Kuriles - an integral part of our homeland
selflessly exploited new land and water.
Sovetskimi warriors, courageously in battle to defend the Kuril Islands
and restored historical justice.
The Kuril Islands are the island between the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Hokkaido Island, a slightly convex arc separating the Sea of Okhotsk from the Pacific Ocean. The length is about 1'200 km. Total area - 10,5 thousand km².
It is not the first time that they are the object of the illegal claims made by our countries by Japan, trying to seize the archipelago. So it was both in the 19th century, and in the 20th, and in the 21st, but depending on the current political situation, the country's policy of the rising sun took on different forms.
We would like to consider the history of the Kuril Islands, to get to it, to get to it, to get to it, to get to it, to get to it, to get it out of the country, and to prove that it’s absolutely legal for us, to return to Kursk and South Sakhalin in 1945, the Soviet Union is absolutely legal, to comply with all the Soviet Union’s laws and South Sakhalin is absolutely legal, to keep to Russia and South Sakhalin completely legal, to keep to Russia and South Sakhalin completely legal, to keep to Russia and South Sakhalin. Japanese land, and restored historical justice.
Getting to the analysis of this topic, first of all it is necessary to briefly say about the strategic and economic significance of the Kuril Islands for our country.
Kuriles - a storehouse of minerals. The total estimate of only the mineral reserves of mineral resources for the year 1988 is 44 billion dollars. However, the main mineral resource of Kuril are titanium-magnesium ores, located on the shelf in the form of scattering, and will be applied to earth-earth metals. And titan is, according to expert estimates, the XXI century material. In addition, the offshore island is a potential source of oil and gas.
True, the unique value of Southern Kuril is due to the wealth of water resources. The total stocks of fish and other seafood in the Yuzhno-Kurilskom fishery region is more than 5 mln. Tons, and the permissible catches are about 800 thousand. Tons. In the aquatorium of the Southern Kuril, there is the richest in red seaweed marine life, constituting 89% used for biotechnology of the entire Far Eastern region. According to me, spetsialists, XXI Vek - this is Vek biotechnology, and now the biofartsevtichesky firms of the world in terms of their income are second only to the military-industrial complex.
In addition, in the waters of the Southern Kuril are non-freezing straits from the Sea of Okhotsk to the Pacific Ocean. The Sverokurilsky Straits freeze, thus losing their strategic value for the winter season.
All these facts are undoubtedly known to Japan, which has long been looking at the Kuril Islands to the object of expansion.
What do we know about open Kuril?
In the Kuril Islands, Russia reached the boundary of the XVIII – XVIII table after the famous Kamchatka campaign of Vladimir Atlasov 1696 – 1699, which ended with the annexation of the whole of Kamchatka to the Russian Empire. From the local residents of Atlasov he learned that to the south of Kamchatka there live some special people, “Kurilian foreigners”, “smoked”. It was from Vladimir Atlasov, Kamchatka Yermak, according to the expressions of Pushkin, that the new geographic names “Kuril land”, “Kuriles” and the new ethnonym “Kurilian foreigners”, “Kurils” were included. But in his communion the village of the island has not yet gone about the island, but only about the southern tip of the Kamchatka Peninsula. Here, at the presentation of Atlasov, and was the center of the "Kuril land". And that is why one of the most beautiful lakes of Southern Kamchatka is still bearing the name of Kurilskago. It was in this Kamchatka “Kuril land” opposite the mouth of the first “Kuril rѣka” that Atlas put some kind of earth into the sea.
Indeed, the mouth of the river Goligina sees the island Alaid, in 1954, it was renamed Atlas Island.
The first competent cartographic description of the Kurilsk archipelago, including four southern islands and even the island of Hokkaido, was made in 1711 – 1713 years in the results of the service carried out by the expedition Ignatya Kozyrevsky. In 1726, Akanasіy Yedorovich Shestakov clarifies and supplements the first detailed map compiled by Kozyrevsky in 1713. The Shestakov map for the first time correctly shows the turn to the south of the Pacific coast of the Far East, as well as all islands of the Kuril ridge, including the southern ones, are indicated and listed in detail. Shestakov's card was translated and published in France.
During the 1739 – 1741 years, Martyn Shpanberg headed the next expedition to the Kuril Islands. The 1739 expedition of the year came out to the islands of the Small Kuril Ridge. Through interpreters, the Ainu reported that close to "there are twoteen islands, on which there are a lot of people, and no one on the islands is subject to", with the exception of Matmai Island (Hokkaido), which is "under the rule of the Japanese Khan". So the Russian sailors were convinced that Russia could occupy all the Kuril Islands, including the Small ridge, right up to the coast of Hokkaido.
Upon completion of the expedition, work was done on the first map of the Kuril Islands. The map compiled by Španberg was published in 1745, the Atlas of the Russian Empire. Atlas was published in Russian, French and Dutch. Thus, he received the status of an official document of international significance.
It should be said that the official map issued by him had a special meaning. It was a legal document-izvesheniyem, reflecting the position of the country that issued it, firstly, the composition of its own territory and the length of the border and, secondly, the other countries' legal status. From the point of view of international law ХІІІ - the first half of the XIX century, when many territories were not yet surveyed and therefore did not belong to anyone, preceded by the publication of the geographical map of the “new land” which gave the country that published it and the right of priority to claim ownership of this territory. In other words, it was a principle: the first issued card of the “new territory” has the preferential right to consider it as its possession, even if it is not the first to open it. And to challenge such a cartographic argument was very difficult. An additional advantage was given to the country that issued the card in a foreign language, since in this way it gave its “imitation” not only internal status, but also an international document. And Russia in 1713 – 1796 years produced at least fourteen maps of the Kuril Islands, including the southern group of islands of the archipelago.
Even at the end of the ХѴІІІ century Hokkaido Island, bordering the south by the Kuril Islands, was not part of Japan, which is clearly indicated by the map of the Irkutsk Alliance, published in 1796 year.
The first scientific work was published in 1755 – 1756 in Petersburgѣ, a significant part of which was removed from the Kuril Islands. This is the “Description of the Land of Kamchatka” by Stepan Petrovich Krasheninnikov. Two chapters of the book were specifically devoted to the Kuril Islands. The book of Krasheninnikov was transferred abroad, thanks to which the Kuril Islands gained wide popularity beyond the borders of our country. But it is especially important for science and literature. This book has been carefully studied and spelled out by Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin.
Many materials about the Kuril Islands were sent by the Governor of Irkutsk to the Academy of Sciences. October 24 The 1782 of the year was reviewed by the Tatarinovs' Description of the Kuril Islands - extracts from the notes of the centurion Ivan Chernago, non-commissioned officer and translator The turn and the Siberian nobleman Antipin. In 1785, it was published in the academic "Msesyatselovѣ", in 1790, it was published again. It is noteworthy that in Nometsky and English languages (“translation”) it was published before, in the original…. Tak labor of Ivan Chernago, Ivan Next and Ivan Antipin in the treatment of Mikhail Tatarinov became izvesten the whole world.
Soviet scientists have proven in complete humor that it was we who were the pioneers and explorers of the Kuril Islands.
One of the most venerable experts in the history of Rossi’s entry into their present far-east borders is Dr. E. Ya. Fainberg, author of the Russian-Japanese relationship 1697 – 1875's capital labor. This labor was published on the basis of the eponymous doctoral dissertation defended by it in 1955. The most briefly, the main concept of the author is presented in the dissertation, where it is written:
One can quote Boris Petrovich Polevoi’s statements - one of the most authoritative experts on the history of pioneering and first-line Kuril. In the final chapter of his book The Discoverers of the Kuril Islands, which was the result of a long study by the author of little-known archival materials, as well as by the work of foreign and domestic researchers, the following summarizes his findings in the following way:
Russian first to be quite detailed descriptions of the entire Kuril ridge. They named this archipelago “Kurilskimi”And this name has become firmly established in all the world geographical literature. They were the first to establish the authentic names of all the islands of the archipelago, and also made these names known to the whole world. Finally, it was the Russians who were the first to establish their true location and put on geographical maps.
At first glance, acquaintance with the history of the most diverse Russian expeditions to the Kuril Islands creates an impression that in their organization there were a lot of chance. But when the history of these campaigns is examined sequentially, the important historical task of all the actions of Russians in Kurilakh - to make them the property of our country, our people - is more clearly revealed. And in this they fully succeeded.
It is important to emphasize that the southern Kuril Islands, which the Russians could have been able to pass before the Japanese, certainly were the most interested in the XVII century in Russia. But the guilt of the Russians, the land explorers and the seafarers, in the very end of the 18th - beginning of the 19th century, they remained at the right moment without the support of the government, and the Japanese aggressors took advantage of it. Particularly great here was the role of the ridiculous Paul I. However, short-sightedness was also peculiar to other leaders of the fate of Tsarist Russia. Tsarskіe dignitaries did not understand glavnago - tsѣnnost Kurilskih Isles opredѣlyaetsya not so limited ih fur wealth as ih strategicheskim polozhenіem: vѣd they then began to play a role glavnyh Fatherland forpostov on Dalnem Vostokѣ and Tihom okeanѣ and Japanese ih used unto primarily unto svoih agressivnyh tsѣlyah , “a dagger directed into the heart of Kamchatka”, like a deadbolt blocking the path of Russia to the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, the assignment of the entire Kuril chain to the tsarist government was an unforgivable mistake, as indicated by S O Makarov in 80-x. Nineteenth century. [famous admiral, perished in the Russo-Japanese War]. Even then, the correction of this error has become a historical necessity. However, it was succeeded in correcting it only under Soviet power in 1945, also of considerable sacrifice ”[2].
It is worth emphasizing that the use of Japan in the development of the Kuril Islands is denied not only by our compatriots, but also by foreign scientists, who became suspicious in the objectivity of the Japanese supporters of territorial claims and conducted independent research and development. Note to this - the statements of the most prominent American specialist who speaks Russian, Japanese and Japanese, Professor John Stefan of the University of Hawaii, described in the “Kuril Islands. The Russian-Japanese border in the Pacific Ocean. " Tak, describing the situation prevailing in the region of the southern islands of the Kuril ridge in the middle of the XVIII century, Stephen writes:
At the same time, Professor Stefan rejects the undeserving confidence of the attempts of Japanese historians to attribute to their compatriots the priority of the development of the Kuril Islands.
A further author directly writes that the first documentary evidence of the appearance of the Japanese in the South Kurilakhs refers only to the year 1754. The author does not deny even more early adventures on the islands, but does not give such an opportunity any historical significance, since they were, as he wrote, only “nameless, strayed along the path and forgotten victims of circumstances” [5].
But, perhaps, the very best evidence of the inconsistency of the Japanese official propaganda is given to us by the works of honest Japanese scientists, who, in the name of truth, were not afraid to go against the course and reject the conclusions of tokiy diplomats. The example is a professor at Kagosimskogo University Yoshimitsu Koriyama, who published in 1980 in the year the major work "Studied history of Japanese-Russian relations in the period of Bakumatsu". Operating with a large amount of historical facts, Koriya completely showed in her books that the version was inconsistent as if the Southern Kurils were “from the Japanese land”. From the book it is clear, in particular, that already in the beginning of the 18th century Russian explorers, representatives of the Russian-American company, as well as the envoys of the government of Russia, step by step, began to open and master the Kuril Islands, including them in the Russian State. At the same time, the river is going on about the Sverts, Tak and the Southern Kuriles, including the Kunashir and Iturup islands, the indigenous population of which - Ainu, as it is clear from the book, took Russian citizenship in 1778 a year, that is, 22 years ago, that is, over twenty years, that is, over twenty years ago, I took XNUMX a year, that is, over twenty years, that is, over twenty years ago, I took XNUMX a year, that is, over twenty years, that is, over twenty years ago, I took XNUMX a year, that is, over twenty years, that is, over twenty years ago, I took XNUMX a year, that is, over twenty years, that is, over twenty years ago, I took XNUMX a year, that is, over 20 years, that is, I took out the book, XNUMX, that is, over twenty years, that is, over twenty books, I took XNUMX a year, that is, 22 years ago, i. Kak these islands were in one-sided order declared by the Japanese owners. The Japanese government did not consider not only the Kuriles, but also the northern part of the island of Hokkaido, the Japanese territory of Japan in the 17th century.
Such are the authoritative testimonies not of the journalistic top, but of the real experts on the problem. These testimonies clearly show all the groundlessness of the Japanese claims on the Kuril Islands on the “ancient Japanese territory”. Up until the end of the XVIIIth century, until the beginning of the Japanese expansion on the sovereign, the Kuril Islands, along the Sakhalin Island, remained “abroad”, “alien land”, and the “land of Ainov” for Japan.
In the middle of the XVIII century, the Russians were able to so quickly spread their power to the Kurils, that even then the inhabitants of the southern islands, including the largest of them, Kunashir and Iturup, became subjects of Russia. This further strengthening of Russia in the Pacific Ocean was annoying for some of its foreign rivals. Even in 1763, Lomonosov, pointing out the great strategic importance of the Kuril Islands, warned of future threats to our Far Eastern possession by foreign sea powers. And in the area of the Kuril Islands, foreign intrigues began.
It is known that right up to the middle of 1780-xb the rulers of Tokugawa Japan strictly forbade their subjects to leave its limits under the threat of death. The only Europeans to trade were the Dutch. Rossiya sought to establish trade relations with the Japanese, which could not please the Dutch: in such a case, they would have lost the opportunity to sell their goods at a monopolistically high price. In order to prevent normal contact with Japan, the Dutch began to slander Russia, spread rumors about the threat of Japan and sovereigns. The Dutch directly rebuked the Japanese in that they allowed Russia to occupy the entire Kuril Islands. Wishing to help Russian trade by any means, the Dutch strongly persuaded the Japanese to extract Russians from the southern Kuril Islands: any aggravation of relations would automatically exclude any Russian-Japanese trade.
In 1802, in the city of Hakodat in Hokkaido, an office was created for the colonization of the Kuril Islands. The Japanese “colonization” was accompanied by the demolition of the Russians, the sign of the cross, which had been installed in the 18th century in the sign of belonging to these islands of Russia, and the forcible expulsion of the industrialists from Iturup and Kunashir. The Russian authorities reacted diplomatically to this.
I, the undersigned, all-presidential sovereign, Emperor Alexander I, acting chamberlain and Kavaler Nikolai Rezanov, declare to the Japanese government:
4. In order for the Japanese Empire beyond the so-called extremity of Matmai [Hokkaido] Island not to stretch its owners, the whole land and water belong to my sovereign [6].
Unfortunately, the official authorities did not show the necessary strength to close the Kuriles behind Russia. All this led to the fact that in 1855, Russia was turned out to be on the southern islands of the archipelago. And the main efforts of the beginning of the ward were directed at the development of the all-American possession of Russia. But they were lost in 1867 year due to the short-sighted policy of Alexander II; last but not least, economic and political, from the loss of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands, we still feel that way. And it is completely unknown when exactly Russian America will return back to the fold of Russia. However, we are convinced that sooner or later this will happen and historical justice will triumph, although it is up to us at the international level to raise this issue at the international level.
According to the Shimoda treatise on January 25 (February 7) 1855, the border in Kurilakh was drawn between the islands of Iturup and Urup. How did it happen that Russia gave away a part of its territory, still in the XVII, closed behind it? First, there was a weakening of military power and political influence of Russia in the Far East. Secondly, the unfavorable outcome of the negotiations was predetermined by the short-sightedness of Petersburg politicians and diplomats, poorly informed by this problem. They clearly underestimated the strategic significance of the Southern Kuril Islands and accompanied Putyatin with vicious instructions drawn up without proper knowledge of the situation and of taking into account the national interests and historical rights of Russia. Thirdly, the Simodsk treatise was signed in the years of the Crimean War, when the Anglo-French squadron literally hunted for the embassy Putyatin, and the Japanese, of course, knew the extent of this, which could not fail to follow the outcome of the negotiations. All this has played its role in the fact that Japan has received significant, unreasonable territorial concessions, and Russia on 90 has lost the South Kurils, which will be returned already to the other government.
The last part of the island Japan, naturally, wanted and continue to continue its expansion into our territory. Tak, Japan, during the signing of the Shimodskoe tractate, claimed the southern part of Sakhalin Island, despite the fact that it was well-known by the Russians, it created military posts and settlements and started mining coal. The Japanese settlements on Sakhalin were few, mainly seasonal, and occupied a very limited part of the coast of Aniva Bay; The Japanese did not know the deep part of the island. In 1855, the territory of Sakhalin remained unlimited, which was recorded in the Simodsk treatise.
Such a situation could not be maintained for a long time, and therefore in 1860-хъ - 1870-ху a gray negotiation was conducted for the solution of the Sakhalin issue. Considering the ever increasing importance of islands for Russia, the tsarist government made a concession to the remaining Kuril Islands from Urup to Shumsh in exchange for the refusal of Japan from Sakhalin. This was closed in the Petersburg treatise on April 25 (May 7) 1875. The concession was unreasonably large and completely unreasonable. The Northern Kurils and so belonged to Russia, while the Japanese did not have any permanent settlements on Sakhalin but were engaged exclusively in fishing on its southern coast, for which they created temporary fishermen villages. In general, the Petersburg treatise is a diplomatic defeat of Alexander II, a defeat that left another spot exactly seventy years in the history of our Far East.
Tak vs во Kuriles passed into the possession of Japan to 1945 year.
The following was signed by the Portsmouth Peace Treaty of 1905, which annulled all previous treaties and agreements, which was fixed in the 9 article, as well as in the annex 10. Thus, they terminated their agreement on trade and navigation 1895 of the year (they, in turn, annulled the Simodsk treatise) and Petersburg treatise. This is a fundamentally important legal position, especially in the context of today's references in Japan to the Simodsk and Peterburgsk treatises. For some reason, the Japanese “forget” that these treatises have long since lost their force.
However, the Portsmouth Treaty was also violated by Japan in 1918 – 1925 years, when the Japanese army occupied the Russian Far East. Recall that our country was not only not located in Japan in the state of war, but was also its ally in the First World War. It is not a secret that Japan dreamed of annexing the Far East from the Russian Empire. Her wishes did not change after the royal power fell and the Russian Empire became Soviet Russia. Even maps were published, where our continental territory was marked as Japanese.
Armed intervention on the mainland continued from 1918 to November 1922. In connection with the international position of our country and the expulsion of the interventionists, the withdrawal of the European part of Japan was forced to establish a diplomatic relationship with us, and the 20 of January 1925 of Beijing signed the Basic Principles of the relations between the USSR and Japan and the countries. 1925 of the year. According to the Convention, Japan undertook to release Southern Sakhalin to 15 in May 1925, which was done by her to the 14 number. Thus, the intervention on Svernem Sakhalin lasted five years, starting with 21 in April 1920.
In the Convention, the agreement was agreed that all agreements concluded by Russia and Japan before November 14, November 7, agreements, agreements and conventions, excluding the Portsmouth Peace Treaty, should be revised. In addition, in the Declaration of the Soviet Government attached to the Convention, it was stated:
Thus, the Soviet government did not assume responsibility for the loss of South Sakhalin, not recognizing the transfer of the "Count Polusakhalinsky" to this territory of Japan. What a striking difference from Vittev diplomacy!
Let us now consider how the Kuril Islands were returned.
In 1930-ies, Japan, contrary to the provisions of the 1925 Convention, conducted a policy hostile to the Soviet Union, was preparing for an armed assault on it. In addition, Japan clearly demonstrated its aggressive attributes by unleashing military action at Lake Khasan in 1938, and at Khalkhin-Gol River in 1939.
The question of the South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands was discussed at the Soviet-Japanese negotiations on the conclusion of a non-aggression pact. 18 November 1940 of the year the Soviet government stated that in the public opinion of the USSR the question of such a pact will be tied up by the problem of returning the lost territories of South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. It was noted that if Japan was not ready to pose these questions, then it would be reasonable to talk about the conclusion of a neutrality pact, which does not entail a solution to the territorial issues. At the same time, the Soviet government insisted on signing simultaneously a pact on the neutrality of the protocol on the liquidation of Japanese oil and coal concessions on Sverne Sakhalin.
The corresponding pact was signed by 13 of April of 1941 of the year, however, Japan began to not set up to perform it. The Japanese seized, fired and even sank the Soviet merchant ships. Japan retained from joining the war, oppose us not a neutrality pact, but availability to the Far East of Soviet troops and victories of Soviet arms under Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk. In all the years of the Great Patriotic War in the Far East, there was from 15 to 30% of the total composition of the Red Army, to the delight of Hitler and his generals. South Sakhalin and the Kuriles were turned into a base for attacking our country.
The question of the restoration of the Soviet Union’s rights to South Sakhalin and the Kuriles was discussed in November 1943 at the Teheran Conference by the heads of the Allied Powers. At the Yalta conference, the issue was finally resolved.
The leaders of the Three Great Powers - the Soviet Union, the United States of America and Great Britain - agreed that in two or three months after the capitulation of Germany and the end of the war in Europe, the Soviet Union would join the war against Japan on the side of the Allies against the Allies, against the Allies, against the Allies, against the Allies, against the United States and the end of the United States of America and the United States of America and Great Britain and the United States of America and Great Britain.
1. Preservation of the status quo of Mongolia (Mongolian People’s Republic).
2. Restoration of rights belonging to Russia, violated in the control of Japan by 1904, namely:
a) the return to the Soviet Union of the southern part of Fr. Sakhalin and all adjacent islands;
3. Transfers to the Soviet Union Kuril Islands.
The Heads of Government of the Three Great Powers agreed that the claims of the Soviet Union would certainly be satisfied after the victory of Japan [8].
In an effort to avoid final defeat, the Japanese government offered to “voluntarily” return South Sakhalin and the Kuriles in 1945 year.
In the liberal press there is a lot of opinion that the USSR first attacked Japan, and only then declared war on it, and all this with the existence of a Pact of neutrality between the two states of 1941 of the year. These gentlemen deduce that the USSR acted with Japan and did exactly the same as four years earlier Nazi Germania did itself. Say, the Soviet Union violated all the norms of international law, acted as an aggressor. Needless to say, what position in relation to the Kuril Islands these gentlemen occupy and in general belong to our country and our history. However, our country for them is not the Motherland, but “this country”, which all intelligent people (by whom they mean only themselves and themselves), dream of “dumping”.
Consider how everything happened at the very same time.
6 April, more to the end of combat actions on the soviet-german front, in the official soviet organ of the press published a corresponding statement, handed to the japanese side of the day.
The Neutrality Pact between the Soviet Union and Japan was 13 on April 1941, that is, before the German attack on the USSR and before the war between Japan, on the one hand, and England and the United States of America, on the other.
Since that time, the situation has changed in the root. Germania attacked the USSR, and Japan, an ally of Germany, helped the last war against the USSR. In addition, Japan is at war with the United States and Anglia, which are allies of the Soviet Union.
With such a position, the Neutrality Pact between Japan and the USSR lost its meaning, and the extension of this Covenant became impossible.
In force of the said above and in accordance with the article 3 of the Covenant, which provides for its rights of denunciation
Kak see, the Soviet Union in advance denounced the pact, observing all its norms. In addition, by publishing an official statement to an official source, the Soviet government informed the whole world that the pact was terminating its activities.
Now as for the fact that the USSR has attacked Japan comfortably without the declaration of war. As is known, the fighting on the Soviet-Japanese front began on August 9. And, as in the case of the denunciation of the Covenant, a corresponding declaration was published. Pay attention to the text of this document.
After the defeat and capitulation of Hitler's Germania, Japan turned out to be the only great power that was still behind the continuation of the war.
The requirement of the three powers - the United States of America, the United Kingdom and China from 26 on July this year about unconditional surrender was rejected by Japan. This is the very proposal of the Japanese government to the Soviet Union to mediate in the war in the Far East that is losing all soil.
Considering the refusal of Japan to capitulate, the Allies appealed to the Soviet Government to propose to enter the war against the Japanese aggression and thus shorten the terms of the end of the war, reduce the number of sacrifices and contribute to the speedy restoring of the universal peace.
In its allied debt, the Soviet government accepted the proposals of the allies and joined the declaration of the allied powers from 26 on July this year.
The Soviet Government believes that such a policy is the only means capable of bringing the onset of peace closer, freeing the people from further sacrifices and sufferings and enabling the Japanese people to get rid of the dangers and destruction that were experienced by Germany after its refusal to accept unconditional surrender.
In view of the above, the Soviet Government declares that, tomorrow, that is, on August 9, the Soviet Union will consider itself in a state of war in Japan [10].
So, we can see that the Soviet Union did not even think to attack Japan in the absolute, and in exactly one day warn it about the start of the war. It turns out that all the imitations of the liberals and the antipatriots are broken about documentaries Sources that are worthless discrepancies prove the deliberate deceit of our internal enemies of the Fatherland.
If something can be compared with the USSR and Hitler's Germanism, then this is also the degree of fulfillment of Hitler's willed dream — the so-called lightning war. Hitler, regardless of loss, went to Moscow, but reached our capital only in late autumn, and so did not manage to capture it. The USSR 8 August declared war on Japan, and already 2 September, twenty five days after the war was declared by us, Japan signed the act of unconditional surrender. Truly, what Hitler wanted to bring about in relation to us, we ourselves carried out his ally.
Japan ... took advantage of the defeat of Tsarist Russia in order to grab South Sakhalin from Russia, to establish itself on the Kuril Islands and, thus, to close our country east to the east of the Crimea and the Soviet Union of Czechoslovakia and East Siberia, this way. It was clear that Japan set itself the task of rejecting all its Far East from Russia.
But the defeat of the Russian troops in the 1904 year in the first Russian-Japanese war left in the minds of the people a hard memory. It fell on our country black spot. Our people waited and waited for the day when Japan would be broken and the spot would be eliminated. Forty years we, the people of old generation, were waiting for this day. And here, this day has come. Today Japan recognized itself to be conquered and signed the act of unconditional surrender.
This means that South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands will depart to the Soviet Union, and from now on they will not serve as a means of separating the ocean and the base of the Japanese attack on our Far East, but a means of direct communication between the Soviet Union and the ocean and the base of our country's defense from Japanese aggression.
In addition, an important international legal document that recorded an unqualified refusal of Japan from its claims on the Kuril Islands, became the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 8 of September 1951 of the year it signed. The Soviet Union refused to sign it, since it opposed early commitments, gave Japan the opportunity to participate in aggressive blocks, did not contain the democratic provisions of Japan. Moreover, thanks to the reinforcements of our former allies in the Second World War, the text of the Treaty did not explicitly indicate in favor of whom Japan refused from South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. Clause “c” of Article 2 of the Treaty states:
“C) Japan refuses from all rights, rights and claims to the Kuril Islands and to that part of Sakhalin Island and the islands adjacent to it, sovereignty over which Japan obtained under the Portsmouth Treaty from September 5 on 1905 of the year [XNXX]
In an effort to weaken the legal significance of the refusal, in the following years, the leaders of the Japanese Foreign Ministry brought their casuistic argument, the essence of which is reduced to the statement that the representatives of the USSR did not sign the Peace Treaty, but did not receive a consent of the USSR to agree to the Peace Treaty, the USSR did not have to agree to a peace agreement, the USSR did not sign a peace agreement, the USSR did not sign a peace agreement community ownership of the Kuril Islands and Southern Sakhalin, from which Japan refused, and that the USSR did not have the right to refer to this agreement. However, the artificiality, illogicality and inconsistency of such an interpretation are obvious. Suffice it to recall that Japanese diplomats do not put the doubts of China’s right to Taiwan and the Pescadore Islands, from which Japan refused to comply with the agreement, and also without mentioning the extent to which these islands are taken over.
Attempts by Japanese diplomacy to alter the meaning of San Francisco’s peace treaty clause refusing Japan from the claims of the Kuril Islands by deceitful approvals seem to be more conclusive and essentially dishonest and dishonorable. The essence of them comes down to the fact that de recorded in an agreement ѣ rejection of Japan from the Kuril Islands does not mean its refusal from the four islands of the Kuril archipelago on the basis that these islands of Japan did not consider the Kuril Islands and that when signing the agreement, the Japanese government considered Kak Kuriles, and Kak islands, adjacent to the coast of the island of Hokkaido. Naturally, these requirements were supported by the Americans. However, let us turn to the fact.
October 19 The 1951 of the Year of the Special Committee on the Peace Treaty of the House of Representatives of the Japanese Parliament, Head of the Department of Foreign Affairs Department of the Japan Kumao Nishimura Foreign Ministry, referring to the understanding of the Kuril Islands, said:
Thus, the official face of Japan recognized that the southern islands of the Kuril Islands are Kuril Islands, but it was immediately stipulated that the Japanese government would always look at the South and South Kurils in different ways.
Here is the definition of the Kuril Islands Islands Encyclopedia of Americana, published by Japanese friends:
When the Kuril Islands entered into Japan, it did not occur to the Japanese to consider the Southern Kuriles to be something else that was not part of the Kuril Archipelago. Here you can find the Kuril Islands The official guide to Japan in the Department of public health roads Japan 1941:
The Kurile range includes: Kunashir, Shikotan, Iturup, Urup, Shumshu, Alaid and Paramushir ”[14].
The authors of the guidebook are mistaken about the origins of the names: philologists have established that the basis of the name of the island lies with one of the self-identified Ainovs - “kur”, which means “human, people, people”. This Ainu word formed the basis of the Russian name of the island - Kurilia. But that's not what's important here. From the quotations it can be seen that the Kunashir, Shikotan, Iturup are included in the Kuril Islands, which later on, after the return of the island to the Soviet Union, the Japanese will try to exclude the numbers entering the Kuril archipelago.
Four years later, the San Francisco Conference of the Government of the USSR and Japan expressed their readiness to enter into contact with each other in order to find ways for the formal settlement of their relations and the conclusion of a peace treaty. It was precisely such a goal that, at first, it seemed, both sides at the Soviet-Japanese negotiations, which began in London in June 1955, at the level of ambassadors of all countries. But it just seemed, for kak it turned out, the main task togdashnyago yaponskago government was unto tom to use Soviet interest unto normalizatsіi otnoshenіy Sh Yaponіey and unto zaklyuchenіi be with her mirnago contract for vytorgovyvanіya in Moscow territorіalnyh ustupok and return beneath yaponskіy administrative control of a significant part of tѣh “Sovereign territories”, from which Japan had refused four years earlier. Not accidentally top peregovorov unto Londonѣ preceded sensatsіonnoe vystuplenіe unto yaponskom parlamentѣ 26 May 1955 years togdashnyago Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu inostrannyh dѣl suddenly obyavivshago of namѣrenіi Yaponіi continue to pursue her vozvraschenіya Sakhalin (obviously of all, and not just the southern part) and Kurilskih Isles. There is an act of revanchism, the abandonment of peaceful cooperation and a turnaround to the militaristic policy pursued by Japan in 20-40-e. Japan, an ally of America, did not want to be a neutral country and openly became our own enemy, as it was before.
Negotiations between the USSR and Japan were going on for ten months, and then they were interrupted and resumed in Moscow. It is important to note that at the same time the Japanese side was zatyan territorial dispute. It was not in the name of restoring justice, but proceeding from other calculations. The main task was to ensure nationality, to cause nationalist attitudes, to adjust the inhabitants to the achievement of a new national political and political task and rally their foundations around this foundation around their foundations. Putting forward territorial claims to the Soviet Union, the Japanese government circles were drawn up to us and were recognized by the patriotic anti-American slogans of the democratic movement (recall that America held in Japan, the occupying forces) to take advantage of our own forces, to take advantage of our own forces, to take advantage of our own forces, to take advantage of Japan’s Union.
Noteworthy behavior of the ruling circles of the United States. Contrary to the Yalta agreement, the US government, under the names of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, began to put pressure on the Japanese people, pushing them towards the advancement of territorial demands. Tak 19 August 1956 was located in London by the Minister for Foreign Affairs Mamoru Sigemitsu through the US Ambassador to the United States who was informed that if the signing of the peace treaty of the USSR Japan agreed to recognize South Sakhalin and Kuriles, when they signed the peace treaty of the USSR, Japan agreed to recognize South Sakhalin and Kurilsky in the United States, when they agreed to recognize South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, they would consider the South American and the United States to recognize South Sakhalin and Kuril Islands as part of the United States to recognize South Sakhalin and Kuril Islands in the United States will retain in their possession the islands of the Ryukyu Islands (Okinawa), transformed into the largest US base in the Far East. The backstage maneuvers of the American diplomacy testify to the fact that the entry of Japan into the territorial dispute over the Soviet Union in the middle of the 50 year began not only at home and in the approval of American diplomacy, but also as a result of its hidden presidency.
At first, Japan tried, in the quality of the basis of the conclusion of the peace treaty, to put forward the requirements for the transfer of South Sakhalin and all Kuril to it. But this was utterly absurd, and, in order not to disrupt the negotiations, she had to limit her territorial harassment to four southern islands, the most favorable for life and economic activity: Kunashir, Iturup, Shikotanom, and I apply.
During the course of negotiations, the incompatibility of the approach to the territorial claims of the then leadership of our country was revealed. The main figure among them is Khrushchev, the one who fights the most with the cult of personality, the renamer of Stalingrad, the maker of corn up to the St. Vernac of the Polarnago circle, and so on, and so on.
Not having a clear understanding of the Kuril Islands and the fact that they have more strategic and economic value, Khrushchev was concerned with the name of a kind of coins. He decided to give Japan a small territorial concession, thinking that this would speed up the negotiation and the signing of the peace treaty. At the point 9 of the Joint Declaration of the USSR and Japan 1956, the following words appeared:
This Khrushchev's gesture, detrimental to our national interests, was perceived by Japan not as a friendly act, but as a manifest weakness of our side. It could not be otherwise. Never in the history of such a thing were things otherwise perceived.
Happily, Khrushchev's tyranny did not deprive the Soviet Union of its primordial territories. Having felt the weakness of the Japanese, they began to put forward all the most territorial demands. Distortedly interpreting the Joint Declaration, Japan began to argue that the normalization of the cooperation between the two countries was not the end, but, on the contrary, it implies further negotiation on the “territorial issue”, and that the Declaration does not draw a line out of the second. .
All this prompted the Soviet leadership to make adjustments to the assessments of the Japanese foreign policy, which did not respond to the spirit of the Joint Declaration. 27 January 1960 of the year, after Japan signed the US Security Treaty, which was obviously anti-Soviet, the USSR government sent a memorandum to the Government of Japan. In her, in particular, it was said:
In response, the Japanese government in a memorable note from 5 February of the same year wrote:
Kak see, answer the Japanese side was very aggressive. The Japanese government did not even stop writing about its own revanchist namurenіyah, which was mentioned in the memorable note of the soviet government from February 24 1960 of the year.
Fortunately, the Soviet government was able to ultimately counteract the tyranny of Khrushchev. In a memorable note of the soviet government from 22 in April 1960, the Soviet Union finally declared that
From this point on, 25’s position of the Soviet Union on the territory of Japan’s relations was more simple and clear: the issue of the settlement of the wagons was about the settlement of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons, and the situation of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons of the wagons. The most important role was played by Andrei Andreevich Gromyko, who became Minister of Foreign Affairs in 1958 for a year. With his name, he deservedly links the whole epoch into our foreign policy. It differed from the others of the Brezhnevskoye neighborhood both by the greatest political experience, and by the foresight, and the breadth of horizons, and the hardness of its judgments. It is his merit that is the strength of the Soviet position in relation to the so-called “territorial issue”, against the escalation which the Japanese government did not spare the money. Gromyko seriously made only one mistake: the code was approved by the appointment of Gorbachev as general secretary of the CPSU. Kak sam Andrei Andreevich after all talked, "not according to the Shink's hat". But nothing could have done this old man. He was lucky that he died in 1989 year, did not see our greatest for all the history of the defeat, which we suffered in two years.
Years went by. Time worked on the strengthening of the Soviet position in this dispute. For decades, past to the middle of 80-ху years from the time of the signing of the Joint Declaration, the South Kuril Islands were already inhabited by Soviet people and turned into an integral part of the economic complex of the Sakhalin region. For many of their inhabitants, they became their homeland: the second and third generation of Kurilites were born there, and what could seem to the Japanese possible in the 1956 year, after 30 the year became impossible.
In addition, the belonging of the Kuril Islands to the Soviet Union was indirectly recognized by Japan itself. In accordance with international law, the state, the actions which testify to the express or tacit consent under the terms of the international agreement, does not have the right to refer to the invalidity of this agreement. In other words, if the state actually fulfills or recognizes any international agreement with its actions, it does not have the right to declare that this agreement is not valid for it. This position is fixed in the article 45 of the Vѣnsky convention on the rights of international treaties of the year 1969.
This factual recognition of the Soviet-Japanese border is the Japan-Fisheries Agreement and the Fishing Agreement of the Soviet Union, in particular the 1963 and 1981 Agreements. According to the 6 Agreement of the 1963 of the Year and the 5 Agreement of the 1981 of the Year, Japanese fishermen engaged in the seaweed harvesting pledged to comply with the laws, regulations and rules of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic, which are located in the area of the trade. The fishery was supposed to take place near the island of Signalny, which is part of the Small Kuril ridge. In addition, in addition, the lines of the limited area of the fishery, data on the coordinate system were indicated.
Signing the Agreement, Japan actually recognized the sovereignty of the USSR above the islands of the Lesser Kuril Ridge. After this she does not have any legal basis to assert that the question of the line of passage of the border is unresolved.
But, despite the firm position of the Soviet leadership, Japan has all the years been constantly aggravating the problem of sovereign territories in the country. As you can see from the outset of one name, this phrase can be interpreted in different ways. Some Japanese circles under the sovereign territories named the Southern Kuriles, the others - all the Kuriles' archipelago, and the third - the Kuriles and South Sakhalin. In addition, even those from the champions of territorial claims to the Soviet Union, which were limited to their requirements by four southern islands, did not rule out the prospects for the possibility of increasing these requirements, and sometimes, by cynical frankness, it was precisely in favor of such a prospect. By the way, the Communist Party of Japan officially demanded from the Soviet Union, as it demands now, the transfer of Japan not only to the Southern Kuriles, but to the whole of the Kuril archipelago. And nothing, nothing of the aggrieved international conscience of the Japanese left no experience *.
* Here it is meant that internationalism is far from being everywhere, especially in the international arena. It is necessary for us to remember that in the name of falsely understood internationalism, national interests cannot be neglected. But the Communists Japan, of course, the USSR friends were not.
In the beginning of 1980-x, when the authorities came to Dzenko Suzuki, the Japanese government adopted a provocative resolution on the introduction of countries and the introduction of the “Territory Territories” calendars. This “day” was 7 February. It was this day that 1855 was signed by the Simodsk treatise, which caused damage to the interests of our country. The choice of this date was to emphasize that the Simodsk treatise, which had been annulled a long time ago, and still remains important. The first “Day of Territory Territories” report was held on February 7 of the year.
Everything changed when Gorbachev came to power. LNTOM 1985, Gromyko was relieved of his post as Minister of Foreign Affairs, which he occupied for the duration of 27 lѣt. Nearly he was appointed by Shevardnadze, who had no experience in similar work. It was clear that the changes would occur.
At the beginning of the restructuring, the Foreign Ministry did not change its positions: Gorbachev was afraid of the so-called conservative wing of the CPSU, which, if it had learned about his real interests, would have immediately removed him from power. Therefore, Gorbachev, Kak, and his friend Shevardnadze, had to maneuver and agree on the words of the position, which the previous Soviet leadership adhered to. The Foreign Ministry began to “restructure itself” only in 1988 of the year, gradually yielding to the Japanese and indirectly recognizing that the territorial problem sucked by the finger in the name of the triumph of Japanese imperialism and outright revanchism still exists.
In addition, starting with 1988, on the pages of the Soviet press and on television, absolutely incompetent people began to express their opinion, but then Japan's great friends. Those who didn’t agree with such a “new idea”, who began to put a label on them like “conservative”, “dogmatic” or even “chauvinist”. When there is nothing to argue, they begin to arrive at demagogy.
Now it became clear that in the Southern Kuril question, even then, the political background was exacerbated. Proponents of concession in Moscow and Tokio negotiations were in the overwhelming majority of the press and the public groups, who after a year and a half joined the movement aimed at breaking the soviet state structure, transforming the USSR into a conglomerate of large and small “sovereign states.” But then, in the 1988 year, it seemed to many more that such views are no more misleading.
In addition, supporters of “common human values” began to pass to Japan from the USSR and express their opinion, which was essentially the support of Japanese imperialism to the detriment of our Motherland.
So, Akanasyev spoke in favor of the transfer of the four southern islands of Japan. At the same time, he said his sadly famous words that “perestroika is historical reality is the end of the last empire, called the Soviet Union”. The performance of this man provoked a stormy protest in the Sakhalin region.
The notorious “academician” Sakharov, declared to his merits before American imperialism for the weakening and destruction of the USSR by the “conscience of the nation”, also expressed his “authoritative” many. We will not comment on it and refute with factual material, we confine ourselves to a quote, for the blatant ignorance of the topic to which this “academician” spoke was obvious to anyone, even to a schoolboy.
It is also worth quoting Yeltsin’s words, which was Japan’s 1990 year.
Yeltsin, in a brazen manner, slandered Soviet people, accusing them of a low level of political culture. It turns out that the negative attitude towards the illegal transfer of Soviet territory means “undeveloped”, “undemocratic”. Pnul Yeltsin and previous soviet rulers, who allegedly were not considered to be the demise of the people. But Yeltsin, as his own father, was considered to be the em of many people, even such an undeveloped one, like us! Pharisees lie gravedigger of the USSR amaze! By the way, in the negotiations with Japan, Yeltsin talked about the market of the Russian Federation, about the possible conclusion of a peace treaty between Japan and the Russian Federation! And this is in 1990, when the USSR still existed! He already then saw himself reigning in the "sovereign" Russia!
At times, there were proposals to give Japan four islands, sell them, make them a free zone, and so on. The media conducted a frankly pro-Japanese campaign, not scientists, but “experts” expressed themselves - supporters of “new thinking”, proteges of the main perestroika.
True, authoritative opinions were also expressed. Tak, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Rogachyov, to write ѣ 24 on January 1989, published in Izvіstyіykh, touched upon the history of the Kuril issue, and proved that the Southern Kurils belong to the USSR legally founded, not occupied by the Second martial law. propaganda and japanese politics.
Of course, Gorbachev also had to agree with words that the territorial claims of Japan were unfounded. However, it has long been known that all of Gorbachev’s policy was built on a false game: to say one thing in words, but to surrender to one’s own national interests. So, in a joint Soviet-Japanese statement from 18 in April 1991, in paragraph 4 was first mentioned the territorial dispute between the USSR and Japan. There is nothing justified the concession of Japan, made by Gorbachev during his visit to the country of the rising sun.
In the same year, the concept of “two plus alpha” was born, which boiled down to immediately transferring the islands of the Lesser Kuril Ridge to Japan, and starting negotiations on the fate of Kunashir and Iturup for a clear prospect of concessions. Her nominal creator was Kunadze - Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Kozyrev, known for his destructive policies. In calculating the implementation of such a "compromise", the leadership of the "sovereign" of the Russian Foreign Ministry began to plan the visit of President Yeltsin to Japan. Only the mass resistance that engulfed many deputies of the Supreme Soviet, the military circles, the scientific community and patriotic organizations, forced the leadership of the Russian Federation to reject the proposed visit. This led to the cooling of Russian-Japanese relations, and in the long run forced the regime to go to the position of refusal from the transfer of Japan Kuril.
I think that the "democrats" could carry out their criminal plans. For example, during Yeltsin’s time, polls were published according to which the supposedly overwhelming majority of the residents of the Sakhalin Oblast and Moscow were in favor of transferring the South Kuril Japan. By provirk it was not clear when and among whom these alleged polls were conducted. First of all, Japan would have succeeded in realizing its revenge-seekers, if not for one “but”. Soviet people lived on Kurilakh. And they acted with mass protests against the transfer of our land to Japan, and they were also supported by ordinary people, living in other regions of our vast Motherland. It is precisely the population of the islands and the mass resistance of the treacherous policies of the authorities, in my opinion, that were the main reasons why the Kuriles and the aftermath of the collapse of the USSR remained in the Russian Federation. We must not forget that in the case of the transfer of Japan to the Southern Kuril we would have had to decide the fate of 25 thousands of people living on them, massively resettle them, gain housing, work and other things. And with the fierce resistance of the southern Kurilians, the question of their resettlement, if it had reached him, would have provoked the island’s insubordination to the regime, which could have resulted in an open recovery. If they were followed by residents of the Far East, as well as other regions. All this would greatly undermine the legitimacy of power and put an edge on the question of its existence.
The regime has worked instinct self-preservation. He could have drowned thousands of people in the blood, but an attempt to suppress the forces of twenty-five thousand could have ended in a “sad” manner for the “democrats”. Moreover, they would hardly have been able to find a sufficient number of mercenaries ready to fight for the money against such a large number of people. For a thousand who rose back, the mercenaries would be found, and by ten thousand - no. It would be extremely dangerous for the regime to use regular troops and police for suppression. History teaches that in such cases, the soldiers go over to the side of the restoring people.
However, the Yeltsin regime still made concessions to Japan. So, in 1996, the Russian Foreign Ministry put forward a proposal for “joint economic development” on the four southern islands of the Kurilsk archipelago. The issue of the Southern Kuriles in a special zone accessible to the business activities of Japanese citizens was interpreted in Japan as indirect recognition by the Russian side of the justification of the Japanese claims to these islands.
Noteworthy and another thing: in the Russian proposals that supposed a wide access of Japanese businessmen to the South Kuriles, there was not even an attempt to determine this access by agreeing Japan to appropriate privileges and free access of Russian businessmen to the territory with a close access to South Africa and to free access to the territory close to South Africa and to free access to the territory close to South Africa, to the territory close to South Africa, on the territory close to South Kurils. In other words, the idea of “joint economic development” of the Southern Kuril Islands was no different than one-sided step of the Yeltsin regime to build up the Japanese aspiration to master these islands.
In accordance with the agreement on certain issues of cooperation in the field of marine living resources from 21 in February 1998, Japan was granted the right to almost free access to its fishermen in the southern Kuril waters. Note: it’s not about a two-hundred-mile economic zone, but about a two-and-a-half-mile coastal zone, which, under international law, cannot include foreign vessels without the permission of a host.
Japan pinned great hopes on the so-called "meeting without a tie" by Yeltsin and then-Prime Minister of Japan Ryutaro Hashimoto. There were no official reports about the content of the meetings that were held on these meetings. Kursik on Japanese demands, fortunately, did not lead to irreparable aftermaths, for the restraining influence was rendered by opponents of territorial concessions, especially among the people, also in higher circles.
With the arrival of Putin’s Kremlin, the situation has changed. The position of the modern leadership is fundamentally different from the position of Yeltsin, although, to a great regret, the official authorities recognize the 1956 Joint Declaration of the Year, including the 9 article, which the Soviet leadership refused in 1960 in the year. Otherwise, it can’t be called a mistake. Not least, Putin has repeatedly stated that Russia does not intend to transfer the Kuril Islands to Japan. And the President Medvedev in 2010 was even visited by the Southern Kuriles, which caused a protest from Japan, which urgently withdrew its ambassador from Moscow to Moscow for counseling. Ambassador, however, soon returned. Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehary said that Medvdeva's trip injured the population of Japan, and Prime Minister Naoto Kan said that Medvedy appeared in South Kurilakh regrettably. The Russian Foreign Ministry, in a note of protest, declared that the president of the country can establish its territory without the consent of foreign countries. In 2012, the situation repeated. Medvedev, now Prime Minister, again visited the Southern Kuriles, paid particular attention to the economic development of the region, and Japan called its ambassador to Moscow "for clarification" in Tokio.
It is possible to say that modern management occupies the correct position on the relations between the Kuriles and the statesman. But we should never forget that in the Russian Federation, there is still a fifth column of “Japanese friends” ready to be activated at any moment. Recall that not a single person who claimed the "validity" of territorial claims, received from the official authorities at least a protest for such actions.
In conclusion we say two things. Our country has always had many enemies, but we survived. Stand and now, do not disgrace the honor of their ancestors.
As for Japan and Japanese, I want to sincerely wish the prosperity and all the universal development. But let it not be forgotten that aggressive aspirations will not only not contribute to good relations with us, but will also be used by dark forces striving for world domination.
Literature
1. Latyshev I. A. Poultry on the Kurils. - Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 1992. - 240;
2. Field B.P. Discoverers of the Kuril Islands. From the history of Russian geographic discoveries on the Pacific Ocean of the XVIIIth century - Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Far Eastern Book Publishing House, Sakhalin Department, 1982. - 208;
3. Russian Pacific epic. - Khabarovsk, 1979. - 608;
4. Russian Kuriles. History and modernity. Collection of documents on the history of the formation of the Russian-Japanese and Soviet-Japanese border / Issued 2-e, extended and augmented. - M .: Algorithm, 2002. - 256 with.
I am a convinced supporter of pre-revolutionary orografii. And this is not my whim. This circumstance is dictated by the fact that it is the old spelling that reflects all the possibilities of the Russian language as an exponent of the Word. What was introduced in 1917 year distorted the Russian language, in many ways beyond recognition.
We need to return the Russian language to its original form - then it will truly transform, and together it will transform everything in our life. This is not a waste of words. Everything is interconnected.
By the way, many contemporaries of the revolution did not accept orographical changes, and still wrote until the end of their lives. And this is not a coincidence.
In order for the moment to move to the dead point, you need to start at the Malago. What will be more like I write in accordance with the norms of the pre-revolutionary orografy, so that a speedy society will come to the fact that you need to go back to the source. And such as I, in historical Russia are many.
I hope you understand why I am writing in the old way.
If you start to publish books, publish articles in journals in accordance with pre-revolutionary spelling, a short time, when will be canceled by the decree of the People's Commissar of "Education" of Lunacharsk.
Naturally, it is necessary to train people in the rules of pre-revolutionary organization. By the way, to learn, where the letter ѣ (aj) is put, it’s not difficult at all. The letter і (і decimal) is put in front of vowels, st (and short) and in the word mіr.
If a person knows the rules, he does not want to write "in a modern way" (if he, of course, is not a hater of the Russian language).
Information