Capital ... avoids noise and abuse and is timid in kind. This is true, but it is not the whole truth. Capital is afraid of lack of profit or too little profit, as nature is afraid of emptiness. But once sufficient profit is available, capital becomes bold. Provide 10 percent, and the capital agrees to any use, with 20 percent it becomes lively, with 50 percent positively ready to break its head, with 100 percent it tramples all human laws, with 300 percent there is no crime for which he would not risk, at least under the gallows fear. If noise and warfare make a profit, capital will contribute to both. Proof: smuggling and slave trade.
T. J. Dunning
The first to understand the advantage of financial wars and provocations was Rothschild and his textbook alienation of foreign capital with the help of disinformation. Leaving this without consequences for Rothschild, the financial circles (by whom the pillar was Rothschild) created a precedent - financial intervention. This is how cartels were born, the purpose of which was to use their financial influence on political, social, financial and government systems for the sake of personal enrichment. With the accumulation of capital in industry: technological, military, engineering, oil refining, pharmacological - cartels began to dictate their political will, expressed in numerous wars, invasive, colonial, ethnic, social, civil.
And from this point of view, the current view in history - this is one big lie. It is enough to understand that wars are started not just like that, but with a completely pragmatic and concrete goal: to seize territories, resources, increase geopolitical influence. The task of modern history is to consider the history of wars as a kind of random factors at first glance and supposedly a way out of control of those political forces that started the war, while these same forces that unleashed wars were just an instrument of oligocracy, whose sole purpose was to enrich and the seizure of new checkpoints and frontiers, the establishment of ties with new political and power elites in new regions.
I will not delve into the distant history and will simply look through the prism of gain and collusion in the history of the 2-th World War. All the countries of Europe, Germany won virtually no resistance, moreover, at the time all countries had a fairly large arsenal and a human resource, captured ammunition and weapons in European countries Hitler was enough to subsequently arm 250 divisions. In addition, all enterprises in the captured countries continued to work for the Hitler army and among these corporations during the entire war that they are still widely known: JP Morgan Bank, Ford, Standard Oil, Kodak, Coca-Cola, Shell, Nestle, Nivea, Maggi, Siemens (I cited the example of not German concerns, European and American, abstracting from the concept of patriotism), one way or another they contributed to Nazi Germany.
The wars in Europe and the USSR were different, in Europe the war was like a redistribution of spheres and guidelines of influence without undermining the well-being of the main shareholders of capital, in the USSR the war was for destruction, without the right to mercy and mercy.
How did fascism in the face of its three main trends (fascism, Nazism, Francoism) so quickly spread to Europe? Captured plants in Europe continued to work, residents of the occupied countries were the backbone of the economic power of the Third Reich. France, for example, has allocated daily German marks for 1940 million since the summer of 20, and for 1942 million since the fall of 25. These funds were not only enough to provide German troops with everything they needed, but also to prepare and wage war against THE USSR. In total, European countries “donated” Germany for these purposes more than 80 billion marks (of which France - 35 billion). And what do historians write about financial, economic, military and resource assistance to Germany from the occupied, allied and neutral European countries? There is neither a common figure of European aid to Hitler, nor for individual countries - historians are shyly silent about this. Only fragmentary data: industrial capacity after the capture of Europe from Germany has doubled, and agricultural - has tripled. European countries helped Germany to eliminate the growing shortage of its labor force due to the call of the Germans for the army. According to incomplete data, from France were delivered to German factories 875 thousand workers, from Belgium and the Netherlands - half a million, from Norway - 300 thousand, from Denmark - 70 thousand. This gave Germany the opportunity to mobilize almost a quarter of its population, and they as soldiers, in all respects they were superior to their allies - Italians, Romanians or Slovaks. Take the first two weeks of the war in France and the USSR. Already on the fifth day of the war, the real war that began on 10 in May of 1940, and not the one that the Germans called "sit-down", the Americans and the British - "strange" when there was simply no fighting.
So who fought against the USSR? This is another indirect confirmation of the fact that they are trying to present us the war between the USSR and Europe as an exclusively crisis of relations between Nazism and communism, whereas if we take into account the fact that almost every fifth participated in this war on the side of Germany - was not German, then this interpretation of history does not hold water.
It is believed that 22 June 1941 of the year Germany attacked the Soviet Union. In fact this is not true, against the USSR began the war several countriesamong them: Romania - about 200 thousand people, Slovakia - 90 thousand people, Finland - about 450 thousand people, Hungary - about 500 thousand people, Italy - 200 thousand people, Croatia as a part of the guard division - 35 thousand people, Spain - “ Blue Division 18 thousand people. And these are only countries who officially declared war on the Soviet Union. According to various sources, from one and a half to two and a half million volunteers who fought in the Wehrmacht and the Waffen SS took part in this “crusade” against the USSR. These were representatives of such countries as the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Sweden, Finland, France, Switzerland, Spain, Luxembourg. Now many will say that this is the Moloch of the war, but not themselves they went to war against the USSR? Someone else might say a pompous phrase that wars are declared by states, not soldiers. Wars are declared by very specific people, gray cardinals hiding in the shadows and managing huge capitals. Another thing is that the soldiers execute their orders through their command and the government, but let us return to the fact that everyone knows “the declaration of war”. The declaration of war by Hitler’s Germany, the USSR was WITHOUT a declaration of war, and indeed all the wars Germany, Italy and Japan began WITHOUT a declaration of war — in Poland and Abyssinia, in France and Pearl Harbor, in Holland and Belgium. A declaration of war by one state to another is a procedure that imposes certain obligations on both states that are in a state of war. Since the declaration of war, the state that declared war, and the state to which the war was declared legally, are in a state of war, regardless of whether hostilities began directly. The act of declaring war automatically entails the imposition of a series of rights and obligations on both sides of a military conflict. Since the declaration of war, the rules of International Humanitarian Law come into force. Did these standards work for people in Europe and the USA? Yes, definitely. Did international humanitarian law work in respect of the soldiers of the Red Army and the inhabitants of the occupied territories of the USSR? There are numerous cases examined at the Nuremberg process that the norms of international humanitarian law in relation to our compatriots did not work either in particular or in principle. One German term that appeared during this war puts all the points on this very right - Vernichtungskrieg . The war of extermination.
That is, there are two visions of war - on the European arena and the Eastern Front. Now we will again return to the economy of Europe and to the countries forging the victory of Germany on its way to the Third Reich. What we see now, in our days, is an absolute contempt for International Humanitarian Law, to hang up the head of a sovereign state on the gallows, to crush the country's leader with the hands of insurgents, there are many such examples ...
Let's go back to that war.
Belgium and the Netherlands supplied the Germans with coal, iron, iron, manganese, zinc, and so on. Most interestingly, all the occupied countries, ruled by collaborators, did not require payment in cash. They were promised to pay after the victorious - for the Germans - the end of the war. They all worked on Hitler for free. And what about neutral countries - Sweden and Switzerland? And they worked for Germany. The Swedes supplied bearings, iron ore, steel, rare earth elements. They actually fed the German MIC until the end of the 1944 of the year. The rapid German offensive against Leningrad was connected, in particular, with the aim of "locking" our navy and securing supplies of Swedish steel and ore. Significant deliveries from Latin America went through the Swedish "neutral" ports for Germany. Our military intelligence reported, for example, that from January to October 1942 of the year more than 6 million tons of various cargoes, mainly strategic raw materials, were imported to Germany through Swedish ports. In contrast to the occupied countries, Sweden earned good money in the war. How many? Such data has not yet been published. Swedes have something to be ashamed of. Like the Swiss. The latter supplied precision instruments, and Swiss banks were used to pay for much-needed purchases in Latin America.
It would be interesting to compare in detail what Germany received from the occupied, allied and neutral countries of Europe (and as it turned out, mostly free) with the volume of US aid to the Soviet Union (we paid for it). It turns out that there is no common figure for European aid to Hitler, nor for individual countries. Only fragmentary data. For the Germans, even judging by one Skoda, this assistance was extremely important. As for us, for example, the delivery of American "Studebakers" after the Battle of Stalingrad, which made the Red Army mobile and maneuverable. But, I repeat, historians do not have complete data on German aid. And she, judging by the available data, was enormous. In the four-volume World Wars of the 20th Century, the following figures are given: the industrial potential after the capture of Europe from Germany doubled, and the agricultural potential tripled.
What was planned to do with the conquered peoples? According to Himmler’s plans, the racially inferior peoples of the USSR should have been thrown back beyond the Urals, and their number was reduced several times. The Aryans of Nordic blood were to settle in the occupied territories of the eastern lands.
“This is a war of ideologies and the struggle of races. On one side is National Socialism: an ideology based on the values of our German, Nordic blood. The world is worth as we want to see it: a beautiful, orderly, socially equitable world, which, perhaps, still suffers from some flaws, but on the whole is a happy, wonderful world filled with culture, which Germany is. On the other side is the 180-million people, a mixture of races and peoples whose names are unpredictable and whose physical essence is such that the only thing that can be done with them is to shoot without any pity and mercy. These animals, who torture and mistreat every prisoner on our part, who do not provide medical assistance to our wounded people captured by them, as decent soldiers do, you will see them yourself. These people were united by the Jews of one religion, one ideology, called Bolshevism, with the task: having Russia now, half [located] in Asia, partly in Europe, to crush Germany and the whole world.
When you, my friends, fight in the East, you continue the same struggle against the same subhumanity, against the same lower races that once spoke under the name of the Huns, later 1000 years ago in the days of Kings Heinrich and Otto I, the name of the Hungarians, and later under the name of the Tatars; then they appeared again under the name of Genghis Khan and the Mongols. Today they are called Russians under the political banner of Bolshevism.
- Speech by Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler in Stettin 13 July 1941 year "
The German historian Christian Streit points to "the destruction of Einzatzgruppen in the region of the OKV and in the frontal zone about 600 000 of prisoners of war, most of which were eliminated before the spring of 1942." In general, the death toll is known from official Nazi sources — from the report of the head of the working group on the use of labor by the ministerial director Mansfeld in the imperial economic chamber 19 of February 1942 of the year:
“We had 3,9 million Russians at our disposal, of which only 1,1 million remained. Only from November 1941 to January 1942 did 500.000 Russians die.
- Speech by the Ministerial Director Mansfeld in the Imperial Chamber of Commerce 19 February 1942 of the Year
And what did Hitler say?
“For centuries, Russia has lived at the expense of the German core in its upper layers of the population. Now this core has been completely destroyed. The Germans took the place of the Jews. But just as the Russians cannot throw off the yoke of the Jews with their own efforts, so many Jews cannot keep this vast state under their control for a long time. The Jews themselves are by no means an element of the organization, but rather an enzyme of disorganization. This giant eastern state is inevitably doomed to ruin. All the prerequisites are ripe for this. The end of Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state. Fate intended us to witness such a catastrophe, which, better than anything else, will confirm the absolute correctness of our racial theory. ”
Adolf Hitler, “Mein Kampf”
Are there still any liberals and revisionists who would argue that the fate of the peoples of the USSR would be different, except for total destruction?
The Second World War is unique of all wars; never in history have there been such cases of the mass transition of citizens of conquered countries to the service of invaders. Almost the majority of the population voluntarily became under Hitler’s banners, including in the Soviet occupied territories. And now the descendants of those traitors and traitors of the motherland who are not as short as ever are louder and louder speak about oppression and deportation, swing rights and make claims to those whose ancestors withstood all the war and broke the back of the European “crusade” campaign against our peoples. Is it not obvious that the USSR suffered all the war, while the countries of Europe continued to work for Germany, supplied human and material resources, when our women, old people and children working in harsh conditions, malnourished, raising industry from their knees, and scientific design institutions, in the bare steppe, building plants and developing new fields in the permafrost and the Far North, defended their right to victory, which with enviable consistency wants to drag yourself to England, then the United States, then France.
A civilized Europe always diligently erases from the history of the Second World War these shameful facts of its cooperation with the bloodiest and inhuman regime of the twentieth century, and this is the truth about the war that you need to know and remember.
And now in the face of even such superficial cited facts - do we really not see those demiurges who were behind this war? Are they so blind that we cannot put together the jigsaw puzzles we have and see the whole picture?
Then move on to the second part.
Recently I read an interview with Bashar Al-Assad, where he clearly speaks about the demonic forces behind the Syrian "revolution". It makes it quite clear that not only the influence in the region is at stake, but the natural resources of Syria located in the coastal shelf zone of the country also made it quite clear that Egypt also had natural proven gas reserves on the coastal shelf and what happened to Egypt By the same analogy, it was possible to continue the story of Iraq and Libya, if it were not so significant. Suffice it to recall that on the eve of 11 September, the United States stood on the eve of the biggest financial crisis, such megacorporations as Enron should have fallen victim to this crisis. More than 10 years have passed - Enron's positions are stronger than ever. Al Qaeda "destroyed" the twin skyscrapers, and now they are almost allies of the United States and Britain, is it not a farce and deepest contempt for the opinion of the rest of the world? The financial crisis of those years disappeared like a ghost, but what happened in the Middle East and North Africa? A series of wars and social upheavals, a change of regimes of states and owners of fields of previously independent countries, endless revolutions and millions of deaths. This is the very conspiracy of the cartels, which in its time began the Second World War. And unswervingly dictating the Third.
In the Second World War there were several stages, the initial one was the preparation of public opinion and moods, political domination was the formation of pleasing pro-oligocracies of political regimes in the countries, and finally the decisive phase was the last goal: the USSR.
Time to remember what Truman wrote in his time:
“If we see that Germany is winning, we must help Russia. And if Russia gains the upper hand, we must help Germany. And may they thus kill each other as much as possible. All this is for the good of America. ”This announcement by 24 June 1941 was made by the future president of the United States, Harry Truman, to the American newspaper The New York Times.
In fact, now the second stage of the game, the formation of political regimes is being played on the Middle East map. The first stage, which determines the preparation of public opinion and the alignment of forces, has long been over; if anyone does not understand this, then this is extreme Islamism. In general, Islamism itself has become a force driving millions, and the rate of oligocracy was made in favor of this scenario.
Now the whole world is frightened by Iran, and, like Syria, they demonize this country, whereas this is just a ruse. Behind Iran, there is a very specific and obvious goal, the unleashing of the Great Asian War. Dmitry Aedov quite clearly predicted all the stages of this war, but having missed the obvious, that in any case Russia within its present borders would become an obligatory arena of military operations. Or maybe he just let the rest of us think the rest, but the fact that hostilities will take place on the territory of our country and direct intervention will be introduced - he is silent about that, but if we follow the effect of our Russian oligocracy, everything is prepared for this scenario. It remains quite a bit - to complete the privatization of the latest state assets: Gazprom, Russian Railways, Uralvagonzavod, Rostelecom, Alrosa, Rosneft. That is, to stake out their legal preferences in the world cadastre of oligocracy, about their rights to this property and deposits, and refusal of citizenship, turning in one fell swoop from Russian citizens and “political husbands” into world magnates who, in principle, are indifferent to everything except capital . This is what I see.
We return to Islamism and its consideration outside the religious component. I deliberately do not touch not only the dogmas of religion, but also its components, and describe the understanding that as a political force - Islamism has the largest number of participants all over the world that are similar not by racial or ethnic characteristics, but by ideology. The whole Middle East is mostly Muslim, the Islamist belt stretches from the countries of North Africa to the southern borders of Russia and even penetrates into Russia in its center on the Volga belt. Islamists have a common goal - to proclaim Islam throughout the world and the world to be Muslims are divided into zones - the world where Islam already reigns, and the territory of war - where Islam has yet to fight for the domination of Islam. These are purely mechanical aspects of the course of Islam, the expansion of Islam’s ideas leaves no choice as soon as Gazavat, seizing new territories and then proclaiming on this territory - the land controlled by Allah.
As far as I understand the situation, Syria is doomed, despite the titanic efforts of its army, people and government, Islamists is still more, and the influx of fresh terrorists or “rebels” as the North Atlantic Union, again sponsored by Europe, calls them The United States, and its Middle Eastern neighbors (United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkey, Israel) and directly supporting terrorists, making air raids on the territory of a foreign state WITHOUT a declaration of war, says only that they will stop at nothing, because in this Third Second World War - the second stage is inexorably approaching the end. All the more cynical violation of the norms of international law, more and more desperate throwings of information misinformation and less and less shameless methods of information disguise in the media about violations of the norms of international law and howling of any "tame" human rights organizations.
Again, from time to time, revanchist slogans of Turkey begin to sound, to end the war with the Kurds and the beginning of the revival of the Great Ottoman Empire in its former borders, with the seizure of Greek, Azerbaijani, Armenian territories and there is no doubt about Turkey’s focus on the Caucasus and southern regions of Russia. It is not difficult to guess who will become a locomotive on our southern borders.
These calls are getting louder, Islamist spiritual leaders more and more clearly designate the enemy in the person of Russia and its inhabitants, and the religious leaders of radical Islamists are calling for the killing of Russian citizens and the rape of our women.
If the symbolic Reichstag was set on fire on 11 September 2001, then now the drums of war are heard more clearly, Syria will be the last stronghold before the invasion of Iran. Iran strategically and territorially prevents the invasion of Islamists in Russia from the southern borders, as soon as Iran falls, the barrier will be broken, and the Middle Eastern cauldron of revolution will rush to the countries of Central Asia. Russia has no reliable borders on the border with Central Asian countries, and this border is the longest in the world, from Mongolia to the Black Sea. In fact, the Third World War itself will be presented as a concept of controlled chaos, where the priority vector will be assigned to the invasion of Russia from the southern borders of the entire mass of refugees from the Central Asian region who will certainly appear when the war begins in the Iranian Caspian region. In this war, all means of mass destruction will be used, and a nuclear attack on Iran is more than likely.
It is these masses who are destined to become the destroyers of Russian culture, the Russian people, the Russian language and finally break the only people on earth who opposed both the West and the East for centuries.
It will not only be refugees, it will be primarily Islamists, and, probably, that is why we are so hostile to everyone who has southern blood, it says “war is like a premonition ...”
deja vu ...
Explanations that may not coincide with the majority opinion:
I believe that the Veto right in the Syrian confrontation from Russia is just a forced step, the main guarantor and defender of Syria is China, since its hydrocarbon dependence on Iran is too high, besides this, the transportation of oil by sea through Syria is strategic, as is investment in the Syrian economy . The current official policy and course pursued to Russia, the longer the final act with Syria is postponed, thus the intervention against Iran and the final full-fledged war and a series of social upheavals will be longer and longer, and more and more state capital goes to the private sector, less and less land and rights to their resources from the state. The successors of the country's natural resources are capitalists and oligocracy. This is my personal point of view, as I suspect it may not coincide with the idyllic views of other members of the community.
I did not express my opinion about my attitude to Muslims, because I understand that Muslims are just "cannon fodder" in the hands of oligocracy.
I believe that the laws adopted in the Russian Federation recently have a direct bearing on what I have stated above, because directly protesting against any religion, including Islam, is to protest against the vector of growing events in which Islamists will play a significant role. In the event of a conflict between the Russian population and the Muslim - any development of events rolls into the theological plane of the difference of religions (Orthodoxy and Islam), while atheist patriots do not dare to express their opinion anyway, since any verbal confrontation can be interpreted as anti-religious activity. The law back is directly proportional to the protection of citizens in a secular state, the law about insulting the feelings of believers is a violation of the constitution, this is my opinion. In this state, one category of citizens has more rights than another, the main thing is to be pious and religious, the rest is already ruled by the courts and penal servitude (in fact).
I am not so convinced in the forecasts given by Dmitry Aedov, my opinion is that the war in Iran can only be of nominal character, they only need a corridor to Central Asia and to our southern borders. They are interested in Iran’s resources only as a way to control China’s hydrocarbon needs and influence its economy. Let us call them the word NATO, it is enough for them to change the political elite in Iran.
I can not judge the President of the Russian Federation for the work he has done, but in the light of recent events - the tightening of restrictions on the freedoms and rights of citizens of my country - I’m not sure that he acts in their interests. I see how the national interests of Russia are being destroyed, whole branches of high-tech and educational institutions, medicine and space engineering are being destroyed, aviation industry and nuclear, electric power and resource-extracting industries, laws in the social sphere and legal defenselessness of citizens are violated. And all this went according to plan, from the collapse of the army, theft, the decline of the authority of the army and fleet to the level ... below nowhere.
I also do not believe in the slogans or ideas of Russian liberal political movements, right, left, red, patriotic and national, green and blue, all oval and square for me, as well as all other geometric figures of political beau monde - they all I inspire only disgust and disgust only because I am their compatriot. This is all shelupon who wants to get into the cohort of those in power and ensure a comfortable future for themselves and their loved ones. They are as far from the people as all other bureaucrats and party bonuses.
I worry about the fate of Syria and its people, but I also understand what forces oppose them, so understanding Syria’s doom for me is a matter of time. Although, of course, I dream that Syria would survive, but there everything rests on the authority of the personality of President Bashar Al-Assad and the bayonets, with his departure, surely the corrupt conformists will come to power.
My opinion is just my opinion, you can either think the same way, or you can have your own.
The printed material is the interpretation of the works I have read:
http://www.warmech.ru/war_mech/tyl-evr.html Николай ЕФИМОВ, "РФ сегодня", №12, 2006 г.; Газета "Дуэль" № 25  от 17 июня 2008 года
http://scepsis.net/library/id_523.html Александр Тарасов "Фашизмов много"
http://zhurnal.lib.ru/a/aedow_dmitrij/wojna20hh.shtml Аэдов Дмитрий. 1939-й. Начало... - Самиздат