Military Review

Demonstration of the chassis MZKT-79291

31
During the military parade in Minsk 3 July 2013, the promising MZKT-79291 wheeled chassis with the wheel formula 12х12, already developed by Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant OJSC (MZKT), was demonstrated for the first time. The MZKT-79291 chassis past at the parade was equipped with an overall prototypical body, apparently simulating a missile launcher.


According to known data, the chassis is intended primarily for use as the base of the self-propelled launcher Rubezh with a small-sized “light” intercontinental ballistic missile created by the Moskovsky Institute of Thermal Engineering Corporation (MIT) OJSC. 7929 (first in the 10x10 and 10x8 versions) for various missile systems designed in the USSR at that time was carried out in Minsk at MZKT with 1980s. In the future, the MZKT-79291 chassis project It was reported that in the 2008 year at MIT, the Minsk plant delivered a set of documentation (technical project) to the MZKT-79291 chassis in a modern version for the AAP of the promising PGRK, and MIT conducted the associated R & D with the MWTP.

It is known that the modern diesel version of the MZKT-79291 chassis should have a 854.10 diesel engine with 650 horsepower. special development of JSC "Tutaev Motor Plant".

In the evening of June 6, 2013, from the Kapustin Yar test site in the Astrakhan Region, a Rubezh test complex with an intercontinental ballistic missile was launched. According to the chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, Colonel-General Vladimir Zarudnitsky, during the test, new combat equipment was tested. At the same time, the general clarified that this was already the fourth launch of the Frontier in the framework of the tests.

The launch of the rocket from the new complex was recognized as successful. This year, another launch will be made, which will be the last for "Boundary" in the framework of tests, Zarudnitsky said. Then the missile system will be adopted by the Strategic Missile Forces. The new Rubezh strategic missile system will be put on combat duty until the end of 2013, according to the general, and the first missile regiment on the new complex will be deployed in 2014. Currently, work is underway to create the necessary infrastructure, personnel are being trained and combat crews are being coordinated.

Demonstration of the chassis MZKT-79291

Prototype of the new wheel chassis MZKT-79291 with the wheel formula 12х12 developed by Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant OJSC at a military parade in Minsk
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andrei332809
    andrei332809 8 July 2013 10: 04 New
    +8
    Well, MZKT has always been famous for quality. dad did not let the production collapse - you can trust the bulbache technique
    1. Airman
      Airman 8 July 2013 10: 24 New
      +1
      Quote: andrei332809
      Well, MZKT has always been famous for quality. dad did not let the production collapse - you can trust the bulbache technique


      It is good that, in addition to Topols and Yars, "Rubezh" will appear, and on what base is already a secondary issue. It is better to be independent from the supply of equipment, but you have to choose the best.
      1. andrei332809
        andrei332809 8 July 2013 10: 51 New
        +6
        Quote: Povshnik
        Better to be independent of the supply of equipment,

        from whom is independent? from bulbash? people will not speak in vain, they are not looking for good from good. Yes, the technique needs different, but it must be unified. And so let me down, I never heard
        1. StolzSS
          StolzSS 8 July 2013 12: 03 New
          +2
          Yes, I also did not hear reviews with global failures and it pleases wink
          1. crazyrom
            crazyrom 9 July 2013 04: 39 New
            0
            Is this chassis so long that it can turn on to put the 4 iskander? Or is it not long enough yet?
      2. Nick
        Nick 8 July 2013 17: 31 New
        0
        Quote: Povshnik
        It is better to be independent from the supply of equipment, but you need to choose the best.

        Since Soviet times, mechanical engineering and the electronics industry have been well developed in Belarus. Old Man kept all this, but Russia is the main consumer of all this, so Belarus will not cut off our supplies to us, otherwise we will have to stop the factories, yes, we have a union state with Belarus, in the end ...
  2. Vadivak
    Vadivak 8 July 2013 10: 13 New
    +2
    I wonder how our Voshchina-2? Finally stalled? The theme seems to have been and the formulas are no worse than in Belarus
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 8 July 2013 10: 21 New
      +3
      You compare the load capacity.

      In general, we need to look closely at this enterprise. The land is full of rumors about the sale of MZKT to the Chinese; they show great interest in it.
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 8 July 2013 10: 23 New
        +1
        Quote: Spade
        You compare the load capacity.


        There are also 12 wheeled ones in the project, just not in the metal
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 8 July 2013 10: 24 New
          +1
          Lifting capacity not only depends on the number of wheelsets.
          Voshchina has its own niche, and it is not clear why they are not bought. The same "carts" - a huge number of them are needed in the troops. For example, what is the point of creating brigades on armored personnel carriers, if the tank battalions in them do not have the same operational mobility?
          1. Vadivak
            Vadivak 8 July 2013 10: 51 New
            +1
            Quote: Spade
            For example, what is the point of creating brigades on armored personnel carriers if tank battalions in them do not have the same operational mobility?


            I absolutely agree with you on this issue
      2. rolik
        rolik 8 July 2013 13: 06 New
        +2
        Quote: Spade
        In general, we need to look closely at this enterprise. Earth rumors about the sale of MZKT to the Chinese

        A representative of the Goskomvoyenproma refuted the report on the sale of shares of Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant (MZKT) to investors from China.
        "There were no deals with the participation of the Chinese with MZKT shares and were not planned," the representative of the State Military Committee told Interfax-Zapad agency on Sunday.
        The agency interlocutor claims that MWTP is considered as a participant in one of the integration projects agreed at the level of the governments of Belarus and Russia. “In accordance with the previously reached agreements, the negotiation process on this project with the participation of the MWTP and the Russian side continues, everything is going according to the previously scheduled schedule,” said a representative of the State Military-Industrial Committee of Belarus.
    2. Bad_gr
      Bad_gr 8 July 2013 12: 04 New
      +4
      By the way, in contrast to the KAMAZ chassis imposed by Serdyukov, the Pancyp-S on the BAZ chassis can fire right away. For the same reason, the Arabs preferred to use the Pantsir-S on the MAN chassis.
  3. afire
    afire 8 July 2013 10: 13 New
    10
    Technique Mlyn! Frontiers, s-300,400,500, uh, ships) shirts on the back from the satisfaction of events. Someone else about Putin has a bad thing? And he alone essentially pushes everyone who can and should work to protect the sovereignty of the Motherland-Russia, finds money to raise enterprises, but not everything is as smooth as we would like, but this is better than what was and ALREADY exceeds our recent state factor of. Plus, Russia's refusal to propose disarmament of the strategic nuclear forces is generally a bomb!
    Keep it up Vladimir Vladimirovich. What does Putin and the MZKT have to do with it? - I think this is a stupid question.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 8 July 2013 11: 16 New
      +2
      Quote: afire
      And he alone essentially pushes everyone


      Quote: afire
      What does Putin and the MZKT have to do with it? - I think this is a stupid question.


      I absolutely agree, the question is not just stupid, - indeed, what does Putin and the achievements of Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant OJSC have to do with it?
      1. Russ69
        Russ69 8 July 2013 11: 43 New
        +6
        Quote: Vadivak
        I absolutely agree, the question is not just stupid, - indeed, what does Putin and the achievements of Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant OJSC have to do with it?

        It had not been a venture to re-equip GDP, in such a volume the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant would have been without orders. There is a direct link here.
        1. afire
          afire 8 July 2013 11: 46 New
          0
          Quote: Russ69
          It had not been a venture to re-equip GDP, in such a volume the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant would have been without orders. There is a direct link here.

          +
        2. Vadivak
          Vadivak 8 July 2013 11: 52 New
          +3
          Quote: Russ69
          and the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant OJSC would be without orders. Here's a direct link


          Remarkably, the Bryansk plant is without orders and the Minsk plant is with orders, what is this to us? When will you understand that Old Man works only for himself? And no one will give these mazes for free, and their production will die along with developments
          1. Nitup
            Nitup 8 July 2013 12: 01 New
            +4
            Quote: Vadivak
            Bryansk factory without orders and Minsk with orders

            Bryansk factory also with orders. Do not forget about the large number of complexes S-400, Vityaz, Morpheus, which use the BAZ chassis in large quantities.
            1. Bad_gr
              Bad_gr 8 July 2013 12: 12 New
              +1
              Quote: Nitup
              Bryansk factory also with orders. Do not forget about the large number of complexes S-400, Vityaz, Morpheus, which use tractors and chassis BAZ, about a large number.

              If my memory serves me, once in the union time there was only one enterprise, with one design bureau, engaged in heavy wheeled machinery. Then it was scattered into three parts: MAZ, BAZ, KrAZ.
              If wrong, correct.
          2. Russ69
            Russ69 9 July 2013 05: 42 New
            0
            Remarkably, the Bryansk plant is without orders and the Minsk plant is with orders, what is this to us? When will you understand that Old Man works only for himself? And no one will give these mazes for free, and their production will die along with developments


            Bryansk has its own niche for the production of tractors and does not have any threat from the Minsk plant in terms of competition. For Bryansk, the problem is KAMAZ, which wants to bend under itself the production of all equipment for the Moscow Region.
        3. Lopatov
          Lopatov 8 July 2013 11: 54 New
          +3
          Quote: Russ69
          It had not been a venture to rearmament, in such a volume the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant would have been without orders.

          The Chinese also really need such cars
          1. Vadivak
            Vadivak 8 July 2013 12: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: Spade
            The Chinese also really need such cars


            Well, now it’s quite clear that GDP should be kept .....
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 8 July 2013 12: 36 New
              +3
              It is necessary to create a joint venture with Belarusians. Without fail. MZKT should not be lost.
              1. Vadivak
                Vadivak 8 July 2013 18: 09 New
                +1
                Quote: Spade
                It is necessary to create a joint venture with Belarus


                It’s better to immediately president Luka, why pull something
        4. rolik
          rolik 8 July 2013 13: 08 New
          0
          Quote: Russ69
          It had not been a venture to re-equip GDP, in such a volume the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant would have been without orders. There is a direct link here.

          It seems to me that then there would be customers. That's just, for sure, they were with slanting eyes and came from the Huang He River.
          1. Russ69
            Russ69 9 July 2013 05: 46 New
            0
            Maybe, yes, guess what. All the same, the technology of the Minsk plant is very specific. Probably without our orders, they would not have disappeared, but now they live and work quietly.
    2. KERGUDU BIMBAR
      KERGUDU BIMBAR 8 July 2013 22: 42 New
      0
      IF NOT Vladimir Vladimirovich SO WHO ...
      Call me!
  4. Savl
    Savl 8 July 2013 10: 28 New
    +3
    In metal, there is a 12x12 chassis for about 30 years, although a prototype. And in the photo 6x6.
    1. Nick
      Nick 8 July 2013 17: 41 New
      0
      Quote: SaVL
      And in the photo 6x6.

      In the photo just 12 * 12. Chassis 12-wheel of them 12 leading ...
  5. AVV
    AVV 8 July 2013 10: 44 New
    +1
    Now there will be a choice for some complexes, the BAZ goes, and for other MAZs, It’s good when there is an alternative, it creates healthy competition. It does not allow designers to stagnate !!! And so a good car, only the photo is not what it should be, but a pity !!!
  6. Nitup
    Nitup 8 July 2013 10: 46 New
    +1
    It is interesting, and what will be the mass of such a small-sized ICBM, if it should reach the United States, breaking the missile defense, or is it still a ballistic missile defense?
    1. Nick
      Nick 8 July 2013 17: 45 New
      0
      Quote: Nitup
      It is interesting, and what will be the mass of such a small-sized ICBM, if it should reach the United States, breaking the missile defense, or is it still a ballistic missile defense?

      When NATO facilities are located in Poland and the Baltic states, not only ICBMs, but also the same Iskander become strategic ... wink
  7. papss
    papss 8 July 2013 10: 58 New
    +2
    The chassis is primarily intended for use as a base for a self-propelled launcher for the new Russian Rubezh mobile ground-based missile system
    , well ... good luck ...
    As Rogozin said - "missile defense killer", another gift from the United States ... Russia - a missile, Belarus - a chassis ...
  8. gregor6549
    gregor6549 8 July 2013 11: 34 New
    +1
    This chassis can be used not only for "Rubezh" but also as an excellent platform for other advanced weapon systems. If the citizens of Minsk also managed to bring to mind the computer control system of this platform, developed by the citizens of Minsk on the basis of the SU27 avionics, then this will be a fairy tale that even a salaga can manage without the risk of screwing up very expensive equipment.
  9. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 8 July 2013 11: 38 New
    +1
    Quote: Nitup
    It is interesting, and what will be the mass of such a small-sized ICBM, if it should reach the United States, breaking the missile defense, or is it still a ballistic missile defense?

    Since Russia has no INF Treaty under START treaties, let it ride along the Ural Mountains and cover the whole of Europe with ports, what’s not an option?
    1. Nitup
      Nitup 8 July 2013 11: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Starover_Z
      Since Russia has no INF Treaty under START treaties, let it ride along the Ural Mountains and cover the whole of Europe with ports, what’s not an option?

      Then it is unclear why Putin and Ivanov are declaring that we will withdraw from the INF Treaty if we want to formally use ICBMs, but in fact - INF.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. PPO-1980
    PPO-1980 8 July 2013 12: 16 New
    +2
    Well done Belarusians. We should learn from them how to preserve the best Soviet heritage.
  13. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 9 July 2013 06: 31 New
    0
    All that is good to us is apparently not very pleasant for the Yankees. So keep the GDP! Your favorite city can sleep peacefully, there is something to ensure this peace of mind.