Military Review

Politics Political analyst Sergei Markov: “Navalny is a protege of the world oligarchy”

28
Politics Political analyst Sergei Markov: “Navalny is a protege of the world oligarchy” Quotes were spread by statements by the head of the US Political Economy Institute, Paul Craig Roberts, who said that the Russian opposition, like the "color revolutions" all over the world, is financed by the Americans.


A political scientist, member of the Public Chamber, vice-rector of the Russian Economic University. Plekhanov Sergey MARKOV.

- Recently, the trend for "color revolutions" in the US administration itself has noticeably weakened. Obama was, in particular, against the coup in Ukraine, which, obviously, was preparing against Viktor Yanukovych. In this regard, the Ukrainian president should be grateful to both Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama for their support. In addition, there was a very serious crisis in the relations of the American White House with Mikhail Saakashvili. The United States effectively ceased supporting Saakashvili in the fight against his political opponents.

That is, Obama, apparently, has ceased to rely on gross interference in the internal affairs of other countries - what the Bush administration, for example, has been doing - and is increasingly trying to find compromises, reasonable solutions in foreign policy issues.

However, other subjects of world politics continue to actively intervene in the internal political processes of different states. It can be said that the center for the preparation and financing of the “color revolutions” is now not in Washington, but in New York and London — the centers of the world financial oligarchy, where their main exchanges and headquarters are concentrated. The largest oligarchic groups have recently significantly increased their pressure on a number of states, including Russia.

And one of the projects of these oligarchic circles is the promotion of Navalny. The fact is that the support of the “color revolutions” initially came primarily from transnational oligarchies. The first such revolutions took place, as is known, in Slovakia and Serbia, then we observed the “revolution of roses” in Georgia. And, say, the Georgian revolution was financed by George Soros, and not by the then US administration. Moreover, at that time there was a strong mutual hostility between Soros and the Washington White House. Soros, a typical representative of the liberal-activist oligarchic network, fought both Shevardnadze, who, in general, was quite comfortable with Washington, and with official Washington itself.

Roughly the same thing is happening now stories with Bulk. At the same time, one should pay attention to how the Russian “liberal” public perceives him, who is positioning himself as a nationalist. Despite the fact that today his openly xenophobic statements have become widely known, Navalny is actively supported by such fighters with Russian nationalism as Evgenia Albats, Garry Kasparov, Sergey Guriev. The latter, by the way, at one time gave him a recommendation to one of the centers for the preparation of "national leaders" at Yale University. We don’t see the bright denunciations of Navalny from the pages of Moskovsky Komsomolets, we don’t read in the liberal press strong analytical articles showing that the nationalist Navalny is “fiendish”, we don’t see any investigations on this score in Novaya Gazeta.

Based on this, I personally conclude that Navalny’s candidature was approved for the role of the leader of the Orange Revolution in Russia. According to all the theories of “color revolutions”, he is supposed to be a sort of charismatic populist, who is allowed to use, including nationalist rhetoric, and xenophobic statements. For those who really support him from abroad, are well aware that Navalny is in fact a fake Russian nationalist.

All this is sewn with white thread. However, very large amounts of money have already been invested in Navalny, and obviously it would not be desirable to lose their foreign sponsors. Therefore, the mentioned sponsors will not refuse from this support at least in the near future. They will continue to support Navalny even despite the fact that his public statements radically diverge from the principles declared by the liberal public.

At the same time, the world oligarchy will put pressure on Obama, demanding that he take the "Navalny factor" into account and justify this pressure by the need to weaken Vladimir Putin’s power in our country. The US and Russian president need to work together to solve a lot of problems. And although Obama himself, I repeat, is not, in my opinion, a supporter of gross interference in the internal affairs of other states, he can also use the situation with Navalny purely pragmatically. That is, in the interests of his administration.
Originator:
http://file-rf.ru/context/2729
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. domokl
    domokl 25 July 2013 06: 17 New
    +6
    I agree with the author. The bulk leader is really paid. Not only the United States, as a state, but financial tycoons. More precisely, the next paid. They just can’t understand the bags with dollars, that Russia is not only Moscow and St. Petersburg. Russia is much bigger, much more static and more stable. It was precisely this that helped us withstand EBEn with its blue back bent in a pose.
    1. serge-68-68
      serge-68-68 25 July 2013 06: 30 New
      +6
      "Bags of bucks" understand this very well. That is why they staked on topics that were win-win for mainstream Russia: sawing off, corruption, etc. And, perhaps, the Russian authorities understood this too - judging by the way they began to intercept these topics. And perhaps they did not understand, judging by the statements of various ministers about the low salaries of officials, and the fuss with Serdyukov and his "Amazons". Only "non-Muscovites" expect real action from them. And, alas, non-capital Russia has long been unstable. The level of dissatisfaction with the current government is quite high. And I will assume that people are kept from performing only by the fear of worsening the situation and losing what they have gained so hard.
    2. strange and pretty meaningless
      strange and pretty meaningless 25 July 2013 06: 44 New
      +4
      Quote: domokl
      Bulk is really a paid leader. Not only the United States, as a state, but financial tycoons.

      Bulk, it turns out to be paid ... This is news to all news. Is he also a LEADER? Well, well ... Cases ... It turns out there is not only the US state - but the financial oligarchy within them ?! Oh-oh-oh ... Live and learn.

      I read all these "discoveries of experts" and I think - and who in this snake tangle is our current High Command ..? Or, as here in one article it was written - the Present Tsar. Why are he and his entourage so zealously replenishing this bulk heap? Rallies, arrest, "term", released ... Are you worried that they will forget about Navalny? It turns out that they are playing along with the overseas oligarchs? And why? Experts, you have the floor!
      1. S_mirnov
        S_mirnov 25 July 2013 09: 42 New
        +6
        "Experts, you have the floor!" - Someone pays the "experts" too! What I like about the Navalny-Putin conflict is that they speak almost the truth against each other, but they lie about themselves godlessly! wink But it’s better to know at least fragments of the truth.
      2. Mairos
        Mairos 25 July 2013 13: 12 New
        0
        If he is not paid, then he is either a naive fool or an unpaid scoundrel.
  2. Valery Neonov
    25 July 2013 06: 39 New
    +1
    Fresh in the personal file of Navalny:Hacker Hell found accounts in a US bank with a mayoral candidate and his wife. If this information is confirmed, Navalny can be removed from the election race.

    Read on: http://izvestia.ru/news/554299#ixzz2a1NCUyZv
    1. Alez
      Alez 25 July 2013 07: 22 New
      0
      How many blood-stolen wooden dollars or kirovrubles are on the account?
  3. Alez
    Alez 25 July 2013 07: 21 New
    0
    Who is Navalny ??? I know Putin, I know Zhirinovsky and Zyuganov.
    1. AVV
      AVV 25 July 2013 09: 09 New
      0
      Navalny, Chirikov, the Gudkovs are all American henchmen, and they have a short conversation! Their house is Magadan!
  4. Sirocco
    Sirocco 25 July 2013 07: 51 New
    +3
    This rotten-smelling tandem smiled at me
    Despite the fact that his frankly xenophobic statements have become widely known today, Navalny is actively supported by such fighters against Russian nationalism as Evgenia Albats, Garry Kasparov, Sergey Guriev.
    All as one real Russian bogatyrs, who care about the Russian people, or about their cunning pocket? laughing
  5. dmb
    dmb 25 July 2013 07: 57 New
    +7
    Autobiography Markov: 1989 - Assistant, Senior Lecturer, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Philosophy, Moscow State University; 1987-1989 - member of the "Perestroika" club, "Democratic perestroika" (Moscow), founder of the "Democratic perestroika" club (Dubna); 1989-1990 - Member of the Board of the Social Democratic Association; 1990-1992 - Member of the Board of the Social Democratic Party of Russia; since 1990 - advisor, consultant to various committees and subcommittees of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR / RF and the State Duma and the Federation Council of the RF; 1991-1993 - Advisor to the Security Council of the Russian Federation; 1990-1999 - Fellow, Senior Scientific Advisor, National Democratic Institute (USA); 1993 - internship at the University of Wisconsin - Madison (USA); 1993-1994 - Lecturer at the Higher School of Social and Political Sciences; 1994-1997 - Research Fellow, Moscow Center, Carnegie Endowment. Well, how is it ... different from the same Navalny?
    1. fzr1000
      fzr1000 25 July 2013 08: 04 New
      0
      The fact that he does not make himself a hero of the revolution is a struggling regime. Rather, on the contrary, today.
      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 25 July 2013 09: 49 New
        +3
        Quote: fzr1000
        Rather, on the contrary, today.

        Yes, no, the order is being fulfilled.
        Quote: fzr1000
        Markov autobiography: 1

        Quote: dmb
        Well, how is it ... different from the same Navalny?

        Yes, it’s no different. Both play in the same team. The goal of which is simple: to powder the brains of the people.
        1. fzr1000
          fzr1000 25 July 2013 11: 46 New
          0
          What difference does it make whose order he fulfills? Another ikspert says that Navalny is a skin. That's good. All the more so if this "ikspert" is from the camp of "liberals". Why are they so straightforward?
    2. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 25 July 2013 15: 12 New
      0
      Quote: dmb
      Well, how is it ... different from the same Navalny?

      ... the point here is not the difference, but the conclusions and assessments that he made ... and the true incentives for these assessments - let them stay with MARKOV!
      1. Yarosvet
        Yarosvet 25 July 2013 16: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        ... the point here is not the difference, but the conclusions and assessments that he made ... and the true incentives for these assessments - let them stay with MARKOV!

        Gold words! Now, if oval plums were also perceived in the same vein ...
      2. dmb
        dmb 25 July 2013 20: 05 New
        +2
        The conclusions and assessments of Markov ALWAYS correspond to the wishes of the current government, and therefore it is infamous even Navalny.
        1. Yarosvet
          Yarosvet 25 July 2013 21: 24 New
          0
          Quote: dmb
          The conclusions and assessments of Markov ALWAYS correspond to the wishes of the current government, and therefore it is infamous even Navalny.

          And there is.
  6. Garrin
    Garrin 25 July 2013 08: 36 New
    0
    All this is sewn with white thread. However, very large amounts of money have already been invested in Navalny, and obviously it would not be desirable to lose their foreign sponsors. Therefore, the mentioned sponsors will not refuse from this support at least in the near future. They will continue to support Navalny even despite the fact that his public statements radically diverge from the principles declared by the liberal public.

    Yes, just "close" it for 5 years by a court verdict and FORGET.
  7. valokordin
    valokordin 25 July 2013 09: 00 New
    +4
    If Navalny is the choice of the Jewish-oligarchic circle of the USA, then the choice is unsuccessful, even because of his last name, which can be distorted to indecent. He will not be heard by the people as I.V. Stalin. And all of his supporters are doomed to failure, therefore, the authorities will babysit with him, either they will plant them, they will let them go. He poses no threat to power. Kvachkov, who spent 5 years in prison on charges of attempted assassination of Chubayas, was not even credited at the appointed time for serving a year and a half and did not release him before the sentence entered into legal force, because the authorities are afraid. And about Markov, you can ask a question, who finances his activities? For whom he works, who pays him for the struggle against Marxism, socialism and the CPSU, where he, apparently, consisted. Or did he, joining the CPSU, write a statement that he wanted to support Gorbachev in eliminating the dictatorship of the CPSU and building capitalism with a human face?
    1. Poppy
      Poppy 25 July 2013 09: 21 New
      +1
      he doesn’t care about his name, because nobody plans him for the leaders and leaders of the country, he is needed only for collapse, and here any name is good - even Kerensky, even Navalny, even Gorbachev
  8. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 25 July 2013 09: 39 New
    +2
    I didn’t even read the article, I saw the name of Navalny and decided to express it. I don’t know what will happen to this Leberast or a protege of the oligarchy. I know one thing: if Navalny sits and Serdyukov has no power, then you can safely spit in the face
    1. Parabelum
      Parabelum 25 July 2013 11: 52 New
      +2
      I want to take and give ...
    2. Garrin
      Garrin 25 July 2013 11: 57 New
      +1
      Quote: kapitan281271
      I don’t know what will happen to this Leberast or a protege of the oligarchy. I know one thing: if Navalny sits and Serdyukov has no power, then you can safely spit in the face

      But what if they do not sit down, neither one nor the other?
  9. bomg.77
    bomg.77 25 July 2013 10: 11 New
    0
    What kind of leader are they talking about if he is officially an adviser to the United States? Who will make the revolution? These paper shifters and copiers are "creatives, he's office plankton." He had a short political career and it ended after he was released from custody.
  10. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 25 July 2013 10: 44 New
    +1
    Obama was, in particular, against the coup in Ukraine, which, obviously, was preparing against Viktor Yanukovych.
    Tse me even Yanukovych and he himself will destroy the country without the help of a party.
  11. serge
    serge 25 July 2013 11: 21 New
    0
    A typical American way is to pull a person out of nowhere and make him president. But it doesn’t work for us, the Americans have broken their teeth about local specifics.
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 25 July 2013 16: 53 New
      +2
      Quote: serge
      But it doesn’t work for us

      More how it works laughing
  12. knn54
    knn54 25 July 2013 12: 18 New
    0
    People saw through Jewish thieves-oligarchs - among Prokhorov, Chubais ... There is no POLITICAL future. But Navalny is a Slav, did not participate in privatization, did not consist, acts against Caucasians (But NOT ZIONISTS!) ... Quality is replaced by quantity. "Pop Gapon of our time" is just one of them.
    1. serge
      serge 25 July 2013 12: 44 New
      +2
      Bulk is a Jew. A cast-iron gaze, eyes hidden deep, sharp ears, no earlobes. Similar to Russian, yes, but not Russian. Navalny’s wife is also a Jew, Julia Borisovna.
    2. fzr1000
      fzr1000 25 July 2013 12: 54 New
      0
      He also likes Gaidar's reforms, and he was a part of his family. “I have no more questions,” said Ostap.
    3. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 25 July 2013 16: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: knn54
      And Navalny is a Slav

      Bulk - from the Old Testament name Naval (insanity)
  13. varov14
    varov14 25 July 2013 13: 31 New
    +1
    The point is Navalny, this is an ordinary bullshit, to figure it out, it turns out that we have paid for all the power. The point is in ourselves, open "Arguments and Facts" - 65% of the population are ready to dump from the country, if there was an opportunity, that's where the whole tragedy lies.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. Andrey312
    Andrey312 25 July 2013 13: 54 New
    +2
    Since Navalny is trying to convey to citizens information about how loot is being cut in Russia, he is definitely a Westerner ... We, ordinary mortals, for example, are madly pleased with the expensive and comfortable cars of officials ... Let them drive to our health. .
    1. Ulysses
      Ulysses 25 July 2013 14: 52 New
      0
      Lousy power is not yet a reason to rush to the neck of the first comer who crowed "steal".
      Bulk, ordinary populist, not bothering his head with ideological considerations.
      1. Andrey312
        Andrey312 26 July 2013 09: 24 New
        0
        Well, I would not say .... Go to the site of Rospil and read ... .. there are a lot of interesting things ... I personally know people who through RosYama sought repair of roads, and through RosZHKH repair at the entrances ... This is a long correspondence with the competent authorities .... but still - there is a result. For some reason, the authorities did not bother to create such mechanisms for citizens ... .. and the western hireling Navalny took care ... well, of course, he didn’t guess it himself! ... and most likely everything was organized with the money of the State Department! This is amer, not us, most of all we need good roads in Russia, so that when they begin to invade our territory, they will not get caught in the mud ... ..)
  16. KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 25 July 2013 15: 34 New
    -1
    I wrote a couple of months ago that this graduate of the Institute for the Training of Democratic Leaders at Yale University is a sent "Cossack" who was financed and "appointed" by the AMERA leader for the implementation of the "color" revolution in Russia.
    And when the court gave him "five years to think" with a pick or an ax, we were very upset by this - the Amers .... they invested so much both directly in the bulk and to support in the media his "image of an implacable fighter against corruption and the tyranny of GDP ". But among the absolute majority of the broad masses of Russians, something spoiled mood is not visible, except that Ksyusha Sobchak and her wrestling collegiate Masha Gaidar and a couple of hundred of the same ...!
    So maybe the COURT DOES RIGHT, isolating this new "leader appointed by the Amer" from us! Probably right!
  17. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 25 July 2013 16: 19 New
    0
    I think they let him out to take part in the elections, so that they don’t say how they deal with political opponents in Russia. And then they will close it with a clear conscience, most likely he won’t win anything.
  18. Normal
    Normal 25 July 2013 22: 54 New
    +1
    Well, of course, the Cossack and of course mishandled. But what else? All who are against the monopoly on power are mishandled Cossacks. All who are - true patriots of the Fatherland.
    But the point is not in Navalny. All this circus that happens with the court, the sentence, the detention, the protest of the prosecutor’s office and the release on subscription shows that Navalny’s figure is being untwisted. But to promote someone in our country can only power. By his action or inaction, his ingenious combinations and impenetrable stupidity, voluntarily or not freely, but ONLY POWER! No one in the country, and beyond its borders, has such opportunities and resources, except for our government.
    The country's leadership did nothing but destroy all the more or less opposition forces in the country. I cleaned the political space. And very successful in this; the phrase "There is no alternative to Putin" sounds more often than in its time "Glory to the KPSS"
    And here you are - an unexpected person! The miracle is lawless. Thief and fighter against corruption. Nationalist and State Department custodian trained in the USA. The future president of Russia - BULK! belay wassat And all this without participation, and even contrary to power? Not even funny ...
    The people have the Power that they deserve, and the Power has the opposition that they deserve. Even more than that, she raised it.
  19. EdwardTich68
    EdwardTich68 26 July 2013 00: 08 New
    0
    If this ethnic West-Ukrainian was at least some kind of threat to the existing system, he would have long been allowed to go to feed for pigs. laughing