kg
    maximum take-off: 34500 kg
    ultimate take-off: 38800 kg
    fuel: 9640 kg
    Engine: 2 × turbofan "AL-31F" (AL-31FP on the Su-30M2)
    Link:
    maximum speedless: 2 × 7770 kgf
    afterburner: 2 × 12500 kg
    thrust vector deflection angles (for AL-31FP): ± 16 ° in any direction, ± 20 ° in the plane
    thrust vector deflection speed (for AL-31FP): 60 ° / s
    weight: 1520 kg
    Maximum operational overload: +9 G
    Flight characteristics
    Maximum speed:
    by the ground: 1350 km / h (1,13 M)
    at an altitude: 2125 km / h (1,9-2,0 M for the version with PGO)
    Distance flight:
    at the ground: 1270 km
    at the height of: 3000 km
    combat radius: 1500 km
    Flight duration: 3,5 h (without refueling)
    Service ceiling: 17300 m
    Rate of climb: 13800 m / min (230 m / s)
    Length of takeoff: 550 m
    path length: 750 m
    Thrust:
    normal take-off weight: 1,00
    with maximum take-off weight: 0,84
    at maximum take-off weight: 0,76
    Wing load:
    with normal take-off weight: 398 kg / m²
    with maximum take-off weight: 532 kg / m²
    Armament [edit | edit source]
    Cannon: 30-mm integrated gun GSh-30-1
    Suspension Points: 12
    The combat load: 8000 kg
    Suspension arms:
    6 medium-range guided missiles R-77, R-27R or R-27ER, R-27T or R-27ET with TGS and 6 melee missiles R-73 with TGS;
    Free-fall bombs weighing 500 kg (up to 8 units) or 250 kg (28 units);
    Containers KMG-U (up to 7 units) or blocks NAR C-13 and C-8 (up to 4 units);
    Various combinations of guided and unguided weapons of various classes are possible.
  20. indiggo
    indiggo 19 August 2013 17: 30
    0
    absolutely normal rates that are growing every year.
  21. Artillerist
    Artillerist 19 August 2013 18: 02
    0
    Quote: vm68dm
    Suspension Points: 12

    Find these 12 points in the photo. I found only 2 guaranteed and 4 likely.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. vm68dm
      vm68dm 19 August 2013 21: 07
      +2
      Here you are! True Vidio about the Su35 but this does not change the essence. Count it! 6 under the wings + 4 under the engines + 2 between the engines.
  22. NEXUS
    NEXUS 19 August 2013 18: 13
    +4
    the modernized equipment in the troops is certainly good ... but, gentlemen and comrades, I will allow myself to move slightly away from this topic and ask the question, what about our t-50? m ... you can add arbitrarily pluses to the four, but with each the lag is growing for a year! Amerikosy are not sitting around, and Europe too ... China, how much backward in military aircraft construction is puffing and trying to keep up ... but Russia, what? We sit, draw pluses and praise ourselves ... we have the best equipment in the world, so far ... but it is so far! we vitally need a fifth-generation fighter and we need it already yesterday!!!
  23. indiggo
    indiggo 19 August 2013 18: 14
    0
    if they are not in the photo, this does not mean that they are not at all, when the aircraft will be taken into combat regiments there and the suspensions will appear.
    1. Artillerist
      Artillerist 19 August 2013 18: 19
      0
      Pendants must be installed at the factory with fire control systems. You want to say that directly in the warhead, the ensign mechanic screwed pendants into the wing with rusty screws?
  24. indiggo
    indiggo 19 August 2013 18: 24
    0
    it’s not necessary when the machines will be sent to the place of service and then put.
  25. darksoul
    darksoul 19 August 2013 21: 19
    0
    cheers comrades cheers more let's