Military Review

Photofact: the newest Voronezh-M radar in Usolye-Sibirskiy is at the final stage of readiness

83
Photofact: the newest Voronezh-M radar in Usolye-Sibirskiy is at the final stage of readiness



The Voronezh-M missile attack warning system radar in Usolye-Sibirskoye is almost ready for preliminary tests that will begin on September 1. They will be followed by the government, which is scheduled for completion in 2014.

“Preliminary tests are quite lengthy. All the necessary adjustment passes, the station's radiation pattern is calculated, the main parameters are tested. This process is quite lengthy, ”said Yuri Borisov.

At the same time, the Deputy Minister of Defense noted that the station already successfully accomplishes tasks for its intended purpose. “This is already a combat station. This is not a model. And the information to the command post comes real, which is obtained after processing the radar information from the real air. That is, it works now, ”stated Deputy Minister of Defense of Russia Yuri Borisov.



Also during the visit at the Irkutsk Aviation Plant, the Deputy Minister of Defense of Russia reported that Irkut Corporation successfully implements contracts with the military department for the supply of X-NUMX multi-purpose aircraft Su-60 SM and 30 to combat-training aircraft Yak-55. According to him, “the entire volume of the order for 130 year, and this 2013 of the Yak-18 and 130 of the Su-14CM planes will go to the troops on time. The deadline for deliveries is November this year. ”
Originator:
http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/38282/
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Scoun
    Scoun 8 August 2013 13: 22 New
    29
    An excellent photo fact, every morning would begin with such photo facts.
    1. elmi
      elmi 8 August 2013 13: 37 New
      11
      Good news,
      Also during the visit at the Irkutsk Aviation Plant, the Deputy Minister of Defense of Russia reported that Irkut Corporation successfully implements contracts with the military department for the supply of X-NUMX multi-purpose aircraft Su-60 SM and 30 to combat-training aircraft Yak-55. According to him, “the entire volume of the order for 130 year, and this 2013 of the Yak-18 and 130 of the Su-14CM planes will go to the troops on time. The deadline for deliveries is November this year. ”

      Worried about why not reviving the moment 31? all the more, there is a supply of engines for them; the northern direction must be closed.
      1. mogus
        mogus 8 August 2013 14: 46 New
        +4
        MiG-35 decided to do ...
        1. klimpopov
          klimpopov 8 August 2013 16: 58 New
          +9
          Do you think that Mig-35 will replace Mig-31? These are absolutely different planes. One high-altitude interceptor, another light exterminator. This is if very rude.
          1. KazaK Bo
            KazaK Bo 8 August 2013 19: 26 New
            +6
            Quote: klimpopov
            Do you think that the MiG-35 will replace the MiG-31? These are absolutely different planes. One high-altitude interceptor, another light exterminator. This is if very rude.

            Sorry, I was taught at the academy that the MiG-31 is not only a high-altitude aircraft, but rather, and more importantly, a long-range air defense interceptor, which replaced the Tu-128. Its main purpose is to protect the airspace in the vast expanses of our North and Siberia ... but it can also fulfill the role of a leader ... the role of an air command post.
            1. klimpopov
              klimpopov 8 August 2013 19: 33 New
              +4
              So what am I talking about? Mig-35 and Mig-31 how they are interchangeable belay ? all right Mig -31 high-altitude long-range air defense interceptor, and Mig 35 light battlefield fighter. Is not it? request
              1. KazaK Bo
                KazaK Bo 8 August 2013 20: 09 New
                +3
                Quote: klimpopov
                Is not it?

                ... so it is, but the trochs are not so ... therefore I inserted my "5 kopecks" ... we have a lot of high-altitude workers, but distant interceptors ...
                1. VAF
                  VAF 8 August 2013 20: 14 New
                  +8
                  Quote: KazaK Bo
                  we have a lot of high-altitude workers, but distant interceptors ...


                  Speak correctly on the MiG-31-m, although you might argue that the tactical range of the future MiG-35S and SU-35S, as well as the old Su-27P / PD / S, and of course, the Su-27SM were equal, and they surpass them in terms of barrage time, but in missile weapons, here, yes .... the undisputed advantage of the Mig-31, and of the Barrier-M capabilities +! soldier
                  1. Nick
                    Nick 8 August 2013 21: 37 New
                    +2
                    Quote: vaf
                    but in the missile arsenal, yes here .... the undisputed advantage of the Mig-31, well, and in terms of the capabilities of Barrier-M +!

                    And how important are the speed parameters of an aircraft acting as an air defense interceptor? The Mig-31 has a speed of up to 3000 km / h. and Su has a little more than 2000 km / h.
                    1. VAF
                      VAF 8 August 2013 22: 07 New
                      +8
                      Quote: Nick
                      And how important are the speed parameters of an aircraft acting as an air defense interceptor?


                      Speed ​​parameters are always important, especially when the ascent is from the “duty on the ground” position, the second question is how far enough kerosene is if you “take” it from takeoff in full fast and furious engines, that is. at the MFR.
                      As far as I remember, at the MiG-31st intercept line somewhere under 720-780 km, at the Su-27th 840 km.
                      But the missiles, and the locator, yes .. but the Barrier cannot be compared with the Sword.
                      And at a speed of 2500 for Sushka and M2,85 (depending on the height, the speed varies), but for small ones it is almost the same.
                      But if you add all the components together, i.e. Locator, rockets, altitude and speed, then for long-range interception it is preferable of course MiG-31st.
                      If so ... on the fingers and simply winked
                      1. Alex 241
                        Alex 241 8 August 2013 22: 18 New
                        +5
                        Seryozha will screw my five kopecks, 31 due to the data transmission equipment (ADF 518) can work as an avax.
                      2. VAF
                        VAF 8 August 2013 22: 41 New
                        +5
                        Quote: Alex 241
                        I'll screw my five cents


                        Sasha, good 5 kopecks, or rather chic drinks !

                        But Irkut was not able to “shove” the Su-27PU (Su-30VKP), but it is a pity ... the same one “steered” freely by a link! recourse

                      3. Alex 241
                        Alex 241 8 August 2013 22: 44 New
                        +2
                        Seryozha, but they have the same equipment for interfacing with the ADF. Although you are right, they are tied to the 31st.
                      4. Shumka
                        Shumka 8 August 2013 23: 19 New
                        +2
                        Vaf, I can’t stand your comments because there is nothing to hide. Comment more often and With C And greetings from members of the forum.
                  2. klimpopov
                    klimpopov 8 August 2013 22: 27 New
                    +2
                    So here I am about the same ... If on the fingers and in a simple way. What started the dispute? Migar 31 = Migar 35 ... So I tried to find out about the sign with a friend ..
                  3. VAF
                    VAF 8 August 2013 22: 45 New
                    +4
                    Quote: klimpopov
                    So here I am about the same ..


                    Klim, hi! drinks Finally, he became like a person, otherwise, with this mug, “Obama fuck knows”, to say the least, was not comme il faut lol

                  4. klimpopov
                    klimpopov 8 August 2013 23: 00 New
                    +3
                    He threw off the skin of the Negro! Hi Seryozha, a week on the seas I was so relaxed with Batya))) Apparently matured!)) Here is an avatar like a person now! I Tersky already wrote for her respect)) for your wallpaper can finally plus !!!!
                2. Alex 241
                  Alex 241 8 August 2013 22: 51 New
                  +2
                  Klim, I'm sorry to interrupt, but the MiG 31 is a long-range interceptor (aka “iron”, aka “flying deli” laughing ) and MiG 35 multipurpose fighter. You should make conclusions.
                3. klimpopov
                  klimpopov 8 August 2013 23: 09 New
                  +2
                  Yes, without your "disruptions" the topvar would not be a topvar !!!!!!!!
                4. Alex 241
                  Alex 241 8 August 2013 23: 13 New
                  +5
                  well and my traditional drinks
                5. klimpopov
                  klimpopov 8 August 2013 23: 20 New
                  +4
                  Finished me off! My favorite film ! After this scene, just cry! Bykov Great actor and pilot! And say that I'm wrong! "We can" !!!! drinks
                6. The comment was deleted.
                7. klimpopov
                  klimpopov 8 August 2013 23: 27 New
                  +2
                  Yes, I put the film and watch it completely! drinks
    2. Nick
      Nick 8 August 2013 23: 16 New
      +2
      Quote: vaf
      If so ... on the fingers and simply

      Thank you for the educational program.
  • Tambov we ...
    Tambov we ... 8 August 2013 22: 13 New
    +2
    MiG-35, not an easy fighter of the “battlefield” - it is a tactical aviation fighter.
    1. klimpopov
      klimpopov 8 August 2013 22: 37 New
      +5
      Well, in a new way, yes, that’s what I meant. For what I love the topwar, it’s always corrected and poked with my nose (in the best sense of the word), but in general it’s possible to get specialists to talk about aviation by provocation, excuse me. Yes, and my knowledge is purely theoretical drinks
      1. Tambov we ...
        Tambov we ... 8 August 2013 23: 58 New
        +2
        This is not new - in 1982 my military-industrial college was a front-line tactical aviation pilot. Number VUSa, unfortunately I do not remember.
  • NauruS
    NauruS 9 August 2013 01: 38 New
    0
    what's the point? So far, you can upgrade to the MiG-31BM version, and after the T-50 it will be able to perform these functions !!
  • klimpopov
    klimpopov 8 August 2013 14: 21 New
    18
    They are also building near us! Consider the fact! soldier
    Photo from internet bully
    1. Kibalchish
      Kibalchish 8 August 2013 14: 33 New
      +2
      “Near us” is where?
      1. 11 black
        11 black 8 August 2013 14: 39 New
        +8
        Quote: Kibalchish
        Near us "- where is it?

        Armavir if I'm not mistaken, Krasnodar Territory
        1. klimpopov
          klimpopov 8 August 2013 14: 42 New
          10
          Yes sir! Under Armavir ...
          1. eplewke
            eplewke 8 August 2013 14: 53 New
            +5
            Great news!
            1. Uncle Serozha
              Uncle Serozha 8 August 2013 15: 48 New
              13
              Yes, Voronezh-M is a modern thing. They take envy directly, looking at what a little technical building there is. On my own Danube-3U everything was oversized ... But after 40 years of service, he is still in service, although he no longer performs missile defense tasks. Now only satellites are grazing, old man.
              Danai-3U
              1. Ivan79
                Ivan79 9 August 2013 10: 36 New
                0
                And here it is written that it is being taken apart ... belay
                http://lana-sator.livejournal.com/192153.html
    2. Ascetic
      Ascetic 8 August 2013 16: 32 New
      +5
      Quote: klimpopov
      They are also building near us! Consider the fact!


      On June 6, 2013, ORTK entered the database (on the birthday of the chief designer of NPK Niidar Saprykin). This is the second section (southern Gabala). And the lead station 77Я6-DM "Voronezh-DM" in Armavir was put into operation in 2008 and put on regular combat duty on 26.02.2009/XNUMX/XNUMX (southwestern Ukrainian section)
      By the way, neighboring Ukraine is also preparing to replace its obsolete radar equipment in Sevastopol and Mukachevo: by 2017 they want to create a new generation radar system using digital antenna array technology.
      Further partnership of Russia with Ukraine and Azerbaijan in the field of radar is possible, but so far no concrete proposals have been received from them, said Sergey Boev, general designer of the missile attack warning system, in an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
      "We have contacts with the Ukrainian side to create systems that are of interest to them: complexes for monitoring the 200-mile economic zone, marine waters. Cooperation on the use of the radar is possible, but so far there are no real projects. As with the Azerbaijani side. Protection tasks the maritime borders in the Caspian Sea may become a subject of cooperation in the future. But for now - no concrete projects "

      Full interview here
      1. klimpopov
        klimpopov 8 August 2013 17: 02 New
        +3
        In Armavir, it was fully adopted in June 2013 of the year as far as I know. And then with reservations, there will still be understaffed.
  • Very old
    Very old 8 August 2013 16: 42 New
    +3
    Roman, I just don’t understand one thing; someone sculpts a foul minus to any, even very, very positive article. For what? Who! We are all military people here
    1. guran
      guran 8 August 2013 17: 11 New
      +1
      yes put on the minuses / pluses, what's the difference?
      just some adults here, and some as children))
      there are a lot of pensioners on the forum, they look at life with grounding, all the best for them in the past
      1. Very old
        Very old 8 August 2013 20: 07 New
        0
        So after all, I’m not young ... Very old
      2. VAF
        VAF 8 August 2013 20: 10 New
        +7
        Quote: guran
        there are a lot of pensioners on the forum, they look at life with grounding, all the best for them in the past


        “Dear Guran, what’s wrong with this, that there are a lot of military pensioners on the site?”
        Yes, I forgot to say, I did not put cons in the article!
        I’m telling you that in aviation we really had in the past much better, more and more efficiently!
        Well, about the children .. this is correct, but the presence of “clowns” is worse, this is a clear disaster, but such is the Internet world!
        1. Alex 241
          Alex 241 8 August 2013 20: 17 New
          +2
          all the best for them in the past ...... Hi Seryozha, well, why is all the best in the past, there are pros and cons everywhere, youth is youth, with age comes the realization of something that I did not think about before.
          1. VAF
            VAF 8 August 2013 20: 38 New
            +5
            Quote: Alex 241
            Hi Seryozha, why is all the best in the past, there are pros and cons everywhere, youth is youth, with age comes the realization of something that I had not thought about before.


            Hi Sasha! Well, you watch "apostle" "business trip" became a philosopher drinks
            Or is it wisdom? good
            And I’m fighting the “clowns” .... breed like ... rabbits, and even with ambition. This is me about yesterday (welding and 66 wassat ).
            Well, "welding" is a separate issue ... not only is the "clown" so he also has a distance determined by time belay , oh ..m .. there’s no word “airshel”!

            Here you go ... fresh from LII ... getting ready for MAKSU, well, about yesterday’s article ... 056th was officially postponed for delivery in 2014, otherwise friend Sania Romanov talked with someone there and everything will be in that request

            1. Alex 241
              Alex 241 8 August 2013 20: 57 New
              +2
              Well, Duc, you know the Caucasus is a delicate matter laughing I hope for the duration of the salon will not be driven anywhere.
              1. VAF
                VAF 8 August 2013 21: 04 New
                +3
                Quote: Alex 241
                I hope for the duration of the salon will not be driven anywhere.


                And I decided not to go, or rather, they "decided" for me lol and, in principle, everything has already been seen, re-seen. Kmitytsev only look? So they are already in Chagol ... tired. but ... fly well .. drafts and most importantly ... fall sad

                1. Alex 241
                  Alex 241 8 August 2013 21: 12 New
                  +2
                  Seryozha, you remember about the Chinese a year ago they said, everything was as expected, the quality was tightened, and Maroussia cried for a beautiful scarf laughing
            2. TSOOBER
              TSOOBER 8 August 2013 21: 48 New
              +2
              Hello Sergey! There is a question, what kind of holes are at the base of the keels and what are they for, if it’s not a secret? bully
              1. Alex 241
                Alex 241 8 August 2013 22: 07 New
                +3
                Additional air intakes about their purpose differ in information, one for blowing engine compartment and another for cooling equipment.
              2. VAF
                VAF 8 August 2013 22: 20 New
                +3
                Quote: TSOOBER
                There is a question - what kind of holes are at the base of the keels and what are they for - if it's not a secret?


                La what's the secret wink only if the open lol Sasha, in principle, answered correctly. good

                But if you adhere to the Instructions, then this is the air intakes of blowing motor bays and heat exchangers of the air conditioning system. drinks

                1. Black Colonel
                  Black Colonel 9 August 2013 15: 03 New
                  0
                  Dear VAF, all your photos are interesting, but for some reason stretched horizontally.
            3. K-36
              K-36 8 August 2013 22: 23 New
              +2
              Dear Sergey (vaf). I dare to clarify: did you bring the Yak-130 to mind? And then, about three years ago, one prototype crashed right on take-off (onto the concrete runway of my native airfield). Taskaev led the topic, and he turned out to be an eyewitness unwittingly. The crew (two "local" pilots) successfully ejected through the flashlight. I then, I remember, through the Internet I turned to A. Garnaev with a question, why did Roman lead the topic on the Yak-am (after all, it seems that he worked with MiG-ovsky KB together with Garnayev)? Garnayev replied that YES, now Roman is the leading pilot-isp. in the company of Yakovlev. In that accident, I personally heard from Taskkaev’s mouth (on the porch of TsKDP): "The same story, which seems to be with board No. ...". I learned from the objectors that the CDS failed (moreover, it was duplicated many times !!). After this incident, the second (of two) Yak-s flew from our air. on their own, and the wreckage of the second was sent by a transporter. A group of specialists, led by Taskaev, also left. More than the Yak-130 in his airportE did not see. Sincerely.
              1. VAF
                VAF 8 August 2013 23: 16 New
                +3
                Quote: K-36
                I dare to clarify: did you bring the Yak-130 to mind?


                Dear Victor! Yes, they brought the plane! You probably talk about the case of Shcherbina and Kononenko?
                Why is the novel. Rather led this topic? So he is the chief pilot of the Yakovlev Design Bureau.
                I don’t want to tidy up the past, but the ticket and support for the test work at the MiG DGC from Roman was thanks to the late V. Menitsky, who chose him on behalf of the late Fedotov, after the tragic death of which Menitsky became the chief pilot.
                About Roman only flattering words and the best reviews. Pilot from GOD !!! It’s not without reason that Menitsky, when he left his summer job, it was Roman who tested the place of the chief pilot, although the entire “top” (Belyakov, Waldenberg, Belosvet, etc.) were opposed for various reasons, but Menitsky is menitsky and ..Roman became Mikoyan’s chief pilot, but ..... for a number of reasons, he soon moved to the same position at Yakovlev Design Bureau.

                And ESDU .. this is a very moody thing and. as a rule, if one subchannel flies, then others may fly out ... how many accidents and catastrophes for this reason you yourself know.
                That's somewhere like that, if in short drinks
                1. K-36
                  K-36 9 August 2013 01: 43 New
                  +1
                  Sergey (vaf) thanks for the answer. I mentioned here about this accident - http://www.take-off.ru/news/94-may-2010/477-av-yak-130-29-05-2010 But Taskaev (on the porch of TsKDP) is visible as just referred to Shcherbina and Kononenko). Our (local) people said that the subsequently crashed board already repeatedly shone its "bziki". There was a strong opinion that digital flight programs are clearly raw. And switching ESDU to backup channels does not always work clearly. It’s good that the pilots stayed there, because they had to jump from a height of about 60 meters from GDP. Sincerely. drinks
    2. Airman
      Airman 8 August 2013 17: 17 New
      +4
      Quote: Old very
      Roman, I just don’t understand one thing; someone sculpts a foul minus to any, even very, very positive article. For what? Who! We are all military people here

      No, not all are military.
      1. Bort radist
        Bort radist 8 August 2013 22: 21 New
        +2
        Quote: Povshnik
        No, not all are military.

        And many without grounding
  • Airman
    Airman 8 August 2013 18: 35 New
    +1
    Quote: Scoun
    An excellent photo fact, every morning would begin with such photo facts.

    With the commissioning, we will close half of China and a little further south, that is, the Indian Ocean.
  • Brave
    Brave 8 August 2013 18: 47 New
    0
    The good news is, any creation is better than destruction.
  • afire
    afire 8 August 2013 13: 22 New
    +7
    Good luck to the engineers at the delivery and station success and trouble-free longevity!
  • alone
    alone 8 August 2013 13: 23 New
    +9
    Yeah!! powerful thing. No comments!!
    1. eplewke
      eplewke 8 August 2013 14: 54 New
      +8
      A powerful thing is to say the least ... 3000 km around will distinguish a mosquito from a fly ...
      1. Airman
        Airman 8 August 2013 17: 18 New
        0
        Quote: eplewke
        A powerful thing is to say the least ... 3000 km around will distinguish a mosquito from a fly ...

        Understated range.
        1. KazaK Bo
          KazaK Bo 8 August 2013 19: 42 New
          0
          Quote: Povshnik
          Understated range.

          ... not "understated" ... these are real numbers ... you can increase significantly, but then you need to rebuild the antenna array ... This is not Darial .. and not the Danube ... or their hybrid with a receiving center from one .. .a transmitting - from another complex, as it was at the facilities ...
          And, never, not like a mosquito ... but it will not see flies ... even in a certain sector ... and even more so to distinguish between them. It has been said more than once - VORONEZH is a decimeter or meter RTKomplex ... And this means that the indicators are an order of magnitude lower than that of the "centimeter" ranges in terms of coordinate accuracy ... in terms of the size of objects under control ... And even earlier, I wrote on forums that these missile defense systems cannot in any way be missile defense guidance stations, as some visitors to the site have falsely stated ...
      2. Airman
        Airman 8 August 2013 17: 20 New
        +1
        Quote: eplewke
        A powerful thing is to say the least ... 3000 km around will distinguish a mosquito from a fly ...

        Not around, but in a certain sector.
      3. alone
        alone 8 August 2013 17: 59 New
        0
        Dear Eugene, I don’t believe that the latest Voronezh M development is far behind the older types of radars as Darial.
      4. Airman
        Airman 8 August 2013 21: 25 New
        +1
        Quote: eplewke
        A powerful thing is to say the least ... 3000 km around will distinguish a mosquito from a fly ...

        Once again I checked the TTX "Voronezh-M" and made sure that the detection range of 6000 km.
        1. alone
          alone 8 August 2013 23: 04 New
          0
          this is closer to the point
        2. eplewke
          eplewke 9 August 2013 08: 29 New
          0
          for 3000 km. it can work on low-flying targets and inconspicuous. at 6000 due to geography and terrain this is simply not possible. I do not argue that for 6 he can work on high-altitude goals and near space.
          1. Black Colonel
            Black Colonel 9 August 2013 15: 08 New
            0
            And who will say in which height ranges “sees” “Voronezh-M”? request
  • MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 8 August 2013 13: 37 New
    +3
    We will not build this yet !!
  • 12345
    12345 8 August 2013 13: 48 New
    16
    What, vorogi? Potentially - flew off? Someone's appetites and fantasies will noticeably decrease.

    How did Uncle Vova formulate: “In order to avoid being tempted by a possible weakness”?
  • kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 8 August 2013 13: 51 New
    19
    I am 41 years old. born when my country had a powerful fleet and aviation, not to mention the rest. Brothers so eager to die when it will be the same. And the numbers 18 and 21 of the plane are so depressing and catch up with longing. Although respect to everyone who works in this direction.
    1. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 8 August 2013 15: 16 New
      +8
      Quote: kapitan281271
      I am 41 years old. born when my country had a powerful fleet and aviation, not to mention the rest. Brothers so eager to die when it will be the same. And the numbers 18 and 21 of the plane are so depressing and catch up with longing. Although respect to everyone who works in this direction.

      You should never want to die, even in the deep .ope of the 90s ... And even more so if everything works out stop
    2. Retx
      Retx 8 August 2013 15: 34 New
      +4
      Quote: kapitan281271
      And the numbers 18 and 21 of the plane are so depressing and catch up with longing. Although respect to everyone who works in this direction.

      This year we will receive ~ 70 combat aircraft. In our current economic situation, a good result. And next year, the KLA gives a guarantee for 90-100 combat aircraft, so there is hope.
      1. VAF
        VAF 8 August 2013 20: 44 New
        +2
        Quote: RETX
        This year we will receive ~ 70 combat aircraft.


        Michael, dear, is it possible to ask in more detail? wink

        Why am I asking? So very "cuts" the rumor ... FIGHT! Even if you just take .. airplanes, then ... there won’t be any, but you immediately 70? request
        1. Retx
          Retx 8 August 2013 23: 54 New
          +1
          Please:
          Su-35S - 12
          Su-34 - 14
          Su-30SM - 14
          MiG-29K - 6-8
          MiG-35 - about 4 (Sergey Korotkov: “One aircraft is ready for operation in the final assembly workshop, three more are on the way”)
          Su-30M2 - about 2 (contract for 2013-2015)
          Yak-130 - 18 (I know, training, but also combat)
          Of course, a lot of optimism, and in the yard in August. If wrong, I will be glad to hear the amendments! hi
          1. VAF
            VAF 9 August 2013 00: 15 New
            +2
            Quote: RETX
            If wrong, I will be glad to hear the amendments!


            Too iridescent, although close to the truth drinks

            1. Su-35- yes.
            2. Su-34 with a nyatyazhka. T.k. 2 pieces are debts for the last 2012 year.
            3. Su-30SM-yes.
            4. Mig-29K - God forbid that there will be a couple.
            5. Mig-35-delete immediately. Tk. this car will still be "brought up" while it's all MiG-29M2.
            6. Su-30M-2- no.
            7. Yak-130 - yes. but NO, because We speak for BATTLE aircraft.

            Total we have -38 pieces. wink + drinks
            1. Retx
              Retx 9 August 2013 00: 37 New
              0
              Almost forty without yaks is also good drinks
  • Apollo
    8 August 2013 14: 27 New
    22
    Regarding the name and content of the information.
    The good news is that Russia is reborn and the army is being reequipped at an accelerated pace. If a army is strong and a country is strong, and if a country is strong then it will be reckoned with all over the world, step by step, Russia will win back when it lost its position in the world.

    I bring to your attention the video in the topic. good
    1. Rustam009
      Rustam009 8 August 2013 23: 22 New
      0
      It would be better if they didn’t show it inside, just one old thing; Buttons, especially monitors, that could not be replaced with more modern LCD monitors?
  • Vlad_Mir
    Vlad_Mir 8 August 2013 14: 55 New
    +2
    It looks epic! Beautiful building!
  • Fire
    Fire 8 August 2013 15: 37 New
    +1
    The news pleased! Now it's not like a rocket, a fly will not fly! good
    1. Airman
      Airman 8 August 2013 17: 24 New
      +2
      Quote: feuer
      The news pleased! Now it's not like a rocket, a fly will not fly! good

      We do not catch flies, and do not count.
    2. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 9 August 2013 15: 13 New
      0
      "... will not fly!" I specify: unnoticed. And you also need to "plant" something, and protect the radar itself from "flies."
  • crambol
    crambol 8 August 2013 15: 41 New
    +4
    The quintessence of engineering! Diamond!! To him would be a more solid frame of those products, which brutally interfere with our sworn friends !!!
  • starhina01
    starhina01 8 August 2013 15: 49 New
    +3
    they all said nothing for me to add crying at least rejoice good
  • hrych
    hrych 8 August 2013 15: 59 New
    +9
    Remember how gay people rejoiced, but it wasn’t here ...

    1. guran
      guran 8 August 2013 16: 18 New
      +7
      as I understand it, this bespectacled type on the podium says:
      latvias homosexus forever and the best))
    2. lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus 8 August 2013 18: 15 New
      +4
      And then he let the pathos into his speech. He crouched before the owners. That's just a special joy on the faces of people (a group in cloaks is not considered) is invisible. Breaking does not build. And what has Latvia built itself useful for itself over the years of supposedly independence?
      1. abdrah
        abdrah 9 August 2013 02: 47 New
        +1
        In the foreground, in front of the radar at 2,17 minutes of the video, there is an array of five-story buildings, obviously a service. the staff lived there. What now will the "liberators of the Baltic lands" command people to do? Folk crafts, hunting and fish farming. What will the forest give and the river is full of guts?
    3. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 August 2013 18: 24 New
      +1
      Like a nail on the glass, bastards !!!
    4. TS3sta3
      TS3sta3 8 August 2013 20: 34 New
      +2
      the Baltic states have a new owner: he said to remove - the slaves bit off bit or bent. am
  • niecke
    niecke 8 August 2013 16: 22 New
    -8
    I look at the photo, I see a bunch of thieving enemies of the people! And against the background of the current lawlessness, no one will convince the opposite !! And by the way, in Soviet times there would be a tower for such data !!!
  • darksoul
    darksoul 8 August 2013 17: 04 New
    +6
    The good news is that a new type of radar is needed in Siberia, our Chinese friends are also there
    1. alone
      alone 8 August 2013 23: 06 New
      +1
      ++ As for the Chinese friends, you correctly noticed))
  • pahom54
    pahom54 8 August 2013 17: 37 New
    +4
    Eh !!! Glad then !!! A lot of new weapons, and no need to cry about the fact that budget funds are spent - a beam on weapons than on theft !!! Joyful !!!
  • KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 8 August 2013 20: 04 New
    +2
    The news is good ... it’s not as if personally I will rejoice wholeheartedly when several more of these objects are built, which will allow us to create a single radar field covered by the sector of one object by the sector of another - the neighbor ... on the main missile-dangerous directions. At the whim of the labeled “Nobel Peace Laureate”, we flunked the Object in the Krasnoyarsk region, leaving the northeastern direction uncontrolled ... The object destroyed in Skrund was able to replace objects in Belarus and Ukraine.
    Yes, I don’t know where one of the members of the forum got information that Ukrainians want to modernize facilities in Mukachevo and Sevastopol? In Mukachevo, the unit is completely dispersed ... there it does not smell like that.
    And even if they build it, then we don’t need information from them for 100 years. And the Ukrainian Armed Forces themselves will never be able to take advantage of it ... and not because there are no personnel (the Zhytomyr School has graduated enough!) ... there is no infrastructure for processing the information received. After all, the RTK Voronezh is only the primary link ... and in order to receive reliable information, a lot of complex systems for processing the received information are still required ...
  • Zomanus
    Zomanus 8 August 2013 23: 47 New
    +1
    The news is great. Now the main thing is to pull up the remaining air defense / missile defense elements to the appropriate level.
  • NOMADE
    NOMADE 9 August 2013 02: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: 12345
    What, vorogi? Potentially - flew off? Someone's appetites and fantasies will noticeably decrease.

    How did Uncle Vova formulate: “In order to avoid being tempted by a possible weakness”?


    + MUCH) Just like in a joke.
    The American is asked how you feel about the Russians?
    He says, yes, in general it’s good, but they have a lot of systems ..., anti-aircraft systems!
    laughing