Military Review

Russia will increase the number of cruise missiles in 30 times before 2020 year

87
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said at a meeting of the Security Council that by 2020, the number of cruise missiles will be increased by 30 times, ITAR-TASS reported. At the same time, according to Shoigu, by 2016, the rocket year will be five times larger than the current one.


In addition to the minister’s words, the head of the Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, noted that at the moment the domestic military-industrial complex is lagging behind world leaders.

“In some areas we have a backlog and the task of the military-industrial complex is to eliminate this backlog,” stressed the head of the Security Council.

Patrushev noted that Russia does not plan to abandon the implementation of the military doctrine adopted in 2010, but will refine it in view of the changing situation in the world.

- Today the task was set to clarify the doctrine. We will do it. We are not saying that we will change it, but based on the changes that are taking place in the world, we will clarify it, he said.
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 6 July 2013 06: 24 New
    20
    More, more! We will positively wait for the results, the main thing is to survive!
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 6 July 2013 07: 14 New
      +6
      The process is on, there is progress. The main thing here is not to drive horses, you need to do everything without excesses and rush, systematically, where quality should be a priority. And everything will be.
      1. nycsson
        nycsson 6 July 2013 18: 44 New
        0
        Quote: SPACE
        Process goes

        If you call promises a process ........
    2. GreatRussia
      GreatRussia 6 July 2013 07: 55 New
      +1
      More, more! We will positively wait for the results, the main thing is to survive!

      I would love to read at least about the approximate performance characteristics of these missiles!
      1. Seraph
        Seraph 7 July 2013 23: 08 New
        0
        I think that in Wikipedia you can try to search for "X-55". It is unlikely that we will have time to supply the army with something newer than the X-2016 before 555
    3. buzuke
      buzuke 6 July 2013 08: 07 New
      +3
      if only not to the detriment of quality
    4. Nevsky
      Nevsky 6 July 2013 09: 18 New
      +4
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      More, more! We will positively wait for the results, the main thing is to survive!


      I just want to say: "we make rockets like sausages" wassat
      1. nycsson
        nycsson 6 July 2013 18: 47 New
        0
        Quote: Nevsky
        More, more! We will positively wait for the results, the main thing is to survive!

        Yeah. Until 20 year still need to live! You said correctly! laughing
        Quote: Nevsky
        I just want to say: "we make rockets like sausages"

        laughing I laugh ........ laughing
    5. vjhbc
      vjhbc 6 July 2013 15: 47 New
      +3
      that's what it is 30 times what if we have 1 rocket then there will be 30 missiles then this is one thing and if we have 1000 missiles then this is completely different
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      More, more! We will positively wait for the results, the main thing is to survive!
      1. Santa Fe
        Santa Fe 6 July 2013 18: 18 New
        0
        In this case, according to Shoigu, by 2016, the missiles will be five times the current.


        And when will: for Shoigu??
        1. nycsson
          nycsson 6 July 2013 18: 49 New
          +2
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          At the same time, according to Shoigu, by the 2016 year, the missiles will be five times larger than the current one.

          You're scaring me! How many are there now? what
          1. cobalt
            cobalt 7 July 2013 00: 50 New
            -2
            Now apparently 1 missile, and there will be 30.
        2. Sandov
          Sandov 6 July 2013 20: 04 New
          +4
          Russia cruise missiles are very necessary to eliminate the imbalance with the amers. I hope Shoigu's promises will be fulfilled. Go Russia.
    6. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 18: 43 New
      +2
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      More, more! We will positively wait for the results, the main thing is to survive!

      Semi-dead article! Increase the number of missiles in 30 times !!! Is it a lot or a little? What figure are we starting from? And further. How did you get these tales about the 20 year. Already revised the budget.
      1. Batman
        Batman 6 July 2013 19: 45 New
        +1
        How did they get these tales about the 20th year.

        There is a suspicion that in the 20s there will be a war .. Something global will happen ...
        1. nycsson
          nycsson 6 July 2013 23: 25 New
          +1
          Quote: Batman
          There is a suspicion that in the 20s there will be a war .. Something global will happen ...

          I’m more than sure that all this will happen much earlier! crying
          1. Lord of the Sith
            Lord of the Sith 8 July 2013 14: 00 New
            -1
            I agree that year at 14. The political abscess is very clearly visible, the masks are dropped. The West is no longer shy and is not afraid of any consequences. We want to land the president’s plane, we want to listen to everyone, we want to directly and openly support the militants.

            Well, in the 80s, nobody could imagine such a thing. And now they want to do what they want. And then see how many countries are rearming.
  2. andrei332809
    andrei332809 6 July 2013 06: 34 New
    +2
    good morning (we have morning).
    Yesterday I read this news on another site. kr is good, but how many sea-based are we now? .. we are still using the backlog of the USSR, and will there be more than a dozen new ones ... they’ll drive me to foreign countries in full swing, but I’m kind of buying it for my own.
    okay, let's hope.
    1. Htuek
      Htuek 6 July 2013 10: 14 New
      +7
      You can’t even imagine how many of them are being done. Such a feeling that as rumors about the modernization of the Eagles passed, the plans for the release changed dramatically upwards. So do not panic stamp for us.
      By the way, the phrase was struck by the journalist about Bramos at a salon in St. Petersburg. type they will do in two years. What the hell if the first 18 pieces were made back in 2001-2002.
      1. andrei332809
        andrei332809 6 July 2013 10: 24 New
        +5
        Quote: Htuek
        So don’t panic stamp for us.

        Yes, I don’t panic. I just know how, what and for whom it is done. This is a marine theme. I do not know about aero, this is for the flyers
        1. Htuek
          Htuek 6 July 2013 10: 27 New
          +4
          Surprisingly, we also have a marine component hi . And if the failure is somewhere, then the customers are tearing and tossing.
          1. yak69
            yak69 6 July 2013 18: 27 New
            +3
            Nice to read such comments. smile good
  3. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 6 July 2013 07: 37 New
    0
    Russia and without rockets morally crush all .. Russian bear is kind if you do not tease him ..
    1. yak69
      yak69 6 July 2013 18: 30 New
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Russia, without rockets, will crush all morally

      Hatchery is good after mass launching towards the enemy. And, strictly, only in such a sequence.
      smile
      hi
  4. mogus
    mogus 6 July 2013 07: 56 New
    +4
    X 101 promised at the beginning of 2013. Range 10tys.km ...
    1. Windbreak
      Windbreak 6 July 2013 10: 12 New
      +5
      Quote: mogus
      Range 10tys.km ...
      these are fables of Izvestia
    2. Fregate
      Fregate 6 July 2013 10: 26 New
      +1
      And not 5,5 thousand?
      1. mogus
        mogus 6 July 2013 11: 16 New
        +4
        these are fables of Izvestia

        And not 5,5 thousand?

        Here I am of something ... 10 thousand. - ICBMs
      2. VAF
        VAF 6 July 2013 14: 45 New
        12
        Quote: Fregate
        And not 5,5 thousand?


        on tests flew from 4.5 to 7.5 thousand bully

        Carriers: Tu-95MSM (so far in a single copy), Tu-160M ​​(while the same one) and plan to convert Tu-22M3, will be called Tu-22M5 soldier

        1. nycsson
          nycsson 6 July 2013 18: 59 New
          +1
          Quote: vaf
          on tests flew from 4.5 to 7.5 thousand

          Everywhere they write that the range of 5000-5500! hi
          1. fzr1000
            fzr1000 6 July 2013 19: 07 New
            +6
            The way the number of Kyrgyz Republics coincides with their range. Nice toast, huh?
          2. VAF
            VAF 6 July 2013 21: 33 New
            +1
            Quote: nycsson
            Everywhere they write that the range of 5000-5500!


            Alex, welcome! +! drinks Well, writing media is not harmful .. it’s harmful not to write wink

            And why voice it ... from what amers ..... nervous tick will be wassat
            1. nycsson
              nycsson 6 July 2013 23: 32 New
              +1
              Quote: vaf
              Alex, welcome! +!

              Mutually! For a long time did not intersect! drinks
              Quote: vaf
              Well, writing media is not harmful .. it’s harmful not to write

              They earn money by this .... yes
              Quote: vaf
              And why voice it ... from what amers ..... nervous tick will be

              In general, you need to figure this out! What is the need to merge such information into general discussion? request Well, you decided to stamp the missiles, so stamp them under the guise so that no one would know. All this is clearly designed for our population. Like, look how good we are! How can I explain it differently? hi
        2. fzr1000
          fzr1000 6 July 2013 20: 35 New
          +3
          Dear VAF, a little off-topic question, but can you see and answer? There was news that they experienced the BKO Talisman. Can you say a short thread about this system? Russian development or again from the bins of the USSR got? How is it compared to foreign analogues
          1. VAF
            VAF 6 July 2013 21: 43 New
            +1
            Quote: fzr1000
            that experienced BKO Talisman.


            Greetings namesake, +! Generally speaking, the topic of electronic warfare and electronic warfare should be "bypassed by the 10th road", it is rather dangerous .. do you understand bully

            And so ... "beautifully" written .... we have the same Omul, the Kazakhs have Sattelit, so the Belarusians have their own drinks



            "Thing" is definitely useful, if only ... to the Air Force "reached", and not everything is left ... in the stage of exhibit copies.

            The only drawback is .. automatic mode ... a complete "unmasking" is performed immediately! recourse

            Well, all this .. "individuals", but we need group protection and .. are needed like air, but we have everything "tarantula" .. they cannot finish NIKOR on "suspension" on the Su-34 .... sad
            1. fzr1000
              fzr1000 6 July 2013 21: 51 New
              +1
              Understood thanks.
          2. Windbreak
            Windbreak 6 July 2013 22: 25 New
            0
            http://defin.by/products/
            1. VAF
              VAF 6 July 2013 22: 40 New
              +1
              Quote: Burel
              http://defin.by/products/


              Yes, I agree .. it is written ..BEAUTIFUL good wink

              BKO "Talisman" is designed to provide protection for combat aircraft:

              - from all types of aircraft and anti-aircraft guided missiles with active (semi-active) homing radar heads

              - from all types of aviation and anti-aircraft guided missiles with optoelectronic (infrared and semi-active laser) homing heads

              - from ground-based air defense systems using anti-aircraft guided missiles with command guidance system

              BCO "Talisman" also provides protection of the aircraft from the "friendly fire" of aviation intercept missile systems and ground-based air defense systems.

              No words ... just a panacea for everything belay ... that's just .. how is this "miraculous" protection will be carried out

              - from all types of aviation and anti-aircraft guided missiles with optoelectronic (infrared and semi-active laser) homing heads belay wink , something "egg" and "spotlight" is not observed there request

              And how were the good old CDS with LTZ ... but this is completely .. "another story" recourse

              And by the way, on the future of our MiG-35C, KDSki was placed elsewhere wink

        3. Zlodeey
          Zlodeey 6 July 2013 20: 41 New
          0
          Quote: vaf
          VAF

          I saw the news about the modernization of all Tu-160s until 2015, is it really so, and is it possible to do this in such a period of time?
          1. VAF
            VAF 6 July 2013 22: 05 New
            +2
            Quote: ZloDeey
            I saw the news about the modernization of all Tu-160s until 2015


            I, in fact, with whom I do not communicate in "counter", but ... once they asked a question ... then I will answer:

            1. Plans were announced to have 10 Tu-160M ​​aircraft by 2020, where and from which media you "got this information" .. I don't know request

            Quote: ZloDeey
            is it possible to do this in such a period of time?


            1. For example, an excerpt from the KNAPO report for the past, 2012: -..... "

            The program of repair and modernization of strategic Tu-160 bombers:

            The 2012 production plan envisaged the delivery of two Tu-160 aircraft after maintenance and repair and one after major repairs.

            Cars with serial numbers 705 and 603 were handed over after KVO in May and December of last year, respectively, and the car number 505 will be overhauled (at the end of the year was still in the final assembly workshop), work on it is planned to be completed in March 2013.(in fact has not yet been commissioned)!

            Since 2012, work on the overhaul of Tu-160 aircraft has been carried out in 2 stages: fault detection and repair.

            Since 2013 is planned to carry out repair works on advanced modernization. "

            Especially for you, I highlighted in black those moments, according to which you yourself can draw conclusions about the terms and possibilities about which you wrote. so that .. "again there were no tomatoes in my garden" tongue

            The first Tu-160M ​​was "made" for almost 5 years ... there were big problems (the SSI was just doing it) bully

            1. Zlodeey
              Zlodeey 7 July 2013 02: 26 New
              +2
              Quote: vaf
              I, in fact, with whom I do not communicate in "counter", but ... once they asked a question ... then I will answer:

              Quote: vaf
              Especially for you, I highlighted in black those moments, according to which you yourself can draw conclusions about the terms and possibilities about which you wrote. so that .. "again there were no tomatoes in my garden"

              Oh, come on, vindictive however you, nevertheless, it has become interesting to me to read your comments recently, I’ve been sitting on the site for several years, and before that I read your comments, but before I wrote you, you persistently started hauling our technique and in those topics in which in principle there is no sense. In place of something interesting about our technology and, accordingly, a beautiful photo, the praise went to foreign technology, the photo and the form of it, and it became a little unpleasant.
              And of course, thank you on the topic, they painted not too lazy. It is a pity that not everything is as rosy as we would like.

              Could not stand out!
              1. VAF
                VAF 7 July 2013 10: 48 New
                +2
                Quote: ZloDeey
                Oh yes come on, vindictive however you


                Not vindictive, but fair!

                Quote: ZloDeey
                you persistently began to haunt our technology in those topics in which, in principle, there is no sense.


                Not to "hait", but to talk about what this technique is really like with us and what they have!

                Quote: ZloDeey
                extolling went on foreign technology, the photo and the form of it, that’s a bit unpleasant.


                In my time, we were taught to know everything about the enemy, better than the multiplication table (maybe that's why in my time there were much less losses wink ) since they studied military affairs in the present way, and the tactics and equipment of the probable enemy stood in First Place!
  5. True
    True 6 July 2013 08: 03 New
    -40
    Shoigu crowed, and there at least do not dawn. By 2020, everyone will forget about these grandiose statements. By 2020? Why not 2220? Or 33020?
    Modern cruise missiles require competent electronic stuffing and software. And who will create it? "Scientific companies?"
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 6 July 2013 08: 53 New
      11
      Quote: True
      Shoigu crowed, but at least do not dawn there.

      Well, let's start with the fact that Shoigu is far from a rooster, and no matter what the hell they poured on him, he is the one who restores what was stolen and destroyed by Tolik & K. brains. "Since it is unlikely that President Yanukovych sees any serious external challenges in the field of defense, it can be assumed that this is something else. There are huge economic and financial problems within the country, and the army is no exception. If Viktor Yanukovych is convinced that this person can make effective changes, then such an appointment is quite logical.
      A person with financial brains will keep at his disposal land, and funds, and property, and this must be dealt with. Therefore, from the very beginning, it would be necessary to have some kind of control levers, so that the temptation to control huge resources would not allow us to do more negative than positive. An example of this is Serdyukov hi
      1. dustycat
        dustycat 6 July 2013 13: 01 New
        -12
        And what, again, we will sculpt with analog control units?
        Or on imported chips?
        Or on the good old set for PDP11 (Electronics 60)?
        Or will we buy Android smartphones from the Chinese?
        Organic microtechnology is certainly cool, but ...
        Russia needs to develop its 10 nanometer technology.
        Without this, it will not be possible to keep the level of armaments at a "worse" level.

        Or did our MO purchase the same 20nanometer technology from Intel?
        1. TSOOBER
          TSOOBER 6 July 2013 17: 05 New
          +7
          at 20 nanometers, 90 does not roll like a wedge? or is the main slogan "fucked up polymers"? and for what such needs is 10 noanometer technology needed?
          1. fisherman
            fisherman 6 July 2013 21: 22 New
            0
            the sizes are such that the antediluvian su perfectly fits and reliably works on the antediluvian principles

            apparently confused with the UAV :)
    2. Gecko
      Gecko 6 July 2013 08: 59 New
      20
      Russia does not develop cruise missiles from scratch, there is a scientific school, more than 2 dozen types of missiles were produced during this time. For your information, Russia produces microprocessors, microcontrollers and other chips according to topological standards up to 0,18 microns (Pentium III processor level)
      The latest cruise missiles that have already been made and which will be purchased:
      X-101 (X-102) - strategic cruise missile 5000-5500 km
      P-800 Onyx - universal anti-ship missile up to 300 km
      X-35 - subsonic low-altitude anti-ship missile up to 260 km
      A large family of missiles Caliber (Club) 3M-54E, 3M-54E1, 3M-14E, 91RE1, 91RTE2, etc. they will most likely be the most massive because are universal both in media and in purpose.
      1. Constantine
        Constantine 6 July 2013 13: 50 New
        +6
        I agree, but a person can also be understood. Many data that we have both microelectronics and other interesting things are bombarded with tons of information that everything is bad. And just such information, for certain reasons, they try not to replicate through large resources.
    3. Htuek
      Htuek 6 July 2013 10: 18 New
      11
      Oops, again, having coalesced the polymers? You before crowing at least in the subject were about the KR. And if you want to discuss Shoigu then you definitely made a mistake with the branch.
    4. Silkway0026
      Silkway0026 6 July 2013 17: 19 New
      +5
      She’s not crowing at you, why are you in trouble? Sit, from mommy, and don’t fuck @ baby ...
    5. satellite
      satellite 6 July 2013 18: 33 New
      -1
      Although it’s necessary to start with something and not grumble under your own brow, let’s let it be so bad with us.
  6. Sirocco
    Sirocco 6 July 2013 08: 21 New
    +9
    Principles Want peace, get ready for war, has not been canceled yet. And against that background, Better more, YES BETTER.
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 19: 16 New
      0
      Quote: Sirocco
      Principles, Want peace, get ready for war, has not been canceled yet.

      Well, it's you in vain! You mean army reform laughing
  7. Tarpon
    Tarpon 6 July 2013 08: 55 New
    +1
    by 2020, the number of cruise missiles will be increased by 30 times

    Interestingly, in numerical terms, how much will this be?
    1. JIaIIoTb
      JIaIIoTb 6 July 2013 09: 13 New
      +1
      Most likely, logically, the number of our cruise missiles will be equalized with the number available to the most likely enemy. According to various sources, the USA today has from 1,5 to 3 thousand cruise missiles.
      Sincerely.
      1. shalk
        shalk 6 July 2013 11: 08 New
        +7
        Russia has no need to focus on the American arsenal of the Kyrgyz Republic. Can even count ammunition and shells and balance?
        Any cited figures on the number of CDs among Americans or the Russian Federation are fantasies. This is classified information.
      2. patsantre
        patsantre 6 July 2013 11: 13 New
        +2
        But how can we equalize the number of CDs when they have a budget more than 10 times, and CDs are a higher priority weapon for us than for us? And the USA has more than 3 KRs, only sea tomahawks can calculate this.
        1. Batman
          Batman 6 July 2013 19: 55 New
          +2
          How can we equalize the number of CDs when they have a budget more than 10 times

          1) They saw at times more than ours
          2) They have the cost of production of any equipment an order of magnitude higher
          3) they have a lot of budget spent on the maintenance of soldiers and military equipment

          it can only be tomahawks nautical counted.

          yes, 3 thousand are just tomahawks (what is known), how many nobody really will say, except only Snowden
  8. True
    True 6 July 2013 09: 45 New
    -29
    Let's start with the fact that Shoigu did nothing in six months. He just frowned his face for show, portraying a soldier, wagging his finger, and arranged cheap populism, like the revival of mass physical education for future soldiers and "scientific companies".
    1) There is not even approximately a development program.
    2) There is not a single criminal case brought to an end.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 6 July 2013 09: 56 New
      -22
      Quote: True
      To begin with, Shoigu did nothing for six months.

      But why? Hanged with stripes, like a real demobilization
      1. True
        True 6 July 2013 10: 06 New
        -26
        At least he makes the stripe demolition and he SERVED. And this one did not serve A DAY. And he makes himself a soldier ... It’s disgusting to look.
        1. Zlodeey
          Zlodeey 6 July 2013 10: 52 New
          13
          True

          I haven’t managed to register already 120 comments in the morning, isn’t it bold? Yes, even under different flags. Ikspert found in everything.
          1. velikoros-xnumx
            velikoros-xnumx 6 July 2013 18: 45 New
            0
            "True" - in what sense, can there be a true bearer of crap ... (ugh, what an opportunity you sealed again recourse ) democratic values.
            1. velikoros-xnumx
              velikoros-xnumx 6 July 2013 18: 53 New
              0
              And in general, guys, "true" and "shovels", you are not mistaken with the site. Try typing "world democratic review" in a search engine negative
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 6 July 2013 10: 05 New
      18
      Quote: True
      2) There is not a single criminal case brought to an end.

      What Shoigu criminal cases?
    3. Batman
      Batman 6 July 2013 19: 57 New
      +2
      1) There is not even approximately a development program.

      No approximate, but there are accurate development programs

      2) There is not a single criminal case brought to an end.

      But should he deal with criminal cases?
  9. Rattenfanger
    Rattenfanger 6 July 2013 09: 47 New
    0
    What kind of products, what performance characteristics, how will they be trolled?
  10. papss
    papss 6 July 2013 09: 58 New
    +1
    the number of our cruise missiles will be equal to the number available to the most likely enemy
    , logically, yes ... but this is pulling into an arms race ... Russia now proceeds from the concept of restraining necessity ...
    The United States, according to various sources, today has from 1,5 to 3 thousand cruise missiles
    ... in the USA, 7000 cruise missiles ...
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 19: 13 New
      +1
      Quote: papss
      ... in the USA, 7000 cruise missiles ...

      No one knows how many rockets they have!
  11. AVDOTYAKARLOVNA
    AVDOTYAKARLOVNA 6 July 2013 10: 37 New
    +4
    Keep it up .. it's good to flirt with the cunning Anglo-Saxons. Lapochka Gorbachev and drunkard Yeltsin gave them a good head start.
  12. ded
    ded 6 July 2013 10: 50 New
    0
    ... in the USA, 7000 cruise missiles ...


    The cost of a cruise missile in the United States is approximately (recently said on television) 1,4 million USD.
    7000 x 1,4 = 9800 i.e. roughly need 10 billion US dollars. Since all over the world OLYMPIAD is an event where people earn money, after SOCHI 2014 Russia can easily spend the money earned on the production and purchase of rockets!
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 19: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: ded
      Since all over the world OLYMPIAD is an event where people earn money, after SOCHI2014 Russia can easily spend the money earned on the production and purchase of rockets!

      What kind of earned money are you talking about? laughing This is all over the world, otherwise we have it! wassat
  13. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 6 July 2013 10: 54 New
    +3
    At the time of the 2nd Iraqi company, the states had about 1500 kroons, and this is definitely known since at some point they ran out (tomahawks). There was even a decent scandal. I had to run a production line that was idle at that time. I think they learned from bitter experience now there are 2500-3000 of them. In Europe, the stock is minimal. Remember, even in Libya it was not enough, I had to buy from the states.
    1. Windbreak
      Windbreak 6 July 2013 11: 10 New
      +5
      And what do you think are only Tomahawk cruise missiles? There are also aircraft AGM-86, AGM-158 JASSM, SLAM
      1. 1c-inform-city
        1c-inform-city 6 July 2013 13: 16 New
        0
        I mean the axes so far
    2. papss
      papss 6 July 2013 11: 17 New
      +3
      And this is precisely known because at some point they ran out of them (tomahawks). There was even a decent scandal.
      We ended up with a dedicated grouping of the company ... Given their then concept of conducting several such warriors at the one-time point ... you need to at least multiply by 2 ... and at the same time take into account the reserves and deterrents of possible other theaters in the ...
  14. papss
    papss 6 July 2013 11: 12 New
    +1
    Quote: 1c-inform-city
    At the time of the 2nd Iraqi company, the states had about 1500 kroons, and this is definitely known since at some point they ran out (tomahawks). There was even a decent scandal. I had to run a production line that was idle at that time. I think they learned from bitter experience now there are 2500-3000 of them. In Europe, the stock is minimal. Remember, even in Libya it was not enough, I had to buy from the states.

    Potential carriers -
    • B-52N (combat-ready 44, max. 94 pieces) carries up to 20 ALCMs;
    • Ohio nuclear submarine (4) carries up to 154 SLCMs;
    • NPS Advanced moose (23) carries up to 12 SLCM + 8;
    • Virginia submarine (5) carries up to 12 SLCM +8;
    • URO ArlyBurk (55);
    • URO Ticonderoga (22).
    For URO, it will be simplified to assume that all of them during the scheduled repair were re-equipped with the latest extreme version of the vertical start-up of the UVP, for Ticonderoga it is 122 cells, for ArliBerk - 96 cells.
    Total, the maximum possible strike potential of the American grouping is 11020 units of the Kyrgyz Republic, but this is at the maximum ... that all the URO cells will be clogged ...
    1. Belkin
      Belkin 6 July 2013 11: 34 New
      +6
      ... or maybe we won't dispose of the Arkhangelsk and Severstal submarines, but modernize them, following the example of the Ohio submarine, for example, with 200 cruise missiles. After all, silos for the Bulava were built into the Dmitry Donskoy submarine.
      1. Su24
        Su24 6 July 2013 21: 22 New
        +2
        Quote: Belkin
        ... or maybe we won't dispose of the Arkhangelsk and Severstal submarines, but modernize them, following the example of the Ohio submarine, for example, with 200 cruise missiles. After all, silos for the Bulava were built into the Dmitry Donskoy submarine.


        These boats are noisy by modern standards and expensive to maintain. Who should they fight with? With banana republics without PLO? Better to set up more Ashes.
    2. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 19: 09 New
      0
      Quote: papss
      Total, the maximum possible strike potential of the American grouping is 11020 units of the Kyrgyz Republic, but this is at the maximum ... that all the URO cells will be clogged ...

      And this is not enough for you ??? belay On the territory of Russia, everything can be smashed to pieces: hydroelectric power stations, nuclear power plants, dams, bridges, airfields and other strategic facilities.
      1. Pilat2009
        Pilat2009 6 July 2013 20: 35 New
        +3
        Quote: nycsson
        you can smash everything to smithereens: hydroelectric power station, nuclear power plant

        They had enough of Chernobyl on the tonsils, half of Europe covered
      2. Su24
        Su24 6 July 2013 21: 15 New
        0
        Quote: nycsson
        Quote: papss
        Total, the maximum possible strike potential of the American grouping is 11020 units of the Kyrgyz Republic, but this is at the maximum ... that all the URO cells will be clogged ...

        And this is not enough for you ??? belay On the territory of Russia, everything can be smashed to pieces: hydroelectric power stations, nuclear power plants, dams, bridges, airfields and other strategic facilities.


        In range, at least it won’t work. Again air defense still, ground and air defense fighters. It’s impossible to hide such a massive preparation, so there will be no surprise either.
        1. nycsson
          nycsson 6 July 2013 23: 40 New
          -1
          Quote: Su24
          In range, at least it won’t work.

          And why is that? request Everything just turns out!
          Quote: Su24
          Again air defense still, ground and air defense fighters.

          We have air defense around Moscow. She is nowhere else - there are her elements, and this is not enough to guarantee a repulsed attack.
          Quote: Su24
          It’s impossible to hide such a massive preparation, so there will be no surprise either.

          Events on our ball are developing so rapidly that no one will bother with secrecy.
  15. patsantre
    patsantre 6 July 2013 11: 16 New
    +3
    If you believe the wiki, then they only have 158 AGM-5 JASSM (2.5 thousand each version, with a range of 400 and 1000 km).
  16. papss
    papss 6 July 2013 11: 20 New
    +5
    Quote: patsantre
    If you believe the wiki, then they only have 158 AGM-5 JASSM (2.5 thousand each version, with a range of 400 and 1000 km).
    just about ... judge for yourself ... the Russian figure is 30 times by 2020 ... should rely on something ...
  17. Volkhov
    Volkhov 6 July 2013 12: 08 New
    +1
    The generals do not run, because in peacetime a running general causes laughter, and in war - panic.
    The flow of nonsense from the top leadership reminds Poland's propaganda in early September 39 - about the huge successes of the Polish army (in newspapers and radio) with the quick German advance in reality.
    "30 times" means the command "save yourself who can" - such a public statement is out of touch with reality.
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 19: 05 New
      0
      Quote: Volkhov
      so public statement is divorced from reality.

      But the spirit invigorates! laughing
  18. Russ69
    Russ69 6 July 2013 13: 20 New
    +4
    From what figure the MO is repelled, then the secret is behind the family. The fact that their number would increase was understandable. Taking into account the construction of "Ash" and the modernization of "Nakhimov", and other ships are under construction, do not forget about the aviation component. And in general: "stock, pocket does not pull."
  19. iOfficer
    iOfficer 6 July 2013 13: 40 New
    +6
    For complete happiness, only a larger number of means of delivery of such missiles to the launch site is lacking. Ships of the far sea and ocean zones, and more launch cells in them :)
  20. Starover_Z
    Starover_Z 6 July 2013 17: 58 New
    +1
    Quote: Tarpon
    by 2020, the number of cruise missiles will be increased by 30 times

    Interestingly, in numerical terms, how much will this be?

    There will be carriers, there will be rockets! The main thing is to think through and place orders competently, and not just lament the lack of money!
  21. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 6 July 2013 18: 27 New
    0
    Cautious Everyman: In time to stop, so as not to plunge into the next "Star Wars". Americans are such experimenters!
    1. satellite
      satellite 6 July 2013 18: 42 New
      -1
      Amers will have a bigger cough, they again drag us into the next costly arms race
  22. patsantre
    patsantre 6 July 2013 18: 30 New
    0
    This statement smacks of absurdity. How much can we rivet KR in 10 years? 2000? 3000? It turns out that we now have only 100 of them?
    Old X-55s, well, at least something of novya - a few hundred already typed. Are they going to produce 15000 missiles? Horseradish is clear, we won’t pull so much, we don’t need so much, and most importantly, we have enough carriers for three thousand missiles ...
    And all this apart from RCC.
    Maybe, of course, it really meant precisely the new tactical non-nuclear CDs, which, apparently, we can barely get a hundred.
    In general, as always, these "heads" and "ministers" cannot say anything clearly and in Russian, they are chewing snot.
    1. nycsson
      nycsson 6 July 2013 19: 03 New
      -1
      Quote: patsantre
      we have enough carriers for three missiles ...

      You obviously bent .......
      Quote: patsantre
      In general, as always, these "heads" and "ministers" cannot say anything clearly and in Russian.

      Three floors work out! laughing
      1. patsantre
        patsantre 6 July 2013 19: 07 New
        0
        Quote: nycsson
        You obviously bent .......


        Well, I’m with the prospect. That we will have 7 pieces, a couple of Orlans modernized for caliber, and so on)
        1. nycsson
          nycsson 6 July 2013 23: 42 New
          0
          Quote: patsantre
          Well, I’m with the prospect. That we will have 7 pieces, a couple of Orlans modernized for caliber, and so on)

          Don't say "hop" until you've jumped!
          1. patsantre
            patsantre 7 July 2013 01: 22 New
            0
            Did I say? I only calculated how much CD we can have in the best case in the future.
  23. DimYang
    DimYang 6 July 2013 18: 32 New
    0
    I wish it were so. Indeed, how many are there now?
  24. shinobi
    shinobi 6 July 2013 18: 57 New
    0
    It seems to me that they will rearm the submarines. There’s such a tricky thing, a container of the same size with a clip of 4 lionfish is inserted into a single launch shaft from under a ballistic missile. Any warheads can be installed on lionfish.
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 6 July 2013 22: 24 New
      0
      Amer’s got 7 in general. But ours really have fewer mines. Here, the loaves would be redone for calibers.
  25. I think so
    I think so 6 July 2013 22: 49 New
    +1
    All this is not bad, BUT the figure 2020 is alarming ... It looks like a well-known "doctrine" - either the donkey dies or the shah ...
  26. krakozyabr777
    krakozyabr777 6 July 2013 23: 03 New
    -6
    Why are these rockets? Who should defend oneself if the direct leaders of Russia are agents of US influence? Ponte alone for fools.
    1. JackTheRipper
      JackTheRipper 7 July 2013 00: 07 New
      +2
      Why then can the USA not take Snowden from us? Why then does Russia block at the UN all American initiatives that do not fit into our framework?
  27. Witold
    Witold 6 July 2013 23: 13 New
    -3
    Solid pique vests. Even the argument is reluctant to enter
  28. drom.m
    drom.m 7 July 2013 02: 23 New
    +2
    I remind you again, not a specialist in missile weapons, but, as V.V. Putin said, our answer must be effective and not expensive. I ask you not to forget about hyper sound and low-noise P.L.