The contract for the resumption of the construction of the submarine "Kronstadt"

23
Admiralty Shipyards OJSC (St. Petersburg) in its press release from July 15 of 2013 reported that it is resuming construction of the second submarine of the 677 Lada project - Kronstadt, having concluded a state contract for its completion for the Russian Navy.

The state contract signed by Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Yury Borisov and Director General of Admiralty Shipyards OJSC Alexander Buzakov entered into force on July 9 2013.

The submarine "Kronstadt" was laid in July 2005 year. In the 2009 year, by decision of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the construction of the order was suspended until the transfer to the pilot operation of the main order of the series - Submarine St. Petersburg.


The contract for the resumption of the construction of the submarine "Kronstadt"

Being built submarine B-586 "Kronstadt" 677 project in the workshop "Admiralty Shipyards". St. Petersburg, presumably summer of year 2006


The new contract concluded with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation provides for the construction of a ship on a revised technical project.

Designer of the submarine project "Harmony" - CDB ME "Rubin" - much has been done to improve the submarine and the creation of modernized ship complexes.

On the second order of the series, the upgraded models of equipment will be installed - ship technical equipment management system, electric propulsion system, navigation complex. During the construction of Kronstadt, the results of the trial operation of the head order will be taken into account.

To date, the submarines of the 677 project are the most modern non-nuclear submarines, which fully meet the needs of the time, both in terms of combat effectiveness and other tactical and technical characteristics.

In the future, the submarines of the Lada project are planned to be equipped with an anaerobic, air-independent installation (VNEU), which specialists of the TsDB MT Rubin are working on.

Currently, Admiralty Shipyards is actively preparing for the resumption of the construction of the submarine Kronstadt: the deadlines for the delivery of working design documentation are being agreed, contracts for the supply of component equipment are being concluded. The deadline for the order is 2017 year.

The first submarine of the series - "St. Petersburg" since 2010 is in trial operation as part of the Baltic fleet and is currently preparing to participate in the naval parade on Navy Day.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    17 July 2013 11: 43
    Someone from the Ukrainians accused me today of believing that I think someone else’s money, so this is Russia giving the GOZ to the Russian shipyard for the construction of submarines, in which case the head of the Ukrainian shipyard tried to dislodge state funding for the production of armored personnel carriers. Do you feel the difference? hi
    In the future, the submarines of the Lada project are planned to be equipped with an anaerobic, air-independent installation (VNEU), which specialists of the TsDB MT Rubin are working on.

    This is a must. Yesterday Rogozin said that Russia together with France will produce weapons, maybe this was the case?
    1. +13
      17 July 2013 11: 58
      Quote: seasoned
      Do you feel the difference?

      Yes, it’s clear that the wrong profile, and the scale lol
      It's just that Ukrainian manufacturers (ALL) are abandoned by the state to the mercy of the market and fate. That's where the heads of enterprises (those who are not indifferent to their fate) grab any "straw." ..
      1. +4
        17 July 2013 12: 15
        Quote: Corsair
        So the heads of enterprises (those who are not indifferent to their fate) grab at any "straw".

        Honor and praise to such managers, otherwise effective managers are in vogue in these joint-stock companies, who know how to "master" funds and have no idea what the enterprise at which he "works" is doing. Budget funds are "used" on time, and at the exit ...
        1. +1
          17 July 2013 12: 38
          Quote: Author of the article
          ..... Project 677 submarines are the most modern non-nuclear submarinesthat fully meet the needs of the time.

          I am not an expert, but I think that atomic only strategic underwater missile carriers need to be done.
          And such boats, like the recently launched Kaluga shipyard, will be very useful in the brewing struggle for the Arctic and the shelf. They are cheaper, you can make more ... and the autonomy of navigation is enough to solve almost "local" problems.
          1. +5
            17 July 2013 12: 52
            but I think that it is necessary to develop nuclear shipbuilding, to set tasks for developers to reduce the cost and miniaturization of nuclear power plants, etc. there will be demand - there will be development of the industry. there is nothing to burn diesel fuel, it is necessary to develop new, breakthrough technologies
            1. rolik
              +3
              17 July 2013 13: 15
              Quote: buzuke
              , to set tasks for developers about the cost reduction and miniaturization of nuclear power plants, etc.

              And boilers are already reduced in size. Only not as fast as we would like.
          2. +7
            17 July 2013 13: 13
            Quote: Sea Snake
            ... and the autonomy of navigation is enough to solve almost "local" problems.


            Accompany strategists who will be? And to visit potential friends off their shores?
            Everyone has their own tasks, everyone has enough work.
          3. +1
            17 July 2013 16: 52
            Quote: Sea Snake
            I am not a specialist, but I think that only strategic underwater missile carriers should be made nuclear.

            For AUG on a diesel engine you do not especially chase. Atomic multipurpose is also needed.
          4. 0
            17 July 2013 20: 47
            Quote: Sea Snake
            and the autonomy of navigation is enough to solve almost "local" problems.

            and how do you propose to solve "non-local" problems?
        2. rolik
          +3
          17 July 2013 13: 13
          Quote: seasoned
          but now in these joint-stock companies effective managers who know how to "master" funds are in vogue

          I completely agree. These "defective" managers have been tested the hard way. And as soon as they were given a kick in the ass, it immediately became better, the patient sharply went on the mend))))
          But such boats are very necessary. Quiet, inconspicuous but with good armament the most. And if they also deliver VNEU, in general beauty. Where the atomic power and its power will be redundant, this boat is just right.
    2. +1
      17 July 2013 12: 31
      Quote: seasoned
      This is a must. Yesterday Rogozin said that Russia together with France will produce weapons, maybe this was the case?

      VNEU has promised to prepare its own development, which is in full swing, by 2016 already for installation.
    3. 0
      17 July 2013 16: 50
      Quote: seasoned
      This is a must. Yesterday Rogozin said that Russia together with France will produce weapons, maybe this was the case?

      Yesterday you wrote here that we are establishing cooperation with the Italians in the field of submarine construction (project S - 1000), and those also seem to be planning VNEU there.
      It would be nice to get more developments on VNEU.
  2. 0
    17 July 2013 11: 44
    Interestingly, with or without VNEU?
    1. 0
      17 July 2013 11: 54
      Probably not.
    2. 0
      17 July 2013 12: 32
      Quote: fzr1000
      Interestingly, with or without VNEU?

      If everything goes well with the development, then now they are oriented, to install the third boat of the series
    3. 0
      17 July 2013 13: 13
      without - it’s just not there yet.
    4. rolik
      0
      17 July 2013 13: 17
      Quote: fzr1000
      Interestingly, with or without VNEU?

      Without VNEU ...... for now.
    5. 0
      17 July 2013 14: 06
      Without, VNEU something does not work out, 3-4 years are needed more.
    6. +1
      17 July 2013 16: 54
      Quote: fzr1000
      Interestingly, with or without VNEU?

      Given the current situation with the DPL in the fleets and without VNEU will go, and you can even have one.
  3. +3
    17 July 2013 11: 46
    I was afraid that they would continue to build on the old project. Time has passed already. And they upgraded and that’s good.
  4. 0
    17 July 2013 11: 48
    It’s just right to cross myself.
  5. 0
    17 July 2013 11: 51
    Best news. And an extremely useful thing.
  6. Strelok20883
    +5
    17 July 2013 11: 54
    I stood there for a long time. Well, nothing this "baby" will still flutter the nerves of lovers of "Western values" In general, the dynamics of rearmament pleases.
  7. +3
    17 July 2013 11: 56
    The submarine fleet under the USSR was one of the most powerful in the world (if not the most). And we have gained great experience. But, unfortunately, there are few boats .. Good news
  8. Conepatus
    0
    17 July 2013 12: 38
    What they are building is, of course, good. But 4 years for 1 boat is a lot. The UDC French are punching faster.
  9. KononAV
    0
    17 July 2013 12: 39
    It seems like a small boat and how long to build?
    1. +1
      17 July 2013 13: 14
      Build quickly - but if you change projects on the go and clamp money for a long time.
  10. smiths xnumx
    +3
    17 July 2013 14: 11
    Well, project 677 "Lada" already has a short but rather rich history. She, along with the projects PL 956, 855 and 636.3, was supposed to become the main diesel-electric submarine for the fleet and replace the 877 project. It was originally planned to build them as much as 20. This was the first single-hull diesel-electric submarine after the war. The first submarine of the B-585 project "Saint Petersburg" was laid down on December 26, 1997 and handed over to the fleet on April 22, 2010. The boat was planned to be transferred to the Northern Fleet. but that's where the problems started:
    -firstly, the engine could not give more than half the power set by the project;
    Secondly, not a ready-made hydroacoustic complex, and this is not counting the problems with the TE-2 torpedoes.
    In February 2012, the media said that the Navy was abandoning the Lada project - according to the former commander-in-chief of the Navy Vysotsky: “.. the declared technical characteristics of the Project 677 submarines are not confirmed during the tests of the lead submarine Saint Petersburg. “The Russian Navy does not need the Lada in its current form. We do not need new "brains" with weapons that would sit on the energy of the Second World War. What for? Who needs it? And her operational properties are the same .. "The construction of the next 2 submarines in the Kronstadt and Sevastopol series was suspended, they did not begin to dismantle well. There was talk about the procurement of German submarines of project 214. 90 "Sarov", it looks like hydroacoustics have been worked out in the same place. Construction resumed, supposedly in the summer the transition of "St. Petersburg" to the Northern Fleet is being prepared.
  11. +1
    17 July 2013 16: 12
    Great news, article +.
  12. 0
    17 July 2013 20: 54
    Everyone is praying for this VNEU, but at least someone can explain purely statistically and on the fingers, how great is its advantage? How often do ordinary diesels come to the surface, and how long is there? Maybe their autonomy was enough in principle to survive a clash with the enemy, get away from the pursuit, complete the necessary tasks, finally catch the moment and emerge? Was it necessary to emerge such a serious limitation and disadvantage?
  13. +1
    18 July 2013 06: 26
    Russian industry is waking up from hibernation lulled by the "reformers" of the 90s.
  14. 0
    19 July 2013 11: 54
    Quote: Corsair
    Quote: seasoned
    Do you feel the difference?

    Yes, it’s clear that the wrong profile, and the scale lol
    It's just that Ukrainian manufacturers (ALL) are abandoned by the state to the mercy of the market and fate. That's where the heads of enterprises (those who are not indifferent to their fate) grab any "straw." ..

    Pity you neighbors! I would like to say that someday a worthy leader will come and unite everything into a new USSR. But I think that this will not happen already! (((
  15. 0
    19 July 2013 12: 18
    Quote: patsantre
    Everyone is praying so much for this VNEU, but at least someone can explain purely statistically and on the fingers, how great is its advantage? Was there a need to come up with such a serious limitation and disadvantage?

    Dear Have you ever heard of the Hans-Coller generator?
    I talked with one grandfather about work, talked about the war, told him that I was interested in the secret weapons of the Third Reich, and grandfather told me an interesting thing. He turned out to be the old man on a mine minesweeper. In 1945, a submarine was seized in Poland at the pier, the guard was from the NKVDshnikov. Their minesweeper was engaged in towing the boat to Leningrad. The convoy was of seven ships! To the questions: what are we going to tow?
    later in the article
    http://www.skif.biz/index.php?name=Pages&op=page&pid=25

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"