Military Review
Sign in Sign up

Russian military police: first photos

45
He was at the opening of the tank biathlon in Alabino, where he first saw officers and soldiers of the Russian military police. Actually, this is the first event, the protection of which was provided by the Main Directorate of Military Police of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.



Russian military police: first photos








PS Some thoughts about what he saw:

1. Chest badges for VP must be ordered at the Moscow Mint - it will be much more solid and more impressive.
2. Not weapons and special equipment. VP officers should be with pistols, privates and sergeants of VP - with PP-2000 + stun guns (to pacify "dzhigits" who show malicious insubordination).
3. Green takes - not the color. It should be black.
4. Portable communications should be available to all military police.
5. Transport for VP - you need to "Lynx" (IVECO) in the coloring of VP + machine gun (useful for the detention of armed deserters).
Author:
Originator:
http://i-korotchenko.livejournal.com/711442.html
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ruslandeth
    Ruslandeth 19 August 2013 06: 58
    12
    Green beret is not the right color. Must black


    Black is all the more wrong. Marines are not respected. Here is gray - it’s the very thing that it doesn’t take even better, but a green cap, such as that of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

    PS: and the guys have some kind faces wink
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 19 August 2013 07: 41
      +5
      Yes, black has long been worn by anyone. And in the Ministry of Internal Affairs and infantrymen today you can often meet. They say the tankers have or were. They need yellow, so that you can see like a blinker))
      1. def89
        def89 20 August 2013 13: 16
        0
        takes black, and the lining is different.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Vened
    Vened 19 August 2013 06: 59
    -2
    Is it conscripts?
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 19 August 2013 08: 27
      0
      the photo also shows that officers and contractors (although they are somehow strange)
      1. klimpopov
        klimpopov 19 August 2013 08: 54
        +2
        Half are not shaved. And I agree strange ...
  3. KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 19 August 2013 07: 24
    +3
    It is high time! Only the VP will work as intended, when our "military leaders" understand that such a contingent is sometimes called up into the army and navy that they do not want to take them to prison. It's time for them, the leaders, to hand over their checkers to the museum! Therefore, it is necessary to stop counting "sticks and similar designations" of crimes and violations, and on this basis, "MORDOVATE" commanders of all levels. Then they will contact the VP. And the degree of guilt of commanders and chiefs should be determined only after an investigation by the military commander of an incident or violation.
    And it will be differently - "they wanted the best, but it turned out as always"!
    And the color ... It doesn’t matter what color the cat ... the main thing is that she catches mice ... and with VP!
    1. O_RUS
      O_RUS 19 August 2013 07: 35
      +1
      Quote: KazaK Bo
      that such a contingent is sometimes drafted into the army and navy that they don’t want to take them to prison.


      "+" maybe someone runs from the article
    2. Larus
      Larus 12 October 2013 13: 03
      0
      I do not agree because VERY much depends on the officer how he knows who and what he does in his unit.
      And rightly here they wrote above that the VP should be fully equipped (walkie-talkie, weapons and other special equipment) and subordinate to completely different bosses, then independence will be an order of magnitude greater.
  4. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 19 August 2013 07: 27
    +3
    And how did they live in the USSR without the police, and without the military police? I can’t imagine, but now everything is civilized, and the police are in our best houses, and the military police. The number of civil servants will soon be doubled in comparison with the USSR, but the benefits are only not expected to be doubled. Or maybe I don’t understand what?
    1. common man
      common man 19 August 2013 08: 34
      +2
      Well, in the USSR there were also WAIs, and curfew companies, and commandant’s offices. Functions are basically the same. only the name is different. But as for the number of civil servants, I agree to all 100.
      Quote: omsbon
      I don't like the word "police"

      Similarly. It’s not ours. And how did the police not please them?
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 19 August 2013 08: 46
        +1
        and the commandant’s and commandant’s offices do not cause any analogies with Germany, for example? or brigades?
      2. Obliterator
        Obliterator 22 February 2014 12: 37
        0
        Quote: man in the street
        Similarly. It’s not ours. And how did the police not please them?

        The fact that this is the wrong name for the organs of the VD. Militia is not law enforcement at all, but a military militia.
  5. Hort
    Hort 19 August 2013 07: 31
    +1
    all with a severe squint :)
  6. TRex
    TRex 19 August 2013 07: 36
    +4
    I don’t know about special tasks and about how they are framed by the Law of the Russian Federation, what rights and obligations ...
    But about the uniform, there is an opinion that the police (both the military and the Ministry of Internal Affairs) should not hide from the people and their contingent in camouflage - they are not working on the battlefield. "Partners" paint white stripes on their policemen so that they can see from a distance - and be afraid ...
    About weapons, special equipment and communications - I agree. About "Lynx" - no (enough of a domestic manufacturer).
    1. Bum
      Bum 19 August 2013 11: 05
      +1
      But about the uniform, there is an opinion that the police (both the military and the Ministry of Internal Affairs) should not hide from the people and their contingent in camouflage - they are not working on the battlefield. "Partners" paint white stripes on their policemen so that they can see from a distance - and be afraid ...

      Yeah, who is self-propelled! Seen from afar! Wow!
      1. TRex
        TRex 19 August 2013 18: 27
        +5
        And the main purpose of the VP is to catch self-propelled vehicles? Think for yourself: a policeman, as such, is a representative of the authorities. Who should he hide from and why? I am touched by our riot police when in his "shadow" or "city" suit he is engaged in the protection of law and order, conducts special events, etc. Who are we "camouflaging" from? From taxpayers? Have you seen at least one policeman in camouflage in an imported movie? There are even special forces in their "spetsukha", but not in camouflage ...
        At the end of the 80’s, as an MP officer, I found the Marine Corps switching to camouflage uniforms, which I wholeheartedly welcomed because it was really awkward to trample dust in our black one.
        Then, suddenly, he discovered that everything was in camouflage: from the janitor to the Minister of Defense.
  7. omsbon
    omsbon 19 August 2013 07: 59
    +6
    I don’t like the word "police" in relation to our country, and naturally I don’t like "military police". The police were hanged during the war for treason, hence not love.
    1. Ruslandeth
      Ruslandeth 19 August 2013 08: 11
      +4
      Yes, it would be more traditional to name it in Feng Shui. "Commandant's office" or something
    2. vladimirZ
      vladimirZ 19 August 2013 08: 19
      +6
      I agree with you. The word "policeman" and "police" in Russian is associated with the words "traitor", "enemy's accomplice".
      How could one accept it in the name of the law enforcement bodies of Russia? Only, in the case of the subordinate position of Russia, the USA and the West, nothing else.
      Even the address "comrade" and "master" in relation to the policeman is disgusting. Brr, disgusting.
      1. svp67
        svp67 19 August 2013 09: 10
        +6
        Well, let's return to the "origins" and call this emerging branch of the armed forces - ZHANDARMERIA.
        And then you don’t have to think much about the colors of the form - traditional, blue
        1. Serg 122
          Serg 122 17 September 2013 01: 25
          0
          From blue they probably stirs up ...
        2. Doctor71
          Doctor71 20 October 2013 17: 01
          0
          Not not not. The GENDARMERY is the Ministry of Internal Affairs. But not VP.
  8. Hey
    Hey 19 August 2013 09: 05
    +3
    Military police are also field gendarmerie. I wonder why they didn’t call it that? Interesting gendarmes in the photo.
    1. Doctor71
      Doctor71 20 October 2013 17: 05
      0
      Yes, not the Gendarmes! This is MR (i.e. military police). And not badges are necessary, but gogzhetki on flat chains with a 2nd eagle. (Dog plaque laughing )
      1. Kunar
        Kunar 16 January 2014 23: 57
        0
        laughing And in the Urals with a PC in the cradle
  9. Sochi
    Sochi 19 August 2013 09: 32
    +1
    The odd police ... Despite the fact that there is a regular one, so will they perform the same functions? What for? If I am not mistaken, then we have more police officers than military personnel. If the military does not fall under civilian jurisdiction, then the military police are needed, and those structures were enough.
  10. niecke
    niecke 19 August 2013 09: 34
    -2
    It seems that the authorities are sorely lacking Mycopov? and even 3 full divisions of the special forces of the Ministry of Internal Affairs-created this year-did not reassure the gentlemen
    1. garpastum75
      garpastum75 24 August 2013 17: 58
      0
      what kind of 3 full divisions of the special forces of the Ministry of Internal Affairs?
  11. yan
    yan 19 August 2013 09: 41
    -3
    It’s an absolutely correct decision, and you can think about external attributes later. The main thing is to determine the functionality
  12. Hey
    Hey 19 August 2013 09: 41
    +3
    I did not know that the military police make up the arsenal of the Russian Army.
    Why is this article in the section ARSENAL.
  13. user
    user 19 August 2013 09: 42
    +3
    The police should not have conscripts (only contract soldiers) and privates (not lower than warrant officers). Otherwise, the meaning of such a service is lost, well, of course, the quantity, otherwise it will unfold as in the Ministry of Internal Affairs (the world norm is by an amount less than our amount by almost 5 times).
    1. yan
      yan 19 August 2013 10: 10
      0
      I agree on the staffing. A functional responsibilities to prescribe more clearly. The experience of the Special Police was already when it is not clear who is responsible for what and where whose jurisdiction ends.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. Kovrovsky
    Kovrovsky 19 August 2013 10: 02
    +3
    Quote: man in the street
    Well, in the USSR there were also WAIs, and curfew companies, and commandant’s offices. Functions are basically the same. only the name is different. But as for the number of civil servants, I agree to all 100.
    Quote: omsbon
    I don't like the word "police"

    Similarly. It’s not ours. And how did the police not please them?

    As Medvedev explained (the Law on the Police was adopted under him), the police were created from unprofessional people, hence all its troubles, but the police will be created from completely professionals who have passed certification. How it actually turned out, probably, they themselves are in the know!
    1. common man
      common man 19 August 2013 12: 40
      +2
      Thank you, in the know. It would be so laughing if it weren’t crying !
  15. 1961NNN
    1961NNN 19 August 2013 12: 41
    +4
    Another show of Shoigu ... are the military personnel of the Moscow military commandant’s office ... see chevron
    1. lilit.193
      lilit.193 19 August 2013 19: 01
      +1
      Quote: 1961NNN
      Another show of Shoigu ...

      Stopudnyak! good
  16. ed1968
    ed1968 19 August 2013 12: 49
    +2
    they can be judged only by the results of work
  17. lilit.193
    lilit.193 19 August 2013 18: 59
    +1
    But tell me, in general, why are they needed? What, for example, the internal troops will not be able to ensure order? Or have you already completely gone crazy with your departmental affiliation?
    1. svp67
      svp67 19 August 2013 21: 04
      +2
      Quote: lilit.193
      What, for example, the internal troops will not be able to ensure order?
      Where? Inside the military units of the MO. Yes, not one commander of explosives there, without a special order does not climb ...
      1. lilit.193
        lilit.193 19 August 2013 23: 18
        0
        Quote: svp67
        Where?

        At all kinds of events, for example.
        Quote: svp67
        Where? Inside the military units of the MO. Yes, not one commander of explosives there, without a special order does not climb ...

        It will be necessary to climb. And it will be necessary to launch it there. Yes, and in general, in the USSR they did without this military police. The VAI and the commandant’s office were quite enough. And the discipline was higher than now.
        1. svp67
          svp67 22 August 2013 02: 11
          -1
          Quote: lilit.193
          It will be necessary to climb
          Armed formations of different departments will "climb" into each other's internal affairs only in cases of a threat of mutiny ... I don't know your life experience, but on my own behalf I will tell you - God forbid you to get into a "showdown" of two different departments ... but here alone from the MO, others from the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
  18. RoTTor
    RoTTor 19 August 2013 21: 51
    -1
    And this is what the Americans had to say. It would be better if useful ...
  19. krpmlws
    krpmlws 19 August 2013 22: 00
    -1
    Tired of these infantile conversations: it’s good or bad that the police were renamed the police and so on. Fuck this is our government, who will vote for it in the next election is that traitor. How much you can sift everything and everything, it’s time to finally come back from hibernation and remember that we are Russian, we have a national dignity and a duty to protect our Fatherland.
  20. studentmati
    studentmati 21 August 2013 23: 45
    -1
    The need to restore order within the army units can only say that the army has degraded: commanders are nothing, orders are not law. This is already becoming a complete collapse. Nonsense...

    And for the protection of any army events, the rank and file is quite enough. On the contrary, at all times, army units were involved in helping civil law enforcement agencies.
  21. Leader
    Leader 22 August 2013 12: 03
    -1
    Both tank biathlon and military policemen are just another window dressing, "sawing the dough", a senseless undertaking, stupidity ...
    And those who will serve as "military policeman" will have a hard time in life. We traditionally do not like cops, but they will generally be despised, especially by the military.
    1. Serg 122
      Serg 122 17 September 2013 01: 30
      -1
      Yes they will not. From whom did they pick them up? Of those who were at the disposal, or at the state were. Flesh from the flesh is called ...
  22. HINO
    HINO 3 September 2013 18: 11
    0
    The number of punishers is growing near the beloved Motherland ... He is very afraid of the power of his people, whether they are in uniform or without ... In vain, in general ... The fact that Kvachkov is sitting, and the army is silent, clearly indicates that that we don’t have an army. So ... rabble in the form, under the management of Art. reserve lieutenant who had not served in the army for a day.
  23. albanech
    albanech 10 September 2013 15: 18
    0
    It’s better to remove everything and leave the military police flag and inscription on a red background! Beret let it be gray or brown with a brown belt!
  24. itr
    itr 20 September 2013 20: 56
    0
    I still don’t understand. Well, they renamed the command and something has changed?
  25. xomaNN
    xomaNN 29 September 2013 16: 42
    0
    It smacks of some kind of new campaign, like Fazil Iskander's in "Constellation Kozlotur" winked
  26. Roman1970
    Roman1970 11 October 2013 14: 41
    +2
    Here are the big letters "VP" clearly licked off the American band "MR" of a similar department.
  27. Roman1970
    Roman1970 11 October 2013 14: 41
    +2
    Here are the big letters "VP" clearly licked off the American band "MR" of a similar department.
  28. akmoa781
    akmoa781 April 9 2014 16: 56
    0
    I categorically agree with my colleagues, the VP should be armed with personal weapons and special means, as well as means of amplification.
  29. Varly
    Varly 8 August 2014 21: 30
    0
    In units, the commander puts things in order! And if the commander does his job, then outside the unit, his subordinates will keep order!
  30. Swetliy
    Swetliy 24 August 2014 12: 03
    0
    Why then the commandant’s office and patrol?