Military Review

Inter-fleet detachment of warships of the Russian Navy formed in the Atlantic Ocean

49
Inter-fleet detachment of warships of the Russian Navy formed in the Atlantic Ocean

Today, in the Atlantic Ocean, an inter-naval warship squad (OBK) has been formed to carry out tasks in the region, which includes the flagship of the Black Sea fleet (Black Sea Fleet) guards missile cruiser "Moscow", a large anti-submarine ship "Vice Admiral Kulakov" of the Northern Fleet (SF) and a large sea tanker "Ivan Bubnov" Black Sea Fleet. Later, the tugboat “Eugene Khorov” of the Baltic Fleet will join the squad.


Ships and vessels in the first days of joint navigation will work out the elements of maneuvering as part of a warrant, conduct a series of exercises and training sessions on the move, including through communications, organizing air defense of a detachment of ships and repelling an asymmetric threat.
Author:
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. domokl
    domokl 18 July 2013 09: 50
    10
    Something seems to me that their path lies in the Mediterranean ... Work out laughing
    1. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 18 July 2013 09: 58
      +4
      They are there so that the path of American ships does not lie in the middle ground ...
      1. Quiet
        Quiet 19 July 2013 00: 02
        -3
        They are there so that the path of American ships does not lie in the middle ground ...

        And where amer twitch ?? Place is occupied by the Russian Federation bully !!!!
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 18 July 2013 10: 34
      +7
      Quote: domokl
      Something seems to me that their path lies in Middle-earth.

      Recently, Moscow has practically never left Middle-earth, and soon there will be a home port.
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 18 July 2013 12: 52
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        soon there will be a home port.


        It doesn’t fit in Tartus, but there is no other, they refused because it is expensive and America doesn’t like it, remember how they welcomed the closure of the base in Cuba?
    3. Trailer
      Trailer 18 July 2013 10: 41
      +2
      Quote: domokl
      Something seems to me that their path lies in the Mediterranean


      Actually, to Cuba and to South America.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. hommer
        hommer 18 July 2013 14: 19
        +1
        Quote: Karavan
        Actually, to Cuba and to South America.


        Snowden will be taken.
    4. experienced
      experienced 18 July 2013 10: 47
      11
      Unfortunately, the same ships ... Now Russia does not have enough and are driving the same Kulakov to wear across all the seas of the oceans, so soon he will work out a resource, What shall we do?
      1. little man
        little man 18 July 2013 11: 33
        11
        But Bubnov in general as a perpetual motion machine. Like twenty-five years ago, he served the 5th flotilla and now the hard worker continues to plow.
      2. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 18 July 2013 13: 21
        +5
        Quote: seasoned
        Unfortunately, the same ships ... Now Russia does not have enough and are driving the same Kulakov to wear across all the seas of the oceans, so soon he will work out a resource, What shall we do?

        Better to rot at the pier? So at least the guys will get real experience, and the sensations of going out into the ocean cannot be conveyed.
    5. ben gun
      ben gun 18 July 2013 13: 59
      0
      If memory serves, Moscow should go to Cuba, no? in the left of a sick squad.
      Right here is the comment for the news from June 24 - http://www.odnako.org/blogs/show_26432/
    6. Retx
      Retx 18 July 2013 20: 30
      +5
      Quote: domokl
      Work out

      leave it here wink
      Atlantic, July 2013.
      1. dmitrich
        dmitrich 19 July 2013 17: 31
        0
        bang and no George W. Bush, I mean the aircraft carrier.
  2. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 18 July 2013 10: 02
    +6
    Increasingly, there are reports that here and there it is appearing in the pitiful Ocean MILITARY ships of the Russian Navy. it gives confidence that Russia is rising from its knees, and it is very pleasing! You look, and young people will again be proud of their country! good
  3. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 18 July 2013 10: 13
    +1
    The more in the WORLD of Russia, the better! And then wherever you look, everywhere America.
    1. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 18 July 2013 13: 36
      0
      Quote: ia-ai00
      The more in the WORLD of Russia, the better! And then wherever you look, everywhere America.

      We don’t have to be like the Americans. All over the world it’s not necessary, and it’s costly. And it wouldn’t hurt to have two or three bases.
  4. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 18 July 2013 10: 18
    0
    Amer now has tails tucked up .. We take advantage of the moment!
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 18 July 2013 10: 26
      +3
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Amer now has tails tucked up .. We take advantage of the moment!

      Amers now has a financial knockout and a holy place does not happen. We will not take it, others will take it. Although Russia still needs to try hard to take the place of Amers.
    2. Vadivak
      Vadivak 18 July 2013 10: 44
      17
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Amer now has tails tucked up .. We take advantage of the moment!


      Are you seriously?

      The cruiser "Moscow" Black Sea Fleet, the large anti-submarine ship "Vice Admiral Kulakov" (SF) and the large sea tanker "Ivan Bubnov" Black Sea Fleet. Later, the naval tugboat Eugene Khorov of the BF will join the detachment.

      Do you know the composition of the 2nd and 6th US fleets that control the Atlantic? there are only 2, 8, 10 and 12 AUGs, and here there are 4 ships, you have to be more serious
      1. olviko
        olviko 18 July 2013 11: 30
        -1
        If you just whine and wait for a goldfish on the shores of the Atlantic, then nothing will ever happen at all. Moscow, as they say, was also not built immediately.
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 18 July 2013 12: 06
          +4
          Quote: olviko
          If you just whine and wait for a goldfish on the shores of the Atlantic, then nothing will ever happen at all.


          Are you from another planet? Not aware that all Russian capital is registered in offshore and is not going to pay either the army or the fleet? Or do you have the opportunity to personally influence the situation other than chatter?
          1. olviko
            olviko 18 July 2013 13: 01
            0
            Confidently, only to you, I admit that I personally do not have the opportunity to personally influence the situation, as well as you. We can only engage in empty chatter on the forum. Or do you excuse other possibilities? well then call say Abramovich, Friedman, or Deripaska, but they are full, sucking juices from Russia. If they refuse to share, please post on the forum to the moderator.
            1. Vadivak
              Vadivak 18 July 2013 21: 53
              +1
              Quote: olviko
              If they refuse to share, please post on the forum to the moderator.


              You can start, I'm listening
    3. experienced
      experienced 18 July 2013 10: 51
      12
      Quote: MIKHAN
      We take a moment!

      You tie the "Moment" to use it very badly affects the brain wassat There are incomparable values, it’s like a cavalryman with a saber throwing himself at a tank, and the cavalryman is alone and jumps from field to field, and there is a tank on each field. Gave specifically so descriptive, given the brain tortured by "Moment" wassat
    4. little man
      little man 18 July 2013 11: 35
      0
      what nonsense!
  5. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 18 July 2013 10: 46
    +1
    Very serious ships. What words of the president can they confirm?
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 18 July 2013 12: 58
      +3
      They will confirm that excellent ships were built in the Soviet Union.
  6. Rodriques
    Rodriques 18 July 2013 11: 00
    +2
    I talked with a sailor here yesterday on a train, the old ships are gritting and they are working for wear, the sailors do not like these long trips, there are few new ships, the old ones are falling apart.
  7. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 18 July 2013 11: 11
    +2
    And you have to go to all the seas and nothing. And it hurts and pity both sailors and ships.
    But if not them, then who? Let's hope that over the years the number of ships will increase and there will be no squadrons, but squadrons, which, as they said, "the devil himself is not a brother"!
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 18 July 2013 11: 58
      +3
      Quote: Starover_Z
      And you have to go to all the seas and nothing.

      Serdyukov’s reforms also affected the fleet. The Pacific Fleet, for example, for the first time in 278 years, in 2010, it seems, reduced by 5 officers and midshipmen
      1. experienced
        experienced 18 July 2013 12: 03
        +5
        Quote: Vadivak
        Serdyukov’s reforms also affected the fleet. The Pacific Fleet, for example, for the first time in 278 years, in 2010, it seems, reduced by 5 officers and midshipmen

        Vadim, without canceling Serdyukov’s guilt, I would like to clarify that the Fleet was purposefully destroyed even under Mechen, and all this continued under the EBNe and GDP, when ships that did not meet their useful life were simply cut or resold to 3 countries at the price of scrap metal, and sometimes even with unreleased weapons (there were several scandals). It was then that the Navy suffered maximum damage + what remained (scattered) stood at the berths hi
        Well, Serdyukov’s reforms targeted the officer cadres purposefully, this is no secret to anyone. One closure of military schools was worth it.
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 18 July 2013 12: 14
          +3
          Quote: seasoned
          Vadim, without canceling Serdyukov’s guilt, I would like to clarify that the Fleet was purposefully destroyed even under the Mechen


          And I don’t argue that at the request of the United States, the USSR destroyed
  8. smiths xnumx
    smiths xnumx 18 July 2013 11: 27
    0
    This detachment will go to Cuba ((Havana) from there to Nicaragua (Corinto), especially since Nicaragua wants to buy from us 6 boats, 2 "lightning" project 12418 and 4 14310 "Mirage", and from there to Venezuela (La Geuaira) and on the way back to Cape Verde (Praia. True from the BF, they were also going to send the TFR project 11540 "Yaroslav the Wise", but he just returned from the Mediterranean Sea, it seems they did not have time to prepare.
  9. runway
    runway 18 July 2013 11: 56
    +1
    Prepare ships for reflection "asymmetric threat". How shoud I understand this? Those who planned the campaign do not understand this threat, or assume in advance that our ships will be opposed by an enemy force that is many times larger than their number and quality, which is equivalent to sending our ships to certain loss. Yes, you will not envy our sailors with such leaders ...
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 18 July 2013 12: 06
      +1
      Quote: piston
      or they assume in advance that our ships will be opposed by an enemy force many times larger than their number and quality

      What is there to suppose? Isn't that obvious?
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 18 July 2013 12: 27
        +2
        Quote: Vladimirets
        What is there to suppose? Isn't that obvious?


        For some, this is unbelievable, they simply don’t know about the 5th squadron of the USSR Navy, about the bases of the USSR Navy around the world that now are no longer needed, and if the fleet does not need bases without which it cannot exist, then what kind of fleet should they be?
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 18 July 2013 13: 35
          0
          Quote: Vadivak
          about the bases of the USSR Navy around the world that now are no longer needed

          So far, even one ship is not enough for us to deliver to each base that were under the USSR.
          Quote: Vadivak
          what fleet are they then?

          They do not need, we need.
        2. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 18 July 2013 13: 42
          0
          Quote: Vadivak
          Quote: Vladimirets
          What is there to suppose? Isn't that obvious?


          For some, this is unbelievable, they simply don’t know about the 5th squadron of the USSR Navy, about the bases of the USSR Navy around the world that now are no longer needed, and if the fleet does not need bases without which it cannot exist, then what kind of fleet should they be?

          All over the world "is it in Cam Ranh and Cuba? The required minimum ...
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 18 July 2013 14: 17
            +2
            Quote: Semyon Semyonich
            All over the world "is it in Cam Ranh and Cuba?

            Poland, East Germany, Somalia, Yemen, Ethiopia, Egypt, Libya.
  10. UPStoyan
    UPStoyan 18 July 2013 12: 27
    +1
    Somewhat off topic, but also for the fleet. Syria has closed the port of Tartus for all civilian vessels. The rebels say that a group of Russian ships with weapons should enter the port.
    I’ll add that in Novorossiysk three BDK pr.1171 dangled for more than a week. Last week in the morning they quietly disappeared.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 18 July 2013 12: 38
      +3
      Quote: UPStoyan
      Syria has closed the port of Tartus for all civilian vessels. The rebels say that a group of Russian ships with weapons should enter the port.


      The rebels are whistling, Moscow will stand as always on the roads, what should it do in the port? and in the "base" of the Russian Navy it will not fit
      1. experienced
        experienced 18 July 2013 12: 49
        +3
        Quote: Vadivak
        The rebels are whistling, Moscow will stand as always on the roads, what should it do in the port? and in the "base" of the Russian Navy it will not fit

        A strange silence around the explosions at the base in Latakia ... Is it really that the Yakhonts were destroyed and our hurriedly new ones were brought? Silence and silence, some kind of suspicious, because if it was disinformation it was possible to give a refutation, and so some bad thoughts creep in. Russia supplies the latest weapons, and Israel is successfully destroying it, while the price ratio is not in our favor ... recourse
        1. Volkhov
          Volkhov 18 July 2013 15: 59
          +1
          Take a look at the photo article - where on the cruiser Moscow is a lying bulwark and why are these waves so close? This is a small ship with a search helicopter in search of ...
          Moscow is in the Atlantic - Atlant project.
    2. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 18 July 2013 13: 46
      0
      Quote: UPStoyan
      Somewhat off topic, but also for the fleet. Syria has closed the port of Tartus for all civilian vessels. The rebels say that a group of Russian ships with weapons should enter the port.
      I’ll add that in Novorossiysk three BDK pr.1171 dangled for more than a week. Last week in the morning they quietly disappeared.

      Yes you, my friend, shpien)))
  11. Rodriques
    Rodriques 18 July 2013 12: 37
    0
    Quote: UPStoyan
    Somewhat off topic, but also for the fleet. Syria has closed the port of Tartus for all civilian vessels. The rebels say that a group of Russian ships with weapons should enter the port.
    I’ll add that in Novorossiysk three BDK pr.1171 dangled for more than a week. Last week in the morning they quietly disappeared.

    Today, Marat Musin wrote that the Amer’s weapons were still handed over to the militants, have not yet established what kind of anti-tank guns are used, but for 2 days, tangible losses in armored vehicles and personnel. I hope our BDK come with an asymmetric answer.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 18 July 2013 12: 40
      +2
      Quote: Rodriques
      I hope our BDK come with an asymmetric answer.


      And where is the article about BDK?
  12. Rodriques
    Rodriques 18 July 2013 12: 41
    0
    Quote: Vadivak
    Quote: Rodriques
    I hope our BDK come with an asymmetric answer.


    And where is the article about BDK?

    Yes, I answered UPStoyan.
  13. silver_roman
    silver_roman 18 July 2013 13: 05
    -2
    interestingly, the last time our inter-naval formation of ships went to Tartus, the fifth (or sixth - I do not remember) US operational fleet at full speed washed off almost to the Gulf of Mexico. In this situation, ours are already swimming not in the east of the Mediterranean Sea, but already in the Atlantic. I feel that the amers on their aircraft carriers will soon put the wheels and will be wagging already by land, because no longer where ... well, either in the region of Argentina or the Pacific Ocean. And they say one is not a warrior in the field)))).
    Glory to the Russian Navy !!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. silver_roman
      silver_roman 18 July 2013 23: 44
      0
      I wonder why I caused such a terrible anger hamsters ???
      already three minuses .... spare.
  14. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 18 July 2013 13: 58
    +1
    Damn, what is it. We, as mentioned above, cannot seriously influence the situation, but at least we will not be idiots. Please send me a photo, I want to see the face of a person who seriously believes that the cruiser Moscow and this BOD can disperse the sixth fleet. They can cause certain damage at the cost of their own lives, as always in our post-revolutionary history. These cattle have been destroying the fleet for thirty years, and now they are riding over our ears "The fleet is getting new ships" where when no one has seen just no need to talk about a couple of Boreys and a couple of carvettes that have not been brought to the surface. us. Yes, and we go to the ocean so that we believe what kind of GDP the clever fleet has revived. They do not actually carry out combat missions there, but internal political ones, although no one disputes the work and feat of our guys. I have never been a sailor, but I love the fleet since childhood, my heart bleeds to see what has been done to our fleet.
    1. silver_roman
      silver_roman 19 July 2013 17: 13
      0
      at the expense of "idiots" be careful ...
      and cleanliness: do you think whether amers ever suffered major losses? did they lose squadrons, millions of people ???? and sometime our battleships rammed amers on corvettes ??? in short, these are all rhetorical questions. but we all went through it. and corvettes they demolished the mast floor. send me a photo of the person who thinks that victory is determined and achieved only by material means and let's not be idiots - with this I will agree to all 100.
      lose at least one aircraft carrier to them and their entire structure will go to the cesspool, because they can’t promptly plug a hole already.
      and by the way, on that campaign when their fleet knocked down from the Mediterranean, not only Moscow was on our side ... there was a rather large formation ... and besides, I am sure that the Air Force was also on the lookout. the arrival time is not that long.
  15. strange and pretty meaningless
    strange and pretty meaningless 18 July 2013 14: 30
    -1
    I wonder why it is impossible to put the anemometer on the mast stationary? Sailors have nothing to do with buit? request
    1. Lecha57
      Lecha57 19 July 2013 17: 54
      -1
      Anemometer - A measuring device, in this case, a control one and, how do you think, how much will its accuracy change if it works day and night, for months and years?
  16. urganov
    urganov 18 July 2013 15: 09
    0
    "inter-fleet detachment fighting ships (OBK), which included the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet (BSF), the guards missile cruiser Moskva, the large anti-submarine ship Vice-Admiral Kulakov of the Northern Fleet (SF) and the large sea tanker Ivan Bubnov of the Black Sea Fleet. Later the sea tug "Evgeny Khorov" of the Baltic Fleet will join the detachment. "

    Modern journalism is a song. belay
  17. Stalinets
    Stalinets 19 July 2013 02: 00
    0
    "... as part of the ORDER !!!" .. how tired of this surrogate language !!!!! So they will ruin the Russian language ... fool
  18. solidol
    solidol 19 July 2013 02: 17
    0
    Quote: Rodriques
    I talked with a sailor here yesterday on a train, the old ships are gritting and they are working for wear, the sailors do not like these long trips, there are few new ships, the old ones are falling apart.

    Things didn’t disappear after the conversation?
  19. Yuri11076
    Yuri11076 19 July 2013 15: 07
    0
    Good luck to our sailors in fulfilling their tasks and 7 feet under the keel !!!
  20. gleb49
    gleb49 19 July 2013 17: 30
    0
    Thanks to Putin! I thought I won’t live!
    1. Lecha57
      Lecha57 19 July 2013 17: 47
      -1
      It's not about Putin, but about you and me.
  21. Lecha57
    Lecha57 19 July 2013 17: 44
    -1
    It is gratifying that there is such a complex (not sure what it is). One of course is not enough, but to have a large armada - it makes no sense. - There are other systems.