Military Review

US military developed a plan to strike hundreds of targets in Syria

71
US military developed a plan to strike hundreds of targets in Syria

The United States has prepared a plan for limited remote strikes against Syrian army facilities, including air defense systems and command posts. This was stated by the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, Martin Dempsey.


"Potential targets include air defense, air force, ground forces, rocket launchers, fleets, as well as auxiliary military facilities and command posts. Remote air strikes and rocket attacks could be used to hit hundreds of targets on our chosen schedule." , Says Dempsey’s letter to Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Committee on Military Affairs, quoted by online media.

According to Dempsey, the effectiveness of strikes, which will require hundreds of aircraft, ships, submarines and other means, will consist in a significant weakening of the regime and an increase in desertion.

At the same time, the commander did not rule out that the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad could withstand limited blows, the costs of which would be calculated in the billions. "Retaliation attacks are also possible," added Dempsey.

Also in his letter says that the establishment of a no-fly zone in Syria will cost the United States an average of a billion dollars a month.

"We would need hundreds of ground and sea-based aircraft, intelligence and electronic warfare, refueling and communications. The estimated costs are 500 million dollars initially, and an average of a billion dollars a month during the year," said Dempsey.

He also questioned the taking of Syrian chemical arsenals under control.

"This option involves the use of force to prevent the use or spread of chemical weapons. We do this by destroying parts of the large Syrian arsenal, preventing its movement and delivery, or capturing individual components of the program," Dempsey said.

According to the general, such an operation would at a minimum require the introduction of a no-fly zone, as well as strikes using hundreds of aircraft, ships, submarines and other means.

"Thousands of fighters from special operations forces and other ground forces will be needed to storm and retain the most important objects. The average monthly expenses can amount to well over a billion dollars. The result will be control of some, but not all, chemical weapons"- said Dempsey.

According to the commander, the inability to fully control the Syrian reserves of chemical weapons and means of delivery may allow extremists to get better access to them.

Meanwhile, we note, the US Congress has removed objections against the supply of American weapons to the Syrian opposition.

"We think that the administration can move forward (in the supply of weapons) ... It is important to note that we still have serious doubts," Chairman of the Congressional Intelligence Committee Mike Rogers told Reuters.

According to him, the administration is allowed to implement its plan only in view of the concerns of the congress.

The United States announced in June that it intended to provide military support to the Syrian opposition, but both parties in the congress opposed the fear that American weapons would fall into the hands of extremists. Previously, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee removed their objections with the condition that the administration will inform them about all changes in the situation.
Originator:
http://www.rosbalt.ru/
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Constantine
    Constantine 23 July 2013 10: 06 New
    16
    Дальше угроз, скорее всего, не уйдет. Иран тоже десятки раз планировали бомбить. Скоро "план ударов" в исполнении США может стать чем-то эквивалентным "последнему китайскому предупреждению". Заигрались ребята, ситуация то уже изменилась, равно как и мнение общественности.
    1. Kuzkin Batyan
      Kuzkin Batyan 23 July 2013 10: 34 New
      +1
      Most likely they’re just bullying. They are leading an information war. Hat. (This is not for you, accidentally answered your koment).
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 23 July 2013 11: 25 New
        +9
        Цитата: Кузькин Батяня
        Most likely they’re just bullying.

        You can expect everything from the USA. Today, Congress agreed to arm scumbags, so more and more than seriously. They do not hesitate to say anything to anyone about their plans.
        1. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 23 July 2013 11: 31 New
          10
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Цитата: Кузькин Батяня
          Most likely they’re just bullying.

          You can expect everything from the USA. Today, Congress agreed to arm scumbags, so more and more than seriously. They do not hesitate to say anything to anyone about their plans.


          To beat the little ones is their favorite pastime, so that they may well plant in Syria.
          1. Papakiko
            Papakiko 23 July 2013 12: 38 New
            +7
            Quote: Geisenberg
            To beat the little ones is their favorite pastime, so that they may well plant in Syria.

            Цитата: Кузькин Батяня
            Most likely they’re just bullying. They are leading an information war. Hat.

            "Заклятые друзья" готовы морально и не только к интервенции в Сирию.
            The restraining factor is Russia, China and Iran, well, for the time being.
            Как только Асад с генералами и чиновниками дас "маху" их пустят под молотки. Очень-очень нужны матрасу и гейропе трубопроводы через Сирию и рынок потребления товаров из "афганского колхоза".
          2. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 23 July 2013 14: 07 New
            +1
            Quote: Geisenberg
            To beat the little ones is their favorite pastime, so that they may well plant in Syria.

            Moreover, another AUG with six thousand infantrymen advanced into the Persian Gulf region.
        2. dc120mm
          dc120mm 23 July 2013 16: 57 New
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          You can expect everything from the USA.

          That's it!

          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov

          I agree with everyone.
    2. sub307
      sub307 23 July 2013 11: 15 New
      +1
      It would be nice, of course, not to go further than threats.
    3. Russ69
      Russ69 23 July 2013 12: 58 New
      0
      Quote: Constantine
      Iran also planned to bomb dozens of times

      For a long time already somewhere I read such plans. Then some cue general assessed his possible losses. I don’t remember the number of those killed, but for a thousand and not one. But what pinned, then 1 or 2 aircraft carriers and up to a dozen other ships and submarines were brought into possible losses.
    4. Manager
      Manager 23 July 2013 14: 34 New
      +1
      Quote: Constantine
      Дальше угроз, скорее всего, не уйдет. Иран тоже десятки раз планировали бомбить. Скоро "план ударов" в исполнении США может стать чем-то эквивалентным "последнему китайскому предупреждению". Заигрались ребята, ситуация то уже изменилась, равно как и мнение общественности.


      I will say so. if they don’t bomb, then the time has not come or someone America does not want this. Countries like Iran and Syria do not scare the US war machine at all. The United States will only wash more money, etc. Look deeper. There is obvious external influence on internal US polls. Is it easier to say? Who is not from America dictating to Uncle Sam what to do.
    5. xxxMYSTICxxx
      xxxMYSTICxxx 23 July 2013 21: 43 New
      0
      Quote: Constantine
      Дальше угроз, скорее всего, не уйдет. Иран тоже десятки раз планировали бомбить. Скоро "план ударов" в исполнении США может стать чем-то эквивалентным "последнему китайскому предупреждению". Заигрались ребята, ситуация то уже изменилась, равно как и мнение общественности.

      Да не похоже на серьезность данных заявлений, потому как глупо на весь мир рассказывать что да как будешь делать. Есть старый принцип: "Собрался бить-бей!", а если начался треп по поводу того что как да и зачем, по это скорее всего просто попытка создать красивую картинку при плохом раскладе, а этими разговорами и боевиков поддержать морально....
  2. fzr1000
    fzr1000 23 July 2013 10: 07 New
    +6
    The Yankees are taken. Putin told Erdogan that if at least one Turkish soldier set foot on the land of Syria, it would have serious consequences for Turkey. So far, there are no Turks, at least officially, in Syria. What can this be said to Obama?
    1. Trailer
      Trailer 23 July 2013 10: 35 New
      0
      Where is democracy bro?
    2. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 23 July 2013 12: 39 New
      +2
      I wouldn’t say anything, but simply shandarahton on Washington
      1. fzr1000
        fzr1000 23 July 2013 13: 59 New
        +7
        And I, if shandarahat, then in Arabia and Qatar. To start.
      2. Azazel
        Azazel 25 July 2013 00: 50 New
        0
        Shandarahnem. Be sure to shandarahnem. But later.
  3. S-200
    S-200 23 July 2013 10: 07 New
    +1
    Israel, Turkey, Jordan will be put under retaliation ... this is a troublesome undertaking for NATO. After all, Russia can supply Syria with weapons systems.
    1. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 23 July 2013 14: 18 New
      +7
      Quote: S-200
      After all, Russia can supply Syria with weapons systems.

      When? Even the day before yesterday it was necessary to supply not only Syria. It feels like we clicked on bread as always, and now we will scratch our turnips and lament about the treachery of the adversary and the violation of international norms of non-interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state.
      1. Azazel
        Azazel 25 July 2013 00: 53 New
        0
        And how do you know that such systems were not supplied? I haven’t been informed otherwise)
  4. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 July 2013 10: 07 New
    +3
    A dangerous trend .. Not really dare .. ?? This will be the highest degree of arrogance and cynicism.
    1. HAM
      HAM 23 July 2013 13: 36 New
      0
      Well, they won’t be impudent and cynical. They will say that the Papuans attacked the USA, and they save Syria from the corrupting influence of the Papuans.
    2. Azazel
      Azazel 25 July 2013 00: 58 New
      0
      Мне думается что эта ситуация стала бы близкой карибскому кризису. Похоже что нам тут отступать некуда. Сомневаюсь что США пойдут на это. Да и "папуасы", с нашей поддержкой, могут реально остудить "цивилизованные" гомо-головы (вьетнам-2?). Блеф. Попытка сохранить лицо.
  5. Tuzik
    Tuzik 23 July 2013 10: 08 New
    +2
    in the usa people are starving, eating on cards, and lousy-minded politicians have no money for laundering weapons
    1. JonnyT
      JonnyT 23 July 2013 11: 43 New
      +5
      a showdown in Syria is part of the US plan to get out of the crisis. Starting a world war they
      1. Conduct a large-scale reduction of those who eat on the cards.
      2. Profit from the sale of defense industry products.

      Самое интересное что из доклада сша следует вывод в случае вторжения США в Сирии хим оружие точно попадет в руки алькаиды (или цру), которая его обязательно использует. Применение ОМП это уже серьезный повод для начала полномасштабных разборок. Сирийское хим оружие может поссорить РФ с Китаем. Главное "правильно" его применить
    2. Nayhas
      Nayhas 23 July 2013 14: 03 New
      0
      Indeed, in the United States, a terrible famine provoked by the authorities, in addition to lack of food, people are specially pumped out fat so that they stretch less ...
  6. artist-mamluk
    artist-mamluk 23 July 2013 10: 09 New
    +3
    Well, aren't they stupid people there at the Pentagon. Everyone has already been pentagonized.
  7. il grand casino
    il grand casino 23 July 2013 10: 16 New
    +4
    Well, we also have a plan for hundreds of attacks on targets in the United States. It doesn't mean anything yet
  8. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 23 July 2013 10: 17 New
    17
    "Тысячи бойцов сил специальных операций и других наземных сил будут нужны для штурма и удержания важнейших объектов. Средние ежемесячные расходы могут составить значительно больше миллиарда долларов."

    No matter how much it dies, the main thing is how much it will cost. This is all of America.
  9. Fetel
    Fetel 23 July 2013 10: 17 New
    +9
    План США и Израиля по смене власти в Сирии руками наёмников, выдаваемых за "сирийский народ", провалился, раз говорят о прямом военном вмешательстве.
  10. papss
    papss 23 July 2013 10: 18 New
    0
    We would need 500 million dollars initially, and on average a billion dollars a month for a year
    и это только по плану, а на дополнительный, "ответ-но-побочные" моменты - не мешает просчитать...Видимо США не видит возможности у бандитов взять власть в Сирии...
  11. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 23 July 2013 10: 24 New
    0
    Quote: Tuzik
    in the usa people are starving, eating on cards, and lousy-minded politicians have no money for laundering weapons

    The USA is waiting for the same as the USSR! Do not go into macro politics if you have a mess in micro politics! The Soviet Union replenished for this when it improved life far from its borders, but forgot about its citizens that they lived in huts and drowned with firewood 100 km from Moscow time! And the Americans will not be able to hit Syria, they understand what this threatens. They have MB and a strike plan is ready, I'm sure we have a ready response plan!
  12. Mhpv
    Mhpv 23 July 2013 10: 34 New
    0
    Another air shock: He, the general, calculated the costs of the United States, but the Americans themselves rarely get involved in such matters without their European mongrels, and there is also no flowering economy, a bunch of ballast states flying into the abyss of bankruptcy.
    Let McDonalds shout.
  13. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 23 July 2013 10: 42 New
    +2
    , have already estimated how much the war will cost. And how then the Syrians will rebuild all this and how much it will cost them - not a word.
    1. Russ69
      Russ69 23 July 2013 13: 01 New
      +1
      Quote: FC Skif
      already made an estimate of how much the war will cost. And how then the Syrians will rebuild all this and how much it will cost them - not a word.

      Yes, no matter how ... Did they rebuild a lot in Iraq? Nothing, but oil is regularly pumped on preferential terms.
  14. pinecone
    pinecone 23 July 2013 10: 43 New
    +1
    Quote: fzr1000
    The Yankees are taken. Putin told Erdogan that if at least one Turkish soldier set foot on the land of Syria, it would have serious consequences for Turkey. So far, there are no Turks, at least officially, in Syria. What can this be said to Obama?


    Could you explain where, when and for what reason such a formidable warning was issued?
    1. fzr1000
      fzr1000 23 July 2013 12: 06 New
      0
      I could not. And should?
    2. fzr1000
      fzr1000 23 July 2013 12: 09 New
      +1
      Hold on.

      According to the Turkish newspaper Aydinlik, on October 8, 2012, a tense telephone conversation took place between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

      The publication reports that Erdogan during the conversation hung up and gives a transcript of the conversation:

      Putin: "If at least one Turkish soldier crosses the Syrian border, we will take it as an attack on Moscow."

      Erdogan: “Is this a threat? This is unacceptable to us. ”

      Putin: "Take it as you want."

      It is noted that Erdogan just after these words hung up the phone, however, some Palestinian sources claim that Putin did it.

      Recall that a day after this alleged conversation, Putin postponed his visit to Turkey, and a couple of days later an incident occurred with a passenger plane of the Moscow-Damascus flight.
      1. El13
        El13 23 July 2013 12: 38 New
        +2
        I have always considered such telephone conversations to be confidential and ongoing through closed channels, and you are a transcript ...
        1. fzr1000
          fzr1000 23 July 2013 12: 46 New
          +1
          I also think so, but that is, that is.
          1. El13
            El13 23 July 2013 13: 16 New
            +2
            I think, nevertheless, that this is a beautiful fairy tale, which supposedly describes the situation that we have today, there would be a different situation, there would be a different fairy tale, something like that :)))
      2. dmitreach
        dmitreach 23 July 2013 14: 03 New
        0
        Это как Чуркин про Катар? Тогда где опровержение? Мол я не я и "утка" не моя. В прошлый раз это была какая-то арабская газетенка...
  15. knn54
    knn54 23 July 2013 10: 55 New
    +2
    - the letter says DEMPSY to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Military Affairs Karl LEVIN.
    And what else can a Jew say to a Jew.
    P.S «Гладко было на бумаге, да забыли про овраги"! (Ирак, Афганистан...)
    Yankees, your level is Grenada.
  16. Yves762
    Yves762 23 July 2013 10: 59 New
    +1
    I think the fool is rich ....
  17. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 23 July 2013 11: 31 New
    +2
    Это зажравшееся б...о(имею ввиду истинных хозяев США)не остановится ни перед чем в осуществлении своих людоедских планов.Единственно чем можно помочь американскому и другим народам-это с помощью спецслужб выкосить всю эту мерзость.Ведь они не стесняются строить и осуществлять планы по уничтожение целых стран и народов,а мы что:"...не смеют наши командиры чужие изорвать мундиры о русские штыки!"
  18. LaGlobal
    LaGlobal 23 July 2013 11: 33 New
    +2
    That's because the provocateurs are bad! Here he is numb and numb by him. After all, God sees everything. I will not envy you in the future.
  19. s1н7т
    s1н7т 23 July 2013 11: 49 New
    +2
    "Военные США разработали план ударов по сотням целей в Сирии..."
    У янки какая-то патологическая ненависть ко всему миру? При такой запущенности есть только 2 варианта - или их кто-то однажды "вылечит", или сами, наконец, сдохнут.
  20. Galinanp
    Galinanp 23 July 2013 11: 49 New
    +1
    В отношениях с америкосами расслабление после каких либо их "миролюбивых" заявлений, действий, смерти подобно. У них ни к кому нет добрых намерений. С ними должно быть постоянное военно-дипломатическое противостояние.
  21. Stiletto
    Stiletto 23 July 2013 11: 54 New
    0
    Как заколебали эти "демократизаторы"! Вот ни дня без "войнушки" прожить не могут. Сами еще из афганского дерьма вылезти не успели, а уже новую "кучку" пожирнее для себя присматривают. А потом негодуют, что башни-близнецы рушатся, террористов ищут, чтобы войну им объявить. Сами-то и есть главные террористы для всего мира. Как говорится, нечего на зеркало пенять...
  22. erased
    erased 23 July 2013 11: 57 New
    0
    We are waiting for the development of events. If only the nuclear cloud did not come to us.
  23. wax
    wax 23 July 2013 12: 00 New
    0
    Here it is - the empire of evil
    and http://warfiles.ru/show-35240-ssha-nezakonno-vyvezli-iz-iraka-do-90000-arheologi
    cheskih-artefaktov-s-2003-goda.html
  24. smart ass
    smart ass 23 July 2013 12: 02 New
    +1
    America generally does not matter how much it will cost, the loot will be printed and that's it
  25. Muxalet
    Muxalet 23 July 2013 12: 04 New
    +3
    America is the world's largest lender, giving out money to the right and to the left, to developed and poor countries ... The dollar is just a piece of paper ... and the return of loans is taken by the natural resources of these countries. Over time, the countries grew wiser and began to trade their resources with Europe and give back US money +%, and you won’t eat a piece of paper and you won’t pour in the tank, over time you get an excess of money (what happens when the state prints more than it produces, we all remember and know very well). such a money bubble that is growing. It urgently needs to be destroyed, punctured, in one word, to destroy the excess money supply. The easiest and also very profitable is to unleash an armed conflict. Each missile launched is a million, a thousand shells, a cartridge-dollar, which does not need to be burned in a furnace, but you can order rockets, planes, bombs, etc. from the defense department for this money ... And they wanted to spit on democracy, freedom and regimes. As soon as the country begins to pay off loans with money and not with resources, a no-fly zone, the threat of chemical weapons, nuclear deterrence immediately begins. Assad became a tyrant only for this reason, like Gaddafi.
    The more U.S. technicians ditch those for their economy, how paradoxical this may sound is better. That's just the most painful question, what% of manpower can they afford to lose. The reason is that Afghanistan does not leave because there are big losses or there is not enough money, Afghanistan is not a rich country for natural resources + the Taliban have learned how to militate and not cripple the military ... more crippled appears in state cities the greater public resonance it has, and very high costs for the maintenance of disabled people, even more than for missiles and bombs ..
  26. Andrey Peter
    Andrey Peter 23 July 2013 12: 16 New
    0
    Oh, to throw weapons to Syria with our instructors to teach these world democrats and their accomplices am But I think the US Tua themselves will not climb someone up.
    1. stroporez
      stroporez 23 July 2013 13: 47 New
      +2
      почему кого нибудь????? у них есть верные , проверенные потаскушки ----европа и израиль....так шо кого "подставят" известно заранее.........
    2. creak
      creak 23 July 2013 14: 21 New
      0
      All this has already been thrown up - and weapons and advisers, and even deployed in Syria our anti-aircraft missile battalions with the calculations. Only on the ground everything turns out to be much more complicated than on maps, and even more so on the forum ... I happened to be in the Middle East as an adviser.
  27. uhu189
    uhu189 23 July 2013 12: 29 New
    10
    It seems strange to me that before the Dempsey report, no one in the US Senate had expected the cost of the operation in Syria, and for them it was a surprise. I am absolutely sure that the United States had plans of action in Syria developed at least a few years ago, or even earlier, and how much it would cost them they knew perfectly well, and this letter is nothing more than a tool for the influence of one part of the US ruling elite on another part of the elite using public opinion in the same USA. This is more of a document for internal use than for external, because such letters will not scare either Syria, the Russian Federation, or China, but you cannot inspire Syrian militants. There are obviously some kind of hidden serious internal processes taking place in the USA, which we still cannot fully appreciate, unfortunately. And accordingly, to understand why they, too, can not be ...
    1. El13
      El13 23 July 2013 12: 48 New
      +1
      I think your comment is the most correct, +
  28. Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 23 July 2013 12: 45 New
    +1
    For some reason, it seems to me that on the sidelines of the world a plan is already being developed for introducing a dose of chlorpromazine into the upper outer quadrant of the buttocks of the United States of America, covered with a layer of fat. In fact, they lifted up so much that there is nowhere else to go.
    Реально пора пацанов на место ставить и призывать к ответу "за козла"
  29. escobar
    escobar 23 July 2013 13: 03 New
    +6
    There is an undercover game .. Russia introduces a ban on the circulation of the dollar in the country, the stabilization fund spends money on the state. projects and not for the purchase of government bonds SSHA, amers threaten to bomb Syria, turn Russia out of the G-20, and boycott the Sochi Olympics. It's only the beginning!
  30. gregor6549
    gregor6549 23 July 2013 13: 10 New
    +2
    The people, the fact that the US military has developed a plan does not mean at all that they are eager to strike at Syria. On the one hand, they complied with the order of the US political leadership to prepare such a plan if it, the leadership decides on armed intervention in the Syrian events, and on the other hand, they, the military, show on the basis of this plan that such an intervention entails very serious consequences for whoever intervenes will be decided. So the plan is a double-edged sword and one of the ends can hit the United States very painfully.
  31. ratuld
    ratuld 23 July 2013 13: 29 New
    +2
    Given the problems in the United States and the reaction of Russia and China, the result is predictable.
    These are the latest versions of the S-300 in Iran and Syria. Supply of rockets and multiple launch rocket systems.
    The Syrian army is more than combat-ready and prepared for long and exhausting battles. So the plans of the Pentagon are unrealistic.
    1. Papakiko
      Papakiko 23 July 2013 14: 42 New
      +1
      Quote: ratuld
      The Syrian army is more than combat-ready and prepared for long and exhausting battles.

      Hinting at STALINGRAD, it’s what the cities in Syria are like now.
  32. asbaev
    asbaev 23 July 2013 13: 45 New
    0
    The main thing is that their navel does not untie, a hernia is serious.
  33. Far East
    Far East 23 July 2013 13: 45 New
    0
    пока амерекосы не упрутся своим не чистым рылом об Российский кулак они будут чувствовать себя"королями".И ничего мы не сделаем,нужны конкретные шаги,и политическая воля нашего президента. они ссыкуны! против адекватной силы они не попрут.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Manager
      Manager 23 July 2013 14: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: Far East
      пока амерекосы не упрутся своим не чистым рылом об Российский кулак они будут чувствовать себя"королями".И ничего мы не сделаем,нужны конкретные шаги,и политическая воля нашего президента. они ссыкуны! против адекватной силы они не попрут.


      Have you heard of a beast cornered? So this beast also has the most equipped army in the world and nuclear weapons. And also the lack of humanity and the constant thirst for blood, money and power. And you still think that this foul will scare someone's fist ?? In our world, even the gopniks of the kulaks are no longer afraid.
      1. Far East
        Far East 26 July 2013 04: 24 New
        +1
        Quote: Manager
        Have you heard of a beast cornered? So this beast also has the most equipped army in the world and nuclear weapons. As well as the lack of humanity and

        Уважаемый Манагер! я не думаю,шо это зверь. это не до человеки,и кто их загнал в угол? около них никто не разворачивает ПРО и не угрожает. то что у них армия "супер" а МУЖЕСТВО у них есть? в чем я сомневаюсь! на слабых нападать,вот их "мужество". с уважением.
  34. ksan
    ksan 23 July 2013 13: 53 New
    0
    При всей наглости и безпринципности штатов ,я думаю это шантаж,ну или способ оказать давление.Удары которые собираются нанести обычно не рекламируют.Да и общество американское не "готово" к неизбежным немаленьким потерям
  35. sergej30003
    sergej30003 23 July 2013 13: 57 New
    +1
    if the Americans get involved in this adventure, the consequences will be tragic for America itself
  36. escobar
    escobar 23 July 2013 13: 57 New
    0
    Another stone from the United States: the supply of weapons to the Syrian bandits to be.
    http://directpress.ru/v-mire/26842-kongress-ssha-razreshil-postavki-oruzhiya-v-s

    iriyu
    what will be the answer, we'll find out soon ..
  37. vadson
    vadson 23 July 2013 14: 04 New
    0
    yeah, if only it starts, then the nearby Yankees bases in the region will be fully raked and not only from Syria but also from Iran. And this immediately oil like Gagarin on p7 will go into space. They somehow did not say about this in the report. Euro 3.14 Do you need this? This is a deep opa for them
  38. Rodriques
    Rodriques 23 July 2013 14: 07 New
    0
    I'll post it here. A small photo report. I apologize for the quality. The exercises have just ended, the legendary patrol ship has spotted an unknown speed boat approaching the presidential yacht. Alerts raised aircraft and maritime border guards. The Ka-27 evacuated from the deck of the first-person yacht, the Mi-8 pair discovered and destroyed boats with terrorists. No one was injured, with the exception of the paratrooper hurtfully hitting the deck. Something like this ))
  39. Rodriques
    Rodriques 23 July 2013 14: 09 New
    0
    Presidential Yacht.
  40. Rodriques
    Rodriques 23 July 2013 14: 10 New
    0
    Landing.
  41. escobar
    escobar 23 July 2013 14: 11 New
    +1
    They bite Assad like a wounded wolf. Turks, Egypt, Jordan, their swamps, the Wahhabi army, not to mention the Arabian sponsors, the old Europe and the United States. If Syria is even suppressed, a new long war between the new government and the Wahhabis is inevitable. If there is no such confrontation, it means that the United States really completely subjugated yourself alkaida
  42. Rodriques
    Rodriques 23 July 2013 14: 11 New
    0
    The first is saved))
  43. 128mgb
    128mgb 23 July 2013 14: 15 New
    +1
    According to him, the administration is allowed to implement its plan only in view of the concerns of the congress.
    That is, they used to give weapons with a sense of deep satisfaction, and now with a sense of deep concern. Although what they there overseas worry, but their ally ..
  44. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 23 July 2013 14: 15 New
    +2
    Не даёт им покоя не поддавшаяся "повстанцам" Сирия!
    Scum, if they finish Syria, they will take up Iran and that's it,
    almost the entire region in their striped paws.
    You can’t abandon Syria in any case. I hope Moscow understands this.
  45. Rodriques
    Rodriques 23 July 2013 14: 18 New
    +2
    But whoever gives them a strike will fall off. Otherwise, a world war, let them make a choice.
  46. Nayhas
    Nayhas 23 July 2013 14: 25 New
    0
    Oh, how many indignations and curses! The most interesting thing is that everyone perceives the situation in Syria as a war of noble Assad with terrorists with the full support of the Syrian people. Either people do not read the news, or fury noble reason obscures ... Now in Syria there is a war of all against all. SSA is fighting with Assad, Hezbalah, the IRGC, Iraqi militants and jihadists. Jihadists are fighting with the same but also with the Kurds. Kurds are trying to distance themselves absolutely from everyone and build their own state. In addition to all this fraternity, smuggling groups living on the border with Lebanon are trying to get their own benefit, either by teaming up with the SSA, then with Assad. In Syria, probably now there is not a single peaceful place, even in Damascus. Probably the unfortunate Daraya has been released for the thirtieth time. That is why the United States did not want to supply weapons, because it is not clear to whom it will fall. The trouble is that neither side has a significant advantage either in armaments or in support of the population. The US hopes to weaken Assad and give a chance to the SSA, but it is doubtful whether they will succeed. No alliance is foreseen, for jihadists with the SSA have completely fallen asleep; with Assad, their alliance is generally impossible. Is it possible to combine pro-Assad forces with the SSA? It is completely impossible to deny, a chance is possible if Assad will fall down and Hezbollah and Iraqi Shiites will return home ...
    1. Rodriques
      Rodriques 23 July 2013 14: 37 New
      +2
      What are you saying)) and thousands of mercenaries from different states just crawled out of the basements .. yes yes.
    2. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 23 July 2013 14: 43 New
      +2
      Quote: Nayhas
      Oh, how many indignations and curses! The most interesting thing is that everyone perceives the situation in Syria as a war of noble Assad with terrorists with the full support of the Syrian people

      Еухений вы хоть и с Российским флажком, но говорите точ в точ, как ваши соплеменники пупырчатый, фараон,бек, румата, профессор и т.д. Про то, кто эту херню в Сирии организовал и для чего и продолжает финансировать все знают, Асад не свалит, а то что амеры боятся , что оружие куда то там попадёт "лепет на лужайке" они его и так всем террористическим организациям мира поставляют.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 23 July 2013 16: 16 New
        -1
        У меня есть мнение, если вы со мной не согласны, то я не против, ваше обвинение попахивает "не снами, значит против нас"... Вы придерживаетесь мнения, что причиной волнений в Сирии стали вражьи козни. Однако забываете, что сунниты не раз высказывали возмущение беспределом алавитской верхушки, за что карались кровопусканием. Сунниты в очередной раз попытались достучаться до правящей верхушки (которую никто не выбирал), но в очередной раз получили по зубам, однако этим воспользовались чужие дяди и на этот раз Асаду уже младшему пришлось отвечать за кровь убитых. Так и кто же ему в этом виноват? Кто довел до этого страну?
  47. krakozyabr777
    krakozyabr777 23 July 2013 14: 45 New
    +3
    The world will be saved only by the total nuclear bombing of the United States.
  48. ars_pro
    ars_pro 23 July 2013 15: 23 New
    +1
    In all this mess I like the Jordan, which allows us to be based, he is also our friend, so to speak, to take care of our authorities a couple of measures taken in the form of a salute in honor of American supplies,
  49. Magadan
    Magadan 23 July 2013 15: 39 New
    +1
    Oh guys, I'm afraid they won’t leave the Yankees Syria alone. At stake is their prestige as the chief policeman. This prestige will not be there, their dollar will collapse. And there will be no prestige when Assad wins.
  50. yur20100
    yur20100 23 July 2013 17: 21 New
    0
    as will be the plum, if Russia, China, Iran do not intercede