US military developed a plan to strike hundreds of targets in Syria

71
US military developed a plan to strike hundreds of targets in Syria

The United States has prepared a plan for limited remote strikes against Syrian army facilities, including air defense systems and command posts. This was stated by the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, Martin Dempsey.

"Potential targets include air defense, air force, ground forces, rocket launchers, fleets, as well as auxiliary military facilities and command posts. Remote air strikes and rocket attacks could be used to hit hundreds of targets on our chosen schedule." , Says Dempsey’s letter to Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Committee on Military Affairs, quoted by online media.

According to Dempsey, the effectiveness of strikes, which will require hundreds of aircraft, ships, submarines and other means, will consist in a significant weakening of the regime and an increase in desertion.

At the same time, the commander did not rule out that the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad could withstand limited blows, the costs of which would be calculated in the billions. "Retaliation attacks are also possible," added Dempsey.

Also in his letter says that the establishment of a no-fly zone in Syria will cost the United States an average of a billion dollars a month.

"We would need hundreds of ground and sea-based aircraft, intelligence and electronic warfare, refueling and communications. The estimated costs are 500 million dollars initially, and an average of a billion dollars a month during the year," said Dempsey.

He also questioned the taking of Syrian chemical arsenals under control.

"This option involves the use of force to prevent the use or spread of chemical weapons. We do this by destroying parts of the large Syrian arsenal, preventing its movement and delivery, or capturing individual components of the program," Dempsey said.

According to the general, such an operation would at a minimum require the introduction of a no-fly zone, as well as strikes using hundreds of aircraft, ships, submarines and other means.

"Thousands of fighters from special operations forces and other ground forces will be needed to storm and retain the most important objects. The average monthly expenses can amount to well over a billion dollars. The result will be control of some, but not all, chemical weapons"- said Dempsey.

According to the commander, the inability to fully control the Syrian reserves of chemical weapons and means of delivery may allow extremists to get better access to them.

Meanwhile, we note, the US Congress has removed objections against the supply of American weapons to the Syrian opposition.

"We think that the administration can move forward (in the supply of weapons) ... It is important to note that we still have serious doubts," Chairman of the Congressional Intelligence Committee Mike Rogers told Reuters.

According to him, the administration is allowed to implement its plan only in view of the concerns of the congress.

The United States announced in June that it intended to provide military support to the Syrian opposition, but both parties in the congress opposed the fear that American weapons would fall into the hands of extremists. Previously, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee removed their objections with the condition that the administration will inform them about all changes in the situation.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Constantine
    +16
    23 July 2013 10: 06
    The threats, most likely, will not go further. Iran was also planned to be bombed dozens of times. Soon, the US's "strike plan" may become something equivalent to the "last Chinese warning." The guys started playing, the situation has already changed, as well as the public opinion.
    1. Kuzkin Batyan
      +1
      23 July 2013 10: 34
      Most likely they’re just bullying. They are leading an information war. Hat. (This is not for you, accidentally answered your koment).
      1. +9
        23 July 2013 11: 25
        Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
        Most likely they’re just bullying.

        You can expect everything from the USA. Today, Congress agreed to arm scumbags, so more and more than seriously. They do not hesitate to say anything to anyone about their plans.
        1. +10
          23 July 2013 11: 31
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
          Most likely they’re just bullying.

          You can expect everything from the USA. Today, Congress agreed to arm scumbags, so more and more than seriously. They do not hesitate to say anything to anyone about their plans.


          To beat the little ones is their favorite pastime, so that they may well plant in Syria.
          1. +7
            23 July 2013 12: 38
            Quote: Geisenberg
            To beat the little ones is their favorite pastime, so that they may well plant in Syria.

            Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
            Most likely they’re just bullying. They are leading an information war. Hat.

            The "sworn friends" are morally ready and not only for the intervention in Syria.
            The restraining factor is Russia, China and Iran, well, for the time being.
            As soon as Assad with the generals and officials das "mahu" they are put under the hammers. The mattress and Geyrope need very, very much pipelines through Syria and the market for the consumption of goods from the "Afghan collective farm".
          2. +1
            23 July 2013 14: 07
            Quote: Geisenberg
            To beat the little ones is their favorite pastime, so that they may well plant in Syria.

            Moreover, another AUG with six thousand infantrymen advanced into the Persian Gulf region.
        2. dc120mm
          0
          23 July 2013 16: 57
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          You can expect everything from the USA.

          That's it!

          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov

          I agree with everyone.
    2. +1
      23 July 2013 11: 15
      It would be nice, of course, not to go further than threats.
    3. 0
      23 July 2013 12: 58
      Quote: Constantine
      Iran also planned to bomb dozens of times

      For a long time already somewhere I read such plans. Then some cue general assessed his possible losses. I don’t remember the number of those killed, but for a thousand and not one. But what pinned, then 1 or 2 aircraft carriers and up to a dozen other ships and submarines were brought into possible losses.
    4. +1
      23 July 2013 14: 34
      Quote: Constantine
      The threats, most likely, will not go further. Iran was also planned to be bombed dozens of times. Soon, the US's "strike plan" may become something equivalent to the "last Chinese warning." The guys started playing, the situation has already changed, as well as the public opinion.


      I will say so. if they don’t bomb, then the time has not come or someone America does not want this. Countries like Iran and Syria do not scare the US war machine at all. The United States will only wash more money, etc. Look deeper. There is obvious external influence on internal US polls. Is it easier to say? Who is not from America dictating to Uncle Sam what to do.
    5. 0
      23 July 2013 21: 43
      Quote: Constantine
      The threats, most likely, will not go further. Iran was also planned to be bombed dozens of times. Soon, the US's "strike plan" may become something equivalent to the "last Chinese warning." The guys started playing, the situation has already changed, as well as the public opinion.

      Yes, it does not seem like the seriousness of these statements, because it is stupid to tell the whole world what and how you will do. There is an old principle: "I was going to beat and beat!", And if you started chatting about what, how and why, then this is most likely just an attempt to create a beautiful picture in a bad scenario, and with these conversations to support the militants morally ...
  2. +6
    23 July 2013 10: 07
    The Yankees are taken. Putin told Erdogan that if at least one Turkish soldier set foot on the land of Syria, it would have serious consequences for Turkey. So far, there are no Turks, at least officially, in Syria. What can this be said to Obama?
    1. 0
      23 July 2013 10: 35
      Where is democracy bro?
    2. Bashkaus
      +2
      23 July 2013 12: 39
      I wouldn’t say anything, but simply shandarahton on Washington
      1. +7
        23 July 2013 13: 59
        And I, if shandarahat, then in Arabia and Qatar. To start.
      2. Azazel
        0
        25 July 2013 00: 50
        Shandarahnem. Be sure to shandarahnem. But later.
  3. series
    +1
    23 July 2013 10: 07
    Israel, Turkey, Jordan will be put under retaliation ... this is a troublesome undertaking for NATO. After all, Russia can supply Syria with weapons systems.
    1. +7
      23 July 2013 14: 18
      Quote: S-200
      After all, Russia can supply Syria with weapons systems.

      When? Even the day before yesterday it was necessary to supply not only Syria. It feels like we clicked on bread as always, and now we will scratch our turnips and lament about the treachery of the adversary and the violation of international norms of non-interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state.
      1. Azazel
        0
        25 July 2013 00: 53
        And how do you know that such systems were not supplied? I haven’t been informed otherwise)
  4. +3
    23 July 2013 10: 07
    A dangerous trend .. Not really dare .. ?? This will be the highest degree of arrogance and cynicism.
    1. HAM
      0
      23 July 2013 13: 36
      Well, they won’t be impudent and cynical. They will say that the Papuans attacked the USA, and they save Syria from the corrupting influence of the Papuans.
    2. Azazel
      0
      25 July 2013 00: 58
      I think this situation would be close to the Caribbean crisis. It seems that we have nowhere to retreat. I doubt that the US will agree to this. And the "Papuans", with our support, can really cool the "civilized" homo-heads (Vietnam-2?). Bluff. An attempt to save face.
  5. +2
    23 July 2013 10: 08
    in the usa people are starving, eating on cards, and lousy-minded politicians have no money for laundering weapons
    1. +5
      23 July 2013 11: 43
      a showdown in Syria is part of the US plan to get out of the crisis. Starting a world war they
      1. Conduct a large-scale reduction of those who eat on the cards.
      2. Profit from the sale of defense industry products.

      The most interesting thing is that from the US report, the conclusion follows in the event of a US invasion of Syria, chemical weapons will definitely fall into the hands of the alkaida (or CIA), which will definitely use it. The use of weapons of mass destruction is already a serious reason for starting a full-scale showdown. Syrian chemical weapons can embroil the Russian Federation with China. The main thing is to use it "correctly"
    2. 0
      23 July 2013 14: 03
      Indeed, in the United States, a terrible famine provoked by the authorities, in addition to lack of food, people are specially pumped out fat so that they stretch less ...
  6. +3
    23 July 2013 10: 09
    Well, aren't they stupid people there at the Pentagon. Everyone has already been pentagonized.
  7. +4
    23 July 2013 10: 16
    Well, we also have a plan for hundreds of attacks on targets in the United States. It doesn't mean anything yet
  8. +17
    23 July 2013 10: 17
    "Thousands of Special Operations and other ground forces will be needed to assault and hold critical targets. Average monthly costs could be well over a billion dollars."

    No matter how much it dies, the main thing is how much it will cost. This is all of America.
  9. Fetel
    +9
    23 July 2013 10: 17
    The plan of the United States and Israel to change power in Syria by the hands of mercenaries posing as the "Syrian people" has failed, since there is talk of direct military intervention.
  10. 0
    23 July 2013 10: 18
    We would need 500 million dollars initially, and on average a billion dollars a month for a year
    and this is only according to the plan, but for additional, "answer-but-collateral" moments - it does not interfere with calculating ... Apparently the United States does not see the possibility of the bandits taking power in Syria ...
  11. 0
    23 July 2013 10: 24
    Quote: Tuzik
    in the usa people are starving, eating on cards, and lousy-minded politicians have no money for laundering weapons

    The USA is waiting for the same as the USSR! Do not go into macro politics if you have a mess in micro politics! The Soviet Union replenished for this when it improved life far from its borders, but forgot about its citizens that they lived in huts and drowned with firewood 100 km from Moscow time! And the Americans will not be able to hit Syria, they understand what this threatens. They have MB and a strike plan is ready, I'm sure we have a ready response plan!
  12. 0
    23 July 2013 10: 34
    Another air shock: He, the general, calculated the costs of the United States, but the Americans themselves rarely get involved in such matters without their European mongrels, and there is also no flowering economy, a bunch of ballast states flying into the abyss of bankruptcy.
    Let McDonalds shout.
  13. +2
    23 July 2013 10: 42
    , have already estimated how much the war will cost. And how then the Syrians will rebuild all this and how much it will cost them - not a word.
    1. +1
      23 July 2013 13: 01
      Quote: FC Skif
      already made an estimate of how much the war will cost. And how then the Syrians will rebuild all this and how much it will cost them - not a word.

      Yes, no matter how ... Did they rebuild a lot in Iraq? Nothing, but oil is regularly pumped on preferential terms.
  14. pinecone
    +1
    23 July 2013 10: 43
    Quote: fzr1000
    The Yankees are taken. Putin told Erdogan that if at least one Turkish soldier set foot on the land of Syria, it would have serious consequences for Turkey. So far, there are no Turks, at least officially, in Syria. What can this be said to Obama?


    Could you explain where, when and for what reason such a formidable warning was issued?
    1. 0
      23 July 2013 12: 06
      I could not. And should?
    2. +1
      23 July 2013 12: 09
      Hold on.

      According to the Turkish newspaper Aydinlik, on October 8, 2012, a tense telephone conversation took place between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

      The publication reports that Erdogan during the conversation hung up and gives a transcript of the conversation:

      Putin: "If at least one Turkish soldier crosses the Syrian border, we will take it as an attack on Moscow."

      Erdogan: “Is this a threat? This is unacceptable to us. ”

      Putin: "Take it as you want."

      It is noted that Erdogan just after these words hung up the phone, however, some Palestinian sources claim that Putin did it.

      Recall that a day after this alleged conversation, Putin postponed his visit to Turkey, and a couple of days later an incident occurred with a passenger plane of the Moscow-Damascus flight.
      1. +2
        23 July 2013 12: 38
        I have always considered such telephone conversations to be confidential and ongoing through closed channels, and you are a transcript ...
        1. +1
          23 July 2013 12: 46
          I also think so, but that is, that is.
          1. +2
            23 July 2013 13: 16
            I think, nevertheless, that this is a beautiful fairy tale, which supposedly describes the situation that we have today, there would be a different situation, there would be a different fairy tale, something like that :)))
      2. 0
        23 July 2013 14: 03
        Is it like Churkin about Qatar? Then where is the refutation? They say I'm not me and the "duck" is not mine. Last time it was some kind of Arab rag ...
  15. +2
    23 July 2013 10: 55
    - the letter says DEMPSY to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Military Affairs Karl LEVIN.
    And what else can a Jew say to a Jew.
    PS “It was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines!” (Iraq, Afghanistan ...)
    Yankees, your level is Grenada.
  16. +1
    23 July 2013 10: 59
    I think the fool is rich ....
  17. +2
    23 July 2013 11: 31
    This giggled b ... oh (I mean the true masters of the United States) will stop at nothing in implementing their cannibalistic plans. The only way to help the American and other peoples is to mow down all this abomination with the help of the special services. After all, they do not hesitate to build and implement plans for the destruction of entire countries and peoples, but we that: "... our commanders of strangers dare not tear off their uniforms against Russian bayonets!"
  18. +2
    23 July 2013 11: 33
    That's because the provocateurs are bad! Here he is numb and numb by him. After all, God sees everything. I will not envy you in the future.
  19. s1н7т
    +2
    23 July 2013 11: 49
    "The US military has developed a plan to strike hundreds of targets in Syria ..."
    Does the Yankee have any pathological hatred for the whole world? With such neglect, there are only 2 options - either someone will "cure" them one day, or they themselves will finally die.
  20. +1
    23 July 2013 11: 49
    In relations with Americans, relaxation after any of their "peaceful" statements, actions, is like death. They have no good intentions for anyone. There should be constant military-diplomatic confrontation with them.
  21. 0
    23 July 2013 11: 54
    How these "democratizers" hesitated! They cannot live a day without "war". They themselves did not have time to crawl out of the Afghan shit, but they are already looking after a new "handful" fatter for themselves. And then they are indignant that the twin towers are crumbling, they are looking for terrorists to declare war on them. Themselves are the main terrorists for the whole world. As they say, there is nothing to blame on the mirror ...
  22. 0
    23 July 2013 11: 57
    We are waiting for the development of events. If only the nuclear cloud did not come to us.
  23. wax
    0
    23 July 2013 12: 00
    Here it is - the empire of evil
    and http://warfiles.ru/show-35240-ssha-nezakonno-vyvezli-iz-iraka-do-90000-arheologi
    cheskih-artefaktov-s-2003-goda.html
  24. +1
    23 July 2013 12: 02
    America generally does not matter how much it will cost, the loot will be printed and that's it
  25. +3
    23 July 2013 12: 04
    America is the world's largest lender, giving out money to the right and to the left, to developed and poor countries ... The dollar is just a piece of paper ... and the return of loans is taken by the natural resources of these countries. Over time, the countries grew wiser and began to trade their resources with Europe and give back US money +%, and you won’t eat a piece of paper and you won’t pour in the tank, over time you get an excess of money (what happens when the state prints more than it produces, we all remember and know very well). such a money bubble that is growing. It urgently needs to be destroyed, punctured, in one word, to destroy the excess money supply. The easiest and also very profitable is to unleash an armed conflict. Each missile launched is a million, a thousand shells, a cartridge-dollar, which does not need to be burned in a furnace, but you can order rockets, planes, bombs, etc. from the defense department for this money ... And they wanted to spit on democracy, freedom and regimes. As soon as the country begins to pay off loans with money and not with resources, a no-fly zone, the threat of chemical weapons, nuclear deterrence immediately begins. Assad became a tyrant only for this reason, like Gaddafi.
    The more U.S. technicians ditch those for their economy, how paradoxical this may sound is better. That's just the most painful question, what% of manpower can they afford to lose. The reason is that Afghanistan does not leave because there are big losses or there is not enough money, Afghanistan is not a rich country for natural resources + the Taliban have learned how to militate and not cripple the military ... more crippled appears in state cities the greater public resonance it has, and very high costs for the maintenance of disabled people, even more than for missiles and bombs ..
  26. 0
    23 July 2013 12: 16
    Oh, to throw weapons to Syria with our instructors to teach these world democrats and their accomplices am But I think the US Tua themselves will not climb someone up.
    1. stroporez
      +2
      23 July 2013 13: 47
      why anyone ????? they have faithful, proven sluts ---- Europe and Israel .... so who will be "set up" is known in advance .........
    2. 0
      23 July 2013 14: 21
      All this has already been thrown up - and weapons and advisers, and even deployed in Syria our anti-aircraft missile battalions with the calculations. Only on the ground everything turns out to be much more complicated than on maps, and even more so on the forum ... I happened to be in the Middle East as an adviser.
  27. +10
    23 July 2013 12: 29
    It seems strange to me that before the Dempsey report, no one in the US Senate had expected the cost of the operation in Syria, and for them it was a surprise. I am absolutely sure that the United States had plans of action in Syria developed at least a few years ago, or even earlier, and how much it would cost them they knew perfectly well, and this letter is nothing more than a tool for the influence of one part of the US ruling elite on another part of the elite using public opinion in the same USA. This is more of a document for internal use than for external, because such letters will not scare either Syria, the Russian Federation, or China, but you cannot inspire Syrian militants. There are obviously some kind of hidden serious internal processes taking place in the USA, which we still cannot fully appreciate, unfortunately. And accordingly, to understand why they, too, can not be ...
    1. +1
      23 July 2013 12: 48
      I think your comment is the most correct, +
  28. Bashkaus
    +1
    23 July 2013 12: 45
    For some reason, it seems to me that on the sidelines of the world a plan is already being developed for introducing a dose of chlorpromazine into the upper outer quadrant of the buttocks of the United States of America, covered with a layer of fat. In fact, they lifted up so much that there is nowhere else to go.
    Really it's time to put the boys in place and call to account "for the goat"
  29. escobar
    +6
    23 July 2013 13: 03
    There is an undercover game .. Russia introduces a ban on the circulation of the dollar in the country, the stabilization fund spends money on the state. projects and not for the purchase of government bonds SSHA, amers threaten to bomb Syria, turn Russia out of the G-20, and boycott the Sochi Olympics. It's only the beginning!
  30. +2
    23 July 2013 13: 10
    The people, the fact that the US military has developed a plan does not mean at all that they are eager to strike at Syria. On the one hand, they complied with the order of the US political leadership to prepare such a plan if it, the leadership decides on armed intervention in the Syrian events, and on the other hand, they, the military, show on the basis of this plan that such an intervention entails very serious consequences for whoever intervenes will be decided. So the plan is a double-edged sword and one of the ends can hit the United States very painfully.
  31. ratuld
    +2
    23 July 2013 13: 29
    Given the problems in the United States and the reaction of Russia and China, the result is predictable.
    These are the latest versions of the S-300 in Iran and Syria. Supply of rockets and multiple launch rocket systems.
    The Syrian army is more than combat-ready and prepared for long and exhausting battles. So the plans of the Pentagon are unrealistic.
    1. +1
      23 July 2013 14: 42
      Quote: ratuld
      The Syrian army is more than combat-ready and prepared for long and exhausting battles.

      Hinting at STALINGRAD, it’s what the cities in Syria are like now.
  32. 0
    23 July 2013 13: 45
    The main thing is that their navel does not untie, a hernia is serious.
  33. 0
    23 July 2013 13: 45
    until the Americans rest their not clean snout against the Russian fist, they will feel like "kings." And we will not do anything, concrete steps are needed, and the political will of our president. they are pissing! they will not trample against adequate force.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      23 July 2013 14: 38
      Quote: Far East
      until the Americans rest their not clean snout against the Russian fist, they will feel like "kings." And we will not do anything, concrete steps are needed, and the political will of our president. they are pissing! they will not trample against adequate force.


      Have you heard of a beast cornered? So this beast also has the most equipped army in the world and nuclear weapons. And also the lack of humanity and the constant thirst for blood, money and power. And you still think that this foul will scare someone's fist ?? In our world, even the gopniks of the kulaks are no longer afraid.
      1. +1
        26 July 2013 04: 24
        Quote: Manager
        Have you heard of a beast cornered? So this beast also has the most equipped army in the world and nuclear weapons. As well as the lack of humanity and

        Dear Manager! I don't think sho is a beast. it's not up to humans, and who drove them into a corner? around them no one is deploying missile defense or threatening. then that they have an army of "super" and they have COURAGE? what I doubt! to attack the weak, this is their "courage". with respect.
  34. 0
    23 July 2013 13: 53
    For all the impudence and lack of principle of the states, I think this is blackmail, or a way to exert pressure. The blows that are going to be inflicted are usually not advertised. And American society is not "ready" for the inevitable rather big losses
  35. +1
    23 July 2013 13: 57
    if the Americans get involved in this adventure, the consequences will be tragic for America itself
  36. escobar
    0
    23 July 2013 13: 57
    Another stone from the United States: the supply of weapons to the Syrian bandits to be.
    http://directpress.ru/v-mire/26842-kongress-ssha-razreshil-postavki-oruzhiya-v-s

    iriyu
    what will be the answer, we'll find out soon ..
  37. 0
    23 July 2013 14: 04
    yeah, if only it starts, then the nearby Yankees bases in the region will be fully raked and not only from Syria but also from Iran. And this immediately oil like Gagarin on p7 will go into space. They somehow did not say about this in the report. Euro 3.14 Do you need this? This is a deep opa for them
  38. 0
    23 July 2013 14: 07
    I'll post it here. A small photo report. I apologize for the quality. The exercises have just ended, the legendary patrol ship has spotted an unknown speed boat approaching the presidential yacht. Alerts raised aircraft and maritime border guards. The Ka-27 evacuated from the deck of the first-person yacht, the Mi-8 pair discovered and destroyed boats with terrorists. No one was injured, with the exception of the paratrooper hurtfully hitting the deck. Something like this ))
  39. 0
    23 July 2013 14: 09
    Presidential Yacht.
  40. 0
    23 July 2013 14: 10
    Landing.
  41. escobar
    +1
    23 July 2013 14: 11
    They bite Assad like a wounded wolf. Turks, Egypt, Jordan, their swamps, the Wahhabi army, not to mention the Arabian sponsors, the old Europe and the United States. If Syria is even suppressed, a new long war between the new government and the Wahhabis is inevitable. If there is no such confrontation, it means that the United States really completely subjugated yourself alkaida
  42. 0
    23 July 2013 14: 11
    The first is saved))
  43. 128mgb
    +1
    23 July 2013 14: 15
    According to him, the administration is allowed to implement its plan only in view of the concerns of the congress.
    That is, they used to give weapons with a sense of deep satisfaction, and now with a sense of deep concern. Although what they there overseas worry, but their ally ..
  44. +2
    23 July 2013 14: 15
    Syria, which has not yielded to the "rebels", haunts them!
    Scum, if they finish Syria, they will take up Iran and that's it,
    almost the entire region in their striped paws.
    You can’t abandon Syria in any case. I hope Moscow understands this.
  45. +2
    23 July 2013 14: 18
    But whoever gives them a strike will fall off. Otherwise, a world war, let them make a choice.
  46. 0
    23 July 2013 14: 25
    Oh, how many indignations and curses! The most interesting thing is that everyone perceives the situation in Syria as a war of noble Assad with terrorists with the full support of the Syrian people. Either people do not read the news, or fury noble reason obscures ... Now in Syria there is a war of all against all. SSA is fighting with Assad, Hezbalah, the IRGC, Iraqi militants and jihadists. Jihadists are fighting with the same but also with the Kurds. Kurds are trying to distance themselves absolutely from everyone and build their own state. In addition to all this fraternity, smuggling groups living on the border with Lebanon are trying to get their own benefit, either by teaming up with the SSA, then with Assad. In Syria, probably now there is not a single peaceful place, even in Damascus. Probably the unfortunate Daraya has been released for the thirtieth time. That is why the United States did not want to supply weapons, because it is not clear to whom it will fall. The trouble is that neither side has a significant advantage either in armaments or in support of the population. The US hopes to weaken Assad and give a chance to the SSA, but it is doubtful whether they will succeed. No alliance is foreseen, for jihadists with the SSA have completely fallen asleep; with Assad, their alliance is generally impossible. Is it possible to combine pro-Assad forces with the SSA? It is completely impossible to deny, a chance is possible if Assad will fall down and Hezbollah and Iraqi Shiites will return home ...
    1. +2
      23 July 2013 14: 37
      What are you saying)) and thousands of mercenaries from different states just crawled out of the basements .. yes yes.
    2. +2
      23 July 2013 14: 43
      Quote: Nayhas
      Oh, how many indignations and curses! The most interesting thing is that everyone perceives the situation in Syria as a war of noble Assad with terrorists with the full support of the Syrian people

      Eukheny, though you have a Russian flag, but speak exactly like your pimply fellow tribesmen, Pharaoh, Bek, Rumata, professor, etc. About who organized this garbage in Syria and for what and continues to finance everyone knows, Assad will not knock down, but the fact that the amers are afraid that the weapon will end up somewhere "babble on the lawn" they already supply it to all terrorist organizations of the world.
      1. -1
        23 July 2013 16: 16
        I have an opinion, if you disagree with me, then I do not mind, your accusation smacks of "not dreams, then against us" ... You are of the opinion that the cause of the unrest in Syria was the intrigues of the enemy. However, you forget that the Sunnis have repeatedly expressed their outrage at the lawlessness of the Alawite elite, for which they were punished with bloodletting. The Sunnis once again tried to reach out to the ruling elite (which no one chose), but once again got in the teeth, but other people's uncles took advantage of this, and this time Assad, the youngest, had to answer for the blood of those killed. So who is to blame for this? Who brought the country to this?
  47. +3
    23 July 2013 14: 45
    The world will be saved only by the total nuclear bombing of the United States.
  48. +1
    23 July 2013 15: 23
    In all this mess I like the Jordan, which allows us to be based, he is also our friend, so to speak, to take care of our authorities a couple of measures taken in the form of a salute in honor of American supplies,
  49. +1
    23 July 2013 15: 39
    Oh guys, I'm afraid they won’t leave the Yankees Syria alone. At stake is their prestige as the chief policeman. This prestige will not be there, their dollar will collapse. And there will be no prestige when Assad wins.
  50. yur20100
    0
    23 July 2013 17: 21
    as will be the plum, if Russia, China, Iran do not intercede
  51. 0
    23 July 2013 18: 55
    In this situation, Assad is unlikely to use chemical weapons. He will not go against the people. But it’s easy for “Yakhontami” to work on oil rigs off the Israeli coast, and “Zhel.K(aput)upol” will not help here, not its hierarchy. So we are waiting for another “someone’s raid” for our safety net. This, in my opinion, will be confirmation of a full-scale invasion.
  52. 0
    23 July 2013 21: 04
    http://postskriptum.me/2013/07/23/tunnels/2/
    Curious article.
  53. 0
    24 July 2013 22: 20
    They developed these plans on their own. The consequences of their plan will be incompatible with their lives...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"