Weapons from Obama and his satellites: give in good hands
Foreign ministers of the Group of Friends of Syria members states and met in Doha 22 June: gentlemen from the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. The main topic of the meeting was the issue of arming the Syrian "opposition". According to US Secretary of State John Kerry, it is necessary to eliminate the existing "imbalance of forces." At the same time, Kerry said that the US is for peace.
Well, yes, let us add, “tyranny” cannot outweigh “democracy”. And when weapon is in good hands, it shoots solely in the name of peace and this very democracy, the samples of which Kerry can observe anywhere in Libya, Iraq, Kosovo and other fragments of federal Yugoslavia. In Afghanistan, by the way, democracy is now too. Opium-heroin.
Of the 11 participants in the Qatari forum, 9 supported the decision to supply weapons to the "rebels". This is not about joint deliveries, but about supplies at the level of individual states. So that participants do not interpret the aforementioned autonomy in the decisions on deliveries wrong, the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jasem Al Tani, said in Doha that moral support alone would not be enough.
The "friends" decided to turn the tide in Syria in favor of the opposition on the eve of the once postponed Geneva Conference, wanting to dictate its conditions to Assad. However, Kerry said that Washington supports the peaceful settlement of the conflict and the holding of an international conference.
It is hard to understand what the world means by the masters from America. Here, for example, we all know that President Obama is the Nobel laureate of this very world. He received the award as if in advance, and then worked it out in Libya. His closest associate, H. Clinton, is said to be very happy about the murder of Muammar Gaddafi, and even said on the phone: "Wow."
Probably, peace, friendship and democracy in the interpretation of the Obama administration mean something like a carpet bombing of a certain unfriendly US space. Once the ideologist of American democracy and the great idealist F. Fukuyama explained once (still at the very beginning of 1990's) that American-style democracy is all, the end stories. Humanity does not need a different social idea. Everybody will have democracy, sooner or later everyone will join it. And in proof of his words, Mr. Fukuyama cited in his book about the end of history and the “last person” tables, in rows and columns of which, according to historical periods, were countries where there was no democracy before, but which subsequently came to it. Democratization is inevitable. True, Fukuyama did not write anything about the ways of achieving democratic ideals.
Let us return to our sheep, that is, to arms for the opposition. For the opposition itself, which not only cuts out the hearts or lungs of those killed to have a bite after the battle, not only shoots the boys who did not run to make them free coffee, but also nurtures (and voices on YouTube) plans to build Sharia in Syria, and at the same time in the United States. Democracy, such a democracy ... Even "Dzhebhat an-Nusroy" - and that is commanded by a tseerushnik.
Recently, Sheikh Nabil Naim, a former al-Qaeda party, recorded a video stating that the leader of the Dzhebhat al-Nusra group trying to overthrow President Assad is a CIA agent. This was told by the opposition in the US publicist Paul Joseph Watson (Infowars.com; source of translation - Mixednews.ru).
The former jihadist Naim has abandoned violence and is now busy exposing comrades who are on a payroll to the CIA. “I personally believe that the leader of the Nusra army (Mohammed al-Javlani), who announced his support for Ayman al-Zawahiri, is a CIA agent in Al Nusra,” the sheikh said. Moreover, Naim called Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri a double American agent.
Sheikh warns the terrorists of "An-Nusra" fighting in Syria: "You are fighting in the war in Syria in the interests of America." In the end, you "will be called terrorists, and will be killed or thrown into jail just as happened to us after Afghanistan." “These leaders are manipulating you, you will understand that you are dying, and the Americans, it turns out, are achieving their goals, not yours,” adds Naim.
Comrade Watson writes:
What kind of equipment and what kind of weapon did the “Friends” decide to supply to the bloodthirsty criminals who are fighting against the people of the country and the legitimate government in order to correct the “imbalance”?
It will become clear as weapons. Sheikhs are completely classified. "Euronews" indicates that concrete decisions were made at the Friends meeting, but they are kept secret. Nadim Zuawi (RIA News") reports that all deliveries, the decision about which was made at the meeting, will go through the high command of the "Syrian Free Army" led by Salim Idris.
The other day, the Russian Foreign Ministry blamed the US satellite in the region, Saudi Arabia, for supporting international terrorists in Syria. This is stated in the statement of the official representative of the Foreign Ministry Alexander Lukashevich, published on the website of the department, reports "Lenta.ru".
The Foreign Ministry said that Saudi Arabia finances international terrorists and extremist groups and provides them with weapons in order to “realize their own geopolitical ambitions at the expense of the blood and suffering of the Syrian people.”
So Moscow responded to the statement of Riyadh, who accused Russia of "unlimited military support for the massacres in Syria."
The response of the Saudis was Riyadh’s call for the EU to supply arms to Syrian “oppositionists”.
The Foreign Minister of the Kingdom of Prince Saud al-Faisal Al Saud, speaking in the capital of Bahrain Manama at a meeting of representatives of the European Union and the Gulf countries, said that the EU should immediately provide military assistance to the Syrian opposition. This was reported by 1 July ITAR-TASS with reference to the Saudi Press Agency.
The Minister stressed: "The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia appeals to the European Union to begin supplying arms to the opposition." The Syrian opposition, he said, fights not only with the troops of Assad, but also with “foreign invaders” - Hezbollah’s militants.
And what about the United States?
Oh there is against
A group of US lawmakers, consisting of members of the Republican and Democratic parties, opposed the United States sending weapons to the Syrian opposition, reports RIA News" with reference to the Associated Press.
A few days ago, five American congressmen held a press conference at which they proposed to adopt a resolution prohibiting the White House to send weapons to Syria without Congress approval. Earlier, reminds RIA "News“, The Obama administration announced its intention to supply weapons to the Syrian opposition, the reason for which was intelligence data on the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian army.
"I am opposed to the United States being involved in a civil war in Syria, I am against sending weapons to the Syrian Islamic rebels, I am even more against being done without the consent of American citizens through their representatives (in Congress)," the Fox TV channel reports. News "words of congressman Rand Paul.
This man and other congressmen fear that American intervention will only worsen the situation in Syria. In addition, the military items of the state budget are curtailed. Politicians reminded the general public that the US intervention in Libya subsequently led to an attack on the American embassy, resulting in the death of Ambassador Stevens.
According to the results of a survey of the TV channel, 66% of Americans do not approve of Obama’s decision on arming the opposition. However, as noted by Fox News, the authors of the initiative may have many opponents in Congress.
The names of the brave comrades who took the initiative to prohibit the peacemaker Obama to arm the Syrian democratizers, leads "Russian newspaper" with reference to ITAR-TASS.
Republicans Michelle Buckman, Chris Gibson, Walter Jones, Peter Welch and Democrat Rick Nolan submitted a bill on "protecting Americans against the transfer of weapons to terrorists" for consideration by the lower house of Congress.
The document prohibits US military intervention in the development of events in Syria, including the provision of military assistance to anti-government armed groups, without the sanction of both chambers of Congress.
Comrade Welch visited the Syrian-Turkish border this spring. He believes that the need to "learn from" the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He directly spoke out against the “Americanization” of the conflict: “Sending military aid to Syrian militants or direct intervention in this conflict between Sunnis and Shiites will only lead to its Americanization.”
Not only these people in the United States are protesting against the arming of the so-called "opposition" in Syria.
The White House claims that the weapons intended for the "rebels" will not fall into the hands of the Islamists, but not all Americans believe the White House. There are such politicians in the USA that they are seriously concerned about the possibility of the newest types of weapons falling into the hands of fanatic fighters. This correspondent told "RT" Gayane Chichakian.
“Does anyone know if President Obama is going to check the identities of the Syrian rebels before giving them weapons?” Senator Ted Cruz tweeted.
Former Pentagon Officer Michael Maloof says: “More radical elements will inevitably gain access to these weapons. It's almost impossible to prevent it. ”
Once the Americans supported Osama bin Laden, and not so long ago, Senator McCain was photographed with Syrian militants who turned out to be kidnappers in Syria. Here is the caption for the picture in his album: “An important meeting with the brave fighters in Syria who risk their lives for freedom and need our help.” McCain representatives later stated that he did not know these people when he agreed to the photo. And Michael Malouf rightly notes: "This situation demonstrates an absolute lack of understanding and inability to determine where the good guys are and where the bad guys are."
These “misunderstanding and inability”, we add in conclusion, is the engine of the American inertial political machine, which leads it along a curved path - as in the reign of Bush Jr., who could not find Iraq on the world map, with whom, by the way, he fought , and in the difficult crisis of Obama, who deserved the reputation of the worst president in the history of the country. By the way, in parallel with him in the worst rulers are the Frenchman Hollande and the British Cameron - also burning with the desire to arm the Syrian "rebels".
- especially for topwar.ru
Information