Military Review

How “For Human Rights” was evicted from the office

81
One of the main topics at the end of the working week was the issue of evicting employees of the organization For Human Rights from an office in Moscow. On Friday afternoon, the office in Maly Kislovsky Lane of the capital was blocked, and his employees were asked to leave the building, stating that the lease had expired. Negotiations with the office staff led the city authorities.


Human rights activists themselves say that some time ago they submitted all the necessary documents to extend the lease of the office, and refused to leave it. After the employees did not want to leave the building, the office was blocked by riot police. At that moment, there were quite a large number of so-called public figures in the building on Maly Kislovsky, including Yabloko’s leader Mitrokhin, deputy Ilya Ponomarev (the same one about whom he is currently hearing about the price of lectures given by Skolkovo) , Lev Ponomarev, Alexander Muzykantsky (Commissioner for Human Rights in Moscow).

After the broken talks, riot police received an order to storm the office. The assault began immediately after the ombudsman in the Russian Federation, Mr. Lukin, left the office. At this time, in the microblogs of the activists of the organization, among which were human rights activists from Moscow, lawyers in Tyumen, St. Petersburg and other cities, began to appear records that the assault begins. As a result of the assault, as reported by those who occupied the defense in the office building, several dozen people were injured. For example, Mitrokhin, riot policemen, let him down the stairs at the moment when he tried to explain to the police that "they are wrong."

Tumakov from the police received and 72-year-old Lev Ponomarev, who has already stated that a real raider seizure took place in Maly Kislovsky Lane, during which the police used excessive force measures.

If we talk about the documentary side of the issue, then the rent of the office is valid expired at the end of May. At the same time, the office staff received a notice of the date of the move more than 3 months ago. During this time, Lev Ponomarev and his comrades could not collect things. It turns out that the conflict was provoked by the gentlemen themselves from the organization “For Human Rights”. The result - bruises, abrasions and liberal hubbub.
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. experienced
    experienced 24 June 2013 10: 44 New
    18
    Eh, Lukin shouldn’t have been released and must have used noise-and-noise grenades, “Bird cherry”, and then surely treated with rubber democratizers .... Dreams, dreams winked
    1. psdf
      psdf 24 June 2013 11: 40 New
      11
      Quote: seasoned
      Dreams Dreams

      And then, at the request of the audience, riot police detained criminals two more encores (c)
      1. cartridge
        cartridge 24 June 2013 12: 19 New
        +1
        Mitrokhin OMON pulled down the stairs


        It would be nice to lower Mr. Mitrokhin from the Potemkin Stairs in Odessa ... And at the same time not be limited to once! laughing
    2. w.ebdo.g
      w.ebdo.g 24 June 2013 12: 28 New
      +3
      many say that everything is bad in Russia ...
      Good news about Russia:
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Grishka100watt
        Grishka100watt 25 June 2013 11: 10 New
        +1
        These programs will show when television is nationalized.
        And then thrash is impossible to watch already. In addition to the "Fighter" and watch something nefig request .
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. shark
    shark 24 June 2013 10: 47 New
    14
    It’s high time to pass a law on the defeat of the rights of those whose activities are aimed at harming Russia. The main thing is that it be proved and legally enshrined. That everyone would know that these are outcasts who are being touched. People who disdain their own people.
    1. kris
      kris 24 June 2013 11: 09 New
      -22
      Quote: shark
      It’s high time to pass a law on the defeat of the rights of those whose activities are aimed at harming Russia. The main thing is that it be proved and legally enshrined. That everyone would know that these are outcasts who are being touched. People who disdain their own people.

      How do you imagine a defeat in the rights of Putin or Medvedev?
      1. ia-ai00
        ia-ai00 24 June 2013 12: 06 New
        0
        You can safely add the Medvedev to the list.
        1. ia-ai00
          ia-ai00 24 June 2013 13: 26 New
          0
          And what did Medvedev do good for the country? For what (-, -)?
          1. shark
            shark 24 June 2013 17: 03 New
            +2
            I completely agree with Medvedev. In my opinion, he is a mishandled Cossack of liberals
  3. Opera
    Opera 24 June 2013 10: 48 New
    +4
    Here at the end of May and had to be thrown out!
  4. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 24 June 2013 10: 49 New
    17
    They themselves brought the conflict to such a development. It is always beneficial for liberals to be persecuted, they will now scream at all angles that Russia has violated the rights of people (namely, people), that Putin is an eater (although what does he have to do with it), and that we don’t allow homosexuals to love whom they want to love and other heresy.
    1. Pit
      Pit 24 June 2013 10: 55 New
      10
      Quote: JIaIIoTb
      now they will yell at all angles

      Whatever the yelling, it was necessary to adjust the shuttle to the entrance and pack the whole crowd into it. And the fact that these general people divorced, it is time for them to begin to bring benefits to the people, in Kolyma (for example)!
  5. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 24 June 2013 10: 50 New
    14
    Shit right in the center of the capital bullshit.
    Give a free office in Magadan. And so as not to crap.
    1. lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus 24 June 2013 12: 07 New
      +9
      Quote: Dmitry 2246
      Give a free office in Magadan

      And in Magadan that, Inhumans, or something they live. There the conditions are severe, and you still want to send THIS to them. Send nx out of the country and deprive of citizenship. The Americans, he, from his former intelligence officer instantly took the passport and want to wrench it up immediately.
    2. Masterzserg
      Masterzserg 24 June 2013 13: 04 New
      +2
      I wanted to say: "at the bottom in Baikal", but these stinks will finally ruin the ecology ...
  6. uhu189
    uhu189 24 June 2013 10: 58 New
    14
    I’m wondering, but what kind of rights and what kind of people were the employees of this organization involved in protecting with such a big name? Gays and lesbians, pussy raiot, etc. etc. Can they even boast of anything besides loud whining? Did they protect anyone specifically? Most of all, the cries from liberal clowns who once again screamed about the violation of human rights in Russia, the police state, political pressure, repression and other nonsense are the most amusing ... I would like to wish one thing - they would all be cut to Turkey there, that no one else would ever speak ...
  7. nov_tech.vrn
    nov_tech.vrn 24 June 2013 11: 01 New
    +7
    Quote: Dmitry 2246
    Give a free office in Magadan. And so as not to crap.

    and drive with pissed rags all the way to Magadan
  8. Russ69
    Russ69 24 June 2013 11: 16 New
    +2
    They threw it out, they did it right, it was high time.
    Ponomarev from kicked a little, so it's not enough.
    1. kris
      kris 24 June 2013 11: 39 New
      -1
      Quote: Russ69
      They threw it out, they did it right, it was high time.
      Ponomarev from kicked a little, so it's not enough.

      if the policemen acted like that with everyone. regardless of position, people would respect them.
      and then the powerful thieves and bandits, house arrests and pledges!
  9. Xroft
    Xroft 24 June 2013 11: 22 New
    +4
    Well done, drive liberals in the neck. The question is when Ponomarev will be imprisoned or at least they will write out a fine .....
  10. Evgeniy46
    Evgeniy46 24 June 2013 11: 26 New
    +1
    please insert a video, I really want to see this sweet action repeat
  11. Enot-poloskun
    Enot-poloskun 24 June 2013 11: 30 New
    +3
    So them!

    All these "human rights defenders" are not a grandmother - they protect a pensioner from the arbitrariness of officials, not a hard worker or student, but all sorts of homosexuals and thieves!

    It's my opinion.

    And they are agents of influence. American
  12. IRBIS
    IRBIS 24 June 2013 11: 31 New
    +6
    Ah, what a delight! "Down the stairs ...." - I would read and read. At least someone was lucky to kick the "human rights activist" in the ass. Someone's dream came true, even a little envy.
  13. Apollo
    Apollo 24 June 2013 11: 38 New
    -2
    video on the above topic.

    1. Where is the court decision ?! winked
    2. The Regulation on the Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Federal District (approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 13 2000 N 849) in Part IV. 8 Clause Plenipotentiary Rights: Plenipotentiary Representative in Office has the right of unhindered access to any organizations located within the relevant federal district "is this provision for whom ?! winked

    1. kris
      kris 24 June 2013 11: 43 New
      -3
      Quote: Apollon
      1. Where is the court decision ?!
      2. The Regulation on the Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Federal District (approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 13 2000 N 849) in Part IV. Rights of the plenipotentiary of paragraph 8: The plenipotentiary, in the performance of official duties, has the right to unhindered access to any organizations located within the relevant federal district "is this provision for whom ?!

      rubbish on the drum for all these decisions and provisions.
      they only execute commands. which gives the owner.
    2. Manager
      Manager 24 June 2013 11: 52 New
      +4
      Quote: Apollon
      1. Where is the court decision ?!

      And why do you need a court decision if the lease has expired, respectively, and the agreement has been canceled)
      1. skrgar
        skrgar 24 June 2013 12: 44 New
        +6
        Quote: Manager
        Quote: Apollon
        1. Where is the court decision ?!

        And why do you need a court decision if the lease has expired, respectively, and the agreement has been canceled)

        That's it))) .. People! -You have rented your apartment .. and the lease has expired, and what's more, you have your letter to the tenant about the eviction ... Do you also need a court decision? Fig there! - The “lock crackers" and the district police officer are called out !! - Present your passport and documents on the property .. and that's it !! - The locks are cracked — whoever is an outsider in the room — write an application for illegal entry + your money may “disappear” from the room .. (it is necessary to justify how you put them there, preferably a witness), that is, + a criminal article .. And then the stubborn insoles ..- become "silk" .. why then))) (I have similar experience in practice!)
      2. Apollo
        Apollo 24 June 2013 13: 48 New
        -1
        Quote: Manager
        And why do you need a court decision if the lease has expired, respectively, and the agreement has been canceled)


        The contract is canceled, there is not one of the parties has not notified the other, on time that is before the expiration of the contract. The notice was belated after the expiration of the contract, This is the first. Second, all conflicts of the contract are resolved in court. then it is the court. Only by decision of the court, the bailiffs evict. The bailiffs and not the OMON. OMON was created for other purposes.

        afterword. so all the same it is canceled or canceled. Literate, you are ours. laughing
        1. Manager
          Manager 24 June 2013 14: 18 New
          0
          Quote: Apollon
          The contract is canceled, there is not one of the parties who did not notify the other, on time that is, before the contract expired. The notice was belated, that is, after the contract expired, This is the first. Second, all conflicts of the contract are resolved in court. by a court decision, the bailiffs evict. The bailiffs and not the OMON. OMON was created for other purposes.

          afterword. so all the same it is canceled or canceled. Literate, you are ours

          Canceled))
          So then it is, but in this case, do not forget the one hundred rental period has ended. And it is not known what was generally prescribed in the lease. Maybe it was spelled out in small letters, they say the next day after the lease term ends, riot police have the right to give you a kick in the ass and lower it from the stairs. =)
          1. Apollo
            Apollo 24 June 2013 18: 26 New
            -1
            Quote: Manager
            Riot police have the right to kick you in the ass and lower you from the stairs.


            rather it will give you a kick, believe me, I’m savvy, but just right for legal illiteracy. I’ve probably received it more than once in my life. laughingHow many times have I noticed that in the legal plane there are very few people who know the laws, hence legal chaos and legal nihilism.
        2. bddrus
          bddrus 24 June 2013 19: 27 New
          0
          if the term of the contract is over, then the conflicts already seem to me not to be related to the contract. and it seems like they’ve been notified three months ago
    3. experienced
      experienced 24 June 2013 11: 53 New
      +8
      [quote = Apollon] video on the above topic.

      I’ll try to explain with a clear example:
      It’s as if there was an organization operating in the center of Baku that would call on Azerbaijanis to repent, donate the NK of Armenia and dissolve the army of Azerbaijan winked
      How would you perceive the news that this "hypothetical organization" was repelled by commandos? Well, Lukin, the Jude is still one am
    4. Anti
      Anti 24 June 2013 12: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: Apollon
      The plenipotentiary representative in the exercise of official duties has the right of unhindered access to any organizations located within the relevant federal district "


      Even if there are operational activities?
      1. Apollo
        Apollo 24 June 2013 13: 52 New
        +1
        Quote: Anti
        Even if there are operational activities?


        Oleg, kidding me ?! laughing
    5. Evgeniy46
      Evgeniy46 24 June 2013 16: 10 New
      +1
      eh, not really that ...
      The points.
      1. I xs where to look for it.
      2. Once evicted by force, it means there is.
      3. What organization are you talking about? For more than a month, de facto, this NPO did not pay for the lease, the lease agreement itself ended and de facto it did not have its own premises. You about what free access in
      Quote: Apollon
      in part of chapter IV. Rights of the Plenipotentiary Representative of Point 8: The Plenipotentiary, in the performance of official duties, has the right of unhindered access to any organizations located within the relevant federal district

      trying to say? She doesn’t have an address, therefore, there’s nowhere to go
  14. wasjasibirjac
    wasjasibirjac 24 June 2013 11: 43 New
    +6
    funny people. they say that they protect human rights - it would be necessary to claim the list of "protected", while violating the contract - they did not extend it in time or could not agree with the landlord, violate the law of the Russian Federation, preventing the legal owner from using his property - and now it will turn out that riot police are to blame, the court and the police!
  15. treskoed
    treskoed 24 June 2013 11: 49 New
    +2
    They also need to be attracted for failure to comply with requirements and resistance to law enforcement agencies, there is such an article. By law - until the end!
  16. sever123
    sever123 24 June 2013 11: 49 New
    +3
    Overseas INFECTION, sorry not everyone has immunity.
  17. Manager
    Manager 24 June 2013 11: 51 New
    +6
    then in Maliy Kislovsky Lane there was a real raider seizure, during which the police used excessive force.

    Yes, what a clown capture))) This is not your room. The lease has expired and the owner has every right to drive you out with a broom. And they made poor unfortunate shows.
    1. AKOL
      AKOL 25 June 2013 07: 47 New
      0
      Well, they at least somehow should pay attention to themselves, and then there’s nothing to pay for the rent)))
  18. mirag2
    mirag2 24 June 2013 11: 53 New
    +4
    Yes, all this is nonsense. When the rental period ends, they drive everyone out into the street. They just imagined themselves untouchable.
  19. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 24 June 2013 11: 58 New
    +1
    Class, and let's again! good
  20. individual
    individual 24 June 2013 12: 02 New
    +4
    It was high time to rake the nest of the satanic sabbath in Moscow, where the sediment of "swamp leaven" was going to.
  21. LaGlobal
    LaGlobal 24 June 2013 12: 04 New
    +4
    Jumped, played out! It is a pity that some individuals, as was previously said by forum users, were not lowered down the stairs and were not thrown with grenades =)
  22. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 24 June 2013 12: 18 New
    -6
    The article is one-sided, and why we should only believe its author, this is the first, second I don’t think that the organization occupied huge areas, so eviction is not just a legal step, it is a demonstration of strength. Forces to those who dare to criticize power. And this is just superfluous proof for those who claim that freedom of speech in Russia and that politics can be pursued by peaceful means
    1. Ruslan67
      Ruslan67 24 June 2013 18: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: vladsolo56
      eviction is not just a legal step, it is a show of strength

      To the point good Now these creatures will think - the State Department is far away and the riot police baton in front of the face and whether the treatment of lost teeth paid by the states is still a question what
  23. andrei332809
    andrei332809 24 June 2013 12: 20 New
    +4
    and it’s not a pity. I watched a report about this not even an event-incident-laughed. do they (the “defenders") really think that after them someone will believe?
    and humanly, they need to allocate another room. Yarangu somewhere on Wrangel Island
  24. ale-x
    ale-x 24 June 2013 12: 24 New
    +5
    What conclusion? Under enemies, the earth begins to burn. First, create conditions for them unacceptable for their activities, and then drive everyone out of the country.
  25. Bekzat
    Bekzat 24 June 2013 12: 53 New
    +6
    Greetings to all, this is how we need to crush the liberals feeding in the west !!!
  26. Masterzserg
    Masterzserg 24 June 2013 12: 53 New
    +6
    then the office rental actually expired at the end of May. At the same time, office employees received a notice of the timing of the move more than 3 months ago. During this time, Lev Ponomarev and his associates were not able to collect things. It turns out that the conflict was provoked by the gentlemen themselves from the organization For Human Rights. The result - bruises, abrasions and liberal whine.
    "Human rights activists" for these bruises and abrasions, they are ready to pay money to riot police! And then, what will Western friends give them money for then? And here again Putin’s “bloody regime” is encroaching, but to whom? on the Great Protectors !!!! How will all this be presented in Western media? "Under the pretext of ending the lease, human rights activists are being evicted." If they paid on time, who needs these defenders nafig? And then the scandal! They will soon kill on the streets, and when they break their opera, the "human rights activists" will scream in front of prostitutes dancing with cameras from the west, they say again "bloody regime" forbade democrats to freely do lawlessness! Here in Syria, you can democrats kill children, women, old people, and in Russia for such freedom the level of democracy is still very low than Western "friends" are very unhappy.
  27. _KM_
    _KM_ 24 June 2013 12: 58 New
    -5
    Quote: shark
    It is high time to pass a law on the defeat of the rights of those whose activities are aimed at harming Russia.


    So passed in the 37th. Nothing good.
  28. bddrus
    bddrus 24 June 2013 13: 02 New
    -10
    putinoidy finally can be overgrown - in any democratic country (truly democratic) opposition members have the right to occupy any municipal premises free of charge!
    1. Masterzserg
      Masterzserg 24 June 2013 13: 10 New
      +4
      Why are there municipal buildings! In a democratic Libya, you can kill anyone who disagrees with "democracy"!

      You are talking nonsense! Give me the link where the opposition, financed from the Russian or Chinese embassy, ​​in the United States occupies a municipal building for free ???
      1. bddrus
        bddrus 24 June 2013 13: 17 New
        -7
        hmm ... sad me
        1. Masterzserg
          Masterzserg 24 June 2013 13: 20 New
          +3
          nobody is interested in your sorrow laughing
        2. Nevsky
          Nevsky 24 June 2013 14: 18 New
          +1
          Quote: bddrus
          hmm ... sad me


          McFaul is often at their office, is that normal? stop
          1. bddrus
            bddrus 24 June 2013 14: 27 New
            -5
            you seemed adequate to me. how much do you think is the place to be- "in any democratic country (truly democratic), the opposition has the right to occupy any municipal premises free of charge"
            1. Masterzserg
              Masterzserg 24 June 2013 15: 15 New
              +2
              Quote: bddrus
              you seemed adequate to me.

              Quote: bddrus
              hmm ... sad me
              - You are all about yourself, but about yourself dear. Who cares about your sadness and your illusions? Do you have anything to write about? laughing Or just rhetoric brown to yellow speckled? )
              1. bddrus
                bddrus 24 June 2013 16: 21 New
                -3
                Are you now in the case that the fighter wrote?
                and about illusions - do you still think that the adequacy of Nevsky is an illusion? - you wrote it
                1. Masterzserg
                  Masterzserg 24 June 2013 18: 37 New
                  +2
                  Quote: bddrus
                  Are you now in the case that the fighter wrote?
                  - And again, not the case. My call has remained unheard for you.
                  Quote: bddrus
                  do you think that the adequacy of Nevsky is an illusion? - you wrote it
                  - no, I didn’t write this,, and your belief in this calls into question not only your attentiveness, but also your adequacy. laughing
                  1. bddrus
                    bddrus 24 June 2013 19: 21 New
                    -3
                    you are with the Russian language, I look, you are not friends, even your emoticons do not help seem smarter - try
                    1. Masterzserg
                      Masterzserg 24 June 2013 20: 32 New
                      +2
                      Quote: bddrus
                      you and the Russian language, I look, are not friends
                      - It already smells like schizophrenia. Who are you with now and about what? laughing If it seems to you that you answered me, then first read MY a post, not invented in your head, and then it will become clear to you, I hope so. But judging by your inadequate posts, I suspect either schizophrenia or alcohol intoxication. laughing And here you can’t really do with emoticons)
          2. Ruslan67
            Ruslan67 24 June 2013 18: 11 New
            +4
            Quote: Nevsky
            McFaul often happens, is that normal?

            Of course ! regularly comes in to avoid going to a paid toilet wassat
            1. bddrus
              bddrus 24 June 2013 19: 30 New
              0
              you're not right! he just pays for the toilet.
              Here, as in a joke - "what to stop him - get out - say it is money for the toilet"
    2. andrei332809
      andrei332809 24 June 2013 13: 11 New
      +3
      Quote: bddrus
      putinoidy finally can be overgrown - in any democratic country (truly democratic) opposition members have the right to occupy any municipal premises free of charge!

      so put them in your apartment, they have the right. or you own and you are protected from rudeness and arrogance? and about the premises, I gave them advice above, and I think it’s quite viable
      1. bddrus
        bddrus 24 June 2013 13: 21 New
        0
        I wrote - "municipal"! laughing
        Damn - I had to write that they have the right to walk in pointe shoes and a tutu for free!
        1. andrei332809
          andrei332809 24 June 2013 13: 24 New
          +1
          Quote: bddrus
          Damn - I had to write that they have the right to walk in pointe shoes and a tutu for free!

          it would be more suitable for them, they are white and fluffy
        2. Masterzserg
          Masterzserg 24 June 2013 13: 32 New
          +2
          Municipal means tax-supported, why should I pay for these scumbags? I don’t want, let someone who supports them take off and at least rent a room. These ponamarev and bulk support a tenth of the population of the Russian Federation, what for they need the rest? easier to bang them at the behest of the people’s will and all business laughing
      2. Nevsky
        Nevsky 24 June 2013 13: 24 New
        +4
        Our “Donetsk” people in Ukraine are more jovial ... The skinheads come and begin to evict and smash everyone. Then the authorities declare that this is a dispute between two business entities, for example, on renting something, and that’s all. The power is clean, it is promised to investigate, investigate and threatens with a finger. And Putin is so substituted, they say the regime is strangling human rights defenders. Representatives of the company "horns and hooves" would come here and begin to paint all these agents of the State Department ... That's all. hi

        Here's an example:

        1. Grishka100watt
          Grishka100watt 25 June 2013 11: 33 New
          0
          Oh, I wanted to look further)))
  29. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 24 June 2013 13: 24 New
    +3
    wasjasibirjac RU
    ... funny people. They say that they protect the rights of people - it would be necessary to claim the list of "protected"

    I’m constantly asking this question, and I see that only one nation is protected from those who undermine the country's economy, who pour dirt on it, all sorts of perverts. Other "protected" people - I do not see point blank!
  30. Russ69
    Russ69 24 June 2013 14: 00 New
    +2
    Interesting docs found there however.
    There is also http://www.russia.ru/news/politics/2013/6/22/13069.html
  31. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 24 June 2013 14: 01 New
    +3
    bddrus (1) RU
    putinoidy finally can be overgrown - in any democratic country (truly democratic) opposition members have the right to occupy any municipal premises free of charge!

    This is not the opposition, but the agents of the TsRu!
  32. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 24 June 2013 14: 16 New
    -4
    That's just how anyone should just call out that he is a pro-Western liberal and they immediately lynch him without even understanding. How do we quickly determine who is who. Looks very much like something, just very similar.
    1. Masterzserg
      Masterzserg 24 June 2013 14: 31 New
      +2
      They go to the US Embassy to work out of decency, say hello! laughing What are they about western? They just consult the US Embassy on how to make Russia stronger, richer and more powerful After all, for the United States it is very beneficial that Russia would be a strong and influential country. And here you threw a cry and now the poor liberals working exclusively in the interests of Russia, it is true on behalf of the United States, they were going to lynch ... ayah. laughing
      1. vladsolo56
        vladsolo56 24 June 2013 14: 36 New
        -2
        Well, have you personally witnessed? or so you were told you believed. If they are such pests, why haven’t they been charged, why are they simply evicting their office? Do you have a head or not, if they were financed from the USA, then believe them, the money for renting an office would be enough.
        1. Masterzserg
          Masterzserg 24 June 2013 14: 43 New
          +3
          Yes, they have enough of this money to rent. I just needed to make noise! As a "lawless" Putin spread rot "human rights activists" !!! This whole story is sewn with white thread.
          Quote: vladsolo56
          Well, have you personally witnessed? or so you were told you believed.
          you in Yandex or vkontakte type "embassy of the us liberals" I hope you believe your eyes? they themselves did not hide that they visit the embassy regularly. For you, this will of course be a video editing. laughing That you do not have enough information. This is what you believed. laughing I return the words about the head — they are more necessary for you, they are necessary, I would say so.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Nevsky
          Nevsky 24 June 2013 15: 10 New
          +3
          Well, have you personally witnessed? or so you were told you believed. If they are such pests, why haven’t they been charged, why are they simply evicting their office? do you have a head or not if they were funded from the USA


          Lord, I read you, and I think how Russia tolerates such people !?

          We are Russians living in the South-East of Ukraine, sincerely worried about Russia, and are waiting for the return of the Great Motherland, the Empire. It doesn’t matter, USSR 2.0, or in another form !!

          But even I know that the office that was closed was baited by the USA !!!!

          Well, have you personally witnessed? or so you were told you believed.

          What other proofs are needed, see:



          Who was there next to go in that door? CIA Director? Head of the Pentagon?
          1. Masterzserg
            Masterzserg 24 June 2013 15: 25 New
            +2
            Quote: Nevsky
            Lord, I read you, and I think how Russia tolerates such people !?
            What to do? This is the law of life. The family is not without an oppositionist ...
            1. vladsolo56
              vladsolo56 24 June 2013 18: 53 New
              0
              I’ll answer right away to everyone who instructed the cons, I would willingly believe in a lot, if, as the organization claims, there was enmity, then why did the demonstrative eviction happen, and not arrest? who needed to arrange a show that only Western propagandists could benefit from? Yes, I remember how there were those who called Khabarov the enemy, and the fact that the hero of Russia, an honest officer was planted, there were those who were happy and claimed that they had given him little. Therefore, I do not really believe everything that is shown on Telik, and about which the official media are cracking. you always need to look for someone who benefits. so wait and see which of us is right and which is not. And it's never too late to wave fists. And judging people is easier than a steamed turnip.
              1. bddrus
                bddrus 24 June 2013 19: 35 New
                0
                But what does it mean to you to evict "not demonstratively"? at night?
                1. vladsolo56
                  vladsolo56 24 June 2013 20: 12 New
                  0
                  not demonstratively, this means not collecting journalists and not involving riot police. that it’s hard to understand. do you think if they came to evict me, for example, there would be many journalists, and if riot police were needed.
                  1. Masterzserg
                    Masterzserg 24 June 2013 20: 44 New
                    +2
                    Hahakh, of course, the riot police himself brought the journalists, but not "human rights activists called ??? Journalists are beneficial only to the Ponamarevites, they called.
                    Quote: vladsolo56
                    I don’t really believe everything that is shown on Telik,
                    - But what is there to believe, not to believe. Chirikov, Germans, Ponamarev and other husks go to the US Embassy, ​​shout about it at the camera and are not shy about it, because they are convinced that they are right. And all things. There is no particular intrigue.
              2. Masterzserg
                Masterzserg 24 June 2013 20: 37 New
                +1
                Quote: vladsolo56
                if, as the organization claims, there was enmity, then why did the demonstrative eviction take place, and not arrest?
                - arrest? What would Paul McCartney then describe himself, and Western media revel in the slogans "Putin strangles human rights activists"? They did not pay - they are being evicted, and the opposition just raised the noise, because it suits them. And about the arrest, I think, everything has its time.
              3. Grishka100watt
                Grishka100watt 25 June 2013 11: 44 New
                0
                Why do you always equate Khabarov with Kvachkov with the liberal "opposition"? Do not do this, it does not add points to you at all, just like them. The officers did not understand the situation (more precisely, they figured out, but not completely), although they were right men.

                And on your part, I repeat once again, it is wrong every time to equal them with the "opposition".
                Official media outlets cover information from the perspective of the official position of America, and not of Russia, who comes to mind to believe them.
  33. 128mgb
    128mgb 24 June 2013 14: 30 New
    +4
    I protest !!! Why was only one down the stairs? And why is the staircase so short? Not an order!
  34. cool.ya-nikola
    cool.ya-nikola 24 June 2013 15: 15 New
    +5
    Good day, dear colleagues! Those passions that flare up around a seemingly ordinary event are not completely understood. Well, the lease term has ended, well, the landlord does not want to extend the lease (who knows what his plans and intentions are!), He warned the tenant in advance about his intentions, it would seem, as they say, "what is the market about?" ... Ah, the whole thing that the landlord made the main mistake when he rented his premises, not to anyone, but to the Human Rights Organization and not to anyone but For Human Rights! In-of-from, and, since only a person in this organization has rights, they must be protected! To the last drop of blood! ... And since, "human rights activists and rr-revolutionaries," they cannot fully carry out their "human rights functions without an office in the center of Moscow and sorry, without a warm closet, here’s" noble rage boils up " .
    Well, if the SOBR employees, unlike NTV journalists, have a protective mantra: “You are Surkov’s propaganda!”, It doesn’t work at all, so you have to pull up the “heavy artillery” in the form of Lukin and Mitrokhin. Yes, the tribe “swamp-revolutionary!” Was shredding ... They forget the golden rule that “No place paints a person”, here Vladimir Ilyich, in absolutely uncomfortable conditions, in a hut in Razliv, and what kind of revolution you forgot! ...
    1. Masterzserg
      Masterzserg 24 June 2013 15: 19 New
      +3
      Your words are like honey in your soul. Better not to formulate. I support and completely agree!
  35. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 24 June 2013 15: 29 New
    +4
    With great pleasure I would have helped riot police. smile And not just to lower them from the stairs, but immediately to the jail would accompany.
  36. Alf
    Alf 24 June 2013 18: 16 New
    +2
    Quote: vladsolo56
    The article is one-sided, and why we should only believe its author, this is the first, second I don’t think that the organization occupied huge areas, so eviction is not just a legal step, it is a demonstration of strength. Forces to those who dare to criticize power. And this is just superfluous proof for those who claim that freedom of speech in Russia and that politics can be pursued by peaceful means

    And what's the difference, do they occupy one hundred squares or one? Important fact - the rental has expired, kindly, leave the room. If the lease expired 3 months ago, the owner of the premises still has the right to recover the amount for damage from occupying the premises.
    Regarding the demonstration of power. The law is the law, he didn’t leave by himself, they will kick him out and be right.
    Regarding freedom ... Ah, gentlemen, if you have a public organization, where do you get money to pay for rent? And if you are financed from abroad, then have you been noted in the tax? And, in the end, go to your native p.i.d.s.osiya and there defend the rights of blacks, p.ed.d.i.l and l.s. nothing, we ourselves will put things in order in our country.
    1. vladsolo56
      vladsolo56 24 June 2013 19: 39 New
      0
      Of course, this whole performance is designed for just that, and not only this one. The people, or rather, a certain part of it, specifically develop a conditioned reflex, with certain words, the fur on end, and with fists or whatever comes to hand to beat anyone whom they show, and it does not matter who he is, grandfather, woman, child. After all, there was a team of faces. it was recently and very much in large numbers, but then it was early, skinheads were driven into the shadows, but they were not completely destroyed, as they say, everything will come in handy on the farm. Oh, people, naive simpletons believe everything and are ready to tear anyone on whom they point a finger.
      1. Masterzserg
        Masterzserg 24 June 2013 21: 00 New
        +1
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Oh people, naive simpletons believe everything and are ready
        Your position is interesting, which means those who are loyal to the government and even support it are definitely a naive simpleton. In the meantime, your phrases:
        Quote: vladsolo56
        this performance, and not only this one.

        Quote: vladsolo56
        The people, or rather, a certain part of it, specifically develop a conditioned reflex
        not naive. I have already met such. Imagine when you say to them: about the Western opposition, the State Department ... they write in response about paranoia, in turn when they write: crooks and thieves, edrobots, bulk-saint, then they consider this to be the pure truth. Who are clairvoyants and who are simpletons? Our opposition is non-systemic, in full force visits the US embassy, ​​travels with reports to the USA, to all sorts of Yale universities and does not hide this at all - and what does it mean to be naive?
  37. Landwarrior
    Landwarrior 24 June 2013 18: 58 New
    +2
    I came across a reference here, what kind of documents Ponomarev tried to hide repeat
    http://tagan.livejournal.com/621858.html#comments