Vladimir Putin: Russian helicopters surpass foreign analogues

51
In the first half of 2013, shipments of domestic armaments and military equipment for export grew by almost 15%. This was announced today by Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting of the commission on military-technical cooperation between Russia and foreign countries.

“As for the first results of the current year, they once again confirm that the external relations of Russia through the MTC continue to strengthen,” Putin said.

According to the head of state, it is necessary to keep up the momentum. This requires a more active military-technical cooperation policy, aimed at the constant increase of the competitiveness of Russian export offers.

The President recalled that the growth in orders for high-tech defense products is extremely important for the Russian economy as a whole, as it is the source of a large number of jobs.

Over the past three years, Russian manufacturers of military equipment have received from the state budget 27 billion rubles in subsidies.

Today, domestic weapons are supplied to 66 countries of the world, and agreements on military-technical cooperation have been concluded with 88 states.
“A separate topic on today's agenda concerns the supply of Russian helicopters. Here we have formed a fairly solid package of orders. The reserve is good: about 9 thousands of Russian machines are already being used today in more than 100 countries of the world, ”Putin said.

According to the head of state, “domestic helicopters outnumber most foreign analogues in technical and combat capabilities, reliability and ease of control, and also benefit from price competition.”

The President stressed that the irreplaceability of domestic aircrafts was also recognized by the representatives of NATO.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -9
    25 June 2013 09: 59
    As a matter of fact, yes, but in quantity And in quality when will they exceed, and GDP ????
    1. -14
      25 June 2013 11: 09
      Quote: avant-garde
      Vladimir Putin: Russian helicopters surpass foreign analogues

      did he finally understand that?
      but he is not involved in this!
      this is all the SOVIET legacy.
      1. +15
        25 June 2013 12: 15
        Quote: kris
        did he finally understand that?
        but he is not involved in this!
        this is all the SOVIET legacy.

        And you see that the Soviets still have heirs ??? Russia is rightfully the heir, or do you think that it was necessary to renounce the whole past and start life from scratch ???? Gorbachev and Yeltsin tried - but hell did.
        1. -2
          25 June 2013 13: 32
          Quote: Mijgan
          And you see that the Soviets still have heirs ??? Russia is rightfully the heir, or do you think that it was necessary to renounce the whole past and start life from scratch ???? Gorbachev and Yeltsin tried - but hell did.


          "At least not p-p-o-s-host" all inheritance is a small merit. A worthy heir must to multiply!
          1. 0
            25 June 2013 14: 54
            Quote: aviator_IAS
            "At least not p-p-o-s-host" all inheritance is a small merit. A worthy heir must increase!

            , multiply ... It took only 13 years.
        2. Arthur 775
          0
          26 June 2013 06: 10
          Russia is rightfully the heir! you won’t say more precisely, I completely agree with you. And the fact that the GDP has stirred up and disturbed this baryzhno-Kumov legacy from Humpback and EBN is a fact that happened. There are only articles left with confiscation and normal deadlines!
      2. sashka
        0
        27 June 2013 15: 01
        You "forgot" to shout hurray .. And in general, minus is a plus. So you were noticed or so (noticed) In the sense that they made a note .. Why worry so much? Everyone knows that we are wasting the latter and we will have to buy our equipment from China. But we have a lot of hats and there are even more people who want to throw tomahawks with them. I don't see any problems .. Ordinary Russia. And the site is German (German). This is how the country indicator shows for me. A strange symbiosis of Patriotism and adultery ..
  2. +11
    25 June 2013 10: 02
    Now organize the "pipeline".
    Launch a couple of factories and new models.
    1. sashka
      -8
      25 June 2013 12: 38
      Quote: Dmitry 2246
      Now organize the "pipeline".
      Launch a couple of factories and new models.

      Only pumping conveyor. The head does not hurt plants. This is not a royal thing .. The team is changing places. And you friends, no matter how you sit down, but you’re not good at musicians .. Maybe they passed the exam in Soviet times? Deceivers for business and determination ..
  3. +15
    25 June 2013 10: 03
    Putin appeared to look old, but he didn’t have any experience. I’m not familiar with him, so more and more on TV laughing but it seems to me that it is not in vain that he eats his bread. Not a bad uncle or already a grandfather, but sometimes I don’t understand him.
    1. +11
      25 June 2013 10: 13
      Quote: sasha.28blaga
      Putin seemed to age


      And what are those who get younger with age? smile
      1. +5
        25 June 2013 10: 17
        Quote: Vadivak
        Putin looked old

        Quote: Vadivak
        And what are those who get younger with age?

        but he is Putin
        1. +8
          25 June 2013 10: 47
          Quote: evgenii67
          but he is Putin


          Sorry, realized was wrong
      2. 0
        25 June 2013 10: 52


        Quote: Vadivak
        And what are those who get younger with age? smile



        There! smile
      3. Arthur 775
        0
        26 June 2013 06: 19
        there aren’t those who, from greed over time, don’t crawl into the telly anymore. I'm talking about Taburetkin! He will soon have the last fold on his ass.
    2. +5
      25 June 2013 11: 07
      Quote: sasha.28blaga
      I’m not familiar with him, so more and more on TV

      By means of the TV you communicate belay well, how does he answer you laughing
    3. +7
      25 June 2013 11: 12
      Quote: sasha.28blaga
      I’m not familiar with him

      I know his guard closely, he came to MAKS-2011, I wanted to take a picture of him, but the blow to the chest of his security service stopped me wassat . In my opinion, what about the photo? The answer was cool. laughing !!!
      1. +2
        25 June 2013 16: 11
        Quote: avant-garde
        In my opinion, what about the photo? The answer was cool.


        My friend after trying to take a picture, not like a zoom, the whole SLR stopped working))))) And it is far from accidental. Also after meeting with the security service.
  4. -14
    25 June 2013 10: 03
    Glory to Sikorsky!
    1. +9
      25 June 2013 10: 15
      Hello everyone! Well, which helicopters are better, here you can talk endlessly ....
      Quote: Sashkessss
      Glory to Sikorsky!

      he is not Glory, he is Igor Ivanovich Sikorsky hi
      1. +3
        25 June 2013 10: 17
        Quote: evgenii67
        he is not glory

        probably meant glory (glory) to Sikorsky. I beg your pardon for interfering hi
        1. +5
          25 June 2013 10: 23
          Quote: avant-garde
          I beg your pardon for interfering

          Greetings, Alexander! Yes, everything is clear laughing just allowed myself a little pun, pun drinks
          1. +1
            25 June 2013 10: 27
            And hello to you, Eugene, well, thank God. drinks !!!
    2. +8
      25 June 2013 10: 17
      Quote: Sashkessss
      Glory to Sikorsky!



      Then Yuriev too
      1. +1
        25 June 2013 16: 23
        Quote: Vadivak
        Then Yuriev too

        I will be brief! For there is still someone to thank! A helicopter is not only a form, but also what it consists of and without which it would not have flown))
        1) Thomas SAVERY - Steam Engine
        2) Gottlieb Daimler - Internal Combustion Engine.
        3) Nikola Tesla-Electricity (discovered)
        4) Popov-Edison - Radio (Communication)
        5) Yuriev - Model
        NU, etc.)))
        1. +4
          25 June 2013 20: 42
          Quote: Manager
          5) Yuriev - Model


          The model is yes, but the main thing is that He invented the swashplate,
        2. sashka
          0
          27 June 2013 15: 17
          Well, about electricity, you can argue .. The Egyptians, too, did not shun them .. Take an interest and find out ..
    3. avt
      +5
      25 June 2013 10: 42
      Quote: Sashkessss
      Glory to Sikorsky!

      Actually, earlier Cheremukhin rose by 450-500 meters.
    4. +5
      25 June 2013 11: 05
      Igor Ivanovich Sikorsky, in any case, respect. He was a talented designer. But he has nothing to do with Russian helicopters. And he had something to learn from our M.L. Milya and N.I. Kamova. He himself admitted it.
  5. Vtel
    +1
    25 June 2013 10: 12
    The President stressed that the irreplaceability of domestic aircrafts was also recognized by the representatives of NATO.

    Why would they pour it on our mill.
    1. +1
      25 June 2013 10: 14
      Quote: Vtel
      Why would they pour it on our mill.

      Well, since they are taking it for us from Afghanistan, it is foolish to deny this fact.
    2. +1
      25 June 2013 11: 16
      Quote: Vtel
      Why would they pour it on our mill.


      Everything is very simple. The Amer immediately rejected the idea of ​​training the "Karzai falcons" using Western technology. Too complicated. And on our what only Papuans were not taught! Yesterday I was sitting on a palm tree, and today I am a helicopter pilot. smile
  6. 0
    25 June 2013 10: 24
    MI-8 current (17) and that's it.
    1. +4
      25 June 2013 11: 03
      yeah. current. some currents are such currents ....
  7. +2
    25 June 2013 10: 28
    Our helicopters proved to be wonderful in all corners of the world.
    They also have first-class technology. The photo shows a helicopter of the rescue service of the French gendarmerie.
    Pay attention to the hangar.
    1. +3
      25 June 2013 10: 48
      Such a hangar does not pull the Taliban.
      1. sashka
        +2
        25 June 2013 14: 10
        Quote: tarks
        Such a hangar does not pull the Taliban.

        And we ourselves do not need for our technology? Well, yes they are all-weather ..
    2. +3
      25 June 2013 12: 52
      Quote: Humpty
      They also have first-class technology. The photo shows a helicopter of the rescue service of the French gendarmerie.
      Pay attention to the hangar.

      So this is hangar helicopters. If you provide them with the operating and storage-parking conditions of domestic equipment, then the vaunted Western equipment will crumble three to four times faster ... And if you pour domestic kerosene, it will not take off at all, even the first time ... wassat
      1. +3
        25 June 2013 14: 14
        Quote: Mijgan
        And if you fill in domestic kerosene, it won’t take off at all,


        And if you refuel with coal, then generally it will be very smoke belay

        What do you dislike about our kerosene? Is it any different from imported?
  8. +5
    25 June 2013 10: 47
    Correctly. The main thing is a powerful infrastructure for repair and maintenance. And frames. Our helicopters went to Afghanistan also because there were quite a lot of people familiar with cars, and they said - what the hell are we for you when these concrete things start with a kick, if that.
    And do not faint from the first popped zrk.
  9. +1
    25 June 2013 11: 30
    In the 90s, I read an article about how ordinary Americans got into the habit of buying MiG-15 and MiG-17 aircraft in the countries of the former socialist camp. Our technology delighted them. Reliable as a tractor. Pour the fuel, pump the wheels and fly. The same Cessna's were more difficult to maintain.
  10. +4
    25 June 2013 11: 34
    “According to the head of state,“ domestic helicopters surpass most of their foreign counterparts in technical and combat capabilities, reliability and ease of control, and also win in price competition. ”.....“ Since when and since what hangover did Putin become an expert in the field aviation technology capable of giving such estimates. After all, he has never been an expert in his field, the KGB. It would still be understandable if the article wrote that such assessments were made by the expert council on weapons and military equipment under the President of Russia and the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Armed Forces and reported these assessments to the chief. After all, there was already "Comrade Stalin, you are a great scientist and I am a simple Soviet prisoner ..." As for the conclusion that Russian helicopters, developed several decades ago, surpass everything that was created in this area much later and using much more modern materials, avionics, weapon systems, etc., then such a conclusion can only be made by comparing the combat effectiveness of Russian and all other helicopters of the same class in the same real combat conditions. As far as I am aware, no one has had the opportunity for such a comparison so far, thank God. And if so, are we not present at the next benefit performance of the old song "And the rest of the beautiful marquise, everything is fine, everything is fine! ..."
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. sashka
    -6
    25 June 2013 12: 27
    After the president "taught" the cranes to fly, it remains only to believe .. He already knows ...))) Here's another advice to "Berkuts". True, they won't listen ..
    1. sashka
      -2
      26 June 2013 16: 53
      WHO DOES NOT DO THIS ON A "TEAM"? What did I say? Is Esaul on the "wire"? Funny
  13. +2
    25 June 2013 12: 29
    ВLadimir Putin: Russian helicopters outperform foreign counterparts
    And they will always be superior!
  14. +2
    25 June 2013 12: 53
    GLORY OF RUSSIAN AVIATION !!! Although ours will teach to fly and a fence with a wicket, and not to occupy brains in Russia (unlike a sashka)!
  15. +2
    25 June 2013 13: 06
    When the enemy's faces or "potential opponents" repent and admit, like so ... is YES !!!!! am
    When they praise their own negative
    IMHO ....
  16. +2
    25 June 2013 13: 07
    Even if ours is not the best, it’s all the same, it’s beneficial to advertise our aircraft at the level of the head of state. But, nevertheless, our military equipment has a greater margin of reliability.
  17. +1
    25 June 2013 13: 31
    With equal arms, the army is more disciplined and with a talented commander. From the history of world wars. And the fact that the bayonet is a little longer is garbage. A crowd of peasants with a pitchfork will easily defeat one armed soldier with a musket.
    1. +1
      25 June 2013 14: 37
      Ie the crowd of horsemen will defeat the crew in t 55 ??? maybe we shouldn’t follow the example of others and not create our own nuclear weapons, but hope for the talents of commanders and the training of soldiers ???
  18. +1
    25 June 2013 16: 00
    Yes ... our engineers have always been among the best in the world, and the most inventive. But with the politicians and leaders of the country we have complete ... Well, with rare exceptions.
    1. 0
      25 June 2013 16: 21
      Without exception, alas
  19. 0
    25 June 2013 16: 20
    Afghanistan has almost a number of Russian aircraft factories, and this factor also played a role in signing the contract for the supply of our helicopters.
  20. 0
    25 June 2013 16: 35
    Our helicopters are wonderful! But depending on what to compare. In real hostilities, that the spacecraft were not checked for MI (I mean against the forces of a potential adversary of NATO). Of course, I’m not talking about the fact that they must confront the APACHES there and other Indians, for the main goals that ours have that the Indians are the destruction of armored vehicles day and night.
    My opinion is that the armament, in essence, is worthy, both here and there, but in the guidance systems, especially at night, we lose a little. How is this offset? I do not even know.
    I really want to add that at the moment we are comparing about 5 dozen of our helicopters with about a thousand of their "Indians". Therefore, it makes no sense to compare yet.
    1. Uncle Serozha
      +1
      26 June 2013 19: 55
      Quote: Manager
      that KA that MI were not checked (I mean against the forces of a potential adversary of NATO). Of course, I’m not talking about the fact that they must confront the Apache there and other Indians

      To date, there have been two cases of fire contact between the Mi-24 and the Apache. In both cases, an American vehicle was shot down.
      The first round was in Serbia in 1999, when a Serbian Mi-24V missile 9M114M2 "Shturm" was sent to the grandmother's AH-64D. The Apache was escorted by the Black Hawk, who flew to rescue the ejected pilot. Oddly enough, the Apache suffered because of its radar. The American pilot did not see the Mi-24, which No.
      "crawling on his belly" over the mountainous terrain. But the radiation from its radar was recorded by SPO-17, installed on the Mi-24. The Mile pilot, who did not have a radar, simply went to the American car on the bearing (SPO-17 allows) and sniffed the Shturm from a jump.
      The second fight with "Apache" was even more interesting and even led to the fact that the United States had a bit of a fight with South Korea. On July 22, 2002, a South Korean AH-64A pressed forward (allegedly) into North Korean airspace and was shot down by a North Korean Mi-35VPM. Although it fell all the same in South Korea. :)
      Here the technical advantage was clearly on the side of our machine. The Apache was old, still of the first spill, and the Mi-24 was modernized and was equipped with the Attack complex and R-62M anti-fighter missiles with a range of 15 km (this is an export one. Ours are equipped with longer-range R-64V). It was her that "Apache" got hold of.
      The Koreans tried to blame the United States for the Apache crash due to defects in the control system, but when the Americans took out characteristic tungsten rods from all corners of the downed car - the striking elements of the R-62, the Koreans were asked to shut up and learn to fly.
      Read more here:
      http://skyfireavia.narod.ru/Heli/Mi24av/mi24av.htm
      1. +1
        26 June 2013 20: 30
        Very good comment, it was interesting to read.
  21. 0
    25 June 2013 17: 29
    It is strange that about the civilian version did not put up a word!
    So are we going to buy robinsons? This is me just about small aircraft, such a huge segment of the market and somehow quiet.
  22. phantom359
    0
    25 June 2013 21: 46
    Helicopters are good, but they have a lot of analogues. Yes, and all the achievements of the Soviet, and under Yeltsin, all bright heads lured Americans. What we have is not stored, definitely. Just a question - when will the Ka60 enter the troops?