So, for example, I confess that I was mistaken in relation to the combat training aircraft Yak-130, ordered for the Assad army. Familiar pilots convinced that in capable hands this machine becomes quite a battle machine, able to withstand aviation NATO. I want to say the same thing about tanks.
Of course, with regard to T-90, I, as it were, put it more mildly, skipped ... I completely agree with those who wrote that proven "old men" T-72 can cope with all the tasks facing the Syrian army in defeating frostbitten thugs it is not clear for what reason they are called "rebels". I admit honestly, I mentioned T-90, well, for “smart words” or something. But, one way or another, the terrible, that is, the direct entry into the war of the NATO countries, in Syria, thank God, did not happen. And, apparently, it will not happen for another half a year.
I would not want to deceive ahead of time, because always used to and preparing for the worst in everything (the best in this situation would be a pleasant gift), but it seems that the Syrian land has become the frontier where alliance hirelings will have to retreat. I really hope that Comrade Asad has enough strength and will to burn out this rotten abscess to the end!
And, if the situation is really like this, then we can say that the opposition of the all-consuming hydra of the “democracy” of NATO and all countries resisting this monster has matured a turning point. Speaking figuratively, a cold-hot war (just so, since the squabbles of diplomats are interspersed in it with real fighting, here and there) reached its “Stalingrad”. I repeat, I do not dare to argue, I just really, really hope. Although, who knows, maybe I’m giving a strong wish to the real? ..
Well, the enemy is exhausted. At least, his offensive was exhausted, and he was no longer able to push further (at least for now). And it’s just criminal not to take advantage of such a moment (no matter how long it will be, nobody will predict it), so as not to go on the counterattack now, gradually developing it in an offensive on all fronts.
In my previous article on Syria, as a long-range goal of this offensive, I called the dissolution of the UN in its current form and the formation of a different international organization headquartered not at all in New York, but not in Moscow or Leningrad (I will specifically call his certainly heroic name), and in a truly foreign, neutral country. However, after thinking it over, I came to the conclusion that the UN dissolution is not a goal, but only a means, albeit a powerful tool, on the way to destroying through the false and cynical bourgeois empire of NATO, which carries the ideas of “good and democracy” in cluster bombs dumped on the roofs of residential areas. This is the holy and main goal of our GREAT RUSSIA in the international arena.
I apologize if I am tired of someone with a long and lengthy introduction, but I consider it necessary. Let's get down to business. At first I will say that the international situation for a decisive blow to NATO has matured. The whole world is already full of "fed up" and the policy of "big brother", and the policy of "big dollar" when you take a tiny cent, and without even noticing it, you owe billions of "green" (by the way, empty and unsecured papers) . You wake up at the bottom of a deep debt pit with sheer walls. So a bitter awakening in one "beautiful" morning overtook both Greece and Bulgaria, and Spain, and Italy.
And about the policy of the “big stick”, when smiling uncles from across the ocean suddenly in some moments destroy the whole usual way of life “in the name of the triumph of democracy” I am completely silent. By all appearances, the peoples of the world are filled with anger. And, which is especially important for us, the peoples of Europe (including the NATO countries themselves) are not an exception.
Moreover, the Bulgarians, the Greeks, the Spaniards, for several months in a row, have taken to the streets to defend their rights brazenly stolen from them. In the recognized poorest country in Europe, Bulgaria has long come to regular clashes with the police. And on the night of 23 on 24 of July of this year, people driven to despair by high prices for public utilities with negligible salaries blocked the parliament building. The situation is far from smooth in such relatively “prosperous” countries as Germany, France and the United Kingdom.
For example, my good friend from the Volga Germans, in the dashing 90s he moved to historical homeland, said that over the past 5 years all the gains of trade unions have come to naught. The German employer (however, like any other filthy bourgeois driven only by the idea of profit) “sleeps and sees” how to cut the salaries of hard workers, which (even with German taxes) are already small. Well, with such a grief “ruler” as Merkel, raving with the idea of hook or by crook to keep the European Union within its current borders and, it seems to me, for a long time not paying attention to the problems of its people, it could hardly have been otherwise. This frau also has a tendency to look overseas “big brother” in the mouth. That is why, dear readers, I called her “not too smart” in an article about Syria. Oh, Germans, Germans, why did you “move” Schroeder? ..
And the siege of the European Central Bank (ECB) in Frankfurt 31 of May, when the people led by anti-globalists protested against the "economy" of Brussels (if suddenly someone does not know - the capital of the EU) - is not a sign of Europe's readiness for an explosion ?!
By the way, I do not force anyone to believe in it, but I personally consider the European Union a "creation" of NATO "great strategists." On the one hand, this is a kind of illusion for European countries, giving them the opportunity to feel "independence" from Washington. Like, "we ourselves with a mustache", we can make decisions without bush, clintons and Obama. In fact, all of Europe has long been indebted to the States, thanks to the very “Marshall Plan”, which any student who is more or less interested in history knows about. On the other hand, having pan-European structures (European Parliament, European Commission, ECB), it is much easier for America to oversee this multinational gathering. It’s just like before the “patchwork” Austro-Hungarian empire, but also within the borders wider. Yes, and the next “crisis” is easier to arrange when there is a single currency (which has recently become the same “candy wrappers” as dollars).
But that's not all. In addition to the economic collapse, there are many other equally burning problems in Europe. And, perhaps, the most important can be called two of them: national and moral.
That the same Germany almost lost the German face is no longer a secret to anyone. But then, strictly speaking, Paris ceased to belong to the French. However, the EU authorities (read between the lines - NATO) do not just do not want to see it, but on the contrary, they only do that they shout about the need for “tolerance” (ugh, they have invented the word), I mean tolerance. By and large, in Russia in this sense is not better. We, too, were allowed and for now let everyone who feels like. But Tajiks or Kirghiz even sweep the streets of our cities or work on construction sites (it is clear that they wouldn’t have bothered and didn’t work, bourgeois would have to take us Slavs and pay many times more). And the same Turks, Kurds, Gypsies from Romania - in Germany, Arabs and black Africans (interestingly, the word “Negro” - printed or already on a par with the mat?) - in France do not hurry. Why, if possible, and live on benefits? I do not think that the Germans, the French or the British (unlike us, they know how to count every penny, it’s ours - the soul is unbuttoned) because they have to keep all these parasites.
Yes, there is no need to think, it is enough to open foreign on the Internet news. You learn that here and there a rebellion against intruders breaks out in Europe. True, very often already the guests, feeling their strength, arrange riots. The most interesting thing is that if the same German strikes, let's say, a presumptuous Kurd, this is Nazism, the ghost of Hitler, the fascist shortage, ay-ay-ay, oh-oh ...! And if on the contrary - this is a common street fight, well, just think, they didn’t share something. However, everything, like us ... But now it is not about that. It is important for us that the problem is there, it is ubiquitous.
Well, about morality generally keep quiet. After all, the EU leadership declared the problem of “oppressed” sexual minorities everywhere (I will transfer from politically correct Russian to popular people: homosexuals and lesbians!)! Between the lines, read: "The EU government personally took up the widespread propaganda of Sodom sin !!!" Do people who still stand behind traditional family values like this ?! Your right, of course, is to ask: “Did such people stay in Europe?” - Stay! And the direct evidence of this is the mass appearance of Parisians on the streets, when, at the suggestion of the president, a “socialist” (how can he then associate himself with the great word “socialism” after all?) Hollander in France legalized same-sex marriages (and lines: Sodomian orgies). The most ordinary people, outraged that from now on individuals of the male sex can not only poke each other a member of the 5 point of support, but also CHILDREN TO BIRTH UP (!), Have been declared “ultra-right” or “retarded”. And dispersed. Water from hoses and tear gas (all, including women, adolescents and the elderly). To say that a blatant case - to say nothing! What do you think is not enough after that in France dissatisfied?
I declare with all responsibility that this or that problem pushing people to revolt is now in all European countries (well, we will not take seriously a trifle: San Marino, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Luxembourg, Andorra and, especially, the Vatican)! The situation in the camp of the enemy - nowhere hot. To this we add that if you carefully look at the publications in the media, only Poland and only the Baltic States (they are serious allies, have nothing to say!) Shout their loyalty to “NATO and the holy cause of democracy”. And in the same Germany, they are outraged by sending soldiers of the Bundeswehr (despite the fact that their soldiers are now all contract soldiers) in Asia-Africa. In other words, the alliance is no longer an alliance, but a “bubble”, and the EU is a bubble whose walls are even thinner than the first.
In fact, if the director of the FSB has still not brought a report to the head of our state on how to use the European mess to destroy NATO from the inside, then he does not work out his own bread. Dismiss such a time.
In Europe, the world has not come together. Let's see what is happening in other parts of the world, with regard to the topic of the article, of course. And that's what's going on - a circle of countries has emerged that are ready to confront the world of "democracy" and the dollar. There are those who can be considered quite likely allies of Russia.
And, first of all, it is not China or even North Korea, and, of course, not India, but Latin American countries. The better, the harder it will be for the States. Indeed, in a geographical sense, by concluding an alliance with Latin America (more precisely, having created a bloc, we already have good relations with the majority of these countries) we will strike the Americans “below the belt”.
Here we can not say that the situation in the countries of the South American continent is better for us nowhere. In Venezuela, the ally of Hugo Chávez Nicolas Maduro, a simple working man, was restrained. Of course, he is not Comrade Lieutenant Colonel Chavez, but still ours. In Bolivia, at the helm of an ethnic Indian, Evo Morales, is also a simple person, and therefore between the States and Russia, by definition, will always choose our country (even in its current bourgeois form). In Nicaragua, head of state Daniel Ortega, though not the Sandinist Ortega, who smashed the Samos troops, but still an ally of Russia, even the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia was one of the first to recognize us. Finally, Cuba, where, from the hands of the sick Fidel Castro, his younger brother Raul seized power.
Even with such a cursory review, we see that four Latin American countries are controlled by “pro-Russian” regimes. Judging by Putin’s meeting with the leaders of these countries in Moscow, at least in this direction the head of the FSB director is working.
In Asia, Russia is an ally of Iran. It is not so important that according to the principle “the enemy of my enemy is a friend to me”. It is clear that one should be “friendly” with such a country (after all, Shiite Muslims are in power there). However, in the event of a confrontation with America, Tehran certainly will not accept its side. Well, Syria does not need to be discounted. If Comrade Asad manages to finish off the rebels in the next six months (and we must certainly help him in such a godly deed), then he will not forget us.
Total, even offhand already 6 countries. It is no coincidence about China (and along with the DPRK), I am still silent. China will behave very carefully, so its voice in our favor (by the way, it’s better that we’ve limited it to his voice, otherwise we’ll have to) we can only hope when we show our strength.
Here it is, today's position on the fronts. The further procedure is as simple as the world: by weakening them, we strengthen ourselves. Very conditionally, the whole plan of the counteroffensive can be divided into three stages.
Stage one. We add fuel to the fire of an already raging Europe. We act in the same way as in the 70-80 of the last century, the United States acted against us. Those. against his enemy weapons. Bulgarians are rioting - we heat them up with various statements in support of the rebels in the media and at the level of diplomats. To start. Then we try to understand if there is a leader among the discontented, if he has some kind of backbone of supporters that can be turned into a party, for example. If these people eventually lead to power, then Bulgaria, you see, will come out of the EU, and from NATO ... Well, but it will not work - God be with them. Then if only rebelled a little longer. As long as there is internal turmoil in the enemy's camp, he is hardly going anywhere to "defend democracy."
According to the same scheme, you can work with the Greeks, Spaniards, Italians, and who else will take to the streets. It is appropriate here to recall and recall the history of the same Greeks, as they themselves drove the Nazis, and the English "allies" put a collar on them. You see, they did not like the fact that the resistance in the country was led by the Communists. It is possible to tell the Spaniards about their glorious republican past and, as if by the way, to notice that the king sat down on the throne with the blessing of generalissimo Franco.
In Germany and France it is reasonable to “rock the boat”, playing the national and moral cards. With the Germans, it is more to rest on the first, with the French on the second. In short, from whom it hurts, we are talking about that. These two countries are relatively “prosperous”, so you need to be more vigilant with them. Those. with the preparation of agents of influence and the formation of the party to overthrow the government not to rush. Here you can stay at the level of beautiful words of support.
What else I would like to note, it is necessary to stop the expansion of the EU. It is still in our power to prevent Serbia from joining the “united Europe” of Serbia. But a little - just not to allow. Just the Serb brothers need to help as soon as possible to establish a pro-Russian (without a hint of quotation marks in this case) and anti-American-anti-European regime in the country. Russia is the richest country, we are able to make a prosperous land from a small brotherly country. What for? - And do not you guess? Let everyone around go and lick, jealous of Serbia, not bound by any EU treaty obligations. And again, as if by the way, we will say: “You see, what kind of Serbs are great? - Do not climb into your total debt trap. And in the appendage to everything, at any opportunity we will be in one with our Slavic brothers a voice to shout: “Scum! Free Radovan Karadzic, free the glorious General Radko Mladić! ”
Stage Two. Very conditionally - the second. Because it is necessary to carry it out simultaneously with the first. We weaken the enemy and form a block ourselves. We continue to trade arms with Venezuela. Bolivia offer the same. If our allies are poor - not scary. We simply supply older weapons, but no credit is very desirable. You can not pay for the MiG-31, Su-27 and, say, T-80 - no question! - We offer you (much cheaper, of course) the same Yak-130, L-39 (in combat version), T-72, BMP-1, AK-47. Everything works, everything is good. Yes, outdated, but you have no money for a new one. We can offer other options: you allow us to build a base on your coast (or an airfield on your territory) and use it (them) for free 5 years. And we, on account of these savings, are newer weapons. By the way, in case of a tough quarrel with the United States, they are ready to drive you to help the air regiment, to calm it down.
And limited to military cooperation is not worth it. No one has canceled, for example, cooperation in energy, production, culture, tourism, finally! - The latter is especially interesting, why not bargain for our citizens in exchange for a weapon cheap holidays in the best hotels in Venezuela with luxury beaches?
If all the steps are done consistently and correctly, without releasing anyone from our strong (undoubtedly friendly hugs), then very soon, already in 5-10 years, that “glorious moment” will come when “there is still pressure and the enemy is running.” The moment in which the NATO bubble will burst at European seams, and our union will get stronger enough.
This is where we will proceed to stage 3, the dissolution of the UN. This measure, in fact, has matured a long time ago. The UN has simply exhausted itself. Refer again to the newspapers and compare offhand how many times NATO or the EU is mentioned there, and how many - the UN. I assure you, the comparison will not be in favor of the latter. Moreover, UN decisions for NATO since the Kosovo war have ceased to be binding. Remember how in 1998 Americans didn’t even pay attention to the veto right we used.
But, I repeat, in order to begin this final stage of the defeat of NATO, the mess in Europe must reach its apogee, and the anti-NATO bloc we have formed can become quite powerful. And an indicator of this power will be just the interest of China (and with it the DPRK). And then you can put a heavy diplomatic blow!
The action itself should be arranged with fanfare and take place directly at the UN headquarters in New York, where all the heads of state should arrive (under good protection, otherwise the Americans are not written at all) of our bloc. It may look something like this. First, the representatives of our allies will speak, bringing all kinds of complaints and accusations to the United States. Moreover, each question should imply a direct answer - “yes” or “no”, no “think it over”, “we are not completely sure” or “from the point of view of banal erudition.” Russia, as an eminent artist at the concert, will perform last. Our representative will not blame anyone, his speech will be short and sharp, like a sword, the result. For example, his speech may sound like this: “We understood that you could not answer anything intelligible to our friends. And you can not in the future. And therefore your opinion no longer interests us. We, Russia, believe that the UN has completely exhausted itself. And in this, many support us (it really should be so).
Therefore, our country announces its withdrawal from the UN. We hope all those who spoke here before us will follow our example. Together with them, we will form a new community of nations, where there will be no place for lies, hypocrisy and justification of murders by the word "democracy", with headquarters in no way in New York, but not in Moscow, but in a truly neutral country. You will not have a place there until you completely dissolve NATO and abandon the colonial policy, apologizing for it to all countries of the world. ” So, clearly and firmly. Then get up and leave the room. Behind our representative should go all representatives of the allies. More than sure, other countries will follow this example. The “bad” example is contagious.
Now the reputation of “political science fiction” is firmly established behind me. And again I will not argue. So far, all of the above is pure invention. But there is no one fairy tale that could not have come true! If you have the patience to read it to the end, then you remember the mention of Putin's meeting with the heads of the countries of Latin America. In addition, Russia, thank God, adopted a law banning the promotion of homosexuality. All these are steps in the right direction. Just as an attempt (most likely, purely indicative) to curb the influx of newcomers from Central Asia to us.
But it must be tougher and it should be more honest. Is it possible to? “Perhaps, but only when Russia throws off the bourgeois yoke from its shoulders ...”