JL-10 (L-15) trials began for combat use of weapons

16
JL-10 (L-15) trials began for combat use of weapons

According to the newspaper Jiefangjun Bao, recently the PLA Air Force began testing the new combat trainer JL-10 (L-15) "Lein" ("Falcon"), during which issues of the combat use of aircraft weapons were worked out. According to the correspondent, during the departure of the departure observed by him, the aircraft successfully hit the ground target with 24 unmanaged aviation rockets. In addition, bombing and firing at ground targets from an aircraft gun were practiced.

The tests are conducted by a group of PLA N4 air force personnel. During the tests, several thousand shots were fired from an aircraft cannon, several hundreds of unguided aircraft missiles, and several dozen aerial bombs were used, while the accuracy of the use of weapons was rated as “good and better.” The use of any types of high precision weapons, as well as the use of weapons on air targets in the article is not mentioned.

The purpose of the test, according to the publication, is to develop a program for the training of pilot instructors who will later train pilots and cadets in flight schools of the PLA Air Force in combat use of weapons.

JL-10 / L-15 is manufactured by the Chinese aviation industry company Hongdu Aircraft Industry Corporation, which is part of the general aviation holding of the Chinese aviation industry company AVIC. The aircraft was developed in 1990-e and 2000-ies with the participation of Yakovlev Design Bureau and is actually a Chinese modification of the Russian Yak-130 aircraft.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    29 July 2013 10: 47
    Our Yak-130 is better ......
    1. +4
      29 July 2013 11: 03
      so that engines without afterburner? Although there are pluses, an increased resource, profitability.
      It is interesting that Chinese engines do not stand here, apparently because of their high resource and reliability.
    2. +3
      29 July 2013 11: 13
      Quote: ziqzaq
      Ours is better ......

      - Oh, China ... Some kind of direct game.
      In my youth, gypsies in the market sold Chinese carpets.
      Bring home, hang on the wall. In the afternoon - like nothing.
      And at night, the green carpet begins to sparkle, and on it a portrait of Mao Tse-tung appears in the coffin. Such are the traditions.
    3. +2
      29 July 2013 11: 21
      Quote: ziqzaq
      Our Yak-130 is better .....

      And who argues. But the Yak-130, at best, will build hundreds.
      The Chinese will stamp JL-10 thousand.
    4. 0
      30 July 2013 04: 40
      yes is better - but the Chinese are jumping faster
  2. +1
    29 July 2013 10: 51
    Ours is better, for the Chinese cost is 2 times cheaper.
    1. +1
      29 July 2013 10: 53
      So they do it on a 3D scanner
      1. +2
        29 July 2013 19: 42
        Quote: Edward72
        So they do it on a 3D scanner


        3D printer. On the scanner they scan laughing
    2. AVV
      0
      29 July 2013 10: 55
      Price for quality !!!
    3. 0
      29 July 2013 11: 01
      Quote: Alez
      Ours is better, for the Chinese cost is 2 times cheaper.

      Did you buy it?
      1. 0
        29 July 2013 19: 42
        Quote: ziqzaq
        Quote: Alez
        Ours is better, for the Chinese cost is 2 times cheaper.

        Did you buy it?


        And yes, yesterday I literally took a couple ...
    4. +3
      29 July 2013 11: 06
      Why is this a fright ??? nothing that the AI-222-25F is clearly not cheaper than the AI-222-25, for example?
    5. +1
      29 July 2013 12: 24
      Quote: Alez
      at a cost of Chinese 2 times cheaper

      Well, if all of our aircraft factory workers reduce their salaries to the size of Chinese, I suspect that the Yak will become clearly cheaper. But this is the question! And will you go to work at those plants? What, none of those who speak like that are now trying not to do and go around the place where you need to work side by side and away.
    6. 0
      29 July 2013 22: 19
      And he has wooden dviguny ...
  3. 0
    29 July 2013 11: 25
    All the same, the strength of the PLA Air Force is not in the number of aircraft, but in the number of pilots!
    1. +3
      29 July 2013 11: 59
      Quote: Standard Oil
      All the same, the strength of the PLA Air Force is not in the number of aircraft, but in the number of pilots!

      What are your conclusions about low preparedness?
      In general, only in recent years have we begun to raid something.
      "Exhibition" "Russian Knights", "Swifts" do not count.
      Yes, and they look at what condition the equipment.
      1. +2
        29 July 2013 12: 05
        You don’t understand me. I’ll say so that it’s more understandable, the strength of the PLA Air Force is not in the number of aircraft, but in the number of well-trained pilots. I did not in any way want to criticize China.
  4. 0
    30 July 2013 17: 49
    The Chinese have to learn a lot, study and study again ...