Saddam Hussein: “Gorbachev is a crook and a traitor!”

111
Saddam Hussein: “Gorbachev is a crook and a traitor!”
Our age will pass. Open archives
And all that has been hidden so far,
All secret stories twists
Show the world glory and shame.


So wrote the Soviet poet Nikolai Tikhonov. A century has passed, the archives were captured by the Americans. Thank God, not ours - Iraqi, who became the prey of the Yankees in 2003. However, Russia also has this “history twisted”, for the partially declassified documents (full volume - 2300 hours of audio recordings and millions of pages of printed text) show when America for the first time ceased to reckon with our country in the international arena. And also thanks to whom we from “parity partners” have slipped to the level of “singing along”.

... By occupying neighboring Kuwait, the leader of Iraq hardly imagined what the similar demarche would end for him personally. And although Hussein's confrontation with the cowboy little family Bush has been stretched for years, no matter how much the rope is wound, it still turned out to be a noose. But this eternal "if"!

America, which long ago proclaimed the Persian Gulf a zone of its national interests, pursued purely specific goals there, the main of which was control over the largest oil fields. For the USSR, such a “protectorate” was extremely disadvantageous. One of the reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union called a sharp decline in world prices for black gold. From here - reduction of food import, empty counters, discontent of the population, etc., etc.

Now imagine the next option. After the seizure of Kuwait in Baghdad, they also thought hard about suddenly becoming neighboring Saudi Arabia. The seriousness of Hussein’s intentions was confirmed by a large group of Iraqi soldiers focused on the Kuwaiti-Saudi direction and a whole series of border conflicts. The military potential of Saudi Arabia was much weaker, which is why King Fahd agreed to accept American aid. But while he was thinking, there was plenty of time to attack.

Ah, if Saddam Hussein could have managed to concentrate in his hands such oil wealth as Iraq + Kuwait + Saudi Arabia! Cynical, but very pragmatic for the USSR. Dictate prices in the global black gold market (we were allies with Iraq) would be almost absolute. And it is quite possible that such a turn of events could save our economy and ultimately the state, the disintegration of which even former critics of the Soviet system now call tragedy.

Even if Hussein did not succeed in carrying out his plans in full, the “long-playing” instability in the Persian Gulf zone would automatically keep the oil price level at an acceptable level for us. The Soviet Union still had opportunities, without interfering directly in an armed conflict, to influence the situation with maximum benefit for themselves, at least through a veto on the launched “Storm” in the UN (at that time they were still considered this organization). "There are no friends, no enemies - there are only state interests." For the then leadership of the USSR, the formula seemed extremely rigid. “Peace” with America was preferred to the war in the Persian Gulf.

The Iraqi army began bombing 20 years ago, January 17 1991. In air strikes took part to 1000 (!) Aircraft, first used so-called. Smart, high precision weapon: Americans really did not want to damage the oil fields. And then they were set on fire by the order of Saddam Hussein, who put on a thick black smoke that would close the target enemy pilots. February 24 has launched the “Desert Storm” ground phase. It is also called “television war”, because (also for the first time) the military conflict was broadcast live.

As soon as Hussein was informed about the first battles on the ground, he attacked Mikhail Gorbachev with swearing, writes, based on documents from the captured archives, the newspaper The New York Times. The Iraqi leader can be understood: to the last he hoped for the help of his Soviet colleague. Now it turns out that he simply “threw” him: he promised, but did not.

Earlier, Hussein sent his foreign minister to Moscow, trying to prevent ground fighting at the last moment. Under the influence of Gorbachev, Hussein volunteered to withdraw Iraqi troops from Kuwait on 21 day. A day before February 24, Hussein wrote a letter to Gorbachev in which he categorically said: “The situation is getting worse. Our people and the army are puzzled. We ask ourselves: what is more important - the proposal of the USSR or the threat of Americans? ”In conversations with trusted assistants, Hussein expressed less diplomacy. He called Gorbachev a “fraud”, arguing that he was either not influential enough or simply did not want to stop President Bush. “He deceived us! I knew that he would betray us! ”The Iraqi President emotionally exclaimed.

Combined with declassified transcripts from the presidential library of George W. Bush, the Iraqi archive paints this picture: “Gorbachev was eager to find a solution that would protect Iraq — the former“ client ”of the USSR — and make the USSR an equal partner of the United States in international diplomacy. At the same time, he did not want to risk his relationship with the Bush administration, ”the American edition confesses.

February 23, a few minutes before the X-hour, Bush and Gorbachev talked on the phone. Gorbachev assured: joint actions by the USA and the USSR through the UN will become a model for resolving other crises in the future. “George, let's keep cool,” he literally asked (although he had to demand) he. But Bush said the time is up: if the Iraqis are going to withdraw troops, let them do it in ... the next minutes. Mikhail Sergeevich swallowed a “joke”.
111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    23 March 2013 09: 26
    In this, he did not discover America for us; for a long time much was painfully familiar
    Now, if I said how to make this head patchwork, he would end the days like him, then it would be
    1. 755962
      +13
      23 March 2013 11: 27
      Who is behind all this is not necessary to remind ....
      1. Bas luis
        +3
        6 May 2013 14: 27
        Soviet power, socialism - this is the best that has happened in the history of mankind! ,, ,, The role of Stalin in the history of the USSR and the whole world is sharply positive! ,, COMMUNISM IS FOR THE WHOLE HUMANITY OF OUR PLANET ONLY POSITIVE !! And who is behind all this !! ?? This is USA, NATO, EU, capitalism, slavery, violence, exploitation, those who want to live at the expense of weak peoples, here you live in the USA at the expense of the peoples of Africa, they destroyed LIVIA SERBIA YUGOSLAVIA, where these NATO instigators are criminals CAPITALISTS OF WAR AND POVERTY !!!
    2. +20
      23 March 2013 11: 49
      A hunchback must be judged, and his name is a hunchbacked goat
      1. 755962
        +3
        23 March 2013 12: 01
        At the moment he is on "REN" -TV "Territory of delusions" with Igor Prokopenko .. SEE EVERYTHING !!!
        1. +7
          25 March 2013 06: 22
          I looked ... I have a question - where is the ice ax ????
      2. +16
        23 March 2013 14: 41
        In general, he was nicknamed from those for someone of distant times - labeled Judas.
        1. +1
          24 March 2013 23: 29
          In general, he was nicknamed from those for someone of distant times - labeled Judas.

          I keep asking myself why the earth still bears it, why doesn’t the Lord punish this bastard ?! And I can’t find an answer ....
          1. EIN
            EIN
            0
            21 May 2013 13: 23
            I keep asking myself why the earth still bears it, why doesn’t the Lord punish this bastard ?! And I can’t find an answer ....

            It's all simple.
            He will not go to heaven for his "righteous" deeds. And the devils do not want to take him to hell, because he will betray them too and break up all hell for x ..., and he will also receive a prize for this!
            Avenged the grandfather of a fist. The USSR collapsed.
      3. +1
        24 March 2013 20: 55
        I completely agree with you. He must be judged for betrayal in relation to his people. negative
        1. 0
          24 May 2013 18: 47
          He betrayed not only his people but also the allies of his people
      4. Bas luis
        0
        6 May 2013 14: 22
        He deserves to be executed by the people of the USSR who he betrayed the goat
    3. +6
      23 March 2013 13: 06
      Let's start first Gorbachev did a lot of bad things and most importantly brought to the collapse of the USSR, that's his fault

      but Saddam no guys wink

      Saddam Hussein - himself to blame for his situation - because in the 80s his main ally was the United States, which provided all kinds of assistance. In those days, the interests of the United States in the Middle East were not threatened by Iraq, but by Iran, which survived the Islamic revolution. The overthrow of the pro-American regime in Tehran deprived Washington of access to one of the richest sources of "black gold". It was then that the Ronald Reagan administration began to strengthen the offensive power of Baghdad,
      And Saddam Hussein has become a major US ally in the region.

      and they set him up! after all, before invading Kuwait, Saddam asked permission from the United States (where he received an approval yes) - after which the United States, after accusing Iraq of aggression, began its victorious Desert Storm operation.

      iconic photo - Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein 1983 Baghdad Allies for Ages wink [media = http: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = zaP7ZrmkcuU]
      1. Kaa
        +4
        23 March 2013 17: 53
        Quote: Rustam
        Gorbachev did a lot of bad things and most importantly brought to the collapse of the USSR, that's his fault

        Of course, "about the dead - either good or nothing", but this does not apply to public people. So you have to quote: " Prior to Gorbacheva, not a single wife of the Secretary General intervened in decisions of national importance. But Raisa Maksimovna violated this correct tradition. Judging by what I know, there was not a single serious issue that Mikhail Sergeyevich would solve without the participation of his wife!
        Of course, Raisa Maksimovna was a smart, but too ambitious and power-hungry woman, whose influence, unfortunately, was not just her husband, but the leader of a superpower.
        Raisa Maksimovna could arrange “demonstrations” and give the head of security and even the head of the Security Department instructions on personnel matters. She allowed herself to intervene in the affairs of the Politburo members, disregarding their rights and obligations and, finally, their interests. At the whim of the “first lady” a large team of experienced and reliable personal security officers was fired. Among them - the head of security A. Ligacheva Sokolov. But Ligachev once defended "the right of Raisa Maximovna to travel with her husband." He explained that this is an exceptional family. In a word, some of Gorbachev’s comrades-in-arms helped to nurture from her something like a “queen”. As a result, Yegor Kuzmich Ligachev himself was removed from Gorbachev after some time.
        In general, Gorbachev’s character is suspicious, unstable. At the same time, he is able, without rushing to make hasty conclusions, to hold the offender close to him, but in such a way that he will be able to deal with him for sure and forever, if necessary. But he got a puncture with Yeltsin ... Gorbachev was connected with the putschists, but he left them under the pressure of circumstances. In this situation, he was afraid of losing power. A great influence was exerted on him by his wife, who came to taste the position of the “first lady” of the country. Gorbachev was going to rule the country until the end of his days. This is evidenced by the fact of building a gorgeous state-owned only for themselves and their families on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus in the Musers! Even members of the Politburo were banned from entering there. I did not know then that Mikhail Sergeyevich was a naked politician, did not see in people that several years later he would endlessly shuffle his political environment, leaving both the left and the right, some of them moving closer and throwing again. In the end: they left him - they.http: //www.kp.ru/daily/26036.3/2951405/
      2. +5
        24 March 2013 10: 37
        Quote: Rustam
        Let's start first Gorbachev did a lot of bad things and most importantly brought to the collapse of the USSR, that's his fault

        He did not ruin the USSR - he betrayed the people who made up the country !!!
        1. Gari
          +1
          24 March 2013 15: 13
          In conversations with trusted assistants, Hussein expressed himself less diplomatically. He called Gorbachev a “fraudster,” claiming that he was either not influential enough or simply did not want to stop President Bush. “He tricked us! I knew that he would betray us! ” - the president of Iraq exclaimed emotionally.
          And whom he did not betray Judah, as the earth bears him
        2. 0
          24 March 2013 20: 59
          Gorbach betrayed his people, who elected him the first president of the USSR, and who trusted him. Yes
      3. Bas luis
        +1
        6 May 2013 15: 08
        Gorbachev didn’t do anything good, a person with one crinkle like Gorbachev Kravchuk Yeltsin can only colorfully lie on a piece of paper, and sweep the place of their street
    4. Smersh Put
      +4
      23 March 2013 13: 33
      Who will hand over Russia, Shelomov or Mendel? The people of Russia, where are you?
      1. Heccrbq
        0
        24 March 2013 20: 39
        He will surrender Russia ---- they already sold it in the 90s, bought it and sold it once more with giblets (we are the giblets.)
    5. 0
      23 March 2013 16: 34
      Quote: Denis
      this patchwork head will end his days,


      He lives in Bielefeld, where employers bought a house for him. By the way, recently there was a case, in one expensive store he (yes he laughing ) stole a bottle of wine (probably not cheap). And not by mistake, but with his own hand tore off * a squeaker * on a bottle, so that the output would not beep. The case was closed so quickly, the speed of light smokes nervously in the hallway. So things are not very important for him. Spent material, and at what for a long time.
      1. +4
        23 March 2013 16: 51
        Quote: JACOB
        stole a bottle of wine
        It remains only to bow before the wisdom of the people-Humpbacked Tomb Correct - who invented for a long time

        the State Department detained him or something?
        yes, sorry poor thing feel
      2. +3
        23 March 2013 19: 23
        Quote: JACOB
        Spent material, and at what for a long time.

        The worst punishment is oblivion. Humpback honestly deserved it.
        1. +5
          23 March 2013 21: 18
          Quote: stariy
          honestly deserved


          In German, there is such a term as * Hochverrat *. If you stupidly translate it in parts, you get a high (highest) betrayal (betrayal). And if you translate it carefully and in its entirety, you get * high treason * (and not just a mere mortal, but a general or minister at least) ...

          That is, there is nowhere higher (high-level laughing ) ...
          1. +1
            24 March 2013 13: 33
            Honecker thought he was kissing a man, and he is a snake !!
        2. 0
          24 March 2013 12: 18
          Definitely-to hang! So that it was not disagreeable to others!
    6. Bas luis
      0
      6 May 2013 14: 30
      Humpbacked Judah, if everyone who hates him will spit in him, then in the spit of the people, the hunchbacked will drown
    7. Bas luis
      0
      6 May 2013 14: 31
      Gorbachev in the spit of the people will drown
  2. +8
    23 March 2013 09: 35
    Iraq has been pulled into a "socialist" orbit. And this titanic work was crossed out at once.
    Nicholas II even took death for his weak character, and Gorbachev ... dances to the tune of the liberals.
  3. Zhzhuk
    +7
    23 March 2013 09: 39
    who can explain to me why the USSR depended on oil prices, because then, as I understand it, almost all the necessary goods for people were produced in the country, moreover, oil. What kind of import did the country depend on that it needed to sell oil. Or was the USSR like Russia of the late 90s with defeated collective farms, factories ...?
    1. Goga
      +14
      23 March 2013 09: 46
      zhzhzhuk - Colleague, but the USSR sold oil for a hill four times less oil than the Russian Federation now, and it was not a matter of the country's dependence on imports, the trouble was that the hunchback was not a loser but a direct enemy, but how a country with a traitor at the head could survive ?
      1. Zhzhuk
        +8
        23 March 2013 09: 56
        Gorbachev surrendered Iraq, Medvedev to Libya: what is the bear doing in the government?
        1. +1
          23 March 2013 11: 29
          Serves Putin's interests in the "If not me, then who? Really - this one?"
        2. ABV
          +1
          24 March 2013 03: 07
          Medvedev is not Libya, he s.tsuka passed us ... time has gone wrong, fin. flows under the brand - we will cancel the transfer from traffic cops to insurance companies, 0 ppm masterpiece of technical thought - an absolute zero from nonexistence ... that’s because such a small bunny-andon, and the whole country suffers ...
          What does a man do, which is not an undertaking, so the whole country is crying and laughing in government ???
          and don’t tell me that we ourselves deserved it, we didn’t vote in the wrong way, supposedly (by the way, I voted for Putin, I’m not hiding ..) ... I just got into a shit and I can’t pick it out ...
        3. 0
          24 March 2013 12: 22
          Medvedev has the right quality in politics, he is 100% to Putin always, even if in some way he does not agree with him.
      2. +4
        23 March 2013 11: 28
        The traitor was not Gorbachev, the traitor was Yeltsin. Gorbachev was a jerk.
        1. Beck
          -3
          23 March 2013 21: 42
          Hussein could not be perceived as a politician, statesman. He was perceived as who he was - a dictator who at one time seized power. Therefore, his actions were impulsive, depended more on mood than on state necessity. Only a dictator can unleash an unnecessary, worthless 8 year war with Iran, poison his people with chemistry and occupy Kuwait. And also unveil plans to capture Saudi Arabia. A normal statesman will not risk his country so much because he understands that there will be retaliatory actions. A dictator, intoxicated by his sole power, can.

          In those years, the USSR simply could not physically help anyone. The country was on the verge of economic collapse. And this collapse was caused by an inefficient socialist economy, since the communist ideology itself was fundamentally wrong. The socialist economy worked for some 70 years, not at the expense of extracting additional profit from increasing the profitability of production and labor, but at the expense of simple quantitative increase in the exploitation of natural resources. That is, if the western plant, due to technology, got so much iron from one mine. That socialism in order to extract so much iron from one mine had to build three plants. And such management at first still gave a return - Val. Come on, come on. Then in the future could no longer meet the requirements of the new time. This led to stagnation of the economy. And this inefficient socialist economy led to the collapse of the USSR.

          In addition to the ineffective economy is the low level of political leadership of the USSR in the 90s. If the ideological revolutionaries of the 20s were selected for leadership positions on the basis of certain business qualities, then subsequent generations in business terms were smaller. And the one-party system automatically led to this. Now the career of a businessman was being replaced by the careerism of sycophants. To break through to the top, it was not professional qualities that were needed, but patience, toadying, servility, and compromise. Only people with such qualities could get into the elite. Secretary of the district committee, regional committee, etc. "Swineherd" Khrushchev, climbed not because he was businesslike, but because for many years he danced a hopak in front of Stalin. "Surveyor" Brezhnev got through because he kissed his superiors passionately and at one point betrayed. Tikhonya Chernenko spent his whole life quietly in the Politburo, until chance endured him. "Combineer" Gorbachev also pleased everyone and sycophant, otherwise it was impossible to get into the Politburo.

          All this, instead of taken, led the USSR to collapse.
          1. +1
            24 March 2013 15: 12
            how smart are you !!!! answers to all questions! just the messiah!
            1. Beck
              +1
              24 March 2013 15: 25
              Quote: Alesha
              how smart are you !!!! answers to all questions! just the messiah!


              It's my personal opinion. Do not want do not read. You can’t write like that, not a zuboscal. And if you can argue your calculations.
              1. +1
                24 March 2013 20: 06
                that is, now, as I understand it, we have an efficient economy ??? it is without gibberish! I can write something more reliable! only your personal opinion is not the truth!
              2. 0
                24 March 2013 20: 09
                hang tags, one swineherd, the other kisses well !!! it's like about football tryndet, everyone can !!! like to be n ******* m be it !!!
                1. Beck
                  -1
                  24 March 2013 20: 58
                  Quote: Alesha
                  Ie now, as I understand it, we have an effective economy ???


                  Better than in 1991. And better than in the year 200. And so from the devastation and immediately to the level of the United States for 20 years, this is impossible. But Russia, without a socialist economy, but with a normal one, will still rank among the leading countries. With communism, this is not possible.

                  Quote: Alesha
                  only your personal opinion is not the truth!


                  I specifically wrote that this is my opinion. And I did not write that this is true.

                  Quote: Alesha
                  hang tags, one swineherd, the other kisses well !!


                  Well, you didn’t find that time. But I heard on the radio and read in the newspapers when Khrushchev personally shook his fist over the podium. Like here I am a former swineherd and became the head of state. These are the advantages of communism. And Brezhnev kissed in a hickey, it was printed in all the newspapers. And people, looking at these aspirations, were uncomfortable for the country.
      3. Fox
        +2
        23 March 2013 11: 34
        Quote: Gogh
        Yes, the Soviet Union sold oil for a hill four times less

        if not mistaken, about 17% of GDP, now 85%.
    2. +3
      23 March 2013 12: 40
      Quote: Zhzhuk
      why the USSR depended on oil prices

      in fact - the fall in oil prices in the 80s - of course played a role - but still it was not paramount .....
      Until the beginning of the 70s, the USSR did well without dollars - and there was food ...
      But oil played a very negative role in the development of the USSR, because gratuitous money completely flooded the brains of the Soviet leadership and it gave up on almost all development - they say, "we will buy everything" ... So "ruin in the heads" led to stagnation and in the end, to the fact that the Politburo dragged Marked by the ears to power and destroyed the empire with his hands.
    3. +12
      23 March 2013 13: 09
      Quote: Zhzhuk
      who can explain to me why the USSR depended on oil prices, because then, as I understand it, almost all the necessary goods for people were produced in the country, and here oil.


      The share of revenues from the sale of fuel and electricity (I ask you to pay attention to fuel and electricity) in the budget does not actually exceed 10,3% in the most “dependent” years, and on average between 1980 and 1990 it was about 8%. Is this the very “oil needle” that people like to talk about? It is clear that 8-10% is a lot, but to call it a “needle” (despite the fact that 8-10% is with electricity, please do not forget), in my opinion it is dishonest. After all, after all, the Soviet Union produced almost everything on its own, little depended on external goods, and it is unlikely that even a half reduction in oil revenues could somehow greatly affect the “collapse” of the USSR. Moreover, as can be seen from the data above, the USSR budget even grew in those years. And it’s absolutely impossible to say that “half of the USSR’s income was from oil, and the Russian Federation inherited such a dependent economy”
      link

      The current high dependence of the Russian economy on hydrocarbon prices is rooted in Soviet times, said Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, RIA Novosti reports.
      «Now less than 50% of our income comes from raw materials. So, after all, there is something else, namely the domestic market, which is already giving a rather serious impetus to development. It used to be small, now people's purchasing power has grown, so there is a growth resource here, ”

      link

      So compare the Soviet 10 percent with Medvedev's "less than 50" and at the same time he claims that we got all this from the USSR. A common Jewish lie, the main principle of which is to call black white and vice versa.
      1. Kaa
        +2
        23 March 2013 18: 04
        Quote: Ascetic
        Ordinary Jewish lies, the main principle of which is called black white and vice versa

        The question is: who is "on the oil and gas needle"? Usually liberoids yell - Russia! And if you think about it - count?
        "The dependence of the European Union on imports of hydrocarbons is still quite tough, and in the future it will most likely only grow. This will be especially evident as the consequences of the global financial and economic crisis are overcome and the European economy enters the trajectory of sustainable growth. Moreover, this dependence has already dramatically increased at the beginning of the XXI century in connection with the expansion of the EU at the expense of the countries of Eastern Europe (former satellites of the USSR), which basically do not have hydrocarbon resources and inherited an excessively energy-intensive economy that was formed during the existence of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA). Russia and a number of countries in the Middle East are in Europe, and the Russian Federation plays the most important role in ensuring the EU's energy security, since Russian supplies (over 300 million tons of oil and about 200 billion cubic meters of gas) cover about 33% of the EU's oil needs and 46% - in gas. In addition, Moscow VA intends to partially reorient its hydrocarbon exports to the eastern (Chinese and Asian as a whole) direction, which may result in a decrease in exports to Europe. http://www.casfactor.com/rus/analitic/281.html
        With the upcoming instability in the Middle East for the foreseeable future, European hydrocarbon addicts need to fawn on Russia, cherish it and cherish it, as well as in every way appease ...
    4. 0
      23 March 2013 13: 14
      I can explain in this way, meat, grain, which products, and mine, minerals, there is light, heavy industry, and so on, all of their own. but you can’t buy anything in rubles on the world market, for example gold and much more, the same technologies (MIG-15 engines), that’s why they sold oil for currency
    5. +3
      23 March 2013 16: 10
      Quote: Zhzhuk

      who can explain to me why the USSR depended on oil prices
      This horror story was invented in a catastrophe, as well as a lot of others. People advocate the type of how bad it was and it became good. But only now did it happen, although to someone like
    6. +1
      24 March 2013 17: 33
      Quote: Zhzhuk
      who can explain to me why the USSR depended on oil prices, because then, as I understand it, almost all the necessary goods for people were produced in the country, moreover, oil. What kind of import did the country depend on that it needed to sell oil. Or was the USSR like Russia of the late 90s with defeated collective farms, factories ...?
      - It began with the fact that the Soviet leadership did not attach importance to such a factor as the impact on international product standards (in the USSR - international GOSty). Who dictated his GOST - he is on horseback! See how they fought for the right to accept Sony and PANASONIK in a high-quality digital recording as a standard - Blue Ray and I don’t remember how I competed.
      As a result, Soviet products, on the basis of deviations from standards, were able to be pushed back from international markets. Soviet planes, for example, did not pass due to noise, etc. Although the planes were quite up to par! There is no access to the international arena - the USSR industry lagged further, as a result of which the further uncompetitiveness of Soviet CIVIL products increased, especially in the field of electronic and radio engineering industries - all kinds of televisions, tape recorders, computers, etc. There was no such lag in cars at that time - the Zhiguli were quite at the level for their time, and the Niva was a very advanced car of its time. Then the ruble received an offensive nickname - "wooden", for which it was possible to buy only Soviet products. In the end, the population resisted and generally stopped taking Soviet products. Shoes, in general, of good quality, according to GOST, with a leather top and with an orthopedic base, but completely unfashionable in design (I will not say what the people called this shoe) lay in tons on the shelves - and this is a completed plan for the production of shoes, already received awards for the implementation of the plan, but there was no implementation.
      Under these conditions, the Soviet Union had to increase the export of raw materials - oil, metals and gas. So the USSR got hooked on an oil needle, with which it has not cried so far.
  4. +35
    23 March 2013 09: 51
    Nothing to add !!!
    1. +1
      23 March 2013 19: 38
      He himself awaits the trial like a kick from God, no one needs him, no one listens to him, everyone is hardened, he even began to steal the booze.
      Quote: JACOB
      stole a bottle of wine
      so that the court will only sentence him to death, although he will sentence him to the tower. The best sentence to Gorbatom is oblivion.
  5. DuraLexSedLex.
    +6
    23 March 2013 10: 01
    Unfortunately, with this phrase: “Gorbachev is a fraudster and a traitor!”, Everything is said. His betrayal will poison the life of the Russian people for a long time, and will come back more than once.
  6. +7
    23 March 2013 10: 02
    It is for these exploits that this Humpbacked Judas was awarded the Nobel Prize. It is a pity that Saddam Hussein tried on a "tie" and not Gorbachev. Pay attention in the West he is welcomed as a hero, he is showered with awards, what other proofs of the betrayal of his people and country are needed. Spit in his face. If you think about it, then imagine how many people in the former USSR died from that perestroika, because many who could not "rebuild" and join a new life became alcoholics, drug addicts, What we now have and what we are fighting is his business and successes. I do not want to hear about this Judas. am
  7. +9
    23 March 2013 10: 06
    Gorbachev, shit, you need to wet him in the toilet ... along with Yeltsin-2 moral freak
    1. Kubanets
      +6
      23 March 2013 13: 18
      Comrades, I hope the site under this name will unite and gentlemen who do not share the red idea. It is time for Judah to give what he deserves. Are we not a part of the nation. We will gather on the forum the necessary number of votes to bring Gorbachev to justice
      1. Kubanets
        +1
        23 March 2013 13: 43
        I am YOUR minus in the form Show your face who are you
      2. +2
        23 March 2013 16: 14
        Quote: Kubanets
        the necessary number of votes to hold Gorbachev accountable
        Yeah, they’ll attract. What is it that he was hanged by the First-Called-Highest Order of the country?
        1. +9
          23 March 2013 16: 43
          Why did they give the order? Well, well, because he is a prominent political figure of the era of Alla Pugacheva ...
          1. Kaa
            +2
            24 March 2013 04: 44
            Quote: JACOB
            Why did they give the order?

            Quote: Thunderbolt
            senses that he is not very popular in his homeland ..

            And the famous character Isaev-Stirlitz was generally shot by a Soviet soldier in the novel "Ordered to Survive". Obama got the Peace Prize up front? So Gorbachev ... in advance ... He now frightens the Americans ... puts them into a stupor, deprives them of their will: "Gorbachev predicts the fate of the USSR for the USA (InoSMI, Russia) - Six Iranian editions at once Keyhan (15.12), Iran (15.12 ), Resalat (15.12), Hamshahri (15.12), Khabar (15.12) and Jomhuri-ye Eslami (15.12) report on Mikhail Gorbachev's speech at a conference of the New Politics Forum on the Middle East. , what The United States made a big mistake in starting the war in Afghanistan, and they will face the sad fate of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev’s point of view is also noted that in Soviet Russia the Bolsheviks fought with religion and, in particular, with Muslim values, and subsequently the protection of religious shrines became one of the instruments of the Cold War. http://www.inosmi.ru/overview/20121218/203489970.html#ixzz2OPhEQIzR
            REVERSED DEMON! wassat
            1. 0
              24 March 2013 05: 39
              Everything is just beginning ........ Well, look, this guy has written on his forehead that he is a Nobel laureate .....
              1. +3
                24 March 2013 06: 06
                Quote: Thunderbolt
                this guy has written on his forehead
                Is it also a patchwork head?

                people like Gorbachev send a telegram-how is your health
                Berezovsky then died
            2. 0
              26 March 2013 03: 44
              Quote: Kaa
              Stirlitz was generally shot down


              So it is, they shoot someone. Not everyone can run with impunity syudy ...

              In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft ...
        2. Kubanets
          0
          23 March 2013 19: 37
          Well, your way to wipe the snot in a rag Let's wait for new landmark events
    2. ABV
      +3
      24 March 2013 03: 19
      how unpleasant it is to hear from you, Sasha19871987, such uh pranks ..... in the sense-- how not_space_ it’s nice (separately) to hear this, I want to add --- EBN died, unfortunately, not to be put on a bench, but a hunchback - how patriotic and wonderful it would be to spoofly show - treason and put wanted on Interpol, she is with. Tsuka lives in Germany ... senses that he is not very popular in his homeland ..
      1. +1
        24 March 2013 04: 00
        Quote: ABV
        feels that he is not very popular in his homeland ..
  8. +4
    23 March 2013 10: 36
    Quote: sasha 19871987

    Gorbachev, shit, you need to wet him in the toilet ... along with Yeltsin-2 moral freak

    Where there, he also receives rewards in the favorites of the West, they participate in their events, everyone adores him, and here no one will give him an insult. He ruined the country and goes on high))
    1. +3
      23 March 2013 10: 39
      that’s the point ... like a respected person, now he’s shooting a scum there, but it’s better to hang
      1. +4
        23 March 2013 11: 12
        Quote: sasha 19871987

        that’s the point ... like a respected person, now he’s shooting a scum there, but it’s better to hang

        He’s not there, but he is specifically madly respected and honored, saying that a great man brought joy to the whole world, but because of his inaction, the Karabakh conflict flared up, because of his actions in Baku, Soviet soldiers shot people and received another a greater negativity to the central government and a trump card in the hands of nationalists led to the destruction of the USSR.
        Many in Baku want his death, and on a brazier over a slow fire, to pay for the lives of thousands of people who died due to his actions.
      2. +2
        23 March 2013 16: 18
        Quote: sasha 19871987
        shoot paskuda, but better to hang

        Why such atrocities. Just let go
        To people, though without protection
  9. fenix57
    +2
    23 March 2013 10: 47
    And here he had a hunchback. Well, straight: "figaro is here, figaro is there, but not at work .."The humpback had" good "teachers during his presidency about" throwing "," substituting ".. betraying
  10. Indigo
    +8
    23 March 2013 10: 57
    Even an aspen stake will not straighten a humpbacked Judas. It is necessary to be so "respected" in the country that all its inhabitants are eager to tighten the loop without soap and knock out a stool from the laureate ...
  11. pinecone
    +3
    23 March 2013 11: 06
    Quote: Zhzhuk
    what is the bear doing in government?

    Pounding hard at the Schengen doors. Sometimes one gets the impression that he has no other things to do, except to achieve a visa-free regime with the EU countries. Are they preparing corridors for the flight of state officials and party functionaries to Europe? There are clearly not enough planes for everyone. By the way, they could buy multiple entry visas on the "free market of services". Pay and ride as much as you like.
  12. +3
    23 March 2013 11: 17
    The economy of the USSR had to be saved.
    Iraqi expansion is a step agreed upon by both sides (Iraq - USSR).
    The party betrayed the USSR, betrayed its friends, for the sake of a place at the court with slops.
    Gorbachev did not decide anything, the Party decided everything, Gorbi only voiced decisions that did not diminish his guilt for what he had done.
    The trial of traitors will certainly be.
    1. 0
      23 March 2013 12: 16
      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
      The economy of the USSR had to be saved.
      Iraqi expansion is a step agreed upon by both sides (Iraq - USSR).
      The party betrayed the USSR, betrayed its friends, for the sake of a place at the court with slops.
      Gorbachev didn’t decide anything, the Party decided everything, Gorby only voiced the decisions,

      With the latter, I agree completely !!! Gorby- and puppet in the hands of the Party, or rather its elite, which decided to merge the USSR as an empire.

      With the first - do you have proof of that? Something I do not remember the great love of Hussein for the Communists.
      I think it is Hussein's painful adventurism. He thought that the time of "parity" had not passed and the States would swallow the capture of Kuwait. Yes, he did not take into account that by 91 the top of the Politburo had already merged the country, and the states simply crushed him.
  13. +6
    23 March 2013 11: 24
    Well, why in recent history among our rulers, besides Stalin, there is no one to remember with a kind word?
  14. +2
    23 March 2013 11: 27
    Gorbachev is a prostitute. His advertising spear pissed off.
  15. +1
    23 March 2013 11: 27
    I won’t be surprised that this is with Gorbachev who has long been sitting on the salary of the Americans ...
    1. +5
      23 March 2013 16: 54
      Quote: Yuri11076
      for a long time on the salary of the Americans sitting ...


      I think not with amers, but with Germany. And the salary is small, if recently in a store on theft has become inflamed. The house was given with guards and servants and 2-5 pieces per month in person. It’s not worth much, the wrong flight of a bird ...

      He gave his granddaughter the rights to the symbolism of perestroika, and this will be enough for Madame Virgana to pins for the rest of her life ...
    2. +1
      23 March 2013 22: 43
      Quote: Yuri11076
      I won’t be surprised that this is with Gorbachev who has long been sitting on the salary of the Americans ...

      Nope! It is not profitable! Here is the "authoritative evidence"
      Yushchenko’s wife believes spying on the US is unprofitable and unprofitable
      The wife of the former President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko (2005-2010) Kateryna argues that being an American spy is not profitable. This was stated by the AMU ex-President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko, reports "Gordon Boulevard"
      "When she (Yushchenko - Ed.) Was thrown in the back:" Spy! "... She is straightforward in these matters, somewhat naive, and explained to me:" Vitya, being an American spy is unprofitable - only those who I haven’t achieved anything in life, they pay little ... It’s not a privilege, as they believe here, - my dream was to become a diplomat, to come here and serve the country where my mom and dad were born, where are my roots, ”Yushchenko said.
      http://polemika.com.ua/news-113386.html#title
      xxxxxx
      Maybe Gorby will try to come here as a "diplomat" as a great specialist in Russia. Well, we'll meet him !!!!!!
      1. +3
        24 March 2013 04: 21
        Quote: Egoza
        I have straightforward in these matters


        Ketrin-Claire Chumachenko since she was fifteen is a member of the youth organization of the Union of Ukrainian Youth (SUM) created by the OUN-b. In 1982, she graduated from Georgetown University, in which she was recruited by agent Gene Kirkpatrick (who combined teaching with work in American intelligence agencies). After Chumachenko agreed to participate in the work of the United States in her historic homeland, she begins a successful career in US government. From 1982 to 1984, Chumachenko is an authorized representative of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UKCA) and works with the closest associate of Bandera, Yaroslav Stetsko. It closely cooperates with the OUN-b and the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Peoples (ABN). At the same time, Katherine continues her studies and receives a master's degree at the University of Chicago. From 1985 to 1991, she worked as an analyst at the US Department of State and the National Security Council.

        Chumachenko always shies away from direct answers to questions about what she did in the service of the US government. To clarify the nature of the activity, the names of some of Katerina Chumachenko’s analytical works can be cited: “Arms control”, “Defense issues”, “International strategic ties”, “Coalition for strategic defense initiative”, “American friends of the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations”, “Soviet Union / Soviet ties ”,“ Arms control - OSV-2 ”,“ Arms export reform ”,“ American-Yugoslav relations ”,“ American-Croat relations ”,“ Macedonia ”,“ Religion in the USSR ”,“ Ukrainian Catholics ”.

        To date, access to 99,9% of these materials requires permission from the CIA, that is, under the heading secret (and above, for example, top secret, top secret ...). From 971 !!! works of the wife of the President of Ukraine - only 4 are available without prior permission !!!.

        In the photo she is young, at the congress of some Nazi-racist sect ...
        1. +1
          24 March 2013 05: 06
          Quote: JACOB
          Katherine-Claire Chumachenko

          So maybe orange gayfolition is not an exact term, rather bed
          From the wife picked up laughing
  16. Vovka levka
    -1
    23 March 2013 11: 39
    Do you really think that in 1991 the USSR was capable of doing something. In 1991, the question was whether the USSR would be. This is firstly, secondly why did he even climb into Kuwait? What is inadequate man? What was stopping him from Kuwait? It’s the same when a stoned (buh) man climbs with an ax to the people’s house and gets a ball there, and you run to save him poor little one.
    As for the socialist choice, it was only worthwhile to some "Tumba Yumbe" to declare his love for the ideals of Marxism-Leninism and fraternal help in the form of technology and people immediately rushed. Ask how much they gave to these so-called brothers, and this is still at those prices. And these "grateful" laugh then from us, well, these "Soviets" suckers.
    1. 0
      23 March 2013 12: 09
      Actually, Sadam always paid the bills. Since 1958, arms worth 30.5 billion dollars have been delivered to Iraq. Of this amount, at least 22.4 billion dollars have been paid (including oil, which was subsequently sold on the world market). The current debt of Iraq in this way amounts to 8.5 billion dollars. By the way, the current Iraqi government also recognizes its debt obligations to Russia and is ready to start paying off the remaining debt in the near future.
      What about Kuwait. Dear, have you seen the map for a long time? For Saddam Kuwait, that for Peter the Great, the northwestern territories on which Petersburg was built. You know, there are no unnecessary access to the sea. I am already silent about the resource base.
      Quote: Vovka Levka
      it cost only to some "Tumba Yumba" to declare his love for the ideals of Marxism-Leninism and fraternal help in the form of technology and people immediately rushed. Ask how much they gave to these so-called brothers, and this is still at those prices.
      “Didn't the amers do the same, huh?” Didn’t they prepare the majahideen, who then turned against them?
    2. +2
      23 March 2013 12: 12
      Actually, Sadam always paid the bills. Since 1958, arms worth 30.5 billion dollars have been delivered to Iraq. Of this amount, at least 22.4 billion dollars have been paid (including oil, which was subsequently sold on the world market). The current debt of Iraq in this way amounts to 8.5 billion dollars. By the way, the current Iraqi government also recognizes its debt obligations to Russia and is ready to start paying off the remaining debt in the near future.
      What about Kuwait. Dear, have you seen the map for a long time? For Saddam Kuwait, that for Peter the Great, the northwestern territories on which Petersburg was built. You know, there are no unnecessary access to the sea. I am already silent about the resource base.
      Quote: Vovka Levka
      it cost only to some "Tumba Yumba" to declare his love for the ideals of Marxism-Leninism and fraternal help in the form of technology and people immediately rushed. Ask how much they gave to these so-called brothers, and this is still at those prices.

      “Didn't the amers do the same, huh?” Didn’t they prepare the majahideen, who then turned against them?
      1. Vovka levka
        -4
        23 March 2013 12: 45
        What goes around comes around.
        And about access to the sea and so on, if you think so, you can justify everything, any "accomplishment".
        Good intentions lead to hell.
  17. Terminator
    +7
    23 March 2013 11: 53
    "... the leader of Iraq ..." - no, Saddam is not a leader, he is a great leader, a patriot of his country! Unlike the same Gorby. That is why Gorbachev had a medal on his neck, and Hussein had a "tie"
    1. Drosselmeyer
      +3
      23 March 2013 13: 01
      Yeah, good patriot. He participated in several coups, then unleashed an insane eight (!!!) summer war with Iran. Somehow I got out of the war on the verge of defeat, but borrowed huge loans from my neighbors. And three years after the end of the eight-year war, he climbed into Kuwait again substituting his people for bombs. Then a shameful defeat and ten years of fluttering in power. And also, as the great ruler Saddam periodically poisoned the citizens of his country with mustard gas. Great patriot.
      Saddam is an ordinary eastern despod-adventurer with big, not justified ambitions. Hanged and not sorry.
      1. Terminator
        +1
        24 March 2013 12: 40
        Everyone has their own understanding of priotism. But the current pro-American "leaders of Iraq" and Saddam are two big differences, in my opinion.
  18. +1
    23 March 2013 12: 42
    Yes, I think if everyone whom the tagged threw spits on his bald head, he will drown.
  19. predator.3
    +2
    23 March 2013 12: 46
    I remember reading "Baptism by Fire: The Star of Captivating Risk" by Maxim Kalashnikov, something like science fiction or, more precisely, an alternative to "Desert Storm", but if then someone else, a strong-willed Leader, was in the place of the "marked" get a second vietnam.
  20. -1
    23 March 2013 13: 27
    Quote: Zhzhuk

    who can explain to me why the USSR depended on oil prices, because then, as I understand it, almost all the necessary goods for people were produced in the country, moreover, oil. What kind of import did the country depend on that it needed to sell oil. Or was the USSR like Russia of the late 90s with defeated collective farms, factories ...?


    I explain that in the USSR the domestic market was calculated in rubles, and in order to enter the foreign market the rubles didn’t go, we need a currency (to buy gold, MiG-15 technology engines and so on) and they sold oil.
    1. +3
      23 March 2013 13: 59
      No need to write nonsense ... the USSR was in no way dependent on oil exports. He had TOTAL resources and people enough, the only thing missing was the brains of the leaders. Reorient the economy from the military industry to the production of consumer goods, modernize a LITTLE agriculture and ALL no problems. And oil was sold in order to support FOREIGN FRIENDS. And that was right, now without any friends Russia is selling five times more oil and has ten times MORE problems ... And all from the lack of BRAINS in the leadership ...
      1. 0
        23 March 2013 20: 17
        One way or another, but the collapse of the USSR economy happened precisely because of the collusion of p-e-indos with the Arab countries. Oil.
        My question is, why are p-e-indos not allowed to be called by their name?
      2. Stalinets
        0
        25 March 2013 07: 10
        After Yevsey Liberman, as an economic adviser to Khrushchev, began perestroika, the collapse of the USSR became a matter of time. And the fifth column made sure that this process went as they needed. Whoever needs to be poisoned on time .... Chazov did this ... Yes
    2. +1
      23 March 2013 16: 47
      Quote: 76rtbr
      buy gold, technology-engines on the MiG-15 and so on
      About engines, etc. it’s clear, but gold ...
      As if their own were washed enough and correct, not Turkish-gypsy samples
      1. 0
        24 March 2013 00: 44
        Quote: 76rtbr
        and in order to enter the foreign market, rubles didn’t go, you need a currency (buy gold

        And why did you need to buy gold urgently? Earlier, even 1 ruble was backed by gold, about which the corresponding inscription was. And then somehow these inscriptions "disappeared". And the ruble itself was more expensive than the dollar! Who robbed the country?
        1. Beck
          -1
          24 March 2013 14: 30
          Quote: Egoza
          Earlier, even 1 ruble was backed by gold, about which the corresponding inscription was. And then somehow these inscriptions "disappeared". And the ruble itself was more expensive than the dollar! Who robbed the country?


          You are confusing something. The ruble was to be provided with all the wealth of the country. And in those years, this was with any currency. That is, the currency was provided by the total value of pre-valued metals, factories, factories, cattle, grain and so on. That is, the entire aggregate product of the country.

          Towards the end of the USSR, the ruble was weak, since the aggregate product of the USSR was inferior to the aggregate product of leading countries. And the fact that the ruble is more expensive than gold, this was done artificially for propaganda purposes. As soon as the ruble entered the world arena on its own, it collapsed.

          Now the old system that the currency corresponds to the aggregate product of the country is a thing of the past. Now some other mechanisms are working, this should be asked by specialists. Now currencies live in some kind of independent life. Example. Dallar USA, it travels so much around the world that its nominal amount is much higher than the total US product. And the US economy is still not collapsing. The same can be said about the yen and the euro. In general, central banks print the right amount of currency without looking back at the country's total product. It's my opinion.
  21. nickname 1 and 2
    0
    23 March 2013 13: 56
    When God wants to punish a person, he robs his mind!
    And God, marks!

    If you recall, because the fact that this is a slut we saw. And if you saw what you expected?
    The question is, why did God deprive him of his mind? Indeed, in that chatter there wasn’t any hint of reasonable speech!

    What were we waiting for? Met an empty man with a near. As a result, the collapse of the country.

    You have to pay for everything! For connivance, first of all!
  22. +1
    23 March 2013 17: 37
    hmm .... but in Germany they carry it on their hands -Gorby connected their country and ruined ours ... (didn’t turn to say his own language)
  23. +2
    23 March 2013 18: 59
    Greetings, colleagues!
    We were betrayed in 1985 ... And before that, the "Kremlin elders" were periodically deceived, in principle, unable to really fully work.
    1.Since 1985 M.S. Gorbachev (A.N. Yakovlev, E.A. Shevardnadze and a number of leaders like them), having become ("democratically" elected) first at the head of the party, and then the state, carried out an advanced policy of openness and democratization, later called "new thinking" ... Support for the new course in governing the country was massive, if not nationwide. (WELL, WE WILL NOT LIE TO YOURSELF ...) In fact - the crisis in the party brought revisionists, the latter radically changed the policy, both internal and external, surrendering everything positive in the country, which an ordinary Soviet person could be proud of (The people's enlightenment came much later).
    2. By 1991, the Union was in a fever (Baku, Sumgait, Fergana, Karabakh), the withdrawal of FGPs from Europe began ... The national elites of the republics want independence and their own real power. The people read the newspapers, in which the "stupid democratic" delirium coexisted with the chronicle from hot spots, and did not understand a damn thing, but joined the global values.
    3. The first president and his people betrayed all the allies of the present (and potential) countries after their people.
    3. Saddam Hussein, nevertheless, was originally the leader of the Baath, the head of state, with an unconditional, oriental specifics, i.e. despot, but otherwise the Arabs do not succeed (mentality, peculiarities of the worldview, national character ...) But, he always clearly pursued a policy of benefits for his country ... "At least with the devil, at least with an angel, but so that Iraq would be beneficial ".

    In our country, since the conclusion of the Russian-French military alliance at the end of the 19th century, national state interests begin to recede into the background for the sake of a) the personal interests of the rulers, b) the interests of the allies, c) ideological "trends". Only the period from the second half of the 20s to the end of the 40s of the XX century was dictated exclusively by national interests. It's time to return the pragmatists.
    1. Frunze
      0
      25 March 2013 00: 07
      I absolutely agree with your opinion hi
  24. 0
    23 March 2013 19: 51
    Gorbachev, undoubtedly a traitor to the Motherland, under the guise of democracy, he destroyed the country and people, as only a three-year-old girl could do "Take everything away and go." Any scourge could give such a democracy, but to do something similar to China, brains are needed. Gorby alone, the piggy bank and traitor to the country, is not to blame for everything. There were a bunch of generals and ministers, where were they looking? Failed? Toda their price, decrepit, could not steer, like Nicholas II in his time, the result: The victory is NOT THE LEADERS, and this is fatal for the country that they are doing with my homeland and people ... creatures
  25. 0
    23 March 2013 20: 13
    Labeled \\\\\\, I hope he ends his life very badly. How much trouble he has done.
  26. 0
    23 March 2013 20: 40
    There were reasons for the collapse of the USSR. One and the main thing is betrayal!
  27. 0
    23 March 2013 20: 56
    The younger generation forgot the "statesman" Gorbachev during the lifetime of this Jew.
    Significantly, however.
  28. +2
    23 March 2013 22: 55
    Humpback - to the wall. am
  29. Dimych from Vanino
    0
    24 March 2013 05: 46
    Why is it interesting that no one is submitting initiatives to consider and evaluate rulers in life. Great ... popularly ... and then expose ... the cult of personality ... betrayal, etc. .... when it does not even bring a sense of justice ...
  30. 0
    24 March 2013 13: 56
    Everywhere the humpbacked retrainer "visited", there are indelible traces of him - mindlessness, meanness and betrayal. So he will remain in history as the main Nobel JUDAS! We can only hope that the time will come when Russia will show political will and, at least, give an official assessment of "the activities of this traitor!
  31. -2
    24 March 2013 15: 17
    I think the collapse of the USSR began much earlier !! When a Soviet soldier came to Europe and returned from there with trophies !! So the USSR began to get drawn into a consumer society, we are seeing a peak now !!!
  32. 0
    24 March 2013 15: 18
    There was only one way out for Stalin to live at least one hundred years!
    1. +2
      26 March 2013 01: 27
      Quote: Alesha
      Stalin lived at least


      I consider Stalin, with all due respect and criticism of this extraordinary and great personality, Ivan the Terrible v.2.0 ...

      Also fought against boyars, sorry Bolsheviks, also won power from them, there were also their Shuiskys and their Kurbs. He also cared about the people, and hung boyars, sorry, he fought democratic methods against the Bolsheviks of the Leninist clan.

      Something too many coincidences, it seems to me, to see the villain story has a tendency to repeat itself ...
  33. +2
    24 March 2013 16: 46
    Quote: JACOB
    in one expensive store he (yes he) stole a bottle of wine (probably not cheap). And not by mistake, but with his own hand tore off * a squeaker * on a bottle, so that the output would not beep.

    I am ashamed that such a "petty thief" ruled a superpower. It is not clear: why did the cantor overlook this agent of influence? And if they did, why wasn't our Lee Harold Oswald found?
    1. Bas luis
      0
      6 May 2013 15: 04
      The collapse of the USSR began in the year 76 when werewolves such as Kravchuk Yeltsin humpbacked and the like twisted the thieves in their favor and they came to power and ...
  34. Hudo
    0
    24 March 2013 20: 10
    This humpback ................... ............................ A.A. Gromyko, in 1985 at a meeting of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU in Moscow, nominated the head of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. WHY???????????????????????????????????????????
    Any collective farm chairman would be a more worthy candidate.
    1. Bas luis
      0
      6 May 2013 15: 00
      Humpback judged as a traitor in wartime
      America imposed its deceitful democracy
      Only there is no this democracy and there are der6mokrada
  35. Stalinets
    +3
    25 March 2013 07: 04
    The usual Trotskyist. Dumb, ambitious and greedy. This scum did not betray anyone. He was never ours or of us. For bribes he did what the brothers on the Masonic lodge ordered. And we thought he was for us .... Oh, we .... Yes
  36. z-exit
    +2
    25 March 2013 11: 00
    I put the author of the article "minus" only because of one phrase "the leader of Iraq".
    Dear, next time be a little more respectful to the people of Iraq and its rule!
    1. +1
      26 March 2013 01: 54
      We already went through this, maybe in some newspaper newspaper a young journalist accidentally broke through a censorship cordon, and didn’t pay attention to the rest * by the machine *. And maybe for the view it was necessary to insert * supposedly criticism * ...

      Well done, he, and respect for him, and bow to the ground ...

      Russia is an occupied country, and * respect and respect * to such reporters, namely reporters, not prostitutes. Who brought the truth to the people ...

      And what is even the whole life of Gorbachev against one word of Saddam, even with all the criticism of the same Hussein? ...

      Dirty dirt ...
  37. -1
    26 March 2013 01: 43
    Quote: JACOB
    Quote: Alesha
    Stalin lived at least


    I consider Stalin, with all due respect and criticism of this extraordinary and great personality, Ivan the Terrible v.2.0 ...

    Also fought against boyars, sorry Bolsheviks, also won power from them, there were also their Shuiskys and their Kurbs. He also cared about the people, and hung boyars, sorry, democratic methods fought against the undemocratic Bolsheviks of the Leninist clan.

    Something too many coincidences, it seems to me, to see the villain story has a tendency to repeat itself ...
  38. +1
    29 March 2013 22: 32
    Humpback hang in one place!
  39. Bas luis
    0
    6 May 2013 14: 20
    If you attach a hunchback to a pillar on Red Square and that everyone spits on his face, Gorbachev will drown in the spit of the people
  40. Bas luis
    0
    6 May 2013 14: 39
    USSR The country of good, for the common people, on the whole planet EARTH
    US evil empire for the entire planet EARTH
    USA for thieves of oligarchs, exploiters
    To whom and to which politicians one can say thanks, and to whom to spit in the face, of course, Gorbachev Yeltsin Kravchuk Yushan Svanidze, etc., people deserve spitting.
    And Stalin deserves from the common people only THANKS !!!!

    Under Stalin, the borders of the USSR occupied the largest territory on the world map, under his strict guidance, victory was achieved in the Second World War.
    Under Stalin, after the aftermath of the war, the salaries increased annually, and the prices of the most significant goods fell
    STALIN is our pride in STALIN needs to learn, these not far-sighted politicians liars how to build a state for a simple PEOPLE !!!
    Thanks to Stalin for our homeland, the USSR was something to be proud of !!
    Thanks to Stalin for our childhood, under his leadership in the USSR, schools were built for the pioneer house with different circles, photos, radio, model aircraft, etc.
    where youth received the best education in the world, we need such a president, STALIN IS THE PRIDE OF THE SOVIET PEOPLE !!!
  41. Bas luis
    0
    6 May 2013 15: 11
    It’s our duty to open our eyes about the truth of the one that was stolen from us, pass it on, everyone should know. The people should know the truth, who rules Ukraine and in other republics of the USSR — these are the ones that harmed the USSR and ruined a great power !! And now they all have power and tearing to power, but brought to power these unscrupulous KRAVCHUK YELTSIN SUSHKEVICH which must be judged by wartime ..
    Today's pseudo-democrats presidents, in contrast to Stalin, express the interests of a handful of super-rich "oligarchs". AND CLICK ONE OF THEM, since he is with the bandits, liars and scoundrels who vilify our entire history of the USSR! Especially on the part of those who are for the EU NATO America for the capitalists is a gang of traitors who want to destroy our people and Ukrainu.U we had one patriot of our people this is STALIN! Stalin acted in the interests of the entire people. What Stalin did for the common people, no president of the world could raise the country in such a short time as Stalin