The Iron Curtain is the initiative of a European loser in the Second World War (loss of a significant part of the territory, devastation, failure to achieve the goals of the war, concessions to the winner in the territory, agreement to the governments disliked by the West) to isolate themselves from the winner. And Churchill spoke about this for the first time, at a lecture at an American university. The curtain fenced off Europe from the expansion of the ideas of communism (in their frightened opinion, the entire Warsaw bloc is communism), and from thoughts that are harmful to the West from the victorious USSR. Then, oh, how the iron curtain saved; there was still no global information space without borders, plus the Babylonian problem of languages.
As a result, the USSR mainly (before Khrushchev) focused * inside itself * on clarifying the issue of establishing social justice, and its implementation in practice. Or otherwise, the establishment of true proportions, for the labor expended and the values created by labor, to their payment for these works, expressed in a generalized unit, referred to all the real values of the entire USSR. (the latter is the mathematical expression of public ownership of the means of production, natural resources and the available life benefits). Inside the USSR, he did it, even with mistakes.
Then the West in 90 for some reason decided that the danger of socialist ideas for the Western world was over, and the Iron Curtain, from the West, was proposed to be dismantled. The naive idea of the West is now clear that it is enough to buy the top of the CPSU, headed by Gorbachev, as the entire civilization on the territory of the USSR immediately accepts the eurovalue of acquisitiveness and the permissibility of coups, violence, and robbery in neo-colonies. Probably also with the expectation that the new corrupt Western-liberal government of Russia will again allow Russian workers to pump vast amounts of valuable resources to the West with their help and through their territory, like it was 100 years ago.
But the expected consequences of the fall of the iron curtain do not coincide with the facts.
Civilization "Russia", after historical “microseconds” at age 20, she began to examine the entire globe now with a view to establishing * on it * social justice and the rule of law, and not just inside the USSR. That is, the information and those ideas from the USSR, which the West was afraid of in its society to death, and which lowered the iron curtain to protect against them, are now spreading not only to the territory of the West, but also to the entire globe, thanks to global informatization.
At the same time, a defeat could be called such a factual situation, when the West dictates its assessments, and on the basis of these assessments forces us to take collective decisions in our own interests. But again, this is not the case. Estimates of the West, for example, for Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, are not perceived without objections from authoritative and powerful on the world map. Only the strong, such as China or Russia, can object to the West and Co. The situation in practice is this: if you want to act by military means without a coordinated assessment with all countries, go ahead, with a song. But you will receive an assessment in the world community as aggressors, and you will receive a lot of evidence of the robbery of your actions and lies beyond the expected, the iron curtain is not there. The world is looked at by millions of lens holes that keep traces of your activity and artifacts in social networks and distributed repositories.
For me, it is clear that the West and the USA have miscalculated. As it turned out, the public consciousness in Russia is not formed by the opposition, bought with printed US dollars. Rolling on them like cheese in oil in Russia. Non-gangsters in other countries (Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya) lured by printed dollars will make the election of leaders legitimate in the eyes of the public. And it is certainly not the false rhetoric of the corrupt top, as in Afghanistan, or as the CPSU, headed by Gorbachev, that determines the consciousness of society. This consciousness relies on something more stable and deep.
Now a good mine is made for a bad game. The game did not work out. They took off the Iron Curtain, but what was for this a solid foundation? The fact that the traitor Gorbachev assured that he knew his people for sure that in the USSR people simply wanted to acquire, deribate, crush, saw, water their ancestors with mud, dance and ape in churches, and together would return the LGBT community to represent family values. That backwardness and primitiveness in thinking came to light when assessing two social processes. West thinks colonial stamps, where sales leaders, hung with beads and mirrors, decide everything. Where to dig, where to drill, and how many unsuspecting tribesmen to send with good uncles into slavery. In short, Europe and Co. believed that they had finally bought Russian civilization, and in a very reliable, proven, colonial way - by buying the native leaders.
So, removed the curtain, and thus released the Russian Bear. And Bear took it and began to demand order on the planet.
In my opinion, here it is obvious that the West is now engaged in self-suggestion “everything is good, everything goes according to plan”, calling Russia a loser, and Putin - a tyrant-tyrant among the populous European values (po-Gorbachev). We seem to overestimate Europe, as if it has a plan. They don’t have a plan for themselves whatsoever, and with regard to Russians, they apparently seriously believe that it is enough to once again show the freedom to organize gay parades and bring creacles to Bolotnaya, like Putin’s bloody regime will fall.
Need to be more serious guys. Not Putin, so different, not this one earlier, so different later, but it was realized the demand in society for the protection of the dignity of their state, and the protection of the state itself. Liberal-creative foam in information space was asleep, and the monitoring of public sentiment showed in what way and with what gesture the people escorted the Berezovsky, Gorbachevs, Gaidar-Chubais. Not for the future they will go pineapples and grouse. And plus, society seems to have remembered that the state is being created for their own protection.
So who is the loser here? And the one whose plans collapsed and who was in deep crisis, despite the fact that repeating the somersault with the pumping of the Papuans with beads and mirrors in exchange for their real resources will not work, this card is a bit. And this is a complete fiasco of Europe and Co. at the end of the Cold War.
The West seems to be beginning to realize that with declaring himself a winner in the Cold War, he clearly hurried. The Cold War, the lowering of the Iron Curtain by the Church before the Soviet bloc, was originally a war against the idea of communism, which, by its own stupidity, was transformed into a war against the carrier of the idea. This is a logical loss, and in reality - a loss, which history shows.
After all, the very same ideas of communism:
* "who does not work shall not eat.",
* "mass production - in public ownership, and
apartments, yachts, Mercedes or villas - in private ",
* anti-bank money-printing scam => hidden inflationary
tax on all property of the population, on their cash deposits, and their salary,
definition of capitalism: "creating the conditions when 85% of the population are forced
work on 8 hours just for the necessary life benefits, for
providing 15% bathing in luxury (condition for the existence of capitalism) "
and so forth and so forth ...
the same ideas began to spread throughout the world at a breakneck pace, some time after the iron curtain was removed from the USSR. In its confidence in the "victory", the West disarmed before the idea of an opposite social order for the planet, putting, by its stupidity, the sufficiency of the fact that once the carrier of the opposite idea is economically defeated, then this is equivalent to the very idea of being ashamed. But the economic loss of 85% of the population of a particular country under capitalism, or 85% of the population of a single planet, is just a fact in support of the definition and principle of capitalism.
In view of ignorance or lack of awareness, for 85% of the population of a single country, paradise conditions are shown for 15% of the population in the countries of the "golden billion" of a single planet. This Fact, we agree, unequivocally shows that the society "15%" lives with chic.
But no fact explains, and in general, fact cannot explain why. A fact can disprove (a counterexample) or substantiate (a hypothesis). Explains the indication of a generalization, a strictly logical reasoning on facts and further interpolation (the principle of induction). And just the definition and principle of capitalism "85 / 15" shows why those 85% listeners live poorly. But they, taking advantage of their ignorance in logic and mathematics, are presented with this fact as if it follows from them that they do little work, do not work well, and are fundamentally incapable of working otherwise. But after all, it does not follow logically.
In the countries of the “golden billion,” where the 15% is concentrated, a part of those living well under capitalism on the planet, invented the theory of inferiority of the 85% of the part of the population that lives worse to explain. At first, in the period of inhuman colonialism, the West gave the task to its pseudo-scientists to justify the racial inferiority of the population of the colonies. With the filing of these pseudo-scholarships in the 15% society, there was controversy about whether the natives have a soul, or whether they are simply humanoid cattle. The very bourgeois population of the society "15%" made bestial, from such reasoning.
Then the pseudo-scientists made the label "economists-scientists", and set them the task of justifying with national, cultural, and other non-essential signs the alleged "inability" of 85% society to operate as efficiently and qualitatively as the idle 15% supposedly works. Further, these pseudo-scholars continue to drag out their explanations of the bad life of society "85%" by the lack of democratic values, European values, and even some mythical ideas in their minds. When the ideas of values ended, the ideas of abominations, incest, pedophilia, and bestiality came to the fore. The main thing is that these unacceptable ideas explain the inaccurate, inefficient clumsy people from the “85%” society, which is why they are not doing well.
An iron curtain from the idea of a different social order was needed, in 30-40. A placebo effect survey was actually conducted among Americans. A newspaper ad was given:
... at the beginning of 30, the Soviet firm Amtorg announced a recruitment of specialists to work in the USSR, for a small Soviet salary, more than 100 thousand (!) applications from Americans were submitted for these vacancies. [a source]
Not only simple workers had a positive view of the USSR in the 30-40 years. Not only in that environment were the ideas of the new social order popular. Today they will be called "agents." But the fact that this trend is objective - to see the USSR as an advanced social system - is confirmed by the fact that such an assessment was at the highest levels, among the US government:
During the 1930s and 1940s. For example, when he was on his case, he negotiated the county lawsuit. Johnny Haynes, Harley Klehr, and other scholars have consistently established that they’ve been scale suggested by Sen. Joseph McCarthy, often credits his position.
For example, it was a matter of fact, that the United States bloody economist was influenced by Communist agents. ..
As usual, the fool is at war with the bearer of the idea when there is nothing to say logically. The West could not logically deny anything in the communist and Marxist ideas explaining the principle of capitalism "85 / 15", and decided on a stupid idea: to declare not the ideas of the USSR false, but the USSR an evil empire.
Logically, “everything comes from somewhere” (the law of causality). Evil has a source of lies, which is tantamount, evil is a consequence of a cause, a lie. The investigation without a reason does not happen. Therefore, it is necessary to refute the lie. But a lie is an idea, and is refuted solely by mental reasoning. At the same time, the translation of the reasoning from the subject (evil idea), on the subject of personality (the carrier of evil) is primitive sophism.
Now, the loss of the West in the Cold War is obvious to the most important segment of the population of the former USSR, numbering in 85%. (if one still does not confuse evidence for consciousness with the unwillingness to explicitly recognize it, then everything is clear and 99%). It is obvious to everyone, from my old parents who did not really complain about the USSR system, to the new generation who had never seen the USSR — the West is lying, and the one who is lying is the enemy.
Despite the fact that the definition of capitalism and the principle that motivates it to act, is more and more obvious to the population, even without strict scientific wording, the West has been defeated in the ideological confrontation. The most passionate part of the former USSR, after experimenting in a single taken country and some countries of the Eastern bloc of Europe, is ready to undertake the reorganization of the entire planet. But the Iron Curtain is no longer there, instead of it there is a global and open information space, and it will be the battle of ideas in it. The ideas of Lenin, Marx and others - "good communism and bad capitalism", against the opposite idea.
The West is now in the same position as Hitler, who, declaring the war against Bolshevism (idea), in reality, replaced it with a simple murder of the carriers of this idea and the robbery seizing their land and property. This logical error has ended with the chopping into pieces of the erroneous and burying it in the ground as fertilizer. And now, when the repeated "Drang Nach Osten" is incredible, due to the presence of nuclear weapons on the head of the aggressor, and the population with a thousand-year-old skill to defeat the aggressors, the West has no chance of keeping its system of metropolises on the planet.