Military Review

God knows what's going on

121
This is my first experience, except for school essays (published in the district newspaper) on the exam after the 8 class. Contrary to the established tradition, I will not ask to treat him condescendingly. I consider the purpose of the presence on the site to check my beliefs in communicating with other people and, to some extent, self-education. So, did you name yourself? - fell-wrung out!


Write this opus prompted me to several reasons. These are stormy discussions on the site of three articles on the LGBT issue, M. Delyagin’s article “The Russian Ruble and the World Backstage” and the article “From Bilbderberg to Guglberg: Technocratic Restructuring of Global Elites” by Olga Chetverikova.
One thing was superimposed on the other, “the bowl overflowed,” “the bar fell,” and “Ostap suffered.” So:

What's going on

And, as we know, globalization occurs. That is, the process of world economic, political and cultural integration and unification (wiki). This is a general definition that does not reveal the meaning and purpose of the process. Why is this happening? What for? Or maybe it happens by itself, so to speak, as a result of objective development processes? But "if the stars are lit, then someone needs it." Each action has its own reasons. Nothing happens just like that. Hence, globalization is not an "objective process", but the result of targeted, consistent actions of certain forces.

In order to understand the meaning of globalization, it is necessary to decompose the general process into its components:

Why do we need economic integration? To extract and increase profits, and reduce costs. Why do we need cultural integration and unification? To eliminate obstacles (in the form of cultural differences) to maximizing profits.

What is all this for? - FOR POLITICAL UNIFICATION. And what is it for? - To establish the monotony of power mechanisms and institutions throughout the earth. That is, to establish world domination.

Already, a significant proportion of all world assets and finances belong to a very narrow circle of people. This is the very “World Government” (hereinafter MP) about the impossibility of which so often we are told by “independent media and experts”.

Mn does not hold meetings and is not engaged in economic activities. It determines priorities and directs financial flows in the direction it needs. The main goals of MP obvious - World domination and its transfer to their descendants. Yes. There is no unity, but that is its strength. To solve technical issues MP. created a whole class of managers on whom all responsibility for what is happening in the world was transferred. Managers (presidents of states, top managers of corporations, high-ranking officials and others) are free in their decisions to a strictly defined extent. and members MP determine the most profitable scenario for themselves. As a result, M.P. always win, and all responsibility goes to managers.

This is well illustrated by the example of World War 2. Tsarist Russia did not fit into the global project and then funds were allocated for the revolution. To accelerate the process of globalization, a "competition" was created between the "Red Project" and the "Liberal Project". But there was a discrepancy. The informal leader (as it seemed to be MP) of the “Red Project” Trotsky lost the political struggle and got an ice pick into the brain so that the head would not dangle.

Headed the "Red Project" is not a political prostitute, but the leader is tough and knows his interest - Stalin. The vision of the World by Stalin did not suit at all. and in contrast, the Nazi Project was created. A clash was inevitable. MP helped both of them, but since, due to specific features, the leader of the "Nazi project" did not suit MP. he had to be roasted in the courtyard of the Reich Chancellery.

With the Red Project out of control, it was much more difficult, but even here methods were found. Over time, the top of the USSR oskotinilas and forgot its purpose - to be the opposite of the "Liberal Project." The "red project" surrendered, was dismantled, and its last leader received his thirty pieces of silver. It is a pity that aspen has not yet waited. Mn and the seat of the majority of its members came out of the war at a profit, and all the misfortunes went to others. It is time for globalization.

The role of LGBT in globalization

Actually, I promised not to speak out on this topic. But Ruslan67 said "Do not promise." So it happened. In fact, not in the LGBT case. Well, what does it matter to us how lesbians torment each other? Absolutely on the drum. But homosexuals are not indifferent to us. We do not like them ... do not respect ... And there is a reason. This is what they "catch" us. The role of blue in globalization can not be overemphasized.

First, with the help of introducing buggers into all structures of society, its full decomposition is achieved. This contingent is considered to be omitted. (We will not hide the fact that a significant part of men passed through prisons and zones, and there ...) That is, humiliated, defeated in rights, incapable of resisting and breeding outcasts. Caste! Caste is strong in its solidarity, common interests and goals. A caste of untouchables will always oppose traditional society and the state. Will always be on the side of MP, since only MP promotes and guards this caste.

Secondly, the blue ones do not multiply, and the reduction of the world's population is one of the main tasks of MP Thirdly, with the help of the “LGBT problem”, society can be distracted from the very process of globalization, the concentration of power and finance in the hands of a small group of people, from the problem of observance by the Governmental Managers not of national and national interests, but of the interests of MP This is vividly demonstrated on the site. For three days, everyone just did what they branded homosexual, they did a great job.

The role of managers in globalization

Managers are the main battle force of globalization. Their role in this destructive business is paramount. It is they who receive major preferences from globalization. It is they who travel around the world and live in luxury presidential apartments. They are proud of each other in front of each other with yachts, football clubs, diamonds, silicone dolls - wives and mistresses. It is they who, for the sake of their privileges, are ready to betray and sell the people from whom they came out, and with ease to replace it with unusual migrants. They are the people of the world, people without a homeland, people without conscience. They think that they are ruling, and in fact they are being used in a dark, higher level of management - MP. And I would not be myself if I did not say:

Putin V.V.

What is the phenomenon of Putin? It seems to me that the whole phenomenon of GDP lies in the fact that he became a manager in fact by chance. No, of course, nothing happens just like that. There were all sorts of options before him. but settled on it. Lucky as esaul said. But having received the throne almost as a gift, Putin turned out to be much stronger than all his foreign colleagues. They have come a long way to power, they have been rubbing their hands in some parties and political get-togethers since their young nails, they have passed through a sieve of repeated multi-level elections.

And here you are! KGB Colonel! Not a manager as a matter of fact, but only a utilitarian instrument on guard of the interests of managers. Security intelligence function with managers. So what? We are now on an equal footing with him? Yes, what is equal? It turns out that he is also much stronger than them!

It would seem necessary to rejoice. So many Putin fans do. But the fact is that GDP is a MANAGER! And he, as a representative of his class, is characterized by all the vices of managers. One of these vices is unreasonable conceit. The manager, in accordance with his function, considers himself to be infallible, Putin builds the state according to the principles of the corporation, and the corporation must make a profit and be competitive. Who will work in the corporation is not important. If Tajik gives profit, it will be Tajik. Russian will not give profit - there will be no Russian.

The manager believes that he has the right to dispose of human destinies at his discretion. Even on the site now and then there is managerial arrogance. They say: "How many people did you lead? Not led? And what are you talking about here with our head?"

It is treated. Rotation and change of managers, but we have not the case. Moreover, having concentrated the budget of the country under his administration, Putin becomes on an equal footing with the members of the World Government.

That there can not understand. There, century-old dynasties and upstarts do not accept. But there is nothing to do, and this option has to be worked out especially since GDP speaks everywhere and everywhere (and not only speaks, but also actively works on this) about the integration of the Russian economy into the world economic system. Is it in the interests of the Russian population? Not! It is in the interests of the class of managers and, therefore, in the interests of M.P.
And yet not MP. the highest stage.

WHO is above the World Government.

Above all - GOD!
Do not ... Atheism does not explain anything and does not lead anywhere. I'm not talking about religion. Religion is only one degree of control of the masses. I'm talking about THOSE WHO created this world. Who created man. Who gave man the first knowledge. Who created by genetic engineering cultural varieties of cereals, which appeared some sort of 10 000 years ago.

Here either GOD does not see what is happening on Earth, or it is included in his plans. We are not given to understand. But it seems to me that the outcome must occur during the life of the current generation of people.

Thank you for attention.
Author:
121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Averias
    Averias 27 June 2013 08: 05 New
    -3
    World Government, The Phenomenon of Putin, Globalization, LGBT, and finally God. Yes, we read it, read it. What's new is said? Oskomin already filled. This is written by all and sundry.
    1. Averias
      Averias 27 June 2013 08: 18 New
      +1
      Well, how many times can I repeat, put a minus - justify.

      Or what, the article "shines" with novelty and freshness? Is something new and unknown in the article? There is a lot of such in the Internet, as well as on this resource. As a first experience - normal, but no more.
      “Dear editor, is it possible about the reactor, about the beloved lunar tractor. Well, it’s impossible, for a year in a row, they frighten them with plates, they say vile ones fly, then their dogs bark, then they say ruins. (Immortal V. Vysotsky)
      1. Averias
        Averias 27 June 2013 08: 32 New
        -14
        As I see, anonymity is held in high esteem. And rightly so, he slammed into a quiet minus and "revels" in his own "omnipotence." That's the way it is with us everywhere.
        1. Z.A.M.
          Z.A.M. 27 June 2013 09: 49 New
          19
          Listen, well, let’s let me justify you my minus? Well, I do not agree with you, with your attitude to the work of man. Well, he expressed his opinion, his understanding and vision, his thoughts. What is so? Not new? Well, write yourself, something new. Surprise us.
          Just substantiating is a waste of time. I think that’s why many do not justify.
          Yes, and I did not, and I will not. Excuse me hi
          1. 755962
            755962 27 June 2013 10: 37 New
            21
            Quote: Z.A.M.
            Well, he expressed his opinion, his understanding and vision, his thoughts.

            But I personally am pleased that an increasing number of forum users began to express their opinion. This trend, however. This means that people began to not only read but also express their vision of the situation. You only need to be happy for this state of affairs. The site is popular for its diversity. it and figures and facts and history. But to read the arguments of the forum participants themselves online ... Worth it. Article PLUS. For opinion.
            Sincerely.
            1. Ascetic
              Ascetic 27 June 2013 12: 50 New
              14
              Quote: 755962
              Article PLUS. Per opinion.


              I join this assessment, briefly the essence of globalization and the tasks of the world elite of corporatocrats and bankers to create a unified global world government in the world are set forth correctly. I can not agree only on one thing. Global capitalism is all-so is the process objective proceeding from the internal needs and processes of the development of capitalism, such as, in particular, the world division of labor and the concentration of capital in transnational corporations and banks. If, according to Marxist-Leninist theory, imperialism was considered the highest and last phase of capitalism after which its collapse and transition to socialism ensued, then history shows us that this is not the next phase of capitalism into which we are moving and there is globalism (world domination of transnational corporations with a single financial center in the form of the World Bank, IMF or Fed). In this society, there will be no bourgeoisie and proletariat as such in the classical sense of the word, but there will be a certain elite layer of people of “neo-nomads” who move freely around the world and work for the benefit of these corporations (that is, they are “free and civilized”) and there will be other "lower estates". And all these backstage plans of bildebergs and others serve to ensure that non-nomads need to build a world in which countries are divided into higher and lower grades. That is, the essence of capitalism does not change from this, it simply goes into a new phase of its development. And as again, we remember from history that all these transitions were accompanied by wars and revolutions.
              So Putin’s task is not to be the manager (manager) of the comprador corporation as Yeltsin was, namely, how to maximize the country out of the political (almost done), economic and financial influence of these globalizers, and to minimize the use of the Soviet potential and reviving The military-industrial complex to prepare the country for these global challenges, that is, for the very inevitable wars, revolutions and conflicts. It is for these things that are contrary to the global civilizational trend (and here we can take the same position on LGBT) so they hate Putin in the West.
              1. Zhzhuk
                Zhzhuk 27 June 2013 13: 02 New
                0
                explain the phenomenon, in the film the zeitgatest was created in the USA, it speaks of corporatocracy and the like, very right things, but suddenly I find that it was created with the support of the Rothschilds, that you can’t resist the principle - head
                plums are also very doubtful about the snowdenes of Ascange and other allegedly whistleblowers, but I can’t give an answer why they are needed, maybe just inter-clan blackmail like Rothschilds against the Rockefellers, although I can’t understand the confrontation between the USA and England because they are one swamp
                1. Furnace driver
                  Furnace driver 27 June 2013 14: 04 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Zhzhuk
                  plums are also very doubtful about the snowden of Ascange and other alleged whistleblowers

                  Maybe this is an informational struggle between the two camps, let's put it this way: the Rockffelers (countries of the "West") against whom the attack is directed, and the Rothschilds (China, as well as quite all the BRICS countries) ...
                  That is, actions aimed at intensifying aggression in the United States.
                  An important point, remember which two publications Snowden gave the first interview after arriving in Hong Kong ... Correctly American, but in fact they also, like Snowden, disclosed information ... but after all, these media operate according to strict censorship ... and here such tricks ...
              2. arkady149
                arkady149 27 June 2013 14: 27 New
                0
                The logical continuation of this trend will be the development of "Black Water" (and they were already allowed to have A10 attack aircraft) with "them", and with us? Some kind of SSR or still the RF Armed Forces.
                Quote: Ascetic
                there will be a certain elite stratum of people of "neo-nomads" who move freely around the world and work for the benefit of these corporations

                Nomads (people not attached to the place of birth, upbringing) have always been grave diggers of empires.
                Stanislav, I have not read your convincing comments on VO for a long time.
                To the author + for a quite successful attempt to explain the current processes.
            2. Ivan.
              Ivan. 27 June 2013 13: 30 New
              +4
              Quote: 755962
              But I personally am pleased that an increasing number of members of the forum began to express their opinion. This trend, however. This means that people began to not only read but also express their vision of the situation.

              I can’t hold back! Happy! I think for many this idea comes to mind only while it is restrained by various factors, including someone’s limbs.
          2. Averias
            Averias 27 June 2013 11: 23 New
            0
            Well, what are you motivated by, putting me minus? And to put it simply because I did not like it was small. I justified why I did not like it. No, not that, it's not like it or not. The fact is that absolutely nothing new has been said. Just a concussion.

            PS Writing such an article without a losing option. We take high-profile abstracts, phrases and voila, the product is ready. When I have something to write, I write. When not, I don’t write. Everything is simple. And doing transfusion from empty to empty is absurd.
          3. Averias
            Averias 27 June 2013 11: 34 New
            0
            Quote: Z.A.M.
            Well, I do not agree with you, with your attitude to the work of man.

            In general, I have no complaints about the work of the author. Claim to the contents of this work.
          4. dmb
            dmb 27 June 2013 12: 20 New
            +3
            With regard to the minuses, I agree with your opponent, but you found an opportunity to explain why he was placed? In your opinion, the opponent neglected the work. And how do you yourself feel about the work of a graphomaniac (This is not about the author), in any case, give him a positive assessment? As for the article, it personally causes dual feelings in me. The slender line of substantiation of the globalization process breaks off at the most interesting place. Why is world domination necessary? The author rightly raises the question of purpose. But if the goal of what he calls the “Red Project” is simple and understandable, and the paths toward it are described in theory, the goal of the “world government” is voiced. Neither in this article, nor in any other have I personally met with any more or less serious evidence that the “red project” is the devilish idea of ​​the insidious “world government”. The fact that the same Bolsheviks received foreign funding is not at all proof of its existence. Everyone who gave money pursued quite utilitarian goals. Germany-weakening the warring enemy, proud Britons, the seizure of economically interesting oil areas, etc. We are not referring to the world behind the scenes. when they “sawed” China with her after the boxing uprising. The author’s assessment of Putin as a whole is correct in my opinion. That's just the "backstage" has nothing to do with it again. Vova, the guy is not stupid, and perfectly understands that no matter how much you take, you will lose power, and your money will quickly disappear. Berezovsky, the latest example. And therefore, he will hold on to it until the last opportunity and in order to keep maneuvering between the West and its own people. The last passage of the article is not at all clear. Better than in the film you can’t say: “Some say that God is, others say that he is not. Both are equally unprovable.”
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. sashka
                sashka 27 June 2013 13: 08 New
                -1
                Why do you cite other people as an example? I myself have something to say .. Or is there nothing else besides standing out for the soul?
        2. Forward
          Forward 27 June 2013 14: 50 New
          +3
          I put you one plus and one minus. And I put them only because you wrote about it. I don’t know why you are so scrupulous about this? As for me, I'm just expressing my opinion here. And to me personally, absolutely ..... what they will instruct me there. There are always different points of view and always someone will agree with you, and someone will not. Yes, and the props are here, if you are of course concerned about your status! So I think it’s better to relate to such things. A good article. The author implicitly asks a question. What next? And therefore, respect to the author for asking the right questions.
      2. Ustas
        Ustas 27 June 2013 09: 52 New
        12
        Quote: Averias
        Well, how many times can I repeat, put a minus - justify.

        The author of the article is plus, but you are minus.
        Quote: Averias
        Yes, we read it, read it. What's new is said? Oskomin already filled. This is written by all and sundry.

        Maybe we read this, it doesn’t matter. It is important that the author analyzes the previous facts and expresses his thoughts in the article. Everyone has the right to be heard.
        If you do not agree with his conclusions, prove that he is wrong, and do not shout "Fee ..!" just because you have a different point of view.
        1. seller trucks
          seller trucks 27 June 2013 14: 10 New
          +1
          Quote: Ustas
          . It is important that the author analyzes the previous facts and expresses his thoughts in the article.


          to the author and you (+), but I personally doubt the authorship of “my thoughts”, Vladimir reads this a lot, no doubt, some conclusions are not author’s, but for example, in book about MP, I saw Coleman’s “300 Committee”, you can even say the whole structure articles (author, well done, try again) is built in the Coleman style. Although a lot on my own. From this series of books I really liked Confession of the Economic Killer and the Debate about Zion, I also advise E. Hodos to read.
      3. alex13-61
        alex13-61 27 June 2013 09: 59 New
        +1
        Quote: Averias
        Listen, well, let’s let me justify you my minus? Well, I do not agree with you, with your attitude to the work of man. Well, he expressed his opinion, his understanding and vision, his thoughts. What is so? Not new? Well, write yourself, something new. Surprise us.
        Just substantiating is a waste of time. I think that’s why many do not justify.
        Yes, and I did not, and I will not. Excuse me hi

        And I will subscribe to it ...
      4. matross
        matross 27 June 2013 14: 17 New
        +1
        Quote: Averias
        set a minus - justify.

        Or what, the article "shines" with novelty and freshness?

        Any article of a non-informational nature will make an impression - “I already heard it somewhere”! If this is not an abstract of an honest dissertation. At least, she will make such an impression on people who think, are educated and well-read, to whom you, I believe, relate. hi
        So for the disclosure of the topic, harmony of reasoning and style of presentation - to the author is “plus”, and to you for unreasonable, in my opinion, criticism - “minus”
    2. Xroft
      Xroft 27 June 2013 09: 55 New
      +6
      People like to read the "truth" about the situation in the country and in the world. The version sounds very believable, why not? on the Internet and about the army they write a lot, this does not prevent new articles from being done. Therefore, the minus
    3. Cartoon
      Cartoon 27 June 2013 09: 58 New
      -18
      I would tweak a little "Author Vladimir NeNormalny"
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 27 June 2013 11: 28 New
        +7
        Justify ..
        minus, second ordinal, Averias, mine - for aggression towards the material.
        minus, fifth, ordinal, Cartoon - y, mine - for aggression towards auto RU.
        All clear?
        It is not clear, please explain.
        1. Very old
          Very old 27 June 2013 15: 32 New
          0
          IGOR, I try not to comment on the "nameless." It’s a pity that the site administration allows you to put on masks, which is why the same vote occurs (from naked?) F. and I. indicated in his profile. I come to get to know people, their opinions, listen to objections, say my own - and that’s all. Sometimes bickering is so annoying - serious discussion becomes impossible, an ordinary scandal. It's sad
          1. matross
            matross 27 June 2013 19: 17 New
            +2
            Quote: Old very
            In his profile indicated F.i.I.

            And what has that changed? Who knows whether they are real or fictional? If you want to be identified - indicate your home address and more, up to the size of the gas mask! And anonymity on the Internet is the key to free expression. Although there are inevitable disadvantages - unpunished rudeness, for example. But if you abandon anonymity, you have to abandon free discussion - is it good or bad - everyone decides!
            1. Ivan.
              Ivan. 27 June 2013 19: 44 New
              +1
              Quote: matRoss
              And anonymity on the Internet is the key to free expression

              Freedom without responsibility is something else. Anonymity in a boarding school is needed, as long as it is necessary, while people are not in power in their countries, while they are collecting files on everyone and everything, but politeness rules require at least a pseudonym, the Western invention "Login" is not suitable for these purposes, except for the Pepsi generation .
              1. matross
                matross 27 June 2013 20: 15 New
                0
                Perhaps I agree with your opinion! hi
              2. Igarr
                Igarr 27 June 2013 22: 22 New
                +1
                Guys, well, do not tell ..
                Does each of you use a MAC address spoofing program?
                Does each of you have your own crypto machine and your own, personal network connection?
                Or, nevertheless, you work through providers - CONDUCTING you to the Internet. Beeline there, Megaphone, Rostelecom.
                Maybe you do not know about the SORM system - a system of operational-search measures?
                This I still demonstrate junk.
                So ... whoever needs it - he knows perfectly well who is at what address, at what tariff, how many rooms are in the hut, where is the computer, and where is the router ...
                Nicky .... no more, no less like - nicknames. Baby.
                The myth is ... anonymity. As if no one would guess what the name of one talker with the nickname Igarr.
                1. Ivan.
                  Ivan. 28 June 2013 01: 33 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Igarr
                  The myth is ... anonymity. As if no one would guess what the name of one talker with the nickname Igarr.

                  For those who have attracted attention, this is true then and it will not help.
                  Does each of you use a MAC address spoofing program?
                  Does each of you have your own crypto machine and your own, personal network connection?
                  If I did not light up, then why should I help in identifying in the possible future some kind of MP or services that want to use it against me. Now you can save any amount of data, but they still need to be processed and the more confusion there is, the better.
                  Quote: Igarr
                  whoever needs it knows perfectly well

                  Those who know, not about everyone, although they have the ability, are not enough to physically take on the "development" of all. Secondly, anonymity is necessary as a defense against crime, according to the personal information left on the network, you can think of a lot of things against a person. This is not a solution to the problem; it is a security feature. Complete security in the box only.
                  Third, it’s more difficult to unbalance the anonym, the less the other knows about you, the more you have the ability to “maneuver”.
      2. maxvik
        maxvik 27 June 2013 11: 40 New
        +4
        It’s NOT normal to speak about the author and the person in general. This separates us, and this is precisely the goal of the opponents of Russia, our opponents. Very sorry
      3. Ivan.
        Ivan. 27 June 2013 13: 44 New
        -2
        Quote: Cartoon
        I would tweak a little "Author Vladimir NeNormalny"

        So it’s good that it does not meet the standards! I hope you do not want to be standard?
    4. Corsair
      Corsair 27 June 2013 11: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: Averias
      What's new is said? Oskomin already filled. This is written by all and sundry.

      I read the article and ... confused! fellow I don’t understand, “minus” or “plus” the article, I decided to leave HOW Yes repeat
      1. 755962
        755962 27 June 2013 12: 05 New
        +5
        Quote: Corsair
        I don’t understand, "minus" ali "plus" article, I decided to leave AS is

        Oh God .. How many people can repeat ... AUUU

        The man expressed his view!!!!
        Communicate, share, reason, analyze ..
        This is the miracle of this site!
        Pros ... cons ... light ... shadow ... good .. bad ..

        Do NOT think what to put + or -

        SEEK AND WRITE ...
        1. Very old
          Very old 27 June 2013 15: 40 New
          0
          EUGENE, you are with the Name, My opinion is: + to you. Now, if I didn’t agree with you, then I wouldn’t bother myself and people
      2. Ivan.
        Ivan. 27 June 2013 13: 48 New
        0
        Quote: Corsair
        I don’t understand, "minus" or "plus"

        I had to learn math at school! laughing
    5. Ivan.
      Ivan. 27 June 2013 13: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: Averias
      Oskomin already filled.

      You need to justify the attitude to the opinion, you didn’t have it - only you got a sore point, we read about a sore point ...
      Quote: Averias
      What's new is said?

      You can say that something new will receive an order of the name "it cannot be private," everything new is either a forgotten old or a consequence of it.
      1. Averias
        Averias 27 June 2013 14: 25 New
        -2
        What was it now? This is what I wrote about you. If there is nothing to say, then why is it that the air is simply spoiled? They themselves understood what they wrote.
        I basically justified. Standard cliches were taken - “World Government”, “Phenomenon of Putin”, “LGBT”, “God” - I use any of the above, you can always write an article that will be discussed. I do not detract from the work of the author. I do not understand the very contents of the article. It has already been chewed, chewed and digested. That was all already. Just the author to try the pen, took a win-win theme. That's all.
        1. Ivan.
          Ivan. 27 June 2013 15: 01 New
          +1
          Quote: Averias
          Standard cliches are taken - “World Government”, “Phenomenon of Putin”, “LGBT”, “God” - I use any of the above, you can always write an article that will be discussed

          The foundation may be the same and the buildings are different, these topics are chewed but not chewed and will stir up water for a long time to come.
          Quote: Averias
          I do not understand the content of the article

          If they indicated that it was not clear, then they would be right, it would be the opinion and not the cliche of "soreness" on the cliche "Putin, God ..."
          Quote: Averias
          That was all already. Just the author to try the pen, took a win-win theme. That's all.

          You probably read inattentively, the author clearly wrote the “gag” from the article and it can be seen that there are interesting differences from the opinions of other people (I do not agree with everyone) and the most important person is revealed more in such large “comments” and it’s clear what he is for fruit "this is communication and not reading of uninteresting articles of which half here with comments sucked out of your fingers just to say and grab the pluses.
    6. 755962
      755962 27 June 2013 14: 05 New
      +3
      Quote: Averias
      "World government"

      And believe it or not.The first official confirmation of the cooperation of earthlings and aliens was received.


      How do you like this .. Only without hysteria!
      1. Averias
        Averias 27 June 2013 14: 36 New
        +1
        What am I? Should react somehow? Ok, here's an example:
        And in the village of Kukuyevo, they came up with nylon wires, the wires are excellent, light, cheap.
        True, they don’t transmit current - but nylon laughing
        In general, aliens (Reptilians from Tau-Kit) are sitting in the "World Government", and Prokopenko (Ren-TV) is their only whistleblower. laughing
        If you are interested (video), then for God's sake. Everyone has the right to their point of view. Denying the fact of the existence of the "Green Men" is probably stupid, but as they say - we have our own affairs, they have their own.
        1. 755962
          755962 27 June 2013 16: 24 New
          +2
          Quote: Averias
          Denying the existence of the "Green Men" is probably stupid

          Perhaps you are right .. BUT!
          THIS STATEMENT OFFICIAL PERSONS FROM THE GOVERNMENT!
  2. Son
    Son 27 June 2013 08: 12 New
    16
    I studied your opus ... Your first experience was a success. Congratulations.
    Get ready, now they will "straighten you", so to speak - to expand the experience ...
    With your conclusion: - ".. that the denouement should occur during the lifetime of the current generation of people ..", I agree. But, something sad ...
    1. baltika-18
      baltika-18 27 June 2013 09: 17 New
      +5
      Quote: Son
      I studied your opus ... Your first experience was a success. Congratulations.

      I will support.
      Quote: Son
      Get ready, now they will "level you up",

      There is no need to rhyme, it is stated briefly, but it is true. Especially the thought about the corporation "Putin and K." If you think about it, a lot of the behavior of the authorities explains.
      Well, as for the denouement, I also agree, the second half of 2014 began.
    2. Z.A.M.
      Z.A.M. 27 June 2013 10: 27 New
      +3
      Quote: Son
      Get ready, now they will "straighten you", so to speak - to expand the experience ...

      laughing
      Great, smiled.
      And so, I agree with you, the experience is successful. Thoughts are the same as you
      Quote: Son
      But, something sad ...


      Quote: baltika-18
      There’s nothing to be riddled with, it’s summarized briefly, but true. Especially the thought about Putin and Co.

      The Baltics, Hi.
    3. slvevg
      slvevg 27 June 2013 11: 02 New
      +2
      the so-called denouement occurs during the life of each generation. Decoupling the next knot on a long knitted scarf does not lead to an understanding of what is happening in the short term, and when the end is clear, nothing can be done. The article is written in my favorite style, to the author plus. The material has been generalized from various sources not claiming to be true, although its own seed has been added, and this is good, since it is possible that truth will grow from it. wink
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 27 June 2013 11: 40 New
        +5
        I will join the above.
        Only, I hope, it will be permissible to contribute my “widow's contribution”.
        I do not agree with - God, as the personification specified in the article.
        When already said, by God, by the way - ".. Caesarean - to Caesar, God's - to God ..".
        GOD, for me, at least, is a synthesis of all mankind. Maybe, including all nature, the whole Earth, the Galaxy. In esoteric terms - astral, mental, Logos, Universe.
        And if according to Professor Vernadsky - the noosphere.
        Accordingly, we ourselves, each person and society - shape the future. To the best of how we represent and see it.
        Both our sins and our spiritual impulses are all in a common cauldron. Brewed.
        Therefore, they say that God gave Man - free will.
        Therefore, they say that a fly in the ointment spoils a barrel of honey.
        ....
        Around a spoon .. of highly diluted honey - Russia - gathered ... tar tar. And skip-and-d-ara, if you recall the aggressive Wahhabism.
        Can we handle it?


        PS. well, they survived ... the word is a solvent made of wood, it is impossible to write the letter -c. Because there is a ski ... gift.
    4. 755962
      755962 27 June 2013 12: 17 New
      0
      Quote: Son
      Your first experience was a success.

      About how many wonderful discoveries
      Prepare the spirit of enlightenment
      And the experience of the son of errors difficult,
      And genius, the paradoxes friend
      And the case, god is the inventor.
    5. klimpopov
      klimpopov 27 June 2013 13: 41 New
      +5
      Indeed, it was a success, albeit nothing new but how to say it, generalization also means a lot. And here a clear line and thought is not lost. In general, the feeling that a person systematically writes articles or polishes for a very long time ... Vobschem repost from me! I read - yes, that's right! Delivered a plus article! Thanks to the author.
      I just can’t get my thoughts together to write something worthwhile, there are a lot of thoughts, but to summarize how here it does not work alas. But nothing comes to me!
    6. Ivan.
      Ivan. 27 June 2013 13: 52 New
      0
      Quote: Son
      But, something sad ...

      It is sad when the seed dies, but we must not forget that this is the beginning of the sprout's life and more attention should be paid to this!
    7. YuDDP
      YuDDP 27 June 2013 20: 22 New
      0
      Quote: Son
      the denouement must happen during the lifetime of the current generation of people

      in 2036 city
      And the author apparently receives the information ...
  3. Avenger711
    Avenger711 27 June 2013 08: 15 New
    -13
    This is clearly seen in the example of World War II. Tsarist Russia did not fit into the global project, and then funds were allocated for the revolution. To speed up the process of globalization, a "competition" was created between the "Red Project" and the "Liberal Project"


    The author should study at least the history of Russia, and then the question of some serious financing of the revolution there will disappear immediately, because the country itself has been bent.

    But those who don’t know the history of politics should not reason in principle.
    1. alex13-61
      alex13-61 27 June 2013 10: 02 New
      +3
      Quote: Avenger711
      The author at least study the story

      There are many points of view on our history ... Here is the most objective - the question ...
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 27 June 2013 11: 34 New
        -1
        Quote: alex13-61
        There are many points of view on our history ... Here is the most objective - the question ...

        But the fact is that GDP is a MANAGER! And he, as a representative of his class, is characterized by all the vices of managers.

        But Stalin IV, was not a manager? Who then "formatted" the country? Really mythical MP ?!
    2. Cartoon
      Cartoon 27 June 2013 10: 04 New
      0
      I’ll get into psychoanalysis. The author wants to think that he already knows the super secret, and therefore he himself becomes part of the "chosen ones". So many people think, who write the "real truth" about UFOs, magic, etc. All from their own powerlessness and feelings of inferiority.

      PS Those who really know at least part of the truth will never write about it.
      1. Semurg
        Semurg 27 June 2013 13: 49 New
        0
        Quote: Cartoon
        I’ll get into psychoanalysis. The author wants to think that he already knows the super secret, and therefore he himself becomes part of the "chosen ones". So many people think, who write the "real truth" about UFOs, magic, etc. All from their own powerlessness and feelings of inferiority.

        PS Those who really know at least part of the truth will never write about it.

        They will write edited in the memoirs, if you stay alive and with the money.
      2. YuDDP
        YuDDP 27 June 2013 20: 25 New
        +1
        Quote: Cartoon
        I’ll get into psychoanalysis. The author wants to think that he knows the super secret

        No need to get into psychoanalysis. The author does not "want", the author "knows" ...
    3. uhu189
      uhu189 27 June 2013 10: 39 New
      +3
      Well, then the question arises - why did it suddenly start to bend the country? Why did the food cease to be enough in the capital of an agricultural country? Where did the ubiquitous terrorists, constant rallies, unrest come from? Where did inflation come from? Just think so, of course? Probably, large-scale financing did not directly extend to the Bolsheviks, but the contribution from outside to destabilization was definitely huge.
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 27 June 2013 15: 54 New
        0
        Quote: uhu189
        Well, then the question arises - why did it suddenly start to bend the country?

        Perhaps we live in different countries? I am in Russia.
        Quote: uhu189
        Why did the food cease to be enough in the capital of an agricultural country?

        Who needs food in Russia?
        Quote: uhu189
        Where did the ubiquitous terrorists, constant rallies, unrest come from?

        Melkobritts and phasington paid from here.
        1. matross
          matross 27 June 2013 20: 38 New
          0
          You do not understand fellow ear189! smile
          He's talking about the beginning of the 20 century! Not about the present!
    4. matross
      matross 27 June 2013 20: 32 New
      0
      Quote: Avenger711
      The author should study at least the history of Russia, and then the question of some serious financing of the revolution there will disappear immediately, because the country itself has been bent.

      Bent over? Russian empire? Herself? Well, such distortions I do not even remember when I met! And the facts are weak to cite?
      And, I believe, do you also think that the Soviet Union was already "bent by itself" by the end of the 80's?
      And if, suddenly, pah-pah, the "swamp revolution" took place, would you write that "Putin's Russia is already bent"?
  4. gribnik777
    gribnik777 27 June 2013 08: 17 New
    +4
    Either GOD does not see what is happening on Earth, or this is included in his plans. We are not given to understand.

    It’s strange. What is not clear here?
    The Lord has given us freedom of choice in our affairs and is watching who is worth what.
    Everything is very simple. We must often look back at him and check his affairs with him.
  5. Denis
    Denis 27 June 2013 08: 18 New
    +8
    Firstly, with the introduction of buggers in all structures of society, its complete decomposition is achieved.
    Whether this is their main role, I don’t know, it seems to me that this problem is thought up to distract
    The French are hoarse about arguing about same-sex marriage, and Paris, not to mention the southern cities, is little different from Algeria
    Many questions arise as if by command. Remember how many crocodile tears shed by the media about the fate of children in the divorce of our citizens from foreigners. I didn’t say that or write only the lazy, now they are silent. Did the problem disappear?
    Such examples are darkness, these are hazing and the fact that drafted soldiers freeze, children adopted abroad and many, many others
    It seems that everyone will steal and forget
    I don’t know the world government, Zionists or Masons give a command, but the media yells regularly
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 27 June 2013 08: 49 New
      +8
      Whether this is their main role, I don’t know, it seems to me that this problem is thought up to distract

      Absolutely correct! And the author has this. He outlined three options (as he sees it) and I agree with him. Moreover, I consider them to be equivalent: distracting society from pressing problems at the same time to decompose and reduce it. Indeed, in fact, the decomposition of society is at the same time its distraction. Agree, if the dude is singing, is there a problem for him in the economy?
      1. O_RUS
        O_RUS 27 June 2013 11: 25 New
        +2
        Quote: Old_Kapitan
        distracting society from pressing problems at the same time to decompose and reduce it. Indeed, in fact, the decomposition of society is at the same time its distraction. Agree, if the dude is singing, is there a problem for him in the economy?


        + article and to you
  6. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 27 June 2013 08: 21 New
    12
    About managers and M.P. I agree, about Putin I agree more than not.
    But about God, you turned a little ... Rather, over MP there is V.M.P. or something else or someone else.
  7. skychnii
    skychnii 27 June 2013 08: 31 New
    +4
    I will be lenient. A set of phrases and epithets and the topic is not revealed. The feeling of "c world on a string"
  8. Kazakh
    Kazakh 27 June 2013 08: 36 New
    10
    Quote: Avenger711
    But those who don’t know the history of politics should not reason in principle.

    We are uneducated, of course, ashamed, but we want our voice to be heard. So you don’t need to go to the polls, but I don’t understand in politics, and take what they give in the store, the seller studied for it, and here you came to ignorant suitability. A man wrote his vision of the problem; if he made a mistake, correct the facts as they say he is sincere in his errors
  9. sashka
    sashka 27 June 2013 08: 38 New
    +6
    You can bet, of course. That's just corn without human participation does not grow.
    In general, God is in the Soul of each of us. They just forgot about it or beat it. From this, all the troubles come ... And Pu here is on no side.
    1. Nevsky
      Nevsky 27 June 2013 08: 40 New
      0
      Quote: Sasha
      You can bet, of course. That's just corn without human participation does not grow.


      Tore off my tongue. It is this circumstance that gives us ground for thought, and the author introduced us to these. what
      1. sashka
        sashka 27 June 2013 08: 43 New
        +1
        Quote: Nevsky
        Torn off my tongue

        Sorry .. I won’t do it anymore)) I’ll think the other way))
        1. Igarr
          Igarr 27 June 2013 12: 09 New
          -1
          Uh, uh, brothers ..
          Sasha, a fellow countryman ... end talking with such words - "... I will think in the other direction)) .."
          To the other side of the tongue ... it is known that ... We condemn, sir ..
          1. Ivan.
            Ivan. 27 June 2013 14: 09 New
            -1
            Yes, the guys made fun! laughing And someone does not understand the humor set a minus.
          2. Very old
            Very old 27 June 2013 15: 53 New
            -1
            IGOR, it would always be like this: Stanislav, SASHA. With understanding and respect = Valka =
            1. matross
              matross 27 June 2013 23: 03 New
              -1
              Quote: Old very
              Very old

              Old age can be forgiven much. Almost all. In addition to farting at the common table and senile sobs on the topic: "Introduce yourself, young man!". laughing
  10. Arthur 775
    Arthur 775 27 June 2013 08: 56 New
    +6
    Crap, of course, but interesting. He’s right, you need to think “why holes in the bread” and “who paints the carrots underground”. The information is certainly not new, but the author has the right to interpret it this way. The author has a plus!
    Write a friend, otherwise some people have got their brains rusted!
    1. cdrt
      cdrt 27 June 2013 11: 33 New
      0
      1. The author seems to have a lot of things mixed up in his head (horses, people mixed up in a bunch), though this death is not an analysis: the main signs of enemies are buggers, bosses and ZOG.
      It was already, for the first time, probably loudly voiced by German Nazis in the 1920s ...

      2. And if you think about it - gays, no weapons, no purpose. Just a sign that the time of the dominance of European Catholic (or its second half, dialectically opposing - European Protestantism) culture in Europe is drawing to a close.
      According to the purely empirical passionary approach of Gumilyov, this is exactly how it should be. The addition of Europeans - beginning to mid IX - has passed 12 centuries. Civilization is quietly dying, something remains, some attitudes are dying. There are no forces to resist the Muslim conquest.

      3. Managers are the "enemies of free humanity."
      Well, these are just complexes of an everyday loser, or a person who is oppressed by the fact that he is not engaged in what he wants.
      Managers have always been since the concentration of production a century since the sixteenth.
      Another question is that the spread of large corporations (which in large part determine the rules of the business game) leads to a completely hypertrophied size of this layer, when there are not just managers, but "managers-managers-managers ..." In other words, when a rather large stratum of people is formed who are not related to the creation of values.
      However, corporations have enlarged in pursuit of increased profits (i.e., natural selection in general).
      Perhaps the question should not be a reduction in the managerial stratum, but the fragmentation of large corporations. This will slow down technological progress, but will expand the circle of owners, increasing the opportunities for developing the human potential of entrepreneurship.

      4. Already if we talk about the "shock core" of globalization, then this is the middle class as a whole, especially its upper part, and it includes not only managers, but also average rentiers, entrepreneurs, large officials, the top of show business etc.

      5. By the way, if you analyze, then there was already one globalization - the end of the "century of love" 189X-191X. It was possible to move around the world freely, entrepreneurship was developing, there were no major wars, science and technology were developing rapidly, the well-being of all (including workers) was growing.
      How it ended - everyone knows. disaster WWII, 20 years of truce WWII.
  11. zero700
    zero700 27 June 2013 09: 04 New
    +1
    Just a man spoke out! Nothing more!
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. deman73
    deman73 27 June 2013 09: 20 New
    +7
    I do not argue, a man expressed his opinion and it is good that he has this opinion
  14. Xroft
    Xroft 27 June 2013 09: 24 New
    +8
    Well, in fact, the option is very plausible .... What are the main problems right now in the country? The dominance of liberals in power (Dvorkovichi, etc.) whom they represent for a long time has been known to everyone. And not the desire of the authorities to fight corruption (it has already been written 10000 times that it is easier to overcome it in our country than it seems, you just need to take measures that will implement it). All this fits into the concept M.P. (you can call business elites, etc. everyone will find a name) As before, there isn’t that force (leader, party, or at least a business enclave) that will unite most people and set aside their interests (namely, the interests of most citizens of their country) ... and not will be because she will never be allowed into power. Again fits into the concept. Better tell me why this does not seem to be true? in the 20 years of the country's existence, nothing has been done for the people ... why now can the Russian Federation be proud as a separate country? We all remember the USSR and love it (especially those who were born and raised in it).
    Ps. I love my country, its history and people, but I can’t stand modern power that only defends business interests and sells what was created by generations of people.
  15. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 27 June 2013 09: 34 New
    -1
    So homosexuals and managers, or homosexual managers, are to blame for everything, and apparently atheists too?
  16. Z.A.M.
    Z.A.M. 27 June 2013 09: 34 New
    12
    To the author, Vladimir (Normal) - five points per article.
    You can agree or not, but this is an opinion. And formulated and written correctly, sometimes even “smiles” (about Trotsky). "This is my first experience, except for the school essay ..." Apparently, not a bad composition was wink
    On the topic of the article.
    I won’t talk about patients, I’ll say about Putin.
    Recently, on the site, someone wrote that Putin would not have a price if he were not the president, but the foreign minister. I agree. The way he conducts a variety of - negotiations, talks, interviews, with representatives of Europe and the United States - is simply brilliance. Indeed, he looks just intellectually superior to his opponents, and even makes fun of him.
    But this is foreign policy ... This is - "external"Putin ...
    But from the inside ... Just - jo.a. Sorry, but - jo.a.
    And I agree with Vladimir - "... Putin is building a state on the principles of a corporation, and a corporation must make a profit and be competitive. Who will work in the corporation is not important. Tajik will give profit - there will be a Tajik. Russian will not profit - Russian will not. "
    WTO, all sorts of migrants (both LYAGALNYA and NYA very), continuous THRESHOLD in ALL power structures, pushing away functions Liability on municipalities and below, and LACK of any REAL responsibility to the people, for decisions made, often DUP (time translation, recertification of cops, multi-billion dollar MEGAbuildings for Olympic competitions, TV-media fooling and molestation, playing on the vile human vices, etc. etc., etc.
    And here’s the last thing that I’m just in a stupor from - I N D U L L E H E C I And to all future thieves - an amnesty for economic crimes fool The liberalization of the Criminal Code for economic crimes began under Medvedev, now it’s cooler - steal a million, proved one hundred thousand, sat down - nothing. Pay the penalty - 50, and walk further. BUT! Share ... Once again, I emphasize - it is proved that only 5-10 percent of the damage actually done.

    So I have to think about "domestic"Putin?
    "Is it in the interests of the Russian population? No!" This is a quote from the article.
    It's just a betrayal ...
    When Fundamental values: culture, morality, and yes, yes - JUSTICE, ridiculed, and replaced, you can rejoice as much as you like, and PHOEND that somewhere on the 20th floor it’s very cool and “comfortable” (a dirty word) ... But the building will collapse .

    Vladimir, author hi
    1. Hleb
      Hleb 27 June 2013 11: 02 New
      -1
      It's just a betrayal

      Do you think Putin is a traitor to the country and people?
      I understood correctly?
      1. Z.A.M.
        Z.A.M. 27 June 2013 11: 36 New
        +4
        Quote: Gleb
        I understood correctly?

        Maybe yes. Unfortunately...
        But what do you call all this differently? How?
        Replacing our Russian nation, not Russian migrants. Well, after all, how much has already been written - why should our compatriots, Belarusians, Ukrainians, why not create conditions for their arrival, life and work, citizenship, in the end, whoever wishes. Minimize all moral and material costs, with the issuance of interest-free, long-term, subsidy loans. Live, develop, give birth !!!
        This is the first.
        The second one. What about culture and education? ..
        Well, let’s, we will call it all softly and fluffy, comb, comb and blush. So what? Just change? This is the foundation of any nation. Morality, culture, traditions, respect and honor for the elderly, youth education.
        I see that sent all this far and long. Exceptions only emphasize the rule.
        You think differently about the president than me, please.
        But I do not believe it; rather, I just DO NOT TRUST him. That's all.
        I would like to fix it a long time ago and put things in order. That's what he CAN bring - I believe. And on business I look - I do not believe.
        Such a "daisy" ...
        1. Hleb
          Hleb 27 June 2013 11: 47 New
          0
          You think of the president differently than I do, please. Well, come on, we will call all this softly and fluffy, combing, blushing. So what
          Thank you. I just wanted to hear a clear answer to my question.
        2. Very old
          Very old 27 June 2013 16: 09 New
          -2
          Anton, remember: JIN cannot kill, cannot force to love, cannot force to stop loving he forgot. A year ago, he unconditionally ++. Today I am in doubt, and tomorrow ... (Z.A.Mu +)
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. aviamed90
      aviamed90 27 June 2013 15: 20 New
      0
      Z.A.M. yeah

      "Recently, someone wrote on the website that Putin would not have a price if he were not the president, but the foreign minister. I agree."

      I probably dared to suggest this. Many did not agree with me that time.

      Thanks for support!
  17. Skavron
    Skavron 27 June 2013 09: 49 New
    +7
    Good "second experience", I liked it. Put +.
    Only it seemed to me that the author clearly did not have enough space in one article, and therefore it turned out to be somewhat fettered.
    So write more.
  18. cartridge
    cartridge 27 June 2013 09: 53 New
    +4
    Putin is building a state on the principles of a corporation, and a corporation must be profitable and competitive. Who will work in the corporation is not important. Tajik will give profit - there will be a Tajik. Russian will not give profit - there will be no Russian.


    The very correct idea was formulated by the author. Bravo!
  19. Opera
    Opera 27 June 2013 09: 56 New
    +6
    There are interesting points in the article. Why do not they like blue people because many were sitting ?!
    Managers are celestials! The medicine is rotation!
    Sorry, author, but everything is simplified to 9 children's blocks. I folded it up and got a picture. A little thought I turned it over and it turned out another!
    It makes no sense to think about it for a long time. I’ll just say - maybe they don’t like blue people because it is a sin and it’s disgusting, not because of the “higher” or even several formations received in the zones ?! And rotation (regular) has not only positive, but also no less significant negative sides!
    Everything is much more complicated.
    1. alex13-61
      alex13-61 27 June 2013 10: 10 New
      +3
      Quote: Oper
      Sorry, author, but everything is simplified to 9 children's blocks.

      Brevity is the soul of wit...
      But you and the author of the article are a plus.
    2. O_RUS
      O_RUS 27 June 2013 11: 32 New
      +3
      Quote: Oper
      Sorry, author, but everything is simplified to 9 children's blocks. I folded it up and got a picture. A little thought I turned it over and it turned out another!


      opera wrote wrote and wrote
      Quote: Oper
      Everything is much more complicated.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 27 June 2013 12: 14 New
        +1
        Concise - ++ !!
        1. Ivan.
          Ivan. 27 June 2013 14: 24 New
          0
          All four are good! And from both Igor I will wait for their thoughts in the article.
  20. Opera
    Opera 27 June 2013 10: 08 New
    +3
    Quote: cartridge
    Tajik will give profit - there will be a Tajik. Russian will not give profit - there will be no Russian.

    Tajik will give profit - great!
    Russian does not give profit - he is busy, defends his homeland!
    There will be no Russian - there is no subject for conversation and no one to talk, and there is nothing to write articles about!
  21. Vtel
    Vtel 27 June 2013 10: 19 New
    -2
    Religion is just one of the degrees of mass control.

    Let me disagree.
    "The good answer is the whole Old Testament story of the Jewish people, who disobeyed God many times. Such disobedience would not have been possible if religion were an instrument of government and not a personal connection with the Living God." Archpriest Michael Samokhin.
    1. ed65b
      ed65b 27 June 2013 12: 16 New
      -1
      Yes, just such a breed of Jews, stub FIG what prove? therefore the Lord suffered with them.
      1. Gato
        Gato 27 June 2013 15: 07 New
        0
        Yes! He would have turned something heavy on top - and it’s easier for Him, and it would be easier for us. True, more boring - you can not argue with the professor.
  22. Opera
    Opera 27 June 2013 10: 23 New
    +1
    On castes (if you can call it that) - there are nations participating in various historical events to one degree or another.
    There are nations writing history (they don’t add or rewrite something).
    There are nations doing this story! The more united the nation (caste) is making history, the better we will live! Turning to the end of the article, I think that this is precisely what is included in HIS plans!
    As for the denouement ... So the end is always the beginning of a new one!
    1. Skavron
      Skavron 27 June 2013 10: 37 New
      +2
      Quote: Oper
      So the end is always the beginning of a new

      the main thing is not to meet this "new" with batons and dressed in skins
      1. Gato
        Gato 27 June 2013 15: 09 New
        0
        Quote: Skavron
        the main thing is not to meet this "new" with batons and dressed in skins

        And not with fins or tentacles (if this, of course, is not included in the plans)
  23. sasha.28blaga
    sasha.28blaga 27 June 2013 10: 38 New
    0
    The manager believes that he has the right to control human fate at his discretion.
    Who will work in the corporation is not important. Tajik will give profit - there will be a Tajik. Russian will not give profit - there will be no Russian.
    In order not to argue who will make a profit, and who will not make a profit, who will and who will not, we must give birth to our own kind (I won’t say exactly who would not indicate nationalism). Any business executive will not look at nationality when hiring, but will look primarily at the dedication and the price of this dedication, and we lose to that in all respects to the Tajiks. Many believe that labor migrants take away work from the local population. Honestly, I did not see the kind of work that migrants would take. Moreover, if we compare the cost of goods, work, services provided by migrants with local suppliers, then the difference is noticeable. A good manager, he is also a manager in Africa.
    Some conclusions in the article are very correct.
  24. Asgard
    Asgard 27 June 2013 10: 43 New
    +6
    With an initiative ....and the comments as a whole are on your side ....
    FEELINGS TRUE. You need to trust yourself and listen to others, but believe in your heart, what is "tormenting" inside you and says nothing ......
    They put torment on the "words" as they could ??? Yes!!!!! and did the right thing, the more of such PEOPLE-WITH THE RIGHT FEELING OF LIFE, the better to the People .... (the land where you live, the Planet)))
    I agree about Vova, he is trying to buy a place in the MP or, as a last resort, wash glasses after their feasts ....
    By sale Rosneft - a deal where the Rothschilds (BP corporation)) gave away 20% of the shares, paid off money inappropriately, and made Dudley the director of the State Corporation (foreign citizen))) with Rosneft giving the "fat" fields without auction ....... ....
    Vova -em Already registered the fate of Muamer, he also "was friends" with the Westerners (Naglosaks))
    so that we "write it off", he did nothing "good" to the Russian people, so individual citizens — Abramovich, Vasilyev, Serdyukov, Timchenko, Kovalchuk and many more with non-Russian surnames — Balloev, Vekselberg, BerLazar, Rotenbergs .... could I would like to thank him, but They’ve vryatli .... they’ll betray him soon, so they called Abramovich to the FBI (he said something))) they released him (for now))))

    I liked about lesbians)))
    I don’t write about blueness in principle and urge the forum users to follow my example .....
    The guy writes correctly -This is a topic for distraction (no longer for what)) but what "such" are in power ... Do you judge who is easier to manage? Guys or "these"?
    Therefore, we have a Duma with a frantic printer, because there "is no place for discussion" I remember how Gryzlov (being a shuttle)) drove to Petrozavodsk Skis from Finland in some kind of purple puffer jacket, rode in the same carriage))))

    Therefore, we have "laws" stupid and only providing for punishment ...and the conditions for FAVORABLE development should be spelled out ....

    I read almost all articles, comments are interesting, I learn a lot of new things, rarely comment, guys are offended, I write incomprehensibly))))
    well, if you get a grasp of it (without missing punctuation marks)), you will always understand the "deep" meaning written in Russian letters ...
    and you’ll not quite understand, if you DO NOT THINK IN RUSSIAN (his Images))

    For MP, there’s definitely “someone”, since there are “degenerates” (Rockefellers, Rothschild,
    1. Asgard
      Asgard 27 June 2013 11: 17 New
      +8
      How I began to write serious things "cut" comments)))
      Fishing

      Behind the MP, there is definitely someone "there" because degenerates (Baruchs, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Watburgs,))) could not pursue a focused policy for so many generations ...
      "essence" holds "pedro-families" tightly for intimacy and forces the WORLD to go according to a degenerate scenario ...
      By the way, and you can regret them- They are the last to destroy ....
      So there is little hope for the “rulers", or rather, her ....
      But there is a "force"which sank container ship, spent a lot of "work"
      Stalin gave us two centuries .... odds ...
      So HOPE E C T ))))
      we must remember - we are the gods ....
      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 27 June 2013 19: 24 New
        +1
        Quote: Asgard
        we must remember - we are the gods ....

        Not yet.....
        But there is not much time left .....
    2. Z.A.M.
      Z.A.M. 27 June 2013 12: 12 New
      +5
      Quote: Asgard
      I don’t write about blueness in principle and urge the forum users to follow my example .....

      Greetings. Similarly.
      Quote: Asgard
      rarely comment, guys are offended, I write incomprehensibly))))

      It's you, my friend, in vain. wink Very clear, because
      Quote: Asgard
      well, if you get a grasp of it (without missing punctuation marks)), you will always understand the "deep" meaning written in Russian letters ...

      Too bad it’s rare.
      I personally read your comments with interest. I agree in many ways.
  25. de_monSher
    de_monSher 27 June 2013 10: 45 New
    0
    Auto RU

    Who gave the person the first knowledge. Who created through genetic engineering cultivars of cereals that appeared some 10 years ago.


    = Sigh = ... respected author. Peremptory, sister of ignorance, and cousin - of unprincipledness. Well, why ... why, spoil an article in the style of "conspiracy theory" elite "", an insert from the "conspiracy theory of the gods"? Oil can no longer be oily ... but Occam's razor, in theory, is always at hand ... unless, of course, you want and know how to use it ...
    1. maxvik
      maxvik 27 June 2013 11: 51 New
      0
      Occam's double-edged razor wink
    2. ed65b
      ed65b 27 June 2013 12: 12 New
      -1
      About the conspiracy of the gods - E.P. Blavatsky wrote about this in a secret doctrine.
  26. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 27 June 2013 10: 50 New
    +7
    Most importantly, the article made us think, generalize, compare and draw conclusions ...
    That's why we thinkers hi
    1. de_monSher
      de_monSher 27 June 2013 11: 51 New
      +5
      Ex ... If this was an article - "brainstorming", then too few options are considered and discarded. Why is accepted as an axiom "the informal leader of the Red Project - Trotsky"? Trotsky is a buffoon. He lived like a jester, and died like a clown. He only behaved as a more or less a person when he was obsessed with a lame-footed artist, a Mexican (at least he struck a woman, beautifully, before he died). All the rest of his actions are actions of a clown. Dangerous clown, yes. But dangerous in its stupidity. His whole "philosophical" system, a worthless egg is not worth it. Simple passable figure. Such people as Frunze, Dzerzhinsky, and even the same Tukhachevsky, were much more likely, according to the logic of the author, to be the "banner" of the Revolution.

      Next - the postulate of "managers", I personally do not like, for one reason. The author, and himself and me, and all of you, calmly, defines the herd. Do you need it? Do you want to be sheep with "shepherds", even in mental calculations? Or, the weight of one maaalenko radical in the system of equations, called human society, must be considered not as a statistical error, but as e-mail, a fundamental constant? Only if people perceive themselves as a herd do they become them. Otherwise, there is still such a weight as the inertia of the system.

      Farther. Let's move on to these ... “Rainbow” dudes and dudes, and tipsters stuck between them. The author again shies away from brainstorming, and the most obvious thing is not postulated. Why not consider this option - for the support of this pink-blue fraternity and sister, x-a-r-and biotechnological transports are looming. They, under the banner of supporting these and-d-and-o-t-o-v, quietly so drag the possibility of industrial reproduction of the population (after all, for same-sex couples SHOULD BE EQUAL RIGHTS!) And that's it ... here's the new slave-owning system, solving human resources problems, etc. etc.

      And then ... you can, brainstorm ... and China to consider from all sides, its main problem, such as an attempt to cross a hedgehog already - communism with corporate fascism, and the HUGE problem that it still faces because of of this ...

      Ex ... well, let's ... brainstorm if you make an application for it - Author.
      1. Sashkessss
        Sashkessss 27 June 2013 13: 43 New
        +1
        I liked the fact that you began to renew his thoughts in a very interesting rut. Especially about the rainbow - I did not even think much about this topic. Thank you, gave the material for discussion.
        In general, it was then possible to create separate topics in which opinions were gathered in this way and try to overlap them. As a result, a very interesting mosaic wink
  27. pensioner
    pensioner 27 June 2013 11: 28 New
    +2
    I don’t know ... You can talk about the “World Government” with the same knowledge of the matter as about the anatomy of the Martians. Nobody saw either one or the other and did not touch his hands ... Maybe, nevertheless, closer to life? To real. The same is enough. But I didn’t understand anything about the "degree of mass control." What's this? Or: "What?".
    I didn’t like the article ... But the cons-pluses will be delivered without me ...
  28. Yura
    Yura 27 June 2013 11: 37 New
    +1
    Vladimir Normal has a normal article, perhaps there is one point with which I don’t agree that this concerns our president; in my opinion, he doesn’t have many options to achieve his goals. And so in the article the author’s position is close to most of us, my thoughts are stated briefly and without water, the article is my unequivocal approval and plus. Eh .., to know more "What to do"?
  29. maxvik
    maxvik 27 June 2013 11: 47 New
    -1
    The article is good.
    Somewhere in the interpretation of the apocalypse from Daniel Sysoev it is said:
    It doesn’t matter if there is a conspiracy of Freemasons, there is a world government or something like that, or none of this exists, but there is a “Holy Trinity conspiracy” and what it can be read by those who wish.
  30. ed65b
    ed65b 27 June 2013 12: 10 New
    0
    The article set a plus for the original vision. I can not agree with the author about the GDP. there is such an ancient well-known surname of the Rothschilds. so these old men sitting in London set the world gold rate. Bright representative of the World Government. What was the "charm" of the iron curtain - in self-sufficiency. One can argue hoarsely about the role of the party in the destruction of the USSR and external factors. however, we must remember that only during Stalin there was a constant decrease in prices for goods and products. after no. In general, there is something to think about and talk about, just talk and not swear. The nightmare for the West was the transformation of Russia after the collapse of the USSR into the Russia Corporation. there are CIA materials and reports about this. Maybe our president is growing this corporation. With gigantic resources and influence through them on the world order.
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 27 June 2013 13: 46 New
      +1
      Quote: ed65b
      What was the "charm" of the iron curtain - in self-sufficiency.

      So Yes. But to leave because of him would still have to. Question: "For what?" In order to become part of the world "on the other side"? Or, perhaps, in order to change the world order? Even in a historical perspective. I hope that for the sake of 2nd Russia came out from behind the curtain. It’s a pity that during our lifetime ...
  31. Sashkessss
    Sashkessss 27 June 2013 12: 17 New
    0
    I would like to explain my minus ... The author is undoubtedly very honored and respected that he decided to write this article and expressed his opinion on his vision of the world at the moment, at the moment. But alas, I do not agree with the author ...
    Firstly, I will not start from the beginning, but from the end. Religion, that’s what the author touched on at the end. You can consider me a reptile, a creature, a freak - but I am a mature and adequate atheist, I do not believe in such religious nonsense. For me, all religion is like a store. Here is Christianity - It is like MacDuck, the most basic. And then there are competing fast-food restaurants. "Come to us and get a place in heaven." It has long been known that there is no one there and that if something would have happened, then it would have long thrown everyone into lyuli for our behavior.
    You must believe in yourself, and not in some bearded man who sits in heaven and makes your fate.
    Secondly, V.V. Putin was affected. I am not a fan of him, I am not some kind of politician. I have no weight at all. But I just remember how people usually express dissatisfaction with the current government ... by writing "Putin Loch" or the like on a social network, you will not achieve anything with this. Bottom line - your words fly to the wind, without any facts and arguments. Sorry, but I believe that you dragged him by the ears to a topic for which all this opinion was created. If many people like your vision of the government, it’s better to express it openly,
    And here I go already to the main and most delicious - World Domination. I apologize, again, to the author, but this is definitely nonsense. World conspiracies are the same justification for all our problems, like the curse of the Lord or the influence of aliens on our politicians ... All our problems come from what is happening in our heads. We ourselves create our own headaches, and then, to make it easier, we throw everything away to someone who really can’t even throw a hat at us, not to punish him. And why? Because he is not.
    Again, I apologize that I expressed my opinion on your opinion in your topic. I hope that this text will not be deleted simply because many people don’t like it.
    1. de_monSher
      de_monSher 27 June 2013 12: 25 New
      -3
      Here is Christianity - It is like MacDuck, the most basic. And then there are competing fast-food restaurants. "Come to us and get a place in heaven."


      You have a very utilitarian perception of such a section of human philosophy as Faith. It comes to the grotesque, already by the fact that you are trying to consider only its miserable part - religion. Let’s say, let’s conduct a thought experiment - throw out of you, your Faith, “religion”, atheism ... what remains of you? I think only an amoeba-like something, only without pseudopods.

      And you reduce everything to ducks ...
      1. Sashkessss
        Sashkessss 27 June 2013 12: 38 New
        0
        Sorry, I continue to believe in atheism. But I believe, as I said, not in God, not in religion. I believe in my own strengths and know what I can and what I want. You do not confuse the concept, please.
        1. de_monSher
          de_monSher 27 June 2013 12: 46 New
          -2
          I believe in my own strength and know


          Forgive me, I’m not sorry. Your faith in yourself is as irrational as the belief of some Irishman in the Holy Trinity, a Bedouin in Allah, or a dude from Burkina Faso - in the spirits of ancestors. You cannot justify YOUR Belief in yourself. Who you are? The toy is in your hands, in the hands of Nature, whatever its nature may be, or you are in your own eyes, "Bogatyr-Winner-All-Elements-Ukrotit

          spruce-All-Violent-Neighbors ", etc. etc. In Believing in yourself, you immediately enlist in the regiment of ALL believers, in all gods, demigods and spirits. If this is simplified, consider ... In this and there is the grotesque nature of your position - you are trying to rationalize others, being completely irrational in essence ... *) Explained?
          1. Sashkessss
            Sashkessss 27 June 2013 12: 53 New
            +2
            Ahem. Do you want to equate reality with fantasies in this way? So you want to say that I am an incorporeal spirit, since I believe in myself? I apologize for the umpteenth time, but I can consciously say that I exist, and here I am, I write you the answer, scribbling on the keyboard. I do not see myself as either a “Bogatyr” or a toy in the hands of nature, as you put it. I see myself as an ordinary person who has what he has gained through his labor. No more and no less. My conceit did not grow to the state of "I am God and niipet." I just know that neither bearded uncles from heaven nor dudes with horns from under the ground helped me in my efforts.
            1. de_monSher
              de_monSher 27 June 2013 12: 58 New
              -1
              No ... I didn’t want to reduce everything to banal idealism, and even more so to solipsism ... well, I couldn’t explain it ... sorry, I will take my words back ... further if I argue, it will already be a banal flood .

              Sorry if I offended with anything, I didn’t want a gram ... *)

              PS:

              I just know that neither bearded uncles from heaven nor dudes with horns from under the ground helped me in my efforts.


              And yet, I talked about this - you are trying to concentrate on the MYTH, in any form ... and you lose sight of the harmonious logical system that gives us the power to live, in fact ... *)
              1. Sashkessss
                Sashkessss 27 June 2013 13: 32 New
                +1
                I also ask you to forgive me if I hurt the feelings of a believer. I never pointed out to anyone what and how to believe people. I just expressed my opinion according to the author, which he wrote. He can remain with his opinion, I do not impose my own. And yes, I apologize for the last time, but ...
                Quote: de_monSher
                And yet, I talked about this - you are trying to concentrate on the MYTH, in any form ... and you lose sight of the harmonious logical system that gives us the power to live, in fact ... *)

                In our world of vanity, just religion has the last place according to Faith. To be more precise - she is alpha and omega in this place, she is a monopolist. How much has happened just because of religion ... These are terrible things, but they happened. Therefore, I rely on the myths that you have indicated.
                And another reason for the disagreement, most likely because we did not fully understand each other, I would like to hear your opinion about Vera, and what else is there besides religion.
                1. de_monSher
                  de_monSher 27 June 2013 13: 47 New
                  0
                  Everything is OK ... *) Only I misled you ... I am not a religious person, if by the word "believer" you still mean exactly that ... *) I just know that Vera, this is what what makes us Humans ... *)) Even ... even ... okay - to the victory of true Communism around the world (although - I would like to ... *)))) At least, the belief that in the evening at least a little the heat will subside ... *))) is also an irrational feeling and desire ... *))))

                  Now, in essence of your question ... *) Without Faith, nobody is a person ... and Faith can take the most unexpected forms ... thank God, most often, the postulates of any Faith are dictated by the Socium ... a person, as a social being, accepts exactly the Faith that does not harm the Socium ... *) when the opposite happens, it leads to the wildest distortions ... *) A person, or a group of people manipulating the Socium, is that same disgust we are living in, and which became a cancer on the body of mankind ... *)

                  Now, I will try to give a little justification for my words. You, a person belonging to the Christian subsocium ... So? You put Christianity in the first place, in your first logical constructions. And will you still say that you are, at least a little, not a Christian? *))))

                  But have you ever noticed that I, a person, as it were, belonging to the Muslim sub-society? *))) = even though I have a lot of But, allowing me to say that the person of the Soviet subsocium = ... *)))

                  That's something like this ... Sorry, I have to run a shas. I won’t be there for three hours ... *) Good luck ... *)
                  1. Sashkessss
                    Sashkessss 27 June 2013 13: 52 New
                    0
                    I cited Christianity as an example, since in our country it is the main one - Orthodoxy. I perfectly understood your idea about Faith, but alas, it seemed to me that this was Desire. And as for the manipulation of the Socium, I agree with you on 200 percent and now I am sure that I was not mistaken about my thoughts. It's nice that I found such a good conversationalist. Thank you for the dispute.
                    1. de_monSher
                      de_monSher 27 June 2013 13: 57 New
                      0
                      = Running away =

                      The main difference between Desire and Faith, the RATIONALITY of the first and the complete IRRATION of the latter ... *) This is philosophy, the first course ... *)

                      Thank you too... *)

                      = Ran away =
    2. Z.A.M.
      Z.A.M. 27 June 2013 12: 48 New
      0
      Sashkessss
      The article is a plus, the author a plus. And you - plus. I read it - I thought. This is not bad. Different opinions, different approach. Interesting.
      hi
    3. Forward
      Forward 27 June 2013 15: 06 New
      +3
      Religion and Faith are two different things !!!! I will say more, having little in common with each other.
      1. aviamed90
        aviamed90 27 June 2013 15: 24 New
        0
        Forward

        You probably wanted to say "FAITH and CHURCH"?
        1. Forward
          Forward 27 June 2013 15: 44 New
          +1
          Yes exactly . Sorry, wrong!
    4. YuDDP
      YuDDP 27 June 2013 20: 38 New
      +1
      Quote: Sashkessss
      It has long been known that no one is there

      On the contrary, it has long been known that there is someone (something) there ...
      And churches are "business" like that
  32. 128mgb
    128mgb 27 June 2013 12: 40 New
    -2
    The first pancake is lumpy. Try next. Just do not next time interfere with God's gift with fried eggs.
    1. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 27 June 2013 14: 11 New
      -3
      As you say, “God's gift” is probably the only guideline in the modern world for which it’s not scary to take a course being sure that it is the right course. Not one other idea, be it lebralism or something else like pederasty, they do not excite me, somewhere in my gut I feel that the track is not there. And sometimes you read a chapter from the Gospel, so immediately and calmly, and you want to live (and not exist)
  33. ed65b
    ed65b 27 June 2013 13: 33 New
    -2
    No, there is still someone above us, providence if you will. After the accident, I had an operation for 3 hours that was barely pumped out, and right after the operation in the corridor (the wards were busy), a “thought” or “someone said” got up in my head (as it were to say correctly) Get up and go pee. If you manage, you will survive. and I groaned (but it really hurt) finding some kind of crutches hobbled to the toilet. I did the job and believe how the dog started to heal everything not instantly, of course, but after 3 months when the plaster was removed, the hand moved (and it was torn off, sewn back. The Uzbek surgeon is ready to kiss his legs so far) After this incident, something turned in me in the shower , I ceased to be an atheist.
  34. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 27 June 2013 13: 47 New
    -1
    Minus. I’m sorry ... The author claims to analyze the ongoing processes, and immediately at the global level. You can’t refuse courage smile Other qualities ... Managers are to blame for all troubles. And the red ones ?! Isn't the redheads to blame? I see such a redhead on television .... Having made a marvelous conclusion that requires our civilization to urgently begin mass executions (because we don’t need managers, they are enemies. I sincerely ask the author, let me show you how to conduct work WITHOUT managers) takes the next gigantic step - announces the manager ... of the KGB colonel.
    As I understand it, there are a number of colonels among visitors to the site. And my heart is telling me that the author would have received a quick and very informal rebuff, had he tried to announce them all as "managers" in his understanding of this word. Because who are the managers according to his vision? These are people who do not understand what they are doing, being seduced by yachts and silicone boobs. And they are engaged in the destruction of no less than their own food supply and the environment!
    Moreover (the author somehow overlooked this, blinded by the beauty of his idea) these are people who are engaged in organizing and managing large masses of people and resources. To assume in such people a tendency to suicidal acts ... In general, I wish the author to work sometime in a modest leadership position. So that he would have at least six people and at least fifty thousand accountable under his command. After that, I would love to see the author’s reaction after reading this article ...
  35. Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 27 June 2013 14: 08 New
    +1
    Article PLUS! I also recently wrote that a tendency has appeared on the site to express my thoughts and words. And it doesn’t matter that the articles are written not grammatically, not skillfully. Another thing is important, people are starting to wake up, they are already starting to see what is happening around them, they are starting to express their opinions.
    In fact, this is a very important signal for everyone, we passed the point of no return when people were simply silent. Now people start talking, expressing their disagreement not only with economic, political, etc. events, but also moral. Over time, this will only increase, and then another important stage will occur, people will begin to unite to fight the modern world order in the entire depth of the meaning of the word. It's time to understand that people are tired of this valuable world and they began to ripen in order to change it.
  36. Severok
    Severok 27 June 2013 14: 09 New
    +3
    Plus for the opinion ... It’s a pity that some still don’t understand how important it is to have YOUR opinion ... Many still don’t understand how difficult it is to express YOUR opinion simply and easily, plus the author for trying to express himself, chaotically and awkwardly - but this is his OPINION.
  37. sanych your division
    sanych your division 27 June 2013 14: 22 New
    -2
    in diversity is the beauty of this world! God created the multitude and varieties of living organisms as a beautiful stained glass window where every shade of every color gives the beauty and perfection of everything in common. and to erase the differences between nations, the difference between men and women means to gloss over the monochromatic paint with the result of the creation of the Creator. arguing about atheism is stupid. the truth is around you. we, like blind kittens, do not see and do not understand that the world that surrounds us is the main evidence of the presence of God! but what we do with this world is our fault ...
  38. dropout
    dropout 27 June 2013 14: 53 New
    0
    For the first experiment it’s very good. But for some reason it seems to me that a heading should be put a question mark. For the theme of GOD is very ambiguous. And yet, if you have chosen for yourself the role of an “evil satyr”, then you need more sarcasm and even something of cynicism. And so +.
  39. Dymkovsky
    Dymkovsky 27 June 2013 14: 57 New
    0
    It’s bad when you don’t have an opinion, a vision of the environment, it’s good when it is! Author plus, dashing trouble beginning!
  40. aviamed90
    aviamed90 27 June 2013 15: 12 New
    -1
    To the author of the article, Vladimir Normal - a normal article!

    The experience of the Soviet school in writing essays did not disappoint! Article - "+"! Although - you can argue in some points.
  41. Grigorich 1962
    Grigorich 1962 27 June 2013 15: 41 New
    0
    Dear author! Read VEDA, everything is said beforehand what and how .... and also why .... now comes the age of Kale, which is characterized by all of the above vices and people have ceased to understand and distinguish evil from good. Life on earth does not just happen ..... everything is much deeper than you imagine and are trying to present in this article. But your desire is welcome ..... now the main thing remains - to get new knowledge ..... but they are. Read the Vedas and many things happening on this sinful earth will become more clear to you.
    1. Gato
      Gato 27 June 2013 17: 43 New
      0
      Read the VEDA, everything is said beforehand what and how .... and also why .... now is the age of Calais

      Yes, we read about the Kali-yuga, and about the Mayan calendars we read, and we read the election programs, and much more. If you wish, you can fit anything you want under all these predictions - from the war in Syria to the plot of the soap series.
      Believe everything - there isn’t enough verification.
  42. fisherman
    fisherman 27 June 2013 15: 59 New
    +1
    most admired comments, re-read them with pleasure :)

    I didn’t put a plus article, I consider it incomplete

    there are many tendencies in the world, when considering general social trends, one must still remember not only those that are heard (which most often purr on the TV), but also about the forgotten

    enough has been said about globalization

    look on the Internet for the meaning of the word “differentiation” (since the wisdom is higher than the roof, then stop only for diff in sociology, for diff in biology, for diff in language)

    as regards language differentiation (Polish dialects are an example), here's what I found on the Internet:

    "Greater Poland, non-Kashubian, Silesian and Lesser Poland, Mazovian."

    words such as Differentiation, Dialect, Dari (and this language has also undergone differentiation) in BES are next to each other, very convenient

    so: these two big trends (globalization and differentiation) have been successfully opposing each other for thousands of years, something like a swing, and maybe something like a big perpetual motion machine, if we start from the title of the article :)
  43. gabatikuk
    gabatikuk 27 June 2013 18: 15 New
    +1
    that GDP says everywhere (and not only says, but is actively working on it) about the integration of the Russian economy into the global economic system. Is it in the interests of the Russian population? Not! This is in the interests of the managerial class and, therefore, in the interests of M.P.

    Here I do not agree with the author: Integration is in the interests of any country, because for the interest they integrate countries, for the development of economic relations, for business development. hi
    The fact that the GDP pulled the country out of the deep pit is obvious, only the blind can not see.
  44. Normal
    27 June 2013 19: 27 New
    +3
    Greetings! Thanks to everyone who spoke out.
    I confess that I am very, very surprised. Pleasantly surprised. Counted on 30-50 comments. Reality exceeds all expectations.
    When there were not many posts, I thought that I would answer everyone whose comment will catch me or just like me.
    Alas, there is no way to personally answer even half of the participants in the discussion. My average daily norm is 3-5 posts, and the article "lives" on the site for 2-3 days.
    But I will try to answer you and take into account your wishes in the next article, which I hope to publish in the coming days. It will be a logical continuation of this article and under a similar heading (well, unless of course the administration skips). I’ll try to reveal the topic more fully and more clearly formulate my thoughts.
    Once again, thank you all for your attention.
    Heartfelt gratitude for participation and kind words
    Anton, nickname Z.A.M.,
    Eugene, nickname 755962,
    Vitaliy, nickname seller trucks
    (I didn’t read Colemit 300 of Coleman)lol,
    matrossy
    Igor, nickname Igarr,
    Ivan, nickname Ivan
    Dmitriciu, nickname Sonny
    Unlatch - I’ll be so good laughing
    Nikolay baltika-18,
    Klimu klimpopov,
    Valery Old_kapitan,
    Alexander Kazakh,
    Skavronu
    definitely noticed, I’ll definitely write.
    Ivan’s nickname is a cartridge,
    To Vladimir Asgard,
    Sergey Bashkaus,
    Max Severok,
    aviamed90
    Putin's Foreign Minister good or to the Ministry of Foreign Trade (no? -create!)
    Sergey Grigorich I read, the truth is not enough ...

    My regards Ascetic for an authoritative, as always well-grounded opinion, for a monumental, I would say, comment.

    Thanks to all the critics of the article. Thanks to your comments, I will write better.

    All the best.
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 28 June 2013 04: 14 New
      +2
      Quote: Normal
      With an initiative! drinks

      Although, as it seems to me, the article turned out to be somewhat ambiguous and superficial, the direction of thought, in my opinion, is absolutely correct.

      In this regard, I allow myself to offer you material on the topic: "Armageddon tomorrow: a textbook for those who want to survive" Authors: D. Kalyuzhny and S. Valyansky. (this material is a socio-psychological analysis, it has nothing to do with religion, it’s on the network. It’s convenient to read online on the website "PointEye of the planet ").


      I also want to express myself separately on factor X: it seems to me that it makes sense to think about what is more likely to be a paleocontact of a long period (knowledge needs to be trained and consolidated in tradition), or else a branch of an ancient earth civilization that managed to save itself to this day.
      In this regard, in my opinion, a small book by David Naydis will be interesting "Bible truth"written in the manner of banter and representing an analysis of biblical inconsistencies (available on the net).

      I wish you good luck and every success. hi
    2. Sashkessss
      Sashkessss 28 June 2013 09: 29 New
      0
      I would like to tell you a special thank you, you prompted me to create something similar and put it into opinions. It’s unpleasant for me to realize that our opinions are the opposite. But I think that in a competent debate, any truce is possible, leaving this opinion to myself.
  45. Ruslan67
    Ruslan67 28 June 2013 05: 52 New
    +2
    Volodya + hi Especially I write without answering all posts This is the case when we are all distracted from something more serious request To give the genetic disease as normal and at the same time provoke that part of sick people who suffer, in addition, from psycho-diseases for some kind of active actions, this is in the best traditions of Anglo-Saxon fascism There are many people who understand that this is a disease and bear their cross But the problem is that at the right time, those who started this to attract the votes of the voters and create a fundamentally new industry will do so that everyone who has never even gone to this gathering and to the geyclubs will fall under the general knock And you know, in this case I can’t say for sure whose side I will stand There is a difference between hammering a humanoid bat on a leash and in the skin and the person who was born so by mistake of nature or because of the predisposition of the parents
    1. Ruslan67
      Ruslan67 28 June 2013 05: 58 New
      +2
      So it happened request We can’t keep silent both belay
  46. Bort radist
    Bort radist 28 June 2013 06: 20 New
    0
    "Grandfather stole the icon" - I heard the news on the radio, in our Kemerovo region. Grandfather was caught, the icon was taken away. It threatens to 10 years !!! And for five and a half for the theft dozens of millions from the state treasury. It doesn't fit in my head.
    1. Yarosvet
      Yarosvet 28 June 2013 09: 05 New
      -2
      Quote: Bort Radist
      "Grandfather stole the icon" - I heard the news on the radio, in our Kemerovo region. Grandfather was caught, the icon was taken away. It threatens to 10 years !!! And for five and a half for the theft dozens of millions from the state treasury. It doesn't fit in my head.
      1. Setrac
        Setrac 28 June 2013 13: 10 New
        +1
        If she is a pregnant mother of four children, then the law is not written to her?
        1. Yarosvet
          Yarosvet 28 June 2013 20: 58 New
          +2
          Sergei, the law was written to her, of course, and I personally am against any deferrals, but since such a norm exists, Kruglova had much more reasons for deferring punishment than Shavenkova (by the way - the deferral after the appeal was still granted).

          Here is another option for comparison: she was charged with fraud for 16 million rubles, and her uncle is lower ...

          Look at the amount and the sentence yourself.
  47. Lukich
    Lukich 28 June 2013 10: 24 New
    +1
    Quote: Averias
    World Government, The Phenomenon of Putin, Globalization, LGBT, and finally God. Yes, we read it, read it. What's new is said? Oskomin already filled. This is written by all and sundry.


    ... no, it’s necessary to put “great hopes” on everything and go to the theaters and listen to the birds singing ... and there’s even a flood !!!
  48. Lukich
    Lukich 28 June 2013 13: 51 New
    0
    ... interesting thoughts aloud - you are definitely normal ??? ... I think you can agree with you, I put a plus ...

    Averias u set a minus - it blurs the article ... (there is such a method of discrediting)
  49. radio operator
    radio operator 18 July 2013 13: 23 New
    0
    ... humiliated, defeated in rights, incapable of resistance and reproduction by outcasts. Caste! Caste is strong in its cohesion, common interests and goals. The untouchable caste will always oppose traditional society and the state. Will always be on the side of M.P., since only M.P. promotes and protects this caste.

    It’s hard not to agree. Of course "+".
    Especially in the context of Divine providence. Here it is even more simplified: the MP is the nest of anti-christ, as soon as it crushes the whole world under itself, then everything will end. Academician Moiseev says that this will happen in the middle of the 21 century.
    Well, wait and see. We can also influence the situation. We will fight.