Military Review

Army for citizens has become more important than the economy

49

Most Russians believe that the country still needs a "strong leader" who can bring order - even at the price of restriction of freedom. And the Russians agree to spend more on defense, even if it creates problems for the economy. But there are fewer strong supporters of such measures, experts of the analytical Levada Center have found out. Oppositionists are sure that doubts about the merits of the existing political regime and its author are gradually increasing in society.


Sociologists from 1998 find out the attitude of Russians to the thesis: "Russia needs a strong leader who can bring order, even at the price of temporarily canceling the elections and restricting freedom of speech." The share of those who agree with this thesis has not changed over the past 15 years. In the 1998 year, when the country lived under President Boris Yeltsin, and Putin was known only in the Kremlin, 76% of Russians agreed to a "strong leader." In the 2013 year, almost as many agree with this - 75% (statistical error 3,4%). This share is made up of those who "fully agree" on a strong leader and who "rather agree." 15's “Fully Consonant” years ago was 56%, and now 39%. "Rather consonants" was 20%, became 36%.

A member of the political committee of the Yabloko party, Sergei Ivanenko, believes that the reduction of staunch supporters of a “strong hand, a strong leader” is, among other things, a matter of trust in the current government. But Mr. Ivanenko considers this "a normal manifestation of democracy, when people are not going to break everything."

If "the perception of key problems has not changed dramatically in 15 for years, then no problem has been solved during this time," Sergei Obukhov, secretary of the Communist Party Central Committee, told Kommersant. But “political discontent” with this is manifested, in his words, “specifically: people still do not accept politics in their pure form, preferring jokes and kitchen grumbling.”

Also, the Levada Center constantly monitors the issue of relations between Russia and the USA - here, too, the views of Russians have changed a little. Most - 75-76% of citizens - with 1998, are in the belief that "the US is using Russia's current difficulties to turn it into a raw materials appendage of the West." But 15 years ago 46% agreed with this thesis “completely”, now 32% agreed. "Rather agreed" with this 29%, now - 45%. Previously, 62% of Russians were confident that “Western culture has a negative impact on Russian life,” and 37% were “firmly convinced” of this. Now "firmly confident" - 24%. But those who "rather agree" became 41%, although it was 25%.

The issues of defense have gained special significance for the 15 years in the mass consciousness. Previously, the majority of Russians - 53% - were to some degree or other categorical against “spending more on defense if this creates some problems for our economic development.” Supporters of the militarization of the economy remained in the minority - 35%. Now almost half of them - 46%.

The country's population is now “generally distant” from all these issues, Aleksey Grazhdankin, deputy director of the Levada Center, explained to Kommersant, explaining why there are fewer Russians with a firm position. "The 90s passed when the market economy and integration with the West were talked about a lot and positively. Public opinion was subjected to state propaganda," he said. But the passion for a strong leader remains "unchanged", the expert stressed. "Most of the citizens do not perceive acutely the former threats," the vice-speaker of the State Duma, United Russia Sergei Zheleznyak, told Kommersant. "This is a very positive phenomenon, since it indirectly indicates an increase in stability in the country."
Originator:
http://www.kommersant.ru/
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 11 July 2013 12: 06 New
    15
    An apple, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, and to them is unified, who is talking about something of his own. What citizens do not perceive acute problems ???? What are the acute problems of the past salary and standard of living, is it kind of solved or not what The deputies and trying to become them, live some kind of their own life, somewhere far away.
    1. afire
      afire 11 July 2013 23: 29 New
      +6
      found out the experts of the analytical "Levada Center"
      -can not read further laughing
      1. Very old
        Very old 12 July 2013 09: 08 New
        0
        And we found out on the territory, which is called "within the Moscow Ring Road"
    2. Lavr75
      Lavr75 12 July 2013 00: 00 New
      +4
      Zadalbal already this Blevada center, where they generally conduct polls. I live in Moscow, not one of my friends has ever participated in any polls. although according to theory of probability they should, at least once.
      1. Very old
        Very old 12 July 2013 09: 10 New
        +1
        Vanya, Vanya, you’re not interested in them, you don’t know how to blow the right pipe
  2. Airman
    Airman 11 July 2013 12: 06 New
    37
    Again "Levada Center", and again "opinion" of the Russians. Or maybe this is the opinion of mattress makers, imposed on us with the help of such surveys. I have never been questioned in my entire life.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 11 July 2013 12: 12 New
      +6
      Quote: Povshnik
      Again "Levada Center", and again "opinion" of the Russians.

      The State Department simply transferred the salary money.
      1. zart_arn
        zart_arn 11 July 2013 14: 43 New
        +8
        Let’s conduct a survey, has anyone here ever involved anyone in such events? Me and my friends - no one ever.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 11 July 2013 15: 39 New
          +4
          Quote: zart_arn
          Let’s conduct a survey, has anyone here ever involved anyone in such events?

          Honestly, I recently participated in a VTsIOM survey. Interestingly, after he answered the questions, a few days later they called back and clarified whether they had interrogated me, who had interrogated me and several personal questions for control, was surprised.
          1. smile
            smile 11 July 2013 17: 13 New
            0
            Vladimirets
            I confirm that I was interviewed three times. Called back once.
            1. Vladimirets
              Vladimirets 11 July 2013 23: 07 New
              +2
              Quote: smile
              I confirm that I was interviewed three times.

              Yes you are a veteran of polls!
    2. FATEMOGAN
      FATEMOGAN 11 July 2013 13: 03 New
      11
      Quote: Povshnik
      Again "Levada Center", and again "opinion" of the Russians. Or maybe this is the opinion of mattress makers, imposed on us with the help of such surveys. I have never been questioned in my entire life.


      Indeed, Levada is funded by amers and it is strange that this is not indicated in the article, although they are required to indicate that this poll was conducted by a foreign agent. According to this survey, it turns out that earlier we treated the amers worse, and now, after Libya, Syria, after these snacks, attempts to impose pedoparades on us, we began to relate to them better ????? This is not a survey, but complete crap (to say the least). Yes, and that a lot of this statistics levada is given on our site recently, we can soon cite as a fact, the data from a survey of Navalny or Gozman ???


      1. FATEMOGAN
        FATEMOGAN 11 July 2013 13: 20 New
        +2
        and how polls are made ala - levada, it is told well in the English series, it is unlikely that something has changed since ....


        http://rutube.ru/video/fae67d80c85f756aa3376d292a53c77b/


        1. Airman
          Airman 11 July 2013 14: 43 New
          +2
          Quote: FATEMOGAN
          and how polls are made ala - levada, it is told well in the English series, it is unlikely that something has changed since ....




          Isn't it time to shut down this Levada Center NGO? Where are the authorities looking? Or is it to their advantage?
          1. FATEMOGAN
            FATEMOGAN 11 July 2013 20: 39 New
            +1
            Quote: Povshnik
            Isn't it time to shut down this Levada Center NGO? Where are the authorities looking? Or is it to their advantage?

            I completely agree with you that the Levada Center is a clear pest beetle, but how to get rid of it, that’s the question, they don’t officially break the laws, it’s another matter that when publishing any information of their research, it should be indicated that these data were provided not just a Levada center, but a foreign agent. In the past, few people even wondered at the expense of whose money all of these centers live, and now people will once again think about whether to believe the research that has been done and, frankly, the State Department’s money.
      2. aksakal
        aksakal 12 July 2013 01: 25 New
        0
        Quote: FATEMOGAN
        Full crap (to put it mildly)
        - Your tact and politeness, frankly, I envy smile With such egregious juggling, I am not able to select expressions and speak out very harshly, for which I sometimes suffer laughing Sometimes with teeth laughing
        These are the figures of "Kurginyan vs Svanidze" - this is the real figure both on the defense of Russia and on the relations between the United States and Russia - that is, the views held by the Armenian in this duel "Armenians vs. Georgians - who is more for Russia?" laughingadheres to just such a number of Russians. There can simply be no other numbers - neither 46%, nor 53%!
        1. FATEMOGAN
          FATEMOGAN 12 July 2013 10: 00 New
          0
          Quote: aksakal
          - With such egregious juggling, I am not able to select expressions and speak out very harshly, for which I sometimes suffer sometimes with teeth


          I’ll just swear them to myself, and after that I’ll write laughing Yes, and I wrote crap with a capital letter, as if, it’s not easy crap and a giant laughing
    3. Bronis
      Bronis 11 July 2013 13: 27 New
      +4
      Quote: Povshnik
      Again "Levada Center", and again "opinion" of the Russians. Or maybe this is the opinion of mattress makers, imposed on us with the help of such surveys. I have never been questioned in my entire life.

      The probability of getting a sample is quite small. The largest polls are conducted during the election period. But more than 20.000 thousand did not happen across the country (for a long time, now it is no longer necessary ... for obvious reasons). For a representative sample, 2-5 thousand respondents is maximum.
      As for Levada, this is a private office, spun off from the completely state VTsIOM. Although there are still those guys there ... Usually their numbers do not differ much (and considering that the questions can be formulated differently, this is natural). Formally, they even refused foreign money, although for denyuzhki polls for private entities are very active. In fact, only the form of financing was changed to legal.
      The vector is, in principle, fairly well defined. And it is natural. Moreover, many have forgotten the 90s (and someone has grown up and does not know). And we cannot say that we have solved system-wide problems. Plus, traditionally, a leader who has been in power for a long time is slowly losing popularity starting from 8-9 years old (in the most optimistic scenario). But the rest of the results are also understandable. It would be interesting not to look at the "average", but to compare what the capital, regional centers, national republics, remote places think.
      1. Owl
        Owl 11 July 2013 14: 27 New
        +3
        "Levada Center" judging by its "data from surveys of Russians," is an instrument of psychological warfare against the Russian people. By publishing some kind of polls that are beneficial for the US State Department and for Russia's liberal internal enemies (led by "plush Dima"), this center is trying to induce Russians to lean toward pro-American policies, both foreign and domestic. So far, for a large part of the population of Russia, the destructiveness of this course for us is not particularly noticeable, but who saw the beginning of the destruction of the USSR in "glasnost" and in "perestroika"? Too many obvious enemies of the Russian (Soviet) are now in power and near-power structures (Khakamada, Nemtsov, Alekseeva, and the like) and amazes, or rather frightens, connivance at this and indulgence on the part of the elected president.
        1. FATEMOGAN
          FATEMOGAN 11 July 2013 20: 53 New
          0
          Quote: Eagle Owl
          and it surprises, or rather scares, the connivance of this and the indulgence of the chosen president.


          Why connivance is tightened by little, the law of Dima Yakovlev - from January 1, citizens of the Russian Federation, who simultaneously have the citizenship of the United States, are deprived of the right to be members or leaders of non-profit organizations operating in the country. And NGOs that participate in political activities and are funded from the United States should be closed.

          The Law on NPOs, any NPO that meets two criteria - financing from abroad and participation in political activities - must be included in the register of non-profit organizations that perform the functions of a foreign agent. A different legal regime will apply for these NPOs than for ordinary NPOs - providing, in particular, special reporting and special checks.

          Little by little the order is being put in place, information is provided according to which people themselves can decide whether or not to trust certain organizations and their data, as an example, is the foreign agent Levada Center. Well, I don’t believe that mattress-beds will be with good intentions, it’s useless to do anything, I don’t believe either them or their pretenders, I don’t believe that’s all.
      2. cdrt
        cdrt 11 July 2013 15: 37 New
        0
        + 100500.
        It would be really interesting to see exactly the alignment, and not the average: regions, capital, social. groups, groups by source of income and level (small business / self-employed, employees and levels of education and pay, civil servants with the same layout, employees of state enterprises, state employees, pensioners by group, etc.).
        1. Very old
          Very old 12 July 2013 09: 33 New
          0
          Eat what you want. And who will pay for it?
    4. Gora66
      Gora66 11 July 2013 14: 27 New
      +2
      I think such "polls" are carried out without leaving the office. We put down the necessary numbers and gave it to such an "analyst" to write an article. But how can they take for this "green candy wrappers" that stink of heroin and blood?
    5. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW 11 July 2013 18: 10 New
      +2
      and LEVADA WHOM IS FINANCED? IF ABROAD, THEN THE AGENT OF INFLUENCE AND NOTHING TO LISTEN, AGAIN WASTE BRAINS ALREADY GOT THESE JUDOSIONISKY FOOTAGES !!!
    6. starshina78
      starshina78 11 July 2013 21: 28 New
      0
      You contradict yourself! "Again" Levada - center "" - you write, .... "No one has interrogated in my entire life." So if you do not believe this center, but believe VTsIOM, then where is the confidence that they are also interviewing someone, and not fulfilling the order. For example, I trust Levada Center more than VTsIOM. Painfully, they (VTsIOM) always have optimistic forecasts. If the results of the poll concerning the state, the leaders of the state or something else are announced, then everything is good, sheer optimism, if the opposition, then everything is bad, sheer pessimism. It smells like a lie. Moderator, ay! Don't forget to drop my comment down to the footer and add "delete". Do you love me! God forbid ! Someone will read and support! You won't sleep! And without sarcasm - censorship - then stop!
    7. NickitaDembelnulsa
      NickitaDembelnulsa 12 July 2013 04: 55 New
      0
      In-in. Who are they interviewing at all! I didn’t even participate in the census, but here’s a survey about defense
  3. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 11 July 2013 12: 08 New
    +3
    The modern political system will not be able to give the country any leader, because the current political system in Russia is an impotent impotent system, incapable of producing anything but corruption. A leader can appear only from the outside, from the people, from the army or from elsewhere, but definitely NOT ANYTHING RELATED with the modern political system, which is popularly perceived to be mildly criticized and every person who leaves from there is perceived negatively in advance.
    1. Apologet.Ru
      Apologet.Ru 11 July 2013 13: 38 New
      +2
      . A leader can only appear from outside, from a people,from the army

      You mean, a colleague, as an example, the Egyptian events?
      1. Standard Oil
        Standard Oil 11 July 2013 19: 08 New
        0
        Rather, France on November 9, 1799 or Germany 1933, it is possible and Russia October 1917, which option do you like more?
        1. Very old
          Very old 12 July 2013 09: 38 New
          -1
          No. And there must be a way out. Well, you can’t be an eternal example- HOW TO LIVE NOT!
  4. My address
    My address 11 July 2013 12: 10 New
    +3
    So they don't want the strong from good. A strong leader can make the "elite" work for the country and disperse thieves and idlers. Often, a strong person does not care how much something he has, he is more interested in the results of his site, enterprise, region, country. It is more interesting to be proud not of yourself, but of the country.
  5. bars280
    bars280 11 July 2013 12: 12 New
    +3
    Personally, I believe that in Russia, every first (except for marsh) considers the United States an enemy !!!!
    1. little man
      little man 11 July 2013 13: 57 New
      0
      Put a minus for the marsh.
      Personally, I went to the swamp to yell against thieves and crooks, and not at the request of the State Department.
      1. seller trucks
        seller trucks 11 July 2013 14: 54 New
        +1
        Quote: man
        Personally, I went to the swamp to yell against thieves and crooks, and not at the request of the State Department.


        you could shout somewhere in the woods, why go to the "swamp"? confess - a liberal? by the way (-)
      2. Bronis
        Bronis 11 July 2013 15: 39 New
        +2
        Quote: man
        Personally, I went to the swamp to yell against thieves and crooks, and not at the request of the State Department.

        Helped?
      3. smile
        smile 11 July 2013 17: 29 New
        +1
        little man
        Does it bother you that the crowd you joined was led by even bigger crooks and thieves, who were also staggering about instructions on embassies and throwing mud at Russia in Congress and demanding tough action against our country from the United States? Do you like it, or do you think that American paid puppets are more concerned about the Motherland? :))) Did you understand whom you helped with your "orania"?
        1. seller trucks
          seller trucks 11 July 2013 17: 42 New
          +1
          Quote: smile
          Did you understand whom you were helping with your "scream"?


          this is his "civic" duty, their own kind, they call them "thinking" on the anthology with "Svidomo" in Ukraine, and "Bolotnaya" is their analogue of "Maidan", the participants, too, the same Nemtsov and Yavlinsky, the author and directors like us we all understand one.
          1. smile
            smile 11 July 2013 18: 40 New
            +1
            seller trucks
            Yeah, to the point! The goal is hit! :)))) And I figured out why "svidomye" ... :)))
  6. kasha
    kasha 11 July 2013 12: 13 New
    +1
    You need to hold your weapon tightly in your hands, and do not pay anyone attention! In another way, the enemy will come, and no one will ask anyone in different polls !!
  7. pensioner
    pensioner 11 July 2013 12: 20 New
    10
    Sergei Ivanenko, member of the political committee of the Yabloko party - it's like a member of the Donut Hole Party. Well, or the movement for "Dead donkey ears". A very reputable companion.
  8. avt
    avt 11 July 2013 12: 21 New
    +6
    Quote: Standard Oil
    The modern political system will not be able to give the country any leader, for the current political system prevailing in Russia is an impotent impotent system, incapable of producing anything but corruption.

    request It is quite natural, because the main ideology of the system and the “elite” that fills it is to get pleasure at the expense of consumption. It is foolish to demand some kind of outrageous accomplishments such as the restoration of the Country after World War II and space exploration. get new people with an idea in mind. But everything, as with the EDR, will end with the settling of new fighters, including "Putin's special forces - Homeland", in Moscow in warm comfortable apartments somewhere in New Moscow and groans and calls to raise the regions of Russia and its intact. Already highlight the previous ,, set "and how they were tamed in Moscow and turned into well-fed, lazy, castrated cats. Well, who did not want to, like Rokhlin, then ... request As EBN said, Rokhlins will sweep away! ""
  9. Dimy4
    Dimy4 11 July 2013 12: 32 New
    +1
    With an aggressive foreign policy, the leadership distracts the population from internal problems, which it (the leadership) seems to be solving or does not know how, or they are satisfied with the current state of affairs. The latter argument is supported by the "immortality" and untouchability of certain political persons, whom the people can no longer see without pouring blood into their eyes.
    1. smile
      smile 11 July 2013 17: 54 New
      +1
      Dimy4
      Are you our pathetic (due to lack of strength) and rather cautious our attempts to counteract the attempts of external forces to drown us you call aggressive foreign policy? Well, without such a policy, we will not need any internal - there will be an ordinary external management ... is it really so better. In your?
      1. Dimy4
        Dimy4 11 July 2013 22: 50 New
        0
        Compared with the past twenty years - it is aggressive. And we had almost external control in the 90s. In my opinion, duck is nothing good (I put it so gently).
    2. Bigriver
      Bigriver 12 July 2013 07: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Dimy4
      Aggressive foreign policy leadership distracts the population from internal problems ....

      About how! laughing
      That is, requiring us to put our obstinacy in upholding national interests into the toilet, go into self-isolation, and rush desperately to solve only internal problems. And in international politics, adhere to the rules: do not be rude to anyone, do not demand anything, do what they say, know your own insignificant place, quietly follow in the wake of the world hegemon.
      No words, good concept love
      For passive pi .., homosexualist.
      So, let’s say, Europe was dissatisfied with the rights of LGBT people in our country. We are right there - bang the law they want! Yes? laughing
      Or Japan, like a thread there, again huddled along the Kuril Islands in a fit ... No need to anger it, no need to be aggressive ... Give the islands, let them use it. The main thing is not to be distracted from internal problems. Huh? wassat
      1. Dimy4
        Dimy4 12 July 2013 07: 23 New
        0
        And where in the commentary did you see a proposal to abandon the hard defense of our national interests? It says only what is written.
  10. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 11 July 2013 12: 46 New
    +2
    Another article for blowing out brains !! This "Levada-Blevada got it already"
  11. nov_tech.vrn
    nov_tech.vrn 11 July 2013 12: 49 New
    +2
    The Levada Center, in relation to the opinion of the Russians, has one relation, it falsifies it, but the author, on this basis, organizes dances. The people are dissatisfied with a number of people who constantly hang out in the leadership of Russia, and have a strong impact on our reality unequivocally, but not against increasing defense capability.
  12. Sinbad
    Sinbad 11 July 2013 12: 58 New
    +1
    I wonder who and where did they interview? They probably first found out whether the opinion of the respondent coincides with their opinion. Or three of the party just sent them ....
  13. Sewer
    Sewer 11 July 2013 13: 01 New
    +2
    Quote: Povshnik
    In my entire life no one has interrogated me.

    I’ve also never been asked, not my friends, my acquaintances, how many people I know, who I’ve asked people more than once, but have you ever been asked, if asked, about any kind of garbage like a new movie for you, and you were in the new supermarket, if not, go in like that, but they don’t ask about the urgent, because they know the answers perfectly!
  14. Imigrantt
    Imigrantt 11 July 2013 13: 36 New
    +2
    I think Levada or whatever, the collection of loudmouths and "Mazepas" of unknown nationalities - financed from overseas, is located in the wrong geographic location! Bluvada needs to be closer to the owners, either overseas, or in extreme cases in two-faced Europe! And here the Odessa noise, which looks like work, is already rather boring! negative
  15. pahom54
    pahom54 11 July 2013 13: 57 New
    +3
    I do not believe these polls (more precisely, their results), paid for by unknown people. After all, it is enough to bias the composition of the respondents, and as a result it may turn out that we, Russians and citizens of Russia, want disarmament and a weak state in order to voluntarily go to the servants of the Americans and their allies. Elementary: interview migrants who have received Russian citizenship - and they will say: for hell we need an army. Interview the residents of Ichkeria - they will also say: to hell with us (supposedly to us, but in fact - to Russia) a strong defense industry and army. Interrogate the generation of Pepsi, who is now 20-30 years old, and especially those who are waiting for the call - get the same answers.
    But ask the supposedly lost generation (as Gorbach called us) - and I’m sure that 90% of this layer will say: Yes, we need a strong Russia, a strong defense and army, and a strong leader!
  16. VadimSt
    VadimSt 11 July 2013 14: 33 New
    +2
    Levada Center? On a patriotic site, the research of a foreign agent is given - this is how he was recognized in May by 2013.

    The Prosecutor General’s Office conducted an audit of one of the country's most respected sociological services - the autonomous non-profit organization Analytical Center of Yuri Levada. According to Yuri Chaika’s department, from 26 of December 2012 of the year to 24 of March of 2013 of the year, 3,9 million rubles were received from Levada Center’s accounts from abroad. About this "Izvestia" said a source in the Prosecutor General. The analytical center received money from the American Open Society Institute, as well as from organizations from Italy, the UK, Poland and Korea.

    Soft and unobtrusive fooling and "destruction of minds", alas, continues!
  17. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 11 July 2013 14: 45 New
    +5
    The Blevada Center, as always, rigging the facts and distorting the answers, reported to the State Department that work is underway, and the United States love more and more and very soon all of Russia will be waiting with open arms for the good representatives of the United States, everywhere and everywhere, without any resistance and fees resources needy USkalam.
  18. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 11 July 2013 15: 39 New
    +1
    This "Levada" with their polls should go to the outback, or at least in the region, and in the capital, by polling the people in the offices, you will find out the desires of the "people". Let them include in the starting points the level of income, the degree of expenses, the convenience of living, and then they would ask about their own!
    An interesting rating would be!
  19. tank64rus
    tank64rus 11 July 2013 15: 55 New
    0
    According to Yuri Chaika’s department, from December 26, 2012 to March 24, 2013, 3,9 million rubles were transferred to the accounts of the Levada Center from abroad. About this "Izvestia" said a source in the Prosecutor General. The analytical center received money from the American Open Society Institute, as well as from organizations from Italy, the UK, Poland and Korea. There is nothing to add, except for one, this organization is a foreign agent and it can only work in any way.
  20. tank64rus
    tank64rus 11 July 2013 15: 55 New
    0
    According to Yuri Chaika’s department, from December 26, 2012 to March 24, 2013, 3,9 million rubles were transferred to the accounts of the Levada Center from abroad. About this "Izvestia" said a source in the Prosecutor General. The analytical center received money from the American Open Society Institute, as well as from organizations from Italy, the UK, Poland and Korea. There is nothing to add, except for one, this organization is a foreign agent and it can only work in any way.
  21. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 11 July 2013 16: 55 New
    0
    The Levada Center is a continuous ordering, any opinion polls can be carried out so that the result that is needed is obtained. The question is among which population groups to conduct such polls, in which regions, even in what tone and context. Similar centers successfully use all this. Even the same person will answer the same question in different ways, if interpreted differently.
  22. individual
    individual 11 July 2013 17: 22 New
    0
    Kommersant and Levada are executing the order.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. And raid
    And raid 11 July 2013 17: 26 New
    -1
    I have nothing to protect in this country, I’m practically a beggar, the state strips me of taxes, and then they steal the treasury. I don’t need such Russia, I’d rather sit out than go to war!
  25. ed65b
    ed65b 11 July 2013 18: 08 New
    +1
    Quote: AndRade
    I have nothing to protect in this country, I’m practically a beggar, the state strips me of taxes, and then they steal the treasury. I don’t need such Russia, I’d rather sit out than go to war!

    You really do not mind. all in essence. Only have to fight because those who made you a beggar will flee to the conquerors immediately.
  26. Ruslan_F38
    Ruslan_F38 11 July 2013 18: 08 New
    0
    The country needs not only a strong leader, but also a master, a person for whom the country's problems are perceived as personal. The country does not need a functionary who lives according to the job description, who has worked on it from call to call and has forgotten everything when he comes home.
    “Previously, 62% of Russians were convinced that“ Western culture has a negative impact on Russian life, ”and 37% were“ firmly convinced. ”Now, 24% are“ firmly confident. ”But those who“ rather agree ”have become 41%, although it was 25%. " - it turns out there are those who believe that "Western culture" has a positive impact on Russian life? Apparently Chubais and Nemtsov were asked many times?)))
  27. Lankov Victor
    Lankov Victor 11 July 2013 19: 17 New
    +3
    I did not begin to waste time on the fabrications of a foreign agent at the blevade center.
  28. e-froloff
    e-froloff 11 July 2013 22: 49 New
    0
    I somehow do not trust this Levada Center for a long time! They are selling! And they spread statistics, supposedly people really think so! I support commentator Viktor Lankov !!!
  29. Diviz
    Diviz 12 July 2013 06: 40 New
    0
    that’s where the difference between the activities of this levada center and NGOs.