Military Review

Soviet BOPS for 2А46 family of guns

By the end of the fifties of the last century, various ideas related to improving the penetration characteristics of armor-piercing shells tank guns gradually began to merge into a single concept. As a result of this process, armor-piercing sub-caliber projectiles first appeared, intended for firing from guns with gentle grooves, and then feathered sub-caliber projectiles (BOPS) for smooth-bore tank guns. The greatest impetus to the development of this class of ammunition in our country was given by the creation of the 2A46 tank gun. It was developed in the early sixties at the Sverdlovsk design bureau No. 9. The 2A46 gun had a caliber of 125 millimeters and the corresponding characteristics of fire. In this regard, the creation of a BOPS for a new weapon, capable of hitting existing and promising armored vehicles of a potential enemy, began.

In the mid-fifties, the Moscow research institute-24 (now the Scientific-Research Machine-Building Institute) was appointed the head enterprise for the development of artillery ammunition of medium and large calibers. This organization is still engaged in the creation of tank ammunition, including BOPS. By the end of the decade, Soviet gunsmiths had formed the shape of an armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectile. In the future, all new ammunition of this class was designed in accordance with this scheme, and all the differences mainly consisted in the use of new materials, new technologies, etc. Due to the fact that the new tank gun 2А46 had a separate-cartridge loading, the designers of ammunition had to apply a rather original solution.

The shot was divided into two parts - the sleeve and the cylinder with the projectile itself. The sleeve and the cylinder are burned, usually made from cardboard, impregnated with an explosive. The sleeve has a metal pan on which the ignition means are mounted. The burning cylinder has no metal parts and is put on the armor-piercing core with a pallet. The sleeve and the cylinder are filled with a propelling charge. The type and amount of explosive depends on the specific type of shot. When firing, the cylinder and liner are completely burned, leaving only a small pallet of the last, which is removed outside the limits of the crew compartment.

The projectile of such ammunition is a metal rod of high elongation with tail in the tail section. Due to the relatively small caliber, it is possible to ensure high speed and low energy losses in flight, which gives BOPS the corresponding armor penetration indicators. Prior to leaving the barrel, the swept projectile is held in the correct position by special driving devices (also called a pallet), which are separated after passing through the muzzle and tail tail, whose span corresponds to the caliber of the barrel.

With the help of such a division of the shot into two parts, it was possible to ensure the use of projectiles with high performance in the existing loading mechanisms of tank guns. However, the separate-cartridge loading has long been the object of criticism. Because of the need to split the shot into two parts, it is necessary to limit the length of the swept projectile, which leads to a reduction in its ability to break through the armor.

One of the first Soviet BOPS, made according to the scheme described above, was the 3BBM-3 shot with the 3BM-9 projectile (hereinafter the designation of the swept ammunition itself is indicated; -3), which appeared in 10 year. The detachable cartridge ammunition with a feathered projectile caliber 1962 mm, equipped with a steel alloy core and five-plane empennage, was intended for use with the new tank gun 36А2. Ammunition weighing 46 kilogram left the barrel at a speed of 3,6 meters per second. At a distance of two kilometers at an encounter angle in 1800 ° (further data on normative penetrability under the same conditions will be given), the 60BM-3 projectile punched only 10 millimeters of armored steel. Such low characteristics were due to the applied core material: martensitic-aging steel did not allow for a dramatic increase in armor penetration.

Soviet BOPS for 2А46 family of guns

Due to the insufficient penetration characteristics of the 3BBM-3 shot, a new 3BBM-6 munition (3BM-12 projectile) was created in the mid-sixties. From his predecessor, he was distinguished by a new design of a feathered projectile. With similar dimensions and mass, the new projectile was equipped with a tungsten carbide core. Thanks to a new striking element, the penetrability of the 3BBM-6 shot has increased to 110 millimeters. At the same distance (2000 meters), but at an angle of 0 °, the 3BM-12 projectile could penetrate up to 280 mm of armor.

In 1972, the 3BBM-7 shot appeared with the 3BM-15 projectile. The level of technology of the late sixties and early seventies allowed the creation of ammunition capable of sending a projectile to the target at a speed of 1780 meters per second. The core of the projectile was made of tungsten carbide. The shell had a length of 548 mm and weighed a kilogram 3,9. Caliber remains the same - 36 mm. When testing this shot, sufficiently high penetrability characteristics were detected: the striking element punched up to 100-150 millimeters of homogeneous armor. BOPS 3BBM-7 has become one of the most common ammunition in its class. For many years, this projectile was delivered to countries that were armed with tanks of the T-72 family.

3BBM-7 shot, 3BM-15 active part, 3BM-16 projectile (1972 year)

The next 3BBM-8 shot with the 3BM-17 projectile, also created in the early seventies, was a simplified version of the previous ammunition. It differs from 3BBM-7 using a steel alloy core and a new armor-piercing damper, which partially compensates for the absence of a core. All characteristics except the length remained the same: the armor-piercing projectile was longer by 10 millimeters. According to some sources, the 3BBM-8 shot was made only for deliveries to third countries.

size = 1] 3BBM-9 shot, 3BM-22 active part, 3BM-23 projectile (1976 year)

In 1976, the arsenal of Soviet tank crews was supplemented with a new 3BBM-9 shot with a 3BM-22 projectile, created as part of the “Hairpin” theme. The main elements of the design of the new projectile in comparison with 3BM-17 have undergone minimal changes. At the same time, to increase the armor penetration, a new, larger-sized damper was used. The detail with a diameter of 37 millimeters and a length of 88 mm resulted in an increase in the mass of the entire shot. So, the 3BM-22 projectile without a pallet weighed about 4,5 a kilogram, the whole shot with a sleeve - 20,2 kg. Thanks to the use of the new massive damper, armor penetration increased to 200 mm. The 3BBM-9 shot was fired for several years and as a result became one of the most massive ammunition in the Soviet armored forces. A large number of 3BM-22 shells and cartridges for them are still stored in the warehouses of tank units.

All of the above BOPS Soviet production had several similar features. First of all, it is the size and placement of the core. The shell and the plumage of the projectile were made of alloys based on steel, and the cores were installed cores of harder materials. For the passage of the bore all the shells that can be attributed to the conditional first generation, were equipped with a detachable annular driving device of the expanding type. It consisted of three parts, separated from the projectile after exiting the barrel. In the late seventies, the designers of tank ammunition from THEM faced new challenges. Now it was necessary to create armor-piercing projectiles capable of striking enemy vehicles in a wide range of meeting angles, and in addition, having the ability to penetrate the prospective dynamic defense that existed at that time. Finally, it was necessary to take into account the constantly growing level of protection of foreign tanks.

In this connection, Soviet scientists had to study new alloys based on steel, tungsten and even depleted uranium. In addition, among the tasks that needed to be urgently addressed were issues of aerodynamic qualities of the projectile and increasing its initial velocity. Numerous studies have resulted in several BOPS projects at once, differing from each other in some constructive solutions, but using a number of common elements. For example, the conditional “second generation” of Soviet armor-piercing fired snapping shells was given to new so-called leading devices. clamping type. A pallet made of aluminum alloy and / or plastic made it possible to reduce the energy losses of the propellant charge, which had a beneficial effect on the characteristics of the projectile.

The 3BBM-11 shot with the 3BM-26 projectile (Nadezhda-R), put into service in the 1983 year, became a kind of transitional link between old and new tank ammunition. In its design used a large number of old developments, however, there were several innovations. Thus, the 4,8 projectile weighing a kilogram received a new armor-piercing damper of greater length, and the tungsten carbide core was moved from the head to the tail. This was done to reduce the likelihood of rebound. Previous projectiles, falling into oblique armored obstacles, sometimes did not pierce them at all or at least could not make a deep hole in the metal. It is worth noting that the armor penetration capability of the 3BM-26 projectile remained at the level of 3BM-22 - about 200 millimeters. Also, some changes have been a detachable pallet. In its design, made on the basis of the old leading devices, some developments were used for new projects.

The 3BBM-10 shot with the 3БМ-29 projectile, also known by the name of the Nadfil-2 project, was the first full-fledged representative of the new family of piercing projectiles in which the new solutions and ideas were fully used. New ammunition received the original leading device of a smaller mass, which was achieved through the use of aluminum. At the same time, the lightweight three-section pallet had a large area of ​​contact with the shell of the projectile. The steel structure of the shell itself received updated stabilizers designed to improve aerodynamics. Also, this ammunition was equipped with a core of "material B" - an alloy based on depleted uranium. As a result of all the changes, the 4,85 kg projectile was able to leave the gun barrel at a speed of 1700 m / s and pierce up to 210 mm armor steel. The shot of the 3BBM-10 was put into service in the 1982 year.

In 1985, the new army 3BBM-13 “Vant” with the 3BM-32 projectile was commissioned by the Soviet army. By design, a new armor-piercing projectile resembled previous developments in this area, and one of its characteristics resembled the early Soviet BOPS. The fact is that the shell of the projectile 3BM-32 was monolithic, made of the same material - uranium alloy. Due to the use of relatively heavy metal, to maintain the mass of the munition at the level of previous models (4,85 kg), it was necessary to reduce its length to 480 mm and diameter to 31 mm. With an initial flight speed of 1700 m / s, the Vant projectile is capable of penetrating up to 250 mm of armor. It is worth noting that at an angle of meeting 0 °, the penetrability at a distance of two kilometers increases to 560 mm. Despite its considerable age, the 3BBM-13 shot with the 3BM-32 projectile is still one of the most common tank ammunition in the Russian army.

Shortly after “Vant” a new domestic BOPS 3BM-42, which is part of the Mango 3BBM-17 shot, appeared. Like the previous projectiles, it is equipped with detachable masters consisting of three sections. In this case, the ammunition with a length of 574 millimeter, a diameter of 30 mm and a mass of 4,85 kg has an original complex structure. The shell of the projectile is a hollow tube, inside which are armor-piercing damper and two cores of an alloy of tungsten, iron and nickel. The surfaces of the cores and the hull are separated by a special jacket made of low-melting metal, thanks to which the armor-piercing elements are firmly held in place during transportation, firing and in flight. When hitting the target, the shirt melts and the cores do not consume energy for separation from the body. At distances of about two kilometers, the 3BM-42 projectile at a meeting angle of 60 ° punches up to 230 mm of homogeneous armor. When normal, this parameter increases to 440 mm. Also in the public domain there is evidence of the effectiveness of BOPS "Mango" against combined armored forces. Thus, a seven-layer block (exact composition unknown) at an angle of encounter 60 ° (thickness of the block in the course of the projectile motion - 620 mm) makes its way from a distance of 3800 meters. The three-layer spaced target at the meeting angle 65 ° (total thickness 1830 mm) is surely struck at distances around 2700 meters.

The last armor-piercing feathered sabot, created before the collapse of the Soviet Union, was the Lead 3BM-46 (shot 3ВБМ-20). Its design traces both new and already mastered solutions at that time. The first thing to mention is a one-piece uranium alloy casing. An interesting feature of the 3BM-46 projectile was the fact that it has the maximum possible length allowed by the design of the automatic loading of domestic tanks - 640 mm. The mass of the projectile increased slightly, to 5,2 kilogram. For the first time in domestic practice, the Svinets projectile received a sub-caliber tail, providing higher flight characteristics. Because of this innovation, designers had to solve one additional problem. In previous shots with BOPS, the projectile in the barrel bore was centered with the help of leading devices in its central part and tail in the tail section. Due to the reduction in the span of the “Lead” plumage, he received a new detachable pallet having additional supports in the rear. Thus, when fired, the sub-caliber projectile of this model does not come into contact with the surface of the bore. Under the conditions described above, BOPS 3BM-46 with an initial speed of 1650 m / s punches up to 300 millimeters of homogeneous armor.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, NIMI continued to develop new armor-piercing pierced piercing shells. In recent years, a modernized version of the 3BM-46 projectile with the name “Lead-2” and the “Slate” ammunition family have appeared. Unfortunately, due to a number of problems of past years, Russian tankers still have to use old ammunition created in Soviet times. A number of new developments, in turn, remain unclaimed by the army and have not yet entered mass production.

On the materials of the sites:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Field
    Field 26 July 2013 09: 12
    I would also read with interest about the practice of using BOPs against foreign MBTs with multi-layer booking
    1. _Igor_
      _Igor_ 26 July 2013 12: 22
      generally about the practice of application and effectiveness
  2. SOZIN2013
    SOZIN2013 26 July 2013 12: 23
    I wonder what new ammunition will be developed for Almaty ??? If anyone knows, share it!
  3. ALEX74
    ALEX74 26 July 2013 15: 18
    I'm not special. in tank ammunition, but saw the results !!! The tank is a terrible beast in the field! True in the city it is a major target!
  4. svp67
    svp67 26 July 2013 17: 59
    Ryabov Kirill, you are a GOOD MAN. Easy, intelligible, nothing superfluous ... "+"
  5. svp67
    svp67 26 July 2013 18: 01
    Question to the author or to someone who has reliable information - have new BOPs been developed for the infuriated MOH, what is their length, weight, core material and estimated armor penetration?
  6. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv 26 July 2013 22: 41
    It was interesting to read the history of "crowbars" for 2A46, they were rarely used with "emki".
    Thanks to Cyril.
    It’s interesting what they are inventing now.

    Quote: svp67
    for crazy MH

    Sergey, tell me, what is this "beast"? What Object?
    1. Kars
      Kars 26 July 2013 22: 49
      Quote: Aleks tv
      rarely used them from "emki"

      I had a BOPS in my childhood, probably from 115 mm guns. We thought that a rocket, tried to launch - they picked up a tracer. I got lost somewhere. Now I'm looking, I can’t get it.
      1. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv 26 July 2013 23: 10
        Quote: Kars
        I’m lost somewhere. Now I’m looking for it, I can’t get it.

        laughing good
        1. Kars
          Kars 26 July 2013 23: 36
          It would look cool on a .. shelf .. moreover, there is no explosive. But no way, at least somewhere.
          1. Crang
            Crang 27 July 2013 06: 48
            Yes - and if one sticks in the ass?
      2. Prohor
        Prohor 29 July 2013 20: 46
        And the tracer didn’t catch fire? We lit a cigarette from the tracers, tapping them with a good heavy screwdriver. wink
    2. svp67
      svp67 28 July 2013 09: 57
      Quote: Aleks tv
      Sergey, tell me, what is this "beast"? What Object?
      Honestly, so far only at the OBS level (one grandmother said). There is persistent talk that if in the near future the "Armata" does not go to the troops in sufficient quantity, then the old tanks will be radically modernized, in particular with the installation of a "suspended MZ", precisely to accommodate extended BOPSs of "increased power" and like At the Prospector, they have already experienced something from this series, and that Omsk will become a production site for modernization. Indians are said to have shown a keen interest.
      1. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv 28 July 2013 23: 42
        Quote: svp67
        in particular, with the installation of a "suspended MZ", specifically for the placement of elongated BOPS

        Those. elongation...
        Yes, rumors have been circulating about this for a long time. With a decrease in the number of cells in the MH and AZ conveyor, this is technologically easier to achieve, but there is a small supply.
        Otherwise, only the "Eagle" developments.
        Thanks for the info, boom to watch.

        Quote: svp67
        then the old tanks will be radically modernized,

        I like this phrase more, especially the word "cardinally".
        Thermal imager - to the gunner, stabilized panoramic - to the commander, all-round protection of the hull and turret, "normal" control of the Cliff ...
        At least so, and then go ahead. Even without upgrading the shots, it looks too expensive and unrealistic.
        If they take the path of increasing the projectile for mass modernization of the T-72, 80 family, then ...
        ... too many thoughts arise that are undesirable to voice.
  7. vim3
    vim3 26 July 2013 23: 47
    Cyril, you have factual errors in almost every paragraph. I understand that it is difficult to write popularly on special topics. But your schools are misleading readers in almost all respects of foreign, Soviet and Russian kinetic armor-piercing ammunition.
    1. Karamultukov
      Karamultukov 10 May 2015 05: 55
      Evidence? And then in a decent society for unfounded accusations beaten with a candelabrum. And in general, who is stopping YOU from writing "correctly", indicating links, evidence, photographs of BOPS and hit targets?
      And then your post from the series "" Everything is bad, we will all die! "
  8. Crang
    Crang 27 July 2013 05: 46
    Moreover, not all shells were listed.
  9. Fuzzy
    Fuzzy 27 July 2013 11: 43
    The 125A water pipe 2A46M-X cannot be in unitary BOPs, so it shoots with all sorts of rubbish that cannot break anything at all.
  10. max702
    max702 4 August 2013 19: 42
    All uranium ammunition was produced at the ChMZ enterprise in the city of Glazov, production of 300. It was also phased out at the very beginning of the nineties, (though the warehouses are quite small) to the question, why did they shut down? it was said that the military found a more effective solution and the need for uranium ammunition disappeared. No one intelligibly said what and how they found a replacement.
    1. evgenaleks
      evgenaleks 12 December 2016 18: 08
      very simple - ALL the tavars made in 3 shifts (starting from the mid-1970s reptiles) went west - saving capitalism. current fed maskva and Peter. found a replacement there as feed people. and not throw the current evo but put it down so that it doesn’t come out. . and ani can be fooled with the help of sports and skating - see on the sofa and that’s all. and why those football? settle down on a construction site and patey. the same andropav pa katoramu was going back to memory - what was he doing? he sang the songs of rednecks and did - withdrew ALL BOOKS from the libraries to the ombudsman movement .. which is easy in the country where the Stalin English official agent raised their slaves and herders. for the assimilation of the north. as well as books on NATO technology. banned and release them. But what about restructuring? Ana opened it? what kind of adjustment? Chernenko worked for the kulako and knew what it was. but the hunchback Evo killed and appropriated and perverted perestroika.
      1. Grigory_78
        Grigory_78 25 March 2017 19: 42
        Who taught you the Russian language, history, logical thinking? Look into his eyes
  11. Askold
    Askold 5 September 2013 18: 21
    I didn’t understand something: why does the Mango shell have an armor-piercing tip and why does the damper serve?
    And also with caliber shells they fired at old target tanks thousands of times. In theory, sub-caliber shells should pierce the side armor of the tank through, which means that the remnants of the BOPs should remain inside the tanks. Tell me: did anyone see the remains of these shells inside the target tanks?
  12. Dimka off
    Dimka off 15 May 2015 10: 56
    BOPS Stylus is designed for 152 mm guns. But for some reason, the author of the article did not say so.
    1. Grigory_78
      Grigory_78 25 March 2017 19: 46
      I am embarrassed to ask - what side of the BOPS Slate pencil belongs to 2A46?
  13. evgenaleks
    evgenaleks 12 December 2016 18: 01
    the Swiss ammunition for the "kokkeril" cannon, with a smaller caliber, has approximately the same size. vyvad - a larger caliber for perspective and + for solving the defeat of non-armored targets (which is confirmed by the experience of the Second World War)