It seems strange that the United States had suddenly decided to withdraw from the region, for which they have always fought to the death. Hydrocarbons "Saudi democracies" and the Jewish roots of the American establishment tightly tied to the interests of the United States in this region. What was going to happen to these unshakable foundations suddenly began to change so radically?
It is difficult to convince anyone that the Middle East oil has ceased to bother Western oil magnates. It also seems unreal that the fate of the “people of Israel” suddenly became somehow indifferent to those to whom Israel is paying for support. They still need kickbacks from Israel for American aid. However, the new expansionary policy of the United States is aimed at countries in the Asia-Pacific region.
There are certain “political experts” in Russia who represent to us the future concept of Russian defense based on the ability to withstand external threats. These very threats to Russia are seen by these gentlemen as “political scientists” exactly coinciding with the threats to the West. Among them are listed: “the proliferation of nuclear weapons and other means of mass destruction, international terrorism, transnational crime, environmental problems ”. Further, in the opinion of the masters of political scientists, the identity of threats presupposes the allied identity of countering these same threats together with the West.
Everything would probably be nice if it were not for all sorts of "but." First, the proliferation of a nuclear threat is a direct consequence of the gangster US foreign policy. Who would have to spend huge amounts on the production of nuclear weapons, if not for the completely unacceptable behavior of the United States in foreign policy? If, for example, all controversial issues could be resolved in the UN Security Council, then who needs to fight? The thing is that the United States spits on international law and today neither Iraq, nor Afghanistan, nor Libya could stop them, but North Korea has perfectly stopped it. This sees the whole world, hence the desire to gain access to nuclear weapons, as a guarantee of the integrity and sovereignty of the state.
Nothing in the world has brought so much evil to countries and peoples, as it did the unlimited domination of the United States. The US itself suffers from this no less. We are often told about the value of life of American citizens, but after all, it is American citizens who are dying more and more in hot spots. Do they protect US interests? Of course no. They lay down their lives in the name of the criminal interests of dishonest American politicians, and this cannot be the interests of the American people.
The same applies to international terrorism, which was created by US intelligence. (Everyone remembers where Bin Laden came from). Transnational crime is simply paid in cash by the United States. For example, all sorts of color revolutions were paid for with bags of money, easily brought by the USA to Georgia, to Ukraine, to Kyrgyzstan. In Georgia, the United States also paid salaries to all government officials. What sovereignty can we talk about? Environmental problems are possible and apply to all countries, but to a greater extent, still the United States and China. Thus, it is absolutely clear that Russia and the United States do not have common interests in the fight against threats. The US is the source of these threats, and Russia has to restrain them. Here, the countries are still on different sides of the barricades. But those who work in Russia for Western money try to hide it from ordinary citizens. Including organizations such as the Higher School of Economics (HSE). This is exactly the organization that, as we know, was run by Sergei Guriev, who escaped. However, many such people in Russia still remain. They are trying to convince us of the indispensability of Guriev, but forgive a certain cynicism to the author, this sounds like another nonsense of snotty opposition.
Russia is seriously resisting brainwashing, and now many European countries are thinking the same thing. We have heard before that the United States understands that the time of unlimited domination has passed. Russia's relations with the EU countries are getting closer, and in this case the USA is getting farther and farther from Europe. Also, Europe does not see a threat from Russia, and the EU does not want to pay tribute to NATO in the amount of 2% of national budgets. Here Putin clearly outplayed his opponents. And beat one all. It is impossible to believe it, but it is impossible not to believe it. Of course, Putin did not do everything alone, but he no doubt was in charge of everything.
The US withdrawal from the Middle East may be the final chord for Israel. Does this mean that this is the end for the Jews? Of course no. Perhaps, after the demise of Israel, the Jews will live even better than they live now. The thing is that Israel spends a significant part of the budget for defense and this is clearly not enough for him. If the Jews live not in their own state, and since they lived before, a significant amount of their money will remain with them. For example, in the same Iran there used to be the largest Jewish community among all the countries of the region. They were not threatened, and nobody limited their ability to do business. Even today, very many Jews still live in Iran. When we hear that the next president calls for wiping Israel off the face of the earth, this does not concern the Jews themselves. They both lived in Iran, and still live without problems. The same is true for the rest of the region.
But what should happen in this case in a new region for the USA? Why do you need to leave Europe and BV, leaving the "familiar place". As we know, after the development of China, the financial world rushed to that region because of extremely cheap labor. This gives considerable freedom in handling finances. A well-established logistics system, which at the expense of computer and information technologies makes it possible to deliver the goods produced with a high value-added ratio at minimal cost, makes China’s remoteness a minor factor.
In fact, the United States is going to trade and "fight" with China at the same time, but it will be a special war. The difficult task that the United States has set itself in this case is to saddle Chinese business and thus straddle Chinese expansion, but this is still an intermediate, tactical goal. China in this case should be the first phase. The second and strategic goal, of course, is Russia. Having not achieved anything through Europe, the United States simply decided to come in from the other side. So probably your cat does when it can't get to something. He is driven from one side, and he comes from the other. In this case история absolutely the same.
Here it is important to note a certain point. The fact that the USA has left Europe and BV to China speaks very eloquently about their true goals. Through Europe, the United States tried to reach Russia, and through China they sought to achieve the same goal. You say, well, why not directly try to go to Russia in such a case? The answer is clear, Russia is well-armed and under Putin it is impossible to cope with it, that is, not to force, not to press. The existing laws have completely confused the cards and all kinds of "non-profit organizations" can no longer do anything. As a matter of fact, they could not have done anything before, but the US persistently spent on their maintenance. In the fight against such a state as Russia, with the help of NGOs alone, it will not be possible to achieve the goals set. As soon as the people feel a threat to the social order of Russia, the people will simply hang their birches in all these NCOs.
However, this is particular. The real game is that the big three of the US, Russia and China can defeat the enemy only if the forces are twice as strong as the enemy forces. That is, in order to get to Russia, first you need to win over to your side China. The US-China pair will then oppose Russia. Of course, China has its own plans for this. In China, too, it is well understood that they need to be on the side where there are two countries. Alone, China can not resist the US. All world finances in the region will be in the hands of the United States. The huge population of the region (China, Pakistan, India, USA and Indonesia) implies a huge turnover of money. Scrolling through the population of these countries, which constitute almost 45% of the world's population (China 19.31%, India 17.55%, USA 4.48%, Indonesia 3.48%), the US will generate huge revenues. Europe does not even dream about it. The possibility of pressure on the Chinese authorities will be very significant. In fact, China will cease to be sovereign.
Therefore, in such a situation, China will press close to Russia. This will be the first task for the United States to be addressed. Once such a task was already facing America. In the 1971 year, then Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger visited China twice. In January, Major General Alexander Heig, who was then only the National Security Advisor to 1972, visited China in December 4. A month later, in February, US President Richard Nixon visited China. Notice that the President of the United States is going to a country that does not even have diplomatic relations with the United States. They were installed only in the 1979 year. But before that, another president had been there. Gerald Ford visited China in 1975. This story did not know. Presidents travel to a country with which there are no diplomatic relations, and two presidents.
This was the only chance that could lead to a different alignment of forces in the region. And then the USA did not miss this chance. Now the task is about the same, but the difference is still huge. In those years, China was a backward margin of the world. Today, the same China is a “world factory” and, moreover, the largest holder of American debts. Nahrap here will not work. That is why the United States goes to the region not to fight, but to trade. Although American trade almost always looks like a war. The US is pushing its business interests very actively. Virtually no government in the world can stand against American expansion. There can be resistance not by the government, but by the people. This is exactly what is happening with respect to the United States in Russia, and this is what worries the United States most of all. However, this is the choice of the Russians, and nothing will succeed here. This is just an echo of what the US did earlier in Yugoslavia, then in Iraq and so on.
For some reason, the United States believed that Russia was the champion of swallowing bitter pills, and they could still be pushed into this huge country. Now it seems that Russia is already feeding these pills to the United States. Recently, in a private conversation with one of those who makes politics in the country, the author heard “well, what to do now? Russia will always remind us of our political stupidity, and will many next generations of Americans suffer because of Russia? ”
The author's opinion on this issue as follows: if the Americans are going to suffer, it is not because of the vindictiveness of Russia, and because of the stupidity of their own politicians. Russia retains only its sovereignty here. Americans should not consider the whole world as a garden where you can plant whatever Arboretum and start there the Serpentarium. That's exactly what the United States wants to do today in Asia tihookeansom region. Person involved in breeding snakes, it should be understood that once they are sure to bite it and bin Laden that there is a good illustration.