Landing boat "Cossack" presented at the IMDS plant "Nizhny Novgorod ship"

38
Landing boat "Cossack" presented at the IMDS plant "Nizhny Novgorod ship"The 02320 project of the Kazak landing craft developed by the design and engineering bureau of ZNT-Engineering OJSC was first presented at IMDS-2013 in St. Petersburg. About this to the correspondent of the Central Naval Portal the chief designer of the project Andrei Chichagov.

The boat is a landing craft with a length of about 28 meters and a width of more than 7 meters, capable of speeds up to 11 nodes. The carrying capacity of the boat is 2 armored personnel carrier type BTR-80 or 100 man landing.

A distinctive feature of the Kazak boat is the ability to place a Mistral-type DVKD in the dock chamber: it houses the 4 boat, as well as an armament complex consisting of three remotely controlled modules — one 12,7-mm heavy machine gun and two 30-mm automatic grenade launchers.

The boat can be used as a multipurpose vessel for delivery of rescue equipment, diving complexes, diving operations at depths up to 60 meters. The project of the boat will be offered to the Russian Navy as a replacement and addition to the 1176, 1785 and other projects that are in service.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -15
    8 July 2013 10: 01
    A distinctive feature of the boat "Kazak" is the possibility of placing a DVKD of the "Misral" type in the dock chamber: it accommodates 4 boats,
    A good typo about a zhaboyedsky trough!
    1. +14
      8 July 2013 10: 09
      Come on, at least something ... Better that way than nothing at all. Remember the past decade - a lot of what was then done in the metal? Of course you want everything at once, and that would be the best in the world ... but it doesn’t always happen the way you want.
      The main thing in this is that the designer works and this is embodied in the metal. In this sense, this is good news ...
      And the Mistral is a passing stage. As the USSR in the 20s and 30s survived the tanks of Renault and Christie. We will also have domestic and the best. ))))))))))))))
      1. +2
        8 July 2013 10: 17
        In my opinion, the very first comment is incompetent, as these are all the same vessels that will, to one degree or another, stand up to protect our interests!
      2. +10
        8 July 2013 10: 29
        The Japanese howled when they learned that the first 2 MisтRalya will be stationed at the Pacific Fleet. Mistral colonial ship. Here are the Japanese and worried and suddenly .....)))))
        Sincerely.
        1. +2
          8 July 2013 10: 55
          Quote: JIaIIoTb
          The Japanese howled when they learned that the first 2 of Mistral would be stationed at the Pacific Fleet. Mistral colonial ship. Here are the Japanese and worried and suddenly .....)))))
          Sincerely.

          Tactics and strategies for their application have not yet been developed.
          Papuans drive they fit perfectly. But it seems we were going to do it.
          We need to build ships for specific tasks.
          1. StolzSS
            0
            8 July 2013 12: 08
            Tactics and strategies on the go will be developed as always in the process of development .... hi
    2. KERGUDU BIMBAR
      +1
      8 July 2013 22: 25
      ENOUGH VISITING!
      TIME WE CAN’T BUY IT BY YOURSELF.
      Until we can ...
      1. Cat
        0
        8 July 2013 22: 50
        Quote: KERGUDU BIMBAR
        ENOUGH VISITING!
        TIME WE CAN’T BUY IT BY YOURSELF.
        Until we can ...

        yeah ...
        We do not know how to make tractors? Well ... you have to allocate money from the budget and buy a limousine in Abroad. And how to plow and sow on it - then, in the process, we will figure it out.
  2. +7
    8 July 2013 10: 02
    Greatest invention! The speed is higher than that of the armored personnel carrier by 1 km / h! I am truly proud of our designers! Why do we need Mistrals? We have "Cossack !!!
    1. +3
      8 July 2013 10: 08
      Quote: PPSh
      Speed ​​is higher than that of an APC for an entire 1 km / h

      do not confuse nodes and km \ h.
      1. +3
        8 July 2013 12: 34
        Quote: kris
        do not confuse nodes and km \ h.

        A node is a unit of speed equal to one nautical mile per hour. It is used in seafaring and aviation practice. By international definition, one node is equal to 1,852 km / h or 0,514 m / s.

        Stunning speed of 11 knots for landing operations.
        Maybe it’s better to transport the tractor to hard-to-reach areas.
        1. Constantine
          +1
          9 July 2013 00: 14
          Apparently, the boat is a deep modernization of Cossack boats from Sich. Hence the name :)
    2. +2
      8 July 2013 13: 09
      20 km / h Is this speed higher than the speed of the APC? On the basis of Belarus that the armored personnel carrier was released?
  3. +8
    8 July 2013 10: 07
    Yeah, over the speed of 11 nodes. If only they were ashamed of shame.
    1. +12
      8 July 2013 10: 10
      Quote: Mechanic
      Yeah, over the speed of 11 nodes. If only they were ashamed of shame.

      There probably the pedal drive stands, what would the paratroopers have something to do?
      No offense to our Fleet, but the speed is really just ridiculous!
      1. +3
        8 July 2013 10: 44
        With the same success, PThi can be revived! So those even have a gun ...
    2. +3
      8 July 2013 13: 51
      I think it's a manual oar drive. No wonder they called it - "Cossack" 8) Here is Zhen, a Cossack, and oars - one-two-one-two. 8)))
    3. +1
      8 July 2013 21: 34
      Quote: Mechanic
      Yeah, over the speed of 11 nodes.

      Hi Zhenya! You did not understand sad , this is at the time of starting the engine fellow , and then increasing wassat , well, like "Cupid" wink (joke) wink Of course, this is not speed for a landing boat, except for forcing rivers.
  4. +2
    8 July 2013 10: 12
    It looks like an ordinary die-cast ... Of course, nothing particularly outstanding, but at least it comes to the realization that you won’t be full of BDKs alone, you need a class of small landing gear.
    1. +5
      8 July 2013 10: 19
      Quote: Corsair
      It looks like an ordinary die-cast ... Of course, nothing particularly outstanding, but at least it comes to the realization that you won’t be full of BDKs alone, you need a class of small landing gear.
      on the one hand, you are right, but small landing craft, due to their vulnerability, must have high speed and maneuverability. What I do not see in this project. But then there are 4 pieces in Pezhik’s.
      1. +1
        8 July 2013 21: 42
        Quote: Mechanic
        . But then there are 4 pieces in Pezhik’s.

        We take a number, I won’t talk about skill, everyone knows how, what and how much we can Yes
  5. +7
    8 July 2013 10: 42
    Strange, the project 21820 (length 45 m, m 280 tons) has a speed of 35 knots, and this one has only 11. Strange.

    1. 0
      8 July 2013 13: 25
      Probably this boat belongs to the ships with an air cavity, like the Serna. Hence the speed.
      1. 0
        8 July 2013 16: 01
        Quote: Coward
        Probably this boat belongs to the vessels with an air cavity, like the Serna. Hence the speed.
        Well, yes, exactly that class does 35 +. Only buy Cossacks.
  6. -4
    8 July 2013 11: 11
    Misral - We shit !!!!!
    1. Algor73
      +2
      8 July 2013 12: 06
      Mistral is actually not even a very bad ship. There was simply no such class in Russia. This is a classic for local wars. I am not saying that the ship is perfect, but it is very effective in cooperating with other cover ships. For the Russian fleet it is needed.
  7. +3
    8 July 2013 11: 20
    Speed ​​of course ay-yay. For overseas landing in my opinion is not suitable. He will row 3 hours to the shore.
    1. +2
      8 July 2013 12: 40
      Quote: 1c-inform-city
      He will row 3 hours to the shore.

      At this time, a likely opponent will play chess.
      1. maxvet
        -1
        8 July 2013 13: 51
        ties to eat hi
  8. +2
    8 July 2013 11: 45
    And about the seaworthiness is silent ...
    And how will the wave hit, what will happen to the landing of this "Cossack"?
  9. Constantine
    +5
    8 July 2013 12: 20
    Americanism type "ZNT-Engineering", in my opinion, in the names of enterprises that are going to work for the good of the country, I consider it unacceptable in principle.
    1. Cat
      0
      8 July 2013 18: 28
      Quote: Constantine
      Americanism type "ZNT-Engineering", in my opinion, in the names of enterprises that are going to work for the good of the country, I consider it unacceptable in principle.

      This company is going to work on own good. And the country, from their point of view, is the source of this very good.
      1. Constantine
        0
        9 July 2013 00: 19
        Given that they offer the state to buy and put into service - yes. To offer a vessel with such characteristics can be regarded as a spit in our Navy. Could still offer a couple of rafts, a modernized boat of Peter and a couple of not bad ships like Scandinavian boats and a replica of Queen Elizabeth's revenge))
  10. 0
    8 July 2013 13: 12
    Well, again they suck in another pelvis. And this Cossack wasn’t mishandled by chance? Well, is this just a little more than those vessels on which the Allies landed in Normandy, is there a problem with brains or for the sake of Mysral?
  11. 0
    8 July 2013 17: 32
    The mood on the forum ah-ah-ah !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Cat
    +1
    8 July 2013 18: 40
    IMHO, this dish is quite suitable for the second or third wave of landing - when there is already some bridgehead, and more or less suppressed PDO. But, in this case, it would be smarter to imprison it for the transport of MBT or self-propelled guns - armored personnel carriers and they will swim themselves.
    Letting these "Cossacks" into the first wave is just an expensive method of suicide. Moreover, Mistrals, with their "trading" buildings and the corresponding survivability, are categorically contraindicated to appear in view of the enemy coast, and to cut from the horizon at 11 nodes is still a pleasure ... besides, it is not known at what wave these 11 nodes are obtained ...
  14. The comment was deleted.
    1. Cat
      0
      8 July 2013 19: 09
      Quote from rudolf
      Cat, of course, you can use anything in the second wave of the landing, including these cargo scows, but you still need to deliver them somehow to the landing zone! If these boats take regular places in the same Mistral, then this will not be an amphibious operation, but a banal delivery of cargo to the coast. Well, do not drag them in tows after the UDC!

      so Mistral is just that - a truck. For solidity they called him a landing ship, well, so as to raise the price. Marketing, in general =)))
  15. +1
    8 July 2013 19: 07
    Quote: Nayhas
    20 km / h Is this speed higher than the speed of the APC? On the basis of Belarus that the armored personnel carrier was released?

    on the water - yes laughing
  16. ICT
    +1
    8 July 2013 19: 57
    if you need faster, then the guys on the Volga will soon be left without work, it’s possible to make something on their basis
  17. 128mgb
    0
    8 July 2013 20: 36
    Quote: kris

    A good typo about a zhaboyedsky trough!

    Put a minus - you said badly. They do not eat more "toads" than we "drink vodka".