Military Review

The West wants to destroy the Islamic world ("Yeni Safak", Turkey)

96
The West wants to destroy the Islamic world ("Yeni Safak", Turkey)Journalist Yigit Bulut, extraordinarily evaluating the events around Gezi Park, believes that the coup in Egypt is part of a plan to destroy the Islamic world. According to Bulut, as a result of the coup, which resulted from the actions of Israel and the neocons to create a new design in the region, one of the pillars on which Islam was balanced was destroyed. Next in line is Turkey.


Noting that the July 3 coup was aimed at neutralizing the Islamic world, the journalist claims that the West deposed Mursi, wanting to prevent the domination of Muslims in the world. He also believes that while maintaining multi-vector pressure in Egypt, the Islamic revolution is inevitable.

Kubra Senmezyshyk: Recently, Deputy Prime Minister Beshir Atalay blamed external forces and the Jewish diaspora for fomenting unrest in Turkey. What is the basis of these events?

Yigit Bulut: This is just the beginning, we only saw the first wave. The global coalition and its constituent forces do not want to see in power in Turkey, the incoming 10 anniversary of his reign, Prime Minister Recep Erdogan. Unfortunately, this coalition includes an opposition party, a percentage lobby, Ergenekon and a kind of financial Ergenekon.

- To what extent is the Republican People’s Party (RNP) connected with the events?

- It is necessary to consider this batch in relation to its stories. Jellal Bayar and Ismet Inonu began to actively influence Atatürk’s policy in the 10 year of his reign. After 1933, the financial structures of the RNP were in the center of the banking system, thanks to bank loans they managed to create their own quickly enriched bourgeois stratum, which together with the RNP participated in a number of anti-government actions.
Speeches by supporters of Mohammed Mursi in Cairo

- For example?

- The coup in 1960 was carried out by the regime built into the state structure in cooperation with the global coalition and the assistance of the armed forces. The RPP is not just a party, but a kind of offshoot of the “deep state”. Whoever was involved in the activity they did not want, they blocked them. Atatürk, Menderes, Ozal are virtually eliminated on the 10 year of his reign.

- Why on 10?

- After the 10 anniversary expires, the power of the political leader begins to grow stronger, and at the same time the interests of the people are better protected. This situation is a concern for the built-in mode. Pay attention to these businessmen who flaunt the words “I am a marauder” (as Prime Minister Erdogan called the protesters in Istanbul): over the past four years, their shares worth 30 millions have reached 500.

“You claim that the events underlying the protests in Gezi are an attempted coup, but fortunately, today this process has come to an end.” Game over?

- The first wave is completed. We could not prevent the February 28 coup, but now we are familiar with the methods of these people. Judging by the latest events, they, having left the cover, chose Erdogan directly as a target. This shows that they are in a difficult situation. The built-in mode they created collapses. In desperation, divulging their names, they take to the streets.

- Creative circles fearlessly expressed their thoughts. What did they rely on?

- These circles were given guarantees important figures in Germany and the UK. The owner of the built-in mode in Turkish media today is Germany. Merkel and Doğan Holding act together. Behind the "assembly production" is the UK. And it was said: "We will overthrow this man, do not be afraid, we stand behind you, go to the end." Having received such guarantees, people took to the streets without hiding their faces.

- The coup in Egypt was compared with the situation in Turkey 1998 th ...

- The Islamic Union stood on two legs: Turkey and Egypt. One of the basics collapsed. This is in the best interest of Israel. Among the Muslim countries remained Turkey, in which Islam is properly represented. Therefore, the next goal is Turkey.

- Why does the West demonstrate a two-faced position on the issue of democracy?
American soldier searches Iraqi woman

- The West can not allow the dominance of a Muslim state. In the period when Turkey carries the banner of Islam, we intended to put one leg of a compass on Turkey, another - on Egypt. Thanks to this, the entire Middle East would be in our sphere of influence. However, today the right leg of the compass is broken.

- What will happen next?

- What happened to the 52% of the Egyptians? Have they sunk into oblivion? No, they still insist on their position, and if pressure increases in Egypt, in the end, an Islamic revolution will occur. But, if to force events continue the West, the result will be completely different.

- What awaits Turkey in this process?

- Provocative manipulations in Turkey will continue until the elections, that is, about two years. The objectives are as follows: to overthrow Recep Erdogan, get rid of the Justice and Development Party, create a system at its own discretion.

- What kind of consequences can be brought about by the restoration of Egypt led by a Christian secular leader?

- In Egypt, the only democratically elected Muslim leader was Mursi. If we turn to the history of Egypt, then this is a country that has always been under external control - the Roman, Ottoman Empire and, as a result, the Arabs. In my opinion, the people will compensate for this in the long term. If, a year later, the Muslim Brotherhood is allowed to participate in the elections, they may again be in power and gain even more votes. The arrow fell off the bowstring, and Egypt will return to its essence.

- The statement of Saudi Arabia was surprising, what fears exist there?

- Saudi Arabia remains in the shadow of those who have planned a further path for it, the UAE remains in the shadow of the British. Since after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, there is no power in the region that would take them under its wing, they live on the orders of these states.
Author:
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. serge-68-68
    serge-68-68 18 July 2013 07: 04 New
    +7
    Firstly, not to destroy (it is said too much, and the consequences are unpredictable), but to weaken, and secondly, weakening the world of Islam is beneficial to the entire European tradition (Christian) and the main representatives of non-European (China, India) too.
    1. sevtrash
      sevtrash 18 July 2013 10: 32 New
      +1
      It seems that for Muslims, non-Muslims are legitimate enemies, the destruction of which is a necessary stepping stone to paradise, and in fact a condition for a normal life before death, because all problems are from infidels.
    2. 755962
      755962 18 July 2013 16: 54 New
      +2
      The US fight against the Muslim world.

      The Muslim world is having an increasing influence on world processes. It is united by Islam. Islam is a religion of the masses, it is a public, collectivist consciousness. Its foundations are fundamentally at odds with the cult of individualism and the power of money - the ideology of the United States. As the analysis shows, The United States launched an information war against Islam. They assigned the key role to the Taliban. We give typical estimates of printing various directions about this movement.



      When the Taliban fulfill their tasks, the United States, according to Directive 20/1, will say that they have nothing to do with it, and all this is the work of Islamism. And then, naturally, the Taliban will be subject to liquidation. There are already examples. The USA betrayed Hekmatyar, Ahmad Shah Masoud, Rabbani, as soon as they were no longer needed. The United States already has experience in the mass destruction of Muslims in Iraq, in organizing the mass death of Iraqi children through a blockade, in killing innocent people as a result of shelling by Sudan missiles. In the future, catastrophic events and the transition to the dictates of the United States are approaching the Muslim world.


      http://www.psichology.vuzlib.org/book_o734_page_140.html
    3. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ 18 July 2013 17: 04 New
      0
      Quote: serge-68-68
      Firstly, not to destroy (it is said too much, and the consequences are unpredictable), but to weaken, and secondly, weakening the world of Islam is beneficial to the entire European tradition (Christian) and the main representatives of non-European (China, India) too.

      Destroy as an independent center of power. The weakening of the Islamic world is beneficial only to the forces controlling this Islamic world. For all other states, the weakened Islamic world will turn into a herd of bloody fanatics at war for some reason. The sovereign Islamic world would conduct an independent policy in its own interests. So, first of all, it would cooperate with its neighbors. But a handful of “tribes” will not build an Islamic civilization, but will seek “their own gurus” in death in a confrontation with “unfaithful neighbors”.
    4. Dilshat
      Dilshat 19 July 2013 00: 15 New
      0
      Jesus also drove shopkeepers from the temple. But for them nothing, profit is paramount. No wonder Isa (Jesus) is one of the prophets in the Qur'an. Islam (the Qur'an) forbids usury, which is the opposite of modern Western ideology living on interest. Therefore, the West wants to destroy The Islamic world. And therefore, the Islamic world can theoretically be an ally of Russia. If Russian diplomacy shows itself. Is my friend an enemy of my enemy? Is it true? Experienced sailors know that even headwinds can be skillfully controlled by sails. It’s not for nothing that the British empire is the foundation of power became not only the Navy but also diplomacy. But then I skidded a little to the side.
  2. Refund_SSSR
    Refund_SSSR 18 July 2013 07: 09 New
    14
    Well, the Turks are saints and not at all to blame for what is happening in the world, and in particular in Syria ...
    “What you reap, you reap” - this saying must urgently be translated into Turkish and sent to the Turkish authorities .. Maybe they will become wiser.
  3. taseka
    taseka 18 July 2013 08: 11 New
    +3
    No matter how they talk about "fraternal peoples", we remember how quickly the Armenians and Azerbaijanis began to kill each other! Therefore, the threat is visible to the Slavic world! We need to seriously think about these kaganates !!!
    1. Yeraz
      Yeraz 18 July 2013 11: 13 New
      +1
      Quote: taseka
      No matter how they talk about "fraternal peoples", we remember how quickly the Armenians and Azerbaijanis began to kill each other!

      Ash stumps that friendship had previously rested on tsarist bayonets, and in Soviet times on the strength of the KGB. Otherwise, Armenians would remain only with Arabs and the United States and France.
  4. igor36
    igor36 18 July 2013 08: 22 New
    0
    The fact is that in the West they later realized that they were losing to Islam. Now in every country of Western Europe and the USA, the Islamic diaspora makes up about a third of the population, and this is a young, active and organized part. Even if they succeed in overthrowing those who are now in power, Islamic extremists will eventually come to power and the war could spread to the territory of the current aggressors.
    1. Vovka levka
      Vovka levka 18 July 2013 08: 38 New
      +7
      Quote: igor36
      The fact is that in the West they later realized that they were losing to Islam. Now in every country of Western Europe and the USA, the Islamic diaspora makes up about a third of the population, and this is a young, active and organized part. Even if they succeed in overthrowing those who are now in power, Islamic extremists will eventually come to power and the war could spread to the territory of the current aggressors.

      The main war is fertility. The West and we are snickering in this matter. We love ourselves so much that there is no time to give birth and raise children. And they give birth, and a lot. That’s the whole story.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 18 July 2013 08: 40 New
        +3
        Quote: Vovka Levka
        And they give birth, and a lot. That’s the whole story.

        To give birth is not enough, you need to grow and educate. They have many children, but many bring up mules. Open any video, except for allah, I’m nothing in the bar. The level of intelligence does not allow us to say more.
        1. Alexei
          Alexei 18 July 2013 08: 47 New
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          except for alla, I have nothing in the bar.

          Funny smile Yes and breed from illiteracy, it is proved. Maybe Rome fell because wild peoples sprang up around? Oh, I wouldn’t like to sad
        2. valokordin
          valokordin 18 July 2013 09: 09 New
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov

          To give birth is not enough, you need to grow and educate. They have many children, but many bring up mules. Open any video, except for allah, I’m nothing in the bar. The level of intelligence does not allow to say more

          Yes, Alexander, you’re right, you don’t need to have a mind to give birth to many children, you need to spend much more energy to educate them, and our Slavs are spoiled for doing this, and Muslims do not pay much attention to this. Although Erdogan (in Russian Sokolov) should once again turn in the right direction, because Assad is a butcher, and he is just an American liberal.
        3. Yeraz
          Yeraz 18 July 2013 11: 34 New
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          They have many children, but many bring up mules.

          What Muslims do you mean, or all?
      2. igor36
        igor36 18 July 2013 08: 58 New
        +1
        Quote: Vovka Levka
        The main war is fertility. The West and we are snickering in this matter. We love ourselves so much that there is no time to give birth and raise children. And they give birth, and a lot. That’s the whole story.

        There is no birth rate, but a struggle for the minds. Official ideologies lose the war for influencing Islamic youth by religious extremists.
    2. Scoun
      Scoun 18 July 2013 12: 30 New
      +2
      Quote: igor36
      The fact is that in the West they later realized that they were losing to Islam.

      Who in the West understood, such as Ben Bernanke or David Cameron? both of them are not native even once and they are connected with the same non-native around the world ... and the fate of the native is of least concern to them. "Our businessman Polansky stole here in Russia and rushed from Cambodia to get citizenship?
    3. Nordwest
      Nordwest 18 July 2013 14: 19 New
      0
      Igor, where do you get such data. From 3% to 5% cannot be considered as 30% and it is still “too early” to say that they are losing.
      1. igor36
        igor36 18 July 2013 15: 28 New
        +2
        Currently, Islam is already the second largest follower (after Christianity) of the world religion. More than two-thirds of Muslims live in Asia, where they make up over 20% of the population, almost 30% - in Africa (half of the continent's population). Muslim communities exist in more than 120 countries of the world, in 35 of them they make up over 80% of the population (most of them are in North Africa and West Asia). The largest absolute Muslim communities live in Indonesia, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Sociologists predict that by 2010 in the United States, the Islamic community will be the second largest after Christians, overtaking the Jewish community.

        Especially rapidly increasing the number of Muslims in Europe. The largest Muslim community is in France: from 5 to 7 million (up to 10% of the total population), Islam has become the country's second largest religion after Catholicism. Numerous communities of followers of Islam were formed in Germany (4 million), Great Britain (1,7 million), Italy and Holland (1 million each). Significant Muslim communities are scattered throughout all, without exception, Western European countries.

        It should be noted that no one knows the real number of Muslims in Western Europe, since along with legal immigrants and their descendants, there are many millions of illegalthat are not in the official statistics. According to various estimates, from 15 to 24 million Muslims now live in Western Europe. Data for 2007. .Demographers predict that by 2015 the number of Muslims in Europe will double due to the high birth rate and mass immigration from North Africa and the Middle East.It is logical to calculate that now out of 50 million or even more, do not forget that local Islam is accepted, and women who marry a Muslim convert to Islam.
        So pour water, white people, your train is gone, circumcise and stock up on hijabs. And homosexuals and other things in general Khan.
        1. sevtrash
          sevtrash 18 July 2013 17: 09 New
          0
          The end of Europe.
    4. 12061973
      12061973 18 July 2013 18: 23 New
      0
      Quote: igor36
      and this is a young active and organized part.

      just a little dumb, judging by the behavior.
  5. slaventi
    slaventi 18 July 2013 09: 00 New
    0
    West wants to destroy the Islamic world

    And draw Russia into it. They always did. And for this, including preparing an army of militants in the Middle East. Now Syria, then Iran, Central Asia, then Russia.
  6. knn54
    knn54 18 July 2013 09: 43 New
    +2
    In the US, the president is, in fact, an illegitimately chosen "mishandled Arabian Cossack." In the UK, the penetration of the “Trojan Arabian horse” after the death of (?) Lady D ...
    As for Turkey, with its neo-Ottomanism, it poses a threat to the Arabian monarchies. Events in Egypt and Syria show that al-Qaeda will deliberately destroy Sunni rivals from the SSA, the Muslim Brotherhood ...
    The head of the Church of England, the Archbishop of Canterbury, as well as the royal family (bearing the title "Defender of the [Christian] Faith"!) Turned into accomplices of Islam. Jens Orbuck, one of Sweden’s ministers, said: “We must be open and tolerant of Islam and Muslims, because when we become a minority (!) They will be equally tolerant of us.”
    T.E. there is a bunch: the West and the pseudo-Muslim obscurantists ...
    Next is Iran, the ultimate goal of the Russian Federation and China. Along the way, Turkey, Algeria. Solute and Israel.
    It’s time for Erdogan and other adequate leaders (including from the Muslim world) to understand how friendship with a corrupt West ends.
  7. ed65b
    ed65b 18 July 2013 10: 27 New
    0
    Turkey, thanks to its two-faced position, itself takes a large part in the destruction of this world. The Islamic world now is the spiders in the bank who themselves will bite each other only need to take places in the amphitheater and wait. The rest (who will survive) of the West are bent into a pose known to all. Yes, they themselves are happy to be bent, and who does not want to, for example, Syria, are trying to break what Muslims themselves are helping them successfully.
  8. Opera
    Opera 18 July 2013 10: 52 New
    +1
    Quote: slaventi
    And draw Russia into it.

    You are a little mistaken not to drag in, but to bleed Russia with Islamic countries! To weaken both those and others, to cash in on the war and to cash in further on the ruined economies by pumping out resources and using the free labor force as laborers! Here is an interesting moment even with China ... US debt to the Celestial Empire rolls over! The growing cooperation between Russia and China, not only economic but also military - technical, scares the Anglo-Saxons! Here is another song! Here is Japan and South Korea and the buildup of the US military component in the region - they haven’t come up with anything better and are not going to invent it! Destabilization of the situation in the region - war - divide and conquer - profit - way out of the crisis! How the West repays debts we know - France - Libya!
    What about Turkey? And what about Turkey? Turkey, as a bastion of traditional Islam, is like the west is a bastion of Christianity! And Syria is not an example of this! This is just a consequence of that pro-Western policy in the mainstream of which the "bastion of Islam" has been dragging for more than a century! The elevation of other people's values ​​and goals to the rank of national policy has never led to good, and that does not! Why be surprised ?!
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 18 July 2013 11: 09 New
      +3
      Quote: Oper
      pit Russia with Islamic countries!

      I agree.
      Neo-jihad is triumphantly walking on the planet, because
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      They have many children, but many bring up mules. Open any video, except for allah, I’m nothing in the bar. The level of intelligence does not allow us to say more.
  9. antibanukurayza
    antibanukurayza 18 July 2013 10: 56 New
    +6
    Islam does not tolerate prostitution, Islam does not tolerate music that destroys a brain of the "hard rock" type, where half-drowned, stoned and painted "Kiss" jerk on stage under the music tearing ears. Islam does not tolerate gays, lesbians, trance and different colors of LGBT. Islam does not tolerate orphanages, nursing homes, orphanages. And whatever others say about Islam, they judge it from what the West shows the world, and they show only what they themselves generate. Islamic terrorism is a product of the United States and it is no secret to anyone. Islamic terrorist organizations receive support from the West and the United States. The leaders of Islamic movements calling on Muslims around the world to fight against the infidels are proteges of the United States, the CIA and the like of the Three-Letter Structures, for which they receive a salary. And the most important thing is that Islam does not tolerate usury. In Islam there is no concept of "percentage". This at once puts an end to loans issued by the US billions to other countries, this jeopardizes the banking system introduced by the West. If the Muslim world abandons the standard banking system and switches to financing according to Sharia principles, the financial system of the West will collapse, which will inevitably lead to the collapse of the European Union and the United States. Therefore, it is vital for the United States and the West to prevent Muslims from uniting. Otherwise, the USA and the West will come to an end. That is why they studied Islam for a long time, studied the intricacies of Islamic beliefs. Then they began to introduce new religious movements, distorting the very essence of religion, distorting the meaning of the Qur'an. At the Islamic universities, Israelis and “pseudo-Muslims” are still studying, who study the trends in Islam, their differences, etc. No matter what the enemies of Islam write, Islam is not as it is shown to us. Those whom they show and who shout: “Allahu akbar” at every opportunity, are real ignoramuses who have fallen into the net of the Big Birder. Thanks to such stupid, narrow-minded “Muslims”, the USA and the West manage to make Islam the most bloodthirsty religion. If this is so, then why the whole world, the West, with its vaunted defense of human rights and the United States with its democracy, will not stop the genocide of the Muslims of Rohina? The Muslim world seems to have begun to resent, but somehow quickly deflated and calmed down. The Muslim genocide of Rohingya could become a factor that could unite the Islamic world, but the West said: "Fight!" and our ulema were quiet. Muslims now act as cannon fodder, and the actions of the United States, Israel and the European Union essentially confirm the words of Lunatic Bush about the crusade on the Muslim world. The crusade has begun. And why am I, a Muslim who reads namaz, who gives alms without dividing people by nationality, gender and faith, who fasts during the month of Ramadan and respects the creed of Christians, Jews, Buddhists, should listen to negative, sometimes openly hostile statements about their religion only because American henchmen, wearing a turban on their heads, growing a beard of solid size and vilely, distorting quotes from the Koran, mislead people, push them to kill, join the ranks of those who tomorrow will raise weapons against their own But is a Muslim brother just because he greets each morning a non-Muslim neighbor or does not want to call a "kyafir" a person who considers himself a Muslim, but does not read the prayer?
    1. Orik
      Orik 18 July 2013 11: 19 New
      0
      Because these "henchmen" set the tone in the Muslim world, and the Muslim world does not have or does not want to have antidotes against them. Although it is very difficult, most always follow the path of least resistance for those who promise more. And these play on the base instincts of the crowd. What will the faithful do ?!
    2. Gari
      Gari 18 July 2013 11: 41 New
      0
      I allow myself being a Christian I will try to bring to you - Islam from Wikipedia
      Islam is a monotheistic world religion. The word "Islam" is translated as "surrender to God," "humility", "submission" (the laws of Allah). In Arabic, the word “Islam” is a verbal noun formed from the verb which means “to be safe”, “to be saved”, “to be saved”, “to be free”
      Adherents of Islam are called Muslims. The main holy book of Islam is the Quran. The language of worship is classic Arabic. In its final form, Islam was formulated in the sermons of Muhammad in the XNUMXth century, which is a prophet for Muslims.
      Islam is a relatively young religion. From the point of view of a number of European and American scholars, it was a syncretic religion that absorbed elements of pre-Islamic ancient beliefs and cults of Arabs, Hanifism, Judaism, Christianity and Mazdeism
      Allah is God, Creator, Creator and Organizer of all things. In addition to him, according to Muslim views, no one has these qualities. According to the Qur'an, Allah is eternal, was not born and did not give birth. The existence of Allah is necessary for the universe, and its absence is impossible. He, as described in the Qur'an, has no equal, and this expresses his uniqueness. According to the Qur'an, the essence of Allah is incomprehensible to the human mind
      The Quran is the holy book of Islam. According to the teachings of the majority of Sunnis and Shiites, the Twelve, the Quran is a direct, eternal and uncreated word of God. The Qur'an was sent down by God to the Seventh Heaven [source not specified 496 days], and then the angel Jabrail passed it in parts to the prophet Muhammad by way of Revelation during 23 years of his prophetic activity. The Qur'an is the Amanat for all Muslims.
      Muhammad is the prophet of Islam, directed by God to all mankind. Muslims believe that through Muhammad God sent the nations of the world a new religion - Islam - in its final form, as well as the Koran - the last Divine Revelation.
      In Medina, Muhammad proclaimed the brotherhood of all people, regardless of their tribal, national or racial affiliation
      Pillars of faith
      Belief in Allah is the creator of all things. It includes a number of provisions, the main of which is Monotheism.
      Belief in angels. Angels are creatures created by Allah from the light, executors of God's will [22].
      Belief in the scriptures sent by Allah through the prophets. This refers to divine revelations that were sent down at various periods in the history of mankind. Muslims recognize the texts of Taurat (Torah), Zabur (Book of Psalms of the Prophet David), Injil (Gospel), as well as older scrolls sent down to several prophets as true. But all previous Scriptures were canceled by the Qur'an. From the point of view of Muslim theologians, modern versions of all holy books except the Qur'an are distorted
      Faith in the prophets (messengers) of God. The Qur'an and Sunnah is prescribed to accept the true of all the messengers of Allah. They were sent to different nations and tribes, but only Muhammad was a messenger to all of humanity.
      Faith on the Day of Judgment. It includes faith in the end of the world, the coming resurrection, God's Judgment, the presence of Hell and Paradise (Ahira).
      Belief in predestination. Muslims believe that Allah predetermined the fate of everything (Kadar), that is, that all events occur according to the plan of the Creator. Predestination is understood as the eternal knowledge of Allah about all events and processes that will occur in the universe; all events occur with the approval of Allah, in accordance with his knowledge. A person has free will, has the ability to choose between good and evil, and therefore bears responsibility for his actions.
      1. Gari
        Gari 18 July 2013 11: 43 New
        +2
        Pillars of Islam
        Shahada - observance of the strictest monotheism (Tawheed). The injunction to witness the adoption of monotheism and the messenger mission of the Prophet Muhammad is contained in the symbol of the faith of Islam: “Ashkhad al-la ilyah ill a-l-Lahu wa ashkhadu Anna Muhammadan rasul l-Lah” (“I testify that there is no God, except Allah, - The Messenger of Allah ”) [25]. .
        Namaz is the performance of daily fivefold prayers (salat).
        Zakat is a material donation. A Muslim is obliged to annually give part of the funds to help the disadvantaged and the poor, orphans, as well as some social programs. Zakat is charged in a strictly defined amount. Poor Muslims are exempted from paying zakat. Zakat is a form of worship of Allah through the use of property.
        Saum - fasting during the month of Ramadan. The essence of fasting is worship of God through abstinence from food, drink and intimacy during daylight hours, more diligent service to the Lord and diligent abstinence from sins this month.
        Hajj - making a pilgrimage to Mecca.
        Every Muslim is obliged to constantly purify and improve spiritually, morally and physically, striving to become impeccable. Muslims should refrain from actions that can corrupt and destroy the personality
        The family in Islam is the main element of society. Any close relationship between members of the opposite sexes is encouraged only in cases where the marriage is legal.
        Parenting in the bosom of the family is not only encouraged, but also the responsibility of the spouses. Divorce, being one of the most abominable acts, is nevertheless allowed as the last, inevitable way out, if all measures taken to preserve a decaying family have not led to a positive result.
        Extramarital affairs are expressly prohibited, moreover, severe penalties are provided for them. Such relations are considered the main source of complete decomposition of the individual and society, leading to moral, physical degradation of people.
        The Koran, recommending Muslim men to have one wife, allows them to marry up to four women. If a Muslim has several wives, he is obliged to give everyone equal attention, love, equally provide them and not highlight any of them.
        1. Gari
          Gari 18 July 2013 11: 48 New
          +4
          The moral standards prescribed by Islam are very numerous. The following is a list of some moral standards that a Muslim should observe:
          Verity (al-sidk).
          Reliability and loyalty (al-aman).
          Sincerity (Al-Ihlas).
          Politeness, correctness and other rules of conversation and dispute (adab al-hadith).
          The expulsion of anger, hatred, envy and other vices from the heart (salamat as-sadr).
          The moral and physical strength (al-kuwva).
          Tolerance and the ability to forgive (al-hilm and al-safh).
          Modesty (al-haya).
          Dignity and self-esteem (al-Izza).
          The search for wisdom and knowledge, the desire for self-education and intellectual self-improvement (al-ilm).
          The desire to devote all his time and his life to good deeds (al-hirs ala al-wakt).
          Generosity (Al-Jude Val-Karam).
          Patience (as-sabr).
          Reasonable management of their funds (al-iktisad).
          Sociability, good attitude towards others (at-taaruf).
          Addiction to purity and beauty (en-nazafa wattajmmul).
          Aversion to evil and sin (tajannub al-aatam val shubuhat).
          Each of the above merits is described in the Qur'an and the Sunnah either directly or through examples, parables and sayings of the prophets
          Muslims are called the “People of the Scripture” by the followers of Judaism and Christianity, as well as the Nazarites and Sabaeans. By this term, adherents of the mentioned religions are separated from the so-called Gentiles. The people of Scripture had the right to freely practice their religion in an Islamic state. Muslims are prohibited from insulting or encroaching on their lives, property, honor and dignity. It is allowed to have family ties with them (in particular, it was allowed to marry women from the people of the Scriptures who were in their religion before the prophecy of Muhammad and business relations
          Islamic dogma teaches that all people on earth are equal. Based on the phrase of the Prophet Muhammad: "There is no difference between an Arab and a non-Arab, between white and black, and people are equal to each other like the teeth of a crest." The Qur'an says: “Verily, We created you men and women, made you nations and tribes, so that you know each other [do good to each other]. After all, the most noble of you before Allah is the most pious ”
          1. Gari
            Gari 18 July 2013 11: 55 New
            +2
            But for all the so-known Jihad
            Jihad (“effort”) is a concept in Islam meaning zeal on the path of Allah. Jihad is usually associated with armed struggle, but the concept is much broader.
            Islam jihad is the struggle against one’s spiritual or social vices (for example, lying, deceit, depravity of society, etc.), eliminating social injustice, constant zeal in spreading Islam, waging war against aggressors, punishing criminals and offenders. In addition, in Arabic, the word "jihad" means any effort or diligence, in particular in work, study, etc.
            According to the Qur'an, every Muslim should be diligent in the establishment and defense of Islam, to spend his material resources and all his strength for this. In case of danger, it is necessary to rise to an armed struggle against the enemies of the faith. Jihad is the pinnacle of Islam, the surrender of all forces and opportunities for the spread and triumph of Islam is one of the main responsibilities of the Muslim community. During the period of the national liberation movement, the ideas of jihad can be applied to the struggle against colonialism.
            The concept of military jihad has become the main meaning for non-Muslims and has received the name "holy war." However, some Muslim authors reject this approach.
            Some Islamic theologians, based on hadiths, divide jihad into large (spiritual struggle) and small (ghazavat - armed struggle). As already noted, the concept of jihad refers not only to the conduct of war, but also in the broad sense means constant action and diligence in the name of the triumph of the ideals of the Islamic religion.
            Therefore, Islamic doctrine contains provisions on various types of jihad, in particular the following:
            Jihad on the battlefield. (“Jihad hands”) The conduct of hostilities to protect the life and property of people, to protect the state from aggression is mandatory (fard) in Islam. Muslims participating in wars are called Mujahideen. Muslims who die in wars are called martyrs. They occupy one of the highest places in Allah and will be introduced to paradise. And the living participants in the war are called Ghazis (Ghazis).
            Jihad against one's vices (nafs, "jihad of the heart"). The individual struggle of every Muslim against his vices is the most difficult form of jihad, since people can’t fight for the triumph of religious ideals without overcoming their sinful passions and spiritual vices. This definition was introduced by al-Ghazali.
            Military Jihad (Gazavat). (“Jihad of the sword”) [9] This is necessary if Muslims are forbidden to practice their religion in any country, if Muslims are oppressed, etc. Also if Muslims appeal to other people religions in their countries of residence, met an obstacle from the authorities of these states. In other words, if Muslims are actually forbidden to bring the word of the Lord to people and to preach Islam.
            Jihad language. Command of the approved and prohibition of the censured.
            Jihad by your knowledge. The study of various sciences, erudition, scholarship leads to the improvement of the human personality and is opposed to ignorance.
            Jihad through the dissemination of true knowledge of Islam.
            Jihad by material means. Solving problems with money, property.
            Islamic law, based on the Qur'an and the practice of the Prophet Muhammad, sets out a number of laws that must be observed during military jihad. In particular, this law prohibits the killing of non-combatants: the elderly, women, children, clergy and other civilians who do not take part in battles.
          2. Ezhaak
            Ezhaak 18 July 2013 12: 49 New
            +5
            Great standards. Gorgeous. Nothing is impossible to say against. If you do not mention some not widely accepted words. These norms most likely apply to the application of INSIDE religion. But with the infidels, the conversation is different and the attitude is different. It is not wrong to lie, and sin. Like the Jews. “Do not kill” refers only to Jews (Jews), to goyim (otherworldly, non-Jews) this is not related. Or I'm wrong???
            1. Gari
              Gari 18 July 2013 14: 16 New
              +6
              Quote: Hedgehog
              Great standards. Gorgeous. Nothing is impossible to say against

              Yes, the rules are good and right.
              Only in my opinion all sorts of fighters for ,, faith ”and all sorts of others, but essentially terrorists screaming,“ Alah Akbar, ”who cut out hearts, cut off their heads, have nothing to do with Islam.
              1. Gari
                Gari 18 July 2013 14: 35 New
                +1
                I just rewrote from Wikipedia about Islam and Jihad
                who do not like to write an argument reasonably, and then cons to the article
                1. stalkerwalker
                  stalkerwalker 18 July 2013 15: 36 New
                  +5
                  Quote: Gari
                  I just rewrote from Wikipedia about Islam and Jihad

                  Thanks for the cult clearance.
                  hi
              2. Ezhaak
                Ezhaak 18 July 2013 14: 49 New
                +4
                It is precisely on the difference that what is possible here and what is possible there is the whole pillar of misunderstanding.
                If it were so in reality, we, the Russians, would live with the North Caucasus in love and mutual understanding. Well, almost like with the Tatars, Bashkirs, for example. But it doesn’t work out. But both one and the other carry the banner of Islam. Most likely, the days profess a more relaxed course of Islam, others - more aggressive. Although there are many misunderstandings. Islam forbids interpretation of the Quran, but for some reason, there will certainly be an interpreter who does this for his own purposes. He said, as I understand it, maybe in what and is wrong.
                1. Yeraz
                  Yeraz 18 July 2013 15: 01 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Hedgehog
                  Well, almost like with the Tatars, Bashkirs, for example. But it doesn’t work out. But both one and the other carry the banner of Islam. Most likely, the days profess a more relaxed course of Islam, others - more aggressive.

                  Yes, with the Tatars everything rests on the fact that they found themselves inside Russia in distinction from others who were on the outskirts and the influence of Russians was many times less, then the huge Russian population among the Tatars, then the Tatars themselves were intertwined with Russian marriages. Whether they are on the outskirts it would be different. Even they became alarmed when Yeltsin gave freedom. But they don’t have borders around the outside world. Therefore, they agreed, although they made some concessions.
            2. Yarosvet
              Yarosvet 18 July 2013 15: 29 New
              +2
              Quote: Hedgehog
              Or I'm wrong???

              Do not be mistaken - this is characteristic of any Abrahamic religion.
            3. antibanukurayza
              antibanukurayza 19 July 2013 08: 15 New
              -2
              Yes. You're wrong. Jews base their belief on "God's chosen people," distinguish themselves especially and therefore they can lie. Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
              1) “A Muslim can be cowardly, can be mean, but a Muslim can never be a liar” (Baykhaki).
              2) "On the Day of Judgment, the one who has the most false conversations will be the most sinful." Hadith narrated by ibn Abi al-Dunya.
              3) "Beware of lies, lies walk with error, and they are both in hell." Hadith narrated by ibn Maj, Nasai.
              In Islam, lies are allowed in 3 cases:
              1) In order to reconcile the parties;
              2) Between husband and wife to achieve contentment. However, this does not mean that the husband can lie to his wife and vice versa. Scientists say that a lie is possible, for example, if the wife cooked tastelessly, but the husband praises his wife for a delicious meal. Here the goal is not to offend the wife, not to hurt her feelings and show that she is loved by her husband. Lies between spouses in order to hide treason and other vices are not permissible
              3) Lies as a way of conducting military operations in order to hide their plans, forces and the location of troops. As a method of misleading the enemy.
              In all cases, a lie for a Muslim is a GREAT SIN.
              1. sevtrash
                sevtrash 19 July 2013 10: 19 New
                +3
                Quote: antibanukuraza
                Lying as a way of conducting military operations with the aim of concealing one’s plans, forces and disposition of troops As a method of misleading the enemy.

                We have to communicate with Arabs of the age of 20-25 years - they lie, they deceive without any problems and on any trifle. I will not say that everything, but - the majority.
                As I understand it, based on the fact that you can’t stand on ceremony with infidels. Based on your position - are they conducting military operations?
                Previously, when I didn’t talk to each other, I had a different attitude - like our brothers. It’s funny to remember now. And sad. Of course, there are good people. But life has taught - first of all always wait for a trick. Because they are brought up like that.
        2. Revolver
          Revolver 19 July 2013 04: 08 New
          0
          Quote: Gari
          Parenting in the bosom of the family is not only encouraged, but also the responsibility of the spouses. Divorce, being one of the most abominable acts, is nevertheless allowed as the last, inevitable way out, if all measures taken to preserve a decaying family have not led to a positive result.

          Nevertheless, it is enough for the husband to say “talak” 3 times in order to kick the wife (from this moment the former) out of his house with what kicks.
          1. antibanukurayza
            antibanukurayza 19 July 2013 08: 24 New
            +1
            NOT TRUE! After the husband uttered the formula “Talak” (divorce), he is obliged to support his wife for another 1 month without entering into an intimate relationship with her. This is done so that the husband is convinced that the wife is not pregnant from him and that the unborn child is not left without a father. If within a month it is discovered that the wife is pregnant, the divorce is considered invalid. Nobody kicks out with kicks. And in general, "talak" is given three times. In two cases, the spouse can converge again if they express a desire, but after the third “talak”, the divorce is considered final. Therefore, the husband will think a thousand times before pronouncing the divorce formula for the third time.
        3. Revolver
          Revolver 19 July 2013 04: 13 New
          0
          Quote: Gari
          Extramarital affairs are expressly prohibited, moreover, severe penalties are provided for them. Such relations are considered the main source of complete decomposition of the individual and society, leading to moral, physical degradation of people.
          The Koran, recommending Muslim men to have one wife, allows them to marry up to four women. If a Muslim has several wives, he is obliged to give everyone equal attention, love, equally provide them and not highlight any of them.

          Nevertheless, a Muslim has the right to have his slaves whenever he wants and how he can. That's how harems were created for 4 official legal wives and as many concubines as there were enough bablos.
          1. antibanukurayza
            antibanukurayza 19 July 2013 08: 27 New
            0
            You proceed from the information that is usually shown in feature films about harems, from fairy tales about eunuchs, etc. These phenomena appeared much later, when Islam was distorted beyond recognition and in the Middle Ages, when slavery existed not only in the Islamic world, but everywhere. Polygamy is largely aimed at social security of the status of women in society, at minimizing the number of “old maidens, single mothers.” Islam is very encouraged if a Muslim, for the sake of contentment, Allah marries a single mother and brings up her children on equal terms with his relatives
    3. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 14: 13 New
      +3
      I read your post to the end. And the thought arose - religion, it’s like an operating system for a computer in which there are holes for hackers. Perhaps in Islam there are weaknesses used by unscrupulous (hackers) Western ideologists? Maybe the Islamic world should reconsider those religious tenets that make it possible to manipulate from the outside?
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 18 July 2013 14: 30 New
        0
        Quote: Tambov we ...
        Perhaps in Islam there are weaknesses used by unscrupulous (hackers) Western ideologists?


        both western and eastern "ideologists" used to harm each other

        now everyone is slurring over the consequences, and more will be given to both
      2. Gari
        Gari 18 July 2013 14: 37 New
        0
        Quote: Tambov we ...
        . Perhaps in Islam there are weaknesses used by unscrupulous (hackers) Western ideologists?

        Well, so they probably found places in the Bible, why so many sectarians from Jehovah’s witnesses, subbotniks, Pentecostals and others
        1. Tambov we ...
          Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 14: 56 New
          0
          That's right, you noticed. Not only Islam, but also Christianity, and possibly all world religions, have a "back door" that allows people to be manipulated through the gateways of religious dogma. This leads to certain thoughts about the essence of the existence of religion (any) in the world of people.
      3. Scoun
        Scoun 18 July 2013 18: 18 New
        +2
        Suffice it to recall how the United States promoted the word of the Mujahideen, who later became the Taliban and then Alkaida.
        A newspaper source said that Egyptian security services received information about the beginning of the supply of Turkish weapons to Egypt on board merchant ships chartered by an import-export company.

        On this tip, the ship of the Turkish company ACM in the East port of Port Said was checked. In one of the containers found 20 thousand pistols and silencers.

        Large army and police forces block the east and west ports of Port Said.

        A Turkish ship is being searched in the West Port of Port Said.

        http://warfiles.ru/show-35064-vlasti-egipta-perehvatili-partiyu-oruzhiya-iz-turc
        ii.html
        Erdogan and Egypt decided to singe?
        or who controls Erdogan whose doll he is?
    4. bulvas
      bulvas 18 July 2013 14: 35 New
      +1
      Quote: antibanukuraza
      ... Islam does not tolerate ...


      Orthodoxy also does not tolerate much, unlike Catholicism, which adapts its entire history to a changing life, as a result of which it turned into what became

      all the nasty things with the letter "G" that are now parading in western Europe come from the intolerance of religion
    5. sevtrash
      sevtrash 18 July 2013 17: 26 New
      0
      Why intolerance of dissidents - in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, was recently executed for disagreeing with the dogmas of Islam, why intolerance of criticizing Islam is an example of Denmark, Rushdie, why intolerance of other religions. Is there a more aggressive and intolerant religion than Islam?
  10. Opera
    Opera 18 July 2013 11: 43 New
    +1
    Quote: antibanukuraza
    West with its vaunted defense of human rights and the United States with its der (b) democracy will not stop the genocide of Muslims of Rohina?

    This is so Myanmar is democratizing! The same democratization as with non-citizens in the Baltic states, where a significant part of the population is deprived of rights precisely on a national basis in a more "civilized" way than in Myanmar!
    Quote: antibanukuraza
    No matter what the enemies of Islam write, Islam is not as it is shown to us. Those whom they show and who shout: “Allahu akbar” at every opportunity, are real ignoramuses who have fallen into the net of the Big Birder. Thanks to such stupid, narrow-minded “Muslims”, the USA and the West manage to make Islam the most bloodthirsty
    Exactly! Inciting ethnic and religious hatred has very specific practical goals! There is no and cannot be antagonism and hostility between traditional Islam and Orthodoxy in this case!
    Quote: antibanukuraza
    And why am I, a Muslim who reads namaz, who gives alms without dividing people by nationality, gender and faith, who fasts during the month of Ramadan and respects the creed of Christians, Jews, Buddhists, should listen to negative, sometimes openly hostile statements about their religion only because American henchmen, wearing a turban on their heads, growing a beard of solid size and vilely, distorting quotes from the Koran, mislead people, push them to kill, join the ranks of those who tomorrow will raise weapons against their own But is a Muslim brother just because he greets each morning a non-Muslim neighbor or does not want to call a "kyafir" a person who considers himself a Muslim, but does not read the prayer?
    SHOULD NOT! As well as the Orthodox, they should not tolerate the demonic antics of tolerant - liberal villains, especially recently, regarding shrines, churches, clergy ... insulting the feelings of believers!
    To divide, intimidate, and knock out the people’s historical moral foundation ... these are far from all the methods of the struggle of Western democracy!
    1. Gari
      Gari 18 July 2013 12: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: Oper
      SHOULD NOT! As well as the Orthodox, they should not tolerate the demonic antics of tolerant - liberal villains, especially recently, regarding shrines, churches, clergy ... insulting the feelings of believers!

      From my comment
      Muslims are called the “People of the Scripture” by the followers of Judaism and Christianity, as well as the Nazarites and Sabaeans. By this term, adherents of the mentioned religions are separated from the so-called Gentiles. The people of Scripture had the right to freely practice their religion in an Islamic state.
      That is, Muslims of Believers of other religions were called, “People of the Scripture,” and treated with respect, but unlike the Gentiles, and who are these liberals now, fans of all sects and others
    2. Essenger
      Essenger 18 July 2013 13: 46 New
      +2
      Quote: Oper
      in the Baltic states where a significant part of the population is deprived of rights precisely on a national basis

      Be more precise not by nationality, but by language.
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 18 July 2013 14: 27 New
        +3
        Quote: Essenger
        Be more precise not by nationality, but by language.

        And what is the difference in determining the sign of RACISM?
        1. Essenger
          Essenger 18 July 2013 17: 55 New
          +3
          Quote: stalkerwalker
          And what is the difference in determining the sign of RACISM?


          This is not racism.
          1. stalkerwalker
            stalkerwalker 18 July 2013 17: 59 New
            +3
            Quote: Essenger
            This is not racism.

            Really?
            Well then, the Estonian SS fought against the Wehrmacht. stop
            1. Essenger
              Essenger 18 July 2013 20: 54 New
              +2
              And then what is it? I wrote about language policy in the Baltic states. You write to me about the Estonian SS.
              1. stalkerwalker
                stalkerwalker 19 July 2013 11: 34 New
                +3
                Quote: Essenger
                I wrote about language policy in the Baltic states. You write to me about the Estonian SS.

                An interesting definition, however, is "language policy" ....
                That’s why I am writing about the Estonian SS, to which the Estonian authorities give honors for the same reasons, with the same tricks under which the SEREGATION of Estonian residents to CITIZENS and CITIZENS is carried out today. That is RACISM - division into two races - Estonian and non-Estonian.
                In Latvia - the same thing.
                In Lithuania, it’s not so.
                Why - the answer, in part, lies in the number of volunteers in each of the three Baltic countries who joined the formation of "self-defense", and then converted into the SS, during the Great Patriotic War.
                1. Essenger
                  Essenger 19 July 2013 13: 14 New
                  +3
                  They are not divided into races. For example, I checked the laws of Latvia not too lazy. I also advise you before discussing. It says the state languages ​​(Latvian and Libyan) and foreign languages. For example, the mayor of Riga, the capital of Latvia, ethnically Russian Neil Ushakov. He was not too lazy as others and learned the language. Now he is the leader of the party, which has the largest mandate in parliament. If you know the language there are no problems. You want to imagine as if representatives of other nations are considered second-class people there. If you don’t want to learn the state language and feel like a second-rate person, hand over your country's passport (EU member and Schengen zone) and leave for your historical homeland. But they don’t want to.
                  1. stalkerwalker
                    stalkerwalker 19 July 2013 16: 59 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Essenger
                    If you don’t want to learn the state language and feel like a second-rate person, hand over your country's passport (EU member and Schengen zone) and leave for your historical homeland

                    "Ha-ha-rosh" the answer.
                    It is quite "democratic."
                    Question.
                    Why are the inhabitants of these "democratic" countries that settled there long before the change in "statehood" not allowed to "not learn" state languages? Why an exam? As you know, the law has no “retroactive force”.
                    And how many residents in Kyrgyzstan today who will pass a similar "exam", should such a question arise? Who will be in the examiners?
                    It is this “tolerance” that gives rise to a new kind of racism - “linguistic”.
                    1. Essenger
                      Essenger 19 July 2013 17: 58 New
                      +3
                      Quote: stalkerwalker
                      And how many inhabitants in Kyrgyzstan today,


                      I don’t know, ask the Kyrgyz.
                      1. stalkerwalker
                        stalkerwalker 19 July 2013 18: 49 New
                        +3
                        Quote: Essenger
                        I don’t know, ask the Kyrgyz.

                        And you read the article "Lietuva - the country of tears" here on Politobozrenie.
                        Maybe change something in your opinion on this issue ...
  11. Opera
    Opera 18 July 2013 12: 14 New
    0
    Quote: Gari
    That is, Muslims of Believers of other religions were called, “People of the Scripture,” and treated with respect, but unlike the Gentiles, and who are these liberals now, fans of all sects and others

    You yourself answered, dear, who they are.
  12. honest jew
    honest jew 18 July 2013 13: 42 New
    0
    Quote: xasharat
    You write about Islam as if Islam is the axis of evil.


    religion opium for the people! Moreover, such a religion as Islam !!!
    1. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 22 New
      0
      Islam should not be singled out as the most extremist religion, for the reason that it arose in the minds of Western political technologists in order to please their views on the possibility of the existence of their countries in the modern world.
  13. chauvinist
    chauvinist 18 July 2013 13: 49 New
    +1
    The weakening of Islam is beneficial throughout Europe, and the Russian Federation should not be hindered.
    1. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 23 New
      0
      Why?
  14. The comment was deleted.
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 18 July 2013 14: 27 New
      0
      Quote: honest Jew
      some lumps have already begun to minus


      fix, the idea is very correct, with a small correction:

      religion is needed, but without fanaticism
      1. Tambov we ...
        Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 28 New
        +2
        Yes, you are always right! Religion is needed, it is very necessary for the manipulation of peoples. In order to own fossil resources, redraw borders, genocide without problems. In general, you understand me, I hope. :)
  15. Rubik
    Rubik 18 July 2013 14: 34 New
    +3
    Let Muslims know their place. If you let them do what they want, then ultimately everything will be bad. For us, this is no less important, since we are just between the Western Christian world and the Eastern Muslim. This infection will affect us first of all, the Caucasus, Crimea, Tatarstan everything will catch fire. Muslims should always be kept under control.
    1. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 33 New
      -2
      Yes, it’s not Muslims that need to be controlled, but their own brains that are obsessed with Western sweet halva about the imaginary superiority of one sapiens over another, because his hair is whiter (well, if you do not follow the conspiracy theorists claiming stellar resettlement of races).
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 18 July 2013 15: 41 New
        0
        Quote: Tambov we ...
        their own brains, avid for a western sweet halva about the alleged superiority of one sapiens over another, because his hair is whiter


        former political worker? or instructor - propagandist?
        who else knows how to make such speeches in the "party dialect"?
        1. Tambov we ...
          Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 48 New
          +1
          No dear! Pilot fighter reserve aircraft of the USSR. Now the architect, I draw houses. :)
          1. bulvas
            bulvas 18 July 2013 16: 02 New
            +1
            Quote: Tambov we ...
            Fighter pilot


            I respect the pilots

            I hope not offended?

            it’s not the superiority of the races and not the color of the hair, but that, after listening to the mullah, they grab a knife or machine gun and run to kill the “infidels”, instead of trying to work, or at least remove the garbage near their home

            but in reality - they fight for money and it doesn’t matter with whom and for what
            1. Tambov we ...
              Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 16: 09 New
              +2
              So it’s not to the traditional Islam, which interprets tolerance, but to the fervor “on the back” of the historically arisen religion in its region. So our Orthodox priest may also cry out that the Jews were soaked in Christ, and Pontius Pilate - an Italian, according to modern standards, washed his little hands. So will we water all Italians?
              1. bulvas
                bulvas 18 July 2013 16: 25 New
                0
                being determines consciousness

                we have other goals in life, other values

                Muslims, who also have normal goals in life and normal values ​​(most importantly, normal brains and education) do not have the thought of going to kill someone, picking up property and a woman of “infidels”
      2. smersh70
        smersh70 18 July 2013 17: 26 New
        -2



        better keep it under control of Christian allies .. see how they put on a bathrobe at the Russian embassy ......
      3. Rubik
        Rubik 18 July 2013 17: 43 New
        +1
        Quote: Tambov we ...
        Yes, it’s not Muslims that need to be controlled, but their own brains that are obsessed with Western sweet halva about the imaginary superiority of one sapiens over another, because his hair is whiter (well, if you do not follow the conspiracy theorists claiming stellar resettlement of races).

        Dear, you’ve been stuck at least a century ago, where you were supposedly a pilot (I’m not trying to accuse you of lying, but I don’t know the truth either). So, no one today puts forward the theory of the superiority of one race over another; now, on the contrary, the theory of the equality of races and religions of the so-called triumphs. tolerance. In the USA, the president is half black and the son of a Muslim, and in Italy, the minister of emigration and integration is from Africa. So stop throwing cliches a hundred years ago. But the whole problem is that this is a delusion and people have never been the same, people are different, and depending on the nation, culture and religion, the difference only increases. And the point is not who is better and who is worse, but in order to protect some from others, because Muslims in particular do not share the idea of ​​tolerance of the West and Russia, completely different ideas are popularized there, ideas of jihad, hatred of infidels, etc. .d. People there are poor and often poorly educated, they will be told tomorrow to cut the infidels and blow up the subway, and they will obediently do it. Their Muslim elites will do everything to split the world where there is no Muslim power, split Russia, split Europe, etc. and they use the Muslim population of these countries as a third column.
        1. Tambov we ...
          Tambov we ... 22 July 2013 16: 56 New
          0
          You’re not trying to blame lies, although you don’t know the truth. Mean-spirited, however ...
  16. bulvas
    bulvas 18 July 2013 15: 17 New
    0
    First of all, Islam and Muslims are to blame for the fact that they have the main oil reserves on Earth.

    Be different - who would surrender their sands and camels
    1. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 41 New
      +2
      They have only obtainable oil reserves (which, alas, are already running out), and global reserves in Russia. And this, a trace to know and perceive, respectively. :)
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 18 July 2013 15: 45 New
        0
        Quote: Tambov we ...
        They have only obtainable oil reserves (which, alas, are already running out)


        where do they end?
        in Arabia? or in Qatar? or in Iran? or in Kuwait?
        where are such conclusions?

        and why "alas"? do you have a share there?
        1. Tambov we ...
          Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 15: 53 New
          +1
          I don’t have a share there, I am an ordinary citizen of the Russian Federation. And their reserves are running out, based on international monitoring, the findings of which are available to everyone on the network.
  17. Yarosvet
    Yarosvet 18 July 2013 15: 41 New
    0
    It makes no sense for the West to destroy the Islamic world, as the West uses it as a tool for destabilization.

    Muslims are very easy to incite to conflict (which makes it possible through provocations to make a mess in the area and region where it is necessary).
    And due to the strict dogmatism of Islam, if it turns out to be agreed with the leaders, there is the possibility of managing the process directly.

    What the West really wants is a decrease in the level of education of the population (where it is quite high), and the presence of pocket ideologues (capable of leading people and interpreting the Koran in the right way).
    1. Tambov we ...
      Tambov we ... 18 July 2013 17: 00 New
      +1
      Of course, the West (church, mentality) is very historically dependent on Islam - the Moors in Spain, the movement throughout the Mediterranean and the struggle of all warlike Christian orders with incomprehensible functions, and this after the division of the Roman Empire into the East-West, with the loss of Byzantium and the rise of the Ottoman Empire, and then the Russian Empire, capable of all this Mediterranean hypocrisy just put in an uncomfortable position ... So draw conclusions, but not hastily.
    2. UFO
      UFO 18 July 2013 17: 44 New
      +5
      Finally! The most accurate comment good It remains to add, at the present stage, this "herd" begins to play a more important role for the "puppeteers" than NATO. In the future, this is a "tool of pressure" on Europe, China and Russia, the first "swallows" have already appeared in Syria: "Next Russia, etc.", then in increasing order - Egypt, Turkey, etc., the Mujaids will return to Europe, in Russia-the Caucasus, the Volga region, uncontrolled hordes of Tajik-Kyrgyz and other medieval representatives of villages and auls.
      Now the "methodology of process control" is being developed, we will see all this in action, and in order not to wander in reasoning, we just need to understand that Islam is a religion of past centuries, which stops development, turns into a herd, does not tolerate dissent and other behaviors, leading to dullness, back to the Middle Ages. hi
  18. Taurus
    Taurus 18 July 2013 18: 46 New
    -1
    As I understand it, Al Qaeda is a product of America's production. If you put aside all the negro-American crap, this is so. And now they want to fight Al Qaeda until victory, supplying it with ptursy and other necessary. Some kind of loophole. I don’t see a point in this rubbish. Although what is the point of a rabbit who squeaks, but voluntarily crawls into the mouth of a boa constrictor? Everyone in al-Qaeda should have, in theory, firmware tattooed on their forehead, Made in USA "
  19. sashka
    sashka 18 July 2013 20: 48 New
    -1
    The harder you push, the greater the resistance. Elementary truths. But here the Amer Unified State Examination will be abruptly ours. Dumbest of all are stupid .. They don’t want to learn anything ..
  20. Cpa
    Cpa 19 July 2013 01: 33 New
    +1
    There is a conflict of essence and form, while the USSR existed, it shared the foundations (essence) with the Muslims of the country and the Middle East. These foundations were respected and valued on a par with traditional, religious ways. Some even have higher traditions. Socialism gave faith in a great bright future. and universal equality. When the union collapsed, many nations felt betrayed and abandoned (lost their essence) and decided to return to national, religious principles. For many, this became a form that needed to be observed. Of these, fanatics were born for whom the form became more important than the essence. As you know, fanatics seek truth outside, surrounding those who confirm their innocence. That is, they strictly observe their form. And all this ripens in the field of ignorance and obscurantism. The Arab world respected Soviet people for the fact that ordinary people could become strong, educated and moral. Who knows if the advice would not leave Afghanistan (or not), maybe there would not be a collapse of ideology (essence)? The Arab (Muslim) world recognized the defeat of the ideology of socialism before traditionalism and somewhere deep down in the souls of Russians are also in it doubted. Chechnya was the result of these contradictions.
  21. regsSSSR
    regsSSSR 19 July 2013 03: 58 New
    0
    Journalist Yigit Bulut, uncommonly evaluating the events surrounding Gezi Park, believes that the coup in Egypt is part of a plan to destroy the Islamic world.


    well, the glory of those gods finally came at least to the kagoto, and that before they really believed that the whole Arab spring and specifically the revolution in Egypt is a sparking expression of the will of the people and the voice of Allah belay that’s naive smile straight like us in the nineties recourse
    (Probably they just connected to the Internet)))
  22. EdwardTich68
    EdwardTich68 22 July 2013 04: 23 New
    0
    Well, since the West began to destroy the Islamic world, then most likely it would destroy it more likely
    and then only one conversation. We here in Russia will not be able to help any of them; therefore, we can only observe playing with jelly, spinning our ears, sprinkling our heads with ash (radioactive) and wringing our hands washed beforehand drinks
  23. Bakht
    Bakht 29 July 2013 01: 02 New
    0
    The author is a stubborn Islamist who has pulled all that is possible by the ears. And for the most part it’s wrong. Since when did Egypt and Turkey become the vehicles of Islam? All the shrines of Islam are in completely different countries. Plus, the author got into the conspiracy theory so much that he himself does not understand what he is writing.

    Erdogan led Turkey into a political impasse and if he remains in power, he will safely lead Turkey to a large-scale crisis. The worst thing is that the crisis of statehood. The very existence of Turkey will be called into question. Without any intervention from the West or Martians.

    I hope the healthy forces of Turkey can still remove Erdogan from power. In Turkey, a military coup and the coming to power of a military junta is long overdue.