In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of Russia

234
In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of RussiaYou want - you do not want, but the reality will knock on the door, even if you do not notice it. You can talk for a long time about the sovereignty of Russia and the absolute independence of the media. Until you turn on the TV. Do not listen to the radio and do not open the leading Internet resources.

A couple of days in a row, all filled with one news. In Britain, the next heir to the throne, the great-grandson of Queen Elizabeth, was born.

Just what have the people of Russia?

Nothing shows the general “involvement” of the Russian media in the Western model and the controllability of “from there” than the events in the British royal house. So for the viewers of Russia, DIRECT BROADCASTING of the wedding of one English prince was conducted, now every day all the means of communication were broadcast by the birth of another prince.

What I want to say. Having children is great. I am all for the birth of as many children as possible. In Russia. I am for "Russian billion", do not mind that children were born in other countries.

But I do not want all the Russian media from morning to evening to tell about the birth of the royal family of Great Britain and show the British people dancing and dancing with joy. Let them rejoice. On the screens of English and Scottish television. Maybe even Irish. But not Russian.

They are nobody to us. In our country there is no reason to live someone else's joy. Those citizens of Russia that for democracy and the republic, a priori should be indifferent to the clans in the family of the monarch, and even a foreign country. When a crowned child is born in Belgium or Holland, will you also be telling us days and days with affection, gentlemen journalists? And if in Sweden or Saudi Arabia? You are all equal? Or the British monarchs are the most equal of all?

Those citizens of Russia who feel sympathy for the monarchical method of governing the country also have no particular reason for joy. Because they remember that the refusal of the English king to take over the family of Nikolay Romanov after the revolution was one of the reasons for her death. Although Tsar Nicholas and King George were cousins ​​and were very similar. Their mothers were sisters, Danish princesses.

The sugary, unnecessary and completely unnatural from the point of view of common sense dominance in the information field of Russia news from British monarchs clearly shows us who rules in the world. Russian media are managed from abroad and are included in the information field of the West. We have the same agenda, which is determined in London and Washington for the whole world. The whole world should rejoice if the British prince married. The queen will die - the whole world will be obliged to grieve.

Sovereign media of a fully sovereign country will tell about it. In passing. Under the heading "Other".

I really want to live to see this time - when the news about the birth in the UK will complete the release of Russian news. Seconds 10 is enough.

Today a boy is born in the royal family of Great Britain.
And now about the weather.
Today in Russia ...

Not in the UK.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

234 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    25 July 2013 06: 28
    I hope and am sure that Vladimir Vladimirovich will inform about the birth of a grandson or granddaughter. It does not matter, then we'll figure it out.
    1. +97
      25 July 2013 07: 11
      In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of Russia
      Article plus. I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU. I believe that we are alien to their traditions in any manifestation, especially their transfer balls, and discos.
      1. +77
        25 July 2013 07: 55
        Quote: Sirocco
        In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of Russia
        Article plus. I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU. I believe that we are alien to their traditions in any manifestation, especially their transfer balls, and discos.

        I, too, have been driven by the situation all these days: we have exercises there, fires, accidents, corruption, etc., but most of all they show / talk about the fact that everyone is waiting for the birth of the heir. Sorry yes me nasr all the same, who will be born there and what will they call him. Do we really have no other worries?
        1. +55
          25 July 2013 08: 19
          And I don’t understand, so what if a child was born, all over Russia a huge number of children are born every year and no worse!
          1. +11
            25 July 2013 09: 17
            Quote: INTER
            And I don’t understand, so what if a child was born, all over Russia a huge number of children are born every year and no worse!


            it’s not just a child, it’s a child in the family of those who really rule the world and the same media, see how we have promoted the same English heirs to the media in parallel with the company on the Internet, which is like a monarchy is good

            in the brains of the Anglo-Saxons, the idea of ​​a fix to impose some kind of Prince Harry on Russia is really visible, and an extra PR of the "best and most developed" country in the world will not hurt

            Novosibirsk and Irkutsk are at hand, and I in Krasnoyarsk really don’t remember when they said something about them in the mailbox, and I’m more than sure that if we set out to find out, I’ll learn something unpleasant
            1. kyga
              -29
              25 July 2013 10: 04
              Everyone just yells that someone is managing them. Bottoms without tops can live, but the tops without us is a big question .... And the way they even consider themselves gods, I do not care for them. I manage my life myself, and if someone needs a switchman in his failures, you don’t have to go far, look only.
              1. +14
                25 July 2013 15: 33
                Quote: kyga
                Everyone just yells that someone is managing them. Bottoms without tops can live, but the tops without us is a big question .... And the way they even consider themselves gods, I do not care for them. I manage my life myself, and if someone needs a switchman in his failures, you don’t have to go far, look only.

                Are you talking to anyone now ??? (just in case, the theme of the monarchist offspring and brain filth)
                1. +2
                  25 July 2013 20: 25
                  Author, I have long been asking myself the same question. what x .. they show us something that has nothing to do with us? I just saw this news on the agenda, immediately closed Google, disgusting, there simply are no words.
                  1. +1
                    26 July 2013 08: 06
                    Do you use Google? stop
              2. +11
                25 July 2013 21: 35
                Quote: kyga
                And the way they even consider themselves gods, I do not care for them. I manage my life myself, and if someone needs a switchman in his failures, you don’t have to go far, look only.

                So I understand, one minus in your subject? I am pleased to return it to you, I regret that it is no longer possible.
                This is not about the fact that some of the members of the forum are dissatisfied with their life, I've been here for three years and I know almost everyone, when you read their comments, in total you already know what kind of person, what breathing ... You are at the wrong address, there are no losers who need to blame someone for their failures, the same English queen. We are not talking about that here, we are talking about the fact that the Russian people want their own information field, their national television, their own radio and their own Internet. What would they show not about the birth of the great-grandson of the reigning person of a foreign country, but about the sore one, about the successes and failures, although they talked a little more in detail about the boy who saved two teenage girls at the cost of his life, full name, who is that such an act, show his parents, so that they would tell about their blood, that she left them so untimely ... And then "a young man of Dagestan origin saved him. But he could not save himself" and that's it! Is this how it should be told?
                The discussion is about this and the subject matter, no one here blames them for Russian problems, on the contrary, there are expressed wishes that the residents would leave alone - they don’t leave !!!! Shoveling on the brain? So I’ll be in your PM constantly poop - you like it? You’ll start to contact the moderators, etc. So the question is - why are millions of Russians obliged to endure aglitsky poop? What a fright? Let them go and buy a dead chicken and shake someone’s brains with their births - I’m not going to share their joys and ask you not to share my joys — without them I’ll be more happy. Is the speech clear?
            2. Gari
              +6
              25 July 2013 11: 31
              Quote: Andrey Skokovsky
              it’s not just a child, it’s a child in the family of those who really rule the world and the same media,

              Yeah, the world only within Buckingham Palace - the residence of the English kings
              there’s even a joke - if they want to say about the leader whom the subordinates scored - they say, he’s like an English queen,
              Quote: Andrey Skokovsky
              to impose on Russia some prince harry,


              but my namesake, but only he has a grandmother, a queen,
              although my grandmother Ekaterina was better in all respects
              1. Gari
                +15
                25 July 2013 11: 40
                That's what she really controls
                1. +18
                  25 July 2013 12: 49
                  In her youth, her troops in Nigeria and India laid the people unmeasured.
                  1. shpuntik
                    +8
                    25 July 2013 16: 04
                    Sandov (1) RU Today, 12:49 ↑
                    In her youth, her troops in Nigeria and India laid the people unmeasured.

                    Ah, then! Looks like he smiles falsely: the cat knows whose meat has eaten.
                    Well, and her ancestors, how many wars did they start? Our family of Romanovs was "drained" ...
                    This hornet's nest would have burned, the whole ball of the earth would breathe freely:

                    "Daughter of George VI, Head of the Commonwealth of Nations, Queen of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia , Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Jamaica. "
                2. FATEMOGAN
                  +8
                  25 July 2013 13: 09
                  http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/388/xuhh96.jpg

                  At first they sucked, a boy or a girl, otherwise they do not do ultrasound and don’t know, then the idea of ​​fixation was, how would they call it, but this is the next news - how the baby met Elizabeth’s favorite dogs.
                  1. +3
                    25 July 2013 14: 31
                    Quote: FATEMOGAN
                    otherwise they don’t do ultrasound and don’t know

                    It’s just that this non-human is aware of the harmful effects of ultrasound and doesn’t use it for himself, but is forcibly imposed on others.
                    1. swine
                      0
                      26 July 2013 03: 21
                      Quote: Ivan.
                      It's just that this non-humans know about the harmful effects of ultrasound ...

                      You probably also know about the harmful effects of ultrasound.
                      Can you tell me more?
                      1. +1
                        26 July 2013 13: 25
                        Quote: swayn
                        Can you tell me more?

                        http://video.i.ua/user/295100/43088/368801/
                        Somewhere I read it, the doctors themselves said that at the time of irradiation, the fetus starts tossing and turning, I do not like it. It is enough for me to understand the principle of action in order to get an idea of ​​the impact. This is the first video that came out in the search, if you want to own a question, dig a bunch of information and draw your own conclusions.
                3. +11
                  25 July 2013 21: 46
                  Quote: Gari
                  That's what she really controls

                  It is not that simple! You just read the Constitution of Canada, given the fact that the Anglo-Saxons this law is meticulously enforced. Learn a lot laughing They have a constitutional monarchy, you see laughing Soaring to the whole world that the prime minister controls them there. And I see that Blair, that the current Cameron talk one to one, are they being raised in the incubator or something, according to one DNA program? Or are they just talking heads? In this case, this granny really rules, which poses as mercy here in the photo laughing He does not directly manage, but he really sticks out in the Bildeberg and other clubs, where real decisions are made, which the Camerons are so zealous for executing. There is no need here la-la about the non-governing queen, rules and rules! Consequently, she is the true author of the words "Russians have enough for 15 million," Thatcher's talking head just sounded. I wish them so - so that the kind of this wicked old woman would end on this born! That the second grandson got sick and didn't marry, but this one who was born also got sick and didn't get married either. Let them grab what they are now selling to their own people! Yes it will come true! Amen!
                  1. kavkaz8888
                    +1
                    25 July 2013 23: 53
                    In the article there are good words "Russian billion", I'm talking about 15 million talking heads.
            3. +11
              25 July 2013 11: 44
              One person not so long ago, already recommended in a letter to Putin V.V. to plant Prince Harry of their reign in Russia). After that, he left our sinful world under mysterious circumstances. the man’s name was B.A. Berezovsky.
              1. FATEMOGAN
                +3
                25 July 2013 15: 23
                Quote: ben gun
                . After that, he left our sinful world under mysterious circumstances. the man’s name was B.A. Berezovsky.


                Did you leave .... ??? Not a single posthumous photograph of Berezovsky was made public .... what the hell is not joking ...
                First gear about it ..

                1. Anti
                  +2
                  25 July 2013 23: 02
                  Quote: FATEMOGAN
                  First gear about it ..


                  A terrible report about the military general, only negative emotions in the case. After all, if it’s true_ what they say there, then it’s krants. This gave the installation to move the general, for doing his duty to the homeland, and how many of these are unknown to us? So corruption must be plagued to the root, to the seventh generation, without mercy and a twinge of conscience. Indeed, if you think about it, these are the enemies of Russia and the people, they are agents of a potential adversary and all means are good in the fight against this. sad
                  1. FATEMOGAN
                    +1
                    26 July 2013 00: 01
                    Yes, it’s impossible to watch how they tried to crush the general without imotions, thank God he had the opportunity through the program to talk about bureaucratic lawlessness. One thing is good, as far as I noticed, if Karaulov talks about some crime, then he brings it to a final legal decision. The bureaucracy is so ossified that without numerous landings there is simply no way to cleanse Russia of this disease.
            4. 0
              25 July 2013 12: 36
              Quote: Andrey Skokovsky
              it’s not just a child, it’s a child in the family of those who really rule the world and the same media, see how we have promoted the same English heirs to the media in parallel with the company on the Internet, which is like a monarchy is good

              I don’t know how everyone else is, but for me personally this is the same child as yours and mine. And who is Harry? same flesh same blood!
              1. +1
                25 July 2013 21: 03
                Another p ... er or s..er appeared to be in trouble for many. I do not know if he is.
            5. +3
              25 July 2013 16: 05
              Quote: but I really do not remember in Krasnoyarsk when they said something on the box about them
              Sly T. Skokovsky. The darned Krasnoyarsk television channel playing the opposition only screams about Navalny and the princes of England.
            6. klyka1960
              -1
              25 July 2013 19: 30
              For the first time I hear that the English royal family would rule the world. Maybe once .....
          2. +12
            25 July 2013 10: 54
            1. The media we have is mainly dependent on the West ......
            2. They fill the information space with all sorts of nonsense in order to distract from really important matters.
            3. Cultivate in the head of "hamsters" the idea of ​​submission to the future owner ....

            When will the thoughts of enthusiasm on the Western way of life cease to be imposed on us?
            1. FATEMOGAN
              +38
              25 July 2013 13: 52
              It would be better to say that
              July 24th:
              - The technological launch of the UMMC-Steel plant took place in Tyumen
              - About 400 thousand fry of carp were released in the Ob in Altai
              - 7 new boats received the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Krasnodar Territory

              July 23th:
              - Russian students won medals at the international chemistry olympiad
              - The Bugulma Electric Pump Plant (Tatarstan) launched two new plants
              - In the Kaluga region launched a new generation electrometallurgical plant NLMK-Kaluga
              - The accelerator of heavy ions began to be built in Dubna
              - The construction of the largest telescope on the planet began near Irkutsk
              - Production of cyanide salts launched at Corund-Cyan (Nizhny Novgorod region)
              - In the Kuban harvested a record over the past twenty years, wheat
              - In Yekaterinburg, the only fully low-floor tram in Russia is being run in

              22 of July:
              - The Khabarovsk Territory launched the Belaya Gora mining and processing plant
              - The largest livestock complex in the region is being built in the Novosibirsk region
              - 6,5 thousand hectares of abandoned agricultural land put into operation
              - Fish hatcheries released 50 million salmon fry into the waters of Kamchatka
              - Russian Railways purchased 387 locomotives in the first half of the year
              - The Admiralty Shipyards launched the Bester-1 deep-rescue vehicle
              - Volleyball players of the Russian team won the World League final

              July 21th:
              - China launches a freight train to Germany through Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus and Poland
              - The second multifunctional rescue vessel of the MPSV07 project “Rescuer Kavdeikin”
              -

              July 20th:
              - Alumar plant opened in Nevinnomyssk, Stavropol Territory
              - In Chukotka, an enrichment plant of the Mayskoye gold deposit was opened
              - Commissioning of energy capacities following the results of 2012 became the largest in the last 20 years
              - The largest oilfield service base in Russia is being built in the Astrakhan region
              - Russia in January-June increased gold production by 11%

              And this is a fraction of our news - sdelanounas.ru

              1. +6
                25 July 2013 16: 12
                FATEMOGAN Thank you so much for the news! I watch the news, but I did not hear many news, I watched. without sarcasm from the heart.
                1. FATEMOGAN
                  +7
                  25 July 2013 18: 15
                  Please, Far East, you are absolutely right, many of these news are not allowed on the television network, the question is why, apparently, such a television policy on our channels, the more negative on the screen - the better. Although I specifically selected only the largest news, of the All-Russian level and each of them deserves a separate, detailed coverage. There will be a desire to look at this site - sdelanounas.ru, you will find many interesting things.
                  1. +1
                    25 July 2013 18: 24
                    Quote: FATEMOGAN
                    site - sdelanounas.ru, you will find many interesting things.

                    I agree with you 100%. Thanks for the info., Tomorrow I'll see you have to go buy by us already 01.23. nights. Thanks with respect!
                    1. FATEMOGAN
                      +1
                      25 July 2013 18: 57
                      Please, with respect.
              2. +2
                25 July 2013 18: 51
                you are well done that good news has been posted. The only question is what the hell our media on their hind legs are dancing in front of these kings, bumpheads and other foreign parasites.
                1. Nicotine 7
                  +5
                  25 July 2013 20: 32
                  SW kotvov they are not even OUR media, believe me!
                2. FATEMOGAN
                  +5
                  25 July 2013 21: 11
                  Quote: kotvov
                  the question is what the hell our media on their hind legs are dancing in front of these kings, bumpkins and other foreign parasites.


                  Who pays the money, he and the girl are dancing. We would not be hindered by the law on the media, like the law on NGOs, so that the editorial offices disclose their sources of financing. It is interesting whether the Russian media in general remained as such, or are they already completely overbought. On newspapers, magazines, on the front pages there should be warning inscriptions, as on cigarette packages - DANGER FOR YOUR HEALTH !!!!
            2. DPN
              0
              25 July 2013 22: 30
              When they completely do slaves, then they will stop. One shitty climate we have in our cars in the winter we won’t live in the states like in the states. So we’ll execute the program of the West, they need 15 million of our population, their heir will not cope with a lot
        2. +17
          25 July 2013 08: 59
          This is not interesting for you, dear, since you do not receive grants, and mongrels simply have to work out the brain bone Woof-woof-woof
        3. +15
          25 July 2013 09: 26
          Quote: Hauptmann Emil
          Do we really have no other worries?

          These are all ratings. Why is the broadcast of Home-2 still going on? Because they are watching it. And the huge mass of the population is very interested to know what color the Basque pants are and what a chic wedding was the wedding at Volochkova. And to put exercises, corruption and fires.
          1. 0
            25 July 2013 09: 45
            It also seems to me that TV people stupidly fill the air. that is, there’s no superpot here. but really - got it.
            1. +15
              25 July 2013 10: 19
              Quote: dmitreach
              It also seems to me that TV people stupidly fill the air. that is, there’s no superpot here. but really - got it.

              Actually, this is called an information policy!
              And our policy is copied from the West. Now we do not need programs of scientific and educational, children's or about nature, we are increasingly trying to shove "who else will sleep with Pugachev" and Pusi Wright prisoners of conscience!
              Trying to fashion a dumb herd from the people!
              1. stroporez
                +9
                25 July 2013 11: 47
                Quote: APASUS
                Trying to fashion a dumb herd from the people!
                --- not "try" but quite successfully mold ... No.
              2. +4
                25 July 2013 20: 45
                APASUS, There is no information policy here. There is only one reason and it lies on the surface: MONEY! The ratings of each channel consider for us what, in their opinion, is the most interesting for us in their programs and reports. That shit that is shown to us on TV is, in their opinion, the most "tasty" thing that will attract potential viewers and, accordingly, advertisers. It is difficult to say if the taste of the ratings is true and if this pile of dung really attracts the viewer. But they can tell the advertiser with a clear conscience: "We did everything we could and to the highest quality." Well, with our requests, we stand far behind advertisers and TV specialists, of course, don't care deeply about us.
              3. DPN
                +1
                25 July 2013 22: 39
                A very good diagnosis, and they almost succeed.
                This is a quote from APASUS
          2. +9
            25 July 2013 09: 58
            Quote: Middle Brother
            These are all ratings.

            Come on. These are not ratings, this is zombies. Stop showing and no one will be interested. The meaning of zombies consists in that, the more often the plot is shown, the more this picture is postponed in the brain of ordinary people.
          3. kyga
            +1
            25 July 2013 10: 12
            I’ll tell you a secret, most of the working population does not look at this nonsense. Television lives on through advertising and nothing more, they don’t care whether you watch their programs or not, that’s supposedly all kinds of nonsense. Their target audience is pensioners, whose brain from drugs has already turned into jelly, or a teenager who has stupefied sitting in a social network. I despise such television, even news on all channels, like a carbon copy.
            1. +2
              25 July 2013 15: 42
              Quote: kyga
              I’ll tell you a secret, most of the working population does not look at this nonsense. Television lives on through advertising and nothing more, they don’t care whether you watch their programs or not, that’s supposedly all kinds of nonsense. Their target audience is pensioners, whose brain from drugs has already turned into jelly, or a teenager who has stupefied sitting in a social network. I despise such television, even news on all channels, like a carbon copy.

              What clever you are! If only pensioners with teenagers would be so morally stable ...
            2. +3
              25 July 2013 18: 58
              dear, if you see your future, retirees who already have jelly in their brain, this is of course your business. I’m for example a pensioner, but I understand what is good and what is bad. I THINK the disrespect you show to the older generation, you come around.
          4. +7
            25 July 2013 16: 15
            To the middle brother:
            Recently I was in one of the shopping centers of Krasnoyarsk. I hear joyful squeals and screams. It turned out came one of the house-2. Young people (60-80 people), like crazy, squealed joyfully. Such education today. Unfortunately, patriotic education is not enough.
            1. +3
              25 July 2013 22: 00
              Quote: kush62
              To the middle brother:
              Recently I was in one of the shopping centers of Krasnoyarsk. I hear joyful squeals and screams. It turned out came one of the house-2. Young people (60-80 people), like crazy, squealed joyfully. Such education today. Unfortunately, patriotic education is not enough.

              Everything is simple, their intelligence level does not exceed the level of House-2 ... The level of frozen turnip ... If such programs have a rating, this says a lot ... Naglosak zombie in action ...
        4. +7
          25 July 2013 12: 46
          Yes to all sane citizens of Russia on x .. problems with the procreation of heirs to the throne in England. It's like house 2, from the same series. The media ... the bone of an elderly English.
        5. skeptic-
          +2
          25 July 2013 15: 26
          Quote: Hauptmann Emil
          I, too, have been driven by the situation all these days: we have exercises there, fires, accidents, corruption, etc., but most of all they show / talk about the fact that everyone is waiting for the birth of the heir. Sorry, but I don’t care who will be born to them and what they will call him. Do we really have no other worries?


          Now, you can more accurately calibrate the media. Who has them, he dances them.
        6. 0
          29 July 2013 16: 28
          Quote: Hauptmann Emil
          we have exercises there, fires, accidents, corruption, etc., but most of all they show / talk about the fact that everyone is waiting for the birth of the heir

          Of course, I am sincerely happy for the Royal Family of Great Britain, maybe the birth of a child will make them softer in their aggressive policy towards Syria .. By the way, you noticed how our media cover the Syrian war, you will not receive normal reports, and their number has sharply decreased, as if it was no longer important for Russia, and the fact that there are terrorist attacks every day as 10 Boston, no one cares ..
          The best portal in Syria
          http://anna-news.info/
      2. Grenz
        +14
        25 July 2013 09: 02
        Alas, you can’t even imagine how much they depend on the owners. The West understands the power of words. Dreiser in one of the novels showed the fate of two people - one bought plants for expensive, the other for next to nothing newspapers. Then the newspaper tycoon launched a newspaper hype, devastated the capitalist and appropriated his factories.
        So, our media very successfully work in the interests of those who want to control Russia from abroad. Thank God that although the weather still does not start from New York, but from Moscow.
        1. +6
          25 July 2013 09: 35
          Yes nifiga you all did not understand. Here they showed a close-up of the happy family of the prince leaving the hospital in a Range Rover. And now economists are seriously discussing whether this will affect sales of Range Rover or not. And there is a cradle of firm X, a vest of firm Y, diapers of firm Z. And rest assured, in Russia, as elsewhere, there are idiots to buy for their child "so that everything is like the prince of England." Well, if you can't carry a child in a Range Rover of the same top-end configuration, there is not enough money even for a Ford Focus (purely for example), then even if the diaper is of the same company. And sales are bonuses to the management of firms. And who benefits from showing you news that contains something really informative?
          Quote: grenz
          Thank God that although the weather still does not start from New York, but from Moscow.

          And in the program "Time", even the Soviet one, to the music of Franck Pourcel - Manchester et Liverpool, the weather forecast ended in Moscow.
        2. +3
          25 July 2013 15: 45
          Quote: grenz
          Alas, you can’t even imagine how much they depend on the owners. The West understands the power of words. Dreiser in one of the novels showed the fate of two people - one bought plants for expensive, the other for next to nothing newspapers. Then the newspaper tycoon launched a newspaper hype, devastated the capitalist and appropriated his factories.
          So, our media very successfully work in the interests of those who want to control Russia from abroad. Thank God that although the weather still does not start from New York, but from Moscow.

          Moscow, it still ends)))
      3. +7
        25 July 2013 09: 03
        Quote: Sirocco
        I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU.

        What reply? What are you talking about! And from whom? From our ... well, very, very free press from objectivity and conscience, ... from the aspirations of the people ... from our liberal press, TV ?. You yourself gave the answer - "the impression that we are part of England and the EU". As the EVERNOPYAN (in the world simply EBN) drove us into slave dependence, so We still remain a protectorate of the powerful.
      4. +9
        25 July 2013 09: 37
        Quote: Sirocco
        I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors,
        TV-means of fooling number 1! am
        1. 0
          25 July 2013 20: 38
          to a certain extent. but not quite.
        2. -1
          25 July 2013 20: 57
          I'm talking about TV. Know your worth, and do not be clever, once again.
      5. +6
        25 July 2013 10: 47
        Article plus. I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media.

        There will be another People-Putin online conference, he will have to ask him the question, what the hell do we need to know who was born or married to them ...
      6. +5
        25 July 2013 11: 41
        The article is a plus. In this case, N. Starikov is also a plus. And I have long been curious to hear the answer to this question. As for their wedding, they rang the bell day and night, now about the heir.
      7. +4
        25 July 2013 11: 49
        Quote: Sirocco
        It seems that we are part of England and the EU.

        Funny.
        What are you discovering "America"?
        Abramovich and many "persecuted" Aligophrenics live in England.
        Therefore, no one takes into account our opinion and will not. Until civil society begins to actively defend the position of citizens, starting with housing and communal services and ending with the "Pugachev events."

        Look, People who are in the cast of the Hollywood movies are all over England. They rejoice there that a son was born and I think with malice: After five years of liberal transformations in the "developed" world, public censure will be given and bisexual marriages will probably be brought to trial. Who will continue the dynasty?
        Start to grow from test tubes?
        Laugh, laugh, laugh.
        Here is a small video "in spite" of civil society:
      8. -2
        25 July 2013 12: 38
        Quote: Sirocco
        Article plus. I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU. I believe that we are alien to their traditions in any manifestation, especially their transfer balls, and discos.

        By your comments you have already answered your media question. If you are not interested, then just skip this news and that's it!
        To me, by the way, this is news on the drum, I came in because the appearance of such articles ourselves fuels interest.
        What do you blame the media if you read and comment on such news yourself.
        Skip it! hi
      9. Natalia
        +9
        25 July 2013 12: 46
        Quote: Sirocco
        I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU.

        I agree completely, because for the last three days I wondered what the hell we should be wondering how many contractions during childbirth at all sorts of British princesses there, let the British media cover Paratrooper Day. I would really like to ask our media a question about whether they were overheated in the sun. Article unconditional bold +
        1. Che
          Che
          0
          26 July 2013 19: 19
          wassat In the fountain, bathe the Angles and drink vodka to insensibility - know ours. Let them remember the landing.
      10. +1
        25 July 2013 13: 01
        I agree with you, they lifted up with marriage now with birth
      11. -1
        25 July 2013 13: 35
        Yes, that's all: we don’t care what to drink for, and the British heir will be pleased ;-)
      12. +2
        25 July 2013 13: 48
        If the media were independent then the headlines would sound like this. "Slaves celebrate the birth of a new master"
      13. +2
        25 July 2013 19: 40
        You can watch any news on the central channels, there will be everything except life in Russia. The news has now become somewhat "black". Some messages about terrorism, murder, destruction, hurricanes, and other nonsense. Yes, why should I find out about the fact that there is a flood in New Zealand, snow covered in the USA, a prince was born in England, and a piglet in Germany. You might think that everything is fine in Russia. No problem . Sometimes you watch the news, and you remember those Soviet news. They were more interesting. The plenum of the Central Committee will be shown, another order will be given to Brezhnev, the collective farmers of the Kuban collected ... tons of grain, the millionth ZIL - 130 rolled off the assembly line, etc. , etc. ... Nostalgia! And another thing is interesting: in all news programs, news is like a carbon copy, only in a different order of presentation. What's this ? Distribution or censorship?
      14. 0
        25 July 2013 19: 43
        but they killed the Hasan, but what does the people of Russia put in place a gangster, but what does the people of Russia in Russia media turned inside out the negative in front of positive in the end and in small print
        Quote: Sirocco
        In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of Russia
        Article plus. I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU. I believe that we are alien to their traditions in any manifestation, especially their transfer balls, and discos.
      15. series
        +2
        25 July 2013 23: 12
        but remember how the media "sucked" the kooks of the slutty grandmother of the newborn - "lady Dee", which set off "all bad", at the same time foolish from general attention and scandals?
      16. redwar6
        +1
        26 July 2013 22: 54
        We sat with my father and turned the channels, my head was boiling after 20 minutes, we could not understand where did we go.)
      17. Ruslan_F38
        0
        28 July 2013 16: 12
        Quote: Sirocco
        In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of Russia
        Article plus. I would like to hear the answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not as much. It seems that we are part of England and the EU. I believe that we are alien to their traditions in any manifestation, especially their transfer balls, and discos.


        Exactly, this hype around this event is annoying, why do we care about snickering, pompous killers? Another killer was born, only while his hands are not in blood, but he grows up, ascends to the throne and gives the order to bomb some "not democratic" country in their opinion. In my opinion, our media have forgotten what role England played and is playing in the destruction of our country. I propose to our media to show what is happening there in England, if only they start hanging the royal family on Trafalgar Square or wash them into the ocean, or .... The rest is not interesting.
    2. -2
      25 July 2013 09: 20
      Quote: studentmati
      I hope and am sure that Vladimir Vladimirovich will inform about the birth of a grandson or granddaughter.

      Rather son or daughter
    3. +6
      25 July 2013 09: 26
      It is really annoying that "our" media are focused on serving Western values ​​... it is sad that many people really consider this an important event, especially young people ...
      1. S_mirnov
        +1
        25 July 2013 09: 37
        A person needs information about the outside world, but can only digest a limited amount. Therefore, it is extremely important for the government to hammer an average citizen’s brain with a useless, but emotionally capacious blizzard, so that, God forbid, a complete picture of what is happening around develops in the citizen’s brain!
        This site is no exception, if you analyze the usefulness of local news, the percentage of information junk is also quite large.
    4. +4
      25 July 2013 09: 27
      I personally don’t care whether the heir was born in Britain or not.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    5. sashka
      +5
      25 July 2013 10: 05
      Probably only we have the president who declared 2013 the year of the family, he divorced himself .. It’s better to throw the television or not to watch., And everything will be fine.
    6. +15
      25 July 2013 10: 28
      Nothing, in 2 weeks I’m expecting a second addition to the family- DAUGHTER ... :)) And I would not really like the media to cover this event, my relatives and friends will suffice.
      1. -1
        25 July 2013 19: 06
        CONGRATULATIONS! HEALTH AND HAPPINESS!
        1. 0
          April 17 2018 15: 39
          Thank you, we are 4,5 years old
    7. honest jew
      -13
      25 July 2013 10: 44
      An heir was born in Britain, but what does the people of Russia have to do with it?

      What do you mean? The Chaldeans must know their future king !!!!
      1. +2
        25 July 2013 12: 31
        Quote: Honest Jew
        What do you mean? The Chaldeans must know their future king !!!!

        What the people minus practically correct statement.
        Offended by the Chaldeans?
        Chaldeans (Babylonian Kaldu, Hebrew כַּשְׂדִּים - Qasdim, Greek. Λαλδαίοι) - a Semitic people who lived in the mouth of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers on the northwestern coast of the Persian Gulf. They spoke Aramaic. It also serves as the name of sorcerers, magicians, magicians, fortunetellers, astrologers. According to one version, the Chaldean magicians were magicians who came to bow to the born Jesus.
        Or from: Explanatory Dictionary of Efremova, Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov, Dictionary of Russian Synonyms.
        1) The name of a clowned buffoon or buffoon who amused people in the streets, bazaars and did not hesitate to obscene antics (usually dismissive). 3) Use. like a swear word, which is called a cheeky, insolent man.
        1. +3
          25 July 2013 18: 37
          In my time, the Chaldeans were called waiters, not in the eyes of course, or else they’ll give a damn about soup. I don’t know why and where it came from, but it was.
    8. +14
      25 July 2013 13: 55
      For me, such news is better ..
      PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKY, July 24, RIA FederalPress. The authorities of Kamchatka promised to allocate a new apartment to a family from Petropavlovsk, where triplets were born: two boys and a girl. According to the press service of the regional government, all three newborns were transferred to the regional children's hospital, which has all the necessary equipment for nursing children born with insufficient body weight.http://fedpress.ru/news/society/news_society/1374661700-roditelyam-petropavlovsk
      oi-troini-poobeshchali-novuyu-kvartiru
      But the news told us about England request
    9. -11
      25 July 2013 15: 49
      In my opinion, the article is just a grumbling wink
      There have always been celebrities in the news at all times. wink
      So it was, is and will be. The main consumer of news will always be interested in this.
      He will be pleased for the sake of circulation (or any other similar indicator) wink
      As Pelevin wrote there, TV exists to display ads. Subjects must hold the viewer in front of the screen so that he sees the advertisement laughing
      1. +3
        25 July 2013 16: 18
        I am infuriated by our television only for the reason that hundreds of television channels are created just for the sake of making a profit, and what they are going to broadcast - they do not think at all. That is why there are so many stupid and stupid channels. The adage - "there is nothing to watch" is just from this series, because they are all of the same type and do not know how to get interesting information, since you need to maintain a large staff of competent employees. It's the same on the web, thousands of information portals that simply copy pearls from each other so that the Yandex robot can index them quickly, attract users to sites and then offer a bunch of advertising. Topwar I look in the same way starts to go, as already explicitly in the words are inserted advertising links + A HORRIBLY RUNNING INCREASING banner at the beginning of any article. Nu-Nu !!!
      2. -1
        25 July 2013 19: 10
        another brainwashing victim. You fit perfectly into the picture of modern Europe.
  2. +9
    25 July 2013 06: 38
    How? and despite the fact that everyone should know their bosses.
    1. +6
      25 July 2013 07: 12
      Do not make laugh, Oleg! Ha ha ha !!!! I understood you.
  3. +17
    25 July 2013 06: 39
    I support the author. The given joy of the British should be brought to us only for reference. Those who are very interested in this event can also receive information in the British media. There should be more news, and preferably positive news. And then their news consists only in how many more criminal cases have been initiated (marsh, bulk, defense service cases), where and how many CTO regimes have been introduced, and our rulers cut the ribbons and pressed the buttons. And Mr. Markin became the main commentator on news programs.
  4. +22
    25 July 2013 06: 39
    I completely agree with the author! tired of this news. Well, another contender for the throne was born, well, boy ... well, what else? AND!!! Great heat in Britain! And so seven or eight minutes of precious time. I mean my time. It's precious, because I want to hear and see the latest NEWS, but instead I see some dull hut in London and a crowd of British idiots with flags. You better tell me why Mr. Serdyukov refuses to testify? And in general - how is the investigation going on "Oboronservis"?
    And Honduras doesn't bother me at all!
    1. +10
      25 July 2013 07: 15
      Quote: TRex
      Well, another contender for the throne was born, well, boy ... well, what else?

      I can’t understand the shaving, It must be so happy about the birth of another freeloader. It’s worthless from their kings absolutely no, so beautiful screen. Just recently, an article was about a dad of a newborn who was accused of tax evasion. This must live at the expense of the people, and is still trying to fuck it (the people). Pipets is full.
    2. +1
      25 July 2013 08: 29
      Quote: TRex
      You better tell me why Mr. Serdyukov refuses to testify?

      Well, it’s clear without zhurnalyug.
      Firstly, we do not have 37 year.
      Secondly, the 51 article of the Constitution gives him the right to a takra.
      No one is obliged to testify against himself, his spouse and close relatives, the circle of which is determined by federal law.

      With this, he determined the circle of perpetrators, because in other cases he has no right to refuse to testify.
  5. serge-68-68
    +7
    25 July 2013 06: 42
    The federal media (especially the Internet media) generally very poorly reflect the current agenda for Russia. And for what? They are instruments of propaganda. And as such, they should not “reflect”, but “shape” the agenda. That is why we have relevant news. This has long been known - tell a man that he is a pig - he grunts. Start talking to him about philosophy - he will become a philosopher.
  6. +15
    25 July 2013 06: 43
    But I do not want all the Russian media from morning to evening to tell about the birth of the royal family of Great Britain and show the British people dancing and dancing with joy. Let them rejoice. On the screens of English and Scottish television. Maybe even Irish. But not Russian.

    I completely agree with the author. They really got it, I personally was not at all interested in listening to and watching how and when the duchess had lost water. But it was imposed on all channels.
  7. +4
    25 July 2013 06: 44
    Nothing shows the general “involvement” of the Russian media in the Western model and the controllability of “from there” than the events in the British royal house. So for the viewers of Russia, DIRECT BROADCASTING of the wedding of one English prince was conducted, now every day all the means of communication were broadcast by the birth of another prince.


    Television needs a rating, it needs to be watched. If this is shown, then there is a rating and our people are watching it. If they didn’t look, they wouldn’t show. I personally don’t care about the English monarchy, let them live as they want, I don’t show interest in this. Let everyone make their choice, watch or turn off, no need to look for a worldwide conspiracy here. If it were, then in August 2008, our media would repeat the Western ones, and would not cover actual events.
    1. Hudo
      +7
      25 July 2013 06: 59
      Quote: Orel
      Television needs a rating, it needs to be watched. If this is shown, then there is a rating and our people are watching it


      To be precisewant to watch. In other words, the fifth column in action. And this, with the full connivance of the authorities, I mean, of course, not to prohibit, because it’s stupid, but to create an information precedent by itself, as a counterweight, is quite within our means.
    2. +3
      25 July 2013 08: 36
      Quote: Orel
      If this is shown, then there is a rating and our people are watching it

      We need a rating - create a separate program, you’ll also earn money from advertising in it. Who cares - look. The news is superfluous.
      Masa people turn on TV, just to watch the news and preferably Russian. Why from morning till night talk about princesses, heirs and homosexual mayors with their gay parades?
    3. +2
      25 July 2013 09: 31
      Quote: Orel
      Television needs a rating, it needs to be watched.

      Surprisingly, I don’t look. I learned about the birth of a prince from an article by Starikov.
      I agree with Starikov on this issue. But what's the point?
      The system then works regardless of our desires. For it, we are the electorate demanded once every 6 years.
    4. kyga
      -4
      25 July 2013 10: 20
      I wonder what "real events" are for you. There are always two sides of the coin and I have never seen a situation illuminated from different sides. So do not worry you were deceived again.
      1. 0
        25 July 2013 15: 58
        Quote: kyga
        I wonder what "real events" are for you. There are always two sides of the coin and I have never seen a situation illuminated from different sides. So do not worry you were deceived again.

        Wan! Specifically registered for the owners to tear the shirt?
  8. +9
    25 July 2013 06: 45
    I agree with Starikov, this news is NOT the main thing for Russia!
    1. serge-68-68
      +6
      25 July 2013 06: 51
      Rambler news feed: people killed in a train crash in Spain; measures to increase economic growth invented by the Ministry of Economic Development; a bomb in a man's car in Moscow; DG wants to remove "puberty" from the Criminal Code; Bush shaved his head to meet a sick child. Is this the BIG NEWS?
  9. +8
    25 July 2013 06: 46
    It has been reportedly bought and drunk by the British for billions of pounds of alcohol drunkards. Part of the British in a bowl of soup in lines, there is nothing to pay for housing, the rest is having fun. But about the media bought, I agree, we do not have the Ministry of Propaganda and Censorship.
  10. +7
    25 July 2013 06: 47
    I agree that there is so much noise as if he was born a black man.
    Something reminds a fairy tale about Moses and his youth.
  11. +19
    25 July 2013 06: 50
    If they have nothing to occupy the airtime, which I doubt, then they can show the show "the life of a corrupt official on the air." Serdukov and Vasilyeva are still being watched, journalists are involved in the observation. The ratings will go off scale. Violation of privacy is out of the question. They will have privacy in the zone.
    1. +10
      25 July 2013 07: 25
      I propose to name the transmission UNDER THE GLASS, UNDER THE CAP or behind the GRILLE. Broadcast on TNT around the clock instead of HOUSE-2
  12. Valery Neonov
    +7
    25 July 2013 06: 56
    Quote: TRex
    Well, another contender for the throne was born, well, boy ..

    He is the third in line for the throne, and since he is a long-lived family, he will remain a contender.
    And it's worth the second day to "speak" about it.
  13. VkadimirEfimov1942
    +4
    25 July 2013 07: 05
    “Nothing shows the general“ involvement ”of the Russian media in the Western model and their controllability“ from there ”than the events in the British royal house. That for the audience of Russia they had a LIVE BROADCAST of the wedding of one English prince, now for days on end they scored the air of all means of communication with the birth of another prince.>

    I agree and agree with Nikolai Starikov! The West through our media directly pours out the "tubs" of its dirty propaganda.
  14. strange and pretty meaningless
    +3
    25 July 2013 07: 07
    Today a boy is born in the royal family of Great Britain.
    Why are you boiling ?! This news simply replaces the traditional TV bike - "the elephant has given birth." wassat
  15. +3
    25 July 2013 07: 09
    Damn ..)) And I thought to me alone it seems that the news about the birth of the monarch’s baby is too clogging the air. So not paranoia! ))) I agree with the author.
  16. +7
    25 July 2013 07: 17
    I completely agree with the author. But if we assume that there should be one "mistress of the seas" in the World, one monarchy, etc., and we all know the name of this country, then the death of Nicholas II at the hands of Latvian riflemen in 1918 and subsequent events in Russia and beyond its borders they somehow stand in one row by themselves. Are we witnessing the triumph of the winners now?
    1. +5
      25 July 2013 07: 26
      We were shown on TV a candidate for president of Russia, elected by the people of Britain
  17. +1
    25 July 2013 07: 28
    And it seems to me that not everything is so bad. It’s just that our journalists simplify their lives and steal some news from Western shit + herd instinct. Normal laziness. And about the birth of the baby - well, well, now it is a pure innocent creature and he still does not care whether he is a king or an emperor. I don’t understand the monarchy especially at this stage - they will choose a flock of monkeys and pray for it for centuries, it looks silly from the side but works.
  18. +2
    25 July 2013 07: 32
    Honestly, it bothers me a bit that people generally look at such crap. I completely agree with the article.
  19. +29
    25 July 2013 07: 46
    Britain and the entire Anglo-Saxon world have brought us #vna more than Germany in two wars!

    The queen gave birth to the night
    and not a son and not a daughter,
    not a duckling, not a frog,
    not an unknown animal,
    not a groundhog and not a ferret,
    not the director of the stall,
    not a herring or sprats,
    not two paratroopers,
    no railing from the balcony
    and not three vodka bottles,
    and not strings of glomeruli,
    and a stinky lump,
    she has recently
    there was a terrible constipation!
  20. Luger
    +17
    25 July 2013 07: 49
    Yesterday at the RSN, the presenter tried to discuss the news of the birth of the heir in a positive manner, people started calling and began to send her away with her enthusiasm culturally, she was very surprised why our people are not happy like all progressive humanity to the birth of the royal person of Great Britain, I was surprised by her surprise , some kind of strange ..... request
    The article is correct, I support.
  21. pinecone
    +4
    25 July 2013 07: 51
    Another so-called "show", another reason for the pro-Western media to divert the attention of the citizens of the Russian Federation from the sore problems of the country. Likewise, there was a rumor about Thatcher's death.
  22. Alexander borey
    +4
    25 July 2013 07: 56
    Unpleasantly surprised by the violent reaction of the central Russian media to the birth of this ... Excitement and admiration cover this topic. WHO DOES IT NEED ?! They created such a hype as if God was born. After all, not God was born, but vice versa. Starikov and the article are respected.
    1. Alexander borey
      +4
      25 July 2013 08: 05
      And in 2015, the world community unexpectedly learns the "joyful" news: the prince is not an ordinary prince, but the "direct heir of Christ", "Messiah." He will just turn 33 years old. All confessions recognize him as a "descendant of Jesus." unite all religions for the sake of a new world government. As in the Bible. I doubt at all that there are people in the British royal family.
  23. rodevaan
    +7
    25 July 2013 07: 57
    Yes, they all went on a famous erotic journey in 3 Soviet letters with their heirs, inspectors!
    To the fifth point, who was born there was born, and generally put big and thick on small-brittle.
    I do not look stupid zomboyaschik and I do not advise others to litter their brain ...
  24. vladsolo56
    +7
    25 July 2013 08: 03
    And as our media grieved over Thatcher’s death, everyone was crying with crocodile tears, well, I don’t watch our TV
    1. +12
      25 July 2013 08: 26
      In 2005, our media waited 2 weeks for the death of Pope John Paul II, broadcasting 60-80% of news programs. Although there are no more than 300 thousand Catholics in Russia, they still have to talk about and show them. It’s only hot. it is for people - the question is not for them. Yes, and you need to fulfill orders. The British are delighted with our puppy screech ...
      1. rolik
        0
        25 July 2013 13: 49
        Quote: AleksUkr
        . The British are delighted with our puppy screech ...

        But it was especially funny for me when they called our Foreign Ministry from the English embassy and said that you can congratulate you on your birth. What's this ? did they give us permission or something?
  25. explorer
    +1
    25 July 2013 08: 10
    no it is impossible to forbid. Let them show it every day, let them drive it to the point of absurdity, to the point of nausea: - so that the people say: "Well, all of them in ...".
    but you need to offer an alternative - unobtrusive ...
  26. +7
    25 July 2013 08: 14
    this "very important news" served as a good indicator for whom "our" media really work.

    and briefly about the news itself - all do not care wassat
    gentlemen of Anglo-Saxons, you can leave these joyful news to yourself. I equally do not care about your entire royal brood, House of Lords and Big-mother-him-bin.
  27. 0
    25 July 2013 08: 16
    Remember how we were told half a year every day in all the news about Sharon's health!
    1. +3
      25 July 2013 08: 46
      Yeah ... and also about some princess who either hanged herself in a tunnel or exploded ...
  28. ramsi
    +4
    25 July 2013 08: 16
    our media is not only one general disgust. One can’t even speak about the slightest professionalism, and, in my opinion, at all levels
  29. +6
    25 July 2013 08: 17
    It turns out that not all gay men in the UK ...
    1. 0
      25 July 2013 22: 54
      I agree, there are also bisexuals and other transgender people.
  30. Mr. Truth
    +3
    25 July 2013 08: 18
    Somehow it’s not like a royal ordinary mortal to die. It would be better if he found a sister for himself or with his brother tried to applaud the blue-blooded blue-toed teeth.
    Anglo-Saxon coprophages are pathetic.
    1. +2
      25 July 2013 08: 58
      There was already one, the most blue-blooded, "Princess Di" illiterate, did not graduate from school, worked as a nurse in a kindergarten, a descendant of the Spencer Counts, well, the German queen (Hesse Coburg of the Saxon dynasty) Elizabeth-2 took her as her daughter-in-law, except for shame and it did nothing good to compromise the institution of royalty. In general, I do not care who got out there, this is the problem of the zombie English public. Py SyVindzoromi, they seemed to be closed up in 16 by the decision of parliament, the German origin was striking.
    2. 0
      25 July 2013 12: 57
      So the British did the opposite. This Russian house from European closely related houses took wives. Therefore, it fell. And the British always took from their own people. This is a double benefit, do not take from someone else (it is not clear to whom he (she) sympathizes and is healthy the ruler at the exit (not stunted, incest). Therefore, only the English house remained. Small kingdoms do not count. As they say, in the end there will be only one.
      1. 0
        25 July 2013 13: 02
        Quote: Dilshat
        This is a double benefit, you don’t need to take it from the side of someone else (it is not clear to whom he (she) sympathizes with a healthy ruler at the exit (not stunted, incest).

        is it in the sense of humor or are you off topic?
      2. +4
        25 July 2013 13: 02
        Usually the opposite is degeneration, where everything happens inside your population. Yes, and I must admit that the Romanovs' house and the English royal are close relatives. And hemophilia Alexei, he got from Queen Victoria.
    3. +1
      25 July 2013 13: 30
      Quote: Mr. Truth
      Somehow it’s not like a royal ordinary mortal to die.

      I’ve gotten married and married a mere mortal, that all monarchies in the geyropa have long been interchanged .. they are guilty of marriage and degeneration, degradation and outset as a result of incest, and then healthy offspring are needed for the reign. If the Danish or Swedish prince does not fail me I married a girl, let's say so from the common people, and the Princess of Monaco was easily given to all car racers and tamers, but the offspring are healthy. Unlike their daddy, the prince is not all right, although this is the norm according to the Geyropean terms. Well, you understand What are you talking about?
  31. +2
    25 July 2013 08: 27
    No wonder. Almost all media outlets are not state-owned. So they play the music ordered by the owner. Somehow I was puzzled by the question, what blockhead during the period of reforming our army came up with to hang epaulettes ... on the chest instead of traditional places - on the shoulders? Today I saw a photo of the Pentagon General ... yeah. here it is. So this is an attempt to comb the whole world with one brush, so that everyone looks in the direction of the Anglo-Saxons, claiming to be the masters of this planet. A striking example of this is just all this fuss in the royal family of small-shavens. Who was born, who was baptized, who divorced ... And meanwhile "people hawala" ... I won't be surprised if another sugary-snotty puppy-touching release of Malakhov about how everyone was waiting for the Great birth in the royal family will be released soon
  32. +4
    25 July 2013 08: 37
    Russian media are controlled from abroad and are included in the information field of the West. We have the same agenda, which is determined in London and Washington for the whole world.

    The way it is! Who would argue? We can elect the president, deputies of all levels, but the real power is in the hands of the owners of the media. And they are not controlled by ANYONE!
    So, the author is absolutely right.
    And, if suddenly, you want to put things in order in the media economy - the whole West will howl about the violation of freedom of speech. Although, what do I care about their freedom of speech. I live in my country and do not want to live their values.
  33. recruit
    +4
    25 July 2013 08: 40
    It would be better if our media spoke more about their people. And they showed in what conditions our women give birth.
  34. +2
    25 July 2013 08: 48
    Take sports news. The same thing, although in our country a lot of interesting things.
  35. ed65b
    +2
    25 July 2013 08: 49
    The article may be correct but tense. Do not like the birth of a prince, switch the channel. I switched. I do not like house2, press the button on the remote control. Do not want to watch Chernukha on TNT there is a culture channel or a star. And there is a rbk voice Prokhorovsky there poop flowing like a river. There are rashatudey. Channels a priori belong to someone and serve the interests of the owner. Here Prokhorov took the birth of the prince 1 minute; his task is different, and he is trying to solve it in his own way.
  36. +4
    25 July 2013 08: 50
    There will be few nations such as the British who have so much shattered Russia. And every day, about
    their ........ the queen, then about their ........ heirs. Just a mockery.
  37. +4
    25 July 2013 08: 53
    But I do not want all the Russian media from morning to evening to talk about the birth of the royal family

    ... and not only YOU! But what can we do - our TV’s dilemma - or tell us that thanks to the tireless inactivity of our stupid liberal government, inflation jumps 2 times faster than forecasts ... or that the ruble was lowered by order of oligarchs - exporters of raw materials ... or to hammer in the net broadcasting news of the new English heir ... The first couple of news will cause a negative ... and the last ... so-so ... because the Glitsky heir has certain rights to the Russian throne ... What if ..! This then will be credited to the asset ..!
  38. _Igor_
    +3
    25 July 2013 08: 57
    But I do not want all the Russian media from morning to evening to tell about the birth of the royal family of Great Britain and show the British people dancing and dancing with joy. Let them rejoice. On the screens of English and Scottish television. Maybe even Irish. But not Russian.


    fully support
  39. +5
    25 July 2013 09: 08
    Full crap show on the news. then in the USA a man fell into a hole and broke his leg, they say that the king of Belgium abdicated, then in England a child was born in the family. I agree with the author to us -! there Russia is a huge country I doubt that there is no news. Of course, it will be more interesting for a journalist to visit Europe than to come for a report to a Siberian town. This is the trouble for our journalists to be less able to work. (To be in the right place where the situation really requires it).
  40. +19
    25 July 2013 09: 12
    The West is controlled not only by the media and oligarchs, but also by all power. Therefore, nothing good happens.
    Most talked about topics:
    1. Personal life of "stars".
    2. Quarrels and quarrels in "star families".
    3. Fiction and myths.
    4. Foreign chronicle.
    5. House-2.
    But that almost does not cover:
    1. Industry - success, development, dynamics of growth or decline.
    2. Agriculture is the same.
    3. New technologies, the training system for young scientists, workers.
    4. The situation in the country - problems, solutions to problems.
    5. State development plans for the future.
    And now, who can, remember the news in Soviet times. All in all. Because then there was POWER, and now ... the contents of the toilet (sorry, Madame, Monsieur, I hope I was politolentorant).

    I congratulate England on the birth of the heir to the throne, but by and large I don’t give a damn about that.
    1. +3
      25 July 2013 15: 10
      And now, who can, remember the news in Soviet times.
      I will not correct much, the program "News" was called, and there was also a wonderful program "International Panorama", which began at 18-00 on Sunday. hi
  41. +2
    25 July 2013 09: 12
    talked about it better
    http://www.freecity.lv/bestseller/55/
  42. +6
    25 July 2013 09: 12
    As for me, for Russia, if you can show this news, it’s only at the very end after the weather forecast, or after the news about the wonderful harvest of cucumbers from Baba Shura from the village of Vasyuki, i.e. when all the news from Russia is covered, including cucumbers and leaky pipes on X Street in the county town of N, at the end so briefly, but not at the very beginning, I understand even if the prince married a Russian citizen, well, if he himself Russian then understand, but somehow strange.
  43. dmb
    +9
    25 July 2013 09: 14
    That rare case when Starikov says business. The media are pursuing the policies of their masters. The owners, however, quite deliberately form programs in the interests of a very specific group of people. Therefore, we will continue to hear about the birth of crowned babies, anniversaries of pop stars and consider the clever faces of ministers listening to the Guarantor. At the same time, the Guarantor will demand to "expand" and "deepen", and the ministers will nod in agreement. However, you will never hear from him what really caused the increase in tariffs, why we wrote off billions of debts to the next Honduras, why, despite general criticism, the education reform continues according to Fursenko and Livanov, and what are the real achievements of Rusnano in general and Chubais in particular. And so that the Guarantor does not ask these stupid questions, watch TV series about Snowden and the royal grandchildren.
    1. Piterkras
      +1
      25 July 2013 16: 00
      We are writing off Soviet debts to Honduras, because it really can’t get them out, because the USSR itself has collapsed, and Russia, the USSR, is no good at all.
  44. +3
    25 July 2013 09: 29
    What to rejoice, one more was born (I will not be afraid of this word and if it is missed) ub people.
  45. +5
    25 July 2013 09: 29
    And yesterday, before going to bed, I decided to watch the news and, when the epic of birth began, I calmly made my evening exercise in the toilet, so there was probably good news.
  46. Vlad_Mir
    +4
    25 July 2013 09: 39
    Journalists mess up the information space, write just about anything, make an elephant out of a fly!
  47. Taurus
    +4
    25 July 2013 09: 49
    As far as I see, the zeal with which England is fighting for pedarism cannot serve her pride in the birth of a child from a man and a woman. It is rather a misunderstanding. Now, if the prince married them in a taxi driver or there married his husband for a hairy stoker, it would be democratic and approving. And so he is not proud of anything.
    1. +1
      25 July 2013 12: 27
      Taurus

      As far as me is seen, then pthe phenomenon with which England fights behind pedaristry cannot serve her pride in the birth of a child from a man and a woman. It is rather a misunderstanding. Now, if the prince married them in a taxi driver or there married his husband for a hairy stoker, it would be democratic and approving. And so he is not proud of anything.
      1. rereture
        +1
        25 July 2013 12: 36
        Actually, this is a set of Chinese cubes, nothing to do with it. It's very stupid to post shkolota demotivators.
      2. Piterkras
        0
        25 July 2013 16: 01
        If a person is a stupid person, then neither the Unified State Examination nor the normal exams will save him.
  48. +2
    25 July 2013 09: 51
    article plus 1000
    zadolbali limes
  49. +7
    25 July 2013 09: 52
    Article plus. but not only England ... For example, when a thief in law died, all the news was also about his funeral. Or the life of stellar pop, who cares? I would like to listen to something Soviet, for example, about harvesting.
    1. +2
      25 July 2013 10: 23
      Quote: Gardamir
      For example, when a thief in law died, all the news was also about his funeral. Or the life of star pop, who cares? I would like to listen to something Soviet, for example, about harvesting.

      I fully support.
  50. +4
    25 July 2013 09: 52
    "Independent" Russian media necessarily belong to someone. And these people very often buy real estate in England, invest huge funds in the economy of this country. These "gentlemen" remember about Russia only when there is another opportunity to privatize a piece of the former national property That is why they boggle our heads with all sorts of English princes, because they will not write how they plundered and plundered a huge and richest state, the only drawback of which was that all the wealth of the country belonged to the people, and not to a bunch of thieves and swindlers.
    1. +2
      25 July 2013 12: 48
      independent media cannot be in nature, just as a free person
  51. pa_nik
    +5
    25 July 2013 09: 53
    Quote: Taurus
    It's more of a misunderstanding.


    100% !!!

    The true face of the island is demonstrated by the uncle of the newborn Harry... belay
  52. +6
    25 July 2013 09: 56
    Wait, we'll soon nominate a candidate for the US presidential nomination and our brains will be numb for almost a year until he's nominated, and then the presidential race (in the US, naturally) will begin.

    Even the presidential elections in RUSSIA will not be covered like this.

    Although I think they miscalculated here, our people have a different mentality; everyone starts poking at the remote control and goes to another channel.
    Our PIPL is normal, he’s friendly
  53. +11
    25 July 2013 09: 59
    "An heir was born in Britain" - Yes, and f... with him laughing
  54. +4
    25 July 2013 10: 03
    I agree with the article, I’ve been pissed off for the last two days... What kind of nonsense is this? Well, someone was born to someone else, so what? (especially THESE)
  55. +4
    25 July 2013 10: 16
    Today, in the British royal family, an heir of currently unknown gender was born to parents A and B.
    And now about the weather.
    Today in Russia, 20 regular launches of Proton N rockets were carried out as planned and 40 dual-use satellites were successfully launched into orbit, these were the last of the 300 hundred satellites planned for this year, the program was completed ahead of schedule.
  56. +2
    25 July 2013 10: 19
    >
    I don’t want to either, let the Anglitos dance, what do we have to do with it?
    1. +2
      25 July 2013 10: 30
      Well, the Scots, that’s a question, they are now dreaming of leaving the united kingdom on their suitcases.
  57. VkadimirEfimov1942
    +2
    25 July 2013 10: 27
    Our media suffers from “Vaskism” - no matter how indignant we are, but he (the cat Vaska) “listens and eats.” Therefore, they will continue to “crawl” before the West.
  58. +3
    25 July 2013 10: 30
    Today a boy is born in the royal family of Great Britain.


    Geez! Think about it! So, we must remember to take out the trash.
  59. serge
    +2
    25 July 2013 10: 45
    What does this have to do with news? This is a Jewish king. His father is circumcised, even though he is an English prince. Our media are Jewish, so they celebrate. The people of Russia really have nothing to do with this, but do Russian media belong to the people of Russia?
  60. Boot under the carpet
    +2
    25 July 2013 10: 46
    The Masonic authorities rejoice at the appearance of another little Mason.
  61. +3
    25 July 2013 10: 49
    Article plus. The TVIzer himself almost broke from this diarrhea. Although the Internet rules, it has become a kitchen in which EVERYTHING and more is said to the point. And TV is destined to play the role of theater, and the theater of the absurd.
  62. honest jew
    +2
    25 July 2013 10: 53
    Today a boy is born in the royal family of Great Britain.

    1. +1
      25 July 2013 11: 09
      Rather, in German!
  63. Alexandr0id
    +2
    25 July 2013 11: 03
    The point is not that something is being imposed on us, but that TV people stupidly need to fill the timing with something, filming your own means money and you have to work, and re-showing BBC stories is much easier and cheaper. for the same reason, the news more and more often contains stories from YouTube and all sorts of slag from other people’s sources
  64. -5
    25 July 2013 11: 09
    “a reason to live someone else’s joy”... the author, honor yourself.... if you don’t want to watch, don’t look - pressed the button and “hello”... spit on Britain and rub it, don’t spoil your nerves... take care of your health))) )

    P/s/ one of the PR methods is to publish an article. I was surprised when I saw this news AGAIN on this resource, I was completely sure that this news would take up a paragraph in the review of the week’s results and that’s all...why did I write the article?
  65. Large52
    +1
    25 July 2013 11: 14
    I think people who understand themselves choose what to watch, fortunately today there is a great choice, for every taste and color... someone wants to watch mtv, someone wants to watch house 2, someone wants to watch what is happening in England. Someone sit and read "Military Review")) Choose your own field of interests!
  66. USNik
    +4
    25 July 2013 11: 15
    But I don’t want all the Russian media to talk about the birth of the British royal family from morning to evening
    They're really sick of it, they've been buzzing about this EPIC event for three days now.
    the point is not that something is being imposed on us, but that the TV people stupidly need to fill the timing with something

    Nothing to fill with!? Explosions in Iraq, more than 60 people killed, an operation in Mali, the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, events in Syria, military exercises in Russia and America, the bankruptcy of Detroit (!), earthquakes and floods.. There’s nothing damn to write about!? Even the more or less sane RTR even chokingly admires in all the news, off-the-way-without a nurse...ugh.
  67. Molotov
    0
    25 July 2013 11: 21
    Finally, someone expressed my thoughts out loud))) Thank you, comrade!
  68. +1
    25 July 2013 11: 27
    A murky story with the birth of an heir. It seems that behind all this tinsel the real difficulties of the royal family are simply hidden. Google the news of '11 about the current mother. It turns out that she (as was once claimed) ... cannot have children. The current uproar just reinforces these conspiracy theories.
    I understand that now medicine, miracles, doctors...
    And the direction of the discussion has been set in the right direction - we are all screaming - we've had enough of it already. We don’t talk about the real reasons for secrets and omissions. Doesn’t it seem that even in this we are being manipulated? :)
  69. 0
    25 July 2013 11: 32
    Quote: Sirocco
    In Britain, the heir was born, but what have the people of Russia
    Article plus. I would like to hear an answer to the question from our media. I understand that some of them are dependent on Western sponsors, but not that much. .....


    SO.
  70. Belogor
    -1
    25 July 2013 11: 36
    Somehow all this (comments) reminds me of one cute expression - “hedgehogs injected themselves, cried, but continued to eat the cactus”
  71. +1
    25 July 2013 11: 41
    Trivial event.
    One more prince, one less.
    When the plug sticks the flippers together, it will be an event.
    Streams of tears of loyal subjects will wash away the English kingdom into the sea. laughing
  72. +1
    25 July 2013 11: 44
    >>
    This is the true face of our “independent” media that “cares” about the interests of the people. In their opinion, there is nothing worthy of their attention in Russia and the people are just waiting for messages - how is it with the birth of an English prince? How far they are from the people! How much well-fed, self-satisfied liberal crap, drooling with emotion about life in Geyrop, enthusiastic admirers of Western values, has entrenched itself in our supposedly Russian media, with enthusiasm and enthusiasm procrastinating on all sorts of foreign crap that has absolutely nothing to do with Russia, the needs of the people and his interests!
  73. Tolik.Skiff.
    +1
    25 July 2013 11: 46
    I have lost all respect for this “family”...After this old lady signed the law “on minorities”, they simply disgust me crying And the s.s. minorities got their K...VU! Fuck them...And also an elderly woman...Burn in her a.u...Rome was silent, but for such things they used to be excommunicated from the church...Apparently They are praying to the wrong god!!! hi
  74. -1
    25 July 2013 11: 46
    The contrast the media sets is so negative. A little prince was born in the kingdom, just like in a fairy tale. And then what a miracle this state is. where Serdyukov gives birth gives birth cannot give birth.
  75. 0
    25 July 2013 11: 47
    Today a child was born in the English royal family. The gender of the child will be determined much later, when the gender is determined, then the child will be given a name. This is approximately what media reports should sound like.
  76. sonovlad
    +2
    25 July 2013 11: 47
    Why a boy? Why not a girl? Why not IT? How dare they violate his rights and decide without him? Or do the kings not adhere to the liberal values ​​that they themselves are moving around the world?
  77. Politician
    0
    25 July 2013 11: 50
    Sovereign media of a fully sovereign country will tell about it. In passing. Under the heading "Other".

    Key phrase! Apparently, many of our media are fed from the hands of razors and staffers. We have a lot of people who want to yap on Russia and engage in anal leasing of Western “portners” for an additional fee. Radio ECHO Matza is especially successful in this! Yes, I don’t care what happens in the royal family, but from morning to evening they tell me about such a great event. It feels like the prince of all the earth has been born! Ugh!
  78. rereture
    -1
    25 July 2013 12: 00
    The whole family watched the news and laughed at the savages.
    1. 0
      25 July 2013 13: 12
      News, yes, for savages, but civilized people try to write without grammatical errors.
      1. rereture
        0
        25 July 2013 13: 22
        It’s not news itself for savages, but shaved people behave like savages, whether in the 14th century or now.
  79. 0
    25 July 2013 12: 11
    “Our” media are already fed up with everyone. They are STRANGER to us :(
  80. Piterkras
    +2
    25 July 2013 12: 17
    The whole problem is that the English royal family occupies almost 1-2 places in the secret world government, I am the royal family of the West. All large and more or less significant media are under the control of tycoons and bankers in the USA and England. The government plans to continue to work on reducing the number of unnecessary eaters. It takes a certain amount of time to achieve a result that is acceptable to them. And it is quite possible that this particular Henry 7 (?) will be the one who will take the helm of the new world order. So we are shown our future owner in advance.
  81. +3
    25 July 2013 12: 18
    I apologize in advance to Muscovites. But why did the media talk about the storm in Yekaterinburg in passing, basically the same story? But about the fact that in Moscow it’s +10, there are noises every 5 minutes, and what are the words: Abnormal temperature, Bad weather, and so on. Bad weather is when it's -40 and there's a snowstorm for a week. It’s the same with Great Britain, but I don’t care who was born to whom in the royal family. I'm interested in what's happening in Russia.
  82. +3
    25 July 2013 12: 33
    This is precisely the reason why I don't watch TV. I'm sick of this British couple, their heir and the monarchy as a whole. another proof that the media is a tool of liberals - the enemies of our statehood!
  83. +2
    25 July 2013 12: 48
    That's right, Nikolai! We sold the media to the people of one odious nation and want to make patriotism a national idea. Homosexuality, an immense thirst for consumption, primitive tastes and other things that are aimed at distorting national self-awareness can only be instilled by media alien to the people of Russia... the immediate nationalization of most channels is needed, leaving only a few censored entertainment channels in private hands
  84. +3
    25 July 2013 12: 53
    My dears! I also believe that there is nothing to talk about here at all! At all! But they said this, because this child is the legal successor of the British queen and her policies. Policies DIRECTLY opposite to us. They have imperial ambitions, they also want to eat, not even eat, and devour, each in three throats, and all their interests relate to the fullness of their pocket. What to do? There are no mineral resources in Britain, and they don’t want to allow popular unrest, like in the 80s. And the news itself is a level the English yellow press (= our newspaper "LIFE"), as they write and say here, for example, about poor Pugacheva.
  85. Oleg1986
    +2
    25 July 2013 13: 04
    It makes no sense to even talk about the media. Everything has been clear to everyone for a long time, and scratching your tongue on this topic once again is not a matter of great intelligence. We have enough experts at every entrance. But to do something is something everyone is too weak to do.
    The only thing that stuck in the article was the fact that our tsar was not going to run away anywhere in sealed carriages, like some bald leaders, even if someone provided him with asylum. It is enough to remember how a subject of that same George said about the overthrow of the monarchy: “One of the goals of the war has been achieved.” There in England they can pose as mourners of Tsarist Russia and zealous haters of Leninism as much as they want, but you cannot deceive the Russian people.
  86. +3
    25 July 2013 13: 15
    Quote: Middle Brother
    These are all ratings. Why is the broadcast of Home-2 still going on? Because they are watching it. And the huge mass of the population is very interested to know what color the Basque pants are and what a chic wedding was the wedding at Volochkova. And to put exercises, corruption and fires.

    This is because for 20 years it has been drummed into people’s heads, especially young people, that Dom-2 and Baskov’s underpants are much more interesting than army exercises, the construction of a new plant or the yield per hectare.
  87. 12061973
    +2
    25 July 2013 13: 20
    and despite the fact that women who don’t have much to do, they watch all sorts of rubbish like House-2, if only some prince was born, got married, fell in love, it would be better if they cooked more food and cleaned the house.
  88. Cat
    +1
    25 July 2013 13: 30
    So, is anyone else watching TV?
    1. +1
      25 July 2013 14: 32
      Quote: Gato
      So, is anyone else watching TV?


      I don’t know about you, but on “Zvezda” I listen to the documentary with my back in the morning while I’m preparing breakfast, and also “Fight Club” to cheer me up.
  89. gura
    -4
    25 July 2013 13: 33
    From Minsk. I really liked the story about how William and Kate and their newborn were leaving the hospital. No British riot police, no slingshots, no special sirens and flashing lights. It’s simply impossible to imagine this in Moscow with your “sun-faced” ones! The prince takes the wheel and go! The Second Prince is a combat helicopter pilot who served for some time in Afghanistan. And he wasn’t even awarded! I can’t believe it, looking at the shoulder straps and trinkets of Shoigu, who has not served a single day. And before my eyes is another example, from another story - Colonel Nicholas II and his children, finished off with bayonets by the “bearers of universal happiness” and lying in pools of blood in the basement. Therefore, I sincerely congratulate Prince William and his wife, and I know that there will never be a Russian experience in Britain, and in general in a united Europe! Happy.
    1. Politician
      +3
      25 July 2013 18: 32
      No British riot police, no slingshots, no special sirens and flashing lights. It’s simply impossible to imagine this in Moscow with your “sun-faced” ones!

      Because no one needs your idiot Harry! He is not the first person in the state to carry him around with flashing lights. And the top officials of the state, by law, have the right to personal safety, especially in a country like Russia! Our president is like a thorn in the ass of world imperialism! am
      1. FRIGATE2
        +2
        25 July 2013 19: 13
        Quote: Politics
        Because no one needs your idiot Harry! He is not the first person in the state to carry him around with flashing lights. And the top officials of the state, by law, have the right to personal safety, especially in a country like Russia! Our

        Then why do your fellow citizens and relatives like Starikov criticize the monarchical family, presenting them with disdain?
        I don’t think that the Prime Minister of England cares about himself like the presidents of Russia
        1. Politician
          +1
          25 July 2013 19: 38
          Then why do your fellow citizens and relatives like Starikov criticize the monarchical family, presenting them with disdain?

          that's how they expose themselves laughing.
          Naked Prince Harry in Las Vegas: http://www.spletnik.ru/blogs/pro_zvezd/59812_golyy-printc-garri-v-las-vegase
      2. gura
        +1
        25 July 2013 20: 05
        From Minsk. A pain in the ass, and even in the damned world, imperialist!!!. Well well! And this is about the very, very, great, united and indivisible! About (whispers) Vladimir Vladimirovich PUTIN himself!!! How dare you! How could you even imagine such a thing?! Disturb the orderly choir singing the glory of the leader! If he reads your blasphemy against himself, he will be offended, and will leave to rule America and the European Union! All US citizens, judging by this writing, only dream about this. But they will be a bummer. The great cooperative “Ozero” has not yet stolen all of Russia. Serdyukov, Madame Agricultural Minister (forgot her last name), and who knows how many other swindlers have not yet transferred all the loot, not all the relatives have been transported to the West they “curse”! The Motherland still needs GDP! Unlike other GDP, real, marking time.
    2. +1
      27 July 2013 14: 48
      Naive, can you imagine how the guards of this prince in Afghanistan sweated so that the prince would not be killed. This is all for the common people, they say he served for his homeland just like everyone else))))
  90. +1
    25 July 2013 13: 38
    My attitude towards news collections in the media completely coincides with what the author wrote. For several days now they have been talking about the birth of one individual in a small country - Britain; before that, ears were buzzing about the abdication of someone from the “pre-throne” in an even smaller country. Their influence on my life is so significant?! laughing Then, like it or not, you’ll think about it - how can you erase them from your life, maybe kill them if the opportunity arises? wassat
  91. +3
    25 July 2013 13: 46
    Quote: Kushadasov
    No wonder. Almost all media are not state owned. So they play the music that the owner orders. Somehow I was puzzled by the question, what idiot, during the period of reform of our army, came up with the idea of ​​hanging epaulettes...on the chest instead of the traditional places - on the shoulders? Today I saw a photo of the Pentagon general...yeah. here it is. So this is an attempt to comb the whole world with one brush, so that everyone looks in the direction of the Anglo-Saxons, who claim to be the masters of this planet. A striking example of this is precisely all this fuss in the royal family of small-shaven people. Who was born, who was baptized, who got divorced... And meanwhile, “people are eating up”... I wouldn’t be surprised if Malakhov’s next sweet, snotty, puppy-loving release about how everyone was waiting for the Great Birth in the royal family comes out soon

    Good day to all!
    Unfortunately, the author of the note on the article and many others are absolutely right.
    The owners of all media determine the directions, topics and angle of view on events. Little depends on journalists or workers; they just, like many of us, earn their bread, forgetting what conscience is and why it was given to us...
    After all, all our states in the CIS, with the exception of Belarus, sold and stole everything they could!
    But The media is precisely the weapon of influence on the brains of ordinary people and especially young people, which has not yet learned the details of real life, and also the media directly carry out the instructions and orders of various ideological centers from abroad from their media tycoons.
    Such dirt and vulgarity is poured out on viewers and readers everywhere in the CIS (except Belarus) and all former socialist countries.
    I myself live in Slovakia and here the situation with the dominance of ideology and the duping of the people is exactly the same.
    In addition, comparing the environment and behavior of ordinary people in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, I can say that the Czechs are more pragmatic, sober-minded and self-respecting citizens, since they cannot be fooled as easily as the gullible, good-natured Slovaks.
  92. +3
    25 July 2013 13: 50
    Continued ...
    But the real situation will change only when, media will belong to the people (not capitalist) to the state.
    But the efforts or rebuff of individuals in the media or the Internet in general are of interest to only a few, and most consumers simply follow the media broadcasts for a bright future, like a herd of sheep, not noticing that they are leading us all to the slaughter.
    And having sobered up at the last moment in front of the doors of the meat processing plant, we sheep will not go back and will not retreat...

    After all, in the same way, all of us who are more than 50 years old believed the Marked Traitor of the Motherland, who, under the order of traitors from the KGB and foreign masters, and the collapse of the UNION, but only a few of us realized this in time and tried to do something (alas, I was not in that number)...
    But most of us allowed all this bastard to destroy the UNION (1991) and the Commonwealth of Socialist Countries (1989)!
    But even then, every day and hour from the pages of the press, radio and TV screens, all the announcers tried empty words “glasnost, acceleration, perestroika” and other alluring rubbish.
    Glasnost died with the delay in notifying the people about the Chernobyl accident, party bosses-traitors under the leadership of CIA agent Yakovlev began to falsify the State Archives of the Communist Party and powers, and behind our backs they distributed the UNION, maritime territories (Georgian partisan Shevardnadze) and the Judas Gorbachev himself gave out state secrets and military maps , descriptions and diagrams to American customers and destroyed weapons that were dear to us and very necessary for us...
    So, all 273 million citizens of the ex-USSR very cleverly deceived us and threw us away like boys!

    And now many of us here and elsewhere we squabble and quarrel with each other, which is exactly what our foreign enemies wanted, sorry, democratic friends!

    But we, all sober-minded people, need to look for what unites us and will make us all stronger!
    And not quarrel with each other over trifles or because of a difference in taste...
  93. 0
    25 July 2013 14: 55
    Quote: Gari
    Yeah, the world only within Buckingham Palace - the residence of the English kings
    there’s even a joke - if they want to say about the leader whom the subordinates scored - they say, he’s like an English queen,


    Only those “who scored” are not invited to the Bildelberg gatherings, but the royal family has its own there.
  94. +1
    25 July 2013 14: 57
    Yes, this news seemed like a boil on my ass. wassat
  95. 0
    25 July 2013 15: 00
    here’s a little bit about real England, I understand that the author has a lot of complaints, but it’s interesting, as I assumed, stupid people are stupid people, red-haired Bobiks
    http://www.yaplakal.com/forum6/topic618859.html
  96. +1
    25 July 2013 15: 01
    This news terribly irritates everyone I know. They were talking about the small British queen for a week, then about Whitney Houston when she died, and now about these princes. Guys, maybe there is still another Seven Boyars sitting in the Kremlin and how in 1612 foreigners ruled us?
    1. shpuntik
      +1
      25 July 2013 17: 10
      Magadan (1) RU Today, 15:01
      Guys, maybe there is still another Seven Boyars sitting in the Kremlin and how in 1612 foreigners ruled us?

      More likely: "seven bankers".
    2. Master Taiga
      -1
      25 July 2013 19: 05
      Have you just begun to see the light?
    3. DPN
      +1
      25 July 2013 22: 18
      This is how it has been known since Yeltsin’s times, they rule, this used to be the slogan of everything for the people, now whoever wants to survives.
  97. +2
    25 July 2013 15: 05
    Quote: Mr. Truth
    Somehow it’s not like a royal ordinary mortal to die.

    The king gives birth to an ordinary child - it turns out to be an ordinary child.
    An ordinary one gives birth to the queen - it turns out royal.
    Somewhere here injustice lurks.

    And in all the comments and text next to the word TV, non-Russian letters are hidden. What is it for?
    1. 0
      25 July 2013 22: 49
      This is for sure, you can even make predictions in connection with the policy of tolerance, the prince’s next bride will be either a Muslim or a black Negrila, and the next one will be a man from 3.14 Dors and this will end the existence of the royal house of England because 3.14 Dors have no children.
  98. RPD
    +2
    25 July 2013 15: 18
    I would like to know what gender identity the heir will be raised in? she, he or it? and what do your parents call themselves? mom-dad or parent1-parent2? and will the newborn be educated about homosexuality?
  99. Foooxxxxx
    +4
    25 July 2013 15: 43
    Off topic, but...
    Well, gay Europeans!!!
  100. Serafim1983
    +1
    25 July 2013 15: 50
    I agree with the author, pro-Western media disguised as Russian media cause vomiting. Fedorov is right that we are being bent over as a colony.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"