"Armata": silence that has no analogues

Over the last time, various kinds of images regularly appear, which show the alleged appearance of a promising tank based on the Armata platform. However, all such drawings and three-dimensional models have one characteristic feature - among them there is not a single official image of the new combat vehicle. The authors of the project have not yet spoiled the public with information, which is why a variety of speculations on this topic appear. The declared dates for adopting "Almaty" into service are approaching, but, nevertheless, responsible persons are still limited only to general statements and are in no hurry to publish any technical information.

Last week, 27 of June, the Deputy Minister of Defense Y. Borisov once again touched upon the creation of a new armored platform, which attracted the attention of the entire public interested in this topic. To the chagrin of armored amateurs and experts, the deputy minister again managed to use common words, without specifics. Y. Borisov said that the promising main battle tank “Armata”, which is being created now, will surpass all existing foreign vehicles of this class in its combat characteristics. Moreover, the Deputy Minister of Defense said that the characteristics and capabilities of “Almaty” will be higher than those of similar foreign cars being developed at present.

The same, according to Borisov, applies to other weapons systems that are being built in our country now. So, at the stage of completing the design work, any new types of weapons and military equipment are at least as good as their foreign counterparts. The deputy minister noted that in some cases the characteristics of domestic developments are even higher than those of corresponding foreign samples. Otherwise, there is no point in running such projects.

Thus, the conversation about a promising tank on the basis of an armored platform "Armata" once again ended on the most common words. Of course, the statements of the Deputy Minister of Defense about the superiority of the new domestic technology over foreign please the ear, but do not add any new information to the existing one. The technical details of the project are still unknown, which can be interpreted in the broadest possible manner, including in a negative way.

The reason for the specific reaction of the public, among other things, may be plans of Uralvagonzavod regarding the display of a new tank. A few weeks ago, the company's general director, I. Sienko, stated that the Armata tank would not be on display at the Russian Arms Expo military equipment exhibition in September in Nizhny Tagil. The reason for this is the secrecy of the project. Earlier, some sources claimed that the future exhibition will be held "premiere" promising tank. Now, it seems, the public will have to suffer several months before they show her a new combat vehicle.

In the context of the display of the new tank, the third version is also mentioned. Thus, expert A. Khlopotov, citing rumors circulating in certain circles, writes that the first show of Almaty will take place this fall. However, at first the tank will be shown to a narrow circle of persons from the leadership of the country and the military department. What will happen after this - while no one can say. The hassle suggests that the upcoming show may turn out to be a trivial blow of dust in the eyes of the high authorities. For these purposes, they can assemble a model of a promising combat vehicle at a single tank-building enterprise, which they will show to the president, the minister of defense and other officials.

So far, for obvious reasons, it is impossible to say how much Hlopote is right. Perhaps the assembly of the first prototype of the Armata tank will begin soon, but another development scenario cannot be ruled out, in which the design bureau of Uralvagonzavod will not have time to complete the design work by the fall. In view of the secrecy of the project, it remains only to guess what its actual state is. Naturally, this can be the cause of the emergence of various kinds of speculations, including negative ones. Probably, to correct the situation with a large number of rumors and the almost complete absence of verified information could timely announcement of information about the progress of work.

However, until now, only the most general facts are known about “Armata”, and more accurate information concerns only the approximate terms of development and adoption. Naturally, this serves as an excellent ground for the emergence of various rumors. Most likely, in the future, the industry and the Ministry of Defense will continue the current policy of announcing information about the project, which does not imply the publication of any details. Therefore, until a full-fledged demonstration of the prototype of a promising tank — and now we can assume that this will not happen next autumn — the Armat program will remain secret and therefore provoking controversy.


On the materials of the sites:
http://ria.ru/
http://rg.ru/
http://gurkhan.blogspot.ru/

Comments

[alexdol]

Given the pogrom of production and science that occurred after the collapse of the USSR, it is difficult to count on something UNIQUE, because everything that continues to be created today is done so far on the basis of the backlog of what remained after the UNION. Therefore, a plausible assumption by expert Khlopotov:
“For example, expert A. Khlopotov, citing rumors circulating in certain circles, writes that the first demonstration of“ Armata ”will take place this fall. However, first, the tank will be shown to a narrow circle of people from the country's leadership and the military department. ... Khlopotov suggests that the upcoming show may turn out to be a BANAL PUSHING OF DUST in the eyes of high-ranking officials. For these purposes, a mock-up of a promising combat vehicle can be assembled at the only tank-building enterprise, which will be shown to the president, defense minister and other officials. "

[neri73-r]

Comrades, don’t be jealous !!! Everything is going according to plan, well, it just so happened that we have at least something under construction!

[Armata]

Quote: neri73-r

Comrades, don’t be jealous !!! Everything is going according to plan, well, it just so happened that we have at least something under construction!

Yah? What plan? Do not confuse grass with desires, or rather with her dreams. So the project was suspended by order of the Moscow Region. Who needs to defend their homeland?

[Basileus]

Will there be an order number? I would like to get acquainted at my leisure.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

I would like to get acquainted at my leisure.

You want too much.

[Basileus]

Well essno. The main thing is to blurt out, but that there is nothing to confirm is unimportant, and so they will believe.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

Well essno. The main thing is to blurt out, but that there is nothing to confirm is unimportant, and so they will believe.

Listen. So that is the concept of "state secret". Many of yours here are divorced, and adequate already in the minority. Run the site as you want morally left out.

[Basileus]

That is, they managed to get them into the water, but they didn’t confirm their words. Go the right way, comrade!

[Yarbay]

Quote: Basileus

That is, they managed to get them into the water, but they didn’t confirm their words. Go the right way, comrade!

You please watch your expressions while talking with a stranger to you!
Everyone who has been writing here for a long time knows Eugene well and knows that he knows very well in the field that he comments on!
And I know him as a person who loves his homeland and cheers for it with all his heart!

[Basileus]

Well, maybe we’ll wait from him for something other than rudeness. In the meantime, only unconfirmed OBM mixed with rudeness.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Basileus

Well, maybe we’ll wait from him for something other than rudeness

Yes, it was not rudeness, but the answer to your incompetent question!
and here you are in return sham!
Maybe Eugenia should not have written about it at all, but he is better informed than all of us and everyone here knows that!

[Basileus]

If this is so secret, then maybe it was not worth talking about it at all?

Of course, the words of a person confusing the T-80 and T-72 are not in doubt.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Basileus

If this is so secret, then maybe it was not worth talking about it at all?

He knows better than us what and in what quantity I can say so!

[Basileus]

It is likely that I'm wrong here. But so far, apart from doubtful words, which will not be confirmed, nothing is heard from him. Here are the confirmations - I will sprinkle ash on my head.

[old man54]

very restrained, tactful and at the same time tough answer! :) "+"! I'm not sure if I could do that. :) East ... however :)))

[andrey903]

T-72 and T-90 can be confused, it is likely that the T-72 and armandode will be similar

[POBEDA]

100% can be mixed up!
The armata will have 2 tracks, 6-7 pairs of rollers, 1 cannon 125-150 mm, 1-2 machine guns 7.62, and it will be green)))

[Pimply]

Given your communication style, I wonder how you were not sent at all.

[Basileus]

Given the fact that a person is lying without hesitation, it is strange that he generally has some weight here. Maybe you will give links for it, it would be interesting.

Oh yes, let's write everything that comes to mind, we will send them to all questions of beginners and we will zaminusut! So win!

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

Given the fact that a person is lying unashamedly,

Justify, but not from the Internet. I wanted to call you a little-educated shaggy animal, which is scooped with info on the internet, but not. And if you don’t like it, leave the site (or weak?)

[Basileus]

You have not provided ANY confirmation to your words. Why should I believe you?

I wanted to call you a fat troll, not responsible for my words, but you have a bunch of fans here, so I won’t.

[Vanek]

Quote: Basileus

I wanted to call you a fat troll, not responsible for my words, but you have a bunch of fans here, so I won’t.

Well, it's just a sin not to intervene.

you at least apologize.

[Basileus]

For what? A person writes something with a smart look, while not leading anything at all to his advantage. Why should I believe him? I already wrote - as soon as at least one of his words is confirmed - I will certainly apologize. In the meantime, not at all.

[Kars]

In vain you are so. I personally see no reason (well, except for a badly working mail))) I do not believe the Steam Engine / Mechanic. We do not have a better source of information on Armata. And your right to believe or not, but it’s not worth it so actively distributed.

[Basileus]

Well, sobsno he himself reacted so violently to doubts in his words, and here the locals ran. No one is able to answer humanly here - so you have to snap.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Basileus

Well, sobsno he himself reacted so violently to doubts in his words, and here the locals ran. No one is able to answer humanly here - so you have to snap.

Yes, they didn’t))))
You probably understand that this is not a dating site or a forum of beer lovers !!))
And we have known each other for a long time !!
We agree in something, we argue about something to the last!
But first, we know who is competent in what, who has what character!
Secondly, knowing each other for a long time, despite disagreements, we are trying to get along in the framework!
Ramanov gave you good advice, I often answer a stranger first read what he wrote before!

[Basileus]

And I read that they write to me in response. And I answer rudeness with rudeness, for a person who is not able to properly answer the question is not worthy of another. But a newbie can be sent, why should he explain something, right?

[Yarbay]

Quote: Basileus

who is not able to properly answer the question posed otherwise is not worthy

Do you think your question was normal ??
If Yes, then I have nothing more to say!

[Armata]

Quote: Yarbay

Amanov gave you good advice, I often answer a stranger first read what he wrote before

Alibek, do not worry about something to prove to him, This is just a random passerby.

[Alexander Romanov]

Alibek, Zhenya , I wrote to the person in PM, explained, tie up to run over.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

I wrote to the person in PM, explained, tie to run over.

I’m not going to run into anything!)))
I just tried to explain my position, otherwise they will write me down again in some sort of gang)))

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Yarbay

, and then again I will be recorded in some sort of gang)))

Alibek, you don’t get used to it. welcome to Russia

[Yarbay]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Alibek, you don’t get used to it. welcome to Russia

Sanya, I returned yesterday))))))))))
Spent 4 unforgettable days in Moscow)))))))
And surprisingly, I was received everywhere very hospitably)))

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Yarbay

And surprisingly, I was received everywhere very hospitably)))

Where you were received hospitably by the police

[Yarbay]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Where you were received hospitably by the police

Tell you everything)))))
and the police are normal guys, very politely a couple of times showed the way, but not where you just thought))))))))))))

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Yarbay

and police normal guys, very politely a couple of times showed the way, n

By type - Yes, you go ON **** right there will be a stop
Polite cops, you were in Russia for sure

[Yarbay]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Polite cops, you were in Russia for sure

Capital))))))))))))))
Moscow is for you no Mukhos *** k)))))
gaining the best)))))
The face of the country !!)))

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Yarbay

gaining the best)))))

That's just the way I can answer you with a longing in my soul

[PSih2097]

Quote: Yarbay

and then again I will be recorded in some sort of gang)))

Alikbek, initially you are a citizen of Azerbaijan, and only then you are cool from our site ... Although I read the opposite.

[Armata]

Quote: Kars

well, except for badly working mail)

She returned to my home)))))))))) Well, what Africa, Ukraine has the same customs.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Basileus

Why should I believe him?

Read his old komenty, maybe you will understand why.

[Vanek]

Quote: Basileus

. In the meantime, not at all.

And this:

Quote: Basileus

I wanted to call you a fat troll, not responsible for my words, but you have a bunch of fans here, so I won’t.

Do you think it's not worth apologizing for?

Until you apologize for this, I will address you with a small letter.

[Basileus]

I do not care what letter you will contact me. A person is not able to respond normally to a simple request for evidence, so, should I look at his epaulettes and lash myself with a scourge for such impudence?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Basileus

A person is not able to respond normally to a simple request for evidence,

And what kind of info do you want to get from secret developments?

[Basileus]

So what is there to spread about them in this case? Climb higher, there is the answer to your question.

[KG_patriot_last]

in the east, disputes like that of the Mechanic and Basilius are resolved very simply:
one swears that this is so, and the other sincerely believes his words

[aksakal]

Gentlemen, the Mechanic was actually the first to get nasty. Basi Les asked for the order number in confirmation, he was simply rudely answered - you want a lot! Why not: unfortunately, the order is secret, so it will not be given to you! And that's it! The conflict is over! Mechanic, alas, you and the VAF are overdoing it a little ... Do you assert yourself so much when you talk in such a tone with lovers of Russian military equipment? To be honest, I did not see confirmation of your occupation and confirmation of special professionalism in your posts (I saw it at the VAF) - that ermine KARS has even more sense, but the ambition like "you want a lot!" - more than enough! Sorry and do not be offended, if you go to the site to communicate, you should know that people here are uninitiated, you can be a little more lenient

[Armata]

Quote: aksakal

Gentlemen, in fact, the first Naughty Mechanic. Bazi Forest asked for the order number in confirmation, he was simply boorishly answered - you want a lot!

And what should I put the number of the order and the full text? Or maybe even the text of TK and the full CD to put on display? Even much you all want from the site. When allowed, then there will be an article about Armata.

[aksakal]

Quote: Mechanic

And what should I put the number of the order and the full text?

No, it's enough instead of "You want a lot!" reformulate "The order is secret, I can not help you here!" And there would be no such useless argument. I'm talking about that.

[Denis]

Quote: Mechanic

When allowed, then there will be an article about Armata.

Support!
Glasnost publicity, but in moderation
They began to forget the inscription on the phones secret negotiations are prohibited! Yes and a poster SOMETIMES still very relevant

[avensis]

Aksakal rightly told you "Why not: unfortunately, the order is secret, therefore it will not be given to you! And that's it! The conflict is over!"
They spread an empty chatter on the floor of the site, just to measure their pussy.

[SPACE]

Quote: aksakal

Sorry and don’t be offended if you go to the site to talk, you should know that people here are uninitiated, you can be a little more condescending

I support Aksakal, wisely! In general, on the site, sometimes some "authorities" are heavily inflated, they are bursting with their involvement in some "events", or from their own significance in the eyes of others, but that one thing, that another, in principle, cannot be an indisputable sign of intelligence and knowledge, and knowledge itself has never been the only main reason for showing respect for a person and recognizing his authority, just as recognition of merit by others cannot be evidence of this. Pride and arrogance can never command respect. For a truly smart / wise person, it will not be difficult to condescend to a NORMAL explanation to an opponent, whoever he is, without anger and superiority and especially without these flawed insults such as "stupid, hurray, patsreots, etc. ...". In this regard, Ascetic and Kaptsov command the greatest respect ... In short, it would be nice for some to think a little ... over their "backlashes", and those who support such "long-standing friendship ..." should be more impartial ... In general, no offense ...

[viktorR]

I want to offend anyone, but! This is not the first time an old-timer with epaulettes is somehow lenient about newcomers. I recall a recent story with a respected (still ) Waf, when he was openly rude to someone, and he was mercilessly neglected, even those posts when he was not rude in reply and gave arguments that were easier to give an answer than was excused. Now the Mechanic also gave a blunder, but it is clear that the man is a beginner, and that he does not know who the Mechanic is and that he knows a lot about armature. You could just tell him: so they say, and so I work there first-hand and I know firsthand ... I understand your indignation, but I will not provide evidence as a state secret ...

I’m not trying to teach anyone to communicate, but I urge you to be tolerant of each other!

PS Came out such a friendly fire))

[Vanek]

Quote: Basileus

look at his epaulettes

Shoulder straps here have nothing to do with it !!! Authority and respect. There is such a thing.

[Lopatov]

And why then such a desperate minuscule?

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

A person is not able to respond normally to a simple request for evidence,

Your simple request is to contradict the laws of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. So don’t let the boy over, I don’t want to sit.

[bazilio]

Quote: Mechanic

Your simple request is to contradict the laws of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. So don’t let the boy over, I don’t want to sit.

Is it possible to mention the secret order and its brief content "So the project was suspended by order of the Ministry of Defense" does not contradict the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
ZY "to the laws of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation." - there is no such concept. There may be norms or provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

[Yarbay]

Quote: bazilio

Did I mention

Can we talk about technology or about the girls of the policemen ???))))))))))
It seems to me this conversation dragged on a little !!))
with respect!

[bazilio]

Quote: Yarbay

Can we talk about technology or about the girls of the policemen ???))))))))))
It seems to me this conversation dragged on a little !!))
with respect!

Dear Yarbai, I would love to. But then they made porridge. To be honest, Comrade Mechanic went too far. I understand that he is a man of wisdom, involved in the topic under discussion, guarding this site, but he still went too far. This familiarity "you want a lot", etc. - why? why is it impossible to calmly and constructively conduct dialogues? By the way, for the umpteenth time I notice on the topvar a manifestation of, so to speak, hazing)) Those who are older by their "rank" begin to crush those who are junior in rank, and it is not always reasoned.

[Yarbay]

Quote: bazilio

Comrade Mechanic went too far. I understand that he is a wise person involved in the subject under discussion

And quick-tempered, however, like me))))))))

[common man]

Sorry for interfering in your "multi-star" wrangling, but I (personally) got the impression that MECHANIKA is gnawing deeply at the termination of work on the Armata. When you work a lot on something and is already starting to work out, and you "bam", we are already (or so far) not interested. Hence the excessive aggressiveness.

[bazilio]

Quote: man in the street

Sorry for interfering in your "multi-star" wrangling, but I (personally) got the impression that MECHANIKA is gnawing deeply at the termination of work on the Armata

It is possible, but still it does not give the right to behave rudely and to be rude.

[Armata]

Quote: bazilio

Is it possible to mention the secret order and its brief content "So the project was suspended by order of the Ministry of Defense" does not contradict the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
ZY "to the laws of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation." - there is no such concept. There may be norms or provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

And what did I give out something secret? Or what am I now, as the owner of Lycilix hiding in Africa?

[bazilio]

Quote: Mechanic

And what did I give out something secret?

the beginning, the progress of implementation, the completion of work on classified projects, of which Armata is, this is disclosure. Maybe the topic of armata was a well-thought-out disa, and you informed many that the work was curtailed. How do you like this option. In addition, to inform the order number is a state secret, and the contents of this order to stop the rebar work is not a secret, so what?

[Armata]

Quote: bazilio

no such thing. There may be norms or provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Yah? Norm on suspension of project financing. Well, or the provision on the suspension of project financing. He thought what he said? I am not a nationalist, but you had a poor education in Uzbekistan. Learn from the classics from Central Asia ......... (next mat)

[bazilio]

You know what, who gave you the right to contact me on you?
It’s immediately obvious that you have the most mediocre idea of ​​jurisprudence.
A code is a law of a codification nature, in which, on the basis of common principles, all or the bulk of the norms that regulate a certain area of ​​public relations in sufficient detail are combined, in addition, the code and the law as a type of normative legal act have the same legal entity. strength. Therefore, your phrase "provided for by the laws of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation" stands for "provided by the laws of the Russian Federation Law on Criminal Liability." tautology turns out.
And lastly, justify your words about my poor education in Uzbekistan! And not as you are used to doing it at the kindergarten level, but with clear objective facts and arguments.
Z.Y. I’ll figure out who I’m learning from myself, and you would learn good manners

[The gentleman]

Vasily, that’s why you’re trying to explain to a person what law is. It’s obvious that a person did not study TGP and generally does not understand the essence of what was said. in addition, you, as a Russian, should notice the attitude towards you based on the flag that you relate to on the basis of your place of birth. Considering this factor, I consider it advisable to end the conversation and move on to a topic where the question of your belonging to that will not be raised again or another state.
ps Dear Mechanic, believe me, those people who taught me and Vasily did not even dream of you. Therefore, be so kind as to choose words. All the same, teachers.

[bazilio]

Dear Timur. I agree with you that it is not advisable to have a discussion with the Mechanic, the person considers himself smart, educated (I do not argue, javascript: AddComplaint ('1294800',% 20'comments') is possible
about the way it is), and the rest are stupid, makes loud statements, not bothering to justify them. In addition, there are no manners and culture of communication. Probably the mechanic primarily focuses on the stars on the epaulettes under the avatar.

Quote: Gentleman

in addition, you, as a Russian, should notice the attitude towards you based on the flag that you relate to on the basis of your place of birth. Considering this factor, I consider it advisable to end the conversation and move on to a topic where the question of your belonging to that will not be raised again or another state.

Well, what can I say, as always, people and the state are judged on the basis of their personal feelings (and not a well-founded opinion), considering that Uzbekistan lives in the Stone Age. And of course, the national question - now probably there will be indignations like "if Russian, why not in Russia" or "if not in Russia, then not Russian"
I apologize for the offtopic.

[viktorR]

Why inflate it like that? this is your "want a lot", "boy", "do not boil" ... Why all this? It was simply impossible to immediately say: I will not provide anything secretly.

[bazilio]

Quote: viktorR

Why inflate it like that? this is your "want a lot", "boy", "do not boil" ... Why all this?

Comrades, who was the last time I read the rules of this site? Everyone began to forget about them.
"The site is strictly prohibited:

a) mate in any form (open and veiled), swearing curses; insult and threats against the opponent;
b) inciting ethnic hatred. This also includes the use of such words and derivatives as: crest, yandiya, Jew, USA, bulbash, Talaponets, chock, khachik, Azeri, cross-eyed, b, Rashka (generally the mention of Russia and Russianness in a derogatory form) and other similar turns of unnatural speech ; "
It seems that they forgot about these rules, the rules are not respected.

[rolik]

Quote: Basileus

should I look at his epaulettes and lash myself with a scourge for such impudence?

Do not take it closely)))) Sometimes epaulettes here and in life are two big differences)))) So that we do not get nervous and breathe evenly and deeply)))
And let me give you a little advice.
If you want to find out how things really are with Armata. Go to the Urals, talk there with the local guys (working at UVZ) in some sort of bar on a Friday day with a glass of beer. Turn from what will be told. It will be possible to conclude about the tank itself, when it will be made, and how it will ride.
Lord !!!! They didn’t go to the door of my apartment in black people, after all that I just wrote

[Denis]

Quote: rolik

Lord !!!! They didn’t go to the door of my apartment in black people, after all that I just wrote

Nobody will come for what is written, but you should have a beer
The enemy, although he smiles and climbs friends, does not sleep
Anyway, they didn’t become friends

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

For what? A person writes something with a smart look, while not leading anything at all to his advantage. Why should I believe him? I already wrote - as soon as at least one of his words is confirmed - I will certainly apologize. In the meantime, not at all.

Can you also lay out the drawings?

[Basileus]

I didn’t ask you about the drawings.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

I didn’t ask you about the drawings.

What about? Likely that I admitted that the agent is Masad?

[Pimply]

No need to take your laurels. Mossad agent is me 8)

[Armata]

Quote: Pimply

No need to take your laurels. Mossad agent is me 8)

Oh damn colleague. and most importantly the namesake

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Mechanic

Oh damn co-worker

You seem to have been from the CIA a week ago Now you are already in the mossad Mossad transfer is a promotion or demoted

[rolik]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

You seem to have been from the CIA a week ago. Now you are already in the mossad. Transferring to the mossad is a promotion or demoted

This is an experience exchange sent))))))

[Pimply]

In Israel, everyone is sure that all men from Russia are named after Eugene, Sergey or Alex 8)

[Wedmak]

And I thought that beyond the hill of all Russians, they are called Ivanes and Boris. However, unexpectedly ...

[rolik]

Quote: Wedmak

And I thought that beyond the hill of all Russians, they’re called Ivan and Boris

With the surname Chenkov, Pochenkov, Andropov)))))

[Pimply]

Not for a long time. 8) Dmitry still pops up

[mogus]

For foreigners, our speech is harsh. Maybe they caress their ears, then

[Denis]

Quote: Pimply

In Israel, everyone is sure that all men from Russia are named after Eugene, Sergey or Alex 8)

Is that all right? What about ... a quarter of our former people(C) are they too?

[Pimply]

Well, are we in a circus or something? We will now conduct accurate statistics, who believes who is not? If you need it so much, I meant a high percentage of non-Russian-speaking Israelis who were primarily born in the country or moved to it at an early age. That's better?

[Denis]

Quote: Pimply

We will now conduct accurate statistics, who believes who is not?

Why, especially since the lie is that statistics ...
Just a song by V.S. Vysotsky by the way

[Pimply]

Can you clearly explain to me what you are talking about?

[Denis]

Pimply
Already silent. Just did not understand each other

[Yarbay]

Quote: Pimply

No need to take your laurels. Mossad agent is me 8)

Yes Yes Yes))))))))
I recall Zadornov’s monologue about a CIA agent)))


“I, a foreign intelligence agent, John Kaif. Born on the instructions of the CIA. I am fluent in fourteen languages, telepathy, yoga and karate, Nanai wrestling, judo and judo after, I can seduce women from a distance I photograph with my left eye, in the right I show microfilms, spitting down helicopters and extinguish fires, shoot from any button, and from all four holes at once, I can cause earthquakes, tsunamis, and taxis with the force of my will.

They shot me 16 times, drowned 32 times in the Atlantic Ocean. I stole 5 residents, 11 presidents, bit to death 47 border dogs. He set the horns of thirty-three shahs with their harems.

But a year ago, I got my main and, unfortunately, the last task - to sneak into your country, transfer to a tram and, sitting under the guise of a young specialist, find out how many people work in the Research Institute of VTsYRCHERMETBREDBRAKMRAKSNABSTYTSbyt3AG

[Victor]

Quote: Pimply

No need to take your laurels. Mossad agent is me 8)

Pimpled, sometimes I just have HUGE respect for you, despite the difference in views. That is what our people in Israel mean!

[Black]

Quote: Pimply

No need to take your laurels. Mossad agent is me

WELL!!!!!
FIRST PLEASANT KOMENT !!!!

[kosmos44]

Quote: Mechanic

Justify, but not from the Internet. I wanted to call you a little-educated shaggy animal, which is scooped with info on the internet, but not. And if you don’t like it, leave the site (or weak?)

Kindergarten - pants on the straps.

[Vanek]

Quote: Basileus

Given the fact that a person is lying without hesitation, it is strange that he generally has some weight here.

Well, at least we know him. But you are not here.

[Alexander Romanov]

Okay people, tie up to run over, a person on a new site, may not have moved in. What's what. Settles, reads komenty-remember.

[Vanek]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Settles, reads komenty-remember.

And he will not apologize for the "fat troll". Publicly getting nasty? No problem. And not how to apologize. ... I doubt that I will understand.

[cherkas.oe]

Quote: Basileus

we will send them to all questions of beginners and we will zaminusut!

Of you, a novice, like a bullet from shit, you can see by style.

[cherkas.oe]

Quote: cherkas.oe

Of you, a novice, like a bullet from shit, you can see by style.

About this comment (-10) came from nowhere, So a team of "newbies" works on the site. Remember. Moderators - Administrators, AU-U. Pay attention to the organized groups of "newbies", otherwise they are already bored.

[Armata]

Quote: Yarbay

And I know him as a person who loves his homeland and cheers for it with all his heart!

Alibek hello. Do not worry about those who "hurray for everything" though it is not always in chocolate.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Mechanic

Alibek hello. Do not worry about those who "hurray for everything" though it is not always in chocolate.

Hello Eugene!
Honestly, I was upset to hear from you this news!
And about soaring, the person simply does not know you and therefore writes nonsense!

[uwzek]

Before you get into trouble, turn on your imagination ... UVZ is not a division of the Ministry of Defense, even super-secret orders of direct action at the plant do not have ... The only military at the plant are representatives of the customer. Since there is no order for "armature" yet - think for yourself ...
And cars on this topic are being assembled, serious about some delays, I personally have not heard, they will be noticeably different from the previous ones, the rest is really a secret. Wait for the fall ...

[Armata]

Quote: uwzek

Since there is no order for "armature" yet - think for yourself ...
And cars on this topic are being assembled, serious about some delays, I personally have not heard, they will be noticeably different from the previous ones, the rest is really a secret. Wait for the fall ...

Yah? And what are they going to? And where, if not on the goat’s path, is they experiencing? Maybe you live on Lining and saw a platform, and not T90 in a coloring for Hindus?

[Yarbay]

Quote: Mechanic

Maybe you live on Lining and saw a platform, not a T90 in a coloring for Hindus?

And how did the tanks manage to rivet for us (Azerbaijan) ???
All the same, it’s obvious that production production is still worse than that !!!))))))

[Vanek]

Quote: Mechanic

Don't worry

Alexei, the one who wrote an article about ignoring not so long ago. Correctly wrote: - Ignore. ... No! I certainly do not urge to ignore ... but sometimes it is possible.

Eugene.

[kirieeleyson]

I will support with pleasure, Do not bully the Mechanics. This is not a mail site.

[Semen Semyonitch]

Quote: kirieeleyson

I will support with pleasure, Do not bully the Mechanics. This is not a mail site.

Something is not clear, why is such a reaction inadequate? Is there an untouchable (indisputable) authority on the site that cannot be objected to? If a person has long been on the site and enjoys authority, this does not give him the right in such a familiar arrogant style to communicate with members of the forum. Moreover, Basileus was more correct in his statements. With all due respect to the Mechanic ...

[Slevinst]

if this mechanic is the mechanic about whom I know then you should not question his words, he works directly at UVZ and knows more than all of you together, it’s better not to rush

[Pimply]

Respected. Do not try to be rude to a person who, firstly, most likely is much older than you, and, secondly, knows an order of magnitude more.

[Basileus]

That's when there will be evidence of both of them, I will scatter in apology. In the meantime - nonsense.

[common man]

Respected. What do you want to see a photocopy of the order signed by Shoigu?

[sashka]

Quote: Pimply

Respected. Do not try to be rude to a person who, firstly, most likely is much older than you, and, secondly, knows an order of magnitude more.

Not a FACT .. We, too, are not done with a finger .. Something we understand ..

[Pimply]

In some ways, this does not mean working directly with this particular tank.

[sashka]

I do not have time .. Well, then look at the end ..

[cdrt]

Hmm ... one knows, the other does not.
Anyone who does not know requires him to prove something.
Why waste time knowing?
Those who understand who such a knowledgeer heard his words.
The rest is the best way to simply stop responding to the lines of the unknowing.
As if he weren’t

[cdrt]

It seems like the Mechanic was a couple of orders more connected with the tank industry than you (judging by the track record on the site) ...

[Semen Semyonitch]

Quote: cdrt

It seems like the Mechanic was a couple of orders more connected with the tank industry than you (judging by the track record on the site) ...

Nobody disputes his "connection with the tank industry" and his competence in this topic. Talk about basic mutual respect ...

[rolik]

Quote: Mechanic

So that is the concept of "state secret"

With this expression you can cover absolutely everything, any topic.

[max702]

I completely agree with you! when I hear state secrets and secrecy there is a mess and disorder! I myself was convinced of this many times, all the allegedly secret information turns out to be with interested persons (a probable enemy) an order of magnitude earlier than in the press and others, the media, and leaks with our corruption of bureaucrats do not come from the pages of newspapers, but from the offices of controllers and others observers, and not in a blurred form, but in specific numbers and data (drawings and blurred photos are not needed by anyone, it is not the 19th century in the yard), well, we'll see a picture, so what? what are the conclusions from this? how will this affect the secrecy of the car? but if there is nothing or another handicraft (that at least something to show), then yes, it immediately turns out that "the king is naked!"

[Armata]

Quote: max702

I fully agree with you! when I hear a state secret and secrecy there will read a mess and collapse! He himself was convinced of this many times, all allegedly sensitive data is turned out to interested parties (a likely adversary)

Yeah. At least once faced with access categories?

[uwzek]

But this topic shows the opposite, the privacy mode works well. I doubt very much that even interested parties have comprehensive data. Online - see for yourself.

[kirieeleyson]

Greetings, Dear our Mechanic. What interesting thread will you tell, is it worth the wait or not? Something already tired of reading all the gnomes, every day is a new term. (((

[cdrt]

we settle at UVZ for the head of the project team, get access and read the order So, at leisure, to satisfy idle curiosity ...

[botsman-palych]

On the Iraqwar website, a great expert, especially close to top secret, told the same thing for several years, only about the T-95.
They were about to accept, almost drove himself ... Looks like he was working on a salary.

[botsman-palych]

On the Iraqwar website, a great expert, especially close to top secret, told the same thing for several years, only about the T-95.
They were about to accept, almost drove himself ... Looks like he was working on a salary.

[botsman-palych]

On the Iraqwar website, a great expert, especially close to top secret, told the same thing for several years, only about the T-95.
They were about to accept, almost drove himself ... Looks like he was working on a salary.

[Pimply]

And where does the fagot talk about the tank?

[rolik]

Quote: Pimply

And where does the fagot talk about the tank?

In this case, nothing to do with. But, there is one bearded joke:
Two fagots are sitting in the war in the trench, with a grenade launcher in their hands. Suddenly a tank enters them. One says to the other:
- Look, please, are there handsome boys on the tank ???
the second peeps out of the trench, looks around, dives back into the trench and answers:
- No. I didn’t see the beautiful ones, all evil and protivist.
first to this:
- AND!!!! Well then shoot dear.

[Prohor]

There is a continuation of this joke.
The second tank was beautiful. And the commander, looking up from the processing of nails with a nail file, says: "Well, then press the trigger very gently!"
...........
To illustrate this article, the question is: with this arrangement, the gun will have a declination angle at all?

[Kars]

Quote: Prokhor

To illustrate this article, the question is: with this arrangement, the gun will have a declination angle at all?

If the turret is uninhabited, a sliding roof over the breech can be made. And the line of fire will be lifted. So, the landing gear itself may not depend much. But what kind of barrel will be, will the turret move to the stern?

[Armata]

Quote: Kars

But what will be the departure of the trunk, will the tower shift to the stern?

It will shift, but I don’t know about the rest (yes, if they knew, you yourself understand)

[rolik]

Quote: Prokhor

There is a continuation of this joke.

Now Pupyrchaty zaminusaet you))))) Someone has a topic about fagots such a stir

[Pimply]

I rarely minus. Especially adequate comments.

[rolik]

Quote: Pimply

I rarely minus. Especially adequate comments.

Ok don't take close Just remembered a joke))))

[Pimply]

So a good joke. To this topic. I have no questions for him.

[cdrt]

We are discussing the Almaty project, it would seem, where are the fagots?

[nnz226]

I wonder what can be unique in tank building? The T-34 became the prototype for all tank building, the only Merkavas are out of the ordinary in terms of layout ... So what do they want to see uniqueness in? The motor in the tower ?! or a cannon between the tracks? (so the Swedes have it). How do ALL MODERN TANKS differ from the prototype - T-34 ??? The filling is electronic, the armor is composite, the protection is dynamic, and the caliber of the gun is bigger ... and so, no uniqueness, even though 73 years have passed since the release of the prototype ...

[Wedmak]

The layout may be unique. Yes, and geometric shapes can be such that even with minimal booking, the shell can go into rebound. You will not argue that the cars of formula 1 are not unique and come from the first Ford?

[rolik]

Quote: Wedmak

the shell can go into rebound.

As long as I remember. After the adoption of cumulative shells, the angle of inclination of the armor ceased to be decisive in the tank. I apologize in advance, maybe I didn’t put it right.

[Wedmak]

I have not in vain mentioned the minimum booking. DZ can hang on the armor, it will destroy the cumulative stream, and the inclined armor will not let BOPS penetrate behind the armor. The mass of options - I just gave an example.

[rolik]

Quote: Wedmak

DZ can hang on the armor

And not only DZ, combined booking, rental towers.
In general, it’s interesting to read this material about booking our tanks.
http://btvt.narod.ru/4/armor.htm

[Prohor]

The inclination of the armor is not only a possibility of a rebound, but also an increase in the effective thickness of the armor, which is also unpleasant for a cumulative jet.

[Setrac]

Quote: rolik

As long as I remember. After the adoption of cumulative shells, the angle of inclination of the armor ceased to be decisive in the tank. I apologize in advance, maybe I didn’t put it right.

This is not the case, the matter is the ratio of the internal volume to the reservation area, in this indicator tanks with inclined armor are inferior to tanks with vertical armor.

[Prohor]

This indicator is a fiction. Pierce the foam sheet vertically standing and tilted at an angle of 60 degrees, and get a real figure.

[Setrac]

Quote: Prokhor

This indicator is a fiction. Pierce the foam sheet vertically standing and tilted at an angle of 60 degrees, and get a real figure.

Not everything is so simple, with the same mass of armor the vertical will be thicker (if measured perpendicular to the plane of the armor plate).

[Wedmak]

with the same mass of armor, the vertical will be thicker (if measured perpendicular to the plane of the armor plate).

Is that so? With the same weight and composition of the armor, the inclined armor will be thicker in the normal.

[Setrac]

Quote: Wedmak

Is that so? With the same weight and composition of the armor, the inclined armor will be thicker in the normal.

This, if you do not take into account the internal volume, with the same internal volume, the vertical armor will be thicker, since its area is smaller.

[Wedmak]

This is if you do not take into account the internal volume

And then I agree.

[Setrac]

Quote: Wedmak

And then I agree.

Actually, I am not a supporter of vertical armor (considering that nothing depends on me ), there is simply such a SMALL advantage.

[Denis]

Quote: nnz226

How ALL MODERN TANKS differ from the prototype - T-34 ???

The main difference is that the media of that time were going to release it, to put it mildly, not particularly spread
True, he did not become worse from this
The time will come and learn about this

[kotdavin4i]

For that matter, it was not the T-34 but the French Renault FT-17, the first tank with a classic layout. 1. Department of management, 2. Combat, 3. Motor.

[maxvet]

then probably not the t-34, but the Renault FT 17

[rolik]

[quote = alexdol] Given the pogrom of production and science that occurred after the collapse of the USSR, it is difficult to count on something UNIQUE, [/ quote
A bit wrong. Given the pogrom and lack of money, it is difficult to expect something revolutionary from the Ukrainian industry. Old projects are being used, old models are being slowly upgraded. That's all. Russia has already begun to produce new products, and not just modernize old ones. In aviation, there is a new one, in the navy too, the Strategic Missile Forces are new, only the armored direction remains to be tightened. The only thing that is very annoying is a lot of talking. Instead of stirring the air with chatter, they did and showed. Secrecy? Where is it, this secrecy))))) It is said so much that even the Chinese, without seeing the tank, can copy, in appearance, the same.

[old man54]

Quote: alexdol

Given the pogrom of production and science that occurred after the collapse of the USSR,

comrade, if jealous, it is very constructive! In his writing, especially at the beginning of the post, there is a large share of truth that the patriots did not like. Why for the truth did they make a man cons?: ((Not in our opinion this ...

[alexdol]

Here I look at how many "minuses" I have earned, and it makes me sad that I understand that people who pose them BIG problems with LOGICAL THINKING !!!
I am a Russian myself, I live in present-day Ukraine, which was and will once again be, I hope, RUSSIA. Do you really think that I am opposed to creating something WORTHY in RUSSIA !!! It is being created there, even on the basis of Soviet groundwork. And today it is difficult, but the work, fortunately, continues. Here in Ukraine there is a complete Zh.O.P.A, all production COST. The power here is anti-people, hostile, but what do I see in RUSSIA? One LADY is worth something! This is an outright ENEMY, but continues to remain in power ?! Now he has conceived the next episode of a soap opera called "ACADEMSERVICE", which is consonant with the "defense service" business. If he continues to remain with the AUTHORITIES, then about no "fittings", etc. and there will be no question! And President Putin is delaying the solution of this issue, why? That he does not see and understands nothing? So you put your "minuses" at the wrong address, I'm just ashamed for you!

[old man54]

Quote: alexdol

But what do I see in RUSSIA. One LADY is worth something! This is an outright ENEMY, but continues to remain in power ?! ... And President Putin is delaying the solution of this issue, why? That he does not see and understands nothing? So you put your "minuses" at the wrong address, I'm just ashamed for you!

medvepusik (LADIES) is of course the one to attack, but by itself he is "0", believe me! He, the "king," is played by his entourage, all entirely liberal. And VVP ... yes, they are a berry with an iPhone-medvepusik of the same field, but they just diverged their views a little, so their scattering is not easy in different political camps today.
We ourselves are often ashamed of ourselves, so what is it!

[Cynic]

Quote: old man54

Yes, they’re a berry as an iPhone-medvepsik of the same field, but they only diverged a little, so their spread is not easy in different political camps today.

Beautifully, and most importantly, it is clearly stated _ One field of berries of different political camps!

[rolik]

Quote: alexdol

I am Russian myself, I live in today's Ukraine,

I'm going to go to my dad in Bulgaria in August. And now, to be honest, the sphincter begins to shrink from the anticipation of driving through the "brotherly" Ukrainian territory. I start counting in advance how many DAYs will have to unfasten, how many local Cossacks and other "ecologists" who wind around the track will have to politely send to the farm. Good drive in that direction for the last time. In Bulgaria itself we will buy a car, it’s easier, and there by plane or by train.
Our traffic police are also not sugar, but not such brutal personalities.

[Drummer]

There is no doubt. Given the huge PR value of the topic, secrecy can mean only one thing - there is nothing to show.

[dustycat]

If the main priority communication channel in it is an analog voice channel on the P137M or an analogue - and something tells me that it will be - then all the other "latest achievements" will be from the same area.

[valokordin]

Oh tremble .uk in NATO
We will create our own tank Armata.

[Nick]

Quote: alexdol

Given the pogrom of production and science that occurred after the collapse of the USSR, it is difficult to count on something UNIQUE, because everything that continues to be created today is being done so far on the basis of the reserve left over after the UNION .;

Basically, you are right, but judging by the number of minuses to your comment, many people really prick their eyes ...

[Atrix]

I. Sienko said that the Armata tank will not be demonstrated at the September exhibition of military equipment Russian Arms Expo in Nizhny Tagil. The reason for this is the secrecy of the project.

Most likely, the matter is not in secrecy, but in the fact that there is no living sample in the "metal", the T-50, as soon as it appeared, was immediately shown to the public.
We’ll eat up all the same that will finish Armata and in the near future will show her. And the main thing is that it would go into the normal series, and not as we are now developing new developments for a couple of pieces in the troops.

[klimpopov]

The fact of the matter is that they "saw" ...

[buzuke]

not, before the T50 showed around him which round dances were not taken. many also said that there is not even any T50, the authorities are lying, the judges are bought, polymers are pr..ny. I think just some problems solve, so as not to publicly shame

[zvereok]

Quote: Atrix

Most likely, the matter is not in secrecy, but in the fact that there is no living sample in the "metal", the T-50, as soon as it appeared, was immediately shown to the public.

The T-50 show was dedicated to the State Duma and presidential elections.

[Bronis]

Quote: zvereok

The T-50 show was dedicated to the State Duma and presidential elections.

Does not converge in terms. T-50 - January 2010, Duma - December 2011, President - March 2012. Forgotten already.

[zvereok]

Everything converges, then spat on EP then, and it was urgent to correct the image. So, achievements began to roll in the year before the election and the plans were different, as if from a cornucopia.

[viktorR]

Well, I don’t know, all the same, the T-50s showed when it first flew, and I think they could show the stats much earlier.

[Prohor]

I am only 41, the main MBTs are the same age as me, so I can’t remember the conversations preceding their appearance. And they were generally in front of the T-72/80, Abrams, Leopard-2, before taking them into service?

[Wedmak]

The first MBT, if memory serves, was the T-54/55. Just the strands lived out their last days.

[Setrac]

Probably the first MBT was the T-64A

[Wedmak]

Watching how to watch. By name, yes, the first, by mass and TTX, perhaps he became the first.

[Setrac]

Quote: viktorR

Well, I don’t know, all the same, the T-50s showed when it first flew, and I think they could show the stats much earlier.

It is difficult to hide the flying car, and probably we will see the armature when it is sent to the training ground.

[bddrus]

phew, I really thought Armata will see when she flies too!

[rolik]

Quote: Atrix

Most likely it is not about secrecy, but about the fact that there is no living sample in the "metal",

That's right, they didn't meet the deadlines ... that's the whole story. And since they loudly reported that now ... the noise of the engine is already heard. That had to work back, well, nothing more "reinforced concrete" was invented.
Where he flashed infa that did not have time because of the optics. Ours could not cope on time and this segment was given to Belarusians.
And here, I found)))))
We planned to show a tank based on the "Armata" already in action, but it will not be ready by September. There are serious problems with the fire control system. Russian optics suppliers are failing. Now we are considering the option of switching this contract to the Belarusian company "Peleng", they made a fire control system for the T-90S tank, which we are actively exhibiting now, and they have proposals for the "Armata". This was said by an unnamed representative in the Moscow Region.
Something like that. And again about secrecy. What kind of secrecy is it when a super duper secret project helps to do the second side ???? Or is this a new concept of secrecy. No, Belarusians are reliable guys, they know how to keep their mouths better than ours. The very principle of secrecy, as suchalready violated, in this case. That's all.

[cdrt]

Mnda ... Khlopotov was probably right - taking into account the failure of 199X and 200X - they probably would have taken a new wagon, engine, transmission and glued the T-90MS tower to it.
At least there would already be a result.

[Beibit]

Ehhh ... we would have Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90С units 500 and Armature units 500, as well as 50-100 units Su-35С, SAM S-400 100 regiments. Shell of pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces of 500. BTR-82A pieces of 1000. Tigers Pieces 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, City of pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces of 50 and MiNUMX-H pieces of 28 At least ... probably enough for a start =) I wonder how much will it cost us ???

[Atrix]

Quote: Beibit

Ehhh ... we would have Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90С units 500 and Armature units 500, as well as 50-100 units Su-35С, SAM S-400 100 regiments. Shell of pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces of 500. BTR-82A pieces of 1000. Tigers Pieces 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, City of pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces of 50 and MiNUMX-H pieces of 28 At least ... probably enough for a start =) I wonder how much will it cost us ???

First you ask if so much technology in Russia

[erased]

Need a technique? Do it yourself. At the same time, you will develop industry.

[Basileus]

Need a car? Do it yourself, at the same time and pump skill. It doesn’t matter that it will look a little better than the work of Karl Benz - but his own.

Only the most developed states that have developed the production of military equipment and the design school since the advent of this same equipment can build themselves. Kazakhstan is not capable of it.

[Beibit]

if you take it with your mind, it’s only a matter of time ...

[Basileus]

We need to grow personnel, we must build a design school. We need to build factories in the end. That it is a matter of time and considerable money, no one argues. But how much time and money will be needed and when they will pay off is another question.

[flint1309]

Alternatively, invite the Chinese

[Pimply]

Oh how. Hare attempts to progress then.

[Alexander-Tomsk]

Quote: Beibit

Ehhh ... we would like to Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90S pieces of 500 and Armata pieces of 500, as well as 50-100 pieces of Su-35S, S-400 air defense systems of 100 regiments. Shell pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces 500. BTR-82A pieces 1000. Tigers Piece 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, Grad pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces 50 and Mi28-H pieces 100 At least ... probably enough for a start =)

Are you going to fight with someone? To start... I remembered a joke about greed. Okay, plus for supporting a domestic manufacturer

[Beibit]

Well, you look ... did Syria, Libya, etc., etc. wanted to fight with someone? no, they had to ... there are no guarantees that we will not have to either ... we all know what is happening ... where everything is going ... so, as the saying goes, "We need Fedya, we need ..."

[ale-x]

I convinced .... Motivation is visible.

[Evrepid]

Have the CSTO already ruined everything?
In the CSTO of the Chinese the sea, our equipment is enough.
Stop fighting off if that.

[buzuke]

don’t tell me, it can also gurgle among the Kazakhs in the south. especially if the comrade with the State Department will help

[Setrac]

Quote: Alexander-Tomsk

Are you going to fight with someone?

After joining the Customs Union of Iran (if such an event takes place) The question will arise of establishing order in Afghanistan.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Beibit

Ehhh ... we would have Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90S pieces of 500 and Armata pieces of 500, as well as 50-100 pieces of Su-35S, S-400 air defense systems of 100 regiments. Shell pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces 500. BTR-82A pieces 1000. Tigers Piece 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, Grad pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces 50 and Mi28-H pieces 100

I don’t know how much it will cost, but personally to you as a gift

[aksakal]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

I don’t know how much it will cost, but personally to you as a gift

- present it in "real life" - it won't rust behind us. Already, there are insults for the fact that Kazakhstan has begun assembling a light military helicopter "Eurocopter", like, "why didn't you arrange KA-226 (I may be wrong)?" Well, since hand over this unit that you have in your post, so no question. "Aselsan" with "Otokar" graze in Kazakhstan, vying with each other to offer their "Altai" ... I agree, not the best tank, but not the worst. There, the Germans and the Israelis had a hand in the development of this tank, and even the Koreans passed on their developments, you can kill with such a tank if you like. Across the spectrum, everything is the same. Therefore, do not scatter too much with lip-rolling machines - they can return.
Good advice about developing your industry. This is what they do in Kazakhstan. There is already a tank repair plant in Semey. He is already carrying out modernization of tanks on his own - you have already seen a couple of pictures - when all the upgrades of the T-72 tank were posted on the site, there were a couple of not the worst upgrades from Kazakhstan. But you also need to be realistic - even within the framework of armored vehicles alone, Kazakhstan will never be able to either produce or master the entire spectrum of what is present in a modern tank. Even Russia is not able to do this - from the good life, part of the "Armata" developments has been transferred to the Belarusians? I generally keep quiet about if we go beyond armored vehicles. So, to the best of our ability, factories will be built in Kazakhstan and industry will develop. But this business is not even ten years old.
According to the spectrum - what Beibut dreams of ... He laughed a little.

Quote: Beibit

we would like to Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90S pieces of 500 and Armata pieces of 500, as well as 50-100 pieces of Su-35S, S-400 air defense systems of 100 regiments. Shell pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces 500. BTR-82A pieces 1000. Tigers Piece 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, Grad pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces 50 and Mi28-H pieces 100 At least ... for starters, probably enough =) I wonder how much it will cost us ???

- in reality, it still won't help defend against China, the neighbors to the south have no armed forces at all ... Taliban? So against them it's all unnecessary. The Taliban will work either in the mountains (as in the attack on Kyrgyzstan by Juma Namangoni) or in the city. Why then all the expensive disgrace? Instead, the SU-35S will be in the very theme of the "Supertukano" from Brazil, on the propeller. Chinese high-altitude tanks would be in place, and tanks adapted to urban combat. There are a lot of UAVs needed. Babut didn't even mention them. We need good melee weapons (WBB) - and Beibut again did not mention them. How much do we need four hundred? The latest modifications of the S-300 such as Antey and Vityaz are several times cheaper and not worse in terms of efficiency. And so many regiments are not needed, two times less. What is the SU-35S fighter for? The latest modifications of the MiG-29 in the very theme. And it is good to modernize the MiG-31 and SU-27 that Kazakhstan has, according to the latest technology - and this together is sufficient air force for a small Kazakhstan. But I agree on the Terminators and attack helicopters. And then I would have finished them, these Terminators. Why buy the Pantsir, if you can put a radar in the Terminator, and train a crew of five to work both in the tank support mode and in the military air defense mode? There, all you need to do is modify the Cornets so that they could hit air targets (somewhere it flashed that the Cornets can do this, and have been able to do this for a long time) and integrate detection, tracking and target designation from the same Shell into the Terminator's side. Then we don't need Pntsir either.

[Wedmak]

Why buy the Shell, if you can put a radar in the Terminator and train a crew of five in operation both in tank support mode and in military air defense mode

Question: so if all this is screwed, you will get the same Shell. But, it is possible with worse performance characteristics both on the ground and in the air. Yes, and heavy. Do you need it?

[aksakal]

Quote: Wedmak

Yes, and heavy

- so on a heavy armored platform, already heavy by definition.

Quote: Wedmak

But, it is possible with worse performance characteristics both on the ground and in the air.

- well, I just don’t see the reasons here
such a modified Terminator is worse than the Shell in the air and worse than itself on the ground. By the way, it is precisely the current Shell armor that is not praised right now, like it works poorly on maneuvering targets, but Cornets are better in this regard. According to the guns - the same thing there - all the same Tula in the authors, the same Gryazev and Shipunov. I did not see the reasons. But the support of tanks with such a refinement can really become a full-fledged SUPPORT OF TANKS, even from an air attack.

[Wedmak]

Well, I just don’t see the reasons here
such a modified Terminator is worse than the Shell in the air and worse than itself on the ground.

If everything was so simple, I do not think that they would bother with the division into anti-aircraft missiles and anti-tank ones. Cannons are guns, and rockets are a very effective tool.

[aksakal]

Quote: Wedmak

If everything was so simple, I do not think that they would bother with the division into anti-aircraft missiles and anti-tank ones. Cannons are guns, and rockets are a very effective tool.

- I think there are reasons for bothering, and it is commonplace - grandmothers ... Why don't the Ministry of Defense put in two positions, although it is possible to combine everything in one position? Of course, it’s ugly to suspect the Tula people, but they need to feed thousands of workers, so I'm not in a hurry to condemn them, but I would not be in a hurry to buy Terminators + shells in separate bottles. As for the separation of missiles into anti-aircraft and anti-tank, here is the link: http://vpk.name/news/92313_kornetem_predstavyat_na_rae2013.html. Is it a lie or an exaggeration? An excellent universal thing turned out, IMHO. If so, then on the site of the Ministry of Defense of Kazakhstan, I would still ask to finalize the Terminators in this vein, and the Armor ... Armor is a good thing, I admire it, but pragmatism is pragmatism, Armor is not needed in the terminators, or we need to a small amount for some special tasks. As a military air defense for the tasks of directly covering tank and other columns from attack by helicopters and attack aircraft, and even cruise missiles, these modified Terminators will also go. When installing these Cornets on these machines, that http://vpk.name/news/92313_kornetem_predstavyat_na_rae2013.html you can only install equipment in terms of radar and target designation, many of whose units can also be unified without a loss of combat properties - and Shell especially not needed. IMHO

[Wedmak]

Is it a lie or an exaggeration?

Yet doubts torment me. To defeat the tank, either BOPS, or the cumulative stream, or a combination of them is used. To destroy air targets - mostly fragmentation (or high-explosive / fragmentation) ammunition. Did different rockets be made at Cornet-EM? Honor and praise if so.
Guns ... will there be enough rate of fire and tracking speed for Terminator guns to hit an air target?

Why do not the Ministry of Defense vparit two positions, although it is possible to combine everything in one position?

But wouldn't it be more economical to have one universal system than two different ones? Let this system cost as two different ones - what a saving on spare parts! But after all - they share.
And yet, the dimensions and mobility of such a universal system? Not small I suppose will be.

[aksakal]

Quote: Wedmak

To defeat the tank, either BOPS, or the cumulative stream, or a combination of them is used. To destroy air targets - mostly fragmentation (or high-explosive / fragmentation) ammunition. Did different rockets be made at Cornet-EM?

- I think the missile is single, but the warheads are different, when firing the main thing is not to confuse sending a missile from the tandem warhead (anti-tank) against the helicopter, namely with the desired anti-helicopter warhead. As far as I read, there is a cloud of warheads, there are even thermobaric ones.

Quote: Wedmak

But wouldn't it be more economical to have one universal system than two different ones?

MO as a consumer and operator is more profitable. And here is the question for the Tula. Armor is produced by one site, there is a supervising director and a general designer - their own, according to Terminator - another production site, and there is also its own established staff with its own ambitions. The combination of Terminator and Carapace in one bottle means that someone will become subordinate to someone (and these are wounded ambitions), and in general it may smell like a reduction in staff - well, if not workers, then design engineers for sure. That is why it is normal to resist and declare that unification in one bottle is "technically impossible" - this is normal, I would do the same, no question. It's another matter that here we are, who are indirectly related to this particular technique, but nevertheless having a technical education and still working with technology, we still guess that it is possible and even necessary to modify the Terminator. Of course, there are technical difficulties - and the integration of radio technical gadgets, to fit all this into a cramped tank hull, and to modify a pair of 30 mm cannons - all this is there, but these are not so straightforward such unsolvable difficulties, all the more for the Tula - they have something to do with it business of professionalism and ingenuity does not take away!

[Bad_gr]

Quote: aksakal

Why do not the Ministry of Defense vparit two positions, although it is possible to combine everything in one position?

Tanks and self-propelled guns are very similar: both there and there is an armored tracked platform with a gun. Instead of releasing just one thing, they split the MO into two positions?

[ed65b]

Quote: Beibit

Ehhh ... we would have Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90С units 500 and Armature units 500, as well as 50-100 units Su-35С, SAM S-400 100 regiments. Shell of pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces of 500. BTR-82A pieces of 1000. Tigers Pieces 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, City of pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces of 50 and MiNUMX-H pieces of 28 At least ... probably enough for a start =) I wonder how much will it cost us ???

Who are the Kazakh brothers going to fight with ???

[Beibit]

we’re not going to fight with anyone ... so ... just in case ...

[antibanukurayza]

Yes, it would be nice ... Our equipment is in bulk, but it is aging, it does not meet modern requirements. I would not mind placing several Iskanders with us, so that the Dragon does not lick its lips and the Americas do not decide to place their bases under our side

[Yarbay]

Quote: antibanukuraza

I would not mind placing several Iskanders with us,

A few is how much ???
Do you seriously think that having a pair of Iskanders means solving the problem with licking! ??
this is not serious!

[rolik]

Quote: Beibit

. so ... just in case ..

Stock, pocket does not pull)))))

[Pimply]

The Kazakhs have China on their side for a minute.

[max702]

For a moment, even the USSR did not plan to fight with China without the use of nuclear weapons.

[aksakal]

Quote: max702

For a moment, even the USSR did not plan to fight with China without the use of nuclear weapons.

- with China, this whole set is only to inflict good losses, but this set will not be able to stop the occupation. So Max702 is right. But the funny thing is not even that. There are only 200 thousand troops in Kazakhstan, this whole set requires good professionals, who simply have nowhere to take in 200 thousand troops. This is all a very complicated technique, especially the SU-35S and S-400, and all the rest - you won’t come from the street and you won’t fight such a thing ... I posted it above, where the Witcher argued a bit, I think a different set would be more optimal, It would be better to respond to real threats, would be much cheaper and not require so many high professionals.

[dustycat]

With Romanians, of course. In 2004, they squeezed out the gas-bearing region of the Black Sea with the island.

[ale-x]

This is not interesting .... Why do you need all this ????????

[ziqzaq]

Quote: Beibit

Ehhh ... we would have Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90С units 500 and Armature units 500, as well as 50-100 units Su-35С, SAM S-400 100 regiments. Shell of pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces of 500. BTR-82A pieces of 1000. Tigers Pieces 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, City of pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces of 50 and MiNUMX-H pieces of 28 At least ... probably enough for a start =) I wonder how much will it cost us ???

Both Kazakhstan and Russia are members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), so if anyone pokes their head in questions with military assistance there will not be. We’ll fight off shoulder to shoulder, as it was more than once ......

[ed65b]

Odkb ??? And how did Odkb and our allies actually help us ??? Abkhazib and Ossetia were not recognized. Everywhere they are silent. In the event of a war with Azerbaijan, Armenia will not be shaken. We’ll have to figure it out ourselves. In general, hiding behind the CST just sit behind our backs.

[Check]

I agree, besides, the Kazakh people are not shaky, there were plenty of heroes in the WWII.

[KG_patriot_last]

Terminators and BMP take more

[Prohor]

Where do you need such passion ?!
For the Golden Horde?

[Yarbay]

Quote: Beibit

Exhh ... we would Kazakhstan

You forgot about Tornado and not enough tanks))))))
And in general, now no one in a single-breasted one is at war))))))))))

[Kasym]

Beibut, good evening, countryman! First of all, I would think about consumables - cartridges and shells. Not high precision, but ordinary. We need these productions up to the neck. Wars are fleeting now. While you pull up with Russia, but deliver it to parts, it’s probably already to deliver some.
And from your list, I would do an attack on the Air Force and Air Defense. And, for example, tanks y of us modernized T-72 980 pieces. , almost everything on the go. And 4 more in storage. So this good enough until Armata appears. Of these, by the way, or more correctly based on them, Terminators and Byratins will do. Sincerely.

[erased]

at a single tank building enterprise can ...

That's what really bothers. One factory for the whole country !! And how many cars can he produce per month? Year? Yes, now there is no need to do 2500 per month, as it was during the Great War! But if you need to expand production - will Uralvagonzavod cope? But to open a new production in time pressure will now be a hundred times more difficult than then! Yes, and may not have time to open the second.
It’s sad ... One, even two tank factories, is still not enough.

[Yun Klob]

Very, very true said.

[Basileus]

The only KB. There are Omsk residents, whose design bureau has failed, but the plant is still standing. Yes, it has recently been announced that KBTM ceases to design armored vehicles, but is still able to produce its plant.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

There are Omsk residents, whose design bureau has failed, but the plant is still standing.

And what does the design bureau and the factory do? Well, if you are very competent, you will answer.

[Basileus]

It is better to look at the KBTM site itself) Specifically for tanks, as far as I know, they are now engaged in repairs. In general, the news recently slipped that KBTM ceases to develop armored vehicles - such work is being transferred to UVZ.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

Better to look at the site of KBTM itself

Well, he himself admitted. Repair, modernization. This is what they are doing.

[Basileus]

Until UVZ did not take over the domestic tank building, there they were produced and developed.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

Until UVZ did not take over the domestic tank building, there they were produced and developed.

Well, they did. Only (if he lived in the USSR) how much was produced at UVZ and how much in Ukraine and in Omsk? So it’s nothing that Tagil has a world record, with 41-12 they released 130000 tanks. No country in the world has been able to do so much in the same period as one city.

[Basileus]

Wartime is not an indicator at all. But peacetime is really worth a look.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

Wartime is not an indicator at all. But peacetime is really worth a look.

And how many factories in Tagil were producing T34?

[uwzek]

The Omsk plant has long been a division of UVZ (otherwise it would not have existed). There is just a design bureau, but no factory. The plant is engineers, workers, equipment ... In dashing years, everything is pumped up ...

[buzuke]

Omsk plant immediately comes to mind. stabbed such an enterprise ...

[Basileus]

Yes, the strange decision is to make the UVZ monopoly with their T-72, which they barely brought to the level of T-80, instead of making the main design bureaus exactly the Leningrad and Omsk - the real locomotives of the industry.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

Yeah, the strange decision is to make UVZ a monopolist with their T-72, which they barely brought to the level of T-80,

Yah? Well, smart, tell me how the T80 is being modified to "Slingshot"? So these are two different tanks. And T80 was delivered only to the European part. They couldn't grab the desert dust down their throats.

[Basileus]

And what does the "Slingshot" have to do with it? This title T-72B2. In general, the T-80 is slowly being withdrawn from the Armed Forces, why should it be modified.

[Kars]

Quote: Mechanic

Well, smart, tell me how the T80 is being modified to "Slingshot"?

Well, I don’t know, put on the T-80U gun A82 FCS to hang up.

Quote: Mechanic

And T80s were delivered only to the European part. They couldn't grab the dust of deserts in their throats

Now Kazakhstan is operating the T-80 in a desert area, and it seems normal.

[Armata]

Quote: Kars

Now Kazakhstan is operating the T-80 in a desert area, and it seems normal.

And how do gas turbines feel?

[Kars]

Quote: Mechanic

And how do gas turbines feel?

So the fact of the matter is that it is good. Otherwise they would not have traveled.

[Kasym]

Hi, CARS! Somehow intersect! I have not heard about the T-80 in Kazakhstan. We weren’t there, if there is such information, it would be interesting. The mechanic writes correctly, in our region only diesel. T-80 y us were only on trials. Our climate is not very good - there is a lot of dust. Y us T-72, I’m poorly versed in the initials, but in my opinion B. Modernized y us, in Semipalatensk. In storage there are, in my opinion, T-62 and T-72.

[Armata]

Quote: Basileus

And what does the "Slingshot" have to do with it? This is the name of the T-72B2. In fact, the T-80 is being slowly withdrawn from the Armed Forces, so why modify it?

Yes, I’m sorry, it was T72 who wanted to modify the slingshot, sorry, sorry lads.

[uwzek]

"Slingshot" - just one of the tank protection systems, has long been outdated, and never entered into service. The T-80 is being removed from the Armed Forces because there is nowhere to repair it. They were brought to our factory, but the armored hulls are very different, and Omsk did not provide the equipment at that time - perhaps they were handed over to scrap metal. And now in Omsk, the T-72 is being modernized ...

[Armata]

Quote: uwzek

Slingshot "- just one of the tank protection systems, has long been outdated, never put into service. The T-80 is therefore removed from the Armed Forces, there is nowhere to repair it. They were brought to our factory, but the armored hulls are very different, and Omsk did not provide equipment at that time - perhaps they handed it over to scrap metal.

thank you dear. Finally, someone can explain to everyone what is happening at UVZ.

[Cynic]

Quote: uwzek

and Omsk did not provide snap

Sent in due time with a tower, sent and now.

[Zhaman-Urus]

Tell me, is rudeness to the interlocutor your style on the site, or in general in life?

[Armata]

Quote: Zhaman-Urus

Tell me, is rudeness to the interlocutor your style on the site, or in general in life?

Who is this for? If in my account, then I'm sorry that I offended your feelings.

[Zhaman-Urus]

"You are angry Caesar, then you are wrong" Do not forget about this during the DISCUSSION, dear Mechanic)

[old man54]

Quote: Mechanic

And T80 were delivered only to the European part. They could not grab desert dust in their throats.

I'm certainly not quite in the subject, how do you look like, but what about the T-80 tests in the Indian deserts (as claimed), which they supposedly passed there perfectly ??

[Cynic]

Quote: Mechanic

They could not grab desert dust in their throats.

Do you actually know that in 80s to say that?

[Cynic]

-1

For connoisseurs

For the Russian T-80U, the problem of air purification for the engine was solved in an original way - by installing an air intake device (VZU).

More
http://www.plam.ru/transportavi/osnovnoi_boevoi_tank_t_80/p3.php#metkadoc4

[Armata]

Quote: erased

That's what really bothers. One factory for the whole country !! And how many cars can he produce per month?

Formerly 200 tanks per month, now 15-20. But cars from 100.

[Vanek]

Quote: Mechanic

But cars from 100.

That's how we live...

[uwzek]

Record - 250 tanks. Currently - how much they order ...

[Armata]

Quote: uwzek

Record - 250 tanks. Currently - how much they order ...

How much do they do?

[old man54]

Quote: erased

at a single tank building enterprise can ...

That's what really bothers. One factory for the whole country !!

Why breed a tantrum !!! In Omsk there is an enterprise for the assembly of tanks, still alive today! In St. Petersburg (Leningrad), when there was an alliance, Kirovsky Zavod, the birthplace of T-80, now I do not know what is happening to him, something is not heard about him. Why dozens of them? Again, the military-industrial complex of the USSR will be reproduced, but within the framework of Russia?

[Denis]

Quote: old man54

Kirovsky Zavod, the birthplace of T-80, now I don’t know what is happening to him, something is not heard about him

Alas, nothing good ...
It’s better not to hear it. In the workshops they don’t do anything, sausage, cookies, film ...

The production of the Onega and Ladoga armored vehicles, forage harvesters, high-speed trench vehicles, self-propelled crawler cranes, etc. was mastered. In 2000, the production of the K-744R tractor range began.

This is from official posts, and I can’t hear about this technique
Privatization and devastation of the sisters, so that they ...

[Setrac]

Quote: erased

One factory for the whole country !!

I’ll pay attention to the name of the plant - Uralvagonzavod. They will stop rolling stock production, increase the production of tanks by orders of magnitude. In fact, the issue can be adjusted at other similar plants, the question is financing.

[uwzek]

You are naive guy! The least rudeness, just really, do you think that tanks are so easy to do?

[kotdavin4i]

Good morning everybody. Do not show and do it right is not the concept of a fashionable sedan. Military equipment should have an advantage over the enemy. And while there is an opportunity to hide all its characteristics, you need to do this. A potential adversary will need more time to create countermeasures.

[family tree]

Armata is not a tank, but a platform on the basis of which a tank will be created, including. Probably the only reliable fact. This is the first. Why lay out such a large volume of letters. It’s simpler and faster to say that there are still no specific data about Armata, except for rumors, but everybody knows this. This is the second.

“Armata” program will remain secret and therefore provoking disputes

To argue about what you have no idea is at least silly, for the most part, it smells like a clinic. This is the third

[Basileus]

I envy the author - to write so much text to say that nothing is known and is unlikely to become known in the near future, we must be able to.

By the way, as far as I know, the only official model with the signature "Armata" is the one shown to Rogozin in Kurgan (from the Military Russia website):

[Armata]

Yes Yes. There is a platform, but only one. But the fact that it is unique is a fact. Well, just think for yourself. If someone from non-traditional developed it, he would immediately boast of a new bauble. We work, we remove jambs. We would not be hindered by Putin and Rogozin and given money, would have been there a long time ago, and now the fate of Armata is unknown. While under T90 for Hindus we are trying and everything is frozen. It seems to me that they again pumped denyuzhku, but the exhaust will not be accepted.

[family tree]

Dear Mechanic. Two questions, if not secret. Just yes or no.
1. Torque converter?
2. GOP?

[Armata]

Quote: perepilka

1. Torque converter?
2. GOP?

Gop yes, but kidrach no. Guys do not entertain themselves with illusions. This is just a platform for a single, averaged tank, self-propelled gun, heavy infantry fighting vehicle. Do you think this is good?

[Kars]

Quote: Mechanic

It’s just a platform for a single, averaged tank

There are at least seven skating rinks left? And it turns out that the location of the MTO is provided for varying

[Armata]

Quote: Kars

There are at least seven skating rinks left? And it turns out that varying the location of the MTO location is provided?

7 rollers, MTO front. Radial piston dvigun.

[Kars]

Quote: Mechanic

Katkov 7, MTO front

In carrots that will rejoice))) put out the light)))

Thank you.

[Armata]

Quote: Kars

Carrot experts will be delighted

Who are the sailors?

[Kars]

Quote: Mechanic

Who are the sailors?

There are such people))

[Armata]

Quote: Kars

There are such people))

Come on, letters are measured. You yourself know. what’s the main crew.

[Pimply]

30% crew, 30% car, 30% logistics and 10 - unforeseen circumstances.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Pimply

30% crew, 30% car, 30% logistics and 10 - unforeseen circumstances.

I would add a lot of percent about the higher command!

[Pimply]

Yes, but this is a separate issue.

[Pimply]

Zhen, hi. How are you?

Tell me, will armor go to Armata focusing on DZ, or will there be any other options?

[Armata]

Quote: Pimply

Tell me, will armor go to Armata focusing on DZ, or will there be any other options?

Hello namesake. I do not know. I’m just doing platforming, but what they are hanging on, well, then we will change the iron.

[Pimply]

Zhen thanks

[Pimply]

Ho-ho-ho, but not the right word 8))) I went to drink champagne 8)))

[Argon]

After the "radial piston" mechanic (for me personally) precipitated, maybe you will tell your fairy tales elsewhere, or speculate about secrecy, but the technical aspects are not yours.

[common man]

This refers to the X-shaped diesel family 2B. In principle, the cylinders are arranged radially. piston engine. Not a mechanic, which is a mechanic, maybe so to speak. Therefore, do not scuffle for any reason. (I’m not a lawyer and I’m not protecting anyone!)

[Argon]

Dear man in the street, if you follow similar principles, then on the B-46 (for example) each pair of cylinders (in different blocks) "tied" to one connecting rod is also located radially, but the V-shaped engine does not cease to be. "radial piston" (relative to the internal combustion engine) is found ONLY in the English-language technical literature (and the Internet), but refers to radial engines. In our literature they are always called X-shaped (by the way, the Germans have it too). In connection with the above, please evaluate; knowledge of English, given by the subject, his professional suitability as a "minder". Judging by the rhetoric, he is young, he works at UVZ-plankton, not a techie (logistics department no more), perhaps a modeller like karsa, therefore, he has a few knowledge of the topic. I came across it about 4 years ago, in the form of a DGr-ki; the timing belt is completely differently made (with one camshaft on the cylinder head) and hydraulic compensators, structurally all engine parts are very different, but the size (well, all the "heat engineering" is probably the same?) 150 \ 180mm.

[family tree]

Quote: Mechanic

Do you think this is good?

In terms of repair and maintenance, the field is good. With our organization, everything for spare parts will be easier, in the case of infantry or self-propelled guns you can bail out. From the point of view universality, to be honest, xs, it’s driven into the head that the universal is worse than the special one when solving a certain problem, but these machines cannot be called highly specialized, and what kind of tasks in real life (and not in the commander’s dreams) will face them, hell knows.

Gop yes, but kidrach no.

Reverse, though done, or is it all one back?

[IRBIS]

Quote: perepilka

From the point of view universality, to be honest, xs, it’s driven into the head, that universal is worse than special when solving a certain problem

Everything is right to you "hammered into the head". An attempt to mold something universal for all occasions can play a cruel joke.

Quote: Mechanic

7 rollers, MTO front.

This is alarming. Moving away from the traditional layout is, of course, a bold decision. And least of all, it looks like caring for the life of the crew. Versatility is where the wedge converges, but you can’t do the self-propelled guns on a traditional tank chassis. Mass distribution problems.
Wait and see. This was told about T-90, science fiction blushed.

[Wedmak]

Trying to create something universal for all occasions can play a cruel joke.

Yes, but if it comes to, roughly speaking, the boxes and the chassis - what difference does it make, because you can make a platform for most soils and a different layout depending on the purpose. What is the difference that goes on the field - a tank or self-propelled guns?
I kind of heard that the MTO will be in different places at the tank, at TBMP, at self-propelled guns. I don’t know how true this is.

[Armata]

Quote: IRBIS

You can’t do self-propelled guns on a traditional tank chassis. Mass distribution problems.

she dives her nose now.

[Lopatov]

Quote: IRBIS

and you can’t do self-propelled guns on a traditional tank chassis. Mass distribution problems.

Why did you decide this? It all depends on the tower.

[IRBIS]

Quote: Spade

Why did you decide this? It all depends on the tower.

Now the traditional layout of the tank base is MTO in the back. The weight of the gun barrel is compensated by the weight of the MTO. The total weight of the machine is almost evenly distributed. Pay attention to the ACS - the turret is shifted closer to the stern. However, without the BC, while moving, it is still constantly "hit" by the nose. It hits so that the barrel stopper flies off.
So this is not what I decided, this is a design feature. Otherwise, it just won’t work, even with a casemate gun.

[Lopatov]

Quote: IRBIS

The weight of the gun barrel is compensated by the weight of the MTO.

The weight of the barrel is compensated by the weight of the conveyors of the loading mechanism with ammunition and the power unit. Ammunition empty - pecks. We rearrange the tower back. Empty she will ride perfectly. But in a war, conveyors must be complete. In addition, self-propelled guns will be painfully long.

So moving the engine forward requires abandoning the only debugged 2C19 loading mechanism, and creating a fundamentally new or returning to manual, like on 2C1 and 2C3

[Armata]

Quote: Spade

Why did you decide this? It all depends on the tower.

Greetings. There are no towers yet, and how can one create a single balanced platform for different towers for MBT and self-propelled guns?

[Wedmak]

and how can one create a balanced platform for different towers for MBT and self-propelled guns?

But what about MBT, self-propelled guns, and heavy infantry fighting vehicles going to be made on the basis of Almaty? To average some parameters?

[Lopatov]

They don’t want to do heavy BMP.

[Pimply]

In vain, in my opinion

[Setrac]

Quote: Wedmak

But what about MBT, self-propelled guns, and heavy infantry fighting vehicles going to be made on the basis of Almaty? To average some parameters?

Apparently, the platform will initially be made to the desired configuration, and not to cut the finished chassis.
I see everything as follows, for example:
Peter makes the platform in the heavily armored version for the MBT, Omsk - in the medium-armored version for the BMP, assault guns, SAM, etc. Tagil - makes the lightly armored version for the armored personnel carrier, artillery, and special equipment.
This is for example.

[Wedmak]

Apparently, the platform will initially be made to the desired configuration, and not to cut the finished chassis.

No, I'm not talking about booking, I'm talking about towers for MBT, self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers. The towers are different, the guns are different, the ammunition is different - the weight is different, the platform is one. The mechanic said that under such a difficult to make a single platform with the right weight distribution. But they are going to do it. How so?

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Wedmak

The towers are different, the guns are different, the ammunition is different - the weight is different, the platform is one.

I assumed that the platform will be one, but the engine will be installed in different places, depending on what the platform is for.
For example, if this is a self-propelled gun, it’s more convenient to have the MTO in front and the huge tower at the back. It is obtained with such a layout and more compact (the barrel sticks out in front less) and it is easier for the crew to work from the ground.
If it is a tank, then a heavy forehead reservation should balance the MTO from behind. The tower is closer to the center, as this is the most comfortable place to shoot on the go (chatting less).

If there will be a single layout for all occasions, then personally I doubt that it was a good idea.

[Setrac]

Quote: Wedmak

No, I'm not talking about booking, I'm talking about towers for MBT, self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers.

I, too, about this, design features can be laid in the production not only for booking.

[Wedmak]

Well, then we'll wait and see what they came up with at UVZ. I hope that next year they will at least roll out MBT.

[Lopatov]

Welcome.

The fact of the matter is that we have only one tower with a loading mechanism, and this is the 2C19 tower, designed for the rear location of the engine.

So they need to build both towers from scratch. Artillery - an analogue of the "German", tank - with even greater problems, with a high line of fire. I don't understand what they are doing.

[old man54]

Quote: IRBIS

Everything is right to you "hammered into the head". An attempt to mold something universal for all occasions can play a cruel joke. ... This is alarming. A departure from the traditional layout is, of course, a bold decision. And least of all it looks like taking care of the crew's life. Versatility is where the wedge came together.

I agree with you, "+"! Front MTO will be a problem, we'll see! And it was put in front just for the sake of versatility, so that it would be more convenient to mold an infantry fighting vehicle on this base. Yes, and the BMP based on the tank ... apparently, indeed, Jewish tales about the invincibility of their tanks had a strong influence on the minds of our generals, or on what was left of them.

[svp67]

Quote: IRBIS

You can’t do self-propelled guns on a traditional tank chassis.

What cannot be done ...

[Bad_gr]

Not quite a correct example.
The main chassis is from the T-80, but the track rollers are located differently (not in pairs, like the T-80, but mostly closer to the stern), booking is simpler, the engine compartment is from the T-72.

[svp67]

Quote: Bad_gr

Not quite a correct example.

Correct, Correct ...

One of the requirements for the new self-propelled guns was its deployment on a unified base with tanks (T-72, T-80) and the installation of a universal artillery unit, which could be used both in self-propelled guns and in towed artillery.

Read more: http://www.arms-expo.ru/049050053052124049051053050.html

The self-propelled gun hull is armored, structurally and externally similar to the T-72 tank hull. It features a weaker reservation, providing protection for the crew, weapons, ammunition and equipment for armor-piercing bullets and fragments, the frontal part is made of homogeneous armor steel.

[Armata]

Quote: perepilka

Reverse, though done, or all in one back

The box is reversible. Rejoice

[family tree]

Quote: Mechanic

The box is reversible. Rejoice drinks smile

Rejoice! Now I’ll go to the garage, there we’ll rejoice with the guys as much as possible

[Setrac]

Quote: perepilka

From the point of view universality, to be honest, xs, it’s driven into the head that the universal is worse than the special one when solving a certain problem, but these machines cannot be called highly specialized, and what kind of tasks in real life (and not in the commander’s dreams) will face them, hell knows.

This is if you take a tank, remove a tower and saw another combat vehicle from the tank, for example self-propelled guns, if you produce it initially under self-propelled guns, then there will be no loss against special vehicles.

[Denis]

Quote: Mechanic

Do you think this is good?

The examples are of course long-standing, but the commonality of the T-34 and SU-100 platforms, IS and ISUs, say that it’s not bad at all
There are many modern examples too
Reasonable unification is always good
As an example: for the Octopus-SD, they did not particularly invent a new one

The main armament of the 2C25 self-propelled guns consists of the 125-mm smoothbore 2A75 tank gun, which is based on the 125-mm 2A46 tank gun mounted on the main battle tanks T-72, T-80 and T-90.

[AK-47]

Quote: Mechanic

We would not be bothered ... and now the fate of Armata is unknown.

Grieved the gracious, but we hoped.

[Armata]

Quote: AK-47

Grieved the gracious, but we hoped.

Better bitter truth than a beautiful lie. And we have already hung so much on our ears.

[leon-iv]

Zhenya, tell me the dark.
How linking Armata and Bishma
Even if Bishmu makes a serial plant and there is more field supervision is needed.
But Armata Still has more UKBTM, not UVZ (as a production site)

[Armata]

Quote: leon-iv

But Armata Still has more UKBTM, not UVZ (as a production site)

Hello dear. UKBTM makes a unified platform, but all the others work the same way as on the topic of "Coalition".

[leon-iv]

Ok with the trolley. By the way, how do you rate it yourself?
And with BM there will be many problems there, and so it was clear.

[Pimply]

So you ended up staying there?

[Armata]

Quote: Pimply

So you ended up staying there?

Yes, bye.

[Aleks tv]

Quote: Mechanic

Yes, bye.

Thank you for the info, Eugene, with pleasure I read at least something "not airy".
Good luck at work and with your "place of work".

[rolik]

Quote: Mechanic

While under T90 for Hindus we are trying and everything is frozen. It seems to me that they again pumped denyuzhku, but the exhaust will not be accepted.

So we have the same garbage. Scored, the previous head, credits under Wikiramidya. Now they don’t know how to close loans. But the GDP said, give money, now the first income has gone. As these effective managers managed to get stuck, it’s good even now they seem to have entered the mind. There is no worse villain than the meneger in uniform. So that the boats will be. Recently I watched a program with Karaulov, damn it ... some nonsense is pouring from our screens onto our heads. It seems that he is also a respected person, and carry such a heresy in the program. I should be ashamed, ashamed. But they look at him in the country and draw their opinion on his conclusions, that’s sad. If you are a layman, please attract those who really do what you are talking about. Do not embarrass yourself.

[uwzek]

Stop about the Indian order ... Yes, the Indians cannot make the T-90 themselves, so they order the hulls of the tanks at UVZ, but this does not interfere with the armature ...

[Yarbay]

Quote: uwzek

Stop about the Indian order ..

What is it))))))))
That all those working in the defense industry are so nervous and intolerant ??))))))
Mlyn what liberals did to you))))))))))

[ramsi]

Oh, judging by the raised snowstorm, something I'm already afraid that it will turn out a grand zilch

[sys-1985]

Must do something worthwhile .. otherwise the point was to start all this ?! IMHO

[a.hamster55]

The keyword "platform" and it seems to me that everything is slowed down due to the variety of requirements
from future customers (that would float and fly at least low). Although this is a global trend, but for us it is somehow long.

[dominion]

In any case, the next 2 years will show how far we have come in the construction of a new tank.
I think "UVZ" will not disappoint, the organization is solid.

[Airman]

Quote: dominion

In any case, the next 2 years will show how far we have come in the construction of a new tank.
I think "UVZ" will not disappoint, the organization is solid.

The only pity is that the monopolist, no competition. If there was competition, they would move faster, but whatever you do, they will anyway accept it, because you need equipment, but there is no other! And this is very sad.

[dominion]

We will not pull the development of several platforms as the USSR used to be. And other design teams all the same, after all, both Omsk and Kurgan design bureaus and others are involved in the development. Armata will be the synergy of our entire tank building school.

[Armata]

Quote: dominion

Armata will be the synergy of our entire tank building school.

Sure?

Quote: dominion

And other design teams all the same, after all, both Omsk and Kurgan design bureaus and others are involved in the development.

Duck Omsk Research Institute that works at UVZ? And now that KMP does not have prepared sites and assembly slides for the new platform?

[Bad_gr]

Quote: dominion

Armata will be the synergy of our entire tank building school.

If only this single platform would not work like an adjustable wrench: you can twist the nuts of any size, but everything is equally not convenient.

[Cat]

absolutely, you see, "near-war" journalists were starving ...
On the heap of information resources are hundreds of articles about Armata, the general meaning of which boils down to one: everything is classified, no one knows anything, no one sees anything, and when they see it is not clear. And his FIG knows that it’s such a beast in general, Armata is either a tank, or an armored car, or a platform, or a locomotive on a caterpillar track.
Some non-lazy and talented people try to portray something like that - some on the basis of previous developments, some "based on" their own dreams.
In general, the good old journalistic method: "our business is to drive circulation, but whether there is information and common sense there - let the readers figure it out"

[JonnyT]

The tank will be! I believe in it!!!
Although it's time to show it to the world. Tanks are also weapons of deterrence. Hitler once said about the T-34. "If I had known earlier that the Russians have such a tank, I would not have started a war against them."

I get the impression that all production capacities are aimed at making a profit, they will remember about Armata when a roasted cock pecks in one place, well, what to do - the mentality is

[Blad_21617]

"... but was there a boy" this Armata has already been "created" for about 5 years, won't it turn out to be another farce or something like a defense service?

[AK-47]

Quote: Blad_21617

will it turn out to be another farce or business as with defense service?

Mechanic... and now the fate of Almaty is unknown .... Better is the bitter truth than a beautiful lie. And we have already hung so much on our ears.

Experts say that farce.

[Armata]

Quote: AK-47

Experts say that farce.

this is not a farce, but simply a delayed, frozen project.

[Prapor Afonya]

Quote: Beibit

Ehhh ... we would have Kazakhstan such tanks as T-90С units 500 and Armature units 500, as well as 50-100 units Su-35С, SAM S-400 100 regiments. Shell of pieces 50. Iskander 20 regiments. BMD-4 pieces of 500. BTR-82A pieces of 1000. Tigers Pieces 1000. Msta-S pieces 300. MLRS Tornado, City of pieces 150 Teminator pieces 50. TOROV M2 pieces 50. Ka-52 pieces of 50 and MiNUMX-H pieces of 28 At least ... probably enough for a start =) I wonder how much will it cost us ???

HA! Expensive!!!

[Prapor Afonya]

Quote: alexdol

Given the pogrom of production and science that occurred after the collapse of the USSR, it is difficult to count on something UNIQUE, because everything that continues to be created today is done so far on the basis of the backlog of what remained after the UNION. Therefore, a plausible assumption by expert Khlopotov:
“For example, expert A. Khlopotov, citing rumors circulating in certain circles, writes that the first demonstration of“ Armata ”will take place this fall. However, first, the tank will be shown to a narrow circle of people from the country's leadership and the military department. ... Khlopotov suggests that the upcoming show may turn out to be a BANAL PUSHING OF DUST in the eyes of high-ranking officials. For these purposes, a mock-up of a promising combat vehicle can be assembled at the only tank-building enterprise, which will be shown to the president, defense minister and other officials. "

Believe me, there will still be enough Union developments for many years to come, and these developments will not have analogues in the world, just a lot because of humpback reforms could not be embodied in the metal!

[mark1]

I think - "Armata" should be shown. Even though a live tank, even a mock-up, even a "single platform", even a poster with pictures and a beautiful girl for comments - otherwise the plant will lose face. So many cod over the years (first the T-95, then "Armata" - "a simplified version of the T-95" as stated at the beginning) - and the forest is getting darker, and the fog is getting thicker ...

[sub307]

Yes, they will show, probably, when they will make a sample.

[mark1]

I meant that it’s time to show now, at least what is (or didn’t have to beat the drums and wave flags for 10 years).

[Airman]

Quote: sub307

Yes, they will show, probably, when they will make a sample.

It’s ridiculous to talk about the choice from one sample - this is not a choice, it is a forced! The choice is when you have 2-4 samples in front of you, and from them you need to choose the BEST.

[Armata]

Quote: mark1

I think - "Armata" should be shown. Even though a live tank, even a model,

The layout was shown, but wait for the platform.

[mark1]

We are waiting, we are waiting. Do you even give a hint - are you "dancing" from the T-95 or right from scratch - have you lost everything you have developed on the T-95?

[Armata]

Quote: mark1

We are waiting, we are waiting. Do you even give a hint - are you "dancing" from the T-95 or right from scratch - have you lost everything you have developed on the T-95?

All the best from all the samples, now they are watching what happens.

[mark1]

Quote: Mechanic

Quote: mark1
We are waiting, we are waiting. Do you even give a hint - are you "dancing" from the T-95 or right from scratch - have you lost everything you have developed on the T-95?
All the best from all the samples, now they are watching what happens.

Dear Mechanic, with your style of answering, without saying anything in fact, you probably would have found a place in the Foreign Ministry (this is a compliment)

[Argon]

Yes, actually, what do you want about him according to the answers judging by the person submits the maximum keys.

[Kostya77]

They will show, they will not show ... Yes, okay. The most important thing is that by the announced date of deliveries to the troops a ready-made sample is released, and not a rawhide from a cart and birdhouse

[Algor73]

"... will be higher than those of similar foreign machines currently being developed." It turns out that the characteristics being developed tanks are already known abroad, but "Armata" is not yet? It is alarming that there is no specificity for any unit or unit. And all that is in the internet - reasoning without references to specific persons. Although, maybe "Armata" will not be offered for export, then it is not necessary to inform the public about the characteristics, the main thing is that the defense capability should be increased.

[Armata]

Quote: Algor73

..will be higher than those of similar foreign machines being developed at the present time. "It turns out that the characteristics of tanks being developed abroad are already known, but the" Armata "is not yet? It is alarming that there is no specifics for any unit or unit. there is in the internet - reasoning without references to specific persons Although, maybe "Armata" will not be offered for export, then it is not necessary to inform the public about the characteristics, the main thing is that the defense capability should increase.

Look further in the internet.

[Begemot]

Weapons based on traditional physical principles have practically exhausted the resource of improvement.
This also applies to tanks as well. Nothing breakthrough will be done in the coming years. all the fuss is going on around the ratio of "combat effectiveness / cost", so it is unlikely that something fundamentally different from existing machines will be created. Maybe this is what dictated the desire to make a modular platform. The issue of armament is very relevant, a new tank needs new ammunition, but there is generally silence about this, if nothing is done, then Armata should not have begun at all. If someone found the press on this issue - share it, I will be grateful.

[Setrac]

Quote: Begemot

Weapons based on traditional physical principles have practically exhausted the resource of improvement.

This is not true, it is the powder weapon that has exhausted itself, and that is debatable.

[Wedmak]

Nothing breakthrough will be made in the coming years.

It is not a matter of new physical principles, but of where to get energy for this weapon.
EM guns are already being tested, but guzzle unnecessarily.
Lasers were tested, but in the atmosphere they are ineffective, again they consume a lot.
Wave weapons ... nuuu ... it's easier to say xs than to find something on it.
Nevertheless, the main stone for a breakthrough is energy.

[Kars]

What can I say rumored for Armata will be the A82 gun, which according to the characteristics will be analogous to the German Rheinmetal L55, what’s a breakthrough? And for the tank, it’s not the new physical principle that is most real, but at least the transition is not Liquid propellant.

[Wedmak]

What is rumored to be for the A82 cannon

You are talking about a tool, and Armata is a platform. For the tool in particular. Yes, there will hardly be a breakthrough, but I hope it will surpass the existing "carts" in terms of performance characteristics.

[Aleks tv]

Quote: Kars

and at least the transition is not Liquid propellant.

About iron ore, divided into two low-combustible fractions, we were told at the end of the 80's in the camp, as a promising direction.
Extremely interesting thing: relatively safe and compact can be placed in a combat vehicle. The ammunition load of shells increases and the time for a charge cycle decreases. Theoretically increases the initial speed.

Kars, is there something to read interesting in this area in a practical aspect?
I would be grateful for the Old.

[Kars]

Quote: Aleks tv

Kars, is there something to read interesting in this area in a practical aspect?
I would be grateful for the Old.

nothing that will not give google. to regret.

[Aleks tv]

Quote: Kars

nothing that will not give google. to regret.

Clear. I have an ancologic.

[ed65b]

should work out. And as they show something such a breakthrough, so everyone gasps. well, they’re sitting there completely headless, since such statements are made they cannot frown. Well, the whole world will make fun of us, and the professor will immediately become the generalissimo.

[Sashko07]

Quote: neri73-r

Comrades, don’t be jealous !!! Everything is going according to plan, well, it just so happened that we have at least something under construction!

I don’t want to offend anyone in any way, but Russia does not know how to build tanks, in India your T-90 still spits and don’t know what to do with it - send it for scrap or sell it to someone for cheap. Sarmat, I think, will not be something that would be a cut above the T-90.

Modernization of old models is what they are doing now in all tank-building states, but there is no point in creating new, fundamentally different machines, because such a tank should have just phenomenal armor with very expensive materials, no one will do such a clear stump because such a tank will cost tens of millions apiece. Well, Sarmat will have the best electronics - what’s the problem, you can put it on any tank, well, there will be more modern guidance systems and optics, again all this can be put on existing cars. A tank is not a plane or a rocket, a completely new tank with characteristics a cut above its counterparts will appear no earlier than in a few decades.

[Basileus]

Lol, funny. Given that the T-80 was developed in Leningrad.

Could you tell me more about the Indians? Only not from those articles in which lobbyists of Arjun push their unfinished business, but something more serious.

[family tree]

Quote: Sashko07

I don’t want to offend anyone in any way, but Russia does not know how to build tanks, in India your T-90 still spits and don’t know what to do with it - send it for scrap or sell it to someone for cheap. Sarmat, I think, will not be something that would be a cut above the T-90.

So here you are, verbal diarrhea ...?!

[sashka]

Quote: perepilka

So here you are, verbal diarrhea ...?!

Yes . I am. I speak and write correctly, and present My thoughts and views. And who are you ? "piece of the exam"? A dropout from the Outskirts? The flag was not defined. Who are YOU or who are you? Answer yourself first. Then ask questions to others ..

[family tree]

Sashka (3) RU

So here you are, reindeer!

Usually, to strangers, in the second, only I refer to "you", but here is a quote, so
But this

I don’t want to offend anyone in any way, but Russia doesn’t know how to build tanks, in India your T-90 still spits and don’t know what to do with it - send it for scrap or sell it to someone for cheap. Sarmat, I think, will not be something that would be a cut above the T-90. Etc

verbal diarrhea, or logorrhea, as you prefer. Good luck

[Setrac]

Quote: Sasha

Who are you or who are you?

It is believed that our ex from Israel are hiding under the Soviet flag.

[family tree]

Quote: Setrac

It is believed that our ex from Israel are hiding under the Soviet flag.

Setrac (1) RU
Pimply (1) RU

[ed65b]

Quote: Sashko07

I don’t want to offend anyone in any way, but Russia does not know how to build tanks, in India your T-90 still spits and don’t know what to do with it - send it for scrap or sell it to someone for cheap. Sarmat, I think, will not be something that would be a cut above the T-90.

And then who is the super tank builder ????? Professor is you ??? sorry in makeup did not recognize.

[Pimply]

The professor did not stoop to insults from Russian tank building.

[sashka]

Quote: Pimply

The professor did not stoop to insults from Russian tank building.

And not only "professor" but also you. The obvious is the obvious. What is there to argue about? It's just that it's not that simple .. The main thing is not to pollute yourself and others. You +. To the "professor" too. Courageous people with hellish patience))

[Yarbay]

Quote: Sasha

Courageous people with infernal patience))

The professor could not stand it anymore)))

[Slevinst]

and for kai horseradish then stopped the armature in order to fulfill the Indian contract? where is your logic

[Armata]

Quote: Slevinst

and for kai horseradish then stopped the armature in order to fulfill the Indian contract? where is your logic

Smoke less. So then I do not manage orders for stands, which are required, then we deliver.

[Slevinst]

mechanic so it was a comment here on this

Quote: Sashko07

I don’t want to offend anyone in any way, but Russia does not know how to build tanks, in India your T-90 still spits and don’t know what to do with it - send it for scrap or sell it to someone for cheap. Sarmat, I think, will not be something that would be a cut above the T-90.

[Slevinst]

can an insulated armored capsule also be placed on any tank?

[KG_patriot_last]

a new tank is not necessarily more powerful. If the tank retains the qualities of the former, but will cost less, weigh less, smaller - this will be a breakthrough ...

[Bad_gr]

Quote: KG_patriot_last

If the tank retains the qualities of the former, but will cost less, weigh less, smaller - this will be a breakthrough ...

This approach is relevant when it is important to produce as many products as possible, but not lower quality - this is in wartime.
Now it’s more important to release a tank with greater crew survival + more powerful and accurate weapons + integrate this combat unit into a single information field.

[Russ69]

According to the same Borisov As part of the development work under the names "Buttercup", "Sineva" and "Armata" a new tank is being developed for the Russian army.
"Buttercup", as I understand it, a self-propelled gun, they are all flower series.
And "Sineva", what?


RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20130627/946239120.html#13726709088603&message=resi
ze & relto = register & action = addClass & value = registration # ixzz2XmhcmoDU

[Wedmak]

And Sineva is probably the same armored vehicle for the Marine Corps.

[Russ69]

Quote: Wedmak

And Sineva is probably the same armored vehicle for the Marine Corps.

On the basis of "Armata", hardly. Although by name, it can be attributed to both the Airborne Forces and the Marines.

[Wedmak]

On the basis of "Armata", hardly.

Of course not, for the Airborne Forces, for the Marines there will be a very specialized machine. There, the requirements are not too compatible with each other.

[ale-x]

And the Airborne Forces, probably .... They know a lot about "blue", and drink it, and sing about it. Now they will ride the "blue". Well, these designers comedians)))))

[Lopatov]

Quote: Russ69

"Buttercup", as I understand it, a self-propelled gun, they are all flower series.

We now have Msta and Vienna self-propelled guns. A self-propelled gun ATGM - "Chrysanthemum"

Not a fact.

[Wedmak]

And for some reason I dreamed about "Buttercup" - a self-propelled mortar. Xs why ...

[Lopatov]

Already moved away from this. The last greetings from the past - "Host". There is such a flower.

Quote: Wedmak

And for some reason I dreamed about "Buttercup" - a self-propelled mortar.

By analogy with "Tulip" it is also masculine.

[Wedmak]

By analogy with "Tulip" it is also masculine.

Maybe ... Tulip in the face, Buttercup in the eye!

[Lopatov]

After "Tulip" eyes are usually no longer found.

[sashka]

Quote: Russ69

And "Sineva", what?

Is it logical to assume "what" is it?

[rudolff]

All the debates about Armata are connected with the fact that before conceiving a child, they have already announced that this will be a boy-hero "unparalleled" and by the age of ten "will reach at least two meters in height. The boy has not yet been born, but how many copies already broken. There would be no bravura statements, then there would be no disputes. As with the T-95. How many years were fiddling with it in quiet, and then, as if by chance, "outdated at the design stage, work stopped." Without noise and dust We will probably see the Armata platform in the foreseeable future. But this is not a tank yet! Only an uninhabited combat module is worth something, another piece of work! Perhaps not even a tank will appear first, but some BMPT based on it. But in any case, new items in combat units will wait for a long time, and guessing what it will be is an empty and thankless task.

[gallville]

Quote: rudolff

All the debates about the Armata are connected with the fact that before conceiving a child, they have already announced that this will be a boy-hero "unparalleled" and by ten years "will reach at least two meters in height.

Entirely and completely agree.
From myself I will add.
1. Such accelerated development, the main "marketing" against the background of other countries of tank manufacturers (all of them have upgrades) smells strongly of the "dough cut" allocated for GPV-2020.
2. The internal wars of the military-industrial complex led to the fact that instead of the T-80 we have the T-72 in the troops.
And the T-80 platform has such advantages as:
a) initially larger reservation
b) a more powerful engine of 1000 l / s against 740
c) two types of engine which is very important considering the north
d) good suo even without modernization
e) yes, even an inside-controlled anti-aircraft machine gun.

[vladimir VR]

The T-80 is a great car, but the MSA, the HFM is not for every climate.

[uwzek]

You bring TTD tanks of the period of the 80s of the last century. In this sense, the T-90 is cooler on all points ...
The trouble with all our tanks is the too small amount of internal space that no longer allows them to be seriously modernized. In this regard, even arrange dances in Armata ...

[Setrac]

Quote: uwzek

The trouble with all of our tanks is too little internal space

In fact, this is an advantage, the smaller the ratio of volume to weight, the higher the security.

[Check]

Well, on the same resource for any one there is an employee of Uralvagonzavod, I understand that it is secret, but at least tell me, is there at least something already on this Armata, yes or no. )))

[common man]

Read the MECHANICS. Including between the lines.

[KG_patriot_last]

The most important thing on this platform is the city tank! A very necessary thing in modern wars. Especially in local.

[vladimir VR]

Then BMPP (infantry support vehicle).

[Lopatov]

Any tank can be made urban. It is enough to fasten a platoon of trained foot soldiers to it.

[Argon]

Aha "urban", and also rural, settlement, forest and mountainous, these are about the kind of people now in the headquarters and sit.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: Argon

Yeah "city", and also rural, settlement, forest and mountain, .....

Now it’s practiced among manufacturers to make additional protection (DZ, gratings) that are hung on standard equipment, improving circular protection, which is important when fighting in the city.

[patsantre]

I now have such an idea, but will the fate of the F-35 in the form of not the most outstanding performance characteristics befall Armata because of all these attempts to universalize, standardize and unify?

[Vanek]

Alright peasants. It’s interesting with you, but it’s better at home. I apologize to someone who was naughty. If there are any.

... and ... this is ... the most ... Basilio, apologize for the troll.

[Landwarrior]

Well, now, once again sat down in a galosh. Well what for such advertising to drive? It would be better as before - quietly, quietly, and then - AP! "Guys, what do we have!"

[vladimir VR]

Why sat down in a galosh? They made the "probable friends" sleep badly at night. Let them suffer.

[old man54]

Quote: vladimir VR

Why sat down in a galosh? They made the "probable friends" sleep badly at night. Let them suffer.

Yes, or what they do not suffer, about Armata so especially! Today they are very tense about GDP and its poorly predictable actions regarding foreign policy and its course towards a sharp increase in the country's defense capability.

[Volkhov]

Look at how many weapons go to Syria, all the warehouses have been sorted out, that with the fleet - there are no funds for new equipment that cannot be used - a normal military situation.

[old man54]

the article is ambiguous, but "+" delivered. To be honest, all this hysteria around the new MBT in the media, provoked by politicians, the military and UVZ itself, has already gotten over the roof! And this is nothing more than a stupid and inept copying of the Western, primarily amerovsky, style of marketing military-industrial complex products. THOSE. such an advertising trick! It seems that the priorities of our military-industrial complex, after 91, are not the creation of armored vehicles to increase the country's defense capability, but the sale of its samples abroad, in the first place!: ((Hence such PR actions when it was created.

The declared dates for adopting "Almaty" into service are approaching, but, nevertheless, responsible persons are still limited only to general statements and are in no hurry to publish any technical information.

Thus, the conversation about a promising tank based on the Armata armored platform once again ended with the most common words.

The technical details of the project are still unknown, which can be interpreted in the broadest possible way, including in a negative way.

And why did they all decide that it is not applicable to notify everyone about the latest weapons developments, to upload performance characteristics and BX to the network? What nonsense is that? It is clear that the last 20 years of our history have greatly softened the brain of a good half of the population, but not to the same extent! :)) Why is it that even the appearance of secret developments should become public knowledge, how do all sorts of figures groan here ?? I remember, during the Soviet era, my relative was finishing the Leningrad Combined Arms (Pushkin), so he said that they had our most secret tank (T-80) on their territory, to familiarize future commanders. They stand almost always under the tarpaulin, although it was already 1, and it was adopted in 1987! And then no one was hit by an epileptic, why is it not shown to the people. It is necessary, that is not showing !!! And the T-1976 then and the Armata now!

[Wedmak]

It is clear that the last 20 years of our history have greatly softened the brains of a good half of the population, but not to the same extent!

The propaganda of freedom of speech really greatly softened the brains of ordinary people. Therefore, freedom of speech has forgotten responsibility for these very words. The agitprom did not say anything about this .... So we get what we have ...

[mark1]

Quote: Wedmak

The propaganda of freedom of speech really greatly softened the brains of ordinary people. Therefore, freedom of speech has forgotten responsibility for these very words. The agitprom did not say anything about this .... So we get what we have ...

And what have the brains of the townsfolk have to do with it? Information about the development of the platform on the topic "Armata" came from the Ministry of Defense and the management of UVZ, promises to show the platform by 2011; 2012; 2013 ... and to infinity came from them. If the development is secret - do not try and do not scatter empty words, no one pretends to know the state secrets. So, the propaganda of freedom of speech rather softened the brains of some representatives of the Ministry of Defense, and for some, on the contrary, the brain only became harder.
Remarochka on T-80. You can keep it under cover for another 50 years, but as far back as 1978, I was discussing with the guys who came from the SA (Taman Division) new tanks with a gas turbine engine (guess what) and the people who served in the GSVG in the choke talked about the T-64. So all the secrets - a very relative thing - to someone a secret and to someone a reason in the kitchen to squabble

[Wedmak]

Information about the development of the platform on the "Armata" topic came from the Ministry of Defense and the leadership of UVZ

And who said that this guide cannot be a layman? Yes, and you can say something when you do it yourself. The meaning of my post is not in the inhabitants, but on the lack of responsibility for their words.

[mark1]

Well, then, we are like-minded people, the essence of my passages is the same - you have to answer for the "bazaar".

[sub307]

And this is what the deputy minister says: "
According to the Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Yuri Borisov, the fundamentally new Armata tank platform will appear in the Russian Armed Forces by 2015.
He told about this on the air of the radio "Echo of Moscow". "The task of creating this platform is to get a qualitative leap forward in the development of this direction. We will definitely create this platform by 2015. It will be used not only for tanks, but also for infantry fighting vehicles, for all equipment of this class," Borisov said.
According to him, the current tank equipment, including the T-90 tank, was created on the T-72 platforms, the development of which has been exhausted. At the same time, the deputy head of the Russian Defense Ministry emphasized that the T-90 tanks as a whole are not inferior to their counterparts from Germany and the United States.
In August 2012, Oleg Sienko, the general director of Uralvagonzavod, announced that the company he heads expects to release the first prototype of a tank on the Armata platform in 2013. "Armata", according to the plans of the corporation, will be mass-produced from 2015, and by 2020 the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will receive 2,3 thousand of these machines. "

[Yarbay]

Quote: sub307

According to him, the current tank equipment, including the T-90 tank, was created on the T-72 platforms, the development of which has been exhausted.

I don’t understand then why let’s say my country recently bought TOS-1 And they write that they built on the T-90 platform, what is the latest ??
After all, is there a difference between the T-72 and T-90 platforms, or am I mistaken?

[Alekseev]

What do you mean by the term platform?
Something had not been consumed before, it is now a trendy word in use. Who understands about what, who is not, but they repeat everything.
Earlier in Russia (USSR) they said, for example, a bridge-layer on the basis of the T-55 tank.
And the T-90 is based on, say, the platform, the T-72.
True, tanks on the same "platform" can differ in combat effectiveness at times ...
So what is the "platform" for advanced BTT samples?
This is a set of components and assemblies: an engine, or rather MTO with all systems, transmission, chassis, PAZ, PPO, RHB protection systems.
But the hulls in our time should be different, the tank and the self-propelled guns and other equipment cannot have the same level of protection.
But the technology of their manufacture should be similar.
Various weapons systems and SLAs are installed on this platform.
What is not ready there: the Armata platform itself, or the tank on this platform, is covered in darkness.
Wait and see.

[Yarbay]

Quote: Alekseev

And the T-90 is based on, say, the platform, the T-72.

so am I about it)))))
they wrote that the new * suns * are made on the basis of the t-90, they say the old ones on the t-72))))))))))
Buyers bred?)))))))))))

[Kars]

Quote: Alekseev

This is a set of components and assemblies: an engine, or rather MTO with all systems, transmission, chassis, PAZ, PPO, RHB protection systems.
But the hulls in our time should be different, the tank and the self-propelled guns and other equipment cannot have the same level of protection.

That's right. And that is how a self-propelled howitzer is fired from behind the second line, with tank frontal armor.

Quote: Yarbay

they wrote that the new * suns * are made on the basis of the t-90, they say the old ones on the t-72))))))))))

I used to raise the topic there)) about the Solntsepeks, that means they should have new, specially made hulls, and not like Buratin from ready tanks.

[svp67]

Quote: Alekseev

But the hulls in our time should be different, the tank and the self-propelled guns and other equipment cannot have the same level of protection.

And here you are wrong, modern technologies make it possible to make an EQUAL hull, but the level of protection of the "first line" vehicles - a tank and TBMP, can be raised due to "protection modules" ...

[Alekseev]

Quote: svp67

... modern technologies make it possible to make an EQUAL hull, but the level of protection for vehicles of the "first line" - a tank and TBMP, can be raised due to "protection modules" ..

They allow a lot of things .
But do not forget that "built-in" armor is also mechanical strength, and modules are simply extra weight in terms of mechanical strength.
A classic historical example, though "from a different element," is the Il-2 attack aircraft.
And whoever thinks that the hull of a tank is such a "stout", unbreakable thing, is mistaken.
Deflection of the bottom, for example, is a common thing.

[Cynic]

Quote: svp67

but the level of protection ... can be raised due to the "protection modules" ...

What protection? Specifically!
Such a direct, one might even say naive, question.

[uwzek]

There is a difference between machines, between platforms - no. Moreover, if you keep in mind the TOCs ...

[ed65b]

I read the memory of a tankman in the formidable 80 threw out due to failures of electronics and 72 fought.
Something like that.

[kirieeleyson]

Dear comrades. I often arranged holivars here, cursed and called names on many respected forum users here. But while I’m here, I learned to respect opponents, listen to statements that I don’t like and find useful facts in them. I also learned to admit my mistakes, and those urapatriotic slogans that I wrote are the way out of the desired, but not always real. Therefore, to someone who reads my message - I would like to apologize for all of my negative verses that I wrote above. I am not a professor and not an expert, but a hereditary military man. All the same, sometimes it’s more important to read the comments than the news itself, which makes this site and the community my favorite. Something like this, I really wanted to sincerely apologize to everyone for their exercises.

[soldier's grandson]

something a lot of talk for more than one year about the armature and it is not visible also the black shark was only shown and in the troops it is not

[Wedmak]

also the black shark was only shown and in the troops it is not

Of course not, there is her "son" - Alligator.

[soldier's grandson]

and her sons do not have much current in parades

[Wedmak]

and her sons do not have much current in parades

No, training of combat pilots is already in full swing. Cars come into service.

[Cynic]

Quote: Soldier's grandson

also the black shark was only shown and in the troops it is not

The Ka-50 was adopted in 1995, I think it’s not necessary to continue further ...
Ka-52 development of the 50s according to the comments of the Ministry of Defense.

Ka-52 has already begun to enter the army.

[xomaNN]

Well, a naughty verbal slaughter, and, unfortunately, far from normal discussion :)) Guys, let's respect each other! The site is really interesting, do not scare new visitors.

[Cynic]

Quote: xomaNN

Well, a naughty verbal slaughter,

Yes holivar is pure water.
I will express heretical I think _ And actually, why does Russia need Armata now, actually, like a tank? I will not touch on other options.
Let us just take a sober look at it soberly, without this very frenzy of patriotism.
Firstly _ Never wagon could not surpass the specialist in his field.
Secondly _ With all the desire there will be nothing revolutionary in it, that's just about the uninhabited tower is not necessary. The current tower is already pulled by half-inhabited

etc.

[Kars]

Quote: Cynic

But actually, why does Russia need Armata now, actually, like a tank?

And the profit of UVZ? And its future owners?

[Cynic]

Quote: Kars

And the profit of UVZ? And its future owners?

Do you mean altruist?

[soldier's grandson]

on this topic there is only a concussion, everyone has their own opinion, that's when the armature will receive armature in full volume and the battle test will pass then we can talk

[bddrus]

only the article was about nothing and then the second - but there are no less disputes

[NickitaDembelnulsa]

Here I presented that Armata will be presented just like Iphone 5, the General Designer will walk around the stage and tell the military who came to the presentation about the characteristics of the new tank, will announce the price for different models, with ammunition 32, 64, 128 shells. In general, the picture would be excellent)

[Wedmak]

I just imagined that Armata will be presented just like Iphone 5

will announce the price for different models, with ammunition 32, 64, 128 shells

Not respected, you still need to get enough sleep. Recommend.

[NickitaDembelnulsa]

It's just a light addiction

[Check]

in the states like that and present))) make a show. for generals

[papas-57]

Yes, just nothing to show, and therefore darken. When there is something to show, they will call all those who need and who do not need, and the noise will not be measured. Who is needed - for knocking out prizes and awards, and who is not needed - for the number (and suddenly useful for something, there are absolutely no useless people). This is RUSSIA

[BruderV]

Quote: Mechanic

So the project was suspended by order of the Ministry of Defense

And, well, apparently, as in the case of the already finished T-95 with a smart look, they will say that the object turned out to be so advanced and complex that just a shot from a new gun causes a local rupture of the space-time continuum and the formation of unstable microscopic black holes, which is why Obama’s ass in a parallel universe ceases to produce melanin and it turns white, and this is a guaranteed apocalypse. Why am I all this? In short, due to excessive complexity, the good old T-90MS will be purchased, it is also unsinkable T-72 during the last reincarnation.

[Locksmith]

Quote: BruderV

In short, due to excess complexity, they will purchase the good old T-90MS

It’s not enough to come up with new equipment, you still need to have developed production of YOUR electronics and electrical engineering, and in our country a little strain has arisen in connection with recent events, just like after the war = collapse. New factories are being built and when they are ready to give the required equipment, then all the ingenious plans will be realized on time, and now I suspect that it is partially built on the imported element base, which is apparently unacceptable. In fact, reading the forum, you can understand from some statements that the problem is like once in the periphery-locators -optics -video-servo systems, and not in iron, the iron successfully rolled on another T95.

[Argon]

Let's hope that the situation will develop as with the PAK FA. How many words have been said, how many copies are broken, and you fly. Nowadays it's just a miracle, simply because it flew, even if it’s not a fighter, but it’s the same, now it’s confident we can say, "Will".

[lord]

it’s more likely to look what they came up with there so secret ...

[sergey158-29]

Quote: “Armata”: silence that has no analogues ...
And as for me, everyday Soviet reality, when in the "west" Soviet weapons were shown in full on "discovery", in the USSR even for military personnel under a "big secret", not to mention civilians ... Our "secrets" do not exist from " enemies ", and from the people - the taxpayer ...

[t-95]

Good afternoon. And yet, I still did not understand where the information came from that the work on the new tank had stopped? I understand that there is no trust in everything that the authorities say, I understand that for more than 20 years we have been dizzy with our democracy. But I have no reason not to believe that the current rearmament program will not be implemented. And all attempts to start to moan ahead of time, it painfully looks like the fact that youth is gone and the times are not the same. And Mr. Mechanic, whether he wants it or not, the first to be rude

[Best novel]

Borisov said that the promising Armata main battle tank, which is being created now, will surpass all existing foreign vehicles of this class in its combat characteristics. Moreover, the Deputy Minister of Defense said that the characteristics and capabilities of “Almaty” will be higher than that of similar foreign machines currently being developed. After that, he said that he (Borisov) has the longest, thickest and hardest in the world and analogues 100-200 years will not appear in nature. According to all indicators, it’s better only for Putin. But he didn’t show it, he was modest, and the current ruler loves mainly with his ears.

[t-95]

I have not read a more stupid comment.

[t-95]

Dogs bark, the caravan goes on.