Military Review

Islamophobia - a history of the disease

50
Ideologists and victims of Wahhabi religious and political extremism


25 June in Pyatigorsk, a conference devoted to countering the spread of the ideology of terrorism in the North Caucasus. The report “The main ideological attitudes of religious extremist organizations operating in the North Caucasus region. Formation of informational content for the de-radicalization of youth ”.

In the North-West Federal District, for several years now, a fairly high level of terrorist threats has been maintained. The bandit groups, despite the measures of forceful influence on the part of the special services and the forces of law and order, still retain the ability to restore their numerical potential and infrastructure. One of the reasons for this is the presence in the region of an abusive base, represented primarily by young people between the ages of 17 and 30, who have fallen under the influence of the ideology of religious-political extremism.

Nothing but

Our state, like the whole world, has been trying for many years to find effective measures to counter terrorism, which hides its true face under the guise of religious or political ideologies.

Islamophobia - a history of the diseaseAmong the main reasons for the radicalization and involvement of youth in terrorist organizations are the growing spread of the ideas of religious-political extremism and Wahhabism, which are at the core of Al-Qaida’s activities and all its cells, including the Emirate of the Caucasus.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the process of religious revival began in the country. These conditions were considered favorable by certain representatives of foreign Muslim countries - supporters of Wahhabism.

Many religious education centers, where representatives of the Muslim clergy were trained in Soviet times, found themselves abroad. Muslims of the North Caucasus had to build their own system of religious education. This process inevitably faced a shortage of personnel and a lack of religious educational literature, based on the principles of traditional Islam in Russia. These shortcomings began to be reimbursed by foreign “benefactors” who offered cadres, literature, and much more.

The assistance to the Muslim countries was rendered and continues to be rendered by the special services of a number of western states in order to shatter the situation in Russia.

As a result, in the middle and higher Muslim educational institutions that appeared on the territory of the North Caucasus at the end of the last century, both the teaching staff and textbooks were often of Arabic origin. Thus, the ideology of Wahhabism was introduced among young people.

Since the end of the 20th century, the spread of this trend throughout the world has become an important component of the foreign policy strategy of Saudi Arabia. At least six thousand Arabian charitable foundations distributed in various countries of the world, including Russia, Wahhabi literature and sent preachers to local Muslims. Similar literature was disseminated through Russian pilgrims who visited Saudi Arabia during the Hajj. In one of these brochures, published in Russian, it was recommended no more, no less - “to kill Muslims who do not attend the Friday prayer”. By the way, Christianity in Saudi Arabia is prohibited, and its confession is punishable by death.

Not one thousand Russian citizens studied at foreign “Islamic universities”. Upon returning to Russia, they created various institutes and funds specializing in Wahhabi propaganda. Their representatives published newspapers, appeared on radio and television, and the most active managed to register their own media, including television.

In the course of the spread of Wahhabism in Russia, the differences between historically formed Islam, which became known as “traditional”, and Wahhabism itself, were sharply manifested. The latter began to eat away traditional Islam.

Some young people who were not properly educated in traditional religious or non-religious families were interested in Wahhabism. Someone was attracted by the maximalist monotheism of the Wahhabis, someone by the proclaimed simplicity and purity of morals in the context of the moral decay of the surrounding society. Many Muslims paid attention to the simplicity and cheapness of rites in Wahhabi organizations. For others, the solidarity of the Wahhabi Jamaats became an alternative to nepotism and corruption.

Wahhabism, in turn, is characterized by a programmatic rejection of the freedom of conscience. In its ideology laid religious intolerance, the preaching of religious hatred, a call for the violent eradication of all non-Wahhabi systems and ideas.

Wahhabism proclaims the inferiority of citizens on the basis of their attitude to religion. Christians who worship icons, according to the Wahhabi ulama, are among the worst creatures before Allah. For non-Muslims, discrimination on religious grounds is proclaimed. “We should not trust them even the lowest leadership positions. The doors of all media and communications must be closed in front of them so that they do not spread their poison among Muslims, ”we read in the book Al-Almaniyah (secular lifestyle) and its disgusting consequences.

Is Russia an Enemy of Islam?

Wahhabism spreads appeals aimed at inciting religious hatred, accompanied by the use of violence or threats of its use. “Jihad is necessary in the name of Allah. We must declare war on everyone who fights against Allah and His Messenger so that all paganism and all religion would disappear belong to Allah. ” Moreover, by "paganism" is meant any, not necessarily religious, non-Wahhabi system of ideas and actions. According to the Wahhabi ulama, apostasy should be punished with death - the transition from Islam to another religion. “Kill someone who changes his religion,” says one of the Wahhabi books.

We can formulate the main theses that are put forward by the ideologists of terrorism and religious and political extremism, including representatives of the "Emirate of the Caucasus" in the North Caucasus:

  • Russia is the enemy of Islam, the majority of the population of Russia have a negative attitude towards Islam;
  • in Russia they suppress Islam, infringe upon the rights of its supporters;
  • the goal of jihad is the establishment of a just society based on sharia;
  • it is necessary to spread jihad to the whole territory of Russia;
  • the personal goal of the fighter for the faith (mujahid) is to become a shahid, the common goal of the Muslims is to defeat the enemy;
  • the global goal of the Muslims of the world is the reconstruction of the caliphate;
  • Muslims should be united in their struggle against the infidels;
  • infidels seek to stop jihad through “government scientists” issuing special fatwas;
  • on the territory of Russia it is permissible to carry out sabotage of an economic nature, to destroy the enemies of Islam;
  • causing harm to the civilian population of the infidels and their destruction corresponds to Sharia.

    Wahhabis are consistently trying to implement all these provisions.

    There is one more aspect of the problem, which usually remains imperceptible. The spread of Wahhabism in Russia with its preaching of religious intolerance, jihad, and religiously motivated terrorism — all this led to the growth of Islamophobia and xenophobia against ethnic Muslims. What kind of reaction can occur among Orthodox, Judea, non-believers in reading anti-Christian, anti-Judaic, anti-liberal ideological attitudes in Wahhabi writings, for example: Islam?

    Islamophobia is the fear of Islam. The emergence of a fear of Muslims, of Islam is a characteristic feature of a certain part of Russian society. And this leads to the corresponding consequences, including to counteraction.

    Russian Muslims should be focused on their own religious centers (Kazan, Ufa, Grozny). Experience shows that foreign religious influence promises nothing good to Muslims of Russia.

    What should we oppose to the ideology of terrorism? Answering this question, it is necessary to dwell in detail on the role of the media in the de-radicalization of young people.

    Irresponsible journalists

    A feature of modern terrorism is the use of informational influence as an important element of manipulation of the consciousness and behavior of society.

    Terrorists always seek to use the channels of mass media and the media to promote their views, and the dissemination of relevant information about the terrorist act is precisely the purpose for which they commit their large-scale and inhuman actions aimed at intimidating the population.

    Moreover, they are not only aiming at highlighting their actions, but also trying to get journalists to recognize their legitimacy and morality, they are trying to attract new members to terrorist and extremist gangs.

    The influence exerted by journalists on public opinion can now be called decisive, and the terrorists are trying to actively use this, carrying out their criminal activities.

    The most difficult question is the optimal degree of media coverage of terrorist acts. Unfortunately, quite often journalists pay more attention to the race for the news or exclusive rights to them. Mass media themselves fall into the trap and become victims of targeted terrorist propaganda, broadcasting and disseminating the destructive ideas of terrorists around the world.

    Modern terrorism is becoming increasingly associated with the activities of the media. Almost all terrorist groups have their own mass media, many contain their own Internet sites. In turn, terrorist acts (explosions, arson, shelling, murder) become for journalists of all publications a central information occasion.

    Representatives of the media not only inform us about what is happening, but also formulate basic definitions, suggest conclusions, setting the framework for the interpretation of a particular event.

    The media is a powerful tool for shaping public opinion. Therefore, an important direction in the activities of journalists is the work of discrediting terrorist and extremist organizations in society, creating an atmosphere of intolerance towards any manifestations of terror, political and religious extremism, actions aimed at undermining the integrity of the state and inciting ethnic and religious hatred. It is necessary to promote the dissemination of information exposing the criminal nature of terrorist and extremist organizations.

    However, the impression is often created that journalists forget about their social responsibility to society, although they undoubtedly have to work in the interests of developing the legal education of people, and journalism should perform an educational and educational function.

    There is an information war against our country, affecting all spheres of life, including culture, religion, history, interethnic relations, morality. Specific manifestations of this war are on television and movie screens, computer monitors, newspaper publications, and analytical studies of individual non-profit and non-governmental organizations, often acting for foreign grants. One of the consequences of this war was the fact that the educational aspect was almost completely excluded from our information space, from the sphere of education and the arts, as well as from the media. And for some reason, everyone thinks that only the state should do this. But, in our opinion, this should be the work of all healthy strata of our society.

    In connection with the above, I would like to encourage the media to solve the following tasks:

  • countering the spread of the ideology of violence, terrorism and extremism;
  • the development of a moral, morally and physically healthy young generation;
  • education of young people patriotic in relation to their Fatherland;
  • the formation of a moral ideology, in which personal creative work is the basis of success in life.

    People with such a position can do a lot to rid the country of extremism and terrorism.

    The threat of terrorism is quite removable. It would be wrong to consider this phenomenon as fatally inevitable. But an indispensable condition for victory over him is the unification of efforts of all sectors of society.

    The problem is not to destroy this or that gang, a terrorist organization or a gang leader. The main problem is to destroy the very ideology of terrorism.

    Nowadays, it is extremely important to form citizens a sense of non-acceptance of violence as a method of struggle, as well as an understanding of the necessity of the efforts of the whole society to counter violence. It is extremely clear that this struggle must be waged in the fields of education, mass culture, the work of the mass media, the formation of public opinion, etc. Victory over terrorism is possible only when society wants it.
  • Author:
    50 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

    I have an account? Sign in

    1. makst83
      makst83 25 July 2013 08: 06
      34
      Islamophobia is an adequate reaction to what Wahhabi fanatics around the world are doing!
      1. Sergey_K
        Sergey_K 25 July 2013 15: 44
        25
        This is not a disease, but just the reaction of the body to the disease. No need to confuse cause and effect.
        1. S_mirnov
          S_mirnov 25 July 2013 16: 51
          +1
          As priests and other ministers of religious cults were launched before the authorities, inter-religious conflicts began! Naturally!
      2. Hleb
        Hleb 25 July 2013 17: 05
        +2
        An adequate reaction is the struggle and destruction of Wahhabis fanatics. A phobia of Islam is the inheritance of cowards and fools.
        1. ed65b
          ed65b 25 July 2013 17: 51
          11
          It was necessary to hold the eggs in time, tightly squeezing at the right time. They spread the Muslims around the world and got infected.
          1. Hleb
            Hleb 25 July 2013 17: 57
            +3
            squeezing tight at the right moment

            I already twitched from the presented pain and clutching hand)
          2. Revolver
            Revolver 26 July 2013 01: 59
            +1
            Quote: ed65b
            It was necessary to hold the eggs in time, tightly squeezing at the right time.

            It's disgusting to touch them, even with a rubber glove. However, if disgust does not torment you, I will only approve of your actions. good
      3. starshina78
        starshina78 25 July 2013 19: 31
        +5
        You said correctly - the Wahhabis are creating, and not all who profess Islam. In our country, it is customary to equate everyone under one comb, since if you profess Islam, it means a terrorist. It is not right . Nine guys from Dagestan are working in my workshop as drivers. Normal guys. When I asked for a job when they were going to hold their prayers, they replied that Allah allowed them not to pray during their stay here. Of course, they jokingly said, but he didn’t interrupt his work for the sake of prayers, and what they do at home is their business. The most important thing is that they took root in the team, did not begin to withdraw, but got accustomed. Wahhabism and all movements of Islam professing jihad, not ours, they are implanted to us. Young people in the Caucasus go there from despair. They give at least some money there, and so unemployment is solid, and everyone wants to eat - that's why the terrorists and other scum come from.
        1. I am a Russian
          I am a Russian 26 July 2013 08: 23
          -3
          Quote: starshina78
          In our country, it is customary to equate everyone under one comb, since if you profess Islam, it means a terrorist. It is not right . Nine guys from Dagestan are working in my workshop as drivers. Normal guys.


          "It is customary for us to equate everyone with the same size" - a Muslim will help (assist) a Muslim in any situation

          and the time will come ... your Dagestanis will crush everyone in the workshop for themselves ... they will write a letter on your back and be proud to wear
    2. Denis
      Denis 25 July 2013 15: 35
      19
      What is the fig Sharia in Russia? !! While you live with us, you will live according to Russian law, you don’t like it - bring it to Europe, you are welcome there.
      1. survivor
        survivor 26 July 2013 08: 00
        0
        do not confuse Sharia and Wahhabism. Sharia is just inherent in traditional Islam. There are many nationalities practicing Islam in Russia.
    3. Yeraz
      Yeraz 25 July 2013 15: 38
      +2
      Smart guys, they do, and the negative goes to all Muslims and their replenishment.
      Regarding traditional Islam, the Soviet Union destroyed it and when the union broke up, people knew that they were Muslims, but what Islam and its traditions are not. And the Arabs came and explained, before that they couldn’t, because local imams in a matter of seconds their propaganda would be dispelled in the wind. And right now the imams have all learned from them.
      1. ayyildiz
        ayyildiz 25 July 2013 18: 51
        +5
        Wahhabism (from the Arabic. الوهابية) is one of the names of the sect in Islam, which formed in the XVIII century. The name "Wahhabism" is used by opponents of this movement (as a rule, its supporters call themselves Salafists). Wahhabism is named for Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab at-Tamimi (1703 — 1792), who is a follower of Ibn Taymiyah (1263 — 1328).
      2. ed65b
        ed65b 25 July 2013 18: 53
        +2
        Eh Ali, as it were, the Arabs came on their own, so it was we ourselves who sent Pakistani and other countries of "advanced" religiosity to them. Then they lost the dialogue with the traditionalists, the muddy time was missed.
        1. smersh70
          smersh70 1 August 2013 14: 37
          +1
          Quote: ed65b
          Then they lost the dialogue with the traditional; the muddy time was missed.



          and everyone hit the trade ....... fellow ..you've lost everything .... but you need to be stupid with them clearly, like us ...... the police take us culturally to the station and shave their beards or don’t give identification with photos with a beard))))) )) ... and in Russia, by the way, they give out such pictures ..................
      3. ayyildiz
        ayyildiz 25 July 2013 18: 53
        16
        It would be absurd to refer to an Orthodox priest in this article, but nevertheless: Deacon Andrei Kuraev once expressed himself that many Muslims know their religion at the vocational school level. Offensive for us statement, but fair !!!

        Every Muslim in his head has “his” Islam. The knowledge of religion is often based not on the Holy Quran - our main document of ISLAM, but on the explanations of the clergy, various "instructors", and "alims". But they are different ...
        1. ed65b
          ed65b 25 July 2013 19: 51
          +3
          Quote: ayyildiz
          It would be absurd to refer to an Orthodox priest in this article, but nevertheless: Deacon Andrei Kuraev once expressed himself that many Muslims know their religion at the vocational school level. Offensive for us statement, but fair !!!

          Every Muslim in his head has “his” Islam. The knowledge of religion is often based not on the Holy Quran - our main document of ISLAM, but on the explanations of the clergy, various "instructors", and "alims". But they are different ...

          Here in this respected you are right. a plus.
    4. fzr1000
      fzr1000 25 July 2013 15: 38
      25
      There is no Islamophobia. There is rejection in the native streets of scum. Well, and if they pray to Allah, then what to do?
      The high-profile case of the murder in the city of Pugachev, which led to massive protests by local residents, is gaining terrible details. Ali Nazirov refused his own initial testimony. The guy said that he never held in his hands the scalpel with which the paratrooper Ruslan Marzhanov was killed.
      Nazirov said that he considers guilty of the killing of the paratroopers of his cousins ​​- 28-year-old Ruslan, 21-year-old Khidir and 25-year-old Khamzat Khaydaev. According to Ali, the siblings Khidir and Khamzat kept Marzhanov, and Ruslan Khaydaev beat him with a scalpel. Ali Nazirov himself allegedly only took part in the fight, but did not kill anyone. During the detention, Ruslan Khaidaev resisted the police. On law enforcement, he rushed with a pitchfork, lowered the dogs. In response, he received a tangential wound in the leg.
      All four young people have now been charged under Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (murder), and at the request of the investigation, the court chose a preventive measure in the form of detention. According to the Investigative Committee of Russia, at least 17 (!) Stab wounds were inflicted on Marzhanov. As part of the criminal case, over 60 witnesses were interrogated by the investigation, 14 medical, biological, genetic, fingerprint, forensic and other examinations were appointed.
      The mother of the deceased paratrooper Svetlana Vladimirovna told MK that the current testimony of Nazirov is more like the truth. “My son was a tough guy. It is clear that the 16-year-old puny teenager could not cope with him. I saw injuries on my son’s body: he had several cuts on his face. He was clearly held and slaughtered, bullied, reveled in impunity. Witnesses of the incident also told me that he was being held. Killed more than one person. "
      Earlier, the aunt of the accused Yakha Nazirova in a conversation with reporters reported that she was hit with a scalpel by her nephew Ali Nazirov, who came to her to rest. After the incident, brother Khamzat beat Ali allegedly for what he had done, but in fact, apparently intimidating and demanding to take the blame on himself. It is clear why the Chechen side put Nazirov guilty - the teenager will receive minimal punishment due to age.
      It turns out that the Chechens first deceived Marzhanov (he was called to speak “one on one”), then he was torn to pieces with chilling cynicism, then they lied to reporters. It is important to note that this is not about one kooky killer maniac. Four adult men were killed. It also becomes clear that the appearance of a scalpel in the case - the paratrooper was first bullied, and then killed. Under such conditions, the most acute reaction to the incident was understood by the Pugachevites - Marzhanov was killed not by accident, but in cold blood, by a group of people, with a feeling of impunity and superiority.
      1. Denis
        Denis 25 July 2013 15: 46
        +9
        And now these mountaineers are hiding from the people in the police.
      2. Sergey_K
        Sergey_K 25 July 2013 15: 47
        +1
        It seems so to you, in fact, everything is like this:

        http://www.yapfiles.ru/show/660705/90ec96ec36af06e5ccd2547f67f5047e.flv.html

        Please note, this is a "federal" channel.
      3. Revolver
        Revolver 25 July 2013 19: 03
        +8
        Quote: fzr1000
        All four young people have now been charged under Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (murder), and at the request of the investigation, the court chose a preventive measure in the form of detention.

        One of those extremely rare cases when from homo ... well, in general, people of non-traditional orientation can be obtained real benefits. Put everyone in a hut where they will be, ahem, dearly loved, and very soon these heroes will begin to knock on the door and yell that they want to give a confession.
        1. Uhalus
          Uhalus 25 July 2013 23: 29
          -1
          Not a method. They will like it. They have it in culture.
          1. survivor
            survivor 26 July 2013 08: 03
            +1
            how well do you know the culture ....
      4. Normal
        Normal 26 July 2013 00: 14
        +5
        Quote: fzr1000
        The high-profile case of the murder in the city of Pugachev, which led to massive protests by local residents, is gaining terrible details. Ali Nazirov refused his own initial testimony. The guy said that he never held in his hands the scalpel with which the paratrooper Ruslan Marzhanov was killed.

        It's time to recall the discussion of the article "Lessons from the tragedy in Pugachev"
        http://topwar.ru/30720-uroki-tragedii-v-pugacheve.html#comment-id-1326144
        How, then, many commentators stood up for the Chechens, so as not to escalate the national question. They claimed that all this is a domestic conflict and a drunken quarrel. How they talked about the problem and replaced it with the machinations of the opposition, the threat of the collapse of the country. How mockingly-feignedly surprised that a 16-year-old boy stabbed a paratrooper. The worst thing is that there were Russians among such commentators, and that if news about this turn in the murder investigation were posted on the site, everything would be repeated again. Again they will tell us that criminals do not have a nationality. Again, an example of a hoe will be given. Again, the nationalists will be accused of escalating Caucasophobia. All repeat again.
    5. JIaIIoTb
      JIaIIoTb 25 July 2013 15: 45
      +7
      Highly educated and cultured Muslims are quite adequate people. I know many friends with many.
      But now, those who receive education exclusively in madrasahs or generally only from imams and other religious figures, of course, other than "Allah Akbar", they do not know anything else and do not want to know. And most importantly, EVERYONE who does not belong to their faith must die or be slaves.
      Re-educating them is useless. They need only be destroyed.
      It also makes sense to provide comprehensive assistance to religious leaders professing peaceful Islam.
      We have been living with Muslims side by side for over a thousand years. As a rule, we live peacefully (the Caucasus is an exception).
      And I still hope that healthy forces, both in Orthodoxy and among Muslims, will prevail.
      Sincerely.
      1. Denis
        Denis 25 July 2013 15: 51
        12
        Quote: JIaIIoTb
        Highly educated and cultured Muslims are quite adequate people.

        First of all, the struggle against Wahhabis should be carried out by normal Muslims, both spiritual and annihilation, and we will help them.
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco 25 July 2013 16: 20
          +7
          Quote: Denis
          First of all, it is the normal Muslims who must fight the Wahhabis.

          In order to wage this struggle, it is necessary to stop the practice of teaching Islam over the "hill", there more often in countries such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Anyway, any training over the hill, NOW, can be regarded as preparing an opposition from among the golden youth.
          1. kavkaz8888
            kavkaz8888 26 July 2013 00: 44
            0
            Those. "agents of influence"
    6. Gato
      Gato 25 July 2013 15: 50
      10
      It is now extremely important that citizens develop a sense of rejection of violence as a method of struggle

      Yeah, right now! In Europe, have already been formed. The only way to neutralize fanatics is to completely destroy them.
    7. seller trucks
      seller trucks 25 July 2013 15: 51
      +1
      Media is a powerful tool for shaping public opinion.


      Media is the ultimate good and important, but not the main. The main thing is to maintain and strengthen, incl. and financial influences, the traditional directions of Islam, the second largest number of religious religions in Russia, therefore it is impossible not to notice this and it is criminal. Yes, TFR is subsidized, but if we deprive federal investments in the regions, do not build kindergartens and schools, do not raise living standards, but this is still Russia, we run the risk of getting regular hot spots near our sides. The second, it is necessary to identify and suppress the action of radical Islamic NGOs, which are financed and supplied with weapons from abroad, propaganda literature, and the third, it is necessary to develop undercover legal and illegal to identify these very agents of influence.
    8. Alexandr0id
      Alexandr0id 25 July 2013 15: 54
      +3
      in all this near-Islamic chatter, the thesis about the creation of a world caliphate is most surprising to me. immediately a bunch of questions come out. what is it and how can it look? Malays will unite with the Uzbeks, Persians and Bosnians? Can anyone in their right mind imagine this?
      and who will become the caliph, will announce a competition for filling a vacant position among seyyids and sheriffs?
      no single Islamic world exists, as well as the Christian or Buddhist. there are Muslim countries, many of which are so far geographically, culturally, ethnically, that there can be no talk of any unification. the maximum that can be assumed is a kind of pan-Arab association, but it will never be due to insoluble intra-Arab political contradictions and the completely different level of economic development of countries.
      the activity of Wahhabis in Russia will remain at the level of sectarianism, which is dangerous, but insignificant in scale
      1. seller trucks
        seller trucks 25 July 2013 16: 58
        +1
        well this is so, for example, about sectarians

        Magomed Tagaev "Our struggle, or the rebel army of the imam" 1997 Publishing House "Science" Ukraine

        “The peoples of the Caucasus must free themselves and, most importantly, together. We need to set ourselves the goal of liberating our homeland, our Caucasus from the foreign Russian yoke. The Caucasus and Russia will remain neighbors ... It is impossible to tolerate such a neighbor. Russia as a national state never existed ... Naturally, Russia will remain within the limits of historical Muscovy, Tver and Novgorod region only. ”

        “... Only by seizing political power ... Everyone who cherishes honor, freedom and independence, we call on the Kurultay. There we will elect an imam and determine the ways of further development ... of the country ... The majority ... has the right to revolutionary way suppress that part of the minority that ... resists the majority movement ...
        If your government does not give up its intentions to perpetuate our slavery, then the war without which it (as the author has. - S.K.) cannot live without, will be fully funded. ”

        “We will fight in the fields, in the mountains and at sea. Along and across, in the Volga region, in the Urals and Siberia, in the North and the Far East ... We will turn the sea and land, road and surface bridges, airfields, airports and railway (?) Railway stations, both civilian and military, fleets and elevators, power systems throughout your empire. ”

        “We will force you to protect everything that you have from our alleged attacks. We will create a few special units, no more than three trained and trained in special camps of murids. Well-trained and mobile for small wars, these units will be able to raise the oppressed Tatar peoples, the peoples of the Southern Urals, Siberia and the Far East in our struggle against the empire.
        We must also use women fully in the struggle. ”

        “There can be no talk of any Russian interests in the North Caucasus ... Only one way out is to burn everything to the ground with a sword and fire, who survived, so that no one crawls away, who did not manage to leave the borders outlined above by us on time” .
        1. Revolver
          Revolver 25 July 2013 21: 18
          +2
          Quote: seller trucks
          Magomed Tagaev "Our struggle, or the rebel army of the imam" ... We need to set ourselves the goal of liberating our homeland ... It is impossible to tolerate such a neighbor ... ... Only by seizing political power ... Everyone who cherishes honor, freedom and independence, we urge ... Only one way out - with a sword and fire, burn everything to the ground and slaughter who survived, so that not one crawls away, who has not managed to leave the borders outlined above by us in due time

          Something this “Our struggle” strongly resembles the “My struggle” of Adolf's evil memory. However, I have repeatedly written on this site that Islam = fascism, for which he was mercilessly zamususovat. I can repeat once again: it is necessary to de-Islamize according to the same principles by which denazification was carried out in the second half of the 1940s. Hang over the top and the proven participants in crimes against humanity, activists such as SS men to camps, and the rest must watch documentaries about the criminal nature of Islam, with graphic details and dissected bodies. and food cards only at the exit from the cinema after the session.
    9. serge-68-68
      serge-68-68 25 July 2013 15: 54
      +7
      There is Islamophobia. Moreover, there are fewer young people, and more older people. And it is present among the majority of the non-Muslim population of Russia. It is based not only on "typical" scum from the streets, and not only on what the media tell us about, but also on what those who fought in Chechnya, those who fled from the former republics of the USSR, told. These stories, as a rule, are embellished, but they do not change the essence of the matter. Ordinary people do not want to divide Muslims into good and bad. For them, a radical Islamist merges with the scum from the street in a ONE and extremely negative image of a Muslim.
      And it makes no sense to blame the media (as well as encourage them to paint the image of a good Muslim and a bad bastard). Stop killing and robbing - stop being bad (not right away, alas, not right away, because breaking is not building).
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 25 July 2013 17: 00
        +2
        older ages - more

        A phobia is a strongly expressed persistent obsessive fear, irreversibly aggravated in certain situations and not amenable to a complete logical explanation. A mental disorder in which a person involuntarily experiences a painful fear that forces him to avoid relatively safe situations or objects. Although the causes of phobias are complex and not fully understood, these disorders are likely to develop in people with a rich imagination and increased emotionality who, in their family or social environment, have not learned to distinguish between fear caused by an imaginary threat and a fear associated with a real threat.
        Are you so afraid of Islam?
        1. serge-68-68
          serge-68-68 25 July 2013 17: 53
          +1
          Go out into the streets of any city in Russia and ask this question to people. Judging by your question, the answers of middle and older ages will amaze you.
          Am I Afraid of Islam? A fairly young and strong enough religion with a powerful radical wing, mobilized, with trained preachers, the necessary experience (including combat) and resources. The peoples entering Islam for the most part began to modernize from a tribal state, which enhances their capabilities in comparison with peoples who have long forgotten about the clan and the tribe, because these relations are based on INTERNAL mutual assistance and EXTERNAL force ("strong rights"). The collapse of the USSR and Russian "capitalism" corrupted the Muslim youth, pushing them even more towards the use of force to resolve conflicts. Yes, I am afraid of such Islam.
          1. Hleb
            Hleb 25 July 2013 18: 04
            0
            eyes are big with fear. you have collected everything you could - and called it Islam
            1. serge-68-68
              serge-68-68 25 July 2013 18: 57
              +4
              I didn't collect "everything I could." I can give a short lecture on the history of Islam. But here we are not talking about its history, positive or negative features of Islam as one of the world's religions. Here we are talking about how Islam is perceived by ordinary Russian non-Muslim citizens. And here I have collected only how Islam is seen by the majority of Russian non-Muslims. And this image and the phobia associated with it, by and large, is not a problem of Russian non-Muslims, but a problem of Russian Muslims.
              1. Hleb
                Hleb 25 July 2013 19: 25
                0
                Here we talk about how Islam is perceived by ordinary Russian non-Muslim citizens.
                Well, in general, I'm probably the only ordinary citizen for whom Islam is not a phobia. There is nothing to be done ((
                By the way, I would have learned with great interest about Islam that I don’t see. So, there’s definitely no lecture here offtopic. Although it would be small. And if you convince, your ranks will be replenished with a full-fledged military unit)
                1. serge-68-68
                  serge-68-68 25 July 2013 20: 27
                  +1
                  I am not recruiting supporters (especially "combat units") and I am not going to convince you of the presence of Islamophobia - you live among people, go out and ask. Just three weeks ago, we conducted such a survey. The theme is the construction of a mosque in our city. I have already named the result in my first post.
                  And to learn real Islam, without "additions" and amendments of various political and religious figures, it is enough to read the Koran, Sunnah and fatwas (but you need to be careful with the latter, they often depend on certain madhhabs). For example, the Koran (a holy book (all without any exceptions, unlike the Christian Bible)) prohibits suicide: “Don't kill yourself! Indeed, Allah is Merciful to you (forbidding you this) ”(surah al-Nisa, ayah 29). And there are many hadiths in the Sunnah prohibiting any suicide. But this does not bother Islamic terrorists, moreover, self-detonation is practically a purely Muslim invention.
                  1. Hleb
                    Hleb 25 July 2013 21: 15
                    +1
                    and I’m not going to convince you of the presence of Islamophobia
                    but it would be necessary. to declare it peremptorily
                    You live among people, go outside and ask
                    Do you hold me for a boy? I was born in Kazakhstan, I know the Caucasus and Central Asia by service. I live in the border region. and we have mosques. we have "Muslim" areas and you think for all the years that I have lived, I still have and you need to go outside and ask? I have one of the closest Muslim friends, and we became friends after colliding. We found out who is cooler for a very long time, but at one point we just began to listen to each other and respect, and not prove and speak
                    suicide prohibits: “Do not kill yourself! Verily
                    But does Christianity allow? Why are you telling me this? Where is suicide considered the norm?
                    But this does not stop Islamic terrorists, moreover, self-disruption is almost a purely Muslim invention
                    you are such a connoisseur of Islam! but to die saving a person’s life? consciously dying is not suicide, as the definition of the term forbids means? you nod everything at the bombings, but forget about the savior-saving Islam who sank. during this life. You play with one goal.
                    here on the forum there is not a single Muslim who would know Islam from and to, and you preach. yes, still relying on everything they call "from the shaitan"
                    I’m not afraid of Islam and my friends are not afraid. And my family will always be safe. You’ll be a fob on the forums, but we will continue to do
                    1. serge-68-68
                      serge-68-68 25 July 2013 22: 11
                      +2
                      You are strange ... You do not feel fear of Islam - and God is with you. Perhaps the residents of Stavropol, former Russian residents of Chechnya and Dagestan, former Russian residents of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, and many other thousands of people who fled from "peace-loving" Muslims, do not feel fear either.
                      You really decide, no boy, what do you want to hear? At first, you are not satisfied with everyday Islamophobia, and you are talking about real Islam. Then you are not satisfied with the Koran, you drag Christianity here and turn to everyday life "I live next to Muslims, I have friends" ...
                      Regarding the Koran and the prohibition of suicide, one should distinguish between holy books and later interpretations.
                      Regarding "I live ..." - I live in one of the cities of central Russia, the most ordinary and ordinary regional center. And we have Islamophobia. I have given you the reasons.
                      Here on the forum, I think, there are Muslims. And they are unlikely to challenge the suicide ban, which is also found in Christianity.
                      1. Hleb
                        Hleb 26 July 2013 06: 57
                        0
                        Then you are not satisfied with the Quran
                        where did I say that? what to invent? and I don’t feel fear because Islam does not teach Muslims to kill me. why should I be afraid of it?
                        Perhaps the residents of Stavropol do not feel fear either
                        and in this case, the residents of Kushchevskaya felt fear of Christianity? Let’s say so, then, in your opinion.
                        And they are unlikely to challenge the suicide ban, which is also found in Christianity.
                        you perfectly understood what I was talking about. if a person knowing that he will die, consciously closes the body with a grenade and saves people, he is not a sinner.
                        and if according to the Qur'an, then what were you talking about, but naturally intentional deprivation of life, suicide is a big sin. And the terrorists blowing up people and themselves, Wahhabis, cannot be Muslims. So what are you blaming Islam for here? Know the Qur'an then determine by the Qur'an. who are you to assign everything to Islam and talk about Islamophobia? what phobias can be in front of Islam in this case? a phobia in front of terror and crime.
                        1. serge-68-68
                          serge-68-68 26 July 2013 17: 29
                          +2
                          Just in case: Wahhabis (Salafists) are a fairly old trend in Islam.
                          Kushchevsky bandits Christ did not hide behind and in the Bible did not look for justifications for their atrocities.
                          Last time: I have no currency on Islam.
                          For the last time: everyday Islamophobia is widespread in Russia and it is connected with the fact that for the majority of the non-Muslim population of Russia "persons of Caucasian nationality" are almost identical to Muslim terrorists. They do not understand the Koran, do not know the differences in adat and Sharia law, they do not care about the difference between Shiites and Sunnis. For these people, Islam is an aggressive (not only in the sense of violence) religion.
                        2. The comment was deleted.
                        3. Hleb
                          Hleb 27 July 2013 20: 02
                          0
                          "persons of Caucasian nationality" are almost identical to Muslim terrorists. They do not understand the Koran, they do not know the differences in adat and Sharia law
                          Well, here we come to a partial understanding. That is why I insist that this is not Islamophobia, but a phobia of terror. It's just that people associate everything with Islam. Although these scumbags are exterminated by Muslim relatives and they cannot be considered Muslims. None of the Muslims recognizes theirs for what they are doing. The crusades also allegedly took place under the "aegis" of Christ, but this does not mean that Christianity called for violence. And I remembered about Kushchevskaya not in vain. It does not matter whether they were hiding behind or not, but following the logic of "Islamophobia "You can bring this to Christianity on the basis of even the seen cross on Tsapok's neck. And you can find quite a few such shameful moments in our history. Imagine how many Muslims live in our country? adequate, normal, creative. Do you want to destroy the country? Then you go racially -religiously correct road.
                          and don’t just forget about nationalism. just about rejecting a foreign culture. about a completely normal state. in this problem it is very important
            2. I am a Russian
              I am a Russian 1 August 2013 14: 13
              -1
              Sergei! good
              Aren't you tired of the arrogance of this ...? From this *** the body carries the troll.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Sirocco
    Sirocco 25 July 2013 16: 09
    +7
    What to say? And I don’t know, the topic raised by the article is more relevant than ever. Maybe it's time to stop coming to our house with their charter? And this primarily concerns our leaders, there are some mayors of cities who cover the diaspora for 30 pieces of silver, giving them the green light. And all these Wahhabis and their comrades must be "strangled" in the bud. I do not like it when I see bearded Balochi in harem pants in the market, who behave defiantly. It's time not to fight with small "fish", but to cut off the head, the ideologists of this anti-Russian company. These are Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and other types of Turkey.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • bart
    bart 25 July 2013 16: 15
    +1
    Quote: Alexandr0id
    in all this near-Islamic chatter, the thesis about the creation of a world caliphate is most surprising to me. immediately a bunch of questions come out. what is it and how can it look? Malays will unite with the Uzbeks, Persians and Bosnians? Can anyone in their right mind imagine this?



    first of all, they are Muslims for them religious identity above the national creation of the caliphate is much more real than it seems
  • KG_patriot_last
    KG_patriot_last 25 July 2013 16: 20
    10
    There is no Islamophobia. There is a rejection of a foreign culture. Any foreign culture. And this is normal.
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 25 July 2013 16: 32
      +4
      I agree. This is nationalism. This is normal.
  • creak
    creak 25 July 2013 16: 26
    18
    99 percent of Muslims are not terrorists, but 99 percent of Muslims are terrorists. And it’s high time to stop this slobbering about tolerance of political correctness. Western Europe has already played these games .. Maybe we will still learn from the mistakes of others ... And the media just reflects the world around us. The position of Kota Leopold is inappropriate here and the presumptuous public must be put in place, and not educate patriots of their fatherland from them . And which Fatherland is their own?
  • Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 25 July 2013 16: 33
    +5
    Oh, how right would Mr. Lenin who said something like the following: "We are communist proletarians, militant atheists, we oppose all religions against Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism and other religious delusions. Religion is an opium for the people, no matter what it is, for distracts a person from building a society based on labor-humanistic ideals of universal brotherhood leads him into the abyss, a swamp of ignorance and intolerance.We can, over time, eliminate property and social stratification, ensure the same social benefits for everyone, etc., but if stratification persists society on a religious basis, then all this will be useless, because in a socially equal society in the first place will come, namely, a religious problem, strife on a religious basis ... "
  • a52333
    a52333 25 July 2013 16: 43
    +4
    Well, one thing can be added: the supreme mufti Ravil Gainutdin, in my opinion, should make efforts to prevent Islam from radicalizing. Is it really hard to track the mullah. who preaches Wahhabism?
    Not to expel Russian citizens leading propaganda after they have served under the 282 article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (for inciting ethnic hatred), and there will be no ceremony with locals either.
  • Alexey M
    Alexey M 25 July 2013 17: 03
    +7
    Not one religion of the world calls for a holy war, except Islam. Only in Islam is there a loophole to justify killing a person, declare him wrong and do whatever you want. West and East are completely different value systems. Historically, the bulk of the population of the East are poorly educated and dark people. Therefore, words about jihad fall into fertile soil and quickly give sprouts. Yes, they also pay for it. Emigrants as one cockroaches appeared, after 10 years it’s already an ethnic enclave. And most importantly, we let them work and live, and then we are surprised how many of them divorced. And someone thought what to do to the group healthy men in the city in their free time. He has no family at home here, where will the poor guest worker go? And he goes to the prayer house and there they whisper that the infidels are stopping you from living, cleanse the earth and live in paradise according to the laws of wide you will have three wives and a bunch of children. Here they cleanse the earth. Only the poor do not know that nothing will be cut off for them except the land of 1x2 meters. And in general, if a person has something to lose, he will never break into a war, if only to protect his own home.
    1. Yeraz
      Yeraz 25 July 2013 20: 55
      -5
      Quote: Alexey M
      Declare him wrong and do what you want.

      Here propaganda works, most think the same way, although this is fundamentally wrong. IT IS NOT SIMPLE TO KILL A MAN ON THE BASIS THAT IT IS SIMPLE WRONG, IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO FORCE A MAN TO ISLAM IT IS A GREAT SIN FOR MUSLIM, THOUGHT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN THINKED FOR PEOPLE TO THINK! vice versa.
      1. I am a Russian
        I am a Russian 25 July 2013 22: 09
        0
        This is not propaganda Yeraz- it is alien to the Slavs Islam.

        Kill [unbelievers], wherever you meet them, expel them from the places from which they expelled you, because for them unbelief is worse than death at your fingertips. And do not fight them at the Forbidden Mosque until they fight with you in it. If they fight [at the Forbidden Mosque], then kill them. Such is the reward of the unfaithful! If they evade [from battle], then Allah is forgiving, merciful. ” As the saying goes, the law is strict, but fair: if they are fighting against you, then fight them too. However, a sequel follows immediately, explaining to the faithful how long to fight with unbelievers: “Fight with them until unbelief disappears and faith in Allah is established. If they renounce unbelief, then there should be no enmity, except for the wicked ”(Sura 2, 190-193). Muslims do not have the right to end the war against non-Muslims until Islam is established on earth as the dominant religion. A temporary truce - yes, but a permanent peace with the infidels is a betrayal of Allah.
        1. Hleb
          Hleb 27 July 2013 20: 16
          0
          Do you know Mullah? Arabic? Interpret in different dialects in any form of writing?
  • knn54
    knn54 25 July 2013 17: 15
    +6
    "Islamophobia" is resistance to the inclinations of Islamic expansion. The "tolerant" policy of the emperors of Byzantium towards the Ottomans led to the death of the state.
    Recent events in Egypt, Turkey have shown that sane people do not want Islamization.
    But Bashar al-Assad is an opponent of cannibal Islamism.
    1. Alex Nick
      Alex Nick 26 July 2013 01: 10
      +1
      I hope for normal Muslims who need the Wahhabis as a dog’s fifth leg. Health will definitely win.
      1. I am a Russian
        I am a Russian 26 July 2013 08: 27
        -1
        Quote: Alex Nick
        Sanity will definitely win.


        nonsense, delusion !!!!

        Strength wins! Only from a position of strength!
      2. rainufa
        rainufa 26 July 2013 22: 52
        0
        Most Russian Muslims are just normal people.
        Of course there are Wahhabi sects in the Volga region. Wahhabis do not roll it for sure, if any followers of Al-Nusra, etc. appear. then they are caught and mercilessly given them deadlines.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 25 July 2013 17: 41
    +1
    Islamophobia, terrorism, is a project of the Western intelligence services. Note that in the Western Hemisphere this is almost absent .. And all the bases and the US Navy are concentrated in the Old World (Europe Asia Middle East) .. Under the USSR, this was all suppressed and jihad bombings were not so widespread .. The aim is to unleash the third world in Eurasia (after the second, the States got rich fabulously ..) How I do not want war .....
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 25 July 2013 17: 51
      0
      Islamophobia is a project of Western intelligence
      Do you want to say that even those who were marked on this topic as Islamophobes are victims of Western intelligence services? smile
  • krez-74
    krez-74 25 July 2013 17: 46
    +4
    There is no unifying ideology in the country! In addition, a huge stratification and lack of prospects! It is because of this that Islam finds its followers!
    As for Islam as such, it, like all religions, must be within the spiritual, and no closer to power, otherwise it becomes intolerant of everything around and different from itself!
    1. dmb
      dmb 25 July 2013 20: 20
      +1
      I absolutely agree with you about religions and power, and far from everything with the author. He either does not know from his youth, or deliberately holds back that during the life of the surviving 1985 year, the problem of terrorism did not actually exist in the country, so these are achievements of an entirely new Russia.
      1. krez-74
        krez-74 26 July 2013 13: 22
        0
        good You're right! I hope today's Russia will be able to unite the people!
  • Strashila
    Strashila 25 July 2013 18: 24
    +2
    As the wise say ... you want to be rich, create a religion. Islam is split into primordial pure Islam, in central Russia, which existed for a millennium in its original form, as it was originally, like the Orthodox, Orthodox Christian church, preserving the foundations of the faith of an unclouded religion .And various kinds of Islam are presented as true, but in essence being ordinary business sects, and there are enough of such in Christianity. Well, Catholics and other sectarians like them, with the hands of business Muslims, destroy their opponents, Orthodox, they suffer in the first place ... Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria ... everywhere the blood of Orthodox Christians has been shed.
  • Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 25 July 2013 18: 46
    +4
    Quote: Gleb
    Islamophobia is a project of Western intelligence
    Do you want to say that even those who were marked on this topic as Islamophobes are victims of Western intelligence services? smile

    You don’t understand what is happening in Europe in the Middle East Caucasus .. this is all an artificially made problem .. I personally do not put it mildly to all these jihad caliphates akbar .. I just feel a threat to my Motherland .. and if all this horde will run to Russia .. it will be terrible ..
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 25 July 2013 18: 51
      +3
      akbaram to say the least not very good attitude

      need an adequate answer wink
  • Cpa
    Cpa 25 July 2013 19: 10
    0
    Extremism in the Caucasus has deep roots, even Imam Shamil fought against radical Sufism that came from Persia. The so-called "zikrists (radical Sufism)" found their soil on the territory of modern Ingushetia. Shamil took citizenship of the Russian Empire, thereby allowing the "zikrists" to develop independently A whole galaxy of fighters for the "purity of faith" was formed, who waged a war in the Caucasus against Russia. Now they are revered as saints, pilgrims go to their graves in the Caucasus. Only the ideology of socialism could fully resist the centrifugal movements in the Caucasus, having lost it, the "zikrists" found companions in the ranks of the Wahhabists. It was the loss of moral imperatives that triggered the unrest that began, the people returned to the basics of adat, which was used by preachers from Arab countries.
  • Yazov
    Yazov 25 July 2013 19: 18
    0
    Extremism? Yes, it happens ... How to eradicate? Yes, there are a lot of undeveloped lands in Siberia .... Enough for all Wahhabis.
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 25 July 2013 19: 29
      +8
      and the Siberians were asked? nah here are extremists and Wahhabis? they need to be destroyed, and not push them away from their hut .. to their own ..
      a normal Russian man himself solves his problems on the spot, and does not dismiss the Siberians.
      if you call for help, the Siberians will not refuse. This will be ours
  • Onotollah
    Onotollah 25 July 2013 19: 26
    +2
    No need to go into excessive theorizing, in practice it will be like this: we either them, or they us.
  • Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 25 July 2013 19: 51
    0
    Quote: Gleb
    and the Siberians were asked? nah here are extremists and Wahhabis? they need to be destroyed, and not push them away from their hut .. to their own ..
    a normal Russian man himself solves his problems on the spot, and does not dismiss the Siberians.
    if you call for help, the Siberians will not refuse. This will be ours

    Well written !! Siberia, the Urals and the North have always been a stronghold of Russia .. It is not for nothing that our ancestors mastered these lands and shed blood .. (they felt .. that without these vast expanses there would be no Russia) ..
  • ed65b
    ed65b 25 July 2013 20: 19
    +2
    Siberia checks the cold. There, everyone becomes what he really is, Ponte will not pass, and bragging, too. taiga heals and cripples. If you are just stupidly passing by in the middle lane and in the south along the highway, then the picture is changing beyond the Urals. Especially since the fall.
  • darksoul
    darksoul 25 July 2013 20: 59
    +1
    Islamophobia is a history of the disease ,,, there is no disease, there is a reaction to this growing sore ... I would call the imposition of tolerance (tolerance a kind of rotten word) why should I put up with someone in my country? on the contrary, it shouldn’t be ... but in general it’s also difficult to equal everyone ... Our Tatars, for example ..... traditional Islam ... I know many Tatars that they will not be able to say a bad language, on the contrary, people from the North Caucasus .. .to live with us we have to study and learn, but nowhere to go: one country, but I would have drove visiting animals from here, drugs, banditry, Wahhabis, traffic accidents .... they will bring many benefits
    1. grafrozow
      grafrozow 25 July 2013 22: 28
      +1
      Totally agree.
      Quote: darksoul
      Islamophobia is a history of the disease ,,, there is no disease, there is a reaction to this growing sore ... I would call the imposition of tolerance (tolerance a kind of rotten word) why should I put up with someone in my country? vice versa should not be ..

      It’s not a matter of Islam, but of an ordinary household routine, of the behavior of people from the Caucasus, of their upbringing, of the undisguised rudeness of our guests, hence the irritation and rejection. We would behave normally, no one would recall the Islamist this frame or Maoist, Buddhist.
  • alert_timka
    alert_timka 25 July 2013 22: 01
    0
    The whole world is afraid of someone in this world. West is east, and east is west. Muslim Christians and vice versa. It seems to me that a big war on this planet is still inevitable, such is the nature of mankind. When everyone fears and hates someone, you cannot live in fear forever. This fear should pour somewhere ...
  • Anatolich
    Anatolich 25 July 2013 22: 26
    +3
    Quote: S_mirnov
    As priests and other ministers of religious cults were launched before the authorities, inter-religious conflicts began! Naturally!

    Nonsense, back in 1996, when he served under a contract in 201 divisions in Tajikistan, there came across newspapers promoting Wahobism and their plans to Islamize Russia through the former Soviet republics, the Caucasus, the Volga region and all the way to Siberia. And what we see now - Asia is fighting, it’s not calm in the Caucasus either, in Europe even Islamists are bulling. In my opinion, radical Islam will still make the whole world startle if our and European rulers chew snot
  • EdwardTich68
    EdwardTich68 25 July 2013 23: 34
    +3
    There is no Islamophobia; there is a fair reaction of society to the satanic crimes of illiterate obscurantists flooding Europe and Russia. The fate of tens of thousands of Russians in Chechnya and Serbs in Bosnia and Kosovo showed that they expect normal people in the future if anti-human-anti-Christian doctrine wins. There was not and there is not a single Islamic technically developed state in the world. By the way, not so long ago in Saudi Arabia a woman was cut off her head for witchcraft. stop
  • Anatolich
    Anatolich 25 July 2013 23: 37
    +1
    Yes, and in Pakistan, two girls were shot for dancing in the rain
  • Anatolich
    Anatolich 25 July 2013 23: 40
    +1
    Quote: EdwardTich68
    There was not and there is not a single Islamic technically developed state in the world. By the way, not so long ago in Saudi Arabia a woman was cut off her head for witchcraft.

    they don’t need any equipment; they only recognize the Kalashnikov assault rifle
  • ratuld
    ratuld 26 July 2013 04: 30
    0
    Yes, the topic is already rotten.
    This Alahakbar is of no interest to anyone.
    Even Akbarov himself.
    I think that the coens of all the lice combed in agony what else to think of
    for idiots who need any religion like a cow, a saddle.
    It's all about the same braces.
    I eat meat.
    You chew cabbage.
    The neighbor is choked with potatoes.
    on the contrary - he drinks some water.
    TOGETHER TOGETHER - WE BREAD BORSCH. !!!!
  • survivor
    survivor 26 July 2013 08: 20
    0
    I’m convinced once again how few there are those who are ready to live in a multinational state. However, Russia is such. indeed, the topic is rotten! Wahhabism, like Baptism, and many other trends, is the essence of the sect. On the issue of traditional faiths, distortion is extremely negative. Tolerance is taught by world religions, tolerance, because it is through tolerance that dialogue first appears, and then the ability to live side by side Bok. Nationalism is good, but any dish is good in moderation. Do not forget about it!
  • ed65b
    ed65b 26 July 2013 08: 34
    +3
    My firm belief that no one can quarrel the Orthodox with Muslims of Russia is not stronger than the two religions that have existed together for more than 1000 years, joined together by hardships and hardships. For our part, we must provide the most active help to traditional Muslims and help them fight sectarians from the faith. In the end, it’s the children of Muslims who go into the woods, blow themselves up and die at the hands of law enforcement agencies and disaster comes to their homes more often.
    1. ratuld
      ratuld 26 July 2013 10: 33
      0
      This is not an eyebrow - but an eye !!!
      Given the fact that all these religions were invented in one kagala.
      Let there in this kagal and stomp.
      along with guide and shepherds.
      Amen.
  • sigizmund472
    sigizmund472 26 July 2013 11: 12
    -1
    Quote: fzr1000
    The Chechens, it turns out, Marzhanov was first deceived (he was called to speak "one on one")

    Sorry, but who and when has seen a Chechen who agrees to speak "one-on-one" ???? This will not be due to the fact that this can never be! Five for one is their style.
    1. ratuld
      ratuld 26 July 2013 12: 58
      -1
      And what is incomprehensible then ...
      Chechen Jews are no better than Turkish or Qatari or Coen.
      All of them are children of the desert. And there are their own concepts.
    2. I am a Russian
      I am a Russian 26 July 2013 23: 44
      -1
      Quote: sigizmund472
      Five for one - that's their style.


      ... well, and a knife in the back ....

      JACKALS in one word
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 27 July 2013 20: 14
        -1
        Five for one - that's their style
        Is it you how these five Russian companies can build?
        keyboard hero ((
  • Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 27 July 2013 20: 19
    0
    Quote: ed65b
    My firm belief that no one can quarrel the Orthodox with Muslims of Russia is not stronger than the two religions that have existed together for more than 1000 years, joined together by hardships and hardships. For our part, we must provide the most active help to traditional Muslims and help them fight sectarians from the faith. In the end, it’s the children of Muslims who go into the woods, blow themselves up and die at the hands of law enforcement agencies and disaster comes to their homes more often.

    I agree to all 100 .. !! Here is the only thing that Russia does not agree on (you need to write with a capital letter) Well, in the subject. If religion is put at the head of state, it is always blood ... Assad spoke correctly about the change of power in Egypt "The end of Islamic politics .." Religion should be separated from the state otherwise blood and eternal war of all against all..That's what I wanted to say..Hold the Syrians Russia is with you. !!